“Draining our emergency supplies is a shortsighted and dangerous choice that imperils our energy security at a critical time of global uncertainty,” Senator Jerry Moran, Republican of Kansas, said last week.

The Biden administration has defended the decision, insisting that all Americans benefit from lower gas prices and that energy prices around the world are elevated because of Russia’s war in Ukraine.

“President Biden has said for months how he is committed to doing everything that he can, in his power, to address Putin’s price hike,” Karine Jean-Pierre, the White House press secretary, said on Tuesday. “Should the president not do everything that he can to lower prices?”

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2022/10/18/business/us-oil-reserve-gas-prices.html

According to Russia’s Vremya TV news, each family member will get 100,000 roubles (£1,433; $1,626) to replace household goods they were forced to abandon.

Source Article from https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-63309095

Republican Sen. Marco Rubio and Democratic Rep. Val Demings demonstrated in Tuesday’s Florida Senate debate why they are considered two of the brightest stars by their respective parties.

In a spirited and testy 60-minute debate – the first and only of the race – they traded quick barbs, sharp rebukes and pointed answers, covering a range of issues from abortion and guns to the economy and nuclear war.

Rubio, a one-time presidential candidate who is no stranger to the debate stage, leaned into his legislative achievements and policy proposals while calling his opponent a creature of the political left who hasn’t passed any meaningful bills. Demings, a House impeachment manager during former President Donald Trump’s first impeachment proceedings, painted Rubio as a politician who will say and do anything to get reelected and compared his long career in elected office to her time on the police force in Orlando.

The race has largely flown under the radar compared to other hotly contested matchups that could control the fate of the evenly divided Senate. And neither party had plans going into Tuesday to spend much on airtime in the final three weeks. That reality favors Rubio in a state where Republicans have consistently held the electoral edge and now outnumber Democrats in registered voters, putting the onus on Demings Tuesday to seize momentum before early voting begins on Monday in many counties.

Here are five takeaways from the debate.

Abortion access looms large

On a day when President Joe Biden moved to recast the midterm election as a referendum on abortion access, Demings and Rubio tried to pin each other down on where they would draw the line in a post-Roe world.

Rubio said that he is “100% pro-life,” including in cases of rape or incest because “I don’t believe that the value of human life is determined by the circumstances.” But he said he would support legislation with exceptions if it helps get something passed. He is one of nine Republican co-sponsors of a Senate bill to ban abortion nationwide at 15 weeks, which Sen. Lindsey Graham filed in response to the US Supreme Court decision in Dobbs earlier this year.

“We’re never going to get a vote on a law that doesn’t have exceptions, because that’s where the majority of the American people are,” Rubio said. “And I respect and understand that.”

Demings in her response invoked her law enforcement background (she is a former Orlando police officer and chief of police) for the first of several times.

“As a police detective who investigated cases of rape and incest, no, Senator, I don’t think it’s okay for a 10-year-old girl to be raped and have to carry the seed of her rapist,” Demings said.

Pushed by Rubio to define the week she would limit abortion, Demings said she would “support a woman’s right to choose up to the time of viability,” and would let doctors decide when that is. Rubio said that wasn’t good enough.

“She supports no limits of any kind,” he said. “That is out of the mainstream. That is radical.”

Firearms a focus

In a country perpetually rocked by gun violence, Florida still manages to stand out as a state uniquely affected by mass shootings. Rubio served in the Senate for two of the most notable, which stand as key moments in his political biography. Rubio said he decided to run for reelection to the Senate after the 2016 Pulse nightclub massacre. After the 2018 tragedy at a Parkland high school, Rubio faced a crowd at a CNN Town Hall that demanded action and he promised he would work on solutions.

In that town hall event, Rubio said, “I absolutely believe that in this country, if you are 18 years of age, you should not be able to buy a rifle, and I will support a law that takes that right away,” adding, “I think that’s the right thing to do.”

Asked on Tuesday about his vow at that forum to consider age restrictions for certain firearms, Rubio said, “That doesn’t work.”

“I think the solution of this problem is to identify these people that are acting this way and stop them before they act,” Rubio said, pointing to the so-called red flag bill he proposed that would give states tools to implement a process to take guns out of the hands of people flagged as threats by law enforcement. But Rubio voted against a bipartisan gun safety bill that Biden signed into law.

“The fundamental issue is why are these kids, why are these people going out there and massacring these people?” Rubio said. “Because a lot of people own AR-15s and they don’t kill anyone.”

To which Demings responded: “People who are families of victims of gun violence just heard that and they’re asking themselves, ‘What in the hell did he just say?’”

Demings, whose Orlando-based district includes Pulse, said Rubio has done “nothing to help address gun violence and get dangerous weapons out of the hands of dangerous people.”

Rubio replied that it’s impossible to legislate criminals.

“The only people that follow these laws are law-abiding citizens,” he said.

Demings responded: “Why don’t we just stop arresting murderers since we can’t find them all?”

Hurricane politics

Out of the gate, Rubio and Demings were asked about Hurricane Ian, the massive Category 4 hurricane that pummeled Florida’s Southwest coast last month, and what the country should do to prepare for future super storms.

Demings wasted no time mentioning climate change.

“If we don’t do something about it, we’re going to pay a terrible price for it,” Demings said. “The federal government has got to make sure that FEMA has the resources that it needs to adequately respond, but we gotta get serious about climate change.”

Rubio declined to look ahead, or discuss climate change, and instead focused on emergency response and recovery.

Asked later about the crumbling property insurance in the state, a focal point in the wake of Ian, Rubio called it “a state issue.”

Demings shot back that if it is a state issue then Rubio had a chance to address the problem when he was speaker of the Florida House.

“He’s been in elected office since 1998 and insurance of Florida has tripled and people are suffering,” Demings said. “I sent a letter to Governor (Ron) DeSantis saying, ‘Yes, I know it’s a state issue. But how can we work together to lower the costs of property insurance for Floridians because people are suffering?’”

Rubio said he did address it in the Florida House.

“You know who the governor was at the time? Charlie Crist, your gubernatorial candidate,” Rubio quipped. “I think you’ve endorsed him. So you should ask him if it didn’t work, but we certainly supported it.”

Avoiding Trump

While Trump has loomed large in many of the midterm contests this cycle, he was hardly mentioned in a debate in a race that will determine who will represent the former President in Washington.

Demings, in fact, never mentioned Trump at all.

Nor did DeSantis, the state’s consequential Republican governor, get much airtime.

But the other top Republican in the state – Sen. Rick Scott, the head of the Senate GOP campaign arm – was the topic of discussion on Social Security and Medicare.

Rubio was asked about Scott’s 11-point “Rescue America” plan, which included a provision to sunset all federal programs every five years, including the popular entitlement programs.

Rubio quickly dismissed the idea. “That’s not my plan.”

“You should ask him,” Rubio said.

Back and forth on the border

A segment focused on immigration policy started with the moderator asking Rubio about Biden’s new policy to stem the flow of Venezuelan migrants by having them apply to arrive in the US at ports of entry, not the Mexico-US border.

Rubio summarized it thusly: “Joe Biden just instituted Trump’s ‘Return to Mexico’ policy.”

“This cannot continue. It has to be fixed,” he added. “That needs to happen with everyone that’s trying to come across but we’re gonna have 10,000 people a day coming. And we can’t afford it. No country in the world can tolerate that.”

The Republican then put Demings on the defensive over the number of people who have crossed into the United States since Biden took office while also attempting to appear sympathetic to the people fleeing brutal regimes in South America. Florida is home to many Latino communities, including the largest population of Venezuelans living in the US.

“No one has done more on the issue of Venezuela than I have,” Rubio said. “And Cuba and Nicaragua.”

Demings, too, attempted to straddle her party’s support for migrants seeking asylum without appearing indifferent to the concerns about the activity at the Southern border. She said she supported adding border patrol agents, investing in unspecified technology and hiring more people to process migrants moving through the legal immigration system.

“We’re a nation of laws,” Demings said. “We have to enforce the law but we also obey the law that says people who were in trouble can seek asylum in this country.”

Source Article from https://www.cnn.com/2022/10/18/politics/rubio-demings-fla-senate-debate-takeaways/index.html

  • Trump’s lawyers have claimed attorney-client or executive privilege over documents seized by FBI.
  • A judge agreed to appoint a special master who can review documents to check for privileged info.
  • The special master said there has been insufficient evidence of privileged information so far.

A judge who was appointed special master to review thousands of White House documents seized from former President Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago home in August challenged the former president’s legal claim of privilege over certain records on Tuesday, according to The New York Times.

Trump and his lawyers have claimed that the documents are protected by either attorney-client or executive privilege, therefore, blocking the Justice Department’s access to certain documents for its criminal probe into Trump’s handling of sensitive government records.

But so far, Judge Raymond R. Drearie, the special master, said in a hearing that the batch of documents he reviewed lacked enough evidence to support the privilege claim, The Times reported. 

“It’s a little perplexing as I go through the log,” Dearie said, according to The Times. “What’s the expression: ‘Where’s the beef?’ I need some beef.”

The judge seemingly makes a reference to a catchphrase from the fast food chain Wendy’s — “Where’s the beef?” — that first appeared in 1984.

 

Drearie’s doubts revolved around a small batch of records that the DOJ already set aside from the larger trove of records that were seized from Trump’s resort, according to The Times

In one case, Drearie challenged how Trump’s lawyers could claim that a document was Trump’s personal property while also claiming that it’s protected by executive privilege, which is only reserved for government records.

“Unless I’m wrong, and I’ve been wrong before, there’s certainly an incongruity there,” Dearie said in the hearing.

The concern from Drearie is the latest roadblock in the documents scandal for Trump, who has hoped to undermine the DOJ’s investigation and downplay the severity of taking classified records, some of which may have pertained to national security intelligence.

In September, Drearie requested evidence that proved FBI agents planted documents in Mar-a-Lago or that the former president declassified records with highly sensitive information, as Trump claimed. Judge Aileen M. Cannon later overruled Drearie’s request for the information.

Trump’s lawyers also raised issues with finding a vendor to digitize thousands of documents so that they can be reviewed by Drearie. They argued in a court filing that they can’t find a vendor willing to do the job and that the deadlines for handing over the documents were too rigid.

Judge Cannon extended the deadline to complete the special master review by December 16.

Source Article from https://www.businessinsider.com/judge-for-special-master-review-questions-trumps-privilege-claim-nyt-2022-10

“Without Kristin, there’s no joy or happiness,” Stan Smart, her father, told reporters after the verdict. “This has been an agonizingly long journey, with more downs than ups,” he said, before thanking prosecutors for securing the guilty verdict for the younger Flores. But he said that with the senior Flores acquitted, the Smarts’ “quest for justice will continue.”

Source Article from https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2022/10/18/kristin-smart-murder-trial-paul-flores/

WASHINGTON, Oct 18 (Reuters) – A Russian researcher who contributed explosive details to a document dubbed the “Steele dossier” that alleged ties between former U.S. President Donald Trump’s 2016 election campaign and Russia was acquitted by a jury on Tuesday on charges that he lied to the FBI about the sources of his information.

Igor Danchenko’s acquittal in federal court in Washington dealt another blow to Special Counsel John Durham, who was appointed in 2019 by Trump-era Attorney General William Barr to investigate the FBI’s “Crossfire Hurricane” probe into whether members of Trump’s campaign had colluded with Russia.

Jurors acquitted Danchenko on four charges. The judge in the case earlier had thrown out a fifth charge.

“While we are disappointed in the outcome, we respect the jury’s decision and thank them for their service,” Durham said in a statement.

In another trial of a defendant charged by Durham, a jury in Washington in May acquitted Michael Sussmann, an attorney for Democrat Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign, of charges that he lied to the FBI when he passed along a later-discredited tip about possible communications between Trump’s business and a Russian bank.

Danchenko, a Russian-born researcher who resides in Northern Virginia, was indicted by Durham’s office in 2021 on five counts of making false statements to FBI agents in 2017 about the sources of information he provided to former British intelligence officer Christopher Steele.

His attorneys argued that the indictment was baseless, saying their client’s answers to the FBI’s often “ambiguous” questions were “literally” true and not material.

For instance, Danchenko was accused of misleading the FBI by claiming he never “talked” to Charles Dolan, a Democratic operative and public relations executive, about anything in the Steele dossier, when in fact they had communicated in writing.

U.S. District Judge Anthony Trenga said last week he agreed with the defense, and he dismissed one of the five charges against Danchenko related to his communications with Dolan.

The judge allowed the other four charges to be decided by the jury. Those charges accused Danchenko of lying to the FBI by claiming he had spoken to Sergei Millian, the former president of the Russian-American Chamber of Commerce, to gather information later used in the dossier.

Danchenko’s lawyers maintained their client received an anonymous call from a person who Danchenko suspected was Millian, but he told agents he was not certain it was him.

Steele was hired by a U.S.-based research firm called Fusion GPS, which in turn was retained by Sussmann’s law firm on behalf of Clinton’s campaign and the Democratic National Committee to dig up dirt on Trump. The dossier contained salacious details about Trump, many of which have never been substantiated.

Trenga placed strict limits on what Durham’s team could present as evidence to the jury, including ruling that the scandalous allegations about “Donald Trump’s alleged sexual activity” in a Moscow hotel were off limits, finding they were not direct evidence and their relevancy was questionable.

An investigation by the Justice Department’s inspector general later found that the FBI improperly continued to rely on unsubstantiated allegations in the Steele dossier when it applied for court-approved warrant applications to monitor the communications of Carter Page, a former Trump campaign adviser.

A former FBI attorney, Kevin Clinesmith, was later prosecuted by Durham and pleaded guilty to falsifying a document used in the law enforcement agency’s warrant applications.

Another special counsel, Robert Mueller, conducted an investigation that documented contacts between Trump’s campaign and Russians, but his final report concluded there was not enough evidence to establish that the campaign had engaged in a criminal conspiracy with Moscow.

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

Source Article from https://www.reuters.com/legal/us-jury-acquits-russian-charges-he-lied-fbi-over-steele-dossier-2022-10-18/

Paul Flores has been found guilty of first-degree murder in the death of missing California college student Kristin Smart 25 years ago. Flores’ father Ruben was found not guilty of being an accessory after the fact for allegedly helping to conceal the crime.

The conflicting verdicts were read moments apart in the same courtroom.

Smart disappeared from California Polytechnic State University over Memorial Day weekend in 1996. Her remains were never found.

Prosecutors maintain the younger Flores, now 45, killed the 19-year-old during an attempted rape on May 25, 1996, in his dorm room at Cal Poly, where both were first-year students. He was the last person seen with Smart as he walked her home from an off-campus party where she became intoxicated.

His father, now 81, allegedly helped bury the slain student behind his home in the nearby community of Arroyo Grande and later dug up the remains and moved them.

The son’s defense attorney, Robert Sanger, had tried to pin the killing on someone else – noting that Scott Peterson, who was later convicted at a sensational trial of killing his pregnant wife and the fetus she was carrying – was also a Cal Poly student at the time.

During his closing arguments, the son’s defense attorney, Robert Sanger, told jurors that no attempted rape occurred and he cast doubt on testimony from witnesses, including a student who was in Smart’s dorm who testified to seeing Flores in Smart’s room.

He also referred to forensic evidence offered by the prosecution as “junk science.”

“This case was not prosecuted for all these years because there’s no evidence,” Sanger said. “It’s sad Kristin Smart disappeared, and she may have gone out on her own, but who knows?”

Paul Flores had long been considered a suspect in the killing. He had a black eye when investigators interviewed him. He told them he got it playing basketball with friends, who denied his account, according to court records. He later changed his story to say he bumped his head while working on his car.

However, the father and son were only arrested in 2021 after the case was revived.

Investigators conducted dozens of fruitless searches for Smart’s body over two decades but in the past two years they turned their attention to Ruben Flores’ home about 12 miles (20 kilometers) south of Cal Poly in the community of Arroyo Grande.

Behind latticework beneath the deck of his large house on a dead end street, archaeologists working for police in March 2021 found a soil disturbance about the size of a casket and the presence of human blood, prosecutors said. The blood was too degraded to extract a DNA sample.

The trial was held in Salinas, 110 miles north of San Luis Obispo, after a judge granted a defense request to move it. The defense argued that it was unlikely the Flores’ could receive a fair trial with so much much notoriety in the city of about 47,000 people.

Paul Flores will be sentenced in December.

Smart’s father Stan spoke after the verdicts were delivered, thanking Chris Lambert, the creator of the “In Your Own Backyard” podcast, which investigators have credited with bringing new attention and leads to the case.

“After 26 years, with today’s split verdict, we learned that our quest for justice for Kristin will continue,” Smart said.

He said “our faith in the justice system has been renewed” by the commitment of jurors in the case.

Source Article from https://www.kcra.com/article/verdicts-reached-in-kristin-smart-murder-trial/41694064

With three weeks until Election Day, Republican Sen. Marco Rubio and Democrat Rep. Val Demings will debate for the first and only time Tuesday, putting a spotlight, at least for an hour, on a US Senate race that has flown under the radar.

Beyond providing a venue for Demings to shift the political winds that until now appear to have favored Rubio, the debate may also be her last, best chance to convince her party that Florida is a worthwhile investment for its final push to maintain control of the US Senate. While national Democrats and their allies celebrated when Demings announced she would challenge Rubio, they have offered little by way of reinforcements ever since, leaving the three-term congresswoman to largely fend for herself against a seasoned campaigner and one of the Republican Party’s most recognizable figures.

At a recent campaign stop in Tampa, Demings acknowledged the uphill climb she faces, telling CNN of the race, “Of course it’s hard, but it’s not impossible.” She said her own fundraising, which had surpassed Rubio by $20 million as of September 30, showed voters in Florida and around the country are “willing to stand up and fight for what they need, not just allow the same old broken record to be played over and over again, with pitiful results.”

But her campaign coffers are dwindling, and at the start of October, Rubio had more cash on hand: $9.6 million to Demings’ $6.6 million.

Asked about the party’s support, Demings replied, “My parents gave me the resources that I need to win,” a nod to the work ethic she said was instilled by her upbringing.

Much of the Democratic Party’s attention and resources have focused on a handful of battlegrounds that appear more tightly contested than Florida, where Republicans have seized momentum with such vigor that some are questioning whether the Sunshine State remains a purple battleground. Republicans entered September with 270,000 more registered voters than Democrats – a 600,000 voter swing from the last time Rubio was on the ballot six years ago.

That Republican enthusiasm has been credited to the state’s hard-charging governor, Ron DeSantis, and its most famous resident, ex-President Donald Trump, but Rubio has benefited from it nevertheless. Despite running a low-key campaign, polls suggest the Republican incumbent entered the final stretch of the race with a comfortable lead.

From this position, Rubio has faced head-on two contentious issues others in his party have ducked heading into midterms: the future of abortion access and Trump’s legal troubles.

Rubio cosponsored a Senate bill introduced by South Carolina Sen. Lindsey Graham that would ban abortion in every state at 15 weeks, with exceptions for abortions required to protect the life of the mother, and if the woman becomes pregnant through rape or incest. The support for a national abortion ban came just as Demings was already airing an ad critical of Rubio’s position.

And in the days after the US Department of Justice seized classified documents at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago, Rubio, who serves as vice chairman of the Senate select committee on intelligence, defended the former President and dismissed concerns about Trump’s handling of state secrets as a “fight over the storage of documents.”

Rubio, through his campaign, declined a request for an interview, but in a statement, spokeswoman Elizabeth Gregory said the senator on Tuesday “will highlight his record of getting things done for Florida and shine a light on Congresswoman Val Demings’ blind support for Democrats’ agenda and her failure to deliver results for Floridians.”

Rubio reversal

When Rubio ended his campaign for president in 2016, DeSantis — then a relatively unknown congressman — bowed out of the Republican race for US Senate so Rubio, the Florida GOP’s senior statesman, could run again for his job.

Six years later, Rubio remains the veteran, but he is clearly behind DeSantis in the state’s Republican pecking order. It is now DeSantis who commands crowds of people across the country that once showed up for Rubio, who Time magazine in 2013 dubbed “the Republican Savior.” When the Republican ticket toured the state after the August primary, DeSantis headlined and Rubio was the warm-up act.

The reversal in political standing is reflected in the GOP enthusiasm for the two candidates. While DeSantis approached nearly universal support from Republicans in a Spectrum News/Siena College poll of likely voters taken last month – 93% – Rubio’s favorability didn’t eclipse 80%. DeSantis polled higher than Rubio across nearly every demographic. Rubio, the son of Cuban immigrants, has typically enjoyed higher support than most Republicans among Latino voters, but DeSantis has the edge there, too.

Don Levy, director of the Siena Research Institute, said the numbers suggest Rubio would be facing a tougher reelection fight were it not for the energy DeSantis brings to the ballot. DeSantis is leading Democrat Charlie Crist in the race for governor 49% to 41%, a similar margin as the Senate race, the poll found.

“Rubio’s favorability shows that he’s not really ascendant at this point in time,” Levy said. “But it’s hard to imagine there are going to be a lot of Desantis-Demings voters. Even if the Republican voter is not sold on Rubio, he still has a R next to his name.”

JC Martin, the longtime chairman of the Polk County Republican Party, said Rubio doesn’t connect with the grassroots the way he used to and that is driving the enthusiasm gap between him and DeSantis.

“Rubio doesn’t get out to the localities as much as he should. I’ve told him that myself,” Martin said. “Out of sight, out of mind.”

No money, more problems

Heading into the summer of 2022, Florida’s US Senate race looked like it could materialize into a marquee matchup of two political heavyweights. Demings, a former impeachment manager for House Democrats who two years ago made Joe Biden’s shortlist for a running mate, entered the race in April and immediately announced herself as a serious political challenger by outraising Rubio in her first three months as a candidate.

Democrats were already struggling in Florida. Then came Hurricane Ian.

Getting Demings into the race was a shot in the arm for a state Democratic Party that has struggled in recent years to recruit strong candidates. Her backstory — born in Jacksonville, the daughter of a maid and a janitor, a former Orlando police chief married to a former sheriff — became bullet points in campaign ads and helped her attract national attention from the likes of The Atlantic and Vanity Fair. The latter featured Demings this summer in a favorable profile accompanied with pictures of the Democratic congresswoman riding her red Harley-Davidson.

But despite aggressive early spending and beating Rubio to the airwaves, many Floridians are still learning who Demings is. The Spectrum News/Siena College poll of likely voters from last month showed 44% of respondents didn’t know enough about Demings to say whether they had a favorable opinion of her.

“Demings to us appeared as though she was still introducing herself,” Levy said.

In addition to the headwinds she faces in Florida, Demings is fighting to distance herself from corners of the Democratic Party that have at times pushed for governments to reduce funding for police departments. As a former beat cop turned police chief, Demings offered Democrats hope that she could neutralize Republican messaging on crime, but it has not deterred Rubio from running ads tying her to anti-law enforcement sentiments in her party.

As recently as this month, Demings defensively ran ads to push back against “defund the police” and her campaign was amplifying coverage that emphasized her “independence” from Democrats on the issue.

“I do think it’s interesting that a couple of people in Congress talked about defunding the police. The overwhelming majority of people in Congress have not said that,” she said in Tampa. “If anybody who wants to run with the defund the police narrative bothered to talk to people in the most vulnerable communities, they would tell you, we don’t want to defund the police.”

Demings said Tuesday’s debate will offer voters a choice between a candidate “who has protected and served their community, wasn’t afraid to do that … or someone who has been in elected office since 1998.” But there isn’t much airtime reserved for her to pound that message into the minds of Floridians once the debate ends.

After drawing over $50 million in ad spending up to this point, Florida has fallen off the Senate midterm map dramatically. The race is set to see less than $8 million in total ad spending by both parties over the final three weeks, according to the latest data provided by the advertising tracker AdImpact. And tellingly, no outside groups from either party have booked airtime over the critical home stretch.

The spending in Florida pales to the $53 million in ad time reserved for the coming weeks in neighboring Georgia, and it falls far short of the 8-figure sums ready to be spent in Wisconsin, North Carolina, New Hampshire and Arizona, states where it is far cheaper to advertise than notoriously expensive Florida.

Ione Townsend, the chairwoman of the Hillsborough County Democratic Party, couldn’t recall a year when statewide candidates had less support from national groups and parties.

“By not getting involved in 2022, they’re sending a message that they’re passing on us in 2024,” said Townsend. “And they may have already done that. We know that there has not been a lot of money coming into Florida. We’re all feeling that.”

CORRECTION: A previous version of this story incorrectly stated parameters of Lindsey Graham’s proposed 15-week abortion ban. It would provide exceptions in cases of rape, incest and to protect the life of the mother. This story has also been updated to correct the spelling of Graham’s first name.

Source Article from https://www.cnn.com/2022/10/18/politics/florida-senate-debate-preview/index.html

The new commander of Moscow’s army in Ukraine has announced that civilians were being “resettled” from the Russian-occupied southern city of Kherson, describing the military situation as “tense”.

“The enemy continually attempts to attack the positions of Russian troops,” Sergei Surovikin said in his first televised interview since being appointed earlier this month, adding that the situation was particularly difficult around the occupied southern city of Kherson.

Surovikin’s statements on Tuesday came amid repeated military setbacks for Russian forces prompting Moscow’s dependence on Iran, which is sending missiles and drones.

On Tuesday, the New York Times reported that military advisers from Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps were on Ukrainian soil, at a Russian military base in occupied Crimea. The Iranians were reported to have been deployed to help Russian troops deal with problems with the Tehran-supplied fleet of Shahed-136 drones, rebranded as Geran-2 by the attackers.

Russian forces have been trying to hold off a fierce Ukrainian counter-assault in Kherson, a region in the south of Ukraine that Moscow claimed to have annexed last month after staging a sham referendum.

Surovikin admitted that the situation in Kherson was “not easy”.

“Further actions and plans regarding the city of Kherson will depend on the developing military-tactical situation, which is not easy. We will act consciously, in a timely manner, without ruling out difficult decisions,” he added.

The comments appeared to mark a rare acknowledgment of the difficulties facing Russian forces. But it was not immediately clear whether Surovikin, the ruthless general now in charge of the war, was hinting at a looming Russian withdrawal from Kherson or a fresh round of airstrikes.

Kherson, which lies near the mouth of the Dnipro on the west bank, was one of the first cities to fall to Russia after the invasion on 24 February and is a crucial strategic and symbolic target for Ukraine’s government.

Gruelling fighting has been reported in the region since the start of Ukraine’s counter-offensive at the end of the summer, with both sides suffering steep casualties.

The Ukrainian army has sought to pinch off Russian supply lines to Kherson by destroying the two main road bridges across the Dnipro. Kyiv has recently introduced a news blackout in the south of the country, leading to speculations that it was preparing a new major offensive on Kherson.

“When the Ukrainians have a news blackout it means something is going on. They have always done this before when there is a big offensive push on,” Michael Clarke, a former director general of the Royal United Services Institute, told Sky News.

“I am guessing in the next 48-72 hours they might tell us what is happening,” he added.

Shortly after Surovikin’s statements, the Russian-installed head of Kherson, Vladimir Saldo, said in a video address that people in four towns in the Kherson region were being moved, in anticipation of a “large-scale offensive”.

Kirill Stremousov, the Russian-installed deputy administrator of the Kherson region, echoed the message on Telegram late on Tuesday. “The battle for Kherson will begin in the very near future. The civilian population is advised, if possible, to leave the area of the upcoming fierce hostilities,” he said.

Since Surovikin’s appointment on 8 October, Moscow has unleashed a barrage of cruise missiles and “kamikaze” drones targeting Ukrainian critical infrastructure as well as the civilian population.

Ukraine’s president, Volodymyr Zelenskiy, said that Moscow’s use of Iranian-made drones was a symbol of the Kremlin’s “military and political bankruptcy”.

“The very fact of Russia’s appeal to Iran for such assistance is the Kremlin’s recognition of its military and political bankruptcy,” Zelenskiy said in his daily address on Tuesday.

“For decades, they spent billions of dollars on their own military industrial complex. And in the end, they bowed down to Tehran in order to secure quite simple drones and missiles.”

But, Zelenskiy added, “strategically, it will not help them anyway. It only further proves to the world that Russia is on the path of defeat and is trying to draw someone else into its accomplices in terror.”

The bombing is often inaccurate and civilians have been killed in residential buildings in Kyiv and other big cities. But enough have got through to cause problems for a power grid already short of generation after the Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant was shut down.

Nearly a third of Ukraine’s power stations have been destroyed by Russian attacks since Monday last week – prompting Nato’s secretary general to announce that new counter-drone defences would be delivered within days.

Kyrylo Tymoshenko, the deputy head of the presidential office, said energy infrastructure and power supply were targeted overnight in an eastern district of Kyiv, where two people were killed, and in the cities of Dnipro and Zhytomyr.

“The situation is critical now across the country because our regions are dependent on one another … it’s necessary for the whole country to prepare for electricity, water and heating outages,” Tymoshenko told Ukrainian television.

Jens Stoltenberg, Nato’s secretary general, said member countries would “step up” and deliver more air defences to help stabilise the situation. “Nato will in the coming days deliver counter-drone systems to counter the specific threat of drones, including those from Iran,” he said.

Although there are signs that Moscow is running short on guided missiles, it has acquired up to 2,400 Iranian drones, according to Ukraine, and is using them as cheaper substitutes to hit the energy targets and strike fear into civilians.

Iran denies supplying the drones to Russia, while the Kremlin spokesperson, Dmitry Peskov, said he did not have any information about their origin. “Russian equipment with Russian names is being used,” Peskov said.

Ukraine, experts and western governments believe the Gerans are rebranded Shahed drones, identifiable by their distinctive delta wing shape and from an examination of fragments recovered from the ground.

A western official, speaking on condition of anonymity in a briefing on Tuesday, said they believed Russia was “pursuing a deliberate strategy of attempting to destroy Ukraine’s electricity network”.

Reuters reported that Iran had promised to provide Russia with surface-to-surface missiles, in addition to more drones, citing two senior Iranian officials and two Iranian diplomats.

The UK defence secretary, Ben Wallace, and the foreign secretary, James Cleverly, flew to Washington on Tuesday to discuss how to respond to Iran’s intervention, as officials briefed that a new air defence package for Ukraine was being prepared.

Last week Germany delivered the first of four Iris-T air defence systems it had promised to supply Ukraine, but the US has been wary of strengthening Ukraine’s air force and defences for fear it would be seen as an escalation.

Kevin McCarthy, the Republican leader in the US House of Representatives, warned on Tuesday that Congress would not “write a blank cheque to Ukraine” if his party wins next month’s midterm elections.

Hours later, however, another senior Republican, Michael McCaul, said that he thought that the Ukrainians should “get what they need” – including longer-range missiles than those the Biden administration has so far been prepared to supply.

Analysts say the mixed messages reflect an internal debate between traditional national security conservatives and the Trumpist wing of the party, where pro-Russian sentiment is much stronger.

Source Article from https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/oct/18/russias-new-ukraine-commander-signals-civilian-evacuation-from-tense-kherson

“That is pretty irresponsible reporting because it’s impossible to know what all these variants mean,” said UC Berkeley infectious disease expert John Swartzberg.

“We are seeing a slew of new variants that are using a similar approach to survive — they are finding ways to evade the way we get immunity from vaccines and previous infection with changes on the spike protein,” he said.”XBB is no different from the others.”

The subvariant was first detected in August in India and has since been sequenced in more than 17 countries, including Bangladesh, Japan, and Singapore, where it has caused cases to spike at an alarming rate.

“XBB is now the predominant subvariant circulating in the community, accounting for 54% of local cases,” up from 22% the previous week, according to a bulletin from the Singapore Ministry of Health.

The subvariant has overtaken BA.5, which is estimated to account for 21% of cases in the country — with many of the new cases being reinfections.

“It will be their second biggest wave after BA.2 — even bigger than BA.5,” said Eric Topol, executive vice president of Scripps Research in San Diego.

But he added that Singapore’s 79% booster uptake rate and strict virus mitigation measures appear to be blunting the impact of the new strain when it comes to the worst outcomes of the disease.

“The number of people dying or in the ICU is really low,” he said. “Their protection level is really solid.”

Singapore’s health ministry added that so far “there is no evidence that XBB causes more severe illness.” Like BQ.1, there are indications that XBB is resistant to the monoclonal antibody treatments Evusheld and bebtelovimab, according to a pre-print study from researchers in China.

The good news is the updated bivalent boosters — which contain half the recipe that targeted the original coronavirus strain and half protection against the dominant BA.4 and BA.5 omicron versions — are designed to broaden immune defenses against newer strains. Experts just don’t know how much.

“We might expect some dent in efficacy,” Topol said.

BQ.1 and XBB — both descendants of the omicron BA.2 subvariant — appear to have similar growth advantages. But they are surging in different geographic regions, with the former mostly affecting North America, Europe and Africa while the latter has been detected in Asia.

In the few countries where they overlap, the two strains appear to be co-circulating rather than out-competing each other.

“If the immunity from the BQs is enough to not let us get sick from XBB then we could get some cross-protection there,” said Swartzberg. “What we can be doing in the meantime is getting immunized and being more assiduous, specifically by wearing masks indoors in crowded places.”

So far, 23 sequences from XBB have been detected in the US, including six cases in California, based on data from GISAID, an international research organization that tracks virus variants.

“XBB is a chimera,” Natalie Thornburg, the CDC’s lead respiratory virus immunology specialist, said during a webinar this week. “I think there have been a couple of sequences identified in the United States. But it’s way, way, way, way below that 1% threshold. I mean, it’s really like a handful of sequences.”

Topol said he is more concerned about the omicron coronavirus variant BQ.1 and its sibling BQ.1.1, which could drive another winter surge in the U.S. and could knock the BA.5 variant out of its dominant spot — especially with sluggish booster uptake.

“We’ve got another bad variant and we don’t have enough people protected,” Topol said. “We’re booster-vaccine deficient and we’re not in a good place to deal with a very tough variant like BQ.1.”

Nationally, about 14.8 million Americans have received the updated COVID-19 booster shots since they became available in early September, based on numbers reported by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. That’s a little under 7% of the more than 209 million vaccinated people who are eligible — in stark contrast to Singapore’s robust numbers.

“We’re going to have another wave,” Topol said. “The question is, how bad is it going to be?”

Aidin Vaziri is a San Francisco Chronicle staff writer. Email: avaziri@sfchronicle.com

Source Article from https://www.sfchronicle.com/health/article/Is-there-really-a-COVID-nightmare-variant-17517688.php

Some of the Iranian cargo planes designated by the United States are U.S.-origin Boeing 747s that have been publicly tracked and filmed flying in and out of Moscow in recent weeks. None of the footage and satellite imagery analyzed by The New York Times revealed what the aircraft were offloading in Russia. A message to Iran’s mission to the United Nations was not immediately returned.

The deployment of the Iranian trainers was reported earlier by The Daily Mirror.

Iran has deployed Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps personnel to other conflict zones. For example, in Yemen, the group’s officers have mostly stayed out of the fight directly and instead served as trainers and advisers for their Houthi proxy force, Mr. Mulroy said.

While Iran has officially denied supplying Russia with drones for use in Ukraine, U.S. officials said that the first batch of such weapons was delivered in August.

Those include Shaheds, which are single-use drones meant to explode and destroy targets, but which have a range of more than 1,000 miles. Iran has also sent the larger Mohajer-6 drone, which is used for surveillance and can carry up to four missiles.

Strikes this week by Iranian drones in Kyiv have killed multiple people. On Monday, an Iranian-made kamikaze drone struck a residential building and exploded on impact, killing a young couple, including a woman who was six months pregnant.

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2022/10/18/us/politics/iran-drones-russia-ukraine.html

We’ve detected unusual activity from your computer network

To continue, please click the box below to let us know you’re not a robot.

Source Article from https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-10-18/trump-special-master-says-he-has-no-patience-for-records-spats

Sen. Raphael Warnock (D-Ga.) is signaling that he’s ready to ditch his typically restrained persona in favor of more direct attacks on his Republican opponent Herschel Walker as the Georgia Senate race enters its final stretch.

 In recent days, Warnock, who has built his campaign around his work in the Senate and a record of bipartisanship, has shifted toward more open confrontation with Walker. He used a Sunday debate that Walker did not attend to hammer the former football star over his history of domestic violence and leveled another series of attacks on Monday, accusing Walker of lying about everything from his academic credentials to his claim that he has worked in law enforcement.

 “I guess he expects the people of Georgia now to hallucinate and imagine that he is also a United States senator,” Warnock told reporters after casting his ballot on the first day of early voting on Monday. “He’s clearly not ready.”

The more pugilistic approach is likely to come as a relief to some Democrats, who have privately complained about Warnock’s tendency to play nice and argue that the incumbent senator needs to do more to highlight Walker’s liabilities in an ever-tightening race.

“I think a lot of what voters appreciate about Raphael Warnock is that he’s a good man; he doesn’t play into the shit show,” one Democratic strategist who has worked on Senate campaigns said. “But at some point, there’s no payoff for being nice, especially when Republicans are going to do everything they can to bring you down.”

“You’ve got to let people know what they’re going to get from Herschel Walker,” the strategist added.

For his part, Walker, who has dealt with his fair share of controversies since launching his Senate bid, has run a campaign almost singularly focused on casting Warnock as an out-of-touch politician who has stood in lockstep with President Biden amid towering inflation and rising crime. 

While Warnock has largely ignored Walker’s attacks, preferring to run as a steady hand for Georgians in Washington, the potential shortcomings of that strategy became apparent Friday, when he met an aggressive Walker for their first and only face-to-face debate.

That showdown saw Walker frequently interrupt and fiercely criticize a cautious Warnock, who seldom went on the attack and focused more on touting Democratic policy achievements, like the passage of a sweeping tax and climate bill over the summer. 

While Walker hit the occasional snag — at one point, he was scolded by the moderator for brandishing an honorary sheriff’s badge in violation of a rule against using props — his debate performance was seen by Republicans as one that could help him quiet doubts about his ability to serve in the Senate.

“I think it gave some comfort to people who had some angst about his ability simply to stand up and articulate and look like he’s fundamentally in charge of both himself and the key issues in a way that matches Georgia,” said Chuck Clay, a former state senator and Georgia GOP chair.

“He overperformed in a way that assured people he’s a competent candidate and can go to the Senate and provide leadership on things that traditionally a majority of Georgians have cared about — the economy, jobs and job security,” Clay said. 

Most polling in the race shows Warnock with only a narrow lead over Walker, and few surveys show either candidate receiving the majority support they’ll need to win the election outright in November and avoid what would likely be a chaotic and expensive runoff.

What’s more, early voting is already underway in Georgia and Election Day is fewer than three weeks out, meaning that the window for either candidate to expand his base of support is rapidly closing. 

Jon Reinish, a Democratic strategist, said that Warnock’s primary mission in the closing weeks of the campaign should be to remind voters of Walker’s personal and political baggage, arguing that a policy-focused closing argument alone may not be enough to bring the race to a close.

“Warnock is a singular figure. He’s a pastor, he’s a person of faith, he’s a man of principles,” Reinish said. “But you have to fight, and you have to score knockout punches, and you have to make sure you’re consistently defining your opponent as part of your closing argument, and Warnock finally seems to be doing that now.”

To be sure, Walker’s turbulent personal life hasn’t gone untouched. Warnock’s campaign has aired ads attacking Walker, while Democratic-aligned groups are spending $36 million hammering the GOP candidate. 

Republicans, meanwhile, have countered with personal attacks of their own. 34N22, a PAC aligned with Walker, dropped $1.5 million on an ad last week featuring police body camera footage of a March 2020 altercation between Warnock and his ex-wife. 

Some Democrats say that the attacks on Walker will be more powerful coming directly from Warnock in the final weeks of the campaign, believing that the outcome of the race could come down to a handful of moderates and swing voters, who may have reservations about both candidates.

“I think the strategy is: We’re going to go hard, we’re going to be more aggressive at the candidate level; we’ve got to turn the heat up to show we’re emotionally invested in this, and it needs to come from the candidate himself,” one Democratic consultant said.

Still, Republicans have stood behind Walker in the face of negative headlines and campaign-trail gaffes. After a report from The Daily Beast earlier this month detailed allegations that Walker had paid for his then-girlfriend to have an abortion in 2009, top Republican groups put out statements of support for Walker, accusing Democrats and the media of trying to smear him.

Clay, the former Georgia state senator, noted that Walker has “been hit with just about every torpedo you can toss at him, and it hasn’t brought him down.” He cautioned that Warnock should be careful not to go too negative against Walker, warning that doing so could damage his bipartisan appeal.

“I think it’s a little more difficult to turn him into a raging bull without losing a little bit of credibility, losing who he is and who he wants to be portrayed as,” Clay said. “If you go too far, people will see it as desperation.”

Source Article from https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/3695030-warnock-takes-the-gloves-off-vs-walker/

Paul Flores, 45, will face a sentence of 25 years to life in prison when he is sentenced on Dec. 9, prosecutors said.

After Ms. Smart’s disappearance in 1996, the search for her ranged from remote areas of the campus to her dorm room in Muir Hall, where investigators found her wallet and reminders to turn in class work. A billboard seeking help in finding her was organized by her family. Paul Flores’s dorm room was searched and he was interviewed by investigators.

Ms. Smart’s family had their daughter declared legally dead in 2002.

Nearly two decades later, in 2021, the authorities described Paul Flores as a “prime suspect” and executed search warrants, including at his Los Angeles home. Investigators used dogs trained to detect human remains and ground-penetrating radar to search Ruben Flores’s property in Arroyo Grande, Calif.

Paul Flores was taken into custody at his home in Los Angeles on April 13, 2021, and was charged with murder during a rape or attempted rape. Ruben Flores was arrested at his home and charged with being an accessory after the fact.

Mr. Dow, the San Luis Obispo County district attorney, said at the time that Paul Flores had “caused the death” of Ms. Smart “while in the commission of, or attempted, rape.” Ruben Flores helped to hide her remains, he said.

The trials of Paul and Ruben Flores were not live-streamed, but local media organizations covered them intensively over the last three months.

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2022/10/18/us/paul-flores-guilty-kristin-smart.html

Several other elements of the tax code also are indexed to inflation. The maximum 2023 Earned Income Tax Credit, one of the federal government’s main anti-poverty measures, will be $7,430, up from $6,935 in 2022.

Source Article from https://www.washingtonpost.com/us-policy/2022/10/18/irs-deductions-brackets-inflation/

Britain’s Prime Minister Liz Truss attends a news conference in the Downing Street Briefing Room in central London, Oct. 14. Truss has only been in office for six weeks but has already drawn calls for her removal.

Daniel Leal/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Daniel Leal/AP

Britain’s Prime Minister Liz Truss attends a news conference in the Downing Street Briefing Room in central London, Oct. 14. Truss has only been in office for six weeks but has already drawn calls for her removal.

Daniel Leal/AP

LONDON — After a bruising first six weeks in office, Britain’s still very new Prime Minister Liz Truss is having to bat away repeated questions about her future at No. 10 Downing Street.

After serving as a Cabinet minister for more than a decade under three predecessors, Truss took office Sept. 6 at the end of a long leadership campaign to replace Boris Johnson, who had resigned amid a swirl of scandals centered on poor judgment.

But the vast majority of the economic vision that won her support from tens of thousands of grassroots Conservative Party members now lies in tatters.

She replaced the finance chief with a leadership rival

She fired her first finance minister, Kwasi Kwarteng, last Friday. Since then, she has had to watch his replacement, Jeremy Hunt — a former leadership rival she appointed to the second most powerful post in government — publicly tear down a series of proposals that she had insisted were critical to Britain’s long-term economic growth prospects. They included cuts to the United Kingdom’s basic rate of tax, after she had already reversed course on tax cuts for Britain’s wealthiest. A planned drop in corporate taxes was junked too, along with plans to keep alcohol prices low and incentivize overseas shoppers to spend money tax-free in Britain.

Perhaps the most politically painful change of direction concerns an energy price cap that Truss promised last month to keep in place for the next two years. It was designed to protect British households from the high costs of gas and electricity required to heat and power their homes, and Truss as recently as last week taunted her political opponents for suggesting that two years was too long of a guarantee. If gas prices rose again precipitously, as they did earlier this year after Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, the British government would be on the hook for what might be billions of pounds in unforeseen price hikes.

Hunt said this was inadvisable, and reduced the plan’s lifespan to just six months. That means by next spring, Britons may be once more at the mercy of global energy markets, at a time when inflation is expected to still be very high, and interest rates set by the Bank of England will mean mortgage costs for many have soared.

Conservatives have fallen far behind Labour in polls

That damaging long-term outlook is what has many of Truss’ fellow Conservatives concerned. The party’s poll numbers have fallen through the floor, with around two years before the next election. Late Monday, Truss insisted in a BBC interview that she will lead her party into that election.

But already five Conservative legislators have publicly called for her to resign, with many more criticizing and questioning her position anonymously in British media outlets. British front pages in recent days have appeared united in the narrative that she cannot remain in the role for long.

“People don’t respect her, they don’t trust her, and the government is now effectively being run by a chancellor who is going against the very thing the prime minister stood on,” Rainbow Murray, a politics professor at Queen Mary University of London, said on NPR’s Morning Edition. Murray was referring to the formal name for the finance chief — the chancellor of the Exchequer, which is the U.K.’s Treasury.

Truss has apologized for recent mistakes, she told the BBC, but insists she has now fixed them and remains wedded to her vision for the country’s economic growth. Chancellor Hunt will unveil a long-term tax and spending plan at the end of this month.

She has also sought to dodge questions from her chief political antagonists, the opposition Labour Party, which currently leads the Conservatives by 28 percentage points in voter intention, according to the latest poll from YouGov.

Criticism and jokes about Truss abound

Her failure to show up at the House of Commons on Monday to answer an urgent question about firing Kwarteng drew sharp ridicule.

“Instead of leadership we have this utter vacuum,” Labour leader Keir Starmer said in Parliament.

Another Labour legislator accused her of having hidden “under her desk” to avoid parliamentary scrutiny.

It will be harder to avoid Wednesday, at the weekly ritual known as Prime Minister’s Questions, when Truss will be forced to explain her actions and reactions to political friends and foes alike.

Source Article from https://www.npr.org/2022/10/18/1129632993/liz-truss-prime-minister-mistakes-trouble-finance

Iran has sent military personnel to Russian-occupied territory inside Crimea to train and advise the Russian military on the use of Iranian-built drones that Moscow has used to devastating effect in its war in Ukraine, according to two sources familiar with US intelligence.

Russia has launched many of what is believed to be a store of hundreds of Iranian-made drones from Crimea in a fusillade that has targeted Ukrainian cities and energy infrastructure in increasing numbers in recent weeks. The drones have been seen as a signal of growing closeness between Tehran and Moscow.

CNN has reached out to the Iranian mission at the United Nations for comment.

State Department principal deputy spokesperson Vedant Patel said Tuesday that the “deepening” of relations between Moscow and Tehran should be seen as “a profound threat.”

The Daily Mirror first reported the trainers’ presence in Ukraine.

US trying to speed up delivery of key air defense systems to Ukraine after Russia’s Iranian-supplied drone attacks

It was not immediately clear how many trainers traveled to Crimea and whether they remain present. One source briefed on US intelligence said “dozens” of Iranian personnel had been sent.

US officials have said that when Russia first began testing and deploying the drones in Ukraine in August, many of them experienced numerous failures. Russian operatives had been training on the systems inside Iran, but Iranian personnel began traveling to Crimea in recent weeks to help Russia operate the systems and try to fix their problems.

Tehran has provided two types: Shaheds, which explode on impact and have a range of upwards of 1,000 miles, and the Mohajer-6, which can both carry missiles and be used for surveillance.

US officials have seen Russia’s reliance on these Iranian drones — in particular the Shaheds — as evidence that Russia is struggling to replenish its native stocks of munitions after eight months of missile salvos and a punishing regime of Western sanctions that the US believes has cut Moscow off from needed components for new weapons. Iran has denied sending the drones to Russia.

Patel said that the United States would “continue to take practical, aggressive steps to make these weapons sales harder, including sanctions, export control actions against any entities involved.”

A US official told CNN that on Wednesday, the US, France and the United Kingdom plan to discuss Iran’s drone transfers to Russia during a closed UN Security Council meeting.

The US, France, and the UK have said that the transfer of the Iranian-made drones to Russia violates UN Security Council Resolution 2231, which restricts certain arms transfers to or from Iran. It is unclear whether they will raise this specific point in the meeting Wednesday or move to snap back sanctions on Iran for the arms transfers.

CNN’s Jennifer Hansler contributed to this report.

Source Article from https://www.cnn.com/2022/10/18/politics/iran-trainers-crimea-drones/index.html

Donald Trump’s assertions of executive and attorney-client privilege over certain documents that the FBI seized from his Mar-a-Lago resort appeared to lack evidence sufficient for him to rule in the former US president’s favor, the special master reviewing the records suggested on Tuesday.

The special master, senior US district court judge Raymond Dearie, complained during a conference call in the case that the log of documents Trump is trying to withhold from the justice department did not give enough information about the validity of the privilege claims.

Dearie encouraged Trump’s lawyers to elaborate on why they believed the documents could be excluded from the justice department’s criminal investigation into the potential willful retention of national defense information, removal of government records and obstruction of justice.

“It’s a little perplexing as I go through the log,” Dearie said. “What’s the expression – ‘Where’s the beef?’ I need some beef.”

The discussion on the conference call was the latest development in the ongoing review that is examining whether any of the 11,000 documents without classified markings seized from Mar-a-Lago are legally privileged and cannot be used by prosecutors in the criminal investigation.

Trump sought the appointment of a special master and argued to US district court judge Aileen Cannon in Florida – a Trump appointee – that the justice department should not itself decide whether some of the documents were potentially protected by executive or attorney-client privilege.

The request was granted in an unprecedented ruling – partly because of Trump’s status as a former president, Cannon said – that also prevented federal investigators from examining both the 11,000 documents and an additional 103 documents bearing classified markings.

That prompted the justice department to seek to reverse elements of Cannon’s ruling in order to regain access to the 103 documents, which the US court of appeals for the 11th circuit granted and the US supreme court last week upheld over Trump’s objections.

The conference call touched only on privilege disagreements concerning a small subset of the seized materials that remains, for now, in the special master’s purview. The justice department has since appealed the appointment of the special master in its entirety.

The dispute could foreshadow what could be a messy argument between Trump’s lawyers seeking to limit what documents can be used in the criminal inquiry, and the justice department, which is trying to keep as many records in play.

The Guardian has previously reported that Trump is seeking to withhold from federal prosecutors letters and signing sheets with the National Archives, among a number of documents that were scooped up by the FBI that appear germane to the criminal investigation.

On the call, Dearie specifically asked Trump’s lawyers to give him a better sense of how one document, for instance, could both be subject to executive privilege – a designation applying to presidential records – and simultaneously be a non-governmental, personal document.

“Unless I’m wrong, and I’ve been wrong before, there’s certainly an incongruity there,” Dearie said, appearing to cast doubt on the notion that a document could carry both characterizations.

The special master also asked Trump’s lawyers to provide more details on documents they asserted were protected by attorney-client privilege, as he suggested that some of the documents in question had been seen by a third party, which would make the communications no longer confidential.

Dearie also grew frustrated that the two sides were unable to resolve more disagreements among themselves, at one stage criticizing the government for not saying whether one of the documents, concerning the 2017 special counsel investigation, had been sent to the justice department.

The conference call, however, did resolve why Trump’s legal team had been told at one stage that there could be 200,000 pages to examine but the actual number was 21,792 pages: a company hired to digitize the seized materials for the special master review had overestimated the page count.

Source Article from https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2022/oct/18/trump-mar-a-lago-documents-seized-fbi

However, Durham and his aides used the forum of the recent trials to air evidence of what they suggested was a failure by FBI personnel to pursue leads as they probed the sourcing of the Steele dossier, a compendium of allegations former British intelligence officer Christopher Steele assembled about links between Trump and Russia. Danchenko was Steele’s key source when compiling the dossier.

Durham’s open criticism of the FBI produced an unusual spectacle at the trial, as he and his team attacked the competence of FBI agents and analysts who were the prosecution’s key witnesses. The back-and-forth led to disclosures about senior investigators’ refusal to pursue inquiries that more junior FBI personnel thought were warranted, as well as ongoing efforts to discipline FBI personnel over issues related to the Trump-Russia investigation.

Defenders of the FBI’s Trump-Russia probe have said Durham’s criticisms have focused on a relatively small part of the broad investigation, although Durham could offer more disclosures in a forthcoming report. However, his back-to-back courtroom defeats suggest he and his aides misjudged those cases and committed some of the same investigative gaffes they’ve decried in the original probe.

Danchenko managed to defeat the charges against him even though he declined to take the stand in his own defense and called no witnesses during the trial. His attorneys suggested to the jury that he was the victim of a politically inspired prosecution by Durham, who was tapped in 2019 by then-Attorney General William Barr to look into how the Trump-Russia probe began and played out.

The jury of seven men and five women deliberated for about nine hours over two days before returning their verdicts.

Danchenko initially showed little emotion as the successive “not guilty” verdicts were read aloud by a court clerk shortly after 4 p.m. Tuesday. At least one member of the jury looked directly at him as the verdicts came down.

Danchenko glanced briefly at his wife, who began crying as the verdicts were delivered and was handed a box of tissues by a bailiff via one onlooker in the audience. Later, Danchenko teared up himself and embraced his attorneys.

Durham did not address reporters at the courthouse, but issued a written statement saying: “While we are disappointed in the outcome, we respect the jury’s decision and thank them for their service. I also want to recognize and thank the investigators and the prosecution team for their dedicated efforts in seeking truth and justice in this case.”

The four charges the jury considered all involve Danchenko’s statements about his dealings with Sergei Millian, who served in 2016 as head of the Russian American Chamber of Commerce.

Danchenko told the FBI that he received a call in July 2016 from an unidentified man who shared derogatory information about Trump. The Russian researcher said he believed the man was Millian and that the pair agreed to meet up in New York, but the man never showed.

Durham’s team said Danchenko never had contact with Millian and invented the entire story to cover for having told Steele that Millian was the source of a lurid story about Trump’s alleged actions at a Moscow hotel.

“There was no call with Millian and there was no call with any individual,” prosecutor Michael Keilty said in a closing statement for the Durham team. “It’s a not-to-be believed story.”

But the prosecutors found themselves in the difficult situation of having to prove a negative — that Millian never talked to Danchenko — and having to do so beyond a reasonable doubt.

Durham’s team suggested that the absence of Millian’s known phone numbers from call logs for Danchenko’s phone proved the two men never spoke, but the defense noted that people often speak via a variety of phone apps, such as WhatsApp and Signal.

They also noted that travel records showed Millian, who did not testify, arriving in New York from Asia on the night before the day Danchenko said he was supposed to meet the anonymous caller in New York.

Before the jury verdicts Tuesday, the criminal case against Danchenko had already proved to be difficult for Durham and his team. At the conclusion of the prosecution’s evidence on Friday, U.S. District Court Judge Anthony Trenga granted a defense motion to throw out one of the five false-statement charges the former think tank employee faced.

Durham had charged Danchenko with lying to the FBI when he said he never “talked” to public relations executive Charles Dolan about the compendium Trump’s political opponents paid Steele to compile about Trump’s ties to Russia. Many of the stories in the so-called Steele Dossier appear to be apocryphal and FBI personnel who testified at the trial said they were unable to corroborate any of it.

While there was proof at the trial that Danchenko emailed with Dolan about the dossier, there was no evidence the two men ever spoke. Durham’s team alleged the jury could find the emails amounted to talking, but Trenga- — an appointee of President George W. Bush — said it appeared Danchenko’s denial was literally true so the count had to be thrown out.

The prosecution of Danchenko on false-statement charges is the third criminal case brought by Durham’s team.

The first, against FBI attorney Kevin Clinesmith, netted a guilty plea from the lawyer for forging details in an email related to a surveillance application during the early stages of the Trump-Russia probe. Clinesmith, who said he altered the message to save himself time, got no jail time.

Jurors in Washington made short work of Durham’s second outing, a single-count false-statement charge against cybersecurity lawyer Michael Sussmann for allegedly lying about his client when relaying to the FBI suspicions about computer links between Trump and Russia.

A prosecutor argued to jurors that the evidence of Sussmann’s guilt was “overwhelming,” but after a two-week trial, the jury took just six hours to acquit the Washington lawyer.

Shortly after the verdicts were received, Trenga called Danchenko to the lectern, saying “Your bond has been discharged and you’re free to go.” After that, the Russian national also began crying and embraced both of his defense attorneys, Stuart Sears and Danny Onorato.

In the wake of the verdicts, Onorato and Sears shook hands with Durham and his prosecutors, Keilty and Brittain Shaw.

“We’ve known all along that Mr. Danchenko was innocent. We’re happy now that the American public knows that as well,” Sears said outside the courthouse, flanked by his client. “We thank these jurors for their hard work and deliberation for reaching the right result.”

The defense lawyers declined to answer questions from reporters, while Durham never came to the cameras stationed in front of the courthouse and commented only in his written statement.

Source Article from https://www.politico.com/news/2022/10/18/danchenko-acquitted-on-all-counts-in-durham-russia-probe-00062380

Monday marked eight months since WNBA star Brittney Griner was arrested in Russia. Tuesday marked her 32nd birthday.

Griner’s representatives shared a message on Tuesday thanking everyone for the support they have given over the past several months.

“Thank you everyone for fighting so hard to get me home. All the support and love are definitely helping me,” Griner said in her message, according to the statement.

CLICK HERE FOR MORE SPORTS COVERAGE ON FOXNEWS.COM

U.S. basketball player Brittney Griner, who was detained at Moscow’s Sheremetyevo airport and later charged with illegal possession of cannabis, sits inside a defendants’ cage during the reading of the court’s verdict in Khimki outside Moscow, Russia, Aug. 4, 2022.
(REUTERS/Evgenia Novozhenina/Pool)

Griner was in Russia in February to compete during the WNBA offseason, and Russian authorities said she had vape canisters with cannabis oil inside her luggage while traveling through an airport in Moscow.

The Biden administration reportedly talked about a potential prisoner swap to free her and another American held in a Russian jail.

Last week, Griner’s attorney said she is growing increasingly nervous about the prospects of being released.

“She is not yet absolutely convinced that America will be able to take her home,” Alexander Boykov said in an interview with the New York Times. “She is very worried about what the price of that will be, and she is afraid that she will have to serve the whole sentence here in Russia.”

Brittney Griner’s wife, Cherelle Griner helped create the #WeAreBG campaign in hopes of keeping pressure on the United States government and other officials to continue to work to bring Brittney home.

Cherelle Griner, wife of WNBA star Brittney Griner, speaks during a news conference in Chicago July 8, 2022.
(AP Photo/Nam Y. Huh, File)

The #WeAreBG campaign released a video on Brittney’s birthday in which Cherelle said, in part, “I’ve felt every moment of the grueling seven months without her.”

She also thanked everyone who has helped and supported Brittney.

BRITTNEY GRINER QUESTION SPARKS COMPLETE OPPOSITE RESPONSES FROM LSU, BAYLOR COACHES

The WNBA released a tweet in support of Griner saying, in part, “We will not forget about you and we will not stop fighting for you.”

Legendary former tennis player Billie Jean King took to social media and wrote, “Let’s continue to advocate for [Brittney’s] release and bring her home.” 

One of Griner’s fellow WNBA stars, Seattle Storm player Breanna Stewart, expressed admiration for Griner.

Stewart is playing overseas in Turkey. Her and other WNBA players previously announced that Griner’s arrest deterred them from playing in Russia this offseason. Another player, Courtney Vandersloot, elected to compete in Hungary.

“Honestly, my time in Russia has been wonderful, but especially with BG still wrongfully detained there, nobody’s going to go there until she’s home,” Stewart said when she previously spoke about Griner’s situation. “I think that, you know, now people want to go overseas, and if the money is not much different, they want to be in a better place.”

To entice players to stay home, WNBA Commissioner Cathy Engelbert said top players could make up to $700,000 this year between base salary, marketing agreements and award bonuses.

Bernice King, daughter of Martin Luther King Jr., wrote, “Brittney, I am grateful for your life. I pray that you do not lose heart, as we are advocating for your release and return home.”

Dawn Staley, six-time WNBA All-Star and head coach of the reigning women’s basketball national champion South Carolina Gamecocks, showed support for Griner and wished her a happy birthday.

In August, Griner was sentenced to nine years in prison. Her appeal, which the U.S. has called “another sham judicial proceeding,” has been scheduled for Oct. 25.

WNBA star and two-time Olympic gold medalist Brittney Griner is escorted from a courtroom after a hearing in Khimki just outside Moscow, Russia, Aug. 4, 2022. 
(AP Photo/Alexander Zemlianichenko)

U.S. authorities have said they are continuing to work to arrange for Griner’s release and have previously designated her as “wrongfully detained.”

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Griner is an eight-time All-Star and a two-time Olympic gold medalist.

The #WeAreBG campaign encouraged everyone to write notes of support for Griner for her birthday.

Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/sports/brittney-griner-releases-message-32nd-birthday-marking-eight-month-stay-russian-detention

Kyrylo Tymoshenko, the deputy head of the president’s office, said that “everyone should be ready, first, to save electricity, and second, rolling power blackouts are also possible if strikes continue”.

Source Article from https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-63297239