California’s Fair Political Practices Commission (FPPC) has opened an investigation into gubernatorial recall candidate Larry Elder’s financial disclosure, a FPPC spokesperson confirmed to The Hill.

The investigation comes after the California Democratic Party filed a complaint against Elder, accusing the Republican of not properly disclosing aspects of his finances and business, following a story reported by the Los Angeles Times earlier this month, according to the news outlet

The FPPC’s investigation into Elder’s campaign financial disclosure was first reported by the Times.

Elder is a leading candidate in next month’s California gubernatorial recall election.

The Times reported over a week ago that it looked like Elder had improperly listed financial disclosures related to Laurence A. Elder & Associates Inc, a business which experts told the news outlet it appeared he owned.

The Times reported that in his Statement of Economic Interests, a public filing which helps note whether there’s any potential ethical concerns, including conflicts of interest, he had not indicated if he owned a stake of that company. He did note that it was a source of income.

An Elder spokeswoman had told the Times that “it appears there might have been an oversight” and his filing was later updated to show that he owned 100 percent of the company. He also updated that the company was valued at between $100,000 and $1 million.

Additionally, the updated filing indicated that Elder had received donations from the Epoch Times and Alachua County (Fla.) Republican Executive Committee, the Times reported.

In a letter to a lawyer representing the California Democratic Party, FPPC said it was looking into the political party’s allegations and added, “You will next receive notification from us upon final disposition of the case. However, please be advised that at this time we have not made any determination about the validity of the allegation(s) your client has made or about the culpability, if any, of the person(s) identified in the complaint.”

In a statement to the Times regarding the investigation, campaign spokesperson for Elder, Ying Ma, said: “We made a simple mistake and we fixed it as soon as possible. These investigations are very common in campaign world.”

If Elder is found in violation of not improper campaign financial disclosure, each penalty costs a maximum of $5,000, according to the Times, which cited the FPPC. 

The Hill has reached out to Elder’s campaign for comment.

Source Article from https://thehill.com/homenews/state-watch/568953-california-launches-investigation-into-leading-recall-candidate-larry

As the US evacuation from Kabul, Afghanistan, continues, Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin moved to activate the Civil Reserve Air Fleet on Sunday for just the third time in its history, calling up commercial aircraft to join the effort to transport evacuees.

The civilian fleet will not fly into Kabul’s airport directly, according to the Pentagon, but will instead be used to ferry evacuees onward “from temporary safe havens and interim staging bases” after they have been airlifted from Kabul.

“Activating CRAF increases passenger movement beyond organic capability and allows military aircraft to focus on operations in and out of Kabul,” the Pentagon said in a statement Sunday.

The Wall Street Journal first reported that CRAF activation was under consideration by the Biden administration.

Currently, military aircraft — massive C-17 Globemaster III and C-130 Hercules planes — are being used to rescue thousands of US citizens, Afghan Special Immigrant Visa recipients, and “other at-risk individuals” from the country following the collapse of the US-backed government there earlier this month and ahead of the US troop withdrawal deadline of August 31.

The US is flying evacuees from Kabul to Doha, Qatar, where the US maintains an air base, and to a number of other countries, both in the region and further away.

“Bahrain, Denmark, Germany, Italy, Kazakhstan, Kuwait, Qatar, Tajikistan, Turkey, the UAE, the United Kingdom, and Uzbekistan have been, or will soon be, transiting Americans or, in some circumstances, others through their territories to safety,” State Department spokesman Ned Price said this week.

Some Afghan refugees have also been evacuated to the US; hundreds arrived in Annandale, Virginia, on Saturday night, and thousands more are expected to arrive in coming weeks.

“We have never seen this kind of increase in people wanting to volunteer,” Jacqueline Buzas, a program supervisor for a Texas refugee aid organization, told the Washington Post as communities in the US prepare to welcome Afghan refugees. “We have people calling to say, ‘I have an extra bedroom.’ Or, ‘I’m retired and have this extra house.’ People understand the human aspects of this, having to flee this life-or-death situation. And they just open the door.”

More than a dozen other countries, including the United Kingdom, France, and Germany, have also evacuated their citizens and Afghan nationals this week, according to Reuters.

The initial CRAF response will consist of 18 aircraft drawn from six different US-based passenger and cargo airlines, according to the Pentagon: American Airlines, Atlas Air, Delta Air Lines, and Omni Air will contribute three planes each, while Hawaiian Airlines will provide two and United Airlines four.

Capt. John Perkins, a spokesperson for the US Transportation Command, told the New York Times on Sunday that CRAF aircraft would begin operating on either Monday or Tuesday. In a Sunday statement, American Airlines said its aircraft would be “ready to deploy” by Monday.

“American is part of the CRAF program and is proud to fulfill its duty to help the U.S. military scale this humanitarian and diplomatic rescue mission,” the company said. “The images from Afghanistan are heartbreaking. The airline is proud and grateful of our pilots and flight attendants, who will be operating these trips to be a part of this life-saving effort.”

Previously, CRAF aircraft have been activated to assist US forces as part of Operations Desert Shield/Storm and Operation Iraqi Freedom, the Pentagon said. The program itself was established in 1951 by the Defense and Commerce departments in response to the Berlin airlift.

The decision to enlist civilian aircraft in the evacuation comes after a hectic week; Kabul fell to Taliban forces on August 15, and the US has deployed thousands of troops back into the country to help stabilize the airlift operation from Kabul’s Hamid Karzai International Airport.

As of Saturday, according to Maj. Gen. Hank Taylor, the US has about 5,800 troops on the ground and the airport “remains secure” as evacuation flights continue.

“In the last 24 hours, six US military C-17s and 32 charters departed Kabul,” Taylor said Saturday. “Through this combined effort, the total passenger count for those flights was approximately 3,800.”

At one point earlier in the week, a single US C-17 also evacuated 823 Afghans, including 183 children, setting an aircraft record for C-17s in the process.

According to Defense One, which first reported the story,

The C-17, using the call sign Reach 871, was not intending to take on such a large load, but panicked Afghans who had been cleared to evacuate pulled themselves onto the C-17’s half-open ramp, one defense official said.

Instead of trying to force those refugees off the aircraft, “the crew made the decision to go,” a defense official told Defense One.

Within the last 24 hours, Secretary of State Antony Blinken said on Sunday, the US and coalition partners have evacuated almost “8,000 people on about 60 flights.” Since last Saturday, according to the White House, more than 25,000 people have been evacuated between US and coalition flights.

However, there are tens of thousands more people who still need help: In a Wednesday interview, President Joe Biden told ABC News’s George Stephanopoulos that his administration estimated there were still between 50,000 and 65,000 Afghan allies of the US to be evacuated, including families.

“The threat is real”

As airlift efforts by US and coalition forces continue, safety concerns remain front of mind. In addition to a Taliban presence surrounding the Kabul airport, US officials have signaled that they are increasingly concerned about the possibility of an ISIS attack on the airport.

According to CNN, the Pentagon is worried that dense crowds around Kabul’s airport could become a target for ISIS or another terrorist group, using mortars, car bombs, or suicide bombers.

US concerns center specifically on a branch of ISIS, called ISIS-K or Islamic State Khorasan, that operates in Afghanistan and Pakistan, one US defense official told CNN. According to Biden, ISIS-K is a “sworn enemy” of the Taliban.

“The [ISIS] threat is real. It is acute. It is persistent. And it is something we’re focused on with every tool in our arsenal,” White House national security adviser Jake Sullivan told CNN on Sunday.

In response to the threat, the US began warning US citizens away from the airport on Saturday until directed otherwise.

“Because of potential security threats outside the gates at the Kabul airport, we are advising U.S. citizens to avoid traveling to the airport and to avoid airport gates at this time unless you receive individual instructions from a U.S. government representative to do so,” the US embassy in Afghanistan said in a security alert.

However, evacuations are continuing, Taylor said Saturday, with US commanders “metering how many people come in and out of the gate to ensure the [safety] and ability to screen applicants as they come.”

Desperate conditions at the Kabul airport

In addition to potential terror threats, conditions on the ground outside the Kabul airport remain chaotic, and at times deadly. At least seven people were killed in a stampede near the airport on Saturday, according to CNN correspondent Sam Kiley, and Austin told US lawmakers Friday that “some people, including Americans, have been harassed and even beaten by the Taliban.”

Harrowing personal stories — such as a baby who was lifted over razor wire by US Marines before being reunited with his father, or an Afghan interpreter for US special forces who finally made it to safety inside the airport after being beaten by the Taliban — have also emerged during the week.

At points, US helicopters have been used to retrieve US citizens and Afghans in Kabul. According to the AP, a trio of Chinook helicopters flew 169 Americans from a nearby hotel to the airport because of safety concerns over traveling through a large crowd, while another helicopter ferried 96 Afghans to the airport for evacuation.

However, the US embassy in Kabul has warned “the U.S. government cannot ensure safe passage to the airport” — and some US flights have left the airport “nearly half empty,” according to the Pentagon, while the AP reports that one Belgian plane “took off empty because the people who were supposed to be aboard couldn’t get in.”

All told, there are believed to be anywhere from “several thousand” to 15,000 Americans still in Afghanistan, though the exact number remains unclear, and there are many thousands more Afghans hoping to escape the country.

As Vox’s Li Zhou reported earlier this week,

Already, roughly 88,000 Afghans are estimated to have applied for special immigrant visas (SIVs), an immigration channel open to individuals who worked with the US government as well as their family members. In addition to people pursuing SIVs, other Afghan residents are expected to apply for refugee status if they’re able to do so.

Earlier this week, the Pentagon announced that the US intends to resettle 22,000 Afghan SIV applicants in the coming weeks, though the number of people trying to leave is expected to be much larger.

Delays in the visa process, however — an issue that lawmakers and advocates raised well before the Taliban takeover this month — have also hindered evacuation efforts from the Kabul airport in some cases, with Afghan allies of the US stuck in a bureaucratic backlog.

“The past week has been heartbreaking,” Biden said in a Friday speech on the status of the US evacuation effort. “We’ve seen gut-wrenching images of panicked people acting out of sheer desperation. You know, it’s completely understandable. They’re frightened. They’re sad — uncertain what happens next.”

“I don’t think anyone — I don’t think any one of us can see those pictures and not feel that pain on a human level,” he said.

A looming deadline

As US and coalition evacuation efforts enter their second week after the fall of Kabul, the Biden administration is also facing down a deadline: August 31, the date Biden set in July to conclude the US military mission in Afghanistan.

On Wednesday, Biden told ABC that while the US is “gonna try to get it done before August 31,” it also won’t leave US citizens behind.

“If there’s American citizens left, we’re gonna stay to get them all out,” Biden said.

That could come with its own set of complications, however, including the need for the US to revisit its current arrangement with the Taliban, which ostensibly allows evacuations to go ahead without interference.

As of Thursday, Pentagon spokesperson John Kirby told reporters that “there has been no decision to change the deadline, and we are focused on doing everything we can inside that deadline to move as many people out as possible.

“If and when there’s a decision to change that, then obviously that would require additional conversations with the Taliban, as well,” he said, “but I don’t believe that those conversations have happened at this point.”

Biden administration officials have also expressed optimism that Sunday’s CRAF activation — as well as “agreements with more than two dozen countries on four continents” — can help expedite the evacuation process going forward, with Afghan immigrants going through background and security checks at various “staging points” outside of the US.

“We need more planes in the mix to do that piece of it, to move them from these initial points of landing on to places that they’ll ultimately resettle,” Blinken told CBS on Sunday.

Source Article from https://www.vox.com/2021/8/22/22636498/pentagon-afghan-airlift-evacuation-american-kabul-taliban

Both polls show declines in views of Biden, whose presidency has been besieged by twin crises in recent weeks: a resurgence of the coronavirus domestically, and the rocky withdrawal of U.S. military personnel and other Americans from Afghanistan ahead of Biden’s looming deadline. Biden’s approval rating slid 8 points in the CBS poll since July, and it’s down 4 points since the last NBC News survey, in April.

The two surveys are consistent with other polls indicating the strong approval ratings with which Biden entered the Oval Office have waned. The latest RealClearPolitics average pegs Biden’s approval rating and disapproval rating at the same number: 48 percent. And while the FiveThirtyEight average — which adjusts numbers from polling firms with histories of bias — is more positive for Biden (49 percent approval), Biden’s average disapproval rating of 46 percent is higher than at any point in his young presidency.

Despite the recent decline, Biden’s approval ratings remain higher than his predecessor’s: In four years, former President Donald Trump’s approval rating never hit 48 percent in the RealClearPolitics average, while his disapproval rating remained at 50 percent or greater from the two-month mark of his presidency until he left office this past January.

But Biden’s slide is troubling news for Democrats, who have only narrow majorities in Congress that are increasingly imperiled in next year’s midterm elections.

Despite a week of negative headlines about the faster-than-expected fall of the U.S.-supported Afghan government, Biden’s weakening appears driven more by events closer to home, namely the sharp increase in Covid-19 cases after months of optimism following the nation’s vaccination program.

In the NBC News poll, 53 percent of respondents approve of the way Biden is handling the coronavirus, down sharply from 69 percent in April. Jeff Horwitt, a Democratic pollster who is part of the bipartisan team that conducts surveys for the network, blamed “the domestic storm, Covid’s delta wave, that is causing more difficulties at this stage here at home and for President Biden,” in an interview with NBC News.

Meanwhile, while few respondents think the U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan is going well, most Americans still support bringing troops home. In the CBS News survey, 63 percent approve of the U.S. withdrawing troops, while only 37 percent disapprove.

The CBS News poll was conducted online by YouGov from Aug. 18-20, surveying 2,142 adults. The margin of error is plus or minus 2.3 percentage points.

The NBC News poll was conducted Aug. 14-17 by telephone, surveying 1,000 adults. It has a margin of error of plus or minus 3.1 percentage points.

Source Article from https://www.politico.com/news/2021/08/22/polls-biden-approval-ratings-506529

  • Gaetz and Luckey met in March 2020 at the Mar-a-Lago Club in Palm Beach, Florida, Luckey told the Daily Mail.
  • Gaetz is currently under federal investigation for sex crimes across multiple states.
  • Former Rand Paul staffer Sergio Gor officiated the ceremony. 

US Rep. Matt Gaetz announced on Twitter that he and Ginger Luckey eloped to Southern California over the weekend, sharing a picture of the pair with the caption, “I love my wife!”

Luckey, 26, works as an analyst for biotech company Apeel Sciences and is the sister of Palmer Luckey, founder of Facebook-acquired Oculus VR, who supported and hosted fundraisers for former President Donald Trump. She met Gaetz in March 2020 at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago Club in Palm Beach, Florida, where they eventually got engaged 10 months later, Luckey told the Daily Mail.

Following a few campaign stops in the Midwest with US Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, Gaetz and Luckey tied the knot in a small ceremony on Catalina Island, just 22 miles off the coast of Southern California, Vanity Fair reported.

Only a few dozen attended, including former Rand Paul staffer Sergio Gor, who was both the officiant and DJ. Other attendees included Palmer Luckey and his wife, “Bannon’s War Room” hosts Raheem Kassam and Natalie Winters, and Nestor Galban, Gaetz’s adopted son, according to Vanity Fair.

Gaetz, a Republican who has represented Florida’s 1st Congressional District since 2017, is currently being investigated as part of a sex trafficking probe alongside his former right-hand man, Joel Greenberg. The New York Times reported that the inquiry is focusing on their interactions with “multiple women who were recruited online for sex and received cash payments” across multiple states.

Greenberg was indicted on 33 criminal counts and struck a plea deal in May, pleading guilty to six felony counts of sex trafficking, wire fraud, identity theft, conspiracy, and stalking.

Gaetz has denied any wrongdoing and has not been charged with a crime.

 

Source Article from https://www.businessinsider.com/matt-gaetz-ginger-luckey-elope-california-married-catalina-island-2021-8

A CNN panel blasted President Biden for what they called misleading messaging on the current crisis in Afghanistan.

“There’s a serious disconnect between the messaging from the Biden administration, which is essentially, ‘We’ve got this, we have a plan, we’re getting this under control. If you want to get out of Afghanistan, you can,'” the Associated Press’ Julie Pace said on Sunday’s “Inside Politics.” “And then what we’re seeing on the ground from really brave reporters who are there, from a lot of Afghan civilians who are sharing pictures of images of the scene outside the airport where, no, you cannot get out if you want to get out.” 

Since the withdrawal of U.S. troops from Afghanistan, the Taliban have regained control of major parts of the country. Stunning images have captured Afghans desperately clinging to U.S. airplanes in attempts to flee the extremist group.

TONY BLAIR SAYS BIDEN’S AFGHANISTAN ‘ABANDONMENT’ IS ‘TRAGIC, DANGEROUS, UNNECESSARY’

Pace rejected any suggestion from the White House the situation in Kabul is stable.

“It’s very difficult to get through,” she added. “We see again today that there is violence, chaos outside the gates of the airport. And so I think the onus is on the Biden administration to do two things: One, to actually get that situation under control and then two, to be upfront with the American people about what’s going on. They can see it with their own eyes at this point.”

BIDEN PLEDGE TO RENEW AMERICA’S STANDING AROUND WORLD IN PERIL AS AFGHANISTAN DEBACLE SPARKS OUTRAGE

CNN’s chief national affairs correspondent Jeff Zeleny agreed the Biden White House’s messaging on the crisis was “bizarre,” taking particular issue with the president’s response to a question about whether allies around the world had lost confidence in the U.S. following Biden’s bungled response. 

“I have seen no question of our credibility from our allies around the world,” Biden claimed on Friday.

But his answer came on the heels of German Chancellor Angela Merkel calling the rapid withdrawal an “absolutely bitter development,” and British Prime Minister Boris Johnson admitting it was “fair to say” the U.S. decision to withdraw troops “accelerated” the Taliban’s takeover of Afghanistan. Since Biden’s press conference, former British Prime Minister Tony Blair criticized the president for what he called an “abandonment” of Afghanistan.

“The world is now uncertain of where the West stands because it is so obvious that the decision to withdraw from Afghanistan in this way was driven not by grand strategy but by politics,” Blair wrote in an essay published on the website of the Tony Blair Institute for Global Change. 

“You have to question, is the president insulated, isolated?” Zeleny asked on CNN. “On Friday it was almost bizarre. What he was saying did not match the reality of what some of his other advisers were saying.”

“I think this will be a very defining moment in the Biden presidency about what we learn of him as president, but it seems to me he’s a bit insulated or isolated inside the White House,” Zeleny continued.

The president, Zeleny said, may have “empathy” for the situation in Afghanistan, but has been unable to focus on the task at hand and has oftentimes been too defensive.

Biden has also appeared to mislead the American people on the presence of al Qaeda in Afghanistan, and whether Americans are having problems getting through Taliban checkpoints. CNN’s Brianna Keilar pressed national security adviser Jake Sullivan on why Biden was “misleading with his words” on those two points. Sullivan said he “rejected” her characterization, insisting that U.S. intelligence has shown al Qaeda in Afghanistan does not currently represent a threat to the United States homeland.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Military planes are still evacuating Afghans and American citizens from Kabul. Fox News foreign correspondent Trey Yingst reported live from the airport Sunday, noting that while the situation may not seem as chaotic as it was a few days ago, the calm is “simply temporary.” 

Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/media/cnn-panel-notes-serious-disconnect-from-bidens-messaging-and-reality

In an effort to speed the evacuation, Defense Secretary Lloyd J. Austin III ordered six commercial airlines to provide passenger jets to help with the growing U.S. military operation evacuating Americans and Afghan allies from Kabul, the Afghan capital, the Pentagon said on Sunday.

Mr. Austin activated Stage 1 of the Civil Reserve Air Fleet, created in 1952 after the Berlin airlift, to provide airliners to help ferry passengers arriving at bases in the Middle East from Afghanistan, John F. Kirby, the Pentagon spokesman, said in a statement.

The current activation is for 18 planes: four from United Airlines; three each from American Airlines, Atlas Air, Delta Air Lines and Omni Air; and two from Hawaiian Airlines. The civilian planes will not fly into or out of Kabul, where a rapidly deteriorating security situation has hampered evacuation flights.

At Kabul airport, the presence of Taliban fighters around the perimeter mingling with British and other Western forces created an impression “like a very strange dream,” Ms. Ferguson said. It underscored how, in a moment, with scarcely a shot fired, Afghanistan was lost, the Taliban entered Kabul and the white flag of the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan was hoisted.

Still, resistance remains among the Afghan leaders who have taken refuge in the Panjshir Valley, a rugged gorge where Afghan fighters resisted the Taliban for years during Afghanistan’s civil war in the 1990s. Former Afghan officials put the number of fighters holed up today in the Panjshir at 2,000 to 2,500 men, but they are isolated and lack logistical support.

A former first vice president, Amrullah Saleh, who is based there, now claims to be the “caretaker president” under Afghanistan’s U.S.-brokered Constitution of 2004, because President Ghani has fled the country. The Panjshiris have said they intend to resist a takeover of the valley unless the Taliban agree to an inclusive government.

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2021/08/22/world/asia/afghanistan-taliban-biden-karzai.html

HARTFORD, CT (WFSB) – Tropical Storm Henri made landfall during the early afternoon hours of Sunday.

While the worst of the storm has passed, the state will still be seeing the effects of Henri into Monday.

Track any showers associated with Henri on Monday with the Early Warning Pinpoint Doppler:

The updated track from the National Hurricane Center has Henri centered within 20 miles of Hartford.

It later weakened to a tropical depression as moved inland.



“Henri continues to weaken, and now has maximum sustained winds of 40 mph,” Chief Meteorologist Bruce DePrest said.

The tropical storm warning for Connecticut has since expired.

A storm surge warning was in effect for the coastline, but has expired.

A flood watch is in place statewide.



Winds could still gust to over 30 mph going into Sunday evening, but DePrest said the risk for additional power outages is greatly reduced.

“While there will still be some rain, the tropical downpours have moved out of the state for now,” DePrest said.

The entire state can expect a baseline of 1 inch of rain through Sunday night. Areas near the core of the system in Litchfield, Hartford, and Tolland Counties will be areas expected to get closer to 2 inches of rain. Those areas will also get a reprieve in the rain as the eye of the storm crosses.

Landfall happened around 12:15 p.m. near Westerly, RI.

As of 8:55 p.m., Eversource reported 19,776 outages. United Illuminating reported 4.

“Since the circulation associated with Henri will move slowly, there will be additional showers and a few thunderstorms tonight and tomorrow,” DePrest said.

Though considerably downgraded by Monday, many forecast models show it making a loop over the lower Hudson Valley before scooting back across southern New England.

“Provided this, there will be some ongoing flash floods and coastal flooding concerns,” Meteorologist Mark Dixon said. “Parts of the state could see another soaking of rain, on top of what falls [Sunday]. So additional flash flooding could occur.”

Widespread light rain and isolated thunderstorms are also possible on Monday.

Temperatures should be in the upper 70s.

Read the complete technical discussion here.

For weather updates on smartphones and tablets, head here or text “WFSB” to 23765 to download the Channel 3 app.



Source Article from https://www.wfsb.com/news/tropical-storm-warning-dropped-as-parts-of-ct-still-seeing-rain/article_2a62a776-019d-11ec-99e0-132fb9f54ab2.html

“What I’m not going to do is talk about the tactical changes we’re making to make sure we maintain as much security as we can,” he said. “We have constantly — how can I say it — increased rational access to the airport where more folk can get there more safely. It’s still a dangerous operation, but I don’t want to go into the detail while we’re doing that.”

The president said the Taliban has “been cooperative in extending some of the perimeter.“

Biden also touched on his administration’s ramped-up efforts to get civilians out of Afghanistan, saying 28,000 people had been evacuated since Aug. 14, and went into detail on the activation of the Civil Reserve Air Fleet, which asks U.S. airlines and charter carriers to assist with the evacuation efforts.

In a turn from his hard-line rhetoric on the topic over the past week, the president took a more empathetic stance toward the situation in his speech on Sunday. But he also reiterated that he still stood behind his decision to go forward with the withdrawal, since “the evacuation of thousands of people from Kabul is going to be hard and painful, no matter when it started, when we began.”

“There is no way to evacuate this many people without pain and loss of heartbreaking images you see on television,” Biden said. “It’s just a fact. My heart aches for those people you see.”

He added that although the U.S. military evacuated about 11,000 people out of Kabul in less than 36 hours over the weekend and that “we see no reason why this tempo will not be kept up,” there was still “a long way to go” and “a lot could still go wrong.”

Biden said that while he was hoping to meet his self-imposed Aug. 31 deadline for pulling all troops out of Afghanistan, his administration was in talks with the military about possibly extending it to continue the safe evacuation of U.S. citizens and Afghan allies.

On whether the Taliban would agree to an extension, Biden said, “That remains to be seen whether we ask that question.”

Source Article from https://www.politico.com/news/2021/08/22/biden-extends-perimeter-kabul-airport-506537

HARTFORD, CT (WFSB) – Tropical Storm Henri made landfall during the early afternoon hours of Sunday.

While the worst of the storm has passed, the state will still be seeing the effects of Henri into Monday.

Track any showers associated with Henri on Monday with the Early Warning Pinpoint Doppler:

The 5 p.m. updated track from the National Hurricane Center has Henri centered within 20 miles of Hartford.



“Henri continues to weaken, and now has maximum sustained winds of 40 mph,” Chief Meteorologist Bruce DePrest said.

The tropical storm warning for Connecticut has since expired.

A storm surge warning was in effect for the coastline, but has expired.

A flood watch is in place statewide.



Winds could still gust to over 30 mph going into Sunday evening, but DePrest said the risk for additional power outages is greatly reduced.

“While there will still be some rain, the tropical downpours have moved out of the state for now,” DePrest said.

The entire state can expect a baseline of 1 inch of rain through Sunday night. Areas near the core of the system in Litchfield, Hartford, and Tolland Counties will be areas expected to get closer to 2 inches of rain. Those areas will also get a reprieve in the rain as the eye of the storm crosses.

Landfall happened around 12:15 p.m. near Westerly, RI.

As of 6:30 p.m., Eversource reported 25,000 outages. United Illuminating reported 10.

“Since the circulation associated with Henri will move slowly, there will be additional showers and a few thunderstorms tonight and tomorrow,” DePrest said.

Though considerably downgraded by Monday, many forecast models show it making a loop over the lower Hudson Valley before scooting back across southern New England.

“Provided this, there will be some ongoing flash floods and coastal flooding concerns,” Meteorologist Mark Dixon said. “Parts of the state could see another soaking of rain, on top of what falls [Sunday]. So additional flash flooding could occur.”

Widespread light rain and isolated thunderstorms are also possible on Monday.

Temperatures should be in the upper 70s.

Read the complete technical discussion here.

For weather updates on smartphones and tablets, head here or text “WFSB” to 23765 to download the Channel 3 app.



Source Article from https://www.wfsb.com/news/tropical-storm-warning-dropped-as-parts-of-ct-still-seeing-rain/article_2a62a776-019d-11ec-99e0-132fb9f54ab2.html

Along the main street, volunteers handed out warm meals, bottled water and supplies. Churches had been converted into shelters. Some residents were steeling themselves to go back into their homes, uncertain of where to begin.

“It smells like death,” Ms. Burns, 43, said, describing the stench that assaulted her as soon as she stepped inside her house. “It’s a struggle.”

Richard Wheeler, a retired firefighter, said he had been out running errands on Saturday morning. He returned to discover his home was in the middle of the road. He recalled past floods, including one that had water flowing underneath his home.

“This is worse than any of them,” he said. “This is the worst one.”

As he stood on the front steps of Waverly Church of Christ, one man slipped him a rolled-up $20 bill and a woman in a pink dress and clutching her Bible invited him to stay at her home. He said he was staying with his daughter who lives in a town about 10 miles away.

“When it rains, it pours,” the woman told him, “and it’s raining on you.”

After she walked off, he choked up. He lived on his own. He was already being assured of what he figured would be the case: His neighbors would take care of him. “This is a very God-loving county,” he said.

Mr. Larkin, 62, sat on the ground, his back leaning against the church hall’s brick wall, holding a Capri Sun and a cigarette. He was exhausted. He was also physically sore from being whipped around by the choppy water.

Still, he said that he was grateful, repeating again and again how thankful he was for the rescuers that collected him, his wife and his 11-year-old cat. That gratitude, at the moment, superseded any sadness over being stranded with only the clothes he had on. For now, Mr. Larkin and his wife were staying in the shelter and hoping to get into a motel.

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2021/08/22/us/tennessee-flash-flooding.html

California regulators have launched an investigation into whether recall election gubernatorial candidate Larry Elder failed to properly disclose his income sources, a spokesman with the Fair Political Practices Commission confirmed on Sunday.

Elder, like all candidates for public office, was required to file a public statement of economic interests that discloses some aspects of his personal finances, including stocks, gifts, real estate that he owns and sources of income. The document is supposed to show the public whether a candidate for office would have conflicts of interest in his or her decisions.

Elder’s initial filing was only two pages long and only showed income from Laurence A. Elder and Associates Inc. A Times article earlier this month first reported that Elder likely failed to properly disclose his finances because he appeared to own the company, meaning he was also required to report ownership in the business as well as income sources to the company above certain amounts.

After the Times story, the California Democratic Party filed a complaint with the Fair Political Practices Commission alleging that Elder failed to properly disclose the business and its sources of income. Elder, a conservative radio show host, amended the document to show that Elder owned 100% of the company and that it is worth between $100,000 and $1 million. His exact wealth is difficult to determine because the state requires disclosure in broad dollar ranges.

Elder is the leading contender vying to replace Gov. Gavin Newsom in the Sept. 14 recall election. Ying Ma, an Elder campaign spokesperson, emailed The Times the following statement about the investigation: “We made a simple mistake and we fixed it as soon as possible. These investigations are very common in campaign world.”

Failure to comply with the disclosure requirements carries an administrative penalty of up to $5,000 per violation, according to the state Fair Political Practices Commission.

An FPPC letter sent to an attorney for the complainant said that although the watchdog agency had opened an investigation, it had “not made any determination about the validity of the allegation(s) your client has made about the culpability, if any, of the person(s) identified in the complaint.”

The amended document, filed Tuesday, showed that Elder collected at least $10,000 from several conservative organizations, including the Alachua County (Fla.) Republican Executive Committee and Epoch Times, a far-right newspaper affiliated with the Falun Gong new religious movement.

Elder also disclosed income from the anti-abortion nonprofit Heartbeatat22, Calvary Chapel Chino Hills, Promedev Relief Factor, a supplement that Elder has endorsed, BLEXIT, the conservative nonprofit Turning Point USA, and Salem Media Group, the media company that syndicates his national radio show.

This is not the first time Elder has run into disclosure problems. The office of the California secretary of state initially excluded him from the recall election ballot because he did not properly disclose five years of tax returns to the agency, according to court filings. Elder sued the state over that requirement, arguing in part that it did not apply to recall elections. A judge last month sided with Elder, and the tax return requirement was waived for all candidates in the race.

Source Article from https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2021-08-22/state-officials-investigation-larry-elder-disclose-income-sources

A CNN panel blasted President Biden for what they called misleading messaging on the current crisis in Afghanistan.

“There’s a serious disconnect between the messaging from the Biden administration, which is essentially, ‘We’ve got this, we have a plan, we’re getting this under control. If you want to get out of Afghanistan, you can,'” the Associated Press’ Julie Pace said on Sunday’s “Inside Politics.” “And then what we’re seeing on the ground from really brave reporters who are there, from a lot of Afghan civilians who are sharing pictures of images of the scene outside the airport where, no, you cannot get out if you want to get out.” 

Since the withdrawal of U.S. troops from Afghanistan, the Taliban have regained control of major parts of the country. Stunning images have captured Afghans desperately clinging to U.S. airplanes in attempts to flee the extremist group.

TONY BLAIR SAYS BIDEN’S AFGHANISTAN ‘ABANDONMENT’ IS ‘TRAGIC, DANGEROUS, UNNECESSARY’

Pace rejected any suggestion from the White House the situation in Kabul is stable.

“It’s very difficult to get through,” she added. “We see again today that there is violence, chaos outside the gates of the airport. And so I think the onus is on the Biden administration to do two things: One, to actually get that situation under control and then two, to be upfront with the American people about what’s going on. They can see it with their own eyes at this point.”

BIDEN PLEDGE TO RENEW AMERICA’S STANDING AROUND WORLD IN PERIL AS AFGHANISTAN DEBACLE SPARKS OUTRAGE

CNN’s chief national affairs correspondent Jeff Zeleny agreed the Biden White House’s messaging on the crisis was “bizarre,” taking particular issue with the president’s response to a question about whether allies around the world had lost confidence in the U.S. following Biden’s bungled response. 

“I have seen no question of our credibility from our allies around the world,” Biden claimed on Friday.

But his answer came on the heels of German Chancellor Angela Merkel calling the rapid withdrawal an “absolutely bitter development,” and British Prime Minister Boris Johnson admitting it was “fair to say” the U.S. decision to withdraw troops “accelerated” the Taliban’s takeover of Afghanistan. Since Biden’s press conference, former British Prime Minister Tony Blair criticized the president for what he called an “abandonment” of Afghanistan.

“The world is now uncertain of where the West stands because it is so obvious that the decision to withdraw from Afghanistan in this way was driven not by grand strategy but by politics,” Blair wrote in an essay published on the website of the Tony Blair Institute for Global Change. 

“You have to question, is the president insulated, isolated?” Zeleny asked on CNN. “On Friday it was almost bizarre. What he was saying did not match the reality of what some of his other advisers were saying.”

“I think this will be a very defining moment in the Biden presidency about what we learn of him as president, but it seems to me he’s a bit insulated or isolated inside the White House,” Zeleny continued.

The president, Zeleny said, may have “empathy” for the situation in Afghanistan, but has been unable to focus on the task at hand and has oftentimes been too defensive.

Biden has also appeared to mislead the American people on the presence of al Qaeda in Afghanistan, and whether Americans are having problems getting through Taliban checkpoints. CNN’s Brianna Keilar pressed national security adviser Jake Sullivan on why Biden was “misleading with his words” on those two points. Sullivan said he “rejected” her characterization, insisting that U.S. intelligence has shown al Qaeda in Afghanistan does not currently represent a threat to the United States homeland.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Military planes are still evacuating Afghans and American citizens from Kabul. Fox News foreign correspondent Trey Yingst reported live from the airport Sunday, noting that while the situation may not seem as chaotic as it was a few days ago, the calm is “simply temporary.” 

Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/media/cnn-panel-notes-serious-disconnect-from-bidens-messaging-and-reality

By James Mackenzie

(Reuters) -Ahmad Massoud, leader of Afghanistan’s last major outpost of anti-Taliban resistance, said on Sunday he hoped to hold peaceful talks with the Islamist movement that seized power in Kabul a week ago but that his forces were ready to fight.

“We want to make the Taliban realise that the only way forward is through negotiation,” he told Reuters by telephone from his stronghold in the Panjshir valley northwest of Kabul, where he has gathered forces made up of remnants of regular army units and special forces as well as local militia fighters.

“We do not want a war to break out.”

The comments came as a statement on the Taliban’s Alemarah Twitter feed said hundreds of fighters were heading towards Panjshir “after local state officials refused to hand it over peacefully”. A short video showed a column of captured trucks with the white Taliban flag but still bearing their government markings moving along a highway.

Massoud, son of Ahmad Shah Massoud, one of the main leaders of Afghanistan’s anti-Soviet resistance in the 1980s, said his supporters were ready to fight if Taliban forces tried to invade the valley.

“They want to defend, they want to fight, they want to resist against any totalitarian regime.”

However there was some uncertainty about whether the operation by Taliban forces had begun or not. A Taliban official said an offensive had been launched on Panjshir. But an aide to Massoud said there were no signs that the column had actually entered the narrow pass into the valley and there had been no reports of fighting.

In the only confirmed fighting since the fall of Kabul on Sunday, anti-Taliban forces took back three districts in the northern province of Baghlan, bordering Panjshir last week. However Massoud he said he had not organised the operation which he said had been carried out by local militia groups reacting to “brutality” in the area.

Massoud called for an inclusive, broad-based government in Kabul representing all of Afghanistan’s different ethnic groups and said a “totalitarian regime” should not be recognised by the international community.

The wreckage of Soviet armoured vehicles that still dot the valley show how hard Panjshir has been to defeat in the past. But many outside observers have questioned whether Massoud’s forces will be able to resist for long without outside support.

He said his forces, which one aide said numbered more than 6,000, would need international support if it came to fighting. But he said they did not just come from Panjshir, a region of Persian-speaking Tajiks long at odds with the Pashtuns who form the core of the Taliban movement.

“There are many other people from many other provinces who are seeking refuge in the Panjshir valley who are standing with us and who do not want to accept another identity for Afghanistan,” he said.

(Additional reporting by Ahmad Elhamy in Cairo; Gibran Peshimam in IslamabadEditing by Giles Elgood and Frances Kerry)

Source Article from https://news.yahoo.com/anti-taliban-leader-massoud-says-155041447.html

BOSTON (CBS) – Henri made landfall as a powerful tropical storm Sunday afternoon in Westerly, Rhode Island. This is the first tropical storm to make landfall in New England since Beryl in 2006.

(WBZ-TV Graphic)

As expected, Henri was downgraded from a category 1 hurricane to a tropical storm Sunday morning as it encountered cooler ocean water and began to slow down its forward speed. As mentioned Saturday, this is NOT a reason to let your guard down or take the storm less seriously, it is simply a drop in 5-10 mph of maximum sustained wind speed.

TRACK OF HENRI

After landing in Rhode Island, it will head northwest, inland through Connecticut and western Massachusetts. By Sunday night, what is left of Henri will be somewhere near the New York border in western New England.

The remnants will slowly degrade and spin around in that area for a good part of Monday before finally getting picked up and pushed eastward Monday night. Finally, by Tuesday morning, the system will move offshore and out to sea.

RAINFALL

The heaviest rainfall will be to the west of the track, which is typical of a tropical system. This puts portions of Central Massachusetts and more so Western Massachusetts and Connecticut in the crosshairs for a long period of very heavy rain.

Rain totals in those areas are likely to be in the 3-6 inches range with some higher amounts possible. From Worcester County eastward, the rain will be more in bands and waves, stopping and starting through Sunday evening.

Parts of eastern MA could receive an inch or two of rain, not likely enough for any massive flooding issues, but some localized flooding is possible. We get a lull in the rainfall locally Sunday night into early Monday before the downpours return later on Monday as the remnants of Henri swing back through.

This could actually be the time period when central/eastern Massachusetts receive their greatest rainfall.

WINDS

Winds will be strongest and most damaging Sunday. Expect frequent gusts from 40-65 mph along the South Coast, Cape and Islands and into parts of southeastern Massachusetts and Rhode Island as well. Some isolated locations near the South Coast could get gusts as high as 70-75 mph.  Expect numerous downed trees and power outages in this high wind zone.

(WBZ-TV Graphic)

Further inland, including areas north and west of Boston, the winds won’t be as strong, gusting 30-50 mph at times. This is still enough to produce some tree damage and power outages.

As the storm pulls off to the north and west this evening and also continues to weaken, the winds will gradually ramp down, below damaging levels.

COASTAL ISSUES

East coast beaches have a midday high tide, while most south coastal beaches in the Narragansett/Buzzards Bay area have an earlier high tide, just before 9 a.m. Expect local storm surges as high as 2-3 feet, enough to wash out some coastal roads for a period of time later Sunday morning through early Sunday afternoon.

(WBZ-TV Graphic)

Sunday night’s high tide will likely be less impactful with Henri well inland, although seas will remain rough so some minor flooding/splashover is likely.

As always, we urge that you stay tuned to WBZ-TV, CBSBoston and CBSN Boston for important updates leading up to and during the storm.

Source Article from https://boston.cbslocal.com/2021/08/22/tropical-storm-henri-path-hurricane-watch-storm-boston-weather-forecast-westerly-rhode-island-landfall/

BOSTON (CBS) – Henri is on track to make landfall as a powerful tropical storm midday Sunday along the South Coast of Rhode Island.

(WBZ-TV Graphic)

As expected, the storm was downgraded from a category 1 hurricane to a tropical storm this morning as it encountered cooler ocean water and began to slow down its forward speed. As mentioned Saturday, this is NOT a reason to let your guard down or take the storm less seriously, it is simply a drop in 5-10 mph of maximum sustained wind speed.

TRACK OF HENRI

Again, Henri will make landfall midday Sunday along the South Coast of Rhode Island. From there, it will head northwest, inland through Rhode Island, Connecticut and Western Massachusetts. By Sunday night, what is left of Henri will be somewhere near the New York border in western New England.

The remnants will slowly degrade and spin around in that area for a good part of Monday before finally getting picked up and pushed eastward Monday night. Finally, by Tuesday morning, the system will move offshore and out to sea.

RAINFALL

The heaviest rainfall will be to the west of the track, which is typical of a tropical system. This puts portions of Central Massachusetts and more so Western Massachusetts and Connecticut in the crosshairs for a long period of very heavy rain.

Rain totals in those areas are likely to be in the 3-6 inches range with some higher amounts possible. From Worcester County eastward, the rain will be more in bands and waves, stopping and starting through Sunday evening.

Parts of eastern MA could receive an inch or two of rain, not likely enough for any massive flooding issues, but some localized flooding is possible. We get a lull in the rainfall locally Sunday night into early Monday before the downpours return later on Monday as the remnants of Henri swing back through.

This could actually be the time period when central/eastern Massachusetts receive their greatest rainfall.

WINDS

Winds will be strongest and most damaging Sunday morning and afternoon. Expect frequent gusts from 40-65 mph along the South Coast, Cape and Islands and into parts of southeastern Massachusetts and Rhode Island as well. Some isolated locations near the South Coast could get gusts as high as 70-75 mph.  Expect numerous downed trees and power outages in this high wind zone.

(WBZ-TV Graphic)

Further inland, including areas north and west of Boston, the winds won’t be as strong, gusting 30-50 mph at times. This is still enough to produce some tree damage and power outages.

As the storm pulls off to the north and west this evening and also continues to weaken, the winds will gradually ramp down, below damaging levels.

COASTAL ISSUES

The main period of impact along the Coastline is high tide Sunday morning.  East coast beaches have a midday high tide, while most south coastal beaches in the Narragansett/Buzzards Bay area have an earlier high tide, just before 9 a.m. Expect local storm surges as high as 2-3 feet, enough to wash out some coastal roads for a period of time later Sunday morning through early Sunday afternoon.

(WBZ-TV Graphic)

Sunday night’s high tide will likely be less impactful with Henri well inland, although seas will remain rough so some minor flooding/splashover is likely.

As always, we urge that you stay tuned to WBZ-TV, CBSBoston and CBSN Boston for important updates leading up to and during the storm.

Source Article from https://boston.cbslocal.com/2021/08/22/tropical-storm-henri-path-hurricane-watch-storm-boston-weather-forecast-massachusetts-cape-cod-nantucket-new-england/

Captain Perkins said in a telephone interview that the military had requested wide-bodied, long-haul aircraft capable of carrying several hundred passengers. He said that discussions started with the airlines last week and that some carriers had volunteered planes for the evacuation. But, he added, the demand was great enough for Mr. Austin to order more airlines to honor their obligations under the reserve fleet program.

Civilian planes would not fly into or out of Kabul, where a rapidly deteriorating security situation has hampered evacuation flights. Instead, commercial airline pilots and crews would help transport thousands of Afghans who are arriving at U.S. bases in Bahrain, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates.

The commercial airlines would ease the burden on those bases, which are filling up rapidly as the Biden administration rushes to increase the number of flights for thousands of Afghans fearing reprisals from Taliban fighters.

From the bases in the Middle East, the airliners would augment military flights carrying Afghans to Germany, Italy, Spain and other stops in Europe, and then ultimately to the United States for many of the Afghans, officials said.

Scott Kirby, the chief executive of United Airlines, said on social media, “As a global airline and flag carrier for our country, we embrace the responsibility to quickly respond to international challenges like this one.”

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2021/08/22/world/afghan-refugees-commercial-airlines.html

For weeks, legal scholars have debated whether the recall election of Gov. Gavin Newsom could be found unconstitutional if Newsom failed to realize a “no recall” majority of the ballots cast and was ousted by a candidate who received fewer votes than he did.

Although it’s impossible to predict how courts will rule, many experts say the current recall process has long survived legal challenges, and probably would again, even if a fringe candidate won on Sept. 14 and became governor with a minority of overall votes.

That view is based on court decisions on election law, especially rulings stemming from the recall election of Gov. Gray Davis, when voters removed Davis in 2003 and replaced him with Arnold Schwarzenegger, a popular actor who went on to win reelection.

In that case, more people voted for Schwarzenegger than Davis so the candidate with the most votes won. Even so, California’s recall scheme permits a candidate with fewer votes to prevail over an incumbent, as was demonstrated by the state’s last successful recall of an elected legislator.

In 2018, voters recalled Sen. Josh Newman (D-Fullerton). On the recall question, 41.9% voted to retain Newman. On the second ballot question, in which voters are asked to select a successor, a Republican won with only 33.8% of the vote. An incumbent who faces a recall is not permitted to be named as a successor candidate on the second part of the ballot.

“Maybe I should have been reinstated,” joked Newman, after reading a recent essay by legal scholars who helped spark the current debate by arguing that California’s recall law violated the federal Constitution.

Newsom and his political strategists want supporters to use only half their ballots and leave the rest blank.

Newman was in fact reinstated — but by voters, not the courts. He booted the Republican who beat him in the recall in 2020 and now serves in Sacramento.

His ouster was one of 179 recall attempts of state officials in California since 1913. Eleven qualified for the battle. Of those, six incumbents, including Newman and Davis, were ousted and replaced with other people running on the same ballot.

Unlike in 2003, when Davis faced a recall vote, the attempted removal of Newsom has stirred few court challenges by recall foes.

Constitutional law scholar Vikram D. Amar, who closely followed the litigation during the Davis recall, said the failure of most lawsuits probably discouraged attempts this time.

“Maybe people got the message,” said Amar, law school dean of the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign campus, “and thought, ‘What is the point?’”

In their essay in the New York Times — and a subsequent one Friday in the Los Angeles Times — UC Berkeley Law School Dean Erwin Chemerinsky and law and economics professor Aaron S. Edlin argued that California’s recall law was unconstitutional because the incumbent could be replaced with a candidate who received fewer votes. The scholars said that violated a federal constitutional principle that every voter should have an equal ability to influence an election result.

Judging by polls, the professors predicted with “virtual certainty that if Newsom is recalled, he will get far more votes — probably more than twice as many — as whoever would replace him.”

“This makes no sense and violates the most basic notions of democracy,” they argued in the Los Angeles Times.

But when a prominent constitutional lawyer representing Gov. Davis made this provocative assertion before the California Supreme Court in 2003, it failed, Amar noted. The court rejected the challenge and the equal protection argument.

The challenge sought to delay the election to allow Davis to appear with others in the second ballot question listing replacement candidates. That would have allowed Davis to remain governor if he obtained a plurality of the votes.

Amar said courts have long permitted rules that limit ballot access as long as they are reasonable and not overtly discriminatory.

“California’s voting process might be unwise or needlessly confusing, but it is not unconstitutional in the way critics have recently charged,” wrote Amar and University of Michigan constitutional law professor Evan Caminker this month on an online forum for legal commentary.

Still, the California Supreme Court’s rulings on several anti-recall lawsuits during the Davis recall did not create precedent. They came in the form of decisions on whether to take up the lawsuits. At the time, six of the seven justices were Republican appointees. Today five of the seven were appointed by Democrats.

Chemerinsky, in an interview, said he believed the law was unconstitutional but agreed that courts could decide that the recall proposal itself amounted to a separate election from the second question on the replacement candidates. That would likely defeat the equal protection challenge. Federal courts, he also noted, have been reluctant to involve themselves in elections.

In the L.A. Times essay, the UC Berkeley scholars argued the challenge should be brought directly to the California Supreme Court as soon as possible and the court should be asked to rule that if Newsom wins the plurality vote, he should be succeeded by the lieutenant governor until the end of the term.

That would be a bold move by the state’s highest court, whose justices face voters to be retained to 12-year terms.

Without court intervention, it would require a two-thirds vote of the Legislature or a signature campaign to place a measure on the ballot to change California’s recall law, which allows for the ouster of judges as well as legislators and governors.

That is because the recall right is enshrined in the state Constitution, placed there by voters in 1911 as a way to remove corrupt office holders.

Still, Chemerinsky said, some change must be made to “increase the difficulty” of holding recalls.

“Otherwise we are going to see a real increase in this,” he said. He noted that in the last two decades, a governor and a judge have been recalled.

During the Davis recall, the only lawsuit the California Supreme Court partially supported was a challenge of the requirements for potential replacement candidates to get on the ballot. The original constitutional requirement made it more difficult for people to be listed as candidates to replace a recalled incumbent, but the rules were substantially weakened by a later amendment and legislation.

It would not take a constitutional amendment to revise those requirements.

Then Chief Justice Ronald M. George wanted to delay the Davis recall election until the court reviewed a legal challenge of the requirements to be listed as a successor candidate.

“The chaos, confusion, and circus-like atmosphere that has characterized the current recall process undoubtedly has been brought about in large measure by the extremely low threshold …for potential candidates to qualify for inclusion on the ballot to succeed to the office of Governor,” George wrote in a dissent to the court’s refusal to take up the matter.

Then-Justice Carlos R. Moreno, at the time the court’s only Democratic appointee, agreed with George.

The Newsom recall is being challenged in federal court on equal protection grounds by Los Angeles civil rights lawyer Stephen Yagman, who unsuccessfully brought suit against the Davis recall too. Legal scholars said the suit was unlikely to succeed. “I think the suit is a loser in part because it was brought too late,” said UC Davis law school professor Christopher S. Elmendorf.

A narrow win by the Democrat might embolden challengers. But toppling a sitting governor is tough.

Amar, who spent much of his legal career in California, doubted that all the criticism of the recall process that Democrats and some legal scholars are now voicing will lead to actual reform after the election. The recall of Davis prompted similar calls for reform, but the recall law remains intact, he said.

“These things aren’t sexy, and they don’t have a constituency behind them,” Amar said. “You are not going to win an election by doing these really mundane, housekeeping things.”

Of the myriad court challenges during 2003, only one changed the law, Amar said. A federal judge struck down a requirement that voters had to vote on the recall question to be able to vote on the successor candidates.

But another challenge briefly put the Davis recall election in doubt. A three-judge panel of the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the election had to be delayed because of error-prone punch-card voting machines in some places. Eight days later, a larger and more conservative 9th Circuit panel overturned that decision.

Amar believes the delay caused by the court actually hurt Davis and that Newsom would face a similar backlash from any court-ordered delay now.

“Those eight days cost Gray Davis the momentum he had going into that period,” Amar said. “No one knew whether there would be a recall election.”

Source Article from https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2021-08-22/newsom-could-be-replaced-by-recall-candidate-with-fewer-votes

President Joe Biden’s job approval ratings have taken a dive as he’s been criticized for his administration’s handling of the withdrawal of U.S. troops from Afghanistan and while Covid-19 cases surge across the country.

An NBC News poll released Sunday shows 49% of all adults surveyed say they strongly approve of the job Biden is doing as president while 48% disapprove. The 49% represents a drop of four percentage points compared to a previous NBC News survey done in April. The disapproval number is up by nine percentage points from that same prior poll.

Among the registered voters surveyed, 50% say they approved of Biden’s job performance while 48% noted they disapproved.

The NBC News poll shows they interviewed 1,000 adults and the survey has a margin of error of plus or minus 3.10%. The survey took place from August 14 through August 17.

A vast majority of those polled say they disapprove of Biden’s handling of the current situation in Afghanistan, with only 25% noting they approve of the way he’s dealt with the crisis.

Biden has been under scrutiny for the way his administration has handled trying to evacuate allies in Afghanistan as American troops pull out of the country and the Taliban retake control of the government there.

While new coronavirus cases continue to go up across the country, Biden’s approval of handling the pandemic has fallen significantly.

Of those surveyed, 53% say they approve of the president’s way of handling the pandemic. That’s a drop of 16 points compared to a poll taken in April. Just over 40% of the poll’s participants say they disapprove of Biden’s handling of the coronavirus pandemic.

Source Article from https://www.cnbc.com/2021/08/22/president-joe-bidens-job-approval-ratings-drop-as-crisis-in-afghanistan-mounts-.html