LONDON, Dec 18 (Reuters) – Britain reported a surge in cases of the fast-spreading Omicron coronavirus variant on Saturday, and London’s mayor declared a “major incident” to help the capital’s hospitals following a sharp rise in COVID-19 admissions.

The total number of Omicron cases recorded across the country hit almost 25,000 as of 1800 GMT on Friday, up by more than 10,000 cases from 24 hours earlier, the UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) said in its latest data.

Seven people believed to have had the Omicron variant had died as of Thursday, up from one death in the UKHSA’s previous data which ran up to Tuesday. Hospitalisations of people thought to have the variant increased to 85 from 65.

London Mayor Sadiq Khan declared a “major incident” – which allows for closer coordination between different public agencies and possibly more central government support – as COVID-19 hospital admissions in the city rose by nearly 30% this week.

He said health worker absences had also increased.

“I’ve taken the decision, in consultation with our partners, to declare a major incident today,” Khan said during a visit to Stamford Bridge, the home of Chelsea Football Club which is being used as a mass vaccination centre.

“This is a statement of how serious things are,” he said.

Khan, from the opposition Labour Party, also declared a major incident in January, when rising COVID-19 cases threatened to overwhelm hospitals.

The Omicron variant is estimated to account for more than 80% of new COVID-19 cases in London, officials said on Friday.

Mayor of London, Sadiq Khan visits a coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pop-up vaccination centre at Chelsea football ground, Stamford Bridge in London, Britain, December 18, 2021. REUTERS/David Klein

Prime Minister Boris Johnson was due to chair an emergency committee meeting over the weekend with the devolved administrations in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland, which have their own powers over public health.

The BBC said the leaked minutes of a meeting of the government’s health advisers showed modelling suggested hospital admissions could more than triple to at least 3,000 a day in England in early 2022 without new restrictions.

A report in The Times newspaper said officials were preparing draft rules that, if introduced, would ban indoor mixing in England except for work for two weeks after Christmas when pubs and restaurants would be limited to outdoor table service.

People would be able to meet in groups of up to six outdoors, the newspaper said.

But ministers were yet to formally consider the plans, The Times said.

Johnson said on Friday “we are not closing things down”.

A government spokesperson, asked about The Times report, said the government would continue to “look closely at all the emerging data and we’ll keep our measures under review as we learn more about this variant”.

The total number of all new COVID-19 cases reported in official data edged down to 90,418 from a record high of more than 93,000 on Friday, but that was still the country’s second-highest daily toll. Figures typically dip at the weekend.

Cases were up 44.4% over the seven days to Dec. 18 compared with the previous week. read more

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

Source Article from https://www.reuters.com/world/uk/london-declares-major-incident-help-covid-hit-hospitals-2021-12-18/

Dec 17 (Reuters) – A U.S. appeals court on Friday reinstated a nationwide vaccine-or-testing COVID-19 mandate for large businesses, which covers 80 million American workers, prompting opponents to rush to the Supreme Court to ask it to intervene.

The ruling by the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Cincinnati lifted a November injunction that had blocked the rule from the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), which applies to businesses with at least 100 workers.

“It is difficult to imagine what more OSHA could do or rely on to justify its finding that workers face a grave danger in the workplace,” said the opinion. “It is not appropriate to second-guess that agency determination considering the substantial evidence, including many peer-reviewed scientific studies, on which it relied.”

President Joe Biden unveiled in September regulations to increase the adult vaccination rate as a way of fighting the pandemic, which has killed more than 750,000 Americans and weighed on the economy.

The ruling coincides with public health officials bracing for a “tidal wave” of coronavirus infections in the United States as the more transmissible Omicron variant spreads rapidly worldwide.

“While we are disappointed in the Court’s decision, we will continue to fight the illegal mandate in the Supreme Court,” South Carolina Attorney General Alan Wilson said on Twitter. “We are confident the mandate can be stopped.”

Within hours of the ruling, at least three petitions were filed with the U.S. Supreme Court, asking it to immediately block the mandate.

A protester gestures at passing traffic as Boeing employees and others line the street to protest the company’s coronavirus disease (COVID-19) vaccine mandate, outside the Boeing facility in Everett, Washington, October 15, 2021. REUTERS/Lindsey Wasson

A group of business groups representing retail, wholesale, warehousing, transportation, travel and logistics filed one of the first petitions with the high court, raising among other issues the potential for workers to quit rather than take the shot.

“The resulting labor upheaval will devastate already fragile supply chains and labor markets at the peak holiday season,” said the petition.

Companies such as United Airlines (UAL.O) have used mandates to increase the number of vaccinated employees, often with only a small number of workers refusing the shots. read more

But others such as Boeing Co (BA.N) have suspended their plans, in part because of court rulings putting government mandates on hold, but also due to resistance among workers. read more

Courts have blocked Biden’s vaccine requirement for healthcare workers in half the states and a vaccine mandate for federal contractors has been blocked nationwide. read more

Friday’s ruling was 2-1 with Judges Jane Stranch, appointed by President Barack Obama, and Julia Gibbons, appointed by President George W. Bush, in the majority. Judge Joan Larsen, appointed by President Donald Trump, dissented.

Republicans, conservative groups and trade organizations sued over the OSHA rule, arguing the agency overstepped its authority. read more

The rule set a Jan. 4 deadline for compliance, although it was unclear if that will be enforced because the rule was blocked for weeks.

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

Source Article from https://www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/us-appeals-court-reinstates-covid-19-vaccine-or-test-rule-us-workplaces-2021-12-18/

A federal appeals court panel has allowed Joe Biden’s Covid-19 vaccine mandate for larger private employers to move ahead, reversing a previous decision on a requirement that could affect some 84 million US workers.

The 2-1 decision by a panel of the 6th US circuit court of appeals in Cincinnati overrules a decision by a federal judge in a separate court that had paused the mandate nationwide.

The mandate from the US Occupational Safety and Health Administration (Osha) was to take effect on 4 January. With Friday’s ruling, it’s not clear when the requirement might be put in place, but the White House said in a statement that it will protect workers: “Especially as the US faces the highly transmissible Omicron variant, it’s critical we move forward with vaccination requirements and protections for workers with the urgency needed in this moment.”

Republican state attorneys general and conservative groups said they would appeal Friday’s decision to the US supreme court.

Twenty-seven Republican-led states joined with conservative groups, business associations and some individual businesses to push back against the requirement as soon as Osha published the rules in early November. They argued the agency was not authorized to make the emergency rule, in part because the coronavirus is a general health risk and not one faced only by employees at work.

The panel’s majority disagreed.

“Given Osha’s clear and exercised authority to regulate viruses, Osha necessarily has the authority to regulate infectious diseases that are not unique to the workplace,” Judge Julia Smith Gibbons, who was nominated to the court by George W Bush, a Republican, wrote in her majority opinion.

“Vaccination and medical examinations are both tools that Osha historically employed to contain illness in the workplace,” she wrote.

Gibbons noted that the agency’s authority extended beyond just regulating “hard hats and safety goggles”. She said the vaccine requirement “is not a novel expansion of Osha’s power; it is an existing application of authority to a novel and dangerous worldwide pandemic”.

She was joined in the majority decision by Judge Jane Branstetter Stranch, an appointee of Barack Obama.

The case was consolidated in the 6th circuit, which is dominated by Republican-appointed judges. Earlier this week, the circuit’s active judges rejected a move to have the entire panel consider the case, on an 8-8 vote.

The dissent in Friday’s ruling came from Judge Joan Larsen, an appointee of Donald Trump, who said Congress did not authorize Osha to make this sort of rule and that it did not qualify as a necessity to use the emergency procedures the agency followed to put it in place.

The vaccine requirement would apply to companies with 100 or more employees and would cover about 84 million workers in the US. Employees who are not fully vaccinated would have to wear face masks and be subject to weekly Covid-19 tests. There would be exceptions, including for those who work outdoors or only at home.

The administration has estimated that the rule would save 6,500 lives and prevent 250,000 hospitalizations over six months. On Friday, the US Department of Labor, which includes Osha, said the 6th circuit’s ruling will allow the agency to implement “commonsense, science-based measures to keep workers safe and healthy during a deadly pandemic”.

Source Article from https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/dec/18/court-rules-bidens-vaccine-mandate-for-large-employers-can-take-effect

“I remember yelling ‘Taser, Taser, Taser’, and nothing happened. Then he told me I shot him,” she added, breaking down in tears.

Source Article from https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-59691902

Vague threats shared on TikTok that warned of nationwide school violence Friday — which authorities said were not credible — led New Jersey officials to reassure parents and boost security while the social media company said it found nothing threatening on its platform.

Rumors of the posts rattled nerves and forced officials to take precautionary steps in New Jersey as the day progressed with no major incidents reported. Along with the Garden State, officials in states across the country from Texas to Maryland said they increased security over the non-specific social media scare.

The U.S. Department of Homeland Security said Friday it was monitoring the issue, but echoed local messages that there was no evidence of danger.

“DHS is aware of public reporting that suggests possible threats to schools on December 17, 2021. DHS does not have any information indicating any specific, credible threats to schools but recommends communities remain alert,” the department said in a statement.

Meanwhile, TikTok pushed back on reports about the viral messages, and the original source of the posts remained unclear. The social media platform said it was working with law enforcement agencies, but its search didn’t turn up threats.

“We handle even rumored threats with utmost seriousness, which is why we’re working with law enforcement to look into warnings about potential violence at schools even though we have not found evidence of such threats originating or spreading via TikTok,” the company said.

“Update: we’ve exhaustively searched for content that promotes violence at schools today, but have still found nothing. What we find are videos discussing this rumor and warning others to stay safe,” the company added.

TikTok further cited media reports for spreading claims of the false threats.

“Media reports have been widespread and based on rumors rather than facts, and we are deeply concerned that the proliferation of local media reports on an alleged trend that has not been found on the platform could end up inspiring real world harm,” TikTok said.

In New Jersey and across the nation, local news outlets largely reported statements about the non-credible threat released by law enforcement and school administrators.

The exact nature of the messages varied, according to reports from officials. In Nutley, a police spokesman said his department learned of “a viral TikTok/Snapchat social media post indicating a potential school shooting,” on Dec. 17. Other reports said the messages included a “challenge” for students to report false threats.

“There is NO credible information to suggest that there is any direct threat specific to the Nutley School System or any school located in New Jersey,” Nutley police Detective Tony Montanari wrote in an email.

“While today’s school-related social media threats proved to be non-credible, these events underscore the importance of situational awareness and identifying the signs of suspicious activity,” the New Jersey Office of Homeland Security and Preparedness said.

New York City Schools Chancellor Meisha Porter alerted parents of a TikTok trend encouraging students to “call in bomb threats, school shootings threats, etc,” according to a New York Post report.

In South Jersey, Eastern Camden County Regional School District Schools Superintendent Robert Cloutier said the New Jersey Department of Education’s Office of School Preparedness and Emergency Planning notified officials about the concerning posts on Thursday.

“A video has been making the rounds on Tik Tok warning of nationwide school shootings on December 17th along with hashtags #december172021, #december17th, and #december17,” Cloutier said in a message to parents.

“A similar threat has been noted on SnapChat. It can be expected these posts may migrate to other social media platforms or surface in messaging between students. Messages such as this current one, circulating in numerous states, typically cause confusion and heightened anxiety among the school community,” he said.

N.J. schools on high alert

In Cloutier’s district, he said additional police were deployed at the school.

“We are closely monitoring the disturbing threats apparently being made on TikTok and other platforms and are staying vigilant,” a spokesperson for Snap said in a statement Friday. “We treat threats of violence as urgently as possible, and if they occur, we immediately delete the content and proactively escalate the threat to law enforcement.”

As school officials were on high alert, a school lockdown system “experienced a malfunction shortly after school dismissal,” at Waldwick High School, according to borough police Lt. Thomas Dowling. The erroneous report led to a response from the Bergen County Regional SWAT team and nearby police departments.

On Thursday night, Gov. Phil Murphy said he spoke with top state law enforcement officials about the social media concern as reports of the supposed threat spread, but there was no known specific threats against New Jersey schools.

In recent weeks, school officials in New Jersey faced a range of separate, false social media threats following a deadly school shooting in Michigan. Police have charged students with making threats, including in New Brunswick this week.

White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki said federal authorities were monitoring reports of the threats.

“We know a number of schools across the country are closing today, and some parents are keeping their children home,” Psaki tweeted.

“Today is another reminder of how many kids and parents live in fear of school shootings or violence. It is unacceptable,” she said.

Our journalism needs your support. Please subscribe today to NJ.com.

Noah Cohen may be reached at ncohen@njadvancemedia.com.

Source Article from https://www.nj.com/news/2021/12/tiktok-pushes-back-after-reports-of-viral-school-threat-caused-added-security-in-nj.html

“Even with the recent increase in Omicron variant, we expect that these prevention strategies will continue to work,” Kristen Nordlund, a C.D.C. spokeswoman, said in a statement on Friday. “However, as we learn more about the Omicron variant, C.D.C. will continue to review and update guidance as needed.”

The new policy, hinted at in the winter Covid-19 plan that President Biden unveiled this month, still calls on students to wear masks and socially distance, and applies only to those who remain asymptomatic. Until now, unvaccinated students were expected to quarantine at home for as long as two weeks after exposure. Some states have had tens of thousands of students in quarantine.

“While over 99 percent of schools are open now, we need to make sure we keep that throughout the winter,” Mr. Biden said as he announced the plan. “We want our children in school.”

Vaccinated students with exposures have generally been allowed to remain in school as long as they are asymptomatic and wear a mask. Dr. Rochelle P. Walensky, the C.D.C. director, said at a news conference on Friday that students participating in test-to-stay programs should be tested at least twice during the seven-day period after an exposure.

In one of the studies the C.D.C. released on Friday, students at schools in Los Angeles County that did not participate in a pilot test-to-stay program, and who had to quarantine, lost an estimated 92,455 in-person school days from Sept. 20 to Oct. 31. In schools participating in the pilot, students exposed to the virus lost no days. Those schools also did not see increases in virus rates among students.

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2021/12/17/health/unvaccinated-children-covid-testing-cdc.html

The company and law firm names shown above are generated automatically based on the text of the article. We are improving this feature as we continue to test and develop in beta. We welcome feedback, which you can provide using the feedback tab on the right of the page.

NEW YORK, Dec 17 (Reuters) – Ghislaine Maxwell’s defense rested its case in her sex abuse trial on Friday after the British socialite told the judge prosecutors had not proven their case beyond a reasonable doubt.

In two days of testimony from former employees of Jeffrey Epstein, a psychologist specializing in memory, and an ex-girlfriend of the late financier, the defense sought to undercut the testimony of four women who said Maxwell set them up for sexual abuse by Epstein when they were teenagers.

Maxwell, 59, pleaded not guilty to eight counts of sex trafficking and other crimes. Her attorneys argued she is being scapegoated for Epstein’s conduct. Epstein killed himself in 2019 at the age of 66 in a Manhattan jail cell while awaiting trial on sex crimes charges.

Maxwell told U.S. District Judge Alison Nathan that she would not testify in her own defense on Friday.

“Your honor, the government has not proven the case beyond a reasonable doubt and so there is no need for me to testify,” said Maxwell, standing up in the courtroom.

Maxwell’s attorney Bobbi Sternheim wrapped her arm around her back as she spoke. Defendants in U.S. criminal trials are not required to testify, and often do not, since the burden of proof is on prosecutors.

Closing arguments in the trial are expected on Monday in federal court in Manhattan. The jury would then begin deliberations.

1/6

Ghislaine Maxwell listens as attorney Bobbi Sternheim questions psychologist Elizabeth Loftus during the trial of Maxwell, the Jeffrey Epstein associate accused of sex trafficking, in a courtroom sketch in New York City, U.S., December 16, 2021. REUTERS/Jane Rosenberg

Nathan advised jurors to “be cautious out there” before sending them home for the weekend. COVID-19 cases are on the rise in New York, and Nathan earlier on Friday said she wanted to avoid “unnecessary delays” to the trial.

“I want to see everybody back here Monday,” Nathan said.

During the trial, Maxwell’s defense sought to portray her four accusers as not credible, arguing their memories had been corrupted since the events were said to have happened between 1994 and 2004 and that they were motivated by the prospect of a payout from a compensation fund for Epstein’s victims.

On Friday afternoon, Maxwell attorney Christian Everdell read a stipulation agreed upon by both sides indicating that an attorney for one of the women, known by the pseudonym Jane, had told her that cooperating with prosecutors could “help her case,” without providing details.

The lawyer, Robert Glassman, also told her that cooperating was the “morally right thing to do,” the stipulation said.

Jane testified during the trial’s first week that she was awarded $5 million from the fund but did not think participating in Maxwell’s criminal case would help her claim.

Jurors earlier on Friday heard from an FBI agent who interviewed Jane multiple times before Maxwell’s July 2020 arrest. The agent acknowledged that Jane had not initially told them she was ever in a room alone with Epstein and Maxwell. Jane testified that Maxwell sometimes participated in sex acts with her and Epstein.

Jane, who said she was 14 when Epstein began abusing her in 1994, testified that “memory is not linear.” She also said she was not comfortable enough during her first few meetings with the FBI to share everything that happened to her.

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

Source Article from https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/defense-case-ghislaine-maxwells-sex-abuse-trial-enters-second-day-2021-12-17/

A Florida man was sentenced to more than five years behind bars Friday for storming the US Capitol on Jan. 6 — the harshest penalty dished out yet over the insurrection.

Robert Palmer, 54, was handed a 63-month sentence after he pleaded guilty in October to attacking police officers during the riot.

“Your honor. I’m really really ashamed of what I did,” he told US District Judge Tanya Chutkan through sobs on Friday.

Federal prosecutors said Palmer, of Largo Florida, was on the “front lines” of the mob attempting to disrupt the certification of Joe Biden’s victory in the 2020 election. Palmer threw a wooden plank at cops before spraying a fire extinguisher that he then also hurled.

He was halted briefly when he was pepper-sprayed by law-enforcement — but then attacked again with a pole, according to prosecutors.

In a handwritten letter to the judge, Palmer said that he and other supporters of former President Donald Trump were “lied to by those at the time who had great power.”

Robert Palmer is accused of spraying a fire extinguisher onto officers.
Lev Radin/Pacific Press via ZUMA Wire
Robert Palmer believed it was his duty “to stand up to tyranny” on behalf of former President Donald Trump.
AP Photo/Evan Vucci, File

“They kept spitting out the false narrative about a stolen election and how it was ‘our duty’ to stand up to tyranny.”

Palmer — one of several rioters sentenced in Washington, DC, court on Friday — argued it wasn’t fair that he be punished so severely, when the many ringleaders aren’t in jail.

Chutkan agreed — to a point.

“The people who extorted you and encouraged you and rallied you to go and take action have not been charged,” the judge said. “That is not the court’s decision. I have my opinions but they are not relevant.”

Robert Palmer is seen throwing a fire extinguisher at police before being pepper-sprayed on Jan. 6.
Department of Justice

The previous longest sentence for a Capitol rioter was the 41 months dealt to both “QAnon Shaman” Jacob Chansley of Arizona and New Jersey gym owner Scott Fairlamb, who was the first defendant sentenced for assaulting a law enforcement officer.

“It has to be made clear … trying to stop the peaceful transition of power and assaulting law enforcement officers is going to be met with certain punishment,” Chutkan said. “There are going to be consequences. I’m not making an example of you. I’m sentencing you for the conduct you did.”

Capitol rioter Jacob Chansley, aka “QAnon Shaman”, was given a 41-month jail sentence.
REUTERS/Stephanie Keith/File
Robert Palmer argued several ringleaders of the Capitol riot have not yet been punished.
Department of Justice

Palmer is the 65th defendant to be sentenced overall out of more than 700 people who have been charged. In all, there was about $1.5 million in damage done to the Capitol.

With Post wires

Source Article from https://nypost.com/2021/12/17/capitol-rioter-robert-palmer-gets-5-years-harshest-sentence-yet/

A federal appeals court has reinstated the Biden administration’s vaccine and testing requirement for private businesses that covers about 80 million American workers.

The ruling by the 6th U.S. Court of Appeals in Cincinnati lifted a November injunction that had blocked the rule from the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, which applies to businesses with at least 100 workers.

In the decision Friday, the 6th Circuit noted that OSHA has historical precedent for using wide discretion to ensure worker safety and “demonstrated the pervasive danger that COVID-19 poses to workers—unvaccinated workers in particular—in their workplaces.”

The Justice Department argued last week that blocking the requirements would result in “enormous” harm to the public, as hospitals brace for an increase in Covid cases this winter and the highly mutated omicron variant takes root in more states.

“COVID-19 is spreading in workplaces, and workers are being hospitalized and dying,” the Justice Department argued in a court filing on Friday. “As COVID-19 case numbers continue to rise and a new variant has emerged, the threat to workers is ongoing and overwhelming.”

The policy required businesses with 100 or more employees to ensure their workers were fully vaccinated by Jan. 4 or submit a negative Covid test weekly to enter the workplace. Unvaccinated employees were required to start wearing masks indoors starting Dec. 5.

Republican attorneys general, private companies and industry groups such as the National Retail Federation, the American Trucking Associations, and the National Federation of Independent Business sued to have the policy overturned. They argued that the requirements are unnecessary, burden businesses with compliance costs, and exceed the authority of the federal government.

“These assertions ignore the economic analysis OSHA conducted that demonstrates the feasibility of implementing the ETS [Emergency Temporary Standard],” the 6th Circuit said Friday, labeling concerns by the petitioning groups “speculative.”

The Biden administration last month stopped implementation and enforcement of the requirements to comply with an order issued by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit in New Orleans. Judge Kurt D. Englehardt, in an opinion for a three-judge panel, said the requirements were “staggeringly overbroad” and raised “serious constitutional concerns.”

The more than two dozen lawsuits filed against the vaccine and testing requirements were transferred to the Sixth Circuit last month after the Biden administration ask a multidistrict litigation panel to consolidate the case in a single court through random selection.

The Justice Department, in its court filing last week, argued that the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, which developed the requirements, acted within its emergency powers as established by Congress. The Biden administration dismissed opponents claims that workers would quit because of the policy and said the compliance costs were “modest.”

“The threat to human life and health also vastly outweighs petitioners’ guesswork about the number of workers who may quit rather than get vaccinated or tested,” The Justice Department wrote in its filing, arguing that many workers who say they will quit end up complying with vaccine mandates.

OSHA, which polices workplace safety for the Labor department, developed the vaccine and testing requirements under emergency powers that allow the agency to shortcut the normal rulemaking process, which can take years. OSHA can issue an emergency workplace safety standard if the Labor secretary determines a standard is necessary to protect workers from a grave danger.

The White House has repeatedly argued that Covid presents a grave danger to workers, pointing to the staggering death toll from the pandemic and rising Covid infections across the U.S.

Reuters contributed to this report.

This breaking news. Please check back for updates.

Source Article from https://www.cnbc.com/2021/12/17/federal-court-reinstates-biden-administrations-business-vaccine-mandate.html

Source Article from https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2021/12/16/tiktok-violence-threats-schools-united-states-security/8933323002/

The 63-month sentence Chutkan imposed was the harshest yet handed down in the more than 700 Capitol riot prosecutions. Prosecutors had sought the lengthy jail term, which was nearly two years longer than the sentences handed down to Jacob Chansley — known as the QAnon Shaman — and Scott Fairlamb, who pleaded guilty to assaulting an officer.

Her remarks upon sentencing included a stirring defense of police officers, deputy U.S. marshals and members of Congress, who she said were the real patriots that day. She also lamented that the Jan. 6 rioters appeared to be treated more gently by police than they might’ve been if they were non-white.

The 90-minute long sentencing hearing was wrenching at times, as Palmer came to grips with the lengthy sentence he was facing. Through tears, he pleaded for leniency, with his children nearby in the courtroom. One of them, Robert Palmer Jr., also urged the judge for leniency.

But Chutkan, an appointee of former President Barack Obama, said her sentence needed to also factor in the grave threat to democracy posed by crimes like the one Palmer committed, particularly as evidence continues to emerge of threats to future elections.

“It has to be made clear that trying to violently overthrow the government, trying to stop the peaceful transition of power, meets absolutely certain punishment,” she said. “Not staying at home. Not watching Netflix.”

Palmer’s defense lawyer urged the judge when fashioning the sentence to take into account that the political leaders who helped stoke the unrest that led to the assault on the Capitol had not been punished.

Chutkan said she agreed with that observation, but emphasized it was not her role to decide who’s charged.

“I don’t have any influence over that. I have my opinions, but they are not relevant,” Chutkan replied. “You’re correct in that…No one who was encouraging everybody to take the Capitol has been charged as of yet.”

But she said any decisions to seek charges against those actors are not in her purview. “I don’t charge anybody,” Chutkan said.

Justice Department officials have said they are looking at anyone who may have committed a crime in connection with the events of Jan. 6, but there has been no sign of a concerted federal investigation into Trump or numerous allies whose fiery rhetoric and advocacy contributed to the violence.

The probe into whether leaders bear responsibility has largely been the province of the Jan. 6 select committee in the House, which has probed Trump’s efforts to overturn the election and his actions as supporters stormed the Capitol.

Palmer made a brief statement, expressing remorse for his actions. In his remarks he mentioned that while he was in prison, he watched a video clip from MSNBC’s “Rachel Maddow Show” about his own case.

“I was horrified, absolutely devastated, to see myself on there,” he said. “I can tell you, my memory is just not what it should be sometimes. It just brought back what actually happened. Those officers were so brave just standing there, taking what the people were giving them … I’m just so ashamed I was part of that.”

Chutkan said that while the rioters cloaked themselves in claims of patriotism, they were not acting patriotically on Jan. 6.

Palmer’s trip to D.C., attendance at Trump’s rally and march to the Capitol itself were not punishable, she said. It was when he breached police lines and repeatedly attacked officers that he ran afoul of the law. Those police, she said, were the true heroes.

“They were the patriots that day, Mr. Palmer,” the judge said. “That day, U.S. Marshals ran from this courthouse to the Capitol. They put themselves in danger to protect the occupants of that Capitol….They are the patriots and some of them did not know if they were going to see their children again that night.”

“They deserve the thanks of this nation and didn’t deserve to have a fire extinguisher thrown at them. They didn’t deserve to be called names, to be spat on,” Chutkan added.

The judge said she was pleased to learn that, unlike many Jan. 6 defendants, Palmer recently agreed to be vaccinated for the coronavirus. However, she stressed that she wasn’t imposing sentences based on the political views or health views of defendants.

“I’m not punishing anyone for who they support — for the flying spaghetti monster or what your political beliefs are,” she said.

Chutkan, who has previously mused publicly about whether Jan. 6 defendants had been treated more leniently than typical D.C. defendants, said she’s not sure the usual criminal defendants in her court would have faced non-lethal munitions.

“I wonder Mr. Palmer whether some of the people that I see before me on a regular basis in this courtroom, charged with drug offenses and other offenses that are usually the subject of federal charges, if they had tried to storm the Capitol that day if they would have been met with rubber bullets, and I suspect not.”

Chutkan, noting Palmer’s mention of MSNBC, said she was pleased that Palmer was diversifying his intake of media but said it comes with a caveat.

“You tell me you’re watching MSNBC. I think a steady diet of any one of these cable shows is probably not a good idea for anybody,” the judge said.

Chutkan also suggested consumption of just one strain of media helped set in motion the events of the Capitol Riot and the consequences for people like Palmer.

“We might not have had Jan. 6, but people get very siloed and they listen to an echo chamber of information,” she said.

Source Article from https://www.politico.com/news/2021/12/17/judge-lack-charges-trump-jan-6-525277

British socialite Ghislaine Maxwell on Friday said she would not testify at her trial on federal criminal charges related to her alleged abetting of the late money manager Jeffrey Epstein’s sexual abuse of underage girls.

“Your honor, the Government has not proved its case beyond a reasonable doubt and so there’s no reason for me to testify,” the 59-year-old Maxwell told the judge at her trial in Manhattan federal court.

Maxwell’s defense lawyers rested their case on Friday. Prosecutors said they will not present evidence or testimony to rebut the defense’s case.

Closing arguments in the trial are set for Monday. Jurors could begin deliberating Maxwell’s fate later that same day.

Maxwell, who has been held without bail since her arrest, is charged with conspiracy to entice and coerce minors to travel to engage in illegal sex acts, sex trafficking and other charges.

Her trial began more than two years after the arrest of Epstein on child sex trafficking charges. Epstein died from what has officially been ruled a suicide by hanging while being held in a federal jail in Manhattan in August 2019.

Epstein years earlier had been a friend to two former presidents, Donald Trump and Bill Clinton, Britan’s Prince Andrew, and a number of other wealthy, high-profile people.

One of Epstein’s accusers, Virginia Giuffre, earlier this year sued Prince Andrew in Manhattan federal court, claiming that she had sex with the royal family member three times in London, New York and the Virgin Islands in 2001, when she was just 17 years old.

Giuffre alleges that she had sex with Andrew at the direction of Maxwell and Epstein.

Source Article from https://www.cnbc.com/2021/12/17/ghislaine-maxwell-will-not-testify-in-sex-case-related-to-jeffrey-epstein.html

The arbiter of Senate rules found that Democrats’ plan to provide temporary protections for immigrants living in the U.S. illegally can’t be passed as a component of party lawmakers’ roughly $2 trillion education, healthcare and climate package

The guidance provided by Senate parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough is set to force Democrats to remove the protections from the bill, the third time the party’s immigration proposals have been found to run afoul of the chamber’s rules. The current provisions would have shielded immigrants from deportation for five years and would have provided a five-year renewable work authorization, available to any immigrant who arrived in the country before 2011. 

All of the measures Democrats hope to advance in the wide-ranging $2 trillion package must comply with a series of rules associated with reconciliation, the process Democrats are using to advance the legislation and skirt a filibuster in the Senate. 

WARREN, SCHUMER ‘STRONGLY URGE’ BIDEN TO EXTEND STUDENT LOAN FORBEARANCE AND CANCEL DEBT 

Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., speaks at the J Street National Conference.  (Michael Brochstein/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images / Getty Images)

Chief among reconciliation’s restrictions is that measures in the bill must relate directly to the federal budget. In a brief finding, Ms. MacDonough objected to multiple aspects of the immigration proposal, including that it would allow some immigrants under the program to become eligible for green cards, and that the government wouldn’t have leeway to turn down some immigrants if they met the standards for the program. 

She also said the measure covered substantially the same population as previous proposals that she rejected. 

“These are substantial policy changes with lasting effects, just like those we previously considered, and outweigh the budgetary impact,” she wrote, according to a copy of her ruling reviewed by The Wall Street Journal. 

The Congressional Budget Office estimated that the immigration provision would cover about 6.5 million immigrants living in the U.S. illegally. 

Sen. Richard Durbin (D., Ill.), who helps craft immigration policy as the chairman of the Judiciary Committee, said he was disappointed by the finding. 

“We’re considering what options remain,” Mr. Durbin said. 

The stakes of the effort are perhaps highest for young immigrants known as Dreamers, many of whom rely on a program called Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, or DACA, to protect them from deportation and allow them to work legally. A federal court in Texas ruled the Obama-era program was illegal in a decision last summer and analysts expect the issue will eventually reach the Supreme Court. 

The parliamentarian’s ruling doesn’t touch on a separate set of proposals designed to help immigrants caught in yearslong green card backlogs by recapturing unused visas from previous years and creating extra fees for some immigrants to jump ahead in line. Democrats sent the parliamentarian a memo on those provisions last week, according to Democratic aides familiar with the matter. 

The absence of the temporary immigrant protections from the bill is set to frustrate both immigration advocates and Democrats, some of whom have insisted that the $2 trillion package include immigration measures. Some have also called on Senate Democrats to ignore the parliamentarian’s finding and move forward with the measures anyway. 

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE ON FOX BUSINESS 

While centrist Democrats have said they don’t support such a move, advocates and some progressive Democrats may now begin to more vocally advocate for it. 

“This can be disregarded,” said Rebecca Shi, executive director of American Business Immigration Coalition, a group advocating for a path to citizenship or other measures for immigrants in the country without permission. “The Senate should move forward with a path to citizenship for the essential workers and dreamers who have worked and made our nation stronger throughout Covid.” 

Sen. Chuck Grassley (R., Iowa), the top Republican on the Senate Judiciary Committee, applauded the parliamentarian’s finding. 

Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, speaks with reporters before a vote at the U.S. Capitol Building before a Senate Luncheons on Oct. 19, 2021, in Washington, D.C.  (Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images / Getty Images)

“Trying to shoehorn radical immigration policy provisions into reconciliation has always been about avoiding bipartisan negotiation and compromise,” he said in a statement. 

Immigration is one of several measures in the social spending and climate legislation that the parliamentarian could find is inconsistent with the Senate’s reconciliation rules. Lawmakers and aides also expect that the bill’s proposal to regulate drug prices in the commercial market could also run afoul of reconciliation’s restrictions. 

CLICK HERE TO GET FOX BUSINESS ON THE GO  

Beyond working through the procedural challenges, Democrats are also working to build the necessary political support for the package. Sen. Joe Manchin (D., W.Va.), whose support Democrats will need in the 50-50 Senate, has continued to raise concerns about the bill’s structure, among other issues. 

In a statement Thursday, President Biden said Democrats would continue working on the bill. 

This article first appeared in the Wall Street Journal 

Source Article from https://www.foxbusiness.com/politics/democrats-immigration-proposal-rejected-senate-parliamentarian

Analysts said the North Shropshire vote concentrated minds on Johnson’s ability — or not — to win elections. “His whole premiership is based on, ‘He’s good at winning elections,’” said Rob Ford, a professor of politics at the University of Manchester. “If it becomes a settled view that, far from being an electoral Gandalf, he is an electoral Voldemort, he’s not long for Number 10,” he added, referring to the prime minister’s address at 10 Downing St. in London.

Source Article from https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2021/12/17/boris-johnson-election-lib-dems/