But it would leave large swaths of the president’s economic proposals — including much of his spending to combat climate change, along with investments in child care, education and other types of what administration officials call “human infrastructure” — for a potential future bill that Democrats would try to pass through Congress without any Republican votes using a procedural mechanism known as reconciliation.

Progressive Democrats in the House and the Senate, along with liberal activists, have complained publicly in recent weeks that Mr. Biden’s negotiations with Republicans toward a bipartisan deal risked stranding much of the agenda that he campaigned on, including efforts to increase worker pay and speed the transition to a low-carbon future.

Moderate Democrats, including crucial swing votes for Mr. Biden like Senator Joe Manchin III of West Virginia and Kyrsten Sinema of Arizona, have pushed the president to continue bipartisan talks. So have business groups, who have told Republican lawmakers privately that their best chance of blocking Democrats from raising tax rates on businesses and high earners is to cut a deal with Mr. Biden on an infrastructure bill that raised revenues in another way.

Mr. Biden dispatched aides to Capitol Hill repeatedly in recent days to meet with the centrist group of senators and hammer out disagreements over their initial framework, which was never formally made public without White House approval.

“I would call this a much sturdier framework,” said Senator Mark Warner, Democrat of Virginia. He added, “We wouldn’t be going to the White House” if lawmakers did not believe the outline had a broad base of support.

Three of Mr. Biden’s aides — Brian Deese, the director of the National Economic Council; Steve Ricchetti, a top adviser to the president; and Louisa Terrell, the director of the White House Office of Legislative Affairs — met with the bipartisan group twice on Wednesday before joining a meeting with Senator Chuck Schumer of New York, the majority leader, and Speaker Nancy Pelosi of California later in the evening.

That meeting was intended to focus not only on the bipartisan talks, but plans to push some, if not all, of Mr. Biden’s agenda through both chambers using the fast-track budget reconciliation process that would allow Democrats to bypass Republican opposition. It lasted past 9 p.m.

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2021/06/23/us/politics/biden-infrastructure-plan.html

A grandmother from Indiana who participated in the Jan. 6 insurrection at the U.S. Capitol was sentenced Wednesday to three years of probation for her participation in the riot, making her the first person sentenced in the attack.

Anna Morgan-Lloyd, a 49-year-old hair salon owner, pleaded guilty to one misdemeanor count of parading, demonstrating, or picketing in a capitol building, which carries a maximum sentence of six months in jail and a $5,000 fine. Washington, D.C., District Judge Royce Lamberth also ordered her to complete 40 hours of community service and pay $500 in restitution.

The sentence is what the defense had asked for, and the government supported.

Prior to sentencing, prosecutors said they found the sentence “appropriate,” despite what they called Morgan-Lloyd’s initial “ill-considered and misguided commentary,” in part because there was no evidence that she preplanned her attack or incited others, and because she worked with investigators, admitted to her actions, and expressed contrition.

Before receiving her sentence, Morgan-Lloyd tearfully apologized to the court for participating in what she called a “disgraceful” day.

“I went there to show support for President Trump peacefully, and I’m ashamed that it became a savage display of violence that day,” Morgan-Lloyd said.

She did not face any major charges for her role.

The sentencing marks a milestone in the Jan. 6 investigation, which enters a new phase after its first seven months. Dozens of accused rioters are in early plea discussions, according to prosecutors, with nearly a dozen rioters having pleaded guilty to charges so far.

To date, roughly 500 individuals have been arrested for participating in the riot in what has become one of the largest investigations ever undertaken by the Department of Justice.

Morgan-Lloyd first came to the attention of authorities in January when she applied for a gun permit just weeks after the riot, and an employee at the local sheriff’s office recognized her while processing the application. A client at her hair salon told FBI investigators that she “regularly spoke supportively of QAnon and other conspiracy theories,” according to court documents.

A friend who accompanied Lloyd to the Capitol later posted multiple photos on Facebook, with one caption reading, “Inside Capitol Building.”

“Best … day ever!! I’ll never forget. We got into the Capitol Building,” Morgan-Lloyd responded in the comments accompanying the photo, according to prosecutors.

In a letter written to the judge in support of probation, Morgan-Lloyd said she “felt ashamed” that the riot had turned violent and apologized for the chaos that day. Morgan-Lloyd said that she is a registered Democrat who “found [herself] supporting Trump” in the 2016 election, which she “found hard to believe because we didn’t like him at all before.”

“But he was standing up for what we believe in. We couldn’t argue with it,” Morgan-Lloyd said in the letter.

“Probation comes once in a lifetime,” Judge Lamberth told Morgan-Lloyd Wednesday in court. “This is your once.”

Source Article from https://abcnews.go.com/US/im-ashamed-woman-breached-capitol-receives-probation-1st/story?id=78445859

Officer Rose, leaving the police after seven years, first worked for a moving company started by a fellow officer who had also quit. She felt angry, tired, disgruntled and like a failure all at once, she said. She slept badly and had no appetite.

“My story is not unique,” she said.

Some time in January, she decided she wanted to retrieve her badge, to give it to her grandfather, who had pinned it on her when she had completed her training.

She had to apply to Chief Zack to get it, she said. Leaving the police had been the hardest decision of her life, she said, and the chief dangled a job as a community liaison officer designed to make the department more transparent to the public.

Plus in an effort to “humanize the badge,” he had relaxed some of the rules. She could now wear short sleeves, for example, displaying the bursts of floral and other tattoos on her arms. Her wife, an Asheville native, endorsed her return as well.

She said yes.

Officer Rose said she still nourishes the idea first planted when she joined the police that she can make a difference in people’s lives, but she is more wary. “It was a rude awaking,” she said. “It’s like you are in a loving relationship, and then all of a sudden you are dumped and you don’t know why.”

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2021/06/24/us/police-resignations-protests-asheville.html

John McAfee, the antivirus software pioneer turned anti-government cryptocurrency promoter and frequent fugitive from the law, was found dead in his prison cell in Spain on Wednesday.

The last 15 years of the grizzled tycoon’s life were marked by run-ins with — and flights from — police and governments across the Western Hemisphere. In media interviews and posts on his own social media accounts, he cultivated the air of a louche renegade, sometimes shirtless, frequently on a boat, often with a gun nearby, holding out against tyrannical government conspiracies.

McAfee, 75, announced his most recent exile in 2019, writing on Twitter that he had not paid taxes in eight years. “Every year I tell the IRS, ‘I am not filing a return, I have no intention of doing so, come and find me,’” he added in a video post.

That same year, a Florida court ordered McAfee to pay $25 million in a wrongful-death suit to the estate of his former neighbor in Belize, Gregory Viant Faull. McAfee fled the Central American nation in 2012, after police in Belize announced that he was a “person of interest” in Faull’s apparent murder.

In October 2020, he was arrested by Spanish authorities on tax evasion charges filed by the U.S. Justice Department, and was imprisoned outside Barcelona awaiting a decision on extradition until his death.

Spain’s National Court on Monday ruled in favor of extraditing McAfee, who had argued in a hearing earlier this month that the charges against him were politically motivated and that he would spend the rest of his life in prison if he was returned to the U.S.

The court’s ruling was made public Wednesday and could have been appealed. Any final extradition order would also have needed approval from the Spanish Cabinet.

Nishay Sanan, the Chicago-based attorney defending him in those cases, told the Associated Press that McAfee “will always be remembered as a fighter.”

“He tried to love this country but the U.S. government made his existence impossible,” Sanan said. “They tried to erase him, but they failed.”

Nanette Burstein, director of the documentary “Gringo: The Dangerous Life of John McAfee,” described McAfee as both brilliant and “scary,” with an ability to “manipulate people to view him the way he wanted them to.”

“He can cause harm to people, and a lot of people get sucked into his charisma,” Burstein said. “And he preys on the vulnerable, quite frankly.”

John David McAfee was born at a U.S. Army base in Gloucestershire, England, in 1945, and spent his early years in Virginia, graduating from Roanoke College in Salem, Va., with a degree in mathematics in 1967. Fresh out of college, he went to work at NASA in 1968, then built a career as a programmer jumping between the major corporations of the day, including Xerox and Siemens.

McAfee displayed a brash techno-libertarianism from his earliest days in the public eye — though he focused on human viruses before turning to their digital analogs. He founded his first splashy initiative, the American Institute for Safe Sex Practices, while working at Lockheed Corp. in 1986.

The computerized dating service required new applicants to take an HIV antibody test, and allowed only the HIV-negative to join. Members were issued a card certifying their viral status and were asked to refrain from sexual contact with nonmembers to remain in good standing.

“Everybody is concerned about this issue,” McAfee said to the San Diego Union-Tribune in 1987. “I came up with the idea to help people deal with this crisis in an intelligent manner.”

Then McAfee turned his attention to the business that would make his a household name: computer viruses.

He became a go-to expert on the new phenomenon bedeviling computer users and drew criticism as a virus hype man, drumming up fears of new digital plagues every year to sell more software.

Inside the walls of his company, McAfee Associates, he oversaw a corporate culture nearly as eccentric as his later life. The company was built on a shareware model, encouraging users to download antiviral software for free and pay later. Early employees carried out Wiccan rituals during the lunch hour, practiced sword fights and Shakespearean dialogue, and ran a secret competition to have sex in as many parts of the office as possible — with double points awarded if the act occurred during business hours, according to the San Jose Mercury News in 2001.

McAfee became a multimillionaire when his company went public in 1992 and left the following year, saying he wanted out before things got too corporate. With his new fortune, he moved to the mountains — first to a complex in the Rockies above Colorado Springs, and then to a collection of properties in Arizona and New Mexico. There, he founded a company called Tribal Voice, whose central product PowWow was an instant messaging service for Windows. He sold that company for $17 million in 1999.

During this period, according to the Mercury News, McAfee lived a life of yoga and motorsports, riding ATVs, jet skis and lightweight aircraft around his New Mexico ranch.

In 2006, McAfee encountered the first of the legal troubles that would mark the rest of his life. After two guests died in a flying accident at his ranch that year, a relative sued McAfee for negligence. Two years later, with his fortune reduced to $4 million through failed investments, according to Bloomberg, McAfee sold his U.S. holdings and moved to an island in Belize, where he surrounded himself with heavily armed guards and prostitutes.

On a Sunday in November 2012, McAfee’s neighbor Faull was found dead in his home with a single gunshot wound in the back of his head. Local police announced that they considered McAfee a “person of interest,” and he went to ground, feeding commentary of his flight to Wired reporter Joshua Davis, who relayed McAfee’s testimony that he had buried himself in the sand with a cardboard box over his head when the police first came to his home.

Less than a month later, reporters at Vice magazine meeting with McAfee for a clandestine interview accidentally revealed his location — a resort in Guatemala — in the metadata of a digital photo posted on the publication’s website. Soon after, Guatemalan police arrested McAfee. He successfully fought against extradition to Belize, and was deported to the U.S. within a week.

Back in the States, McAfee did not choose to lie low. In 2015 McAfee was arrested on charges of driving under the influence and handgun possession in his new home of Alabama, then kicked off a run for president on a platform of disbanding the border patrol and redirecting its budget to supporting immigrants, among other ideas.

Two years after that, McAfee woke up in the middle of the night and sprayed his home with bullets “naked but for an ammunition belt,” according to a report in Newsweek. The incident led to McAfee’s discovery that his wife, Janice, a former sex worker whom he had met in South Beach, Fla., upon his return to the U.S., had been plotting with her former pimp to kidnap McAfee.

The pair remained together, and Janice accompanied McAfee on the next leg of his journey outside the law. In 2019, McAfee declared that he was living in exile on his yacht at sea while the U.S. government sought him for tax evasion.

In July, he went to Cuba, where he encouraged the government to use cryptocurrency to evade the ongoing U.S. trade embargo. Later that month, he was arrested in the Dominican Republic for trying to enter the country with high-caliber guns and ammunition.

At the same time, he was campaigning again for president and took to Twitter frequently to promote cryptocurrencies — including one of his own coinage, a token called “Epstein Didn’t Kill Himself,” in reference to the conspiracy theories surrounding the death in prison of Jeffrey Epstein in August 2019.

The tax hammer dropped in October of the following year. McAfee was arrested in Spain on suspicion of tax evasion, following an indictment by the U.S. Department of Justice, on the same day that the Securities and Exchange Commission sued him for promoting sales of cryptocurrencies while being paid to promote them.

In March of this year, while McAfee sat in Spanish prison awaiting a decision on his extradition to the U.S., federal prosecutors in New York also indicted him on fraud and money laundering charges in relation to his social media promotion of cryptocurrencies.

Representatives of the Justice Department, Commodity Futures Trading Commission, Securities and Exchange Commission and FBI did not reply to inquiries.

Burstein, the documentary maker, likened McAfee to former President Trump in his ability to court media attention while dodging accountability. “Nothing sticks to them no matter what they’re accused of, or what crimes they’ve committed, or what outrageous things they’ve said. The more outrageous, the better,” she said.

Times staff writers Andrew Mendez and Brian Contreras contributed to this report. The Associated Press was used in compiling this report.

Source Article from https://www.latimes.com/world-nation/story/2021-06-23/mcafee-antivirus-software-creator-found-dead-in-spanish-prison-hours-after-court-okays-his-extradition-to-the-us

Attorney General Merrick Garland opened for the president on Wednesday, outlining the details of the plan. Garland noted that most federally licensed firearms dealers sell to those who passed background checks.

“But those dealers that willfully violate the law increase the risk that guns will fall into the wrong hands,” he said, characterizing part of the administration’s plan as a “concerted effort to crack down on gun traffickers.”

Before delivering his remarks, Biden met with a group that included the mayors of Baltimore and Miami-Dade, as well as the attorney general of New Jersey. Biden said the bipartisan group discussed how to combat the recent wave of gun violence.

The administration’s plan to curb gun violence includes ramping up funding for the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, and having the ATF publicly post about inspection frequency and outcomes.

Once Biden took to the podium for his remarks, he singled out illegal gun traffickers. Specifically, he brought up a conversation with Baltimore Mayor Brandon Scott — a member of the day’s roundtable discussion on crime — who said 80 percent of guns in his city were acquired somewhere else. To address this issue, Biden said, the Justice Department will create five strike forces in cities, including New York and Chicago.

The president also brought up programs that cities can invest in with American Rescue Plan money. Biden quoted his mother, as he is wont to do, saying that “an idle mind is the devil’s workshop” and naming summer jobs programs as one possible solution to the problem of crime surging as the school year ends.

Closing gun control loopholes and cracking down on rogue dealers has long been a hot topic on both sides of the aisle, with former Presidents Donald Trump and Barack Obama alike pledging to reform the background check system.

Specific gun control legislation was passed as early as Franklin D. Roosevelt’s presidency, in response to gang violence. The calls for gun reform grew stronger in the 1990s after the Columbine High School shooting, which at the time was the deadliest school shooting in the country’s history. Many mass shootings followed in the years since, including 10 over the last weekend alone.

But presidents have always faced obstacles when it comes to passing gun reform.

The National Rifle Association is often seen as one of the most powerful lobbying organizations in politics, and conservative groups are quick to anger when they think Second Amendment rights are in question.

In his remarks, Biden himself invoked the Second Amendment, with an assurance that his plan wouldn’t affect responsible gun owners.

“Talk to most responsible gun owners and hunters — they’ll tell you there’s no possible justification for having a hundred rounds in a magazine of a gun,” the president said. “ … What do you think? The deer are wearing kevlar vests?”

His language was reminiscent of Obama, who assured Americans that he wasn’t trying to disarm them when he introduced his own actions on gun control.

On Wednesday, Biden painted the gun reform plan as a common-sense solution to the crime issue. He pointed out that the Second Amendment always restricted who could own a gun and what type it could be. “You couldn’t buy a cannon,” he added.

“Folks, this shouldn’t be a red or blue issue,” he said. “It’s an American issue. We’re not changing the Constitution. We’re enforcing it, being reasonable.”

Source Article from https://www.politico.com/news/2021/06/23/biden-crack-down-illegal-guns-495751

Sen. Rob Portman, R-Ohio, center, arrives to a bipartisan infrastructure meeting at the U.S. Capitol on Wednesday.

Stefani Reynolds/Bloomberg via Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Stefani Reynolds/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Sen. Rob Portman, R-Ohio, center, arrives to a bipartisan infrastructure meeting at the U.S. Capitol on Wednesday.

Stefani Reynolds/Bloomberg via Getty Images

A bipartisan group of senators is “very, very close” to an agreement on a deal for an infrastructure package, Ohio Republican Rob Portman told Capitol Hill reporters Wednesday, and President Biden has invited the group to the White House Thursday.

The invitation follows meetings between White House advisers and the group of senators Wednesday.

“White House senior staff had two productive meetings today with the bipartisan group of Senators who have been negotiating about infrastructure,” White House press secretary Jen Psaki said in a statement. ‘The group made progress towards an outline of a potential agreement, and the President has invited the group to come to the White House tomorrow to discuss this in person.”

Portman told reporters that the senators have had a “framework” of a deal for a couple of weeks. Indeed on June 10, a group of five Republicans and five Democrats announced they had agreed on the contours of a package: some $1.2 trillion in spending over eight years, but less than half that in new spending.

The bipartisan group has now grown to 21 members.

A key sticking point has been how to pay for the measure, with Republicans opposed to undoing any of their 2017 tax cuts, and Biden against raising the gas tax.

Portman told reporters the group has “a balanced group of pay-fors,” but did not go into more detail.

A two-track effort

The bipartisan infrastructure talks are on one track. Meanwhile, Democrats are eyeing a second, much larger package that would include spending on climate and education and pass along party lines, via the Senate’s budget reconciliation process.

Senate Democrats have begun the budget process that would allow such a measure to move through the chamber.

“Discussions about infrastructure are progressing along two tracks,” Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., said on the chamber floor Wednesday. “The first is bipartisan, and the second incorporates elements of the president’s American Jobs and Families Plan. The second track is something we must support even if it doesn’t get any Republican support.”

Biden originally proposed a more than $2 trillion infrastructure and jobs plan, in addition to a separate proposal of near similar size on education, child care and paid leave.

“For several weeks, the trains have been chugging down both tracks quite well,” Schumer added. “When the Senate returns after the July 4th state work period, it will be time to take the next step forward.”

Schumer and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., were planning on meeting with White House aides Wednesday evening to discuss the latest on infrastructure.

Source Article from https://www.npr.org/2021/06/23/1009695245/with-progress-toward-infrastructure-deal-biden-invites-senators-for-new-talks?ft=nprml&f=

The Supreme Court in a 6-3 decision Wednesday ruled that a California law allowing union organizers access to farms to organize workers is unconstitutional because it in effect deprives farm owners of their property rights without just compensation. 

The six Republican-appointed justices ruled for the businesses while the three Democrat-appointed justices dissented, siding with state officials who defended the pro-union rule. It represented a show of force from the conservative majority on a hot-button political issue after a recent string of largely unanimous or 8-1 rulings. 

“The right to exclude is ‘one of the most treasured’ rights of property ownership,” Chief Justice John Roberts wrote in the majority opinion. “Accordingly, the growers’ complaint states a claim for an uncompensated taking in violation of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments.”

Roberts was specifically citing the Fifth Amendment’s Takings Clause, which says private property can’t be “taken for public use, without just compensation.” 

Official portrait of U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice John G. Roberts. The chief justice wrote an opinion for the court Wednesday that was a blow to union power in California. 

The California law allowed union organizers access to growers’ property for organizing activities up to three hours per day during non-working hours like lunch and before and after work, for up to 120 days per year. Lawyers for the state defended the 1975 law on the grounds that it did not do significant harm to farmers’ businesses. 

SUPREME COURT RULES SCHOOL WRONG TO PUNISH CHEERLEADER FOR PROFANE SNAPCHAT RANT IN 8-1 FREE SPEECH DECISION

“There is no indication that the access regulation poses a significant problem for California farms,” the state said in a brief. “Although there are more than 16,000 agricultural employers in California, petitioners’ statistics indicate that union organizers invoked the regulation to access the property of just 62 employers in 2015.”

And lower courts, Roberts noted, said the California law did not violate the Fifth Amendment because “it does not allow for permanent and continuous access ’24 hours a day, 365 days a year.'” But the six GOP-appointed justices disagreed. 

“That position is insupportable as a matter of precedent and common sense. There is no reason the law should analyze an abrogation of the right to exclude in one manner if it extends for 365 days, but in an entirely different manner if it lasts for 364,” Roberts wrote. 

The three dissenting justices, led by Justice Stephen Breyer, argued that there was no violation of the Takings Clause because nothing was taken by the California government. The government issued only a garden variety regulation, they said. 

U.S. Supreme Court Associate Justice Stephen Breyer is seen during a group portrait session for the new full court at the Supreme Court in Washington, U.S., November 30, 2018. Breyer and the three Democrat-appointed justices dissented from a decision Wednesday that represented a blow to union power. (REUTERS/Jim Young)

“It is important to understand… that, technically speaking, the majority is wrong,” Breyer wrote. “The regulation does not appropriate anything. It does not take from the owners a right to invade (whatever that might mean). It does not give the union organizations the right to exclude anyone. It does not give the government the right to exclude anyone. What does it do? It gives union organizers the right temporarily to invade a portion of the property owners’ land.”

NCAA DISMISSES KAVANAUGH’S BLISTERING OPINION AFTER SUPREME COURT RULING

Breyer added: “The regulation regulates (but does not appropriate) the owners’ right to exclude.”

Nothing in the court’s precedent, Breyer added, shows “that compensation is automatically required for a temporary right of access.”

Right-leaning court-watchers approved of the court’s ruling. Carrie Severino, the president of the conservative Judicial Crisis Network, said the court’s ruling “stands up for fundamental liberty and property protections that are at the heart of the Constitution.”

The libertarian Pacific Legal Foundation (PLF), which represented the growers in the case, said the ruling is a victory not only for farmers in California but property rights more generally. 

“Today’s ruling is a huge victory for property rights. The decision affirms that one of the most fundamental aspects of property is the right to decide who can and can’t access your property,” PLF senior attorney Joshua Thompson said. 

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Left-leaning commentators, however, warned that the Supreme Court’s decision could have far-reaching consequences. 

“This is a very extreme decision!” Slate writer Mark Joseph Stern said. “In short, the Supreme Court’s conservative supermajority just undid one of César Chávez’s greatest accomplishments. This is an incredibly dark day for organized labor. A complete and total blowout against unions.”

Harvard Law Professor Niko Bowie added that Roberts’ ruling could produce a litany of unintended consequences.

“Antidiscrimination laws ‘take’ private clubs’ ‘right to exclude’ women. They ‘take’ photographers’ ‘right to exclude’ unwanted clients. They ‘take’ the ‘right to exclude’ from Uber drivers, short-term rental owners, and other small businesses,” Bowie said. “It is not difficult to describe any law as “taking” something. The conservative deregulationists on the Supreme Court just said the government must pay for what it regulates.”

Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/politics/supreme-court-issues-blow-unions-california-case-farm-property-rights

  • On Wednesday Secretary Yellen asked Congress to extend a July deadline to pay back some of the federal debt.
  • Without an extension, she warned of a “catastrophic” default that could hurt economic recovery.
  • Some in the GOP have signaled they want spending cuts in exchange for increasing the debt ceiling.
  • See more stories on Insider’s business page.

Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen urged Congress on Wednesday to extend a July 31 deadline to pay down a portion of the federal government’s $28 trillion in debt to investors and foreign governments.

Without the extension, she warned of an “absolutely catastrophic” default that would imperil the nation’s economic recovery from the pandemic.

“I think defaulting on the national debt should be regarded as unthinkable,” she told the Senate Appropriations Committee, calling it “utterly unprecedented in American history for the US government to default on its legal obligations.”

Though borrowing is a routine cycle the federal government uses to keep the country running through the sale of bonds, it’s reaching its “debt ceiling” on July 31 and needs to service its debt before it can borrow more. The Treasury has some ability to keep payments flowing beyond that date, but Yellen said it could exhaust those measures sometime in August during the month-long Congressional recess. Increasing the debt ceiling does not mean additional federal spending.

If the federal government defaults, Yellen said it could jumpstart a chain reaction of cash shortages starting with US bond holders, which include individuals, businesses, and foreign governments.

“I believe it would precipitate a financial crisis,” Yellen said. “It would threaten the jobs and savings of Americans and at a time we’re recovering from the COVID pandemic.”

Congress last suspended the borrowing limit in July 2019 for two years under President Donald Trump. Yellen also emphasized the pandemic is causing uncertainty around the Treasury’s emergency powers to step in with emergency payments if it became necessary.

Some Republicans have signaled they will press for spending cuts in exchange for signing onto a debt ceiling increase, despite supporting a surge of red ink under Trump. Among many Democrats, memories of a 2011 brawl between House Republicans and President Barack Obama on the debt ceiling are still fresh, as it sent stocks tumbling and caused the first downgrade to US credit. 

“This is a page from the Obama-era economic sabotage playbook, and I’m not going to let Republicans play games with the economy for their political benefit,” Sen. Ron Wyden of Oregon, chair of the Senate Finance Committee, told Insider in April.

Source Article from https://www.businessinsider.com/janet-yellen-debt-default-congress-republicans-ceiling-2021-6

But his term was marred by accusations of inaction and graft. In the aftermath of Typhoon Haiyan in 2013, which killed 6,000 Filipinos, many accused the president of being too slow to respond to the crisis. Some Western nations, including Canada, cited the Aquino administration’s lack of immediacy in their decisions to sidestep the government and donate money and aid directly to nongovernmental organizations instead.

It was the deaths of 44 police commandos in a 2015 clash with Muslim rebels that ultimately ended his presidency. The botched raid to capture a Muslim insurgent in the southern town of Mamasapano was, at the time, the deadliest day for the country’s police force in modern history.

In 2017, the country’s anti-graft prosecutor said Mr. Aquino should be held accountable for the officers’ deaths for allowing a suspended national police chief, accused of corruption, to oversee the operation.

Mr. Aquino was succeeded in 2016 by Rodrigo Duterte, a populist president whose policies have included a bloody war of drugs.

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2021/06/23/world/asia/benigno-aquino-III-dead.html

The 10 senators — Collins, Bill Cassidy (R-La.), Joe Manchin III (D-W.Va.), Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska), Rob Portman (R-Ohio), Mitt Romney (R-Utah), Jeanne Shaheen (D-N.H.), Kyrsten Sinema (D-Ariz.), Jon Tester (D-Mont.), and Mark R. Warner (D-Va.) — have met numerous times with the administration’s negotiators this week. Steve Ricchetti, counselor to the president; legislative affairs director Louisa Terrell and National Economic Council director Brian Deese have been representing the administration in talks.

Source Article from https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2021/06/23/senate-infrastructure-framework-white-house/

Harris and her team have repeatedly pushed back against criticism that neither she nor the president have gone to visit the U.S.-Mexico border, arguing that she is more focused on tackling the destabilizing conditions that are causing thousands of migrants from Central America to head to the border seeking refuge. That was the central message during her first foreign trip, a two-day visit to Mexico and Guatemala earlier this month. While there, Harris met with local officials and implored migrants not to make the journey across Mexico into the United States.

Her trip, however, was complicated by continued questions over whether she would go to the border to view the situation there. Harris’ response — in which she downplayed the need and noted that she also hadn’t visited Europe — only amplified the criticism.

Harris’ border visit comes just days before former President Donald Trump is set to travel to the border, where he will be joined by Texas GOP Gov. Greg Abbott and a group of House Republicans. Shortly after the news of Harris’ visit began circulating, Trump released a statement claiming that if he and Abbott “weren’t going there next week, she would have never gone!”

Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) was one of many Republican lawmakers to pile on Harris for announcing the trip, with Cruz echoing Trump’s assertion that the vice president was merely trying to get out in front of the former president’s upcoming visit. “Suddenly President Trump is going to the border and they realized, ‘Oh crap, we got to do something,’” Cruz told Fox News.

But White House press secretary Jen Psaki argued that Harris’ trip was simply a part of her broader mandate to address the root causes of the increase in migration. At a White House press briefing, Psaki also noted to reporters that she had “said here from this podium — and [Harris] has also said — that, when it was the right time, [Harris] may go to visit the border.”

The number of migrants arriving at the U.S. southern border has soared in the months since the Biden administration took office. In May, more than 180,000 migrants were apprehended at the border, according to monthly figures from Customs and Border Protection.

Of those, the majority — more than 112,000 — were almost immediately expelled. That’s because the Biden administration has continued to use Title 42, a public health order former Trump invoked in March 2020 at the start of the pandemic to kick out migrants without letting them seek asylum.

The U.S. has also seen a record number of unaccompanied children taken into custody under the Biden administration. More than 18,800 unaccompanied children crossed the border in March, according to CBP figures; the highest monthly number previously recorded was more than 11,000 children who crossed the border in May 2019. The number of child arrivals has steadily decreased in April and May but remains well above that 2019 record.

Much of the political focus on the U.S. southern border has dissipated in recent weeks. However, Biden continues to grapple with the longstanding political and logistical challenges of handling an increased number of migrant arrivals. Republicans have zeroed in on the increased number of migrants heading to the border as a line of attack against the Biden administration, repeatedly calling it the “Biden border crisis.”

They’ve also slammed Harris, specifically, for not visiting the border after Biden tasked her with leading diplomatic efforts to address root causes of migration, a job Biden had as vice president during the Obama administration. During a press conference with the Guatemalan president earlier this month, Harris dismissed the criticism, saying her visit to the region was focused on finding ways to address irregular migration in a way “that is significant, is tangible and has real results.”

“And I will continue to be focused on that kind of work, as opposed to grand gestures,” Harris said in Guatemala City.

But by the end of the trip, after repeated criticism for her answer to questions around her visiting the border, Harris had pledged to visit the border soon.

“I think it’s important for her to be there,” said Democratic Rep. Vicente Gonzalez, whose southeastern Texas district includes a stretch of the border. “It’s not just going there. Obviously, there’s a lot more to it, right? She needs to, you know, try to create ideas with members of Congress and folks in the administration on the Senate side and people on the ground that will actually have a result, an impactful result on our border.”

“At the end of the day, I think that we need to create policy that will slow down the migration that we have on our border,” Gonzalez continued. “Clearly, a border wall is not going to work and just telling people not to come is not going to work. You need to create conditions and implement policy that actually gives you that result.”

Sabrina Rodriguez, Eugene Daniels, Quint Forgey and Nick Wu contributed to this report.

Source Article from https://www.politico.com/news/2021/06/23/kamala-harris-is-set-to-visit-the-border-495684

“This committee found no evidence of widespread or systematic fraud in Michigan’s prosecution of the 2020 election,” the authors wrote, before adding: “It is the opinion of this committee that the Legislature has a duty to make statutory improvements to our elections system.”

Michigan Republicans, who control the state’s Legislature, have for weeks debated a series of new voting restrictions. Gov. Gretchen Whitmer, a Democrat, has said she will veto the legislation, but Michigan law allows citizens to circumvent the governor by collecting 340,047 signatures.

Michigan’s secretary of state, Jocelyn Benson, a Democrat, said on Wednesday that she hoped Republican lawmakers would use the report to “cease their attempts to deceive citizens with misinformation and abandon legislation based on the lies that undermine our democracy.”

Here are some of the conclusions from the Michigan report that debunked Trump allies’ claims about the election:

  • Referring to Antrim County in Northern Michigan — where local election officials briefly and inadvertently transposed voting numbers before correcting them, leading to false conspiracy theories about voting machines — the report suggests that Michigan’s attorney general, Dana Nessel, a Democrat, should “consider investigating those who have been utilizing misleading and false information about Antrim County to raise money or publicity for their own ends.” It adds that anyone who promoted the Antrim County theories as the prime evidence of a nationwide conspiracy to steal the election had left “all other statements and actions they make in a position of zero credibility.”

  • The Voter Integrity Project, a right-wing group, has said that 289,866 “illegal votes” were cast in Michigan. The report’s authors called 40 people from the group’s list of supposed voters who received absentee ballots without requesting them and found just two who said they had been sent unrequested ballots. One was on the state’s permanent absentee voter list. The other voted absentee in the 2020 primary election and may have forgotten about checking a box then to request an absentee ballot in the general election.

  • The report found that the chaos that unfolded after Election Day as votes were counted at the TCF Center in Detroit was the fault of Republican operatives who called on supporters to protest the count. “The Wayne County Republican Party and other, independent organizations, ought to issue a repudiation of the actions of certain individuals that created a panic and had untrained and unnumbered persons descend on the TCF Center,” the report states.

  • Claims that Dominion Voting Systems machines in Michigan and other states had been hacked to change results were false, the report said. The committee’s chairman, State Senator Ed McBroom, a Republican, called Georgia officials to investigate claims made by Jovan Pulitzer, who said he had access to manipulate vote counts. Mr. Pulitzer’s testimony “has been demonstrated to be untrue and a complete fabrication,” the report said. “He did not, at any time, have access to data or votes, let alone have the ability to manipulate the counts directly or by the introduction of malicious software to the tabulators. Nor could he spot fraudulent ballots from non-fraudulent ones.”

  • Of Mr. Lindell’s wide-ranging claims of fraud and impropriety in vote-counting systems, the report states that “this narrative is ignorant of multiple levels of the actual election process,” before embarking on a lengthy debunking of his claims.

  • While Mr. Trump claimed that more votes had been cast in Detroit than people who live there, the report found that turnout in the city was under 50 percent of eligible voters and about 37 percent of its population.

  • No ballots were secretly “dumped” at the Detroit vote-counting center. “A widely circulated picture in media and online reports allegedly showed ballots secretly being delivered late at night but, in reality, it was a photo of a WXYZ-TV photographer hauling his equipment,” the report states.

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2021/06/23/us/politics/michigan-2020-election.html

  • Israel is worried about the Delta coronavirus variant despite its widespread vaccinations.
  • Its leader described a recent surge as a “new outbreak” and announced new preventive measures.
  • About 70% of new infections were the Delta variant, the Israeli Health Ministry’s director said.
  • See more stories on Insider’s business page.

Israel says it is battling a new outbreak of COVID-19 that struck despite its success vaccinating its population.

Prime Minister Naftali Bennett on Tuesday described a recent surge in infections as a “new outbreak” in the country.

And the director of the Israeli Health Ministry said about 70% of new infections were the Delta variant.

Israel on Wednesday expanded powers meant to control the surge.

It said health officials could quarantine anyone who had been exposed to the variant, even if they had been vaccinated or previously infected, Reuters reported.

Israel has the world’s highest share of its population fully vaccinated, according to Our World in Data.

Its vaccination success means virtually all coronavirus-related restrictions have been removed, apart from requiring some people to quarantine and insisting on measures for international travelers.

The Israeli news outlet Haaretz reported that the 125 new cases the country recorded Monday were the highest daily count in two months.

The Delta variant now makes up most new cases identified in the UK and is making up an increasing proportion of US cases.

Source Article from https://www.businessinsider.com/israel-seeing-new-covid-19-outbreak-despite-vaccine-success-2021-6

Eccentric antivirus software company founder John McAfee was found dead of suspected suicide in his prison cell in Barcelona, Spain, on Wednesday, shortly after Spain’s National Court approved his extradition to the United States to face criminal tax evasion charges, Reuters and the Associated Press confirmed.

The Spanish newspaper El Mundo first reported that the 75-year-old McAfee was dead, according to the Catalan Justice Department.

McAfee’s lawyer told Reuters that McAfee apparently hanged himself.

El Mundo, citing the Catalan Justice Department, reported that the prison’s medical professionals attempted to resuscitate him. McAfee was being held at the Brians 2 prison in Catalunya.

McAfee was arrested last October at the international airport in Barcelona on the tax evasion charges, which are pending in federal court in Tennessee. He had been held in jail in Spain since then.

According to the indictment, McAfee earned millions of dollars in income from promoting cryptocurrencies, consulting work, speaking engagements, and selling the rights to his life story for a documentary.

“From 2014 to 2018, McAfee allegedly failed to file tax returns, despite receiving considerable income from these sources,” the U.S. Justice Department said in October.

McAfee, along with another man, Jimmy Watson, also was charged in Manhattan federal court in March with an alleged “pump-and-dump” scheme promoting in which allegedly bought up large quantities of cheap cryptocurrency and then promoted them online with “false and misleading tweets” to jack up their market prices.

“McAfee Team members collectively earned more than $2 million in illicit profits from their altcoin scalping activities,” the Justice Department said in March.

Last week, McAfee tweeted about his criminal cases, writing, “The US believes I have hidden crypto. I wish I did but it has dissolved through the many hands of Team McAfee (your belief is not required), and my remaining assets are all seized.”

“My friends evaporated through fear of association. I have nothing. Yet, I regret nothing,” wrote McAfee in the tweet, which is pinned to the top of his Twitter feed.

The Securities and Exchange Commission in a civil lawsuit last October accused McAfee of making more than $23 million in undisclosed income from false and misleading cryptocurrency recommendations.

McAfee resigned from the eponymous antivirus software company he founded in 1994.

In 2013, he created a profane parody video explaining how users can uninstall the software.

In 2019, a federal court in Florida ordered McAfee to pay more than $25 million in damages to the estate of a Florida man named Gregory Faull, who allegedly was murdered in the nation of Belize at the direction of McAfee in 2012.

Faull owned a property along a beach next to McAfee, two of whose dogs allegedly were poisoned by Faull.

McAfee earlier had fled Belize and faked a heart attack in order to return to the United States.. He never was criminally charged in Faull’s killing.

This is breaking news. Check back for updates.

Source Article from https://www.cnbc.com/2021/06/23/john-mcafee-found-dead-after-spanish-court-oks-extradition-for-tax-crimes-.html

The U.S. Supreme Court sided with students in a case involving a cheerleader who dropped F-bombs on Snapchat while complaining about her school.

Mark Tenally/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Mark Tenally/AP

The U.S. Supreme Court sided with students in a case involving a cheerleader who dropped F-bombs on Snapchat while complaining about her school.

Mark Tenally/AP

The U.S. Supreme Court sided with students on Wednesday, ruling that a former cheerleader’s online F-bombs about her school is protected speech under the First Amendment.

By an 8-1 vote, the court declared that school administrators do have the power to punish student speech that occurs online or off campus if it genuinely disrupts classroom study. But the justices concluded that a few swear words posted online from off campus, as in this case, did not rise to the definition of disruptive.

“While public schools may have a special interest in regulating some off-campus student speech, the special interests offered by the school are not sufficient to overcome B. L.’s interest in free expression in this case,” Justice Stephen Breyer wrote for the court’s majority.

At issue in the case was a series of F-bombs issued in 2017 on Snapchat by Brandi Levy, then a 14-year-old high school cheerleader who failed to win a promotion from the junior varsity to the varsity cheerleading term at her Pennsylvania school.

“I was really upset and frustrated at everything,” she said in an interview with NPR in April. So she posted a photo of herself and a friend flipping the bird to the camera, along with a message that said, “F*** the school … F*** cheer, F*** everything.”

Suspended from the team for disruptive behavior, Brandi and her parents went to court. They argued that the school had no right to punish her for off-campus speech, whether it was posted online while away from school, as in this case, or spoken out loud at a Starbucks across the street from school.

A federal appeals court agreed with her, declaring that school officials have no authority to punish students for speech that occurs in places unconnected to the campus.

The decision marked the first time that an appeals court issued such a broad interpretation of the Supreme Court’s landmark student speech decision more then a half century ago. Back then, in a case involving students suspended for wearing black armbands to school to protest the Vietnam War, the court ruled that students do have free speech rights under the Constitution, as long as the speech is not disruptive to the school.

Although Brandi Levy is now in college, the school board in Mahanoy, Pa., appealed to the Supreme Court, contending that disruption can come from outside the campus but still have serious effects on campus. It pointed to laws in 47 states that require schools to enforce anti-bullying and anti-harassment policies.

The high court, however, focused on the facts in Levy’s case, concluding that while her posts were less than admirable, they did not meet the test of being disruptive.

“We do not believe the special characteristics that give schools additional license to regulate student speech always disappear when a school regulates speech that takes place off campus,” Breyer wrote. “The school’s regulatory interests remain significant in some off-campus circumstances.”

In a concurring opinion, Justice Samuel Alito wrote: “If today’s decision teaches any lesson, it must be that the regulation of many types of off-premises student speech raises serious First Amendment concerns, and school officials should proceed cautiously before venturing into this territory.”

In a dissent, Justice Clarence Thomas wrote that the school was right to suspend Levy because students like her “who are active in extracurricular programs have a greater potential, by virtue of their participation, to harm those programs.”

“For example, a profanity-laced screed delivered on social media or at the mall has a much different effect on a football program when done by a regular student than when done by the captain of the football team,” Thomas here. So, too, here.”

Source Article from https://www.npr.org/2021/06/23/1001382019/supreme-court-rules-cheerleaders-f-bombs-are-protected-by-the-first-amendment