WASHINGTON—President Biden’s response to Russia’s military aggression along the border with Ukraine is testing whether his career-long reliance on alliance-building can help avert a potential catastrophe in Europe, and so far he has avoided the diplomatic mistakes that dogged his first year in office.

Mr. Biden has deployed U.S. troops to strengthen America’s defense of NATO nations and stepped up intelligence-sharing about Russia’s activities near Ukraine to keep European allies on board with his strategy of threatening severe economic sanctions on Moscow in the event of an invasion. Russia has kept in place a force estimated to be as much as 150,000, and expelled the No. 2 U.S. diplomat from Moscow. Mr. Biden said Thursday that the threat of an invasion was “very high,” though he remained hopeful that a diplomatic pathway still existed.

Source Article from https://www.wsj.com/articles/after-early-foreign-policy-missteps-bidens-ukraine-strategy-leans-on-diplomacy-11645115402

Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., chair of the Appropriations Committee, talks to reporters at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 31. Congress returned from a weeklong recess to take up a number of issues, including a government funding deadline on Feb. 18.

Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., chair of the Appropriations Committee, talks to reporters at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 31. Congress returned from a weeklong recess to take up a number of issues, including a government funding deadline on Feb. 18.

Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

The Senate voted 65-27 Thursday evening to approve a stop-gap spending bill to fund the government through March 11.

The short-term punt is intended to buy lawmakers time to work out a more all-encompassing spending agreement that would fund the government through the end of the fiscal year on Sept. 30. Top negotiators on the House and Senate Appropriations Committees say they have reached an agreement on a spending framework that will need broader approval in the coming weeks.

The stop-gap was delayed for several days as a group of Republican senators demanded the chance to vote on amendments restricting how the government spends federal funds. The Senate ultimately rejected several amendments, including one from Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, to bar federal funding for enforcing COVID-19 vaccine requirements and an amendment from Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, to block federal funding to schools and child care centers that have COVID-19 vaccine requirements.

Senate Appropriations Committee Chair Pat Leahy, D-Vt., said Thursday in a speech on the Senate floor that a long-term spending agreement is necessary to ensure the country’s current pressing needs are met.

“Funding the priorities of yesterday in the world of today would be irresponsible and is no way to govern,” Leahy said.

Leahy and other top negotiators have not revealed the details of their agreement. Democrats have said their top priorities include additional money for global vaccine distribution and further aid for COVID-19 testing in states. Republicans say their main focus is on additional military funding, particularly as the United States weighs intervention into the conflict between Russia and Ukraine.

Source Article from https://www.npr.org/2022/02/17/1081570341/the-senate-avoids-a-government-shutdown-punting-a-spending-deadline-into-march

California State University Chancellor Joseph I. Castro, confronted with growing criticism of his handling of sexual harassment and bullying allegations involving a former top assistant, announced his resignation Thursday.

The announcement marks a stunning fall for Castro, who was hailed as a passionate advocate for students and employees and particularly praised for increasing graduation rates and narrowing achievement gaps while president of Fresno State before he was named chancellor in September 2020.

His resignation came after an all-day closed-door session with the Board of Trustees.

“I have been honored to serve the California State University for more than eight years, including as its eighth chancellor, and the decision to resign is the most difficult of my professional life,” Castro said in a statement. “While I disagree with many aspects of recent media reports and the ensuing commentary, it has become clear to me that resigning at this time is necessary so that the CSU can maintain its focus squarely on its educational mission and the impactful work yet to be done.”

Board of Trustee Chair Lillian Kimbell said in a statement that “we appreciate Chancellor Castro’s cooperation with the Trustees and his decision to step down for the benefit of California State University system.”

The trustees will finalize a succession plan soon. Until then, Executive Vice Chancellor and Chief Financial Officer Steve Relyea will serve as acting chancellor until an interim chancellor has been named. Trustees plan to launch a system-wide assessment of Title IX procedures, beginning with an examination of Fresno State.

Castro’s resignation comes amid widespread criticism after reports that as president of Fresno State in 2020, he quietly authorized a $260,000 payout and a retirement package for former Vice President of Student Affairs Frank Lamas, who was the subject of complaints of bullying and sexual harassment that began in 2014. Castro also provided a glowing letter of recommendation to Lamas without disclosing university investigative findings supporting the allegations of sexual misconduct.

Three weeks later, the Board of Trustees named Castro as the eighth chancellor of the 23-campus Cal State system. Castro said he did not inform the board about the investigation or the settlement.

Faculty at Fresno State, where Castro became the university’s first Latino president in 2013, said Thursday night that they were shocked by the news but believed that resigning was in Cal State’s best interests. Many said, however, that his resignation should not detract from what they say is the system’s ongoing problem of inadequate investigation of misconduct complaints.

“I think it’s the right move,” said Katherine Fobear, an assistant professor in Women’s Gender and Sexuality Studies who was hired in 2017 when Castro and Lamas were at the university.

She said the Lamas case underscores a wider problem across the 23-campus university system of failure to properly handle misconduct complaints due in part to underfunded and understaffed administrative offices.

“I hope that people really don’t stop at what Castro did,” Fobear said. “The bigger problem is how Fresno State failed to follow and support proper Title IX process.”

Former Fresno State professor Cristina Herrera left the university last year after repeatedly reporting to top administrators, including Castro, that human relations and faculty affairs officials had not investigated repeated harassment complaints she had filed against a former faculty member, according to emails reviewed by The Times.

On Thursday night, Herrera said that Castro had no other choice but to resign.

“I think it was the most decent thing for him to do,” said Herrera, now a professor and director of Chicano/Latino Studies at Portland State University.

“The real concern for me is that Castro is one individual,” she said. “It still doesn’t address the structural problems of Fresno State.”

Xitllali Loya, 19, a former Fresno State student who organized protests at the university two weeks ago, said she was hopeful that his resignation would prompt changes to Cal State’s Title IX processes.

“It feels like a step closer to a safer environment,” she said.

In selecting Castro, trustees hailed him for both his work at Fresno State and his own life story of humble beginnings and high achievement. The grandson of farmworkers, he became the first person of color to head Cal State, the nation’s largest four-year university, where 43% of the system’s 480,000 students are Latino and nearly half of whom come from low-income families.

Castro is a native of the San Joaquin Valley. His great-grandparents emigrated from Mexico and lived in tents by the Santa Fe Railroad, not far from the Fresno campus. He attended UC Berkeley through a program for promising Latino students from farming communities, earning a B.A. in political science and later a master of public policy degree at Berkeley. He went on to earn a doctorate in higher education policy and leadership from Stanford, where he wrote his dissertation on university presidents.

Castro worked at the University of California for 23 years, serving as UC San Francisco vice chancellor of student academic affairs and a professor of family and community medicine. He also held leadership positions at UC campuses in Berkeley, Davis, Merced and Santa Barbara.

But Castro left a troubled legacy at Fresno State.

The school’s investigation of Lamas was launched in 2019 after a female employee filed an official Title IX complaint, alleging that he touched her knee and moved his hand up her thigh while talking to her in a car about job prospects. This came after at least two years of other alleged unwelcome contact.

Chancellor Joseph I. Castro approved a quiet $260,000 payout to administrator Frank Lamas, who was accused of sexual misconduct, according to documents and officials.

Lamas has denied any wrongdoing and said he received positive evaluations during his tenure under Castro. He told The Times that he had thought about leaving or moving to a faculty position after complaints first surfaced, but was encouraged by Castro to stay. He retired on Dec. 31, 2020.

“We hoped the things said about my personal character would end. I had never experienced such things,” he said.

Castro and Fresno State officials told The Times that the university followed Cal State procedures and did not immediately launch an investigation into Lamas because no one filed a formal Title IX complaint against him when allegations began to surface in 2014. Title IX prohibits sex discrimination in education by institutions that receive federal funding.

Lamas was hired as vice president of student affairs in May 2014. According to his hiring letter, he reported directly to Castro and held so-called retreat rights that would have allowed him to move into a faculty position should he be terminated from his position of leadership. As part of Lamas’ hiring agreement, he could have become an assistant professor with the university’s Department of Educational Research and Administration.

Castro said a settlement was the only way to cut ties with Lamas permanently and keep him from returning to the Cal State system.

Fresno State said it has since eliminated the “retreat rights” from hiring negotiations for employees.

The disclosures created a leadership crisis for Castro, the first Latino chancellor.

Sacramento lawmakers, the California Faculty Assn. — the union that represents more than 29,000 Cal State faculty members — and students immediately called on the board to launch an investigation, and a petition from more than 200 Cal State Long Beach faculty called on Castro to resign. Assemblyman Jim Patterson (R-Fresno) has also called for a state audit to examine Title IX protocols within the university system and to determine whether the incidents are symptomatic of a widespread problem in the nation’s largest four-year public university system.

In recent interviews, several faculty members at Fresno State said Lamas’ alleged harassment and bullying of students and staff were well-known across the campus community.

An employee in Castro’s presidential office reported to an external investigator that she had been berated and intimidated by Lamas, according to the findings of a 2020 workplace investigation report obtained by The Times.

“Over the past few years, he has raised his voice, asked questions without allowing her to answer, interrupted her and stood over her while she was sitting at her desk in a way that was not respectful,” the April 2020 report said of Lamas’ interactions with the employee.

Castro’s handling of the Lamas case highlights the wide latitude that senior administrators hold in interpreting when a complaint should be investigated, according to Kathryn Forbes, an expert in sexual harassment and employment discrimination who chairs the Women’s, Gender and Sexuality Studies Department at Fresno State.

“The primary objective,” she said, “is to try to head stuff off before going to the courtroom.”

Source Article from https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2022-02-17/csu-chancellor-resigns

President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia this week repeated his false claim that Ukraine was carrying out a “genocide” against Russian speakers in the country’s east, while the Russian authorities announced an investigation into supposed “mass graves” of Russian-speaking victims of Ukrainian forces.

And on Thursday, the Kremlin’s spokesman, Dmitri S. Peskov, offered an ominous assessment. “The excessive concentration of Ukrainian forces near the contact line, together with possible provocations, can pose terrible danger,” he said.

Mr. Blinken told the Security Council that Moscow appeared to be setting the stage.

“Russia plans to manufacture a pretext for its attack,” he said, citing a “so-called terrorist bombing” or “a fake, even a real attack” with chemical weapons. “This could be a violent event that Russia will blame on Ukraine,” he said, “or an outrageous accusation that Russia will level against the Ukrainian government.”

If so, it would not be the first time.

When Russia annexed Crimea in 2014, it did so after claiming that Russian speakers there were threatened by the pro-Western revolution in Kyiv, which the Kremlin described as a fascist coup. And in 2008, Russia invaded Georgia after the Georgian Army moved into a Russian-backed separatist enclave there.

The skirmishing in Eastern Europe between Ukrainian forces and Kremlin-backed separatists is longstanding, but Thursday’s violence was the worst since a cease-fire was reached two years ago.

The combatants exchanged not just shells but accusations. The Ukrainian military said three adult civilians had been wounded at the kindergarten, and on the other side, a Russian-backed separatist leader claimed Ukraine had launched mortar fire “barbarically and cynically.”

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/17/world/europe/ukraine-conflict-russia-military.html

Aiello, who drove here 20 days ago, was sitting in the truck of his area’s “block captain,” who was at an organizing meeting. Nearby, a young man walked around with a walkie-talkie, part of a watch team to monitor who came into their area and prevent instigators from planting anything to make them look bad, Aiello said.

Source Article from https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2022/02/17/canada-freedom-convoy-ottawa-protest/

A judge in New York ruled Thursday that Donald Trump and two of his children, Donald Trump Jr. and Ivanka Trump, can be deposed as part of a civil fraud investigation conducted by the New York Attorney General’s office.

Judge Arthur Engoron wrote that the Trumps’ fear that their depositions might end up being used in a parallel criminal investigation did not shield them from subpoenas.

“This argument completely misses the mark. Neither (the Attorney General) nor the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office has subpoenaed (the Trumps) to appear before a grand jury,” Engoron wrote in his ruling.

The Trumps were challenging subpoenas sent in December seeking “testimony and documents in connection with an investigation into the valuation of properties owned or controlled by Donald J. Trump or the Trump Organization, or any matter which the Attorney General deems pertinent,” according to a court filing.

Engoron wrote Thursday that Trump has 14 days to fulfill document requests and all three Trumps must appear for a deposition within 21 days. During the hearing, an attorney for Trump indicated that they would appeal such a ruling.

New York Attorney General Letitia James praised the ruling in a statement sent to media outlets, saying, “Today, justice prevailed.” 

At Thursday’s hearing, attorney Alan Futerfas, who represents Donald Trump Jr. and Ivanka Trump, accused James of blurring the lines between her investigation and a criminal probe being run by the Manhattan District Attorney’s office.

He noted that at least two of the attorney general’s staffers are working with the Manhattan District Attorney’s criminal grand jury running a similar investigation, a point that was central to the Trumps’ arguments against giving depositions in this case. 

In New York, grand jury testimony comes with automatic transactional immunity — meaning a person can’t be prosecuted for what they tell a grand jury — but civil depositions don’t. The Trump attorneys argued that the civil depositions are an attempt to get around grand jury protections.

Judge Engeron repeatedly pressed the Trump attorneys on why their clients couldn’t invoke the Fifth Amendment during depositions, as Eric Trump did repeatedly during depositions for this investigation in 2020.

The Trump attorneys responded that prosecutors would be able to “draw an adverse inference” if the Trumps take the Fifth.

The judge pushed back on this repeatedly, asking at one point, “Is there any hint or suggestion that the attorney general is going to haul your clients in front of a grand jury?”

Futerfas replied, “To date, there is not.” He later said there’s no reason to believe either Ivanka Trump or Donald Trump Jr. are targets of the criminal probe, which has already led to charges against the Trump Organization and its chief financial officer, Allen Weisselberg.

Ronald Fischetti, an attorney for the former president, said during the hearing that he is trying to protect his client from any potential criminal prosecution, which he said would be unfounded. 

“I’m trying to protect my client from being charged, on charges that are not founded at all,” Fischetti said.

Fischetti said the fact that Trump is a former president makes this a “unique case.” He said if Trump were to sit for a civil deposition, and invoke the Fifth Amendment, “it will be on every front page in the newspaper in the world.”

“How can I possibly pick a jury in that case?” Fischetti asked.

Trump’s civil attorney, Alina Habba, asked the judge to pause the attorney general’s investigation altogether until the Manhattan D.A.’s probe is done. Both James and Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg are Democrats. Habba implied implied that her Republican client’s political leanings mean he has “protected class” status, referring to legal protection against discrimination based on race, nationality, religion, disability or other factors.

The judge appeared unconvinced by that argument.

“We all went to law school and read the cases about protected classes,” Engoron said. “The traditional protected classes are race, religion, et cetera, Donald Trump doesn’t fit that kind of mode or model, he’s not being discriminated against based on race. Is he? Or religion, is he? He’s not a protected class. If Ms. James has a thing against him, that’s not in my understanding unlawful discrimination.”

Trump and his attorneys have repeatedly accused James of pursuing the investigation against him as a political ploy. That accusation is at the heart of a lawsuit filed by Trump on December 21. In a phone call with CBS News that day, he called himself an “aggrieved and innocent party” and called James’ probe “a hoax.”

On February 9, the Trump Organization’s longtime accounting firm, Mazars USA, cited revelations from the attorney general’s investigation in a letter informing the Trump Organization it would no longer work for the company and that a decade’s worth of financial statements Mazars produced for it “should no longer be relied upon.”

During Thursday’s hearing, Kevin Wallace, from the attorney general’s office, spoke much less than the Trumps’ attorneys, but argued that “these respondents (the Trumps) are in a very common situation, of someone who’s facing potential criminal and civil liability.”

“And they need to decide if they are going to testify. And if they invoke their Fifth Amendment right, your honor is correct, they may be subject to an adverse inference. That’s what the law allows. They haven’t shown anything here that says it’s unfair. In fact, they sort of abandoned that argument,” Wallace said.

Source Article from https://www.cbsnews.com/news/donald-trump-ivanka-testify-fraud-investigation-new-york/

MOSCOW/KYIV, Feb 17 (Reuters) – Shelling in Ukraine on Thursday renewed Western fears of an imminent Russian invasion as U.S. President Joe Biden said Moscow is preparing a pretext to justify a possible attack and the Kremlin expelled an American diplomat.

Early morning exchanges of fire between Kyiv’s forces and pro-Russian separatists – who have been at war for years and where a ceasefire is periodically violated – caused alarm as Western countries have said an incursion could come at any time.

One of the deepest crises in post-Cold War relations is playing out in Europe as Russia wants security guarantees, including Kyiv never joining NATO, and the U.S. and allies offer arms control and confidence-building measures.

While Russia accuses the West of hysteria, saying some its troops have returned to bases and that it has no plans to invade, many Western countries are adamant that the military build-up is continuing ahead of a possible assault.

“We have reason to believe they are engaged in a false flag operation to have an excuse to go in,” Biden told reporters at the White House. “Every indication we have is they’re prepared to go into Ukraine and attack Ukraine.” read more

He ordered Secretary of State Antony Blinken to change his travel plans at the last minute to speak at a United Nations Security Council meeting, where he outlined possible Russian scenarios. read more

“It could be a fabricated so-called terrorist bombing inside Russia, the invented discovery of a mass grave, a staged drone strike against civilians, or a fake – even a real – attack using chemical weapons,” Blinken said. “Russia may describe this event as ethnic cleansing, or a genocide.”

Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Vershinin said Blinken’s comments were regrettable and dangerous.

In a new blow to relations between the two world powers, Russia expelled U.S. Deputy Chief of Mission Bart Gorman. The move was announced on Thursday but a senior State Department official said he left last week.

Moscow cited the U.S. expulsion of a senior official in Washington, who it said was forced to leave before a replacement could be found as part of a U.S. “visa war”.

Washington said it would respond to the “unprovoked” move. Russian diplomats who have stayed longer than three years must leave the United States, while Moscow is giving U.S. diplomats less time, a State Department spokesperson said. read more

TRADING ACCUSATIONS

In Ukraine, Russian-backed rebels and Kyiv’s forces traded accusations that each had fired across the ceasefire line in eastern Ukraine, where Moscow accuses Kyiv of “exterminating” civilians.

Ukrainian government forces denied accusations of having targeted separatist positions in the breakaway region of Donbass, which borders Russia.

Details could not be established independently, but reports from both sides suggested an incident more serious than the routine ceasefire violations that are often reported in the area.

Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov said Moscow was “seriously concerned” about the reports. Russia has long said Kyiv wants an excuse to seize rebel territory by force, which Ukraine denies.

Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelenskiy said the pro-Russian forces had shelled a kindergarten, in what he called a “big provocation”.

Video footage released by Ukrainian police showed a hole through a brick wall in a room scattered with debris and children’s toys.

“Some provocations were planned for today, we expected them and thought that a war had begun,” Dmytro, a resident of the village of Stanytsia Luhanska, told Reuters.

The separatists, for their part, accused government forces of opening fire on their territory four times in the past 24 hours.

Neither account could be verified.

A Reuters photographer in the town of Kadiivka, in Ukraine’s rebel-held Luhansk region, heard the sound of some artillery fire from the direction of the line of contact, but was not able to determine details.

SUMMIT OF KEY LEADERS?

Estimates also vary as to how many Russia soldiers have massed near Ukraine. Nearby NATO member Estonia cited around 170,000 troops on Wednesday.

White House spokesperson Karine Jean-Pierre said on Thursday that Russia had added 7,000 troops to its presence at the Ukrainian border over the past 24 hours.

“We see them fly in more combat and support aircraft. We see them sharpen their readiness in the Black Sea,” Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin said at NATO headquarters in Brussels. “We even see them stocking up their blood supplies.”

Russia’s defence ministry released video it said showed more units leaving the area near the border.

Maxar Technologies, a private U.S. company that has been tracking the build-up, said satellite images showed that, while Russia has pulled back some military equipment from near Ukraine, other hardware has arrived. read more

As diplomatic efforts continue, Russia says its security demands are still being ignored.

“In the absence of the readiness of the American side to agree on firm, legally binding guarantees of our security from the United States and its allies, Russia will be forced to respond, including through the implementation of military-technical measures,” it said in a letter to the U.S. ambassador.

Blinken said Washington was evaluating the document and that he had earlier sent a letter to Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov proposing a meeting between the pair in Europe as well as of the NATO Russia Council and the OSCE permanent Council.

“These meetings can pave the way for a summit of key leaders,” he said.

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

Source Article from https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/shelling-breaks-out-east-ukraine-west-moscow-dispute-troop-moves-2022-02-17/

Image
Marco Dieguez, a health educator, and Cynthia Key, a nurse, did community outreach work in a park in Los Angeles in January. The state’s new pandemic plan includes expanded efforts to fight disinformation at the grass-roots level. Credit…Allison Zaucha for The New York Times

California health authorities unveiled a “next phase” pandemic playbook for the most populous U.S. state on Thursday that will treat the coronavirus as a manageable risk that “will remain with us for some time, if not forever,” rather than an emergency.

The plan, which includes measures to promote vaccines, stockpile medical supplies and mount an aggressive assault on disinformation, will mark a new chapter in responding to the coronavirus, which has infected one in five Californians and claimed the lives of more than 83,000 state residents.

It is also an acknowledgment that “we’re going to live with this,” Gov. Gavin Newsom said in an interview preceding the announcement.

“We’re not in denial of the hell that has been the last two years,” he said. But, he added, “This is not like World War II, where we can have a ticker-tape parade and announce the end.”

A towering spike in new coronavirus cases driven by the Omicron variant peaked in the state in mid-January and has since receded, leaving the daily average about where it was late last summer, at about 25,000 new cases a day. The fading of the surge has been taken as a signal to ease restrictions around the country.

Earlier this week, Mr. Newsom loosened California’s indoor mask requirements for vaccinated people, and state health officials said they would reconsider school mask mandates at the end of February. Los Angeles County lifted its outdoor mask mandate, Disneyland and other businesses eased their mask rules for vaccinated people, and the Coachella and Stagecoach music festivals announced that they would not require attendees to wear masks, be vaccinated or take a test when the events take place this spring.

California’s new view of the virus, outlined in a briefing by the state’s top health official, Dr. Mark Ghaly, will continue to emphasize vaccines and boosters, with expansions in school-based vaccination, preparations to vaccinate children younger than 5 when they become eligible, and potential reassessment of vaccine requirements to account for the possibility of some natural immunity from a prior infection, among other targets. Scientists have cautioned that protection may wane over time, and future variants may be better able to sidestep defenses.

Mask requirements would be eased or tightened as required, depending on the severity and trajectory of infections, according to the new plan. Strategic stockpiles would be modernized and bolstered.

The plan would expand wastewater surveillance testing and genomic sequencing; expand access to Covid-19 treatments; and create a special office of community partnerships that would send hundreds of workers into immigrant, disadvantaged and other hard-to-reach communities to combat disinformation and offer access to care.

The governor said that for now, the state would continue to operate under emergency authorization, allowing health officials to move swiftly if there is a new surge. But he said his goal was to unwind the state of emergency as soon as possible.

Other priorities would include addressing worker shortages at hospitals and nursing homes, studying the virus’s impact on communities, expanding the use of smartphone technology to alert people about possible virus exposure; and offering incentives for innovations in testing and air filtration.

Though 70 percent of the state’s residents have been fully vaccinated, that is a far cry from achieving “herd immunity,” a level where so few people remain vulnerable to the virus that it cannot readily spread. Most experts think herd immunity to the coronavirus is now likely out of reach.

Statewide surveys show Californians generally support the governor’s pandemic policies, which have limited Covid deaths to a per capita rate substantially lower than in Florida, Texas or the nation as a whole.

But public patience has frayed since Mr. Newsom announced the nation’s first stay-at-home order in 2020, starting a national wave of restrictions. A local recall election, fueled by anger over pandemic rules and amplified by disinformation, put members of a far-right militia in apparent control of the board of supervisors in rural Shasta County. And a poll released this week by the University of California, Berkeley, Institute of Governmental Studies found that Mr. Newsom’s overall approval rating had slipped from 64 percent in 2020 to 48 percent now.

“Right now, we’re really anxious,” said Mr. Newsom. “A lot of us are distrustful. And it’s affecting us in profound ways across our entire existence, not just this pandemic.”

The state’s updated approach, he added, is aimed at softening that anxiety with “more permanent” guidelines that will help policymakers better navigate the next surge.

California’s new pandemic plan continues to emphasize vaccination. Patricia Vargas held her daughter Rebeca Vargas, 5, as she waited to be vaccinated in Los Angeles in January.Credit…Allison Zaucha for The New York Times

Health experts who were given an early look at the new plan gave it high marks, although some urged the state to be bolder, particularly on vaccination. “California is better than average,” said Eric Topol, founder and director of the Scripps Research Translational Institute, “but that’s not saying much.”

The new plan reflects many aspects of the $2.7 billion in pandemic spending in the governor’s proposed budget, and complements a number of bills pending in the legislature.

“Have we been perfect? God, no,” Mr. Newsom said in the interview. “But we’re evolving. We’re getting smart and we’re not walking away.”

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/live/2022/02/17/world/covid-19-tests-cases-vaccine

Republican members of the Senate Banking Committee, led by Sen. Patrick J. Toomey (Pa.), did not attend Tuesday’s planned meeting in protest of Democrats’ intention to advance Sarah Bloom Raskin, Biden’s nominee for vice chair for supervision at the Fed, citing concerns about her work for a financial technology start-up, denying Democrats a majority quorum.

Source Article from https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/02/17/republicans-fed-supreme-court/

“I’ve always thought of myself as a progressive — until now, recently, when I’m looking at this situation,” said Siva Raj, 49, who launched the San Francisco recall effort with his partner, Autumn Looijen. “I’m shocked — like, how can progressives be for something like this? This is not me. These are not the values that I buy anymore.”

Source Article from https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/02/17/democrats-san-francisco-recall/

Source Article from https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2022/02/17/russia-ukraine-nato-troops/6827362001/

Correction: The caption on a photo in this story has been updated to correct the date it was taken.

Police had gone up and down the basement stairs several times while searching a home in the Saugerties, New York, area Monday for any trace of 6-year-old Paislee Shultis, who had been missing for more than two years.

Roughly an hour and a half into the search, one detective took a closer look at the wooden staircase. “He couldn’t put his finger on it, but there was something about the staircase that bothered him,” police Chief Joseph Sinagra told CNN.

Det. Erik Thiele pointed his flashlight at the spot where a stair met the riser, Sinagra said. Thiele saw what he believed to be a blanket, and police began to disassemble the staircase.

“And as they’re removing the steps off the staircase, they see a set of feet,” the police chief told CNN. “Little feet.”

They were Paislee’s. She was hidden under the staircase with her noncustodial mother, the chief said, huddled in a nest of pillows, blankets and clothes, in what police described as a “dark and wet enclosure.”

Today, the girl is safe, having been returned to her legal guardian and reunited with her older sister. But many questions remain unanswered as investigators try to piece together what she’s been through over the last two and a half years.

The girl was unable to go to school and it was unclear whether she’d seen a doctor since she disappeared, the chief said. And it’s unknown what impact living in these conditions has had on her.

The mother, Kimberly Cooper, was arrested, along with Paislee’s noncustodial father and grandfather, who both denied having knowledge of Paislee’s whereabouts when police executed their search warrant this week.

Cooper was charged with second-degree custodial interference and endangering the welfare of a child, both misdemeanors, according to police. She is out on bail.

Kirk Shultis Jr. and Kirk Shultis Sr. were each charged with custodial interference in the first degree, a felony, and endangering the welfare of a child, a misdemeanor. Both were arraigned and released on their own recognizance, police said. All three defendants were ordered by the court to stay away from the child.

Lawyers for the men declined to comment, while Carol K. Morgan, an attorney representing Cooper said, “We should all wait until the facts come out. Everyone should be patient before they draw their own conclusions.”

‘They lied to us for two years’

Paislee Joann Shultis was reported missing on July 13, 2019, from Cayuga Heights, a village on the outskirts of Ithaca, about 160 miles west of Saugerties. Sinagra told CNN that Cooper and Shultis Jr. had lost custody of Paislee and her sister and a legal guardian had been granted custody.

Sinagra told CNN that police had received several tips about the home, and they had been there about a dozen times over the last two years. But each time, residents denied knowing where the girl was and were instead “adversarial” with police, Sinagra said. Police made it inside several times but were not allowed in the bedrooms areas or in the basement.

“They lied to us for two years – including the father stating that he had no idea where his daughter was,” the chief said.

It wasn’t until Monday that police were able to obtain factual information – not hearsay – that helped them secure a search warrant, he told CNN. Uniformed officers were stationed outside the home that afternoon around 4 to ensure no one left or entered before police executed their warrant soon after 8 p.m.

In the basement, they found an apartment that included a bedroom with Paislee’s name on a wall, Sinagra said. A bed appeared to have been slept in.

“Is she here?” officers asked, according to the chief. But residents denied anyone was living in the room, he said. “They said they had set the room up like that in the event that Paislee should ever return.”

Paislee was hidden under the stairs just 3 or 4 feet away.

Investigators believe the space beneath the stairs was used more than once, Sinagra said – maybe each time an officer visited the residence. He pointed to how the staircase was constructed along with how comfortable residents appeared Monday as they insisted they didn’t know where Paislee was, an indication to the chief they had done this before.

Sinagra believes they had been hiding from the time officers arrived outside the home, meaning they could have been in the “wet” and “cold” space for five hours before they were found.

Neither the girl nor Cooper made a sound as police took apart the stairs that hid them, Sinagra said. A detective had described the silence as “eerie,” the chief said.

While Sinagra is happy that Paislee was found safe, he also said the case was tragic: Whatever the reason Paislee’s parents lost custody of her and her sister, he said, that could have “been rectified by now.”

“But this is going to be a major setback for them,” he said.

CNN’s Mirna Alsharif, Christina Maxouris and Ray Sanchez contributed to this report.

Source Article from https://www.cnn.com/2022/02/17/us/paislee-shultis-6-year-old-found-new-york-saugerties/index.html

Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov has demanded Russia’s core security issues be addressed first in any negotiations with the United States and NATO before other security issues can be resolved.

In a news conference following a meeting with his Italian counterpart Luigi Di Maio in Moscow, Lavrov said that, for example, any agreement to limit and halt the deployment of short- and long-range missiles based in Europe or lower military risks associated with military exercises won’t be resolved “until we agree on our key positions.”

His comments come after Russian President Vladimir Putin, in a news conference with German Chancellor Olaf Scholz on Tuesday, reiterated that the US and NATO had not satisfied Russia’s security concerns.

“The responses we received from the United States and NATO members to security guarantees proposals, in our opinion, do not meet the three basic Russian requirements mentioned above,” Putin said. “The provided responses contain a number of proposals that we are not just open to discussing, but in fact we have proposed them to our partners in previous years: proposals on European security issues, on certain weaponry issues, i.e. intermediate and short-range missiles, and on military transparency.”

“We are ready to continue this joint work further. We are also ready to follow the negotiation track but all issues must be considered as a whole, without being separated from the main Russian proposals, the implementation of which is an unconditional priority for us,” Putin said.

“We noted in the second part of the American response to our initiative there is willingness to discuss and find agreement on the issues we’ve been proposing our NATO colleagues as urgent for the last several years,” Lavrov said.

“They have been avoiding these issues in many ways. I mean an agreement to limit and halt the deployment of short- and long-range missiles land-based in Europe, refraining from placement of other offensive weapons in areas where they can threaten security, reach concrete agreements when it comes to trust measures, measures to lowering military risks associated with military exercises of both parties, including air force and navy traffic,” he said.

Earlier this week, US Secretary of State Antony Blinken “reiterated the US commitment to continue to pursue a diplomatic solution to the crisis Moscow has precipitated.”

Source Article from https://www.cnn.com/europe/live-news/ukraine-russia-news-02-17-22-intl/index.html

MOSCOW/KYIV, Feb 17 (Reuters) – Kyiv and its Western allies said they feared that Russia might be trying to create a pretext to unleash war on Thursday, after reports of shelling across the front line in Ukraine’s longstanding conflict with Moscow-backed separatists.

Ukraine and the pro-Russian rebels gave conflicting accounts of Thursday’s shelling and the details could not be established independently. The reports from both sides suggested an incident more serious than the ceasefire violations that are regularly reported on the line of contact in eastern Ukraine’s Donbass.

Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelenskiy said the pro-Russian forces had shelled a kindergarten, in what he called a “big provocation”. For its part, the Kremlin said Moscow was “seriously concerned” about reports of an escalation after the separatists accused government forces of opening fire on their territory four times in the past 24 hours.

British Foreign Secretary Liz Truss tweeted: “Reports of alleged abnormal military activity by Ukraine in Donbass are a blatant attempt by the Russian government to fabricate pretexts for invasion. This is straight out of the Kremlin playbook.”

NATO was “concerned that Russia is trying to stage a pretext for an armed attack against Ukraine. There is still no clarity, no certainty about the Russian intentions”, the Western military alliance’s Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg said.

“They have enough troops, enough capabilities to launch a full-fledged invasion of Ukraine with very little or no warning time,” he told reporters at the alliance’s headquarters in Brussels. “That is what makes the situation so dangerous.”

Moscow denies Western accusations it is planning to invade its neighbour and said this week it was pulling back some of the more than 100,000 troops it has sent to the area. The West disputes that there has been a significant withdrawal and the United States said thousands more troops were still arriving.

A senior Ukrainian government source said the shelling at the line of contact with Russian-backed separatist forces went beyond the scale of ceasefire violations routinely reported throughout the conflict.

“It is not typical. It looks a lot like a provocation,” the source told Reuters.

A Reuters photographer in the town of Kadiivka, in Ukraine’s rebel-held Luhansk region, heard the sound of some artillery fire from the direction of the line of contact, but was not able to determine the details of the incident.

Kyiv accused the rebels of firing shells at several locations, including some that struck a kindergarten and others that hit a school where pupils had to flee to the cellar.

Video footage released by Ukrainian police showed a hole through a brick wall in a room scattered with debris and children’s toys. Separate images showed emergency workers escorting small children and teachers from a building.

Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov said Moscow had already warned that a concentration of additional Ukrainian forces near the Donbass frontline created a risk of provocations. Kyiv has denied massing extra troops in the area.

Contradicting Russia’s assertions that it has been pulling back, a senior official in U.S. President Joe Biden’s administration said up to 7,000 more troops had moved to the border in recent days, including some arriving on Wednesday.

SATELLITE IMAGES

Russia’s defence ministry released video it said showed more departing units. Maxar Technologies, a private U.S. company that has been tracking the build-up, said satellite images showed that, while Russia has pulled back some military equipment from near Ukraine, other hardware has arrived. read more

A diplomatic source said a longstanding monitoring mission from the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe had recorded multiple shelling incidents along the line of contact in the early hours of Thursday.

Since a 2015 ceasefire brought an end to major combat in the separatist conflict, the OSCE has typically reported dozens of ceasefire violations each day, often minor incidents of test-firing weapons. Reports of significant shelling or clashes that lead to injuries or death can occur several time a month.

The self-proclaimed Luhansk People’s Republic, one of two rebel regions, said Ukrainian forces had used mortars, grenade launchers and a machine gun in four separate incidents on Thursday.

“Armed forces of Ukraine have crudely violated the ceasefire regime, using heavy weapons, which, according to the Minsk agreements, should be withdrawn,” the separatists said in a statement.

Referring to the rebels, Ukraine’s military said: “With particular cynicism, the Russian occupation troops shelled the village of Stanytsa Lugansk in the Luhansk region. As a result of the use of heavy artillery weapons by terrorists, shells hit the kindergarten building. According to preliminary data, two civilians received shell shock.”

Russia denies planning an invasion of Ukraine, but says it could take unspecified “military-technical” action unless a range of demands are met, including a promise never to admit Kyiv into the NATO alliance.

The West has rejected the main Russian demands but has proposed talks on arms control and other issues. The United States and Europe have threatened sanctions if Russia invades, a threat which Moscow has largely brushed off.

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

Source Article from https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/shelling-breaks-out-east-ukraine-west-moscow-dispute-troop-moves-2022-02-17/

An aerial view shows a neighborhood affected by landslides in Petropolis, Brazil, on Wednesday.

Silvia Izquierdo/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Silvia Izquierdo/AP

An aerial view shows a neighborhood affected by landslides in Petropolis, Brazil, on Wednesday.

Silvia Izquierdo/AP

PETROPOLIS, Brazil — Rio de Janeiro state’s government has confirmed 94 deaths from floods and mudslides that swept away homes and cars in the city of Petropolis. But even as families prepared to bury their dead, it was unclear Thursday how many bodies remained trapped in the mud.

Rubens Bomtempo, mayor of the German-influenced city nestled in the mountains, didn’t even offer an estimate for the number of people missing, with recovery efforts still ongoing.

“We don’t yet know the full scale of this,” Bomtempo said at a news conference Wednesday. “It was a hard day, a difficult day.”

More than 24 hours after the deadly deluge early Tuesday, survivors were digging to find lost loved ones. Rio de Janeiro’s public prosecutors’ office said in a statement Wednesday night that it had compiled a list of 35 people yet to be located.

Footage posted on social media showed torrents dragging cars and houses through the streets and water swirling through the city. One video showed two buses sinking into a swollen river as its passengers clambered out the windows, scrambling for safety. Some didn’t make it to the banks and were washed away, out of sight.

On Wednesday morning, houses were left buried beneath mud while appliances and cars were in piles on the streets.

Petropolis, named for a former Brazilian emperor, has been a refuge for people escaping the summer heat and tourists keen to explore the so-called “Imperial City.”

Its prosperity has also drawn poorer residents from Rio’s poorer regions. Its population grew haphazardly, climbing mountainsides now covered with small residences packed tightly together. Many are in areas unfit for structures and made more vulnerable by deforestation and inadequate drainage.

A man rescues a dog from a residential area destroyed by mudslides in Petropolis, Brazil, on Wednesday.

Silvia Izquierdo/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Silvia Izquierdo/AP

A man rescues a dog from a residential area destroyed by mudslides in Petropolis, Brazil, on Wednesday.

Silvia Izquierdo/AP

The state fire department said 25.8 centimeters (just over 10 inches) of rain fell within three hours on Tuesday — almost as much as during the previous 30 days combined. Rio de Janeiro’s Gov. Claudio Castro said in a press conference that the rains were the worst Petropolis has received since 1932.

“No one could predict rain as hard as this,” Castro said. More rain is expected through the rest of the week, according to weather forecasters.

Castro added that almost 400 people were left homeless and 24 people were recovered alive.

They were fortunate, and they were few.

“I could only hear my brother yelling, ‘Help! Help! My God!'” resident Rosilene Virginia told The Associated Press as a man comforted her. “It’s very sad to see people asking for help and having no way of helping, no way of doing anything. It’s desperate, a feeling of loss so great.”

The stricken mountain region has seen similar catastrophes in recent decades, including one that caused more than 900 deaths. In the years since, Petropolis presented a plan to reduce risks of landslides, but works have been advancing only slowly. The plan, presented in 2017, was based on analysis determining that 18% of the city’s territory was at high risk for landslides and flooding.

Local authorities say more than 180 residents who live in at-risk areas are sheltering in schools. More equipment and manpower is expected to help rescue efforts on Thursday.

Brazil’s President Jair Bolsonaro expressed solidarity while on a trip to Russia. Petropolis’ city hall declared three days of mourning for the tragedy.

Southeastern Brazil has been punished with heavy rains since the start of the year, with more than 40 deaths recorded between incidents in Minas Gerais state in early January and Sao Paulo state later the same month.

Source Article from https://www.npr.org/2022/02/17/1081382378/brazil-mudslides-kill-more-than-90-with-dozens-still-missing

Nearly two years later, however, the stimulus data is voluminous yet vexing — for the public and the government alike. The spending portal does not offer a real-time, detailed view as to the way cities, states, schools, hospitals and others actually have deployed broad swaths of the cash they received. In education, for example, federal records show more than $81 billion set aside for school districts in response to the pandemic. Yet the information is 90 days old in some cases and offers no insight as to what those communities actually did once they obtained the grants.

Source Article from https://www.washingtonpost.com/us-policy/2022/02/17/stimulus-aid-oversight-fraud/

A New Jersey police department is being criticized after two officers handcuffed and pinned a black teen to the floor during a weekend mall fight while the white teen involved in the feud was left to sit on a couch.

The Saturday fracas at Bridgewater Commons — and the police response that has sparked an internal investigation — was captured on video that quickly spread on social media.

The teens started out arguing with each other before things turned physical and the two exchanged punches and shoves, the video shows.

Two officers from the Bridgewater Police Department arrived seconds later and pulled the white teen away from the other boy and pushed him onto a nearby couch.

With the black teen already on the floor, the male cop pins him down and places his knee on the boy’s back, the video shows.

The female officer then leaves the white teen alone and joins the male cop, also placing a knee near the back of the black teen’s neck as the two handcuff him.

New Jersey police officers aggressively pin the black teenager to the floor, while the white teen watches.
Sienna Freidinger via Storyful

While the two cops are subduing the black teen, the other boy can be seen standing up and looking at the arrest taking place.

“Yo, it’s ’cause he’s black. Racially motivated,” a person can be heard saying.

The black teen, identified as Kye, told NBC News in an interview that he confronted the other boy, who had been bullying his friend.

“He was kind of saying, like, ‘You’re a little kid, you’re my little pet,’ and stuff like that,” Kye said.

Kye’s mother, who also spoke with the news outlet, slammed the police response.

Video screenshot captures two teenagers fighting.
Sienna Freidinger via Storyful

“It doesn’t take two cops to hold a 14-year-old boy down who’s not resisting, while the other boy is just kind of going free and still going off on my son. It just doesn’t make sense,” she said.

Gov. Phil Murphy said in a statement posted to Twitter that he was “deeply disturbed by what appears to be racially disparate treatment in this video.”

In a Monday Facebook post, the Bridgewater Police Department announced that an internal probe would be conducted.

New Jersey Gov. Phil Murphy speaks to reporters during a briefing in Trenton, Monday, Feb. 7, 2022.
AP
The incident happened at Bridgewater Commons in New Jersey.
Sienna Freidinger via Storyful

Commenters to the department’s post voiced outrage at how the officers handled the situation.

“Those officers need to be held accountable! Immediately!” one woman wrote.

“We want an independent investigation. If we are going to restrain youth, both should have been restrained. Blackness is not more threatening,” another person said.

A third Facebook user said: “Clearly they targeted one over the other. It is disgusting and evidences the reason why the African American community has no trust in the system whatsoever. Very upsetting.”

Source Article from https://nypost.com/2022/02/16/nj-police-cuff-black-teen-in-mall-fight-as-white-teen-watches/