Mr. Reid encouraged Mr. Obama to run for president before the 2008 election even though Mr. Obama was a junior member of the Senate at the time. And after Mr. Obama won the White House, Mr. Reid was one of his most dependable and important allies, using every legislative weapon at his disposal to win approval of the economic stimulus bill and, most critically, the Affordable Care Act, which memorably passed the Senate in 2009 during a blizzard on Christmas Eve.

“The deals Harry made to get that law done didn’t always look pretty,” Mr. Obama said, adding: “Whenever I would object to a change he wanted to make, whether because of some policy concerns or worries about the optics, Harry would tell me with some exasperation in his voice, ‘Mr. President, you know a lot more than I do about health care policy, OK? But I know the Senate.’”

Mr. Biden, a former senator who is now struggling to pass his own sweeping domestic policy bill, grew animated while describing Mr. Reid’s negotiation tactics and congressional victories. “If Harry said he was going to do something, he did it,” he said, adding: “You could bank on it. That’s how he got so much done for the good of the country for so many decades.”

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2022/01/08/us/politics/harry-reid-memorial-service.html

Saturday evening, CPS issued a point-by-point response to the union’s offer, agreeing to several of CTU’s requests on masking, screeners and testing but rejecting others, including the central feature of the proposal, a pause in in-person classes until Jan. 18.

Source Article from https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/breaking/ct-chicago-public-schools-teachers-union-new-deal-proposal-20220108-vsbil4f5fvdqxcx6rnq3acxw4i-story.html

SACRAMENTO, Calif. — Gov. Gavin Newsom on Saturday proposed a new $2.7 billion COVID-19 emergency response package for California, with $1.2 billion dedicated to bolster testing.

According to the governor’s office, the package, which includes a $1.4 billion emergency appropriation request, is targeted to help bolster testing capacity, accelerate vaccination and booster efforts, support frontline workers, strengthen the health care system and battle misinformation. It also calls for new legislation to implement supplemental paid sick leave policies.

“From day one, California has taken swift and direct action to battle COVID-19 with policies that have saved tens of thousands of lives, but there’s more work to be done,” Newsom said. “Our proposed COVID-19 Emergency Response Package will support our testing capacity, accelerate vaccination and booster efforts, support frontline workers and health care systems and battle misinformation, with a focus on the hardest-hit communities.”

Here’s a breakdown of what the package features: 

$1.2 BILLION: BOLSTER TESTING

  • Expand hours and capacity at testing sites throughout the state to help slow the spread
  • Distribute millions of COVID-19 antigen tests to local health departments, community clinics and county offices of education and schools. This is critical to the state’s operational readiness and continued efforts to combat COVID-19, and it includes a $1.4 billion emergency appropriation request to the Legislature for California’s immediate needs
  • Supporting the state’s testing facilities, including specimen collection and expanding capacity in order to meet demand
  • Supporting state departments in testing their staff and congregate populations

$583 MILLION: GET MORE CALIFORNIANS VACCINATED & BOOSTED, COMBAT MISINFORMATION

  • Continue the “Vaccinate all 58” public education campaign to provide reliable information and build vaccine confidence while combating misinformation, all of which is in partnership with 250 ethnic media outlets.
  • Continue a robust community outreach and direct appointment assistance campaign by conducting door-to-door canvassing, phone banking and texting with over 700 CBOs and community partners in partnership with philanthropy.
  • In-home vaccination and testing programs to meet Californians where they’re at.
  • Provide free transportation to vaccination appointments throughout the state to help get more Californians vaccinated and boosted.

$614 MILLION: SUPPORT FRONTLINE WORKERS AND HEALTH CARE SYSTEMS

  • Support and distribution of critical personnel resources for health care systems to help protect frontline workers, patient care and hospital surge capacity as well as additional staffing for vaccination sites.

$200 MILLION: SUPPORT STATE RESPONSE OPERATIONS

  • Resources to enhance the state’s emergency response and public health capacities, including staffing and information technology at California Department of Public Health, Office of Emergency Services and Emergency Medical Services Authority.

$110 MILLION: SUPPORT VULNERABLE POPULATIONS AND BOLSTER CONTACT TRACING EFFORTS

  • Increased public health and humanitarian efforts at the California-Mexico border to keep migrants safe, including vaccinations, testing and isolation and quarantine services.
  • Expanded statewide contact tracing activities to help keep Californians safe and slow the spread.

California Medical Association President Robert E. Wailes, M.D. said the governor’s announcement “comes at a critical time as cases of the Omicron variant surge nationwide.”

“The California Medical Association appreciates Governor Newsom’s leadership as his administration continues to work to anticipate the state’s needs and implement strong public health measures that will save lives,” Wailes said.

On Friday, Newsom announced the activation of more than 200 members of the California National Guard to help provide staffing for COVID-19 testing centers amid the surge of cases due to the omicron variant. In the coming days, members of the National Guard will be helping people get checked out at six San Diego County sites in the coming days.

Source Article from https://fox5sandiego.com/news/coronavirus/newsom-proposes-new-2-7-billion-covid-emergency-response-package/

Sen. Joe Manchin has yanked his proposal for a $1.8 trillion compromise on President Joe Biden’s Build Back Better plan off the table, according to reports — potentially the final nail in the coffin of the Democratic Party’s signature social-spending agenda.

The West Virginia Democrat’s about-face was reported Saturday by the Washington Post, citing three unnamed sources with knowledge of the matter.

The report came days after Manchin told the media that he was no longer discussing Biden’s long-sought bill with the White House.

“I’m really not going to talk about Build Back Better anymore because I think I’ve been very clear on that,” Manchin said Tuesday during a Capitol Hill press gaggle. “There is no negotiations going on at this time, OK?”

Sen. Joe Manchin would reportedly vote “no” on his own compromise.
AP

Manchin’s compromise package made extensive changes to the $2 trillion Build Back Better Act that passed the House of Representatives with no Republican support in November — a budget-buster that, the Congressional Budget Office warned, could add $367 billion to the nation’s deficit.

The senator’s proposal included funding for universal pre-K, an Obamacare expansion, and a tax on billionaires — but left out the expanded child tax credit, a must-have for the party’s progressive wing.

With the Senate divided 50-50, lockstep Democratic unanimity is required for the budget bill to become law.

But insiders say he would be a “no” vote even on his own compromise, as a result of the White House’s blistering response when Manchin put the kibosh on the bill in a Dec. 19 Fox News appearance.

Reports that the compromise was off came just days after Manchin said he would no longer be discussing Biden’s plan.
REUTERS

Instead, the moderate Democrat was said to have been been meeting with Republicans — including Utah Sen. Mitt Romney, who sought to rescue the child tax credit measure, and President Donald Trump’s former economic adviser, Larry Kudlow.

Neither Romney nor Kudlow confirmed the report — but Kudlow this week hinted that he and Manchin had been in contact.

“Joe Manchin [has] been heroic,” Kudlow wrote in the New York Sun on Wednesday. “I fully expect him in the next couple days to tell us all that he intends to save America and kill the bill.”

Source Article from https://nypost.com/2022/01/08/joe-manchin-pulls-his-social-spending-compromise-off-the-table/

In December 2020, when Trump was still president, Thune drew his wrath when he criticized efforts by House Republicans to challenge the results of the election on Jan. 6, 2021, saying it would “go down like a shot dog.”

Source Article from https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/john-thune-reelection-trump/2022/01/08/e9ed3c60-61a0-11ec-a7e8-3a8455b71fad_story.html

U.S. officials raised the possibility of incremental shifts in decisions about America’s future strategic posture in Europe. But they also said Russia would be hit with debilitating sanctions should it intervene in Ukraine.

The officials said the administration would be open to discussions with Russia on curtailing possible future deployments of offensive missiles in Ukraine and putting limits on U.S. and NATO military exercises in Eastern Europe.

Yet, they said Russia will be hit hard with economic sanctions should it intervene in Ukraine. In addition to direct sanctions on Russian entities, those penalties could include significant restrictions on products exported from the U.S. to Russia and potentially foreign-made products subject to U.S. jurisdiction.

The comments came as senior U.S. and Russian officials prepare to meet in Switzerland on Monday amid heightened tensions over Ukraine.

The officials said the U.S. is willing to discuss certain, limited aspects of its European security posture in those talks. But they stressed that any agreements would be contingent on Russia removing threats to Ukraine and that no decisions would be made without the consent of Ukraine or NATO.

And, they said there is no chance the U.S. will reduce its military presence or arsenal in Eastern Europe as Russia has demanded.

While those comments, made to reporters on condition of anonymity in a White House-organized telephone conference call, were the first to suggest a willingness to compromise on issues tangential to Ukraine, they were accompanied by threats for Russian inaction on U.S. demands to step back.

In the event of a Russian invasion of Ukraine, “we – in coordination with our allies and partners – would immediately impose severe and overwhelming costs on Russia’s economy, including its financial system and sectors deemed critical to the Kremlin,” another official said.

In addition to sanctions on energy and consumer goods, the U.S. and its allies are considering bans on the export to Russia of advanced electronic components, software and related technology that uses American equipment. Russia could be added to the most restrictive group of countries for export control purposes, together with Cuba, Iran, North Korea and Syria, officials said.

That would mean that Russia’s ability to obtain integrated circuits, and products containing integrated circuits, would be severely restricted, because of the global dominance of U.S. software, technology and equipment in this sector. The impact could extend to aircraft avionics, machine tools, smartphones, game consoles, tablets and televisions.

Such sanctions could also target critical Russian industry, including its defense and civil aviation sectors, which would hit Russia’s high-tech ambitions, whether in artificial intelligence or quantum computing.

U.S. officials have been careful not to issue ultimatums to Russia, while at the same time demanding that threats to Ukraine cease. But they have also flatly rejected Russian demands that NATO will not further expand eastward and that the U.S. will remove troops and weapons from Eastern Europe.

Despite that stance, the U.S. and NATO have signaled a willingness to explore compromises on related issues.

“We think we can at least explore the possibility of making progress with the Russians,” one official said Saturday, ahead of Monday’s Strategic and Security Dialogue between the U.S. and Russia in Geneva. He added, though, that “there will be no firm commitments made in these talks.”

Monday’s meeting will be followed by discussions between Russia and NATO members on Wednesday and with a broader European audience on Thursday.

Source Article from https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory/us-offers-carrots-threatens-sticks-russia-ukraine-82153915

The second track will cover military exercises, which have contributed to a dialing up of tensions between Moscow and Washington. Russia has grown the size and intensity of its drills that it runs near NATO territory. Meanwhile, the Kremlin continuously complains about the increased tempo of NATO exercises in the Baltic region which often involve U.S. armored units and mobile artillery. These exercises occasionally include non-NATO allies like Sweden and Finland, which have drawn closer to the alliance in recent years. Both Russia and the U.S. have also increased the numbers of flights of nuclear-capable bombers along either side of Ukraine border.

Biden’s team therefore believes there’s room for negotiations over reciprocal restrictions on ground-based exercises and those featuring strategic bombers.

Administration officials made clear to POLITICO and others that more items will be up for discussion. But it’s too early to know if the Russians will negotiate in good faith and there’s little to no expectation of a concrete agreement from the Geneva session or subsequent talks alongside NATO and the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe.

“What [the Russians] say behind closed doors are going to be much more important in determining whether there is a constructive path,” the senior administration official told reporters.

The Washington Post first reported the Biden administration’s negotiation positions.

The issue of missiles in Ukraine will be a significant part of the talks, as Moscow has long complained over U.S. missiles in Eastern Europe. There is an Aegis Ashore missile defense system in Romania, and another being built in Poland, which are designed to take down Iranian ballistic missiles.

Putin has long said the sites could be used to launch offensive missiles into Russia, though the systems are defensive in nature.

The bilateral talks between the U.S. and Russia have led to some concern the U.S. team might consider unilaterally trading security guarantees and military capabilities, though one diplomat from a NATO country told POLITICO that allies have been assured by Washington that rolling back the alliance’s posture isn’t on the table.

“Nobody’s talking about pulling out NATO troops from their current locations. So in that sense, we are not that worried,” the diplomat said.

In the call with reporters, the administration official tried to tamp down concern elsewhere within the NATO alliance. “Nothing will be committed to or agreed to that is not done in full consultation, with full participation of any country or any of our allies whose security interests are implicated” they said.

Source Article from https://www.politico.com/news/2022/01/08/us-discuss-missiles-military-exercises-ukraine-526800

Larry Kudlow, a former economic adviser to former President Donald Trump, shared his reactions Friday night to the federal government’s jobs report for December, which was released earlier in the day.

During an appearance on “The Ingraham Angle,” Kudlow agreed with host Laura Ingraham’s assertion that President Biden largely benefited from actions taken in Republican-led red states to keep the economy on track as the coronavirus pandemic continues.

Biden placed his own spin on the data, stressing a decline in unemployment instead of the fact that new hiring fell far short of expectations.

Kudlow also issued a warning for the near future, claiming that more spending by the Democrats could delay a full economic recovery until several years down the road.

US HIRING COOLS IN DECEMBER AS ECONOMY ADDS JUST 199,000 NEW JOBS

LARRY KUDLOW: Those red states ended the excessively generous unemployment benefits, three or four months earlier, before the federal government did – and many more people returned to work because of that.

So I think you’re making a good argument that a lot of the plusses in the jobs report today come from those very red states.

But, you know, [Biden’s] contribution here, for that $2 trillion package last winter, which [former Treasury Secretary] Larry Summers, Democrat, and other Democrats – and I agree, [former Trump adviser] Kevin Hassett and I agree – that’s what triggered this massive inflation.

And Joe Biden’s hanging tough on this $5 trillion package, which I believe we are going to kill the bill. So if left to his own devices, Biden will be a disaster.

But we have a problem, Laura. You know why? Interest rates are going to go up, the Federal Reserve’s going to have to switch policies to much tighter money. That’s going to damage the economy.

It’s not going to be easy, it’s not going to be a soft landing – and it’s probably going to hit ’23 and ’24. I mean it – ’23 and ’24.

WATCH THE FULL VIDEO BELOW:

Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/media/larry-kudlow-biden-red-state-jobless-benefits-crackdown-jobs-report-ingraham-angle

It is difficult to assess exactly what is happening inside Kazakhstan, which has been largely sealed off from the outside world. Its main airports are closed or commandeered by Russian troops, while internet services and phone lines are mostly down.

The announcement of Mr. Masimov’s arrest comes amid continued signs of the infighting among the country’s political elite that is believed to have contributed to the chaos.

Mr. Tokayev moved this week to virtually sideline Kazakhstan’s first president, Nursultan Nazarbayev, who had retained wide powers as the head of the country’s security council, an umbrella group for national security coordination, and was given the honorary title of “people’s hero.”

At the height of the tumult on Wednesday, Mr. Tokayev — whom Mr. Nazarbayev had handpicked as his successor when he stepped down in 2019 — announced that he had replaced Mr. Nazarbayev as the head of that agency, leaving the former president without any formal levers of power.

After the move by Mr. Tokayev, rumors swirled that Mr. Nazarbayev had fled the country. But Mr. Nazarbayev’s spokesman dismissed them on Saturday, saying that the former leader was in the capital, Nur-Sultan, and that he was urging Kazakhs to find a way to support the president.

Mr. Nazarbayev “calls on everyone to rally around the president of Kazakhstan to overcome current challenges and ensure the integrity of the country,” his spokesman, Aidos Ukibay, wrote on Twitter.

The announcement on Saturday that Mr. Masimov, long a Nazarbayev loyalist, was now being accused of treason added to the considerable intrigue around the infighting among the country’s elite and how it was playing into the unrest.

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2022/01/08/world/asia/kazakhstan-protests.html

Chicago Public Schools students won’t return to the classroom for a fourth school day Monday unless a breakthrough occurs in negotiations with the Chicago Teachers Union, according to a district spokesman.

In a statement, CPS said its “dedicated to working day and night so we can get our students back to school next week, hopefully on Monday,” adding it will provide parents a “status update” over the weekend.

Classes were canceled for a third straight day Friday as the district and union continued to dispute whether remote learning should resume amid the latest surge in COVID cases caused by the omicron variant.

Negotiations are set to continue over the weekend after teachers voted to return to remote learning earlier this week. The move, criticized as an “illegal work stoppage” by Mayor Lori Lightfoot, led officials to cancel classes altogether for the last three days.

News



On Friday, a group of parents represented by the Liberty Justice Center filed a lawsuit against the CTU, calling this week’s school closures an “illegal strike” and demanded teachers return to school for in-person instruction.

“…CTU cannot unilaterally decide what actions should be taken to keep public schools safe, completely silencing parents’ input about what is best for the health, safety, and well-being of their children,” Jeffrey Schwab, senior attorney at the Liberty Justice Center, stated, in part.

CPS, meanwhile, filed a labor complaint, charging that the CTU illegally directed its members not to report to work as directed, but to work remotely until Jan. 18 or when CPS meets certain health metrics.

The union says that not enough is being done to keep teachers and students safe amid a surge in COVID cases, and is calling for additional testing and other protocols to be put into place before educators will return to the classroom.

CPS has pushed back against criticisms from the union, saying that they have spent millions of dollars on safety, and that a full return to remote learning is unnecessary despite the rapid rise in COVID cases.

As Bloomberg News reported, Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker has asked the Biden administration for COVID-19 tests to help resolve the ongoing dispute.

Pritzker didn’t specify how many tests he requested but explained he connected the district to officials from the White House.

“Parents are suffering, children are suffering when they can’t get back in school and I understand teachers need to be safe in school as kids are,” he said. “The parties need to come together and find common middle ground and I have not yet seen that but I am hopeful.”

Source Article from https://www.nbcchicago.com/news/coronavirus/cps-classes-canceled-monday-unless-breakthrough-in-ctu-negotiations-district-says/2723862/

Sean Hannity criticized the United States Supreme Court’s liberal justices Friday on “Hannity” for their stance and comments on the coronavirus, saying it is not up to the Court to determine medical policy.

” … [I]t’s not just the justices’ job to decide medical policy or to make medical decisions,” he said. “Their job is to determine what the Constitution allows for and determine the scope of the federal government’s power. You know, co-equal branches of government. They’re not doctors.”

FEDERAL VACCINE MANDATES ‘UNPRECEDENTED,’ LAWYERS, SUPREME COURT JUSTICES ACKNOWLEDGE

Hannity’s comments came after the highest court in the land heard over three and a half hours of oral arguments Friday about two mandates. He noted that President Biden failed to go through Congress for the mandates, instead ordering them “by the stroke of a pen.”

He “[b]lindsided businesses all across the country,” Hannity said.

One mandate, from the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), requires companies with more than 100 employees to stipulate vaccination against COVID-19 or else weekly testing and masks for unvaccinated workers. The other mandate, from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, would require vaccination for the over 17 million employees of federally-funded healthcare providers.

“[T]hese mandates will result in more workers quitting,” the Fox News host predicted. “We had four and a half million in November alone. That means more staff shortages, skyrocketing costs for businesses. But the liberal justices on the court, predictably, they seem less concerned with the Constitution and all the negative consequences, [and] more worried about fueling more never-ending pandemic theater and restrictions and Draconian shutdowns.” 

Justice Sonia Sotomayor falsely asserted thatover 100,000 children” are in “serious condition” due to COVID. The true number of such children is infinitely lower, with the Department of Health and Human Services reporting 3,342 confirmed pediatric COVID-19 hospitalizations in the U.S. on Friday.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

“Will somebody tell Justice Sotomayor that fully vaccinated people are getting omicron just like they got delta?” asked Hannity. “Fully vaccinated people with boosters are getting omicron. Fully vaccinated people with boosters and natural immunity [from] previous infections – they’re getting it again.” 

Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/media/hannity-not-scotus-job-medical-policy-medical-decisions-covid

The killers of Ahmaud Arbery were led to their cells in handcuffs on Friday to begin their life sentences, as rifle-toting members of the New Black Panther Party protested outside the Georgia courtroom. 

Travis and Gregory McMichael were both sentenced to life without parole for the February 2020 murder, while their neighbor William Roddie Bryan, 52, – who filmed the murder – will be eligible for parole. 

The trio were later seen being led away from the courtroom in handcuffs – the McMichaels never to be seen in public again. 

Travis McMichael was shackled by the ankles as well as being handcuffs; the other two men were just handcuffed. 

During the sentencing hearing, heavily-armed members of the New Black Panther Party gathered outside, raising their fists in a show of support for the Arbery family.

Members of the black nationalist group, which is also anti-white and anti-Semitic, also congregated outside the courthouse during closing arguments, leading the defense lawyers to call for a mistrial and accuse them of intimidation.

Along with banners showing Ahmaud Arbery’s face, the group also carried black and white coffins with mannequins inside them that feature the names of black men killed by police, such as George Floyd and Trayvon Martin.  

The NBPP was founded in 1989 and is designated as a hate group by the Southern Poverty Law Center.

The group is not affiliated with the original Black Panthers from the 1960s, and members of the original Panthers have accused the NBPP of the misappropriation of their name, both in public statements and in legal action. 

Travis McMichael, 36, (left) and his father Gregory, 66, were handcuffed as they were led from court on Friday to begin their sentences

William Bryan, the 52-year-old neighbor of the McMichaels, is seen being led away. He too was sentenced to life, but unlike the McMichaels he has the possibility of parole

A member of the New Black Panther Party is seen outside the Glenn County courthouse on Friday

The heavily-armed NBPP members marched outside the courthouse on Friday as the trio were sentenced for Arbery’s killing

Arbery’s parents asked a judge to sentence his killers to life without parole on Friday at a courthouse in Georgia, saying they ‘lynched him in broad daylight’ and targeted him when he felt most ‘free and alive’. Pictured are members of the NBPP

The NBPP flag is hoisted aloft as the party members march in front of the Georgia courthouse

Members of the NBPP raise their fists to show support for the Arbery family during Friday’s sentencing

Judge Timothy R. Walmsley did not specify how long he would have to spend in prison – prosecutors asked that he spend at least 15 years behind bars. Typically, the minimum in Georgia is 30 years. 

In handing down his sentence, Judge Walmsley called the murder ‘chilling’ and ‘disturbing’. He talked about the ‘terror’ Arbery must have felt for the five minutes the men chased him in their pick-up trucks with a shotgun and revolver. 

‘As we all now know based on the verdict that was handed down in this courtroom, Ahmaud Arbery was murdered. It’s a tragedy. It’s a tragedy on many, many levels.

‘On February 23, 2020…a young man with dreams was gunned down in this community. As we understand it, he went for a run and he ended up running for his life.’ 

To emphasize how long the five-minute chase must have felt for Arbery, the judge sat silently for a minute in the courtroom. 

‘That one minute represents a fraction of the time that Ahmaud Arbery was running in Satilla Shores. The chase that occurred, occurred over a five minute period. 

‘When I thought about this, I kept coming back to the terror that must have been in the mind of the young man running through Satilla Shores,’ he said. 

‘He was hunted down and shot and he was killed because individuals took the law into their own hands.’ 

Travis McMichael, left, has been sentenced to life in prison without parole for shooting dead Ahmaud Arbery in 2020 

Gregory McMichael, Travis’s 66-year-old father, will also die in prison under the life without parole sentence

William Roddie Bryan, the 52-year-old neighbor who filmed the murder, was sentenced to life but he has been given the possibility of parole. Prosecutors asked that he have to serve at least 15 years behind bars 

Judge Timothy Walmsley on Friday called the killing ‘chilling’ and ‘disturbing.’ He talked about the ‘terror’ Arbery must have felt as the men chased him in their pick-up trucks for five minutes 

He then recited some of the comments made by the McMichaels after the shooting to prove that it was a ‘callous’ execution, and said they never showed any remorse. 

‘Remorse is something that’s felt and demonstrated. In this case, getting back to the video, after Ahmaud Arbery fell, the McMichael’s turned their backs. They walked away. This was a killing. It was callous and it occurred because confrontation was being sought. 

‘The most violent crime in Satilla Shores was the murder of Ahmaud Arbery. 

‘The record speaks for itself. Greg McMichael tried to establish a narrative. He said he was ‘trapped like a rat.’

Ahmaud Arbery was shot and killed in Brunswick, Georgia, U.S. on February 23, 2020,one year on

‘He said, ‘stop or I’ll blow your f*****g head off.’ 

‘He told Travis ‘you have no choice’. He also said, ‘If I could have gotten a shot at the guy, I would have shot him.” 

Unlike the father and son, Bryan appeared to show some remorse in the days and weeks after the killing, he said. 

However all three acted as vigilantes, chasing down Arbery and then murdering him because they were ‘seeking confrontation.’  

‘Taking the law into your own hands is a dangerous endeavor. Ultimately with regard to the murder of Ahmaud Arbery it holds us all accountable. At a minimum his death should force us to consider expanding our definition of what a neighbor may be and how we treat them. 

‘I believe that assuming the worst in others, we show our worst character. Assuming the best in others is always the best course of action. Maybe those are the grand lessons of this case,’ the judge said.

There were celebrations outside the court as the sentences were read aloud.  

Earlier, Arbery’s parents asked a judge to sentence his killers to life without parole on Friday at a courthouse in Georgia, saying they ‘lynched him in broad daylight’ and targeted him when he felt most ‘free and alive’.  

On February 23, 2020, they chased Arbery, a 26-year-old black man, through a street in Satilla Shores. They said they thought he was a burglar. Travis pulled the trigger, with his father nearby. Bryan filmed the entire incident on his phone. 

In November, they were all convicted of murder – which carries a mandatory life sentence. Prosecutors chose not to seek the death penalty.  

Gregory and Travis McMichael and their neighbor William Brian Jr were found a guilty of murder in state court on November 23 by a panel of 11 white jurors and one black juror. In compiling that jury pool, 1,000 people in the mostly-white Glynn County were called. Pictured: The moment Arbery was shot by Travis McMichael

Ahmaud Arbery’s mother Wanda Cooper Jones celebrates as she leaves court with her family on Friday after her son’s killers were sentenced to life behind bars without parole

Ahmaud Arbery’s mother Wanda Cooper-Jones, center, speaks with supporters after Superior Court Judge Timothy Walmsley sentenced Greg McMichael, his son, Travis McMichael, and a neighbor, William ‘Roddie’ Bryan, Friday, Jan. 7, 2022, at the Glynn County Courthouse in Brunswick 

(FILES) In this file photo taken on May 23, 2021 a woman holds portraits of Ahmaud Arbery and George Floyd during an event in remembrance of George Floyd in Minneapolis, Minnesota

Ahmaud Arbery’s mother Wanda Cooper Jones (left) and father Marcus (right) asked a judge to impose the maximum sentence possible for his killers – life without parole

Arbery’s father Marcus spoke first, telling the court: ‘The man who killed my son has sat in this courtroom every day next to his father. I’ll never get the chance of sitting next to my son ever again. Not at a dinner table, not at a holiday, not at a wedding. I pray that no one in this courtroom has to do what we had – bury their child.’ 

Arbery’s mother Wanda Cooper Jones, pleaded: ‘They were fully committed to their crimes – let them be fully committed for the consequences.’ 

‘MY SON’S KILLERS HAVE NO REMORSE’ – AHMAUD ARBERY’S MOTHER’S VICTIM IMPACT STATEMENT 

I want to speak directly to my son. This verdict doesn’t bring you back, but it does help bring closure to this very difficult chapter of my life.

I made a promise to you the day I laid you to rest. I told you I loved you and someday, somehow I would get you justice.

Son, I love you as much today as the day you were born. Raising you was the honor of my life and I am very proud of you.

Your honor, these men have chosen to lie and attack my son and his surviving family. They have no remorse and do not deserve leniency. 

This wasn’t a case of mistaken identity or mistaken fact. They chose to target my son because they didn’t want him in their community they chose to treat him differently when they couldn’t sufficiently scare him or intimidate him, they killed him.

My young son, he was born on mothers’ day of 1994. He had a smile so bright it lit up the room. He was a greedy baby and it seemed like he was always searching for something to stick in his mouth. 

He was always a loving baby who seemed to never tire of cuddling, hugs and kisses He loved. He never hesitated to tell me, his sister Jasmine or brother Marcus, and we loved him back, He was messy. He sometimes refused to wear socks.

I wish he would have cut and cleaned his toenails before he went out for his jog that day. I guess he would have if he knew he would be murdered.

My family is going to miss Ahmaud, his jokes, impersonations, his warm smile. These men deserve the maximum sentence for their crimes. Ahamud never said a word to them. He never threatened them, he just wanted to be left alone.

They were fully committed to their crimes – let them be fully committed for the consequences.

I’m standing here before you asking you to please give all three defendants who are responsible for the death of my son, the maximum punishment in this court which I do believe is life without bars without the possible chance for parole. 

She also referred to her son’s toenails on the day of the murder – something that was brought up during the trial in by a defense attorney who stoked outrage by referring to his ‘long, dirty toenails’. 

Wanda, on Friday, said: ‘I wish he would have cut and cleaned his toenails before he went out for his jog that day. I guess he would have if he knew he would be murdered.’  

She then pleaded with the judge: ‘Your honor, I am standing here before you today as the mother of Ahmaud Arbery asking you to please give all three defendants who are responsible for the death of my son, the maximum punishment which I do believe is life without bars without the possible chance for parole.’ 

The men’s lawyers are asking that they be granted parole after 30 years. Prosecutors have asked the judge not to grant any of the men parole. 

Cooper Jones spoke about Ahmaud as a ‘loving’ baby who ‘never seemed to tire of cuddles, hugs and kisses.’

His father Marcus told how he loved to run more than anything because it made him feel ‘free’. 

‘Not only did they lynch my son in broad daylight but they killed him when he was doing what he loved more than anything – running. 

‘That’s when he felt most alive. Most free. And they took all of that from him.

‘When I close my eyes, I see his execution over and over. I’ll see that for the rest of my life.  

‘When I became a father my life became bigger than me, it became bigger than me about my family, protecting him, protecting my boy. I know in my head that there is nothing I could have done that day to have saved my son. 

‘To save him from this evil and hate. My heart is broken and always will be.

‘If I could trade places with Ahmaud, I would in a heartbeat but I can’t’. I’m standing here to do what he can’t – that is to fight for him. His memory, his legacy and to tell you who he was. 

‘That’s the one thing you didn’t hear in this courtroom. More than anything else, you should know who my boy was.

‘We love our son and we will never have him with us to celebrate anything. Thanksgiving, Christmas…his birthday his killers should spend the rest of their lives thinking about what they took from us. 

‘It should be behind my bars.

‘Me and my family have got to live with this for the rest of our lives. They should stay behind those bars the rest of their lives. They didn’t give him a chance.’  

Ahmaud’s mother spoke directly to him, saying: ‘This verdict doesn’t bring you back. But it does help bring closure to this very difficult chapter of my life. 

‘I made a promise to you the day I laid you to rest. 

‘I told you I loved you and someday, somehow I would get you justice. 

‘Son, I love you as much today as the day you were born.

‘Raising you was the honor of my life and I am very proud of you.’ 

She said none of the killers showed remorse for their actions, and deserved to die in prison.  

‘They have no remorse and do not deserve leniency. This wasn’t a case of mistaken identity or mistaken fact. 

‘They chose to target my son because they didn’t want him in their community. 

‘They chose to treat him differently. 

‘And when they couldn’t sufficiently scare him or intimidate him, they killed him.’   

Arbery, a 25-year-old avid jogger, was running through the mostly white residential neighborhood of Satilla Shores on the afternoon of Feb. 23 when the McMichaels decided to grab their guns, jump in a pickup truck and give chase. 

The younger McMichael would later testify to the jury they had a hunch Arbery might be fleeing a crime.

Bryan joined the chase in his own pickup truck after it passed his driveway, and pulled out his cellphone to record Travis McMichael firing a shotgun at Arbery at close range. 

Arbery had nothing on him besides his running clothes and sneakers.

The video caused outrage when it emerged months later and it became clear that none of the men involved had yet been arrested after a local prosecutor concluded the killing was justified. 

Ahmaud Arbery’s mother Wanda Cooper-Jones wipes a tear from her eyes while listening to her daughter’s impact statement to Superior Court Judge Timothy Walmsley

Ahmaud Arbery’s sister Jasmine Arbery wipes a tear from her eyes while listening to her mother’s impact statement to Superior Court Judge Timothy Walmsley during the sentencing of Greg McMichael and his son, Travis McMichael, and a neighbor, William ‘Roddie’ Bryan in the Glynn County Courthouse, on January 7, 2022 in Brunswick, Georgia

Ahmaud Arbery’s father Marcus Arbery, center, sits in the courtroom with other family members during the sentencing of Greg McMichael, his son, Travis McMichael, and a neighbor, William ‘Roddie’ Bryan in the Glynn County Courthouse

William Roddie Bryan, 52, arrives at court in Brunswick, Georgia, on Friday to be sentenced to life in prison for the murder of Ahmaud Arbery 

Travis McMichael, 35, arrives in court in shackles on Friday morning to be sentenced for the murder of Ahmaud Arbery. He will be at least 65 before he gets out of prison

Gregory McMichael, 66, is shown arriving at court for the 10am sentencing hearing

Gregory McMichael makes his way into court on Friday to be sentenced to life in prison

‘The day has finally come that we will get justice. 

‘The day my family an I have prayed for… it has finally come.’ 

Defense attorneys then pleaded with the judge not to sentence the men to the harshest possible term. 

Gregory McMichael’s attorney, Laura Hogue, called him a ‘man of goodness’ and referred to the killing as a ‘five minute chase that ended in tragedy.’

‘Greg McMichael is a good man. He is not a perfect person but none of us are. 

‘The choices he made as a young man, all the way through to the rest of his life, to serve, not to acquire wealth, but to quietly go through the business of choosing career options to help other people. 

‘I say without hesitation he remains a man of goodness,’ she said. 

Three white men guilty of Ahmaud Arbery faced 27 charges between them – this is what each of them mean

COUNT 1 – MALICE MURDER

This is defined as causing a person’s death with deliberate intention without provocation and ‘where all the circumstances in the killing show an abandoned and malignant heart’. 

Travis McMichael – Guilty

Gregory McMichael – Not guilty

William ‘Roddie’ Bryan – Not guilty  

COUNTS 2, 3, 4 AND 5 – FELONY MURDER 

This applies when a death is caused in the course of committing another felony whether or not the killing was intentional or unprovoked. 

Travis McMichael – Guilty on all counts

Gregory McMichael – Guilty on all counts

William ‘Roddie’ Bryan – Guilty on three counts, not guilty on one counts

COUNT 6 and 7 – AGGRAVATED ASSAULT 

Under Georgia law this is an assault using a deadly weapon. Count six refers to the shotgun used, count 7 refers to the two pickup trucks, driven by Gregory McMichael and William ‘Roddie’ Bryan, used to box Arbery in.

Travis McMichael – Guilty 

Gregory McMichael –  Not guilty on count 6; Guilty on count 7

William ‘Roddie’ Bryan – Not guilty on count 6; Guilty on count 7 

COUNT 8 –  FALSE IMPRISONMENT  

This is when a person ‘arrests, confines, or detains’ another person without legal authority. 

Travis McMichael – Guilty 

Gregory McMichael –  Guilty

William ‘Roddie’ Bryan – Guilty

COUNT 9 – CRIMINAL INTENT TO COMMIT A FELONY

This refers to performing ‘any act which constitutes a substantial step’ toward the intentional commission of a crime  

Travis McMichael – Guilty 

Gregory McMichael –  Guilty 

William ‘Roddie’ Bryan – Guilty 

Ahmaud Arbery’s father Marcus Arbery arrives at court on Friday for the sentencing. He spoke briefly before the hearing, telling reporters he is a ‘different man now’

Ahmaud Arbery’s family and friends arrive at the courthouse in Brunswick, Georgia, on Friday morning 

Source Article from https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10380573/Shackled-killers-Ahmaud-Arbery-led-court-New-Black-Panthers-stand-guard.html


Cases

Jan. 2021 peak

202020212022


611,389

Hospitalizations

 

202020212022


116,029

Deaths

 

202020212022


1,405

Cases

Jan. 2021 peak

202020212022


611,389

Hospitalizations

 

202020212022


116,029

Deaths

 

202020212022


1,405

Coronavirus case counts have reached record highs in the United States and continue to climb. Hospitalizations have surpassed the height of the Delta wave. Deaths are just beginning to rise.

The overall pattern is familiar, but a fresh perspective on how to interpret these metrics is necessary as a faster but less severe variant tears through the country. Here’s how to think about the data in the coming days and weeks.

Case spikes show Omicron still has room to grow

In just a matter of days, coronavirus case counts have shattered previous records in the United States, as the Omicron variant spreads rapidly just about everywhere, including in communities with high vaccination rates. All but 13 states have seen record cases in the past week.

Average daily cases per 100,000 people

Record cases in past week

Cases rising

Alaska


67

Maine


55

Vt.


172

N.H.


140

Wash.


124

Idaho


51

Mont.


57

N.D.


108

Minn.


86

Ill.


214

Wis.


143

Mich.


140

N.Y.


360

R.I.


391

Mass.


275

Ore.


95

Nev.


104

Wyo.


85

S.D.


133

Iowa


94

Ind.


144

Ohio


167

Pa.


183

N.J.


343

Conn.


214

Calif.


157

Utah


159

Colo.


149

Neb.


109

Mo.


143

Ky.


162

W.Va.


155

Va.


170

Md.


209

Del.


275

Ariz.


111

N.M.


101

Kan.


146

Ark.


160

Tenn.


149

N.C.


164

S.C.


191

D.C.


280

Okla.


95

La.


200

Miss.


173

Ala.


164

Ga.


174

Hawaii


209

Texas


157

Fla.


264

While these case counts are staggering, experts say they are not as alarming as they might have been a few months or a year ago. Instead, they should serve as a warning for the country, to adjust behaviors and policies to reduce infections and protect the most vulnerable.

“The circumstances have changed and we must adapt,” said Dr. Shama Cash-Goldwasser, a senior technical adviser at Resolve to Save Lives, a global health organization. “We have a less severe variant, plus many are vaccinated, but evidence suggests the vaccines are not as good at preventing infection with Omicron as they were against Delta.”

As high as the case counts are in many places, they are most certainly undercounted right now, as many Omicron infections are asymptomatic or mild and people may not know to test. Testing shortages are also limiting access, and experts say that a majority of results from popular at-home tests are not reported to public health departments.

The sharp rise in cases in many states could be followed by sharp falls, as observed in South Africa, but experts caution that the sheer volume of cases could still lead to significant numbers of extremely sick people, even from a variant that overall gives people less severe disease.

“We are going to have a lot of people sick, and even if a smaller proportion of those individuals have really horrible illnesses and adverse outcomes, it’s still a lot of people,” said Janet Hamilton, the executive director of the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists.

With so much risk for infection right now, public health experts say that keeping an eye on case counts and trends can encourage people to make decisions to protect themselves from infection and to avoid infecting those around them, like by getting a booster shot or wearing a mask indoors.

“We’re still in a situation that needs caution,” said Ms. Hamilton. “We’ve had a month with Omicron and there’s just still a lot we don’t know.”

Hospitalizations reveal a system under strain

50,000

100,000

150,000 hospitalizations

202020212022


116,029

Because the Omicron variant appears to cause less severe illness, hospitalization figures may tell us less about the disease and more about the strain on the health care system, which has consequences for everyone.

Hospitalizations have not yet seen the same explosive growth as cases, but this metric tends to lag case counts, and it may be too early to gauge Omicron’s full impact. What is clear is that the number of people hospitalized with Covid nationwide has already surpassed the peak of the Delta-led wave and is still rising steeply.

Hospitals, emergency rooms, urgent care centers and doctors’ offices are overburdened and understaffed across the country. Hospitals in some areas are already shutting down elective surgeries and must even treat critical care patients in emergency rooms.

And in parts of the country like the Midwest, hospitals may be in a more precarious situation — they were already under strain, having yet to recover from the Delta surge before Omicron-led illnesses began to rise.

New York

Hospitalizations were lower and have shot up.

40

80 hospitalizations per 100,000

202020212022


55

Ohio

Hospitalizations were already high and have since increased.

40

80

202020212022


56

Hospitalization figures are not without flaws. “National data don’t allow us to distinguish between people hospitalized because of Covid-19 and those who happened to test positive while admitted for something else,” said Jason L. Salemi, an epidemiologist at the University of South Florida, who tracks Covid data.

These “incidental patients” may be more prevalent right now because Omicron is so transmissible. Some hospitals are reporting that these patients may make up as much as half of their hospitalizations.

Dr. Salemi noted that a coronavirus infection can still exacerbate the primary illness of incidental patients; pose a risk of infection to staffers and other patients; and contribute to the overall strain on medical centers.

National hospitalization data notably does not include up-to-date measures of severe illness, such as the number of people on ventilators or their length of stay. (Federal data tracks some of this, but it is about two months behind.)

“The absence of these details about hospitalizations in the available data just muddy the water as we try to understand Omicron’s impact,” Dr. Salemi said.

Public health experts suggest monitoring Covid patients in intensive care as well as intensive care unit capacity to better gauge Covid’s impact on serious illness. About one in four U.S. hospitals with I.C.U.s recently reported that at least 95 percent of their critical care beds were full.

Death trends are not yet clear

1,000

2,000

3,000 avg. daily deaths

202020212022


1,405

There is hope that vaccination coverage, improved medical treatment and the milder characteristics of the Omicron variant will mean that fewer infections end in death. But the unprecedented number of cases may still lead to high levels of mortality.

“Are we going to see deaths increase? Yes, we are,” said Ms. Hamilton of the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists. “And they are going to go up if cases keep increasing this way.”

Experience throughout the pandemic shows it takes at least three weeks after an increase in cases to see a resulting increase in deaths, which may explain why death counts have risen only slightly so far.

Trends in deaths lag behind cases and hospitalizations by weeks because of the time it takes for people to become seriously ill and the time needed to complete and file death records. This lag varies by state and often becomes longer in times when there are more deaths, or when a case surge is overwhelming the public health system, as it is now.

Already, there are some troubling early signs of death counts rising in some of the Northeast states first hit with Omicron, including New York, Connecticut, New Jersey and Massachusetts.

Deaths can generally be predicted by looking at hospitalizations and counting backward by three weeks, suggesting that deaths will almost double in the next three weeks, said Dr. David Dowdy, an epidemiologist at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. But it’s still possible that deaths will not rise as sharply as cases and hospitalizations have, he added.

“This linkage between hospitalizations and deaths is being broken as well now, as more people are getting hospitalized for milder illness,” Dr. Dowdy said. “So I actually anticipate that deaths will not reach quite that level.”

“In any case, though, in the midst of major surges,” he said, “we can’t wait three weeks for data in order to act appropriately now.”

Tracking the Coronavirus



Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2022/01/07/us/covid-data-explained.html

Commisso, 33, earlier this week criticized Soares’ decision to drop the case.

“My disappointing experience of re-victimization with the failure to prosecute a serial sexual abuser, no matter what degree the crime committed, yet again sadly highlights the reason victims are afraid to come forward, especially against people in power,” Commisso told the Albany Times Union in a statement.

“When will our voices uniformly be accepted? Where do we go to have our rights vindicated? Unfortunately, this is just another example of where our criminal justice system needs to do better,” she said.

Commisso’s lawyer earlier this week said she planned to file a civil lawsuit against Cuomo.
Cuomo, a Democrat, resigned in August in the middle of his third term after an investigation overseen by state Attorney General Letitia James concluded he sexually harassed nearly a dozen women, including Commisso.

The Albany criminal case, which was initially filed by the Albany County Sheriff’s Office without Soares’ knowledge in advance, was the only criminal case lodged against Cuomo in connection with the alleged harassment.

Two other county district attorneys, in Westchester and Nassau, recently said they would not prosecute Cuomo for alleged unwanted touching of women in those jurisdictions.

On Monday, Cuomo’s lawyer said that a probe by the Manhattan district attorney’s office into the Cuomo administration’s alleged mishandling of Covid-19-related deaths of nursing home patients had ended without any criminal charges.

In a statement later Friday, Cuomo’s spokesman again blasted the probe initiated by James, a Democrat who announced a run for governor after releasing the report, only to drop that campaign months later.

“We have said from the beginning that this entire situation was a political manipulation and would be disproven when a non-corrupted legal review was conducted,” said Rich Azzopardi, the spokesman. “The James report was not a legal review, but a sham to generate a press frenzy and political firestorm to clear the way for her own run for higher office.”

“Three district attorneys have now reviewed James’ report and evidence and have proven that what we said all along was correct — the law was not broken and not a single case has been brought,” he said.

“The Nassau and Westchester District Attorneys found that even if the allegations were credible they did not violate the law,” Azzopardi said. “Kissing someone on the cheek, patting someone’s stomach as you walk by, taking a photograph with an employee or a wedding guest is not illegal — criminally or civilly. Plaintiff lawyers overplayed their hand, and we will not pay one penny in attempts at civil extortion.”

Source Article from https://www.cnbc.com/2022/01/07/andrew-cuomo-criminal-case-against-ex-new-york-governor-dismissed.html

WASHINGTON, Jan 7 (Reuters) – Conservative U.S. Supreme Court justices on Friday questioned the legality of President Joe Biden’s pandemic-related vaccine-or-testing mandate for large businesses but appeared more receptive to his administration’s vaccine requirement for healthcare facilities at a time of surging COVID-19 cases.

The court’s nine justices, who are all vaccinated, heard more than 3-1/2 hours of arguments in two cases that test presidential powers to combat a raging public health crisis that already has killed roughly 835,000 Americans.

The conservative justices, who hold a 6-3 majority, signaled sympathy toward arguments by the state of Ohio and a business group that the federal workplace safety agency that issued the rule affecting businesses with at least 100 workers – a policy requiring vaccines or weekly COVID-19 tests for more than 80 million employees – overstepped its legal authority.

The challengers have asked the court to block the policy before the administration begins enforcement on Monday.

The court’s conservatives suggested that the 1970 law that created the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) did not authorize this type of broad emergency action.

They seemed more open to a separate federal vaccine requirement that states led by Missouri and Louisiana are asking the court to block nationwide. It covers an estimated 10.3 million workers at about 76,000 healthcare facilities including hospitals and nursing homes that accept money from the Medicare and Medicaid government health insurance programs for elderly, disabled and low-income Americans.

The conservative justices have shown skepticism toward sweeping actions by federal agencies in past rulings. Decisions in both cases are expected quickly.

The arguments underscored how divisive the issue of vaccination has become in the United States, as in many nations.

The three liberal justices indicated that both policies were justified during a pandemic showing no signs of abating, with an upswing in COVID-19 cases driven by the fast-spreading Omicron coronavirus variant.

“This is a pandemic in which nearly a million people have died,” liberal Justice Elena Kagan said, referring to the U.S. death toll during arguments over the OSHA mandate. “It is by far the greatest public health danger that this country has faced in the last century. More and more people are dying every day. More and more people are getting sick every day. … And this is the policy that is most geared to stopping all this.”

Chief Justice John Roberts and fellow conservative Justices Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh indicated that the OSHA rule could be invalid under a legal doctrine that says Congress must provide a clear statement on a specific issue in order for a federal agency to issue broad regulations on it.

The conservative justices suggested Congress or individual states would be better suited to act.

SPANISH FLU

1/2

REUTERS/Brendan McDermid

Roberts voiced doubt that the law passed by Congress establishing OSHA empowered it to take such action.

“That was 50 years ago that you’re saying Congress acted. I don’t think it had COVID in mind. That was almost closer to the Spanish flu than it is to today’s problem,” Roberts said, referring to the pandemic that occurred a century ago.

The White House has said the two temporary mandates will save lives and strengthen the U.S. economy by increasing the number of vaccinated Americans by the millions.

“I would find it would be unbelievable to be in the public interest to stop these vaccinations,” liberal Justice Stephen Breyer said.

Some justices raised the possibility of the court issuing a temporary stay blocking the OSHA rule while the court decides how to proceed.

Roberts and Kavanaugh appeared more sympathetic to the Biden administration’s arguments regarding the healthcare facilities mandate issued by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), the agency responsible for administering those programs.

Kavanaugh noted that private healthcare providers did not challenge the mandate that states are contesting. Conservative Justice Amy Coney Barrett suggested the government could require vaccinations in certain facilities but not others.

Gorsuch seemed skeptical of the policy as a whole, questioning whether CMS has the authority to issue a vaccine regulation because such action affects an employer’s staffing decisions, which Congress has said the agency could not do as part of its Medicaid and Medicare funding requirements.

Gorsuch said that “you cannot use the money as a weapon to control these things.”

All the government is doing, Kagan said, is “to say to providers, you know what, basically, the one thing you can’t do is to kill your patients, so you have to get vaccinated.”

Liberal Justice Sonia Sotomayor participated in the arguments from her chambers. Ohio Solicitor General Benjamin Flowers and Louisiana Solicitor General Liz Murrill participated remotely by telephone. Flowers tested positive for COVID-19, his office said. Murrill’s office said she acted in accordance with the court’s COVID-19 protocols, which require lawyers to argue remotely if they receive a positive test.

The justices spent much of the pandemic working remotely before returning to in-person arguments in October, although the building remains closed to the public.

Biden’s administration asked the justices to lift lower court orders blocking the CMS mandate in half the 50 states.

The Cincinnati-based 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on Dec. 17 lifted an injunction issued by another court that had blocked the OSHA rule, prompting challengers to ask the Supreme Court to intervene.

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

Source Article from https://www.reuters.com/world/us/us-supreme-court-considers-whether-halt-biden-vaccine-mandates-2022-01-07/