Former U.S. President Barack Obama speaks during the COP26 U.N. Climate Summit in Glasgow, Scotland on Monday.

Alberto Pezzali/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Alberto Pezzali/AP

Former U.S. President Barack Obama speaks during the COP26 U.N. Climate Summit in Glasgow, Scotland on Monday.

Alberto Pezzali/AP

GLASGOW, Scotland — Barack Obama expressed confidence at U.N. climate talks Monday that the Biden administration will ultimately get its $555 billion climate package through Congress, and faulted U.S. rivals China and Russia for what he called a “dangerous lack of urgency” in cutting their own climate-wrecking emissions.

“When it comes to climate, time really is running out,” Obama told climate advocates. Though there has been progress since the historic 2015 Paris climate agreement “we are nowhere near where we need to be.”

His comments came as conference leaders acknowledged Monday that many key sticking points exist after a week of talks. A trust gap between rich and poor nations on climate change issues emerged when the negotiations went through a check of what’s been accomplished and what’s left to be done. Developing countries used versions of the word “disappointing” five times when leaders talked Monday about the progress to date.

The U.N. climate conference in Glasgow, Scotland, is the former American president’s first since he helped deliver the triumph of the 2015 Paris climate accord, when nations committed to cutting fossil fuel and agricultural emissions fast enough to keep the Earth’s warming below catastrophic levels of 1.5 degrees Celsius (2.7 degrees Fahrenheit).

That celebration has faded and been replaced by worry. Donald Trump pulled the U.S. out of the Paris accord. President Joe Biden put America back in as soon as he took office this year but U.S. efforts at fighting climate change were set back years by the Trump move.

“1.5 C is on life support now, it’s in ICU,” said Alden Meyer, a long-time observer of climate talks with E3G, an environmental think tank.

Obama’s appearance on the sidelines of the talks sought to remind governments of the elation that surrounded the Paris accord, and urge them to announce more immediate, concrete steps to put the 2015 deal into action.

“The U.S. is back and in moving more boldly. The U.S. is not alone,” Obama said.

Obama noted efforts by the United States — the world’s second-worst climate polluter now after China — stalled when Trump pulled out of the climate accord.

“I wasn’t real happy about that,” he admitted, but added that optimism is required to save the planet.

“There are times where I feel discouraged. There are times where the future seems somewhat bleak. There are times where I am doubtful that humanity can get its act together before it’s too late,” Obama said. “We can’t afford hopelessness.”

Despite opposition within Biden’s own Democratic party that has blocked the climate-fighting legislation, Obama said he was confident that some version of Biden’s ambitious climate bill will pass in Congress in the next few weeks.

“It will set the United States on course to meet its new climate targets,” he said.

And while in 2015, rapport between Obama administration negotiators and their Chinese counterparts was seen as paving the way to the global Paris accord, Obama on Monday criticized Chinese President Xi Jinping and Russian President Vladimir Putin for not joining other global leaders at the climate talks in Glasgow.

“It was particularly discouraging to see the leaders of two of the world’s largest emitters, China and Russia, decline to even attend the proceedings, and their national plans reflect what appears to be a dangerous lack of urgency,” Obama said.

Obama spoke earlier Monday to a session on Pacific Island nations, including ones whose existence is threatened by rising oceans under climate change.

“All of us have a part to play. All of us have work to do. All of us have sacrifices to make” on climate, he said. “But those of us who live in wealthy nations, those of us who helped to precipitate the problem … we have an added burden.”

When he was briefing the U.N. climate conference (COP26) on the first week’s progress, COP26 President Alok Sharma had to correct himself about the number of issues settled, changing “many” into “some.”

No deals have been made yet on three main goals of the U.N. conference. Those are pledges to cut emissions in half by 2030 to keep the Paris climate deal’s 1.5 degree Celsius temperature limit goal alive; the need for $100 billion annually in financial help from rich countries to poor ones; and the idea that half of that money goes to adapting to global warming’s worst effects. Several other issues, including trading carbon and transparency, also weren’t solved yet.

Numerous developing nations were pessimistic. They called progress “disappointing” and not near enough, saying announcements on fighting climate change were high in quantity but worried that they were low in quantity.

Representatives of 77 developing nations, along with China, said until this climate conference fixes the financial pledge problem to help poor nations cope with climate change these talks cannot be successful.

Ahmadou Sebory Touré of Guinea, speaking on behalf of poor nations, said rich countries not fulfilling their $100 billion pledge shows those countries are just making “an empty commitment.”

“There is a history of broken promises and unfulfilled commitments by developed countries,” Diego Pacheco Balanza of Bolivia told the conference.

Scientists say the urgency of global warming is as great as the dire speeches at Glasgow have conveyed, with the planet only a few years away from the point where meeting the goals set in the Paris accord becomes impossible, due to mounting damage from coal, petroleum, agriculture and other pollution sources.

The last few days have seen huge protests in Glasgow and around Europe for faster action in fighting global warming.

Obama told young people “you are right to be frustrated,” but then relayed the advice his mother gave him when he was young.

“Don’t sulk. Get busy, get to work and change what needs to be changed,” he said. “Vote like your life depends on it — because it does.”

Source Article from https://www.npr.org/2021/11/08/1053545667/cop26-russia-china-obama

White House deputy press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre backtracked Monday after slamming reporting on the Line 5 pipeline in Michigan as “inaccurate,” admitting that the administration is indeed exploring the potential impact of shutting it down amid a global energy crisis.

Jean-Pierre made the comment during the White House daily press briefing in response to Fox News White House correspondent Peter Doocy, who asked why the Biden administration is “now considering shutting down the Line 5 pipeline from Canada to Michigan” while oil and gas prices continue to skyrocket.

BIDEN DRAWS CRITICISM OVER POSSIBLE PLAN TO SHUT DOWN OIL PIPELINE AS WINTER APPROACHES

White House Deputy press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre reaches to retrieve her mask as U.S. Secretary of Transportation Pete Buttigieg speaks during the daily briefing at the White House on Nov. 8, 2021, in Washington, D.C. (Photo by Win McNamee/Getty Images)

“So, Peter, that is inaccurate,” Jean-Pierre fired back. “That is not right. So any reporting indicating that some decision has been made, again, is not accurate.”

“What’s inaccurate?” Doocy asked.

“The reporting about us wanting to shut down the Line 5,” Jean-Pierre responded.

“I didn’t say ‘wanting,’” Doocy said. “I said, is it being studied right now? Is the administration studying the impact of shutting down the Line 5? 

“Yes, we are. We are,” Jean-Pierre replied. “I thought you were saying that we were going to shut it down, but that is not inaccurate. The Army Corps of Engineers is preparing an environmental impact to look through this.”

President Joe Biden and first lady Jill Biden return to the White House on Nov. 8, 2021, in Washington, D.C. (Photo by Win McNamee/Getty Images)

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Politico originally reported Sunday that the Biden administration was weighing the potential market consequences of shutting down the pipeline. The report has drawn criticism from Republican lawmakers in Congress, and more than a dozen sent a letter to Biden on Nov. 4 warning against such a move as gas prices surge 50%.

While Jean-Pierre referred to an environmental study about the pipeline, the Politico report said the administration was looking at the economic impacts of killing the pipeline. 

An environmental study has been in the works about a potential Line 5 replacement, though that is a separate issue from the dispute between Michigan and Canada about the existing pipeline. 

Line 5 is part of a network that moves crude oil and other petroleum products from western Canada, transporting about 540,000 barrels per day. Petroleum is taken from the pipeline in Escanaba, Michigan.

Fox News’ Jon Brown contributed to this report.

Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/politics/white-house-backtracks-line-5-reporting-inaccurate-shutdown

The United States on Monday ended a pandemic travel ban that was in place for more than a year and a half, a relief for the tourism industry and for families that have been separated by the rules since the crisis began.

At New York’s John F. Kennedy International Airport, passengers who arrived from London on British Airways Flight 1, the same number used for the Concorde, were greeted by applause of airline employees and balloons.

Some business travelers said they are ready to ditch the video calls for in-person meetings and work.

“We’ve been desperate for two years to get out and see our staff,” said Giles English, co-founder of luxury watchmaker Bremont, which has a store in Midtown Manhattan.  

English told CNBC shortly after arriving at JFK on British Airways Flight 1 that video technology is “amazing but I think face-to-face is so important.”

Katherine Donnelly, 52, of London, who flew in on that flight said she hasn’t been in New York for more than two years and that she’s eager to visit her aunt, who has been ill.

“I can’t wait to see her,” she said.

The ban, put in place by then-President Donald Trump in early 2020 and later expanded by President Joe Biden early this year, prohibited visitors from 33 countries, including the U.K., much of Europe, China, Brazil and South Africa.

Source Article from https://www.cnbc.com/2021/11/08/covid-vaccine-us-ends-international-travel-ban-opens-door-to-vaccinated-tourists.html

Democrats may want to replace both halves of the ticket in 2024.

President Biden’s job approval rating fell to a new low in a poll released Monday — but the news was even worse for Vice President Kamala Harris.

The USA Today/Suffolk University survey showed just 37.8 percent of Americans approve of Biden’s performance in office. By contrast, 59 percent of Americans disapprove of the president, whose ratings have been plunging since August.

Biden’s previous low job approval rating came in a Quinnipiac poll last month, which showed 38 percent of Americans approved of his performance, while 53 percent disapproved.

Meanwhile, a paltry 27.8 percent of respondents to the USA Today/Suffolk poll approved of the job Harris is doing as vice president, while 51.2 percent disapproved. More than a fifth of respondents (21 percent) said they were undecided about Harris, while just 3.2 percent said they hadn’t made up their minds about Biden.

Despite his plummeting numbers, Biden showed no signs of strain as he and first lady Jill Biden relaxed at their home in Delaware over the weekend. The president was also all smiles as he and his wife returned to the White House Monday morning.

President Biden and first lady Jill Biden walk along the beach in Rehoboth Beach, Delaware, on November 7, 2021.
AP Photo/Carolyn Kaster

The disastrous poll results for the White House were released exactly one year before the 2022 midterm elections, in which Democrats will battle to retain control of the House and Senate. 

The poll showed that will be a difficult feat to accomplish.

If the election were held today, the survey found, 46 percent of Americans said they would vote for a Republican congressional candidate, while 38 percent said they would back a Democrat.

President Biden and first lady Jill Biden return to the White House on November 08, 2021.
Win McNamee/Getty Images

Forty-six percent of those surveyed also said Biden has done a worse job as president than expected, a number that included 16 percent of respondents who voted for him.

Among independent voters, 44 percent said Biden was performing worse than expected, while just 6 percent said he was doing better than expected. The president was 39 points underwater with independents, with just 28 percent approving of his job performance while 67 percent disapproved.

Most alarmingly for the administration, 64 percent of respondents said Biden should not run for a second term in 2024 — including 28 percent of Democrats. 

President Biden’s trip comes as his approval rating hits an all-time low of 37 points.
AP Photo/Carolyn Kaster

As for former President Donald Trump, 58 percent are opposed to him running in 2024, a number that includes 24 percent of Republicans. 

While Americans don’t seem eager for a rematch of the 2020 presidential race in three years, 44 percent said they would vote for Trump if it came to pass, while 40 percent would select Biden. 

​”I thought he did a great job then, and I know he’ll do a great job in the future,” Lynda Ensenat, 54, a Trump voter and independent insurance adjuster from New Orleans, told the pollsters. “There’s a whole lot going wrong in this society right now, and all the Democrat liberals — that’s what they’re 100 percent for.”

Biden’s approval ratings have been slowy declining since August 2021.

Ensenat added that Biden has “been wrong on absolutely everything he’s touched.”

Tony Emmi, a retired health care worker from Wilmington, Del., said he voted for the president, but believes he has failed to hold members of his party to account to ensure legislation gets passed. 

“I think this country is moving in a direction that is dangerous,” said Emmi, 62.

The poll comes exactly one year from the 2022 midterm elections in which Republicans are seeking to retake both Senate and House.
REUTERS/Joshua Roberts

The House passed a $1.2 trillion bipartisan infrastructure plan on Friday — 87 days after it was approved by the Senate. 

The legislation had been caught up in bickering between progressive and moderate House members, with progressives demanding a vote on Biden’s $1.75 trillion Build Back Better Act before the House took up the infrastructure bill. 

According to the poll, Americans support the infrastructure bill by nearly 2 to 1 (61 percent to 32 percent). The ranks of those who back the bill include 32 percent of Republicans.

President Biden waves as he and first lady Jill Biden walk to board Marine One at Gordons Pond in Rehoboth Beach.
AP Photo/Carolyn Kaster

The Build Back Better package doesn’t have the same level of support among Americans, with 44 percent opposing it and 47 percent backing it. Nearly a third of Americans (30 percent) believe the provisions in that bill would hurt their families more than help them, while 26 percent said they would help more than hurt and 31 percent said they would not have much effect. 

As low as Biden’s numbers are, Congress’ are worse. Seventy-five percent of respondents disapprove of Capitol Hill lawmakers, while just 12 percent approve of them.

Congressional Democrats have a 29 percent favorable rating, with Republicans slightly higher at 35 percent.

The poll surveyed 1,000 registered voters between Nov. 3 and 5 and has a margin of error of plus or minus 3.1 percentage points. 

Source Article from https://nypost.com/2021/11/08/biden-disapproval-near-60-percent-most-say-no-to-reelection-bid/

Shortly after Republicans made dramatic gains in the 1994 midterm elections, then-House Speaker Newt Gingrich was eager to get to work on his plans to balance the budget. High on the Republican’s list was eliminating federal funds for public broadcasting.

The move was not well received. In fact, it led to headlines such as, “Are Newt and His Cronies Afraid of Big Bird?” When the Clinton White House prevailed in budget talks, and support for public broadcasting survived, there were related headlines such as, “Big Bird Taken Off Death Row.”

In other words, Republicans picked a fight with the Corporation for Public Broadcasting — and Big Bird won.

A quarter of a century later, it appears the GOP is taking aim at the 8-foot, 2-inch Muppet again. NBC News reported yesterday:

Big Bird’s seemingly innocuous — and obviously fictional — announcement Saturday that he has been vaccinated against Covid-19 caused a stir online, as Republicans like Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas accused the yellow anthropomorphic bird of tweeting “government propaganda.”

“I got the COVID-19 vaccine today! My wing is feeling a little sore, but it’ll give my body an extra protective boost that keeps me and others healthy,” Big Bird wrote on Twitter over the weekend. “Ms. @EricaRHill even said I’ve been getting vaccines since I was a little bird. I had no idea!”

The timing of the tweet was not coincidental: Children aged 5 to 11 are now eligible for the Pfizer vaccine. Big Bird, whose character is perpetually 6 years old, was clearly using social media to help inform kids about important public health information.

And that did not go over well with some Republicans. Ted Cruz whined that the iconic Sesame Street character was promoting “government propaganda.” Some Fox News personalities pushed similar lines.

A Republican congressional candidate in Pennsylvania suggested the vaccine might kill Big Bird while a GOP state legislator in Arizona called the Muppet a “communist.”

Right off the bat, it’s worth emphasizing for context that Big Bird has spent decades helping inform families about public health campaigns, including vaccination efforts. These efforts haven’t traditionally generated any partisan pushback — probably because political figures would’ve been embarrassed to complain publicly about a Sesame Street character promoting accurate, potentially lifesaving information.

What’s more, let’s pause to note just how weird 2021 has become with regards to Republicans and children’s entertainment. It started with the GOP’s fixation on Dr. Seuss, which was soon followed by complaints about Potato Head dolls and a Disney Plus disclaimer to some episodes of “The Muppet Show.” Now, Big Bird is a new villain in some far-right circles.

I can only imagine how much better off we’d be if the GOP invested this much energy in actual governance.

But perhaps most important of all is the peek behind the rhetorical curtain. For many prominent Republican voices, there’s an official line: They’re not anti-vaccine, they’re anti-mandates. There’s no shortage of GOP officials at multiple levels of government that claim they’re on board with Covid-19 vaccinations, just so long as they’re entirely voluntarily and there are no consequences for those who refuse to do the right thing.

It’s a deeply flawed argument, to be sure, but the pushback against Big Bird suggests it’s not altogether sincere: The Sesame Street character simply helped get the word out about vaccines during a pandemic. For Republicans like Cruz, this was a step too far.

Source Article from https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/why-republicans-newest-fight-big-bird-matters-n1283474

The US reopened its borders Monday after 20 months of travel restrictions — immediately creating wild, miles-long lines of cars waiting to cross over from Canada and Mexico.

The severe restrictions, first imposed by the Trump administration in March 2020, had barred access to non-US citizens traveling from 33 countries as well as overland entry from Mexico and Canada.

But starting Monday, fully vaccinated travelers are allowed again, with tourists rushing to make long-delayed trips and overseas family members finally able to reconnect with loved ones.

Unvaccinated travelers are also allowed for “essential” trips, a leeway that will end in January when all visitors need to have been jabbed.

Before sunrise, lines of cars as far as the eye could see were lining up on the US-Mexico border, with the Ciudad Juarez government having to implement a special system to direct the overwhelming surge of traffic.

Canadian travelers wait in line to cross the border into the United States across the Rainbow Bridge in Niagara Falls, Ontario, early November 8, 2021.
AFP via Getty Images

It included portable toilets on the three bridges crossing into the US “as waiting times of up to four hours are estimated,” the local director of road safety, Cesar Alberto Tapia, told Agence France-Presse.

Underscoring the anticipation of the reopening, currency exchange centers in Mexico’s Ciudad Juarez were also hit by a shortage of dollars.

Meanwhile, similar scenes were occurring in the north too — with seemingly endless lines of passenger cars and motor homes lining up on the Rainbow Bridge between Niagara Falls in Ontario and New York.

River Robinson excitedly planned a US trip to see her American partner, who wasn’t able to be in Canada for the birth of their baby boy 17 months ago.

A pedestrian walks past a line of Canadian travelers in their passenger cars and motor homes on the Rainbow Bridge between Niagara Falls, Ontario, and Niagara Falls, New York.
AFP via Getty Images
Cars queue to cross the border at San Ysidro after the US lifted its pandemic travel ban.
AFP via Getty Images

“I’m planning to take my baby down for the American Thanksgiving,” Robinson told the Associated Press. “If all goes smoothly at the border, I’ll plan on taking him down as much as I can.”

Churches on the boundary with Canada that had members on both sides are hoping to welcome parishioners they haven’t seen in nearly two years.

In other countries, airlines have increased the number of trans-Atlantic flights and plan to use larger planes to cope with the surge in demand.

At London’s Heathrow Airport, two planes from British Airways and Virgin Atlantic heading to New York took off at the same time from parallel runways, to mark the occasion.

Long lines of travelers headed for the US are seen at Heathrow Airport in London.
REUTERS
People wait to check into Virgin Atlantic and Delta Air Lines flights at Heathrow Airport in London, following the lifting of restrictions on the entry of non-US citizens.
REUTERS

Many also lined up at Paris’ Charles de Gaulle airport ready for flights to the Big Apple, including Gaye Camara, 40, who has not seen her New York-based husband since the restrictions were enforced last year.

“I’m going to jump into his arms, kiss him, touch him,” Camara told the AP.

“Just talking about it makes me emotional,” she said in the bustling airport, saying she had “cried nearly every night” when they were first kept apart.

“I cannot wait … Being with him, his presence, his face, his smile,” she said.

The first Virgin Atlantic and British Airways flights carrying non-US citizens take off from London to New York simultaneously.
AP

Bindiya Patel was also traveling from Paris to New York, where she would finally get to meet her young nephew for the first time. “I think we might just start crying,” Patel said.

The changes will be welcomed by many in border towns, which have been economically crippled by the sudden stop of tourism that they relied on.

But it also came amid a historic migrant crisis at the southern border, with recent data obtained by the Washington Post showing more than 1.7 million illegal entrants into the US between October last year and September 2021, the highest ever recorded.

Customs and Border Protection will spot-check documentation at the land border crossings from Mexico and Canada, the agency said.

It also comes as the World Health Organization (WHO) expressed “grave concern” over the rising pace of infections in Europe.

An aerial view of cars lining up to cross the border at San Ysidro on the Mexico-United States border in Tijuana, Baja California state, Mexico, on November 7, 2021.
AFP via Getty Images

The US will accept travelers who have been fully vaccinated with any of the shots approved for emergency use by the WHO — including those not used in the US, such as the AstraZeneca jab given to many in Canada and the UK.

Under-18s are exempt from the new vaccine requirements. Non-tourist travelers from nearly 50 countries with nationwide vaccination rates of less than 10% are also eligible for exemption.

With Post wires

Source Article from https://nypost.com/2021/11/08/us-lifts-pandemic-travel-ban-opens-doors-to-visitors/

In an angry conversation on his final day as president, Donald Trump told the chairwoman of the Republican National Committee he was leaving the GOP and creating his own political party — and that he didn’t care if the move would destroy the Republican Party, according to a new book by ABC News Chief Washington Correspondent Jonathan Karl.

Trump only backed down when Republican leaders threatened to take actions that would have cost Trump millions of dollars, Karl writes his upcoming book, “Betrayal: The Final Act of the Trump Show.”

The book gives a detailed account of Trump’s stated intention to reject the party that elected him president and the aggressive actions taken by party leaders to force him to back down.

The standoff started on Jan. 20, just after Trump boarded Air Force One for his last flight as president.

“[RNC Chairwoman Ronna McDaniel] called to wish him farewell. It was a very un-pleasant conversation,” Karl writes in “Betrayal,” set to be released on Nov. 16.

“Donald Trump was in no mood for small talk or nostalgic goodbyes,” Karl writes. “He got right to the point. He told her he was leaving the Republican Party and would be creating his own political party. The president’s son, Donald Trump Jr., was also on the phone. The younger Trump had been relentlessly denigrating the RNC for being insufficiently loyal to Trump. In fact, at the January 6 rally before the Capitol Riot, the younger Trump all but declared that the old Republican Party didn’t exist anymore.”

With just hours left in his presidency, Trump was telling the Republican Party chairwoman that he was leaving the party entirely. The description of this conversation and the discussions that followed come from two sources with direct knowledge of these events.

“I’m done,” Trump told McDaniel. “I’m starting my own party.”

“You cannot do that,” McDaniel told Trump. “If you do, we will lose forever.”

“Exactly. You lose forever without me,” Trump responded. “I don’t care.”

Trump’s attitude was that if he had lost, he wanted everybody around him to lose as well, Karl writes. According to a source who witnessed the conversation, Trump was talking as if he viewed the destruction of the Republican Party as a punishment to those party leaders who had betrayed him — including those few who voted to impeach him and the much larger group he believed didn’t fight hard enough to overturn the election in his favor.

“This is what Republicans deserve for not sticking up for me,” Trump told McDaniel, according to the book.

In response, McDaniel tried to convince Trump that creating his own party wouldn’t just destroy the Republican Party, it would also destroy him.

“This isn’t what the people who depended on you deserve, the people who believed in you,” McDaniel said. “You’ll ruin your legacy. You’ll be done.”

But Trump said he didn’t care, Karl writes.

“[Trump] wasn’t simply floating an idea,” Karl writes in the book. “He was putting the party chairwoman on notice that he had decided to start his own party. It was a done deal. He had made up his mind. ‘He was very adamant that he was going to do it,’ a source who heard the president’s comments later told me.”

Following the tense conversion, McDaniel informed RNC leadership about Trump’s plans, spurring a tense standoff between Trump and his own party over the course of the next four days.

While Trump, “morose in defeat and eager for revenge, plotted the destruction of the Republican Party … the RNC played hardball,” according to the book.

“We told them there were a lot of things they still depended on the RNC for, and that if this were to move forward, all of it would go away,” an RNC official told Karl.

According to the book, “McDaniel and her leadership team made it clear that if Trump left, the party would immediately stop paying legal bills incurred during post-election challenges.”

“But, more significant, the RNC threatened to render Trump’s most valuable political asset worthless,” Karl writes, referring to “the campaign’s list of the email addresses of forty million Trump supporters.”

“It’s a list Trump had used to generate money by renting it to candidates at a steep cost,” says the book. “The list generated so much money that party officials estimated that it was worth about $100 million.”

Five days after revealing plans that could have destroyed his own political party on that last flight aboard Air Force One, Karl writes, Trump backed down, saying he would remain a Republican after all.

Asked this week to respond to Karl’s book, both Trump and McDaniel denied the story.

“This is false, I have never threatened President Trump with anything,” McDaniel told ABC News. “He and I have a great relationship. We have worked tirelessly together to elect Republicans up and down the ballot, and will continue to do so.”

Trump, responding to the story, said, “ABC Non News and 3rd rate reporter Jonathan Karl have been writing fake news about me from the beginning of my political career. Just look at what has now been revealed about the Russia, Russia, Russia hoax. It was a made up and totally fabricated scam and the lamestream media knew it. It just never ends!”

Trump has long denounced news reports that he had considered starting his own party as “fake news.” In Karl’s final interview with the former president for his book, Trump claimed to not recall his conversation with McDaniel on Jan. 20, saying, “a lot of people suggested a third party, many people” — but that he himself had never even thought about leaving the GOP.

“You mean I was going to form another party or something?” Trump asked Karl incredulously. “Oh, that is bulls**t. It never happened.”

Source Article from https://abcnews.go.com/US/trump-told-rnc-chair-leaving-gop-create-party/story?id=80979889

REHOBOTH BEACH, Del. (AP) — He has been here before.

President Joe Biden doesn’t need to look any further back than his time as vice president to grasp the challenges that lie ahead in promoting his new $1 trillion infrastructure deal to the American people and getting the money out the door fast enough that they can feel a real impact.

When President Barack Obama pushed through a giant stimulus bill in 2009, his administration faced criticism that the money was too slow to work its way into the sluggish economy, and Obama later acknowledged that he had failed to sell Americans on the benefits of the legislation.

Obama’s biggest mistake, he said in 2012, was thinking that the job of the presidency was “just about getting the policy right” rather than telling “a story to the American people that gives them a sense of unity and purpose.”

Biden began his own effort to fashion such a story when he took a victory lap Saturday after his infrastructure bill cleared the Congress, notching a hard-fought win on a $1.2 trillion piece of legislation that he says will tangibly improve Americans’ lives in the months and years to come.

The Democratic president called it a “a once-in-a-generation investment” to tackle a range of challenges — crumbling roads and bridges, gaps in access to affordable internet, water tainted by lead pipes, homes and cities ill-prepared to cope with increasingly frequent extreme weather conditions.

Coming at the end of a particularly difficult week in which his party suffered surprise losses up and down the ballot in elections nationwide, passage of the legislation was a respite from a challenging few months for an embattled president whose poll numbers have dropped as Americans remain frustrated with the coronavirus pandemic and an uneven economic recovery.

But the legislative win sets up a series of challenges for Biden, both in promoting the new deal and at the same time continuing to push for a long-argued-over $1.85 trillion social safety net and climate bill, which would dramatically expand health, family and climate change programs.

The stakes for Biden are clear in his sagging poll numbers.

Priorities USA, a Democratic big money group, warned in a memo this past week that “voters are frustrated, skeptical, and tired — of COVID, of economic hardship, of school closings, of higher prices and stagnant wages, of unaffordable prescription drugs and health care and more.”

“Without results (and effectively communicating those results), voters will punish the party in power,” chairman Guy Cecil said.

While polls broadly suggest Americans support the infrastructure package, some indicate the nation is still not certain what’s in it. About half of adults surveyed in a Pew Research Center poll conducted in September said they favor the infrastructure bill, but a little over a quarter said they weren’t sure about it.

In an effort to correct past messaging mistakes, the White House is planning an aggressive sales campaign for the infrastructure bill, with Biden planning trips across the U.S. to speak about the impacts of the legislation.

He’ll visit a port in Baltimore on Wednesday and promises a splashy signing ceremony for the infrastructure bill when legislators are back in town.

The administration is also deploying the heads of the Transportation, Energy, Interior and Commerce departments, as well as the Environmental Protection Agency administrator and top White House aides to speak about the bill on national and local media and African American and Spanish-language press. And they’re putting out explainers across the departments’ digital platforms to help Americans better understand what’s in the bill.

But even as White House officials speak about what’s in the bill, they’ll also have to ensure the money gets spent. It’s a challenge with which Biden is intimately familiar, having overseen the implementation of the 2009 stimulus as vice president. Then, despite promises to prioritize “shovel-ready projects,” challenges with permitting and other issues led to delays, prompting Obama to joke in 2011 that “shovel-ready was not as shovel-ready as we expected.”

Democrats felt at the time that the party didn’t do enough to remind Americans how they had improved their lives, and ultimately allowed Republicans to frame the election conversation around government overreach. The next year, Democrats faced massive losses in the midterm elections, losing control of the House and a handful of seats in the Senate.

Biden, for his part, insisted Saturday that Americans could start to see the effects of the infrastructure bill in as little as two to three months. Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg made the rounds promising that some projects are just waiting for funding, but others, like investments in new electric vehicle chargers and efforts to reconnect communities divided by highways, will take longer. In contrast to the 2009 stimulus, Buttigieg told NPR, Biden’s infrastructure bill is “about both the short-term and the long-term.”

“There will be work immediately, and for years to come,” he said.

While he’s selling the infrastructure bill as evidence that Democrats can deliver, Biden still will have to contend with ongoing dickering on the other big item on his agenda — the social spending bill.

Unlike the infrastructure bill, which passed with the support of 19 Republicans in the Senate, the social spending package is facing unified GOP opposition, which means Biden will need every Democratic vote in the Senate to get it across the finish line. With the party’s moderate and progressive factions squabbling over the details of the final bill, and two centrist holdouts — Sen. Joe Manchin of West Virginia and Sen. Kyrsten Sinema of Arizona — opposed to many key progressive priorities, winning final passage of the second part of his agenda may be a much tougher puzzle to solve.

“Everybody agreed on infrastructure. You can always agree on whether or not build the roads and the bridges and create the water and sewage that you need and fix your rail and your ports,” said Rep. Jim Clyburn, D-S.C., on Fox’s “Fox News Sunday.”

“But it’s something else again when you start getting into new stuff,” Clyburn said.

Source Article from https://apnews.com/article/joe-biden-business-barack-obama-economy-94c4b2349356f5aa8a776e11720b6f61

Belarusian authorities have escorted an estimated 1,000 people, most of whom are from the Middle East, to the Polish border in an escalation of a deadly crisis that has already left people desperate to reach the EU trapped between borders and at least eight dead due to exposure.

Videos published by Belarusian media on Monday showed armed Belarusian border guards in combat fatigues guiding the column of people, which included families with children, along a highway from the border town of Bruzgi towards a forest that runs alongside Poland’s Podlaskie region.

Video reports showed a standoff at the border, where Polish border guards reportedly used teargas to push back people as some in the crowd tried to cut through barbed wire or knock down border fencing to cross the border. Polish helicopters hovered over the scene as some of the migrants chanted, “Germany!”, their desired destination, according to video posted to social media.

By evening, hundreds had set up tents and lit campfires in a forested border area, suggesting clashes could repeat themselves in coming days as Polish officials have vowed to prevent people from crossing into the country from Belarus.

Poland and other EU countries have accused Belarus of trying to provoke a new refugee crisis in Europe in revenge for their criticism of Alexander Lukashenko’s brutal crackdown on opposition and European sanctions after the forced landing of a Ryanair flight in May, in effect opening up a new migration route to the bloc.

One Iraqi Kurdish woman told the Guardian that she was brought to Belarus by a travel agency that provided them with flights to Minsk and then a transfer to the EU’s external border. People can be charged €15,000-€20,000 (£12,800-£17,100) when they reach Belarus.

Families keep warm at the Belarusian-Polish border. Photograph: Leonid Shcheglov/AFP/Getty

Poland’s deputy foreign minister, Piotr Wawrzyk, told Polish public radio on Monday that Belarus was trying to cause a “major incident, preferably with shots fired and casualties”, and the defence minister, Mariusz Błaszczak, said 12,000 soldiers were “prepared to defend the Polish border”.

Migrants attempting to cross from Belarus into the EU have become trapped between the two since October, when Polish police were authorised to summarily expel migrants and ignore asylum applications. Belarusian border guards refuse to allow them to turn back, meaning that people from countries including Iraq, Syria and Afghanistan are left in the inhospitable forests as temperatures drop below freezing.

Freezing to death: the migrants left to die on the Poland-Belarus border – video

Crystal van Leeuwen, a medical emergency manager with Médecins Sans Frontières, told the Guardian last week that NGOs must urgently gain access to the secure zone for migrants’ claims and international protection to be respected.

Poland has reported nearly 30,000 illegal border crossings this year, with more than 17,000 coming in the month of October. Many are attempting to flee to Germany, which said it had received more than 6,100 refugees via Poland from Belarus since the beginning of the year.

Yet those efforts rarely looked so organised as the mass column on Belarus’s M6 highway on Monday, which critics saw as a dramatic attempt by Lukashenko to increase pressure on his neighbour. Tensions soared between the two countries with the sharp rise in border crossings in October. In one case, Polish officials accused Belarusian troops of firing across the border.

Belarus has denied it has any hand in directing the flow of migrants. “The indifference and inhumane attitude of the Polish authorities has prompted the refugees to take such a step of despair,” the Belarusian border guard said in a statement on Monday.

Source Article from https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/nov/08/belarus-escorts-hundreds-of-migrants-towards-polish-border

Patrons keep their social distance while waiting for donuts outside Donut Friend bakery in the Highland Park neighborhood of Los Angeles, Saturday. A vaccine mandate that is among the strictest in the country takes effect Monday in Los Angeles, requiring proof of shots for everyone entering a wide variety of businesses from restaurants to shopping malls and theaters to nail and hair salons.

Damian Dovarganes/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Damian Dovarganes/AP

Patrons keep their social distance while waiting for donuts outside Donut Friend bakery in the Highland Park neighborhood of Los Angeles, Saturday. A vaccine mandate that is among the strictest in the country takes effect Monday in Los Angeles, requiring proof of shots for everyone entering a wide variety of businesses from restaurants to shopping malls and theaters to nail and hair salons.

Damian Dovarganes/AP

LOS ANGELES — Yoga studio owner David Gross felt relieved after Los Angeles passed a vaccine mandate that is among the strictest in the country, a measure that took effect Monday that requires proof of shots for everyone entering a wide variety of businesses from restaurants to shopping malls and theaters to nail and hair salons.

For Gross, the relief came from knowing he and his co-owner don’t have to unilaterally decide whether to verify their customers are vaccinated. In another part of town, the manager of a struggling nail salon feels trepidation and expects to lose customers. “This is going to be hard for us,” Lucila Vazquez said.

Los Angeles is among a growing number of cities across the U.S., including San Francisco and New York City, requiring people show proof of vaccination to enter various types of businesses and venues. But rules in the nation’s second-most-populous city, called SafePassLA, apply to more types of businesses and other indoor locations including museums and convention centers.

They are being implemented as new cases have started inching up following a sharp decline from an August peak driven by the delta variant.

This was the time of year in 2020 when the worst spike of the pandemic was just beginning in California, which by January saw an average of 500 people die every day. Los Angeles became the state’s epicenter and its hospitals were so overloaded with patients that ambulances idled outside with people struggling to breathe, waiting for beds to open.

So many people died that morgues reached capacity and refrigerated trucks were brought in to handle the overflow. That stark scene played out as coronavirus vaccines arrived and California and Los Angeles moved aggressively to inoculate people.

Among LA county’s roughly 10 million people, 80% of eligible residents now have received at least one COVID-19 vaccine dose and 71% of those eligible are fully vaccinated, according to public health officials.

To guard against anything resembling the January carnage, the LA City Council voted 11-2 last month for the ordinance that requires people 12 and older to be fully vaccinated to enter indoor public spaces including sports arenas, museums, spas, indoor city facilities and other locations.

Negative coronavirus tests within 72 hours of entry to those establishments would be required for people with religious or medical exemptions for vaccinations. Customers without proof can still use outdoor facilities and can briefly enter a business to use a restroom or pick up a food order.

While the order took effect Monday, city officials say they won’t start enforcing it until Nov. 29 to give businesses time to adjust. A first offense will bring a warning but subsequent ones could produce fines running from $1,000 to $5,000.

Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti, who tested positive for the coronavirus last week while attending the United Nations climate change conference in Scotland, said the mandate will encourage more people to get shots and make businesses safer for employees and customers.

“Vaccinating more Angelenos is our only way out of this pandemic, and we must do everything in our power to keep pushing those numbers up,” Garcetti said.

Business trade groups say the mandate will sow confusion because Los Angeles County’s own vaccine rules — which apply to dozens of surrounding communities — are less sweeping. Cities are allowed to pass rules more stringent than the county’s.

“There’s a tremendous lack of clarity,” said Sarah Wiltfong, senior policy manager at the Los Angeles County Business Federation. For example, most retail shops are exempt. “But shopping malls and shopping centers are included, which of course includes retail shops,” she said.

Harassment of workers who are tasked with verifying vaccination is the top concern of the business federation’s members, Wiltfong said.

“This puts employees in a potential position of conflict, when they’re not necessarily trained to handle situations like that,” she said.

Salons were especially hard hit during the pandemic and were among the last businesses to reopen indoors. Before COVID, Lynda Nail Salon in the Los Feliz neighborhood was regularly filled with clients for hair and nail appointments. On Wednesday morning, only one woman waited for her hair to set.

Vazquez, who manages the business, said she will follow the new rules even though many of her hair clients have said they won’t come in if it requires being vaccinated.

Gyms and yoga studio like the one co-owned by Gross also fall under the order. He doesn’t relish having his employees play the role of enforcer, checking every customer’s vaccination status. But now that the rule is on the books, it’s one less decision he and his partner Lydia Stone have to make as they navigate Highland Park Yoga back to in-person classes.

In anticipation of the new rules, the studio last month started encouraging its regular customers to submit their vaccine cards online so they don’t have to show them at the start of every class. Gross and Stone said it would be heartbreaking to turn away anyone.

“You know, the City Council decided, the mayor signed it, and we we have no choice but to comply with the law,” Gross said, adding that the possibility of being punished for violating the law “would be hugely detrimental” to a yoga business that is barely surviving after being shut down for the bulk of the pandemic.

Source Article from https://www.npr.org/2021/11/08/1053435012/strict-mandate-takes-effect-in-la-business-patrons-must-show-proof-of-vaccinatio

Passengers walk through Salt Lake City International Airport, Oct. 27, 2020. More than a year and a half after COVID-19 concerns prompted the U.S. to close its borders to international travelers from countries including Brazil, China, India, South Africa, the U.K. and much of Europe, restrictions are shifting to focus on vaccine status.

Rick Bowmer/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Rick Bowmer/AP

Passengers walk through Salt Lake City International Airport, Oct. 27, 2020. More than a year and a half after COVID-19 concerns prompted the U.S. to close its borders to international travelers from countries including Brazil, China, India, South Africa, the U.K. and much of Europe, restrictions are shifting to focus on vaccine status.

Rick Bowmer/AP

The U.S. lifted restrictions Monday on travel from a long list of countries including Mexico, Canada and most of Europe, allowing tourists to make long-delayed trips and family members to reconnect with loved ones after more than a year and a half apart because of the pandemic.

Starting Monday, the U.S. is accepting fully vaccinated travelers at airports and land borders, doing away with a COVID-19 restriction that dates back to the Trump administration. The new rules allow air travel from previously restricted countries as long as the traveler has proof of vaccination and a negative COVID-19 test. Land travel from Mexico and Canada will require proof of vaccination but no test.

Airlines are expecting more travelers from Europe and elsewhere. Data from travel and analytics firm Cirium showed airlines are increasing flights between the United Kingdom and the U.S. by 21% this month over last month.

The change will have a profound effect on the borders with Mexico and Canada, where traveling back and forth was a way of life until the pandemic hit and the U.S. shut down nonessential travel.

Malls, restaurants and Main Street shops in U.S. border towns have been devastated by the lack of visitors from Mexico. On the boundary with Canada, cross-border hockey rivalries were community traditions until being upended by the pandemic. Churches that had members on both sides of the border are hoping to welcome parishioners they haven’t seen during COVID-19 shutdown.

Loved ones have missed holidays, birthdays and funerals while nonessential air travel was barred, and they are now eager to reconnect.

River Robinson’s American partner wasn’t able to be in Canada for the birth of their baby boy 17 months ago because of pandemic-related border closures. She was thrilled to hear the U.S. is reopening its land crossings to vaccinated travelers.

“I’m planning to take my baby down for the American Thanksgiving,” said Robinson, who lives in St. Thomas, Ontario. “If all goes smoothly at the border I’ll plan on taking him down as much as I can. Is crazy to think he has a whole other side of the family he hasn’t even met yet.”

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the U.S. will accept travelers who have been fully vaccinated with any of the vaccines approved for emergency use by the World Health Organization, not just those in use in the U.S. That means that the AstraZeneca vaccine, widely used in Canada, will be accepted.

For air travelers, the airlines are required to verify vaccine records and match them against ID, and if they don’t, they could face fines of up to nearly $35,000 per violation. Airlines will also collect information about passengers for contact tracing efforts. There will be CDC workers spot-checking travelers for compliance in the U.S. At land borders, Customs and Border Protection agents will check vaccine proof.

The moves come as the U.S. has seen its COVID-19 outlook improve dramatically in recent weeks since the summer delta surge that pushed hospitals to the brink in many locations.

Source Article from https://www.npr.org/2021/11/08/1053434232/the-u-s-lifts-the-pandemic-travel-ban-and-opens-the-doors-to-international-visit

  • Trump slammed Mitch McConnell and GOP lawmakers who supported the infrastructure bill. 
  • “All Republicans who voted for Democrat longevity should be ashamed of themselves,” he said. 
  • The $1.2 trillion infrastructure bill passed in the Senate in August and in the House on Friday.

Former President Donald Trump slammed Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell and Republicans who voted in favor of the infrastructure bill on Sunday. 

“All Republicans who voted for Democrat longevity should be ashamed of themselves,” Trump said in a statement.

On Friday, 13 House Republicans voted with Democrats to pass the $1.2 trillion bipartisan infrastructure bill. The Bill passed in the Senate in August with 19 Republicans, including McConnell, voting in favor alongside every Democrat. 

The legislation included funds for roads, highways, and bridges, alongside electric vehicles, clean energy, and high-speed broadband.

Trump was critical of GOP senators who voted in favor of the bill and said they “voted thinking that helping the Democrats is such a wonderful thing to do, so politically correct. They just don’t get it!”

The former president called Republican lawmakers who supported the measure RINOs, or Republicans in name only, and added that their support would mean Democrats would rely on their help to pass the $1.75 trillion social spending bill.

On Sunday, Trump also doubled down on his criticism of McConnell for offering Democrats a two-month lift of the debt ceiling, which he said “allowed the Democrats time to work things out at out our Country’s and the Republican Party’s expense!”

The two-month lift gave Democrats until December to figure out how to raise the debt ceiling without Republican support. The debt ceiling is what allows the government to borrow money to pay its bills and not raising it could result in a recession.

Trump and McConnell have also repeatedly clashed in the past year.

The former president called McConnell “gutless” and a “stupid fucker” for not helping him overturn the election. McConnell also previously said Trump was “practically and morally responsible” for the January 6 Capitol riot. 

Source Article from https://www.businessinsider.com/trump-slams-mitch-mcconnell-gop-lawmakers-voted-favor-infrastructure-bill-2021-11

Source Article from https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2021/11/07/biden-approval-falls-38-midterms-loom-usa-today-suffolk-poll/6320098001/

The TAKE with Rick Klein

There’s no questioning the Republican Party’s loyalty to former President Trump these days — and a gathering of potential 2024 candidates over the weekend in Las Vegas only underscored that point.

But as for Trump’s loyalty to the GOP, new reporting out Monday morning serves as a reminder of how tenuous it has been.

In his forthcoming book, “Betrayal: The Final Act of the Trump Show,” ABC’s Jonathan Karl reports for the first time on a Jan. 20 conversation between the soon-to-be-former president and Ronna McDaniel, the Republican National Committee chair.

“I’m done,” Trump told McDaniel just after he boarded Air Force One for the last time as president, according to Karl. “I’m starting my own party.”

The full exchange has McDaniel warning of the consequences — “we will lose forever” — and Trump saying he didn’t care. It was only after the RNC threatened to take control of Trump’s email list, among other potential legal actions, that Trump backed down, Karl reports in the book.

In an interview with Karl, Trump claimed not to recall the conversation, and said he never threatened to start a new party.

Whatever might be said about the GOP’s allegiance to Trump for the foreseeable future, the book is a timely reminder that loyalty has often been a one-way street for the former president.

Another thing the book shows is how much is still not known about Trump’s actions before, during and after Jan. 6. Big GOP wins last week are papering over some history that could be revealed anew.

The RUNDOWN with Averi Harper

While there has been no shortage of commentary on the fact that Virginia Gov.-elect Glenn Youngkin kept former Trump at an arm’s length, speakers — including a number of possible 2024 presidential hopefuls — at a gathering of the Republican Jewish Coalition leaned hard into their support of Trump.

“President Trump’s single most redeeming characteristic — the man has a steel backbone and he doesn’t back down,” Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, said Friday to boisterous applause from the crowd which included Miriam Adelson, wife of the late Republican donor Sheldon Adelson. “After years of Republicans scared of their own shadows, there’s a reason we celebrate a leader who’s willing to stand up and fight.”

Still, prominent Republicans expressed that heavy Trump involvement may not be the best move in every campaign. Rep. Lee Zeldin, R-N.Y., who is running for governor, did not commit to campaigning with Trump Saturday when asked by a reporter.

“There are plenty of New Yorkers who love him, there are plenty of New Yorkers out there who don’t,” said Zeldin. He later added, “With regards to anyone when you talk about endorsements, there are people who that endorsement means an awful lot to and we’re gonna be smart in how we approach this campaign.”

Similarly, Sen. Rick Scott, R-Fla., who is the chair of the National Republican Senate Committee, told ABC News that Trump will do “whatever he can” to help Republicans take control of both chambers of Congress in 2022. Depending on the race, it could mean standing back.

“You should listen to the candidate, because they know their state and they know their race,” Scott said. “And so you should let them figure out how involved you should be and that’s anybody, including the NRSC.”

The TIP with Alisa Wiersema

Next year’s midterm primaries are just months away, and Republicans could be seeing more top names entering the political fray as the timeline creeps closer. One of the party’s top recruits, New Hampshire Gov. Chris Sununu, is among those expected to make a decision about his campaign prospects in the near future.

“I think I’d like to make a decision before the holidays, frankly. I don’t want this weighing on me and weighing on the citizens,” Sununu told Fox News over the weekend regarding whether he plans to run for Senate or for governor.

During this weekend’s Republican Jewish Coalition Annual Leadership Meeting, Sununu was publicly urged to run for Senate by party members who are seeking to win the majority in the upper chamber. “I’ve never been more optimistic than I am right now about us taking back the Senate. It starts with great candidates, because Chris Sununu, if you’re watching or listening, please run,” Sen. Lindsey Graham said on Saturday.

Republicans have been eyeing New Hampshire as a possible pick-up opportunity since Trump trailed Hillary Clinton there by less than 1% in 2016. Although that gap widened significantly between President Joe Biden and Trump, Sununu could be the kind of candidate who appeals to Republicans who did not support Trump but remain party loyal. The governor, who is just one of a handful of Republican executives overseeing largely blue electorates, already set himself at odds with the Biden administration over the culturally salient issue of vaccine mandates, calling the federal policy an “overreach.”

THE PLAYLIST

ABC News’ “Start Here” Podcast.Monday morning’s episode features the passage of a long-anticipated infrastructure package with new reporting from ABC News Congressional Correspondent Rachel Scott, who tells us what’s in the bill. Then, a concertgoer from Travis Scott’s Astroworld Festival describes her experience at the packed event that led to the deaths of eight people and multiple injuries. And, ABC News contributor Steve Ganyard offers analysis on the attempted assassination by drone of Iraq’s outgoing prime minister. http://apple.co/2HPocUL

WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW TODAY

  • President Joe Biden and first lady Jill Biden return to the White House from Delaware in the morning. At 10:15 a.m., the president and Vice President Kamala Harris receive the president’s daily brief. At 2:50 p.m., Biden honors the Milwaukee Bucks for winning the 2021 NBA Championship.
  • Principal Deputy Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre and Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg hold a press briefing at 1 p.m.
  • Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell speaks at the Conference on Gender at the Economy at 10 a.m. ET.
  • Secretary of State Antony Blinken hosts Egyptian Foreign Minister Sameh Shoukry for a conversation on U.S.-Egypt relations at 10 a.m., then he meets with Romanian Foreign Minister Bogdan Aurescu at 11:15 a.m. ET.
  • The Supreme Court hears oral arguments beginning at 10 a.m. ET, including on FBI v. Fazaga.
  • Download the ABC News app and select “The Note” as an item of interest to receive the day’s sharpest political analysis.

    The Note is a daily ABC News feature that highlights the day’s top stories in politics. Please check back tomorrow for the latest.

    Source Article from https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/im-trumps-post-jan-threat-gop-light-note/story?id=81020953

    The vaccine mandate in Los Angeles begins at midnight Monday, and some local businesses are working to adjust.

    Claire Risoli, owner of Pocha LA, said her restaurant has to be careful to abide by the rules, but can’t “ruffle feathers” either.

    “We just have to play by the rules if we want to play in the game,” Risoli said.

    That said, Risoli does not want to have to “police” her customers either.

    “It’s definitely a concern. I don’t want to be in the position of having to turn anyone away,” she added.

    Some customers, however, are nonplussed by the requirement.

    “I’m fine with it. We have three kids. Whenever they wanted to play sports, guess what, they had to have their vaccination stuff. Going to the school, they had to show all that. I’m fine with them requesting that we show that we have vaccinations,” said diner Roland Macias.

    For more information about how to provide proof of vaccination, check out KTLA’s guide.

    Source Article from https://ktla.com/news/local-news/businesses-prepare-for-implementation-of-los-angeles-vaccine-mandate-for-many-indoor-establishments/

    If Republicans want more victories like Glenn Youngkin’s in Virginia’s gubernatorial election, the party must learn to coalesce around issues relevant to voters and avoid fixating on things “voters care nothing about,” Fox News host Trey Gowdy said Sunday.

    Youngkin, a first-time candidate who hails from the business wing of the Republican Party, narrowly defeated former Democratic Gov. Terry McAuliffe in a statewide contest with significant national implications.

    Supporters of Republican nominee for Governor of Virginia Glenn Youngkin react as Fox News declares Youngkin has won his race against Democratic Governor Terry McAuliffe and Youngkin will be the next Governor of Virginia during an election night party at a hotel in Chantilly, Virginia, U.S., November 3, 2021.
    (REUTERS/ Elizabeth Frantz)

    Tuesday’s election in Virginia, a one-time battleground but still competitive state, is seen as a key barometer ahead of the 2022 midterm elections, when Republicans aim to win back control of both the House of Representatives and the Senate, where the Democrats hold razor-thin majorities.

    GOP SEES YOUNGKIN’S VICTORY AS BLUEPRINT TO WIN BACK CONGRESS IN 2022

    Gowdy, on “Sunday Night in America” emphasized Youngkin’s ability to flip a typically blue state red, noting that “a double-digit political deficit in less than 12 months is rare.”

    But, he said, Republicans take note of the “why. Why did Glenn Youngkin win and why did Winsome Sears win. What issues did they run on? And can those issues be used in other races? What was their tone and demeanor?” he asked.

    Virginia Gov.-elect Glenn Youngkin tosses a signed basketball to supporters at an election night party in Chantilly, Va., early Wednesday, Nov. 3, 2021, after he defeated Democrat Terry McAuliffe. (AP Photo/Andrew Harnik)
    (AP Photo/Andrew Harnik)

    “To understand elections, we must focus on the why. Why did Republicans win? Why did the state go from Biden to Glenn Youngkin in less than a year? Was it a repudiation on the left, an embrace on the right, or something else?” the host continued.

    Youngkin’s emphasis on tapping into the anger of parents over decisions by their local school boards is largely regarded as a blueprint of how to run campaigns in next year’s elections.

    CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

    Gowdy said that if Republicans could “coalesce around the why and avoid talking about issues that voters care nothing about, there may be more victories next fall. 

    “Be mindful of the what, be mindful of the who,” he said, “but focus on the why.”

    Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/media/gowdy-republicans-must-focus-on-the-why-to-replicate-youngkins-victory-in-2022

    If Republicans want more victories like Glenn Youngkin’s in Virginia’s gubernatorial election, the party must learn to coalesce around issues relevant to voters and avoid fixating on things “voters care nothing about,” Fox News host Trey Gowdy said Sunday.

    Youngkin, a first-time candidate who hails from the business wing of the Republican Party, narrowly defeated former Democratic Gov. Terry McAuliffe in a statewide contest with significant national implications.

    Supporters of Republican nominee for Governor of Virginia Glenn Youngkin react as Fox News declares Youngkin has won his race against Democratic Governor Terry McAuliffe and Youngkin will be the next Governor of Virginia during an election night party at a hotel in Chantilly, Virginia, U.S., November 3, 2021.
    (REUTERS/ Elizabeth Frantz)

    Tuesday’s election in Virginia, a one-time battleground but still competitive state, is seen as a key barometer ahead of the 2022 midterm elections, when Republicans aim to win back control of both the House of Representatives and the Senate, where the Democrats hold razor-thin majorities.

    GOP SEES YOUNGKIN’S VICTORY AS BLUEPRINT TO WIN BACK CONGRESS IN 2022

    Gowdy, on “Sunday Night in America” emphasized Youngkin’s ability to flip a typically blue state red, noting that “a double-digit political deficit in less than 12 months is rare.”

    But, he said, Republicans take note of the “why. Why did Glenn Youngkin win and why did Winsome Sears win. What issues did they run on? And can those issues be used in other races? What was their tone and demeanor?” he asked.

    Virginia Gov.-elect Glenn Youngkin tosses a signed basketball to supporters at an election night party in Chantilly, Va., early Wednesday, Nov. 3, 2021, after he defeated Democrat Terry McAuliffe. (AP Photo/Andrew Harnik)
    (AP Photo/Andrew Harnik)

    “To understand elections, we must focus on the why. Why did Republicans win? Why did the state go from Biden to Glenn Youngkin in less than a year? Was it a repudiation on the left, an embrace on the right, or something else?” the host continued.

    Youngkin’s emphasis on tapping into the anger of parents over decisions by their local school boards is largely regarded as a blueprint of how to run campaigns in next year’s elections.

    CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

    Gowdy said that if Republicans could “coalesce around the why and avoid talking about issues that voters care nothing about, there may be more victories next fall. 

    “Be mindful of the what, be mindful of the who,” he said, “but focus on the why.”

    Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/media/gowdy-republicans-must-focus-on-the-why-to-replicate-youngkins-victory-in-2022

    Former President Donald Trump on Sunday denounced Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell and House Republicans over the passage of President Joe Biden‘s infrastructure bill through the lower chamber.

    The U.S. House passed Biden’s infrastructure bill late Friday in a 228-206 vote largely along party lines. 13 Republican representatives broke with the party to vote in favor of the bill.

    At least one said their rationale was mostly to hit back against progressive Democrats, six of whom voted against it.

    “Very sad that the RINOs in the House and Senate gave Biden and Democrats a victory on the ‘Non-Infrastructure’ Bill,” Trump said in a statement. “Where only 11% of the money being wasted goes to real infrastructure.”

    “How all of those Republican Senators that voted thinking that helping the Democrats is such a wonderful thing to do, so politically correct. They just don’t get it!,” he continued.

    Former President Donald Trump presides over a meeting about immigration with Republican and Democrat members of Congress in the Cabinet Room at the White House January 9, 2018, in Washington, DC.
    Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

    “Now they’ll go for the big kill—getting their second $1.9 Trillion Bill (really $5 Trillion) approved, again with RINO support,” the former Republican president added. “All Republicans who voted for Democrat longevity should be ashamed of themselves, in particular Mitch McConnell, for granting a two month stay which allowed the Democrats time to work things out at our Country’s, and the Republican Party’s expense!”

    The bill now heads to Biden desk to be signed into law. It passed the Senate in August in a 69-30 vote with support from every Democrat and 19 Republicans. McConnell was among the Republican members who supported it, drawing the ire of former president Trump and his supporters.

    “The Republicans in the Senate have the cards, including political cards, to stop the onslaught of Democrat Legislation that will further lead to the destruction of the United States,” Trump said in a statement in September. “The 19 Senators who voted for the [non] Infrastructure Bill, of which only 11 [percent] is infrastructure as we know it, have created a big setback for Republicans. They can’t make mistakes like that again. They must play every card in the deck!”

    Trump argued that passing the infrastructure legislation would boost Democrats in future elections. He also threatened to endorse challengers for any Republicans who vote in favor of Biden’s agenda.

    Trump’s own failure to pass infrastructure legislation during his presidency has been cited by Democrats in the wake of Biden’s bill passing.

    California Rep. Adam Schiff, a top Democrat, invoked the Trump administration’s numerous “infrastructure weeks” in a Facebook post celebrating the vote on Friday. Biden himself also referenced the running joke in his own address on Saturday.

    “Finally, infrastructure week,” the president said. “I’m so happy to say that: infrastructure week.”

    Newsweek reached out to the Biden White House and McConnell’s office for comment.

    Source Article from https://www.newsweek.com/trump-attacks-mcconnell-house-rinos-over-passage-non-infrastructure-bill-1646797