Advertisement



Wu held steady enough, and though her performance was not always as strong as that of her opponent, she did not make any major missteps. Wu at several turns accused Essaibi George of fear-mongering with her criticism of Wu’s plans.

Differences between them became clear when Essaibi George poked at Wu, starting with housing. She challenged Wu to explain how she would implement rent control and what she would do to protect small landlords. Essaibi George said rent control would keep rents high and noted it can be enacted only by the state Legislature. She also emphasized her own proposals to bolster opportunities for homeownership and increasing access to housing stability services in the city.

“Michelle does not believe in the power of that small landlord,” she said, arguing Wu’s approach would “create further disinvestment in our city . . . and push our city’s residents further and further away.”

In response, Wu said she would take a multi-pronged approach that would stabilize rents while also spurring new investments.

Advertisement



“Everything should be on the table when it comes to addressing our housing crisis,” she said. “We can’t be afraid and listen to scare tactics around what our residents need right now.”

The starkest difference centered on public safety: Wu called for a more public health-oriented approach to policing, while Essaibi George accused her of wanting to “defund” the police — which became a third-rail slogan in the debate over police reform around the country last year.

“We need to ensure that our city is a safe city and a just city — that work is incredibly important,” Essaibi George said. She pledged to fulfill “the promise of community policing,” engaging residents with police officers. But, she added, “I believe in investing in public safety, not defunding our public safety agencies and the work we need to do as a city.”

Wu took issue with the suggestion she would defund police, saying, “What Boston needs right now is solutions, not sound bites, not scare tactics.”

Wu said she would bring greater accountability and transparency to the department. She argued for a different response to incidents involving health crises, citing her own experience in getting her mother, who has suffered mental health episodes, treated by medical workers not police officers.

“We need to ensure that our resources are being spent in the right way, delivering the services that our residents need,” she said.

Essaibi George drew out another contrast, citing their differences over the city budget in recent years. Former mayor Martin J. Walsh had warned in 2020 that failure to pass his budget proposal amid the pandemic would result in the layoff of 43 emergency medical technicians and paramedics. Opponents at the time characterized the warning as fear-mongering.

Advertisement



Essaibi George reprised that debate again Tuesday night. “If we want these activities, these actions, these decisions to succeed, we need to invest in them,” she said. “It takes money, it takes dollars, it takes decisive decisions to make it happen.”

Wu responded, “That is simply not true. Again, we don’t need scare tactics in the city of Boston. We don’t need false choices that pit our residents against each other or underestimate what is possible for this city.”

The debate came hours after a new poll was released that showed Wu leads Essaibi George by a commanding 32 percentage points, with 57 percent to Essaibi George’s 25 percent. The poll of 500 likely registered Boston voters was conducted by MassINC Polling Group for WBUR, the Dorchester Reporter, and the Boston Foundation. It had a margin of sampling error of plus or minus 4.9 percentage points.

Nineteen percent of voters surveyed said they remain undecided.

Hoping to sway those undecideds, each candidate sought advantage on the schools front. Wu pushed for improving the school assignment process so that it is more equitable, closing gaps in early education and child care, delivering universal pre-K, and rebuilding crumbling school facilities. Wu also highlighted the importance of details, whether it be punctual school buses or the lack of working water fountains in buildings.

Advertisement



“We need to get the operations right,” she said.

Essaibi George spoke of the need for a strong early literacy program and a curriculum that ensures “every school is high quality.”

“You want to fix the Boston Public Schools, hire a teacher. I’ll get it done,” she said.

On the ongoing humanitarian crisis around the intersection of Massachusetts Avenue and Melnea Cass Boulevard, Wu reiterated her commitment to performing a city audit within her first 100 days as mayor to see what city properties could be repurposed for housing and services to help alleviate problems in the area, known as Mass. and Cass.

Like Wu, Essaibi George indicated she was open to discuss turning a former detention center run by the county sheriff into temporary housing with addiction services, and also using the Shattuck Hospital at Franklin Park for housing and services to help solve the Mass. and Cass crisis.

Essaibi George also mentioned the importance of rebuilding the bridge to Long Island, where the city offered homelessness and addiction services for years before the bridge was closed in 2014. But Wu said such a project is years away and will be costly.

“We need action right away,” said Wu.

Responding to a question about quality of life matters, Essaibi George said a mayor is also responsible for the “little things that maybe aren’t considered broad vision, or big goals, or fancy,” an apparent dig at Wu’s bold proposals.

Advertisement



“We need to fill potholes, we need to repair sidewalks, we need to make sure the trash gets picked up and the lights get turned on every single evening,” she said. “It’s not fancy, but it’s important.”

Wu agreed, saying her proposed Green New Deal has a big vision approach on everyday affairs, such as planting more street trees in Boston, and electrifying the city’s school bus fleet, to help cut down on diesel pollution.

“This is about the day to day, that we can only fix if we are actually getting to the scale of where the issues are in the city,” she said.

Asked how they rated Walsh, both were complimentary. Wu, who had been one of the mayor’s strongest critics on the council, surprisingly said Walsh did well as mayor, though she said the city faces growing pressures to fix schools and address a housing crisis. “I will make sure that we are not just continuing to take baby steps to where we need to go,” she said.

Essaibi George called Walsh a good mayor, and said the two have shared values. But she said she would bring to her administration her years working as a teacher, and experience as a councilor addressing homelessness.

“There’s so much work we have to continue to do, and do in a very different way, and I look forward to doing that as Mayor Essaibi George,” she said.

Emma Platoff and Shannon Larson of the Globe staff contributed to this report.


Danny McDonald can be reached at daniel.mcdonald@globe.com. Follow him on Twitter @Danny__McDonald. Milton J. Valencia can be reached at milton.valencia@globe.com. Follow him on Twitter @miltonvalencia.

Source Article from https://www.bostonglobe.com/2021/10/13/metro/wu-essaibi-george-square-off-debate/

Ms. Sinema is one of the most closely watched Senate Democrats in the country as one of two centrists, along with Senator Joe Manchin of West Virginia, who have objected to the price of Mr. Biden’s budget package, which could spend as much as $3.5 trillion over a decade remaking social and climate policy in the nation.

With the Senate tied 50-50, Democrats need unanimity to pass any package, which has greatly empowered both Mr. Manchin and Ms. Sinema as the party’s vocal holdouts. Vice President Kamala Harris would serve as the tiebreaking vote.

Ms. Sinema has pushed for the House to adopt a separate, bipartisan $1 trillion infrastructure bill while the larger budget package is being negotiated. She called the delay in voting on the infrastructure package “inexcusable” and “deeply disappointing” in early October.

When the Senate is out of session, senators are free to fund-raise, return to their home states for events, remain in Washington working on legislation or travel abroad, both for official government business and for vacations.

Ms. Sinema’s fund-raising while in the midst of budget negotiations has already drawn scrutiny. In late September, a group of five business lobbying groups, many of which oppose the budget bill, held a fund-raiser for her in Washington, D.C. Sponsors of that event included the National Association of Wholesaler-Distributors and the grocers’ political action committee, as well as lobbyists for roofers and electrical contractors.

Days later, Ms. Sinema traveled to Arizona where she had a “retreat” for her political action committee at a high-end resort and spa in Phoenix. When she left Washington, the reason that her spokesman provided was a medical appointment for a foot injury. That injury prevented her from running the Boston Marathon, though she still attended. Some climate activists showed up and waved a banner that urged her to “Be brave — fight for us.”

Progressive activists have expressed growing frustration with Ms. Sinema in recent weeks, with some trying to recruit a primary challenger when she is next up for re-election, in 2024.

Ms. Sinema entered July with $3.5 million in her re-election account.

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2021/10/13/us/politics/kyrsten-sinema-fundraising-europe.html

Former President Donald Trump believes Republicans will sit out the 2022 midterms and the 2024 presidential election, of which he may be a contender, if the fraud he believes occurred during the 2020 election isn’t “solved.”

Trump has been pushing that he rightfully won the 2020 presidential election since the race was called for Biden and has been critical of legislators and judges who don’t back the belief as well. He has yet to prove widespread fraud occurred that would have changed the outcome of the election and on Wednesday, he railed against a Georgia judge who dismissed a fraud suit.

In a statement, Trump denied that little evidence has been produced to prove he’s the rightful winner of the presidential election, saying that they’ve “thoroughly and conclusively documented” it. He added that Republicans will withhold their votes in 2022 and 2024 if the election fraud isn’t “solved.” He added it is the “single most important thing for Republicans to do.”

Liz Shew, a spokesperson for the former president, told Newsweek failing to fix the problems Trump claimed plagued the 2020 election and holding “those who broke the rules” accountable will foster the belief among Republicans that their votes don’t matter.

Newsweek reached out to former President Donald Trump for clarification as to what he would consider the alleged fraud “solved” but did not receive a response in time for publication.

Former President Donald Trump said Republicans wouldn’t vote in the midterms and presidential election if the election fraud of 2020 election isn’t “solved.” Trump speaks to supporters during a rally at the Iowa State Fairgrounds on October 9 in Des Moines, Iowa.
Scott Olson/Getty Images

Although there have been instances of voter fraud occurring during the 2020 election, officials denied it was of the scale that could have changed the result, thereby giving Trump a second term in office. Trump has continuously pushed for investigations into the 2020 election, praising attendees of a rally that called for a full audit of the Michigan election results.

On Wednesday, he also criticized Henry County Superior Court Chief Judge Brian Amero for dismissing a lawsuit that sought to review nearly 150,000 absentee ballots from Fulton County, the most populous county in Georgia. Trump called the dismissal a “disgrace” to America and questioned why the public can’t look at the ballots.

“Our country is going to hell and we are not allowed transparency even in our elections,” Trump said. “The people of Georgia deserve to know the truth…The fight continues, we will never give up. Our elections are so corrupt and nobody wants to do anything about it!”

Filed in December by nine Georgia voters, Amero said the lawsuit lacked standing to claim their constitutional rights were violated because they “failed to allege a particularized injury.”

Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene joined Trump’s frustration at the ruling, telling Steve Bannon on his podcast that issues with the economy and the fallout of the withdrawal from Afghanistan constituted injury.

Garland Favorito, a longtime critic of the state’s election systems and plaintiff in the case, told the Associated Press it’s inadequate for organizations to “secretly tell us there are no counterfeit ballots and refuse to let the public inspect them.”

Fulton County Board of Commissioners Chairman Robb Pitts called the ruling a “win for democracy” and dismissed claims of election fraud as a “meritless conspiracy theory” being spread by those who can’t “accept that their side lost.”

Source Article from https://www.newsweek.com/trump-says-republicans-wont-vote-midterms-2024-election-if-2020-fraud-isnt-solved-1638730

Before taking the man into custody, Aas said a “confrontation” ensued with officers, but he gave no further details.

In addition to the deaths, two other people, including an off-duty officer, were injured and taken to a hospital, according to the Norwegian Broadcasting Corporation, NRK. The age and gender of the victims were not released as of Wednesday evening.

“This is a tragedy for all concerned,” Kongsberg Mayor Kari Anne Sand said to Verdens Gang, a Norwegian newspaper. “Words fail me.”

The incoming prime minister, Jonas Gahr Stoere, called the event a “cruel and brutal act,” the AP reported.

Norway in July marked the 10th anniversary of its worst-ever terrorist attack, in which a far-right extremist killed 77 people.

BuzzFeed News has reached out to the Kongsberg police and the prime minister’s office for more information.

Source Article from https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/nicolefallert/norway-bow-arrow-attack

TAMPA (WFLA) – 8 On Your Side spoke directly with the Teton County, Wyoming Coroner Dr. Brent Blue about the autopsy of Gabby Petito on Wednesday.

On Tuesday, Dr. Blue announced he had determined Petito’s cause of death was strangulation with the manner of death being ruled a homicide.

Petito was reported missing by her family on Sept. 11 after she did not return from a months-long cross-country trip with her fiancé, Brian Laundrie. Her remains were found on Sept. 19 at a campground in Wyoming’s Grand Teton National Park.

She was last seen alive on Aug. 27, on that day, a video from Florida travel bloggers placed Petito’s white van in the camping area close to where her remains were discovered.

On Sept. 21, the autopsy was conducted in Teton County. Within hours, authorities announced Petito’s death was in fact a homicide.

Dr. Blue’s office performed the autopsy with him personally interpreting the results.

“What factors led you to believe so quickly that this was in fact a homicide?” asked 8 On Your Side Investigative Reporter Mahsa Saeidi.

“We look at the scene, we look at the…. apparent injuries, we look at the whole situation,” said Dr. Blue.

Three weeks later, Dr. Blue confirmed the cause of death: manual strangulation or throttling.

“Manual strangulation or throttling is strangulation by use of hands as opposed to mechanical strangulation,” said Dr. Blue.

“How do you determine a finding of manual strangulation, what is the state of the body in general, that allows you to come up with that conclusion?” asked Saeidi.

“Well it’s dictated by the type of injuries,” the doctor responded.

Dr. Blue says, two things can occur during a strangulation.

“One is the cutting off of blood flow to the brain through the carotid arteries, the other is a collapse in the windpipe so the person can’t breathe,” Dr. Blue said.

While manual strangulation is often considered to be murder, there could be a set of facts that make it not murder, like self-defense.

8 On Your Side also asked Dr. Blue to elaborate on comments that appeared to identify a suspect in Petito’s death.

“Unfortunately this is only one of many deaths around the country of people who are involved in domestic violence,” said Dr. Blue during a zoom news conference with reporters Tuesday.

“Did you determine that her cause of death was the result of domestic violence or was that just, you know, a comment that you made in the moment?” asked Saeidi.

After the news conference, some assumed Dr. Blue was confirming that Laundrie was involved in Petito’s death.

“That was a comment I made in the moment,” he said.

Right now, the FBI and federal prosecutors are not releasing any more information.

Laundrie is still a person of interest in Petito’s disappearance, and has been missing according to police since Sept. 17. According to police, his parents reported last seeing him last Monday, Sept. 13, in hiking gear. He has not been named as a suspect in the ongoing investigation. and law enforcement are looking for him.

Source Article from https://www.wfla.com/8-on-your-side/teton-county-coroner-clarifies-comments-in-gabby-petito-case-after-autopsy-announcement/

Los Angeles City Councilman Mark Ridley-Thomas was indicted Wednesday on federal charges that he took bribes from a USC dean in exchange for directing millions of dollars in public funding to the university when he was on the L.A. County Board of Supervisors.

Ridley-Thomas is accused of conspiring with Marilyn Louise Flynn, who at the time was dean of USC’s School of Social Work, to steer county money to the university in return for admitting his son Sebastian into the graduate school with a full-tuition scholarship and a paid professorship.

A 20-count grand jury indictment alleges that Flynn and Ridley-Thomas also concocted a scheme to funnel $100,000 from one of his campaign committees through the university to a nonprofit where his son would work.

Ridley-Thomas, 66, one of the most powerful figures in Los Angeles politics, is the third L.A. City Council member to face federal corruption charges over the last two years. He and Flynn each face charges of conspiracy, bribery, mail and wire fraud.

The alleged kickback scheme is the latest in a string of scandals that have marred USC’s reputation in recent years. Its former medical school dean was exposed as a user of methamphetamine, heroin and other drugs, and the longtime campus gynecologist was accused of sexual misconduct by hundreds of alumnae, leading to a $1.1-billion settlement, the largest sex abuse payout in higher education history.

Full coverage of Mark Ridley-Thomas, his son and the USC School of Social Work.

USC was also the epicenter of the college-admissions bribery scandal in which wealthy parents paid hundreds of thousands of dollars to have their children falsely admitted as athletes.

“This indictment charges a seasoned lawmaker who allegedly abused the public’s trust by taking official actions to benefit himself and his family member,” acting U.S. Atty. Tracy L. Wilkison said. “The corrupt activities alleged in the indictment were facilitated by a major university’s high-ranking administrator whose desire for funding apparently trumped notions of integrity and fair play.”

Ridley-Thomas could not be reached. Michael J. Proctor, his attorney, did not respond to a request for comment.

Flynn’s attorney, Vicki I. Podberesky, said her client “has not committed any crime and we believe that the evidence in this case will ultimately support this conclusion.” She described Flynn as a veteran academic who had “worked tirelessly for the improvement and betterment of the social welfare network in Los Angeles and around the country.”

When state Assemblyman Sebastian Ridley-Thomas resigned suddenly in December, it marked an abrupt halt to a promising political career.

In a statement, a USC spokesperson said university officials have been cooperating with federal investigators since the summer of 2018 when they learned of the $100,000 payment Ridley-Thomas and Flynn allegedly orchestrated and notified prosecutors. Flynn stopped working for the university in September of that year, the statement said.

The indictment comes three years after The Times revealed that USC had provided a scholarship to Sebastian Ridley-Thomas and appointed him as a professor around the time that then-Supervisor Ridley-Thomas had funneled campaign money through the university that ended up in a nonprofit group run by his son.

The Times reported that USC alerted federal prosecutors to the unusual arrangement following an internal investigation. It also described the intense budget pressure Flynn was under at the time of the alleged scheme with Ridley-Thomas in large part because of her embrace of online degree programs.

Under her tenure as dean, USC’s social work program became the largest in the world, exploding from an enrollment of 900 in 2010 to 3,500 in 2016.

Former Assemblyman Sebastian Ridley-Thomas likely made an unwanted sexual advance toward a female Capitol staffer two years ago, according to an Assembly investigation released Wednesday.

That growth, however, was achieved largely through a partnership with a digital learning start-up that received more than half of the roughly $100,000 tuition that students paid for a master’s degree through the school’s online program. The profit-sharing required Flynn to aggressively raise money and seek government contracts to increase revenue.

To fill the online ranks, the school began admitting less qualified students, who sometimes struggled to do the work and who ultimately drove down the rankings of the once prestigious program. In 2019, USC was forced to lay off social work professors and staff.

Shortly before the indictment was made public, Ridley-Thomas spoke with a Times reporter about a new homelessness policy, which he had been integral in drafting. He gave no indication that anything was amiss and said he’d be attending an event for the mayoral campaign of Rep. Karen Bass (D-Los Angeles) this weekend.

Federal authorities will allow Ridley-Thomas to voluntarily surrender, according to the U.S. attorney’s office. Flynn’s attorney said she too will surrender.

The indictment’s political repercussions were immediate. City Councilman Joe Buscaino, who is also running for mayor, called on Ridley-Thomas to resign, saying he was “shocked, saddened, and disgusted” by the bribery charges.

“These charges tarnish the reputation of the entire L.A. City Council,” he said.

The council has been mired in corruption scandals. Former L.A. Councilman Jose Huizar is awaiting trial on racketeering, bribery, money laundering and other charges. Prosecutors allege he headed up a criminal enterprise involving multiple real estate developers looking to build projects in his downtown district when he was on the council. Huizar has pleaded not guilty and is seeking to have many of the charges dismissed.

In a related case, former Councilman Mitchell Englander is serving a 14-month prison sentence after pleading guilty to lying to federal authorities about cash and other gifts that he received in casinos in Las Vegas and near Palm Springs.

Former Assemblyman Sebastian Ridley-Thomas was the subject of two sexual harassment complaints at the time he stepped down from the Legislature last year, according to documents reviewed by The Times and sources familiar with the matter.

Ridley-Thomas was first elected to the City Council in 1991, following 10 years as head of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference of Greater Los Angeles. Over the subsequent three decades, he went to serve in the state Legislature and the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors, before returning to the council in December.

He has been one of the most prominent figures in addressing the homelessness crisis in Los Angeles. In 2017, he was a leader in the campaign to pass Measure H — a quarter-cent sales tax increase that would fund housing and support for thousands of people currently living on the streets.

L.A. City Council President Nury Martinez said she was “disappointed” to hear of the Ridley-Thomas indictment. “While the alleged crimes took place while Mr. Ridley-Thomas sat on the Board of Supervisors, these charges are serious and the Council will need to take appropriate action,” she said.

Times staff writers Ben Oreskes, Dakota Smith and David Zahniser contributed to this report.

Source Article from https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2021-10-13/mark-ridley-thomas-usc-dean-bribery-indictment

Robert J. Costello, a lawyer for Mr. Bannon, did not back down in a letter to the committee on Wednesday, reiterating that his client would not produce documents or testimony “until such time as you reach an agreement with President Trump” on claims of executive privilege “or receive a court ruling.”

On Wednesday, Mr. Thompson said the panel “expects Mr. Clark to cooperate fully with our investigation.”

The Senate Judiciary Committee said last week that there was credible evidence that Mr. Clark was involved in efforts to interrupt the peaceful transfer of power, citing his proposal to deliver a letter to state legislators in Georgia and others encouraging them to delay certification of election results.

The Senate committee also said Mr. Clark recommended holding a news conference announcing that the Justice Department was investigating allegations of voter fraud, in line with Mr. Trump’s repeated demands, despite a lack of evidence of any fraud. Both proposals were rejected by senior leaders in the department.

The New York Times reported in January that Mr. Clark also discussed with Mr. Trump a plan to oust the acting attorney general, Jeffrey A. Rosen, and wield the department’s power to force state lawmakers in Georgia to overturn its presidential election results. Mr. Clark denied the account, which was based on the accounts of four former Trump administration officials who asked not to be named because of fear of retaliation.

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2021/10/13/us/politics/jeffrey-clark-subpoena.html

The White House is discussing options to address fuel and natural gas shortages that have driven prices higher, White House press secretary Jen PsakiJen PsakiOvernight Health Care — Presented by The National Council for Mental Wellbeing — Progressives: Medicare benefit expansions ‘not negotiable’ Texas governor opens new front on vaccine mandates Biden to meet in person with president of Kenya at the White House MORE told reporters Wednesday.

“The president has asked his economic team, as they do on any range of issues impacting the public, to continue to discuss what the options are that we can take to address these shortages,” Psaki said at an afternoon briefing.

Psaki noted that there is a natural gas shortage worldwide and said there are a “range” of options for the Biden administration to explore to help address the issue, but she declined to specify what options are currently being discussed. 

“I’m not in a position yet to outline additional steps we can take,” she said. 

Bloomberg News reported that Biden administration officials including Energy Secretary Jennifer GranholmJennifer GranholmOvernight Energy & Environment — Dozens of countries join US-Europe-led methane pledge Oil trades above a barrel, hitting a 7-year high Overnight Energy & Environment — Biden makes return to pre-Trump national monument boundaries official MORE, Secretary of State Antony BlinkenAntony BlinkenOvernight Defense & National Security — Afghanistan concerns center stage with G-20 Iran and China at top of agenda in joint meeting of US, Israel and UAE US Embassy in Colombia investigating several Havana syndrome cases MORE and Agriculture Secretary Tom VilsackTom VilsackUSDA: Farm-to-school programs help schools serve healthier meals OVERNIGHT MONEY: House poised to pass debt-ceiling bill MORE met Tuesday night to discuss rising fuel and natural gas prices. 

The meeting was reportedly part of talks among the group of officials, who also include deputy Treasury Secretary Adewale Adeyemo, White House climate advisers Gina McCarthyGina McCarthy Environmental activists’ email blast disrupted White House communications over two days: report Greenpeace ad asks if climate change is racist Overnight Energy & Environment — Presented by the American Petroleum Institute — Interior halts Trump-era bird protection rollback MORE and John KerryJohn KerryOvernight Energy & Environment — Dozens of countries join US-Europe-led methane pledge Interpreter who helped rescue Biden in 2008 escapes Afghanistan More than 30 countries join methane pledge led by US, EU MORE, White House economic adviser Brian DeeseBrian Deese Environmental activists’ email blast disrupted White House communications over two days: report Sinema in Arizona as Democrats try to get spending-infrastructure deal White House says it’s ‘closer to agreement than ever’ after House punts infrastructure vote MORE and White House national security adviser Jake SullivanJake SullivanIran and China at top of agenda in joint meeting of US, Israel and UAE Israeli PM calls for UN Security Council to act against Iran over nuclear program North Korea’s Kim rips US, promises ‘invincible’ military MORE

For weeks, European countries have been facing energy price spikes that have raised utility prices for consumers there. 

Meanwhile, in the U.K., there has also been difficulty getting gasoline for their cars amid a shortage of truck drivers.

In the U.S., gasoline prices, which dropped to severe lows at the start of the coronavirus pandemic last year, have been rising throughout the year as the economy turned back on. 

The national average of gasoline prices stood at $3.288 per gallon on Wednesday, according to AAA, up from a low of $1.77 in April 2020 towards the beginning of the pandemic. 

The price of gasoline and fell significantly during the pandemic as people traveled less than normal, and at least part of the global rebound in fuel prices has been attributed to more vaccination and fewer pandemic-related restrictions.

Options the Biden administration could take to address the situation domestically could entail releasing crude oil from the U.S. emergency stockpile or restricting exports to other countries, though the latter could rankle allies in Europe.  

Meanwhile, new data released by the Labor Department on Wednesday showed that consumer prices rose 0.4 percent in the month of September and 5.4 percent over the past year, reflecting sharp increases in food, energy and shelter costs. 

Source Article from https://thehill.com/policy/equilibrium-sustainability/576611-white-house-weighing-steps-to-address-gas-shortages

WASHINGTON (AP) — The House committee investigating the Jan. 6 riot at the U.S. Capitol issued a subpoena Wednesday to a former Justice Department lawyer who positioned himself as an ally of President Donald Trump and aided Trump’s efforts to challenge the results of the presidential election.

The committee on Wednesday said it has demanded documents and testimony from Jeffrey Clark, a former assistant attorney general who lent a sympathetic ear to the president’s baseless claims that the election results were fraudulent. Clark clashed with superiors during the tumultuous final weeks of the Trump administration, including during a dramatic White House meeting.

The subpoena comes one week after the release of a Senate Judiciary Committee report that documented extraordinary tensions within the senior ranks of the Justice Department in December and January as Trump and allies prodded the law enforcement agency to aid in efforts to undo the election won by Democrat Joe Biden.

Trump’s own attorney general William Barr had said the Justice Department found no evidence of widespread fraud that could have overturned the results. Unsubstantiated claims of fraud have been repeatedly rejected by judge after judge, including by Trump appointees, and by election officials across the country.

Meanwhile, at least three of the officials involved in organizing and running the rally that preceded the violent storming of the Capitol are handing over documents in response to subpoenas.

The 11 organizers and staffers were given a Wednesday deadline to turn over documents and records as part of the committee’s investigation into the deadly insurrection that marked the most serious breach of the Capitol building since the War of 1812. The organizers have also been asked to appear at separate depositions the committee has scheduled beginning later this month.

Other subpoenas have also been served to top White House officials and Trump advisers, including former White House chief of staff Mark Meadows and adviser Steve Bannon, who has thus far refused to cooperate, putting him at risk of being charged with contempt.

Among those responding to the Wednesday deadline were Lyndon Brentnall, whose firm was hired to provide event security that day. “All the documents and communications requested by the subpoena were handed in,” he told The Associated Press.

Two longtime Trump campaign and White House staffers, Megan Powers and Hannah Salem, who were listed on the Jan 6. rally permit as “operations manager for scheduling and guidance” and “operations manager for logistics and communications,” have also provided documents or are planning to do so.

Powers, who also served as the Trump reelection campaign’s director of operations, intends to provide the committee with the requested documentation and to meet with them — though it remains unclear what form such meetings will take, according to a person familiar with her response who spoke on condition of anonymity.

Brentnall had previously said his firm had “every intention” of complying with the select committee. “As far as we’re concerned, we ran security at a legally permitted event run in conjunction with the U.S. Secret Service and the Park Police,” he said.

The committee has said the subpoenas are part of its effort to collect information “on the planning, organization, and funding” of the Jan. 6 rally as well as other events planned to support Trump’s baseless claims of election fraud in the weeks between his November election defeat and the January attack.

A committee spokesperson declined to comment Wednesday on the responses it had received and how many of the 11 were complying.

It remains unclear whether the others who were subpoenaed intend to cooperate.

They include Amy Kremer, the founder and chair of Women for America First, a pro-Trump group that was the lead organizer of the event; Cynthia Chafian, an organizer who submitted the first permit for the rally; and Caroline Wren, a veteran GOP fundraiser who was listed on permit paperwork for the Jan. 6 rally as a “VIP Advisor.”

Also on the list are Maggie Mulvaney, a niece of former top Trump chief of staff Mick Mulvaney, who worked as director of finance operations for the Trump campaign and is now a congressional staffer; former Trump campaign official Katrina Pierson, who the committee says was “reportedly involved in the organization” of the rally on Jan. 6 and a smaller one the day before; and Justin Caporale and Tim Unes of Event Strategies Inc., who were listed on Jan. 6 permit paperwork as the rally’s project manager and stage manager, per the committee.

None have responded to multiple requests for comment.

Two additional organizers, Ali Alexander and Nathan Martin, as well as their “Stop the Steal” organization, were also subpoenaed for documents, which are due Oct. 21.

Alexander wrote in a Telegram post Monday that the committee was “subpoenaing people in bad faith.”

“So maybe this Select Commitee is bogus?” he added. “Everyone is waiting to see what I’ll do.”

The committee has said two top Trump officials — Meadows and former Defense Department official Kashyap Patel — are “engaging” with the committee, though it is unclear exactly what that entails. It is also unclear whether Dan Scavino, Trump’s longtime social media director and one of his most loyal aides, will cooperate.

Members of the committee have said they are prepared to fight for the testimony and will use the courts to do so if necessary.

Many of the rioters who stormed the Capitol on Jan. 6, trying to halt the certification of President Joe Biden’s victory, marched up the National Mall after attending at least part of Trump’s rally, where he had repeated his baseless claims of election fraud and implored the crowd to “fight like hell.”

The results of the election were confirmed by state officials and upheld by the courts.

At least nine people died during and after the attack, including a Trump supporter who was shot and killed by police as she tried to break into the House chamber.

__

Colvin reported from New York and Smith from Providence, Rhode Island.

Source Article from https://apnews.com/article/mark-meadows-subpoenas-capitol-siege-373a3f25486028f65d0322eb8827c8ac

Even if the trial judge had been mistaken in excluding the evidence, Mr. Feigin said, the error was harmless given the overwhelming evidence that Dzhokhar Tsarnaev was “a motivated terrorist who willingly maimed and murdered innocents, including an eight-year-old boy, in furtherance of jihad.”

Ginger D. Anders, a lawyer for Mr. Tsarnaev, disagreed. “The Waltham evidence would have changed the terms of the debate,” she said.

“The evidence’s exclusion distorted the penalty phase here by enabling the government to present a deeply misleading account of the key issues of influence and leadership,” she said.

Justice Kagan said the judge had allowed the jury to hear other evidence bearing on Tamerlan Tsarnaev.

“This court let in evidence about Tamerlan poking somebody in the chest,” she said. “This court let in evidence about Tamerlan shouting at people. This court let in evidence about Tamerlan assaulting a fellow student, all because that showed what kind of person Tamerlan was and what kind of influence he might have had over his brother.”

“And yet,” Justice Kagan said, “this court kept out evidence that Tamerlan led a crime that resulted in three murders?”

Justice Stephen G. Breyer seemed to agree that the evidence was important.

“This was their defense,” he said of Mr. Tsarnaev’s lawyers. “They had no other defense. They agreed he was guilty. Their only claim was, don’t give me the death penalty because it’s my brother who was the moving force.”

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2021/10/13/us/politics/supreme-court-death-sentence-boston-marathon-bomber.html

LANSING, Mich. – Gov. Gretchen Whitmer has released a statement on the reopening of the Michigan-Canada border to vaccinated Canadians.

On Wednesday, the United States announced it will allow fully vaccinated foreign nationals to enter the country, starting in early November, regardless of their reason for travel.

By mid-January, even essential travelers who want to enter the U.S. will have to be fully vaccinated to do so.

As a result, Canadian citizens will be allowed to enter Michigan next month, as long as they are fully vaccinated. Canada reopened its border to Michiganders in August.

READVaccinated Americans given the green light to cross into Canada — What to know

The U.S.-Canada border had previously been closed to nonessential travel since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, in March 2020.

Here’s a statement from Whitmer:

“The relationship between Michigan and Canada is one built on trade, travel and friendship. I am grateful to the government of Canada and our federal partners for coming together to reopen the Michigan-Canada border. I look forward to welcoming our neighbors as they cross the Ambassador Bridge or Detroit-Windsor Tunnel into Detroit, the Blue Water Bridge into Port Huron, or the Sault Ste. Marie International Bridge into Sault Ste. Marie.

“By reopening the border, we can build on Michigan’s economic momentum. We had the third-highest GDP growth in the second quarter of 2021 and have a $3.5 billion surplus to invest in our families, communities, and small businesses. I look forward to collaborating with our Canadian friends to emerge from the pandemic and usher in a new era of economic prosperity.”

Source Article from https://www.clickondetroit.com/news/michigan/2021/10/13/gov-whitmer-releases-statement-on-reopening-of-michigan-canada-border-to-vaccinated-canadians/

Veondre Avery, 22, was arrested Tuesday and charged with negligent manslaughter and unsafe storage of a firearm, Altamonte Springs police said.

Investigators said the 2-year-old found the gun in the backpack on Aug. 11 and fired a single shot that hit his mother, Shamaya Lynn, in the head.

A woman who also was on the Zoom call dialed 911, reporting that she heard a noise and saw Lynn fall. The co-worker didn’t know how old Lynn was or where she lived, but meanwhile Avery also called 911, begging responders to hurry as he tried to help Lynn.

“I literally just got home and I come in the room… (and) my girlfriend who was working on the computer, she’s just laid back and there’s blood everywhere,” Avery said on the 911 call.

He told the dispatcher that Lynn wasn’t breathing, and he could not feel her heartbeat. She was pronounced dead at the scene.

Authorities said another child also was in the home during the shooting.

The Seminole County State Attorney’s Office said Avery is being held without bond. Records did not list an attorney who could speak on his behalf.

Source Article from https://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/killed-zoom-dad-held-toddler-finds-gun-shoots-80557477

The Supreme Court appeared to lean toward reinstating the death sentence imposed on the Boston Marathon bomber, though the court’s liberal justices were incredulous about the actions of the district court judge in the original trial.

The judge in the original trial excluded evidence of the involvement of Dzhokhar Tsarnaev’s slain older brother, Tamerlan, in a triple murder two years before the 2013 marathon bombing.

Justice Elena Kagan was incredulous, asking Deputy Solicitor General Eric Feigin, the government’s lawyer: “The court keeps out evidence that the older brother committed three murders?”

The triple murder had remained unsolved until a month after the marathon bombing when Tamerlan’s phone records led FBI agents to a man who admitted he had been at the scene of the crime with him. But the interview turned violent and the man was shot to death by law enforcement officers.

Ginger Anders, Dzhokhar Tsarnaev’s attorney, told the justices that omitting that evidence “distorted” her client’s defense. But Justice Brett Kavanauagh appeared unconvinced, noting that Tamerlan’s accomplice “had all the motive in the world to point the finger at the dead guy.”

The two brothers carried out the fatal bombings that killed three people and injured more than 200 others. Tamerlan Tsarnaev was killed in the manhunt following the attack.

Dzhokhar Tsarnaev was convicted in 2015 on 30 federal terrorism-related charges. The jury sentenced him to death for six of those crimes. But in July 2020, the U.S. Court of Appeals based in Boston overturned the death sentences.

In her opinion for a unanimous circuit panel, Judge O. Rogeriee Thompson wrote that a “core promise of our criminal justice system is that even the very worst among us deserves to be fairly tried and lawfully punished.” Despite a “diligent effort,” the appeals court said, the trial judge “did not meet th[at] standard.”

The trial judge also declined to move the case out of Boston, concluding that any prejudice in the city could be dealt with by carefully screening potential jurors. But in arguments before the federal appeals court, the defense asserted that the trial judge did not do that, refusing to probe the potential jurors’ sometimes incendiary social media postings about Tsarnaev.

Then-President Donald Trump called the appeals court decision “ridiculous,” and the administration quickly expedited an appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court, even as it carried out 13 other federal executions in its final seven months in office. These were the first federal executions since 2003, and in each case the Supreme Court rejected 11th hour pleas to intervene.

Though the Biden administration would later halt all the remaining federal executions to review the government’s policy, it has continued to defend the death sentences in the Tsarnaev case.

Justice Amy Coney Barrett pressed the government’s lawyer, Feigin, on those seemingly contradictory positions.

“He is relegated to living under threat of a death sentence that the government doesn’t plan to carry out,” she said. “So I’m just having trouble following the point.”

Feigin replied: “What we’re asking here is that the sound judgement of 12 of the respondent’s peers that he warrants capital punishment for his personal acts in murdering and maiming scores of innocents and, along with his brother, hundreds of innocents at the finish line of the Boston Marathon should be respected.”

A decision from the Supreme Court is expected by summer.

Source Article from https://www.npr.org/2021/10/13/1045647617/supreme-court-looks-set-to-reimpose-the-death-penalty-for-the-boston-marathon-bo

The high-profile primary promises to be an expensive affair. Hageman, who entered the race in September, raised around $300,000 during the first three weeks of her campaign, according to a person familiar with the totals. Cheney has capitalized on her deep connections in the Republican donor world to rake in money for her toughest race yet, already bringing in more than $5 million this year, her campaign announced Tuesday.

While Cheney’s totals and hefty lead — she raised $1.7 million in the third quarter alone — show that she still has powerful connections in a fast-changing Republican Party, the list of prominent Trump donors throwing in with Hageman highlights his dominant influence in the GOP. And it demonstrates Trump and his allies are mobilizing together to punish the handful of Republicans who voted to impeach him after the Jan. 6 Capitol riot.

Thiel, one of the most sought-after GOP donors, has emerged as a financial force behind the effort to unseat Trump critics.

He has also contributed to army veteran Joe Kent, a challenger to Rep.

Jaime Herrera Beutler
(R-Wash.), who, like Cheney, voted for Trump’s impeachment in January. Thiel, a PayPal co-founder and early Facebook investor, met with Trump for over an hour at his Bedminster golf club last month, according to two people familiar with the sit-down. The meeting was first reported by the Wall Street Journal.

Cheney, the daughter of former Vice President Dick Cheney, has her own high-profile financial help: Former President George W. Bush is headlining a fundraiser for her in Texas later this month. The event will also feature other big political names from the Bush administration, including political strategist Karl Rove.

Trump spent months searching for a challenger to take on Cheney, ultimately leading him to Hageman after a lengthy interview process with other congressional hopefuls. She has inherited the former president’s political apparatus: Two top officials on Trump’s 2020 reelection campaign, Nick Trainer and Tim Murtaugh, are playing leading roles steering her campaign. Two other Republican strategists involved in Trump’s orbit, Andy Surabian and James Blair, are running a pro-Hageman super PAC.

That outfit, Wyoming Values PAC, doesn’t have to disclose its fundraising activity until January. But it is expected to become an outlet for major Hageman to funnel sizeable checks. Unlike Hageman’s campaign, the super PAC does not have any contribution limits. And many of her early campaign backers have shown a willingness to back the Trump cause with six- or seven-figure donations in the past.

While Cheney has won major financial support for her reelection run, her opposition to Trump has alienated some of her past supporters. Maggie Scarlett, a former Cheney campaign leader whom the congresswoman praised in a 2018 House floor speech, has donated to Hageman. Scarlett and her husband, financial executive Dick Scarlett, were donors to Trump’s 2020 reelection effort.

North Carolina investor Helen Laughery, another past Cheney donor, also contributed to Hageman. Laughery gave more than $70,000 to support Trump’s 2020 campaign.

Source Article from https://www.politico.com/news/2021/10/13/liz-cheney-trump-fundraisers-515857