The House committee investigating the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol voted unanimously Thursday to subpoena former President Donald Trump, saying there is precedent for a former president to appear before the panel.

“This is a question about accountability to the American people,” committee chair Rep. Bennie Thompson said during the public hearing. “He must be accountable. He is required to answer for his actions. He is required to answer to those police officers who put their lives and bodies on the line to defend our democracy. He is required to answer to the millions of Americans whose votes he wanted to throw out as part of his scheme to remain in power.”

Vice chair Rep. Liz Cheney said the committee had “sufficient evidence” to answer many of the “critical questions” about the attack and to make criminal referrals to the Justice Department. But she said a “key task” remained: “We must seek the testimony under oath of Jan. 6’s central player.”

Several Trump allies have refused to comply with subpoenas, including top Trump aides Steve Bannon and Peter Navarro, who were charged with contempt of Congress. Bannon was convicted and is expected to be sentenced later this month.  

A video is shown of former US President Donald Trump at the US House Select Committee hearing to Investigate the January 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol, on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C., on October 13, 2022.

ALEX WONG/POOL/AFP via Getty Images


Thursday’s hearing, the ninth and likely final one, recapped much of what the committee has learned so far about the attack. 

The committee showed video testimony from those around Trump who said he acknowledged privately that he had lost the election. Former top White House communications aide Alyssa Farah, said, “I popped into the Oval just to, like, give the president the headlines and see how he was doing. And he was looking at the TV and he said, ‘Can you believe I lost to this effing guy?” 

And according to former White House aide Cassidy Hutchinson, former chief of staff Mark Meadows told her Trump “pretty much acknowledged” that he lost. 

The committee also showed never-before-seen footage from the day of the riot. In the videos, members of Congress call Pence, the Defense Department and the governors of Virginia and Maryland and ask them to bring in the National Guard. “We need them there now,” Schumer said in one of the videos. Meanwhile, the committee said, Trump did nothing to stop the rioters.

The committee said they may still subpoena additional witnesses, including members of the Secret Service. 

Source Article from https://www.cbsnews.com/live-updates/house-january-6-committee-hearing-watch-live-stream-2022-10-13/

Traffic was at a standstill on Eagle Trace Drive, a normally quiet road with a plant-filled berm in the middle, about a mile and a half from the site. Sirens whined in the distance as the cars inched forward, and police cars with lights flashing nosed through.

“I’m never going to get home,” Cheryl St. James, a nurse, said as she sat in her car. “I want to get home. I can’t believe this is happening in my neighborhood. It’s scary.”

Ms. Baldwin placed the shooting in the context of mass shootings across the country. “We must stop this mindless violence in America,” she said at a news conference. “We must address gun violence.”

Anne Berry, 52, who’s lived in the Avington Place neighborhood for over 20 years, said helicopters had intermittently been hovering above her home for more than three hours and that it was “loud enough to feel in your chest when they get close.”

A neighbor recounted to her that when he went to walk his dog, an officer stopped and asked him if he had seen anyone dressed in camouflage and then told him to head back inside, Ms. Berry said.

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2022/10/13/us/raleigh-shooting.html

Trump’s request was modest in any case, legal experts said. “It can be trumpeted as what Trump took to the Supreme Court, but what he took to the Supreme Court was a very narrow argument,” Sean M. Marotta, a Washington appellate lawyer, said before the justices announced their rejection of the petition. “It’s not an earthshaking aspect of the investigation.”

Source Article from https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/10/13/supreme-court-trump-mar-a-lago-classified-documents/

Oct 13 (Reuters) – A Florida jury on Thursday decided to spare Nikolas Cruz, the gunman who killed 17 people in 2018 at a high school in the city of Parkland, from the death penalty, instead calling for life in prison without possibility of parole.

Some family members of victims shook their heads in the Fort Lauderdale courtroom as the jury rejected the prosecution’s request for the death penalty for Cruz in one of the deadliest school shootings in U.S. history. Cruz, 24, showed little emotion while sitting at the defense lawyers’ table attorney as the verdict was read.

Cruz pleaded guilty last year to premeditated murder at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, about 30 miles (50 km) north of Fort Lauderdale. Cruz, who was 19 at the time of the crime and had been expelled from the school, used a semi-automatic rifle to kill 14 students and three staff members.

The jury found that mitigating factors, such as disorders described by witnesses as stemming from his biological mother’s substance abuse during pregnancy, outweighed aggravating factors. The prosecution had argued that Cruz’s crime was premeditated as well as heinous and cruel, which are among criteria that Florida law establishes for deciding whether a death sentence should be imposed.

Under Florida law, a jury must be unanimous in deciding to recommend that a judge sentence a defendant to be executed, requiring a conclusion that aggravating factors outweighed mitigating factors on at least one criminal count.

Jury foreperson Benjamin Thomas told a Florida TV station that one juror insisted that Cruz not get the death penalty because of his mental illness.

“There was one with a hard ‘no,’ she couldn’t do it,” Thomas said in an interview posted on the website of CBS Miami affiliate WFOR-TV, adding that two other jurors “ended up voting the same way.”

Some family members expressed dismay that jurors did not call for the death penalty.

“I’m disgusted with our legal system. I’m disgusted with those jurors,” said Ilan Alhadeff, whose daughter Alyssa Alhadeff was killed. “… What do we have the death penalty for? What is the purpose of it?”

“It’s pretty unreal that nobody paid attention to the facts of this case, that nobody can remember who a victim is and what they look like,” added Tony Montalto, whose daughter Gina was killed. “I know every day because I see my beautiful daughter’s face around our home and in my dreams and I miss her very much.”

The three-month penalty phase of the trial included harrowing testimony from survivors as well as cellphone videos taken by students that day showing them crying for help or speaking in whispers while in hiding.

Defense witnesses included Cruz’s half-sister, who testified that their mother drank heavily and used drugs including cocaine while she was pregnant with Cruz. When Cruz pleaded guilty, he apologized for the killings and said he wants to dedicate his life to helping others.

NOV. 1 SENTENCING

Broward County Circuit Judge Elizabeth Scherer set the formal sentencing for Nov. 1.

Florida Governor Ron DeSantis, speaking at a news conference in the city of Cape Coral concerning the state’s hurricane recovery efforts, voiced disappointment about the verdict.

“This is not what we were looking for,” DeSantis said.

The United States has experienced numerous school shootings in recent decades including one in May in Uvalde, Texas, that left 19 children and two teachers dead.

Some of the teenagers who survived the Parkland rampage formed “March for Our Lives,” an organization that called for gun control legislation such as a ban on assault-style rifles. President Joe Biden in June signed the first major federal gun reform legislation in three decades, which he called a rare bipartisan achievement, though it did not include an assault weapons ban.

Debbi Hixon, whose husband Chris Hixon was the school’s athletic director and was killed after confronting Cruz during the massacre, said on Thursday, “It does and it should say something to society – that we have to look at who we allow to own firearms, how we address mental health in our communities, and where we give grace when it’s warranted.”

Anne Ramsay, whose daughter Helena Ramsay was killed, added, “There is no excuse in this country to have weapons of war on the streets. If you don’t get that, then something is wrong in this country.”

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

Source Article from https://www.reuters.com/world/us/florida-jury-has-reached-verdict-parkland-shooter-case-media-reports-2022-10-13/

The city has been in tumult since the leak of an hourlong conversation between three council members and a local labor leader over the weekend, prompting calls for their resignations from a long list of political leaders including President Joe Biden.

Biden was visiting Los Angeles Thursday and repeated his earlier endorsement of Rep. Karen Bass, who is running for mayor of America’s second-largest city against billionaire developer Rick Caruso.

In the leaked recording, the three can be heard using racist remarks while they discuss redistricting and ways to dilute the power of Black Angelenos.

Martinez at one point used a racist slur to describe the Black son of a fellow council member. The news has mobilized hundreds of angry protesters, who earlier this week swarmed LA City Hall with calls for justice, resulting in one meeting, on Tuesday, adjourning early.

Source Article from https://www.politico.com/news/2022/10/13/la-city-council-resign-leaked-recording-00061740

In another clip, Mr. Schumer told Jeffrey Rosen, then the acting U.S. attorney general, that he was worried about the security of his lawmakers. “There are still senators in their hideaways,” he said, as scenes of violence at the Capitol played out on a television screen before him.

“They’re obviously ransacking our offices; that’s nothing,” Ms. Pelosi added. “The concern we have is about personal safety — it just transcends everything.”

Mr. Schumer chimed in: “Why don’t you get the president to tell them to leave the Capitol, Mr. Attorney General, in your law enforcement responsibility? A public statement that they should all leave.”

The footage, shot by Ms. Pelosi’s daughter, Alexandra, also showed top Democratic and Republican officials — including Senator Mitch McConnell, Republican of Kentucky and the minority leader — huddling on the phone with Pentagon officials, mapping out how they could quickly certify President Biden’s electoral victory.

“This cannot be, we’re just waiting on so-and-so,” said Mr. Schumer. “We need them there now, whoever you’ve got.”

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2022/10/13/us/politics/jan-6-video-pelosi-schumer-capitol.html

New York Attorney General Letitia James speaks during a press conference. Photo: Michael M. Santiago/Getty Images

Source Article from https://www.axios.com/2022/10/13/trump-new-york-attorney-general-lawsuit-judge-request

Judgment Day arrived on Wednesday for Alex Jones — and he said that it felt like he landed in Hell.

“This must be what Hell’s like,” the notorious right-wing conspiracy theorist said on an Infowars livestream as a Connecticut jury awarded plaintiffs a staggering nearly $1 billion in damages.

The families of the Sandy Hook Elementary School victims actually know what Hell feels like. Jones put them there with his heinous conspiracy theories and lies about the 2012 shooting, which he repeated again and again over the years, ignoring pleas to stop.

A version of this article first appeared in the “Reliable Sources” newsletter. Sign up for the daily digest chronicling the evolving media landscape here.

But Jones isn’t wrong to feel crushed.

As former US Attorney Harry Litman said after the mammoth awards to the plaintiffs were read in court, Jones will be “basically broke” for the remainder of his life. And it’s not just his houses or Rolex watches that he could lose.

With its punishing award, the jury’s decision will likely shrink or even doom Jones’ media empire, which has been at the center of major conspiracy theories dating back to former President George W. Bush’s administration and which was embraced by former President Donald Trump.

Jones has, of course, vowed to appeal. And his company has filed for bankruptcy. So he may be able to delay the inevitable for a little time longer.

But not forever. The clock is now ticking on Infowars. Will Jones have a platform in five years? Ten years?

If he struggled with being deplatformed from major social media websites, Jones is going to be in for an entirely new world of hurt when he loses the instrument he built over the years that allowed him to weaponize information for his own ends.

The reckoning for Jones comes at a seismic moment in American society, where hate, lies, and conspiracy theories have flourished in recent years, often enriching and empowering those who peddle them to the masses.

But the corrosive form of information warfare that Jones rode to fame and fortune is not going anywhere. It is here to stay.

And it is, unfortunately, more popular than ever, with right-wing media stars and top Republican politicians emulating Jones’ modus operandi.

At this point, one has to frankly even wonder how much the ultimate demise of Jones and his Infowars business would even clean up the discourse. After all, his brand of hate and lies have already been fused into a large swath of the public dialogue.

Source Article from https://www.cnn.com/2022/10/13/media/jones-conspiracy-empire/index.html

Fred Guttenberg, whose 14-year-old daughter, Jaime, was killed in the massacre, said after court, “I’m not often stunned, but I am stunned by this verdict today.”

“I could not be more disappointed,” he said.

“I don’t know how this jury came to the conclusions that they did,” he said.

“This decision today only makes it more likely that the next mass shooting will be attempted,” he said.

Guttenberg said he thinks the next mass shooter is planning his attack now, and “that person now believes that they can get away with it.”

“There are 17 victims that did not receive justice today,” Guttenberg said. “This jury failed our families today. But I will tell you: The monster is gonna go to prison, and in prison, I hope and pray, he receives the kind of mercy from prisoners that he showed to my daughter and the 16 others. … He will die in prison, and I will be waiting to read that news on that.”

Source Article from https://abcnews.go.com/US/live-updates/parkland-shooter-trial/?id=91379423

The call to the police department in Bristol, a town in central Connecticut about 80 miles northeast of New York City, came at 10:29 p.m. on Wednesday, reporting a possible domestic incident between two siblings, Sgt. Christine Jeltema of the Connecticut State Police said.

When the officers arrived, the suspect, Nicholas Brutcher, was standing outside the home on Redstone Hill Road and immediately began firing, officials said. Mr. Hamzy was shot dead at the scene, while Sergeant Demonte was taken to the hospital and pronounced dead there.

Mr. Brutcher, 35, was shot and killed outside the home, the State Police said. His brother, Nathan Brutcher, 32, was also shot and taken to a nearby hospital for treatment. His condition is unknown.

Norberto Rodriguez, who lives across the street from where the shooting occurred, said he saw a man dressed in camouflage emerge from the house with a gun. Another man ran out, apparently to restrain him, and the man with the rifle shot him, Mr. Rodriguez said.

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2022/10/13/nyregion/bristol-connecticut-shooting.html

DUBAI, United Arab Emirates — The Biden administration asked Saudi Arabia, the de-facto leader of oil producer group OPEC, to delay its decision on oil output by a month, the kingdom said in a statement.

The Saudis declined, and in early October OPEC+ — which includes non-OPEC oil exporters like Russia — announced its largest supply cut since 2020, to the tune of 2 million barrels per day starting from November. That means tighter supplies and higher prices at a time of already high inflation and worries of a global recession, which angered U.S. lawmakers who are now calling for a “reevaluation” of relations with the Saudi kingdom.

Notably, the White House’s request would have delayed the decision until after the U.S. midterm elections.

In a statement dated Wednesday, the Saudi government defended its move and said all OPEC decisions are based on economic forecasts and needs.

“The Government of the Kingdom clarified through its continuous consultation with the US Administration that all economic analyses indicate that postponing the OPEC+ decision for a month, according to what has been suggested, would have had negative economic consequences,” the statement read.

Responding to the Saudi claims, Pentagon spokesman John Kirby reframed the exchange and accused the kingdom of aiding Russia’s revenues and hampering the impact of Western sanctions on Moscow for its war in Ukraine.

“In recent weeks, the Saudis conveyed to us – privately and publicly – their intention to reduce oil production, which they knew would increase Russian revenues and blunt the effectiveness of sanctions. That is the wrong direction,” Kirby said. “We presented Saudi Arabia with analysis to show that there was no market basis to cut production targets, and that they could easily wait for the next OPEC meeting to see how things developed.”

Kirby said, without giving examples, that other OPEC members opposed Saudi Arabia’s move, and reiterated the Biden administration’s vow to reexamine its relationship with Riyadh.

“Other OPEC nations communicated to us privately that they also disagreed with the Saudi decision, but felt coerced to support Saudi’s direction,” he said. “As the President has said, we are reevaluating our relationship with Saudi Arabia in light of these actions, and will continue to look for signs about where they stand in combatting Russian aggression.”

On Tuesday, President Joe Biden said there would be “consequences” for Saudi Arabia’s oil production cut, which the kingdom is carrying out in coordination with other OPEC members and non-OPEC allies like Russia. Many in Washington saw this as a snub and a blatant display of siding with Moscow.

U.S. lawmakers have urged the cutting of military sales to Saudi Arabia, America’s top weapons buyer, and are encouraging the passing of antitrust legislation that would go after OPEC.

Riyadh rejected the accusations of making any politically motivated moves.

“The Government of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia would first like to express its total rejection of these statements that are not based on facts, and which are based on portraying the OPEC+ decision out of its purely economic context. This decision was taken unanimously by all member states of the OPEC+ group,” the Saudi government statement said.

“The Kingdom affirms that the outcomes of the OPEC+ meetings are adopted through consensus among member states, and that they are not based on the unilateral decision by a single country. These outcomes are based purely on economic considerations that take into account maintaining balance of supply and demand in the oil markets.”

The developments spotlight the growing tensions in the nearly 80-year-old U.S.-Saudi relationship, as both parties suggest the other is failing to uphold their end of the bargain in a friendship broadly based on the principle of energy for security.

They also highlight how little control Washington has on Saudi and OPEC energy policy.

“The relationship between Saudi Arabia and the US has soured after OPEC+ opted to cut oil quotas – Saudi Arabia is clearly leaning away from the US orbit,” James Swanston, Middle East and North Africa economist at London-based consultancy Capital Economics, said in a client note Thursday.

Still, the Saudi government stressed the continued importance of its relationship with the U.S.

“The Kingdom affirms that it [views] its relationship with the United States of America as a strategic one that serves the common interests of both countries,” it said in its statement.

“The Kingdom also stresses the importance of building on the solid pillars upon which the Saudi-US relationship had stood over the past eight decades. These pillars include mutual respect, enhancing common interests, actively contributing to preserve regional and international peace and security, countering terrorism and extremism, and achieving prosperity for the peoples of the region.”

Source Article from https://www.cnbc.com/2022/10/13/biden-admin-asked-saudi-arabia-to-postpone-opec-cut-by-a-month-saudis-say.html

The allegations are the latest new strand in Trump’s expanding web of legal woes, which stretches nationwide as he tangles with lawsuits and probes related to classified presidential documents in Florida, the ramifications of the Jan. 6 riots in Washington and fallout from his election denial in several states. It also ratchets up an long-running battle between New York’s top lawyer and the ex-president.

In the new court papers, James says Trump incorporated a new “Trump Organization LLC” in Delaware on Sept. 15, then registered the company with New York as “Trump Organization II LLC” on the day her lawsuit was filed on Sept. 21.

James’ suit seeks monetary penalties up to $250 million and an order blocking Trump from real estate transactions in New York for five years — moves that could doom his unraveling empire. But she now says his lawyers won’t assure her that Trump’s not moving assets out of state in advance.

Trump attorney Alina Habba called James’ filing “a thinly-veiled attempt” at keeping the case in front of Justice Arthur Engoron — who previously held Trump in contempt for not complying with an attorney general probe — and out of the state court’s commercial division.

“We have repeatedly provided assurance, in writing, that the Trump Organization has no intention of doing anything improper. This is simply another stunt which Ms. James hopes will aid her failing political campaign,” Habba said in a statement, repeating a common line of attack against James, who is fundraising off her legal fights.

James wants the court to prohibit the Trump Organization from transferring material assets to anyone not a party to her lawsuit, or otherwise disposing of property without the court’s blessing.

She also wants an independent monitor to oversee the company’s forthcoming 2022 financial statements and to ensure he does not employ the same accounting tricks alleged in her complaint last month. For instance, James contended that Trump continues to count $93 million held in a Vornado partnership as his own cash, even though he shouldn’t.

James is asking for an October 2023 trial date.

Source Article from https://www.politico.com/news/2022/10/13/trump-organization-tish-james-00061662

We’ve detected unusual activity from your computer network

To continue, please click the box below to let us know you’re not a robot.

Source Article from https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-10-13/uk-officials-are-working-on-a-u-turn-for-truss-s-tax-cut-plan

The House Select Committee convenes a hearing to Investigate the January 6 attack on Oct. 13. Photo: Mandel Ngan/AFP via Getty Images

Source Article from https://www.axios.com/2022/10/13/jan-6-public-hearing-former-president-trump

Cruz’s defense attorneys had urged the jury to sentence him to life in prison. The defense admitted Cruz was responsible for his actions and planned the school shooting, but argued Cruz suffered lifelong developmental delays that traced back to fetal alcohol spectrum disorders.

“Sentencing Nikolas to death will change absolutely nothing,” defense attorney Melisa McNeill said in closing arguments. “It will not bring back those 17 innocent victims that he viciously murdered.”

The prosecution, arguing for the death penalty, told jurors that Cruz researched previous mass shootings and planned a “systematic massacre.”

“Some of the remarks the defendant wrote on his YouTube were: ‘No mercy, no questions, double tap. I’m going to … murder children. … I’d love to see the families suffer,'” prosecutor Michael Satz said in closing arguments.

“He’s thinking ahead,” Satz said, by “not only looking to inflict pain” on the victims, but also “anticipating how that pain, fear and death … is gonna affect the families.”

Source Article from https://abcnews.go.com/US/live-updates/parkland-shooter-trial/?id=91379423

The panel intends to focus on evidence that Trump has “consistently and increasingly” been using rhetoric “that we knew caused violence on Jan. 6,” Rep. Liz Cheney (R-Wyo.) told reporters recently. Cheney cited recent comments by U.S. District Court Judge Amy Berman Jackson in which she upbraided elected Republicans for continuing to indulge “one man, who knows full well that he lost, instead of the Constitution he was trying to subvert.”

The select committee’s closing pitch to Americans will draw on all aspects of its more than yearlong probe. It’s expected to feature evidence that Trump’s allies were pushing him to declare victory on Election Day 2020 even before the votes were counted, and that Trump was warned of the unfolding violence at the Capitol before he tweeted an inflammatory attack on then Vice President Mike Pence.

By contending that even amid the wreckage of Jan. 6, Trump continued to plot ways to remain in power, the hearing will also function as a segue of sorts to the criminal case that federal prosecutors are piecing together — bolstered by the recent issuance of dozens of grand jury subpoenas and court-authorized searches of some of Trump’s top allies.

The committee has long emphasized its distinct mission from prosecutors — to inform the public and develop legislative recommendations to prevent future attacks on the peaceful transfer of power — but has used its platform to press the Justice Department to pursue potential crimes among Trump’s inner circle.

The panel won a hard-fought court ruling in March in which a federal judge contended Trump “likely” entered a criminal conspiracy to obstruct the presidential transition, an effort the judge described as “a coup in search of a legal theory.” That ruling became a centerpiece of the committee’s public hearings and legal arguments in the subsequent months.

“We think we very, very much proved the case in a compelling way by the end of that hearing series,” select panel member Rep. Adam Kinzinger (R-Ill.) said in a recent interview. “And now, frankly, on the criminal side, because we’re not the criminal committee, it’s up to the DOJ. … They have the torch, and we’ll see where they go with it.”

Since leaving office, Trump has used his megaphone to promise pardons to many of those jailed for storming the Capitol on Jan. 6 and has leaned on state legislators and members of Congress to embrace impossible proposals to unravel the 2020 election — including an explicit call to be reinstated as president.

He’s also suggested that if he runs and wins another term, he might pardon the rioters who sought to keep him in power, and he’s put pressure on figures like Wisconsin House Speaker Robin Vos to support measures to decertify election results in that state. Vos told Trump it was impossible, and the select committee has subpoenaed him to obtain testimony about his interactions with Trump in recent months.

The hearing had been scheduled to take place originally on Sept. 28, but the select committee postponed it as Hurricane Ian bore down on Florida; the delay may turn out to be a boon for the panel. In the intervening two weeks, the committee obtained testimony from Virginia Thomas, wife of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas. And last week, Jeremy Bertino, a North Carolina leader of the Proud Boys who also interviewed with the select panel, pleaded guilty to seditious conspiracy.

Thursday’s hearing is likely to feature some of the select panel’s evidence obtained after its summer hearings, like interviews with Trump Cabinet members about internal discussions concerning the potential invocation of the 25th Amendment to remove him from power. It’s also set to include documentary footage of longtime Trump ally Roger Stone, who was followed around by a camera crew in the weeks leading up to Jan. 6.

The Stone footage, provided by a Danish film crew and obtained by CNN, includes audio of Stone — one day before Election Day — telling an associate, “Fuck the voting, let’s get right to the violence,” while laughing.

Select panel Chair Bennie Thompson (D-Miss.) has also described a significant trove of documents and messages recently turned over by the Secret Service. Investigators have viewed the agency with skepticism after learning that thousands of messages sent among senior officials — including on and around Jan. 6, 2021 — were erased in what the agency described as a tech upgrade.

Two Secret Service officials have previously testified to the panel: Robert Engel, the head of Trump’s detail, and Tony Ornato, who held an unusual post as a political appointee in Trump’s White House. Ornato retired from the Secret Service at the end of August. But select committee members have suggested that both men said they couldn’t recall key details about the events surrounding Jan. 6 and sought follow-up interviews with them.

The committee is likely to flick at some of the links between pro-Trump extremist groups — like the Oath Keepers and Proud Boys — and Stone. Investigators have eyed the voluminous connections between Trump and those who facilitated nearly every aspect of the former president’s push to subvert the election, even though there’s been little evidence of Stone’s direct involvement in those efforts.

Yet several figures in Stone’s orbit were among the most significant players in the events of Jan. 6: Ali Alexander, founder of the post-election “Stop the Steal” activism; pro-Trump InfoWars broadcaster Alex Jones; Proud Boys national chairman Enrique Tarrio; and Oath Keepers founder Stewart Rhodes.

Stone also hired several members of the Oath Keepers to perform security for him on Jan. 5 and 6, 2021 — among them, Kelly Meggs, who is charged alongside Rhodes with seditious conspiracy for their involvement in the breach of the Capitol. Another Oath Keeper who guarded Stone, Joshua James, has already pleaded guilty to seditious conspiracy.

The hearing will play out alongside the Justice Department’s most significant criminal trial yet stemming from the Jan. 6 attack. Just across the street from the Capitol, five leaders of the Oath Keepers, including Rhodes, are beginning their trial on seditious conspiracy charges.

The select committee is also deeply immersed in the process of writing its final report and conclusions. Though interviews and aspects of the investigation remain ongoing, the panel is seeking to produce a final document in December that sums up its sprawling investigation before the current Congress ends. Investigators are also weighing the timing of the release of hundreds of witness transcripts and interview recordings that federal prosecutors have indicated interest in.

Zach Montellaro contributed to this report.

Source Article from https://www.politico.com/news/2022/10/13/jan-6-committee-trump-threat-00061454

In mid-2018, the families of 10 victims filed four separate defamation lawsuits against Mr. Jones, later combined into three. Beyond stopping Mr. Jones, the families said the lawsuits aimed to draw attention to an explosion of harmful disinformation and false narratives spread by people with powerful social media platforms who were seldom held to account.


How Times reporters cover politics. We rely on our journalists to be independent observers. So while Times staff members may vote, they are not allowed to endorse or campaign for candidates or political causes. This includes participating in marches or rallies in support of a movement or giving money to, or raising money for, any political candidate or election cause.

Once an obscure conspiracy broadcaster in Austin, Texas, Mr. Jones garnered national attention in the aftermath of Sandy Hook, when his explosive defense of the Second Amendment brought him mainstream media coverage.

His staunch support for former President Donald J. Trump, who appeared on Mr. Jones’s show while a Republican candidate for president, ushered Mr. Jones from the extremist fringe to the center of Trump-era Republican politics.

He has had a role in spreading virtually every incendiary lie to dominate headlines over the past decade, including Pizzagate, the false claim that Democrats trafficked children from a Washington pizzeria; the “great replacement theory” that ignited deadly neo-Nazi violence in Charlottesville, Va.; Covid vaccine lies; and the 2020 presidential election falsehoods that brought a violent mob to the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021.

Today, nearly one-fifth of Americans believe high-profile mass shootings have been staged, usually by the government.

Mr. Jones is now under scrutiny by the Justice Department and the House Jan. 6 committee for his role in planning events adjacent to the Jan. 6 Capitol insurrection, which he broadcast live.

Mr. Jones for years refused to supply analytical data, business records or testimony ordered by the courts in the lawsuits, which were filed in Texas, where Infowars is based, and the current one in Connecticut. Late last year judges in both states ruled him liable by default, granting the families a sweeping victory that set the current damages trials in motion.

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2022/10/12/us/politics/alex-jones-sandy-hook-damages.html

WASHINGTON (AP) — The House Jan. 6 committee is set to unveil “surprising” details including evidence from Donald Trump’s Secret Service about the 2021 attack on the U.S. Capitol in what is likely to be its last public hearing before the November midterm elections.

The hearing Thursday afternoon, the 10th public session by the panel, is expected delve into Trump’s “state of mind” and the central role the defeated president played in the multipart effort to overturn the election, according to a committee aide who discussed the plans on condition of anonymity.

The committee is starting to sum up its findings: Trump, after losing the 2020 presidential election, launched an unprecedented attempt to stop Congress from certifying Joe Biden’s victory. The result was the deadly mob siege of the Capitol.

“The mob was led by some extremist groups — they plotted in advance what they were going to do,” Rep. Zoe Lofgren, D-Calif., a committee member, told CNN. “And those individuals were known to people in the Trump orbit.”

Chairman Bennie Thompson, D-Miss., is poised to gavel in Thursday’s session at an otherwise empty Capitol complex, with most lawmakers at home campaigning for reelection. Several people who were among the thousands around the Capitol on Jan. 6 are now running for congressional office, some with Trump’s backing.

The session will serve as a closing argument by the panel’s two Republican lawmakers, Liz Cheney of Wyoming and Adam Kinzinger of Illinois, who have essentially been shunned by Trump and their party and will not be returning in the new Congress. Cheney lost her primary election and Kinzinger decided not to run.

Another committee member, Rep. Elaine Luria, D-Va., a retired Naval commander, is in a tough reelection bid against state Sen. Jen Kiggans, a former Navy helicopter pilot.

Unlike past hearings, this one is not expected to feature live witnesses, though the panel is expected to share information from its recent interviews — including testimony from Ginni Thomas, the conservative activist and wife of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas. She was in contact with the White House during the run-up to Jan. 6.

Fresh information about the movements of then-Vice President Mike Pence, who was presiding over the joint session of Congress on Jan. 6 and was rushed to safety, is also expected, according to a person familiar with the committee’s planning who was not authorized to discuss it publicly and requested anonymity.

For weeks the panel has been in talks with the U.S. Secret Service after issuing a subpoena to produce missing text messages from that day. Former White House aide Cassidy Hutchinson described being told by a White House aide about Trump angrily lunging at the driver of his presidential SUV and demanding to be taken from his rally to the Capitol as the mob formed on Jan. 6.

Some in the Secret Service have disputed Cassidy’s account of the events, but it is unclear if the missing texts that the agency has said were deleted during a technology upgrade will ever be recovered. The hearing is expected to reveal fresh details from a massive trove of documents and other evidence provided by the Secret Service.

The committee plans to show new video footage it received from the Secret Service of the rally on the White House Ellipse. Trump spoke there before encouraging his armed supporters to march to the Capitol and “fight like hell.”

The hearing also will include new documentary footage captured from the day of the attack.

The Secret Service has turned over 1.5 million pages of documents and surveillance video to the committee, according to agency spokesman Anthony Guglielmi.

Lofgren said that as she learned the information being presented Thursday she found it “pretty surprising.”

The committee, having conducted more than 1,500 interviews and obtained countless documents, has produced a sweeping probe of Trump’s activities from his defeat in the November election to the Capitol attack.

“He has used this big lie to destabilize our democracy,” said Lofgren, who was a young House staff member during the Richard Nixon impeachment inquiry in 1974. “When did that idea occur to him and what did he know while he was doing that?”

This week’s hearing is expected to be the final investigative presentation from lawmakers before the midterm elections. But staff members say the investigation continues.

The Jan. 6 committee has been meeting for more than a year, set up by the House after Republican senators blocked the formation of an outside panel similar to the 9/11 commission set up after the 2001 terrorist attacks. Even after the launch of its high-profile public hearings last summer, the Jan. 6 committee continued to gather evidence and interviews.

Under committee rules, the Jan. 6 panel is expected to produce a report of its findings, due after the election, likely in December. The committee will dissolve 30 days after publication of that report, and with the new Congress in January.

House Republicans are expected to drop the Jan. 6 probe and turn to other investigations if they win control after midterm elections, primarily focusing on Biden, his family and his administration.

At least five people died in the Jan. 6 attack and its aftermath, including a Trump supporter shot and killed by Capitol Police.

Police engaged in often bloody, hand-to-hand combat, as Trump’s supporters pushed past barricades, stormed the Capitol and roamed the halls, sending lawmakers fleeing for safety and temporarily disrupting the joint session of Congress certifying Biden’s election.

More than 850 people have been charged by the Justice Department in the Capitol attack, some receiving lengthy prison sentences for their roles. Several leaders and associates of the extremist Oath Keepers and Proud Boys have been charged with sedition.

Trump faces various state and federal investigations over his actions in the election and its aftermath.

Source Article from https://apnews.com/article/capitol-siege-donald-trump-presidential-elections-election-2020-congress-43c97dd8db5ce460e051204f91aa6cd1

Nury Martinez resigned her seat on the Los Angeles City Council on Wednesday, in yet another sign of the enormous fallout that has followed leaked audio of a racist and crude conversation involving Latino political leaders.

“It is with a broken heart that I resign my seat for Council District 6, the community I grew up in and my home,” Martinez wrote in a lengthy resignation message.

Martinez, who represents such San Fernando Valley communities as Van Nuys, Arleta and Sun Valley, told her constituents that it had been a privilege serving them. “I hope you stay engaged and continue to fight for your fair share of the city’s resources,” she said. “It’s hard to say goodbye, but please know that I was in this fight for you.”

She also addressed her colleagues, city workers and other groups. “And last, to all little Latina girls across this city — I hope I’ve inspired you to dream beyond that which you can see,” Martinez said.

In closing, she said: “While I take the time to look inwards and reflect, I ask that you give me space and privacy.”

The announcement comes days after The Times published a recording in which Martinez is heard making racist remarks while talking with fellow Councilmembers Kevin de León and Gil Cedillo and labor leader Ron Herrera about how the city’s council district boundaries should be redrawn.

The October 2021 conversation focused on how the group could maintain Latino political power while ensuring they and their colleagues would have districts that help them win reelection.

Martinez is only the latest in a string of councilmembers to be caught up in scandal. Last year, Councilmember Mark Ridley-Thomas was indicted on bribery and conspiracy charges and was suspended by his colleagues.

Before that, Councilmember Jose Huizar was charged with racketeering, bribery and fraud — and was suspended six months before leaving office. Councilmember Mitchell Englander resigned in 2018, just as he was under federal investigation. Englander was later convicted of scheming to obstruct a federal inquiry into Huizar.

Huizar and Ridley-Thomas have pleaded not guilty and are headed to trial. Also Wednesday, prosecutors announced that Huizar’s brother, Salvador, had agreed to plead guilty to giving false information to federal investigators.

Dan Halden, spokesperson for acting Council President Mitch O’Farrell, said O’Farrell will designate the office of the chief legislative analyst, which advises the council on policy matters, as the nonvoting caretaker of Martinez’s vacant seat.

That process has been relatively common immediately following a vacancy at City Hall. The council would have to decide whether to appoint a temporary replacement or leave it without a voting member until there is a special election.

Gov. Gavin Newsom called Martinez’s resignation “the right move.”

“Again, these comments have no place in our state, or in our politics, and we must all model better behavior to live the values that so many of us fight every day to protect,” he said in a statement.

Mayor Eric Garcetti said that he recognized how “painful” a decision it was for Martinez, but that it was the right one. He added that De León and Cedillo should do the same.

“Angelenos deserve a government focused squarely on meeting challenges in their neighborhoods that are too serious to risk a paralyzed City Council,” he said in a statement.

In her resignation letter, Martinez described how her family had been her “biggest cheerleaders” and spoke of the sacrifices they made for her. She also addressed her young daughter, saying, ”I know I have fallen short recently of the expectations we have for our family. I vow to you that I will strive to be a better woman to make you proud.”

The move came amid mounting pressures from all corners of politics, including President Biden, councilmembers and many community activists. On Monday, Herrera, president of the Los Angeles County Federation of Labor, resigned.

Several councilmembers said Wednesday that the departures of Martinez and Herrera are not enough.

“Two down. Two to go,” Councilman Marqueece Harris-Dawson said.

Harris-Dawson said the council should not pursue any policy changes until all three members have left and the city can begin to move forward. Whether he would actually not show up in person at Friday’s council meeting? He wasn’t sure.

“We shouldn’t do any business until these folks are gone. Rushing to do major pieces of legislation — like the good stuff that was submitted yesterday — is a mistake,” he said, referring to proposals at Tuesday’s council meeting to explore increasing the size of the City Council.

In the same audio clip in which she disparages Black people and Oaxacans, Nury Martinez insults Jews and Armenians too.

In the recording, Martinez focused in particular on Councilmember Mike Bonin, who is white, and Bonin’s young son, who is Black. At one point, Martinez called Bonin a “little bitch” and referred to his son as “parece changuito,” or “like a monkey.” She also said Bonin’s son had misbehaved on a parade float and needed a “beatdown.” But that is just one aspect of the leak, which has sent shock waves through City Hall and led to widespread disgust and outrage.

The three councilmembers are heard expressing frustration with maps that had been proposed by the city’s 21-member redistricting commission.

The recording remained private for nearly a year. The Times published details Sunday, just a month before a pivotal city election, after the audio was posted on Reddit. It remained unclear who recorded it, who uploaded it and whether anyone else was present.

Biden believes Nury Martinez and other L.A. City Council members should resign their seats over racist remarks made during a private conversation.

Martinez had apologized repeatedly in recent days and announced Tuesday she was taking a leave of absence from the council. De León said he regretted his actions and “fell short.” Cedillo said he should have intervened during the conversation but did not mock his colleagues or make racist statements.

On Tuesday, Biden called on the three councilmembers to step down.

“The president is glad to see that one of the participants in that conversation has resigned, but they all should,” said White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre, calling the language in the conversation “unacceptable” and “appalling.”

Audio of Councilmembers Nury Martinez, Kevin de León and Gil Cedillo speaking with labor leader Ron Herrera quickly became a new and incendiary issue in the Nov. 8 election.

Some L.A. City Council members responded to the fury by announcing a series of reform proposals. One would ask voters to expand the size of the council in 2024. Another would create a committee to look at ways of limiting corruption.

O’Farrell, the acting council president, announced his support for those proposals. Earlier this week, he denounced what he called “the casual racism,” the “abhorrent language,” the “dehumanizing racist reference” to Bonin’s son, the “denigration of Indigenous peoples” and “the familiar tropes against LBGTQ+ individuals” uttered during the recorded conversation.

O’Farrell joined Councilmember Curren Price, who has expressed interest in replacing Martinez as president, and three other city councilmembers at a news event Wednesday.

Price described Martinez’s resignation as “the beginning of the end of this nightmare,” and said “accountability” is needed.

“In order for us to govern and handle the people’s business … we need Kevin and Gil to listen to their conscience, own their mistakes and do what’s morally right,” he said.

Source Article from https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2022-10-12/la-me-nury-martinez-resigns