If that happens, the Federal Emergency Management Agency will provide reimbursement for “full funding to states to support vaccinations and outreach,” said Sonya Bernstein, a senior policy adviser for the White House Covid-19 Response Team. That support would involve site setup as well as logistical help like providing transportation to and from vaccine sites.

“We know that access is going to be critical here,” Ms. Bernstein said, adding that the administration has in recent weeks looked at ways to provide a “kid-friendly experience that makes sure that we’re getting shots in arms with trusted providers in ways that makes parents feel comfortable.”

The process will not look or feel the way it did when other groups in the United States were first authorized to receive vaccines. The 5-to-11 age group, with 28 million children, is far larger than the 12-to-15 group, with 17 million, who became eligible for the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine in May. But the younger group will not be expected to line up at mass vaccination sites: “We don’t want lines of kids,” said Ms. Bernstein, who pointed out that children tend to be more sensitive patients. (Read: They cry.) Pediatrician’s offices, children’s hospitals and pharmacies with in-store clinics will be the preferred options.

The needles that administer the vaccine and the vials that hold it will need to be smaller to be more easily stored. (The Pfizer dose for children ages 5 to 11 is expected to contain 10 micrograms, rather than the 30-microgram dose used for ages 12 and up.) To keep doses from spoiling, the child-size vials can be stored for up to 10 weeks at standard refrigeration temperatures, and six months at colder temperatures, according to a memo administration officials plan to make public on Wednesday.

Taking cues from what worked when shots were opened to teenagers, whose vaccinations generally require parental consent, officials are also leaning heavily on local health experts, who they believe are more trusted in their communities and can help reach high-risk children. “Children’s hospitals and health systems will be a critical part of our efforts to advance equity and ensure access for our nation’s highest-risk kids, including those with obesity, diabetes, asthma or immunosuppression,” the memo said.

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2021/10/20/us/politics/kids-covid-vaccination.html

Former White House chief strategist Steve Bannon is seen on Aug. 20, 2020.

Stephanie Keith/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Stephanie Keith/Getty Images

Former White House chief strategist Steve Bannon is seen on Aug. 20, 2020.

Stephanie Keith/Getty Images

The House committee investigating the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol on Tuesday evening unanimously approved a criminal contempt report against Steve Bannon, an ally of former President Donald Trump’s, for defying a subpoena from the panel.

The vote sends the measure to the full House for a planned vote Thursday. If the chamber approves it, the referral would be sent on to federal law enforcement for potential charges.

The nine-member committee, made up of seven Democrats and two Republicans, was united in their scathing response to Bannon’s refusal to come before the panel. Bannon no-showed for a deposition that was sought last Thursday, and did not turn over documents for another deadline a week earlier.

“Mr. Bannon will comply with our investigation or he will face the consequences,” the committee’s chairman, Rep. Bennie Thompson, D-Miss., said in prepared remarks to open a meeting to take up the contempt report.

“Maybe he’s willing to be a martyr to the disgraceful cause of whitewashing what happened on January 6th — of demonstrating his complete loyalty to the former President,” Thompson added. “So I want other witnesses to understand something very plainly: If you’re thinking of following the path Mr. Bannon has gone down, you’re on notice that this is what you’ll face.”

Privilege debate

In the 26-page contempt report, the panel documented its many attempts to make contact with Bannon regarding documents and testimony. Members reiterated that his claim of executive privilege, which says that a president can keep private certain documents or discussions with advisers, did not apply in his case.

The panel also shared a series of exchanges with Bannon’s attorney, Robert Costello, warning that the former Trump strategist was in “defiance” of his subpoena.

The move comes the day after Trump himself filed a lawsuit against the committee, saying he still retained executive privilege. Trump had advised Bannon and others that the legal shield protects them from sharing certain conversations and documents.

However, the committee’s members have argued that protection rests with President Biden, who waived the privilege regarding an earlier document request. They also argued that Bannon’s case especially does not apply since he was a private citizen as of Jan. 6 and not part of the Trump administration.

What happens next

The contempt report now heads to the House floor for a vote that’s scheduled Thursday on whether to approve the referral, and the plan is expected to win approval in the Democratic-controlled chamber. Following passage, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., could certify the report for the U.S. attorney’s office, which can then take it before a grand jury for consideration.

Ultimately, these final prosecution steps could involve the highest levels of the Justice Department, including Attorney General Merrick Garland, as such cases are rare.

“It’s exceedingly rare for the Department of Justice to charge anyone with contempt of Congress,” said Daniel Goldman, a former House impeachment lawyer who served during Trump’s 2019 case before the lower chamber. “This is an unusual situation where you have executive branch officials from a previous administration, not the current administration. And it’s also incredibly unprecedented, unusual circumstances surrounding a insurrection, riot and effort to overturn a lawful election.”

Goldman also noted that pursuing such a criminal referral was “not an option for us” during Trump’s 2019 impeachment as the Justice Department would not have followed through on the contempt report.

“Ultimately, this is going to rest on the Department of Justice and whether they’re willing to use their authority to enforce these subpoenas,” Goldman told NPR after the committee announced its plans to pursue the contempt charge.

Former White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows, ex-Trump White House deputy chief of staff for communications Dan Scavino and former Defense Department official Kash Patel also received subpoenas in recent weeks. But the panel postponed their depositions for now, with Meadows and Patel recently in talks with the committee, and Scavino seeing a delay receiving his subpoena.

The committee has a number of other subpoena deadlines approaching, including ones for the right-wing Stop the Steal group and nearly a dozen other organizers behind the rally that preceded the deadly attack on the Capitol.

And the committee issued another subpoena Wednesday for Jeffrey Clark, an ex-Justice Department official who had promised to pursue Trump’s false election fraud claims.

Source Article from https://www.npr.org/2021/10/19/1047294970/jan-6-panel-approves-criminal-contempt-report-for-ex-trump-strategist-steve-bann

With just two weeks to go until Election Day in Virginia, the gubernatorial showdown between former Democratic Gov. Terry McAuliffe and Republican nominee Glenn Youngkin – a closely watched statewide race with likely national implications – remains a razor-tight margin of error face-off.

Both national and state issues are impacting the race in Virginia, which along with New Jersey are the only two states to hold gubernatorial contests in the year after a presidential election, ensuring they get outsized attention from coast to coast. But a look at the ads by the two campaigns that are currently flooding the TV airwaves and digital devices suggests that the issue of education and former President Donald Trump are front and center in the commonwealth showdown.

“Virginia parents have a right to make decisions on their children’s education. That’s the Virginia I grew up in,” Youngkin says in his campaign ad that’s currently heavily in rotation across the state. 

VICE PRESIDENT KAMALA HARRIS JUMPS INTO VIRGINIA’S CLOSE RACE FOR GOVERNOR

And Youngkin, a first-time candidate and former CEO of a large private equity firm, charges that “Terry McAuliffe wants to change that.”

His commercial then uses a viral clip from the second and final debate between the two candidates where McAuliffe, who’s running for his old job, said “I don’t think parents should be telling schools what they should teach.”

Youngkin, emphasizing his campaign’s closing message, emphasizes in the spot that “I’ll always stand up for Virginia’s parents.”

Public school education has traditionally been a leading issue in gubernatorial contests across the country. But amid a year and a half of frustration over school closures due to the coronavirus pandemic and the push by conservatives nationwide to target race-focused curriculum, including this year’s well publicized battles over critical race theory in Virginia’s Loudon County, Republicans see education as a winning issue to try and recapture suburban voters who fled the GOP during former President Trump’s White House tenure. 

And that was before McAuliffe’s unforced error at the final debate, which Republicans have repeatedly spotlighted over the ensuing weeks.

“This has given a big opening for Youngkin and he’s grabbed it,” longtime GOP consultant and Fox News contributor Karl Rove said Tuesday on “America’s Newsroom”

WHAT THE LATEST NEW FOX NEWS POLL SHOWS IN THE VIRGINIA GUBERNATORIAL SHOWDOWN

An average of the latest polls in the race indicates that McAuliffe holds a slight, lower single-digit edge over Youngkin in a state that President Biden won by 10 points in last year’s election and where Republicans haven’t won a statewide contest in a dozen years. 

The latest Fox News poll in Virginia – which indicated McAuliffe with a narrow five-point advantage among likely voters – spotlighted that 57% of Virginia parents said that parents “should be telling schools what to teach.” 

But the survey also indicated McAuliffe – who launched his campaign at an event at a public school last December to showcase his education plan – with a 10-point lead over Youngkin among parents likely to vote, and suggested all likely voters were divided over whether McAuliffe (45%) or Youngkin (43%) would do a better job on education.

There’s a long-running trend of voters in the commonwealth defeating the gubernatorial nominee of the party that controls the White House. McAuliffe broke with that tradition in 2013 with his election as governor in the year after Obama was reelected. McAuliffe was unable to run for reelection in 2017 because Virginia governors are barred from serving two straight terms.

BIDEN, DESPITE FLAGGING POLL NUMBERS, TO CAMPAIGN FOR MCAULIFFE 

The close contest in Virginia – a one-time key battleground but still competitive state which is seen as a key bellwether ahead of the 2022 midterm elections – has national Democrats on edge as they defend their razor-thin majorities in the House of Representatives and Senate in next year’s contests.

The latest surveys indicate that Republican voters are more motivated than their Democratic counterparts. And McAuliffe’s putting on a full court press to get Democrats to cast ballots in the current early voting period, or to go to the polls on Election Day. 

One way is by bringing in top Democratic surrogates. First Lady Jill Biden campaigned with McAuliffe on Friday and voting rights advocate Stacey Abrams, the former Georgia House Democratic leader who in 2018 made history as the first Black female gubernatorial nominee of a major political party, teamed up with him for two stops on Sunday.

Former President Obama  will campaign with McAuliffe this upcoming Saturday, Oct. 23.  And President Biden’s expected to join McAuliffe as well. Asked last week if Biden would join him on the campaign trail, the former governor said “he’ll be coming back. You bet he will.” And McAuliffe on Tuesday again teased an upcoming appearance by the president

TRUMP, BIDEN NOT ON BALLOT, BUT CENTER STAGE IN VIRGINIA SHOWDOWN

But McAuliffe’s also trying to fire up his base by repeatedly comparing Youngkin to Trump, who remains unpopular in Virginia. The former president is at 44% favorable and 53% unfavorable in the latest Fox News poll, which was conducted Oct. 10-13.

McAuliffe’s current ad that’s running in heavy rotation across Virginia uses visuals of the deadly Jan. 6 insurrection at the U.S. Capitol by right wing extremists trying to upend congressional certification of Biden’s Electoral College victory over Trump, and of the white supremacist protests and violent clashes in Charlottesville, Virginia, in the summer of 2017 that grabbed national attention.

The spot uses then-President Trump’s controversial comments during the Charlottesville violence that “you also had very fine people on both sides.” The ad then cuts to Youngkin saying he was “honored to receive President Trump’s endorsement.”

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

The commercial also spotlights Trump’s repeated unfounded claims that the 2020 presidential loss to Biden was due to massive “election fraud,” followed by a clip of Youngkin saying “let’s just audit the voting machines.”

And McAuliffe took to Twitter on Monday to once again stress that “we must stop the Youngkin-Trump agenda before it’s too late.”

Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/politics/education-trump-in-the-spotlight-in-tight-virginia-governor-race-with-2-weeks-till-election-day

Democratic lawmakers are scrambling to negotiate alternative climate change proposals for President Joe Biden‘s massive budget plan, following West Virginia Sen. Joe Manchin’s strong opposition to the plan’s core climate change strategy.

Manchin, a moderate Democrat who can sink the bill in the 50-50 split Senate, said he will not vote for more than $1.5 trillion in spending and told the White House he’s opposed to a clean electricity plan, a key part of the president’s climate agenda.

The clean electricity program would require some of the country’s electricity to come from zero-carbon sources like wind and solar power and impose financial penalties on utilities that don’t meet clean energy standards. The $150 billion plan is critical for Biden’s commitment to cut emissions in half by 2030 and put the U.S. on track to reach net-zero emissions by 2050.

The president, in an attempt to salvage what had once been his $3.5 trillion budget plan, is meeting with members of the two warring factions of Democratic lawmakers on Tuesday. The outcome of this week’s negotiations could determine whether the budget bill gets through Congress and whether the $1 trillion bipartisan infrastructure bill already passed by the Senate receives a majority in the House.

White House staffers are now rewriting the bill without the clean electricity provision, according to a recent New York Times report, and considering other proposals such a tax on carbon and methane emissions. Manchin told reporters on Tuesday that a carbon tax “is not on the board at all right now.” Manchin’s office declined to comment.

Fighting climate change has been a main component of the president’s “Build Back Better” agenda. Other climate provisions in the budget plan include tax incentives for electric vehicle buyers and renewable energy producers; funding to install EV charging stations across the country; funding to update the country’s electric grid; and spending to drive down emissions from federal buildings and operations.

Democrats previously vowed they would not take the clean electricity program out of the legislation, arguing it’s by far the most feasible way for the U.S. to rapidly reduce emissions. Democrats aim to pass both plans before the end of the month and have not agreed to a final price tag for the budget, though it could amount to roughly $2 trillion.

The opposition from Manchin, whose biggest single source of income last year was a coal consulting business he founded, could give Biden a weaker position at the upcoming United Nations climate change summit in Glasgow, Scotland.

The summit is an opportunity for the U.S., the world’s second-biggest carbon emitter, to prove it’s rejoining global efforts to fight climate change after Former President Donald Trump pulled the country from the Paris climate accord, mocked the science of climate change and dismantled more than 100 environmental regulations.

The clean electricity provision would be the most significant climate policy ever passed by the U.S. and a chance for Biden to show the rest of the world that the U.S. is a leading force on battling climate change. Before the president’s infrastructure proposal, the last major push to pass climate legislation through the Senate was in 2009, when congressional Democrats failed to pass a carbon-pricing system.

White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki on Tuesday said the president will push ahead on future bills focusing on provisions omitted from the budget bill. Therefore, Democrats might need to implement the clean electricity program through a future stand-alone bill if its cut from the president’s agenda at the end of the month.  

“Whatever we cannot tackle now, we will be able to tackle in future bills,” Psaki said during a brief briefing.

— CNBC’s Jacob Pramuk and Christina Wilkie contributed reporting

Source Article from https://www.cnbc.com/2021/10/19/bidens-climate-agenda-at-risk-as-democrats-negotiate-budget-bill-.html

UPDATED, with additional King comments: CNN’s John King revealed on Tuesday that he has multiple sclerosis during a segment of Inside Politics in which the discussion turned to Covid-19 vaccine mandates.

“I’m going to share a secret I have never spoken before. I am immunocompromised,” King said. “I have multiple sclerosis. So I am grateful you are all vaccinated. I am grateful my employer says all of these amazing people who work on the floor, who came in here in the last 18 months when we are doing this, are vaccinated now that we have vaccines. I worry about bringing it home to my 10-year-old son who can’t get a vaccine. I don’t like the government telling me what to do. I don’t like my boss telling me what to do. In this case, it’s important.”

The discussion was triggered in part by the death of former Secretary of State Colin Powell of complications from Covid. He had been vaccinated, but also had a form of blood cancer, multiple mylenoma, that made him vulnerable. In addition, Powell was 84. Age increases the likelihood of a Covid-related death, according to the CDC. The former Secretary of State also had Parkinson’s which, while it does not increase the risk of getting Covid, “does make it harder for you to recover if you contract it,” according to the nonprofit Parkinson’s Foundation. Some right wing media figures cited Powell’s death in making the case that the vaccines are not effective.

King said during the segment, “Now and then something big comes along, forgive me Fox News, is what makes America exceptional is when we all set down our personal preferences for the good of the team. The good of the team here is to come together and not spread that.”

On Monday night, Fox News’ Tucker Carlson led his show with Powell’s death and said that it showed that Americans have been “lied to” about the effectiveness of vaccines. At the end of his show, Carlson did say that he “left out that Powell was suffering from a number of different health problems.

According to the Centers for Disease Control, vaccines are far more effective in preventing serious injury and death due to Covid. “Some people who are fully vaccinated against COVID-19 will still get sick because no vaccine is 100% effective,” the CDC said.

During King’s segment, the CNN chyron read, “Right wing media use Colin Powell’s death to question vaccines when unvaccinated face 11X higher risk of dying from Covid.”

Later, King told Boston Public Radio that his disclosure “was not planned. It is a secret I have kept for a long time except for a very few people very close to me in my life.”

He said that the disease is progressive slowly in me “and I am very lucky.”

“MS sucks, forgive my language,” he told hosts Jim Braude and Margery Eagan. “Every day you are dealing with it in some ways. But there are people who are dealing with it in more profound ways than I am.”

He said that he told his story after playing Carlson’s segment and “it just pissed me off, and it came out…When you have this misinformation about vaccines in a way that threatens people — 727,000 Americans have died of Covid. They are all American treasures, just like General Powell was. If we can do anything to protect them, we should do it, even if we have to set aside a personal preference or personal principle.”

He added, “You don’t have to agree about mandates, but don’t lie about science.”

King, 58, who is CNN’s chief national correspondent. He joined the network in 1997.

Source Article from https://deadline.com/2021/10/cnns-john-king-reveals-that-he-has-multiple-sclerosis-in-discussion-about-covid-19-vaccines-1234858329/

As NBC News noted yesterday, there are at least 10 civil cases pending against Donald Trump — and now that he’s out of office, it’s far more difficult for him to avoid them.

As The Associated Press reported, one of them led to the Republican’s first deposition in quite a while.

Former President Donald Trump was questioned Monday in a deposition for a lawsuit brought by protesters who say his security team roughed them up in the early days of his presidential campaign in 2015. Trump testified under oath behind closed doors at Trump Tower in New York City for several hours, a lawyer for the plaintiffs said.

Circling back to our coverage from last week, it wasn’t the highest-profile controversy of Trump’s 2016 candidacy, but a few months after the Republican launched his national campaign, a small group of activists held a protest outside Trump’s New York office. Those same activists have alleged that they were violently assaulted by the candidate’s security guards, including Trump’s longtime bodyguard, Keith Schiller, who allegedly punched a protester in the head while trying to wrest away his “Make America racist again” sign.

According to the plaintiffs, while the former president did not directly participate in the altercation, he bears legal responsibility for the actions of his employees.

During his time in office, Trump’s lawyers said he was too busy to answer questions about the case and made multiple attempts at having the case dismissed. Those efforts failed.

And now that he’s a private citizen, a New York judge directed Trump to give a deposition at Trump Tower. It was videotaped and could be played during the upcoming trial, though as The New York Times noted, “It is not yet clear whether Mr. Trump’s testimony will be made public; Mr. Trump’s lawyers could ask that it be sealed. But it may touch on several topics of interest, including Mr. Trump’s personal wealth and his relationship with at least one employee who has been scrutinized by prosecutors conducting an investigation into the former president and his business.”

Benjamin Dictor, the attorney representing the men who filed the lawsuit, would not go into any details about what the former president said, but Dictor did tell CNN, “The president was exactly how you would expect him to be, he answered questions the way you would expect Mr. Trump to answer questions and conducted himself in a manner that you would expect Mr. Trump to conduct himself.”

Trump’s lawyers no doubt begged him to keep his answers brief and on topic. That description of his deposition suggests the former president chose a more predictable course.

The CNN report also said the Q&A, which was under oath, lasted more than four hours.

As for the Republican’s reaction to yesterday’s developments, Trump issued a written statement that read, “After years of litigation, I was pleased to have had the opportunity to tell my side of this ridiculous story — Just one more example of baseless harassment of your favorite President.”

He was, evidently, referring to himself.

Source Article from https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/civil-suit-trump-testifies-under-oath-more-four-hours-n1281841

  • Right-wing media personalities are using Colin Powell’s death to question COVID-19 vaccine efficacy.
  • Powell died Monday from COVID-19 complications. He was vaccinated but was being treated for cancer.
  • Health officials are pushing back at the unfounded claims made by Fox News and Newsmax.

Right-wing media personalities are using the death of former Secretary of State Colin Powell to sow doubt over the efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines.

Several conservative media personalities at Fox News and Newsmax reacted to the news that Powell died of COVID-19 complications despite being fully vaccinated.

Being fully vaccinated against COVID-19 dramatically reduces a person’s risk of hospitalization and death from the disease, though rare severe breakthrough cases can still happen.

Powell, 84, also had multiple myeloma, a white blood cell cancer made it difficult for his immune system to function properly. Cancer — and the drugs used to treat it — and his old age are risk factors for COVID-19 cases.

But during Monday’s edition of “Fox & Friends,” host Will Cain said Powell’s death was “a very high-profile example” of Americans needing “more truth from our government and our health leaders as well,” Vanity Fair reported. 

“We’re seeing data from across the world … that fully vaccinated people are being hospitalized, that fully vaccinated people are dying from COVID,” Cain said, according to Vanity Fair. He did not provide scientific evidence for this.

Meanwhile, the Newsmax contributors Hal Lambert and Jennifer Kern both said Powell’s death will “scare off” a lot of elderly people and Black Americans from getting their COVID-19 shots during a segment on the right-wing news channel, Vanity Fair reported.

Lambert, a former finance chair of the Texas Republican Party, added: “Which vaccine did he have? I think we do need to know those answers,” he said, according to Vanity Fair. “He’s a public figure and it was medical care that was provided by tax dollars.”

Newsmax and Fox News did not immediately respond to Insider’s request for comment. (Fox Corporation, which owns Fox News, announced last month that it was requiring COVID-19 vaccines or daily tests, a mandate even stricter than President Joe Biden’s federal policy.)

The Fox News anchor John Roberts also tweeted on Monday that Powell’s death “raises new concerns” about vaccine efficacy. He later deleted the tweet amid widespread criticism and clarified that he was in favor of vaccines.

Health experts have pushed back at the unfounded claims.

Dr. Jonathan Reiner, a CNN medical analyst and professor of medicine at George Washington University told CNN this week that Powell “represented our most vulnerable population in this country.”

“He was over the age of 80, he had cancer, and a treatment for his cancer made him vulnerable,” he said.

Dr. Leana Wen, another CNN medical analyst, also told the network: “The COVID-19 vaccines do not protect you 100%. No vaccine does, just likely virtually no medical treatment is 100% effective. That doesn’t mean the vaccine doesn’t work, or that you shouldn’t take it.”

Source Article from https://www.businessinsider.com/colin-powell-death-right-wing-media-using-sow-vaccine-skepticism-2021-10

“Sen. Manchin has to balance the fact that he may have certain opinions, but he also has a responsibility as a chairman in the Democratic caucus, of the Energy and Natural Resources Committee,” said Sen. Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.), who spoke privately with Manchin after his declaration on Tuesday that the carbon tax was “off the board.”

“So he has to be both true to his positions and his own state, and also take that responsibility to the caucus seriously,” Heinrich added.

For Manchin, the moment is a culmination of his career as a stick in the mud for his party’s climate policies — a position that’s helped him win reelection. After all, he literally shot a hole through Democrats’ cap-and-trade bill in 2010 in one of his ads. The Senate is evenly split, so Democrats need him to advance their legislation, but some fear he’s intent on whittling down the climate component too much for them to stomach.

Democrats don’t have a lot of time to continue debating as Biden and party leaders seek an agreement with Manchin by the end of the month. Whatever Democrats can get through Congress on climate will be far more durable than anything Biden can do through executive action, so lawmakers are determined to convince Manchin now, before they could lose their majorities.

“Of course, it’s frustrating. But it’s also just part of negotiation,” said Sen. Debbie Stabenow (D-Mich.) of the state of talks with Manchin.

Manchin is aware of how sensitive the issue is for his colleagues. After his conversation with Heinrich, Manchin initially demurred: “The more I talk, the more everyone gets pissed off. So I’m going to quit talking.” But later, when approached in the Senate basement, Manchin rebuffed any suggestion that he’s trying to sink the climate change component of his party’s bill.

“My God, absolutely. Criminy,” Manchin said of whether he wants a strong climate component. “The bottom line is, and I’ve been saying from day one: Innovation, not elimination.”

He went on to say that because of a rise in emissions worldwide and continued construction of power plants outside the U.S., the Senate has “got to find an answer for carbon capture in some way, shape or form.” Currently, carbon capture technology is expensive and unproven to work at the scale necessary to put a meaningful dent in the nation’s emissions footprint.

Beyond the $150 billion proposal to pay utilities to transition their energy sources and punish utilities that do not, dubbed the Clean Energy Performance Program, Democrats want to pour hundreds of billions of dollars into addressing climate change in their bill. The biggest bulk of emissions reductions they envision would come from tax credits to help deploy wind, solar and other clean energy sources, as well as electric vehicles.

They also want to fund a civilian climate corps to deploy young people in environmentally friendly projects. Other desired climate action provisions include a methane fee and massive investments in energy efficiency improvements.

“I’m disappointed he’s not agreeing to the biggest game-changer for climate change. But there are about $300 billion in other provisions,” Sen. Mazie Hirono (D-Hawaii) said of Manchin. She added that “I think he will support some of the other provisions, maybe not to the extent” that his Democratic colleagues want.

Worsening scientific warnings of climate change’s toll are driving the urgency among the Democratic rank-and-file. A United Nations report this summer, dubbed a code red for the planet, found a 1.1 degrees Celsius of warming already baked in since the pre-industrial era due to burning of fossil fuels like coal, natural gas and oil.

Many Democrats remain doubtful that they’ll ultimately be able to get Manchin on board with the scale of climate investments they want. Majority Whip Dick Durbin said Tuesday he was unsure of how the party-line bill would treat climate change.

“I hope that there are areas — I think there are areas — where we can find some agreement,” Durbin told reporters. “There are some things he doesn’t agree with — clean electricity is one of them.”

Privately, Democrats are scrambling to produce something big that can win Manchin’s vote. One environmental advocate close to the negotiations told POLITICO a “Plan C” on climate change could involve pouring tons more money into grants, loan guarantees and other programs aimed at curbing emissions.

Sen. Jon Tester (D-Mont.) said that plowing more money into research and development could do the trick: “There are things that make a big difference that Joe would agree to.” And Sen. Angus King (I-Maine) said that increasing energy storage could be feasible to Manchin.

“He’s been more receptive to climate-related legislation this year than I expected given [he’s from] a coal state and all that history,” King said.

That still leaves Democratic leaders with a dilemma, since backing a deal that leans heavily on voluntary and research programs almost surely will disappoint climate advocates on and off the Hill. Dozens of Democrats have vowed for months to oppose legislation insufficiently strong on climate provisions under the tagline of “no climate, no deal.”

Beyond the scientific realities, though, lie political ones. Democrats are anxious for Biden to show up at global climate negotiations in early November with proof the U.S. can be counted on to follow through on its emissions-combating commitments. The fear is that, without a national program for clean electricity or an economy-wide carbon tax, other nations won’t buy the president’s rhetoric.

Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) said this week that he can’t support a reconciliation bill without a climate component. But he contended that his party can still go big without a carbon tax or a new major clean energy transition program, by increasing tax incentives for clean energy and using “other taxing powers beyond a broad carbon tax.”

Sen. Chris Coons (D-Del.), who co-chairs the bipartisan Senate Climate Solution Caucus, said that Democrats are having “purposeful conversations this week” aimed at hashing out “the most possible path forward.”

Manchin has been urging the House to pass the Senate’s bipartisan infrastructure bill, which pours billions into climate resiliency. He says if that can pass before Biden heads to the Glasgow climate talks, it will demonstrate to the world that the U.S. is serious.

But many Democrats say that’s not enough.

“Resiliency is not a solution; resiliency is treatment. If you have heart disease, yes, you need treatment for that. But it’s better off to have a healthy heart,” Heinrich said. “And that’s what climate policy is about.”

Source Article from https://www.politico.com/news/2021/10/19/climate-joe-manchin-plan-c-democrats-516262

“[T]his accusation is entirely false. Jeff did not lie to the FBI. This has all the marks of being a political attack, a bogus charge manufactured to take him out,” reads the email, reported earlier by the Omaha World-Herald.

Fortenberry, whose three felony charges each carry a maximum of five years in federal prison, has agreed to appear in court for his arraignment on Wednesday.

Fortenberry says he first became involved in the FBI investigation when a foreign national tried to funnel $30,000 to him during a fundraiser in 2016, during which he raised a total of roughly $37,000. And he denied knowing about the origins of the majority of the cash, while claiming the FBI “assured and reassured” him that he was not a target.

“They knew he had no knowledge of the illegal donations, and was in fact a victim of that crime,” the Fortenberrys’ joint email reads.

Fortenberry called former Rep. Trey Gowdy of South Carolina, a former federal prosecutor, to seek his “advice and legal representation” after the first interview with investigators, according to the email. However, a campaign spokesperson told POLITICO that Gowdy is not currently providing legal counsel to the GOP congressman.

The Nebraska Republican ultimately interviewed with authorities twice in 2019, but the Fortenberrys’ joint email says it wasn’t until this year that the lawmaker heard they were moving on the case.

A spokesperson for House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy did not immediately respond when asked for comment about how the indictment will impact Fortenberry’s role on the House Appropriations Committee, where he serves as a top Republican for its subpanel on food and agriculture. According to a provision in House GOP conference rules, members facing federal charges must “step aside” from their committee leadership roles as the legal process plays out.

Source Article from https://www.politico.com/news/2021/10/19/nebraska-gop-rep-fortenberry-indicted-516259

Critics of the proposal have incorrectly suggested that the I.R.S. would be tracking information about individual transactions. The administration has said the I.R.S. would not monitor specific customer transactions but instead use the account information to spot discrepancies between it and what individuals reported on their tax returns.

“Banks and their wealthy clients are outright lying, saying they would see individual transactions, and Republicans are backing them up,” Ms. Warren said.

The Biden administration insists that audit rates for those making less than $400,000 would not go up and that the program was focused on collecting unpaid taxes from the rich.

But Republicans, who have expressed distrust of the I.R.S. for years, continued to criticize the proposal as an invasion of privacy. It is familiar ground. In the 1990s, Republicans orchestrated well-attended hearings on I.R.S. abuse that portrayed the agency as out of control. In 2013, Republicans accused the I.R.S. of targeting conservative groups, although the political targeting crossed party lines.

“Whether it’s $600 or $10,000, under this proposal, the intimate financial details of everyone in this room — at a minimum, of every American who has a job — will be turned over on a daily basis to the I.R.S.,” Senator John Kennedy, Republican of Louisiana, told reporters, despite the proposal’s exemption of payroll deposits. “What could possibly go wrong?”

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2021/10/19/us/politics/irs-bank-account-reporting-requirement.html

Dr. Marc Harrison, like Colin Powell was, is fully vaccinated for COVID-19.

But, also like Powell, the Intermountain Healthcare CEO suffers from multiple myeloma — the blood cancer that likely left Powell vulnerable to COVID-19 before he died from the virus this week.

“For people with blood cancers — lymphoma, leukemia, multiple myeloma — only about half of them respond to an mRNA vaccine,” Harrison said Monday, after Powell’s death. Powell, who served as a four-star Army general, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and Secretary of State under George W. Bush, died Monday from the coronavirus.

While the overwhelming majority of Americans dying from COVID-19 right now are unvaccinated, the virus still is claiming victims from the 2% of people who are immunocompromised by other conditions — such as cancer or organ transplants — as well as by drugs that treat other illnesses, like inflammatory bowel disease, Harrison said.

“Somebody is giving them COVID. Somebody is killing us,” Harrison said. “The surest way to decrease that is for people to get their vaccinations.”

Among the immunocompromised, the vaccine may well be protective, especially with a booster shot, Harrison said. But only about half of patients with blood cancer develop antibodies in response to the vaccine, he said — and only one-third of transplant recipients do.

Harrison, for example, only has one-tenth to one-twentieth of some types of immune cells that are needed for “an adequate immune system.”

“I guarantee you that everybody knows somebody out there like Gen. Powell or like me,” Harrison said. “The way herd immunity works is, we are relying on [others] to take good care of themselves and get vaccinated.”

Despite the state’s slightly-below-average vaccination rate, Utahns, Harrison said, are generally “charitable and good neighbors and very responsible.

“I can only believe that people must really just not understand if they are so cavalier. … I can’t imagine they don’t care about one out of every 50 people.”

With about two-thirds of eligible Utahns fully vaccinated, Harrison remains vigilant about who he has contact with, frequently masking and asking others’ vaccine status.

But at one recent public meeting, Harrison said, he found himself in a large group of people who were not masking and were not vaccinated. His risks are so elevated that simply being in the room made him eligible for monoclonal antibodies — an effective but limited-supply treatment typically given to high-risk patients who have contracted the virus but have not yet developed serious symptoms.

“It did make me feel not very valued that people are putting their own convenience ahead of my own life and death,” Harrison said.

He declined to specify the meeting. At an August news conference, Harrison urged Utahns to wear masks in public settings, get vaccinated, stop the spread of misinformation, and “put your virtual arms around” health care workers. After a bone marrow transplant and experimental CAR T-cell therapy, his cancer has been in remission.

Source Article from https://www.sltrib.com/news/2021/10/19/were-all-very-much-risk/

Two Democratic senators on Tuesday expressed opposition to including a carbon tax in the massive social spending plan as Democrats scramble to make good on their pledge to combat climate change. 

Sen. Joe ManchinJoe ManchinOvernight Energy & Environment — Presented by the American Petroleum Institute — Democrats address reports that clean energy program will be axed Overnight Health Care — Presented by Carequest — Colin Powell’s death highlights risks for immunocompromised Progressive coalition unveils ad to pressure Manchin on Biden spending plan MORE (D-W.Va.) on Tuesday poured cold water on the renewed chatter of including a carbon tax.

Asked about a carbon tax, which would effectively place a fee on carbon dioxide and methane emissions, Manchin said the idea was not under discussion. 

“We’re not — the carbon tax is not on the board at all right now,” Manchin told reporters.  

Pressed if he could get behind a carbon tax, Manchin reiterated that it was “not on the board.” 

Sen. Jon TesterJonathan (Jon) TesterSenate GOP signals they’ll help bail out Biden’s Fed chair Senate to vote next week on Freedom to Vote Act Democrats struggle to gain steam on Biden spending plan MORE (Mont.), another red-state Democrat, said he also wasn’t supportive of a carbon tax.

“I’m not a big fan of the carbon tax. I just don’t think it works the way it was explained to me,” Tester said.

A carbon tax has strong supporters within the Senate Democratic Conference but Manchin has long been skeptical of the idea, telling reporters in September, when it was last floated, that “any type of a tax is going to be passed on to the people.” 

But it jumped back into the spotlight as Democrats scramble for alternatives after Manchin closed the door on including in their spending package the Clean Electricity Performance Program (CEPP), which incentivizes companies toward clean energy sources.

“If the CEPP has fallen out of the package, that makes the methane and carbon pollution fees even more critical as a pathway to safety,” Sen. Sheldon WhitehouseSheldon WhitehouseSenate GOP signals they’ll help bail out Biden’s Fed chair The Hill’s Morning Report – Presented by Altria – Jan. 6 panel flexes its muscle Sen. Whitehouse blasts Alito speech: ‘You have fouled your nest, not us’ MORE (D-R.I.) told The Hill this week.

Because Democrats are using reconciliation, a budget process, to pass the bill without GOP support, any ideas need total unity from all 50 Senate Democrats. 

Though some Democrats have stopped short of saying the plan is officially out of the bill, without Manchin’s support it can’t get the total unity needed for Democrats to pass the larger spending bill. 

Asked about getting Manchin on board with the climate provisions, Sen. Dick DurbinDick DurbinManchin on finishing agenda by Halloween: ‘I don’t know how that would happen’ Senate Democrats ask for details on threats against election workers Fill the Eastern District of Virginia  MORE (Ill.), the No. 2 Senate Democrat, said Tuesday that he thought “there are areas that we can find some agreement.”  

“We want to see something that really shows a national commitment to the climate change issue,” Durbin said. “We want the president to be able to sign it, and to speak to other nation’s about it.” 

Source Article from https://thehill.com/policy/equilibrium-sustainability/577378-manchin-carbon-tax-not-on-the-board-for-biden-spending-plan

Some workers opposed to vaccine mandates on the job are increasingly pointing to the same reason for their objection: They already had Covid-19.

Nurses, factory workers and professional athletes are among employees asking that immunity from prior Covid-19 infection be recognized alongside vaccination as sufficient protection against the virus.

Source Article from https://www.wsj.com/articles/some-workers-want-covid-19-recovery-accepted-as-evidence-of-immunity-11634648215

The attack was part of an alarming surge in kidnappings targeting Haitians, both rich and poor, as the poverty-stricken country struggles to overcome a series of crises. Meanwhile, local unions have organized a widespread general strike that was continuing Tuesday, as demonstrators took to the streets of the capital, Port-au-Prince, to protest the deteriorating security situation in the country.

Source Article from https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2021/10/19/haiti-gang-that-kidnapped-17-missionary-group-seeks-1-million-ransom-per-person-says-justice-minister/