Misrach Ewunetie, 20, is a Princeton University undergraduate student who was last seen on campus Oct. 14. She is 5 feet and 4 inches and weighs 130 pounds.

Princeton University


hide caption

toggle caption

Princeton University

Misrach Ewunetie, a 20-year-old undergraduate student, has been missing from Princeton University since last week, school officials said.

Ewunetie, who is expected to graduate in 2024, was last seen Friday, Oct. 14 at about 3 a.m. near Scully Hall, a dormitory building on campus. Her family contacted the school’s department of public safety Sunday saying they had not heard from her in days and asked them to do a wellness check.

The department issued a missing alert Monday and has increased the law enforcement presence at the school. Helicopters and drones have also been circling the area as the search continues.

Ewunetie is 5 feet, 4 inches tall and weighs 130 pounds according to university police. She has brown eyes, black hair and a light brown complexion.

People who may know where Ewunetie is may call the Princeton University Department of Public Safety at (609) 258-1000, or submit an anonymous tip here.

“Since the issuance of the Tiger Alert, our campus community has demonstrated an outpouring of support, concern, prayers and hopes for Misrach’s well-being and safe return,” Princeton’s Vice President for Campus Life Rochelle Calhoun said in a statement. “Thank you to everyone for continuing to hold Misrach and her family in your thoughts as our search continues.

Source Article from https://www.npr.org/2022/10/20/1130135380/misrach-ewunetie-princeton-university-missing

KYIV, Ukraine (AP) — Russian President Vladimir Putin doubled down Wednesday on his faltering invasion of Ukraine with a declaration of martial law in four illegally annexed regions and preparations within Russia for draconian new restrictions and crackdowns.

Putin’s drastic efforts to tighten his grip on Ukrainians and Russians follow a series of embarrassing setbacks: stinging battlefield defeats, sabotage and troubles with his troop mobilization.

The martial law order belies the Kremlin’s attempts to portray life in the annexed regions as returning to normal. The reality is that a military administration has replaced civilian leaders in the southern city of Kherson and a mass evacuation from the city is underway as a Ukrainian counteroffensive grinds on.

The battle for Kherson, a city of more than 250,000 people with key industries and a major port, is a pivotal moment for Ukraine and Russia heading into winter, when front lines could largely freeze for months. It’s the largest city Russia has held during the war, which began Feb. 24.

A trickle of evacuations from the city in recent days has become a flood. Local officials said Wednesday that 5,000 had left out of an expected 60,000. Russian state television showed residents crowding on the banks of the Dnieper River, many with small children, to cross by boats to the east — and, from there, deeper into Russian-controlled territory.

In announcing martial law effective Thursday, Putin told his Security Council, “We are working to solve very difficult large-scale tasks to ensure Russia’s security and safe future.”

Putin’s army is under growing pressure from a Ukrainian counteroffensive that has clawed back territory. The Russian leader is also faltering after the sabotage of a strategically important bridge linking Russia with Crimea, assassinations of Kremlin-installed officials in Kherson and mistakes he himself has admitted in his partial troop mobilization.

Putin’s martial law declaration authorized the creation of civil defense forces; the potential imposition of curfews; restrictions on travel and public gatherings; tighter censorship; and broader law enforcement powers in Kherson and the other annexed regions of Donetsk, Luhansk and Zaporizhzhia.

In an ominous move, Putin opened the door for restrictive measures to be extended across Russia, too. That may lead to a tougher crackdown on dissent than the current dispersal of antiwar protests and jailing of people making statements or providing information about the fighting that differs from the official line.

The severity of new restrictions inside Russia depends on proximity to Ukraine.

Putin put areas nearest Ukraine on medium alert, including annexed Crimea, Krasnodar, Belgorod, Bryansk, Kursk, Rostov. Local leaders are authorized to organize territorial defense, ensure public order and safety, safeguard transportation, communication and energy facilities, and use these resources to help meet the Russian military’s needs.

Leaders in these border areas can also carry out resettlements of residents and restrict freedom of movement. Leaders in other areas have been granted similar powers, depending on their alert level.

In the Kherson region, Ukrainian forces have pushed back Russian positions on the west bank of the Dnieper River. By pulling civilians out and fortifying positions in the region’s main city, which backs onto the river, Russian forces appear to be hoping that the wide, deep waters will serve as a natural barrier against the Ukrainian advance.

Russia has said the movement of Ukrainians to Russia or Russian-controlled territory is voluntary, but in many cases, they have no other routes out, and no other choice.

Under martial law, authorities can force evacuations. Ukraine’s national security chief, Oleksiy Danilov, said on Twitter that Putin’s declaration is “preparation for the mass deportation of the Ukrainian population to the depressed regions of Russia to change the ethnic composition of the occupied territory.”

For months, reports have circulated of forced deportations, and an Associated Press investigation found that Russian officials deported thousands of Ukrainian children to be raised as Russian.

Ukraine’s Foreign Ministry said Putin’s decree is illegal, calling it part of his effort “to deprive the inhabitants of the temporarily occupied territories of Ukraine of even basic human rights.”

Russian authorities played up fears of an attack on Kherson, seemingly to persuade residents to leave. Text messages warned residents to expect shelling, Russian state media reported.

One resident reached by phone described military vehicles leaving the city, Moscow-installed authorities scrambling to load documents onto trucks, and thousands of people lining up for ferries and buses.

“It looks more like a panic rather than an organized evacuation. People are buying the last remaining groceries in grocery shops and are running to the Kherson river port, where thousands of people are already waiting,” the resident, Konstantin, said. The AP is withholding his family name, as he requested, for his safety.

“People are scared by talk of explosions, missiles and a possible blockade of the city,” he added.

Leaflets told evacuees they could take two large suitcases, medicine and food for a few days.

Andriy Yermak, head of the Ukrainian presidential office, called the evacuation “a propaganda show” and said Russia’s claims that Kyiv’s forces might shell Kherson “a rather primitive tactic, given that the armed forces do not fire at Ukrainian cities.”

Ukrainian military analyst Oleh Zhdanov said the operation could presage intense fighting and “the harshest” tactics from Russia’s new commander for Ukraine, Gen. Sergei Surovikin.

“They are prepared to wipe the city from the face of the Earth but not give it back to the Ukrainians,” Zhdanov said in an interview.

In a rare acknowledgement of the pressure that Kyiv’s troops are exerting, Surovikin described the Kherson situation as “very difficult.” Russian bloggers interpreted the comments as a warning of a possible Kremlin pullback. Surovikin claimed that Ukrainian forces were planning to destroy a hydroelectric facility, which local officials said would flood part of Kherson.

Incapable of holding all the territory it has seized and struggling with manpower and equipment losses, Russia has stepped up air bombardments, with a scorched-earth campaign targeting Ukrainian power plants and other key infrastructure. Russia has also increased its use of weaponized Iranian drones to hit apartment buildings and other civilian targets.

Russia launched numerous missiles over Ukraine on Wednesday. Ukrainian authorities said they shot down four cruise missiles and 10 Iranian drones. Energy facilities were hit in the Vinnytsia and Ivano-Frankivsk regions.

Air raid sirens blared in the Ukrainian capital, Kyiv, sending many people into metro stations for shelter. Mayor Vitali Klitschko announced the city would start seasonal centralized heating on Thursday at lower temperatures than normal to conserve energy.

A Ukrainian energy official, Oleksandr Kharchenko reported Wednesday that 40% of the country’s electric system had been severely damaged. Authorities warned all residents to cut consumption and said power supply would be reduced Thursday to prevent blackouts. One area where power and water were reported knocked out due to overnight shelling was Enerhodar. The southern city is next to the Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant, which is one of the war’s most worrisome flashpoints.

Missiles severely damaged an energy facility near Zelenskyy’s hometown, Kryvyi Rih, a city in south-central Ukraine, cutting power to villages, towns and to one city district, the regional governor reported.

___

Karmanau reported from Tallinn, Estonia.

___

Follow AP’s coverage of the war in Ukraine: https://apnews.com/hub/russia-ukraine

Source Article from https://apnews.com/article/russia-ukraine-war-martial-law-e45db58f408947b85f89652fcc4ef39a

There is no one-size-fits-all answer to air defense threats and to these drones specifically, experts say. They point to a diverse set of weapons capable of defending priority targets, from Stinger missiles, which are shoulder-fired weapons developed long ago, to newer, more sophisticated systems like the NASAMS, said Tom Karako, the director of the Missile Defense Project at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, a think tank.

Source Article from https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2022/10/20/russia-iran-kamikaze-drones/

Trump claimed widespread fraud cost him the election. Numerous investigations have shown those claims have no merit.

ExploreFive fraud claims: What investigators found

A detailed account of Trump’s allegations was contained in the December 2020 Fulton County lawsuit. The allegations were based on what Trump’s attorneys billed as expert analysis of state registration and voting records

Election experts quickly debunked the claims. In court filings, they called the analyses “highly inaccurate,” “wildly unreliable,” and “worthless.”

Now a judge has found Trump knew the statistics were inaccurate by the time he vouched for them again a few weeks later in the Atlanta federal lawsuit. That lawsuit challenged the Fulton County proceedings and sought to decertify the presidential election in Georgia.

The judge’s ruling comes in a third lawsuit brought by Trump attorney John Eastman, who helped craft dubious legal arguments that Vice President Mike Pence could refuse to accept the Biden electors on Jan. 6. The House committee investigating the Jan. 6 attacks subpoenaed emails and other correspondence from Eastman as part of its investigation.

ExploreInside the campaign to undermine Georgia’s election

In his lawsuit, Eastman claimed hundreds of documents were protected by attorney-client privilege or were the work product of potential lawsuits. House investigators argued that documents used in the commission of a crime are not privileged and asked the judge to review them to determine whether they should be released.

Earlier this year, Carter ruled that Eastman and Trump had more likely than not committed federal crimes during their campaign to overturn the election.

In his latest ruling, Carter cited the false fraud statistics. He reviewed correspondence in which Eastman relayed “concerns” from Trump’s team “about including specific numbers in the paragraph dealing with felons, deceased, moved, etc.” in the federal lawsuit.

“Although the president signed a verification for (the state court filing) back on Dec. 1, he has since been made aware that some of the allegations (and evidence proffered by the experts) has been inaccurate,” Eastman wrote. “For him to sign a new verification with the knowledge (and incorporation by reference) would not be accurate.”

Carter noted that Trump signed a verification swearing under oath that the numbers were “true and correct” or “believed to be true and correct” to the best of his knowledge.

Carter ordered the release of four documents based on the false Georgia lawsuit statistics. In his order, the judge indicates the false claims were used “for the purpose of delaying the January 6 vote.”

Carter also ordered the release of other documents to the committee for various reasons. They must be given to the committee by Oct. 28.

Source Article from https://www.ajc.com/politics/judge-trump-knew-his-georgia-voting-fraud-stats-were-inaccurate/LM4JRDYZYRGPHADPQABRBRWAZM/

A federal judge on Wednesday ordered the release of emails from John Eastman, a former Donald Trump attorney, to House investigators, saying the communications were made in furtherance of a crime related to Trump’s efforts to subvert the 2020 election.

“The emails show that President Trump knew that the specific numbers of voter fraud were wrong but continued to tout those numbers, both in court and to the public,” Judge David O. Carter wrote.

“The Court finds that these emails are sufficiently related to and in furtherance of a conspiracy to defraud the United States,” he added.

Carter, who sits on the federal district court in central California, already released many of Eastman’s emails from around January 2021 to the House select committee investigating the US Capitol attack, but the two sides were still arguing over 562 additional documents from Eastman’s Chapman University email account.

For eight of the 500-plus Eastman documents the judge was examining, the judge said that the materials could be released because they fit in the so-called crime-fraud exception, which allows disclosure of otherwise privileged materials if the communications were related to or in furtherance of illegal or fraudulent conduct.

Four of the documents were from email threads discussing prospective election litigation. In them, Carter wrote, “Dr. Eastman and other attorneys suggest that – irrespective of the merits – the primary goal of filing is to delay or otherwise disrupt the January 6 vote.”

Carter’s new order cited one email where Trump’s attorneys state that “merely having this case pending in the Supreme Court, and not ruled on, may be enough to delay consideration of Georgia.”

“This email, read in context with other documents in this review, make clear that President Trump filed certain lawsuits not to obtain legal relief, but to disrupt or delay the January 6 congressional proceedings through the courts,” the ruling stated.

“The Court finds that these four documents are sufficiently related to and in furtherance of the obstruction crime,” it adds.

CNN has reached out to representatives for Trump and Eastman for comment.

Four other emails that the judge is ordering disclosed “demonstrate an effort by President Trump and his attorneys to press false claims in federal court for the purpose of delaying the January 6 vote.” Carter pointed to litigation that Trump filed challenging the election results in Georgia. The judge went on to cite a December 2020 email where Eastman said that Trump had been made aware that some of the allegations made in a early December state court election challenge were inaccurate.

According to Carter, Eastman wrote in the December 30, 2020, email: “Although the President signed a verification for [the state court filing] back on Dec. 1, he has since been made aware that some of the allegations (and evidence proffered by the experts) has been inaccurate. For him to sign a new verification with that knowledge (and incorporation by reference) would not be accurate.”

Yet Trump and his attorneys went on to file a federal lawsuit referencing the same inaccurate numbers, Carter said. The federal lawsuit Trump’s attorneys filed did not incorporate the numbers in the body of the complaint, but rather, the lawsuit included as an attachment the state court election challenge. Trump filed it, as Carter noted, without “rectifying, clarifying, or otherwise changing” the bogus fraud numbers.

The federal lawsuit filed by Trump also included that a footnote that Carter characterized as a Trump “attempt to disclaim his responsibility over the misleading allegations.” Trump said in the footnote he was only relying on the figures that that had been presented to him. “But, by his attorneys’ own admissions, the information provided to him was that the alleged voter fraud numbers were inaccurate,” Carter said Wednesday.

Carter’s findings that Trump and Eastman “knowingly” misrepresented voter fraud numbers in federal court will bolster the committee’s investigation into the former President’s election reversal gambits.

The committee has repeatedly argued that a core tenet of Trump’s plan to overturn the 2020 election results was to file frivolous lawsuits intended to delay certification of the results in key swing states. The judge’s ruling echoes that sentiment. The revelation of the emails also comes as the Justice Department as well as the local prosecutor in Atlanta have launched their own criminal probes looking at the 2020 election schemes.

Eastman must also hand over portions of materials related to his proposal for then-Vice President Mike Pence to disrupt certification of the 2020 election on January 6, 2021, the judge ordered Wednesday. Thirty-three documents were ordered disclosed in total, under the new order, which set a deadline for doing so for October 28.

Earlier this month, the committee argued that Eastman has been “consistently unreliable” as he’s tried to protect his communications from the ongoing probe and that the investigators should now get access to more emails from one of his work email accounts.

This story has been updated with additional details.

CNN’s Katelyn Polantz contributed to this report.

Source Article from https://www.cnn.com/2022/10/19/politics/eastman-house-trump-documents/index.html

The committee had argued in its filing that Eastman’s claim of privilege was voided by the “crime/fraud exemption.” That exemption means communication between a lawyer and their client does not have to be kept confidential if the attorney is found to be helping the client commit a crime. To resolve the dispute, the committee asked Carter, the judge, to privately review the documents to see whether he thought Eastman had, in fact, been assisting Trump in criminal acts.

Source Article from https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/10/19/trump-2020-election-eastman-jan-6/

“Tomorrow we will apply controlled, calculated consumption restrictions, which we have to do, to ensure the system functions in a balanced way,” its statement said on social media.

Source Article from https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-63323263

A Wisconsin taxpayers group has asked the Supreme Court to step in on an emergency basis and temporarily block the Biden administration’s student loan forgiveness program from taking effect. The application for student loan forgiveness officially opened Monday.

Student loan cancellation – worth up to $20,000 per eligible borrower – could begin as soon as Sunday, October 23, if the court does not intervene, according to the filing from the Brown County Taxpayers Association.

Have you applied for Biden’s student loan forgiveness? Tell us

The request was filed to Justice Amy Coney Barrett, who has jurisdiction over the lower court that ruled on the case. She is likely to refer the matter to the full court.

The Biden administration is facing several legal challenges over the program, but this is the first to reach the Supreme Court.

The taxpayer group’s lawsuit has not gained traction at the lower court level. A trial-level federal judge dismissed the case within two days of it being filed, ruling that the group lacked standing to bring the lawsuit.

In a one-sentence order, the US 7th Circuit Court of Appeals also refused the plaintiff’s emergency request for a pause.

The Brown County Taxpayers Association, which is being represented by the Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty, argues that the President does not have the legal authority to implement his student loan forgiveness program.

In the new filing with the Supreme Court, lawyers for the group argued that the implementation of the program would be a “staggering blow” to the US Treasury and taxpayers.

“We are witnessing a gargantuan increase in the national debt accomplished by a complete disregard for limitations on the constitutional spending authority,” they wrote.

The Biden administration argues that Congress gave the secretary of education the power to discharge debt in a 2003 law known as the HEROES Act.

The independent Congressional Budget Office has estimated that Biden’s student loan forgiveness program could cost $400 billion.

How Biden’s student loan forgiveness plan could work

Biden’s student loan forgiveness program, first announced in August, aims to deliver debt relief to millions of borrowers before federal student loan payments resume in January after a nearly three-year, pandemic-related pause.

While the application officially opened on Monday, the Biden administration has agreed in court documents to hold off on canceling any debt until October 23. Once processing begins, most qualifying borrowers are expected to receive debt relief within weeks.

Under Biden’s plan, individual borrowers who earned less than $125,000 in either 2020 or 2021 and married couples or heads of households who made less than $250,000 annually in those years will see up to $10,000 of their federal student loan debt forgiven.

If a qualifying borrower also received a federal Pell grant while enrolled in college, the individual is eligible for up to $20,000 of debt forgiveness.

Mounting legal challenges

In a separate lawsuit, six GOP-led states have also asked a federal judge to put student loan cancellation on hold until issuing a final ruling on the case. The judge’s order on that request is expected soon – though the losing party is expected to immediately appeal. That would send the case to the 8th Circuit Court of Appeals, where it is likely to face a panel of conservative judges.

The states have argued that the Biden administration does not have the legal authority to grant broad student loan forgiveness.

The states also claim that the policy would hurt them financially, as well as the revenues of a student loan servicer based in Missouri known as MOHELA.

The loan forgiveness policy creates an incentive for borrowers to consolidate Federal Family Education Loans owned by MOHELA into Direct Loans owned by the government, “depriving them (MOHELA) of the ongoing revenue it earns from servicing those loans,” according to the lawsuit.

On the same day the lawsuit was filed, the Department of Education changed its policy so that borrowers whose federal student loans are guaranteed by the government but held by private lenders – including those made by the former Federal Family Education Loan program – were no longer eligible for debt relief.

The move cut out an estimated 700,000 people from the student loan forgiveness program.

This story has been updated with additional information.

CNN’s Tierney Sneed and Ariane de Vogue contributed to this report.

Source Article from https://www.cnn.com/2022/10/19/politics/biden-student-loan-forgiveness-supreme-court/index.html

Los Angeles Councilmember Kevin De León said in a television interview airing Wednesday night that he “will not resign,” according to a partial transcript of the interview released by Noticiero Univision.

“I’m so sorry. I am extremely sorry, and that is why I apologize to all my people, to my entire community, for the damage caused by the painful words that were carried out that day last year,” De León said in the interview with Noticiero Univision anchor León Krauze, according to the transcript. The interview was conducted at Univision 34’s studio in Los Angeles.

“No, I will not resign, because there is a lot of work ahead,” De León said. “There’s a lot of work in trying to handle the crises that are taking place in the district: the [COVID-19] infections, unemployment, the threat of evictions and the humanitarian crisis of homelessness.”

De León also said that he is “sorry for the damage, for the wounds that exist today in our communities.”

Also Wednesday, De León sent a letter to City Council President Paul Krekorian in which he expressed his “deepest apologies” to Councilmember Mike Bonin, his family, his district’s constituents and to every resident of the city. “I will be spending the coming weeks and months personally asking for your forgiveness,” he wrote.

Krekorian, who has repeatedly called on De León to resign, reiterated Wednesday afternoon that the councilman must “step down.”

“I believe Mr. De León has it in him to be a better person than we heard on that tape, but apologizing is not the same as making amends. We need to show the world that there is no seat for racism, exclusion and disrespect on the Los Angeles City Council.”

Bonin also said Wednesday that De León needs to resign for the city to move forward and that “his stubborn refusal to do what everyone else knows is necessary is deepening the wound he has inflicted on Los Angeles.”

“De León’s comments are gaslighting of the highest order,” Bonin said. “He describes cruel, dehumanizing remarks about a child as ‘flippant.’ He says he should have ‘intervened,’ as if he were a mere bystander to a racist conversation in which he played a central and ignominious role.”

De León gave similar comments in an interview that aired Wednesday on KCAL-TV Channel 9. His statements follow widespread calls for his resignation, including from President Biden. Then-acting City Council President Mitch O’Farrell on Monday stripped De León and Councilmember Gil Cedillo of committee duties in an effort to pressure them to resign.

The racist comments on a recording that rocked Los Angeles City Hall ensnared Councilman Kevin de León in controversy. The tape also revealed an undercurrent of ambition and grievance in his political career.

De León, the onetime leader of the California state Senate, took part in the October 2021 meeting with then-City Council President Nury Martinez, Cedillo, and Ron Herrera, the leader of the Los Angeles Labor Federation, to discuss the proposed redistricting maps of the city’s 15 council districts and how to retain and expand Latino political power. Martinez and Herrera both resigned last week.

The conversation focused on heavily on race, and at one point De León suggested that Bonin used his Black son as a prop akin to a designer handbag.

“I shouldn’t have made that flippant remark,” De León told KCAL-TV Channel 9.

“The comment was directed more towards Nury Martinez and her penchant for having luxury accessories and luxury goods. It was a joke towards her and not towards Mike Bonin’s family. But nonetheless, I apologize to Mike Bonin’s family, profusely,” De León said.”

De León, 55, has two years left in his City Council term to represent the 14th Council District, which includes downtown, Boyle Heights, Eagle Rock and other Eastside neighborhoods.

Hugo Garcia, a community activist who lives in El Sereno, said he was just learning Wednesday afternoon of De León’s announcement that he would not step down.

“It’s good that he comes out and states what his intention is,” Garcia said, adding that both supporters and those calling for him to resign want to know what he plans to do.

De León’s interview will air tonight at 6:30 p.m. on Noticiero Univision and on ViX.com at 7 p.m.

Source Article from https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2022-10-19/kevin-de-leon-no-im-not-resigning

With less than three weeks until the midterm elections, Georgians are already casting their ballots at a fast pace — with vote counts on Tuesday surpassing 2020 presidential election records for the second day of early voting, surging to nearly twice the early vote totals of 2018 at the same point.

The outcome of Georgia’s Senate race could be critical in deciding the balance of power in Washington.

As Georgia entered its third day of early in-person voting on Wednesday, over 291,700 people have voted — 268,050 in person and 23,690 absentee. In 2020, the early vote numbers after the second day were 266,403, and in 2018 they were 147,289, according to the secretary of state’s office.

“We’re extremely pleased that so many Georgians are able to cast their votes, in record numbers and without any reports of substantial delays,” said Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger. “This is a testament to the hard work of Georgia’s election workers, the professionals who keep our elections convenient and secure.”

Georgia’s second day of early voting totals marks a 75.3% increase from that same point in 2018 early midterm voting and an “astounding” 3.3% increase from the second day of early voting in the 2020 presidential election, the state’s top elections official said.

University of Florida professor Michael McDonald, who oversees the school’s U.S. Elections Project, said midterm elections typically turn out far fewer voters than during years when a presidential election is held, though recent numbers indicate a growing trend of participation over the past few cycles.

The state hit totals of 131,318 on Monday, its first day of early voting. That’s slightly smaller than 2020’s 136,739 total and significantly higher than 2018’s 70,849 count.

“We have reviewed the turnout yesterday and we did set a midterm 1st day of early voting & we nearly hit the record for a Presidential,” said Gabe Sterling, with the Georgia Secretary of State’s Office, said in a tweet.

Georgia has a number of critical midterm races on the ballot this election cycle, with highly contested contests for Senate, House, the governor’s seat and the secretary of state’s position.

The state received pushback in 2021, when Republican Gov. Brian Kemp — currently up for reelection against voting rights activist Stacey Abrams — signed into law a sweeping elections bill that Democrats widely deemed as restrictive, noting the legislation increases regulations on mail voting. The also imposed requirements to try and keep poll lines shorter and increase the availability of poll workers.

Statewide reports show lines have been mostly short so far, though some voters have waited to vote for up to an hour. In one of Georgia’s largest counties, Gwinnett, wait times were about 30 minutes at the county’s Registrations and Elections Office. Many other polling locations show no wait times at all.

The new voting law also limits drop box locations, cuts back on voting hours and days, and bans handing out food and drinks to voters waiting in line. State party leaders say the voting numbers show people are overcoming barriers not that they don’t exist, arguing voter suppression is not synonymous with turnout.

Primary voter turnout this year — the first test of Democratic predictions that the bill’s heightened requirements might restrict voting — exceeded previous voting records, leaving Republicans to push back on the allegations.

“[Stacey] Abrams and President [Joe] Biden lied to the people of Georgia and the country for political gain,” Raffensperger said. “From day one, I said that Georgia’s election law balanced security and access, and the facts have proved me right.”

Esosa Osa, the deputy executive director of Fair Fight — founded by Abrams in 2014 — has said that as primary turnout grew in Geor­­­gia, so did the turnout gap between white and Black voters.

Source Article from https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/georgia-outpacing-presidential-election-levels-early-midterms-voting/story?id=91750811

“We’re pleased that on behalf of our client, E. Jean Carroll, we were able to take Donald Trump’s deposition today. We are not able to comment further,” the law firm representing her, Kaplan Hecker & Fink, said in a statement.

Trump has said Carroll’s rape allegation is “a hoax and a lie.”

His legal team worked for years to delay his deposition in the lawsuit, which was filed when the Republican was still president. A federal judge last week rejected Trump’s request for another delay, saying he couldn’t “run the clock out on plaintiff’s attempt to gain a remedy for what allegedly was a serious wrong.”

Alina Habba, an attorney representing Trump, said Wednesday, “My client was pleased to set the record straight today. This case is nothing more than a political ploy like many others in the long list of witch hunts against Donald Trump.”

Carroll was to have been questioned by Trump’s lawyers last Friday. Neither her attorneys nor Trump’s have responded to questions about how that deposition went.

The lawyers also haven’t disclosed whether Trump’s deposition was done in person or remotely, over video. Trump was in Florida on Wednesday. The lawsuit is being handled in a court in New York City.

Anything Trump said during his deposition could potentially be used as evidence in an upcoming civil trial. He hasn’t faced any criminal charges related to Carroll’s allegations, and any prosecution is unlikely. The deadline for criminal charges over alleged sexual assaults that occurred in the 1990s has long expired.

Similar legal deadlines also applied to civil lawsuits claiming sexual assault. As a result, Carroll chose to sue Trump for defamation over comments he made in 2019 when he denied any wrongdoing. She maintains that her reputation was damaged by his denials and attacks on her credibility and character.

However, New York lawmakers recently gave people a one-year window to take old sexual assault claims to civil courts. Carroll’s lawyer has told the court she intends to file such a suit against Trump after that window opens in late November.

According to Carroll’s account, she bumped into Trump as the two were shopping at the Bergdorf Goodman store across Fifth Avenue from Trump Tower. At the time, Carroll was on television as the host of an advice program, “Ask E. Jean.”

She said the two engaged in friendly banter as she tried to help him pick out a gift. But when they were briefly alone in a dressing room, she said he pulled down her tights and raped her.

In a recent statement, Trump called that story “a complete con job.”

“I don’t know this woman, have no idea who she is, other than it seems she got a picture of me many years ago, with her husband, shaking my hand on a reception line at a celebrity charity event,” Trump said.

Source Article from https://www.politico.com/news/2022/10/19/trump-deposed-jean-carroll-defamation-lawsuit-00062628

The Internal Revenue Service announced Wednesday higher federal income tax brackets and standard deductions for next year, which will be a welcomed cost of living adjustment for many Americans.

Why it matters: The new brackets for 2023 mean paychecks for many Americans could see a boost, which will help consumers who are being hit hard by inflation and aren’t seeing raises that keep pace with price increases.

2022 tax brackets for individuals

Individual rates: Each of the tax brackets’ income ranges jumped about 7% from last year’s numbers. Here’s a breakdown of last year’s income and rates:

  • $10,275 or less: 10% marginal rate
  • $10,276 to $41,775: 12%
  • $41,776 to $89,075: 22%
  • $89,076 to $170,050: 24%
  • $170,051 to $215,950: 32%
  • $215,951 to $539,900: 35%
  • $539,901 or more: 37%
2022 tax brackets for married couples

Married couples filing jointly brackets jumped about 7% as well. Here’s a breakdown of last year’s income and rates:

  • $20,550 or less: 10% marginal rate
  • $20,551 to $83,550: 12%
  • $83,551 to $178,150: 22%
  • $178,151 to $340,100: 24%
  • $340,101 to $431,900: 32%
  • $431,901 to $647,850: 35%
  • $647,851 or more: 37%
2023 tax brackets and income

State of play: Inflation is hitting Americans hard right now. In September, consumer prices soared and were up 8.2% compared to a year before.

  • By adjusting the tax brackets — as the IRS does every year — it is attempting to stop “bracket creep,” which happens when inflation pushes taxpayers into a higher income tax bracket without an increase in real income.

Worth noting: The jump could have been higher if not for a tax overhaul signed by former President Trump in 2017, the New York Times reports.

  • Republicans at the time tied the adjustments to the chained Consumer Price Index, which tends to rise at a slower pace than the standard CPI.
  • In September, chained CPI grew 0.2 percentage points slower than the standard CPI compared to 2021.

Thought bubble via Axios’ Emily Peck: These adjustments happen every year but are significant now due to inflation.

  • Congress passed these adjustments the last time inflation was high decades ago. It is hard to imagine lawmakers joining together to enact this kind of policy now.

What they’re saying: “Inflation adjustments to tax brackets mean that it will be harder for taxpayers to hit those higher brackets, and therefore will have more income taxed at lower rates next year,” said Tim Steffen, director of tax planning with wealth management company Baird, in a statement.

Go deeper: IRS releases inflation-adjustments for next year’s taxes

Source Article from https://www.axios.com/2022/10/19/income-tax-brackets-2023-irs

The Supreme Court on Wednesday was asked to block the Biden administration’s student loan debt relief program, which is set to take effect this weekend.

The request by the Brown County Taxpayers Association in Wisconsin was directed to Justice Amy Coney Barrett, who is responsible for handling emergency application requests from the 7th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals.

The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the group’s request.

A federal judge in Wisconsin earlier this month dismissed the taxpayers association’s lawsuit challenging the program, ruling that the group did not have legal standing to block the plan.

The group then filed an appeal of that ruling to the 7th Circuit appeals court.

Wednesday’s request to Barrett asks that the plan by President Joe Biden to cancel up to $20,000 in student debt for millions of borrowers be suspended pending the outcome of the pending appeal.

The U.S. Department of Education opened its application for student loan forgiveness in a beta test on Friday.

More than 8 million people submitted requests for relief over that weekend.

The application officially launched on Monday. The Biden administration could start processing borrowers’ requests for student loan forgiveness as soon as this Sunday.

Legal challenges against student loan forgiveness

The legal challenges that have been brought against the president’s plan continue to mount.

Six Republican-led states — Arkansas, Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska and South Carolina — are trying to block Biden’s plan, arguing that the president doesn’t have the power to issue nationwide debt relief without Congress. They’re also claiming that the policy would harm private companies that service some federal student loans by reducing their business.

The main obstacle for those hoping to foil the president’s action is finding a plaintiff who can prove they’ve been harmed by the policy. “Such injury is needed to establish what courts call ‘standing,'” said Laurence Tribe, a Harvard law professor.

Tribe said he isn’t convinced that any of the current lawsuits filed have successfully done that.

This is a developing story. Check back for updates.

Source Article from https://www.cnbc.com/2022/10/19/supreme-court-asked-to-block-bidens-student-loan-forgiveness-plan.html

Russian forces launched missile strikes against a string of targets in Ukraine over the past 24 hours, killing three civilians, damaging energy infrastructure and forcing residents to find cover in their homes or in shelters, Ukrainian officials said on Wednesday.

Those and other recent strikes across Ukraine have caused hardship and death but have not halted Ukraine’s attempts to regain territory, underscoring how Russia’s targeting of civilian infrastructure in cities including Kyiv and other towns has not translated into fundamental changes on the battlefield.

President Volodymyr Zelensky of Ukraine said in an overnight speech that more than 10 regions in the north, east and south of the country had been attacked since Tuesday.

Missiles rained down on the southern town of Orikhiv in Zaporizhzhia Province for almost seven hours, killing three people and wounding eight others, Oleksandr Starukh, the head of Ukraine’s military administration in the region, wrote on Telegram. He said the attack had destroyed homes, an educational facility and the town council building, forcing 200 people to evacuate from the town and cutting off power and water.

Even before this latest attack, most residents had already fled the town, which is squeezed between the Ukrainian and Russian front lines in an increasingly volatile battlefield in southern Ukraine. Ukrainian control of the town has stood in the way of Russian attempts to close in on the much larger provincial capital.

Russia has pounded civilian targets in Ukraine since its full-scale invasion began in February, on occasion killing dozens of civilians in a single attack. But Moscow has escalated its attacks since Oct. 8, in response to an attack on a bridge that connects the Crimean Peninsula with Russia. The attacks have not stopped Ukraine from stepping up its own pressure in a counteroffensive to retake the strategically important southern region of Kherson.

Control of that area, however precarious, matters to Russia. It allows Russian forces to operate on the western side of the Dnipro River, which divides the country into two. That, in turn, allows Russia to threaten the rest of the Ukrainian-controlled Black Sea coast, including the city of Odesa.

Ukraine’s energy infrastructure has been in Russia’s crosshairs, and Mr. Zelensky said this week that 30 percent of the country’s power stations had been struck. On Wednesday, missiles hit a power plant in the southern city of Kryvyi Rih, cutting off electricity, according to Oleksandr Vilkul, the head of the regional military administration.

Missiles also struck a coal-fired power plant in Burshtyn, in western Ukraine’s Ivano-Frankivsk Province, the head of the regional military administration, Svitlana Onyshchuk, wrote on Telegram. Attacks on western Ukraine, which is far from the war’s front lines, are relatively rare.

“A fire broke out,” Ms. Onyshchuk wrote. “All services are working. Rescuers are on site.”

Shelling damaged three ambulances in Kharkiv Province in the northeast of the country on Wednesday, according to a statement posted on Facebook by the regional council, which said that nobody was injured. Ukrainian forces last month recaptured dozens of towns in the region, dealing a heavy blow to Russia and challenging President Vladimir V. Putin’s war effort.

Buttressed by air defense systems from its western allies, the Ukrainian military has improved its ability to shoot down missiles since the Russian invasion began in February. Ukraine’s Air Force Command said in a statement that it had shot down four out of six cruise missiles and 10 self-destructing drones aimed at Kyiv, Ukraine’s capital, and in Vinnytsia region, southwest of Kyiv, over the past 24 hours.

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/live/2022/10/19/world/russia-ukraine-war-news

A man tows a canoe through a flooded street of his neighborhood in New Smyrna Beach, Fla., last month. Vibrio vulnificus thrives in warm, brackish floodwaters.

Jim Watson/AFP via Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Jim Watson/AFP via Getty Images

A man tows a canoe through a flooded street of his neighborhood in New Smyrna Beach, Fla., last month. Vibrio vulnificus thrives in warm, brackish floodwaters.

Jim Watson/AFP via Getty Images

Parts of Florida hit hardest by Hurricane Ian are seeing nearly double the normal number of infections from a flesh-eating bacteria that thrives in brackish floodwaters.

According to the Florida Department of Health, the state has seen 65 cases of Vibrio vulnificus infections and 11 deaths from the bacterium in 2022. Lee County, where Ian made landfall on Sept 28 as a category 4 storm, accounts for 45% of the cases.

What is Vibrio vulnificus?

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention says that Vibrio vulnificus lives in warm seawater and is a type of foodborne illness-causing bacteria called “halophilic” because they require salt to survive.

The bacteria population increases during the warmer summer months and may also see a boost after sewage spills into coastal waters, as it did during Hurricane Ian.

The storm brought more than 17 inches of rain over West-Central Florida, leading to surges of up to 12 feet.

Infections can lead to skin breakouts and ulcers

Vibrio vulnificus infections can be caused by eating undercooked oysters and shellfish.

But in the aftermath of a hurricane, infections typically start when open wounds, cuts or scratches come into direct contact with warm brackish water. Skin breakdowns and ulcers follow.

Severe illness from Vibrio vulnificus infections is rare. This is the first time the number of cases in Florida has risen above 50 since 2008, when the Florida Department of Health began reporting data on infections.

But for those with weakened immune systems from medication or chronic disease, the infection can become life-threatening if the bacteria enter the bloodstream, leading to symptoms like diarrhea, abdominal cramping, vomiting, fever and chills.

A car sits in floodwater after Hurricane Ian in Orlando. Those who come into contact with floodwaters should immediately wash all wounds.

Gerardo Mora/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Gerardo Mora/Getty Images

A car sits in floodwater after Hurricane Ian in Orlando. Those who come into contact with floodwaters should immediately wash all wounds.

Gerardo Mora/Getty Images

Floodwater contact remains a big risk

When it comes to preventing infections, the Florida Department of Health reminds residents to remember that “water and wounds don’t mix.” It advises residents not to wade through standing water and to avoid eating or drinking anything that has touched floodwaters.

Those who do come into contact with floodwaters should immediately wash and clean all wounds. You should seek medical care if infections show signs of infection such as redness, oozing or swelling.

Overall risk will decrease as the Vibrio vulnificus population shrinks in late October, when Florida’s hot weather wanes.

A spokesperson for the Florida Department of Health told CNN that the number of reported infections has already started to decrease since the hurricane first hit.

Source Article from https://www.npr.org/2022/10/19/1129865243/flesh-eating-bacteria-florida-floodwater

The Kremlin-appointed leaders of the occupied Kherson region in southern Ukraine say they have started to evacuate civilians further away from the frontline.

Vladimir Saldo, the Russian-backed governor of Kherson, told Russian TV late Tuesday they intend to relocate up to 60,000 people to the left bank of the Dnipro river.

Ukraine has previously said that Russia is forcibly deporting Ukrainian civilians; human rights groups and international bodies have warned the practice may constitute a crime against humanity.

Saldo had announced the “organized relocation” of civilians on Telegram on Tuesday.

“Our key task is to save human lives and allow the troops of the Russian Federation to effectively perform their functions in protecting the Kherson region,” he said.

“We will take the civilian population to the left bank in an organized, phased manner.”

All ministries of the Russian-installed civil administration in the Kherson region will also move to the left bank of Dnipro, Saldo said, adding that entry to the region will be closed for civilians for seven days.

Residents in Kherson received a text message asking to leave the city due to the threat of shelling by the Ukrainian army on Wednesday morning, Russian state media RIA Novosti reported.

The “massive deportation of civilians” by Russia could, along with other alleged abuses, constitute crimes against humanity, according to a July report by the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE).

In September, Ukraine’s deputy ambassador to the United Nations, Khrystyna Hayovyshyn, told the UN Security Council that Russia had forcibly deported 2.5 million people from Ukraine – including 38,000 children – saying this was a violation of human rights.

The Kremlin’s mass evacuation of citizens from Kherson comes amid Kyiv’s efforts to retake territory in the south.

A Russian official warned of a potential new Ukrainian counteroffensive in Kherson on Wednesday.

Saldo’s deputy, Kirill Stremousov, said the situation was “stable” but alleged that the Ukrainian army might strike “at any moment” and asked people to cross to the left bank of the Dnipro river.

“On the morning of October 19, the situation on the fronts and approaches to the Kherson region is stable,” he said.

“The enemy is concentrating its forces, and at any moment may start launch the strikes at the civilian population of Kherson and the Kherson region. No one is going to retreat, but we want to save your lives. Please cross to the left bank (of the Dnipro river) as quickly as possible.” 

The Ukrainian deputy head of the Kherson region, Yurii Sobolevskyi, has characterized Russia’s “evacuations” as the “semi-voluntary deportation of the Ukrainian population.”

Sobolevskyi confirmed to CNN that the evacuations were underway.

“People are indeed leaving. There are a lot of people in the port of Kherson now,” he said.

“Today they started mass sending SMS to people about the evacuation. They also started handing out booklets about actions during evacuation. At the same time, the message is spreading among the population that if they go to Russia, they will receive certificates for housing.”

Sobolevskyi, who spoke to CNN from Kyiv, accused the Russian-backed authorities of “escalating hysteria.”

“On the one hand, we understand that the Armed Forces of Ukraine will liberate Kherson and the region, accordingly, there may be active hostilities, and this is a risk for the local population.

“On the other hand, there are no guarantees that the evacuated people will be safe (where they are going) and far from the front line. People will make their own decisions – to leave or stay. It is difficult to say what decision they will make.”

Source Article from https://www.cnn.com/europe/live-news/russia-ukraine-war-news-10-19-22/index.html

But last month, a panel of judges on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit ruled by a 2-to-1 vote that the president is an employee of the federal government, but it did not decide whether he was acting in that capacity when he made his statements about Ms. Carroll. The panel asked the District of Columbia Court of Appeals to answer that question, because Mr. Trump had made his statements in Washington.

Mr. Trump’s lawyer, Ms. Habba, had argued that her client’s deposition should be delayed until the D.C. appeals court ruled. But in his denial last week, Judge Kaplan noted that a ruling from the D.C. court could take a long time.

“Perhaps most significant,” Judge Kaplan wrote, both Ms. Carroll, 78, and Mr. Trump, 76, and perhaps other witnesses in the case, were already of advanced age. “The defendant should not be permitted to run the clock out,” the judge wrote, on Ms. Carroll’s “attempt to gain a remedy for what allegedly was a serious wrong.”

Ms. Carroll’s lawyers have said that she plans to file a separate case against Mr. Trump in November under a new state law allowing adult sexual assault victims a one-time opportunity to sue, even if the statute of limitations has expired.

That suit will probably end up before Judge Kaplan under the federal court’s rules on related cases.

Given the potential filing of the second lawsuit, the judge wrote last week, there was no reason to delay Mr. Trump’s deposition.

“The question whether Mr. Trump in fact raped Ms. Carroll is central to this case,” Judge Kaplan wrote. “But it will be central also to the new case.”

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2022/10/19/nyregion/trump-e-jean-carroll-lawsuit.html

  • Trump’s lawyers have claimed attorney-client or executive privilege over documents seized by FBI.
  • A judge agreed to appoint a special master who can review documents to check for privileged info.
  • The special master said there has been insufficient evidence of privileged information so far.

A judge who was appointed special master to review thousands of White House documents seized from former President Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago home in August challenged the former president’s legal claim of privilege over certain records on Tuesday, according to The New York Times.

Trump and his lawyers have claimed that the documents are protected by either attorney-client or executive privilege, therefore, blocking the Justice Department’s access to certain documents for its criminal probe into Trump’s handling of sensitive government records.

But so far, Judge Raymond R. Drearie, the special master, said in a hearing that the batch of documents he reviewed lacked enough evidence to support the privilege claim, The Times reported. 

“It’s a little perplexing as I go through the log,” Dearie said, according to The Times. “What’s the expression: ‘Where’s the beef?’ I need some beef.”

The judge seemingly makes a reference to a catchphrase from the fast food chain Wendy’s — “Where’s the beef?” — that first appeared in 1984.

 

Drearie’s doubts revolved around a small batch of records that the DOJ already set aside from the larger trove of records that were seized from Trump’s resort, according to The Times

In one case, Drearie challenged how Trump’s lawyers could claim that a document was Trump’s personal property while also claiming that it’s protected by executive privilege, which is only reserved for government records.

“Unless I’m wrong, and I’ve been wrong before, there’s certainly an incongruity there,” Dearie said in the hearing.

The concern from Drearie is the latest roadblock in the documents scandal for Trump, who has hoped to undermine the DOJ’s investigation and downplay the severity of taking classified records, some of which may have pertained to national security intelligence.

In September, Drearie requested evidence that proved FBI agents planted documents in Mar-a-Lago or that the former president declassified records with highly sensitive information, as Trump claimed. Judge Aileen M. Cannon later overruled Drearie’s request for the information.

Trump’s lawyers also raised issues with finding a vendor to digitize thousands of documents so that they can be reviewed by Drearie. They argued in a court filing that they can’t find a vendor willing to do the job and that the deadlines for handing over the documents were too rigid.

Judge Cannon extended the deadline to complete the special master review by December 16.

Source Article from https://www.businessinsider.com/judge-for-special-master-review-questions-trumps-privilege-claim-nyt-2022-10

President Joe Biden will attempt to address Americans’ concerns about gas prices Wednesday, a reflection of the Democratic Party’s imperative to connect with voters’ rising anxiety about inflation, the specter of a looming recession and the havoc that the stock market is wreaking on their retirement accounts.

Democrats looking to hold onto their control of power in Washington don’t have much time to get the message right. With just three weeks before the November election, there are new signs of high voter interest. Early voting numbers suggest that turnout in some parts of the country could be on pace to match 2018, a year that had exceptionally high participation for a recent midterm election.

It is still too early to tell which party is benefiting most from higher voter engagement, although polling suggests Republicans have an edge in terms of voter enthusiasm as economic concerns are the dominant issue in voters’ lives.

This has been an election propelled by opposing messages – Republicans are driving hard on inflation and crime, while Democrats are talking about abortion and, in a defensive posture, starring in their own ads with police officers. Threats to American democracy – top of mind to many voters when Biden took over from Donald Trump – remain a worry, but few rank it as their biggest concern, according to a New York Times/Siena College poll, even as many of Trump’s election-denying candidates vie for offices that would give them control over future elections.

The messaging challenge facing the President and Democratic candidates is on full display this week as Biden toggles between events focused on abortion and gas prices.

On Tuesday, he attempted to fire up Democratic base voters still angry about the Supreme Court’s decision overturning Roe v. Wade, which had guaranteed abortion rights nationwide, by promising that that if more Democrats are elected, the first bill he would send to Congress would codify the rights previously enshrined in that landmark decision. He said he would sign the bill in January. But that’s a sequence of events that hinges not only on whether his party can maintain control of the House and Senate, but also whether they can win enough of a Senate majority to force a change to the filibuster rules – an extremely unlikely proposition.

“We’ll restore the right to choose for every woman in every state in America. So vote. You gotta get out the vote,” Biden pleaded during a Democratic National Committee event Tuesday, as he targeted his appeal to young voters who are crucial to Democrats’ hopes in November. “If you do your part and vote Democratic leader(s) (into) Congress, I promise you, we’ll do our part.”

On Wednesday, Biden will focus his message on a much broader audience – those who increasingly cite the economy and inflation as their top issues – when he is expected to announce the release of an additional 15 million barrels of oil from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve as part of his broader effort to dampen gas prices, CNN’s Phil Mattingly reported Tuesday.

The move is part of the 180 million barrel release over six months that the President promised in March. While the average price for a gallon of gas has dropped to $3.87 nationally – well below the all-time high of $5.02, according to AAA data – prices at the pump remain stubbornly high in certain parts of the country like Arizona and Nevada where key House and Senate races could tip the balance of power in Washington.

White House will announce additional oil reserve sales in wake of OPEC+ cut

The GOP needs a net gain of five seats to win the House majority, and a net gain of just one seat to win control of the evenly decided Senate.

Republicans have spent much of the election hammering Democrats on inflation and blaming the party in power for Americans’ economic woes. In another slice of bad news for Democrats, Fitch Ratings predicted on Tuesday that inflation and the Federal Reserve’s interest rate hikes will push the American economy into a recession starting next spring.

Buffeted by those pressures, White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre said Tuesday that the President will focus both on his hope of restoring abortion rights in America and on his administration’s effort to put more money in Americans’ pockets.

“You’re going to hear from him talking about gas prices,” Jean-Pierre told CNN’s Wolf Blitzer on “The Situation Room” Tuesday. “Look, we are doing everything that we can. We are taking this very seriously when it comes to inflation, when it comes to lowering costs. And the President is going to continue to do that work. That’s why the Inflation Reduction Act was so important.”

Democrats face strong headwinds

For months following the Supreme Court’s abortion decision, which the majority of the public opposed, Democrats believed anger over that ruling was one of their most powerful tools to motivate not just their base voters, but also moderate suburban women and independents, as they sought to defy historical trends that favor Republicans this cycle.

But the bombardment of ads casting Republicans as a threat to reproductive rights in many Senate races and House districts across the country may not be working as well as they’d hoped with many key races remaining on a knife’s edge. While the restrictive abortion laws that the GOP has embraced in many states are unpopular, voters cannot escape daily reminders of the strain on their wallets in this economic climate as they drive past signs advertising gas prices or fill up their carts at the grocery store.

Political mood tilts in Republicans’ favor with economy and inflation top of mind three weeks from midterms

Democrats have tried to highlight what they view as an array of policy achievements that they argue will reduce Americans’ costs. Those include the administration’s recent rule change to allow Americans to buy hearing aids over the counter without a prescription. And it also includes provisions in their health care, climate and tax law, including allowing Medicare to negotiate certain prescription drug prices, a cap on insulin costs for patients with diabetes, as well as tax credits for those with electric vehicles and rebates for families that buy energy efficient home appliances.

But in a CNN poll released last week, voters were tilting toward Republicans over Democrats in competitive districts. Ninety percent of voters in that survey said the economy would be extremely or very important in deciding their vote for who to send to Congress, while 84% put inflation in that same category. About 72% said abortion was as important.

There were also bracing signs for Democrats in a new poll released this week from CBS that showed the party’s momentum in the quest for control of the House appears to have stalled as the economy has become the central concern for voters.

About 65% of registered voters said the economy is getting worse and only 15% said it is getting better in the new CBS News Battleground Tracker poll. (About 20% said it is staying the same). And while gas prices nationally are below the record highs, about 63% of registered voters in that poll said they believed prices were going up in their area – pointing to the tall task ahead of Biden on Wednesday in convincing voters that he can help.

Signs of high voter engagement

As both sides make their closing arguments, there are new signs this week that the electorate is highly interested in the November election.

Nearly 2.5 million Americans have already cast ballots, according to data from election officials, Edison Research, and Catalist. In 30 states where Catalist has data for 2018 and 2022, the pace of pre-election voting is keeping pace with where it was four years ago, when Democrats flipped the House in opposition to then-President Trump. (Catalist is a company that provides data, analytics and other services to Democrats, academics and nonprofit issue advocacy organizations.)

There were also signs of intense engagement as early voting got underway in Georgia this week. More than 131,000 voters cast their ballots on Monday, the first day of early voting. Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger reported that was up from 71,000 voters who cast ballots in 2018 – an 85% increase.

Whit Ayres, a pollster who advises Republican groups and candidates, cautioned that it is too early to forecast which party would benefit more from higher turnout, in part because more data is needed about which voters are casting those ballots. Many Democrats also prefer to cast ballots early, while many Republicans prefer voting on Election Day. But the early indicators, Ayres said, suggest “that the interest in this election is approaching the levels that we saw in 2018, which was the highest we had in over a century.”

Earlier this year, Republicans had a significant enthusiasm advantage, but the Supreme Court’s decision on abortion helped Democrats close that gap, he noted. In these closing weeks, Ayres said: “You’re starting to see very equal levels of enthusiasm and turnout, which is not going to help either side – it is simply going to run up the turnout numbers more.”

Still, a surge in enthusiasm levels in certain states, he said, “could sway some of those very, very close Senate elections. … But you can’t tell that until you see the state-by-state level of enthusiasm.”

Source Article from https://www.cnn.com/2022/10/19/politics/biden-abortion-gas-prices-gop-momentum-midterms/index.html