Most Viewed Videos

The killers of Ahmaud Arbery were led to their cells in handcuffs on Friday to begin their life sentences, as rifle-toting members of the New Black Panther Party protested outside the Georgia courtroom. 

Travis and Gregory McMichael were both sentenced to life without parole for the February 2020 murder, while their neighbor William Roddie Bryan, 52, – who filmed the murder – will be eligible for parole. 

The trio were later seen being led away from the courtroom in handcuffs – the McMichaels never to be seen in public again. 

Travis McMichael was shackled by the ankles as well as being handcuffs; the other two men were just handcuffed. 

During the sentencing hearing, heavily-armed members of the New Black Panther Party gathered outside, raising their fists in a show of support for the Arbery family.

Members of the black nationalist group, which is also anti-white and anti-Semitic, also congregated outside the courthouse during closing arguments, leading the defense lawyers to call for a mistrial and accuse them of intimidation.

Along with banners showing Ahmaud Arbery’s face, the group also carried black and white coffins with mannequins inside them that feature the names of black men killed by police, such as George Floyd and Trayvon Martin.  

The NBPP was founded in 1989 and is designated as a hate group by the Southern Poverty Law Center.

The group is not affiliated with the original Black Panthers from the 1960s, and members of the original Panthers have accused the NBPP of the misappropriation of their name, both in public statements and in legal action. 

Travis McMichael, 36, (left) and his father Gregory, 66, were handcuffed as they were led from court on Friday to begin their sentences

William Bryan, the 52-year-old neighbor of the McMichaels, is seen being led away. He too was sentenced to life, but unlike the McMichaels he has the possibility of parole

A member of the New Black Panther Party is seen outside the Glenn County courthouse on Friday

The heavily-armed NBPP members marched outside the courthouse on Friday as the trio were sentenced for Arbery’s killing

Arbery’s parents asked a judge to sentence his killers to life without parole on Friday at a courthouse in Georgia, saying they ‘lynched him in broad daylight’ and targeted him when he felt most ‘free and alive’. Pictured are members of the NBPP

The NBPP flag is hoisted aloft as the party members march in front of the Georgia courthouse

Members of the NBPP raise their fists to show support for the Arbery family during Friday’s sentencing

Judge Timothy R. Walmsley did not specify how long he would have to spend in prison – prosecutors asked that he spend at least 15 years behind bars. Typically, the minimum in Georgia is 30 years. 

In handing down his sentence, Judge Walmsley called the murder ‘chilling’ and ‘disturbing’. He talked about the ‘terror’ Arbery must have felt for the five minutes the men chased him in their pick-up trucks with a shotgun and revolver. 

‘As we all now know based on the verdict that was handed down in this courtroom, Ahmaud Arbery was murdered. It’s a tragedy. It’s a tragedy on many, many levels.

‘On February 23, 2020…a young man with dreams was gunned down in this community. As we understand it, he went for a run and he ended up running for his life.’ 

To emphasize how long the five-minute chase must have felt for Arbery, the judge sat silently for a minute in the courtroom. 

‘That one minute represents a fraction of the time that Ahmaud Arbery was running in Satilla Shores. The chase that occurred, occurred over a five minute period. 

‘When I thought about this, I kept coming back to the terror that must have been in the mind of the young man running through Satilla Shores,’ he said. 

‘He was hunted down and shot and he was killed because individuals took the law into their own hands.’ 

Travis McMichael, left, has been sentenced to life in prison without parole for shooting dead Ahmaud Arbery in 2020 

Gregory McMichael, Travis’s 66-year-old father, will also die in prison under the life without parole sentence

William Roddie Bryan, the 52-year-old neighbor who filmed the murder, was sentenced to life but he has been given the possibility of parole. Prosecutors asked that he have to serve at least 15 years behind bars 

Judge Timothy Walmsley on Friday called the killing ‘chilling’ and ‘disturbing.’ He talked about the ‘terror’ Arbery must have felt as the men chased him in their pick-up trucks for five minutes 

He then recited some of the comments made by the McMichaels after the shooting to prove that it was a ‘callous’ execution, and said they never showed any remorse. 

‘Remorse is something that’s felt and demonstrated. In this case, getting back to the video, after Ahmaud Arbery fell, the McMichael’s turned their backs. They walked away. This was a killing. It was callous and it occurred because confrontation was being sought. 

‘The most violent crime in Satilla Shores was the murder of Ahmaud Arbery. 

‘The record speaks for itself. Greg McMichael tried to establish a narrative. He said he was ‘trapped like a rat.’

Ahmaud Arbery was shot and killed in Brunswick, Georgia, U.S. on February 23, 2020,one year on

‘He said, ‘stop or I’ll blow your f*****g head off.’ 

‘He told Travis ‘you have no choice’. He also said, ‘If I could have gotten a shot at the guy, I would have shot him.” 

Unlike the father and son, Bryan appeared to show some remorse in the days and weeks after the killing, he said. 

However all three acted as vigilantes, chasing down Arbery and then murdering him because they were ‘seeking confrontation.’  

‘Taking the law into your own hands is a dangerous endeavor. Ultimately with regard to the murder of Ahmaud Arbery it holds us all accountable. At a minimum his death should force us to consider expanding our definition of what a neighbor may be and how we treat them. 

‘I believe that assuming the worst in others, we show our worst character. Assuming the best in others is always the best course of action. Maybe those are the grand lessons of this case,’ the judge said.

There were celebrations outside the court as the sentences were read aloud.  

Earlier, Arbery’s parents asked a judge to sentence his killers to life without parole on Friday at a courthouse in Georgia, saying they ‘lynched him in broad daylight’ and targeted him when he felt most ‘free and alive’.  

On February 23, 2020, they chased Arbery, a 26-year-old black man, through a street in Satilla Shores. They said they thought he was a burglar. Travis pulled the trigger, with his father nearby. Bryan filmed the entire incident on his phone. 

In November, they were all convicted of murder – which carries a mandatory life sentence. Prosecutors chose not to seek the death penalty.  

Gregory and Travis McMichael and their neighbor William Brian Jr were found a guilty of murder in state court on November 23 by a panel of 11 white jurors and one black juror. In compiling that jury pool, 1,000 people in the mostly-white Glynn County were called. Pictured: The moment Arbery was shot by Travis McMichael

Ahmaud Arbery’s mother Wanda Cooper Jones celebrates as she leaves court with her family on Friday after her son’s killers were sentenced to life behind bars without parole

Ahmaud Arbery’s mother Wanda Cooper-Jones, center, speaks with supporters after Superior Court Judge Timothy Walmsley sentenced Greg McMichael, his son, Travis McMichael, and a neighbor, William ‘Roddie’ Bryan, Friday, Jan. 7, 2022, at the Glynn County Courthouse in Brunswick 

(FILES) In this file photo taken on May 23, 2021 a woman holds portraits of Ahmaud Arbery and George Floyd during an event in remembrance of George Floyd in Minneapolis, Minnesota

Ahmaud Arbery’s mother Wanda Cooper Jones (left) and father Marcus (right) asked a judge to impose the maximum sentence possible for his killers – life without parole

Arbery’s father Marcus spoke first, telling the court: ‘The man who killed my son has sat in this courtroom every day next to his father. I’ll never get the chance of sitting next to my son ever again. Not at a dinner table, not at a holiday, not at a wedding. I pray that no one in this courtroom has to do what we had – bury their child.’ 

Arbery’s mother Wanda Cooper Jones, pleaded: ‘They were fully committed to their crimes – let them be fully committed for the consequences.’ 

‘MY SON’S KILLERS HAVE NO REMORSE’ – AHMAUD ARBERY’S MOTHER’S VICTIM IMPACT STATEMENT 

I want to speak directly to my son. This verdict doesn’t bring you back, but it does help bring closure to this very difficult chapter of my life.

I made a promise to you the day I laid you to rest. I told you I loved you and someday, somehow I would get you justice.

Son, I love you as much today as the day you were born. Raising you was the honor of my life and I am very proud of you.

Your honor, these men have chosen to lie and attack my son and his surviving family. They have no remorse and do not deserve leniency. 

This wasn’t a case of mistaken identity or mistaken fact. They chose to target my son because they didn’t want him in their community they chose to treat him differently when they couldn’t sufficiently scare him or intimidate him, they killed him.

My young son, he was born on mothers’ day of 1994. He had a smile so bright it lit up the room. He was a greedy baby and it seemed like he was always searching for something to stick in his mouth. 

He was always a loving baby who seemed to never tire of cuddling, hugs and kisses He loved. He never hesitated to tell me, his sister Jasmine or brother Marcus, and we loved him back, He was messy. He sometimes refused to wear socks.

I wish he would have cut and cleaned his toenails before he went out for his jog that day. I guess he would have if he knew he would be murdered.

My family is going to miss Ahmaud, his jokes, impersonations, his warm smile. These men deserve the maximum sentence for their crimes. Ahamud never said a word to them. He never threatened them, he just wanted to be left alone.

They were fully committed to their crimes – let them be fully committed for the consequences.

I’m standing here before you asking you to please give all three defendants who are responsible for the death of my son, the maximum punishment in this court which I do believe is life without bars without the possible chance for parole. 

She also referred to her son’s toenails on the day of the murder – something that was brought up during the trial in by a defense attorney who stoked outrage by referring to his ‘long, dirty toenails’. 

Wanda, on Friday, said: ‘I wish he would have cut and cleaned his toenails before he went out for his jog that day. I guess he would have if he knew he would be murdered.’  

She then pleaded with the judge: ‘Your honor, I am standing here before you today as the mother of Ahmaud Arbery asking you to please give all three defendants who are responsible for the death of my son, the maximum punishment which I do believe is life without bars without the possible chance for parole.’ 

The men’s lawyers are asking that they be granted parole after 30 years. Prosecutors have asked the judge not to grant any of the men parole. 

Cooper Jones spoke about Ahmaud as a ‘loving’ baby who ‘never seemed to tire of cuddles, hugs and kisses.’

His father Marcus told how he loved to run more than anything because it made him feel ‘free’. 

‘Not only did they lynch my son in broad daylight but they killed him when he was doing what he loved more than anything – running. 

‘That’s when he felt most alive. Most free. And they took all of that from him.

‘When I close my eyes, I see his execution over and over. I’ll see that for the rest of my life.  

‘When I became a father my life became bigger than me, it became bigger than me about my family, protecting him, protecting my boy. I know in my head that there is nothing I could have done that day to have saved my son. 

‘To save him from this evil and hate. My heart is broken and always will be.

‘If I could trade places with Ahmaud, I would in a heartbeat but I can’t’. I’m standing here to do what he can’t – that is to fight for him. His memory, his legacy and to tell you who he was. 

‘That’s the one thing you didn’t hear in this courtroom. More than anything else, you should know who my boy was.

‘We love our son and we will never have him with us to celebrate anything. Thanksgiving, Christmas…his birthday his killers should spend the rest of their lives thinking about what they took from us. 

‘It should be behind my bars.

‘Me and my family have got to live with this for the rest of our lives. They should stay behind those bars the rest of their lives. They didn’t give him a chance.’  

Ahmaud’s mother spoke directly to him, saying: ‘This verdict doesn’t bring you back. But it does help bring closure to this very difficult chapter of my life. 

‘I made a promise to you the day I laid you to rest. 

‘I told you I loved you and someday, somehow I would get you justice. 

‘Son, I love you as much today as the day you were born.

‘Raising you was the honor of my life and I am very proud of you.’ 

She said none of the killers showed remorse for their actions, and deserved to die in prison.  

‘They have no remorse and do not deserve leniency. This wasn’t a case of mistaken identity or mistaken fact. 

‘They chose to target my son because they didn’t want him in their community. 

‘They chose to treat him differently. 

‘And when they couldn’t sufficiently scare him or intimidate him, they killed him.’   

Arbery, a 25-year-old avid jogger, was running through the mostly white residential neighborhood of Satilla Shores on the afternoon of Feb. 23 when the McMichaels decided to grab their guns, jump in a pickup truck and give chase. 

The younger McMichael would later testify to the jury they had a hunch Arbery might be fleeing a crime.

Bryan joined the chase in his own pickup truck after it passed his driveway, and pulled out his cellphone to record Travis McMichael firing a shotgun at Arbery at close range. 

Arbery had nothing on him besides his running clothes and sneakers.

The video caused outrage when it emerged months later and it became clear that none of the men involved had yet been arrested after a local prosecutor concluded the killing was justified. 

Ahmaud Arbery’s mother Wanda Cooper-Jones wipes a tear from her eyes while listening to her daughter’s impact statement to Superior Court Judge Timothy Walmsley

Ahmaud Arbery’s sister Jasmine Arbery wipes a tear from her eyes while listening to her mother’s impact statement to Superior Court Judge Timothy Walmsley during the sentencing of Greg McMichael and his son, Travis McMichael, and a neighbor, William ‘Roddie’ Bryan in the Glynn County Courthouse, on January 7, 2022 in Brunswick, Georgia

Ahmaud Arbery’s father Marcus Arbery, center, sits in the courtroom with other family members during the sentencing of Greg McMichael, his son, Travis McMichael, and a neighbor, William ‘Roddie’ Bryan in the Glynn County Courthouse

William Roddie Bryan, 52, arrives at court in Brunswick, Georgia, on Friday to be sentenced to life in prison for the murder of Ahmaud Arbery 

Travis McMichael, 35, arrives in court in shackles on Friday morning to be sentenced for the murder of Ahmaud Arbery. He will be at least 65 before he gets out of prison

Gregory McMichael, 66, is shown arriving at court for the 10am sentencing hearing

Gregory McMichael makes his way into court on Friday to be sentenced to life in prison

‘The day has finally come that we will get justice. 

‘The day my family an I have prayed for… it has finally come.’ 

Defense attorneys then pleaded with the judge not to sentence the men to the harshest possible term. 

Gregory McMichael’s attorney, Laura Hogue, called him a ‘man of goodness’ and referred to the killing as a ‘five minute chase that ended in tragedy.’

‘Greg McMichael is a good man. He is not a perfect person but none of us are. 

‘The choices he made as a young man, all the way through to the rest of his life, to serve, not to acquire wealth, but to quietly go through the business of choosing career options to help other people. 

‘I say without hesitation he remains a man of goodness,’ she said. 

Three white men guilty of Ahmaud Arbery faced 27 charges between them – this is what each of them mean

COUNT 1 – MALICE MURDER

This is defined as causing a person’s death with deliberate intention without provocation and ‘where all the circumstances in the killing show an abandoned and malignant heart’. 

Travis McMichael – Guilty

Gregory McMichael – Not guilty

William ‘Roddie’ Bryan – Not guilty  

COUNTS 2, 3, 4 AND 5 – FELONY MURDER 

This applies when a death is caused in the course of committing another felony whether or not the killing was intentional or unprovoked. 

Travis McMichael – Guilty on all counts

Gregory McMichael – Guilty on all counts

William ‘Roddie’ Bryan – Guilty on three counts, not guilty on one counts

COUNT 6 and 7 – AGGRAVATED ASSAULT 

Under Georgia law this is an assault using a deadly weapon. Count six refers to the shotgun used, count 7 refers to the two pickup trucks, driven by Gregory McMichael and William ‘Roddie’ Bryan, used to box Arbery in.

Travis McMichael – Guilty 

Gregory McMichael –  Not guilty on count 6; Guilty on count 7

William ‘Roddie’ Bryan – Not guilty on count 6; Guilty on count 7 

COUNT 8 –  FALSE IMPRISONMENT  

This is when a person ‘arrests, confines, or detains’ another person without legal authority. 

Travis McMichael – Guilty 

Gregory McMichael –  Guilty

William ‘Roddie’ Bryan – Guilty

COUNT 9 – CRIMINAL INTENT TO COMMIT A FELONY

This refers to performing ‘any act which constitutes a substantial step’ toward the intentional commission of a crime  

Travis McMichael – Guilty 

Gregory McMichael –  Guilty 

William ‘Roddie’ Bryan – Guilty 

Ahmaud Arbery’s father Marcus Arbery arrives at court on Friday for the sentencing. He spoke briefly before the hearing, telling reporters he is a ‘different man now’

Ahmaud Arbery’s family and friends arrive at the courthouse in Brunswick, Georgia, on Friday morning 

Source Article from https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10380573/Shackled-killers-Ahmaud-Arbery-led-court-New-Black-Panthers-stand-guard.html

Dangerous storms fired up in southwest and central Kansas Friday night in what’s shaping up to be an active few-day stretch of stormy weather.

Friday’s isolated storms produced a few large, damaging tornadoes. You can follow updates as storms popped up and advanced below:

Friday nigh wrap

The threat for severe weather begins to weaken as late Friday night roles into early Saturday morning, but several central-Kansas counties remain in tornado watches until 2 a.m.

Another round of severe storms could impact central and eastern Kansas Saturday. The main threats will be large hail and damaging wind gusts.

Another storm system will move into the central plains for the start of the work week. This could bring more severe weather to Kansas on Monday, with large hail, damaging wind gusts and a few tornadoes possible.

The severe weather threat Tuesday moves to the east, into eastern Kansas.

—–

11:45 p.m.

The lone TORNADO WARNING in effect for southern and eastern portions of Barton County is allowed to expire. This storm did produce a tornado that was on the ground for about a minute near the Barton/Stafford County, about six miles south of Great Bend.












Besides the tornado threat, this storm has produced hail and winds of about 60 mph.

We’re getting a closer look at tornado damage from a storm earlier tonight near Bloom in southeast Ford County. The damage was to a home, but there were no reports of injuries.

—–

11:07 p.m.

A tornado is reported near Radium in eastern Pawnee County,moving northeast toward southern Barton County. This is about 11 miles southwest of the Great Bend area. People in Great Bend should practice caution and take shelter.

—–

11 p.m.

Damaging wind gusts is the primary threat associated with a severe thunderstorm near Lincoln and a severe thunderstorm warning continuing until 11:30 p.m. for Ellsworth, Lincoln and Russell counties.











There are reports of tornado damage including snapped and twisted power poles near Lewis in eastern Pawnee County.

—–

10:48 p.m.

A TORNADO WARNING is in effect until 11:15 p.m. is in effect Edwards, Pawnee and Stafford counties. Larned is included among cities with this warning. Other towns in the warning include Pleasant Grove, Pleasant Ridge and Radium.

—–

10:40 p.m>

The National Weather Service confirms a large, damage-causing tornado near Zook in rural southeast Pawnee County. This storm is moving northeast at about 35 mph.

The tornado crossed K-19 and is expected to stay east of Larned.

—–

10:28 p.m.

The TORNADO WARNING expires in Russell County. The county remains in a severe thunderstorm warning. This storm carries the potential for more damaging winds. Earlier, 76 mph winds were measured in the city of Russell.

—–

10:13 p.m.

The National Weather Service confirms a large tornado impacting the Kinsley area is moving northeast at about 35 mph. A Storm Team 12 chaser says this tornado damaged two homes southwest of Kinsley, but no one was injured.

In Russell, 76 mph winds were reported. Russell County remains in a TORNADO WARNING until 10:45 p.m. Stafford and Pawnee counties are also in a tornado warning until 10:45.


—–

10:02 p.m.

A wedge tornado was confirmed southwest of Kinsley in Edwards County. This storm is south of Highway 50, moving northeast.

A tornado warning is lifted in Ford County, but we are hearing more reports of damage, this report to a home about four miles south of Windhorst.

——

9:58 p.m.

A new TORNADO WARNING is in effect for Pawnee, Stafford and Russell counties until 10:45 p.m. A storm capable of producing a tornado is moving northeast from near the town of Gorham at about 50 mph.

—–

9:45 p.m.

The tornado warning for eastern Ford County, the northwest corner of Kiowa County and southern portions of Edwards County remains in effect until at least 10 p.m.

There are reports of damage to a shed southwest of the city of Ford.

—–

9:40 p.m.

Our Storm Team 12 spotters say the two tornadoes that were on the ground in southeast Ford County have dissipated, but a new TORNADO WARNING is in effect for eastern Ford County, the northwest corner of Kiowa County and southern portions of Edwards County.

This warning does not include Dodge City nor Greensburg, but people in the Kinsley area should take shelter.

A third tornado did touch down in eastern Ford County, but lifted after a few minutes.

—–

9:25 p.m.

A tornado-producing storm continues to move northeast at about 40 mph. This storm is not threatening Dodge City, but people in the community of Ford should take cover. There have been two tornadoes confirmed with this storm with both on the ground at the same time.

There are damage reports to a home a few miles outside of Bloom.

—–

9:15 p.m.

There are two tornadoes on the ground moving through southeastern Ford County, moving through a rural area southwest of the town of Ford.

These tornadoes are well to the southeast of Dodge City and not moving toward the city.

—–

9:05 p.m.

The tornado in southern Ford County heavily damaged a structure (possibly a home) northeast of Minneola as it remains on the ground, tracking northeast. This tornado also overturned a semi between Minneola and Fowler.

Counties under TORNADO WARNINGS include Ford, Meade, Gray, Hodgeman, Ness and Clark counties.

—–

8:55 p.m.

A tornado touched down in the southern part of Ford County has picked up momentum, moving northeast. This rope tornado northeast of Minneola will not threaten Dodge City.

—–

8:40 p.m.

A brief tornado was reported with a storm north of Fowler in northern Meade County. This storm is moving northeast.

A TORNADO WARNING remains in effect for Meade, Clark, Gray and Ford counties until at least 9:15 p.m.

A TORNADO WARNING in Hodgeman County remains in effect until at least 9 p.m. Areas of concern include northern Meade County, north of Fowler and west of Jetmore in Hodgeman County.

—–

8:20 p.m.

A TORNADO WARNING is issued for Hodgeman County. Radar indicates rotation with a storm east of Kalvesta. Tennis-ball-sized hail is also a threat with this storm moving northeast at 40 mph.

Earlier this evening, a tornado touched down near Beaver, Okla. Meade County was included in a tornado warning with this storm.

—–

6 p.m.

As of 6 p.m. tonight (Friday), there are no severe thunderstorm warnings nor immediate tornado threats in Kansas.

Storms that Friday afternoon made their way through northwest Kansas did produce at least a pair of tornadoes in southwest Nebraska, the first of which was reported just north of the Kansas/Nebraska line in Hitchcock County.

In central Kansas, moderate rain and lightning are possible with a storm near Salina, moving northeast. These storm is not severe.

While there are no active warnings in Kansas, a tornado watch remains in effect for several northwest counties until at least 10 p.m.

Another storm threat Saturday includes a low tornado threat, a medium threat for large hail and strong winds and a high threat of flooding rains for much of central and eastern Kansas, including the Wichita area.

—–

5:30 p.m.

A TORNADO WARNING remains in effect for portions of Hitchcock and Red Willow counties in southwest Nebraska, but the tornado threat is over for Rawlins county in northwest Kansas as this storm continues to move northeast.

The threat for more isolated storms to develop and advance across western Kansas continues as the evening rolls along.

—–

5:15 p.m.

A TORNADO WARNING is in effect for north central Rawlins County and southeast Hitchcock County in Nebraska until 5;45 p.m.

The storm capable of producing a tornado is 11 miles north of Atwood and moving northeast at 30 mph.

A tornado watch is in effect until at least 10 p.m. for several western-Kansas counties.

Source Article from https://www.kwch.com/content/news/Another-round-of-severe-storms-hits-Kansas-510090901.html

A health worker grabs at-home COVID-19 test kits to be handed out last month in Youngstown, Ohio. Starting Saturday, private health insurers will be required to cover up to eight home COVID-19 tests per month for those on their plans, the Biden administration announced Monday.

David Dermer/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

David Dermer/AP

A health worker grabs at-home COVID-19 test kits to be handed out last month in Youngstown, Ohio. Starting Saturday, private health insurers will be required to cover up to eight home COVID-19 tests per month for those on their plans, the Biden administration announced Monday.

David Dermer/AP

The Biden Administration announced Monday new details on how Americans can get free COVID-19 tests – or get reimbursements from their private insurance. This is following up on an announcement the White House made last month.

Under the new policy announced by the White House, individuals covered by a health insurance plan who purchase an over-the-counter COVID-19 diagnostic test that has been authorized, cleared, or approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) will be able to have those test costs covered by their insurance beginning this Saturday.

Insurance companies and health plans will be required to cover eight free over-the-counter at-home tests per covered individual per month, according to White House officials. For instance, a family of four all on the same plan would be able to get up to 32 of these tests covered by their health plan per month.

“We are requiring insurers and group health plans to make tests free for millions of Americans. This is all part of our overall strategy to ramp-up access to easy-to-use, at-home tests at no cost,” Department of Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra said in a news release Monday.

During Monday’s White House press briefing, Press Secretary Jen Psaki told reporters that the administration will start to have free COVID tests “out the door in the coming weeks.”

“The contracts (for testing companies) are structured in a way to require that significant amounts are delivered on an aggressive timeline, the first of which should be arriving early next week,” Psaki said.

“We also expect to have details on the website as well as a hotline later this week,” Psaki added.

The Biden administration says it is “incentivizing” insurers and group health plans to set up programs that will allow Americans to get the over-the-counter tests (PCR and rapid tests) directly through preferred pharmacies, retailers or other entities with no out-of-pocket costs.

For people whose health care provider has ordered a COVID-19 test, the Biden administration said there will not be a limit on the number of tests that are covered — including at-home tests.

Currently, State Medicaid and Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) programs must cover FDA-authorized at-home COVID-19 tests without cost-sharing.

Americans who are covered by Medicare already have their COVID-19 diagnostic tests performed by a laboratory, such as PCR and antigen tests, “with no beneficiary cost-sharing when the test is ordered by either a physician, non-physician practitioner, pharmacist, or other authorized health care professional,” the Biden administration says.

Last year, the Biden administration issued guidance saying that both State Medicaid and CHIP programs must cover all types of FDA-authorized COVID-19 tests without cost-sharing.

Source Article from https://www.npr.org/sections/coronavirus-live-updates/2022/01/10/1071899471/insurance-at-home-covid-tests-white-house

Pham Ngoc Canh, from Vietnam, met his North Korean wife Ri Yong Hui in 1971. They finally were able to marry in 2002 and now live in Hanoi.

Nguyen Huy Kham/Reuters


hide caption

toggle caption

Nguyen Huy Kham/Reuters

Pham Ngoc Canh, from Vietnam, met his North Korean wife Ri Yong Hui in 1971. They finally were able to marry in 2002 and now live in Hanoi.

Nguyen Huy Kham/Reuters

A couple in Hanoi is watching the summit between President Trump and North Korean leader Kim Jong Un this week with particular interest.

The husband, from Vietnam, and the wife, from North Korea, had to overcome enormous obstacles to be together. Their love was forbidden for decades by authorities on both sides. But eventually, they triumphed.

“It was love at first sight for me. I fell for him immediately,” recalls Ri Yong Hui, 70, of her Vietnamese husband, 69-year-old Pham Ngoc Canh. The two are sitting on the sofa in their modest, Soviet-era apartment in Hanoi, speaking of the time back in the early 1970s when they first spotted each other working at a fertilizer plant in North Korea.

“I was standing, working on the manufacturing line, and I saw her working in the lab,” says her husband, who was on an internship at the plant. “And I said to myself, ‘I’m going to make her my wife.'”

It was a bold statement, given North Korea’s xenophobic reputation. He didn’t much care. “I’m not afraid of anything,” he says.

Canh started his campaign to woo Ri by watching her movements to figure out her schedule. He arranged to casually bump into her in the hallway. He said hi. She said hi back. And that gave him the courage to take the next step.

“I took a handkerchief I’d bought in Beijing and a photo of me taken with two of my friends,” he says. He snuck into her lab when no one else was there and asked if she had a boyfriend. She said no. He then presented her with the gift and asked if he could visit her home. She said yes.

“I had to take seven buses to get there,” he remembers. “And then I had to walk about three kilometers [2 miles] from the last bus station to her house.”

He continued these visits about once a week, he says, for the remainder of his stay — about another year. Both of them were fully aware of the danger of being caught by the authorities.

“They didn’t allow it, yes,” says Ri, remembering. “But I wasn’t strong enough to resist Canh. Because I knew I was in love with him. I knew I should stop loving him. But I couldn’t.”

Several months later, when he had to return to Vietnam, they met again. Ri feared it might be the last time. “Kill me,” Canh remembers Ri saying, desperate at the thought of living without him. “But I told her we loved each other. ‘There’s no reason to die,’ I said. I told her I would try my best to find opportunities to come back to her as soon as possible.”

And he did, several times in the next five years, wrangling invitations to be part of visiting delegations or offering to translate for others. The two sent letters, surreptitiously, in an era long before smartphones and texting. But letters sometimes went awry. Canh remembers taking a trip to North Korea in the late 1970s and sending Ri a letter, asking her to meet. It arrived a week too late. But they were still able to meet before he left.

“I was glad to see you, but then we had to separate again,” she says. “So, when Canh kept writing in his letters, ‘Love knows no boundary’ it made me upset. And the idea that the end of every meeting was just another separation made me a little afraid of seeing him again.”

Sometimes, when relations between the two countries soured, or when they thought the security services were onto them, the letters stopped. So did the visits. Starting in the late 1980s, the couple had no direct communication for more than a decade.

But there were other things on Ri’s mind in those years.

Pham Ngoc Canh and his wife Ri Yong Hui hold a photo from their early days of courtship in 1971, when he was in North Korea on an internship.

Nguyen Huy Kham/Reuters


hide caption

toggle caption

Nguyen Huy Kham/Reuters

Pham Ngoc Canh and his wife Ri Yong Hui hold a photo from their early days of courtship in 1971, when he was in North Korea on an internship.

Nguyen Huy Kham/Reuters

“My country back then,” she remembers, “every day was a struggle, every day people were on the brink of starvation since the 90s, because of the Arduous March.” That’s the term North Koreans use to refer to the famine that gripped their country, taking hundreds of thousands and perhaps millions of lives, including her mother’s.

Back then, she says, “I opened my eyes every morning thinking, ‘I did not die yet.’ So I couldn’t really think about Canh, because every day was like that.”

But in Hanoi, Canh was still scheming to reunite with her. As relations between the countries started to improve in the late 1980s, he started a personal charm offensive to, as he says, “build my personal credit with North Korea.”

He set up a Vietnam-North Korea friendship committee, raised money for a 7-ton of donation of rice and reached out to North Korean contacts in Hanoi. In 2001, he made an audacious move, using connections in the Foreign Ministry to deliver a letter pleading his case to Vietnam’s president — who was about to leave on a state visit to North Korea.

A few weeks later, a friend told him his gambit had worked.

“After I heard the president raised this issue, I thought, that’s it,” he says. “I’ve done all I can. But I knew in my heart that North Korea would say yes.”

He was right.

In late 2002, after the couple had waited 30 years, North Korea took the rare step of allowing one of its citizens to marry a foreigner.

There was a small ceremony in Pyongyang. Then Canh brought his wife back to her new home in Hanoi, where a bigger ceremony took place, with hundreds attending.

As the two of them sit on the sofa now, gently touching each other on the arm as they speak, they seem every bit as in love as they describe being back in 1971, when they first met.

“I don’t regret anything,” Canh says, laughing. “If I hadn’t met him, if I hadn’t come here, I would have been dead long before now.”

They don’t have much money, she says — she wishes they did so she could help her country more.

“I hope that there is some advancement in the coming summit,” too, she says. “That U.S.-North Korean relationship gets better, and that the U.S. lifts sanctions and helps North Korea so that North Korea can develop.”

But she admits to being a little sad for her husband, “because he went through a lot waiting for me,” she says. “And does not have any children because of that.”

Her husband just smiles. “No regrets,” he says gently. “I still feel the same now as I did then.” And, he says proudly, he was able to convince a country with nuclear weapons to change its mind.

Source Article from https://www.npr.org/2019/02/27/698501335/hes-vietnamese-shes-from-north-korea-they-had-to-wait-30-years-to-marry

BOSTON — In 1850, a Swiss-born Harvard University professor commissioned what are believed to be the earliest photos of American slaves. 

The images, known as daguerreotypes and taken in a South Carolina studio, are crude and dehumanizing — and they were used to promote racist beliefs.

Among the photographed: an African man named Renty and his daughter Delia. They were stripped naked and photographed from several angles. Professor Louis Agassiz, a biologist, had the photos taken to support an erroneous theory called polygenism that he and others used to argue African-Americans were inferior to white people.

Now, a woman who claims to be a direct descendant of that father and child – Tamara Lanier, the great-great-great granddaughter of Renty – is suing Harvard over the photos.

She’s accused Harvard of the wrongful seizure, possession and monetization of the images, ignoring her requests to “stop licensing the pictures for the university’s profit” and misrepresenting the ancestor she calls “Papa Renty.”

The university still owns the photos. Lanier, who resides in Connecticut and filed the suit against Harvard in Middlesex County Superior Court on Wednesday, is seeking an unspecified amount of damages from Harvard. She’s also demanding that the university give her family the photos.

In an interview with USA TODAY, Lanier said she’s presented Harvard with information about her direct lineage to Renty since around 2011 but the school has repeatedly turned down her requests to review the research.

“This will force them to look at my information. It will also force them to publicly have the discussion about who Renty was and restoring him his dignity.”

The suit, which lays out eight different legal claims, cites federal law over property rights, the Massachusetts law for the recovery of personal property and a separate state law about the unauthorized use of a name or picture for advertising purposes.

It also singles out the 13th Amendment to the Constitution, which abolished slavery, arguing that Harvard’s ongoing possession of the photos “reflects and is a continuation of core components or incidents of slavery.”

“For years, Papa Renty’s slave owners profited from his suffering – it’s time for Harvard to stop doing the same thing to our family,” Lanier said.

Who was Renty?

She called Renty a “proud man who, like so many enslaved men, women and children, endured years of unimaginable horrors.”

“Harvard’s refusal to honor our family’s history by acknowledging our lineage and its own shameful past is an insult to Papa Renty’s life and memory.”

The suit further claims Harvard has “never sufficiently repudiated Agassiz and his work.”

Harvard did not immediately return a request for comment shortly after the suit was filed.

Lanier is represented by the law firms of national civil rights attorney Benjamin Crump of Florida, who has worked high-profile cases for the families of Trayvon Martin and Michael Brown, as well as Connecticut-based attorney Michael Koskoff.

The photos taken in 1850 of Renty, Delia and 11 other slaves disappeared for more than a century but were rediscovered in 1976 in the attic of Harvard University’s Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology. 

One of the photos of Renty, showing him waist-up as he looks defiantly into the camera with a straight face, has four decades later turned into an iconic image of slavery in the U.S.  

The lawsuit argues that Harvard has used the Renty images to “enrich itself.” The image is on the the cover of a 2017 book, “From Site to Sight: Anthropology, Photography and the Power of Imagery,” published by the Peabody Museum and sold online by Harvard for $40.

The same photo was also displayed on the program for a 2017 conference that Harvard’s Radcliffe Institute for Advance Study hosted on the school’s relationship with slavery. 

According to Lanier’s attorneys, Harvard requires that people sign a contract in order to view the photos and pay a licensing fee to the university to reproduce the images.

Archives: Harvard Law drops controversial seal

“These images were taken under duress and Harvard has no right to keep them, let alone profit from them,” Koskoff said. “They are the rightful property of the descendants of Papa Renty.”

He accused Harvard of not wanting to tell the “full story” of how Renty’s image was seized – against the will of slaves for a professor who sought to “prove the inferiority” of the black race.

“Harvard continues to this day to honor him, and that’s an abomination,” Koskoff said.

The suit tries to chart how Lanier, a former chief probation officer in Norwich, Connecticut, has on multiple occasion sought to engage the university about the photos to no avail.

How the lawsuit began

Her attorneys say it began in 2011 when she wrote a letter to Harvard’s president at the time, Drew Faust, whose “evasive response” did not provide an opportunity to discuss returning the photos to Lanier’s family.

Five years later, she said she reached out to the student-run Harvard Crimson newspaper, but that its editor relayed that the story had been “killed” due to concerns by the Peabody Museum. 

In the university’s use of the images, plaintiffs contend that Harvard has “avoided the fact that the daguerreotypes were part of a study, overseen by a Harvard professor, to demonstrate racial inferiority of blacks.”

“When will they not condone slavery and finally free Renty? Because their actions denote something different than what they might say,” Crump said of Harvard.

“We are trying to tell as many people throughout America, and especially black people, that Renty does deserve the right to have his image. He was 169 years a slave, but based on this lawsuit, we sought to make sure he would be a slave no more.”

Agassiz was considered one of the greatest biologists and geologists in the world in the mid-19th century. But his record has become problematic over time. He was an opponent of Charles Darwin’s theory of evolution. And in fiercely subscribing to polygenism, he held the now-debunked belief that white people and African-Americans came from different species. 

The photos he commissioned were taken by J.T. Zealy in a studio in Columbia, South Carolina. He published them a month later in an article titled “The Diversity of Origin of the Human Races.”

Agassiz’s legacy still lives on at Harvard. He founded the school’s Museum of Comparative Zoology and his wife Elizabeth Cary Agassiz, also a Harvard researcher of natural history, was founder and the first president of Radcliffe College, now the Society for the Collegiate Instruction of Women. There’s a street in Cambridge named after Agassiz and a Harvard theater, the Agassiz House. 

Lanier has spent years researching and talking to genealogical experts who she said have validated her ancestry. 

Lanier said she began studying her lineage after her mother died in 2010 to follow up on family stories she heard about Papa Renty. She worked with Boston genealogist Chris Child, who is known for tracing ancestors of Barack Obama, according to a 2018 article in the Norwich Bulletin.

“It was a journey,” she said. “It was important to my mother that I write this story of who Papa Renty was down and to do a family tree.

“I made a promise to my mother,” she added. 

According to the newspaper, Lanier said that she believes she can trace her great-grandfather, named Renty Taylor and then Renty Thompson, to a plantation near Columbia, South Carolina, owned by Benjamin Franklin Taylor. This is where the photos are believed to have been taken.

She said she started providing Harvard evidence that she’s a descendant of Renty but that the school has been “non-responsive.” “Most importantly, I want the true story of who Renty is to be told. That’s all I’ve ever asked for.”

The Bulletin quoted Pamela Gerardi, the Peabody Museum’s director of external relations, who described the photos as “extremely delicate” and well cared for.

“We anticipate they will remain here in perpetuity,” she said at the time. “That’s what museums do.”

 

 

Source Article from https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2019/03/20/harvard-university-sued-descendants-slaves-over-photos-renty/3213537002/

“);var a = g[r.size_id].split(“x”).map((function(e) {return Number(e)})), s = u(a, 2);o.width = s[0],o.height = s[1]}o.rubiconTargeting = (Array.isArray(r.targeting) ? r.targeting : []).reduce((function(e, r) {return e[r.key] = r.values[0],e}), {rpfl_elemid: n.adUnitCode}),e.push(o)} else l.logError(“Rubicon bid adapter Error: bidRequest undefined at index position:” + t, c, d);return e}), []).sort((function(e, r) {return (r.cpm || 0) – (e.cpm || 0)}))},getUserSyncs: function(e, r, t) {if (!A && e.iframeEnabled) {var i = “”;return t && “string” == typeof t.consentString && (“boolean” == typeof t.gdprApplies ? i += “?gdpr=” + Number(t.gdprApplies) + “&gdpr_consent=” + t.consentString : i += “?gdpr_consent=” + t.consentString),A = !0,{type: “iframe”,url: n + i}}},transformBidParams: function(e, r) {return l.convertTypes({accountId: “number”,siteId: “number”,zoneId: “number”}, e)}};function m() {return [window.screen.width, window.screen.height].join(“x”)}function b(e, r) {var t = f.config.getConfig(“pageUrl”);return e.params.referrer ? t = e.params.referrer : t || (t = r.refererInfo.referer),e.params.secure ? t.replace(/^http:/i, “https:”) : t}function _(e, r) {var t = e.params;if (“video” === r) {var i = [];return t.video && t.video.playerWidth && t.video.playerHeight ? i = [t.video.playerWidth, t.video.playerHeight] : Array.isArray(l.deepAccess(e, “mediaTypes.video.playerSize”)) && 1 === e.mediaTypes.video.playerSize.length ? i = e.mediaTypes.video.playerSize[0] : Array.isArray(e.sizes) && 0

‘);$vidEndSlate.removeClass(‘video__end-slate–inactive’).addClass(‘video__end-slate–active’);}};CNN.autoPlayVideoExist = (CNN.autoPlayVideoExist === true) ? true : false;var configObj = {thumb: ‘none’,video: ‘politics/2019/03/31/sotu-mulvaney-russia.cnn’,width: ‘100%’,height: ‘100%’,section: ‘domestic’,profile: ‘expansion’,network: ‘cnn’,markupId: ‘large-media_0’,adsection: ‘const-article-pagetop’,frameWidth: ‘100%’,frameHeight: ‘100%’,posterImageOverride: {“mini”:{“width”:220,”type”:”jpg”,”uri”:”//cdn.cnn.com/cnnnext/dam/assets/190331112752-sotu-mulvaney-russia-00022114-small-169.jpg”,”height”:124},”xsmall”:{“width”:307,”type”:”jpg”,”uri”:”//cdn.cnn.com/cnnnext/dam/assets/190331112752-sotu-mulvaney-russia-00022114-medium-plus-169.jpg”,”height”:173},”small”:{“width”:460,”type”:”jpg”,”uri”:”//cdn.cnn.com/cnnnext/dam/assets/190331112752-sotu-mulvaney-russia-00022114-large-169.jpg”,”height”:259},”medium”:{“width”:780,”type”:”jpg”,”uri”:”http://www.noticiasdodia.onlinenewsbusiness.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/190331112752-sotu-mulvaney-russia-00022114-exlarge-169.jpg”,”height”:438},”large”:{“width”:1100,”type”:”jpg”,”uri”:”//cdn.cnn.com/cnnnext/dam/assets/190331112752-sotu-mulvaney-russia-00022114-super-169.jpg”,”height”:619},”full16x9″:{“width”:1600,”type”:”jpg”,”uri”:”//cdn.cnn.com/cnnnext/dam/assets/190331112752-sotu-mulvaney-russia-00022114-full-169.jpg”,”height”:900},”mini1x1″:{“width”:120,”type”:”jpg”,”uri”:”//cdn.cnn.com/cnnnext/dam/assets/190331112752-sotu-mulvaney-russia-00022114-small-11.jpg”,”height”:120}}},autoStartVideo = false,isVideoReplayClicked = false,callbackObj,containerEl,currentVideoCollection = [],currentVideoCollectionId = ”,isLivePlayer = false,mediaMetadataCallbacks,mobilePinnedView = null,moveToNextTimeout,mutePlayerEnabled = false,nextVideoId = ”,nextVideoUrl = ”,turnOnFlashMessaging = false,videoPinner,videoEndSlateImpl;if (CNN.autoPlayVideoExist === false) {autoStartVideo = true;if (autoStartVideo === true) {if (turnOnFlashMessaging === true) {autoStartVideo = false;containerEl = jQuery(document.getElementById(configObj.markupId));CNN.VideoPlayer.showFlashSlate(containerEl);} else {CNN.autoPlayVideoExist = true;}}}configObj.autostart = CNN.Features.enableAutoplayBlock ? false : autoStartVideo;CNN.VideoPlayer.setPlayerProperties(configObj.markupId, autoStartVideo, isLivePlayer, isVideoReplayClicked, mutePlayerEnabled);CNN.VideoPlayer.setFirstVideoInCollection(currentVideoCollection, configObj.markupId);videoEndSlateImpl = new CNN.VideoEndSlate(‘large-media_0’);function findNextVideo(currentVideoId) {var i,vidObj;if (currentVideoId && jQuery.isArray(currentVideoCollection) && currentVideoCollection.length > 0) {for (i = 0; i 0) {videoEndSlateImpl.showEndSlateForContainer();if (mobilePinnedView) {mobilePinnedView.disable();}}}}callbackObj = {onPlayerReady: function (containerId) {var playerInstance,containerClassId = ‘#’ + containerId;CNN.VideoPlayer.handleInitialExpandableVideoState(containerId);CNN.VideoPlayer.handleAdOnCVPVisibilityChange(containerId, CNN.pageVis.isDocumentVisible());if (CNN.Features.enableMobileWebFloatingPlayer &&Modernizr &&(Modernizr.phone || Modernizr.mobile || Modernizr.tablet) &&CNN.VideoPlayer.getLibraryName(containerId) === ‘fave’ &&jQuery(containerClassId).parents(‘.js-pg-rail-tall__head’).length > 0 &&CNN.contentModel.pageType === ‘article’) {playerInstance = FAVE.player.getInstance(containerId);mobilePinnedView = new CNN.MobilePinnedView({element: jQuery(containerClassId),enabled: false,transition: CNN.MobileWebFloatingPlayer.transition,onPin: function () {playerInstance.hideUI();},onUnpin: function () {playerInstance.showUI();},onPlayerClick: function () {if (mobilePinnedView) {playerInstance.enterFullscreen();playerInstance.showUI();}},onDismiss: function() {CNN.Videx.mobile.pinnedPlayer.disable();playerInstance.pause();}});/* Storing pinned view on CNN.Videx.mobile.pinnedPlayer So that all players can see the single pinned player */CNN.Videx = CNN.Videx || {};CNN.Videx.mobile = CNN.Videx.mobile || {};CNN.Videx.mobile.pinnedPlayer = mobilePinnedView;}if (Modernizr && !Modernizr.phone && !Modernizr.mobile && !Modernizr.tablet) {if (jQuery(containerClassId).parents(‘.js-pg-rail-tall__head’).length) {videoPinner = new CNN.VideoPinner(containerClassId);videoPinner.init();} else {CNN.VideoPlayer.hideThumbnail(containerId);}}},onContentEntryLoad: function(containerId, playerId, contentid, isQueue) {CNN.VideoPlayer.showSpinner(containerId);},onContentPause: function (containerId, playerId, videoId, paused) {if (mobilePinnedView) {CNN.VideoPlayer.handleMobilePinnedPlayerStates(containerId, paused);}},onContentMetadata: function (containerId, playerId, metadata, contentId, duration, width, height) {var endSlateLen = jQuery(document.getElementById(containerId)).parent().find(‘.js-video__end-slate’).eq(0).length;CNN.VideoSourceUtils.updateSource(containerId, metadata);if (endSlateLen > 0) {videoEndSlateImpl.fetchAndShowRecommendedVideos(metadata);}},onAdPlay: function (containerId, cvpId, token, mode, id, duration, blockId, adType) {/* Dismissing the pinnedPlayer if another video players plays an Ad */CNN.VideoPlayer.dismissMobilePinnedPlayer(containerId);clearTimeout(moveToNextTimeout);CNN.VideoPlayer.hideSpinner(containerId);if (Modernizr && !Modernizr.phone && !Modernizr.mobile && !Modernizr.tablet) {if (typeof videoPinner !== ‘undefined’ && videoPinner !== null) {videoPinner.setIsPlaying(true);videoPinner.animateDown();}}},onAdPause: function (containerId, playerId, token, mode, id, duration, blockId, adType, instance, isAdPause) {if (mobilePinnedView) {CNN.VideoPlayer.handleMobilePinnedPlayerStates(containerId, isAdPause);}},onTrackingFullscreen: function (containerId, PlayerId, dataObj) {CNN.VideoPlayer.handleFullscreenChange(containerId, dataObj);if (mobilePinnedView &&typeof dataObj === ‘object’ &&FAVE.Utils.os === ‘iOS’ && !dataObj.fullscreen) {jQuery(document).scrollTop(mobilePinnedView.getScrollPosition());playerInstance.hideUI();}},onContentPlay: function (containerId, cvpId, event) {var playerInstance,prevVideoId;if (CNN.companion && typeof CNN.companion.updateCompanionLayout === ‘function’) {CNN.companion.updateCompanionLayout(‘restoreEpicAds’);}clearTimeout(moveToNextTimeout);CNN.VideoPlayer.hideSpinner(containerId);if (Modernizr && !Modernizr.phone && !Modernizr.mobile && !Modernizr.tablet) {if (typeof videoPinner !== ‘undefined’ && videoPinner !== null) {videoPinner.setIsPlaying(true);videoPinner.animateDown();}}},onContentReplayRequest: function (containerId, cvpId, contentId) {if (Modernizr && !Modernizr.phone && !Modernizr.mobile && !Modernizr.tablet) {if (typeof videoPinner !== ‘undefined’ && videoPinner !== null) {videoPinner.setIsPlaying(true);var $endSlate = jQuery(document.getElementById(containerId)).parent().find(‘.js-video__end-slate’).eq(0);if ($endSlate.length > 0) {$endSlate.removeClass(‘video__end-slate–active’).addClass(‘video__end-slate–inactive’);}}}},onContentBegin: function (containerId, cvpId, contentId) {if (mobilePinnedView) {mobilePinnedView.enable();}/* Dismissing the pinnedPlayer if another video players plays a video. */CNN.VideoPlayer.dismissMobilePinnedPlayer(containerId);CNN.VideoPlayer.mutePlayer(containerId);if (CNN.companion && typeof CNN.companion.updateCompanionLayout === ‘function’) {CNN.companion.updateCompanionLayout(‘removeEpicAds’);}CNN.VideoPlayer.hideSpinner(containerId);clearTimeout(moveToNextTimeout);CNN.VideoSourceUtils.clearSource(containerId);jQuery(document).triggerVideoContentStarted();},onContentComplete: function (containerId, cvpId, contentId) {if (CNN.companion && typeof CNN.companion.updateCompanionLayout === ‘function’) {CNN.companion.updateCompanionLayout(‘restoreFreewheel’);}navigateToNextVideo(contentId, containerId);},onContentEnd: function (containerId, cvpId, contentId) {if (Modernizr && !Modernizr.phone && !Modernizr.mobile && !Modernizr.tablet) {if (typeof videoPinner !== ‘undefined’ && videoPinner !== null) {videoPinner.setIsPlaying(false);}}},onCVPVisibilityChange: function (containerId, cvpId, visible) {CNN.VideoPlayer.handleAdOnCVPVisibilityChange(containerId, visible);}};if (typeof configObj.context !== ‘string’ || configObj.context.length 0) {configObj.adsection = window.ssid;}CNN.autoPlayVideoExist = (CNN.autoPlayVideoExist === true) ? true : false;CNN.VideoPlayer.getLibrary(configObj, callbackObj, isLivePlayer);});CNN.INJECTOR.scriptComplete(‘videodemanddust’);

Source Article from https://www.cnn.com/2019/03/31/politics/mick-mulvaney-ethics-mueller-cnntv/index.html

“Y hoy el gobierno uruguayo nos escupe, nos humilla, nos desconoce, nos deprecia, nos defrauda, nos defraudó como nunca”, se lee en la invitación del evento organizado por Mauricio Slivinski‎ que tiene como objetivo reunir a los uruguayos que viven en Israel para protestar por la postura que ha adoptado el gobierno de José Mujica en torno al conflicto Israel-Palestina.

“Señores gobernantes de Uruguay, nos arrancaron un pedazo de nuestro, de nuestro sentir. Cómo perdonarlos. Por el Uruguay que perdimos, por el Uruguay que tenemos en el corazón”, sostiene una de las invitaciones.

La actividad será el próximo viernes 8 de agosto frente a la Embajada de Uruguay en Hertzlia (12244, Herzliya Pituach, C.P. 46733 TLV). El evento en Facebook fue creado el 2 de agosto y hasta el momento tiene más de 130 participantes de los 1.200 invitados.

El propio Slivinski‎ confirmó que el evento cuenta con la autorización policial correspondiente.

En un comunicado emitido la semana pasada, la Cancillería uruguaya sostiene que los ataques israelíes en la Franja de Gaza podían llegar a constituir crímenes de guerra. Días atrás, el presidente José Mujica calificó la respuesta de Israel a Hamas como un “genocidio”. 

Source Article from http://www.elpais.com.uy/informacion/uruguayos-israel-embajada-evento-conflicto.html

Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., said heads should roll at President Biden’s State Department following the botched Afghanistan troop withdrawal. 

The South Carolina senator took aim at Deputy Secretary of State Wendy Sherman’s performance during Wednesday’s press conference, saying he couldn’t “believe” his ears when Sherman “went through all of her efforts to improve the lives of Afghan women going back to 1997 and now believes that those words matter.”

REPUBLICAN SENATORS QUESTION BIDEN’S FITNESS FOR OFFICE AMID AFGHANISTAN DEBACLE

“The Biden Administration has abandoned Afghan women!” Graham tweeted. “The fate that awaits Afghan women, at the hands of the Taliban, is a direct result of the Biden Administration’s failure to adequately plan for an ill-conceived withdrawal.”

Graham called Sherman’s words touting “how much she cares for Afghan women” amid the controversy surrounding the Biden administration for their botched troop withdrawal “beyond shameless” and said it was time for a shake-up at the Department of State.

“The best thing that can happen for Afghan women is if those in charge of this debacle at the State Department resign and be replaced by more competent individuals,” Graham tweeted.

The senator’s words come as some of his colleagues question the president’s fitness for office amid the fallout from the fall of Afghanistan.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Florida Sen. Rick Scott told Fox News that it’s time to “ask the serious question of whether Joe Biden is fit to lead our nation as commander in chief,” while Wisconsin Sen. Ron Johnson said that the Afghanistan debacle is further evidence that Biden is “unfit for office.” 

Scott told Fox News in a statement Wednesday that Biden’s “massive failure of leadership cannot be ignored” and that it is “unconscionable” that the president would withdraw troops without “ensuring the safe evacuation of Americans and our allies.”

Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/politics/lindsey-graham-heads-should-roll-state-department-afghanistan

Sen. Elizabeth Warren wasn’t the first major American politician to put the idea of a tax on large fortunes on the political agenda.

Indeed, it’s been kicking around in one form or another since the late 1990s, when an influential then-independent rolled out a proposal that he framed as a way to reduce the national debt while preserving the interests of the 99 percent.

Here’s how the plan’s architect described it: “By my calculations, 1 percent of Americans, who control 90 percent of the wealth in this country, would be affected by my plan. The other 99 percent of the people would get deep reductions in their federal income taxes.”

His name? Donald Trump.

The Trump plan for debt elimination

Trump’s plan, as articulated during a 1999 flirtation with a Reform Party presidential bid, differed from Warren’s in three important respects.

One, he wanted the tax to be a one-time levy that would reduce the national debt and therefore reduce interest service payments. That reduction in payments would be the enduring win for the middle class, while rich people would just pay the tax once and then forget it. Warren’s plan would simply levy a smaller tax each year.

Two, he wanted a fairly hefty rate — 14.5 percent — that would have required a lot of rapid-fire liquidation of business assets. Warren’s rate structure is much lower than that.

Three, he set the threshold for his tax lower. While Warren wants to tax fortunes worth more than $50 million, Trump proposed taxing wealth starting at $10 million. This was in 1999, and there’s been some inflation since then, but even in inflation-adjusted dollars, the Trump tax cutoff is a bit below $15 million.

What’s more, Warren has a progressive rate structure: Assets worth between $50 million and $1 billion would be taxed at 2 percent, and assets above $1 billion taxed at 3 percent tax. Trump’s tax is flat but starts lower, so he soaks the kinda-sorta rich more relative to the super-duper rich. The plan didn’t really make a ton of sense, but it does underscore one reason that very wealthy people express a lot of anxiety about the national debt.

Trump’s plan had some problems — and some insight

One major issue with wealth taxes historically has been that actually collecting the funds is relatively difficult — financial assets are highly portable, and the rich people who own them have a strong incentive to find ways to avoid paying.

Warren’s proposal contains a few ideas to try to curb avoidance — including the simple but important step of increasing IRS funding — though, of course, there are no guarantees.

Trump’s one-time wealth tax would suffer from all the same challenges as Warren’s, except that by setting the rate much higher while also making it a one-time tax, he created enormous avoidance incentives and never came up with a plan to deal with them.

Perhaps more importantly, the whole concept of dedicating a massive effort to reducing the federal debt overhang is somewhat dubious. Trump’s idea was that paying off the national debt would reduce federal interest rate costs, allowing for a middle-class tax cut. Instead, the debt volume has increased dramatically since 1999, but federal debt service payments as a share of GDP are actually lower than they were back then, since interest rates have fallen dramatically.

Relatively little of that debt accrual took the form of middle-class tax cuts — Bush’s regressive tax cuts, a couple of wars, a major recession, and a new round of regressive Trump tax cuts were the bigger player — but if we’d wanted to enact a big middle-class tax cut in 1999, we could have just done that, rather than fussing around with exotic taxes.

However, Trump’s thinking here does raise an important point. If the country continues to be nonchalant about the deficit, there is at least some chance that at some future point, debt service costs will spike unexpectedly. And if that does happen, some kind of quick soak-the-rich tax scheme would be an attractive means of reducing those costs. So if you happen to be a very wealthy person, it makes a lot of sense to worry about long-term debt accumulation (because if it goes badly, you are likely to be stuck with the bill) and to prefer instead that we slowly but surely reduce the deficit by cutting retirement programs.

The issue is rarely debated squarely in those terms, but Trump floated essentially what would be a reasonable approach to dealing with a debt crisis. And very rich people tend to want to avoid that outcome.

Source Article from https://www.vox.com/2019/1/31/18203999/donald-trump-wealth-tax-14-5-percent

Son muchas las veces que hemos escuchado o leído noticias sobre aviones que han tenido que hacer un aterrizaje de emergencia debido a la falta de combustible, alguna avería en los motores o a causa del mal tiempo. Pero nunca habiamos visto una noticia en la cual comunicaba que un avión ha realizado un aterrizaje de emergencia debido a una invasión de ratas en la cabina del vuelo.

Según unas declaraciones de uno de los responsables de la compañía aérea Air India recogidas por el diario Times of India es que los roedores “podrían haber provocado un verdadero catástrofe si llegan a morder los cables del contro del avión”.

El aterrizaje ha ocurrido en un trayecto de Nueva Delhi a Calcuta al oeste del la India.

Por lo visto este hecho se produce confrecuencia, “los roedores son atraidas por el olor de los furgones de comida” que van a depositar en la aeronave, según unas declaraciones del personal de la aerolínea recogidas por el diario Times of India.

Los expertos señalan que la presencia de ratas en los aviones es algo “normal” en todo el mundo.

Por el contrario, lo pasajeros del vuelo se llevaron un buen susto pensado seguramente que todo el avión iba a ser invadido por los roedores, pero finalmente todo quedo en un susto y sigueiron el vuelo con total normalidad.

Source Article from http://www.ondacero.es/noticias/aterrizaje-emergencia-invasion-ratas-cabina-vuelo_2014080600266.html

Widgets Magazine

<!–

–>

var docUrl = document.URL;
var urlInfo = docUrl.split(“/”);
if ((urlInfo != null) && (urlInfo.length >= 4))
{
var seccion = urlInfo[3].toLowerCase();

switch (seccion) {

case “finanzas-personales”:
var cX = cX || {}; cX.callQueue = cX.callQueue || [];
cX.callQueue.push([‘insertWidget’, {
widgetId: ’61ed6820cb015fa491fc6fabda0a2f4927ca7127′,
insertBeforeElementId: ‘cx_61ed6820cb015fa491fc6fabda0a2f4927ca7127’,
width: 202, height: 137, renderTemplateUrl: ‘auto’
}]);

// Async load of cx.js
(function(d,s,e,t){e=d.createElement(s);e.type=’text/java’+s;e.async=’async’;
e.src=’http’+(‘https:’===location.protocol?’s://s’:’://’)+’cdn.cxense.com/cx.js’;
t=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];t.parentNode.insertBefore(e,t);})(document,’script’);
break;}}

–>

En las noticias más leídas del día, la tercera ronda de renegociaciones del TLCAN concluyó con las primeras aproximaciones a los temas complicados, entre ellos las Pymes. Marcas de ropa y accesorios dejaron atrás el interés de obtener ganancias propias y se unieron a las acciones para apoyar a las comunidades afectadas por terremoto y de los estadounidenses, 13% considera a su presidente como un incompetente o ignorante.

1. Pymes, primer capítulo cerrado rumbo a TLCAN 2.0

México, Estados Unidos y Canadá anunciaron que finalizaron la negociación del capítulo de Pymes y lograron “avances significativos” en el texto consolidado para actualizar el Tratado de Libre Comercio de América del Norte.

Los negociadores avanzaron significativamente en varias áreas mediante la consolidación de propuestas de texto, cerrando brechas y acordando elementos del texto de negociación, informaron en un comunicado conjunto.

2. Se concretan las amenazas de Donald Trump en la tercera ronda del TLCAN

Durante la tercera ronda de las renegociaciones del TLCAN, las amenazas de Donald Trump se concretaron, ya que pretenden reinventar y violar el comercio, aseveró Ildefonso Guajardo, secretario de Economía, quien se comprometió ante industriales de que “México no aceptará ninguna condición que nos ponga atrás de lo que ya hemos venido logrando”.

Al participar en la Reunión Anual de Industriales, el funcionario informó que “en la mesa de negociación no hay campo en el que Estados Unidos no quiera reinventar lo que hoy funciona perfectamente para las tres economías”, entre ellos el sector agropecuario.

3. Ayudar a México está de moda

Mientras conmemorábamos el sismo del 19 de septiembre de 1985, México se vio nuevamente cara a cara con un sismo de 7.1 grados que sacudió al territorio mexicanos. Luego de los daños devastadores que resultaron del sismo, ayudar en México se volvió una constante en las marcas de moda, que aprovecharon para darse a conocer mientras ayudaban.

Diversas marcas mexicanas se han dado a la tarea de ayudar con lo que mejor saben hacer, camisetas, tenis y joyería especialmente para apoyar a los damnificados. Las marcas de ropa mexicana como Primario, Loly In The Sky, Hangers y Mancandy vieron en el sismo una oportunidad de ayudar mientras se daban a conocer.

4. Trump y su imagen de idiota

No es novedad que Donald Trump ha nombrado con apodos a sus adversarios, entre ellos a Hillary Clinton, a quien bautizó como “Hillary la tramposa”. Recientemente arremetió contra el “hombre cohete”, Kim Jong-un, quien en respuesta eligió la palabra “dotard” (que literalmente se traduce como “viejo lunático”) para referirse a Trump.

Pero, ¿cuál es la imagen que tienen los estadounidenses sobre su presidente? Una encuesta de Washington Post-ABC News lo averiguó a través de un sondeo realizado a 1,002 adultos.

La pregunta concreta fue la siguiente: “Para usted, ¿qué palabra describe mejor a Trump?”. El ejercicio es interesante porque los encuestados mencionan la primera palabra que les aparece en su cabeza no es la que el presidente de Estados Unidos se imagina. ¿Quieres saber qué dijeron?, entra a la nota completa.

5. Binomio canino

Un cartón de Perujo.

@davee_son



var docUrl = document.URL;
var urlInfo = docUrl.split(“/”);
if ((urlInfo != null) && (urlInfo.length >= 4))
{
var seccion = urlInfo[3].toLowerCase();

switch (seccion) {

case “finanzas-personales”:
$(“#tecmon”).attr(“style”, “width:516px !important;height:194px;overflow:hidden;float:right;margin-bottom:-10px”);
var cX = cX || {}; cX.callQueue = cX.callQueue || [];
cX.callQueue.push([‘insertWidget’, {
widgetId: ‘bf09f9d581b1a89cfa1a414f3c30acebdc299ab6’,
insertBeforeElementId: ‘cx_bf09f9d581b1a89cfa1a414f3c30acebdc299ab6’,
width: 516, height: 185, renderTemplateUrl: ‘auto’
}]);

// Async load of cx.js
(function(d,s,e,t){e=d.createElement(s);e.type=’text/java’+s;e.async=’async’;
e.src=’http’+(‘https:’===location.protocol?’s://s’:’://’)+’cdn.cxense.com/cx.js’;
t=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];t.parentNode.insertBefore(e,t);})(document,’script’);
break;}}

–>

Source Article from http://eleconomista.com.mx/politica/2017/09/28/5-noticias-dia-28-septiembre

Conocido como el ‘Narco de Narcos’, Rafael Caro Quintero, es considerado una de las leyendas en la historia del tráfico de drogas en México. Nacido en Badiraguato, Sinaloa, el mismo pueblo de Joaquín ‘El Chapo’ Guzmán, Quintero, fue uno de los fundadores del mítico Cártel de Guadalajara, sus socios fueron Miguel Ángel Félix Gallardo y Ernesto Fonseca Carrillo “Don Neto”. Lea la noticia completa.

Source Article from http://www.laprensa.hn/honduras/974812-410/las-noticias-m%C3%A1s-impactantes-de-este-martes-28-de-junio-en-honduras


Murió Cerati: la primera nota de NOTICIAS post Soda Stereo

Es de noviembre de 2001. Lanzaba la película “+bien”. Y habló de todo: Soda, los redondos, Charly, la edad y el conocimiento como “presión creativa”.


Gustavo Cerati

“Una vez me ofrecieron producir a Shakira y dije que no. No me gusta”

NOTICIAS: ¿Por qué se lanzó al cine?

Gustavo Cerati: Eduardo Capilla, el director, es un artista plástico que trabajó conmigo en varias oportunidades. Y por eso pasó. No hay una intención premeditada de convertirme en actor. Me gustaba la idea de tomar la película como un hecho artístico. Tomar el cine como medio para hacer otra cosa. Desde el título, “+bien”, para mí era una situación que me empujaba a ser parte. Y obvio, me interesaba hacer la música. Queríamos hacer una película pop, esa fue la actitud. Hay una intención artística que valoro, sea o no un clásico lenguaje de cine.

NOTICIAS: ¿La forma define todo?

Cerati: Por supuesto. En este caso había una fuerte idea estética previa. A lo mejor tiene más que ver con las instalaciones visuales que el director hace, que con una historia que se pueda relacionar. Es muy difícil hacer una película, que la gente pueda verla y la entienda como tiene que ser.

NOTICIAS: ¿Vio las imágenes antes de componer la música? ¿Cómo fue ese proceso?

Cerati: De alguna manera, al estar metido en el proyecto, iba guardando cosas que me iban saliendo aunque no supiera cuáles iban a ser las imágenes. Por eso la música fue cambiando todo el tiempo.

NOTICIAS: Algo interesante en la película tiene que ver con la visión negativa del saber. ¿Cuáles son los peligros del conocimiento?

Cerati: La sensación que yo tengo es de que planteamos el conocimiento humano como una forma de enfrascar la creatividad. Cerramos la posibilidad entender las cosas de otra manera.

NOTICIAS: Una crítica a la razón.

Cerati: Sí. El conocimiento es una prisión y no podemos escapar a ella. La vida está llena de momentos en los que uno no puede más, donde no debería poder más. Pero la visión de las cosas puede cambiar radicalmente. Conocía las cosas de esa manera, que podían ser de otra.

NOTICIAS: ¿En qué momentos quisiera olvidar lo que conoce?

Cerati: Muchas veces… cuando no conocés nada, la libertad de intromisión… que está mezclada con la timidez de abordar algo, es generalmente magnífica.

NOTICIAS: Hace unos años, Paul McCartney hizo una ópera y se jactaba de que su falta de conocimiento teórico lo liberaba.

Cerati: Si uno desarrolla los anticuerpos creativos para utilizar el saber, no dejo de maravillarme por las cosas que se pueden lograr. Tener un tremendo conocimiento, como Mozart pero no es un conocimiento teórico, técnico… es…

NOTICIAS: Espiritual.

Cerati: Sí, de sensibilidad espiritual. Es una actitud que se va desarrollando, que tiene que ver con la ruptura y que, al final, transforma las cosas en un hecho artístico.

NOTICIAS: ¿Es el camino a seguir?

Cerati: Algunos movimientos míos son así. Aunque me vivo traicionando en ese sentido. Mi búsqueda intenta que todo sea así. Decir todo es medio pretencioso, porque son un montón de cosas. Terminás una película, viene un disco… todos son espacios creativos. Pero algunos son más interesantes que otros.

NOTICIAS: Calamaro propone no moverse del momento mismo de la creación y editar canciones casi sin corregirlas.

Cerati: No creo que vaya por ese lado. No tengo esa personalidad. Creo que el primer impulso siempre es importante y me gusta registrarlo. Pero no tiene porque ser el mejor. A mí me gusta volver sobre las mismas cosas y darles otra lectura. A veces tanto, que las cosas no salen. Aunque a veces logran encontrar su espacio.

NOTICIAS: ¿Cómo es crecer para una estrella de rock?

Cerati: Lo que pasa es que yo quiero hacer cosas que estén buenas. Separo más la paja del trigo que antes. Por su puesto la edad, bah… la cronología de los acontecimientos que es decir lo mis mo…, va generando otras cosas, otros rumbos. No condiciono la masividad a lo que hago. Pero no cambié demasiado con respecto a como era antes. Sólo que ahora tiendo a estar más tranquilo. Cosa que antes no me preocupaba.

NOTICIAS: A Charly no le pasa lo mismo. Cada vez está menos tranquilo.

Cerati: Me encantó eso que dijo el día de su cumpleaños. “Me decían ‘cuando cumplas 50 vas a ver’. Los cumplo hoy y todavía no vi nada.” Él es único en su tipología. La unión que hace entre estrella de rock y artista es solamente de él. Me parece admirable, una persona de la cual se aprende.

NOTICIAS: A Charly no le pasa lo mismo. Cada vez está menos tranquilo.

Cerati: Me encantó eso que dijo el día de su cumpleaños. “Me decían ‘cuando cumplas 50 vas a ver’. Los cumplo hoy y todavía no vi nada.” Él es único en su tipología. La unión que hace entre estrella de rock y artista es solamente de él. Me parece admirable, una persona de la cual se aprende.

NOTICIAS: En el rock argentino no pasa mucho. Y todo se espera de usted, de Charly, de Calamaro, de Fito Páez.

Cerati: Sí…. el parnaso de los solistas. Pero es algo que se va decantando con el tiempo. Eso tiene que ver con la masividad. Hay gente que quizá no sea tan popular pero que, como influencia, es superimportante. Por supuesto, gente que ya no está también. Es una especie de premio de cera que te dan, como un museo, para los que van haciendo mucho. Yo nunca miro en esos términos. Ok, son paterns. Pero nada más.

NOTICIAS: Ya produjo a Leo García. ¿Produciría a Natalia Oreiro?

Cerati: Tiene que pasar una situación que me movilicé. Que me involucre. Eso fue lo que pasó con Leo (García). Fue por cercanía. No creo que me guste la idea de ser productor. No es una actividad que en sí misma me seduzca. Una vez me ofrecieron producir a Shakira.

NOTICIAS: ¿Y?

Cerati: Y dije que no. Porque no llegó en el momento justo. Más allá de que no me gusta lo que ella hace. Aunque hay algo muy energético ahí. A mis hijos les encanta… entiendo la energía, si no, no estaría en el lugar que está. Lo cual no deja de ser interesante. Pero no llegó en el momento justo. A veces pienso que no estaría mal trabajar en algo que no tenga punto de contacto con uno.

NOTICIAS: Bueno, hizo publicidad.

Cerati: A veces la gente se sorprende por cosas que hago. Lo que ocurre es que las cosas llegan cuando tienen que llegar y, de pronto, en ese momento, sí tengo el espíritu para hacerlas. No es que no hay una razón. Por supuesto que la hay… puede ser monetaria, por ejemplo. El punto es que hay momentos en los que no me molesta y otros en los que sí. No tengo más nada que decir sobre eso.

NOTICIAS: ¿Le interesa la fiesta Creamfield? ¿Los dj son músicos?

Cerati: Lo primero es el amor por la música, el querer estar con la música mucho. Está el crítico de rock, que también es músico. Las fronteras se pueden desdibujar porque parten de estímulos muy parecidos. Hay cosas muy claras de la profesión del dj: producir un efecto en la pista. Pero la frontera queda como una cosa más escolástica, hay dj que producen, que escriben, que son músicos, hay músicos que hacen de dj. Todo eso se mueve gracias a Dios.

NOTICIAS: ¿Hay una necesidad mucho más fuerte de bailar que de escuchar

discos?

Cerati: Una cosa no desplaza a la otra. El funcionamiento de la sociedad hace que las cosas se vayan estipulando como especímenes. El todo a veces se pierde, y uno cree que el todos una cosa u otra y no es así. A mí me gusta mucha música bailable. Es cierto que hay cosas que no son interesantes, que son repeticiones que ya viste mil veces. No me gusta la música que te arenga hacia un lugar quieto y bobo. Lo que pasa es que dentro de esos espacios hay posibilidades creativas. Porque cuando uno baila no solamente está sacudiendo el cuerpo, hay un montón de emociones en movimiento.

NOTICIAS: ¿Qué cambiaría de Soda?

Cerati: No puedo imaginarme cambiando piezas para atrás, sin que se me desarmen las que tengo ahora. Podríamos haber tenido un mejor diálogo en la última parte… pero tuvimos el que tuvimos. Pero es así como se van separando las cosas, también lo entiendo. No cambiaría nada.

NOTICIAS: ¿Cómo vivía la rivalidad con Los Redondos? ¿Los escucha?

Cerati: Musicalmente, no me gustan. Nunca sentí ningún interés por Los Redondos, jamás.

La rivalidad fue mediática. Hay mucha gente que vibra con eso. De alguna manera, le entra por un lugar de necesidad musical que está muy bien. Ellos tuvieron un espíritu artístico muy importante en sus comienzos y creo que después su música se estandarizó demasiado. En un punto tal, que a mí se me hace imposible entrar en eso. He tratado. Pero no pude. En ese aspecto no tienen nada que ver con Soda Stereo.

NOTICIAS: ¿Cómo está su relación con Déborah de Corral?

Cerati: No quiero hablar de eso. Lo hablo con mis amigos ¿viste? No es el momento para mí. Y no creo que llegue.

NOTICIAS: ¿Qué está leyendo?

Cerati: Ahora nada… estaba empezando un libro del Tao de la física pero recién comencé.

NOTICIAS: ¿Estudia las filosofías orientales?

Cerati: No mucho. Pero algunas cosas me interesan. Hace poco tuve un encuentro muy interesante en México. Hicimos un concierto con el cantante de Café Tacuba, algunos artistas mexicanos y con unos monjes hindúes que además son músicos. Fue impresionante. Tienen un estudio de grabación del carajo en el medio de la India, me invitaron y pienso ir. Es fascinante lo que pasa a ese nivel… ves esas sonrisas y decís, ¿qué estoy haciendo?

Lila Jara y Guido Bilbao

Murió Gustavo Cerati | “Del mismo dolor vendrá un nuevo amanecer”


 




Source Article from http://noticias.perfil.com/2014-09-04-52039-la-primera-nota-de-noticias-al-cerati-post-soda-stereo/

It was a landslide victory for Governor Gavin Newsom on Tuesday when a large majority of Californians voted against his recall. Had that not been the case, conservative talk-show host Larry Elder would have been elected the first Black governor in the state’s history, as he easily beat the more than three dozen others on the ballot seeking to replace Newsom.

In a 32-minute post-election interview, Newsweek got Elder’s thoughts on what went wrong, what went right and what comes next, and the media-savvy former candidate didn’t pull any punches.

Newsweek: Are you still a Libertarian or are you now a Republican?

Larry Elder: I was always both. I was always a small “L” libertarian and registered Republican, just like Milton Friedman.

Newsweek: Has the Republican party made you an offer to head the RNC in California or nationally?

Elder: Has anybody called me and said, ‘Hey, do you want a job?’ No. But have I gotten support from Republicans up and down the state and nationally? Yes. I haven’t gotten an offer to head the RNC, nor would I expect one.

Newsweek: So you’ll be getting your own TV show?

Elder: I have no idea. I was not running to get a TV show. I’ve been on television many, many times. By the way, I started out in television, even though people call me a radio host. When offers come, I’ll consider them. But right now, I’m just chilling, figuring out what to do with my new-found footprint that I didn’t have before.

Newsweek: But you said you’re not going back to your radio show.

Elder: I didn’t say that.

Newsweek: At your election party you referred to yourself as a ‘former radio host.’

Elder: That was tongue in cheek. My goodness. I wasn’t hosting radio during my campaign, but I didn’t mean I’d never go back to radio. Really, Paul, look into my baby brown libertarian eyeballs — I honestly don’t know what I’ll do next.

Newsweek: Why did you lose to Gavin Newsom?

Elder: Because he outspent me five to one and we’re outnumbered two-to-one Democrat compared to Republican. Even independents outnumber Republicans in California, and Newsom was successfully able to scare people into thinking I’d do everything but reenact slavery. The only actual issue he discussed was that I am anti-vax, which I’m not. I would have had a very different approach to coronavirus, and that’s accurate. He never defended his record on crime, homelessness, how he shut down the economy or how he shut down schools while his kids were enjoying in-person private education and he was yucking it up at the French Laundry while incurring a $12,000 wine tab. I don’t know what he was drinking, but it sure wasn’t Mad Dog 2020. He didn’t mention wildfires and how he mismanaged forests, or a water shortage, or rolling brownouts, or how people are leaving California for the first time. All he did was say “Republican takeover” over and over and show Larry Elder and Donald Trump side-by-side, and it worked, because 83 percent of Democrats believe Trump is a racist, and 61 percent believe all Republicans are racist slash sexist slash bigoted.

Newsweek: The ad with you and Trump was funded by Netflix founder Reed Hastings, and it claimed it was a matter of life and death that you be defeated. Did that surprise you?

Elder: Nothing surprised me. I’ve been critical of the media for a long time. When I decided to run, I knew that the wrath of God was going to come down on me. The flat-out lies didn’t surprise me, like “Larry Elder is anti-vax.” I’m vaccinated and I encourage people to get vaccinated, but I also encourage freedom.

Newsweek: I spoke to celebrities who supported you and they told me that the ad from Hastings sent a chill through conservative Hollywood, as if to say, ‘if you want a relationship with Netflix, you’d better not support Elder.’ Does that make sense to you?

Elder: Of course it does. Two high-profile Hollywood people who support me, Clint Eastwood and Jon Voight, said that I could say they support me but that they wouldn’t put out a statement. Voight later allowed me to post a picture of me and him. And I’m not mad about them not giving a statement, I’m just telling you that this is how it rolls in this state and in this open-minded, tolerant industry.

Newsweek: So you’re saying the media didn’t cover you fairly?

Elder: I put a tweet out, Paul, saying that only in America could a Black man become president and be called the Black face of white supremacy. And not one reporter has said to me, ‘well, Larry, you got smoked on the recall, but, my God, you smoked all these Republicans. You got 47 percent and the next Republican got nine or 10, and you were only campaigning for seven weeks!’ Paul, it is stunning what I have done. I am actually stunned by the margin of my victory.

Newsweek: So then you have further political aspirations, perhaps nationally?

Elder: Stay tuned.

Gubernatorial recall candidate Larry Elder speaks to supporters at an election night event on September 14, 2021 in Costa Mesa, California.
Mario Tama/Getty Images

Newsweek: What’s the biggest problem in California and how should Newsom solve it?

Elder: Crime, the fact that people are leaving because they can’t afford a house, and homelessness. I have no idea what he’ll do about those because if he did, he would have mentioned it in his commercials. He didn’t. He’s clueless. He lives in a $5 million house in a gated community. He got attacked during his campaign by a mentally ill homeless person and his security crew took care of it. The things that working-class people have to deal with don’t affect him at all. I believe it will take California hitting rock bottom, like an alcoholic, before we turn this around, because all he had to say was ‘Trump’ and ‘Republican takeover,’ and people got scared and pulled the lever for him. They hate Republicans more than the rise in crime, rise in cost of living, rise of homelessness, rolling brownouts and wildfires. It’s a remarkable achievement by the left and they did it with the complicity of the media.

Newsweek: Was it a fair election with no irregularities?

Elder: We know that a bunch of people in Republican districts tried to vote and were told they already voted. It was investigated, and they eventually were able to vote, but if that’s not an irregularity, I don’t know what is. When all is said and done, with the margin of victory, whatever shenanigans there may or may not have been won’t matter, but we all should have an interest in making sure the election was handled with integrity. I’ll tell you one thing more, Paul; I was asked repeatedly by reporters if I thought Joe Biden won the 2020 election fair and square. I told several reporters, and none of them did anything with it, that just once I’d like them to ask Newsom if Trump won the 2016 election fair and square, because for four years Hilary Clinton said the election was stolen from her and that Trump was illegitimate, and the result is that 66 percent of Democrats, according to a YouGov poll, believe that Russians changed vote tallies. Never mind a 1,000-page report that said the Russians did not change a single vote tally … a greater percentage of Democrats believe the 2016 election was stolen than Republicans believe the 2020 election was stolen. Even if Newsom said he believed Trump won in 2016, the next question should be whether Hillary Clinton should have her social media platform shut down for pushing the big lie the way Trump has had his shut down. Nobody ever asked him. Nobody. One reporter said, ‘well, that’s what-aboutism.’ I said, ‘no, it’s called consistency and being fair.’

Newsweek: Do you regret your decision to run?

Elder: Not for one moment. Nor am I surprised about anything. I complained about being called ‘the Black face of white supremacy and ‘the Black David Duke,’ but I certainly anticipated it, because I have zero respect for the media. They are the public relations bureau for the Democrats. They long stopped even trying to be objective. I just hope that now people are seeing what I’ve been seeing for decades. I know that even people at the L.A. Times were embarrassed about a columnist calling me ‘the Black face of white supremacy,’ because they told me they were. But not only was she not fired, she was on PBS, so our taxpayer dollars were hosting a woman who said that about me. Scottie, beam me the hell up.

Newsweek: So at your election night party, your handlers told you not to talk to me. Did you like having handlers?

Elder: Every candidate has handlers. It didn’t bother me. But ultimately the candidate decides what to do. I got advice I didn’t follow, and was happy I didn’t. I also got advice I didn’t follow and later regretted it. Most candidates have been at it for years and have relationships, but I had to do it on the fly with people I didn’t know. I went through a few campaign managers before finding the right one.

Newsweek: What’s an example of you not taking advice, or taking it and regretting you did?

Elder: I did an interview with the L.A. Times where I jumped all over them for calling me ‘the Black face of white supremacy,’ and my communications manager was not happy with how combative I was. But she soon learned that that’s why people like me, because I’m authentic and I fight back, so she began to tailor her advice to my personality. Another time, the Today Show asked me if I’d appoint a Republican to replace Sen. Dianne Feinstein. I knew it was a question designed to upset Democrats, so I didn’t answer it directly. Afterwards, one of my handlers told me I should have just said, ‘yes,’ and I should have. I regret fumbling around and not being myself.

Newsweek: You did sound a little more stifled on the campaign trail than on radio, no?

Elder: Oh come on. It’s a different thing. On the radio I’m taking calls and giving my opinion on events of that day; on the campaign trail I was discussing issues.

Newsweek: At your party, there was a guy dancing around with a giant cutout of your head. Is that sort of adulation giving you a big head?

Elder: No, but there definitely was adulation. There’s no question. I was treated like a rock star; like a Beatle. Experienced people told me they’ve never seen anything like it. I thought I’d have a connection, but, my goodness, middle-age men, forget about women, came up to me crying because they were thinking of leaving California until I entered the race. I did not expect that.

Newsweek: Well, you’ve painted a grim picture of California. Are people right to be moving out?

Elder: Do you think things are going to get better? I don’t see any evidence of that. Just recently at a restaurant on Melrose that I’ve eaten at, people in masks held up diners at gunpoint and took their purses and watches, and Newsom has released 20,000 convicted felons early, even though studies say the majority of them are likely to re-offend. We have a law that allows people to steal up to $950, not just a day, but at multiple stores in a day, without any fear of going to prison because they’re not a felon, and we have district attorneys who are soft on crime and support cashless bail, and there’s no consequences if they simply don’t show up to court. You tell me if people should leave. It’s bleak in California. I wasn’t kidding when I said it’s got great resources — where else can you go surfing in the ocean and skiing in the mountains in one day? — but it’s being ruined by horrible leadership.

Newsweek: The accusation I have heard that hurt you most were reports saying you wanted former slaveholders to get reparations. Is that the case?

Elder: Oh good grief. No one on the campaign trail ever asked me about that, just members of the media. I was being interviewed by Candace Owens, and I said that reparations is the extraction of money from people who were never slaveholders to people who were never slaves. If you really want to play this game, the Dred Scott decision called slaves property. It was vulgar, but that’s what the Supreme Court said. But people always leave this part out; the slave trade could have never existed without African chieftains selling people to Arab and European slavers. Should we get reparations from them? It was a long conversation that was boiled down to, ‘Elder believes white slave owners should get reparations.’ It’s totally unfair.

Source Article from https://www.newsweek.com/larry-elder-speaks-newsweek-why-he-lost-gavin-newsom-what-he-may-do-next-1630009