Most Viewed Videos

Widgets Magazine

<!–

–>

var docUrl = document.URL;
var urlInfo = docUrl.split(“/”);
if ((urlInfo != null) && (urlInfo.length >= 4))
{
var seccion = urlInfo[3].toLowerCase();

switch (seccion) {

case “finanzas-personales”:
var cX = cX || {}; cX.callQueue = cX.callQueue || [];
cX.callQueue.push([‘insertWidget’, {
widgetId: ’61ed6820cb015fa491fc6fabda0a2f4927ca7127′,
insertBeforeElementId: ‘cx_61ed6820cb015fa491fc6fabda0a2f4927ca7127’,
width: 202, height: 137, renderTemplateUrl: ‘auto’
}]);

// Async load of cx.js
(function(d,s,e,t){e=d.createElement(s);e.type=’text/java’+s;e.async=’async’;
e.src=’http’+(‘https:’===location.protocol?’s://s’:’://’)+’cdn.cxense.com/cx.js’;
t=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];t.parentNode.insertBefore(e,t);})(document,’script’);
break;}}

–>

En las noticias más leídas del día, la tercera ronda de renegociaciones del TLCAN concluyó con las primeras aproximaciones a los temas complicados, entre ellos las Pymes. Marcas de ropa y accesorios dejaron atrás el interés de obtener ganancias propias y se unieron a las acciones para apoyar a las comunidades afectadas por terremoto y de los estadounidenses, 13% considera a su presidente como un incompetente o ignorante.

1. Pymes, primer capítulo cerrado rumbo a TLCAN 2.0

México, Estados Unidos y Canadá anunciaron que finalizaron la negociación del capítulo de Pymes y lograron “avances significativos” en el texto consolidado para actualizar el Tratado de Libre Comercio de América del Norte.

Los negociadores avanzaron significativamente en varias áreas mediante la consolidación de propuestas de texto, cerrando brechas y acordando elementos del texto de negociación, informaron en un comunicado conjunto.

2. Se concretan las amenazas de Donald Trump en la tercera ronda del TLCAN

Durante la tercera ronda de las renegociaciones del TLCAN, las amenazas de Donald Trump se concretaron, ya que pretenden reinventar y violar el comercio, aseveró Ildefonso Guajardo, secretario de Economía, quien se comprometió ante industriales de que “México no aceptará ninguna condición que nos ponga atrás de lo que ya hemos venido logrando”.

Al participar en la Reunión Anual de Industriales, el funcionario informó que “en la mesa de negociación no hay campo en el que Estados Unidos no quiera reinventar lo que hoy funciona perfectamente para las tres economías”, entre ellos el sector agropecuario.

3. Ayudar a México está de moda

Mientras conmemorábamos el sismo del 19 de septiembre de 1985, México se vio nuevamente cara a cara con un sismo de 7.1 grados que sacudió al territorio mexicanos. Luego de los daños devastadores que resultaron del sismo, ayudar en México se volvió una constante en las marcas de moda, que aprovecharon para darse a conocer mientras ayudaban.

Diversas marcas mexicanas se han dado a la tarea de ayudar con lo que mejor saben hacer, camisetas, tenis y joyería especialmente para apoyar a los damnificados. Las marcas de ropa mexicana como Primario, Loly In The Sky, Hangers y Mancandy vieron en el sismo una oportunidad de ayudar mientras se daban a conocer.

4. Trump y su imagen de idiota

No es novedad que Donald Trump ha nombrado con apodos a sus adversarios, entre ellos a Hillary Clinton, a quien bautizó como “Hillary la tramposa”. Recientemente arremetió contra el “hombre cohete”, Kim Jong-un, quien en respuesta eligió la palabra “dotard” (que literalmente se traduce como “viejo lunático”) para referirse a Trump.

Pero, ¿cuál es la imagen que tienen los estadounidenses sobre su presidente? Una encuesta de Washington Post-ABC News lo averiguó a través de un sondeo realizado a 1,002 adultos.

La pregunta concreta fue la siguiente: “Para usted, ¿qué palabra describe mejor a Trump?”. El ejercicio es interesante porque los encuestados mencionan la primera palabra que les aparece en su cabeza no es la que el presidente de Estados Unidos se imagina. ¿Quieres saber qué dijeron?, entra a la nota completa.

5. Binomio canino

Un cartón de Perujo.

@davee_son



var docUrl = document.URL;
var urlInfo = docUrl.split(“/”);
if ((urlInfo != null) && (urlInfo.length >= 4))
{
var seccion = urlInfo[3].toLowerCase();

switch (seccion) {

case “finanzas-personales”:
$(“#tecmon”).attr(“style”, “width:516px !important;height:194px;overflow:hidden;float:right;margin-bottom:-10px”);
var cX = cX || {}; cX.callQueue = cX.callQueue || [];
cX.callQueue.push([‘insertWidget’, {
widgetId: ‘bf09f9d581b1a89cfa1a414f3c30acebdc299ab6’,
insertBeforeElementId: ‘cx_bf09f9d581b1a89cfa1a414f3c30acebdc299ab6’,
width: 516, height: 185, renderTemplateUrl: ‘auto’
}]);

// Async load of cx.js
(function(d,s,e,t){e=d.createElement(s);e.type=’text/java’+s;e.async=’async’;
e.src=’http’+(‘https:’===location.protocol?’s://s’:’://’)+’cdn.cxense.com/cx.js’;
t=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];t.parentNode.insertBefore(e,t);})(document,’script’);
break;}}

–>

Source Article from http://eleconomista.com.mx/politica/2017/09/28/5-noticias-dia-28-septiembre

Escribe el texto del campo superior
Debe rellenar este campo

Source Article from http://www.telecinco.es/mundialbrasil2014/Veronica_Brunati-Cholo_Simeone-Topo_Lopez_0_1824900355.html

Source Article from https://www.cnn.com/2021/12/28/us/ghislaine-maxwell-trial-tuesday/index.html

Good morning.

The murder case against Kyle Rittenhouse was thrown into jeopardy Wednesday when his lawyers asked for a mistrial over what appeared to be out-of-bounds questions asked of Rittenhouse by the chief prosecutor.

Rittenhouse is on trial on charges of killing two men and injuring a third during protests in Kenosha, Wisconsin, last year after a local Black man was shot by a white police officer. The startling turn came after Rittenhouse took the stand and testified that he was under attack when he shot the three men.

“I defended myself,” the 18-year-old said. During cross-examination, the prosecutor Thomas Binger asked Rittenhouse whether it was appropriate to use deadly force to protect property. Binger also posed questions about Rittenhouse’s silence after his arrest.

At that, the jury was ushered out of the room, and the circuit judge Bruce Schroeder loudly and angrily accused Binger of pursuing an improper line of questioning and trying to introduce testimony that the judge earlier said he was inclined to prohibit.

  • What did the defense ask for? A mistrial with prejudice, meaning that if one is granted, Rittenhouse cannot be retried over the shootings.

  • Will there be a mistrial? The judge did not immediately rule on the request and is allowing the trial to continue.

  • What did Binger say? He told the judge he had been acting in good faith, but the judge replied: “I don’t believe that.”

China and the US announce plan to work together on cutting emissions

China’s special climate envoy, Xie Zhenhua, speaks during the joint China and US statement. Photograph: Jeff J Mitchell/Getty Images

An unexpected agreement between the US and China to work together on cutting emissions has been broadly welcomed by leaders and climate experts.

The world’s two biggest emitters appeared to put aside their differences at the Cop26 climate summit and on Wednesday unveiled a joint declaration that would bring close cooperation on emissions cuts that scientists say are needed in the next 10 years to keep global temperatures within 1.5C of pre-industrial levels.

The agreement calls for “concrete and pragmatic” regulations in decarbonisation, reducing methane emissions and fighting deforestation, the Chinese climate envoy, Xie Zhenhua, said in Glasgow.

The two countries will revive a working group that will “meet regularly to address the climate crisis and advance the multilateral process, focusing on enhancing concrete actions in this decade”, the joint declaration said.

  • Was the move welcomed? It was broadly welcomed by global leaders and climate experts, with the UN secretary general, António Guterres, calling the move “an important step in the right direction”.

  • Is this the first pact between US-China on climate? No, there was a bilateral agreement in 2014 which gave momentum to the historic Paris accord the following year, but that cooperation stopped with the Trump administration.

Republicans who voted for Biden’s infrastructure bill threatened with retaliation

David McKinley of West Virginia, right, was among 13 Republicans to vote for the infrastructure bill. Photograph: J Scott Applewhite/AP

A group of congressional Republicans who helped pass the Biden administration’s infrastructure bill last Friday are facing calls for political punishment by their own party, including the threat of having their committee assignments stripped for supporting the president’s agenda, according to reports this week.

Several hardline Republicans, including the Colorado congresswoman Lauren Boebert and former Trump White House chief of staff Mark Meadows, have publicly urged retaliation against party colleagues who voted for the $1tn bill.

Some members who were among the GOP rank and file who helped the bill pass the House say they have received death threats.

Many of the Republicans who backed the bipartisan bill have ranking positions on full committees or subcommittees, including the homeland security committee and the natural resources committee.

  • Would the bill have gone through without the Republicans? No – the bill, which passed 228 to 206, would have failed if no Republicans voted for it in the House late last Friday.

  • Is this a sign of trouble in the Republican party? Certain GOP divides in Washington have grown in recent weeks , especially in relation to the bipartisan committee investigating the Capitol insurrection of 6 January.

‘We’ve made history’: Flint water crisis victims to receive $626m settlement

‘We’ve made history and hopefully it sets a precedent to maybe don’t poison people,’ one Flint resident said. Photograph: Carlos Osorio/AP

A federal judge has approved a $626m settlement for victims of the lead water crisis in Flint, Michigan, which was one of the country’s worst public health crises in recent memory, in a case brought by tens of thousands of residents affected by the contaminated water.

Announcing the settlement on Tuesday, district judge Judith Levy called it a “remarkable achievement” that “sets forth a comprehensive compensation program and timeline that is consistent for every qualifying participant”.

Most of the money will come from the state of Michigan, which was accused of repeatedly overlooking the risks of using the Flint River without properly treating the water.

“This is a historic and momentous day for the residents of Flint, who will finally begin to see justice served,” said Ted Leopold, one of the lead attorneys in the litigation.

  • What happened to the water in Flint? The city’s troubles began in 2014 after it switched its water supply to the Flint River to cut costs. Corrosive river water caused lead to leach from pipes, contaminating the drinking water and causing an outbreak of legionnaires’ disease.

  • How will the money be distributed? Payouts from the settlement approved on Wednesday will be made based on a formula that directs more money to younger claimants and to those who can prove greater injury.

In other news …

The attorney for Arbery’s family, Benjamin Crump, right, speaks outside Glynn county courthouse on Wednesday. Photograph: Lewis M Levine/AP
  • One of the men standing trial for killing Ahmaud Arbery said they chased him because they were convinced he was running away from a potential crime and not out jogging, a court heard yesterday. Greg McMichael told police he and two other defendants were convinced Arbery “was getting the hell out of there”.

  • A French court has sentenced the killer of an elderly Jewish woman to life imprisonment with no possibility of parole for 22 years, in a case that caused an outcry over antisemitism in France. Yacine Mihoub was convicted of the murder of Mireille Knoll, 85 who died on 23 March 2018.

  • The head of lighting on the film Rust has filed a lawsuit over Alec Baldwin’s fatal shooting of the cinematographer Halyna Hutchins on the New Mexico set of the western, alleging negligence that caused him “severe emotional distress” will haunt him for ever.

  • People testing negative for Covid-19 despite exposure may have “immune memory”, scientists have discovered. The study found some individuals clear virus rapidly due to a strong immune response from existing T-cells. This could pave the way for a new generation of vaccines targeting the T-cell response.

Don’t miss this: meet the ‘inactivists’, tangling up the climate crisis in culture wars

A new tactic of dismissing green policies as elitist is on the rise, and has zoned in on a bitter row over a disused airport in the UK. Photograph: Getty / Guardian design

In May 2020, as the world was convulsed by the coronavirus pandemic, a strange video began appearing on Facebook. “Climate alarm is reaching untold levels of exaggeration and hysteria,” said an unseen narrator, over a montage of protests and clips of a tearful Greta Thunberg. “There is no doubt about it, climate change has become a cult,” it continued, to the kind of pounding beat you might hear on the soundtrack of a Hollywood blockbuster. The video, one of many, showed that as climate science has gone mainstream, outright denialism has been pushed to the fringes.

… Or this: how the wellness industry turned its back on Covid science

Many wellness influencers are ‘using cult leader techniques in digital spaces’, sowing fear and hesitancy about Covid. Illustration: Guardian Design composite

Anti-vaccine or vaccine-hesitant attitudes are as abundant in online wellness circles as pastel-coloured Instagram infographics and asana poses on the beach at sunset. “People are really confused by what is happening,” says Derek Beres, the co-host of Conspirituality, a podcast about the convergence of conspiracy theories and wellness. “Why is their yoga instructor sharing QAnon hashtags?” As wellness gurus increasingly promote vaccine scepticism, conspiracy theories and the myth that ill people have themselves to blame, how did self-care turn so nasty?

Climate check: ‘Our children may not want to be farmers’

Manut Boonpayong stands in his pomelo grove. Photograph: Lauren DeCicca/The Guardian

Throughout Cop26, the Guardian has been publishing the stories of the people whose lives have been upended – sometimes devastated – by the climate breakdown. From extreme weather obliterating homes to rising sea levels ruining crops, climate breakdown is a terrifying daily reality for many including Manut Boonpayong, who lives in Samut Songkhram province, Thailand. He says: “Farming itself is not hard, but the issues that I am facing are ones that I cannot manage, and which are unpredictable and uncontrollable.”

Want more environmental stories delivered to your inbox? Sign up to our new newsletter Down to Earth to get original and essential reporting on the climate crisis every week

Last thing: Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez gives verdict on Scottish favourite Irn-Bru

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez tries Irn Bru for the first time. Photograph: Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez/Reuters

Cop26 is not short of controversial subjects, and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez has demonstrated she is not afraid to get stuck into the big questions: namely, would she like the Scottish fizzy drink Irn-Bru? The bright orange drink has become the surprise curiosity of Cop26. Delegates from all over the world have been sharing their thoughts on its unique taste, with mixed reviews. In an Instagram video of herself trying the drink for the first time, the US congresswoman said: “Oh my God, love it, love it. This tastes just like the Latino soda Kola Champagne.”

Sign up

First Thing is delivered to thousands of inboxes every weekday. If you’re not already signed up, subscribe now.

Get in touch

If you have any questions or comments about any of our newsletters please email newsletters@theguardian.com

Source Article from https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/nov/11/first-thing-kyle-rittenhouse-case-jeopardy-lawyers-seek-mistrial

WikiLeaks has made multiple disclosures over the past decade, including one in March 2017 when the group released what it said were CIA technical documents on a range of spying techniques.

Saul Loeb/AFP/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Saul Loeb/AFP/Getty Images

WikiLeaks has made multiple disclosures over the past decade, including one in March 2017 when the group released what it said were CIA technical documents on a range of spying techniques.

Saul Loeb/AFP/Getty Images

To its supporters, the WikiLeaks disclosures have revealed a wealth of important information that the U.S. government wanted to keep hidden, particularly in the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

This included abuses by the military and a video that showed a U.S. helicopter attack in Iraq on suspected militants. Those killed turned out to be unarmed civilians and journalists.

WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, now under arrest in Britain, has often argued that no one has been harmed by the WikiLeaks disclosures.

But many in the national security community say the leaks were harmful to a broad range of people. However, they generally say the damage was limited and has faded since the first big WikiLeaks dump in 2010, which included hundreds of thousands of classified documents from the U.S. military and the State Department.

Chelsea Manning, a former Army private, spent seven years in prison for leaking the documents to WikiLeaks in 2010. Manning, who was freed two years ago, was taken back into custody last month when she refused to testify before a grand jury in a case involving WikiLeaks and Assange.

P.J. Crowley, the State Department spokesman when the WikiLeaks story erupted in 2010, said those most at risk were civilians in Afghanistan and Iraq who were secretly passing information to the U.S. military.

“A number of people went into hiding, a number of people had to move, particularly those civilians in war zones who had told U.S. soldiers about movements of the Taliban and al-Qaida,” he said. “No doubt some of those people were harmed when their identities were compromised.”

WikiLeaks has made multiple disclosures over the past decade, including one in March 2017 when the group released what it said were CIA technical documents on a range of spying techniques.

This revealed ways that a state-of-the art television could serve as a listening device even when it was turned off.

Larry Pfeiffer, the CIA chief of staff from 2006 to 2009, said these kinds of breaches can impose long-term costs, though they can be difficult to quantify.

“It informs the potential enemies of a technique we use, that they can now develop countermeasures against,” Pfeiffer said.

This also forces the spy agency to go back to the drawing board, he added.

“Once invalidated, it now creates situations where the U.S. intelligence community is going to have to expend resources and going to have to spend both dollars and people to develop new methods,” said Pfeiffer, who now heads the Michael V. Hayden Center for Intelligence at George Mason University.

On the diplomatic front, WikiLeaks shared many examples of U.S. diplomats writing in unflattering terms about foreign leaders, causing the U.S. embarrassment.

But more importantly, said Scott Anderson, a former State Department lawyer who served in Iraq in 2012 and 2013, some of these countries have vulnerable opposition leaders and human rights activists who were quietly in contact with U.S. diplomats. These private, sensitive discussions suddenly became public with the WikiLeaks dumps.

“That can really chill the ability of those American personnel to build those sorts of relationships and have frank conversations with their contacts,” said Anderson, now at the Brookings Institution.

Anderson notes that the U.S. still has a program to issue visas to Afghans and Iraqis to the U.S. in return for the help they provided — and in recognition of the danger they face.

Crowley pointed to the impact of leaks that upset former Libyan leader Moammar Gadhafi.

“We had an ambassador in Libya, and we had to remove him from his post because he was directly threatened by Moammar Gadhafi’s thugs,” Crowley said.

Some countries, Crowley added, took a much more relaxed approach to the disclosures, even when they were criticized in the documents.

“One foreign minister told the U.S. secretary of state, ‘You know, don’t worry about it. You should see what we report about you,’ ” Crowley recalled.

Many of the assessments today are similar to the one offered nine years ago by Bob Gates, who served as defense secretary when the WikiLeaks disclosures took place.

“The fact is, governments deal with the United States because it’s in their interest. Not because they like us, not because they trust us and not because they believe we can keep secrets,” Gates said. “Is this embarrassing? Yes. Is it awkward? Yes. Consequences for U.S. foreign policy? I think fairly modest.”

Greg Myre is a national security correspondent. Follow him @gregmyre1.

Source Article from https://www.npr.org/2019/04/12/712659290/how-much-did-wikileaks-damage-u-s-national-security

SINGAPORE, March 15 (Reuters) – Social media platforms Facebook and Twitter said on Friday they would take down content involving mass shootings at two New Zealand mosques that killed at least 49 people and wounded more than 20.

A suspected gunman broadcast live footage on Facebook of the attack on one mosque in the city of Christchurch, mirroring the carnage played out in video games, after publishing a “manifesto” in which he denounced immigrants.

The video footage, posted online live as the attack unfolded, appeared to show him driving to one mosque, entering it and shooting randomly at people inside.

Worshippers, possibly dead or wounded, lay huddled on the floor, the video showed. Reuters was unable to confirm the authenticity of the footage.

“Police alerted us to a video on Facebook shortly after the livestream commenced and we quickly removed both the shooter’s Facebook and Instagram accounts and the video,” Facebook tweeted.

“We’re also removing any praise or support for the crime and the shooter or shooters as soon as we’re aware.”

Twitter said it had “rigorous processes and a dedicated team in place for managing exigent and emergency situations” such as this.

Related: New Zealand mosque shootings




“We also cooperate with law enforcement to facilitate their investigations as required,” it said.

Alphabet Inc’s YouTube said: “Please know we are working vigilantly to remove any violent footage.”

Live streaming services have become a central component of social media companies’ growth strategy in recent years, but they are also increasingly exploited by some users to livestream offensive and violent content.

In 2017, a father in Thailand broadcast himself killing his daughter on Facebook Live. After more than a day, and 370,000 views, Facebook removed the video. That year, a video of a man shooting and killing another in Cleveland also shocked viewers.

(Reporting by Arjun Panchadar; Writing by Miyoung Kim; Editing by Nick Macfie)

Source Article from https://www.aol.com/article/news/2019/03/15/social-media-platforms-taking-action-to-remove-nz-shooting-content/23693017/

The musical stylings of Weird Al Yankovic rarely offer clarity about the state of legislation in Congress.

But Weird Al’s 1984 hit “Eat it” (a parody on Michael Jackson’s “Beat It”) was inadvertently invoked this past week to crystallize the conundrum facing House Democrats after the Senate approved a crucial border spending bill 84-8.

HOUSE OKS BORDER BILL AFTER PELOSI REVERSES COURSE

House liberals were either going to hold out against the Senate measure in favor of their own – or accept the Senate bill.

Amid these deliberations, former Senate Republican Leader Trent Lott, a veteran of such impasses, ambled by the Speaker’s Office late Wednesday afternoon as a coterie of reporters stood watch in the hallway. Lott advised that if he were still running the Senate – where the overwhelming 84-8 vote spoke volumes – there would be only one clear path.

“I’d say ‘Eat it, House,’” Lott said with a laugh.

It’s exactly what they did.

But not without a fiery fight first within the House Democratic Caucus – and one that threatens to keep burning for weeks and months to come.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi faced a huge challenge as she sought to both assuage the concerns from her left flank and engineer a bill that could actually pass.

The House had approved its own version of the border legislation Tuesday night, 230-195. But the Senate devised a different, more bipartisan piece of legislation. Not as many controls and consequences for those charged with caring for children. Senate Appropriations Committee Chairman Richard Shelby, R-Ala., wrote the measure alongside Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., the top Democrat on the panel. The committee approved the bill 30-1. The Senate then followed suit with a staggering roll call tally of 84-8.

TRUMP REVIVES ICE RAID THREAT

“The administration opposes what the House is going to do,” said Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky. “We believe they support what we’re going to do.”

The House and Senate were out of alignment, approving competing bills. The front-runner for final passage, though, was fairly evident: The Senate bill secured more than 60 yeas, making it filibuster-proof, while the White House threatened to veto the House measure.

The House still held out hope, engineering a revised bill on Thursday as the plan came back across the Capitol from the Senate.

But the administration wouldn’t budge. McConnell wouldn’t budge. Things looked bleak for the House bill, even as it was apparent the House could approve the Senate version with most Republicans and many Democrats.

But Democrats faced a more immediate problem as the House began a pre-debate on the revamped measure Thursday afternoon. House rules allow members to vote on something called “adopting the previous question.” In short, it’s known as a “PQ.” If the House approves the PQ, things continue as normal. However, if the House defeats the PQ, the minority seizes control of the floor for an hour and gets to call up whatever legislation it wants. The majority rarely loses a PQ vote. The House hasn’t defeated a PQ (thus, turning over the floor to the other side) since 2010. If Republicans defeated the PQ, they would bring up the Senate bill. Losing control of the floor in such a fashion would be a major embarrassment for Democrats. But this was a distinct possibility. There was near unanimity on the GOP side for the Senate plan and dozens of Democrats were prepared to join them.

So, the House Democratic brain trust changed course. Pelosi dashed off a letter to her colleagues.

“The children come first,” wrote Pelosi. “We have to make sure that the resources needed to protect the children are available. Therefore, we will not engage in the same disrespectful behavior that the Senate did in ignoring our priorities. In order to get resources to the children fastest, we will reluctantly pass the Senate bill.”

So, the Senate jammed the House. And Pelosi relented because the math simply wasn’t on her side.

The House ultimately moved the Senate package 305-102. Pelosi lost 95 Democrats. But there were 129 Democratic yeas. So, despite the sniping from the liberal wing of the Democratic caucus, Pelosi still marshaled a majority of the majority. But Pelosi couldn’t get to 217 yeas (the magic number in the House right now to pass bills) exclusively on the Democratic side.

That’s the same issue that tormented former House Speakers John Boehner and Paul Ryan. They couldn’t quite move some bills with only GOP support when Republicans were in the majority. This was mostly due to protestations from the House Freedom Caucus. So, Boehner and Ryan often turned to the other side for assistance to pass major legislation. Pelosi did the same Thursday.

In a statement, the Congressional Hispanic Caucus said “what happened today is unacceptable and we will not forget this betrayal.”

A number of moderate Democrats privately vented their frustrations about the internecine warfare among Democrats. One Democrat said it would be “shameful” and “immoral” not to do “something.” Another moderate Democrat groused about liberals placing a premium on “ideological purity.” One Democrat noted that a yes vote on the more tempered Senate bill was a good vote for moderate and conservative Democrats who face tough races in 2020. After all, members from swing districts are why Democrats won the House.

One senior House Democratic leadership source told Fox News that some liberals will understand why Pelosi did what she did. But the source noted that many far-left Democrats “won’t get it. They’ll keep pushing.” The source said some Democrats will take notice of Pelosi fighting for the original House bill and only losing four Democrats. But the leadership source also suggested that Pelosi should have taken one more run at the issue. Perhaps pass the re-retooled bill, forcing McConnell to flush it back to the House and then accepted the Senate package.

This could be a seminal moment for Democrats. Is their tent big enough to accept both liberals and moderates? This is a distillation of what’s going on nationally in the presidential sweepstakes. Democrats may control the House. But they don’t have the Senate, or the White House. And while the bill may not be perfect, it was the right measure for most Democratic districts. By the same token, a no vote was likely the proper disposition for lawmakers representing the most liberal of districts.

Earlier in the week, Rep. Tony Cardenas, D-Calif., was asked if the “perfect was the enemy of the good” in the border bill negotiations.

CLICK HERE FOR THE FOX NEWS APP

“I hate that expression,” said Cardenas. “You don’t want to settle for less than what you’re capable of.”

Many liberal Democrats may agree with Cardenas’s assessment. Otto von Bismarck famously compared passing law to making sausage. And as both Weird Al, Trent Lott and many House Democrats now know, you sometimes just have to eat it.

Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/politics/senate-makes-house-eat-it-in-border-funding-fight-as-liberals-fume-at-betrayal

The devastating fire swept through the cathedral in the evening, riveting the world’s attention as nearly 500 firefighters raced to the scene. Thousands of Parisians gathered nearby to watch the effort to save it, and pray. Many were in tears.

[Here are photos of Notre-Dame over the years before the fire.]

As the last rush of tourists tried to get inside, the doors of Notre-Dame were shut abruptly and without explanation, witnesses said. Within moments, white smoke started rising from the spire, which, at 295 feet, was the highest part of the cathedral.

As it billowed out, the smoke started turning gray, then black, making it clear that a fire was growing inside the cathedral, which is covered in scaffolding. Soon, orange flames began punching out of the spire, quickly increasing in intensity.

Work on Notre-Dame, a celebrated icon of medieval architecture, began in 1163 and was completed in 1345. The cathedral, on an island in the center of Paris, is visited by about 13 million people a year.

“It is like losing a member of one’s own family,” said Pierre Guillaume Bonnet, 45, a marketing director. “For me, there are so many memories tied up in it.”

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/16/world/europe/photos-of-notre-dame-fire.html

via press release:

NOTICIAS  TELEMUNDO  PRESENTS:

“MURIENDO POR CRUZAR,” AN INVESTIGATION INTO THE INCREASING NUMBER OF IMMIGRANT DEATHS ALONG THE BORDER, THIS SUNDAY, AUGUST 3 AT 6 P.M./5 C

Carmen Dominicci and Neida Sandoval present the Telemundo and The Weather Channel co-production

Miami – July 31, 2014 – Telemundo presents “Muriendo por Cruzar”, a documentary that investigates why increasing numbers of immigrants are dying while trying to cross the US-Mexican border near the city of Falfurrias, Texas, this Sunday, August 3 at 6PM/5 C.  The Telemundo and The Weather Channel co-production, presented by Noticias Telemundo journalists Carmen Dominicci and Neida Sandoval, reveals the obstacles immigrants face once they cross into US territory, including extreme weather conditions, as they try to evade the border patrol.  “Muriendo por Cruzar” is part of Noticias Telemundo’s special coverage of the crisis on the border and immigration reform.

 

“‘Muriendo por Cruzar’” dares to ask questions that reveal the actual conditions undocumented immigrants face as they try to start a new life in the United States,” said Alina Falcón, Telemundo’s Executive Vice President for News and Alternative Programming.  “Our collaboration with The Weather Channel was very productive. They have a unique expertise in covering the impact of weather on people’s lives, as we do in covering immigration reform and the border crisis. The result is a compelling documentary that exposes a harrowing reality.”

“Muriendo por Cruzar” is the first co-production by Telemundo and The Weather Channel.  Both networks are part of NBCUniversal.

Source Article from http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2014/07/31/noticias-telemundo-presents-muriendo-por-cruzar-this-sunday-august-3-at-6pm/289119/

Image copyright
Getty

Image caption

Juan Martín Fernández Lobbe celebra junto a su hijo al final del partido que clasificó a Argentina por segunda vez a la semifinales de un Mundial de Rugby.

La aplastante victoria de Argentina ante Irlanda (43-20) en cuartos de final del Campeonato Mundial de Rugby es uno de los resultados más impactantes en la historia de este deporte y confirma la hegemonía de las potencias del Hemisferio Sur, ya que los otros semifinalistas serán Nueva Zelanda, Australia y Sudáfrica.

El comentarista irlandés Liam Toland, del Irish Times, señaló, sin asomo de ironía, que el equipo del trébol, bicampeón de las 6 naciones (es decir, el mejor equipo europeo) “sufrió con y sin la pelota” ante el equipo supuestamente menos poderoso de “las naciones (más fuertes) del Sur”.

Lea: Argentina se clasifica a la semifinal del Mundial de Rugby

Ben Dirs, destacado comentarista de BBC Sport, quedó tan impresionado que el primer párrafo de su crónica podría ser firmado por algún colega argentino en un rapto de entusiasmo:

Image copyright
Getty

Image caption

Juan Imhoff se lanza con toda la fuerza de los Pumas para apoyar el ensayo que sentenció la victoria sobre Irlanda.

“Tome nota, Stuart Lancaster (el entrenador de Inglaterra): eso es cultura. Ambición, estilo, habilidad, crueldad y alegría combinadas. No nacieron de dictados de preceptores escolares, sino que surgieron del corazón. Lancaster tuvo cuatro años mientras que Argentina creó una nueva cultura en tres“.

Dirs y otros analistas de distintas nacionalidades coinciden en saludar la irrupción de una nueva forma argentina de jugar al rugby, más completa y flexible, que en vez de escudarse en el arrollador andar de sus delanteros, tan buenos en las melés o scrums, agrega un contraataque mortífero.

Los Pumas ya no van tanto al choque; ahora buscan el espacio, los pases, las combinaciones, con mayor participación de una zaga temible (un comentarista del Times, Stuart Barnes, compara al wing Juan Imhoff con el neozelandés Julian Savea), un estilo que hace al juego más atractivo y también más eficaz.

Las cuatro naciones

Al hablar de una evolución madurada en tres años, Dirs se refiere a la participación del seleccionado argentino en el Rugby Championship, torneo anual de las principales potencias del Hemisferio Sur, que desde 2012 incluye a los Pumas, además de los All Blacks, los Wallabies y los Springboks.

Los primeros años fueron aparentemente decepcionantes, debido en gran parte a que la mayoría de los jugadores argentinos actuaban en clubes europeos, con el consiguiente desfasaje temporal y también táctico.

Image copyright
Getty

Image caption

Argentina aprovechó su participación en el rugby Championship para cambiar su estilo de rugby.

Los Pumas consiguieron su primera victoria en 2014, ante Australia, en Mendoza, y este año superaron a Sudáfrica en Durban, mostrando ya claros signos de su remozada personalidad deportiva.

Agustín Pichot, excapitán de los Pumas, que ha tenido un papel protagónico en el ingreso de Argentina a “Las 4 Naciones” del Sur y en los planes para el desarrollo futuro del rugby en su país, le dijo a Dirs que la semilla de la transformación fue sembrada en una charla con el técnico Graham Henry.

“¿Cómo podemos ser más exitosos”, preguntó el argentino.

“Ustedes tienen que marcar más ensayos”, replicó el neozelandés, que entonces se desempeñaba como asesor técnico de los Pumas.

Image copyright
Getty

Image caption

No llega al nivel del fútbol en cuanto a popularidad, pero Los Pumas cuenta con el apoyo de una apasionada afición.

Esto suena a simplificación, a anécdota conveniente para explicar un proceso complicado, pero su eficacia se debe a que, en el fondo, es así de simple.

Lea: Agustín Pichot en BBC Deportes, “el rugby es más que un deporte, es un estilo de vida”

Una de las razones por las que Argentina no marcaba tantos ensayos como las otras tres potencias del Sur era que la mayoría de sus hombres jugaba profesionalmente en clubes europeos, muchos de ellos en Francia e Inglaterra.

Y los equipos europeos comparten una predilección por el juego de choque, los melés, los placajes. Así como en el sur se juega un rugby más aventurero, más audaz, arriesgando más con pases, aprovechando la habilidad técnica de los jugadores, los europeos insisten en concentrarse en movimientos básicos.

En el Sur expanden el juego, lo abren, arriesgan; en el norte cierran las escotillas, comprimen el juego, se busca el choque como primer recurso.

Evolución

La necesidad es la madre de la invención, es lo que quiere decir Pichot: si Argentina no transformaba su juego no podría beneficiarse de su participación en el Rugby Championship del Hemisferio Sur.

Image copyright
Getty

Image caption

Nicolás Sánchez es una de las figuras de la selección.

Y esa transformación, demostrada en el Estadio Millenium de Cardiff, se profundizará a partir del año que viene, cuando un equipo argentino profesional, formado por internacionales que vuelven al país, participará en el torneo de clubes del Hemisferio Sur.

Los profesionales argentinos que sigan jugando en clubes europeos no serán llamados por los Pumas. Este es otro de los riesgos calculados por los dirigentes argentinos, que hasta hace poco se contaban entre los más conservadores del mundo.

Muchos volverán y seguirán absorbiendo la nueva mentalidad de juego. El proceso es fascinante.

Todo esto dará a los Pumas una mayor compenetración con el espíritu de aventura y el juego más espectacular que caracteriza a los grandes equipos del Hemisferio Sur.

Rechazo

Es irónico comprobar que esta evolución, que tanto impresiona en el ámbito del rugby, haya sido posible por el rechazo de los dirigentes europeos a la antigua aspiración argentina de participar en el torneo anual de las principales naciones rugbísticas del continente.

Los argentinos y sus aliados proponían que los Pumas participaran en ese torneo, que se llamaría entonces “de las 7 naciones”, jugando en Europa tanto los partidos de “visitante” como los de “local”.

Image copyright
Getty

Image caption

Para Argentina fue positivo que las potencias del rugby europeo le cerraron la puerta y pudo medirse contra Nueva Zelanda y Australia.

Esto fue rechazado tras el Mundial de 2007, alegándose razones de organización y coherencia geográfica, pero en el fondo porque la participación argentina no resultaba económicamente atractiva: la TV argentina no podría pagar mucho y los aficionados argentinos en Europa no son muy numerosos.

La salida más razonable era la participación en el torneo de las potencias del sur, aunque estas también se resistían por razones económicas.

Ben Dirs dice que si Argentina hubiera sido aceptada en el ámbito europeo, su juego tendría muchos de los defectos de equipos como Francia, Gales e Inglaterra, en vez de adaptar con un enfoque latino la convicción de las potencias del sur: “el éxito surge del juego en todo el campo, a través de recursos técnicos aplicados con precisión y rapidez y buscando espacio en vez de choque”.

Suena fácil. O por lo menos así les parece a Agustín Pichot y a esta nueva generación de Pumas.

Sigue a Raúl Fain Binda en Twitter a través del

@BlogDeLalo

Entradas anteriores al blog de Lalo

Source Article from http://www.bbc.com/mundo/noticias/2015/10/151019_blog_lalo_pumas_argentina_mundial_rugby_lecciones_transformacion_jmp

Source Article from https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/2022/03/17/arnold-schwarzenegger-russia-ukraine-video/

Chat with us in Facebook Messenger. Find out what’s happening in the world as it unfolds.

Source Article from https://www.cnn.com/2019/05/09/politics/trump-barr-mueller-testify/index.html

President Trump’s 2020 campaign has quickly created a new website as part of efforts to capitalize on a controversy that has engulfed Democratic rival Joe Biden — after the former vice president said that black Americans who have a hard time “figuring out” whether to support him or Trump “ain’t black.”

Biden made the remarks in an interview Friday morning with “The Breakfast Club,” a nationally broadcast morning talk show popular with black listeners. After host Charlamagne tha God said he had “more questions” for him before November, Biden defended his record with on issues affecting black Americans.

BIDEN TAKES HEAT FROM LEFT-WING ACTIVISTS, BERNIE AIDES FOR ‘YOU AIN’T BLACK’ REMARKS 

“I tell you, if you have a problem figuring out whether you’re for me or Trump, then you ain’t black,” he said.

Biden walked back the remarks the same day, later saying: “I shouldn’t have been so cavalier.”

“I shouldn’t have been such a wise guy,” Biden said. “… No one should have to vote for any party, based on their race or religion or background.”

But the remarks drew swift criticism from across the political spectrum, in particular from the Trump campaign — which sought to highlight the remarks.

Within hours it created www.youaintblack.com. The website, with the logo “Black Voices for Trump 2020,” quotes the remarks in massive lettering, and includes a video that repeats Biden remarks with the word “racist” over his face and a number that supporters are encouraged to text “Woke.”

SEN. TIM SCOTT: BIDEN’S NEW COMMENT ON BLACK VOTERS IS ‘MOST ARROGANT AND CONDESCENDING’ I’VE HEARD

“It’s a reminder that Biden thinks he owns the Black vote and that he can dictate what Black people do,” Trump campaign manager Brad Parscale tweeted.

The website also includes a link not only to various social media sites for “Black Voices for Trump” but also a link to the Trump store, where supporters can now buy “#YouAintBlack” T-shirts.

“Joe Biden actually told Black Americans they ‘AIN’T BLACK’ if they support President Donald J. Trump!” the website says. “Sport this shirt and make sure NO ONE forgets the words #YouAintBlack came out of Joe Biden’s mouth!”

CLICK HERE FOR THE FOX NEWS APP

Politico reported that Trump’s campaign is planning on spending $1 million on an ad blitz to capitalize on the remark, with a video montage highlighting the comment, as well as an ad focusing on Biden’s support for the 1994 crime bill, which it will say “destroyed millions of black lives.”

Fox News’ Paul Steinhauser contributed to this report.

Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-campaign-launches-you-aint-black-website-biden-controversy

TIROTEO EN CENTRO COMERCIAL DE TEXAS

La Policía de Amarillo, en el norte de Texas, asesinó a un hombre armado que había tomado rehenes en un almacén Walmart de esa ciudad estadounidense.

“Sospechoso ha sido asesinado por APD SWAT y aparentemente muerto. Rehenes están seguros”, informó la policía en Twitter.

El Chapo Guzmán guarda prisión en una cárcel de ciudad Juárez.

APARECE TORTURADO Y MUERTO CUSTODIO DEL CHAPO GUZMÁN

Un militar que realizaba labores de vigilancia en el exterior del Cefereso número nueve, donde está recluido Joaquín “El Chapo” Guzmán, fue hallado asesinado y encobijado.

Aunque el homicidio se reportó el viernes, hasta ayer se dio a conocer que se trataba de un elemento de la Secretaría de la Defensa Nacional (Sedena), a quien sus familiares habían reportado como desaparecido.

La policía francesa se mantiene en alerta tras la muerte de dos efectivos.

EL TERRORISTA DE LA EUROCOPA JURÓ LEALTAD A ESTADO ISLÁMICO

El terrorista francés que anoche asesinó a dos policías en su casa al norte de París, Larossi Abballa, aseguró haber jurado lealtad al jefe del Estado Islámico (EI), Abu Bakr al Bagdadi, hace tres semanas, informó hoy el fiscal de París, François Molins.

Abballa dijo que con su acto respondía al llamamiento de Al Bagdadi de “matar a los infieles en sus casas con sus familias”, según Molins, que reveló que el yihadista sabía que sus víctimas eran policías.

Leé la nota completa:

Los compañeros de los fallecidos se mostraron consternados.

DERRUMBE EN TEGUCIGALPA DEJA TRES OBREROS MUERTOS

Tres personas murieron soterradas en una construcción de un supermercado en la colonia América de Tegucigalpa, en la zona central de Honduras. De los cinco a quienes les cayó el alud de tierra, según confirman los bomberos, uno fue rescatado con vida. Además de un rescatista que resultó con heridas.

Según datos preliminares los nombres de los fallecidos son Denis Rolando Sauceda, Alex Danilo Hernández, ambos maestros de obra, y el ayudante Rony Adonis Núnez.

El doble crimen fue en la 27 calle de San Pedro Sula.

ASESINAN A CONDUCTOR Y AYUDANTE DE RAPIDITO EN SAN PEDRO SULA

Dos trabajadores del transporte público fueron asesinados en la 27 calle del sector Satélite de San Pedro Sula, en la zona norte de Honduras.

El hecho ocurrió hoy a la 1:30 pm, en la colonia Municipal. Las víctimas fueron identificadas como Alan Mejía Rivera quien es el conductor y Walter Paz el ayudante de la unidad.

Source Article from http://www.diez.hn/notodoesfutbol/970112-99/resumen-de-las-noticias-m%C3%A1s-importantes-de-este-martes