Most Viewed Videos

Not only is Haiti’s presidency vacant after the assassination, it also has two rival prime ministers and a Parliament that is not functioning. Three men have come forward to stake a claim to leadership of the country, which was already rife with gang violence and hobbled by poverty.

The U.S. delegation met jointly Sunday with both the interim prime minister, Claude Joseph, and with Ariel Henry, the man Mr. Moïse named to succeed Mr. Joseph as prime minister only days before he was assassinated. A third aspirant to power, the Senate president, Joseph Lambert, was also at the meeting.

Ms. Psaki said the White House was still reviewing Haiti’s request that it send troops to help stabilize the county. “But as of right now,” she said, “the U.S. has not committed to having any sort of presence on the ground.”

Dr. Sanon was born in 1958 in Marigot, a city on Haiti’s southern coast, and graduated from the Eugenio María de Hostos University in the Dominican Republic and the Midwestern Baptist Theological Seminary in Kansas City, Mo., according to the Florida Baptist Historical Society.

According to public records, Dr. Sanon is also licensed to practice both conventional medicine as well osteopathic medicine, an area in which doctors sometimes provide therapies like spinal manipulation or massage as part of their treatment.

Dr. Ludner Confident, a Haitian-born anesthesiologist who practices medicine in Florida, said he got to know Dr. Sanon while both were working for the Rome Organization, a nonprofit aid group in Haiti, in the years before an earthquake devastated the country in 2010. The quake destroyed Dr. Sanon’s clinic, according to a 2010 article in the Baylor Line, a campus magazine at Baylor University in Texas.

“He is a pastor,” Dr. Confident said about Dr. Sanon. “He’s a man of God, wanting to do things for Haiti.”

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2021/07/12/world/americas/haiti-jovenel-assasination-sanon.html

We’ve detected unusual activity from your computer network

To continue, please click the box below to let us know you’re not a robot.

Source Article from https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-07-27/nyc-la-among-big-cities-joining-rural-states-in-cdc-mask-zone

Queen Elizabeth II’s lavish state banquet for President Donald Trump and first lady Melania Trump got underway Monday evening at Buckingham Palace with the usual reciprocal toasts as a clutch of Trump and royal relations looked on from a magnificent table in the palace ballroom. 

In addition to the queen, dressed in white and adorned with ruby and diamonds, the Trumps were joined at the white-tie-and-tiaras dinner by Prince Charles and his wife, Camilla, Duchess of Cornwall, and by Charles’ son, Prince William and his wife, Kate, Duchess of Cambridge.

Melania Trump wore an ivory silk crepe gown with silk tulle details by Dior Haute Couture, plus over-the-elbow white gloves. Her hair was pulled up and back in an elegant chignon. 

Duchess Kate wore a gown by Alexander McQueen, plus the Lover’s Knot tiara, and earrings loaned by the queen. 

Also at the dinner: Trump’s four adult children, Donald Trump Jr.; Ivanka Trump and her husband, Jared Kushner; Eric Trump and his wife, Lara; and Tiffany Trump.  

Trump and the queen offered toasts to enduring friendship and values between the two nations, followed by their respective national anthems.

Earlier, the presidential couple toured historic Westminster Abbey, where British royals are crowned, wed and buried, as the first day of the Trumps’ state visit to Britain continued Monday.

The Trumps’ visit to the Abbey also included a solemn laying of a wreath at the Tomb of the Unknown Warrior, first interred in 1920 in the central aisle of the Abbey.

The presidential couple were accompanied by Prince Andrew, Duke of York, second son of Queen Elizabeth II; he will be their main escort during three days of hobnobbing with the royals during the state visit, only the third offered to an American president by the queen during her 67 years on the throne.

Next, the Trumps arrived to take tea with Prince Charles and his wife, Camilla Duchess of Cornwall, at Clarence House, the Prince of Wales’ London home.

The Trumps arrived at Buckingham Palace Monday just after noon, local time, to meet Queen Elizabeth and be treated to the kind of royal pomp-and-ceremony the president loves receiving and the British love staging. 

Kicking off Monday’s visit, the Trumps arrived by helicopter, which touched down in the gardens of the palace.

The queen greeted President Trump after he ascended the palace stairs with Prince Charles at the West Terrace of Buckingham Palace. Melania walked behind with Duchess Camilla. The queen wore a big smile as she greeted the president with a handshake, wearing a mint suit and matching hat. She then acknowledged Melania, and the three royals walked inside with the president and first lady.

CLOSE

Queen Elizabeth II and the royal family welcomed President Donald Trump and first lady Melania Trump with “The Star Spangled Banner.”
USA TODAY

For the occasion, Trump wore a navy suit with a bright periwinkle blue tie. His wife twinned with the duchess – both wore white. Melania Trump wore a Dolce & Gabbana knee-length skirt suit with a contrasting navy collar, belt and shoes that coordinated with her wide-brimmed boater-style hat by one of her favorite designers, Herve Pierre, according to her spokeswoman, Stephanie Grisham. 

More: What to expect during Queen Elizabeth’s visit with the Trumps

When the fivesome returned outside, they took in a performance of “The Star Spangled Banner,” the Trumps with hands over their hearts. 

Trump, accompanied by Prince Charles, then inspected the guard of honor, as he did with the queen in 2018. 

Following a private lunch with the monarch and other royals, including Prince Harry, the queen, in a floral frock, led the Trumps in a review of the Royal Collection of American-themed items. Harry was present, as were Ivanka Trump and her husband, Jared Kushner, both who serve as advisers to the president.

Earlier, the two were spotted by photographers gazing out the window of the palace.

The three-day state visit is timed to coincide with the 75th anniversary of the D-Day landings. It is the second meeting between Queen Elizabeth and President Trump.

As she has done for hundreds of foreign visitors, including former President Barack Obama and first lady Michelle Obama in 2011, the 93-year-old monarch is set to put on an impressive show, deviating slightly from a pattern set down during her years on the throne.  

More: Trump’s U.K. visit: What you need to know, from royal ceremony to protests in London

According to Buckingham Palace, Trump will not meet Prince Harry’s American wife, Meghan, Duchess of Sussex, who expressed some disdain for Trump prior to her 2018 marriage.

As per usual, he’ll meet with the prime minister, Theresa May, who resigned last Friday and is scheduled to leave No.10 on June 7, after she failed to persuade Parliament and her own Tory party to approve a Brexit deal to take the U.K. out of the European Union.

Trump’s visit is expected to spur protests.

Over half of Londoners are opposed to Trump’s visit to Britain’s capital, according to a recent poll by research firm YouGov and Queen Mary, University of London. Although nationwide: 46% to 40% think the visit should go ahead.

When Trump visited London last year as part of an ordinary working visit an estimated 250,000 people protested on the streets of central London. Anti-Trump activists who oppose his divisive policies from immigration to abortion rights are planning for similar numbers this time. There will be smaller protests around the country.

And remember the Trump baby balloon? The phone-wielding, diaper-wearing inflatable that flew above London when Trump visited in July? The team behind it told USA TODAY that the giant orange blimp will again take to the skies, on Tuesday, in Parliament Square. 

London Mayor Sadiq Khan, who Trump has clashed with before, was the subject of two disparaging tweets by the U.S. president on Monday. It came after Khan, London’s first Muslim mayor, wrote in an op-ed in British newspaper the Observer that it is “un-British to roll out the red carpet for Donald Trump.”

Trump tweeted that Khan was “a stone cold loser who should focus on crime in London, not me.”

“Kahn reminds me very much of our very dumb and incompetent Mayor of NYC, de Blasio, who has also done a terrible job − only half his height,” Trump added.

Contributing: Erin Jensen and Kim Hjelmgaard

More: President Trump denies calling Duchess Meghan ‘nasty,’ despite interview recording

Source Article from https://www.usatoday.com/story/life/people/2019/06/03/queen-elizabeth-greets-donald-trump-and-melania-trump-state-visit/1302600001/

CLOSE

As he left for Mar-a-Lago Friday morning, President Donald Trump repeated his claims that Democrats are “anti-Jewish.” (March 22)
AP

WASHINGTON – President Donald Trump used a speech to the Republican Jewish Coalition Saturday to highlight his administration’s work in the Middle East and policies benefiting Israel while targeting the Democratic Party as one rooted in anti-Semitism.

The president started his nearly hour-long speech in Las Vegas thanking lawmakers and public officials in the room, then joked, “Special thanks to Rep. Omar of Minnesota,” a mention of the freshmen Democrat who sparked controversy for criticizing Israel’s treatment of Palestinians and Israeli lobbying efforts. The comments were criticized as playing into enduring stereotypes about Jewish money controlling politics.

“Oh, I forgot. She doesn’t like Israel,” Trump said sarcastically as the crowd booed. “I forgot. I’m so sorry.”

The president’s joke about freshman Rep. Ilhan Omar, D-Minn., came just one day after a New York man was arrested on federal charges of threatening to kill her and accusing her of being a terrorist. 

“Do you work for the Muslim Brotherhood? Why are you working for her, she’s an (expletive) terrorist. I’ll put a bullet in her (expletive) skull,” Patrick W. Carlineo, 55, is accused of saying to a member of Omar’s staff after calling her office last week. 

CLOSE

Democratic House leaders denounced fellow Democrat Rep. Ilhan Omar’s tweet, saying, “Anti-Semitism must be called out, confronted and condemned whenever it is encountered, without exception.”
USA TODAY

More: ‘I’ll put a bullet in her’: Trump supporter charged with threatening to kill Rep. Ilhan Omar

More: House overwhelmingly passes resolution condemning hate after Rep. Ilhan Omar’s comments

Throughout Trump’s speech, he touched on his administration moving the U.S. Embassy in Israel to Jerusalem, stopping illegal immigration, halting the Iran nuclear deal and his work to restore peace in the Middle East. 

“I would like to see peace in the Middle East,” the president said. He added, “If those three can’t do it, you’ll never have it done,” referring to White House advisers Jared Kushner, who is also his son-in-law, Jason Greenblatt, a former Trump Organization employee and adviser on Israel, and David Friedman, the U.S. ambassador to Israel.

Trump also took credit for eliminating hundreds of millions of dollars in aid to the Palestinians and for pulling the U.S. out of several U.N. organizations, the U.N. Human Rights Council and UNESCO, citing anti-Israel bias in their agendas.

He attacked Democrats, painting them as “anti-Israel” and pointing to the controversy surrounding Omar, whose comments spurred a resolution in the House denouncing hate and anti-Semitism. 

“Democrats have even allowed the terrible scourge of anti-Semitism to take root in their party and in their country. They have allowed that,” the president said. “Republicans believe that we must never ignore the vile poison of anti-Semitism.”

He pinned Israel’s future to the 2020 elections, saying that “the Democrats’ radical agenda would destroy our country, cripple our agenda and leave Israel all by itself.”

The Jewish Democratic Council of America denounced Trump’s speech as lies and fantasy, saying policy between the United States and Israel should be bipartisan and not pivot parties against one another. 

“Trump’s claims of Republicans ‘doing well’ in the 2018 election and of American Jews leaving the Democratic Party are completely false. This is a fantasy of the Republican Party,” said the organization’s executive director Halie Soifer. “What happened today in Las Vegas was a shameful display of lies and arrogance. We hope Trump’s continued assault on decency and truth will stay in Vegas.”

The president spoke to the group in Vegas following a two-day swing through the west that included a visit to newly replaced border barriers in California and a pair of fundraisers.  

Trump’s remarks come just weeks after he and others in the White House opened a new line of attack against Democrats by claiming the party had become “anti-Israel” and “anti-Jewish” in the aftermath of Rep. Omar’s comments.

Democrats increased their share of the Jewish vote between the 2016 and 2018 elections, from 71% to 79%. A new Gallup report, based on tracking poll data from 2018, said that “one in six U.S. Jews identify as Republican.” About half described themselves as Democrats.

After a fractious House debate last month over a resolution condemning hate, Trump raised the stakes while speaking with reporters as he left the White House on a weekend trip to Florida, describing the Democrats as an “anti-Israel party.”

“They’ve become an anti-Jewish party and that’s too bad,” he said while traveling to Alabama to review tornado damage.

Despite slamming Democrats, Trump has faced his own criticism from the Jewish community. Trump was slow to condemn white supremacists who marched violently in Charlottesville, Virginia, in 2017. The previous year, he circulated an image of a six-pointed star alongside a photo of Hillary Clinton, a pile of money and the words “most corrupt candidate ever.”

According to exit polling conducted for a consortium of news organizations for the 2016 election, Clinton defeated Trump 71% to 24% among Jewish voters. In last year’s congressional elections, according to those exit polls, Jews broke for Democratic candidates over Republican ones by 79% to 17%.

Jexodus: Trump predicts Jewish voters will switch to GOP. Democrats call it fantasy

Contributing: John Fritze; Associated Press

Source Article from https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2019/04/06/president-trump-ilhan-omar-boasts-israel-relations/3368304002/

El exministro socialista, Miguel Boyer, ha fallecido a los 75 años en la clínica Ruber Internacional pasadas las doce del mediodía, donde ingresó de urgencia esta misma mañana, según informan a Efe fuentes cercanas a la familia. La causa del fallecimiento ha sido una embolia pulmonar. En febrero de 2012 estuvo ingresado en la Ruber de Juan Bravo como consecuencia de un derrame cerebral del que se recuperó, pero que le obligó a apartarse de las responsabilidades que aún mantenía como consejero de Reyal Urbis y de Red Eléctrica de España.

El ”superministro” que expropió Rumasa

El economista, conocido como “el superministro” en los años en que fue titular de Economía, Hacienda y Comercio en el primer gobierno de Felipe González, será recordado fundamentalmente por haber llevado a cabo la expropiación de Rumasa.  Para la historia quedan las imágenes del presidente de Rumasa, José María Ruiz-Mateos, atacando al grito de “¡qué te pego leche!” a Boyer, a quien persiguió sin descanso disfrazado de Supermán o de presidiario, entre otras cosas.

De su etapa en el Gobierno socialista queda una estricta política monetaria dirigida a controlar la inflación, así como el choque ideológico con el otro “peso pesado” del gabinete, el vicepresidente Alfonso Guerra. Es probable que en aquellos años comenzara su transición política, que tuvo como punto de inflexión su inesperada dimisión del Gobierno en julio de 1985 y acabó cuando dejó las filas socialistas en 1996 para apoyar públicamente el programa económico de quienes hasta entonces habían sido sus adversarios políticos.

En 2002 sería nombrado miembro del patronato de la FAES, la fundación del PP, a propuesta del expresidente del Gobierno José María Aznar, aunque la abandonó en 2011 en otro giro por el que volvió a acercarse al Gobierno de José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero. Los contrastes también alcanzaron a su vida privada, en la que pasó de la discreción de su matrimonio con la ginecóloga Elena Arnedo, con quien tuvo dos hijos, a su enlace con la reina del “papel cuché” Isabel Preysler, con quien ha estado casado más de 26 años y tuvo una hija.

La pareja formó parte de la denominada “beautiful people”, gentes del mundo financiero y empresarial que prosperaron en los años 80 y 90 durante los gobiernos socialistas, como el exgobernador del Banco de España Mariano Rubio, o el expresidente de Banesto Mario Conde. Por su pertenencia a aquel círculo se vio salpicado por el caso Ibercorp, escándalo financiero que supuso la caída en desgracia de Mariano Rubio, pero del que Boyer salió indemne.

Le duró poco el descanso de la política porque en diciembre de 1982 entró a formar parte del primer gabinete de Felipe González, años en los que se ganó la fama de frío y altivo, y en los que llegó a estar considerado el ministro más poderoso de aquel Gobierno. Sus políticas de ajuste y reformas se encontraron con la oposición del aparato guerrista y de los sindicatos, defensores de una política económica más expansiva frente a las que consideraban medidas liberales de Boyer.

Fueron los años de la reconversión industrial, que generó una elevada destrucción de empleo, y de la expropiación por decreto de uno de los mayores grupos privados del país para proteger al erario público (unos de sus principales acreedores), a sus trabajadores y a los accionistas. La salida de Boyer del Gobierno a petición propia se justificó en el cansancio, pero inevitablemente fue interpretada como la victoria de Alfonso Guerra.

Tras su periodo en el Ejecutivo pasó por el Banco Exterior, Cartera Central, Grucycsa y FCC, hasta que fue nombrado presidente de CLH, cargó que ocupó hasta 2005. En los años posteriores fue designado consejero de Reyal Urbis y de Red Eléctrica de España, consejos en los que causó baja después de sufrir un derrame cerebral en la primavera de 2012.

Source Article from http://www.elconfidencial.com/espana/2014-09-29/muere-el-exministro-miguel-boyer_218217/

A former staffer on Donald Trump’s presidential campaign says he kissed her without her consent outside a rally in Florida in August 2016, The Washington Post reported Monday.

“I immediately felt violated because I wasn’t expecting it or wanting it,” the staffer, Alva Johnson, told the Post. “I can still see his lips coming straight for my face.” 

The allegation is described in a federal lawsuit filed Monday in Florida, in which Johnson is seeking unspecified damages for emotional pain and suffering, according to the Post.

Trump grabbed Johnson’s hand and tried to kiss her on the lips as he exited an RV outside the Tampa rally on Aug. 24, 2016, she alleges in the lawsuit and told the Post in a series of interviews.

RELATED: Donald Trump at the Oscars through the years




Johnson told the Post she turned her head to avoid the unwanted kiss, which landed on the side of her mouth and felt “super-creepy and inappropriate.”

White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders dismissed Johnson’s accusation, calling it “absurd on its face.”

“This never happened and is directly contradicted by multiple highly credible eye witness accounts,” Sanders said in a statement.

At least 21 other women have accused Trump of various instances of sexual misconduct between the early 1980s and mid-2000s. He has vehemently denied the allegations.

In the lawsuit, Johnson, who is black, also alleges that Trump’s campaign discriminated against her by paying her less than her white colleagues. Trump’s campaign has denied the accusation.

This is a developing story. Check back for updates.

Source Article from https://www.aol.com/article/news/2019/02/25/former-donald-trump-campaign-staffer-alleges-he-kissed-her-without-consent-in-2016/23677488/

En su emisión del domingo 5 de junio, Noticias Uno expuso lo sucedido en el Congreso el pasado jueves, luego de la plenaria en la que se eligió a la magistrada Diana Fajardo en  la Corte Constitucional.

El subsecretario del Senado, Saúl Cruz, pidió la palabra en el auditorio para denunciar que, presuntamente, un camarógrafo de Noticias Uno lo había golpeado con la cámara en la cara. (Vea la nota completa del noticiero al final de esta publicación)

“Iba al baño y me he encontrado con una cámara de Noticias Uno y, como podrán ver, me han pegado en la cara. Yo no entiendo por qué si yo cumplo mi función, esto me tiene muy consternado”, dijo Cruz en la plenaria.

El noticiero publicó tanto los videos grabados con la cámara y un video de una cámara de seguridad que muestra el momento del incidente, en el que, según cuenta el noticiero, fue Cruz el que se abalanzó contra la cámara para golpearse y acusar al camarógrafo de agredirse.

La situación ocurre en dos ocasiones, cuando Cruz nota la presencia de la cámara que lo sigue. Inmediatamente se dirige a uno de los policías del capitolio, que se encontraba al lado del periodista de ese noticiero, Eduardo López Hooker, para denunciar la supuesta agresión.

Con cara de incredulidad, López Hooker le responde a Cruz que no cree que su camarógrafo lo hubiese agredido.  

Luego de que Cruz comentara el suceso en la plenaria, varios senadores lo apoyaron y hasta pidieron que se retirara a los periodistas del Congreso mientras avanzaba la investigación.

“Los senadores hemos tenido las más graves agresiones por parte de Noticias Uno, lo que pasa que la agresión hasta ahora era moral. Ahora saltan a la agresión física a un dignatario de esta corporación. Eso es inaceptable”, dijo el senador José Obdulio Gaviria.

“Ordeno que se haga una investigación al presente o sino va a venir el Eln disfrazado de doctor y nos va a masacrar en este Congreso”, dijo exaltada la congresista Rosemary Martínez, de Cambio Radical.

A juzgar por los videos publicados por el noticiero, no hubo agresión física por parte del camarógrafo en contra del subsecretario del Senado.

Por su parte, el senador Armando Benedetti señaló que la prensa en general merece una disculpa por parte, especialmente, del presidente del Senado, Mauricio Lizcano, porque fue quien abrió el espacio “para el linchamiento a Noticias Uno solo porque, de oídas, se enteró de algo”.

“Rechazo enérgicamente todas las voces de senadores de derecha que censuraban a Noticias Uno y que, además, pedían que los sacaran (…) Por las imágenes que usted está mostrando —le dijo al periodista López Hooker—, Saúl se debe ir”, dijo Benedetti.

“Iniciamos una investigación administrativa que, por supuesto con los videos está pronta a cerrarse. Y debemos enviar esas decisiones a la Procuraduría y a Control internado del Congreso (…) Yo no le puedo pedir la renuncia a él porque caería en una falta disciplinaria”, dijo Mauricio Lizcano, presidente del Senado a W Radio. 

Source Article from http://www.elespectador.com/noticias/politica/noticias-uno-denuncia-que-subsecretario-del-senado-se-autoagredio-para-inculparlos-articulo-696972

Good morning.

The murder case against Kyle Rittenhouse was thrown into jeopardy Wednesday when his lawyers asked for a mistrial over what appeared to be out-of-bounds questions asked of Rittenhouse by the chief prosecutor.

Rittenhouse is on trial on charges of killing two men and injuring a third during protests in Kenosha, Wisconsin, last year after a local Black man was shot by a white police officer. The startling turn came after Rittenhouse took the stand and testified that he was under attack when he shot the three men.

“I defended myself,” the 18-year-old said. During cross-examination, the prosecutor Thomas Binger asked Rittenhouse whether it was appropriate to use deadly force to protect property. Binger also posed questions about Rittenhouse’s silence after his arrest.

At that, the jury was ushered out of the room, and the circuit judge Bruce Schroeder loudly and angrily accused Binger of pursuing an improper line of questioning and trying to introduce testimony that the judge earlier said he was inclined to prohibit.

  • What did the defense ask for? A mistrial with prejudice, meaning that if one is granted, Rittenhouse cannot be retried over the shootings.

  • Will there be a mistrial? The judge did not immediately rule on the request and is allowing the trial to continue.

  • What did Binger say? He told the judge he had been acting in good faith, but the judge replied: “I don’t believe that.”

China and the US announce plan to work together on cutting emissions

China’s special climate envoy, Xie Zhenhua, speaks during the joint China and US statement. Photograph: Jeff J Mitchell/Getty Images

An unexpected agreement between the US and China to work together on cutting emissions has been broadly welcomed by leaders and climate experts.

The world’s two biggest emitters appeared to put aside their differences at the Cop26 climate summit and on Wednesday unveiled a joint declaration that would bring close cooperation on emissions cuts that scientists say are needed in the next 10 years to keep global temperatures within 1.5C of pre-industrial levels.

The agreement calls for “concrete and pragmatic” regulations in decarbonisation, reducing methane emissions and fighting deforestation, the Chinese climate envoy, Xie Zhenhua, said in Glasgow.

The two countries will revive a working group that will “meet regularly to address the climate crisis and advance the multilateral process, focusing on enhancing concrete actions in this decade”, the joint declaration said.

  • Was the move welcomed? It was broadly welcomed by global leaders and climate experts, with the UN secretary general, António Guterres, calling the move “an important step in the right direction”.

  • Is this the first pact between US-China on climate? No, there was a bilateral agreement in 2014 which gave momentum to the historic Paris accord the following year, but that cooperation stopped with the Trump administration.

Republicans who voted for Biden’s infrastructure bill threatened with retaliation

David McKinley of West Virginia, right, was among 13 Republicans to vote for the infrastructure bill. Photograph: J Scott Applewhite/AP

A group of congressional Republicans who helped pass the Biden administration’s infrastructure bill last Friday are facing calls for political punishment by their own party, including the threat of having their committee assignments stripped for supporting the president’s agenda, according to reports this week.

Several hardline Republicans, including the Colorado congresswoman Lauren Boebert and former Trump White House chief of staff Mark Meadows, have publicly urged retaliation against party colleagues who voted for the $1tn bill.

Some members who were among the GOP rank and file who helped the bill pass the House say they have received death threats.

Many of the Republicans who backed the bipartisan bill have ranking positions on full committees or subcommittees, including the homeland security committee and the natural resources committee.

  • Would the bill have gone through without the Republicans? No – the bill, which passed 228 to 206, would have failed if no Republicans voted for it in the House late last Friday.

  • Is this a sign of trouble in the Republican party? Certain GOP divides in Washington have grown in recent weeks , especially in relation to the bipartisan committee investigating the Capitol insurrection of 6 January.

‘We’ve made history’: Flint water crisis victims to receive $626m settlement

‘We’ve made history and hopefully it sets a precedent to maybe don’t poison people,’ one Flint resident said. Photograph: Carlos Osorio/AP

A federal judge has approved a $626m settlement for victims of the lead water crisis in Flint, Michigan, which was one of the country’s worst public health crises in recent memory, in a case brought by tens of thousands of residents affected by the contaminated water.

Announcing the settlement on Tuesday, district judge Judith Levy called it a “remarkable achievement” that “sets forth a comprehensive compensation program and timeline that is consistent for every qualifying participant”.

Most of the money will come from the state of Michigan, which was accused of repeatedly overlooking the risks of using the Flint River without properly treating the water.

“This is a historic and momentous day for the residents of Flint, who will finally begin to see justice served,” said Ted Leopold, one of the lead attorneys in the litigation.

  • What happened to the water in Flint? The city’s troubles began in 2014 after it switched its water supply to the Flint River to cut costs. Corrosive river water caused lead to leach from pipes, contaminating the drinking water and causing an outbreak of legionnaires’ disease.

  • How will the money be distributed? Payouts from the settlement approved on Wednesday will be made based on a formula that directs more money to younger claimants and to those who can prove greater injury.

In other news …

The attorney for Arbery’s family, Benjamin Crump, right, speaks outside Glynn county courthouse on Wednesday. Photograph: Lewis M Levine/AP
  • One of the men standing trial for killing Ahmaud Arbery said they chased him because they were convinced he was running away from a potential crime and not out jogging, a court heard yesterday. Greg McMichael told police he and two other defendants were convinced Arbery “was getting the hell out of there”.

  • A French court has sentenced the killer of an elderly Jewish woman to life imprisonment with no possibility of parole for 22 years, in a case that caused an outcry over antisemitism in France. Yacine Mihoub was convicted of the murder of Mireille Knoll, 85 who died on 23 March 2018.

  • The head of lighting on the film Rust has filed a lawsuit over Alec Baldwin’s fatal shooting of the cinematographer Halyna Hutchins on the New Mexico set of the western, alleging negligence that caused him “severe emotional distress” will haunt him for ever.

  • People testing negative for Covid-19 despite exposure may have “immune memory”, scientists have discovered. The study found some individuals clear virus rapidly due to a strong immune response from existing T-cells. This could pave the way for a new generation of vaccines targeting the T-cell response.

Don’t miss this: meet the ‘inactivists’, tangling up the climate crisis in culture wars

A new tactic of dismissing green policies as elitist is on the rise, and has zoned in on a bitter row over a disused airport in the UK. Photograph: Getty / Guardian design

In May 2020, as the world was convulsed by the coronavirus pandemic, a strange video began appearing on Facebook. “Climate alarm is reaching untold levels of exaggeration and hysteria,” said an unseen narrator, over a montage of protests and clips of a tearful Greta Thunberg. “There is no doubt about it, climate change has become a cult,” it continued, to the kind of pounding beat you might hear on the soundtrack of a Hollywood blockbuster. The video, one of many, showed that as climate science has gone mainstream, outright denialism has been pushed to the fringes.

… Or this: how the wellness industry turned its back on Covid science

Many wellness influencers are ‘using cult leader techniques in digital spaces’, sowing fear and hesitancy about Covid. Illustration: Guardian Design composite

Anti-vaccine or vaccine-hesitant attitudes are as abundant in online wellness circles as pastel-coloured Instagram infographics and asana poses on the beach at sunset. “People are really confused by what is happening,” says Derek Beres, the co-host of Conspirituality, a podcast about the convergence of conspiracy theories and wellness. “Why is their yoga instructor sharing QAnon hashtags?” As wellness gurus increasingly promote vaccine scepticism, conspiracy theories and the myth that ill people have themselves to blame, how did self-care turn so nasty?

Climate check: ‘Our children may not want to be farmers’

Manut Boonpayong stands in his pomelo grove. Photograph: Lauren DeCicca/The Guardian

Throughout Cop26, the Guardian has been publishing the stories of the people whose lives have been upended – sometimes devastated – by the climate breakdown. From extreme weather obliterating homes to rising sea levels ruining crops, climate breakdown is a terrifying daily reality for many including Manut Boonpayong, who lives in Samut Songkhram province, Thailand. He says: “Farming itself is not hard, but the issues that I am facing are ones that I cannot manage, and which are unpredictable and uncontrollable.”

Want more environmental stories delivered to your inbox? Sign up to our new newsletter Down to Earth to get original and essential reporting on the climate crisis every week

Last thing: Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez gives verdict on Scottish favourite Irn-Bru

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez tries Irn Bru for the first time. Photograph: Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez/Reuters

Cop26 is not short of controversial subjects, and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez has demonstrated she is not afraid to get stuck into the big questions: namely, would she like the Scottish fizzy drink Irn-Bru? The bright orange drink has become the surprise curiosity of Cop26. Delegates from all over the world have been sharing their thoughts on its unique taste, with mixed reviews. In an Instagram video of herself trying the drink for the first time, the US congresswoman said: “Oh my God, love it, love it. This tastes just like the Latino soda Kola Champagne.”

Sign up

First Thing is delivered to thousands of inboxes every weekday. If you’re not already signed up, subscribe now.

Get in touch

If you have any questions or comments about any of our newsletters please email newsletters@theguardian.com

Source Article from https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/nov/11/first-thing-kyle-rittenhouse-case-jeopardy-lawyers-seek-mistrial

WikiLeaks has made multiple disclosures over the past decade, including one in March 2017 when the group released what it said were CIA technical documents on a range of spying techniques.

Saul Loeb/AFP/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Saul Loeb/AFP/Getty Images

WikiLeaks has made multiple disclosures over the past decade, including one in March 2017 when the group released what it said were CIA technical documents on a range of spying techniques.

Saul Loeb/AFP/Getty Images

To its supporters, the WikiLeaks disclosures have revealed a wealth of important information that the U.S. government wanted to keep hidden, particularly in the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

This included abuses by the military and a video that showed a U.S. helicopter attack in Iraq on suspected militants. Those killed turned out to be unarmed civilians and journalists.

WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, now under arrest in Britain, has often argued that no one has been harmed by the WikiLeaks disclosures.

But many in the national security community say the leaks were harmful to a broad range of people. However, they generally say the damage was limited and has faded since the first big WikiLeaks dump in 2010, which included hundreds of thousands of classified documents from the U.S. military and the State Department.

Chelsea Manning, a former Army private, spent seven years in prison for leaking the documents to WikiLeaks in 2010. Manning, who was freed two years ago, was taken back into custody last month when she refused to testify before a grand jury in a case involving WikiLeaks and Assange.

P.J. Crowley, the State Department spokesman when the WikiLeaks story erupted in 2010, said those most at risk were civilians in Afghanistan and Iraq who were secretly passing information to the U.S. military.

“A number of people went into hiding, a number of people had to move, particularly those civilians in war zones who had told U.S. soldiers about movements of the Taliban and al-Qaida,” he said. “No doubt some of those people were harmed when their identities were compromised.”

WikiLeaks has made multiple disclosures over the past decade, including one in March 2017 when the group released what it said were CIA technical documents on a range of spying techniques.

This revealed ways that a state-of-the art television could serve as a listening device even when it was turned off.

Larry Pfeiffer, the CIA chief of staff from 2006 to 2009, said these kinds of breaches can impose long-term costs, though they can be difficult to quantify.

“It informs the potential enemies of a technique we use, that they can now develop countermeasures against,” Pfeiffer said.

This also forces the spy agency to go back to the drawing board, he added.

“Once invalidated, it now creates situations where the U.S. intelligence community is going to have to expend resources and going to have to spend both dollars and people to develop new methods,” said Pfeiffer, who now heads the Michael V. Hayden Center for Intelligence at George Mason University.

On the diplomatic front, WikiLeaks shared many examples of U.S. diplomats writing in unflattering terms about foreign leaders, causing the U.S. embarrassment.

But more importantly, said Scott Anderson, a former State Department lawyer who served in Iraq in 2012 and 2013, some of these countries have vulnerable opposition leaders and human rights activists who were quietly in contact with U.S. diplomats. These private, sensitive discussions suddenly became public with the WikiLeaks dumps.

“That can really chill the ability of those American personnel to build those sorts of relationships and have frank conversations with their contacts,” said Anderson, now at the Brookings Institution.

Anderson notes that the U.S. still has a program to issue visas to Afghans and Iraqis to the U.S. in return for the help they provided — and in recognition of the danger they face.

Crowley pointed to the impact of leaks that upset former Libyan leader Moammar Gadhafi.

“We had an ambassador in Libya, and we had to remove him from his post because he was directly threatened by Moammar Gadhafi’s thugs,” Crowley said.

Some countries, Crowley added, took a much more relaxed approach to the disclosures, even when they were criticized in the documents.

“One foreign minister told the U.S. secretary of state, ‘You know, don’t worry about it. You should see what we report about you,’ ” Crowley recalled.

Many of the assessments today are similar to the one offered nine years ago by Bob Gates, who served as defense secretary when the WikiLeaks disclosures took place.

“The fact is, governments deal with the United States because it’s in their interest. Not because they like us, not because they trust us and not because they believe we can keep secrets,” Gates said. “Is this embarrassing? Yes. Is it awkward? Yes. Consequences for U.S. foreign policy? I think fairly modest.”

Greg Myre is a national security correspondent. Follow him @gregmyre1.

Source Article from https://www.npr.org/2019/04/12/712659290/how-much-did-wikileaks-damage-u-s-national-security

Image copyright
AFP

Image caption

Slim es por amplio trecho el más rico de América Latina.

¿Cuál es la manera más rápida de conseguir un sitio en el listado de las familias más fabulosamente ricas de América Latina?

Ser dueño total o parcial de una empresa cervecera parece ser una buena estrategia, dado que 3 de los 5 clanes familiares más pudientes le deben su fortuna a esa actividad.

Pese a las dificultades económicas que ha venido experimentando América Latina los últimos dos años, el club de multimillonarios de la región sigue sólido.

Dueños de fortunas de talla mundial, los miembros de las dinastías empresariales más poderosas de Latinoamérica acumulan patrimonios que sobrepasan el Producto Interno Bruto de algunos de los países más pequeños del continente.

Y pese a la mala hora política y económica por la que atraviesa Brasil, el mayor país de América Latina continúa dominando la lista de las grandes fortunas de la región.

Slim sigue siendo el rey

Del listado que compiló este año la revista Forbes sobre los multimillonarios de la región se desprende que tres de las cinco familias más ricas de América Latina son brasileñas.

Aunque el nombre más poderoso, por amplio margen, sigue siendo el del mexicano Carlos Slim Helu.

  • 1 Slim, US$50.000 millones

  • 2 Lemann, US$27.000 millones

  • 3 Safra, US$17.000 millones

  • 4 Santo Domingo (Alejandro, Andres, Julio y Tatiana) US$14.000 millones

  • 5 Telles, US$13.000 millones

Su fortuna personal, estimada en US$50.000 millones, supera al patrimonio colectivo de cualquier otra familia latinoamericana y equivale aproximadamente al PIB de El Salvador.

Usando los datos del listado de multimillonarios individuales de Forbes, BBC Mundo estimó la fortuna de otros grandes clanes familiares de América Latina.

El segundo y tercer lugar en la lista de los más ricos de la región están en manos de dos potentados brasileños, Jorge Paulo Lemann y Joseph Safra.

Los subcampeones de la riqueza

Lemann es dueño de una porción significativa de la firma cervecera más grande del mundo, AB Inbev.

Image copyright
Getty

Image caption

Jorge Paulo Lemann tiene una fortuna estimada en US$27.000 millones.

Mientras que Joseph Safra es descrito por Forbes como “el banquero más acaudalado del mundo” por cuenta del control que ejerce sobre el banco que lleva su nombre.

En las últimas semanas, sin embargo, el nombre de Safra ha llegado a los titulares de los medios por una razón mucho más polémica.

En abril pasado, las autoridades brasileñas lo acusaron formalmente de estar involucrado en el pago de sobornos a funcionarios.

Safra rechaza los cargos.

La conexión cervecera

En el cuarto y quinto lugar de las dinastías familiares más acaudaladas de América Latina aparecen dos nombres que nuevamente se remiten a los intereses cerveceros.

La familia Santo Domingo, de origen colombiano, agrupa a los hermanos Alejandro y Andrés, cada uno con un patrimonio estimado por Forbes en US$4.900 millones.

También es miembro del clan Julio Mario Jr., sobrino de los anteriores, con US$2.600 millones en el banco.

Image copyright
Getty

Image caption

Tatiana Santo Domingo se casó con un miembro de la familia real de Mónaco.

Y con una fortuna semejante, su hermana Tatiana, hoy casada con un miembro de la familia real de Monaco.

Todos son descendientes del patriarca familiar, Julio Mario Santo Domingo, fallecido en 2011, quien convirtió a la empresa cervecera colombiana Bavaria en la más importante de Colombia antes de venderla a cambio de un porcentaje accionario de 15% en el grupo SAB Miller, hasta el año pasado la segunda mayor productora de cerveza en el mundo.

A su vez, a finales de 2015, AB Inbev, la multinacional controlada por Jorge Paulo Lemann, compró a SAB Miller en un negocio estimado de US$107.000 millones.

Un negocio todavía pendiente de aprobación por las autoridades regulatorias, pero que promete riquezas todavía más fabulosas para los herederos de Julio Mario Santo Domingo.

La fortuna combinada de los cuatro Santodomingo mencionados alcanza los US$14.000 millones.

Supera así al patrimonio de la quinta familia más rica de la región, la del brasileño Marcel Herman Telles, quien tiene “apenas” US$13.000 millones, representados en un 5% de propiedad en la supercervecera AB Inbev controlada por su paisano Jorge Paulo Lemman.

Cerca de esta cifra también están otros clanes familiares brasileños como los Marinho, dueños de la cadena de medios Globo y los Sicupira, también accionistas en AB Inbev.

Así como una dinastía bancaria brasileña, los Moreira, dueños de Itau-Unibanco.

Cerrando el listado de fortunas por encima de los US$10.000 millones, está la de la chilena Iris Fontbona, viuda del magnate de la minería Andrónico Luksic.

Source Article from http://www.bbc.com/mundo/noticias/2016/05/160503_economia_dinastias_familiares_mas_ricas_america_latina

Gov. Gavin Newsom and his Democratic allies are dragging Donald Trump center stage in their fight against the Republican-led campaign to recall the governor, banking on the overwhelming distaste Californians hold for the former president to sink the effort.

But recall supporters want the spotlight to stay trained on Newsom’s actions in office, including his response to the COVID-19 pandemic, and are trying to send a message to the mercurial former president: Please stay out of our campaign.

“I think the less he’s involved in the recall, the better it will be for the recall,” said Dave Gilliard, a veteran Republican consultant who is working on the campaign and helped place the successful 2003 recall of Democratic Gov. Gray Davis on the ballot. “The recall has to be about Gavin Newsom for it to be a success.”

Trump remains extraordinarily unpopular in California — he captured just 34% of the state’s votes in the November election. And that was two months before radicalized Trump supporters rioted at the U.S. Capitol to stop Congress from certifying the outcome of the presidential election, leading to Trump’s second impeachment in the House of Representatives.

Newsom’s Democratic allies have heralded the recall’s support among far-right Trump supporters, including QAnon conspiracy theorists.

Loyalists to the governor are trying to yoke the Republicans behind the recall effort to Trump’s term in the White House, which saw policies targeting immigrants in the country illegally, led to two impeachments, polarized the nation and ended with a half-million Americans dying of COVID-19.

Gov. Gavin Newsom had refused to comment on recall efforts, saying his focus was on reducing coronavirus spread and ensuring Californians were vaccinated.

In January, Rusty Hicks, chairman of the California Democratic Party, described the campaign to recall Newsom as a “coup,” akin to the violent pro-Trump insurrection at the U.S. Capitol. LGBTQ rights advocates recently criticized the recall campaign as a backdoor power grab “led and funded by anti-LGBTQ+ and pro-Trump extremists.” Rep. Karen Bass (D-Los Angeles) on Monday called it a “Republican plot right out of Trump’s playbook.”

Newsom on Monday for the first time directly attacked the effort to oust him from office, labeling the campaign a “Republican recall” led by Trump supporters.

“Let’s call it what it is: it’s a partisan, Republican recall — backed by the RNC, anti-mask and anti-vax extremists, and pro-Trump forces who want to overturn the last election and have opposed much of what we have done to fight the pandemic,” Newsom said in an email sent by his campaign. “If they are successful, it would mean risking the progress we are making to end the pandemic. We can’t let that happen.”

Kimberly Nalder, a political scientist at Cal State Sacramento, expects the attacks on Trump to be effective in California.

“The strategy of tying the signature gathering and any subsequent candidate to Trump — especially to the extremist groups that were associated with the Jan. 6 attacks — is smart,” Nalder said. “He’s pretty toxic. That association is pretty radioactive.”

But Gilliard thinks that tactic will fall flat.

“I think it’s a high hill for them to climb,” he said. “He’s not on the ballot, so I think it’s going to be stretch.”

If the recall campaign’s results hold steady from last month — when state officials reported that almost 84% of the initial signatures were valid — there would be more than enough signatures for an election that could oust Newsom.

More Coverage

Gilliard and other recall supporters dismissed Newsom’s attempt to cast the recall as a Republican effort to short-circuit the governor’s victory in the 2018 election. He said the campaign has received thousands of signatures from independents and Democrats who believe Newsom’s response to the pandemic was ineffective and heavy-handed. While nearly two-thirds of the recall petition signatures his organization has collected are from Republicans, close to a quarter are from independents, he said.

“It is important for Republicans to not play Gavin Newsom’s game, and that is his attempt to turn the recall effort into something that is about Washington, D.C., and the past instead of a referendum on what type of leadership you want to have here in California,” said Ron Nehring, a former chairman of the California Republican Party who unsuccessfully challenged Newsom in the 2014 race for lieutenant governor.

A poll by UC Berkeley’s Institute of Government Studies released in early February offered some insight into how Californians feel about the political futures of Newsom and Trump. Among those surveyed, 36% said they would vote to recall Newsom, while 45% would vote to keep him in office. A poll released Monday by Nexstar Media Group television stations and Emerson College had similar results. Nearly two-thirds of California voters favored having the Senate convict Trump after his impeachment, which would have barred him from holding public office, while 32% opposed it. The Senate acquitted Trump last month.

GOP political consultant Rob Stutzman, who was Republican Arnold Schwarzenegger’s communications director during the 2003 recall and during his first years in office, expressed doubt that Trump would insert himself into the effort to oust Newsom. Not only did Trump lose to President Biden in November, but during his years in the White House, Republicans lost majorities in both the House and Senate to Democrats.

“I don’t know he’s anxious to put another loss on the board,” Stutzman said. “I think there’s actually a pretty good disincentive for Trump to get involved. He might endorse one of the Republicans but I think it would be a light touch because he’s not going to help anything succeed.”

Supporters of an effort to recall Gov. Gavin Newsom are poised to put the matter on the ballot. Here are the details.

Trump’s absence from the White House and his exile from Twitter, his bullhorn of choice, might be the best news recall supporters could hope for, he said.

“It shouldn’t be lost on people that Newsom’s and other Democratic governors’ popularity began to sink as soon as Trump left office,” Stutzman said. “The comparison frame of Democrats-versus-Trump really benefits Democrats in holding their base together, as well as a majority of independents. So Trump getting involved would be very good news for Newsom.”

The recall effort, which now appears to have gathered enough voter signatures to qualify for the ballot by year’s end, was initially fueled by animosity California’s conservative minority has voiced toward Newsom and his progressive agenda, virulence that is concentrated among the most devoted Trump supporters.

The recall petition itself focuses on longstanding GOP grievances: It blames Newsom for California’s high taxes and homelessness crisis, and criticizes him for protecting immigrants who entered the county illegally and halting death row executions. The petition was filed in late February last year, before the enormity of the coronavirus crisis was known.

Gavin Newsom has faced a backlash against COVID closures and their effects on the economy, fueling a recall effort led by Republican activists.

“It’s full of this sort of classic Trumpian language,” said Dan Newman, the governor’s political strategist, who said the petition contained “anti-California extremist rhetoric that comes from Trump.”

Regardless of whether Trump decides to actively support the recall effort, Newsom’s supporters can be expected to do their best to ensure that the Republican president is tied to it in the minds of voters. This week, Newman accused the Republicans who hope to replace Newsom of “crawling all over each other to be as close to Trump as possible.”

Despite Newsom allies casting a Trump endorsement as something akin to a scarlet “T” in deep-blue California, a narrow path exists for a Trump-backed candidate to emerge victorious. If Newsom is recalled, the candidate on the ballot who receives the most votes wins — no matter how many votes he or she receives.

A ballot with crowded field of candidates could potentially splinter the electorate, especially if some high-profile Democrats decide to jump in. Though it’s a long shot, a Republican who reels in just 34% of the vote — what Trump received in November — could become California’s 41st governor.

That would require a Trump-endorsed candidate to attempt to earn the support of every Californian who voted for the former president, an extremely difficult task if there are several GOP choices on the ballot.

A candidate who can attract both right-leaning and left-leaning moderate voters could have a better chance of cobbling together enough support for a victory — and the vast majority of self-described moderates in California have a sour opinion of Trump, according to the Berkeley poll released in February.

Some of the Republican candidates hoping to replace Newsom have been open about their support for Trump and his policies.

Rancho Santa Fe businessman John Cox, who lost to Newsom in a landslide in the 2018 general election, was endorsed by Trump in that race, giving him a boost with GOP voters in the June primary — he finished second to Newsom and, under the state’s top-two primary rules, advanced to November. Cox applauded Trump’s economic policies during his frequent appearances on Fox News and defended Trump’s actions during the president’s first impeachment trial.

President Trump endorsed Republican John Cox for California governor on Friday, backing that could help Cox consolidate the GOP vote in the June primary and increase his chances to win a spot on the November ballot.

Richard Grenell, a former Trump Cabinet member who alleged voter fraud in the November election alongside other supporters without providing proof, has been a vociferous critic of Newsom and last month hinted at the annual Conservative Political Action Conference in Florida that he might run to replace him.

“In my three decades in American politics, I have never seen a better case for a recall than there is right now in California,” said Grenell, who served as Trump’s ambassador to Germany and later as the acting director of national intelligence. “And of course, if a public official is still failing to deliver on their promises and you can’t limit their term, or recall them in time, there’s always another option: You can run against them yourself.”

Afterward, Grenell stopped by Trump‘s Mar-a-Lago resort to have dinner with the former president, an occasion he memorialized on Instagram.

Former San Diego Mayor Kevin Faulconer kept Trump at arm’s length while in office, rejecting the former president’s hard-line immigration policy — including opposing construction of a massive wall at the U.S.-Mexico border — and he’s been more supportive of foreign trade and environmental protections.

Still, Faulconer said he voted for Trump in the November election, and he visited him in the White House in 2019, posing for pictures to celebrate the passage of the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement.

Faulconer personifies the peril for Republicans when it comes to embracing Trump, who attracts fierce loyalty from his supporters but is anathema to California’s Democratic voter majority.

When asked by a Newsweek reporter whether he wanted Trump’s endorsement, Faulconer sidestepped the question, drawing a rebuke from the president’s son, Donald Trump Jr. — via Twitter, of course.

“I think it’s safe to say if he won’t say that he wants it that he likely doesn’t deserve it,” Trump Jr. wrote.

Times staff writers John Myers and Seema Mehta contributed to this report.

Source Article from https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2021-03-16/gavin-newsom-recall-election-trump-covid-19-campaigns-republicans-democrats








Habrá referendo el domingo próximo



Mientras sigue el corralito en Grecia, confirman que el gobierno no pagará al FMI










Grecia no realizará un pago de 1.600 millones de euros que vence este martes por créditos del Fondo Monetario Internacional, dijo a Reuters un funcionario del Gobierno en Atenas, poniendo de relieve la profundidad de la crisis financiera que enfrenta el país, que al inicio de la semana vivió su primer día de corralito bancario.

Los ministros han dicho reiteradamente que Grecia no tendría los fondos para pagar al FMI, a menos que se alcance un acuerdo con los acreedores para desbloquear 7.200 millones de euros de congelados durante la negociación de ambas partes por las condiciones que se exigían a Atenas para obtener ayuda.

Las conversaciones se rompieron el fin de semana, generando la imposición de controles de capitales a los bancos griegos.

La directora gerente del FMI, Christine Lagarde, había dicho este mes que Grecia caería en incumplimiento el 1 de julio si no pagaba, pero un portavoz del FMI dijo la semana pasada que la falta de un pago calificaría a Grecia “en atraso”.

El incumplimiento del pago llevaría a Grecia más cerca de una salida de la zona del euro si provoca que el Banco Central Europeo corte la financiación de emergencia de la que dependen los bancos griegos. Sin embargo, se espera que el BCE mantenga la ayuda al menos por esta semana y hay analistas que dicen que Grecia podría incumplir su deuda y seguir en el euro.

Pese al golpe de un incumplimiento de pagos de un país de la zona euro, el destino de Grecia permanecería sin cambios hasta un referendo del 5 de julio sobre los términos de un rescate presentado por los acreedores del país.

Políticos de la zona euro han advertido a los griegos de que un triunfo del “no” al paquete de ayuda sería equivalente a un rechazo de involucrarse con los acreedores que apunta hacia su salida de la zona del euro.

El domingo el Gobierno griego informó de que los bancos permanecerán cerrados durante seis días (este lunes se aclaró que se podrán pagar jubilaciones) y el límite de retirada de efectivo será de sesenta euros, después que el primer ministro, Alexis Tsipras, haya anunciado la aplicación de un control de capitales a partir del lunes.

Según el decreto oficial, publicado tras una reunión maratoniana del consejo de ministros, las entidades bancarias griegas cerrarán hasta el 6 de julio, aunque este periodo podría acortarse o extenderse por decisión del Ministerio de Finanzas.

El primer ministro Alexis Tsipras había anunciado feriado bancario y controles de capitales en Grecia para este lunes, después de que los griegos respondieran a su sorpresivo llamado a un referendo sobre los términos del rescate del país con retiros de depósitos bancarios.

Tsipras culpó a los socios europeos de Grecia y al Banco Central Europeo por forzar a Grecia a tomar estas medidas, pero dijo que eso no detendría el plan de sostener un referendo el próximo domingo.

El rechazo “del pedido del gobierno griego para una breve extensión del programa fue un acto sin precedentes para los estándares europeos, cuestionando el derecho de un pueblo soberano a decidir”, dijo Tsipras en un mensaje televisado a la nación.

“Esta decisión llevó al BCE hoy a limitar la liquidez disponible para los bancos griegos y forzó al banco central griego a recomendar un feriado bancario y restricciones sobre retiros de los bancos”, indicó.

Sin embargo, el Consejo de Estabilidad Financiera griego había recomendado mantener cerrados los cajeros automáticos el lunes y limitar los retiros a 60 euros por día una vez que reabran el martes. 

El límite recomendado se aplicará a los tenedores de tarjetas bancarias griegas.

Los tenedores de tarjetas extranjeras tendrán permitido retirar el límite máximo fijado por sus bancos, dijo la fuente el domingo.

Para que los controles de capitales entren en vigencia, deben ser aprobados por el gabinete griego y luego promulgarse con un decreto presidencial.

“El consejo recomendó un feriado bancario de seis días hábiles hasta el lunes por la noche de la próxima semana. Los cajeros automáticos no operarán mañana, volverán a abrir el martes”, dijeron fuentes griegas.






























Source Article from http://www.ambito.com/noticia.asp?id=796690

The musical stylings of Weird Al Yankovic rarely offer clarity about the state of legislation in Congress.

But Weird Al’s 1984 hit “Eat it” (a parody on Michael Jackson’s “Beat It”) was inadvertently invoked this past week to crystallize the conundrum facing House Democrats after the Senate approved a crucial border spending bill 84-8.

HOUSE OKS BORDER BILL AFTER PELOSI REVERSES COURSE

House liberals were either going to hold out against the Senate measure in favor of their own – or accept the Senate bill.

Amid these deliberations, former Senate Republican Leader Trent Lott, a veteran of such impasses, ambled by the Speaker’s Office late Wednesday afternoon as a coterie of reporters stood watch in the hallway. Lott advised that if he were still running the Senate – where the overwhelming 84-8 vote spoke volumes – there would be only one clear path.

“I’d say ‘Eat it, House,’” Lott said with a laugh.

It’s exactly what they did.

But not without a fiery fight first within the House Democratic Caucus – and one that threatens to keep burning for weeks and months to come.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi faced a huge challenge as she sought to both assuage the concerns from her left flank and engineer a bill that could actually pass.

The House had approved its own version of the border legislation Tuesday night, 230-195. But the Senate devised a different, more bipartisan piece of legislation. Not as many controls and consequences for those charged with caring for children. Senate Appropriations Committee Chairman Richard Shelby, R-Ala., wrote the measure alongside Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., the top Democrat on the panel. The committee approved the bill 30-1. The Senate then followed suit with a staggering roll call tally of 84-8.

TRUMP REVIVES ICE RAID THREAT

“The administration opposes what the House is going to do,” said Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky. “We believe they support what we’re going to do.”

The House and Senate were out of alignment, approving competing bills. The front-runner for final passage, though, was fairly evident: The Senate bill secured more than 60 yeas, making it filibuster-proof, while the White House threatened to veto the House measure.

The House still held out hope, engineering a revised bill on Thursday as the plan came back across the Capitol from the Senate.

But the administration wouldn’t budge. McConnell wouldn’t budge. Things looked bleak for the House bill, even as it was apparent the House could approve the Senate version with most Republicans and many Democrats.

But Democrats faced a more immediate problem as the House began a pre-debate on the revamped measure Thursday afternoon. House rules allow members to vote on something called “adopting the previous question.” In short, it’s known as a “PQ.” If the House approves the PQ, things continue as normal. However, if the House defeats the PQ, the minority seizes control of the floor for an hour and gets to call up whatever legislation it wants. The majority rarely loses a PQ vote. The House hasn’t defeated a PQ (thus, turning over the floor to the other side) since 2010. If Republicans defeated the PQ, they would bring up the Senate bill. Losing control of the floor in such a fashion would be a major embarrassment for Democrats. But this was a distinct possibility. There was near unanimity on the GOP side for the Senate plan and dozens of Democrats were prepared to join them.

So, the House Democratic brain trust changed course. Pelosi dashed off a letter to her colleagues.

“The children come first,” wrote Pelosi. “We have to make sure that the resources needed to protect the children are available. Therefore, we will not engage in the same disrespectful behavior that the Senate did in ignoring our priorities. In order to get resources to the children fastest, we will reluctantly pass the Senate bill.”

So, the Senate jammed the House. And Pelosi relented because the math simply wasn’t on her side.

The House ultimately moved the Senate package 305-102. Pelosi lost 95 Democrats. But there were 129 Democratic yeas. So, despite the sniping from the liberal wing of the Democratic caucus, Pelosi still marshaled a majority of the majority. But Pelosi couldn’t get to 217 yeas (the magic number in the House right now to pass bills) exclusively on the Democratic side.

That’s the same issue that tormented former House Speakers John Boehner and Paul Ryan. They couldn’t quite move some bills with only GOP support when Republicans were in the majority. This was mostly due to protestations from the House Freedom Caucus. So, Boehner and Ryan often turned to the other side for assistance to pass major legislation. Pelosi did the same Thursday.

In a statement, the Congressional Hispanic Caucus said “what happened today is unacceptable and we will not forget this betrayal.”

A number of moderate Democrats privately vented their frustrations about the internecine warfare among Democrats. One Democrat said it would be “shameful” and “immoral” not to do “something.” Another moderate Democrat groused about liberals placing a premium on “ideological purity.” One Democrat noted that a yes vote on the more tempered Senate bill was a good vote for moderate and conservative Democrats who face tough races in 2020. After all, members from swing districts are why Democrats won the House.

One senior House Democratic leadership source told Fox News that some liberals will understand why Pelosi did what she did. But the source noted that many far-left Democrats “won’t get it. They’ll keep pushing.” The source said some Democrats will take notice of Pelosi fighting for the original House bill and only losing four Democrats. But the leadership source also suggested that Pelosi should have taken one more run at the issue. Perhaps pass the re-retooled bill, forcing McConnell to flush it back to the House and then accepted the Senate package.

This could be a seminal moment for Democrats. Is their tent big enough to accept both liberals and moderates? This is a distillation of what’s going on nationally in the presidential sweepstakes. Democrats may control the House. But they don’t have the Senate, or the White House. And while the bill may not be perfect, it was the right measure for most Democratic districts. By the same token, a no vote was likely the proper disposition for lawmakers representing the most liberal of districts.

Earlier in the week, Rep. Tony Cardenas, D-Calif., was asked if the “perfect was the enemy of the good” in the border bill negotiations.

CLICK HERE FOR THE FOX NEWS APP

“I hate that expression,” said Cardenas. “You don’t want to settle for less than what you’re capable of.”

Many liberal Democrats may agree with Cardenas’s assessment. Otto von Bismarck famously compared passing law to making sausage. And as both Weird Al, Trent Lott and many House Democrats now know, you sometimes just have to eat it.

Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/politics/senate-makes-house-eat-it-in-border-funding-fight-as-liberals-fume-at-betrayal

The devastating fire swept through the cathedral in the evening, riveting the world’s attention as nearly 500 firefighters raced to the scene. Thousands of Parisians gathered nearby to watch the effort to save it, and pray. Many were in tears.

[Here are photos of Notre-Dame over the years before the fire.]

As the last rush of tourists tried to get inside, the doors of Notre-Dame were shut abruptly and without explanation, witnesses said. Within moments, white smoke started rising from the spire, which, at 295 feet, was the highest part of the cathedral.

As it billowed out, the smoke started turning gray, then black, making it clear that a fire was growing inside the cathedral, which is covered in scaffolding. Soon, orange flames began punching out of the spire, quickly increasing in intensity.

Work on Notre-Dame, a celebrated icon of medieval architecture, began in 1163 and was completed in 1345. The cathedral, on an island in the center of Paris, is visited by about 13 million people a year.

“It is like losing a member of one’s own family,” said Pierre Guillaume Bonnet, 45, a marketing director. “For me, there are so many memories tied up in it.”

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/16/world/europe/photos-of-notre-dame-fire.html

via press release:

NOTICIAS  TELEMUNDO  PRESENTS:

“MURIENDO POR CRUZAR,” AN INVESTIGATION INTO THE INCREASING NUMBER OF IMMIGRANT DEATHS ALONG THE BORDER, THIS SUNDAY, AUGUST 3 AT 6 P.M./5 C

Carmen Dominicci and Neida Sandoval present the Telemundo and The Weather Channel co-production

Miami – July 31, 2014 – Telemundo presents “Muriendo por Cruzar”, a documentary that investigates why increasing numbers of immigrants are dying while trying to cross the US-Mexican border near the city of Falfurrias, Texas, this Sunday, August 3 at 6PM/5 C.  The Telemundo and The Weather Channel co-production, presented by Noticias Telemundo journalists Carmen Dominicci and Neida Sandoval, reveals the obstacles immigrants face once they cross into US territory, including extreme weather conditions, as they try to evade the border patrol.  “Muriendo por Cruzar” is part of Noticias Telemundo’s special coverage of the crisis on the border and immigration reform.

 

“‘Muriendo por Cruzar’” dares to ask questions that reveal the actual conditions undocumented immigrants face as they try to start a new life in the United States,” said Alina Falcón, Telemundo’s Executive Vice President for News and Alternative Programming.  “Our collaboration with The Weather Channel was very productive. They have a unique expertise in covering the impact of weather on people’s lives, as we do in covering immigration reform and the border crisis. The result is a compelling documentary that exposes a harrowing reality.”

“Muriendo por Cruzar” is the first co-production by Telemundo and The Weather Channel.  Both networks are part of NBCUniversal.

Source Article from http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2014/07/31/noticias-telemundo-presents-muriendo-por-cruzar-this-sunday-august-3-at-6pm/289119/