JERUSALEM — President Biden said on Friday that now was not the time to restart peace negotiations between Israel and the Palestinians, but insisted that he remained committed to a two-state solution to their conflict and expressed hope that the diplomatic agreements sealed in 2020 between Israel and four Arab states could give new impetus to the peace process.

“Even if the ground is not ripe at this moment to restart negotiations, the United States and my administration will not give up on trying to bring the Palestinians and Israelis and both sides closer together,” Mr. Biden said.

“In this moment, when Israel is improving relations with his neighbors throughout the region, we can harness that same momentum to reinvigorate the peace process between the Palestinian people and the Israelis,” Mr. Biden added, referring to a set of agreements known as the Abraham Accords, which were negotiated under the Trump administration.

Mr. Biden made the comments at a news conference after meeting with the president of the Palestinian Authority, Mahmoud Abbas, at a gloomy time for Palestinians. The meeting took place in Bethlehem instead of Ramallah, the authority’s administrative hub, to enable Mr. Biden to briefly visit the Church of the Nativity, the fourth-century basilica that stands on a site where tradition holds that Jesus was born.

His remarks followed a call by Mr. Abbas for Mr. Biden to help “prepare the atmosphere for a political horizon for a just, comprehensive, durable peace.”

“Isn’t it time for this occupation to end?” Mr. Abbas said at the news conference. “The key to peace and security in our region begins with recognizing the state of Palestine,” he added, despite Saudi Arabia — the most powerful Arab country — beginning incremental steps on Friday to normalize relations with Israel for the first time.

“The opportunity for the two-state solution along the 1967 borders may be only available today,” the Palestinian leader said. “But we don’t know what will happen later.”

After an exuberant reception in Israel, it was a tenser morning for Mr. Biden, who was met with protests by Palestinians in Jerusalem and Bethlehem, hours before a scheduled flight to what could be still more fraught encounters in Saudi Arabia.

In Bethlehem, Mr. Biden said that his commitment to the goal of a two-state solution had not changed, saying, “Two states along 1967 lines with mutually agreed land swaps remains the best way to achieve equal measures of security, prosperity, freedom and democracy for the Palestinians as well as Israelis.”

Mr. Abbas also pushed Mr. Biden to remove the Palestine Liberation Organization from the U.S. terrorism list and reopen the U.S. consulate to the Palestinians in Jerusalem and the P.L.O. mission in Washington, both of which were closed under President Donald J. Trump.

The Palestinian leadership is divided between the Palestinian Authority, which administers parts of the West Bank, and Hamas, the Islamist militant group that wrested control of Gaza from the authority in 2007. Most Palestinians see little hope of reconciliation, recent polling shows.

In Gaza, a blockade enforced by Israel and Egypt is in its 15th year. One in four Palestinians was unemployed in 2021. Seven in 10 say they believe that a Palestinian state is no longer feasible because of the expansion of Israeli settlements in the West Bank, according to a June poll. Nearly 80 percent want the resignation of Mr. Abbas, the authority’s president, who last faced an election in 2005, and the vast majority see both the authority and Hamas as corrupt.

Against this backdrop, many Palestinians are frustrated with the Biden administration, with 65 percent opposing dialogue between their leadership and the United States. While the Biden administration has often called for a two-state solution to the Palestinian conflict — and Mr. Biden repeated that call on Thursday — the perception among analysts is that he has not matched his words with actions.

On the eve of Mr. Biden’s visit, the White House announced several financial measures intended to improve Palestinian life but stopped short of a political process to create a Palestinian state and left several Trump-era measures in place.

In his remarks on Friday, Mr. Biden also called on the Palestinian Authority to do more to clean its own house.

“The Palestinian Authority has important work to do as well, if you don’t mind my saying,” Mr. Biden said. “Now’s the time to strengthen Palestinian institutions to improve governance, transparency and accountability. Now’s the time to unleash the incredible potential of the Palestinian people through greater engagement and civic society to combat corruption, advance rights and freedoms, and improve community services.”

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/live/2022/07/15/world/biden-israel-saudi-arabia-news

The Indiana University Health physician who performed an abortion on a 10-year-old child who was raped did not violate privacy laws when she shared the anecdote with a news outlet, university officials said Friday

The claim: Earlier this week, Indiana Attorney General Todd Rokita questioned whether Dr. Caitlin Bernard, an obstetrician-gynecologist, had broken any HIPAA laws. He did not provide evidence.

What Indiana University Health says: “IU Health conducted an investigation with the full cooperation of Dr. Bernard and other IU Health team members. IU Health’s investigation found Dr. Bernard in compliance with privacy laws,” officials said in an email. They also said that the university “routinely initiate reviews” on privacy and compliance. 

What to know about this case: Earlier this month, the Indianapolis Star, part of the USA TODAY Network, published a story about a 10-year-old child from Ohio who was raped and traveled to Indiana to get an abortion. The account became a talking point for abortion rights supporters, including President Joe Biden, and some opponents and news outlets criticized the story as unproven. A man was arrested and charged this week with the rape

What does HIPAA say?

The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act passed in 1996 aims to protects the privacy of patient information.

Experts in HIPAA compliance say the law exists to prevent the release of identifiable information. Bernard provided the IndyStar only with the age of the girl and the state of her residence.

The question then becomes what the threshold is for identifiable information, said John Howard, director of the HIPAA Privacy Program at the University of Arizona, speaking in general terms about the law and not this specific instance.

Source Article from https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2022/07/15/indiana-doctor-caitlin-bernard-hipaa-abortion-case/10068093002/

“I struggle to contemplate what single elected official in American history will do more to cause more massive suffering,” Sam Ricketts, co-founder and co-director for the environmental group Evergreen Action, said after news of Manchin’s rejection broke Thursday night. “There’s numerous examples, but if you want to look decades out from now, this decision by this one senator from West Virginia is going to have repercussions that affect millions, if not billions.”

Democrats have struggled for months to pass a slimmed-down climate and energy package as part of a budget reconciliation bill that would require the support of all 50 Senate Democrats, including Manchin. He had previously said he could reach agreement on climate if legislation included elements helping both renewables and fossil fuels.

But Manchin informed Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer on Thursday that he wouldn’t support the investments in climate and energy ahead of the August recess, and his office pointed to his concerns about stoking inflation in a statement.

Manchin on Friday disputed reports that he had walked away from the talks completely, instead saying he is waiting for July inflation figures to make a determination and insisting Democrats could still vote on a reconciliation package with climate provisions in September. But that is past the July deadline that Schumer had set, and it forces Democrats to choose between making a deal now to lower prescription drug costs or hold out for a larger bill in September.

“I can’t make that decision basically on taxes of any type and also on the energy and climate because it takes the taxes to pay for the investment in the clean technology that I’m in favor of,” Manchin said during a radio interview on West Virginia’s MetroNews. “But I’m not going to do something and overreach that causes more problems.”

Manchin’s Democratic colleagues, though, are dubious about his intentions and prefer to vote on a bill before the August recess, given the members will be focused on campaigning for November’s midterm elections after that.

“It is hard to feel optimistic there is a way to getting to yes with Sen. Manchin on emissions reductions and clean power given the last year-and-a-half,” Sen. Tina Smith (D-Minn.) said in an interview. “Sen. Manchin is joining every single Republican in stopping the efforts to cut emissions and speed up this transition to clean energy. That is his legacy. I believe there needs to be accountability for that in the ballot box.”

Rep. Sean Casten (D-Ill.) also cast doubt on the prospects of September passage.

“Given the chance to address the pressing needs for the country you can always count on Sen. Manchin not to decide and punt a decision to later. I don’t have reason to think that would end,” he said in an interview. “If you choose not to decide you still haven’t made a choice.”

Manchin had already killed an earlier, larger iteration of the party-line package late last year, even after other Democrats had begun dismantling it to meet the senator’s demands. Those concessions included nixing a program — a key priority of Smith — that among other provisions would have paid money to utilities that supply more clean power and imposed penalties for those that don’t.

What largely remained intact was a broad package of clean energy tax incentives designed to expand and extend long-term subsidies for renewable energy and emerging technologies such as hydrogen, carbon capture and small nuclear reactors. Democrats had recently scrapped from the subsidies a mechanism that would make it easier for companies to gain access to the federal incentives by receiving direct payments rather than tax incentives, and it had seemed that the remaining sticking point revolved around incentives for electric vehicles.

Still, people familiar with the negotiations had expressed optimism in recent days that Democrats were nearing a deal on the clean energy provisions. Senate Finance Chair Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) said in a statement Thursday night that “nearly all issues in the climate and energy space had been resolved.”

Manchin said in the radio interview Friday that talks had been “good,” with staffs working diligently for the past few months. Still, Manchin seemed to sour on the package earlier this week amid a historic rise in inflation, telling reporters on Wednesday that anything Democrats pass needs to be “scrubbed” to make sure it’s not inflationary.

Rep. Earl Blumenauer (D-Ore.), a member of the House Ways and Means Committee, responded Friday that the provisions included in the package would help combat inflation over time.

“If we abandon the approach that we’ve taken, we will lose markets internationally and put us further behind,” he said in an interview. “Ultimately, having these provisions strengthens the economy.”

News of Manchin’s rejection also left environmental activists and Democrats to pick up the pieces to try to find a potential path to cutting emissions. Without action from Congress, however, Biden’s goal for curbing U.S. greenhouse gasses 50 to 52 percent below 2005 levels by the end of this decade appeared to be slipping away.

“We will be way off track and have no plan to limiting warming to the degree that’s necessary,” said Leah Stokes, a University of California-Santa Barbara professor who worked with Democrats on climate provisions of the reconciliation package. “I am sure the Biden administration will use every regulatory tool in the toolbox and use every executive action they can, but ultimately we need Congress to act. But one senator who clearly is in bed with the fossil fuel industry is condemning generations of Americans on this planet to a broken Earth, including his own grandchildren.”

Absent new policy action, a Rhodium Group report this week found that the U.S. is falling short of its targets and is on track to reduce emissions by just 24 percent to 35 percent below 2005 levels by 2030. Scientists have said that is too little to prevent global warming from reaching catastrophic levels.

“As we regroup, obviously there is no giving up on the climate crisis and no giving up on humans’ ability to adapt and address major challenges. But the path is a lot harder,” said Christy Goldfuss, senior vice president for energy and environment policy at liberal Center for American Progress.

Manchin’s move also appeared to leave the administration grappling with what it’s next step should be. “It’s more of a re-evaluation kind of day,” said one federal agency official, who spoke on condition of anonymity.

John Podesta, founder and chairman of the Center for American Progress, said the administration had previously worked up an action plan before last year’s international climate talks in Glasgow, Scotland, that it should now try implement.

“They need to dust that off,” he said. “The tragedy here of course is everything becomes more difficult, less cost effective without this investment package.”

Talks are also likely to start churning on a potential tax extenders package to salvage the existing subsidies for clean power. But that would require the cooperation of Republicans, an unlikely prospect.

“It’s hard for me to see much incentive to help save Democrats from themselves so close to the election,” said Sen. Kevin Cramer of North Dakota, a Republican who took part in bipartisan discussions on energy and climate policy with Manchin earlier this year.

Climate activists are also pressing Biden to expand his use of executive action and to close the door on fossil fuel projects, such as ConocoPhillips’ Willow oil project in Alaska and plans for a new offshore drilling program, which both had emerged as potential trade-offs for Manchin’s support.

“The drilling decisions being made right now are about development and production in years if not almost a decade into the future,” Goldfuss said.

Gregory Wetstone, president and CEO of the American Council on Renewable Energy, said lawmakers also need to salvage as much of the clean energy tax package as possible, whether through the existing reconciliation bill or a different legislative vehicle, or else risk stalling the growth of renewable energy.

“Tax incentives for renewable energy phase down and largely out in today’s tax code, while century-old fossil fuel incentives remain permanently in place,” he said.

Evergreen Action’s Ricketts called for consequences to Manchin specifically, including removing him as chair of the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee. “Frankly, I don’t think he has any business being Energy Committee chairman if he’s unwilling to move energy policy, even as his colleagues bend to his demands,” he said.

Sen. Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.), a member of the panel, also questioned Manchin’s leadership Friday, tweeting that his refusal to act is infuriating “makes me question why he’s Chair of ENR.”

Ricketts added Democrats will need to be “scratching and clawing for every inch” going forward, including pressing for the White House to use executive actions and pressing state governments to lead the charge.

But even action from the administration faces its own daunting prospects following last month’s Supreme Court decision that restricted the EPA’s authority to curb emissions without “clear” direction from Congress. The implications of that ruling have already started to emerge in other cases across the country where opponents are challenging the administration’s regulatory actions.

Still, climate hawks say that should not stop the administration from aggressively moving forward in the absence of action from Congress.

“Every single agency and department across the administration has different actions they can take. West Virginia vs. EPA did not change that,” Goldfuss added.

Zack Colman contributed to this report.

Source Article from https://www.politico.com/news/2022/07/15/democrats-manchin-climate-activists-00046081

Source Article from https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/07/15/house-abortion-roe-v-wade/

Shafer and Jones served as electors, while Beach was a key intermediary between the Trump campaign and the electors, according to one of the sources. Beach, for example, was named in a Trump campaign email that directed the electors to keep their plans secret.

The Republicans’ actions have become a major point of interest of the Fulton County special grand jury examining whether Trump or his allies broke any state laws as they sought to reverse Democrat Joe Biden’s win in Georgia. Some legal experts say those GOP electors may have violated election fraud and forgery statutes, among others.

Investigators in Washington, both for the select committee examining the Jan. 6 attack and at the Justice Department, have also taken notice. Federal prosecutors recently subpoenaed Shafer and others for information about the fake electors.

Shafer did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Friday. Beach said: “I cannot respond to any questions about the grand jury.”

Credit: HYOSUB SHIN / AJC

Credit: HYOSUB SHIN / AJC

Credit: HYOSUB SHIN / AJC

Credit: HYOSUB SHIN / AJC

A spokesman for Willis declined to comment on the targets and did not have an immediate response on Jones’ motion. But the veteran prosecutor told The Atlanta Journal-Constitution last week that her office had informed the lawyers of multiple people that their clients were targets of the investigation.

“We have informed some that they are being looked at as a target — or let me say more clearly, we’ve told people’s lawyers that,” Willis said.

One of the AJC’s sources said they were expecting others to receive target letters.

After the GOP electors cast their ballots, Shafer told reporters who discovered the meeting that the vote was necessary to protect Trump’s legal rights in pending litigation. But documents and testimony made public by congressional investigators show the electors were a key part of Trump’s effort to overturn Biden’s Electoral College victory in Congress on Jan. 6, a plan hatched by attorney John Eastman.

Credit: Nathan Posner

Credit: Nathan Posner

Credit: Nathan Posner

Credit: Nathan Posner

Trump pressured then-Vice President Mike Pence to reject the official Biden electors in Georgia and six other states and to accept the alternative Trump electors under the pretext that Democrats had stolen the election. Alternatively, Trump wanted Pence to delay congressional certification to allow Republican-controlled legislatures in the affected states to endorse the fake electors.

Numerous state and federal investigations have shown Trump’s election fraud claims were false. And legal experts from across the political spectrum say Pence didn’t have the authority to reject the Biden electors.

Jones has been hammered by Bailey, his Democratic opponent, for his involvement in the electors scheme. Bailey said Friday that the target letter should signal to voters that his opponent is “unfit to serve in office” and that his actions are “anti-American and unpatriotic.” He called Jones’ motion to disqualify Willis an attempt to “distract from the fact he attempted to overthrow the United States Government.”

The Republican’s campaign said he had nothing to hide.

“This is clearly a politically motivated attack from the same district attorney who just weeks ago hosted a political fundraiser for Burt’s opponent,” said Stephen Lawson, a spokesman for Jones. “Burt is more than happy to perform his civic duty and answer questions — but not from a prosecutor with such blatant conflicts of interest.”

Credit: TNS

Credit: TNS

Credit: TNS

Credit: TNS

The target letters show the rapid escalation of the Fulton County criminal investigation.

The special grand jury recently subpoenaed several members of Trump’s inner circle, including Eastman, attorney Rudy Giuliani and U.S. Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C.

Graham is challenging his subpoena in federal court — a hearing is scheduled next week in Charleston — and several others are expected to follow suit, citing attorney-client or executive privilege.

Prosecutors have asked several witnesses who have come before the grand jury about their knowledge of the alternative electors scheme before they met in the Capitol.

David Ralston, the speaker of the Georgia House who received calls from Trump and Giuliani in late 2020, testified before the special grand jury on Thursday.

Randy Evans, a Republican lawyer who once served as Trump’s ambassador to Luxembourg, said the target letters have helped change his opinion about the special grand jury investigation.

“It’s unfortunate because it really de-credentials the process,” he said. “Even though many of my colleagues thought this was a witch hunt, I was actually one of those people who said transparency, sunshine are always good to have in a republican democracy.

“But the moment you start with target letters on something which virtually everyone knows is not a crime, then it becomes obvious that its once again just about politics.”

Source Article from https://www.ajc.com/politics/top-ga-republicans-informed-theyre-targets-of-fulton-da-probe/3CZJHEYOD5ADFDCVP3372HROFQ/

President Biden has pledged to the rest of the world that the United States, the country that has historically pumped the most greenhouse gases into the atmosphere, would cut its emissions in half by 2030. Without legislation, it will be impossible to meet Mr. Biden’s climate goals.

“We are not going to meet our targets, period,” said Leah Stokes, a professor of environmental policy at the University of Santa Barbara, California, who has advised congressional Democrats on climate legislation.

“I honestly don’t know how he is going to look his own grandchildren in the eyes,” she said of Mr. Manchin.

At the start of this week, Mr. Manchin said his top concern was the price at the pump and the need for more fossil fuels. “How do we bring down the price of gasoline?” he said. “From the energy thing, but you can’t do it unless you produce more. If there’s people that don’t want to produce more fossil, then you got a problem. That’s just reality. You got to do it.”

On Wednesday, after data was released showing the nation’s inflation rate at 9.1 percent, the highest in a year, Mr. Manchin said in a statement, “No matter what spending aspirations some in Congress may have, it is clear to anyone who visits a grocery store or a gas station that we cannot add any more fuel to this inflation fire.”

Sam Runyon, a spokeswoman for Mr. Manchin, declined to discuss his position on Thursday night, adding that the senator “has not walked away from the table.” But people involved in the talks said they believed they had reached the end of the line.

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2022/07/15/climate/manchin-climate-change-democrats.html

As President Joe Biden defended his plans to visit Saudi Arabia, a country he once vowed to make an international “pariah,” Saudis who have fought to reform the absolute monarchy called the trip a betrayal that could have devastating consequences.

“We feel betrayed,” Abdullah Alaoudh, a U.S.-based leader of the National Assembly Party, an opposition group, told NBC News in a phone interview Monday. “We were promised to be protected from MBS,” he said, referring to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman.

With Biden expected to meet the crown prince, Alaoudh said he feared the president’s visit could embolden Saudi Arabia’s de facto leader to “be more brutal and rogue.” Bin Salman has led a crackdown on reformers and women’s rights activists and the CIA has said likely ordered the brutal killing of Washington Post columnist Jamal Khashoggi.

Bin Salman has said he takes full responsibility for Khashoggi’s murder, but denies any involvement in the slaying of the journalist — an outspoken critic of the crown prince.

Regional powerbroker Saudi Arabia, one of the largest oil producers in the world and the home of Islam’s two holiest sites, has been a vital American ally. And before Khashoggi’s killing in the Saudi consulate in Istanbul, the crown prince had launched an effort to modernize the deeply conservative kingdom economically and socially. Reforms mean women are now allowed to drive and movie theaters have opened for the first time in 35 years.

Jamal Khashoggi, long a regime insider in Saudi Arabia, became disillusioned with Mohammed bin Salman.Mohammed Al-Shaikh / AFP – Getty Images

He has also embarked on an ambitious international campaign to rebrand the kingdom, courting politicians, business leaders, sports tournaments and players, social media influencers and journalists from around the world.

The crown prince’s bid to present himself as a reformer was truly shattered with the October 2018 slaying and dismembering of Khashoggi, but even before the assassination, Saudi Arabia was carrying out public beheadings and jailing activists. And thousands of civilians have died in the war in neighboring Yemen where Saudi-led forces are battling Iran-backed Houthi rebels.

“I don’t have much hope of the U.S. helping us with human rights.”

Ali Adubisi said

Given the crown prince’s tarnished reputation in the wake of Khashoggi’s death, what the royal now wants most from the United States “is recognition and legitimacy,” said Alaoudh, who is also the Gulf director of Democracy for the Arab World Now, or Dawn, a nonprofit organization founded by Khashoggi promoting human rights in the Middle East.

And Biden’s trip could effectively help the powerful crown prince “get away with murder,” he said.

Oil crisis

In an op-ed published by The Washington Post titled “Why I’m going to Saudi Arabia,” Biden defended the planned visit, even as he acknowledged that “there are many who disagree with my decision” to travel to the kingdom.

“A more secure and integrated Middle East benefits Americans in many ways,” he wrote. “Its waterways are essential to global trade and the supply chains we rely on. Its energy resources are vital for mitigating the impact on global supplies of Russia’s war in Ukraine.”

The U.S. is among many Western countries that want the Gulf states to increase oil production, something they hope will ameliorate the politically damaging energy crisis and weaken Russia’s stronghold in that market.

Saudi Arabia is key to these efforts, although Biden has previously said he will not specifically ask the country to increase production during this trip.

Loujain al-Hathloul, a women’s rights activist who remains under a travel ban after she was imprisoned, pictured after her release in February 2021. Lina Alhathloul / Twitter

In his op-ed, Biden said that Saudi Arabia has “helped to restore unity among the six countries of Gulf Cooperation Council, has fully supported the truce in Yemen and is now working with my experts to help stabilize oil markets.”

“My aim was to reorient — but not rupture — relations with a country that’s been a strategic partner for 80 years,” he said.

But while oil will undoubtedly be a major focus of the trip, Biden said: “My views on human rights are clear and long-standing, and fundamental freedoms are always on the agenda when I travel abroad, as they will be during this trip, just as they will be in Israel and the West Bank.”

Alaoudh said he hoped that was true. However, he said, he feared that Biden’s trip would undo any progress made on pressuring Saudi Arabia to make reforms. 

He also noted that the president’s op-ed struck a far different tone from comments Biden made in the lead-up to the 2020 election, when he vowed to treat Saudi Arabia as a “pariah” state in the wake of Khashoggi’s killing.

‘A big win for MBS’

Lina al-Hathloul, whose sister — women’s rights activist Loujain al-Hathloul — remains under a travel ban after she was imprisoned in Saudi Arabia before being released last year, said that regardless of Biden’s intentions, his visit would be perceived as a major victory for the crown prince.

“It’s not about the intention President Biden has when he goes in there and meets MBS,” she said, speaking at a press conference Monday calling on Biden to push for the release of political prisoners during his visit to the kingdom. “It’s about what the consequences will be once he goes there and (is) in the same room as MBS — what the regime will make of that visit. It will be perceived as a big win for MBS.”

Loujain al-Hathloul’s family and others had hoped for more support from Biden, who publicly confirmed and welcomed the news of her release from prison in February 2021.

The prominent activist was arrested in May 2018 along with several other female activists, after making a name for herself as one of the few women to openly call for women’s right to drive. She also called for an end to Saudi Arabia’s restrictive male guardianship system that had long limited women’s freedom of movement.

Ali Adubisi, director of the European Saudi Organization for Human Rights, also said that Biden’s visit would “send MBS a message, that no matter what he is doing inside Saudi Arabia, and abroad in places such as Yemen, he won’t be isolated or pressured by the international community.”

“This visit is for Biden and his government’s interests, for their political goals in Saudi Arabia and the region in general,” he said in a phone interview Tuesday.

“I don’t have much hope of the U.S. helping us with human rights,” Adubisi said, however. “Because historically, it has been responsible for empowering the Saudi government since it was founded, sending weapons, and protecting it in difficult situations.”

“The U.S. will help Saudi Arabia in any situation, and that’s why Saudi Arabia doesn’t care about human rights, because it knows the U.S. will protect it,” he said.

Source Article from https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/saudi-dissidents-betrayed-biden-trip-defends-planned-visit-rcna37717

The mother of a 10-year-old Ohio girl who crossed state lines to get an abortion has defended her daughter’s 27-year-old confessed rapist — who was wrongly listed as a minor during the medical visit, according to reports.

The mom spoke to Telemundo while hiding behind the door of the Columbus apartment that was also listed as the home of rapist Gerson Fuentes, an illegal immigrant from Guatemala.

“She’s my daughter,” the mom, who refused to give a name, confirmed to Telemundo of the girl who would have been just 9 when she was abused and impregnated.

“She’s fine. Everything that they’re saying against him is a lie,” she insisted of Fuentes, who confessed during police interviews to raping the youngster at least twice, according to court records and officials.

The defensive mom, who hid her face when speaking to Telemundo in Spanish, insisted that she had not been the one to file charges against her young daughter’s abuser.

The mother of a 10-year-old Ohio girl who was raped and impregnated by an illegal immigrant has denied the charges, despite the suspect admitting to the crime.
Noticias Telemundo
Gerson Fuentes, 27, confessed to raping the 10-year-old girl, who crossed state lines to get an abortion, prosecutors and police said.
Franklin County Sheriff’s Office
Fuentes was wrongly listed as a minor in the medical report.
WCMH-TV

The shocking case came to light when the girl was taken across state lines to terminate the pregnancy in Indiana on June 30, with President Biden highlighting it as proof of the evils of anti-abortion legislation.

However, despite Fuentes being 27, the person listed as getting the girl pregnant was described as a minor in the report her abortionist sent to authorities, according to Fox News Digital, which obtained a copy.

Dr. Caitlin Bernard listed the rapist as being approximately 17 in her official filing to the Indiana Department of Health, the outlet said.

Gerson Fuentes, an illegal immigrant from Guatemala, was held on $2 million bond after being charged with felony rape of someone under 13.
WCMH-TV

It was not immediately clear if Fuentes was identified in the document. Fox only said it showed how Bernard reported performing a non-surgical abortion for a 6-weeks-pregnant 10-year-old girl of Mexican ethnicity on June 30.

Bernard was the one who then highlighted the tragic case in an interview with the Indy Star on July 1.

The doctor’s attorney, Kathleen DeLaney, insisted that Bernard “took every appropriate and proper action in accordance with the law and both her medical and ethical training as a physician.”

“She followed all relevant policies, procedures and regulations in this case, just as she does every day to provide the best possible care for her patients,” she told Fox.

DeLaney also said they are “considering legal action against those who have smeared my client, including Indiana Attorney General Todd Rokita,” who is investigating Bernard’s actions.

Fuentes was busted Tuesday, and is being held on $2 million bond after being charged with felony rape of a minor under 13 years old in the case. He is scheduled back in court next Friday.

“My heart aches for the pain suffered by this young child,” Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost said.

“I am grateful for the diligent work of the Columbus Police Department in securing a confession and getting a rapist off the street,” he said.

Source Article from https://nypost.com/2022/07/15/mom-of-10-year-old-ohio-girl-who-got-abortion-defends-rapist/

Ivanka Trump mourned her mother Ivana Trump on social media Thursday as new details about circumstances of the 73-year-old’s death emerged.

Ivana Trump, the Czech-born ex-wife of former President Donald Trump and the mother of Ivanka, Donald Trump Jr. and Eric Trump, was found dead at her New York City home on Thursday afternoon. Ivana’s body was discovered following a report of cardiac arrest at her address, with law enforcement officials saying later in the day that there did “not appear to be any criminality” involved.

“Heartbroken by the passing of my mother,” Ivanka tweeted hours after the death was announced. “Mom was brilliant, charming, passionate and wickedly funny. She lived life to the fullest — never forgoing an opportunity to laugh and dance.”

“I will miss her forever and will keep her memory alive in our hearts always,” she added alongside a heart emoji.

Although Ivana Trump’s official cause of death had not been determined at the time of publication, a New York City Fire Department spokesperson told Newsweek that a call about a “report of cardiac arrest” was received at 12:39 p.m., with Ivana soon being declared dead on arrival.

In a statement obtained by Newsweek, a New York City Police Department spokesperson said that officers responded to Ivana’s home at approximately 12:40 p.m. following the 911 call.

Ivanka Trump responded to the news of Ivana Trump’s death by tweeting that her mother was “brilliant, charming, passionate and wickedly funny.” Ivana and Ivanka are pictured together at Trump National Golf Club in Briarcliff Manor, New York, on September 21, 2015.
Grant Lamos IV/Getty

“Upon arrival, officers observed a 73 year-old female unconscious and unresponsive,” the spokesperson said. “EMS responded to the location and pronounced the victim deceased at the scene. There does not appear to be any criminality. The Medical Examiner will determine the cause of death.”

Donald Trump reacted to the death of his first wife by calling her a “a wonderful, beautiful, and amazing woman, who led a great and inspirational life” in a statement posted to his Truth Social platform.

“Her pride and joy were her three children, Donald Jr., Ivanka, and Eric,” he added. “She was so proud of them, as we were all so proud of her. Rest In Peace, Ivana!”

In addition to Ivanka’s tweet, Ivana’s three children responded to the death of their mother in a joint statement issued shortly after the former president announced the news.

“It is with deep sadness that we announce the passing of our beloved mother, Ivana Trump,” reads the joint statement, which Eric Trump posted to Truth Social alongside a photo of the Trump family in the 1980s. “Our mother was an incredible woman — a force in business, a world-class athlete, a radiant beauty, and caring mother and friend.”

“Ivana Trump was a survivor,” it continues. “She fled from communism and embraced this country. She taught her children about grit and toughness, compassion and determination. She will be dearly missed by her mother, her three children and ten grandchildren.”

Source Article from https://www.newsweek.com/heartbroken-ivanka-trump-mourns-mother-ivana-details-emerge-death-1724868

WASHINGTON — Sen. Joe Manchin, D-W.Va., and his staff told Democratic leadership on Thursday that he’s not willing to support major climate and tax provisions in a sweeping Biden agenda bill, according to a Democrat briefed on the conversations.

Instead, Manchin, a key centrist who holds the swing vote in the 50-50 Senate, said he is willing to back only a filibuster-proof economic bill with drug pricing and a two-year extension of funding under the Affordable Care Act, the source said.

Manchin’s move upends lengthy negotiations with Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., most likely forcing the party to scrap climate change policies and new taxes and delivering a major blow to some of President Joe Biden’s priorities heading into an already challenging midterm election landscape for Democrats this fall.

Manchin “was explicit that he will not support a bill in August” with energy or climate provisions or one “closing tax loopholes exploited by the wealthiest” and large corporations, “despite his support for those specific things throughout the entire negotiation,” said the Democrat briefed about the discussions.

Democrats hope to pass a bill before September to prevent major insurance premium hikes under the Affordable Care Act, which could be difficult to avert if they don’t act quickly.

“Political headlines are of no value to the millions of Americans struggling to afford groceries and gas as inflation soars to 9.1%,” Manchin spokesperson Sam Runyon told NBC News in a statement. “Senator Manchin believes it’s time for leaders to put political agendas aside, reevaluate and adjust to the economic realities the country faces to avoid taking steps that add fuel to the inflation fire.”

A Democratic aide familiar with the talks said Manchin conveyed to Democratic leadership that he could support a package that includes climate and tax provisions as long as they’re paid for — or that he would just want a bill on prescription drugs and ACA money.

The negotiations have left party leaders deeply frustrated. The source who was briefed on the talks called it a reversal for Manchin after he backed a provision last week to raise some taxes on high earners to extend the solvency of Medicare.

“Manchin has now backed off of his support for this provision’s inclusion in the bill,” said the source, who requested anonymity to candidly discuss sensitive negotiations between Manchin and Schumer.

“Schumer and his staff have presented legislative text to Sen. Manchin and his staff for months,” the source added, including “major concessions and a willingness to include things that were not in previous bills.”

With no hope of winning Republican support for the package, Manchin’s position leaves Democratic leaders with a grueling choice: They can either drop the package entirely or pass the provisions he supports, which congressional Democrats overwhelmingly support.

“We know what we can pass is basically the drug pricing — on Medicare. We know that one. Is there any more we can do? I don’t know. But I’m very, very cautious,” Manchin told reporters this week.

Democrats had insisted that funding to help combat climate change, a high priority for many, would be paid for.

“If we make a real commitment on the climate front and we pay for it by making big corporations pay their fair share in taxes, that’s going to help us,” said Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass.

The likely failure of clean energy funding is a major setback in efforts to mitigate climate change, which scientists have warned will require aggressive action to move away from fossil fuels to stave off disastrous impacts. The House-passed Build Back Better Act approved $555 billion to combat climate change, but Manchin rejected the bill and slashed the proposed funding to $300 billion in recent negotiations. Now, Congress may not pass any climate funding this year.

Senate Finance Committee Chair Ron Wyden, D-Ore., expressed his dismay at Manchin’s position.

“I’m not going to sugar coat my disappointment here, especially since nearly all issues in the climate and energy space had been resolved,” he said in a statement. “This is our last chance to prevent the most catastrophic — and costly — effects of climate change. We can’t come back in another decade and forestall hundreds of billions — if not trillions — in economic damage and undo the inevitable human toll.”

Manchin forced Democrats to sharply pare back the legislation after he came out against the larger version in December, leaving the party one vote short in the Senate. He had suggested a smaller bill with energy and climate funding, taxes and prescription drug prices. Now, those parameters have again shifted.

But Manchin still appears committed to the drug pricing provisions. He told NBC News on Tuesday that the policies to lower prescription drug costs are “going be a tremendous help.”

“Drug pricing is the most — that’s the one thing that everyone seems to agree on. Let Medicare negotiate, reduce the prices,” he said.

Source Article from https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/manchin-balks-climate-tax-pieces-biden-agenda-bill-backs-health-care-p-rcna38350

WASHINGTON, July 14 (Reuters) – The U.S. Secret Service deleted text messages from Jan. 5 and Jan. 6, 2021 after they were requested by oversight officials investigating the agency’s response to the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol, the agency watchdog has claimed.

The Secret Service disputed that accusation on Thursday, saying some phone data was lost during a routine device migration, but that all of the requested texts had been saved.

In a letter to the House of Representatives and Senate Homeland Security Committees investigating the events of Jan. 6, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) inspector general’s office (OIG) said “many” messages had been erased by the Secret Service with a device-replacement program after the watchdog asked for the records.

It was not clear from the letter what messages the inspector general’s office believed had been deleted or what evidence they might contain.

After the letter was published on Thursday, Bennie Thompson, who chairs both the congressional panel probing the Capitol attack and the House Homeland Security Committee, told the Axios news website the alleged deletion was “concerning.”

“If there’s a way we can reconstruct the texts or what have you, we will,” Thompson said.

The DHS did not respond to a request for comment late on Thursday.

In a lengthy statement issued in response to the accusations, a Secret Service spokesman said the agency had “fully” cooperated with the inspector general’s office.

“DHS OIG requested electronic communications for the first time on Feb. 26, 2021, after the migration was well under way,” spokesman Anthony Guglielmi said. “The Secret Service notified DHS OIG of the loss of certain phones’ data, but confirmed to OIG that none of the texts it was seeking had been lost in the migration.”

Guglielmi said that despite the assertions of the inspector general’s office, its employees had been granted “appropriate and timely access” to the materials.

The Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol followed weeks of false claims by Trump that he won the 2020 election. On Tuesday, lawmakers of the House panel probing the attack accused Trump of inciting the violence in a last-ditch bid to remain in power after losing the election. read more

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

Source Article from https://www.reuters.com/world/us/us-secret-service-deleted-emails-sought-jan-6-probe-watchdog-says-2022-07-15/

Source Article from https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2022/07/15/indiana-doctor-abortion-report-investigation/

Sustained jumps in cases and hospitalizations fueled by the hyper-infectious BA.5 subvariant pushed Los Angeles County into the high COVID-19 community level Thursday, a shift that could trigger a new public indoor mask mandate by the end of this month unless conditions improve.

Health officials have long said the county was inching closer to the metrics for a new mask measure, and those warnings are now closer than ever as the latest COVID-19 wave continues to wash over the region.

Should L.A. County remain in the high COVID-19 community level, which is defined by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, for the next two Thursdays, a new masking order would be issued with an effective date of July 29.

If L.A. County falls back to the medium level during either of the next two weeks, the clock would reset, pushing the earliest date for any new mask order into August.

However, given continued increases in cases — and the potential for a corresponding rise in hospitalizations over the weeks to come — “at this point, it’s much more likely that we will stay in ‘high’ for these two weeks,” said county Public Health Director Barbara Ferrer.

“With the high rates of transmission fueling the increased risks, sensible safety precautions that can slow down the spread of the virus are warranted, and that includes universal indoor masking,” she said Thursday.

A renewed mandate would apply indoors for those 2 and older at a familiar host of establishments and venues — including shared office space, manufacturing and retail settings, event spaces, restaurants and bars, gyms and yoga studios, educational settings and children’s programs.

Importantly, though, masks would not be required for those using outdoor spaces, as the risk of transmission in those settings is significantly lower than it is indoors.

Patrons also would be able to take off their masks indoors when actively eating or drinking.

Though the county is still a few weeks away from possibly mandating indoor masking, health officials have strongly recommended the practice for months — and continue to do so.

“We are not closing anything down. We are not asking people not to gather with the people they love. We are not asking you to forgo activities you love,” Ferrer said. “We’re asking you to take a sensible step when there’s this much transmission, with a highly transmissible variant, to go ahead and put back on a well-fitting, high-filtration mask when you’re indoors around others. And I think that’s the prudent thing to do.”

Weekly COVID-19 deaths doubled in Los Angeles County over the last month, to 100 from 50 a week.

The CDC’s COVID-19 community level is a three-tier measurement of coronavirus transmission and hospital impact. For counties in the worst category on that scale, high, the CDC recommends indoor public masking.

Being in the high community level means L.A. County has observed at least 10 new weekly coronavirus-positive hospitalizations for every 100,000 residents. The latest rate was 10.5 new weekly hospitalizations for every 100,000 residents, according to the county Department of Public Health.

That’s up from a rate of 8.4 the previous week, according to the county. (Last week’s combined rate for L.A. and Orange counties, which was published by the CDC, was 9.7.)

Los Angeles County hasn’t been in the high community level since late February.

Compared with its ancestors, the latest Omicron subvariant, BA.5, may have an enhanced ability to create a numerous copies of the coronavirus once it gets into human cells.

As of Wednesday, 1,202 coronavirus-positive patients were hospitalized countywide — more than double the total recorded a month ago.

And the rate of rise has steepened, with the daily patient census swelling 52% since the end of June.

Fueling this renewed stream of hospitalizations is stubbornly high transmission driven by highly infectious Omicron subvariants, chief among them BA.5. Los Angeles County has averaged about 6,400 coronavirus cases a day over the last week — its highest rate since early February.

The number of weekly reported COVID-19 deaths has also doubled over the last month, from 50 to 100.

Weekly COVID-19 deaths doubled in Los Angeles County over the last month, to 100 from 50 a week.

Officials say BA.5, thought to be the dominant version of the coronavirus circulating nationwide, is not only more contagious than previous versions but also has increased the risk of reinfection — perhaps just weeks after an earlier case.

According to federal estimates, BA.5 accounted for 65% of the nation’s coronavirus cases over the weeklong period ending Saturday, an astonishing climb from a month ago, when it made up 17% of cases.

“Many people feel like the risk is a lot lower right now, and there’s no need to worry. We’re saying there is need to worry,” Ferrer said. “This variant is, as everybody has noted, highly infectious, easily transmitted from person to person. We need an additional layer of protection, and this is the additional layer.”

There are still a number of settings where masking remains mandatory, including healthcare and long-term care facilities, emergency shelters, cooling centers, jails and prisons, and at worksites experiencing a coronavirus outbreak. L.A. County, unlike the state as a whole, also requires face coverings when aboard public transit or in indoor transportation hubs such as airports.

Taking preventative measures is especially important now as BA.4 and especially BA.5 can reinfect even those who recently contracted an earlier Omicron subvariant.

However, should the county move ahead with a wider indoor mask mandate, it will do so alone. No other California counties currently have public indoor mask mandates, although the state Department of Public Health strongly recommends — but does not require — the practice.

As a result, some have questioned the wisdom of L.A. County’s approach, as well as whether there’d be widespread compliance with new rules. The only other county that reinstituted indoor masking during this latest wave, Alameda, rescinded the order three weeks later, and the efficacy of that short-lived mandate has been called into question.

Some experts, though, have noted that Alameda County’s mask mandate was the only time a lone county in the San Francisco Bay Area has issued a mask order without other major counties doing so as well. As a result, the order received significantly less attention in the region, affecting just 1.6 million residents among 7.7 million who live in the Bay Area.

By contrast, an order from L.A. County would instantly affect 10 million residents, give or take the roughly 600,000 residents of Long Beach and Pasadena. Those two cities have their own public health departments and can decide independently whether to align with the county’s rules.

Ferrer pointed to studies suggesting universal masking orders have been effective at reducing viral transmission.

The latest maps and charts on the spread of COVID-19 in Los Angeles County, including cases, deaths, closures and restrictions.

One, published in February in the journal Health Affairs, said that of more than 400 U.S. counties, those with mask mandates between March and October 2020 had coronavirus case rates 35% lower than those without.

A second, published in March by the CDC, said school districts in Arkansas with universal mask requirements from August to October 2021 had a 23% lower coronavirus case incidence than districts without a mask order.

And another report, published by the CDC in February, said consistent use of a high-quality face covering — such as an N95 or KN95 respirator — in indoor public settings was associated with 83% lower odds of testing positive for the coronavirus, compared with those who didn’t wear a mask.

Ferrer acknowledged that, for many, reinstituting an indoor mask order “will feel like a step backward” and that for others it will “feel unnecessary because of the availability of powerful vaccines and therapeutics.”

“The reality is that because we’re living with a mutating SARS-CoV-2 virus, there remains uncertainty around the trajectory of this pandemic,” she said. “The best way to manage the uncertainty, and to reduce morbidity and mortality, is to remain open to using both the sophisticated tools we now have — our tests, our vaccines, our therapeutics — and the non-pharmaceutical strategies, masking ventilation and distancing, to layer on protections to respond to the conditions at hand.”

Ferrer said the next two weeks will be spent reaching out to businesses “so that they’re clear about their need to both supply those masks for all of their employees, make sure that their employees are masked appropriately indoors, and to do their best to message to their customers.”

This wouldn’t be the first time Los Angeles County has acted alone. A year ago — on July 17, 2021 — the county reissued a universal mask mandate in response to the Delta variant, which lasted through March 4. A number of other California counties followed L.A. County’s lead in the subsequent weeks.

Local health officials in other parts of the state have not indicated they’re considering a new mask order, and some have said they don’t anticipate implementing new orders more stringent than those required by the state.

L.A. County health officials plan to lift the mask order once the county dips back into the medium COVID-19 community level for two consecutive weeks.

Source Article from https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2022-07-14/l-a-county-on-track-for-new-indoor-covid-mask-mandate

The Indiana physician who provided abortion services to a 10-year-old Ohio girl who was raped disclosed the abortion in a form filed with the Indiana Department of Health and the Department of Child Services, according to documents obtained by IndyStar through a public records request. 

Indiana Attorney General Todd Rokita and some news outlets have called into question whether Dr. Caitlin Bernard, the Indianapolis OB-GYN who performed the procedure, properly reported the disturbing case, which has become a flashpoint in the national debate over abortion.

An attorney for Bernard said the doctor followed the law and made the appropriate disclosures. She said Bernard is considering legal action against those who have “smeared” her.

Rokita told Fox News on Wednesday that his office was investigating whether Bernard had failed to report the abortion and sexual abuse as required by Indiana law. His comments came one day after Ohio police arrested a 27-year-old man who they say admitted to raping the child.

“We’re gathering the evidence as we speak, and we’re going to fight this to the end, including looking at her licensure,” Rokita said. “If she failed to report it in Indiana, it’s a crime for — to not report, to intentionally not report.”

Despite the newly disclosed form, Rokita said Thursday he plans to forge ahead with his investigation.

“As we stated, we are gathering evidence from multiple sources and agencies related to these allegations,” he said in an emailed statement. “Our legal review of it remains open.”

The story of the young girl who traveled to Indiana for an abortion was first revealed by Bernard in an IndyStar story published earlier this month. The story went viral and quickly became a talking point for abortion rights supporters, including President Joe Biden. Abortion opponents and some news outlets, however, questioned the veracity of the story.

Source Article from https://www.indystar.com/story/news/health/2022/07/14/ohio-abortion-10-year-old-indiana-todd-rokita-dr-caitlin-bernard/65373626007/

Ivana Trump, the first of president Donald Trump’s three wives and the mother of his three eldest children, passed away on Thursday at age 73.

Mr Trump confirmed his ex-wife’s death in a post on his Truth Social platform, writing: “I am very saddened to inform all of those that loved her, of which there are many, that Ivana Trump has passed away at her home in New York City.”

The former president described her as “a wonderful, beautiful, and amazing woman, who led a great and inspirational life” and said her “pride and joy” had been the trio of children she had with the former real-estate mogul: Donald Trump Jr, Ivanka Trump and Eric Trump.

“She was so proud of them, as we were all so proud of her,” he wrote. “Rest In Peace, Ivana!”

In a statement, Ms Trump’s children announced the death of their “beloved mother” with “deep sadness”.

“Our mother was an incredible woman – a force in business, a world-class athlete, a radiant beauty, and caring mother and friend,” they wrote, adding that she had been “a survivor” who had “fled from communism and embraced this country”.

“She taught her children about grit and toughness, compassion and determination. She will be dearly missed by her mother, her three children and ten grandchildren,” they wrote.

Born Ivana Zelníčková in 1949 in what was then Czechoslovakia, she left the then-communist country in 1971 after marrying an Austrian ski instructor who she divorced a year later after obtaining Austrian citizenship, eventually making her way to California, then New York, where she earned a living as a model.

She met the future president in 1976 in New York City, and the couple married in April 1977. Their first child, Donald Trump Jr, was born just over eight months later. Her daughter, whose full name is also Ivana Trump (Ivanka is a diminutive form of the name, literally “little Ivana”) was born in 1981, with their third child, Eric Trump, following three years after that.

The couple was a mainstay of New York City popular culture in the 1980s, but by the end of the decade they would divorce after his affair with his future second wife – Marla Maples – became public. The divorce was contentious and provided front-page tabloid fodder for months. It was during those divorce proceedings that Ms Trump accused her husband of rape in a deposition. She later told the author of a book about her husband that she had “felt violated” by her former husband, but a statement issued by Mr Trump’s lawyers said she had not wanted her words “to be interpreted in a literal or criminal sense”.

According to The New York Times, the 1992 divorce settlement between Ivana and Donald Trump granted her a $14m payment, a mansion in Connecticut, an apartment in the Upper East Side co-op known as Trump Plaza, and one month a year at Mr Trump’s Mar-a-Lago club in Palm Beach, Florida.

Ms Trump would go on to marry and divorce twice more – in 1995 to an Italian businessman who she divorced two years later, and in 2008 to an Italian actor more than two decades her junior, in a ceremony held at Mar-a-Lago with her former sister-in-law, then-Third Circuit Judge Maryanne Trump Barry presiding. That marriage ended less than a year later.

Yet she continued to remain friendly with her first husband. According to the New York Post, she claimed to speak with him “before and after” his campaign appearances. She later told the Post that her ex-husband offered her the post of Ambassador to the Czech Republic after becoming president, but she turned it down. And in 2017, she told ABC News in an interview that she spoke with the then-president every two weeks and had a “direct number” to him at the White House.

She told ABC that she didn’t “really want to call” her husband there because his third wife, Melania Trump, was also living there.

“I don’t want to cause any kind of jealousy or something like that, because I’m basically first Trump wife,” she said. “I’m first lady”.

Source Article from https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/ivana-trump-death-donald-b2123555.html

The Secret Service deleted text messages from Jan. 5 and 6, 2021, after an internal watchdog requested them as part of a review of the department’s handling of last year’s Capitol riot, the watchdog said this week.

A letter sent Wednesday by the Department of Homeland Security Office of Inspector General to the heads of the House and Senate Homeland Security Committees, which was obtained by ABC News, said the messages were deleted “as part of a device-replacement program” despite the inspector general requesting such communications.

“First, the Department notified us that many US Secret Service text messages from January 5 and 6, 2021, were erased as part of a device-replacement program. The USSS erased those text messages after OIG requested records of electronic communications from the USSS, as part of our evaluation of events at the Capitol on January 6,” Joseph Cuffari, the inspector general, wrote.

“Second, DHS personnel have repeatedly told OIG inspectors that they were not permitted to provide records directly to OIG and that such records had to first undergo review by DHS attorneys,” Cuffari wrote. “This review led to weeks-long delays in OIG obtaining records and created confusion over whether all records had been produced.”

The director of communications at the US Secret Service, Anthony Guglielmi, said any insinuation the service intentionally deleted texts is false in a statement Thursday evening.

“The insinuation that the Secret Service maliciously deleted text messages following a request is false. In fact, the Secret Service has been fully cooperating with the Department of Homeland Security Office of Inspector General (DHS OIG) in every respect – whether it be interviews, documents, emails, or texts,” the statement said.

The statement continued that the Secret Service “began to reset its mobile phones to factory settings as part of a pre-planned, three-month system migration. In that process, data resident on some phones was lost,” and that DHS OIG requested electronic communications for the first time on Feb. 26, 2021, after the migration was underway. The agency added that OIG was notified of certain data missing.

The Secret Service also refuted the notion that they were not being cooperative with the DHS investigation.

“To the contrary, DHS OIG has previously alleged that its employees were not granted appropriate and timely access to materials due to attorney review. DHS has repeatedly and publicly debunked this allegation, including in response to OIG’s last two semi-annual reports to Congress. It is unclear why OIG is raising this issue again,” the statement said.

Ohio’s Rob Portman, the top Republican on the Senate Homeland Security Committee, said he was “deeply concerned” over the letter.

“I am deeply concerned by the letter I received from the DHS Inspector General documenting the Department’s delays in producing materials to the Inspector General and its deletion of records following requests by the Inspector General. It is essential that the Department be transparent with its inspector general, Congress, and the American public,” he said in a statement.

The DHS has not yet responded for comment.

Michigan Sen. Gary Peters, the chairman of the committee, echoed that.

“We need to get to the bottom of whether the Secret Service destroyed federal records or the Department of Homeland Security obstructed oversight,” Peters said in a statement. “The DHS Inspector General needs these records to do its independent oversight and the public deserves to have a full picture of what occurred on January 6th. I will be learning more from the DHS Inspector General about these concerning allegations.”

It is unclear whether the messages were deleted intentionally or by accident, though the inspector general’s letter comes as the Secret Service is once again under heightened scrutiny following hearings from the House committee investigating the insurrection.

Recent testimony suggested that former President Donald Trump tried to join his supporters in marching from the Ellipse to the Capitol last year but was stopped by the Secret Service. The agency has since said it will respond on the record to that testimony.

Source Article from https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/secret-service-deleted-texts-jan-2021-watchdog-sought/story?id=86843614

A Washington, DC, police officer has corroborated to the House select committee investigating January 6, 2021, details regarding a heated exchange former President Donald Trump had with his Secret Service detail when he was told he could not go to the US Capitol after his rally, a source familiar with the matter tells CNN.

The officer with the Metropolitan Police Department was in the motorcade with the Secret Service for Trump on January 6 and recounted what was seen to committee investigators, according to the source.

A spokesperson for the committee declined to comment. A spokesperson for Metropolitan Police Department did not immediately respond to comment.

The description of the angry exchange between Trump and his Secret Service detail was a striking moment during the June testimony from former White House aide Cassidy Hutchinson. Hutchinson said that she heard a secondhand account told to her by then-White House deputy chief of staff Tony Ornato that Trump was so enraged at his Secret Service detail for blocking him from going to the Capitol on the day of the insurrection that “he reached up towards the front of the vehicle to grab at the steering wheel” and “then used his free hand to lunge towards” his Secret Service lead agent Robert Engel. Hutchinson testified that Ornato told her the story in front of Engel and he did not dispute the account.

Neither of the agents named in the testimony have commented publicly on Hutchinson’s testimony. But soon after it, a Secret Service official who would only speak on background, said Engel would deny parts of the story regarding Trump grabbing at the steering wheel and lunging toward an agent on his detail. The agency has said the agents involved would testify to that effect, though they have not yet gone back to the committee to testify.

The committee is also engaging with the driver who was in the presidential SUV regarding possible testimony, the source said. A lawyer for the driver did not respond to a request for comment.

CNN has previously reported that two Secret Service sources have said they heard about Trump angrily demanding to go to the Capitol and berating his detail when he didn’t get his way. The sources told CNN that stories circulated about the incident in the months after January 6 – including details that are similar to what Hutchinson described to the committee.

CLARIFICATION: This story has been updated to clarify the type of vehicle in which the reported incident between Trump and his Secret Service detail took place.

Source Article from https://www.cnn.com/2022/07/14/politics/trump-secret-service-january-6-metropolitan-police-officer/index.html

A Uvalde police officer criticized over video of him checking his phone during the massacre at Robb Elementary School is the husband of a teacher who was killed in the classroom and had contacted him after being shot, according to a Texas lawmaker investigating the shooting.

Texas state Rep. Joe Moody came to the defense of Ruben Ruiz after the officer was singled out by some users on social media as an example of the bewildering inaction by law enforcement during the May 24 attack.

Roughly 80 minutes of surveillance video published this week by the Austin American-Statesman showed Ruiz as one of the first officers to arrive in the hallway after the shooting began. He checks his phone moments before officers closer to the classroom run back down the hallway after shots are fired.

Moody tweeted Wednesday that the officer was the husband of Eva Mireles, one of two teachers killed along with 19 children in the fourth-grade classrooms. Moody is part of a Texas House committee that has spent weeks investigating the shooting and plans to release its findings Sunday.

RELATED: Families of Uvalde mass shooting victims react to leaked video

“I’d not planned to speak publicly until the report was released, but I couldn’t say nothing seeing this man, who’s lost everything, maligned as if he was indifferent or actively malicious. Context matters,” Moody tweeted.

The hallway video shows Ruiz quickly glancing at his phone around 11:36 a.m. while holding a position at the end of the hallway. Three minutes earlier, the gunman is seen walking down the hallway and entering the classroom.

Authorities have previously said that body camera footage later showed Ruiz at 11:48 a.m. entering the building through the west door and telling officers, “She is shot.”

RELATED: Officials angered that Uvalde shooting surveillance video was obtained ahead of planned release

“What happened to [Ruiz] is he tried to move forward into the hallway, he was detained and they took his gun away from him and they escorted him from the scene,” Texas Department of Public Safety Director Steve McCraw told lawmakers at a hearing on June 21.

McCraw has called it an “abject failure” that police ultimately waited more than an hour before confronting the gunman.

“We’ll have much to say about the police response, but no criticism of this officer,” Moody tweeted.

RELATED: Video from inside Uvalde school shows officers milling around hallway during massacre

Source Article from https://www.fox4news.com/news/uvalde-officer-checking-phone-dying-wife