Most Viewed Videos

Ante una revolución tecnológica que se acelera y una creciente demanda de noticias a través de Internet, Clarín pone en marcha una nueva y ambiciosa etapa de su proceso de transformación digital. El cambio incluye una profunda reorganización de su redacción por la cual las rutinas de trabajo se vuelven 100% online y la producción de contenidos se realiza las 24 horas para todos los soportes. Hoy, Clarín.com es líder de audiencia en el país.

Los cambios y los nuevos desafíos fueron presentados ayer, en un auditorio colmado, ante todo el plantel periodístico de Clarín por el editor general, Ricardo Kirschbaum, y por el editor general adjunto, Ricardo Roa. Ellos expusieron las reformas generales y respondieron preguntas de editores y redactores.

“Apostamos a una transformación radical de la manera en la que hacemos periodismo, para responder a las nuevas demandas de nuestro público y brindar información de calidad en todos los formatos y dispositivos. El medio digital nos obliga a un proceso de edición continuo y unificado donde las notas se producen ni bien suceden y luego se enriquecen para el diario impreso”, explicó Kirschbaum.

Foto: Fernando de la Orden

Para transitar este camino, se reorganizan los horarios de trabajo de la redacción para que la producción periodística se realice de manera integral desde las primeras horas del día.

“Vamos a producir las notas en una redacción de trabajo continuo las 24 horas del día. En Clarín ya no se trabajará para la Web o para el diario de papel: se creará contenido útil para todas las plataformas, entre ellas la edición impresa, que seguirá ofreciendo un valor agregado a sus lectores”, añadió Roa.

Definió asimismo que la redacción estará orientada a satisfacer las demandas de los distintos sectores de la audiencia, desde la información política más rigurosa hasta los videos que se viralizan en las redes sociales. “El proyecto es distribuir los contenidos que requieren todos los públicos y ser líderes en todos los segmentos”, añadió.

Actualmente, el tráfico de Clarín proviene de tres principales fuentes: los que ingresan al sitio con su navegador, los que buscan información en Google y así llegan a Clarín, y los que acceden a los contenidos por referencias que encuentran en las redes sociales. “Es equívoco plantear que hay que trabajar sólo para una de ellas. Podemos crecer en redes y buscadores sin perjudicar el acceso directo”, dijo Ricardo Roa.

Foto: Fernando de la Orden

En la nueva estructura de la redacción, un equipo de periodistas con amplia experiencia quedará a cargo de manera exclusiva de la edición del impreso. Dependerá de la Mesa Central de Redacción, que también tendrá a su cargo la supervisión general de la Web.

A su vez, se crearon nuevas funciones para responder a los requerimientos del producto digital. La Mesa Digital, por ejemplo, sumará una Mesa de Urgentes dedicada a publicar las noticias de último momento en la Web, hasta que el personal de la sección asuma el seguimiento del tema y encare su cobertura en profundidad.

También se resolvió fortalecer especialmente a la Mesa de Audiencias, que cuenta con equipos destinados a la atención de las redes sociales, a la optimización de los contenidos para buscadores (SEO), al análisis de las métricas de tráfico y a la detección y creación de contenidos masivos que atraen importantes cantidades de visitas.

La Mesa Visual, en tanto, será reforzada para enriquecer la cobertura con una sólida producción de fotografías y videos.

“Tenemos futuro si logramos llegar en digital a todas las audiencias: la que valora nuestro periodismo y está dispuesta a pagarlo, y la masiva de redes que nos da un ancho de mercado para monetizar mejor la publicidad”, aseguró Kirschbaum.

Foto: Fernando de la Orden

“Los resultados demuestran que los lectores están dispuestos a pagar por un buen periodismo, lo que nos reclama ofrecer información de altísima calidad en todos los soportes” (Ricardo Kirschbaum)

Con esta reorganización, Clarín avanza decisivamente en un camino de transformación que vienen recorriendo los grandes medios de comunicación del mundo. Como parte de esa mutación, y para asegurar que el periodismo de calidad sea sostenible en el nuevo contexto, Clarín fue el primer diario argentino en implementar este año un sistema de suscripción digital que ya consiguió 35.000 adhesiones, superando las expectativas.

“Buscamos un nuevo modelo económico -señaló Kirschbaum-. Los resultados demuestran que los lectores están dispuestos a pagar por un buen periodismo, lo que nos reclama ofrecer información de altísima calidad en todos los soportes. En la nueva etapa, a eso apuntamos como máximo objetivo.”

Source Article from https://www.clarin.com/sociedad/nueva-etapa-clarin-produccion-noticias-100-digital_0_SyAUFwuib.html

‘);eIFD.close();
var s = eIFD.createElement(‘SCRIPT’); s.src = ‘http://’ + (eS2?eS2:eS1) +’/layers/epl-41.js’;
eIFD.body.appendChild(s);
if (!eS2) {
var ss = eIFD.createElement(‘SCRIPT’);
ss.src = ‘http://ads.us.e-planning.net/egc/4/2912’;
eIFD.body.appendChild(ss);
}
eplLL = true;
return false;
}
}
eplCheckStart();
function eplSetAd(eID,custF) {
if (eplCheckStart()) {
if (custF) { document.epl.setCustomAdShow(eID,eplArgs.custom[eID]); }
document.epl.showSpace(eID);
} else {
var efu = ‘eplSetAd(“‘+eID+'”, ‘+ (custF?’true’:’false’) +’);’;
setTimeout(efu, 250);
}
}

function eplAD4M(eID,custF) {
document.write(‘

‘);
if (custF) {
if (!eplArgs.custom) { eplArgs.custom = {}; }
eplArgs.custom[eID] = custF;
}
eplSetAd(eID, custF?true:false);
}
//–>

Source Article from http://trome.pe/actualidad/1685074/noticia-multaran-mototaxistas-no-autorizados-independencia

Widgets Magazine <!–

–>

En las noticias más leías del día, la delegada en Tlalpan, Claudia Sheinbaum, informó que el Colegio Enrique Rébsamen estaba bien construido y tenía todos los papeles en regla. La mañana de este lunes se desalojó a todo el personal que labora en la Torre de Pemex tras recibir una amenaza de bomba, por protocolo de seguridad se procedió a evacuar para realizar la revisión correspondiente y Trump pidió a los dueños de los equipos que cuando alguno de sus jugadores se arrodille durante el himno, como protesta por el racismo, lo despida… pero sólo encontró rebeldía.

1. Las noticias falsas que cuentan otro terremoto del 19 de septiembre

El terremoto que colapsó el centro de México se ha convertido en una buena oportunidad para divulgar noticias documentos, videos o imágenes alteradas o falsas sobre el sismo y sus consecuencias, además de rumores que no corresponden a la realidad.

Estas noticias falsas han generado psicosis entre una sociedad que ya se encuentra apabullada por los resultados del temblor más mortífero sufrido por México desde 1985. Te decimos algunas noticias que resultaron ser falsas.

2. La NFL planta cara a Donald Trump

Las reacciones en las ligas deportivas más importantes de Estados Unidos como la NFL, NBA y MLB, no se hicieron esperar y protestaron contra las soeces críticas del presidente Donald Trump.

El mandatario pidió a los dueños de equipos de la NFL que despidan a los jugadores que se arrodillen durante el himno nacional y en la NBA, los actuales campeones Golden State Warriors, cancelaron su visita a la Casa Blanca. La MLB tuvo también su primera reacción cuando el pelotero de los Atléticos de Oakland se arrodilló durante la entonación del himno previo al duelo contra los Rangers.

3. Evacuan Torre de Pemex tras amenaza de bomba

Hoy por la mañana se desalojó a todo el personal que labora en la Torre de Pemex tras recibir una amenaza de bomba, por protocolo de seguridad se procedió a evacuar para realizar la revisión correspondiente.

Horas después la situación en el edificio ubicado en Marina Nacional 329, colonia Verónica Anzures, en la delegación Miguel Hidalgo fue aclarada y se informó que se trató de una falsa alarma.

4. Norcorea asegura que Trump les declaró la guerra

Corea del Norte, afirmó este lunes que Estados Unidosle declaró la guerrar y amenazó con derribar bombarderos estadounidenses.

“Trump proclamó que nuestro liderazgo no iba a permanecer mucho tiempo”, dijo el ministro norcoreano a la prensa afuera del hotel donde se hospeda en Nueva York. “Le declaró la guerra a nuestro país”, aseveró.
“Todos los Estados miembro y el mundo entero deberían recordar claramente que fue Estados Unidos el primero en declarar la guerra a nuestro país”, dijo Ri Yong Ho.

5. Colegio Rébsamen operaba con legalidad: Sheinbaum

Claudia Sheinbaum, delegada en Tlalpan, informó que el Colegio Enrique Rébsamen, que se colapsó por el sismo del martes pasado, estaba bien construido y tenía todos los papeles en regla, y que la atribución del uso de suelo le corresponde a la Secretaría de Desarrollo Urbano y Vivienda del gobierno capitalino.

Señaló que de acuerdo a la norma para la construcción de escuelas, el edificio del colegio que se colapsó tuvo una falla en términos estructurales, dado que el sismo en la zona tuvo una intensidad de 90.
Aclaró que la seguridad estructural de edificio es responsabilidad de un director de Obras y de un corresponsable de seguridad estructural.

@davee_son

Source Article from http://eleconomista.com.mx/politica/2017/09/25/5-noticias-dia-25-septiembre

In response to President Joe Biden’s Tuesday speech on voting rights protection in Philadelphia, Fox News host Laura Ingraham ripped the president on “The Ingraham Angle,” claiming that “as usual, liberals are at war with the facts” and that Biden was “just reading whatever script his writers handed to him.”

During his speech, Biden called “the assault on free and fair election” a “threat” and claimed Americans are facing the “most significant test of democracy since the Civil War.” Biden went on to specifically call out the Texas state legislature for their push for new voter reform.

“In Texas, for example, Republican-led state legislature wants to allow partisan poll watchers to intimidate voters and imperil impartial poll workers,” he said. They want to make it so hard and convenient that they hope people don’t vote at all.”

Ingraham countered Biden’s statements by posing the question of whether or not allowing “an extra hour of required early voting in Texas” is an assault on democracy. She also noted that the increase would put Texas’ voting window “two to three hours longer than Joe’s home state of Delaware.”

Ingraham went on to point out the hypocrisy in the president’s statements on “partisan poll watchers,” arguing that some of his claims about the Texas legislation are “lies.”

“I believe I counted four, maybe five lies there. But for the record, the Texas legislation gives poll watchers free movement, except, of course, contrary to what Biden alleged, not when voters are filling out ballots,” Ingraham exclaimed. “And forcing poll watchers to stand at such a distance that they couldn’t reasonably observe the process would be a criminal offense. You got to have eyes on potential cheating.”

Ingraham also torched Biden’s claims that the Texas bill aims “to make it harder” for Americans to vote, “and if you vote, they want to be able to tell you your vote doesn’t count for any reason.”

“So dramatic, also totally false,” she said. “As we pointed out last week, the Texas bill to expand voting hours for all registered voters. And the bill is even lower the population threshold needed for counties to provide additional early voting hours.”

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

“Democrats want to rig every election going forward to make it nearly impossible for a conservative to win again,” Ingraham opined. “They’re now effectively arguing that the very voting rules that delivered two two-term victories for Bill Clinton and Barack Obama are essentially just like Jim Crow 2.0.”

“So this leaves them really with only one option in their mind, which is to promote racial fear-mongering in pretty much everything around them. We already know what they’re doing in our schools, to our workplaces, the military, even to now our system of voting.”

Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/media/ingraham-biden-philadelphia-voter-rights

Image copyright
AP

Image caption

Kim Jong-un está junto lo que ha denominado una “ojiva nuclear miniatura”, de acuerdo a la agencia de noticias estatal KCNA.

El líder norcoreano, Kim Jong-un, dijo este miércoles que científicos del país lograron desarrollar ojivas nucleares lo suficientemente pequeñas como para ser instaladas en misiles balísticos de largo alcance.

Medios estatales del país asiático mostraron al líder de Corea del Norte junto a lo que señaló era una arma nuclear miniaturizada.

Los analistas coinciden en afirmar que es imposible verificar la afirmación de Kim Jong-un a través de un video.

Pero aunque algunos dudan seriamente de la existencia de tal armamento, otros dicen que no se puede descartar su veracidad.

Image copyright
Naciones Unidas

Image caption

El Consejo de Seguridad de la ONU ha sancionado varias veces al país asiático.

“Hay mucha controversia sobre si los misiles de Corea del Norte pueden llegar a territorio estadounidense, pero lo cierto es que cada vez más se puede creer que el país tiene la capacidad de crear ojivas nucleares miniaturizadas”, le dijo el analista surcoreano de asuntos militares Kim Jin-moo al Financial Times.

En los últimos meses, el país asiático ha elevado su retórica bélica en respuesta al aumento de las sanciones por parte de Naciones Unidas.

El Consejo de Seguridad tomó varias medidas contra Corea del Norte después del ensayo nuclear de enero pasado y el lanzamiento de un satélite, hechos que ya violaban las sanciones previas.

En días recientes, Pyongyang amenazó con lanzar un ataque nuclear indiscriminado contra Estados Unidos y Corea del Sur si continuaban con sus ejercicios militares anuales.

Cada año se realizan ejercicios de entrenamiento entre los ejércitos de Corea de Sur y Estados Unidos (conocidos como Foal Eagle y Key Resolve), lo que siempre genera las protestas del gobierno de Corea de Norte.

Cuestionada

La declaración del líder norcoreano fue realizada en medio de una inspección a una instalación militar.

Las ojivas nucleares han sido estandarizadas para que puedan ser instaladas en misiles balísticos, miniaturizándolas“, informó la agencia de noticias estatal KCNA basados en lo dicho por Kim Jong-un

Image copyright
KCNA

Image caption

Kim Jong-un es ovacionado por soldados durante una reciente visita a una instalación militar.

“Esto puede ser considerado como un verdadero disuasorio nuclear”, añadió.

La visita también incluyó la revisión de las cabezas nucleares diseñadas para reacción termonuclear, que son utilizadas en las bombas de hidrógeno.

Si lo que dice Kim Jong-un es cierto y Corea del Norte puede instalar ojivas nucleares en sus misiles balísticos, representaría una seria amenaza para los países vecinos e incluso para Estados Unidos.

En octubre de 2014, el comandante de las fuerzas de Estados Unidos en Corea del Sur, general Curtis Scaparrotti, le dijo a los medios que él creía que Corea del Norte tenía la capacidad de miniaturizar un dispositivo nuclear.

Y en mayo de 2015, el Comité Nacional de Corea del Norte señaló que el país había logrado la tecnología para miniaturizar armas nucleares.

Pero ese logro ha sido seriamente cuestionado.

Expertos dudan incluso que el ensayo realizado en enero de este año haya sido con una bomba de hidrógeno como afirmaba el gobierno de Corea del Norte.

Misiles balísticos

¿Pero qué significa el anuncio realizado por Corea del Norte?

Image copyright
Getty

Image caption

El ejército de Corea del Norte es considerado el mayor en número de hombres en el mundo.

El pasado mes de enero, el país asiático, considerado el más hermético del planeta, realizó una prueba con un cohete similar a los que utilizan las agencias espaciales para enviar sus satélites a órbita, lo que generó reacciones alrededor del mundo.

Hasta ese momento se desconocía si el ejército de Pyongyang tenía armas suficientemente potentes para poder alcanzar el suelo estadounidense.

Y aunque el cohete lanzado el 8 de enero no tenía el alcance de un misil balístico intercontinental (ICBM) –que puede viajar más de 10.000 kilómetros antes de caer–, la noticia de la miniaturización de una ojiva nuclear genera bastante preocupación.

Corea del Norte está separado de las islas de Hawái (territorio estadounidense) por 7.500 kilómetros y por 10.342 kilómetros del centro de EE.UU.

“Corea del Norte nunca ha demostrado la capacidad para construir un vehículo de reingreso que pueda sobrevivir al menos a la mitad de la velocidad que se requiere para un ICBM”, le dijo a la agencia AFP John Schilling, ingeniero aeroespacial y experto en sistemas de lanzamiento espacial de The Aerospace Corporation.

Image copyright
Getty

Image caption

Solo Rusia, China y Estados Unidos poseen misiles balísticos intercontinentales. Francia e India se encuentran en fase de desarrollo.

Cuando lleguen a hacerlo, y si es que llegan, lo que hoy en día es una amenaza teórica se convertirá en algo muy real y muy alarmante“, agregó.

Hasta ahora los únicos países que poseen este tipo de misiles balísticos son Rusia, Estados Unidos y China, pero de acuerdo a los reportes de la Federación Estadounidense de Científicos, cualquier país con tecnología en el espacio podría desarrollar este tipo de misiles.

Corea del Norte informó en 2012 que había logrado poner un satélite en órbita violando las restricciones que le había impuesto el Consejo de Seguridad de Naciones Unidas.

Source Article from http://www.bbc.com/mundo/noticias/2016/03/160309_corea_del_norte_ojivas_nucleares_miniaturas_amv

El vehículo se movilizaba a 120 km/h y al parecer el conductor no tuvo pericia para tomar un hueco, según primeros resultados de esta investigación.

Además, Fiscalía evalúa abrir proceso formal por homicidio culposo contra el conductor del vehículo.

Vea, además: El aparatoso accidente de tránsito que le costó la vida a Martín Elías

Al respecto, Armando ‘Nando’ Quintero había asegurado en Noticias Caracol que esquivó a unos motociclistas y que un bache en el piso los hizo volcar. “No puede andar uno a 220 km/h”, dijo acerca de cuestionamientos sobre exceso de velocidad. Vea su entrevista completa.

“En esa carretera no se puede andar a 200 km/h, íbamos a 120”: habla…

Aunque el hueco que cogió la camioneta incidió, no habría sido el factor determinante en este siniestro. 

También: Autoridades investigan estado de la vía en la que ocurrió fatal accidente de Martín Elías

También se confirmó que Martín Elías no portaba el cinturón de seguridad cuando ocurrió el fatal accidente.

Adiós a Martín Elías

El hijo de Diomedes Díaz fue trasladado con vida a la clínica Santa María de Sincelejo, pero falleció después de tener hasta cinco paros respiratorios.

Martín Elías, reconocido por canciones como ‘El terremoto’, ‘Ábrete’, ‘Acabaste con mi vida’ y ‘Aquí estoy yo’, murió a sus 26 años producto de las heridas ocasionadas en un accidente de tránsito cuando se dirigía a Valledupar.

Le puede interesar: Valledupar acompañó con tristeza y canciones el último recorrido de Martín Elías

Martín Elías fue homenajeado por varios representantes del género vallenato y su cuerpo estuvo en cámara ardiente por tres días en el Parque de la Leyenda Vallenata.

Fanáticos del artista lo acompañaron en una caravana hasta al cementerio, allí fue enterrado junto a su papá, Diomedez Díaz.

Relacionado: Así fue el homenaje a Martín Elías en el Parque de la Leyenda Vallenata de Valledupar

Source Article from http://noticias.caracoltv.com/colombia/hueco-y-mal-estado-de-la-grandes-responsables-de-muerte-de-martin-elias-policia

David Freedlander writes about politics and culture. He lives in New York.

If you read through the many, many profiles written of presidential candidate Pete Buttigieg in the past several months, it’s hard not to notice just how many reporters happen to have had intimate personal encounters with the candidate, often months before he was in the headlines.

There’s the article in The Atlantic where the writer met the mayor of South Bend, Indiana for a chicken tempura lunch in Manhattan. The writer from Indianapolis Monthly who went for a jog with Buttigieg three months before his feature landed, the Washington Post Magazine writer who sat down in a Virginia soul-food joint with Mayor Pete long before he declared for president and the Yahoo News feature writer who crammed into the corner seat of a midtown Manhattan café with him months ago.

Story Continued Below

I should know: last October, I had my own intimate, off-the-record encounter with Mayor Pete. We met at the Roxy Hotel in Tribeca. I had a beer—he stuck to water—and we talked about his political ambitions and the state of the Democratic Party and why Trump won. He laid out his case for how a millennial municipal official from a town the size of a New York City Council district could somehow seize the Democratic nomination. It felt like we connected—we went over our allotted time, and I had another beer, and by the end I had shifted from very skeptical to only moderately skeptical, just maybe seeing a lane for his candidacy.

When I stood up and left our table, Buttigieg stayed, and I recognized a woman sitting at the bar. It was a reporter from Buzzfeed News, waiting to take my place.

Our meeting was part of a strategy, one run with surprising sophistication and efficacy for a candidate whose highest-profile gig so far is a local office in the fourth-biggest city in Indiana. Buttigieg’s rise from unlikeliest of contenders to actual top-tier presidential candidate has been fueled in part, maybe in large part, by his astonishing success courting the press. And when I began asking around to figure out who was behind that strategy, the same name kept coming up: Lis Smith.

Smith is a fierce New York City-based Democratic operative who helped engineer the plan to get Buttigieg in front of not just national political reporters, but anybody with camera or a microphone. There may be nobody more central to Mayor Pete’s media success—besides the candidate himself, and arguably his social-media-savvy husband, Chasten Buttigieg—than Smith, who serves as a communications advisor and all-around aide. In the last several months, Buttigieg has been not just all over cable and in the newspapers, but in Our Daily Planet, an environmental morning newsletter with just over 5,000 Twitter followers; in a financial planning podcast called Pete the Planner; and on West Wing Weekly, the obsessive episode-by-episode podcast breakdown of The West Wing. He’s been a guest on Buzzfeed’s morning news show, got featured on Vice’s nightly news show and sat down with a couple of the guys from Barstool Sports.

Over-saturation? Not possible, Smith says.

“I want him on everything,” she told me.

The story of American presidential politics is in part the story of the consiglieres who steer the candidate along the path: the person who pushes them forward, comforts them when the campaign flails, plots long-term strategy and tactical short-term advantage, bends the ear of the press corps and makes the public case for a candidate in ways the candidate cannot. Obama had David Axelrod. George Bush had Karl Rove; Bill Clinton had James Carville. Each was the political id the candidate couldn’t, or wouldn’t, express.

But there may be no political couple odder than that of Buttigieg and Smith.

“Pete and I, you can probably tell are pretty laid-back, pretty low-key, I guess what you would call pretty midwestern,” said Mike Schmuhl, Buttigieg’s campaign manager, who sounds like the host of a classical-music radio station who just returned from a yoga retreat. “We are humble and kind, to quote Tim McGraw. Chill.”

“Lis, I guess you could say, comes from a very different world than Northern Indiana.”

***

Lis Smith bursts through the doors of a marbled hotel bar in Brooklyn wearing oversized Anna Wintour sunglasses, a faux-fur lined coat and impossibly thin and tall high heels. She’s on her phone talking to another Buttigieg aide. She puts the word fuck through every part of speech the word can be bent into: noun, pronoun, gerund, verb, term of endearment, sobriquet, epithet, honorific. She is practically shaking with excess energy. I tell her that I have been calling around to former co-workers and associates, trying to get a sense of how she operates. “How badly, she asks me, “are you trying to fuck me over right now?”

She is operating on two and a half hours sleep, having just arrived back in New York on a charter jet from South Bend, IN, after Buttigieg announced he was running for president. She has a three-day-old copy of the New York Post in her bag. It is, she says, the only paper she subscribes to.

She orders a beer, downs it, and orders another. It is 5:15 on a Monday afternoon. Across the street, Brooklyn hipsters of all ages and manner of facial hair are lining up around the block at a bowling alley/music venue to catch Buttigieg at a fundraiser. A few weeks ago, a couple of hundred people expressed interest in this event. Eight hundred have showed up.

And so, she says, she can’t talk right now. Her phone is “literally exploding.” There is a top political reporter for a major national newspaper apologizing for blowing off a meeting with Buttigieg earlier and trying to get one now, asking Smith, “Will you ever forgive me?”

TV news executives are calling, she says, emailing, now complaining that Buttigieg isn’t doing their shows often enough. A text arrives from John Weaver, a top advisor to former Ohio governor John Kasich. When Smith opens up her laptop, there are saved tabs about Carolina Panthers quarterback Cam Newton, a YouTube video of a facial massage routine, kale recipes, a Time Out City Guide to Dubai and 2012 Huffington Post article about how the Obama and Romney campaigns used Twitter.

After the fundraiser, Buttigieg is going to rush off to 30 Rock to do Maddow, then in the morning New Day on CNN, and then fly to Iowa, then do “Morning Joe” when he’s back. He is in talks to do a Fox News town hall in the coming weeks, building off the surprise success of Bernie Sanders’s appearance on Fox, and in the past couple of weeks has also been on Ellen and The View, as well as Preet Bharara’s podcast, The Intercept’s podcast and The New Yorker’s podcast. At the newsstand around the corner, you could buy a New York magazine with Buttigieg’s beatifically smiling face splashed across the cover, and a New York Times with an A1 story about his time at Harvard.

“My observation,” said David Axelrod, who worked with Smith on President Obama’s 2012 re-election campaign, “is that she is the quiet hero of his emergence.”

The speed with which Buttegieg emerged has been astonishing, which happens to be the speed at which Smith works. Schmuhl, his campaign manager, says a typical scene from the trail for the three of them is arriving ten or fifteen minutes early to the airport gate, and while he and Buttegieg—who he’s known since 8th grade in Indianatake a moment to relax for a minute before boarding, Smith will head to the airport bar with her laptop and phone and begins texting and emailing reporters and clapping back to critics on social media. The candidate and the campaign manager dutifully board the aircraft, and just when it seems the door is about to close, as they start looking around nervously, in comes Smith, sunglasses and coat still on, laptop and cords dangling from her arms, phone pressed against her ear.

“You’ve got this hard-nosed New York-style political operative and this friendly Hoosier mayor,” he said. “They have grown to like and trust each other. But it is kind of fascinating to watch.”

Smith met Buttigieg on the recommendation of Axelrod and former Maryland Gov. Martin O’Malley. He was thinking of running for chair of the Democratic National Committee. She had served as a senior aide on O’Malley’s 2016 bid and with the Maryland governor when he was head of the Democratic Governors Association. She knew Axelrod from 2012, when she worked as the director of rapid response for President Barack Obama’s re-election effort. (The rapid-response job, Smith says, was for her “like being a pig in shit. Are you kidding me? When they gave me the job I thought, first of all this job exists? And you are going to pay me to be really quick and really aggressive and to take on Mitt Romney? I would do that for free.”)

The way Smith tells it, she thought she was done with presidential politics after O’Malley’s campaign fizzled in 2016. She advised a couple of governors still left in office, and started taking on more nonprofit clients. Axelrod told Buttigieg about Smith, and O’Malley told Smith about this young mayor from South Bend. She figured that Buttigieg’s sexuality and impossible-to-pronounce last name rendered him dead on arrival, but started researching the 35-year-old Indiana mayor and promptly fell down an eight-hour Google rabbithole. She became obsessed with the idea of working for him, then became further obsessed when she actually met him, and developed the notion that once people got to meet him they would start to like him.

It was by no means an obvious career move for Smith. She has advised New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo, Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe and Montana Gov. Steve Bullock, people who on paper at least are far more likely top-tier presidential contenders, and served as a top aide for a number of senate and gubernatorial races. The obvious thing to do would have been to take on high-paying, quieter corporate gigs, or to re-enter politics with someone truly high profile.

“Lis has an insurgent mentality,” said David Axelrod, a top aide for both of President Obama’s campaigns. “She gravitates to candidates who are challenging and testing the status quo. You don’t reach out to the 35-year-old gay mayor of South Bend, Indiana because you think it will be an easy ride.”

She signed on as a consultant when he was laying the groundwork for a longshot campaign to become the chair of the Democratic National Committee. At that point, reporters she had developed relationships with began to reach out, wondering what she was doing wasting her credibility on a little-known character who seemed like a step down the ladder of political prospects. Smith ended up dropping most of her other clients, politicians and non-profits alike.

“Lis has absolutely no fear,” said Jeff Smith, a former Missouri lawmaker who dated Smith for four years and considers her one of his closest friends. “There is nothing too big for her. She doesn’t give a fuck. She is the most competitive person I have ever known.”

This includes with her own boss. She is 36, a year younger than Buttigieg, which, “Thank god. Otherwise I would kill myself.” Which is to say that Buttigieg may know seven languages and carry around Ulysses and sit in with the South Bend Orchestra on piano, but as far as his top aide is concerned, it is only because he has an extra year on her.

“I think I am impressive because I am a violinist and I went to Dartmouth and I speak French and have travelled all over the world and, I don’t know, I know a lot about great apes,” she says. “But there have been a few times when I’ve been around him when I knew something, a factoid or something he didn’t know, and let me tell you, I fucking lord it all over him. ‘Oh really, you didn’t know that? I can’t believe you didn’t know that! I thought everybody knew that.’”

***

That is not the typical relationship of advisor to political principal, but “typical” is not a word people use about Smith. If there is one thing that makes Smith unique, it’s not her knowledge of great apes or her particular skill eviscerating her opponents on Twitter; It’s that her skin was toughened by a stretch of time in the rawest, roughest media environment of all, the NYC tabloid scrum. And when it happened, the story was her.
Smith had moved to New York in 2013 to work for Eliot Spitzer, the disgraced former governor who’d stepped down in a prostitution scandal. He was attempting a comeback by running for the modest job of New York City comptroller, and when the vote came in, he pulled in a respectable 48 percent, even though the entire city’s political establishment was against him. After his loss in the primary, Smith went to work on the winning election campaign and then the transition of New York City mayor Bill de Blasio.

That fall, Spitzer and Smith started dating, which led to the New York City tabloids staking out her apartment to watch the pair coming and going. “ELIOT AND DeBABE” blared the cover of the New York Post, which ran several photos of the pair together inside its pages and a column from the acid-tongued Andrea Peyser which called Smith “not just any ordinary bimbo” and called her “an ambitious, youngish cookie” who “presumably does not charge Eliot for any services rendered.”

The tabloids followed the pair to Christmas at Smith’s parents house in the upscale suburb of Bronxville. Smith’s mother is a descendent of a signer of the Mayflower Compact, and a cousin of lead Watergate investigator Sam Ervin, and her father was a partner at the white-shoe law firm Sidley Austin. Just before he was sworn in, de Blasio yielded to Peyser’s prodding and cut Smith loose just before he moved into the mayor’s office.

“It wasn’t an ideal situation, but it taught me a lot,” Smith says now. “So many flacks lose their mind over inconsequential things, and have no sense of, ‘This is good press, this is mediocre press, and this is awful press.’ That is something you know once you have been through awful press.”

Spitzer and Smith stayed together for more than two years, with the tabloids following them pretty much the whole time. The saga gave Smith an insight that most campaign operatives lack: what it’s actually like to be that bug trapped under the magnifying glass.

“As a flack, you don’t always understand what it feels like to be a principal, what it feels like to be under scrutiny. And so when they feel like they are getting attacked, or their families are getting atttacked, they think staff can never talk to them on the level, and it is frustrating for principals, because they are like, ‘You are just a kid, you don’t know anything.’ But with me, I can tell them, This is what is going to happen, this is how we are going to deal with it. It may look like the sky is falling, but just ride this out.”

“Candidates and the people around them can get so spun up about things, and when you get spun up you make the worst mistakes,” she says.

The whole saga also taught her the rhythms of the New York tabloids, which have similarities to the national political press. “You get a sense of the news, what is going to get picked up,” she said, reaching into her bag for her copy of The Post, which she said she was saving for Buttigieg. “You know what people are going to react to, and you know that the tabloids, just like the political press, oftentimes just wants a little scalp and then they will move on.”

Buttigieg recently started getting savaged online when it surfaced that he had told an audience in 2015 that “all lives matter,” and as it happened, he was due to speak at Al Sharpton’s annual National Action Network convention. Smith marched him to the front of where the national and New York press were gathered, telling him, “Are you ready for your first gaggle?” He stayed until the matter was exhausted.

The New York tabs may have sharpened her game, but people who’ve known her for years say Smith came ready for the fight. Jeff Smith, her former boyfriend, recalls one time when he was running for office, his campaign manager’s phone rang. The guy didn’t have time to say hello before Smith could hear screaming coming over the line. “He looked white as a ghost, didn’t say anything, just nodding along. He hung up and looked at me in horror, and then my phone started ringing. It was Lis telling me I need to fire my campaign manager, that the guy is a fucking idiot. It went on like this, just cursing up a blue streak for like two minutes.”

The aide’s mistake, Smith recalls, had to do with email: He failed to BCC reporters on a press release he blasted out. “Keep in mind she was 22 at the time,” Smith said. “And also keep in mind she was wasn’t working on my campaign. She was my girlfriend.”

Later, says Smith, when he was a state lawmaker, “I would say to her, ‘I am going to talk to such-and-such group,’ and she would tell me, ‘This is what you should say.’ And I would say to her, ‘Lis, I am not going to say that, it’s not my style, it’s not going to work. Of course, then I would, I’d get a tepid reception and she would never let me hear the end of it. ‘God, you fucked that up. If you had any balls you would have said what I told you to say.’”

“Dating her was four years of that.”

***

When Smith signed on to help Mayor Pete run for DNC chair, it was a part-time gig—helping a candidate nobody had ever heard of run for an insider position, the kind of job decided not by the public, but in backrooms by the most hardcore party loyalists.
That is not how she ran his race. She ran it like he was trying to be president, getting him in front of as many microphones as she could find. “This 35-Year-Old Mayor From Indiana Is Wowing National Democrats” The New Republic declared. “Pete Buttigieg emerges as Democratic ‘rock star’” proclaimed Business Insider during the race. “Meet the DNC dark horse: Indiana mayor Pete Buttigieg is shaking up the race for Democratic chair,” added Salon.

“What we did is fucking ridiculous. I don’t know if that delegate from Oklahoma is going be reading the Elle.com profile, but a lot of people are and they should get to know Pete Buttigieg,” she says. “That was my philosophy. Let’s just blow it out. It might not get you the votes, but I am not the political director. I am here to get you clips. I figured he was special and it couldn’t hurt if everybody knows who he is.”

Through the DNC race and afterward, Smith treated the national political press like it was another constituency that needed to be courted. She led Buttigieg on a series of one-on-one meetings over beer, coffee, lunch or cigars with what used to be known as the Gang of 500—those reporters, producers and pundits who shape much of the nation’s political coverage. Buttigieg has gotten a number of lavish longform features, so many that some have jokingly wondered if Smith is getting paid by the profile.

There were, Smith guesses, probably 150 such meetings with the national press corps, and when he travelled across the country, speaking to local county party dinners and fundraisers across the midwest and the Great Plains, they would make time for one-on-ones with the local political press there, too. “It wasn’t just the biggest names, people you know,” Smith says. “It was younger reporters, super-hungry reporters that really know how to use Twitter, people who can then go to a cocktail party and tell their friends they had a beer with this guy Pete Buttigieg three hours from now.

“It’s a super-aggressive thing to do. Other candidates, they don’t need to do it. They are already well-known.”

As a thirty-something mayor of a medium-sized city, Buttigieg faced a credibility threshold with the national press. But he is also the kind of person journalists tend to like: bookish, somehow both earnest and with a sense of irony, and willing to talk the way journalists like people to talk, playing the pundit and getting into the political process and discussing his own ambitions. And although Smith would never say it, it plays on political reporters’ narcissism, too. Well, of course someone running for president would need to talk about it with me first, right?

“It’s about getting to know people and them getting to know you,” Buttigieg says when I see him after the Brooklyn fundraiser, where he at least pretends to recall our earlier meeting and what we talked about. He’s on his way into a black car to do Maddow. “It’s a local-politics mentality to find the people that are going to be telling this story, and if nothing else making sure they have a real understanding of who you are. There is only so much you can do to bare your soul over a beer, but hopefully people get to know you on some level and more than they would one gaggle at a time.”

Before they get in the car, I ask Buttigieg if Smith is being helpful in his campaign. He shoots her a look and gives a mock shrug, as if it’s an inside joke between the three of us, now old chums: “I mean, a little….I guess.”

As voters look for someone who can beat Trump, the fact that the press corps appears to vouch for this curious character, a young liberal red-state mayor, means that voters can give him a second look too. And the fact that he’s everywhere, from cable TV to Ebony to your local NPR show to your favorite sports podcast, means that a guy with no name recognition is suddenly hard to avoid.

“Lis knew that she had to build wide to build up,” said Stephanie Cutter, who also worked on Obama’s 2012 effort. “Pete’s hitting at this moment in part because of the legwork they did. Regular voters and the media were primed for it.”

***

Now that they have achieved liftoff, as it were, Smith is preparing for the next part of the campaign. Her plan is to emulate maybe the best-known and most successful insurgent move of recent campaign history: John McCain’s 2000 Straight Talk Express. Smith has been exploring the idea of renting a bus, and just as McCain did, inviting reporters aboard to travel and fire away at Buttigieg with any question they want, all day, day after day. Smith has been studying the effort, reaching out to reporters who were there, and has been in regular contact with John Weaver, who helped engineer it.

“I am a liberal Democrat, but I was so into the McCain thing. I romanticize it. I have talked to all the guys who see in the shots. I fucking love John McCain. Why do I fucking love John McCain? Because he was a badass. He was out there. He was going up against George Bush, who had $50 million and he had $4 million, and so he just decides to tear up the playbook and put himself out there. And if people like it they like it, and if they don’t they were probably never going to vote for you anyway.”

Weaver says that recreating that atmosphere in the days of Twitter, and in the days when the national political press corps has metastasized into a constantly hungry and multi-headed beast equipped with cell phones, is ten times harder than when his team tried it in 1999. But it has a clear parallel to Smith’s relentless scheduling of meetings between Buttigieg and reporters—an audaciously direct way to connect with reporters that bouth the campaign pretty good press.

“It’s really hard to do a hit piece on a guy who you are going to see the next morning over coffee and donuts,” says Weaver. “It takes the edge off a bit. Maybe a story that would be 80-20 bad you can get down to 60-40 bad, and that little bit is worth it.”

Smith says that’s worth it. That even in the age of Twitter, that especially in the age of Twitter, people don’t really care about gaffes. They just get swallowed up by the next news cycle, and never reach the voters who matter anyway. “Politics has a bias toward the status quo,” she says. “People get stuck in a rut because something worked last cycle, and so they think it will work this cycle and it doesn’t. You have to know the social media ecosystem, how people are sharing and consuming their news. It’s why in one day we do CBS Sunday Morning, The View, Teen Vogue and the New Yorker. It’s about hustling for opportunities. Pete has no battle scars.

“It pisses me off,” she adds, “When candidates think they are too good for some of these outlets, or that it cheapens them to do TMZ or do a more entertainment focused thing. No, actually, it shows a fundamental disrespect for the people who consume their news on this platform if you aren’t willing to go where they are.”

After the fundraiser, Smith and Buttigieg climb into an SUV and headed to 30 Rock. Smith starts texting me, wanting to know if I’d seen the celebrities in the audience, including George Takei, Kal Penn and Kate McKinnon. She wants to know if I’d seen Buttigieg answer a question about the Notre Dame fire from a French TV station, in French.

“Can I tell you something very off the record,” she texts.

Of course, I reply.

She never texts back.

Source Article from https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2019/04/29/lis-smith-buttigieg-2020-president-campaign-manager-226756

Click here if you are having trouble viewing the photo gallery or video on your mobile device.

SAN JOSE — A UPS driver abducted during a carjacking on Thursday is being lauded for having nerves of steel.

The armed carjackers seized his delivery truck and forced him to drive it, with law enforcement officers in pursuit. But he drove slowly so that the police could keep up and then, in an attempt to derail his captors’ escape, purposely hit the metal spikes officers had placed on the road.

“When you are accosted, taken at gunpoint, and made to drive, like something that comes out in the movies, you can’t train for the calmness that man had,” San Jose Police Chief Eddie Garcia said.

Police say the UPS driver was caught in the middle of a violent sequence that began with a chance encounter at a South San Jose transit station and ended with the fatal shooting of a suspect by police Thursday night.

Sources identified the man who was killed as Mark Morasky of Saratoga. Morasky was on parole after serving four years in prison for a 2012 carjacking and two robberies in San Jose and Saratoga, court records show.

Joanna Mae Macy-Rogers, 23, of San Jose, was arrested Feb. 14, 2019 after a police chase and standoff that ended with the fatal police shooting of another suspect near North First Street and Trimble Road, authorities said. (San Jose Police Dept.) 

Garcia said Morasky and Joanna Mae Macy-Rogers, 23, were inside a black SUV, parked illegally at the Valley Transportation Authority light-rail station at Pearl and Chynoweth avenues around 5 p.m. Thursday. The SUV attracted the attention of plainclothes deputies with the Santa Clara County Sheriff’s Office. The Sheriff’s Office provides transit police for VTA.

As the deputies approached the vehicle to issue a ticket, the car’s occupants spotted them and drove away. A few minutes later, when the deputies caught up to the SUV, Macy-Rogers fired at them with a shotgun, Garcia said.

The car entered Highway 87 and Macy-Rogers allegedly fired multiple times at law enforcement officers who were in pursuit, which now included San Jose Police Department officers and a police helicopter.

“Several rounds struck the sheriff’s vehicle,” Garcia said. “Deputies were not injured and did not return fire.”

At some point, the fleeing SUV drove the wrong way on the freeway before exiting at Curtner Avenue, toward Communications Hill, Garcia said. The suspects abandoned their vehicle, saw the UPS truck and threatened the driver with the shotgun, then forced him to drive them in his truck.

Around 6 p.m. Thursday, the truck made it to North First Street and Trimble Road where dozens of police cars immediately surrounded it.

Pictured is a shotgun allegedly used by a suspect in a police chase and fatal police shooting in North San Jose on Feb. 14, 2019. (San Jose Police Dept.) 

Soon after, the UPS worker was released, and Macy-Rogers also left the truck and surrendered to police. At one point, friends of Morasky went to the scene and told police that they were in contact with the suspect by phone. Referring to the “three strikes” law that mandated life imprisonment for multiple felony offenders, the friends told reporters that Morasky was a “two-striker” who wanted to surrender.

Garcia said police did have brief phone contact with Morasky, but did not comment on whether he signaled any intention to give up.

“He had every opportunity to give up peacefully, and he chose not to,” Garcia said.

Just before 7 p.m., Morasky started the truck and drove it a few feet. As police maneuvered two armored vehicles into the truck’s path, he jumped out of the truck, carrying the shotgun, and tried to flee.

Then, in a scene partially captured by television cameras, Garcia said a San Jose police officer fired a single shot that hit and killed the suspect as he ran “toward officers and civilians.”

Matthew O’Connor, a spokesman for UPS, declined to identify the driver or comment on his actions, but said the company was providing support for him and for other employees who work with him.

“We’re giving our driver some privacy after yesterday’s incident, and we’re offering grief counseling to the driver and our other employees in the area,” he said.

The officer who opened fire, described as a 12-year veteran with the SJPD, was placed on paid administrative leave. As is the case with every officer-involved shooting in the county, an investigation was launched by the police department in conjunction with the District Attorney’s Office, with the DA’s office expected to issue a report in six to eight months.

Macy-Rogers was booked into the Santa Clara County jail on suspicion of attempted murder of a police officer, carjacking, kidnapping and shooting at an occupied vehicle.

Besides driving into the police-laid spike strips, Garcia said the UPS driver apparently convinced his abductors that the delivery truck was equipped with a device that prevented it from going over 50 mph.

“The things this guy did, it’s pretty amazing stuff,” he said. “He definitely saved lives, including his own.”

Staff writers Nico Savidge, Mark Gomez, George Avalos, and George Kelly contributed to this report.

Source Article from https://www.mercurynews.com/2019/02/15/sources-chance-encounter-at-light-rail-station-set-off-chase-ups-carjacking-police-shooting/

“Nunca en estos cuatro años este congreso votó en contra de los intereses del pueblo argentino. De eso podemos sentirnos orgullosos”, celebró el presidente de la Cámara Baja, Julián Domínguez, al dar por cerrada la sesión en su despedida, luego de la votación de un paquete de más de 90 leyes.

La novela legislativa comenzó tras votar el primer punto del temario, que era la creación de YCF, los diputados continuaron a analizar el resto de las iniciativas, aunque luego la sesión se quedó sin quórum, por la ida de cuatro diputados del bloque: tres riojanos, que responde al gobernador Luis Beder Herrera (Javier Tineo, Griselda Herrera y Teresita Madera), y la bonaerense Dulce Granados, esposa del secretario de Seguridad bonaerense, Alejandro Granados. También hubo ausentes, como el santafesino Omar Perotti.

Di Tullio estuvo obligada a pedir dos cuartos intermedios para alcanzar el número necesario de 130 legisladores para sesionar. Después de las 18, con la aparición del diputado del FpV por Tucumás, Isaac Bromberg, se recuperó el quórum.

El diputado Claudio Lozano, presidente del bloque UP, sostuvo que “Unidad Popular participa y da quórum en la sesión del día de hoy con el objeto de aprobar un proyecto que repara las necesidades, la lucha y el compromiso de los trabajadores y la comunidad de Río Turbio al crear la Sociedad del Estado de Yacimientos Carboníferos Fiscales”.

Durante la espera para alcanzar el número de legisladores necesarios para continuar la sesión, Lozano señaló: “No tiene que haber lugar a la hipocresía, lo que no están acá no quieren expropiar el Bauen, porque no quieren la democracia de los trabajadores porque no quieren participación en las ganancias, por eso nos quedamos acá, por eso peleamos el quórum”.

La diputada Victoria Donda fue otras de las que se presentó para dar quórum, como firmante del proyecto de expropiación del BAUEN. “Los trabajadores que lo recuperaron en el momento de mayor crisis que atravesó nuestro país. Es una alegría que después de tantos años de resistencia por fin el Estado tome nota de que hay que legalizar la situación”, destacó.

Respecto de los legisladores ausentes, Donde señaló: “Los diputados y diputadas que hoy no participaron en la sesión, en una enorme mayoría no estuvieron porque se oponen a estos proyectos que son el resultado de años de lucha de los trabajadores argentinos, como ha pasado en todas las sesiones de la Cámara durante esta gestión nacional, y así seguirá siendo durante la que comienza el 10 de diciembre”.

Las bancadas del radicalismo, el PRO, la Coalición Cívica, el Frente Renovador, el socialismo y Compromiso Federal decidieron no concurrir con el argumento que no fue consensuada la agenda legislativa.

La sesión comenzó con el tratamiento del proyecto para crear la empresa Yacimientos Carboníferos Fiscales Sociedad del Estado (YCFSE), a cuyo cargo estará la administración de los complejos de explotación de ese mineral ubicados en Río Turbio, Santa Cruz. El debate fue abierto por el presidente de la comisión de Energía, Mario Metaza, quien aseguró que esta iniciativa “es una recuperación de nuestros patrimonio” y destacó la presencia de los trabajadores y del intendente de Rio Turbio, Matias Mazú.

Source Article from http://www.pagina12.com.ar/diario/ultimas/20-286995-2015-11-26.html

A Texas doctor claimed Saturday that he has deliberately violated the state’s new abortion law in order to help test whether it’s legal.

Alan Braid, an obstetrician-gynecologist in San Antonio, explained his actions in an essay published in The Washington Post.

Braid writes that he understands “there could be legal consequences” because of his action.

“But I wanted to make sure that Texas didn’t get away with its bid to prevent this blatantly unconstitutional law from being tested.”

He added later: “I understand that by providing an abortion beyond the new legal limit, I am taking a personal risk, but it’s something I believe in strongly.”

“I understand that by providing an abortion beyond the new legal limit, I am taking a personal risk, but it’s something I believe in strongly.”

— Alan Braid, obstetrician-gynecologist in San Antonio

Texas Gov. Greg Abbott, a Republican, signed the abortion bill into law in May and it took effect Sept. 1.

Jonathan Mitchell, a former Texas solicitor general who helped prepare the bill, defended it in a legal brief submitted to the U.S. Supreme Court in which he calls on the court to overturn Roe v. Wade, the 1973 high court decision that legalized abortion, The Guardian reported.

‘Change their behavior’

Mitchell argues in the brief that a higher degree of personal integrity in response to a court ban on abortions would help make illegal abortions unnecessary, according to the news outlet.

“Women can ‘control their reproductive lives’ without access to abortion; they can do so by refraining from sexual intercourse,” Mitchell writes. “One can imagine a scenario in which a woman has chosen to engage in unprotected (or insufficiently protected) sexual intercourse on the assumption that an abortion will be available to her later. But when this court announces the overruling of Roe, that individual can simply change their behavior in response to the court’s decision if she no longer wants to take the risk of an unwanted pregnancy.”

The Supreme Court is expected to address a Mississippi case in its next term that could affect Roe v. Wade, The Guardian reported.

But Braid doesn’t support a return to the days before Roe v. Wade, he writes in the Post.

A pro-life demonstrator holds a placard inside the Texas Statehouse in Austin, July 12, 2013. (Reuters)

“For me, it is 1972 all over again,” Braid writes. At that time, he continues, abortions in Texas were available mostly to women of economic means who could afford to travel to states like California, Colorado or New York to have the procedure done. He claims that Texas’ new law returns the state to those days.

He claims he watched three teenagers die from the effects of illegal abortions while performing emergency-room duty as an OB-GYN resident at a San Antonio hospital.

‘A duty of care’

On Sept. 6, five days after the new Texas law took effect Sept. 1, he writes, he provided an abortion to a woman in the first trimester of her pregnancy – a violation of the state law.

“I acted because I had a duty of care to this patient, as I do for all patients, and because she has a fundamental right to receive this care.”

Last Tuesday, the U.S. Justice Department asked a federal judge in Texas to temporarily halt the implementation of the new Texas law.

Texas Gov. Greg Abbott speaks at a news conference, Tuesday, June 8, 2021, in Austin, June 22, 2021. (Associated Press)

The emergency motion seeking a temporary restraining order comes days after the DOJ sued Texas over the law, claiming it was enacted to “prevent women from exercising their constitutional rights.” 

The law went into effect on Sept. 1 after being upheld in a 5-4 decision by the U.S. Supreme Court. It is the strictest abortion law in the country. Critics say many women don’t yet know they’re pregnant at six weeks – around the time when a fetal heartbeat can first be detected – and the law makes no exceptions for rape or incest. 

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

“It’s clearly unconstitutional,” Attorney General Merrick Garland said earlier this month. “The obvious and expressly acknowledged intention of this statutory scheme is to prevent women from exercising their constitutional rights.”

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton and other Republicans have vowed to defend the new law.

“Biden should focus on fixing the border crisis, Afghanistan, the economy and countless other disasters instead of meddling in states’ sovereign rights,” Paxton wrote on Twitter on Sept. 9. “I will use every available resource to fight for life.”

The law prohibits all abortions once a fetal heartbeat can be detected, usually around six weeks, and also allows individuals who oppose abortion to sue clinics and others who assist a woman in getting an abortion.

Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/politics/texas-doctor-abortion-law-illegal

SAN JUAN, Puerto Rico (AP) — A group of 17 U.S. missionaries, including children, was kidnapped by a gang in Haiti on Saturday, according to a voice message sent to various religious missions by an organization with direct knowledge of the incident.

The missionaries were on their way home from building an orphanage, according to a message from Ohio-based Christian Aid Ministries.

“This is a special prayer alert,” the one-minute message said. “Pray that the gang members would come to repentance.”

The message says the mission’s field director is working with the U.S. Embassy, and that the field director’s family and one other unidentified man stayed at the ministry’s base while everyone else visited the orphanage.

No other details were immediately available.

A U.S. government spokesperson said they were aware of the reports on the kidnapping.

“The welfare and safety of U.S. citizens abroad is one of the highest priorities of the Department of State,” the spokesperson said, declining further comment.

Haiti is once again struggling with a spike in gang-related kidnappings that had diminished after President Jovenel Moïse was fatally shot at his private residence on July 7, and following a 7.2-magnitude earthquake that struck southwest Haiti in August and killed more than 2,200 people.

Gangs have demanded ransoms ranging from a couple hundred dollars to more than $1 million, according to authorities.

Last month, a deacon was killed in front of a church in the capital of Port-au-Prince and his wife kidnapped, one of dozens of people who have been abducted in recent months.

At least 328 kidnapping victims were reported to Haiti’s National Police in the first eight months of 2021, compared with a total of 234 for all of 2020, according to a report issued last month by the United Nations Integrated Office in Haiti known as BINUH.

Gangs have been accused of kidnapping schoolchildren, doctors, police officers, busloads of passengers and others as they grow more powerful. In April, one gang kidnapped five priests and two nuns, a move that prompted a protest similar to the one organized for this Monday to decry the lack of security in the impoverished country.

“Political turmoil, the surge in gang violence, deteriorating socioeconomic conditions – including food insecurity and malnutrition – all contribute to the worsening of the humanitarian situation,” BINUH said in its report. “An overstretched and under-resourced police force alone cannot address the security ills of Haiti.”

On Friday, the U.N. Security Council voted unanimously to extend the U.N. political mission in Haiti.

The kidnapping of the missionaries comes just days after high-level U.S. officials visited Haiti and promised more resources for Haiti’s National Police, including another $15 million to help reduce gang violence, which this year has displaced thousands of Haitians who now live in temporary shelters in increasingly unhygienic conditions.

Among those who met with Haiti’s police chief was Uzra Zeya, U.S. under secretary of state for civilian security, democracy, and human rights.

“Dismantling violent gangs is vital to Haitian stability and citizen security,” she recently tweeted.

Source Article from https://fox8.com/news/17-missionaries-including-children-kidnapped-by-gang-in-haiti-ohio-based-ministry-reports/

BOSTON — The Boston Licensing Board, in a unanimous vote Thursday morning, voted to indefinitely suspend the liquor license of the Sons of Boston bar and kitchen following a confrontation in which one of its bouncers was accused of murder in the stabbing of a Marine veteran.

In a scathing critique, the Licensing Board said it would be unsafe for the Sons of Boston to continue to operate, citing a breakdown in its management and a pattern of negligence involving other prior incidents.

“I do not believe Sons of Boston can adequately protect the public within their license premise and I do not believe they are operating a law-abiding business,” said Kathleen Joyce the Chairwoman of the Boston Licensing Board. “I believe it is unsafe for them to continue to operate, someone died directly at the hands of their staff.”

Sons of Boston, which is operated by Causeway Union, LLC. faced six different alleged licensing violations, including assault and battery – employee on patron – with a deadly weapon, and failure to call police about the incident.

“Based on their negligent hiring practices, their utter lack of training, and their recent prior reports of violent staff it should have been foreseeable that an event like this could happen,” said Joyce.

This comes after a March 19 incident where one of their bouncers was charged with a Marine veteran’s murder. Daniel Martinez of Illinois was stabbed and later died after police say one of the bar’s bouncers chased him down after denying Martinez entry.

That bouncer, Alvaro Omar Larrama, 39, of East Boston is facing a murder charge.

In a statement, the Martinez family wrote:

“We would like to thank the licensing board for taking action that today suspended Sons of Boston’s license to operate indefinitely. The Board acted swiftly and thoroughly in looking out for the community’s safety. The Board stated that after reviewing extensive footage – and reviewing the history of Sons of Boston in regard to hiring, training and supervision of its staff – that the establishment failed to do what it was legally required to do and that those failures cost Daniel his life. The family of Daniel Martinez remains steadfast in seeking justice, and will not rest until all questions around Daniel’s tragic death, and the action of the bar before and after, are answered. Most importantly, the Martinez family is still deeply grieving the loss of their beloved son and brother, Daniel. The family appreciates the media’s willingness to respect their privacy during this extraordinarily difficult time.”

—  Statement from Martinez Family Attorney / Thomas Flaws – Altman, Nussbaum, Shunnarah

The bar already had its entertainment license pulled by the mayor’s office.

Download the FREE Boston 25 News app for breaking news alerts.

Follow Boston 25 News on Facebook and Twitter. | Watch Boston 25 News NOW

Source Article from https://www.boston25news.com/news/local/suffolk-county/city-votes-suspend-sons-boston-liquor-license-after-deadly-stabbing-linked-bar/ZDVUILDIOZAHTHAVQNOJICFCZA/

The French government has imposed a month-long lockdown on Paris and parts of northern France after a faltering vaccine rollout and spread of highly contagious coronavirus variants forced the president, Emmanuel Macron, to shift course.

Since late January, when he defied the calls of scientists and some in his government to lock down the country, Macron has said he would do whatever was needed to keep the euro zone’s second-largest economy as open as possible. However, this week he ran out of options just as France and other European countries briefly suspended use of the Oxford/AstraZenca vaccine.

The prime minister, Jean Castex, said on Thursday that France was in the grip of a third wave, with the virulent variant first detected in Britain now accounting for about 75% of cases. Intensive care wards are under severe strain, notably in Paris where the incidence rate surpasses 400 infections in every 100,000 inhabitants. “The epidemic is getting worse. Our responsibility now is to not let it escape our control,” Castex told a news conference.

France reported 35,000 new cases on Thursday and there were more Covid patients in intensive care in Paris than at the peak of the second wave. “Four weeks, the time required for the measures to generate a sufficient impact. [It is] the time we need to reach a threshold in the vaccination of the most vulnerable,” Castex said.

The lockdowns will start from Friday at midnight in France’s 16 hardest-hit departments that, with the exception of one on the Mediterranean, form a corridor from Calais to the capital. Barbers, clothing stores and furniture shops will have to close, though bookstores and other shops selling essential goods can stay open.

Schools will stay open and people will be allowed to exercise outdoors within a 10km (6.2 miles) radius of their homes. Travel out of the worst-hit areas will not permitted without a compelling reason. “Go outdoors, but not to party with friends,” the prime minister said.

Castex said France would resume inoculations with the AstraZeneca vaccine after the European Medicines Agency confirmed it was safe. Seeking to shore up public confidence in the vaccine, critical if France is to hit its targets, Castex said he would get the shot on Friday. “I am confident public trust in the vaccine will be restored,” he said, though he acknowledged it may take time.

Although Macron stopped short of ordering a nationwide lockdown, the new restrictions may be extended to other regions if needed and may yet slow the country’s economic recovery. The Paris region is home to nearly one-fifth of the population and accounts for 30% of economic activity.

A nationwide nightly curfew in place since mid-December remains, though it will start an hour later, at 7pm. The government had no regrets about not locking down earlier, Castex said. “It was the right decision in January. We would have had an unbearable three-month lockdown. We did well not to do so.”

Not everyone agrees. In the intensive care unit of a private hospital on the edge of Paris, doctors expressed resignation at having once again to deal with overloaded wards. “We’re back here again,” said ward chief Abdid Widad.

Source Article from https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/mar/18/paris-enters-four-week-lockdown-as-france-faces-third-covid-wave

Gov. Gavin Newsom signed a bill to return land to the descendants of a Black couple, Willa and Charles Bruce, that was taken from the Bruces in the city of Manhattan Beach, Calif., nearly a century ago. Newsom traveled to the area where the Bruces’ resort was once located to sign the new law in front of Bruce family members, the media and others who raised awareness of how Black Californians were pushed off of valuable beachfront property.

“I’m proud, as a son of this state, proud as the governor of this state, of the most diverse state and the world’s most diverse democracy to be here, Anthony with you,” Newsom said referring to Anthony Bruce, the great-great-grandson of Willa and Charles, and the heir to the property, at the bill signing.

Newsom added that the event was “for all of those families torn asunder because of racism all across this country and around the globe.”

Earlier this month, the California Legislature unanimously approved a measure allowing Los Angeles County to return the property to the descendents of Willa and Charles. The two built and operated a thriving resort that catered to Black patrons. At the time, it was one of the two places in the Los Angeles area where Black people could safely visit the beach, according to the L.A. Times, as other public beaches were deemed for “whites only.”

But their joy came with hardship, as some white residents of Manhattan Beach –– including members of the Ku Klux Klan –– resented the resort and harassed Black visitors to deter them from coming.

In 1924, the Manhattan Beach City Council used eminent domain to strip the Bruce family of their land to create a park.

The property was eventually transferred to the state of California. The state later handed it to the county, with the stipulation that it couldn’t be given away or sold.

This sort of expropriation of Black property was common throughout the United States in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, and it contributed to the racial wealth gap that exists today.

“You got evidence of an entrepreneurial energy that was alive and well in this family, a persistence, a grit, a determination to make things happen,” Newsom said. “We’re here today to try to make up for [their loss].”

Legislation sponsored by Democratic state Sen. Steve Bradford, signed by Newsom on Thursday, removes those state restrictions, allowing L.A. County to return the land. During the bill signing, Bradford –– who is Black and represents a southern L.A. district that borders Manhattan Beach –– talked about growing up in Southern California and hearing stories about the Bruce family as he traveled through Manhattan Beach.

At Thursday’s ceremony, Bradford said that people often ask him, What do you think generational wealth would have looked like for the Bruces?”

He said he responds by pointing to white families that have built fortunes. “I said let’s look at the Gettys, let’s look at the Rockefellers, let’s look at the Forbes,” Bradford said. “That’s what generational wealth could have looked like for the Bruce family. But they were denied that because of the racist behavior of this city.”

Bradford criticized the current Manhattan Beach City Council for not apologizing to the Bruces.

In response, Newsom said: “Let me do what apparently Manhattan Beach is unwilling to do, and I want to apologize to the Bruce family for what was done to them a century ago.”

Janice Hahn, a member of the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors, grew up in the Manhattan Beach area and has been championing the cause on the local level for the county.

“The county, indeed, owned the very parcels which were once Bruce’s resort. I knew there was one thing to do and that was to give the property back,” Hahn said.

“The law was used to steal this property a hundred years ago and the law today will give it back.”

According to family members and historical records, Willa and Charles Bruce fought to keep their land. After the city seized their property, they sued and were awarded damages of $14,500. Adjusted for inflation, that wouldn’t even amount to even one-quarter of a million dollars today, according to the New York Times.

Newsom, Bradford and Hahn all credited Kavon Ward for leading the cause through the Justice for Bruce’s Beach movement. Ward has now started a national campaign to help Black families reclaim property called Where Is My Land. She says multiple people have already contacted her for assistance with potential cases.

The first official acknowledgment of the Bruces’ story was in 2006, when the city council voted to rename a park Bruce’s Beach, near where their resort once stood. It happened under the leadership of then-Mayor Mitch Ward, Manhattan Beach’s first Black elected official. He was also in attendance at the bill signing and was thanked for his efforts.

The Los Angeles County Lifeguard Training Headquarters, currently located at Bruce’s Beach –– is thought to be worth as much as $75 million, according to CNN. The county is planning to lease the land from Anthony Bruce once they come up with a deal to hand it over.

Chief Duane Yellow Feather Shepard, of the Pocasset Wampanoag Tribe of the Pokanoket Nation, is a distant relative of Willa and Charles Bruce and a family spokesman, told Yahoo News in July that this is not a story of reparations, but rather a story of returning land that was stolen.

Read more from Yahoo News:

Source Article from https://news.yahoo.com/california-gov-gavin-newsom-signs-law-returning-beachfront-land-stripped-from-black-family-005247717.html

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi backed embattled California Gov. Gavin Newsom on Thursday and rejected any notion that Democrats should run a back-up candidate as an insurance policy during Newsom’s likely recall election later this year.

“I think it’s an unnecessary notion. I don’t even think it rises to the level of an idea,” Pelosi said Thursday during a news conference with reporters. 

Pelosi suggested the recall effort is being funded by backers of former President Donald Trump and said Democrats should all help Newsom stay in office.

“I think that the governor will defeat this quite successfully, and we’ll all help him do that,” Pelosi, D-Calif., added.

NEWSOM RECALL EFFORT ORGANIZERS SAY THEY SUBMITTED 2.1 MILLION SIGNATURES BY DEADLINE

Backers of Newsom’s recall effort needed 1.5 million valid signatures from California residents by March 17 to trigger a special election later this year. Organizers of the effort say they turned in 2.1 million signatures by the deadline. Election officials have until April 29 to validate the signatures for a final tally, but the governor has acknowledged the effort was likely successful to force an election.

California Gov. Gavin Newsom, center, gestures in front of local officials while speaking about COVID-19 vaccines at the Fresno Fairgrounds, Wednesday, Feb. 10, 2021, in Fresno, Calif. (John Walker/The Fresno Bee via AP)

During a recall election, voters will be asked two questions: Should Newsom be recalled, and who should replace Newsom if he is removed?

So the question for Democrats is should they run a fallback candidate on the ballot if voters, indeed, want Newsom out. Tom Steyer, a billionaire who ran for president in 2020, is conducting polling as a precursor to possibly entering the race as a backup candidate, Politico reported Tuesday, citing information from three sources.

IF CALIFORNIA GOV. NEWSOM FACES RECALL, TOM STEYER MULLING RUN AS ‘FALLBACK’ DEMOCRAT: REPORT

Democrats suffered a big defeat during the 2003 recall of Democratic Gov. Gray Davis when Republican movie star Arnold Schwarzenegger was elected.

Democrats were initially united in not running an alternative candidate to Davis, but Lt. Gov. Cruz Bustamante changed his mind and got into the race — sending a muddled message to Democratic voters, the Los Angeles Times reported

This time around, Pelosi expressed confidence Democrats will succeed.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

“The governor will defeat this initiative, he will continue to be governor and he’ll go on to another victory in the election,” Pelosi added. 

Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/politics/pelosi-newsom-unnecessary-another-dem-california-recall

Image copyright
PA

Image caption

The justice secretary argued Theresa May’s deal remained the best outcome

It would not be “sustainable” to ignore MPs if they vote for a softer Brexit, Justice Secretary David Gauke has said.

On Monday, Parliament will hold an indicative vote on Brexit alternatives. A customs union with the EU is thought to be the most likely preference.

Meanwhile, the prime minister is considering her next move after her withdrawal plan was defeated by MPs for a third time.

Mr Gauke said there are “no ideal choices” over the Brexit deadlock.

Speaking on the BBC’s Andrew Marr Show, he argued the prime minister’s deal was “the best outcome”.

But he added: “Sometimes you do have to accept your second or third choice to avoid an outcome you consider to be even worse.”

Labour’s deputy leader Tom Watson said it would be “inconceivable” if there was a general election and his party did not include a new referendum in its manifesto.

Image copyright
EPA

Image caption

Theresa May arrives at church with her husband Philip

Following the UK’s vote to leave the EU in 2016, Theresa May negotiated a withdrawal deal with the EU.

Although European leaders agreed to the plan, Mrs May has yet to get the deal approved by Parliament.

The prime minister has until 12 April to seek a longer extension to the Article 50 process if the UK is to avoid leaving without a deal.

The prime minister’s deal is currently opposed by parties including Northern Ireland’s DUP – which the government relies upon for support – as well as a group of her own MPs.

Tory Brexiteer Steve Baker, who resigned as a Brexit minister over the PM’s handling of negotiations, wrote in the Sunday Telegraph that Mrs May’s deal “cannot be allowed to go through at any cost”.

However he admitted deciding to vote for it on Thursday before being talked out of it by friends.


What next?

  • Monday, 1 April: MPs hold another set of votes on Brexit options to see if they can agree on a way forward
  • Wednesday, 3 April: Potentially another round of so-called “indicative votes”
  • Wednesday, 10 April: Emergency summit of EU leaders to consider any UK request for further extension
  • Friday, 12 April: Brexit day, if UK does not seek/EU does not grant further delay
  • 23-26 May: European Parliamentary elections

On Monday, MPs have a non-binding vote on a series of options designed to test the will of Parliament. The intention is to see what outcome, if any, commands a majority.

None of MPs’ eight proposed options secured a majority in the first set of indicative votes on 27 March, but those which received the most were a customs union with the EU and a referendum on any deal.

A customs union would allow businesses to move goods around the EU without checks or charges – but membership would bar the UK from striking independent trade deals after Brexit.

Mr Gauke said he was in favour of leaving the customs union, arguing that it would “better reflect the way the country voted in 2016”.

Membership of a customs union would breach the Conservative’s 2017 manifesto.

But he acknowledged that his party “does not have the votes to get its manifesto position through the House of Commons at the moment”.

“We are in an environment where it is not just about going for your first choice,” he added.

Defence Minister Tobias Ellwood told Radio 4’s The World This Weekend he would support something along the lines of customs union membership – if the prime minister’s deal could not get through Parliament.

“I fear that is the only option we have if we want to honour the referendum” he said.

Image copyright
Reuters

Image caption

Brexit demonstrators gather outside the Houses of Parliament

Mr Gauke reiterated his opposition to a no-deal Brexit, warning he would leave government if such a policy was pursued.

A no-deal Brexit would mean cutting ties with the European Union immediately and defaulting to World Trade Organisation rules for trade.

Tom Watson said there was an “emerging consensus” among Labour MPs.

He said: “Whatever the deal looks like – and we understand there has to be compromises – if it’s underpinned by a People’s Vote that is the way we can bring the country back together.”

Please upgrade your browser

Your guide to Brexit jargon

Use the list below or select a button

Speaking on Sky News, shadow foreign secretary Emily Thornberry said under a Labour government it was “likely” that the UK would leave the European Union.

When asked if Labour was a Remain party, Ms Thornberry replied: “In our hearts we want to remain but we have to square that with democracy.

“If the people want us to leave we have to leave.”

‘Last thing we need’

Ms Thornberry also said “it looks like the time may come” for another attempted no confidence vote in the government.

If passed, this would pave the way for a general election.

The deputy chairman of the Conservative Party, James Cleverly, told Sky News that his party is doing “sensible pragmatic planning” in case there is a snap general election, but not seeking to call one.

And Mr Gauke warned he did not see how a general election would solve the current deadlock.

Former Conservative prime minister John Major said: “When feelings are running high… a general election is pretty much the very last thing we need.”

But he added: “We might be driven to it later.”

Image copyright
Reuters

Image caption

John Major signed the Maastricht Treaty, which furthered European integration

If an election failed to produce a majority in the Commons, Sir John suggested a “time limited” national unity government should be formed.

He said: “I think it would be in the national interest to have a cross-party government so we can take decisions without the chaos that we’re seeing in Parliament at the moment where every possible alternative is rejected.”

“I don’t think it is ideal, I would prefer a Conservative government with a clear majority.”

But he argued such a government would at least enable decisions to be taken.

Source Article from https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-47765706