Two San Diego police officers died Friday when a wrong-way driver hit their car in a head-on collision, according to reports. 

California High Patrol (CHP) responded at about 10:20 a.m. Friday to a call about a Honda Civic driving down the I-5 the wrong way. A call about a crash shortly followed. 

The driver of the errant vehicle, as well as the two police officers in the other car, all died upon impact, FOX 5 San Diego reported

“Heroic efforts from San Diego Fire weren’t able to rescue any of the occupants in either of the vehicles,” CHP spokesperson Salvador Castro said at the scene.

It is not clear if the officers were on duty at the time of the incident. The officers were driving a white sedan, though, according to NBC 7 San Diego

Factors surrounding the crash – including vehicle speed and any possible intoxicants – remain unknown at this time. 

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

The highway remains closed while authorities investigate the incident. 

Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/us/san-diego-wrong-way-crash-police

“The takeaway for me is, yesterday Jen Psaki at the White House said she doesn’t want to relitigate 17-month-old emails from Dr. Fauci, yet today we have House Democrats on the Judiciary Committee religitating the Mueller report,” he told reporters, according to C-SPAN.

Meanwhile, committee Democrats called Friday “a great day for Congressional oversight.”

Chair Jerry Nadler said McGahn testified “at length to an extremely dangerous period in our nation’s history,” and that by securing the testimony, “we have made clear that the executive branch must respect our subpoenas.”

“There is no such thing as so-called ‘absolute immunity’ from congressional testimony, and good congressional investigators will eventually secure their witness,” Nadler said in a statement Friday afternoon.

He added that two years was too long, and that the “Trump era has taught us that Congress can no longer depend on good faith cooperation with our committees.” He said he plans to advance legislation that will allow Congress to enforce their subpoenas in a more timely fashion.

In 2019, the committee subpoenaed McGahn to testify about Trump’s efforts to hamstring the Mueller probe. Mueller’s report detailed a host of ways in which Trump sought his firing, and many legal experts saw it as a detailed argument for charging Trump with obstruction of justice. But in deference to a longstanding internal DOJ rule barring the indictment of sitting presidents, Mueller didn’t recommend such charges be brought. The attorney general at the time, Bill Barr, announced Trump would not face charges.

Many Democrats saw the outcome as a travesty. And they sought to hear from McGahn, the chief witness of Trump’s efforts to stop Mueller’s probe. But during the Trump administration, the Justice Department argued energetically against McGahn’s testimony. The litigation dragged on until this year, when the Justice Department — now under the leadership of President Joe Biden’s appointees — cut a deal with congressional Democrats and McGahn to allow his testimony, The New York Times reported.

The committee has said it will release a transcript within seven days following the closed-doors appearance.

McGahn’s testimony comes as criminal probes relating to the former president and his associates have been gaining steam. In April, FBI agents raided the apartment and office of Trump’s former personal attorney, Rudy Giuliani. They also seized the cell phone of another lawyer close to Trump, Victoria Toensing.

Meanwhile, New York’s attorney general announced that the probe of the Trump Organization had become a criminal investigation. Letitia James’ office reportedly sent lawyers to embed with Manhattan’s district attorney, who is also running a criminal investigation related to the president’s businesses. The district attorney has used a grand jury as part of that probe.

At the same time, Trump has cemented his place as de facto leader of the Republican Party. Last month, congressional Republicans removed Rep. Liz Cheney from leadership because of her continued criticism of the president for repeatedly lying about the outcome of the 2020 election. Trump is slated to speak at the North Carolina Republican Party’s convention this weekend.

Myah Ward contributed to this report.

Source Article from https://www.politico.com/news/2021/06/04/republicans-democrats-battle-for-high-ground-after-mcgahn-testimony-491962

Donald Trump has appeared to drop his strongest hint yet at another presidential run in 2024, responding to news of his two-year ban from Facebook on Friday by saying he would not invite Mark Zuckerberg to dinner “next time I’m in the White House”.

It has also been widely reported this week that Trump believes he will be reinstated in the presidency by August.

He will not. But in his statement on Friday he did not say if he thought he would return to the White House because he would be reinstated or because he would run for the Republican nomination again and then defeat Joe Biden or another Democrat.

Trump’s statement read: “Next time I’m in the White House there will be no more dinners, at his request, with Mark Zuckerberg and his wife. It will be all business!”

Trump has a history of using public statements to troll his opponents and a long record of lies and exaggerations and promoting baseless conspiracy theories. At the same time Trump has maintained a strong grip on the Republican party and there is intense speculation about whether or not he would run for the presidency again.

Nick Clegg, the former British deputy prime minister who is now Facebook’s vice-president of global affairs, announced the social media website’s ban on Trump until 2023.

It follows the recommendation of Facebook’s oversight board. Trump has been suspended from the social media site since January, when he incited supporters to attack the US Capitol in service of his lie that his defeat by Joe Biden was the result of electoral fraud.

In a first statement on the suspension, Trump said it was an “insult” to those who voted for him in “the rigged presidential election” and said: “They shouldn’t be allowed to get away with this censoring and silencing.”

Amid striking polling about support for his lies among Republican voters, Trump still dominates polls of possible contenders for the party’s nomination in 2024.

Trump appears to be convincing himself the election was stolen and that some mechanism exists by which he might be reinstated, a belief apparently stoked by Mike Lindell, the chief executive of MyPillow and a hardline Trump supporter.

According to CNN, which confirmed reporting by Maggie Haberman of the New York Times and by the conservative National Review, Trump has asked advisers: “What do you think of this theory?”

A source also told CNN: “People have told him that it’s not true.”

Source Article from https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/jun/04/donald-trump-facebook-white-house

Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., called on top government epidemiologist Anthony Fauci to resign from his post amid revelations about emails Fauci sent early in the coronavirus pandemic. He also called for a congressional inquiry into the virus’ origins. 

“Anthony Fauci’s recently released emails and investigative reporting about #COVID19 origins are shocking,” Hawley tweeted Friday, adding: “The time has come for Fauci to resign and for a full congressional investigation into the origins of #COVID19 – and into any and all efforts to prevent a full accounting.” 

“The public deserves to know if persons within the US govt tried to stop a full investigation into #COVID origins, as recently reported,” the Missouri Republican continued. “And Congress must also find out to what extent Fauci’s NIAID was involved in financing research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.” 

Buzzfeed obtained and published thousands of Fauci’s emails from the early stages of the coronavirus pandemic this week, some of which sparked outrage for a variety of reasons. A group of emails appear to show Fauci’s opposition to mask-wearing early in the pandemic, which was consistent with his public statements, before he and other public health officials reversed that stance. 

FAUCI EMAILS SPARK FLOOD OF BACKLASH: ‘NEEDS TO STOP PLAYING GAMES’

Other emails, however, indicated that the possibility the COVID-19 virus leaked from a Chinese lab was raised to Fauci, who is the director of the National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Diseases, as early as January 2020, and that he and some other reputable scientists took the possibility seriously. 

Nevertheless, Fauci, other public health experts and many in the media were strongly dismissing the possibility that the virus leaked from a lab, even as Fox News reported in April 2020 that at least some in the U.S. intelligence community believed a lab leak to be more likely than other theories. 

The expert who raised lab leak concerns to Fauci on Jan. 31, Kristian G. Andersen, later said that he is quite sure the virus was not artificially altered after looking at the “data.” 

Also sparking outrage against Fauci are two other sets of emails, including one in which Fauci tells his deputy, Hugh Auchincloss, to read a paper about “SARS Gain of function.”

“The paper you sent me says the experiments were performed before the gain of function pause but have since been reviewed and approved by NIH,” Auchincloss said in an email to Fauci. “Not sure what that means since Emily is sure that no Coronavirus work has gone through the P3 framework. She will try to determine if we have any distant ties to this work abroad.”

That’s being interpreted by some to indicate that Fauci and those close to him were concerned that his agency – which has indeed funded research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology – may have indirectly funded experiments on coronaviruses that may have led to the creation and accidental release of the COVID-19 virus. 

FORMER STATE DEPT INVESTIGATOR ON FAUCI EMAILS: ‘I DON’T TRUST THESE SCIENTISTS’ ABOUT WUHAN LAB

“It seems like he was very troubled early on that there was gain of function. He’s like ‘What, is gain of function still going on? I thought we paused it.’ He seemed unclear about whether or not the gain-of-function research, how it got started again in Wuhan,” Paul said on the “Tom Roten Morning Show Wednesday. “And I think he was very concerned – although he doesn’t say it in the email – concerned that he continued to fund it through NIH even though there weren’t doing gain of function.”

Some are also upset about correspondence between Fauci and a man named Peter Daszak. Daszak’s organization EcoHealth received millions in grants from the National Institutes of Health (NIH), including a $600,000 grant from Fauci’s agency, the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) that it later paid to the Wuhan Institute of Virology to study the risk that bat coronaviruses could infect humans.

“I just wanted to say a personal thank you on behalf of our staff and collaborators, for publicly standing up and stating that the scientific evidence supports a natural origin for COVID-19 from a bat-to-human spillover, not a lab release from the Wuhan Institute of Virology,” Daszak said in an email. Fauci replied: “Many thanks for your kind note.” 

Daszak was also notably on the World Health Organization team that investigated the Wuhan Institute of Virology earlier this year, an inquiry that’s been panned even by the Biden White House as lacking transparency. 

“These emails show that Dr. Fauci coordinated with one of the Wuhan Lab’s funders to cover-up the plausible notion that the virus could have come from inside the lab. Dr. Fauci needs to stop playing games and answer questions about his role in funding the very lab that may have unleashed this pandemic on the world,” Sen. Tom Cotton, R-Ark., said in a statement to Fox News Wednesday. 

“It’s all so incestuous,” Paul added on the Tom Roten Morning Show. 

The NIAID did not immediately respond to a request for comment from Fox News on Hawley’s call for Fauci to resign. NIAID did not respond to a request for comment from Fox News earlier this week about the content of Fauci’s emails and the backlash against him. 

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

The White House, which has elevated Fauci’s role to a top adviser to President Biden, meanwhile, is standing by Fauci amid the fallout from his emails. 

“The President and the administration feel that Dr. Fauci has played an incredible role in getting the pandemic under control, being a voice to the public throughout the course of this pandemic,” Press Secretary Jen Psaki said Thursday when asked if the emails changed the White House’s confidence in Fauci. “And, again, I would reiterate a lot of these emails are from 17 months ago or more, certainly predating this administration, but some time ago in — as we look to history.”

Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/politics/josh-hawley-fauci-resign-investigation-covid-origins

June 4, 9.30 a.m. Fifteen vaccinated Californians will win $50,000 today.

Gov. Gavin Newsom is expected to pull the first round of winners in the California’s “Vax for the Win” incentive this morning. 


Don’t worry about registering, if you have received at least one vaccine already, your name is already in the hat. A second group of 15 winners will be drawn next week, Friday June 11.

Beyond the 30 lucky Californians who will end the month both vaccinated and $50,000 richer (before tax), ten further winners will be selected on June 15 to receive a whopping $1.5 million each. 

And a further two million Californians who got vaxxed after May 27 will be receiving a $50 virtual gift card eligible at various outlets including Safeway, Ralph’s and Alberton’s.

To be eligible for any of the prize categories residents just need to be aged 12 and older, though folks who were temporarily present in California when they received their vaccine are not eligible.

Gov. Gavin Newsom announced the $116.5 million vaccine incentive program in May to motivate more people to get inoculated leading up to June 15, when the economy is slated to fully reopen. 

Winners today will not be announced by name, instead numbers will be randomly drawn corresponding to residents. 

The state says that public health officials will then try to make contact via telephone, text, email or other contact info provided in the state’s vaccine registry. The state will then request winners’ approval to share their information publicly.

If the state can’t make contact within 96 hours, the person may no longer be offered a prize and another person may be selected. So today may be a good day to unmute your phone. 

Find further details here. 

 

Source Article from https://www.sfgate.com/local/article/california-vaccine-lottery-winners-covid-how-to-16225177.php

Still, Mr. McGahn was expected to be asked to respond under oath to Mr. Trump’s public denial of events that were described in the report based in part on what Mr. McGahn told Mr. Mueller’s investigators, including that Mr. Trump had ordered him to have Mr. Mueller fired — a step Mr. McGahn said he refused to take.

People familiar with his ongoing testimony said on Friday that the former top White House lawyer was hewing closely to the account he had already given the special counsel, often telling committee lawyers that his recollections of four-year-old events were no longer sharp. In the first several hours, at least, Mr. McGahn had not broken significant new ground, according to the people, who requested anonymity to describe the nonpublic testimony.

“He’s being somewhat difficult,” Representative Jerrold Nadler, Democrat of New York and the Judiciary Committee chairman, said during a break midway through the session, though he added that Mr. McGahn was not being altogether uncooperative.

Republicans were pleased to declare the interview a waste of time as they left the session after more than five hours of questioning.

“Today, we have the House Democrats on the Judiciary Committee relitigating the Mueller report,” said Representative Jim Jordan of Ohio, the top Republican on the Judiciary Committee. “Don McGahn hasn’t been White House counsel for three years.”

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2021/06/04/us/politics/mcgahn-trump-russia-inquiry.html

Facebook on Friday announced that it may allow former President Donald Trump’s Facebook and Instagram accounts to be reinstated in January 2023.

At that time, the social media company will reevaluate whether the risk to public safety of allowing Trump back onto its services has receded.

“We will evaluate external factors, including instances of violence, restrictions on peaceful assembly and other markers of civil unrest,” the company said in a blog post. “If we determine that there is still a serious risk to public safety, we will extend the restriction for a set period of time and continue to re-evaluate until that risk has receded.”

If Trump is allowed back on the service, there will be a strict set of rapidly escalating sanctions that will be triggered if Trump further violates the company’s content moderation rules, Facebook said.

This two-year suspension will prevent Trump from using Facebook or Instagram to broadcast to his followers until after the 2022 U.S. midterm elections.

Facebook suspended Trump’s accounts following the Jan. 6 insurrection on the U.S. Capitol. The decision was Facebook’s most aggressive action against Trump during his four-year term.

Facebook referred the ban to its oversight board a few weeks later, saying that given the significance of the suspension, “we think it is important for the board to review it and reach an independent judgment on whether it should be upheld.”

Facebook’s independent Oversight Board in May decided to uphold the company’s choice to suspend Trump’s accounts. In its decision, however, the board noted that Facebook needed to reassess how it moderates the speech of political leaders, clearly outline those rules for the public and determine how long is appropriate for these users to be suspended.

The company said it determined that a two-year suspension was the appropriate length to allow a safe period of time after the acts of the Jan. 6 insurrection and it was a significant enough suspension to be a deterrent to Trump and others from repeating the violations in the future.

In a statement issued by his office, Trump criticized Facebook’s decision, calling it an insult to his voters and falsely claiming that the 2020 presidential election was rigged.

“They shouldn’t be allowed to get away with this censoring and silencing, and ultimately, we will win,” Trump said in the statement. “Our Country can’t take this abuse anymore!”

Source Article from https://www.cnbc.com/2021/06/04/facebook-says-donald-trump-to-remain-banned-from-platform-for-2-years-effective-from-jan-7.html

Source Article from https://www.cnn.com/2021/06/04/politics/election-audit-arizona/index.html

Former Vice President Mike Pence addresses the annual Hillsborough County Lincoln-Reagan Dinner on Thursday night in Manchester, N.H. He called Jan 6 “a dark day” in the history of the U.S. Capitol.

Elise Amendola/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Elise Amendola/AP

Former Vice President Mike Pence addresses the annual Hillsborough County Lincoln-Reagan Dinner on Thursday night in Manchester, N.H. He called Jan 6 “a dark day” in the history of the U.S. Capitol.

Elise Amendola/AP

Former Vice President Mike Pence said Thursday night that he doubts that he and former President Donald Trump will ever see “eye to eye” over the Jan. 6 insurrection led by a mob of pro-Trump supporters at the U.S. Capitol.

In a speech to a Republican group in New Hampshire, Pence called Jan. 6 “a dark day in the history of the United States Capitol, but thanks to the swift action of the Capitol Police and federal law enforcement, violence was quelled, the Capitol was secured and that same day, we reconvened the Congress and did our duty under the Constitution and the laws of the United States.”

Pence was at the Capitol that day to oversee the counting of electoral votes, a normally ceremonial task that was interrupted by the Trump supporters, some of whom shouted “Hang Mike Pence,” and forced lawmakers and the vice president to evacuate.

“President Trump and I have spoken many times since we’ve left office, and I don’t know if we’ll ever see eye to eye on that day,” Pence said, “but I will always be proud of what we accomplished for the American people over the last four years.”

Pence spoke at the annual Hillsborough County Lincoln-Reagan Dinner in Manchester. Pence’s appearance in New Hampshire, which holds the nation’s first presidential primary is seen as a testing of the waters, as he decides whether to mount his own run for the presidency.

But while delicately distancing himself from Trump, Pence offered up plenty of red meat for the GOP crowd and praise for the former president.

He tried to turn Jan. 6 onto Democrats, saying their calls for an independent commission to investigate the events of that day and what led up to it were political.

“I will not allow Democrats or their allies in the media to use one tragic day to discredit the aspirations of millions of Americans,” Pence said, “or allow Democrats or their allies in the media to distract our attention from a new administration intent on dividing our country to advance their radical agenda.”

Two days after President Biden attended a commemoration marking the 100th anniversary of the Tulsa Race Massacre, in which a Black community was torched by a white mob, Pence asserted that “America is not a racist country,” and that it was “past time for America to discard the left-wing myth of systemic racism.” He also said, “Black lives are not endangered by police. Black lives are saved by police.”

Pence called Biden “the most liberal president since FDR,” and added, “They’ve proposed trillions of dollars in a so-called infrastructure bill that’s just a thinly disguised climate change bill.”

Trump, who polls show remains the favorite of most GOP voters, delivers one of the first speeches of his post-presidency Saturday in North Carolina.

Source Article from https://www.npr.org/2021/06/04/1003228976/pence-distances-himself-from-trump-over-jan-6th-insurrection

Fox News host Sean Hannity ripped Dr. Anthony Fauci’s pushback against the possibility that COVID-19 leaked from a virology lab in Wuhan, China on “Hannity” Thursday, claiming that “any idiot” could’ve discerned in January 2020 “that a Wuhan lab leak was plausible and possibly responsible for the pandemic.”

HANNITY: Now, Fauci and the entire world knew that the Wuhan facility was experimenting with gain of function with coronaviruses. Logically, any idiot could have realized on January 31, 2020, that a Wuhan lab leak was plausible and possibly responsible for the pandemic. If you brought the question up you are a conspiracy theorist. You’re talking about debunked conspiracy theories. Not so debunked anymore, are they? Emails now prove that Dr. Fauci knew that everything was happening in the lab and he was showing great concern that, in fact, NIH money that he was in charge of was being used to do all of this. 

We may have actually paid for this and for months in public Fauci treated the lab leak hypothesis as a Fox News conspiracy theory. He said there was no scientific evidence the coronavirus was made in a Chinese lab, even though he got that note on January 31, 2020. He strongly implied that all signs pointed to the virus originating in nature, just the opposite of what he was told. So why did he do this? What did Fauci know and when did Fauci know it …

Even today, Fauci is still urging Americans don’t be too accusatory of China because they’re working hard to get to the bottom of what really happened. It’s in their best interest to tell the truth. He has emails that he got saying that they were covering up the number of people that were killed and then, in fact, their travel ban prohibited people from leaving Wuhan province and traveling anywhere within China or going to Wuhan Province. You’ve got to be kidding.

WATCH THE FULL MONOLOGUE BELOW

Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/media/hannity-fauci-emails-wuhan-lab-leak-covid-china

The Georgia Board of Education is taking steps to prohibit schools from teaching that the U.S. is fundamentally racist and other controversial ideas associated with critical race theory (CRT).

By an 11-2 vote, the state adopted part of a resolution drafted by conservative think tank Ethics and Public Policy Center, the Atlanta Journal Constitution reported. It contains language restricting external, private influences from changing school teaching — an apparent attempt to exclude diversity consultancies or activist nonprofits from administrators’ decision-making.

The resolution also prevents teachers from being forced to teach that an individual’s worth or sense of shame should be dependent on their race or sex.

It reads, in part: “[C]oncepts that impute fault, blame, a tendency to oppress others, or the need to feel guilt or anguish to persons solely because of their race or sex violate the premises of individual rights, equal opportunity, and individual merit underpinning our constitutional republic, and therefore have no place in training for teachers, administrators, or other employees of the public educational system of the State of Georgia.”

WHAT IS CRITICAL RACE THEORY?

Brian Kemp, the state’s Republican governor, reportedly urged the board last month to take steps against CRT, which is often seen as the source of these ideas.

Georgia’s is just the latest attempt to halt so-called “anti-racist” trainings and curricula in their tracks. Some have defended those types of teachings as a way to foster understanding and dismantle purportedly systemic inequities. Others, like Chris Rufo, have described them as a form of neo-racism that unfairly attributes certain concepts or actions to racial groups.

The issue gained steam in national media this year as controversial materials emerged. For example, the Oregon Department of Education was found to promote a teacher training program that argued white supremacy manifested itself in a focus on finding the right answer in math.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Besides individual racial characteristics, American history has also been a subject of these trainings. Schools across the U.S. have started utilizing the “1619 Project,” which teaches, among other things, that the institution of slavery was the nation’s true founding. 

A series of the resolution’s statements seemed to be aimed at disputing those types of ideas. The board, it says, “[b]elieves the United States of America is not a racist country, and that the state of Georgia is not a racist state.”

Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/us/georgia-board-of-education-critical-race-theory

The upcoming U.S.-Russia summit will be a critical moment in trying to revive poor relations between the two countries, Kirill Dmitriev, the CEO of Russia’s sovereign wealth fund RDIF, told CNBC Friday.

President Joe Biden is meeting President Vladimir Putin on June 16 in Geneva, Switzerland, in what will be their first face-to-face meeting since Biden took office. The summit takes place amid sanctions and allegations of election interference, human rights violations, differences over the Middle East and many other issues.

“I compare (the) U.S.-Russia relationship to a falling knife and we need to catch this knife on the 16th till it falls to the floor,” Dmitriev told CNBC’s Hadley Gamble at the St. Petersburg International Economic Forum.

“There are a lots of real issues that are different, but also there are really a lot of misunderstandings and we at least need to engage and start communicating much more, because when we see things being done, there are really lots of wrong assumptions in the decisions that are being made,” he added.

In the latest escalation between both sides, Russia has suggested ditching dollar-denominated oil contracts if the U.S. were to impose fresh sanctions. Also on Thursday, Finance Minister Anton Siluanov confirmed that U.S. dollar assets will be cut from its $186 billion National Wealth Fund.

The relationship between Moscow and Washington deteriorated in 2014 after Russia’s annexation of Crimea, which led to U.S. sanctions. But, according to Andrey Kostin, the chairman of Russia’s VTB Bank, the link hit its “lowest possible level” during the Donald Trump presidency.

“I am little bit skeptical because the previous records do not give us too much ground for enthusiasm,” Kostin told CNBC about the upcoming summit, adding that it is nonetheless “very, very good that the two leaders will meet.”

Speaking to CNBC Friday at the same event, he said that Putin and Biden will “definitely” not make the relationship worse.

Source Article from https://www.cnbc.com/2021/06/04/biden-putin-summit-a-chance-to-catch-a-falling-knife-rdif.html

Former Vice President Mike Pence addresses the annual Hillsborough County Lincoln-Reagan Dinner on Thursday night in Manchester, N.H. He called Jan 6 “a dark day” in the history of the U.S. Capitol.

Elise Amendola/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Elise Amendola/AP

Former Vice President Mike Pence addresses the annual Hillsborough County Lincoln-Reagan Dinner on Thursday night in Manchester, N.H. He called Jan 6 “a dark day” in the history of the U.S. Capitol.

Elise Amendola/AP

Former Vice President Mike Pence said Thursday night that he doubts that he and former President Donald Trump will ever see “eye to eye” over the Jan. 6 insurrection led by a mob of pro-Trump supporters at the U.S. Capitol.

In a speech to a Republican group in New Hampshire, Pence called Jan. 6 “a dark day in the history of the United States Capitol, but thanks to the swift action of the Capitol Police and federal law enforcement, violence was quelled, the Capitol was secured and that same day, we reconvened the Congress and did our duty under the Constitution and the laws of the United States.”

Pence was at the Capitol that day to oversee the counting of electoral votes, a normally ceremonial task that was interrupted by the Trump supporters, some of whom shouted “Hang Mike Pence,” and forced lawmakers and the vice president to evacuate.

“President Trump and I have spoken many times since we’ve left office, and I don’t know if we’ll ever see eye to eye on that day,” Pence said, “but I will always be proud of what we accomplished for the American people over the last four years.”

Pence spoke at the annual Hillsborough County Lincoln-Reagan Dinner in Manchester. But while delicately distancing himself from Trump, Pence offered up plenty of red meat for the GOP crowd and praise for the former president.

He tried to turn Jan. 6 onto Democrats, saying their calls for an independent commission to investigate the events of that day and what led up to it were political.

“I will not allow Democrats or their allies in the media to use one tragic day to discredit the aspirations of millions of Americans,” Pence said, “or allow Democrats or their allies in the media to distract our attention from a new administration intent on dividing our country to advance their radical agenda.”

Two days after President Biden attended a commemoration marking the 100th anniversary of the Tulsa Race Massacre, in which a Black community was torched by a white mob, Pence asserted that “America is not a racist country,” and that it was “past time for America to discard the left-wing myth of systemic racism.” He also said, “Black lives are not endangered by police. Black lives are saved by police.”

Pence called Biden “the most liberal president since FDR,” and added, “They’ve proposed trillions of dollars in a so-called infrastructure bill that’s just a thinly disguised climate change bill.”

Pence’s appearance in New Hampshire, which holds the nation’s first presidential primary, is seen as a testing of the waters as he decides whether to mount his own run for the presidency in 2024.

Trump, who polls show remains the favorite of most GOP voters, delivers one of the first speeches of his post-presidency Saturday in North Carolina.

Source Article from https://www.npr.org/2021/06/04/1003228976/pence-distances-himself-from-trump-over-jan-6th-insurrection

Dr. Anthony Fauci gave a wide-ranging interview that was published late Thursday that mainly focused on the origins of the coronavirus, and he was asked if he believed his own National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases could have any responsibility for the global pandemic.

“Are you really saying that we are implicated because we gave a multibillion-dollar institution $120,000 a year for bat surveillance?” he asked, according to the Financial Times.

The paper did not post the precise question asked to Fauci, but the top disease doctor has been facing increased criticism by Republicans, including Sen. Rand Paul over a $600,000 grant that went to a group called EcoHealth Alliance and ended up at the Chinese lab. The lab was reportedly tasked with studying the risk that bat coronaviruses.

FAUCI EMAILS SPARK BACKLASH

Francis Collins, director of the National Institute of Health, said at a May 25 hearing that the taxpayer-funded grant was not approved to conduct gain-of-function research, which is research that involves modifying a virus to make it more infectious among humans.

NIAID did not immediately respond to an after-hours email from Fox News about the comments in the FT.

Medical records

Fauci told the paper that the medical records of the three workers who were said to have become sick at the Wuhan lab in late 2019 would be beneficial in the probe of the virus’ origin. 

“Did they really get sick, and if so, what did they get sick with?” he asked.

NEW INTEL LENDS MORE CREDENCE TO WUHAN LAB THEORY AS WHO PRESSURED

“The same with the miners who got ill years ago. … What do the medical records of those people say? Was there [a] virus in those people? What was it? It is entirely conceivable that the origins of Sars-Cov-2 was in that cave and either started spreading naturally or went through the lab,” he said.

Fauci was referring to 2012, when miners became sick after they entered a bat cave, the report said. Three of them died. The paper pointed out that Fauci still believes the virus jumped to humans through animals. 

David Asher, the former State Department investigator, told the paper that he respected Fauci, but was “stunned” that he would only now request the records. Asher pointed out that the Trump administration mentioned the reports of sick scientists in January.

FORMER STATE DEPT INVESTIGATOR ON FAUCI EMAILS: ‘I DON’T TRUST THESE SCIENTISTS’ ABOUT WUHAN LAB

China has promoted unproven theories that the virus may have originated elsewhere or even been brought into the country from overseas with imports of frozen seafood tainted with the virus, a notion roundly rejected by international scientists and agencies.

Robert Redfield, the former head of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, told Vanity Fair that in January 2020, he received a message from Dr. George Fu Gao, head of the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Gao warned him about sickened individuals in Wuhan. The report said “Redfield immediately offered to send a team of specialists to investigate” because he had suspicions about the Wuhan lab. If a team found antibodies in blood samples of workers there, that would be convincing evidence. China refused, he said.

Fox News’ Tyler Olson contributed to this report

Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/politics/fauci-are-you-saying-were-implicated-over-120k-a-year-for-bat-surveillance