House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy, appears alongside Republican House leadership, at a June press conference in the U.S. Capitol.

Saul Loeb/AFP via Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Saul Loeb/AFP via Getty Images

House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy, appears alongside Republican House leadership, at a June press conference in the U.S. Capitol.

Saul Loeb/AFP via Getty Images

House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy released the legislative roadmap Republicans will follow should they win the majority in this year’s midterms.

The “Commitment to America” includes four broad pillars focusing on the economy, safety, individual freedom and government accountability. Big on ideas (“expand U.S. manufacturing”) but short on policy specifics, the agenda is in keeping with tradition established in 1994 with Rep. Newt Gingrich’s “Contract with America,” where the minority party releases their agenda priorities ahead of Election Day.

Gingrich met privately with House Republicans today on Capitol Hill as lawmakers were briefed on the agenda before its unveiling.

House Republicans will next travel to suburban Pittsburgh on Friday to hold an event to tout the agenda as the 2022 campaign comes to a close in about seven weeks. While early 2022 GOP electoral strength has tightened in polls in recent months, the party is still favored to win at least a narrow majority in November, and McCarthy is poised to become speaker if the party succeeds.

The agenda is the product of months of deliberations from rank-and-file Republicans

Much of the agenda relies on traditional conservative orthodoxy — support for tax cuts and reductions in government spending — but also weighs in on some divisive cultural issues. For example, Republicans pledge to support legislation to ensure “that only women can compete in women’s sports” — which would seek to ban trans women from playing on women’s sports teams. Republicans also broadly pledge to advance federal legislation to restrict abortion access promising to “protect the lives of unborn children and their mothers.” The agenda also signals opposition to any legislation to restrict gun rights, pledging to “safeguard” the Second Amendment.

House Republicans’ legislative ambitions would be weakened by divided government; regardless of what happens with control of the Senate, President Biden is unlikely to support much if any of a partisan GOP agenda. But the majority would provide Republicans with oversight and investigative authority over the administration and they plan to use it.

Republicans will “conduct rigorous oversight” and “require the White House to answer for its incompetence at home and abroad,” with plans to hold hearings on: the origins of the coronavirus pandemic, the U.S. withdrawal of Afghanistan, the Justice Department’s investigation into former President Donald Trump and the alleged illegal possession of classified documents at his Florida estate.

Pelosi insists Democrats will maintain the majority

Henry Connelly, a spokesman for House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, derided the Commitment to America as “doubling down on an extreme MAGA agenda.” Pelosi has been bullish that Democrats will defy historical trends and hold on to their majority. In particular, Democrats believe the Supreme Court decision to overturn a federal right to abortion access will tip competitive races in their favor. A pair of Democratic victories in House special elections in New York and Alaska have given the party cause for optimism that a “red wave” is not on the horizon.

“We fully intend to hold the House,” she told reporters last week, “And even though there are some among you who belittle my political instincts and the rest, I got us here twice to the majority, and I don’t intend to [give it up].”

Republican leaders have also made clear they plan to run the House differently than Democrats have, notably by promising to end the practice of remote proxy voting that was approved as an emergency measure in response to the pandemic.

“We’ve got many votes, big votes, where over 100 members of Congress weren’t even here in person voting, that will change under a House Republican majority,” GOP Minority Whip Steve Scalise, R-La., told reporters this week. Scalise intends to run for majority leader, a position that oversees the floor schedule and operations, if Republicans win control.

Source Article from https://www.npr.org/2022/09/22/1124486339/house-gop-unveils-its-legislative-roadmap-if-they-win-back-the-house-in-november

U.S. special presidential climate envoy John Kerry praised the Inflation Reduction Act, calling it an “amazing” bill due to its climate-related impact while acknowledging that it does not seem to do much for inflation.

Speaking at the International Energy Agency’s Global Clean Energy Action Forum, Kerry called the bill “a completely misnamed piece of legislation,” but first he gave a different reason.

“We’re running around saying, ‘I support the IRA. That’s tricky in politics, but here we are,” he joked, an apparent reference to the Irish Republican Army. Then he made the same observation as the bill’s critics.

“And I’m not sure how much it has to do with inflation, but that’s OK,” he acknowledged.

DEMS PLAN TO RESTART BIG OIL HEARINGS AS GAS PRICES COOL: ‘SHAM INVESTIGATION’

U.S. climate envoy John Kerry praised the Inflation Reduction Act during a speech at the 2022 Global Clean Energy Action Forum, hosted by the International Energy Agency.
(AP Photo/Evan Vucci, File)

Later in his address, Kerry called the bill an “amazing piece of legislation” for what it does for green energy and combating climate change.

“The most important parts of the IRA are very simple. Production and investment tax credits. That, I think, is going to do more than almost anything else in the bill. We don’t have to have government making choices about winners and losers. The marketplace is going to choose. You, inventors and investors, are going to help move that along, and we’re going to get there,” he said.

WEST VIRGINIA GOVERNOR TORCHES DEMOCRATS’ ENERGY AGENDA: HOW CAN ANYBODY DEFEND WHAT’S GOING ON IN DC?

Kerry said that for years, he has believed that the private sector is key because “no government is going to solve this problem,” because governments do not have the money to do it.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

“The private sector is the entity that has the trillions of dollars,” he said.

Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/politics/kerry-inflation-reduction-act-amazing-bill-im-sure-how-much-inflation

House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy, appears alongside Republican House leadership, at a June press conference in the U.S. Capitol.

Saul Loeb/AFP via Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Saul Loeb/AFP via Getty Images

House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy, appears alongside Republican House leadership, at a June press conference in the U.S. Capitol.

Saul Loeb/AFP via Getty Images

House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy released the legislative roadmap Republicans will follow should they win the majority in this year’s midterms.

The “Commitment to America” includes four broad pillars focusing on the economy, safety, individual freedom and government accountability. Big on ideas (“expand U.S. manufacturing”) but short on policy specifics, the agenda is in keeping with tradition established in 1994 with Rep. Newt Gingrich’s “Contract with America,” where the minority party releases their agenda priorities ahead of Election Day.

Gingrich met privately with House Republicans today on Capitol Hill as lawmakers were briefed on the agenda before its unveiling.

House Republicans will next travel to suburban Pittsburgh on Friday to hold an event to tout the agenda as the 2022 campaign comes to a close in about seven weeks. While early 2022 GOP electoral strength has tightened in polls in recent months, the party is still favored to win at least a narrow majority in November, and McCarthy is poised to become speaker if the party succeeds.

The agenda is the product of months of deliberations from rank-and-file Republicans

Much of the agenda relies on traditional conservative orthodoxy — support for tax cuts and reductions in government spending — but also weighs in on some divisive cultural issues. For example, Republicans pledge to support legislation to ensure “that only women can compete in women’s sports” — which would seek to ban trans women from playing on women’s sports teams. Republicans also broadly pledge to advance federal legislation to restrict abortion access promising to “protect the lives of unborn children and their mothers.” The agenda also signals opposition to any legislation to restrict gun rights, pledging to “safeguard” the Second Amendment.

House Republicans’ legislative ambitions would be weakened by divided government; regardless of what happens with control of the Senate, President Biden is unlikely to support much if any of a partisan GOP agenda. But the majority would provide Republicans with oversight and investigative authority over the administration and they plan to use it.

Republicans will “conduct rigorous oversight” and “require the White House to answer for its incompetence at home and abroad,” with plans to hold hearings on: the origins of the coronavirus pandemic, the U.S. withdrawal of Afghanistan, the Justice Department’s investigation into former President Donald Trump and the alleged illegal possession of classified documents at his Florida estate.

Pelosi insists Democrats will maintain the majority

Henry Connelly, a spokesman for House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, derided the Commitment to America as “doubling down on an extreme MAGA agenda.” Pelosi has been bullish that Democrats will defy historical trends and hold on to their majority. In particular, Democrats believe the Supreme Court decision to overturn a federal right to abortion access will tip competitive races in their favor. A pair of Democratic victories in House special elections in New York and Alaska have given the party cause for optimism that a “red wave” is not on the horizon.

“We fully intend to hold the House,” she told reporters last week, “And even though there are some among you who belittle my political instincts and the rest, I got us here twice to the majority, and I don’t intend to [give it up].”

Republican leaders have also made clear they plan to run the House differently than Democrats have, notably by promising to end the practice of remote proxy voting that was approved as an emergency measure in response to the pandemic.

“We’ve got many votes, big votes, where over 100 members of Congress weren’t even here in person voting, that will change under a House Republican majority,” GOP Minority Whip Steve Scalise, R-La., told reporters this week. Scalise intends to run for majority leader, a position that oversees the floor schedule and operations, if Republicans win control.

Source Article from https://www.npr.org/2022/09/22/1124486339/house-gop-unveils-its-legislative-roadmap-if-they-win-back-the-house-in-november

Donald Trump’s legal perils have become insurmountable and could snuff out the former US president’s hopes of an election-winning comeback, according to political analysts and legal experts.

On Wednesday, Trump and three of his adult children were accused of lying to tax collectors, lenders and insurers in a “staggering” fraud scheme that routinely misstated the value of his properties to enrich themselves.

The civil lawsuit, filed by New York’s attorney general, came as the FBI investigates Trump’s holding of sensitive government documents at his Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida and a special grand jury in Georgia considers whether he and others attempted to influence state election officials after his defeat there by Joe Biden.

The former US president has repeatedly hinted that he intends to run for the White House again in 2024. But the cascade of criminal, civil and congressional investigations could yet derail that bid.

Trump sued by NY attorney general for fraud – video

“He’s done,said Allan Lichtman, a history professor at American University, in Washington, who has accurately predicted every presidential election since 1984. “He’s got too many burdens, too much baggage to be able to run again even presuming he escapes jail, he escapes bankruptcy. I’m not sure he’s going to escape jail.”

After a three-year investigation, Letitia James, the New York attorney general, alleged that Trump provided fraudulent statements of his net worth and false asset valuations to obtain and satisfy loans, get insurance benefits and pay lower taxes. Offspring Don Jr, Ivanka and Eric were also named as defendants.

At a press conference, James riffed on the title of Trump’s 1987 memoir and business how-to book, The Art of the Deal.

“This investigation revealed that Donald Trump engaged in years of illegal conduct to inflate his net worth, to deceive banks and the people of the great state of New York. Claiming you have money that you do not have does not amount to ‘the art of the deal’. It’s the art of the steal,” she said.

Her office requested that the former president pay at least $250m in penalties and that his family be banned from running businesses in the state.

James cannot bring criminal charges against Trump in this civil investigation but she said she was referring allegations of criminal fraud to federal prosecutors in Manhattan as well as the Internal Revenue Service.

Trump repeated his go-to defence that the suit is “another witch hunt” against him and again referred to James, who is Black, as racist, via his Truth Social platform, also calling her “a fraud who campaigned on a ‘get Trump’ platform, despite the fact that the city is one of the crime and murder disasters of the world under her watch!”

But critics said the suit strikes at the heart of Trump’s self-portrayal as a successful property developer who made billions, hosted the reality TV show The Apprentice and promised to apply that business acumen to the presidency.

Laurence Tribe, a constitutional law professor at Harvard University, noted that the civil component “involves things of particular significance to Trump and his family and his organisation, namely their ability to defraud the public, to defraud banks, to defraud insurance companies, and to continue to subsist through corruption. Without all of that corruption, the entire Trump empire is involved in something like meltdown.”

Tribe added: “Trump is probably more concerned with things of this kind than he is with having to wear an orange jumpsuit and maybe answer a criminal indictment … As a practical matter, this is probably going to cause more sleepless nights for Mr Trump than almost anything else.”

No previous former president has faced investigations so numerous and so serious. Last month FBI agents searched Mar-a-Lago and seized official documents marked Top Secret, Secret and Confidential. Trump faces possible indictment for violating the Espionage Act, obstruction of a federal investigation or mishandling sensitive government records.

As so often during his business career, Trump sought to throw sand in the legal gears. He bought time by persuading a court to appoint a judge, Raymond Dearie, as a special master to review the documents. But so far Dearie appears to be far from a yes-man. On Tuesday he warned Trump’s lawyers: “My view is you can’t have your cake and eat it too.”

The ex-president also faces a state grand jury investigation in Georgia over efforts to subvert that state’s election result in 2020.

The justice department is investigating his role in the deadly January 6 attack on the US Capitol by a mob of his supporters intent on preventing the certification of Biden’s election victory. Its efforts have been boosted by the parallel investigation by a House of Representatives committee, whose hearings are set to resume next week.

In addition, the Trump Organization – which manages hotels, golf courses and other properties around the world – is set to go on trial next month in a criminal case alleging that it schemed to give untaxed perks to senior executives, including its longtime finance chief Allen Weisselberg, who alone took more than $1.7m in extras.

In a further setback on Wednesday, arguably Trump’s worst-ever day of legal defeats, a federal appeals court permitted the justice department to resume its review of classified records seized from Mar-a-Lago as part of its criminal investigation.

The former president, meanwhile, insisted that he did nothing wrong in retaining the documents. “There doesn’t have to be a process, as I understand it,” he told the Fox News host Sean Hannity. “If you’re the president of the United States, you can declassify just by saying: ‘It’s declassified’.”

“Even by thinking about it, because you’re sending it to Mar-a-Lago or to wherever you’re sending it … There can be a process, but there doesn’t have to be.”

Despite it all, Trump has been laying the groundwork for a potential comeback campaign and has accused Biden’s administration of targeting him to undermine his political prospects.

Asked by a conservative radio host what would happen if he was indicted over the classified documents at Mar-a-Lago, Trump replied: “I think you’d have problems in this country the likes of which perhaps we’ve never seen before. I don’t think the people of the United States would stand for it.”

Kurt Bardella, an adviser to the Democratic National Committee, said: “If the best defence you have for your conduct is: if you hold me accountable, there will be violence, that sounds like someone who has no business being either in public service or being outside of jail.”

Bardella expressed hope that, at long last, Trump would be held to account. “Everything about Donald Trump has always been about the grift. It’s always been about the con. And now his unmasking is at hand.”

Source Article from https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2022/sep/21/donald-trump-lawsuit-new-york-investigation

U.S. special presidential climate envoy John Kerry praised the Inflation Reduction Act, calling it an “amazing” bill due to its climate-related impact while acknowledging that it does not seem to do much for inflation.

Speaking at the International Energy Agency’s Global Clean Energy Action Forum, Kerry called the bill “a completely misnamed piece of legislation,” but first he gave a different reason.

“We’re running around saying, ‘I support the IRA. That’s tricky in politics, but here we are,” he joked, an apparent reference to the Irish Republican Army. Then he made the same observation as the bill’s critics.

“And I’m not sure how much it has to do with inflation, but that’s OK,” he acknowledged.

DEMS PLAN TO RESTART BIG OIL HEARINGS AS GAS PRICES COOL: ‘SHAM INVESTIGATION’

U.S. climate envoy John Kerry praised the Inflation Reduction Act during a speech at the 2022 Global Clean Energy Action Forum, hosted by the International Energy Agency.
(AP Photo/Evan Vucci, File)

Later in his address, Kerry called the bill an “amazing piece of legislation” for what it does for green energy and combating climate change.

“The most important parts of the IRA are very simple. Production and investment tax credits. That, I think, is going to do more than almost anything else in the bill. We don’t have to have government making choices about winners and losers. The marketplace is going to choose. You, inventors and investors, are going to help move that along, and we’re going to get there,” he said.

WEST VIRGINIA GOVERNOR TORCHES DEMOCRATS’ ENERGY AGENDA: HOW CAN ANYBODY DEFEND WHAT’S GOING ON IN DC?

Kerry said that for years, he has believed that the private sector is key because “no government is going to solve this problem,” because governments do not have the money to do it.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

“The private sector is the entity that has the trillions of dollars,” he said.

Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/politics/kerry-inflation-reduction-act-amazing-bill-im-sure-how-much-inflation

Former Trump lawyer Michael Cohen on Wednesday predicted New York Attorney General Letitia James’s (D) newly announced fraud investigation into former President Trump’s business will culminate in the Trump Organization’s downfall.

“It’s going to put an end to the entire company,” Cohen said during an appearance on MSNBC’s “All in with Chris Hayes” on Wednesday evening.

“You think that?” Hayes followed up.

“I believe so,” Cohen responded.

James earlier on Wednesday announced the civil fraud suit, the culmination of a three-year investigation into the Trump family and their business practices.

The state attorney general alleges the Trump Organization at times inflated and deflated property values to misleadingly attract investors and gain tax and loan benefits, also exaggerating the former president’s net worth.

James during Wednesday’s announcement said her investigation began after Cohen testified before Congress about the Trump Organization.

“When she mentioned my name, I was obviously quite elated, to be honest, because I’m finally getting the recognition for what I’ve been sitting on the mountain tops yelling for three and a half, four years, which is that the Trump Organization is a criminal enterprise and that I got thrown under the bus by dear old Donald,” Cohen said on MSNBC.

Among James’s requests to the court are $250 million in penalties and a permanent barring of the former president and three of his adult children from serving as an officer or director in any New York-based corporation.

Cohen told Hayes he expects that figure to rise to roughly $750 million once they realize the full extent of the issues.

Trump and his two adult sons, Donald Trump Jr. and Eric Trump, have blasted the investigation as a witch hunt, noting James’s past promises to pursue an investigation into the family and her upcoming reelection contest in November.

James also on Wednesday indicated she referred alleged federal law violations, including conspiracy to falsify business records and commit insurance fraud, to the IRS and the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York.

Source Article from https://thehill.com/homenews/state-watch/3655708-michael-cohen-fraud-lawsuit-will-put-an-end-to-trump-organization/

KYIV, Ukraine — Diana Pashko has spent many sleepless nights since her husband, a Ukrainian soldier who fought in the southern port city of Mariupol, was taken prisoner in May by Russian forces. But on Wednesday night, she said, “it was impossible to sleep from the excitement.”

Her husband, Lev, was free and would soon be home.

“Two hours of travel and here he is, standing on crutches, smiling, and all these months of separation seem to have never happened,” she said.

Lev was one of 215 Ukrainian soldiers released on Wednesday in the largest prisoner exchange of the war, and Ms. Pashko’s sentiment reflected the joy and relief that have rippled across the nation. Those released included 108 members of the Azov battalion, including five of its commanders, who have been vilified as “Nazis” by the Russian state news media but who are widely viewed across Ukraine as heroes for their defense of Mariupol.

In return, the Ukrainians handed over Viktor Medvedchuk, a Ukrainian businessman and politician who is a close friend of Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin, along with 55 other Russian soldiers, including several high-ranking officers.

“This is definitely a victory for our state, for our entire society,” President Volodymyr Zelensky of Ukraine said on Thursday.

The exchange came as a surprise, given that only a few weeks ago Russian proxy leaders in occupied eastern Ukraine said Azov soldiers would soon be put on trial — an announcement that Ukraine and its Western allies immediately condemned. The release of the Ukrainian soldiers also came just hours after Mr. Putin declared a partial mobilization of up to 300,000 more soldiers for the war.

As Ukrainians celebrated the prisoner exchange, anger coursed through the ranks of Russian mercenaries, war hawks and influential military bloggers. They have spent years promoting the notion that Azov fighters embodied the “Nazi” forces that Moscow used to justify its war. Furious that the returning Russian prisoners were barely acknowledged while Ukrainian soldiers were actively welcomed home, many in those ranks made their disapproval known.

Igor Girkin, a former Russian intelligence colonel, went from being a military leader for the Russian-backed separatists in eastern Ukraine to a frequent critic of Kremlin military strategy. In a statement posted on Telegram, he called the exchange “incredible stupidity,” describing it as “worse than a crime and worse than a mistake.”

Andrey Medvedev, a Russian journalist and politician, also noted the absence of ceremony for the returned Russian soldiers. “Empty airfield, no flags, no flowers,” he wrote on Telegram. “It is very weird when our heroes are met like this.”

In Ukraine, it was already dark when the released Ukrainian soldiers emerged from a bus, crying tears of joy, after crossing back into their country.

Kateryna Prokopenko, the wife of the Azov commander, Lt. Col. Denys Prokopenko, has traveled around the world to campaign for the release of the Azov soldiers.

“My heart is going mad!” she wrote on Twitter.

Later on Thursday, Ms. Prokopenko said she could still barely process her feelings. She had spoken to her husband for only a few seconds, she said, breaking down in tears as she tried to describe how tired he looked. “I’m just scared to imagine what they did to him there,” she said, “and what is next.”

She also worried for the thousands of Ukrainian soldiers still being held by Russian forces.

Alla Samoilenko, mother of Illia Samoilenko, who was released, also wrestled with conflicting emotions. “Very many of our guys are still there, and will we have such good exchange options as we had now?” she asked. “We need to fight for them.”

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/live/2022/09/22/world/russia-ukraine-putin-news

WASHINGTON, Sept 21 (Reuters) – The U.S. Justice Department can resume reviewing classified records seized by the FBI from former President Donald Trump’s Florida home pending appeal, a federal appellate court ruled on Wednesday, giving a boost to the criminal investigation into whether the records were mishandled or compromised.

The Atlanta-based 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals granted a request by federal prosecutors to block U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon’s stay barring them from using the classified documents in their probe until an independent arbiter, called a special master, vets the materials to weed out any that could be deemed privileged and withheld from investigators.

The appeals court also said it would agree to reverse a portion of the lower court’s order that required the government to hand over records with classification markings for the special master’s review.

“We conclude that the United States would suffer irreparable harm from the district court’s restrictions on its access to this narrow—and potentially critical—set of materials, as well as the court’s requirement that the United States submit the classified records to the special master for review,” the three-judge panel wrote.

The decision is “limited in nature,” the panel wrote, as the Justice Department had asked only for a partial stay pending appeal, and that the panel was not able to decide on the merits of the case itself.

The three judges who made the decision were Robin Rosenbaum, an appointee of Democratic former President Barack Obama, and Britt Grant and Andrew Brasher, both of whom were appointed by Trump.

Trump’s lawyers could potentially ask the U.S. Supreme Court, whose 6-3 conservative majority includes three justices appointed by him, to intervene in the matter.

In filings on Tuesday, Trump’s lawyers urged the court to keep the stay in place and to allow them under the supervision of the special master, U.S Judge Raymond Dearie, to review all of the seized materials, including those marked classified.

A Justice Department spokesperson did not have an immediate comment. Attorneys for Trump could not be immediately reached for comment.

In an interview on Fox News Wednesday night, Trump repeated his claim without evidence that he declassified the documents and said he had the power to do it “even by thinking about it.”

The FBI conducted a court-approved search on Aug. 8 at Trump’s home at the Mar-a-Lago estate in Palm Beach, seizing more than 11,000 documents including about 100 marked as classified.

The search was part of a federal investigation into whether Trump illegally removed documents from the White House when he left office in January 2021 after his failed 2020 re-election bid and whether Trump tried to obstruct the probe.

Cannon, a Trump appointee herself, appointed Dearie to serve as special master in the case at Trump’s request, despite the Justice Department’s objections about a special master.

Cannon tasked Dearie with reviewing all of the materials, including classified ones, so that he can separate anything that could be subject to attorney-client privilege or executive privilege – a legal doctrine that shields some White House communications from disclosure.

However, Trump’s lawyers have not made such claims in any of their legal filings, and during a hearing before Dearie on Tuesday, they resisted his request to provide proof that Trump had declassified any records. read more

Although the appeals court stressed its ruling was narrow in scope, it nevertheless appeared to sharply rebuke Cannon’s ruling from top to bottom and many of Trump’s legal arguments.

“[Trump]has not even attempted to show that he has a need to know the information contained in the classified documents,” the judges wrote. “Nor has he established that the current administration has waived that requirement for these documents.”

The Justice Department previously also raised strong objections to Cannon’s demand that Dearie review the seized records for documents possibly covered by executive privilege, noting that Trump is a former president and the records do not belong to him.

While it voiced disagreement, however, the Justice Department did not appeal that portion of Cannon’s order. It is not clear if prosecutors may separately seek to appeal other parts of Cannon’s ruling on the special master appointment.

“We decide only the traditional equitable considerations, including whether the United States has shown a substantial likelihood of prevailing on the merits, the harm each party might suffer from a stay, and where the public interest lies,” the appeals court said.

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

Source Article from https://www.reuters.com/legal/us-court-lets-investigators-resume-review-classified-records-trump-probe-2022-09-21/

“There may have been two or three [allegations] that I wasn’t aware of, but the rest I was,” he told CNN in an interview after the lawsuit was unveiled, adding that the claims lent to the “complete destruction” of Trump’s image as an expert businessman.

Trump allegedly overstated the value his name added to Trump National Golf Club, Jupiter in Florida on so-called statements of financial condition submitted to banks and tax authorities. The statements said there was no brand premium, but nonetheless claimed his image raised property values by 30 percent in 2013 and 2014, and 15 percent from 2015 through 2020, according to James.

Trump also claimed his own triplex apartment in Trump Tower as 30,000 square feet when it was actually a hair under 11,000, causing a 2015 valuation of $327 million in total or $29,738 per square foot, according to the attorney general.

In a statement, Trump attorney Alina Habba repeated the former president’s claim that the case is politically motivated.

“Today’s filing is neither focused on the facts nor the law — rather, it is solely focused on advancing the Attorney General’s political agenda,” Habba said. “It is abundantly clear that the Attorney General’s Office has exceeded its statutory authority by prying into transactions where absolutely no wrongdoing has taken place. We are confident that our judicial system will not stand for this unchecked abuse of authority, and we look forward to defending our client against each and every one of the Attorney General’s meritless claims.”

To those who knew Trump when he was a player in New York’s real estate world decades ago, however, the sprawling fraud alleged in the suit came as little surprise.

“The guy is completely untrustworthy. Everyone knew you couldn’t trust his word. That’s why he didn’t build a thing in years,” one high-profile real estate executive, who would only speak on the condition of anonymity, said in an interview.

The person said it was common knowledge among developers that Trump readily engaged in shady business practices, and described much of his real estate portfolio as a marketing and branding scheme.

“He’s a master of hyperbole and has been overstating his role and his importance for decades,” said a different developer who would only speak on the condition of anonymity.

If successful, James’ suit would ban Trump from any commercial real estate transactions for five years — potentially spelling the end to what’s left of his real estate empire.

The AG says Trump priced his Mar-a-Lago club in Florida as high as $739 million — when it was actually worth a tenth of that — based on the “false premise” it could be used for residential purposes, even though he’d signed deeds foreclosing on that possibility.

The suit also lays out how Trump allegedly obtained a 2015 loan from Ladder Capital Finance based on real estate firm Cushman & Wakefield’s purportedly inflated valuations of 40 Wall Street, an office tower in Lower Manhattan for which the Trump Organization owns a ground lease. Cushman, which declined to comment for this article, valued it at $540 million through a series of “unreasonable adjustments,” James alleged.

But Trump nonetheless claimed the property was worth $735.4 million on a financial statement submitted in support of the 2015 loan application, according to the AG’s office. Three years earlier, he allegedly valued the property at $527 million, despite a bank-ordered appraisal it was only worth $220 million, James says.

At Trump Tower, the 58-story skyscraper on Fifth Avenue that’s also home to the Trump Organization’s headquarters, the firm said it consulted “outside professionals” to reach valuations in the annual financial statements between 2011 and 2019. But the suit says there’s “no evidence” any such third-party evaluation occurred and alleges the firm conducted a “series of coordinated actions” to artificially push up the building’s estimated price.

James says Trump further distorted his net worth by repeatedly counting funds he did not control, such as money held by Vornado Partnership Interests, in which he had a minority stake.

Trump’s tax statements also neglected to mention his 50 percent interest in a joint venture in a Las Vegas hotel-condo tower, James alleged. In 2015, his organization submitted a nearly $25 million valuation for the Trump International Hotel and Tower to contest taxes Nevada was charging him. Yet that same year, his company reported the property was worth $107 million — “a value the Trump Organization reached using fraudulent methods,” according to legal papers James released.

At several of the Trump Organization’s golf courses — from Briarcliff Manor, New York, to Colts Neck, New Jersey to Mooresville, North Carolina — the firm inflated the value of unsold memberships to further bump up valuations.

“The pattern of fraud that was used by Mr. Trump and the Trump organization was astounding,” James said at a press conference in announcing her much-anticipated lawsuit.

Olivia Olander contributed to this report.

Source Article from https://www.politico.com/news/2022/09/21/a-peak-inside-the-trump-real-estate-in-tish-james-bombshell-lawsuit-00058144

Security forces detained more than 1,300 people in Russia on Wednesday at protests denouncing mobilisation, a rights group said, hours after President Vladimir Putin ordered Russia’s first military draft since the second world war.

The independent OVD-Info protest monitoring group said that according to information it had collated from 38 Russian cities, more than 1,311 people had been held by late evening.

It said those figures included at least 502 in Moscow and 524 in St Petersburg, Russia’s second most populous city. Unsanctioned rallies are illegal under Russia’s anti-protest laws.

Russian interior ministry official Irina Volk, in a statement quoted by Russian news agencies, said officers had cut short attempts to stage what it called small protests.

“In a number of regions, there were attempts to stage unauthorised actions which brought together an extremely small number of participants,” Volk was quoted as saying.

“These were all stopped. And those persons who violated laws were detained and taken to police stations for investigation and establish their responsibility.”

One-way flights out of Russia were rocketing in price and selling out fast on Wednesday after Putin ordered the immediate call-up of 300,000 reservists.

The Vesna opposition movement called for protests, saying: “Thousands of Russian men, our fathers, brothers and husbands, will be thrown into the meat grinder of the war. What will they be dying for? What will mothers and children be crying for?”

Riot police detain demonstrators in Moscow. Photograph: Alexander Zemlianichenko/AP

The Moscow prosecutor’s office warned that organising or participating in protests could lead to up to 15 years in prison. Authorities have issued similar warnings ahead of other protests. Wednesday’s were the first nationwide anti-war protests since the fighting began in late February.

AFP journalists in the centre of Moscow said at least 50 people were detained by police wearing anti-riot gear on a main shopping street.

In St Petersburg, AFP reporters saw police surround a small group of protesters and detain them one-by-one, loading them on to a bus.

Protesters were chanting “No mobilisation!”

“Everyone is scared. I am for peace and I don’t want to have to shoot. But coming out now is very dangerous, otherwise there would be many more people,” said protester Vasily Fedorov, a student wearing a pacifist symbol on his chest.

“I came out to the rally planning to participate, but it looks like they’ve already arrested everyone. This regime has condemned itself and is destroying its youth,” said Alexei, a 60-year-old resident who declined to give his last name.

Russian Police officers detain a female protester during an unsanctioned anti-war protest rally at Arbat street in Moscow. Photograph: Contributor/Getty Images

“Why are you serving Putin, a man who’s been in power for 20 years!” a young protester shouted at one policeman.

“I came to say that I am against war and mobilisation,” Oksana Sidorenko, a student, told AFP. “Why are they deciding my future for me? I’m scared for myself, for my brother,” she added.

Alina Skvortsova, 20, said she hoped Russians would soon understand the nature of the Kremlin’s offensive in neighbouring Ukraine. “As soon as they really understand, they will come out on to the street, despite the fear,” she said.

In Ekaterinburg, Russia’s fourth-largest city, police hauled on to buses some of the 40 protesters who were detained at an anti-war rally. One woman in a wheelchair shouted, referring to the Russian president: “Goddamn bald-headed ‘nut job’. He’s going to drop a bomb on us, and we’re all still protecting him. I’ve said enough.”

The Interfax news agency quoted the Russian interior ministry as saying it had quashed attempts to “organise unauthorised gatherings”.

All the demonstrations were stopped and those who committed “violations” were arrested and led away by police pending an investigation and prosecution, it added.

With Reuters, Associated Press and Agence France-Presse

Source Article from https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/sep/22/russia-protests-more-than-1300-arrested-at-anti-war-demonstrations-ukraine

Los Angeles mayoral candidates Rick Caruso and Karen Bass tangled for nearly an hour Wednesday night in their first debate ahead of the Nov. 8 election.

Both Caruso and Bass laid out their plans on homelessness while castigating their opponent for not doing enough or thinking ambitiously enough to address the crisis.

Their respective ties to USC and a recent burglary at Bass’ home produced some of the debate’s most contentious moments, with Bass saying Caruso had allowed sexual abuse to run rampant on campus. In turn, Caruso criticized Bass for taking a nearly $100,000 scholarship from the dean of the university’s School of Social Work, who this week pleaded guilty in a federal bribery case.

There was also lots of talk of housing affordability and even street vending.

The debate concluded with several quick-fire questions, including: In one word, what is the state of Los Angeles?

Bass and Caruso both responded by saying, “Crisis.”

After that sober moment, things lightened up for the mayoral rivals.

Asked by Fox 11 anchor Elex Michaelson if the Dodgers would win the World Series, both agreed that they would.

Asked their favorite spot to take visitors in L.A., Bass replied, “the beach.” Caruso said, “the beach, with Karen.”

On corruption

Caruso promised to show “zero tolerance” on corruption at City Hall, while also attempting to tie Bass to the corruption cases that have ensnared three council members.

“The system quite frankly is corrupt, and with all due respect to my opponent, she’s part of that system,” he said.

Bass disputed that idea, while also promising to create an ethics czar and institute an ethics pledge in her administration. And she argued that Caruso’s business had put him at the heart of that system.

“If you look at the corruption at City Hall, it’s been around developers,” she said.

Caruso quickly shot back: “Name one time that I have been named in any scandal at all in my career in my life.”

On Caruso’s party affiliation

A question from Times columnist Erika D. Smith about party affiliation spurred a heated exchange, with both Bass and Caruso landing a number of zingers.

Speaking about his past as a Republican, Caruso — who was last registered as a Republican in 2019 — said he “left the Republican Party a long time ago” because it didn’t reflect his values.

Caruso switched his party registration to “decline to state” in 2011 while considering a bid for L.A. mayor. He re-registered as a Republican in March 2016, staying with the GOP until November 2019, when he went back to “no party preference.” Caruso changed his party affiliation to Democratic in late January, less than a month before filing to run for mayor.

“I’ve always been socially liberal,” Caruso said, citing his support for former Gov. Jerry Brown and current Gov. Gavin Newsom, both Democrats, and noting that he is “close” to both of them.

When it was her turn to speak, Bass knocked Caruso for having previously said he would prefer an earlier, more middle-of-the-road version of the Democratic Party.

“I like the Democratic Party of 10 years ago and the Democratic Party of today,” she said, characterizing the party of today as more diverse and accepting.

“Doesn’t seem to be accepting me,” Caruso said with a bashful smile, spurring laughter in the room. It was a rare acknowledgement from the candidate of how he has been all but shut out from formal party support during the election.

On USC

Bass and Caruso had an interesting back-and-forth over their respective ties to USC.

Bass’ involvement with USC is potentially embarrassing, given that she accepted a $95,000 scholarship to get a master’s degree in social work from Marilyn Flynn, the dean of the school, who this week pleaded guilty in a separate corruption case.

After beginning her tuition-free studies in 2012, Bass advanced legislation that would have resulted in more federal funding for USC and other private universities.

Federal prosecutors indicated that Bass’ scholarship was a “critical” piece of evidence in their criminal allegations against Flynn and City Councilman Mark Ridley-Thomas. But the U.S. attorney’s office told The Times earlier this month that “at this time,” Bass “is not a target or a subject of our office’s investigation.”

Bass got clearance from the Office of Congressional Ethics to take the scholarship for studies that she said benefitted her constituents by enhancing her knowledge of child welfare policy.

Caruso has pilloried his opponent in recent weeks over the scholarship.

“She received a free scholarship simply because she was a powerful member of Congress,” he said at a recent news conference. “This is corruption. This is dishonest, plain and simple.”

Bass failed to list the full value of her scholarship, which she sought in 2011, on congressional disclosure forms until 2019, when forms from several years were amended and a total of more than $80,000 in free tuition was added to her gift disclosures. Bass attributed the errors to her former chief of staff, noting they were discovered in an audit by her lawyer.

Bass went after Caruso’s time as chair of the USC Board of Trustees.

She said he refused to release the results of an investigation of the behavior of a campus gynecologist who was accused of misconduct: “He committed to do an investigation, to do a report, and then he decided afterwards that he wasn’t going to release it when the victims asked for it to be released.”

Caruso invoked reporting in The Times and spoke of his ties to USC as a positive, particularly his work as chair of the university’s board following the allegations against the campus gynecologist, George Tyndall.

Caruso helped USC reach $1.1 billion in legal settlements with Tyndall’s alleged victims and helped overhaul the university’s leadership and governing structure. But in recent years, he backtracked on the release of an internal report on Tyndall, saying USC’s lawyers gave only oral briefings to trustees and that there was no report to release.

USC did publish on its website a trove of internal records related to Tyndall after The Times petitioned a federal court to unseal documents showing complaints about the gynecologist.

Those files make no mention of Caruso, nor did a U.S. Department of Education report on the case.

Caruso served as one of about 55 board members overseeing USC before he became chair in 2018, in the days after the Tyndall revelations rocked the campus — opening himself up to questions about why he and others hadn’t taken a more active role in oversight of the scandal-plagued university.

A 30-second video advertisement accuses Caruso of “covering up” misconduct and depriving Tyndall’s victims of transparency.

Bass said at a recent news conference that “the USC scandal we need to talk about is how he failed to protect these young women.”

On the gun theft at Bass’ home

Discussion of a recent burglary at Bass’ home brought one of the most contentious moments of the debate yet, as Bass calmly but forcefully told Caruso she was disappointed with his campaign’s attacks after her home was burglarized.

Bass accused Caruso of “an act of desperation,” referencing a letter that Caruso ally and City Councilman Joe Buscaino sent to Los Angeles Police Chief Michel Moore asking for an “investigation” into the circumstances surrounding the gun theft, including whether the guns were registered.

Two men were charged last week with burglarizing Bass’ Baldwin Vista home on Sept. 9 and taking two .38-caliber revolvers belonging to the congresswoman. Bass has said the firearms were “safely and securely stored” in a closet. The intruders didn’t take cash, electronics or other valuables, Bass said.

The Times reported that the guns were stored in a Brink’s lockbox. Bass has said she had the guns for her protection.

Bass said the burglary “shattered” her sense of safety, a stark departure from earlier comments she made about feeling very safe in her neighborhood.

At a debate earlier this year, Bass was asked to rate, on a scale of 1 to 10, how safe she feels walking around her neighborhood. She rated her sense of safety as a 10 during that debate, but said Wednesday that she would now “grade it at a 5.”

On housing

Caruso and Bass found one area of agreement on Wednesday night — the need to produce more housing. Both said the process for approving new homes needs to be streamlined.

Caruso, who has built shopping malls and residential buildings, said housing construction has become “overregulated” in L.A.

“It’s so expensive to build in this city, people aren’t building. That’s why affordability is so upside down,” he said.

Bass said the city needs more “decent-paying jobs” to ensure Angelenos can afford to pay their rent. She said the approval process needs to be streamlined at City Hall — and called for more housing overall.

“The way we deal with affordability is to increase the supply,” she said.

On public safety

Caruso has said he wants to grow the LAPD to 11,000 officers. The force is currently at about 9,226 officers. Bass says she wants the department to be at 9,700 officers, which is what the City Council has authorized.

During this back-and-forth, Caruso invoked his time as the president of the Los Angeles Police Commission. He said that during his tenure he improved the LAPD, and claimed that it was removed from the oversight of a federal judge that had been imposed in 2001 because of civil rights abuses.

LAPD observers of that era say the Caruso-led commission and a new police chief did pursue reforms more assiduously than in the past. But the federal judge monitoring the department rebuked the LAPD for moving too slowly on reform and did not hand oversight of the LAPD back to the police commission until 2009, four years after Caruso left.

End the eviction moratorium?

Bass and Caruso were asked whether the city’s eviction moratorium should be extended. The businessman said yes, but added that he wants more verification that people who are not paying rent lack the ability to do so.

Bass said that she would extend the moratorium and that the city should also extend other programs — like Project Roomkey — that came about during the COVID-19 pandemic. She added that landlords should receive help, too.

On abortion

Abortion — an issue that typically gets little play in local L.A. elections — has cast a long shadow over the race since the Supreme Court’s decision to overturn Roe vs. Wade was leaked just before the primary.

Bass invoked abortion rights, and the specter of Caruso’s Republican past, when she described herself as “a lifelong pro-choice Democrat” in her opening answer.

Asked about the role that reproductive rights would play for L.A.’s mayor, Bass described the matter as “a question of values,” regardless of whether the city is involved in administering healthcare.

Caruso — whose past donations to antiabortion politicians have been a subject of frequent attacks during the race — hit back hard.First, he clarified his position for voters, saying, “I am pro-choice; I always have been.”

Then he said the “same standards” being used against him should also apply to Bass. Caruso said Bass had “supported a congressman in Georgia — [who is] anti-abortion, supported the Hyde Amendment with Obama healthcare that prevented federal funds to be used.”

The Hyde Amendment — a decades-long ban on federal funding of abortion was passed in 1976 — is often used as a synonym for such a ban.

According to a Caruso spokesperson, the congressman in question is Rep. Sanford Bishop, who represents Georgia’s 2nd District. Bishop’s district is “heavily rural” and the congressman is a “conservative Democrat,” according to the Atlanta Journal-Constitution.

“While I believe abortion should be rare, it should be legal, safe, and an available choice in cases of rape, incest or to protect the life or health of a woman,” Bishop said in a June 2022 statement decrying the Supreme Court’s reversal of Roe vs. Wade.

It’s accurate that in 2009, Bishop voted in favor of a compromise amendment to the landmark healthcare bill that, as The Times put it at the time, “in effect bans abortion coverage by all plans that are purchased using taxpayer dollars.” It’s also accurate that Bass has donated to Bishop through her campaign committee.

Caruso’s insistence that Bass be held “the same standards that are used against me” in this situation rings a bit false. He’s making something of an apples-to-oranges comparison, equating Bass’ donations to a single Democratic congressperson who now has an “F” rating from SBA Pro-Life America’s “National Pro-Life Scorecard” with his long history of donations to anti-abortion conservatives.

Caruso has been outspoken about his support for abortion rights on the campaign trail, but his past donations include more than $240,000 to a super PAC supporting John Kasich’s GOP presidential run in 2016; $100,000 to a PAC supporting President George W. Bush’s reelection in 2004; $50,000 to a PAC supporting Rep. Kevin McCarthy (R-Bakersfield) in 2017; and $4,300 to a committee supporting Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) in 2007. Caruso also contributed hundreds of thousands of dollars to Republican Party committees between 2003 and 2017.

On homelessness

Caruso mentioned his much-repeated promise to build 30,000 housing units in his first year in office. To realize this expensive plan, he wants to build tiny houses for 15,000 people, and temporarily place another 15,000 people in “sleeping pods” in existing structures, such as warehouses and empty buildings.

It would cost an estimated $843 million in the first year to build or acquire the housing and prepare it for occupancy. Caruso declined to estimate the operating expenses for housing 30,000 people, but a Times analysis of city documents found that it would cost about $660 million a year, or about $22,000 per person.

Bass criticized Caruso’s plan, saying that it was exclusively about interim housing and didn’t offer a balanced approach. She has put forward her own plan to bring 15,000 people indoors by trying to wring as much as possible out of the current system in order to expand both interim and permanent housing, though at a far smaller scale than Caruso envisions.

She would build new shelter beds to accommodate about 1,000 people, expand the use of housing vouchers, lease and buy motels and hotels, and try other approaches. The price tag in the first year would be an estimated $292 million, including construction costs and operating expenses for shelter beds.

Both candidates talked about how shelters can be problematic.

“The shelters have become so dangerous that people don’t even want to be in the shelters and are choosing to be outside on the street, so we have to have interim housing, but it has to be very limited in time, and we have to put people into permanent supportive housing,” Bass said.

Caruso cited recent research from the Rand Corp. indicating that the congregate shelters are not homeless people’s preferred destination. Fewer than a third of those surveyed in Hollywood, skid row and Venice said “group shelter” was an acceptable housing option.

On their differences

Asked to discuss the biggest differences between herself and Caruso, Bass mentioned homelessness and made clear she is “a lifelong pro-choice Democrat.” She added that she thinks “we can have a city where people are not priced out of housing but actually coming in.”

In Caruso’s answer to this question, he invoked his grandparents being from Boyle Heights, then mentioned homelessness and crime. “L.A. is always the place where big dreams come true.”

Karen Bass and Rick Caruso face off at Skirball

With less than seven weeks until the Nov. 8 election, Rep. Karen Bass and real estate developer Rick Caruso are facing off in their first head-to-head debate tonight at Skirball Cultural Center.

Both campaigns have gone into combat mode in recent weeks, with Caruso and Bass attacking each other’s character and ethics. This will be their first time parrying blows without a crowd of other candidates beside them and it’s unclear what their dynamic will look like — or how negative the candidates will be willing to go.

The debate — which is sponsored by The Times, Univision, KPCC, the Skirball Cultural Center, the Los Angeles Urban League and Loyola Marymount University — is being moderated by Times columnist Erika D. Smith and Fox 11 News anchor Elex Michaelson.

The debate was preceded by one featuring the two candidates in the Los Angeles County sheriff’s race, Sheriff Alex Villanueva and retired Long Beach Police Chief Robert Luna. Caruso greeted Villanueva as the sheriff left the stage. “Sounds like you did a good job,” Caruso told him. He also greeted Luna.

About 200 people are inside the venue at Skirball. Those in the audience include city councilman and former mayoral candidate Joe Buscaino and students from Loyola Marymount University, who are visible in their red and white T-shirts.

Bass finished the June primary with a seven-point lead and an August poll from the UC Berkeley Institute of Governmental Studies, co-sponsored by The Times, showed her leading Caruso by 12 percentage points.

But nearly a quarter of Los Angeles voters are still undecided, according to the poll, and Wednesday’s debate offers a potentially decisive opportunity for Caruso and Bass to reintroduce themselves to voters just three weeks before general election ballots are mailed.

Source Article from https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2022-09-21/2022-california-election-los-angeles-mayoral-debate-live-updates

Michael Kofman, director of Russia studies at CNA, a defense research institute in Arlington, Va., said the Kremlin’s first step would likely be to call up reserve officers and others with more recent military experience to replenish badly depleted units in the field, perhaps in the next month or so. The Russian military has been identifying such personnel for months in anticipation of Mr. Putin’s order, he said.

“Bottom line, it’s not going to change a lot of the problems the Russian military has had in this war, and the military will be limited as to how many additional forces it can deploy in the field,” Mr. Kofman said. “But it does begin to address the structural problems that Russia has had with manpower shortages and will extend Russia’s ability to sustain this war.”

Crucially, Mr. Kofman said, Mr. Putin’s announcement extends indefinitely the service contracts of thousands of soldiers who signed up thinking that they would only serve several months, and enacts policies and penalties to prevent them from refusing deployment to Ukraine or leaving the service.

Even if Moscow can mobilize some reservists quickly, the Russian military faces serious longer-term shortages in equipment, vehicles and weaponry, and generating entire new units to replace those lost in battle might not happen until early next year, some officials said.

“It will be many months before they can be properly equipped, trained, organized and deployed to Ukraine,” said Frederick B. Hodges, a former top U.S. Army commander in Europe. “And without massive artillery support, these new soldiers will be pure cannon fodder, sitting in cold, wet trenches this winter as Ukrainian forces continue to press.”

Mr. Putin’s struggles to mobilize enough regular troops has forced the Kremlin to rely on a patchwork of impoverished ethnic minorities, Ukrainians from the separatist territories, mercenaries and militarized National Guard units to fight the war.

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2022/09/21/us/politics/putin-ukraine-biden.html

Robert Luna showed up to his debate with Los Angeles County Sheriff Alex Villanueva at the Skirball Center 2½ hours early. The challenger showed up so early that the security guard didn’t have the VIP parking list yet. The tech people in the auditorium were still doing audio checks.

Luna walked to his green room — a closet compared with Villanueva’s spacious suite two doors down. His footsteps echoed through the emptiness of the Skirball’s courtyard. That’s when I noticed Luna’s shoes.

They were brown, with thick white soles, and looked like off-brand Top-Siders. Middle-aged, middle-class Latino men over the last decade have favored these when they want to class up their look but don’t have the money or hipster fashion sense to buy something fancier.

“I grew up poor,” the retired Long Beach police chief explained. “If I ever spend more than $100 on something, I immediately feel like I did something wrong.”

He looked to his wife, who wore a “Luna for Sheriff” campaign button.

“Where did I get them — Marshalls? Macy’s? I can’t even remember,” he said.

Villanueva finally showed up an hour before the debate, sweeping through the Skirball’s side entrance accompanied by a security detail that seemed to keep growing.

He only emerged from his green room to get his makeup done. Right before that, the sheriff scarfed down a brownie. His shoes were standard-issue loafers as black as the shoes police officers wear.

He and Luna both sported blue ties. That was one of the few commonalities of the evening.

The two were facing off for the first time after a bad summer for Villanueva. Luna had forced him into a runoff as Villanueva received the lowest percentage in a primary election for an incumbent L.A. County sheriff in at least a century.

He had just come off a month in which his department lost a $31-million lawsuit over the improper release of photos of the helicopter crash scene where Kobe Bryant, daughter Gianna and seven others perished.

And Villanueva received national condemnation last week for a morning raid on the house of Sheila Kuehl, an L.A. County supervisor and his frequent critic. He characterized it as an investigation into public corruption, but many others saw it as a thinly veiled witch hunt.

The sheriff had a plan for the debate: He was going to set a double trap to embarrass Luna.

Hours before they faced off, Villanueva’s camp released to the news media a 34-page docket titled “A Record of Racial Violence and Harassment” that gathered police reports, lawsuits and more from Luna’s decades-long career, claiming to prove the Long Beach Police Department’s “disturbing anti-Black history.”

What he didn’t tell the media was that he was also going to offer a treatise on how he is more Latino than Luna.

Strategically, it seemed a brilliant move. This year has seen Villanueva plagued by accusations by activists and members of his own department that he has an animus toward Black people. Polls show that Black voters support Villanueva the least, while Latinos support him the most. If he can portray Luna as anti-Black and a whitewashed Latino, he’ll be able to shore up his support with two voting blocs essential to his reelection.

The debate was sharp and heated. Big topics were discussed — homelessness, deputy gangs, public corruption — but then cast aside in favor of personal attacks. Villanueva called Luna a “puppet” and accused him of using buzzwords. Luna called his opponent’s propensity to lie “scary” multiple times and kept his cool, despite constant goading by Villanueva.

When Villanueva finally unveiled his two-pronged ethnic strategy, he failed. Badly.

He kept attacking Luna while not responding to questions by the moderators. His anti-Black allegations went nowhere.

When Villanueva tried to attack Luna’s Latino credentials, he exposed himself as a petty pendejo.

At one point, a Univison anchor posed a public safety question from a viewer. Villanueva answered in technically perfect Spanish.

But his accent sounded like that of a white guy who learned español from a fancy school, not the streets.

Luna, when asked to translate what Villanueva said, declined, hinting that his Spanish maybe wasn’t the best. But so what? He’s just like millions of Latinos.

Villanueva’s biggest swing involved his wife, Vivian. At one point, he rattled off the names of all the schools in East Los Angeles she attended, from elementary through Cal State L.A.

“That’s what’s called born and raised in East L.A. really means,” the sheriff said, gesturing at Luna. “You want to talk about integrity — you might want to clarify where you were raised and what schools you went to.”

When a moderator asked whether Luna had integrity, Villanueva responded, “He needs to clarify where he was raised.”

The implication: Luna was trying to embellish his Eastlos credentials to try to make himself more Latino than he really was.

Luna stumbled for a bit, then admitted his sin. Yes, he started out in East L.A. But after his parents got some money, they bought a home in Santa Fe Springs, and he went to middle and high school there.

Santa Fe Springs, by the way, is where Villanueva’s campaign headquarters are.

What a burn.

Co-moderator Elex Michaelson of Fox 11 asked what was the point of Villanueva’s roll call.

“Because he claimed that in East L.A., he saw deputies at work, and he knew a good cop from a bad cop,” Villanueva replied. “And I really had doubt when you’re that young, you can understand the difference of the two.”

Luna responded by name-checking one of the most notorious incidents in the history of the L.A. County Sheriff’s Department: the 1970 Chicano Moratorium, when deputies brutalized peaceful anti-Vietnam War protesters and killed Times columnist Ruben Salazar with a tear gas canister to the head.

“When you see deputies using force on people with batons, I don’t know about any of you in the crowd, I never forgot that,” he replied. “So again, we have the sheriff of L.A. County, who’s supposed to talk about deputy-involved shootings, natural disasters and all these critical incidences — and he’s making up information right here in front of all of you.”

Not only was Luna not rattled by Villanueva’s attack, but he returned to his Santa Fe Springs teenage years when asked whether the Sheriff’s Department should use alternative strategies, besides violence, when stopping Latinos on bicycles — a scandal under Villanueva.

“I’m talking to you as a person who, as a 13-year-old, was riding a bicycle and got tossed face first into the hood of a sheriff’s car when I was in middle school in Santa Fe Springs, when the sheriffs had that contract there,” he said. “I’ve seen it from the other side. It doesn’t feel good.”

Villanueva had no answer.

At the end, the moderators tried to do some lighthearted quick questions that exposed more of each candidate’s Latino credentials.

Favorite TV shows? Both answered “Big Bang Theory,” which surprised them to the point they high-fived each other. Who said Latinos can’t be nerds?

Favorite band? Luna answered with ranchera icon Vicente Fernández. Villanueva’s response was Maná, the ersatz U2 of Mexico.

Favorite sports team? Villanueva went with the Dodgers. Luna said Dodgers and Lakers.

¿Quien es más Latino? Only Villanueva cares. His flexes were so weak salsa that they made Pace Picante Sauce seem as fiery as Tapatío.

Source Article from https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2022-09-21/alex-villanueva-robert-luna-debate

“James is playing hardball,” Manhattan defense attorney Michael Shapiro said.

Here are some of POLITICO’s top takeaways from the suit James filed:

A Trump trial on James’ suit? Don’t bank on it

Legal analysts are already debating the finer points of the suit and whether it will or won’t hold muster in court. Her civil suit might fly despite Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg Jr. balking at filing criminal charges over the same conduct.

For one thing, James only has to prove Trump’s conduct was fraudulent or illegal by a preponderance of the evidence, not beyond a reasonable doubt as would be necessary in a criminal case. If it seems more likely than not that Trump knew of false valuations or instructed subordinates to inflate assets and income, that may be enough for James to prevail.

Trump could also be hurt by his numerous invocations of the Fifth Amendment, which can be used against him in the civil suit.

But there’s a good chance the true legal merits of the AG’s suit will never be tested in court. Both sides have strong incentives to reach a settlement. Pursuing the case through to completion could take years and there’s no guarantee that a judge will agree to grant all the relief the AG asked for. Trump seems to have an even stronger incentive to compromise, since the punishing sanctions James is seeking could amount almost to a death sentence for his business empire.

Trump’s lawyers have already made a settlement proposal which James turned down, but her aides said her office isn’t seeking any immediate court action against Trump, like an injunction that would swiftly drive him out of business in New York. And the AG seemed to emphasize her willingness to deal on the onerous punishment she proposed Wednesday.

“Our doors are always open,” James told reporters.

Is ‘everyone-does-it’ a defense for Trump?

Trump’s legal team has suggested that any rosy analyses of Trump’s financial condition in statements submitted to banks is consistent with the practice in the world of real estate and bank financing.

Indeed, his attorneys have argued that bankers were not actually deceived by the alleged asset inflation because they produced more conservative internal assessments before approving the loans to Trump.

Trump himself leveled a version of the “no harm, no foul” defense on his Truth Social media site Wednesday, saying that the banks and insurance companies involved “were fully paid, made a lot of money, and never had a complaint about me.”

However, James’ office appears to be taking the stand that whether the banks were or were not actually tricked isn’t relevant to the legal case — that the alleged intent to deceive on the part of Trump, his children and top aides in order to get a financial benefit is sufficient to constitute a violation of the law.

James has also said that whether the other parties in Trump’s deals sustained a loss also isn’t relevant, so she can pursue these violations even if the banks profited from the deals.

James is trying to get the suit heard by New York Supreme Court Justice Arthur Engoron, who issued orders requiring Trump and his family members to sit for depositions in the probe. The judge seemed largely unsympathetic to Trump, so if the case winds up staying with him the former president could be in for a rough ride.

The Mar-a-Lago FBI raid makes a cameo

In a section dubbed “Ongoing Scheme and Conspiracy,” James’s suit notes that some of the documents seized by the FBI from Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate on Aug. 8, 2022 — revealed in federal court filings to include tax-related records — may have been withheld from her investigators.

“Documents concerning taxes and accounting information would appear to be responsive to OAG’s subpoenas, but no such documents for Mr. Trump were produced,” according to the lawsuit.

James referenced a declaration form Trump attorney Alina Habba, who asserted that she conducted a thorough search of Trump’s Mar-a-Lago office and storage areas for any records relevant to James’ investigation. Her search came just days before the Justice Department issued a subpoena for any records with classified markings held at Mar-a-Lago.

Russia, Russia, Russia

Some long-lost figures scrutinized by congressional investigators and Special Counsel Robert Mueller also make cameos in James’ lawsuit. In a section alleging fraud against insurers and underwriters, the suit contends that Trump declined to disclose “any circumstances involving Russia and the 2016 presidential election” during a Jan. 10, 2017 meeting with underwriters meant to evaluate potential risks amid Trump’s effort to restructure his limited liability policies.

But later, underwriters flagged a series of Russia-related matters as potential causes for concern, including the June 2016 meeting at Trump Tower between Donald Trump Jr. and Natalia Veselnitskaya, a Russian lawyer who offered opposition research on Hillary Clinton. Trump Jr. claimed he had no interest in the information and it became a chapter that was largely consigned to history after the Mueller report was released.

The lawsuit goes on to offer a mega-list of investigations that Trump would later be subjected to — by Congress, Mueller, the U.S. Attorney’s office in Manhattan and other entities — emphasizing that “none of the investigations and inquiries … or the circumstances giving rise to those investigations and inquiries, had previously been disclosed by Trump Organization personnel to underwriters during renewal negotiations.”

Was $100 million windfall on Trump’s DC hotel based on lies?

Trump’s one-time marquee property in DC that became a key spot for Trump aides & allies to see and be seen during his presidency, the Trump International Hotel in the Old Post Office building on Pennsylvania Avenue, accounts for a huge part — roughly $100 million — of the $250 million-dollar value of the newly-filed suit.

The attorney general’s complaint says Trump used a wildly inflated personal financial statement essentially to trick Deutsche Bank into providing $170 million in funding for the luxury hotel project at a lower interest rate than it would have charged without the backing of Trump’s personal fortune for the effort.

Trump sold the hotel in May for a tidy profit many didn’t expect: $100 million. However, any difference in interest rates between what Trump paid and what the AG says he should have paid doesn’t come close to that figure. Yet James is taking the aggressive stance that Trump should have to fork over every penny he (and his family members) made on the whole hotel investment.

“I’m not sure how the government is entitled to all of it,” said Duncan Levin, a former federal prosecutor and asset forfeiture chief in the Manhattan District Attorney’s office. “The calculation of how much the government is entitled is complicated sometimes.”

Source Article from https://www.politico.com/news/2022/09/21/5-juiciest-takeaways-from-the-tish-james-lawsuit-against-donald-trump-00058171

“Of course, there is some panic,” he said. “I am worried that it will get worse, although I don’t know how it can be worse, and that it may be too late to leave.” He added, “But we have some unfinished business here, and the only tickets I could find were already over $16,000, which I can’t afford.”

Source Article from https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2022/09/21/putin-russia-mobilization-public-protest/

But it was Ms. Thomas’s interactions with John Eastman, a conservative lawyer who pushed Vice President Mike Pence to block or delay the certification of Electoral College votes on Jan. 6, 2021, that has most interested investigators.

“We are specifically investigating the activities of President Trump, John Eastman and others as they relate to the Constitution and certain other laws, including the Electoral Count Act, that set out the required process for the election and inauguration of the president,” the committee’s leaders — Representative Bennie Thompson, Democrat of Mississippi, and Representative Liz Cheney, Republican of Wyoming — wrote to Ms. Thomas. “The select committee has obtained evidence that John Eastman worked to develop alternate slates of electors to stop the electoral count on Jan. 6.”

The panel obtained at least one email between Ms. Thomas and Mr. Eastman after a federal judge ordered Mr. Eastman to turn over documents to the panel from the period after the November 2020 election when he was meeting with conservative groups to discuss fighting the election results.

That same judge has said it is “more likely than not” that Mr. Trump and Mr. Eastman committed two felonies as part of the effort, including conspiracy to defraud the American people.

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2022/09/21/us/politics/virginia-thomas-jan-6-panel.html

He spoke on the same day Russian President Vladimir Putin called up 300,000 military reservists for duty, a move which prompted rare protests on the streets of Russia.

Source Article from https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-62990141

Sept 21 (Reuters) – Russia has released 215 Ukrainians it took prisoner after a protracted battle for the port city of Mariupol earlier this year, including top military leaders, a senior official in Kyiv said on Wednesday.

The freed prisoners include the commander and deputy commander of the Azov battalion that did much of the fighting, said Andriy Yermak, the head of President Volodymyr Zelenskiy’s office.

The move is unexpected, since Russian-backed separatists last month said there would be a trial of Azov personnel, who Moscow describes as Nazis. Ukraine denies the charge.

In a statement, Yermak said the freed prisoners included Azov commander Lieutenant Colonel Denys Prokopenko and his deputy, Svyatoslav Palamar.

Also at liberty is Serhiy Volynsky, the commander of the 36th Marine Brigade of the Ukrainian Armed Forces.

The three men had helped lead a dogged weeks-long resistance from the bunkers and tunnels below Mariupol’s giant steel works before they and hundreds of Azov fighters surrendered in May to Russian-backed forces.

Yermak said that in return, Kyiv had freed 55 Russian prisoners as well as Viktor Medvedchuk, the leader of a banned pro-Russian party who was facing treason charges.

Public broadcaster Suspline said the exchange had happened near the northern Ukrainian city of Chernihiv.

Earlier in the day, Saudi Arabia said Russia had released 10 foreign prisoners of war captured in Ukraine following mediation by Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman. read more

Last month, the head of the Russian-backed separatist administration in the eastern Ukrainian region of Donetsk said a trial of captured Azov personnel would take place by the end of the summer. read more

The Azov unit, formed in 2014 as a militia to fight Russian-backed separatists, denies being fascist, and Ukraine says it has been reformed from its radical nationalist origins.

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

Thomson Reuters

Covers Canadian political, economic and general news as well as breaking news across North America, previously based in London and Moscow and a winner of Reuters’ Treasury scoop of the year.

Source Article from https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/ukraine-tv-russia-has-released-some-fighters-taken-during-mariupol-battle-2022-09-21/