Now, just shy of a year after the bodies were found, an Idaho grand jury has indicted Vallow, 47, on murder charges in connection with her children’s deaths. Daybell, 52, also faces murder charges in the children’s deaths and the suspicious death of his ex-wife.

Source Article from https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2021/05/26/lori-vallow-doomsday-murder-charges/

Sean Hannity criticized mainstream media Tuesday for their reporting on the origins of COVID, saying there is a “very real possibility the Wuhan lab was the origin,” and that most journalists and “so-called fact-checkers…called this a debunked conspiracy theory.” 

SEAN HANNITY: The new, compelling evidence that COVID-19 originated at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. You know, the lab that studied deadly viruses? From cell phone data showing a potential shutdown at the lab in the fall of 2019, reports of hospitalized workers in November 2019, China’s silencing of journalists and doctors and other whistleblowers. We have long now covered the very real possibility that the Wuhan lab was the origin, was the source of COVID-19. But during the Trump administration, so-called journalists, so-called fact-checkers, the media mob in general, they called this a debunked conspiracy theory.

[The] abusively biased… media mob just hated Trump so much that you were willing to push Chinese propaganda from the World Health Organization to try and make Donald Trump look stupid… I’ll say it once again – Journalism in America is dead, it’s buried. And the great irony, every single one of these media mob outlets, all of them, they’re the ones that peddled in the massive Trump-Russia conspiracy theory lies. They spread the lies for three long years. They have never been held accountable, they never apologized, they never corrected the record.

WATCH THE FULL MONOLOGUE BELOW:

Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/media/hannity-blasts-media-manipulating-origin-coronavirus-journalism-dead-buried

Portland police on Tuesday declared a riot amid a destructive downtown demonstration held on the one-year anniversary of George Floyd’s murder.

About 200 people gathered Tuesday night outside the Multnomah County Justice Center. Some in the crowd lit fireworks and a dumpster fire, tagged the Justice Center with graffiti and broke windows at nearby Portland City Hall.

Some also threw water bottles and fireworks directly at police officers.

Police declared a riot about 10 p.m.

Marchers later smashed windows at locations including a jewelry and precious metals business, Starbucks shops, a credit union and Ruth’s Chris Steak House.

Police said they made an unspecified number of arrests.

A separate demonstration held earlier Tuesday featured a rally at Southeast Portland’s Revolution Hall, a march and a silent sit-in on the Burnside Bridge.

Tuesday marked the passing of a year since a Minneapolis police officer murdered Floyd, sparking an unprecedented push to address anti-Black racism across the country.

The killing, which was captured on video, touched off a wave of racial justice protests throughout the country and world, with Portland’s demonstrations spanning more than 100 consecutive nights.

— The Oregonian/OregonLive

Source Article from https://www.oregonlive.com/portland/2021/05/portland-police-declare-riot-as-marchers-break-windows-on-anniversary-of-george-floyds-murder.html

The National Institutes of Health earmarked $600,000 for the Wuhan Institute of Virology over a five-year period to study whether bat coronaviruses could be transmitted to humans, White House chief medical adviser Dr. Anthony Fauci told lawmakers Tuesday.

Fauci, the head of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), told a House Appropriations subcommittee that the money was funneled to the Chinese lab through the non-profit EcoHealth Alliance to fund “a modest collaboration with very respectable Chinese scientists who were world experts on coronavirus.”

But Fauci emphatically denied that the money went toward so-called “gain of function” research, which he described as “taking a virus that could infect humans and making it either more transmissible and/or pathogenic for humans.”

“That categorically was not done,” he insisted.

Earlier in the hearing, NIH Director Dr. Francis Collins told Rep. Andy Harris (R-Md.) that researchers at the Wuhan lab “were not approved by NIH for doing “gain of function research” before adding “we are, of course, not aware of other sources of funds or other activities they might have undertaken outside of what our approved grant allowed.”

Dr. Fauci noted it was important to study coronaviruses after the early-2000s SARS outbreak.
Hector Retamal/AFP via Getty Images
Dr. Fauci said the research money went to respected Chinese scientists.
Jim Lo Scalzo/Pool via AP

The NIH cut off funding to EcoHealth Alliance in April of last year, at the height of the pandemic and over the protests of EcoHealth President Peter Daszak

Fauci traced the NIH’s interest in bat coronaviruses to the SARS outbreak from nearly two decades ago.

“We had a big scare with SARS-CoV-1 {SARS] back in 2002, 2003 where that particular virus unquestionably went from a bat to an intermediate host to start an epidemic and a pandemic that resulted in 8,000 cases and close to 800 deaths,” he said. “It would have been almost a dereliction of our duty if we didn’t study this, and the only way you can study these things is you’ve got to go where the action is.”

Fauci added: “You don’t want to study bats in Fairfax County, Virginia, to find out what the animal-human interface is that might lead to a jumping of species.”

NIH funding of work at the Wuhan Institute of Virology has come under increasing scrutiny in recent weeks, with Republican senators like Rand Paul of Kentucky and Tom Cotton of Arkansas accusing Fauci of lying about whether the money was used for gain of function research.

Meanwhile, the theory that the virus accidentally leaked from the lab rather than spreading from bats to humans via another animal, is gaining increasing acceptance among mainstream media.

Sen. Rand Paul is among the contingent who have called the NIH funding into question.
Susan Walsh, Pool/AP

Over the weekend, the Wall Street Journal reported that three researchers at the lab became so ill in November of 2019 that they sought hospital treatment. Though it is not clear whether the workers contracted coronavirus, their hospitalization coincides with the period when most experts believe the virus was spreading through the city of Wuhan.

Source Article from https://nypost.com/2021/05/25/fauci-admits-nih-funding-of-wuhan-lab-denies-gain-of-function/

Critics said the new rules were being used to silence government detractors. Last month, Facebook, Instagram and Twitter were ordered to take down dozens of social media posts that were critical of Mr. Modi’s government and its response to the coronavirus pandemic, which has ravaged the country. Government officials said the posts should be removed because they could incite panic and could hinder its response to the pandemic.

The social media companies complied with many of the requests by making the posts invisible inside India, though they were still visible to people outside the country. In the past, Twitter and Facebook have reposted some content after determining that it didn’t break the law.

Tensions between tech companies and the Indian government escalated this week when the police descended on the New Delhi offices of Twitter to contest labels affixed to certain tweets from senior members of the government. While Twitter’s offices were empty, the visit symbolized the mounting pressure on social media companies to rein in speech seen as critical of the ruling party.

Facebook and WhatsApp have long maintained working relationships with the authorities in dozens of countries, including India. Typically, WhatsApp has said it will respond to lawful requests for information and has a team that assists law enforcement officials with emergencies involving imminent harm.

Only rarely has WhatsApp pushed back. The service has been shut down many times in Brazil after the company resisted requests for user data from the government. And it has skirmished with U.S. officials who have sought to install “back doors” in encrypted messaging services to monitor for criminal activity.

But WhatsApp argued that even if it tried enacting India’s new “traceability” rules, the technology would not work. Such a practice is “ineffective and highly susceptible to abuse,” the company said.

Other technology firms and digital rights groups like Mozilla and the Electronic Frontier Foundation said this week that they supported WhatsApp’s fight against “traceability.”

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2021/05/25/technology/whatsapp-india-lawsuit.html

LEESBURG, Fla. – At least one person is dead after a Black Hawk helicopter crashed into a marsh near the Leesburg airport during a training exercise on Tuesday, according to reports from the Federal Aviation Administration and the Leesburg Fire Rescue.

The FAA said four people were on board the Sikorsky UH-60 firefighting helicopter when it crashed around 4 p.m.

Fire crews said the crash appears to be a total loss and no survivors have been located.

[TRENDING: Cosmic wonder: Supermoon eclipse | Feral hogs run wild, damage lawns | Groomer sentenced for breaking dog’s tail]

Black Hawk helicopters are widely used by the U.S. military and 28 other counties, according to Lockheed Martin, the aircraft manufacture.

A photo from the Leesburg Fire Rescue showed black smoke coming up from a wooded area at the airport.

Crews said most of the fire is under control now and US forestry is on scene plowing a line around the scene to prevent any vegetation fires.

Leesburg Police Captain Joe Iozzi said officers were able to talk to witnesses at the scene.

“It’s apparent that the helicopter went into a tailspin and at some point, the tail separated from the main body,” Iozzi said.

Leesburg officials said the FFA will start their investigation on Wednesday.

“The tail actually went onto the airport runway area while the main body of the helicopter went into the wooded swampy area which is making it difficult for rescue crews to get back to,” Iozzi said.

This is a developing story. We will update this story as more information becomes available.

Source Article from https://www.clickorlando.com/news/local/2021/05/25/black-hawk-helicopter-crashes-into-marsh-near-leesburg-airport-during-training-exercise/

COLUMBUS (WCMH) – Ohio is about 24 hours away from learning who will be its next millionaire.

On Wednesday at 7:29 p.m., the state will release the name of the first winners of the Vax-A-Million lottery initiative to help motivate Ohioans to get the COVID-19 vaccine.

The state will announce two winners – a winner of $1 million and a winner of a full-ride scholarship to an Ohio university.

Viewers can watch the drawing on air on NBC 4, on the NBC4i.com website, in the NBC 4 app, or on the NBC 4 Facebook page.

The state estimated earlier this week that approximately 2.7 million Ohioans have registered for the drawing. Those registrations will roll over into drawings set for the next four weeks.

Names are drawn on the Monday following the Sunday entry deadline. According to the state’s lottery commission, it draws a winner and up to 100 alternates using a random number generator. Those names are then turned over to the Ohio Department of Health to verify their vaccination status. Should the first name not meet the required standards, the next name on the list is checked, and so on until a winner is verified.

The next scheduled drawings for the Vax-A-Million prizes are:

All Ohio residents who have had at least one Pfizer, Moderna, or Johnson & Johnson shot are urged to register at Ohiovaxamillion.com or by calling 1-833-4-ASK-ODH (1-833-427-5634).

Source Article from https://www.nbc4i.com/community/health/coronavirus/ohio-vaccine-lottery/how-to-watch-wednesdays-vax-a-million-drawing/

Separately, New York Attorney General Letitia James (D) began a civil investigation of the Trump Organization in 2019 prompted by Cohen’s testimony to Congress, where he said Trump had misled lenders and taxing authorities with manipulated valuations of his assets. Asset values were inflated at times when the company was seeking favorable loan interest rates and were deflated to reduce tax liability, Cohen has alleged. He has been interviewed extensively by Vance’s team, which has added a decorated former federal prosecutor, Mark F. Pomerantz, to help with the Trump case.

Source Article from https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/trump-investigation-grand-jury/2021/05/25/5f47911c-bcca-11eb-83e3-0ca705a96ba4_story.html

Gianna Floyd, George Floyd’s daughter, walks out of the West Wing door at the White House after meeting Tuesday with President Biden and Vice President Harris.

Evan Vucci/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Evan Vucci/AP

Gianna Floyd, George Floyd’s daughter, walks out of the West Wing door at the White House after meeting Tuesday with President Biden and Vice President Harris.

Evan Vucci/AP

President Biden lauded the courage of George Floyd’s family after meeting with them on the first anniversary of his murder by a Minneapolis police officer, a killing that launched protests and calls for police reform nationwide.

The family visited with Biden and Vice President Harris at the White House on Tuesday and also met with congressional leaders in Washington, D.C.

The meeting with Biden and Harris lasted approximately an hour, and was kept private. The White House said those attending included Floyd’s mother and daughter, three brothers and a nephew.

Biden told reporters that the meeting went “incredibly well.”

“On every anniversary you’re happy people remember, but it also brings everything back immediately like it happened that day. It takes a lot of courage to go through it,” Biden said of the Floyd family.

Rodney Floyd, one of Floyd’s brothers, told reporters after their meeting that Biden and Harris “showed great concern” for them, asking after their emotional state and self-care.

Biden said that the first thing Floyd’s daughter, Gianna, did was to run over to him and give him a hug. “She said, ‘I’m really hungry. Do you have any snacks?’ “

Acknowledging that his wife might be upset, Biden said he listed off some of the available snacks — including ice cream and Cheetos, and possibly chocolate milk.

Police reform legislation

Biden had hoped Congress would pass the George Floyd Justice in Policing Act by the first anniversary of his death.

Brandon Williams, Floyd’s nephew, told reporters that Biden’s deadline was discussed in the White House meeting.

Referring to the president, Williams said, “He’s not happy about it not being met, but all in all he just wants the bill to be right and meaningful and that it holds George’s legacy intact.”

Biden told reporters that he had spoken with congressional negotiators and was hopeful that there would be an agreement “sometime after Memorial Day.”

Philonise Floyd, another of Floyd’s brothers, said, “If you can make federal laws to protect … the bald eagle, you can make federal laws to protect people of color.”

Brandon Williams, Floyd’s nephew, looks on outside the White House as family members speak with reporters Tuesday after the meeting.

Jim Watson/AFP via Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Jim Watson/AFP via Getty Images

Earlier Tuesday, the family visited with House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., who said she hoped Congress “can bring comfort to your family” by passing the police overhaul bill named after Floyd.

The Democratic-led House of Representatives already approved a measure in March, but it remains tied up in negotiations with Senate Republicans, led by South Carolina’s Tim Scott, the chamber’s only Black Republican.

Rep. Karen Bass, D-Calif., said getting “a substantive piece of legislation” is “far more important than a specific date.” She vowed to work on a compromise measure “until we get the job done” and said “it will be passed in a bipartisan manner.”

In a statement, Biden said he appreciates “the good-faith efforts from Democrats and Republicans to pass a meaningful bill out of the Senate. It’s my hope they will get a bill to my desk quickly. We have to act.”

Qualified immunity as the sticking point

Differences over whether the measure should contain provisions making it easier to sue police officers over allegations of brutality appear to be the biggest stumbling block to an agreement.

A group of progressive House lawmakers, led by Reps. Ayanna Pressley of Massachusetts and Cori Bush of Missouri, sent a letter on Friday urging their colleagues to support an end to qualified immunity.

“I believe that eliminating qualified immunity for law enforcement officers must be included in any bill that gets passed in the Senate, just like what we did on our side in the House, and it ultimately needs to be signed into law by the president,” Bush told NPR. “I have made that a red line; there has to be a clear red line with that.”

Asked about the first anniversary of Floyd’s killing, Bush said that “one year later, not enough has changed,” noting the number of people who were killed in encounters with law enforcement since former officer Derek Chauvin knelt on Floyd’s neck.

“Not enough new laws are in place, whether they’re local, state or federal laws,” she said. “Our work in Congress is to save lives, so we have to do the work to shift towards making and implementing policies that will prevent these injustices from happening in the first place.”

The White House also announced Tuesday that Biden will travel to Tulsa, Okla., on June 1, marking the 100th anniversary of the Tulsa Race Massacre, when an armed white mob killed as many as 300 people in the prosperous Black community of Greenwood, known as Black Wall Street.

Source Article from https://www.npr.org/2021/05/25/1000255304/biden-meets-with-george-floyds-family-on-1st-anniversary-of-his-death

As international reaction to Belarus‘ audacious act of airplane piracy comes fast and furious, those who know the journalist snatched off that Ryanair flight Sunday worry deeply about his fate and that of the many other reporters and bloggers now languishing in Belarusian prisons.

“For us it’s very close,” Alexander Lukashuk, the director the Belarus service of Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty (RFE/RL), told Fox News. “And a bigger thing in terms of the human dimension than hijacking a plane, which is in itself quite amazing.”

US CONDEMNS BELARUS REGIME OVER ‘SHOCKING ACT’ TO DIVERT COMMERCIAL FLIGHT

Belarus under six-term President Alexander Lukashenko always had a “human rights and democratic values issue,” Lukashuk said. “After this hijacking, the U.S., EU and NATO will have to look at Lukashenko as a security threat.”

Belarus sent a MiG fighter jet to force the flight from Athens, Greece, to Vilnius, Lithuania, to divert to Minsk, the Belarusian capital, saying they feared there was a bomb on board. The plane had crossed into Belarusian airspace when this occurred.

No sooner had the plane landed when police arrested 26-year-old Roman Protasevich, a popular and swashbuckling blogger and one of the founders of the Telegram channel Nexta, where many around the world get their news about Belarus and where they watched the protests spread across the country after last August’s disputed presidential election. There was no bomb on the plane.

Protasevich cut his teeth at U.S.-funded RFE/RL in a fellowship program. After Nexta, he jumped to another Telegram channel, Belamova, to fill the role of Igor Losik, who was also arrested by Belarus authorities and faces a 12-year prison sentence. Lukashuk worked with both of them.

“[Protasevich is] a very brave young person, never thinking about his security, very independent. Not quite a traditional journalist. He likes to be alone, play by his own rules,” recalled Lukashuk. 

PUTIN TO WOULD-BE AGGRESSORS: ‘WILL KNOCK THEIR TEETH OUT’

Having discovered himself on an official list of “terrorists” for having helped organize “riots,” Protasevich fled to Poland and then on to Lithuania for his safety. There were never riots in Belarus; they were peaceful demonstrations. Belarusians often point out not so much as a shop window was smashed when protesters took to the streets day after day, and then Sunday after Sunday, for many weeks.

Those stopped as Lukashenko and his security services tightened the screws,  jailing or fining opposition figures, journalists and anyone they spotted showing sympathy toward the opposition. Recently someone was fined for wearing red-and-white socks. Red and white are the colors of the movement for change and for getting Lukashenko, often called “Europe’s Last Dictator,” to go. But RFE/RL’s Lukashuk detects the hand of Moscow.

“We spoke to Roman Protasevich’s dad, who is a retired colonel. He was stripped of his rank together with 80 other military personnel 10 days ago by Lukashenko and he told us Belarus security services couldn’t execute such an operation on their own,” Lukashuk said. He added that Russia is quite adept at going after dissidents in the West. When asked what Russia would gain from this incident, Lukashuk said, “It’s multiple messages. They will gain whatever they want from it.  Of course, there is one message: They are exercising their muscle.”

Quite a few people are suggesting Russia may have been behind this, but at this point it is all speculation. Russia’s Foreign Ministry has defended Minsk’s actions.

But as one Russian journalist pointed out, “We should be scared.”

At least in the USSR there were boundaries. Now all bets are off.

Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/world/belarus-roman-protasevich-passenger-jet-diverted

“[McCarthy] obviously has the ability to remove people from leadership or remove people from the conference,” Kinzinger said, pointing to House Republicans stripping Rep. Liz Cheney (R-Wyo.) of her leadership position. “I hope he does.”

McCarthy condemned Greene on Tuesday, saying her comments were “appalling” and “wrong” but not taking any disciplinary action.

Greene, a first-term lawmaker, has been highly controversial, having already been stripped of her committee assignments for endorsing posts calling for violence against Democrats and suggesting school shootings were a hoax. McCarthy previously declined to remove Greene from her committees, offering just to reassign her, saying she made the comments before she was in office.

Kinzinger hasn’t been afraid of laying into Trump-friendly firebrands like Greene, as he was one of 11 Republicans who voted to strip Greene of her committee assignments.

Kinzinger has made waves as one of the few Republican lawmakers to consistently rebut Trump’s lies that the 2020 election was stolen from him. After being one of 10 Republican House lawmakers who voted to impeach Trump this year, Kinzinger has become one of his most prominent GOP critics, along with Cheney, who lost her leadership post over her criticism of the former president.

Last week, he was also one of 35 Republicans who bucked House GOP leadership and voted in favor of a bipartisan commission on the Jan. 6 insurrection. Kinzinger was also the first Republican to call for Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-Fla.) to resign over sex trafficking allegations.

Kinzinger said on Tuesday that he wouldn’t support McCarthy for House speaker as of now.

“This country deserves people that are going to do tough things and tell the truth,” Kinzinger said.

McCarthy originally said Trump “bears responsibility” for the Jan. 6 riots but less than two weeks later said that “I don’t believe he provoked it.”

Kinzinger said he’d “love” to see Cheney as speaker, and said that there were many other good candidates but declined to name them, saying it could be “damaging to their prospects.”

Kinzinger unloaded on McCarthy throughout the event, saying he had been putting loyalty to Trump over loyalty to members of his conference, going back to as early as last summer, or even before. Kinzinger said McCarthy would often defend Trump after his “berzerk” statements.

“When the former president would attack Liz [Cheney] or whatever the issue du jour was, Kevin would defend the president. That’s a backwards role,” Kinzinger said.

He also said McCarthy ignored his warnings, in a conference call with the Republican conference days before Jan. 6, that questioning the election results could result in violence. He said he hadn’t had a “frank” talk with McCarthy since before Jan. 6.

A spokesperson for McCarthy didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment.

The Republican Party has been grappling with its future, and so far, those backing Trump have been winning out. The former president still enjoys broad support among GOP voters, with 80 percent of Republicans viewing him favorably, according to a POLITICO/Morning Consult poll last month.

Kinzinger has argued that sticking with Trump is detrimental for the party in the long term. On Tuesday, he acknowledged that Trump is winning the war so far, but said it’s not over yet.

Source Article from https://www.politico.com/news/2021/05/25/marjorie-taylor-greene-holocaust-kinzinger-490788

The U.S. and China staked out sharply opposing positions over how to trace the origins of the coronavirus pandemic, with Washington calling for a new round of studies to be conducted with independent, international experts.

Beijing, meanwhile, told an annual gathering of the World Health Organization’s decision-making body Tuesday that it considered the investigation in its country to be complete and said attention should now turn to other countries.

The dueling opinions, expressed during a meeting of nearly 200 governments, appear hard to reconcile and show the political tensions hindering an effort to find the source of a virus that first began to spread in China. Under global health regulations, China would have to give its consent for WHO to send international scientists into the country again for further studies.

Earlier this year, a team of scientists convened by the WHO spent a month in China, as part of an effort to understand the origins of the pandemic.

However, the team was largely confined to reviewing research conducted by Chinese state scientists. Some team members expressed frustration that they weren’t given full access to the data Chinese counterparts used to conclude there was little evidence of Covid-19 in China before the first confirmed cases in early December 2019.

Source Article from https://www.wsj.com/articles/inquiry-into-covid-19s-origins-splits-u-s-and-china-11621969480

Source Article from https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2021/05/25/kristen-clarke-confirmed-first-black-woman-lead-doj-civil-rights/7436785002/

House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., speaks with reporters on May 19.

Win McNamee/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Win McNamee/Getty Images

House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., speaks with reporters on May 19.

Win McNamee/Getty Images

Nearly four months after condemning Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene’s comments on antisemitic conspiracy theories, House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy is once again rejecting the Georgia Republican’s rhetoric — this time over her equating of COVID-19 safety measures with the treatment of Jews during the Holocaust.

The remarks by the freshman Republican congresswoman — and criticism of them — come against the backdrop of antisemitic incidents across the United States in apparent response to the recent fighting between Israel and Hamas in the Gaza Strip that saw a large number of civilian casualties. Those domestic incidents have been condemned across the political spectrum, though GOP lawmakers and some moderate Democrats have chastised progressives for, in their view, being insufficiently critical of the incidents.

In a statement Tuesday, McCarthy said Greene’s “intentional decision to compare the horrors of the Holocaust with wearing masks is appalling.”

“Let me be clear: the House Republican Conference condemns this language.”

McCarthy then went on to allege that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi “completely ignored” the rise of antisemitism in her Democratic Party.

A statement from Pelosi’s office pushed back against that allegation, saying the California Democrat “has spoken out for decades against antisemitism and antisemitic attacks.”

“Leader McCarthy waited days to even issue a statement in response to one of his Members demeaning the Holocaust, and he clearly intends to continue to welcome Marjorie Taylor Greene in the GOP and shield her from any real consequence or accountability for her antisemitism,” the statement said. “Leader McCarthy’s silence has spoken volumes about his allegiance to the most extreme elements of the GOP Conference.”

Greene, in her own response, stood her ground. “Their attempts to shame, ostracize, and brand Americans who choose not to get vaccinated or wear a mask are reminiscent of the great tyrants of history who did the same to those who would not comply,” she said.

The competing statements came hours after Greene tweeted an article about a grocery store chain allowing vaccinated employees to go maskless and wear a vaccination logo displayed on their name badge. Greene compared the vaccination logo to the yellow Star of David badges that Jews were forced to wear by Nazi Germany.

It’s not the first time Greene made remarks comparing rules on COVID-19 masking to the atrocities of the Holocaust, where Nazis killed 6 million Jews.

Just days ago, she appeared on a conservative podcast and said Pelosi’s decision to continue masking requirements for House members on the chamber floor is “exactly the type of abuse” Jews experienced under the Nazi regime.

Joel Rubin, executive director of the American Jewish Congress, has called on Greene to be expelled from Congress.

“Kevin McCarthy … is not showing leadership and he needs to stand up and he needs to expel Marjorie Taylor Greene,” Rubin told CNN.

“This is deeply disturbing to the American Jewish community,” he said. “This goes and goes and goes further and now Marjorie Taylor Greene is essentially saying wearing a mask — saving lives — is somehow equal to walking millions of innocent civilians to the gas chamber. It’s just beyond the pale.”

Greene has long embraced conspiracy theories and has a history of making racist and antisemitic remarks. In February, there was an uproar over resurfaced content from before she was elected that showed Greene “liking” social media posts that called for violence against top Democrats.

McCarthy and fellow Republicans condemned her past comments at the time but stopped short of taking disciplinary action.

“I also made clear that as a member of Congress we have a responsibility to hold ourselves to a higher standard than how she presented herself as a private citizen,” McCarthy said at the time regarding a meeting he had with Greene in early February. “Her past comments now have much greater meaning. Marjorie recognized this in our conversation. I hold her to her word, as well as her actions going forward.”

House Democrats ultimately voted to strip Greene of her committee assignments.

Speaking on the Senate floor Tuesday, Majority Leader Chuck Schumer called Greene’s recent comments “reprehensible” and called on her to “stop this vile language immediately.”

There has been a spike in antisemitic vandalism and attacks against Jews in recent weeks as the violence between Israel and Hamas escalated.

President Biden called the recent attacks on the Jewish community “despicable.”

“I condemn this hateful behavior at home and abroad — it’s up to all of us to give hate no safe harbor,” he tweeted Monday.

More than a dozen Republican senators have introduced a resolution condemning violence against the Jewish community, along with denouncing anti-Israel rhetoric from elected officials.

“The horrific spike in anti-Semitic violence and crimes in the United States and around the world serves as reminder that hateful rhetoric and lies can quickly turn into violence,” Florida Sen. Marco Rubio said in a statement. “We must be very clear that this ancient evil has no place in our society and ensure America’s Jewish communities are protected.”

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell said Tuesday he will introduce a bill to confront antisemitism.

“This trash should be the easiest thing in the world for every person in a leadership position to call out. But, perhaps because Israel has become a strangely controversial issue on the far left, the condemnations do not seem to be flowing quite as easily and unequivocally as they should,” he said.

McConnell quoted a tweet from Democratic Rep. Dean Phillips of Minnesota in calling on progressives to condemn antisemitism.

“I’ll say the quiet part out loud. It’s time for ‘progressives’ to start condemning anti-semitism and violent attacks on Jewish people with the same intention and vigor demonstrated in other areas of activism,” his tweet reads. “The silence has been deafening.”

The latest violence in the Middle East has resulted in increasingly vocal criticism of Israel from the left. As NPR’s Asma Khalid reported, the shift is linked to the growing power of racial justice movements in the United States and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s embrace of the American right wing.

Source Article from https://www.npr.org/2021/05/25/1000129271/marjorie-taylor-greenes-holocaust-remarks-blasted-by-republicans-leaders

Source Article from https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2021/05/25/george-floyd-square-shooting-police-report-1-hurt-community-gathers/7430574002/

The case represents one of the first big tests of how far the Justice Department under President Joe Biden and Attorney General Merrick Garland will go to defend the actions of the previous administration. The conclusion of the Mueller investigation was one of the most politically consequential moments of Barr’s tenure. Democrats later accused Barr of misrepresenting and downplaying parts of Mueller’s report that were more damaging to Trump, and even Mueller himself wrote to Barr concerned about how Barr had summarized the report to Congress and the public weeks before releasing the document itself.

The decision to keep up the fight over publicly undetailed aspects of the March 2019 memo is likely to upset liberals eager to see Garland not only roll back Trump administration policies, but also shed light on how the department operated under Trump and any previously unknown instances of political interference or efforts to use the department’s power to help Trump personally avoid legal trouble. In recent weeks, the department revealed two separate instances when the Trump administration collected phone and email records from reporters at the Washington Post and CNN as part of leak investigations.

At his confirmation hearing in February, Garland spoke about “reaffirming” the department’s norms, including the need to “protect the independence of the Department from partisan influence.” Garland also talked about the Freedom of Information Act, and expressed support for policies that interpreted the public records law “generously.”

The Justice Department doesn’t automatically stop defending all of the policies and actions of a previous administration once a new president is sworn in. The department historically has had a strong interest in defending the prerogatives of any given president and executive branch agency to carry out policies and exercise their power. In public records cases, if a reporter or outside group sues an agency for refusing to turn over documents, DOJ is typically in the position of defending the agency and arguing for broad authority to decide what the public can and cannot see.

The latest case dates back to March 24, 2019, when Barr released his own four-page summary of Mueller’s report on Russian interference in the 2016 election; the department wouldn’t publish the full report for another few weeks. Barr wrote that Mueller hadn’t found proof that Russia coordinated with the Trump campaign, and that Mueller had declined to reach a conclusion about whether Trump obstructed the investigation; Barr did note that Mueller indicated the report did not “exonerate” Trump of obstruction.

Barr then announced that after reading the report and consulting with other DOJ officials, including in the Office of Legal Counsel, he had concluded that Mueller’s evidence wasn’t “sufficient” to show that Trump obstructed justice.

Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, a government watchdog group, filed a request under the Freedom of Information Act with OLC for any records related to Barr’s decision to not prosecute Trump. According to court filings, OLC found 61 records related to CREW’s request, and turned over roughly half (with some parts redacted) and refused to release the rest in their entirety, citing various legal exceptions to the public records law.

CREW sued, and the fight eventually narrowed down to two records: one described in court as an “untitled, undated draft legal analysis,” and the March 2019 memo to Barr written by Steven Engel, the head of OLC at the time, and Edward O’Callaghan, a senior official in the deputy attorney general’s office. DOJ argued the two documents were shielded by two types of privilege — the deliberative process privilege, which covers documents that reveal internal agency deliberations before officials make a policy decision, and attorney-client privilege, which protects materials that lawyers prepare for a client.

The department had released a redacted version of the Engel memo to CREW; the unredacted part included a few lines where the officials wrote that they concluded the evidence collected by Mueller’s team wasn’t “sufficient to support a conclusion beyond a reasonable doubt” that Trump obstructed the investigation. The two recommended that Barr decline to pursue criminal charges.

The Justice Department argued that much of the memo was covered by the deliberative process privilege. In her opinion earlier this month ordering the full memo released, Jackson wrote that the contents contradicted the department’s claim that any decision-making process was actually pending at that point. Barr had already decided not to prosecute Trump, so the memo couldn’t be covered by the privilege, she found.

Jackson wrote that both Barr and the Justice Department had been “disingenuous” — Barr in his handling of the release of Mueller’s report to the public and to Congress, and the department in its representations to the court.

“The agency’s redactions and incomplete explanations obfuscate the true purpose of the memorandum, and the excised portions belie the notion that it fell to the Attorney General to make a prosecution decision or that any such decision was on the table at any time,” Jackson wrote.

CREW argued that emails the group received from OLC as part of the public records request undercut the department’s claim that Barr relied on the March 24 memo in reaching a decision about whether to prosecute Trump. The OLC memo was part of a broader effort to “create a narrative” that undermined Mueller and helped Trump, the group posited. Jackson agreed, writing that the emails showed that the same officials who helped Barr draft his four-page summary to Congress were involved in drafting the OLC memo at the same time.

As for attorney–client privilege, Jackson found that because Barr wasn’t truly in the process of deciding whether to prosecute Trump at that point, the memo was meant to provide “strategic and policy advice,” which wouldn’t fall under the privilege. The judge wrote that the department’s “misrepresentation” that Barr received the memo before making a decision and “lack of candor” about its contents “frees the Court from the deference that is ordinarily accorded to agency declarations in FOIA cases.”

Source Article from https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/zoetillman/biden-justice-department-trump-mueller-memo

Show More

Source Article from https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2021/05/25/colonial-hack-pipeline-dhs-cybersecurity/