California Gov. Gavin Newsom signed a landmark bill on Thursday that will allow Los Angeles County to return beachfront land seized from two former Black owners in the 1920s to their descendants. 

The new law is considered a win for reparations advocates. 

“As governor of California, let me do what apparently Manhattan Beach is unwilling to do, and I want to apologize to the Bruce family for the injustice that was done to them a century ago,” the governor said on the land in Manhattan Beach, according to The Associated Press. “I say that as a proud Californian, but also mindful that we always haven’t had a proud past.”

Newsom said the move could be “catalytic,” allowing land to be returned to others who lost it through racism. 

Willa and Charles Bruce’s great-great-grandson and other descendants joined Newsom at the signing. 

“There are other families waiting for this very day, to have their land returned to them,” cousin Patricia Bruce told the AP.

County Supervisor Janice Hahn, who led a government push to transfer the land, said the heirs would almost certainly be millionaires now if the property had not been taken.

VIRGINIA’S LOUDOUN COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS VOTES TO LAUNCH STUDY CONSIDERING REPARATIONS 

“The law was used to steal this property 100 years ago, and the law today will give it back,” Hahn said.

Willa and Charles Bruce bought the two parcels of land in Los Angeles County’s Manhattan Beach in 1912 and ran a resort that catered to Black people. 

The Bruces and other Black families faced harassment from racist White neighbors and in 1924 the city condemned the Black-owned lots and seized them through eminent domain, claiming the need for a public park – now Bruce’s Beach Park – but it was left vacant for years. 

The couple sued for racial discrimination and eventually received $14,500 but never got their land back, according to The Los Angeles Times. 

In 1948, Manhattan Beach gave the Bruces’ land to the state and in 1995, the state gave it to Los Angeles County, which was not legally allowed to give it back to the Bruces. The new law changes that. 

The proposal was unanimously approved by state lawmakers earlier this month. 

The effort to return the land started last summer during the anti-racism protest movement and after a petition demanding reparations at the beach circulated, the Los Angeles Daily News reported. 

The bill “represents economic and historic justice,” state Sen. Steven Bradford told the Daily News, “and is a model of what reparations can truly look like.” 

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

The county, meanwhile, has outlined steps needed to move forward with the transfer, including assessing the value of the parcels and trying to find a means to lessen the tax burden on the heirs.

The county also needs to vet the legal heirs of the Bruces and possibly find a new site for the lifeguard training headquarters. One option would have the heirs lease the land back to the county for continued use.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/politics/gavin-newsom-beachfront-property-bruce-black-family-manhattan-beach

The US House speaker, Nancy Pelosi, postponed a planned vote on a $1tn infrastructure bill on Thursday night in a stinging defeat for Democrats after progressives revolted, withholding their support until an agreement could be reached to enact the full sweep of Joe Biden’s economic vision.

The decision capped a frantic day of negotiations in Washington that stretched late into the evening, as the president and Democratic leaders attempted to break a stalemate between a handful of moderates, who pushed for the infrastructure vote, and progressives who believe it would be insufficient without a broader, $3.5tn social policy package.

“A great deal of progress has been made this week, and we are closer to an agreement than ever,” said the White House press secretary, Jen Psaki, after the House announced there would not be a vote on Thursday. “But we are not there yet, and so we will need some additional time to finish the work, starting tomorrow morning first thing.”

Democrats insisted that the setback was temporary, but the delay underscored the fragile state of the negotiations as a pair of Senate holdouts demanded the president dramatically shrink the more expansive legislation containing many of the party’s top policy priorities. The House was slated to reconvene on Friday, giving Democrats at least another day to attempt to reach an agreement that would satisfy the feuding factions.

Both pieces are critical to Biden’s economic vision. He spent weeks personally courting Republican senators to secure a bipartisan victory on the infrastructure bill, which would invest $1tn in upgrading roads, bridges and broadband. But he has staked his presidency – and his legacy – on the passage of the mammoth social policy bill that would expand healthcare, make childcare more affordable, establish paid federal leave and combat the climate crisis, paid for by tax increases on wealthy Americans and corporations.

In a vaguely worded letter to colleagues on Thursday night, Pelosi called it a “day of progress”.

“Discussions continue with the House, Senate and White House to reach a bicameral framework agreement to Build Back Better through a reconciliation bill,” she wrote.

“All of this momentum brings us closer to shaping the reconciliation bill in a manner that will pass the House and Senate,” she said, concluding the letter with the promise: “More to follow.”

The delayed vote was a significant blow for Pelosi, a self-described master negotiator who insisted earlier that Democrats were “on the path to win” the infrastructure vote. “This is the fun part,” she boasted to reporters on Thursday, referring to the final, chaotic stretch before securing a major legislative achievement.

Yet with only three votes to spare, and Republicans largely opposed, Pelosi was unable to untangle the competing promises made to progressives and centrists in time to vote on Thursday.

In an effort to placate a small band of centrist Democrats, Pelosi promised to bring the infrastructure bill to the House floor for a vote this week. But progressives had long maintained that they would only support that bill if it passed in tandem with the far more expansive $3.5tn package.

When it became clear on Thursday that the Senate was not prepared to pass the legislation as written, progressives stood by their threat to tank the infrastructure bill, which they saw as leverage for ensuring Biden’s entire economic vision was enacted.

The fate of Biden’s agenda remains in limbo, and with Democrats deeply at odds, it was unclear on Thursday night how they planned to progress.

The terms of the negotiations were largely driven by two Democratic holdouts in the Senate, who are opposed to the current size of the spending package. On Thursday, Senator Joe Manchin of West Virginia said he would not support a spending package that exceeded $1.5tn, less than half of the size of the proposal being pushed by Biden and most of the Democratic party.

Amid the negotiations and with only hours to spare, Congress passed legislation to avert a government shutdown at midnight on Thursday, with Biden later signing a measure that would fund the federal government through 3 December.

The measure was passed by the House and Senate with bipartisan support, though a significant number of Republicans voted against it.

Source Article from https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/sep/30/biden-nancy-pelosi-infrastructure-bill

The Senate confirmed President Biden’s embattled eco-terrorist-linked nominee who endorsed population control to lead the Bureau of Land Management (BLM).

In a 50-45 party-line vote, Tracy Stone-Manning was confirmed as the director of BLM on Thursday evening.

The vote came amid a cacophony of political noise blaring from the White House’s compounding crises and debate on the infrastructure bill, with the Senate Democrats slipping the controversial nominee’s confirmation through.

BIDEN LAND MANAGEMENT NOMINEE ‘COLLABORATED WITH ECO-TERRORISTS,’ TRADED TESTIMONY FOR IMMUNITY

Stone-Manning’s nomination saw robust opposition from conservatives in Congress and outside the halls, with Adam Brandon, president of conservative and libertarian advocacy group FreedomWorks, saying it “should come as no surprise” Biden’s nominee holds her views “seeing as she collaborated with eco-terrorist groups with ties to Ted Kaczynski.”

Stone-Manning eventually lost support from major backers and former Democrat officials, including the Dallas Safari Club and former Obama-era BLM leaders.

Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee chairman Joe Manchin, D-W.V., faced monumental pressure from both sides of the aisle on Stone-Manning’s confirmation, eventually announcing that he would vote for the embattled nominee.

The White House stood by their pick to lead BLM throughout her nomination, calling Stone-Manning “exceptionally qualified” to lead the agency that oversees millions of acres of federal land.

BIDEN NOMINEE CALLED FOR POPULATION CONTROL TO PROTECT ENVIRONMENT: ‘WE MUST BREED FEWER CONSUMING HUMANS’

Stone-Manning’s bitter confirmation process was surrounded by controversy, primarily stemming from her links to a 1989 Earth First! tree-spiking plot in an Idaho forest.

Tree spiking is a dangerous and violent eco-terrorism tactic where metal rods are inserted into trees to prevent them from being cut down. The metal rods damage saws that, in turn, have severely injured people, such as a mill worker whose jaw was split in two from an exploding saw.

In 1993, Stone-Manning was granted legal immunity for her testimony that she retyped and sent an anonymous letter to the U.S. Forest Service on behalf of John P. Blount, her former roommate and friend, documents reveal. 

The letter told the Forest Service that 500 pounds of “spikes measuring 8 to 10 inches in length” had been jammed into the trees of an Idaho forest.

BIDEN BLM NOMINEE CALLED TO ‘WAGE WAR ON OVERPOPULATION’

“The sales were marked so that no workers would be injured and so that you a–holes know that they are spiked,” read the letter obtained by Fox News. “The majority of the trees were spiked within the first ten feet, but many, many others were spiked as high as a hundred and fifty feet.”

“P.S., You bastards go in there anyway and a lot of people could get hurt,” the note concluded.

Stone-Manning also took heavy fire for her graduate thesis where she endorsed population control to protect the environment, writing that Americans needed to “breed fewer consuming humans.” She also wrote that parents should stop having children after having two and created a sample advertisement that called a pictured child an “environmental hazard.”

Biden’s new BLM director also wrote in a 1991 essay that Americans should “wage war on overpopulation” to protect grizzly bears.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

“We can bicker and moan at each other in our battle about what is going to help the bear now, but ultimately we need to look at maps less, crunch numbers less, and begin to wage war on overpopulation,” Stone-Manning concluded.

Additionally, last year the newly-minted director of BLM shared her husband’s 2018 article suggesting to let houses caught in forest fires “burn.”

Houston Keene is a reporter for Fox News Digital. You can find him on Twitter at @HoustonKeene.

Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/politics/senate-confirms-tracy-stone-manning-eco-terrorist

Gov. Gavin Newsom signed a bill to return land to the descendants of a Black couple, Willa and Charles Bruce, that was taken from the Bruces in the city of Manhattan Beach, Calif., nearly a century ago. Newsom traveled to the area where the Bruces’ resort was once located to sign the new law in front of Bruce family members, the media and others who raised awareness of how Black Californians were pushed off of valuable beachfront property.

“I’m proud, as a son of this state, proud as the governor of this state, of the most diverse state and the world’s most diverse democracy to be here, Anthony with you,” Newsom said referring to Anthony Bruce, the great-great-grandson of Willa and Charles, and the heir to the property, at the bill signing.

Newsom added that the event was “for all of those families torn asunder because of racism all across this country and around the globe.”

Earlier this month, the California Legislature unanimously approved a measure allowing Los Angeles County to return the property to the descendents of Willa and Charles. The two built and operated a thriving resort that catered to Black patrons. At the time, it was one of the two places in the Los Angeles area where Black people could safely visit the beach, according to the L.A. Times, as other public beaches were deemed for “whites only.”

But their joy came with hardship, as some white residents of Manhattan Beach –– including members of the Ku Klux Klan –– resented the resort and harassed Black visitors to deter them from coming.

In 1924, the Manhattan Beach City Council used eminent domain to strip the Bruce family of their land to create a park.

The property was eventually transferred to the state of California. The state later handed it to the county, with the stipulation that it couldn’t be given away or sold.

This sort of expropriation of Black property was common throughout the United States in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, and it contributed to the racial wealth gap that exists today.

“You got evidence of an entrepreneurial energy that was alive and well in this family, a persistence, a grit, a determination to make things happen,” Newsom said. “We’re here today to try to make up for [their loss].”

Legislation sponsored by Democratic state Sen. Steve Bradford, signed by Newsom on Thursday, removes those state restrictions, allowing L.A. County to return the land. During the bill signing, Bradford –– who is Black and represents a southern L.A. district that borders Manhattan Beach –– talked about growing up in Southern California and hearing stories about the Bruce family as he traveled through Manhattan Beach.

At Thursday’s ceremony, Bradford said that people often ask him, What do you think generational wealth would have looked like for the Bruces?”

He said he responds by pointing to white families that have built fortunes. “I said let’s look at the Gettys, let’s look at the Rockefellers, let’s look at the Forbes,” Bradford said. “That’s what generational wealth could have looked like for the Bruce family. But they were denied that because of the racist behavior of this city.”

Bradford criticized the current Manhattan Beach City Council for not apologizing to the Bruces.

In response, Newsom said: “Let me do what apparently Manhattan Beach is unwilling to do, and I want to apologize to the Bruce family for what was done to them a century ago.”

Janice Hahn, a member of the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors, grew up in the Manhattan Beach area and has been championing the cause on the local level for the county.

“The county, indeed, owned the very parcels which were once Bruce’s resort. I knew there was one thing to do and that was to give the property back,” Hahn said.

“The law was used to steal this property a hundred years ago and the law today will give it back.”

According to family members and historical records, Willa and Charles Bruce fought to keep their land. After the city seized their property, they sued and were awarded damages of $14,500. Adjusted for inflation, that wouldn’t even amount to even one-quarter of a million dollars today, according to the New York Times.

Newsom, Bradford and Hahn all credited Kavon Ward for leading the cause through the Justice for Bruce’s Beach movement. Ward has now started a national campaign to help Black families reclaim property called Where Is My Land. She says multiple people have already contacted her for assistance with potential cases.

The first official acknowledgment of the Bruces’ story was in 2006, when the city council voted to rename a park Bruce’s Beach, near where their resort once stood. It happened under the leadership of then-Mayor Mitch Ward, Manhattan Beach’s first Black elected official. He was also in attendance at the bill signing and was thanked for his efforts.

The Los Angeles County Lifeguard Training Headquarters, currently located at Bruce’s Beach –– is thought to be worth as much as $75 million, according to CNN. The county is planning to lease the land from Anthony Bruce once they come up with a deal to hand it over.

Chief Duane Yellow Feather Shepard, of the Pocasset Wampanoag Tribe of the Pokanoket Nation, is a distant relative of Willa and Charles Bruce and a family spokesman, told Yahoo News in July that this is not a story of reparations, but rather a story of returning land that was stolen.

Read more from Yahoo News:

Source Article from https://news.yahoo.com/california-gov-gavin-newsom-signs-law-returning-beachfront-land-stripped-from-black-family-005247717.html

Source Article from https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2021/09/30/police-killings-unreported-government-data-lancet-study-finds/5915807001/

Sept 30 (Reuters) – A U.S. judge upheld the University of California’s COVID-19 vaccine requirement against a challenge by a professor who alleged he had immunity due to a prior coronavirus infection, in what appears to be the first ruling on the issue.

U.S. District Court Judge James Selna in Santa Ana, California, said the university system acted rationally to protect public health by mandating the vaccine and not exempting individuals with some level of immunity from an infection.

More than 43 million Americans have had confirmed cases of COVID-19 and some opponents of vaccinations have argued that immunity from an infection negates the need for an inoculation.

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) said on Aug. 6 that a study showed vaccines offer better protection than natural immunity gained from prior infection, which wanes over time.

On Wednesday, a group of physicians who are Republican members of Congress wrote to the CDC to urge the agency to acknowledge natural immunity.

The lawmakers said if the growing number of vaccine mandates ignore natural immunity it could lead to labor shortages as people are fired for failing to get a shot. Their letter said such mandates could even trigger a security crisis because up to 20% of the military faces “separation” and many of them “likely have natural immunity.”

Selna’s ruling denied a motion for a preliminary injunction by Aaron Kheriaty. And while Selna said the professor at the University of California, Irvine School of Medicine did not show a likelihood of success, Kheriaty said he plans to continue the litigation.

He told Reuters he plans to use the discovery process to determine how the policy was formulated and to question the university’s expert witnesses about their reasoning for rejecting his arguments on natural immunity.

The university did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

Source Article from https://www.reuters.com/world/us/us-judge-upholds-covid-19-vaccine-requirement-those-with-natural-immunity-2021-09-30/

Migrants are apprehended by U.S. Customs and Border Protection agents in LaJoya, Texas in June.

Nicolo Filippo Rosso/Bloomberg via Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Nicolo Filippo Rosso/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Migrants are apprehended by U.S. Customs and Border Protection agents in LaJoya, Texas in June.

Nicolo Filippo Rosso/Bloomberg via Getty Images

The Biden administration has unveiled new guidelines for federal immigration enforcement that prioritize the most urgent threats to public safety, while still leaving discretion in the hands of individual officers and agents.

“What we have done is we have guided our workforce to exercise its discretion to focus on individuals who pose a threat to national security, public safety and border security,” Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas tells NPR.

Under the new guidance, outlined in a memo from Mayorkas to Immigration Customs and Enforcement and other agencies, simply being present in the U.S. without legal authorization “should not alone be the basis” for immigration authorities to arrest or deport someone.

For many, ICE became the de facto face of former President Donald Trump’s immigration crackdown, as agents were free to arrest anyone they encountered who was in the country illegally. With these new guidelines, the Biden administration is trying to distance itself from those policies.

It is an “incontrovertible fact,” Mayorkas said, that “the majority of undocumented individuals … have contributed so significantly to our communities across the country for years. They include individuals who have worked on the frontlines in the battle against COVID, teach our children, do the backbreaking farm work to help deliver food to our table.”

But as with many of the Biden administration’s immigration policies, the new rules were quickly attacked from all sides.

The guidelines “sit somewhere between lunacy and anarchy,” according to Jon Feere.

“Violating America’s immigration laws is not a reason to hold someone accountable for violating America’s immigration laws,” wrote Feere, a former ICE chief of staff during the Trump administration who is now at the Center for Immigration Studies in Washington, which advocates for lower levels of immigration.

The new guidance largely mirrors the enforcement priorities laid out in interim guidance from the Biden administration earlier this year. But after criticism from Republicans and immigration hardliners, the final guidance gives more leeway to individual ICE agents to make decisions about who is a threat to public safety.

Immigrant advocates worry that open-ended language could lead to abuse.

“This new guidance memo falls short of the Biden administration’s commitments and promises to create a fair and humane immigration system,” said Yaritza Méndez with the advocacy group Make the Road New York.

“Left to use their own discretion, agencies like ICE have an alarming history of terrorizing, detaining and separating communities. We cannot continue to build on a system that inflicts harm on our immigrant communities,” Méndez said in a statement.

But DHS Secretary Mayorkas pushed back on those concerns.

“Yes, it leaves discretion in the hands of the agents. But that discretion is guided. It is supervised. It is managed. It is overseen,” Mayorkas told NPR.

He said ICE officers should look at a wide range of factors when deciding whom to arrest and deport — and that DHS would put safeguards in place to ensure that they do.

“We will hold ourselves accountable internally, and we will hold ourselves accountable to the public externally,” he said.

Source Article from https://www.npr.org/2021/09/30/1042153662/immigration-enforcement-public-safety

You can find the latest on the investigation involving Gabby Petito and Brian Laundrie hereDownload the WFLA app for breaking news push alerts and sign up for breaking news email alerts.

NORTH PORT, Fla. (WFLA) — Ten days before he vanished, Brian Laundrie bought a new cell phone, according to the Laundrie family’s attorney Steve Bertolino.

Bertolino tells 8 On Your Side the FBI now has that phone. But many have been asking about Gabby Petito’s phone and whether Laundrie had a different phone while they were together on their road trip.

Since the phones undoubtedly hold valuable clues, 8 On Your Side has been looking into that question.

We closely examined the police body camera video after the couple’s alleged domestic dispute in Moab, Utah on Aug. 12. The video shows that, at the time, Petito and Laundrie both had phones.

We know Petito had a phone – her mom, Nichole Schmidt, got an “odd text” from her on Aug. 27, according to a search warrant, and a final text on Aug. 30.

About 42 minutes into the police stop in Utah, video shows Laundrie reach into the passenger side of the van. He hands a female law enforcement official Petito’s cellphone.

“She’s got her cellphone. She’s calling her parents,” the officer told other officials minutes later.

(Moab Police Department)

That phone from the passenger side stays in Petito’s lap.

Meanwhile with Laundrie: When we backed up the video to before he retrieved Petito’s cellphone, he is seen slipping what appears to be a different phone into his pocket. Toward the end of the stop, you can see Laundrie pull a phone out of his pocket.

The family’s attorney did not reveal anything about the phone on the cross-country trip. But he says Laundrie did purchase a new phone on Sept. 4, three days after he returned to North Port without Petito.

The attorney says the FBI has the new phone and states it was not a burner phone. Laundrie reportedly had an account with AT&T for the new phone.

Right now, it remains unclear if the FBI has retrieved Petito’s cellphone. 

Editor’s note: A previous version of the story included a statement from Laundrie saying he did not have a phone. We are looking into whether or not he was referring to having a phone in general or in that specific incident with police.

Source Article from https://www.wfla.com/8-on-your-side/gabby-petito-brian-laundrie-investigation-2-phones-seen-in-police-body-cam-video-from-utah-incident/