Most Viewed Videos

Speaker Nancy PelosiNancy Patricia D’Alesandro PelosiPelosi, Schumer push back on new Trump demand for wall funding: ‘We hope he learned his lesson’ Five things to watch for in Trump’s 2020 budget Democrats hurting themselves with handling of Ilhan Omar controversy MORE (D-Calif.) made her strongest comments to date on impeachment, saying in a new interview that President TrumpDonald John TrumpButtigieg: ‘I have more years of government experience under my belt’ than Trump Tucker Carlson says he won’t apologize for comments in resurfaced radio interview Buttigieg calls Pence ‘cheerleader for the porn star presidency’ MORE is “just not worth it,” unless there’s bipartisan support for going down that road.

“Impeachment is so divisive to the country that unless there’s something so compelling and overwhelming and bipartisan, I don’t think we should go down that path, because it divides the country,” Pelosi said in a Washington Post interview published Monday. “And he’s just not worth it.”

Pelosi told the newspaper last week that despite her opposition to impeachment, she does not believe Trump is fit to serve as president.

“Are we talking ethically? Intellectually? Politically? What are we talking here?” she said. “All of the above. No. No. I don’t think he is.”

The California Democrat has set a very high bar for impeachment proceedings, even as the more progressive wing of her caucus clamors to remove Trump from office.

Impeachment has split the caucus since Democrats took control of the House in January, and the topic has gained steam in recent weeks following explosive testimony from Trump’s former lawyer, Michael CohenMichael Dean CohenOversight Dem: ‘I imagine’ chairman will ask for investigation into Cohen for alleged perjury A deal for Trump: Take North Korea’s offer and build upon it The Memo: Team Trump insists Dem probes could ‘boomerang’ MORE.

Rep. Brad ShermanBradley (Brad) James ShermanTlaib to offer impeachment articles against Trump by end of month Democrat vows to move forward with impeachment, dividing his party Trump pick sets up fight over World Bank MORE (D-Calif.) re-introduced articles of impeachment on the first day of the new Congress in January, alleging that Trump had obstructed justice by firing then-FBI Director James ComeyJames Brien ComeyConway’s husband: ‘Banana republic’ if Trump got his wish to go after investigators It’s not about collusion; it’s about obstruction … and impeachment Breadth of Trump probe poses challenge for Dems MORE.

Freshman Rep. Rashida TlaibRashida Harbi TlaibDemocrats hurting themselves with handling of Ilhan Omar controversy Democrats allow anti-Semitism to spread with their weak resolution NY Times columnist on CNN: Omar ‘has come to be a bridge destroyer’ MORE (D-Mich.) — who drew national attention on her first day in office by pledging to “impeach the motherf—er” — said last week she will introduce a measure by the end of the month to oust the president.

In an interview with Showtime’s “The Circus” that aired Sunday, interviewer Alex Wagner remarked to Tlaib that “it doesn’t feel like you think he’s any less of a motherf—er today than two months ago.”

“That’s right,” Tlaib replied, smiling.

A third Democrat, Rep. Al GreenAlexander (Al) N. GreenDem to Trump official: ‘White babies would not be treated the way these babies of color are being treated’ Tlaib to offer impeachment articles against Trump by end of month The Hill’s Morning Report – Presented by the American Academy of HIV Medicine – Next 24 hours critical for stalled funding talks MORE (Texas), has pledged to force another House floor impeachment vote. He forced two procedural votes on impeachment during the 115th Congress when Republicans were in the majority, but neither effort was successful.

Green is scheduled to discuss his next steps on impeachment in an interview with C-SPAN’s “Washington Journal” on Tuesday morning.

Outside of Congress, liberals agitating for Trump’s impeachment, like billionaire activist Tom Steyer, quickly began pushing back on Pelosi.

Steyer’s group, Need to Impeach, has aired television ads and held town halls to pressure Democratic lawmakers on impeachment.

“Speaker Pelosi thinks ‘he’s just not worth it?’ Well, is defending our legal system ‘worth it?’ Is holding the President accountable for his crimes and cover-ups ‘worth it?’ Is doing what’s right ‘worth it?’ Or shall America just stop fighting for our principles and do what’s politically convenient?” Steyer said in a statement on Monday.

Democratic leaders on Capitol Hill have largely sought to tamp down the issue, arguing that lawmakers should take a wait-and-see approach as special counsel Robert MuellerRobert Swan MuellerSasse: US should applaud choice of Mueller to lead Russia probe MORE and congressional committees conduct their investigations.

Pelosi has long attempted to downplay talk of impeachment, calling it a “gift” to Republicans. She has maintained a consistent view on the subject since reclaiming the Speaker’s gavel, arguing it would have to be clear-cut and bipartisan.

“If there’s to be grounds for impeachment of President Trump — and I’m not seeking those grounds — that would have to be so clearly bipartisan in terms of acceptance of it before I think we should go down any impeachment path,” Pelosi told USA Today in an interview published on the first day of the new Congress in early January.

And in an interview around the same time with NBC’s “Today,” Pelosi stressed that “we have to wait and see what happens with the Mueller report.”

“We shouldn’t be impeaching for a political reason,” she added.

Cohen’s hearing late last month before the House Oversight Committee, in which he testified that Trump was directly engaged in bank fraud and involved in a scheme to silence women who alleged they had affairs with Trump more than a decade ago, gave new momentum to impeachment proponents.

Rep. Carolyn MaloneyCarolyn Bosher MaloneyDems feel growing pressure on impeachment Pelosi brushes off impeachment talk after Cohen testimony Dem rep says Cohen hearing ‘could lead to impeachment’ MORE (D-N.Y.), a member of the Oversight panel, said she felt the hearing “ possibly could lead to impeachment.”

But Pelosi declined to wade into the debate, calling it a “divisive issue in our country.”

“I’m not going into that,” she told reporters the day after Cohen’s public testimony.

Instead, she and other party leaders have fixed their attention on ramping up investigations into Trump.

The House Intelligence Committee has spoken with Cohen behind closed doors in recent weeks and is scheduled to interview a Russian-American businessman at the end of the month about plans for a Trump Tower in Moscow.

Democrats on the House Judiciary Committee earlier this month launched a sprawling investigation into the president’s administration, campaign and business, sending document requests to 81 individuals and entities.

House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold NadlerJerrold (Jerry) Lewis NadlerPresident Trump should not underestimate Jerry Nadler House heads down wrong path to impeachment with investigations Tlaib to join protest calling for Trump impeachment MORE (D-N.Y.), whose committee would oversee any impeachment proceedings, said at the time that the probe is part of congressional oversight responsibilities, adding that Congress remained “far from” impeachment.

“We are going to be the check and the balance,” Nadler told CNN the same day he issued document requests. “We are going to find out, we are going to lay out the facts for the American people.”

Updated at 6:52 p.m.

Source Article from https://thehill.com/homenews/house/433547-pelosi-says-impeaching-trump-just-not-worth-it

Two men have been arrested for assaulting Capitol Police officer Brian Sicknick, who died after responding to the riots on January 6, the Department of Justice announced Monday. The details surrounding Sicknick’s death remain unclear. 

Julian Elie Khater, 32, of State College, Pennsylvania, and George Pierre Tanios, 39, of Morgantown, West Virginia, are accused of spraying police officers with a chemical spray. They face nine counts, including assault on a federal officer with a dangerous weapon.

Prosecutors said surveillance video showed Kater and Tanios working together to assault law enforcement with the chemical spray and tear down bike rack barriers that were guarding the Capitol building.

They also viewed an open-source video of the attacks they said showed Khater approaching Tanios, saying, “Give me that bear s***,” and “They just f*****g sprayed me.” Khater is then shown holding a white can that appears to be chemical spray. Later, they said Khater sprayed the chemical toward three officers.

“The officers immediately retreat from the line, bring their hands to their faces and rush to find water to wash out their eyes,” the affidavit reads. Prosecutors said the officers were temporarily blinded and required medical attention.

Sicknick reported being pepper-sprayed with a substance. The two other officers described the spray as a “substance as strong as, if not stronger than, any version of pepper spray they had been exposed to during their training as law enforcement officers.” 

Later that night, Capitol police said Sicknick, 42, returned to “his division office and collapsed.” He was taken to a local hospital where he died. His cause of death has yet to be determined.

His brother, Ken Sicknick, said Brian wanted to be a police officer his entire life. “Brian is a hero and that is what we would like people to remember,” Ken said in a January statement.

U.S. Capitol Police officers guard the remains of Officer Brian Sicknick on February 3, 2021.

Demetrius Freeman / Getty


Prosecutors said a tipster flagged Khater’s LinkedIn page to investigators, who then contacted his former colleague in State College, Pennsylvania. After reviewing old work documents, the ex-colleague confirmed Khater was his last name.

Meanwhile, investigators received two tips including photos of Tanios at the Capitol riot. Prosecutors said Tanios was wearing clothing with “Sandwich University” in his profile photo and in other photos from January 6. The tipster said Tanios is the owner of  Sandwich University, a fast-food restaurant in Morgantown. 

Both men appeared in court Monday. Prosecutors are requesting detention so the men will stay behind bars for the time being. Tanios has a bail hearing scheduled for Thursday.

Federal prosecutors have charged more than 300 people and have arrested over 280 in connection with the Capitol riot on January 6. Officials have called it “the most complex investigation ever prosecuted by the Department of Justice.”

Source Article from https://www.cbsnews.com/news/capitol-riot-julian-khater-george-tanios-arrested-brian-sicknick-assault/

(WASHINGTON) — The 116th Congress gaveled into session Thursday swathed in history, returning the first woman to the House speaker’s office and ushering in a diverse class of Democratic freshmen ready to confront President Donald Trump in a new era of divided government.

The new Congress is like none other. There are more women than ever before, and a new generation of Muslims, Latinos, Native Americans and African-Americans in the House is creating what academics call a reflective democracy, more aligned with the population of the United States. The Republican side in the House is still made up mostly of white men, and in the Senate Republicans bolstered their ranks in the majority.

In a nod to the moment, Nancy Pelosi, the Democratic leader, was broadly pledging to make Congress work for all Americans — addressing kitchen table issues at a time of deep economic churn — even as her party is ready to challenge Trump with investigations and subpoena powers that threaten the White House agenda. It’s the first new Congress to convene amid a partial government shutdown, now in its 13th day over Trump’s demands for money for a wall along the U.S-Mexico border.

“This House will be for the people,” Pelosi was to say in remarks after winning the gavel, according to excerpts released ahead of time, “to lower health costs and prescription drugs prices, and protect people with pre-existing conditions; to increase paychecks by rebuilding America with green and modern infrastructure — from sea to shining sea.”

Pelosi vowed “to restore integrity to government, so that people can have confidence that government works for the public interest, not the special interests.”

The day was unfolding as one of both celebration and impatience. Newly elected lawmakers arrived, often with friends and families in tow, to take the oath of office and pose for ceremonial photos. The Democrats planned to quickly pass legislation to re-open the government, but without the funding Trump is demanding for his promised border wall.

Vice President Mike Pence swore in newly-elected senators, but Senate Republicans under Majority Leader Mitch McConnell had no plans to consider the House bills to fund the government unless Trump agrees to sign them into law. That ensures the shutdown will continue, clouding the first days of the new session.

It’s a time of stark national political division that some analysts say is on par with the Civil War era. Battle lines are drawn not just between Democrats and Republicans but within the parties themselves, splintered by their left and right flanks.

Pelosi defied history in returning to the speaker’s office after eight years in the minority, overcoming internal opposition from Democrats demanding a new generation of leaders. She will be the first to regain the gavel since legendary Sam Rayburn of Texas in 1955.

Putting Pelosi’s name forward for nomination, Rep. Hakeem Jeffries of New York, the incoming Democratic caucus chair, recounted her previous accomplishments — passing the Affordable Care Act, helping the country out of the Great Recession — as preludes to her next ones. He called her leadership “unparalleled in modern American history.”

As speaker, she’ll face an early challenge from the party’s robust wing of liberal newcomers, including 29-year-old New Yorker Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, who has risen to such prominence she is already known around the Capitol — and on her prolific social media accounts — by the nickname “AOC.” She said she’d cast a no vote on a new package of rules to govern the House.

Ocasio-Cortez and other liberals oppose the pay-as-you-go budget provisions in the rules package that would allow restrictive objections to any legislation that would add to federal deficits. They say such restraints would hamstring Democratic efforts to invest in health care, education and develop a Green New Deal of renewable energy infrastructure projects to fight climate change.

Republicans face their own internal battles beyond just the conservative House Freedom Caucus, but as they decide how closely to tie their political fortunes to Trump. GOP leader Kevin McCarthy’s name was put into nomination by his party’s caucus chair, Rep. Liz Cheney of Wyoming, the daughter of the former vice president. She said McCarthy knows “our rights come from God” and “government is not the source of our liberty.”

Many GOP senators are up for re-election in 2020 in states, including Colorado and Maine, where voters have mixed views of Trump’s performance in the White House.

Trump, whose own bid for 2020 already is underway, faces potential challenges from the ranks of Senate Democrats under Chuck Schumer. Trump had little to say early Thursday as the new Congress was convening, but he did tweet an attack on one of his likely presidential challengers, Sen. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts, mocking her claim to Native American ancestry.

The halls of the Capitol were bustling with arrivals, children in the arms of many new lawmakers. Rep. Emanuel Cleaver, D-Mo., opened the House prayer asking at “a time fraught with tribalism at home and turbulence abroad” that lawmakers “become the architects of a kindlier nation.”

Overnight, Democratic Rep-elect Ilhan Omar of Minnesota tweeted a picture with her family at the airport. She wrote, “23 years ago, from a refugee camp in Kenya, my father and I arrived at an airport in Washington DC. Today, we return to that same airport on the eve of my swearing in as the first Somali-American in Congress.”

Contact us at editors@time.com.

Source Article from http://time.com/5493221/new-congress-starts/

Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker says that he will revise executive orders to sync up with new CDC guidelines on mask wearing by vaccinated individuals in indoor and outdoor spaces.

The new guidelines, released Thursday, say that masks are no longer recommended for individuals who are fully vaccinated against coronavirus, paving the way for a return to normalcy as summer nears.

“I firmly believe in following the science, and will revise my executive orders in line with CDC guidelines lifting additional mitigations for vaccinated people,” Pritzker said. “The scientists’ message is clear: if you are vaccinated, you can safely do much more.”

The CDC revised its guidelines on Thursday, saying that vaccinated individuals should not be required to wear masks in indoor and outdoor settings, with some exceptions.

The guidance still advises individuals to wear masks in crowded indoor settings like buses, planes, hospitals, prisons and homeless shelters.

Dr. Rochelle Walensky, the director of the CDC, cited evidence and the efficacy of the COVID vaccine, along with decreasing COVID case numbers, as main reasons for the change.

“If you are fully vaccinated, you can start doing the things that you had stopped doing because of the pandemic,” she said.

Individuals with compromised immune systems should consult with physicians before removing their masks, and individuals may be required to continue wearing them in certain instances, including at private businesses.

Pritzker’s administration has said it would continue to follow CDC guidance on mask-wearing, even as the state prepares to move into a so-called “Bridge Phase” in its COVID reopening plans. In that phase, capacity at outdoor events will increase dramatically, with Cubs and White Sox games now permitting up to 60% capacity.

If numbers continue to decline, Pritzker says the state could move to Phase Five, a full removal of all remaining COVID mitigations, by June 11.

Top Digital Stories – NBC 5



Source Article from https://www.nbcchicago.com/news/coronavirus/pritzker-to-revise-orders-on-mask-wearing-after-new-cdc-guidance-released/2509698/




Fourteen days. That’s how long Attorney General William Barr has withheld the Mueller report from Congress and the public.

It’s hard to imagine a legitimate reason for his foot-dragging, and disturbing leaks should deepen the urgency for members of Congress who are seeking to pry the full document out of his hands.

Special counsel Robert Mueller spent nearly two years investigating Russian interference in the 2016 election and potential obstruction of justice by President Trump. He finished his work two weeks ago and sent a nearly 400-page confidential report to Barr. Two days later, Barr furnished Congress with a four-page letter laying out what he said were its main findings.

According to Barr, Mueller didn’t conclude whether or not Trump obstructed justice — but that in Barr’s view, the evidence Mueller gathered against Trump didn’t add up to obstruction.

It’s become clearer with each passing day, though, that the letter wasn’t a thorough legal analysis. Instead, it was a spin job — an effort by a GOP political appointee to put the best possible gloss on the findings and hope that Mueller’s purported “exoneration” of the president becomes the accepted narrative.

But according to reports in The New York Times and The Washington Post, the actual contents of the Mueller report are a good deal more damaging than Barr’s summary implied, and lay out a serious case that the president obstructed justice. Obstruction of justice is an impeachable offense under modern precedent.

There’s ample grounds to be wary of Barr, considering his past. In his previous stint as attorney general, under President George H.W. Bush, Barr recommended pardons for key players in the Iran-Contra scandal just as an independent counsel investigation was focusing on Bush, related to his role in the illegal selling of arms to Iran and funneling the funds from those sales to the Contras in Nicaragua.

Bush handed out the pardons on Christmas Eve in 1992, which had the effect of pulling the rug out from under the investigation and preventing a full accounting of what Bush and president Ronald Reagan knew about Iran-Contra.

Fast forward to 2018, when Barr sent an unsolicited memo to the Justice Department making clear that he thought questioning the president over obstruction allegations would be inappropriate, a move that should raise concerns about whether Barr approached the obstruction section of the Mueller report with an open mind.

Regardless of whether he spun the report, the fact is that only Congress, not Barr, gets to decide whether whatever actions Mueller uncovered constituted obstruction of justice by a sitting president. And they can only do that when they have the complete document. Rightly, House Democrats voted this week to subpoena the report.

It shouldn’t come to that. If the recent reports are wrong, and Barr’s characterization of the Mueller report was an accurate account of the special counsel’s findings, then the attorney general should release the full report for his own sake. But if the news accounts are right, and the public’s understanding of the Mueller report is incomplete and politically skewed, then Barr must release it for the country’s sake.

Until then, this editorial page will feature a daily reminder of how many days it has been since Barr has received the Mueller report without releasing the full document to Congress. Fourteen days and counting.


Source Article from https://www.bostonglobe.com/opinion/editorials/2019/04/05/days-americans-should-count-days-until-mueller-report-released-congress/wIR8sbhnyKFtnaU8lKOsUN/story.html

Image copyright
Reuters

Image caption

Maduro anuncio también reformas en el sistema de control de precios.

El presidente de Venezuela, Nicolás Maduro, anunció este miércoles una devaluación de la moneda, una flexibilización del control de cambios y una subida en el precio de la gasolina por primera vez en 20 años.

Maduro dijo en una intervención televisada que el precio del litro de 91 octanos pasará a ser de 1 bolívar y el de 95 octanos, que representa un 70% del mercado, se venderá a 6 bolívares.

Eso equivale a US$0,10 y US$0,60 si se calculan a la tasa de cambio oficial fija, que también el presidente anunció será devaluada para pasar a ser de 10 bolívares por dólar.

Sin embargo, el precio es mucho menor si se toman en cuenta los más de 1.000 bolívares a que se cambia el dólar en el mercado negro.

El nuevo sistema de precios de la gasolina entrará en vigor este viernes 19 de febrero en las 1.600 bombas de gasolina del país.

Image copyright
Isabella Saturno

Image caption

En la capital del país, Caracas, los ciudadanos acudieron a comprar gasolina preocupados por la anunciada subida.

La última vez que el gobierno venezolano subió el precio de la gasolina fue en 1996.

Recuerdos del “Caracazo”

El asunto sigue siendo políticamente muy delicado por el recuerdo del “Caracazo”, la ola de protestas contra el alto costo de la vida duramente reprimida en 1989 y que tuvo como uno de sus detonantes la subida del precio de la gasolina.

Image copyright
AP

Image caption

El nerviosismo se empieza a sentir en las gasolineras de Caracas.

A pesar de la subida, la gasolina venezolana sigue siendo una de las más baratas del mundo.

Sistema cambiario

Maduro además anunció cambios en el sistema de control de cambios en el que hasta ahora vienen funcionando en paralelo tres tasas oficiales, junto a la del mercado negro.

A partir de ahora, el esquema se manejará bajo dos bandas: una protegida y otra en un sistema complementario flotante.

El mandatario habló del Plan Nacional de Divisas convertibles con el que la tasa del llamado Sistema Marginal de Divisas (Simadi) pasará a ser “flotante”.

Source Article from http://www.bbc.com/mundo/noticias/2016/02/160217_venezuela_precio_gasolina_az

A grandmother from Indiana who participated in the Jan. 6 insurrection at the U.S. Capitol was sentenced Wednesday to three years of probation for her participation in the riot, making her the first person sentenced in the attack.

Anna Morgan-Lloyd, a 49-year-old hair salon owner, pleaded guilty to one misdemeanor count of parading, demonstrating, or picketing in a capitol building, which carries a maximum sentence of six months in jail and a $5,000 fine. Washington, D.C., District Judge Royce Lamberth also ordered her to complete 40 hours of community service and pay $500 in restitution.

The sentence is what the defense had asked for, and the government supported.

Prior to sentencing, prosecutors said they found the sentence “appropriate,” despite what they called Morgan-Lloyd’s initial “ill-considered and misguided commentary,” in part because there was no evidence that she preplanned her attack or incited others, and because she worked with investigators, admitted to her actions, and expressed contrition.

Before receiving her sentence, Morgan-Lloyd tearfully apologized to the court for participating in what she called a “disgraceful” day.

“I went there to show support for President Trump peacefully, and I’m ashamed that it became a savage display of violence that day,” Morgan-Lloyd said.

She did not face any major charges for her role.

The sentencing marks a milestone in the Jan. 6 investigation, which enters a new phase after its first seven months. Dozens of accused rioters are in early plea discussions, according to prosecutors, with nearly a dozen rioters having pleaded guilty to charges so far.

To date, roughly 500 individuals have been arrested for participating in the riot in what has become one of the largest investigations ever undertaken by the Department of Justice.

Morgan-Lloyd first came to the attention of authorities in January when she applied for a gun permit just weeks after the riot, and an employee at the local sheriff’s office recognized her while processing the application. A client at her hair salon told FBI investigators that she “regularly spoke supportively of QAnon and other conspiracy theories,” according to court documents.

A friend who accompanied Lloyd to the Capitol later posted multiple photos on Facebook, with one caption reading, “Inside Capitol Building.”

“Best … day ever!! I’ll never forget. We got into the Capitol Building,” Morgan-Lloyd responded in the comments accompanying the photo, according to prosecutors.

In a letter written to the judge in support of probation, Morgan-Lloyd said she “felt ashamed” that the riot had turned violent and apologized for the chaos that day. Morgan-Lloyd said that she is a registered Democrat who “found [herself] supporting Trump” in the 2016 election, which she “found hard to believe because we didn’t like him at all before.”

“But he was standing up for what we believe in. We couldn’t argue with it,” Morgan-Lloyd said in the letter.

“Probation comes once in a lifetime,” Judge Lamberth told Morgan-Lloyd Wednesday in court. “This is your once.”

Source Article from https://abcnews.go.com/US/im-ashamed-woman-breached-capitol-receives-probation-1st/story?id=78445859

Mick Mulvaney, the director of the Office of Management and Budget and until three days ago also the director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, is adding acting White House chief of staff to his plate.

Mulvaney, one of the few establishment fiscal wonks of the Trump administration, has been in high demand in a White House bleeding mainstream political operatives. The selection of Mulvaney for a job that no one really wants is wise, insofar as the former congressman has demonstrated political skill.

In practice, it’ll probably be a disaster.

For one thing, when the relationship between Trump and Mulvaney blows up (which it inevitably will, as it would with any chief of staff pick), the White House will lose one of its few truly competent fiscal conservatives. Second, placing Mulvaney front and center will render his entire strategy to manage his relationship with Trump impossible.

At the OMB, Mulvaney’s been responsible, perhaps more than anyone else in the administration, for conservative rollbacks of Obama’s regulatory state. Consider this exchange from a Politico magazine piece last year:

“Look, this is my idea on how to reform Social Security,” the former South Carolina congressman began.

“No!” the president replied. “I told people we wouldn’t do that. What’s next?”

“Well, here are some Medicare reforms,” Mulvaney said.

“No!” Trump repeated. “I’m not doing that.”

“OK, disability insurance.”

“Tell me about that,” Trump replied.

“It’s welfare,” Mulvaney said.

“OK, we can fix welfare,” Trump declared.

Sure enough, the Trump budget plan that Mulvaney unveiled a few weeks later would cut about $70 billion in disability benefits over a decade, mostly through unspecified efforts to get recipients back to work.

Mulvaney is an economic wonk, an attorney with a focus in anti-trust law. The self-described “right-wing nutjob” has excelled in both of his posts during this presidency, mainly because of his ability to circumvent Trump on policy minutiae while maintaining an excellent rapport with him. Trump thinks himself a warrior, and Mulvaney is certainly a happy one.

But managing Trump as a person and as his personnel is a different story. If it ends badly with Mulvaney leaving the administration altogether, Trump will have lost a true and increasingly rare talent.

Source Article from https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/mick-mulvaney-will-have-the-toughest-job-in-the-white-house-and-trump-better-not-ruin-it

A federal appeals court has called President Joe Biden’s vaccine and testing requirements for private businesses “fatally flawed” and “staggeringly overbroad,” arguing that the requirements likely exceed the authority of the federal government and raise “serious constitutional concerns.”

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, in an opinion issued Friday evening, reaffirmed its decision to press pause on the implementation of the requirements, in another sign that they may not survive judicial scrutiny.

The appellate court, considered one of the most conservative in the country, originally halted the requirements on Nov. 6 pending review, in response to challenges by the Republican attorneys general of Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi, South Carolina and Utah, as well as several private companies.

While the court has not yet ruled on the constitutionality of the requirements, the three-judge panel made clear that the lawsuits seeking to overturn the mandates “are likely to succeed on the merits.” They criticized the requirements as “a one-size-fits-all sledgehammer that makes hardly any attempt to account for differences in workplaces (and workers).”

The Occupational Safety and Health Administration, which polices workplace safety for the Labor Department, developed the requirements under emergency authority established by Congress. That authority allows the agency to shortcut the process to issue workplace safety and health standards, which normally years.

OSHA can use its emergency authority if the Labor Secretary determines that a new safety or health standard is necessary to protect workers from a “grave danger” posed by a new hazard. The judges on Friday questioned whether Covid poses a grave danger to all the workers covered by the requirements, and argued that OSHA already has tools it can use short of a sweeping emergency safety standard.

The Biden administration had asked the court on Monday to lift the pause, warning that delaying implementation “would likely cost dozens or even hundreds of lives per day” as the virus spreads. White House officials have repeatedly said that Covid clearly poses a grave danger to workers, pointing to the staggering death toll from the virus and the high levels of transmission in counties across the U.S.

More than 750,000 people have died in the U.S. from the virus since the pandemic began and more than 46 million have been infected, according to data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. More than 1,000 Americans die each day from the virus and nearly 80,000 are infected daily on average, according to data from Johns Hopkins University.

The White House has told businesses to press ahead with implementing the requirements even as the legal drama plays out in the courts. Companies with 100 or more employees have until Jan. 4 to ensure their staff has received the shots required for full vaccination. After that date, unvaccinated employees must submit negative Covid tests weekly to enter the workplace. Unvaccinated employees must start wearing masks indoors at the workplace starting Dec. 5.

The Biden administration faces a flurry of lawsuits seeking to overturn the mandates. Republican attorneys general in at least 26 states have challenged the requirements in five federal appellate courts. The cases will be consolidated in a single court through random selection among the jurisdictions where lawsuits have been filed. The Justice Department said earlier this week that it expects the random selection to take place on Tuesday at the earliest.

David Vladeck, a professor of law at Georgetown University, told CNBC that there’s a “high probability” the case will ultimately end up in the Supreme Court, where there’s a conservative majority.

“There are justices on the court who want to rein in the administrative state and this is a case in which those concerns are likely to come to the fore,” Vladeck told CNBC on Monday.

Source Article from https://www.cnbc.com/2021/11/13/federal-appeals-court-calls-biden-vaccine-mandate-fatally-flawed-and-staggeringly-overbroad-.html

CLOSE

After two days of talks between U.S. officials and Mexico, there is no agreement between the two sides to stave off 5 percent tariffs that are expected to begin Monday. (June 6)
AP, AP

WASHINGTON – The biggest flashpoint in the U.S.-Mexico negotiations over tariffs and immigration revolves around asylum – specifically which country should be responsible for absorbing the desperate migrants fleeing poverty and violence in Central America.

The Trump administration wants Mexico to agree to take almost every asylum seeker that crosses into Mexico – pushing the Mexican government to sign an agreement that would essentially bar Central American migrants from trying to gain asylum in the United States.

Mexican President Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador has resisted that step so far, although there were signs Thursday that Mexican negotiators might relent.

If that happens, the U.S. and Mexico could sign a little-known treaty – called a safe third-country agreement – that would carry huge implications for immigration in both countries.

“That’s probably the most important demand that we have of Mexico,” said Mark Krikorian, executive director of the Center for Immigration Studies, a think tank that favors stronger limits on immigration.

Migrants generally must seek asylum in the first country they reach after fleeing their homeland – but only if that country is considered safe. If it’s not safe, migrants can pass through – as they’re doing in Mexico right now – and apply in the next country they reach, in this case the United States.

If Mexico agrees to be designated as a safe third-party country, the U.S. could deny the asylum claims of virtually all the Central American migrants now seeking refuge in the U.S.

American immigration authorities could “turn them around and send them back” to Mexico, Krikorian said. He has accused Mexico of being an “asylum free rider” by enacting liberal asylum laws but steering most refugees to the U.S. border.

Designating Mexico as a safe asylum country “would really take away most of the incentive” for migrants to trek across Mexico to the U.S. border, Krikorian said.

But immigration advocates say Mexico’s asylum system is already overwhelmed, and the country is not safe – particularly for vulnerable migrants. Trump’s own State Department has advised Americans not to travel to five Mexican states, citing rampant and often violent crime.

“Robberies, extortion, kidnapping … these are common situations,” said Aaron Reichlin-Melnick, a policy analyst with the American Immigration Council, an advocacy group devoted to stronger protections for immigrants.

The council recently conducted a survey of migrant mothers detained in Mexico, and 90% said they did not feel safe. Nearly half of the 500 women said that they or their child had been robbed, sexually assaulted, threatened or subject to other harm.  

“The Mexican police and state agencies charged with providing security are often the very actors robbing migrants, charging them fees in order to pass, or handing them over to criminal groups who tax or victimize migrants,” Stephanie Leutert, director of the Mexico Security Initiative at the University of Texas, wrote in a 2018 analysis of the issue.

She and others note that Mexico has already moved to take in more refugees. Asylum requests have increased each of the past five years, with the nation on track to reach nearly 60,000 in 2019, nearly double the number from the year before, according to data from the Mexican Commission for Refugee Assistance.

Leutert said Mexico’s government institutions are too weak to absorb more migrants than they’re already taking in.

“I think the U.S. should be working with Mexico more on these issues and not pushing all this enforcement onto a country that doesn’t” have the resources to handle it, she said in an interview.

Krikorian says the U.S. might need to offer Mexico financial assistance in exchange for an asylum agreement.

“I think we should combine carrots along with the sticks,” he said, referring to President Trump’s threat to impose tariffs on all Mexican imports if the Obrador government does not stop the flow of migrants.

Indeed, Obrador has called for the U.S. to help Mexico address the root causes of the migrant crisis – urging the Trump administration to help foot the bill for economic development and other initiatives aimed at relieving the crippling poverty and corruption in Guatemala, Honduras and other Central American countries.

“The U.S. stance is centered on immigration control measures, while our focus is on development,” Roberto Velasco, a spokesman for the Mexican Foreign Ministry, tweeted on Thursday evening. “We have not yet reached an agreement but continue to negotiate.”

Mexico’s Foreign Secretary Marcelo Ebrard declined to comment Thursday on the prospect of a safe third-country agreement. And the White House did not respond to questions about the Trump administration’s demands for that.

But Krikorian said a fat financial aid package could go a long way in persuading Mexico to accede to Trump’s demand.

“We can make it worth Mexico’s while, in combination with a stick that if they don’t take our more money that they’re going to suffer some consequences,” he said.

Contributing: Alan Gomez

Source Article from https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2019/06/07/mexico-tariffs-trumps-demand-asylum-changes-flashpoint-talks/1370610001/

Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy this week set the record for the longest speech made in the House of Representatives in modern history, at eight hours and 32 minutes.

The Republican’s marathon floor speech, which started Thursday night and ended before dawn the next day, eclipsed the previous mark set by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi. The Democrat spoke for eight hours and seven minutes on immigration policy in February 2018.

Here are five key quotes from McCarthy’s speech.

AOC ALLEGEDLY INTERRUPTS MCCARTHY TO SAY SHE VOTED FOR BIDEN TO BE A NEW FDR

Immigration

McCarthy didn’t hold back on the House floor when taking aim at President Biden and the Democrats for their leftward-lurching policies.

During his speech, McCarthy torched Biden for ending Trump administration border policies, a decision that he said had incentivized more illegal immigrants to come across the border.

“Biden terminated every successful immigration policy put into place by President Trump, triggering the largest wave of illegal immigration in … history,” McCarthy said.

The U.S. has seen a surge in illegal immigration under the Biden administration.

“What do you think’s going to happen? That border when you hide a billion dollars in amnesty? What do you think’s going to happen when you reward people with $450,000?” McCarthy said in his speech, blasting Democrats over reports of payments to migrants separated at the border, as well as provisions in the bill granting amnesty to some illegal immigrants.

Democrats beefing up the IRS

McCarthy also took aim at Democrats for including a provision in Build Back Better legislation that would hire tens of thousands of Internal Revenue Service agents, asserting that “half” of those agents “are going after Americans who make $75,000 or less.”

“They’re going to have to give more because you’re hiring 87,000 IRS agents to come after them; 1.2 million more audits,” McCarthy said.

“That’s what you base this entire bill on. That’s what you waited for the CBO to tell you,” McCarthy added. The Biden administration lately has placed scrutiny on the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO), which reviews legislation and assigns them a budget score.

“How much money can we get from them? How is that possible? The payments for illegal immigrants?” McCarthy continued. “It’s just the latest data point in a much larger trend of failures.”

McCarthy later accused Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris of presiding over “the greatest series of border security blunders in American history.”

Calling out the Democrats’ zero-dollar price tag claim

Biden and the Democrats have been pushing the talking point that the Build Back Better agenda will cost “zero dollars.”

The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, however, projected that the spending bill will add $367 billion to the federal deficit over the next 10 years, without counting potential revenue from an IRS tax enforcement crackdown that White House officials claim will cover the remaining cost.

“The American people obviously know this bill won’t cost zero dollars,” McCarthy pointed out, adding that the “CBO score says in five years it’s going to cost $800 billion.”

“In 10 [years], more than $367 billion,” the top House Republican warned. “That’s what your children’s children will have to pay, and they’ll mark this day that it happened.”

Inflation 

McCarthy also unloaded on Democrats during his speech for economic policies that he claims is driving up inflation and hurting American families.

“You created inflation,” McCarthy said to Democrats. “But the first thing that was said, ‘it’s just temporary.’ Our own president said he doesn’t know of any economist that’s worried about inflation.”

President Biden, with first lady Jill Biden, speaks during a visit at Brookland Middle School in northeast Washington, on Sept. 10. (AP)

McCarthy pointed out that there were warnings to Democrats from both sides of the aisle about the danger of rising inflation.

“But you felt you had to go forward. You felt it was good for the American public to pay more,” McCarthy said. “And it will infringe on our fundamental American rights and liberties.”

Parallels with the Carter administration

McCarthy said there are similarities between former President Jimmy Carter’s administration and the Biden administration, pointing to the current White House’s response to crises facing Americans.

McCarthy recalled that Carter told Americans that “the heater had to go down because the price is going up, and we need to expect less as Americans.”

“Today, the White House laughs if you ask them what their plan is for America to become energy independent, a lower gas price,” McCarthy said, referring to Energy Secretary Jennifer Granholm laughing off a question about how she would bring down gas costs.

McCarthy noted that Virginia Rep. Abigail Spanberger, a moderate Democrat, said recently that “nobody” voted for Biden to govern like Franklin Delano Roosevelt.

“Just a few weeks ago, Congresswoman Abigail Spanberger said, ‘Nobody elected Joe Biden to be FDR,’” McCarthy said. “In response, Democratic New York Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez shouted, ‘I did!’” 

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Leadership is given special privilege in the House when it comes to floor speeches, which are usually limited to a minute or two per member.

Party leaders on both sides can speak as long as they want to, opening the House up to a filibuster-lite.

Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/politics/5-kevin-mccarthy-quotes-record-house-floor-speech

Source Article from http://www.lanacion.com.ar/1868602-nestor-sclauzero-es-el-nuevo-gerente-de-noticias-de-canal-7






Eñigio Rojas.- Por órdenes de la ministra Iris Varela, los tres pranes que el año pasado lideraron el motín dentro de la Penitenciaria General de Venezuela (PGV) fueron recluidos en área de máxima seguridad del Centro Penitenciario de Formación del Hombre Nuevo “El Libertador”, ubicado en Tocuyito (Car). “Estamos ubicándolos en un solo sitio para tenerlos a la orden de las investigaciones; no habrá impunidad con estos crímenes”, dijo Varela a Últimas Noticias.

Los sujetos son Jean Manuel Montilla (El Chimaras), Nelson Barreto (El Ratón) y Franklin Hernández Quezada (Franklin Masacre), quienes estaban presos en el Centro para Procesados “26 de Julio” desde el 28 de octubre de 2016, día en que se entregaron a las autoridades para dar paso al plan de pacificación en la PGV.

Pero tras el desenterramiento de 14 cadáveres que estaban en una fosa común de la PGV, Varela ordenó sacarlos de la “26 de Julio”, que queda en San Juan de los Morros (Guá), y recluirlos en Tocuyito (Car). Sospechan que el trío de pranes son los autores de la fosa común.

Al parecer allí enterraban a los presos que morían torturados por “Franklin Masacre”, quien no toleraba que los reos se atrasaran con el pago de las causas, una especie de “impuesto por vivir” que rondaba los Bs 2.500 cada semana.

El Grupo de Respuesta Inmediata del Ministerio Penitenciario y obreros que trabajaban en la refacción de la PGV dieron con los restos humanos. El Ministerio Público envió un equipo de expertos para la investigación penal abierta, según boletín de prensa.




Source Article from http://www.ultimasnoticias.com.ve/noticias/sucesos/reubican-pranes-la-pgv/

Copyright 2014 by NewBay Media, LLC. All Rights Reserved. 28 East 28th Street, 12th floor, New York, NY 10016 T (212) 378-0400 F (212) 378-0470

Source Article from http://www.multichannel.com/twc-noticias-ny1-launches-series-honoring-new-yorks-latin-american-communities/374437



– El principal agregador de noticias descubre cómo seguimos, compartimos y usamos las noticias.  

SAN FRANCISCO, 17 de julio de 2014 /PRNewswire/ — News Republic, una aplicación de noticias que agrega noticias globales para smartphones, tabletas y dispositivos portátiles, ha anunciado hoy los resultados de una encuesta global anual sobre cómo y por qué las personas consumen noticias. News Republic recogió casi 14.000 respuestas de personas en países como EE. UU., Francia, Alemania, Reino Unido, Italia y España.  

Foto – http://photos.prnewswire.com/prnh/20140716/127450

“La prensa parece ser el tejido conector de la humanidad”, dijo Gilles Raymond,consejero delegado y fundador de News Republic. “En cada país encuestado, ‘Sentirse conectado con el mundo’ es el principal motive para seguir las noticias”.

El análisis de la encuesta aporta luz sobre las similitudes y diferencias de cómo las nacionalidades se implican con las noticias. Además, los resultados ofrecen perspectivas interesantes sobre el papel del género en la implicación con las noticias.  

Similitudes en el consumo de noticias globalmente

  • 1 de cada 2 lectores en cada país encuestado comparte las noticias para mostrar apoyo por un tema.   
  • Aunque las noticias nacionales son las más importantes para cada lector en cada país, la mayoría de los lectores (60 %) también está interesado en las noticias internacionales. Y todo el mundo está más interesado en las noticias tecnológicas que en las empresariales.
  • 7 de cada 10 altos ejecutivos en los países encuestados revisan las noticias en aplicaciones móviles cada día. 1 de cada 3 le dedican entre 30 y 60 minutos al día.
  • Los resultados son similares para estudiantes de todos los países: el 70 % de ellos utilizan una aplicación de noticias móvil cada día. Y el 30 % de ellos dedican casi una hora a la prensa cada día.  
  • Los franceses, alemanes y estadounidenses están de acuerdo en una cosa: 7 de cada 10 en estos tres países están de acuerdo en que seguir las noticias les ayuda a tener conversaciones más interesantes.  

Y algunas diferencias

  • 1 de cada 2 estadounidenses que lee noticias se siente más inteligente frente a 1 de cada 50 españoles.  
  • Más de 3 de cada 4 lectores franceses y británicos no están interesados en las noticias económicas. Los alemanes, estadunidenses e italianos, sí.  
  • 6 de cada 10 americanos dicen que seguir las noticias les ayuda a tomar mejores decisiones frente a 2 de cada 10 españoles.
  • Los franceses (43 %) son los más propensos a compartir las noticias para mostrar desprecio por un tema, los británicos (40 %) para divertirse y los estadounidenses (33 %) para inspirarse.
  • El mundo se divide en utilizar dispositivos portátiles para seguir las noticias. La mitad, a favor. La mitad, en contra. Los sentimientos más fuertes están en España y Francia: 7 de cada 10 españoles dijo: “Sí”, pero 7 de cada 10 franceses fijo: “No”.  

Además, la encuesta explora cómo y por qué los lectores consumen y comparten noticias:

  • 4 de cada 5 altos ejecutivos utilizan agregadores de noticias para revisar las noticias y los altos ejecutivos son dos veces más propensos que los estudiantes a compartir noticias para inspirarse.  
  • Los estadounidenses son tan propensos como los franceses, españoles e italianos a compartir noticias para inspirar a otros.  
  • 1/3 de los trabajadores del sector privado en seis naciones encuestados son grandes usuarios de agregadores de noticias.  
  • 3 de cada 10 estudiantes y altos ejecutivos dicen que dedican entre 30 y 60 minutos a revisar noticias en el móvil cada día.  

Hombres frente a mujeres

  • Los hombres son un 30 % más propensos que las mujeres a compartir noticias para ayudar o asesorar a un amigo o ser querido.  
  • Los hombres son un 40 % más propensos que las mujeres a seguir las noticias para evitar el aburrimiento.  
  • Las mujeres y hombres son igualmente propensos a utilizar un dispositivo móvil para seguir las noticias. En todos los países, la mitad dijo: “Sí” y la mitad dijo: “No”.

Acerca de News Republic
News Republic es una organización independiente de noticias global con aplicaciones móviles para smartphones (iPhone, Android, Windows), tabletas y dispositivos portátiles (Samsung Galaxy Gear y Sony SmartWatch). Creemos que los que leen más, saben más. Nuestra misión es ofrecer información con fines de implicar a la ciudadanía. News Republic ofrece noticias de 1.000 socios de contenido autorizados, comparte 25.000 artículos diariamente y genera la lectura de 500 millones de artículos mensuales. Más de 12 millones de personas en todo el mundo leen noticias en News Republic.

Descargue la aplicación News Republic para Android, iPhone, Windows y Amazon.

Para más información, visite el sitio web de New Republic: http://www.news-republic.com o conecte con nosotros en Facebook, Twitter y LinkedIn.

SOURCE News Republic

RELATED LINKS
http://www.news-republic.com

Source Article from http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/news-republic-presenta-nuevas-visiones-sobre-como-consumen-noticias-ciudadanos-de-todo-el-mundo-267489471.html

Lake Charles, LA (KPLC) – Locally our weather will remain very summer like through Saturday. Tonight, will be warm and muggy with lows only reaching the mid to upper 70s under partly cloudy skies. The next several days we will see highs reach the low 90s, but with the humidity the heat index will range from 100 to 105! Rain chances will be 40% through Saturday, and most likely in the afternoon hours.

Beyond Saturday our forecast is still somewhat uncertain due to Tropical Storm Ida which is currently located southeast of the Cayman Islands. It is expected to continue moving northwestward until landfall sometime late Sunday or early Monday.

Unfortunately, any hope of this missing the United States appears to be gone, and it is growing very likely that someone along the upper Gulf coast may see a major hurricane make landfall! And because it is already farther north landfall will likely occur sooner too.

First Alert Forecast(KPLC)

There is still a fair amount of uncertainty regarding the track, even though today the models have grown very consistent on a landfall over Louisiana or Mississippi. I expect this variability to decrease Friday morning when additional data gets put into the computer models. Right now, the forecast cone includes the entire coast of Louisiana and thus everyone should prepare for a possible hurricane. Though I expect some areas will be removed from said cone as landfall grows near.

First Alert Forecast(KPLC)

As of 10 p.m. Thursday a Hurricane Watch is in effect from Cameron to the Mississippi/Alabama border; this means portions of Cameron parish are included in this watch. That means hurricane force winds are possible within the next 48 hours. Also a Storm Surge Watch has been issued from Sabine Pass to the Florida border; this means a storm surge is possible in these areas. But the greatest surge would be east of the center at landfall. If the eastward trends continue the watch could be trimmed down, but we likely won’t see that until the landfall location becomes more certain.

First Alert Forecast(KPLC)

It is too early to talk any specific impacts to SWLA because of the uncertainty on the track. But for now it would be best to plan for gusty winds and higher seas. So, pick up or secure any loose items you may outside your home, if it could blow away then secure it so it does not. Also make sure you know what your next step is if there is a change in the track toward our area. You need to think about where you would go if you were evacuating; and keep in mind other areas may be in the path too. That call may never come for that depending on the track, and I think we will know that more Friday.

First Alert Forecast(KPLC)

So here is the bottom-line: SWLA is in the forecast cone of a potential major hurricane, and we should be preparing for that now. However model trends have been going in a positive direction for us with tracks farther east. Unfortunately, that is not set in stone just yet, hopefully we get more clarity on that Friday. It looks very likely that someone from Louisiana to Mississippi will see major hurricane as soon as Sunday!

Be sure to stay tuned to KPLC for updates and be very careful about other information you may find on social media. I have seen a lot of disinformation and downright incorrect information posted and then shared. We here at KPLC do not believe in hyping things up and will always tell it to you straight; if we see a problem ahead, we will let you know. Stay calm and we will get through whatever hopefully does not come our way…

Chief Meteorologist Wade Hampton

Copyright 2021 KPLC. All rights reserved.

Source Article from https://www.kplctv.com/2021/08/27/first-alert-forecast-tropical-storm-ida-near-cayman-islands-hurricane-watch-issued-portions-swla/