Aides to Mr. Biden say they are wary of criticizing Fox News directly, reasoning that it would be counterproductive to promoting a pro-vaccine message to Fox News viewers.

“We need every media platform to step up and ensure their coverage provides accurate, objective information,” a White House spokesman, Kevin Munoz, said in a statement that avoided an aggressive attack against Fox News. “As with any misinformation, we don’t shy away from calling it out.”

Some right-wing media outlets have generated mixed coverage in recent days about vaccines. Breitbart News, for instance, still features articles on its website grouped under the category “Mask/Vax Cult.” But Newsmax, a cable network whose opinion shows run further to the right than Fox News, ran an essay on Tuesday by its chief executive, Christopher Ruddy, that praised Mr. Biden’s vaccination efforts.

“I myself have gotten the Pfizer vaccine,” Mr. Ruddy wrote in the piece, which was published on the Newsmax website. “There’s no question in my mind, countless lives would have been saved if the vaccine was available earlier.”

In an interview, Mr. Ruddy said the White House had not contacted Newsmax regarding its coronavirus coverage. He said he wanted to credit Mr. Biden for “doing a good job,” though he also cautioned that his network would not censor alternative views. “I don’t want to be the thought police,” he said.

Fox News has produced its own 30-second vaccine public service announcement, featuring the hosts and anchors Mr. Doocy, Harris Faulkner, Dana Perino and John Roberts. “If you can, get the vaccine,” Ms. Faulkner says in the ad. The anchor Bret Baier said in April that he was “grateful” to be vaccinated. Mr. Hannity and Mr. Doocy have previously told viewers to consider whether a vaccination would be beneficial to their lives and their families.

On Monday’s “Fox & Friends,” Mr. Doocy echoed government officials in noting that nearly all coronavirus deaths now involve unvaccinated people. After acknowledging that some people, such as pregnant women, might be hesitant, he said: “Everybody else, if you have the chance, get the shot.” Mr. Doocy also cited examples of online disinformation claiming the vaccine is “killing lots of people” or “changes your D.N.A.” or comes with “little microchips.”

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2021/07/20/business/media/fox-news-covid-vaccines.html

Thomas J. Barrack, Jr., the chair of former President Trump’s inaugural committee and a prominent Southern California businessman, was arrested Tuesday on federal charges that he and two associates were part of a secretive, years-long effort to shape Trump’s foreign policy as a candidate and later, president, all to the benefit of the United Arab Emirates.

Barrack, 74, and the two other men were indicted in a New York federal court and accused of acting as unregistered foreign agents of the wealthy Persian Gulf state starting about the spring of 2016.

The indictment said four UAE officials “tasked” Barrack and his associates with influencing public opinion through media appearances; molding the foreign policy positions of the Trump campaign and later, the Trump administration; and developing “a back-channel line of communication” with the U.S. government that promoted Emirati interests.

Barrack was also accused of obstructing justice and making several false statements in a 2019 interview with federal agents, when he denied being asked to acquire a phone dedicated to communicating with Middle Eastern officials.

The indictment alleges Barrack’s work had a direct impact on Trump’s behavior, including a 2016 speech when Trump pledged work with “our Gulf allies” and a phone call the president had with an unidentified UAE leader. Barrack also wrote an op-ed published in Fortune magazine that relied on feedback from UAE officials and made numerous television interviews promoting their national interests.

After a July 2016 television appearance in which Barrack repeatedly praised the UAE, he messaged another man named in the alleged conspiracy, boasting, “I nailed it … for the home team.”

Barrack was arrested Tuesday morning at an unidentified business site in Sylmar, according to an FBI spokeswoman. During an initial appearance Tuesday afternoon at a downtown L.A. federal court, Barrack appeared remotely from a different federal courthouse, also downtown, but thick wire mesh obscured his face.

U.S. Magistrate Patricia Donahue ordered Barrack detained pending a hearing Monday, in accordance with an agreement reached by prosecutors and defense attorneys.

“Mr. Barrack has made himself voluntarily available to investigators from the outset,” said a statement issued by Barrack’s spokesperson. “He is not guilty and will be pleading not guilty.”

A congressional report identified investor Tom Barrack as a key figure in a raft of initiatives that “virtually obliterated the lines normally separating government policymaking from corporate and foreign interests.”

In announcing the high-profile prosecution, federal officials blasted Barrack and the two other defendants, Matthew Grimes, 27, of Aspen, Colo., and a UAE national, Rashid Alshahhi, 43, for participating in the alleged conspiracy to sway the decisions of the Trump campaign and administration.

“The defendants repeatedly capitalized on Barrack’s friendships and access to a candidate who was eventually elected president, high-ranking campaign and government officials, and the American media to advance the policy goals of a foreign government without disclosing their true allegiances,” acting Assistant Atty. Gen. Mark Lesko said in a statement.

He added: “The conduct alleged in the indictment is nothing short of a betrayal of those officials in the United States, including the former president.”

Grimes was arrested at a home in Santa Monica, and an attorney for him could not be reached for comment. At a court appearance Tuesday, Grimes was deemed a flight risk and detained at least until a Monday hearing.

A prosecutor said in court Tuesday that Alshahhi left the U.S. in 2018 after an interview with federal agents; he remains at large.

A spokeswoman for Trump did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The grandson of Lebanese Christian immigrants, Barrack grew up in Culver City and graduated from USC, where he remains a trustee and frequent campus guest. After college, Barrack parlayed a project in Saudi Arabia into advising the royal family, and since the 1970s, he’s cultivated deep ties across the Middle East, including friendships with the leaders of Qatar and the UAE, as well as a three-decade friendship with Trump.

Barrack founded Colony Capital, a publicly held investment firm, and has amassed a net worth of about $1 billion, according to Forbes.

Barrack relied on his status as a well-connected Middle Eastern courtier and Trumpworld insider to illegally — and covertly — further UAE’s foreign policy aims, the indictment said.

As the global recession deepened in 2008, Tom Barrack was in his element.

Barrack capitalized on his close ties to Trump, including influencing a speech about energy issues that was delivered on May 26, 2016, according to the indictment. Trump, then seeking the Republican nomination, pledged in the speech that the U.S. would “work with our Gulf allies.”

After the speech, the indictment said, an unnamed Emirati official emailed Barrack to say “congrats on the great job today” and that “everybody here are happy with the results.”

After Trump defeated Hillary Clinton and became president-elect, Barrack assumed the role of chair of the inaugural committee, raising more than $100 million for the fete from well-heeled supporters and corporate interests.

Barrack also traveled to the UAE with Grimes, who worked at Colony Capital, and they met with Alshahhi and other Emirati officials, according to the indictment. In a meeting there, Barrack conveyed a plan to influence U.S. foreign policy over the next 100 days, six months, year and four years, the indictment details.

Afterward, Alshahhi conveyed to Grimes that officials were “very happy here,” and Alshahhi later told an Emirati official that Barrack would “be with the Arabs.”

Soon after Trump took office, Barrack allegedly ensured that the new president connected over the phone with a UAE leader. Grimes later said that “we can take credit for phone call,” the indictment said.

Alshahhi also sent Grimes the résumé of a congressman that UAE officials hoped would be their next U.S. ambassador. The unnamed congressman’s appointment “was very important for our friends,” Alshahhi advised Grimes, according to the indictment. Alshahhi pushed the nomination of the same congressman to Barrack days later, telling him, “Your help will go long way.”

There followed correspondence and strategizing about the next ambassador, with Barrack at one point mentioning he could be named ambassador or a special envoy to the Middle East. Barrack allegedly said that his appointment “would give Abu Dhabi more power!”

“This will be great for us. And make you deliver more. Very effective operation,” Alshahhi replied to Barrack. No such position ever materialized.

Taken together, the text messages and emails show the trust that UAE officials had in Barrack and his success at navigating an administration that was freewheeling and turbulent during Trump’s first year in office.

The case against Barrack is a reminder of how deeply foreign interests penetrated Trump’s inner circle. Michael Flynn, Trump’s first national security advisor, admitted to working on Turkey’s behalf while serving on Trump’s campaign in 2016. Paul Manafort and Rick Gates, top campaign officials that same year, confessed to acting as unregistered lobbyists for Ukraine.

Imaad Zuberi, a top California fundraiser, admitted funneling foreign money into campaigns of Republicans and Democrats alike.

More recently, Rudolph W. Giuliani, Trump’s lawyer during the former president’s attempt to overturn his election defeat, has been under investigation for his own foreign entanglements. Federal investigators searched his apartment and office and seized his electronic devices in April as part of an investigation into whether he had violated the same lobbying law, known as the Foreign Agents Registration Act.

The law requires people to disclose when they’re lobbying on behalf of a foreign government, and the Justice Department stepped up its enforcement during the special counsel investigation into Russia interference in the 2016 election.

Times staff writer Chris Megerian in Washington, D.C. contributed to this report.

Source Article from https://www.latimes.com/politics/story/2021-07-20/tom-barrack-trump-inaugural-committee-arrested-uae

The new European data protection law requires us to inform you of the following before you use our website:

We use cookies and other technologies to customize your experience, perform analytics and deliver personalized advertising on our sites, apps and newsletters and across the Internet based on your interests. By clicking “I agree” below, you consent to the use by us and our third-party partners of cookies and data gathered from your use of our platforms. See our Privacy Policy and Third Party Partners to learn more about the use of data and your rights. You also agree to our Terms of Service.

Source Article from https://www.washingtonpost.com/gdpr-consent/

Scientists with differing opinions about COVID-19 origins than Dr. Anthony Fauci keep it to themselves because because the top disease expert controls much of their funding, Sen. Rand Paul, R-Kentucky, told “Fox News Primetime” Tuesday night.

Paul subjected Fauci to stiff questioning during a Senate hearing chaired by Democrat Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota earlier in the day, with Fauci quibbling over Paul’s definition of gain-of-function research, which the lawmaker said came from a document sourced by another epidemiological expert. 

The senator went on to urge Fauci, the head of the National Institutes of Allergy & Infectious Disease, to reconsider prior testimony denying NIAID or NIH’s particular funding endeavors at the Wuhan lab; where many believe COVID-19 originated – citing federal perjury laws.

Paul reacted further to Fauci’s behavior and doubled down on his assertion that the 80-year-old Brooklyn, N.Y. native is not letting on as much as he should be on the topic of gain-of-function research funding.

He said he read aloud the NIH’s definition of gain-of-function research, as well as a scholarly paper from a cellular biology expert working at Rutgers University in New Jersey, which described Wuhan lab official Dr. Shi Zhengli’s work as the textbook definition of such experimentation.

“All Dr. Fauci could do was sputter and call me liar – but he never at any point in time addressed any of the facts that we laid out that the money he was giving to Wuhan was indeed for gain of function.”

Paul chalked up the fact he is one of few prominent medical experts – as a doctor himself – speaking out and contradicting Fauci to the assertion that many others in medicine rely on NIAID funding – which Fauci has the ultimate say on.

The senator noted Fauci has worked at the Bethesda, Md.-based NIH since 1968. He was appointed the head of NIAID by President Reagan in 1984.

Host Brian Kilmeade went on to note that Johns Hopkins physician Dr. Marty Makary told him on the “Brian Kilmeade Show” earlier in the day that the NIH distributed $40 billion in research grants in 2020 – but less than one-half-of-one-percent went to COVID-related endeavors.

Makary said Fauci should be ashamed at that statistic, and Kilmeade asked Paul why there is not more outrage on the whole among the medical community:

“He has been [at NIH] for 40 years; probably 39 years too long. But he controls all the funding,” Paul warned.

“So, people are deathly afraid of him. Researchers will not speak out. Why have there not been other scientists?”

Paul said that he receives letters from scientists that routinely contradict Fauci’s prescriptions and public statements, but that they all offer the same regret: that they are afraid to speak out against what the health care bureaucrat says.

“They are very distrustful of what he is saying. They don’t think he is making sense and reading the science accurately,” said Paul.

“They’re afraid to speak out because many of them are university scientists and they depend on NIH funds: To cross him means it’s last money you will ever get.”

Paul said Fauci has a “significant conflict of interest” in the Wuhan matter because he was “at the top of the food chain” of funding distribution and now claims none of it went to the dangerous gain-of-function research.

“All he is saying is oh, well, the research now doesn’t meet our definition,” he said. “He is dancing around the truth. Why? Because if this disease came from the lab and they were funding gain of function, guess what? There is at the very least moral culpability he has for the beginning of the pandemic.”

Paul added that in 2012, Fauci made statements about the potential for a pandemic leaking from a lab, and that if such a situation occurred the research would be worth the risk.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

In the document Fauci prepared that year, he defended controversial gain-of-function research, saying that the “benefits” gained from the science “outweigh the risk” of an accidental pandemic breaking out.

“It is more likely that a pandemic would occur in nature, and the need to stay ahead of such a threat is a primary reason for performing an experiment that might appear to be risky,” the paper read.

During the hearing Tuesday, Fauci responded to Paul’s assertions saying he denies and “resents” them.

Fox News’ Houston Keene contributed to this report.

Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/media/rand-paul-anthony-fauci-intimidates-scientists

Wildfires across the West dramatically increased in size from Monday through Tuesday, with 83 large blazes now burning in the U.S. and about 300 to the north in British Columbia.

Why it matters: The western wildfire season has kicked into high gear about two months early, as climate change-related drought and heat waves have dried out vegetation to levels not typically seen prior to late summer. About 20,000 firefighters are already deployed to blazes.

Driving the news: Wildfires in California and Canada blew up on Monday afternoon and into the night thanks to extreme heat and dryness. Evacuations expanded around the Bootleg Fire in southern Oregon, the Dixie Fire in California, and numerous fires in Canada.

The intrigue: In a filing with the California Public Utilities Commission, PG&E said blown fuses on its power equipment may have sparked the Dixie Fire. This would be the latest in a string of large California blazes started by the company’s equipment.

  • That blaze dramatically grew in size Monday, forcing fire crews to retreat as a towering fire-related thunderstorm cloud, known as a pyrocumulonimbus, billowed above the blaze.
  • This cloud, often referred to as pyroCb, resembled a large explosion, and vaulted smoke and ash as high as 45,000 feet into the atmosphere. It produced its own rain and lightning strikes, as well as erratic winds.
  • At the Bootleg Fire, the nation’s largest at more than 388,000 acres, erratic winds and towering clouds forced firefighters to temporarily retreat from the blaze for the ninth straight day, according to the Associated Press.

Details: The wildfires on Monday occurred on a day featuring triple-digit temperatures in several western states, with records falling in Montana in particular.

  • In Canada, extreme heat helped set the stage for explosive fire growth that forced firefighters to back off from the flames due to the dangerous conditions there.
  • Some of the fires prompted evacuations, but evacuees are having trouble finding places to stay.
  • Heat warnings are still in place in northeastern Montana, though the heat wave there likely peaked on Monday, when Glasgow reached a daily temperature record of 110℉.
  • In Billings, the temperature peaked at 107℉, setting a daily record and coming just 1℉ shy of tying the all-time record high.

In Oregon, officials have called in firefighting support from outside the Pacific Northwest — to battle the Bootleg Fire.

  • Thunderstorms delivering little rain on Monday are now likely in the Pacific Northwest and Intermountain region on Tuesday. Lightning bolts from these storms started new fires in the Sierra Nevada mountains of California, and the potential for more “dry lightning” has made Oregon officials concerned that more wildfires could ignite.
  • So they’ve turned to authorities in Arkansas, Nevada and Alaska for equipment including fire engines, according to a statement by Rogue River-Siskiyou National Forest officials Monday.

Context: In California, twice as many acres have burned so far this year than had burned by this point last year — and 2020 was California’s worst wildfire year on record.

  • Smoke from western wildfires is blanketing the skies in the Mid-Atlantic on Tuesday, with air quality alerts in place for the Philadelphia area. The sky over the nation’s capital took on a milky haze during sunrise.

Between the lines: Human-caused global warming is a major factor behind the severity, longevity and frequency of the heat waves in the American West and other parts of the world.

  • In addition, studies show that the West is seeing more frequent and larger wildfires as climate change alters precipitation patterns, temperatures and the timing of the wet and dry seasons.
  • Climate change is also leading to more days like Monday with extreme fire weather conditions that feature unusually high temperatures, strong winds, and extremely low humidity values.

What’s next: More wildfires are expected to be set off on Tuesday due to the dry lightning threat, with more than a half-dozen states under Red Flag warnings for dangerous fire weather conditions. This includes the entire state of Idaho.

  • Many of the large blazes currently burning across the West are expected to continue to do so until steady and significant precipitation reaches the area this fall or early winter.
  • In other words, it’s going to be an extremely long and grueling fire season, for firefighters and residents of the affected areas.

Go deeper: FEMA chief heads West as large wildfires rage, heat wave peaks

Rebecca Falconer contributed reporting.

Source Article from https://www.axios.com/wildfires-west-size-heat-drought-evacuations-fbc7c2f0-fcd3-46b0-b36a-58941346509c.html

“We know that there will be breakthrough cases,” Ms. Psaki said, adding that there had been previous cases at the White House that had not been disclosed. “This is another reminder of the efficacy of the Covid-19 vaccines against severe illness or hospitalizations.”

She said the aide had no close contact with Mr. Biden or top White House officials.

The Covid vaccines in use in the United States have proven to be effective at reducing the risk of severe symptoms or hospitalization, but infections among fully vaccinated individuals, known as breakthrough infections, are not unheard-of. It is not yet clear whether the highly transmissible Delta variant circulating across the country increases the likelihood of breakthrough infections.

As a result of the positive test, Mr. Hammill said that Ms. Pelosi’s press office was working remotely, with the exception of those aides who had tested negative or did not come into contact with the infected spokesperson.

The news of the infections rattled some on Capitol Hill, where lawmakers and professional staff have been moving toward more normal operations for months now. Representative Steny H. Hoyer, Democrat of Maryland and the majority leader, said that rising coronavirus cases across the country could force the House to reconsider its relaxation of mask requirements and other pandemic-era measures like the use of proxy voting.

“We are going to have to decide, given the upswing in every state, whether or not prudence demands we go back to wearing a mask,” Mr. Hoyer told reporters on Tuesday.

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2021/07/20/us/politics/pelosi-aide-breakthrough-infection.html

Prosecutors say Barrack used his insider access to White House officials that he gained through roles like his position as chair of Trump’s inaugural committee to give the UAE “non-public information about the views and reactions of senior U.S. government officials following a White House meeting between senior U.S. officials and senior UAE officials.”

Also charged in the case were an aide to Barrack at his investment firm Colony Capital, Matthew Grimes, and a businessman from UAE, Rashid Al-Malik.

Prosecutors allege that early in the Trump administration, Barrack sought to be appointed to a high-profile role in Middle East policy, while telling his allies in UAE that such an appointment would be good for them.

“In his communications with Al Malik, the defendant framed his efforts to obtain an official position within the Administration as one that would enable him to further advance the interests of the UAE, rather than the interests of the United States,” prosecutors wrote in a court filing.

While the indictment gives numerous examples of Barrack working closely with Al-Malik to advance UAE interests, it is vague about Barrack’s motivation for doing so. However, the indictment suggests that Barrack’s public relations and lobbying efforts for UAE were intertwined with his financial and investment interests. Prosecutors contend that in December 2016, Grimes sent Al-Malik a proposal that said implementing the plan could “achieve outsized financial returns.”

In addition, the three men charged in the case were working at the time on efforts to help a UAE ally, Saudi Arabia, acquire nuclear power technology from the U.S. That project, which became the focus of a House Oversight Committee investigation, included an effort to use UAE and Saudi funds, along with U.S. investments to take over the U.S.-based energy firm Westinghouse. The House probe found that Al-Malik was acting both on behalf of UAE and Saudi officials.

Prosecutors contend that in May 2016, Barrack shared with the UAE what he called a “totally confidential” draft of a Trump speech on energy and that Al-Malik later attended the inauguration festivities as a “personal guest” of Barrack.

The indictment alleges that Barrack and Grimes obtained a “dedicated cellular phone” for their communications with top UAE officials and installed a secure messaging application on it for that purpose.

Prosecutors also allege Grimes agreed to remove a reference to “dictatorships” in a Barrack op-ed at the UAE officials’ request. “They didn’t like Dictatorships word….They don’t want to be labeled as dictators, which is true,” Al-Malik told Grimes.

The op-ed referenced in the indictment appears to be one Fortune Magazine published on Oct. 22, 2016 that denigrated the Arab Spring movement while praising Saudi Arabia, a close ally of UAE. Barrack’s language tracks with what Grimes agreed to.

“The instability created by contradictory Western interests has invited far worse atrocities by the new regimes than the crimes perpetrated by the previous order,” Barrack wrote.

The indictment says that after the op-ed was published, Al-Malik wrote to Grimes: “Big boss loved it.”

Barrack made his fortune, which Forbes has estimated at $1 billion, while at the helm of private equity firm Colony Capital. He stepped down as the company’s CEO last year and as executive chairman of the firm in April. He and Grimes were arrested in the Los Angeles area and made their initial appearances in federal court there Tuesday afternoon.

Prosecutors said in court papers that they are asking that Barrack be held in federal custody and transported to New York City, so he can go before a federal judge in Brooklyn for a bail hearing. They said Barrack’s extensive wealth and foreign ties would give him ample opportunity to try to hide out overseas.

“There is no doubt that the defendant’s vast financial resources and access to private aircraft give him all the necessary means to flee from justice, now that he is facing extremely serious criminal charges supported by overwhelming evidence,” prosecutors wrote.

Prosecutors also noted that after the FBI interviewed Al-Malik in Los Angeles in 2019, he left the U.S. and has never returned.

During a brief appearance before U.S. Magistrate Judge Patricia Donahue, Barrack’s attorney Matt Herrington said the two sides are continuing to negotiate about a bail package. Donhaue agreed to keep Barrack in Los Angeles until another hearing set for Monday morning.

Grimes also went before the same judge earlier in the same session. His attorney, Matthew Freedman, said his client is 27 years old and is no longer employed by Colony.

“He is a fairly low-level individual in all of this,” said Freedman. “He no longer works at the company.”

Freedman also noted that Grimes has known for years about the federal investigation and, unlike Al-Malik, hasn’t tried to escape. “My client did not flee,” the defense attorney said.

While Freedman sought release for Grimes on a temporary bond, Donahue rejected that idea. “I do find that the defendant presents a very serious risk of flight,” she said. She also continued his bail hearing until Monday.

The indictment is the latest move by the Justice Department to beef up enforcement of laws aimed at limiting and disclosing foreign influence in the U.S. However, the foreign-agent statute used to charge Barrack was not the Foreign Agents Registration Act, but a lesser-known statute typically used to charge individuals accused of working at the direction of senior officials of a foreign government.

The prosecutor handling the bail hearings in Los Angeles, Mack Jenkins, called the statute “very infrequently used.” He said it reflects the elite circles that Barrack and the others were attempting to influence and wield influence on behalf of.

“We’re talking about the highest levels at the UAE and the highest levels of the United States,” Jenkins said.

The charge also offers another benefit the prosecutor did not mention. While FARA requires proof that a person knew his or her conduct was illegal, the foreign-agent statute used to charge Barrack and his co-defendants requires no such proof.

Source Article from https://www.politico.com/news/2021/07/20/tom-barrack-arrested-foreign-agent-charges-500333

“Senator Paul, you do not know what you’re talking about, quite frankly, and I want to say that officially,” Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, said at one point. “You do not know what you are talking about.”

Source Article from https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/07/20/fauci-paul-wuhan-lab/

New York State issued an air quality health advisory for Tuesday, lasting until midnight, because of high levels of fine particulate matter in the air, which wildfires contribute to.

By late afternoon, the Air Quality Index for New York City had reached 170, well above average. The concentration of microscopic particulate pollution called PM2.5 was nine times above exposure recommendations from the World Health Organization.

In a statement, the Department of Environmental Conservation noted that while it was not rare for traveling wildfire smoke to reach the New York region, the smoke usually stayed high in the atmosphere. But in this case, “data showed that the smoke is extending down to the ground level,” since much of it is coming from relatively nearby fires in western Ontario and eastern Manitoba.

Climate change is making wildfires larger and more intense, with results visible from satellites and on the ground. The Bootleg Fire in Oregon now covers more than 388,000 acres and is so intense that it is essentially making its own weather. Satellite images from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration show smoke from that fire and others making its way across wide swaths of the United States and Canada. It first reached New York City around July 15.

Mr. Cristantello said that a cold front pushing through the New York City area on Wednesday should clear out the haze, but it could return if the fires persist.

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2021/07/20/us/wildfire-smoke-new-york-city.html

Pedestrians walk past the National Palace in Port-au-Prince, Haiti, Wednesday, July 7, 2021. A squad of gunmen assassinated Haitian President Jovenel Moise and wounded his wife in an overnight raid on their home Wednesday(AP Photo/Joseph Odelyn)

Joseph Odelyn/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Joseph Odelyn/AP

Pedestrians walk past the National Palace in Port-au-Prince, Haiti, Wednesday, July 7, 2021. A squad of gunmen assassinated Haitian President Jovenel Moise and wounded his wife in an overnight raid on their home Wednesday(AP Photo/Joseph Odelyn)

Joseph Odelyn/AP

Nearly two weeks after the assassination of Haitian President Jovenel Moïse, the man he chose to become the country’s next prime minister, Ariel Henry, is set to assume office. But any fanfare will likely be dampened by the monumental political and social problems facing the impoverished nation and its new leader.

Interim Prime Minister Claude Joseph, who will be replaced by Henry, remained in office with the backing of the police and military after Moïse’s July 7 assassination. In the days after Moïse’s killing a power struggle ensued, with both Moïse and Henry claiming to be in charge. Over the weekend, it seems that the two men came to an agreement and Joseph has agreed to step down.

Haiti’s interim Prime Minister Claude Joseph speaks during a press conference in Port-au Prince on July 11, 2021. Amid deep uncertainty over its political future, the international community has called on the impoverished Caribbean country to go ahead with presidential and legislative elections slated for later this year.

Valerie Baeriswyl/AFP/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Valerie Baeriswyl/AFP/Getty Images

Haiti’s interim Prime Minister Claude Joseph speaks during a press conference in Port-au Prince on July 11, 2021. Amid deep uncertainty over its political future, the international community has called on the impoverished Caribbean country to go ahead with presidential and legislative elections slated for later this year.

Valerie Baeriswyl/AFP/Getty Images

Henry, a 71-year-old neurosurgeon who is no stranger to politics, is set to take the reigns Tuesday afternoon.

He once studied in Boston, and led the response to Haiti’s cholera epidemic

Henry was educated at France’s University of Montpellier school of medicine and at Boston University, according to Haiti Libre.

In 2016, he became interior minister. He also led the country’s public health response to a deadly cholera epidemic that killed some 10,000 people and infected another 800,000 in the wake of a devastating 2010 earthquake.

Henry is closely associated with Moïse, a deeply unpopular and divisive figure who during his time in office further fractured Haiti’s already divided political landscape.

“[Even] though he is not from Moïse’s party, he remains associated with Moïse’s increasingly authoritarian presidency, which many in the country believe already overstayed its mandate,” says Paul Angelo, a fellow for Latin America Studies at the Council on Foreign Relations, in an email to NPR.

He is closely associated to the country’s entrenched powers

Despite being closely associated with the entrenched political powers in Haiti, Henry appears to be signalling a desire for “unity.”

“Some have observed the latest events with amazement, others wonder with reason about the management of the country,” he said, according to the Associated Press.

Moïse said he had met with various unidentified figures in Haiti’s civil society and private sector: “I intend to continue and deepen these discussions, because it is the only way to bring the Haitian family together,” he said.

But many observers are skeptical there will be any break with the country’s divisive past.

“I don’t think he can fix the problems we have now,” Samuel Madistin, a criminal defense and human rights lawyer, told NPR.

There’s been no sitting parliament in Haiti since January 2020, and Moïse had been effectively ruling by decree. So, the late president’s appointment of Henry is problematic, says Angelo.

“Ariel Henry is a known entity to Haitians, given his former role as the coordinator of the country’s public health response to the 2010 cholera outbreak,” Angelo says. “But for many Haitians, he represents an unsatisfactory option to lead the country out of its current crisis.”

A cholera patient arrives at the Cholera Treatment Center in the Carrefour area of Port-au-Prince, on December 10, 2014. The Caribbean country’s cholera outbreak started in 2010 and “an unacceptable number of people have been affected, with nearly 712,330 suspected cases and an estimated 8,655 deaths,” the report by the UN’s Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) said.

Hector Retamal/AFP/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Hector Retamal/AFP/Getty Images

A cholera patient arrives at the Cholera Treatment Center in the Carrefour area of Port-au-Prince, on December 10, 2014. The Caribbean country’s cholera outbreak started in 2010 and “an unacceptable number of people have been affected, with nearly 712,330 suspected cases and an estimated 8,655 deaths,” the report by the UN’s Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) said.

Hector Retamal/AFP/Getty Images

Brian Concannon, a human rights lawyer who founded the Institute for Justice & Democracy in Haiti (IJDH), says Henry “has long been active in politics, usually as part of undemocratic regimes.”

After the 2004 ouster of former president Jean-Bertrand Aristide, Henry “was part of the Council of Sages, an extra-constitutional body that wielded illegal powers to usher in Haiti’s brutal interim government,” Concannon said in an email to NPR.

Moïse, he said, named Henry as prime minister “following a series of backroom discussions, not the broad consultations that Haitian civil society was demanding.”

Michel Eric Gaillard, a Port-au-Prince based political analyst, sums it up in the Miami Herald: “Is he a game changer? Is he the man of the moment to tackle threatened, vital national interests? Does he have the political clout to play the role of a neutral broker? Can he exercise leadership in a captured state?”

Gaillard’s conclusion: “Most likely not. How can he maneuver a sinking ship while wearing a straitjacket?”

His backing from Western powers could hurt him at home

A statement on Saturday from the Core Group — made up of ambassadors from the United States, Canada, Brazil, Spain, France, the European Union and representatives from the United Nations and the Organization of American States — is seen as crucial in Henry winning out in the power struggle with Joseph.

Although backing from such heavyweights could prove valuable, it could also hurt him at home.

Haitian journalist and activist Monique Clesca rejected the Core Group’s statement, calling it “interference.”

In a tweet on Tuesday, she wrote: “Let’s be crystal clear: Nothing has changed in #Haiti except the name of a Prime Minister. He is from the same PHTK regime chaotically ruling for the last 10years with US support. And, it’s unconstitutional.”

Angelo says that the support from the Core Group fuels “perceptions that once again Haiti’s sovereign decisions are being dictated by external actors.”

It’s a perception shared by “most Haitians,” says Concannon. They believe that Moïse was able to hold onto power because of the backing of the Core Group nations — especially the U.S., support that “will similarly allow [Henry] to maintain power for some time.”

Even so, the Core Group’s support will challenge Henry’s legitimacy, Concannon says.

He says he’ll hold new elections, but can they be fair?

Henry has promised to form a provisional government until elections can be held, but there is disagreement whether such polls could be free and fair.

Madistin, speaking to NPR earlier, said elections are needed to “bring stability in Haiti,” but he also expressed concern that rushing ahead with polls — especially given Haiti’s current wave of crime and gang violence — might not be the best idea.

Moïse’s ruling Haitian Tèt Kale Party, or PHTK party, which has been in power for nine years, has run several elections, “but none of them have been fair or inclusive,” says Concannon. “The Haitian commentators and activists I have heard from see nothing in [Henry’s] nomination and government that indicates PHTK will change course and allow fair, inclusive elections.”

Peter Mulrean, who was a U.S. ambassador to Haiti during the Obama administration, writes in Just Security that it’s “tempting to think that new elections will clarify the situation and restore stability.”

“[But] experience teaches us just the opposite,” Mulrean says. “What Haiti needs is to take stock of what is broken and fix it.”

“The decline of Haitian democracy has accelerated recently, but is long in the making, with each set of elections representing a negative loop that further weakens its foundations and the people’s confidence,” he writes.

Source Article from https://www.npr.org/2021/07/20/1018280279/ariel-henry-swearing-in-haiti-new-prime-minister

The U.S. officials have indicated that going public with opposition to the forthcoming agreement could damage the Washington-Kyiv bilateral relationship, those sources said. The officials have also urged the Ukrainians not to discuss the U.S. and Germany’s potential plans with Congress. A senior administration official disputed this reporting, noting that the situation is more nuanced than that, but declined to share further details on U.S. officials’ talks with their Ukrainian counterparts.

American negotiators and diplomats have signaled that they have given up on blocking completion of the pipeline, known as Nord Stream 2, which will ship cheap natural gas from Russia to Germany and stands to be a boon for Moscow.

In the meantime, they have been trying to mollify a key regional partner in Ukraine — which stands to lose the most from the pipeline’s ultimate completion — and rebuild the frayed U.S. relationship with Germany, which supports the pipeline. President Joe Biden and Merkel did not reach an agreement on how to handle the matter when she visited Washington last week, Reuters reported. Biden said after meeting with her that “good friends can disagree.”

In ongoing talks with Germany, U.S. officials are trying to limit the risks the pipeline will present to Ukraine and to European energy security, the official told POLITICO. American and German officials are in talks about the pipeline and its impact on Ukraine, that official added. They are looking for ways to reduce the damage it does to the young democracy.

Secretary of State Antony Blinken said last month that the pipeline’s completion is a fait accompli. The senior administration official said the U.S. has concluded that sanctions will not be able to block the pipeline’s completion.

The administration’s position is at odds with much of Congress and with the Ukrainian government and other Eastern European allies, who have long held that U.S. intervention can still block completion of the pipeline, which is nearly completed.

The four people familiar with the situation, including a congressional source with direct knowledge, described the dynamics on condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive matters. Details began circulating around Capitol Hill late Monday.

U.S. officials’ pressure on Ukrainian officials to withhold criticism of whatever final deal the Americans and the Germans reach will face significant resistance.

A source close to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said that Kyiv’s position is that U.S. sanctions could still stop completion of the project, if only the Biden administration had the will to use them at the construction and certification stages. That person said Kyiv remains staunchly opposed to the project.

Meanwhile, the Biden administration gave Zelensky a date for a meeting at the White House with the president later this summer, according to a senior administration official.

Critics of the forthcoming U.S.-Germany pact over the pipeline say it will mainly serve Russia’s interests and harm ties between Washington and Kyiv.

“It’s unbalanced and unfair that Russia gets a huge reward and Ukraine is flogged over criticism,” said Alina Polyakova, the president and CEO of the Center for European Policy Analysis. “It’s 100 percent true that if Trump did this,” everyone would go nuts, she added.

The U.S. put sanctions on the pipeline during the Trump administration that stalled the project. Germany’s finance minister tried to make a deal with the Trump administration that would have funded the import of U.S. liquefied natural gas to Europe in exchange for withholding sanctions on the pipeline, according to Environmental Action Germany, as RFE/RL reported. But Trump did not take the deal and there were disagreements within the administration about how far to go with sanctions, prompting Congress to beef up the U.S. sanctions regime.

Republicans and Democrats in Washington have long opposed the pipeline, which would run from Russia to Germany and significantly increase Western Europe’s dependence on Russia for energy.

“It’s doubling down on gas energy imports from Russia rather than investing in diversification of energy sources — green energy in particular,” Polyakova said. “As long as you get cheap Russian gas, why invest in other energy sources?”

The new pipeline would also be a body blow to Ukraine’s economy, as Russia pays billions of dollars in transit fees on the gas that passes through Ukraine on its way to Europe.

Nord Stream 2’s opponents say it would also reduce Ukraine’s leverage in peace talks with Russia, whose incursions into eastern Ukraine have drawn international condemnation.

Congress approved a slate of mandatory sanctions last year aimed at crippling the pipeline, amid bipartisan concerns about its completion. The Biden administration earlier this year declined to fully impose those sanctions as it works to rebuild the U.S.-Germany relationship, which suffered under Donald Trump. In the meantime, though, Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) has been holding up key State Department nominees in order to pressure the administration to impose the sanctions.

Completion of the pipeline has long been a priority for Berlin, which sees relatively inexpensive Russian natural gas as a way to wean itself off dirtier coal. Biden, meanwhile, has called the pipeline “a bad deal for Europe” and has maintained that the U.S. does not want to see it completed.

Biden’s allies on Capitol Hill have been especially frustrated with his posture on the pipeline, pushing his administration to impose mandatory sanctions on pipe-laying vessels and other entities involved. That includes Nord Stream 2 AG, the company that has been running point on the pipeline’s construction.

Derek Chollet, an adviser to Blinken, is visiting Kyiv this week to seek Ukraine’s support. He’s also stopping in Poland — where the U.S. recently inked an energy security agreement worth billions — to try to quell criticism from elsewhere in the region. The Polish government has called the pipeline a threat to regional energy security, as Reuters has reported.

The Nord Stream 2 pipeline has bedeviled U.S.-Germany relations for years. Nearly complete, the 764-mile long pipeline under the Baltic Sea is seen in Berlin as key to its energy security and in Moscow as a way to expand influence in Europe while filling its coffers. Some, like former top Pentagon official for Ukraine policy Evelyn Farkas, said she would’ve “preferred” the Biden administration “wait for after the elections in Germany” before making this deal.

Merkel, who was in Washington last week, will leave office later this year.

Many in Washington continue to oppose the pipeline over concerns it mainly benefits Russia, and both Democrats and Republicans have urged the Biden administration to block Nord Stream 2’s completion.

That has led to friction. In May, the administration waived congressionally mandated sanctions on the pipeline because they argued such measures would harm U.S.-German relations, earning Biden and his team a strong rebuke from normally friendly political allies.

“The administration has said that the pipeline is a bad idea and that it is a Russian malign influence project,” Sen. Bob Menendez (D-N.J.), chair of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, said at the time. “I share that sentiment, but fail to see how [the waiver] decision will advance U.S. efforts to counter Russian aggression in Europe.”

Meanwhile, Ukraine fears that a completed Nord Stream 2 will minimize its role as a transit nation for energy flowing from Russia into Europe. German officials, meanwhile, have tried unsuccessfully to reassure Kyiv.

“For us, Ukraine is and will remain a transit country even once Nord Stream 2 is completed,” Merkel said last week during a press conference alongside Zelensky in Berlin. “There are big worries about this on the Ukrainian side and we take those seriously,” she continued, adding “the European Union and Germany will see to it that this continues in the future beyond 2024.”

Farkas, the former DoD official, questioned whether haggling over the pipeline with allies and partners was truly the best use of the administration’s time. “This is the craziest deal to be discussed at this time,” she told POLITICO. “There’s no greater crisis than global climate change, so dealing with this kind of retrograde deal is insane.”

America Hernandez in Brussels contributed to this report.

Source Article from https://www.politico.com/news/2021/07/20/us-ukraine-russia-pipeline-500334

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Director Rochelle Walensky told lawmakers Tuesday the delta variant now makes up 83% of cases, up from 50% at the beginning of this month.

“CDC has released estimates of variants across the country and predicted the delta variant now represents 83% of sequenced cases. This is a dramatic increase from — up from 50% for the week of July 3rd,” she testified in a hearing before the Senate Health Committee.

Walensky said the alarming increase was happening the most in unvaccinated areas and that they were “allowing for the emergence and rapid spread of the highly transmissible delta variant.”

“In some parts of the country, the percentage is even higher, particularly in areas of low vaccination rates,” she said.

“To date, our data indicates that vaccines are available to neutralize the circulating variants in the United States and provide protection against severe disease, hospitalization, and death,” she said. “The message from CDC remains clear: the best way to prevent the spread of COVID-19 variants is to prevent the spread of disease and vaccination is the most powerful tool we have.”

And on the subject of whether booster shots — which could offer extra protection against the variant for immunocompromised people — will be recommended, Walensky and Food and Drug Administration acting chief Janet Woodcock said they don’t yet have a timeline on an answer.

They were pushed multiple times by Republicans who argued Israel has already made the call to use boosters.

Sen. Mitt Romney, R-Utah, pressed Woodcock on when boosters might be available to people who are immunocompromised.

A CDC advisory panel is scheduled to discuss on Thursday what the research shows on that point. While no vote is planned, the discussion could pave the way for the FDA to alter its authorization of the vaccines to allow for booster shots for the immunocompromised.

“Why should we not allow people who, who are elderly or have other compromised conditions to be able to get that booster?” Romney asked, noting that Israel was allowing it.

“Certainly, we are looking at all that,” Woodcock responded.

“Remember this vaccine right now — the vaccines are under emergencies use authorization and require an additional authorization for a booster,” she said.

“Well, how long is that going to take? That’s the question,” Romney asked. “We have people who want to get that booster and I’m hearing that from people who are at risk and concerned… Why can’t they?”

Woodcock didn’t answer directly, but noted that Pfizer was submitting data “to potentially make the case” for a booster and that “the FDA will be looking at that.”

Romney responded: “I don’t like the timeframe, frankly, given the fact that this is being done elsewhere.”

Although the nation’s COVID officials would not give a timeline on when Americans will need boosters, they detailed what they’re looking for to make that decision.

Immunity will slowly decrease, not unexpectedly plummet, the top COVID experts said, and when vaccines get around 70-80% efficacy, boosters will be necessary.

“Fortunately, we’re anticipating that this will wane and not plummet so as we see that waning, that will be our time for action,” Walensky said.

Walensky said the CDC is following a handful of groups, including thousands of people in nursing homes, health care workers, and essential workers, testing them weekly. The CDC is also doing lab studies.

Woodcock also said while immunity will wane, it will not “vanish.”

“It’s waning, it isn’t vanished, and that is clear because everybody who’s getting hospitalized is unvaccinated and they’re being exposed to delta variant. So, the fact is the vaccination is holding right now in the U.S.,” Woodcock said.

GOP Sen. Bill Cassidy also pressed Woodcock on a more exact timeline.

Woodcock said there are people who don’t respond to shots in the first place because they are immunocompromised, but for the general population, it needs to be done only when necessary.

“We can’t just boost them all the time, right?” she said. “We need to boost when it’s appropriate.”

Fauci said that if immunity wanes from the current efficacy for mRNA vaccines — the Pfizer and Moderna shots — down to around 70-80% efficacy from 93-94% efficacy — he would expect boosters would be needed.

“We know, according to the clinical trial, take for an example, the mRNA, they are 93 to 94% effective in preventing clinically recognizable disease. If you see a fall below that, into the 80s or even unfortunately — hope it never happens — into the 70s, then you know you’ve reached the point where the durability needs a boost,” Fauci said.

“Those studies are ongoing right now,” he said.

Source Article from https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/delta-variant-now-makes-83-cases-cdc-director/story?id=78943991

Source Article from https://www.cnn.com/2021/07/20/politics/tom-barrack-arrested/index.html

The delta variant first identified in India is now estimated to make up 83% of all sequenced Covid-19 cases in the U.S., the director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention said Tuesday.

“This is a dramatic increase from up from 50%, the week of July 3,” CDC Director Dr. Rochelle Walensky said during a Senate hearing.

The surge in delta cases is leading to more deaths. Covid fatalities have risen by nearly 48% over the past week to an average of 239 per day, she said.

“Each death is tragic and even more heartbreaking when we know that the majority of these deaths could be prevented with a simple, safe, available vaccine,” she said.

Walensky said nearly two-thirds of the counties in the U.S. have vaccinated less than 40% of their residents, “allowing for the emergence and rapid spread of the highly transmissible delta variant.”

The variant is even more contagious than the alpha variant, which was first identified in the U.K. and was estimated by public health officials there to be between 43% and 90% more transmissible than the original Covid-19 strain. Discovered in October, delta has since spread to more than 100 countries, according to World Health Organization data.

“The reason it’s so formidable is the fact that it has the capability of transmitting efficiently from human to human in an extraordinary manner, well beyond any of the other variants that we’ve experienced, up to now,” Dr. Anthony Fauci, the White House’s chief medical advisor, said during the hearing.

This is breaking news. Please check back for updates.

Source Article from https://www.cnbc.com/2021/07/20/delta-variant-now-accounts-for-83percent-of-all-sequenced-covid-cases-in-the-us-cdc-director-walensky-says.html

Overall, the list contained phone numbers for more than 600 government officials and politicians from 34 countries. In addition to the countries where top leaders’ phone numbers appeared were numbers for officials in Afghanistan, Azerbaijan, Bahrain, Bhutan, China, Congo, Egypt, Hungary, India, Iran, Kazakhstan, Kuwait, Mali, Mexico, Nepal, Qatar, Rwanda, Saudi Arabia, Togo, Turkey, the United Arab Emirates, the United Kingdom and the United States.

Source Article from https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2021/07/20/heads-of-state-pegasus-spyware/