Most Viewed Videos

As federal, state and local authorities continue investigating the disappearance of Alabama corrections officer Vicky White and capital murder suspect Casey Cole White, the Lauderdale County sheriff says the evidence is suggesting she helped the prisoner escape.

“The question is: did she do so willingly or was she coerced into doing it by inmate White by threatening her and/or her family or other means,” the Lauderdale County sheriff’s office said in a statement to news outlets on Saturday afternoon.

Vicky White, an assistant director of corrections at the Lauderdale County jail, and Casey Cole White, a man who was incarcerated on capital murder charges, have been missing since they left the jail Friday morning at 9:41 a.m. The two are not related.

Sheriff Rick Singleton said the primary focus right now is finding the two. Before they left the jail on Friday, Vicky White told jail employees to prepare Casey White for transport to the Lauderdale County Courthouse for a mental health evaluation, the sheriff said, though no such court appearance was scheduled.

Vicky White also told colleagues that she was going to seek medical attention after dropping Casey White off at court because she wasn’t feeling well, but Singleton said there was no such medical appointment.

“Our secondary focus is on investigating the escape itself,” Singleton said in the statement Saturday afternoon. “Indications are, since no court appearance was scheduled, that AD (assistant director) White assisted in the escape.”

The sheriff released a timeline Saturday detailing the chain of events and what has happened in the investigation since Vicky White and Casey White disappeared.

The two never arrived at the courthouse, which is located in downtown Florence, about a half mile from the county jail.

At 11:34 a.m., about two hours after the pair left the jail, a Florence police officer saw White’s patrol vehicle. It was parked among vehicles that were listed for sale. The officer, like other law enforcement, was unaware at the time that officer White and Casey White were missing.

At 3:30 p.m., a jail employee reported to the administration that she had been trying to contact deputy White but could not reach her. The employee also reported that Casey White had not returned to the jail.

After law enforcement announced that the pair was missing, according to the sheriff’s office, a member of the public reported seeing the patrol vehicle in a shopping center parking lot. Deputies searched the vehicle but did not find any evidence.

By 5:30 p.m., about 20 local investigators were working on the case, reviewing surveillance video from the courthouse, jail, shopping center and other locations.

As of Saturday morning, deputies were still looking for any leads on a vehicle that may have been used after White’s patrol vehicle was abandoned.

The FBI, U.S. Marshals and the Alabama Law Enforcement Agency are assisting with the search. The state issued a Blue Alert.

“Casey White is believed to be a serious threat to the corrections officer and the public,” the alert says.

Speaking to reporters at a news conference Friday night, Sheriff Singleton said he believes deputy White is in danger, citing Casey White’s history of violence. “He was in jail for capital murder…,” the sheriff said.

He said Vicky White had been “an exemplary employee” before violating sheriff’s office policy by traveling alone with a prisoner. Two sworn deputies are supposed to escort incarcerated people.

In 2020, Casey White was charged with two counts of capital murder for the Oct. 23, 2015 murder-for-hire slaying of Connie Jane Ridgeway. Rogersville police found Ridgeway’s body in the living room of her apartment after a neighbor requested a welfare check. The 59-year-old woman lived at Meadowland Apartments on Prince Drive in Rogersville, across the street from Lauderdale County High School’s football field.

White in December of 2015 was accused in a two-state crime spree that left a dog dead and a woman injured. Police said he carried out multiple shootings, a home invasion and two carjackings in north Alabama and southern Tennessee. In 2019, he was found guilty of a total of nine charges, including trying to kill his ex-girlfriend and kidnapping her two roommates.

Anyone who sees Casey White is advised to contact 911 immediately. Authorities say it is not safe to approach the 38-year-old. He is described by the authorities as 6 feet 6 inches tall and 252 pounds. He has salt and pepper hair, hazel eyes and tattoos on both arms, according to state police.

Vicky White, who has been with the Lauderdale County Sheriff’s Office for more than 16 years, is described by the authorities as 5 feet 5 inches tall and 160 pounds. She has brown eyes and blond or strawberry blond hair, according to state police. She is 56.

Source Article from https://www.al.com/news/2022/04/alabama-corrections-officer-vicky-white-missing-hunt-continues-for-escaped-inmate-casey-cole-white.html

Copyright 2014 by NewBay Media, LLC. All Rights Reserved. 28 East 28th Street, 12th floor, New York, NY 10016 T (212) 378-0400 F (212) 378-0470

Source Article from http://www.multichannel.com/twc-noticias-ny1-launches-series-honoring-new-yorks-latin-american-communities/374437

Representative Jerrold Nadler, Democrat of New York and the head of the House Judiciary Committee, has argued that the department’s view that presidents are protected from prosecution makes it all the more important for the public to see Mr. Mueller’s report.

“To maintain that a sitting president cannot be indicted, and then to withhold evidence of wrongdoing from Congress because the president cannot be charged, is to convert D.O.J. policy into the means for a cover-up,” he said before the House approved its nonbinding resolution to disclose the special counsel’s findings.

Some predict that any disclosures from Mr. Mueller’s report will satisfy neither Mr. Trump’s critics nor his defenders, especially given the public’s high expectations for answers. A Washington Post-Schar School poll in February illustrated the sharp divide in public opinion: It found that of those surveyed, most Republicans did not believe evidence of crimes that Mr. Mueller’s team had already proved in court, while most Democrats believed he had proved crimes that he had not even alleged.

Recent weeks have brought fresh signs that the special counsel’s work was ending. Five prosecutors have left, reducing the team from 16 to 11. Mr. Mueller’s office confirmed that Andrew Weissmann, a top deputy, is also expected to leave soon. A key F.B.I. agent, David W. Archey, has transferred to another post.

Mr. Rosenstein was expected to leave the Justice Department by mid-March, but may be lingering to see the report to its conclusion.

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/22/us/politics/mueller-report.html

Image copyright
Reuters

Image caption

Epstein’s more than $577m in assets were put into a trust, according to reports

Jeffrey Epstein signed a will two days before killing himself in his New York jail cell, US media reports say.

Court papers filed last week in the US Virgin Islands valued Epstein’s estate at more than $577 million (£475m) but listed no details of beneficiaries, the Associated Press reported.

The will, details of which were first reported by the New York Post, directs Epstein’s assets to be put into trust.

Epstein died while awaiting trial on sex trafficking and conspiracy charges.

The New York medical examiner found that the 66-year-old, whose body was discovered on 10 August, died of “suicide by hanging”.

Epstein pleaded not guilty to the charges against him and was being held without bail. He faced up to 45 years in prison if convicted.

The former financier put all of his holdings into a trust called The 1953 Trust, according to a copy of the will published by the New York Post. He signed the document on 8 August.

No details of any beneficiaries are included in the document, which lists assets including more than $56m in cash, more than $14m in fixed income investments and more than $18m in “aviation assets, automobiles and boats”.

Epstein’s collection of fine arts, antiques and other valuables is yet to be appraised, the document says.

Some of Epstein’s alleged victims have said they will go after his assets for damages following his death.

Reports about Epstein’s will came as US Attorney General William Barr announced a major leadership shake-up at the federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP). The acting chief, Hugh Hurwitz, was removed and former BOP director Kathleen Hawk Sawyer named as his replacement.

“Under Dr. Hawk Sawyer’s previous tenure at the Bureau, she led the agency with excellence, innovation, and efficiency, receiving numerous awards for her outstanding leadership,” Mr Barr said in a statement.

He also named former agency official Thomas Kane as her deputy.

Who was Jeffrey Epstein?

New York-born Epstein worked as a teacher before moving into finance. Prior to the criminal cases against him, he was best known for his wealth and high-profile connections.

He was often seen socialising with the rich and powerful, including US President Donald Trump, former President Bill Clinton and the UK’s Prince Andrew.

Media captionFootage appears to show Prince Andrew inside Jeffery Epstein’s New York residence in 2010

In a 2002 profile in New York Magazine, Mr Trump referred to Epstein as a “terrific guy”. But in comments this year, Mr Trump said that he was “not a fan of Jeffrey Epstein”.

What was Epstein charged with?

Epstein was accused of paying girls under the age of 18 to perform sex acts at his Manhattan and Florida mansions between 2002 and 2005.

He was arrested on 6 July after landing in New Jersey on his private jet. He avoided similar charges in a controversial secret plea deal in 2008, and instead pleaded guilty to a lesser charge.

That plea deal was closely scrutinised in recent weeks and, last month, US Labor Secretary Alex Acosta resigned over his role in it.

Prosecutors also accused Epstein of paying large amounts of money to two potential witnesses ahead of his trial, which was scheduled to take place next year.

Source Article from https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-49402526

President Trump and his political team plan to make his years-long quest for a border wall one of the driving themes of his reelection effort — attempting to turn his failure to build such a project into a combative sales pitch that pits him against the political establishment on immigration.

Trump has declared a national emergency to secure the funds Congress has repeatedly denied him despite his own admission that the move is likely to get tied up in court. This move has galvanized many of his supporters even as others on the right remain dubious and disappointed.

His campaign is fundraising off his showdown with congressional Democrats over the border — portraying the opposition party as more interested in political games than the public’s safety.

And faced with the fact that he has yet to build an inch of the concrete or steel wall he promised, Trump and his campaign have started relying on a rhetorical sleight of hand: speaking the wall into existence.

“Now, you really mean, ‘Finish that wall,’ because we’ve built a lot of it,” Trump falsely claimed at a campaign rally Monday in El Paso after supporters broke out in chants of “Build that wall!”

As he spoke, giant placards with the words “Finish the Wall” hung from the rafters, an unmistakable signal Trump’s aides say reflects the campaign’s growing push to convince the president’s supporters that the border barrier they imagined him building is already real.

These endeavors underscore the extent to which Trump and his allies are attempting to make 2020 a repeat of 2016 — centered on a portrayal of the nation as under siege from criminal immigrants and other dark forces, and reliant upon a die-hard base of older whites in rural areas.

The strategy comes with serious risks. It largely assumes that despite Trump’s poor poll numbers and his setback in the midterms, he remains popular enough to rely on the same strategy that delivered him the White House through a thin electoral college victory even as he lost the popular vote by almost 3 million votes.

“He used immigration pretty effectively in 2018 to motivate voters, but the question is whether it’s going to be enough in the states he needs in 2020,” said Jennifer E. Duffy, a nonpartisan election analyst at the Cook Political Report. “In places like Michigan, Wisconsin, Florida, Pennsylvania and Arizona, can it get the job done?”

Duffy added that if Democrats nominate a strong presidential nominee, Trump might find himself fighting “the last war” as the electorate adjusts to new choices and new debates.

Trump’s Republican allies remain confident and said his messaging in recent weeks — however bungled — is nevertheless setting him up for the 2020 presidential election, both in framing the wall as a motivating tool for his core voters and underscoring his commitment to border security.

“You can argue about the details, but strategically, it works,” said former Republican House speaker Newt Gingrich, a Trump ally.

“The president wants Beto O’Rourke out there, in contrast, saying that walls kill people and we shouldn’t have walls. That could be a snapshot of the 2020 election,” Gingrich said of the former Democratic congressman from Texas, a potential presidential contender.

Critics say the president’s exaggerated claims about ongoing wall construction will ultimately backfire, undermining his ability to sell himself as a master negotiator who can work his will in Washington.

“The president has always survived by living inside a reality-distortion field,’’ said Tim O’Brien, author of “TrumpNation: The Art of Being the Donald” (2005). “When things don’t go his way, he simply creates another narrative.”

Trump’s claims that the wall is well underway have intensified and become more descriptive in recent weeks as he weathered a record-breaking government shutdown over wall money and bipartisan negotiations to stave off a second lapse in federal funding.

“The wall is very, very on its way,” Trump told a conference of law enforcement officials Wednesday. “It’s happening as we speak . . . and it’s a big wall. It’s a strong wall. It’s a wall the people aren’t going through very easy.”

On Friday, Trump signed a bill that included $1.375 billion for fencing and other expenditures, a far cry from the $5.7 billion he previously demanded. That money can also only go toward building the type of barriers already in use, not the concrete wall Trump highlighted during the campaign and early in his presidency.

By declaring a national emergency, the White House is attempting to bypass Congress and repurpose more than $6 billion from the Pentagon and other agencies to fund wall construction, but Democrats said they will attempt to stop the move legislatively and in the courts.

“What you’re seeing is the mother of all pivots,” said veteran GOP strategist Mike Murphy, a Trump critic.

He’s trying to turn being outfoxed by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) “into a win by creating a rally cry for the reelect campaign,” he said. “For his core base, it’ll ameliorate some of the criticism. But it won’t help him with general-election voters. He’s playing survival politics with his own base and using the illusion of success.”

Trump has been building up to this strategy for much of the past year, as conservative angst mounted over the lack of progress on the wall while Republicans had full legislative control. Democrats took back the House in last year’s midterm elections, all but killing Trump’s chances of securing adequate funding to build hundreds of miles of wall on the border.

The president’s original promise, to make Mexico pay for the wall, also remains unfulfilled, succumbing to a political reality that was long obvious despite Trump’s claims to the contrary.

The president has complained repeatedly about news coverage depicting the wall as not being built and has told his campaign and communications officials they have to convince people that more of the wall is being built.

He has sought to meet with contractors about the wall, even giving specifics on how tall the wall should be.

Trump has repeatedly looked to unorthodox places to get wall money. For example, he has discussed using money meant to help Puerto Rico recover from Hurricane Maria to fund the wall. During a recent presidential trip to the border, Sen. John Cornyn (R-Tex.) told Trump that pulling funds from Puerto Rico could jeopardize financial aid to Florida and Texas, which were also hit hard by natural disasters. Still, the option remains on the table for future expenditures toward the wall, two White House officials said.

While Trump has expressed frustration over Republicans not providing funding for his wall during the first two years of his presidency, GOP congressional leaders have been irritated at times by his shifting demands and lack of attention to the specifics of the legislative debate.

The $5 billion he demanded earlier this year was an arbitrary number, aides said, after he grew frustrated that Congress only gave him $1.6 billion — even though his own aides sought that amount. Trump has often talked about the wall, but current and former White House officials say it has not been a top priority among senior aides. There has been no designated point person on the issue, and Trump’s agitation and concern often waxes and wanes.

Several times since taking office, Trump has redefined what he considers a wall. While his administration funded wall prototypes that were to be built of solid concrete or steel, Congress has placed restrictions into funding bills that only allow for previously deployed fencing designs. Trump has since claimed that such fences, including renovations that replace existing barriers, constitute the wall he promised.

During the last government shutdown, Trump told advisers that Democrats would be more inclined to support the wall if it was called a “steel slat barrier” or some other phrase. But eventually he relented, realizing there was no support for the wall no matter what he called it. 

Polls show most voters blamed the president for the government shutdown, though Trump has since cast it as a strategic win, despite the fact that it did not produce the wall funding he wanted.

According to a person who spoke with the president Monday, Trump has argued that he will eventually be able to claim that he “shut down the government over this wall” and that his supporters will approve.

Some of the president’s allies have said that politically, Trump’s “finish the wall” rhetoric should be interpreted more metaphorically than literally.

“The point of the wall is to show how the president is committed to border security and painting Democrats into a corner as being against that,” said former White House legislative director Marc Short.

“Finish the wall,’’ he said, “is a good message as long as the wall is a metaphor for border security.”

A White House official said it is even broader than that.

 “Finish the wall is really: ‘Finish what we started.’ It’s about the Trump presidency, more than anything,” said the official, who spoke under the condition of anonymity because the individual was not authorized to speak publicly. “It’s telling the voters to stick with us, finish what we started, as the Democrats pursue the Green New Deal or Medicare-for-all.” 

Veteran Democrats acknowledge the power of Trump’s pitch in a deeply divided nation but question whether it can work again in 2020 in the same way it worked with some swing voters in 2016.

“It’s an applause line that has emotional resonance — and it’s completely irrational,” said Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.). “There is, I think, a broad majority of Americans who are really fed up with the false contention that the wall is somehow the equivalent to border security. It’s a vanity project for the president.”

Many moderate Republicans, such as Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick (R-Pa.), a former FBI agent who represents the Philadelphia suburbs, have noticed Trump’s evolving updates on the wall — and have grown frustrated with his insistence on calling for a wall. 

“I never even use the term wall,” Fitzpatrick said. “That conjures up images of a brick-and-mortar structure, from sea to shining sea, when it’s far more complicated.”

Democrats have pledged to file legal challenges to Trump’s declaration of a national emergency, setting up a constitutional clash over the president’s attempt to usurp spending power from Congress.

A court battle could stretch out for months or years, but Trump is already determined to tell his supporters he is moving full speed ahead on building the border wall.

“He fashions his own reality,” said Barbara Perry, a presidential historian at the University of Virginia’s Miller Center of Public Affairs. “It’s like John Kennedy going out after the Bay of Pigs and saying, ‘What a great victory.’ But for [Trump’s] base, I’m just not sure that it matters to them.”

Source Article from https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/finish-that-wall-trump-seeks-to-turn-his-failure-to-build-the-wall-into-campaign-rallying-cry/2019/02/16/3fbaebd4-3138-11e9-ac6c-14eea99d5e24_story.html

Derechos de autor de la imagen
Reuters

Image caption

Lula, quien fue presidente de Brasil entre 2003 y 2010, sigue siendo uno de los políticos más populares del país.

El expresidente de Brasil Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva fue condenado este miércoles a 9 años y medio de prisión por corrupción pasiva y lavado de dinero.

En concreto, Lula fue hallado culpable de aceptar sobornos de la constructora OAS por US$1,1 millones, un monto que fue dedicado en la reforma y amueblado con piezas de lujo de un apartamento triplex en la localidad costera de Guarujá, en el estado de Sao Paulo.

Lula, de 71 años y presidente entre 2003 y 2010, siempre negó los cargos y se considera víctima de una caza de brujas. Ahora tiene derecho a apelar la sentencia y no irá a prisión mientras dure este proceso.

La sentencia fue dictada por el juez Sergio Moro, quien señaló que la razón para no ordenar el arresto inmediato del mandatario para que apele en libertad es “evitar ciertos traumas”.

En cualquier caso, la sentencia de Moro, encargado de las investigaciones sobre la trama de corrupción conocida como “Lava Jato” (autolavado, en portugués), es histórica: por primera vez un expresidente de Brasil es condenado por corrupción.

El caso, que inició alrededor de la petrolera estatal Petrobras, ha acabado salpicando a políticos y poderosos empresarios de Brasil.

Derechos de autor de la imagen
Reuters

Image caption

La operación “Lava Jato” comenzó en marzo de 2014 y ha salpicado a políticos y poderosos empresarios de Brasil.

Según la sentencia de Moro, citada en medios brasileños, el de Lula fue “un delito complejo que implicó la práctica de diversos actos en momentos diferentes”.

Además, de acuerdo con el juez, el hecho de que Lula era el encargado de nombrar a los directores de Petrobras, le otorgaba “un papel relevante en la trama criminal”.

En varias oportunidades Lula ha adjudicado fines políticos a este proceso judicial e incluso ha negado que el apartamento de Guarujá sea de su propiedad, algo que Moro descartó en su sentencia.

“Lava jato”

La de Lula es la mayor condena emitida en el marco del escándalo desatado en torno a la petrolera estatal Petrobras y que comenzó casi por casualidad en una gasolinera de Brasilia.

Fue en marzo de 2014, cuando la Policía Federal descubrió que, además de las bombas de combustible, el minimercado y la cafetería, en la estación había una casa de cambio que se usaba para lavar dinero.

Poco después se descubrió la relación de la trama con Petrobras.

Derechos de autor de la imagen
Reuters

Image caption

El juez Sergio Moro se ha convertido en un héroe de los críticos del Partido de los Trabajadores.

Y más tarde, a cambio de beneficios penales, algunos de los que ya estaban siendo acusados empezaron a delatar a otros implicados.

El escándalo fue salpicando a autoridades y empresarios hasta provocar uno de los mayores terremotos políticos del país.

Los fiscales denunciaron que las principales empresas constructoras de Brasil, incluidas gigantes como Odebrecht o Camargo Corrêa, habían formado un cartel para repartirse contratos multimillonarios de Petrobras.

A cambio pagaban sobornos a directores de la petrolera y a medio centenar de políticos de diferentes agrupaciones, incluido el gobernante Partido de los Trabajadores (PT) y aliados.

El dinero desviado oscilaba entre 1% y 3% del valor de los contratos con Petrobras, iba a compañías de fachada que los disfrazaban como pagos por consultorías.

Así, una operación contra el lavado de dinero que se llamó “Lava jato” -que en portugués significa “autolavado” aunque en la gasolinera de Brasilia nadie lavaba autos-, acaba de resultar en la condena de quien fuera uno de los políticos más populares del mundo.

¿Lula 2018?

De hecho, Lula, quien todavía es uno de los políticos más populares de Brasil, había anunciado recientemente su intención de volver a ser candidato a la presidencia de Brasil en las elecciones de octubre de 2018.

No obstante, si el Tribunal Regional Federal confirma la condena, Lula podría resultar inelegible.

Dicho tribunal suele tomarse un año para analizar las apelaciones, por lo que es posible que la decisión judicial llegue en la víspera de la elección presidencial.

Durante sus años de gobierno, el exsindicalista alcanzó tal notoriedad nacional e internacional que el entonces presidente de Estados Unidos, Barack Obama, lo llamó “el político más popular del planeta”.

Derechos de autor de la imagen
AFP

Image caption

Rousseff, la sucesora de Lula en la presidencia de Brasil, fue destituida en agosto de 2016.

La sentencia de Moro, cuyas investigaciones por el operativo “Lava Jato” han llevado a que algunos lo consideren un posible candidato presidencial, llega en un contexto de profunda crisis política en Brasil.

Dilma Rousseff, la sucesora de Lula, fue sometida a un juicio político y destituida en agosto de 2016 por normas fiscales, maquillando el déficit presupuestal.

Desde entonces gobierna quien fuera el vicepresidente de Rousseff, Michel Temer, que actualmente enfrenta cargos por corrupción pasiva.

Hace tan solo dos semanas, Moro sentenció a 12 años de prisión a Antonio Palocci, un influyente ministro durante los gobiernos de Lula y Rousseff, también por corrupción.

Source Article from http://www.bbc.com/mundo/noticias-america-latina-40577510

via press release:

NOTICIAS  TELEMUNDO  PRESENTS:

“MURIENDO POR CRUZAR,” AN INVESTIGATION INTO THE INCREASING NUMBER OF IMMIGRANT DEATHS ALONG THE BORDER, THIS SUNDAY, AUGUST 3 AT 6 P.M./5 C

Carmen Dominicci and Neida Sandoval present the Telemundo and The Weather Channel co-production

Miami – July 31, 2014 – Telemundo presents “Muriendo por Cruzar”, a documentary that investigates why increasing numbers of immigrants are dying while trying to cross the US-Mexican border near the city of Falfurrias, Texas, this Sunday, August 3 at 6PM/5 C.  The Telemundo and The Weather Channel co-production, presented by Noticias Telemundo journalists Carmen Dominicci and Neida Sandoval, reveals the obstacles immigrants face once they cross into US territory, including extreme weather conditions, as they try to evade the border patrol.  “Muriendo por Cruzar” is part of Noticias Telemundo’s special coverage of the crisis on the border and immigration reform.

 

“‘Muriendo por Cruzar’” dares to ask questions that reveal the actual conditions undocumented immigrants face as they try to start a new life in the United States,” said Alina Falcón, Telemundo’s Executive Vice President for News and Alternative Programming.  “Our collaboration with The Weather Channel was very productive. They have a unique expertise in covering the impact of weather on people’s lives, as we do in covering immigration reform and the border crisis. The result is a compelling documentary that exposes a harrowing reality.”

“Muriendo por Cruzar” is the first co-production by Telemundo and The Weather Channel.  Both networks are part of NBCUniversal.

Source Article from http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2014/07/31/noticias-telemundo-presents-muriendo-por-cruzar-this-sunday-august-3-at-6pm/289119/

Una de las noticias más importantes de ayer compitió mano a mano con otras de trascendencia política, como la primera comparecencia de Cristina Fernández de Kirchner ante la Justicia por corrupción o del cierre del blanqueo. La noticia fue una decisión de un propio productor de noticias, de opinión y de análisis.

Luego de 146 años, el diario La Nación cambió de formato. Del tamaño sábana, pasó a otro compacto más cercano al tabloide. No es un cambio menor. El diario fundado por Bartolomé Mitre siguió el camino que ya tomaron, con distinto éxito en esa estrategia, otros periódicos “sábanas” del mundo, que echaron mano a los compactos como un camino para ahorrar papel, retener lectores e intentar seducir a nuevas audiencias.

La industria periodística está en una encrucijada y explora esos caminos en esta época de intensas e inmensas transformaciones en el modo de informarse, en las conductas de los lectores y usuarios.

Una de las expresiones más acabadas que patentiza este tiempo de innovaciones ha sido el Premio Nobel de Literatura, otorgado a Bob Dylan, quien luego de varios días de silencio parece dispuesto a aceptar esa distinción que ha dejado estupefactos a muchos. Algunos autores han ironizado argumentando que así como Dylan fue premiado, algún escritor tiene derecho a obtener un Grammy, que se destina a los cantantes. Mario Vargas Llosa, también Nobel, ha criticado el premio al cantante. Salman Rushdie, sobre quien todavía pesa una fatwa (condena de muerte) por sus críticas al Islam, está en cambio de acuerdo con el premio al genial creador de “Blowin’ in the Wind” (Soplando en el viento), un ícono imborrable para más de una generación.

El significado del Nobel a Dylan es imposible de desprenderlo de esta época y es un símbolo de cómo los géneros y los formatos se entrecruzan de una manera nunca vista.

Los cambios en la forma de contar historias y noticias alcanzan a los contenidos y a las plataformas. Atraviesan también al periodismo y a las fórmulas que diarios centenarios y no tanto se han planteado históricamente para informar, ya sea con el soporte clásico de papel como en las versiones digitales.

Clarín ha presentado a mediados de octubre un nuevo rediseño del diario y de sus contenidos que trata de interpretar los cambios que ha experimentado la sociedad argentina. A caballo de dos eras, el periodismo hace un ejercicio vigoroso para responder a las demandas clásicas, que se mantienen con sus exigencias, y a las nuevas, que surgen de quienes han nacido digitales y se mueven con naturalidad en sus teléfonos inteligentes, tabletas y computadoras personales.

Pocos días atrás, un periódico en inglés más que centenario -The Buenos Aires Herald- informaba de la decisión empresaria de discontinuar su aparición diaria (desde 1876) para transformarlo en semanario: aludía así a esta realidad de la industria en la Argentina y en el mundo, donde se están produciendo procesos de reconversión que alcanzan también a las grandes cabeceras como The New York Times o The Wall Street Journal, entre otros.

Paradójicamente, el periodismo está más vivo que nunca y la avidez de las audiencias por informarse crece geométricamente.

Es una gran noticia.

Source Article from http://www.clarin.com/opinion/Ultimas-noticias-periodismo_0_1679232061.html

MIAMI BEACH, Fla. – “He was a worshipper, the best dad ever.”

That’s how Lora Wakefield, through tears, described her son Dustin, who was shot dead while eating dinner with his family Tuesday evening on South Beach.

Wakefield, 21 and visiting from Colorado, was with his wife, his 1-year-old son and extended relatives when a gunman randomly shot him at an outdoor café at 14th Street and Ocean Drive.

Tamarius Blair Davis Jr., 22, of Norcross, Georgia, confessed to police that he was high on mushrooms when he attacked.

Lora Wakefield remained in shock the next morning as she spoke to Local 10 News.

“We saw miracles. We saw miracles together,” she said of her son. “His music, his music is amazing.”

Witnesses say Dustin was protecting his baby before he was killed.

“[The shooter] pointed the gun at the baby and [Wakefield] said, ‘That’s my son’ and then he pointed the gun at him,” witness Marquita Bradford said.

“He’s a proud dad. When his son grows up and hears about this, he’s going to forever love his dad — no matter if he’s there or not.”

The “best dad ever,” Wakefield’s mom says. A life lost. A son, husband and father gone. And a family shattered.

A GoFundMe page has been set up to support the family.

Source Article from https://www.local10.com/news/local/2021/08/25/man-randomly-shot-dead-in-miami-beach-was-best-dad-ever-and-saw-miracles/

CLOSE

President Donald Trump’s pressure on Ukraine to investigate 2020 presidential challenger Joe Biden is increasingly drawing comparisons to former president Nixon’s Watergate scandal.
USA TODAY

WASHINGTON — Former Republican Senator Jeff Flake said that he thinks at least 35 Republican senators would vote for President Donald Trump to be removed from office if they could vote in private. 

Speaking at the 2019 Texas Tribune Festival Thursday, Flake was responding to comments made by Republican political consultant Mike Murphy on MSNBC who said that if there was a secret vote, at least 30 GOP Senators would back impeachment.

“That’s not true. There would be at least 35,” Flake said. 

Once an officeholder has been impeached, the proceedings shift to the Senate, which holds a trial and decides whether to convict the accused and remove him or her from office.

Calls for an official impeachment inquiry came to fruition Tuesday by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi over the president’s efforts to get Ukraine to investigate Joe Biden and his son, Hunter. 

During an interview with NPR, the Arizona Republican elaborated on his comments, continuing that “anybody who has sat through two years, as I have, of Republican luncheons realizes that there’s not a lot of love for the president. There’s a lot of fear of what it means to go against the president, but most Republican senators would not like to be dealing with this for another year or another five years.”

A two-thirds majority, or 67 senators, is needed to convict and remove the accused from office. Republicans currently hold the majority. For the President to be removed from office by the Senate with impeachment, at least 20 Republicans would need to join the Democrats and independents

Flake was one of the President’s most visible GOP critics in the Senate and announced he wouldn’t be seeking re-election in 2017, citing nastiness of Trump-era politics. 

“That was a pretty damning transcript,” Flake said of the summary of the July 25th phone call between Trump and Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky released Wednesday. “That was not anything you want your president to be doing. I think we need to wait for the investigation to conclude and wait for likely testimony from the whistleblower him or herself before drawing conclusions. But it seems the House is already moving ahead.” 

He stated that he was glad “to see the (House) Intel Committee have the hearing yesterday,” elaborating that he doesn’t want to see impeachment in such a divided country, and that he’d rather see the President defeated the “old fashioned way at the ballot box.”

Flake reinforced Trump’s power of the Senate GOP, stating that “this is the president’s party without a doubt. And to win a Republican primary in just about every state, you’ve got to be with the president. And there’s a lot of fear that if you aren’t, you’ll get primaried.”

Flake also said that he has “not ruled out” voting for a Democrat over Trump, hoping that the “Democrats nominate somebody who has a broad appeal.” 

Source Article from https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2019/09/27/jeff-flake-at-least-35-gop-senators-would-impeach-trump/3792866002/

Breitbart News, el sitio web de noticias falsas que dirigió por años el consejero de Donald Trump Stephen Bannon, parece haber caído en desgracia: perdió el 90% de sus anunciantes en menos de tres meses, mientras el número de lectores se desplomó a más de la mitad, según
un reporte de la consultora de publicidad MediaRadar.

De acuerdo con el documento, de las 246 firmas y corporaciones que anunciaban en la plataforma en marzo pasado, solo 26 quedaban en la lista de anunciantes para finales de mayo, en tanto el tráfico cayó en 53 por ciento en relación a octubre de 2016.

El grupo de ciberactivistas anónimos Sleeping Giants, que promueve la salida de los anunciantes de Breitbart y otros sitios de noticias falsas, anunció que más de 2,200 compañías, entre ellas Audi, Harris Teeter, Ethan Allen y Lyft, han pedido a terceros la retirada de su publicidad del sitio en los últimos meses.

“La publicidad de Breitbart se ha derrumbado. La mayoría de los sitios de temas políticos está ganando menos dinero hoy que hace un año debido al final del ciclo electoral. Pero no han caído a un 90 por ciento en el número de sus patrocinadores, puedo garantizar eso “, aseguró el director de
MediaRadar, Todd Krizelman.

Por su parte, Tom Fitton, presidente de Judicial Watch, la fundación dueña de Breitbart, consideró que los “activistas liberales” quieren “destruir” el sitio.

No obstante aseguró que continúan anunciando “ampliamente en Internet” y que están orgullosos de las alianzas y las relaciones con sus patrocinadores.

La caída de Breitbart

El sitio web, de corte antisemita, fue fundado hace 10 años como “una plataforma para la derecha alternativa (alt-right)” y fue uno de los medios más consultados por los seguidores de Donald Trump durante las elecciones de noviembre, según Comscore, una compañía de marketing que vigila el tráfico por Internet.

El éxito de su estrategia se basó en la publicación de noticias sensacionalistas o falsas y a un hábil uso de las redes sociales y de las campañas de publicidad para promocionar sus historias.

Pero su caída en picada se vislumbraba desde finales de año, cuando el número de lectores comenzó a descender abruptamente tras las elecciones.

En febrero pasado, un nuevo escándalo sacudió al sitio, cuando su editor jefe Milo Yiannopoulos se vio obligado a dimitir tras ofrecer declaraciones en las que parecía apoyar la pedofilia.

En los últimos meses, otra estocada les llegó desde su propio campo de batalla: las redes sociales. Facebook y YouTube, dos de las plataformas en las que más socializan sus historias, comenzaron a etiquetarlas como contenido inseguro o a eliminar algunas de ellas por considerarlas noticias falsas.

Ante este panorama, la campaña de Sleeping Giants se propuso denunciar directamente a los patrocinadores, así como implicar a los lectores en la detección y denuncia de contenidos inapropiados o falsos en el sitio.

Un estudio realizado por Buzzfeed a finales de 2016 determinó que Breitbart era el sitio preferido de Trump para informarse por Internet, si se tenía en cuenta el número de tuits o retuits de informaciones que realizó antes o después de las elecciones.

Source Article from http://www.univision.com/noticias/politica/breitbart-news-uno-de-los-sitios-de-noticias-preferidos-de-trump-pierde-90-de-sus-anunciantes

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – The U.S. Senate on Wednesday approved a bill that would grant $4.6 billion for border aid in a bid to stem illegal migration across the country’s southern border with Mexico.

The legislation will need to be reconciled with a separate different border aid bill passed by the House of Representatives before it is sent to President Donald Trump to be signed into law.

The White House has said Trump would veto the House version, which includes restrictions on U.S. immigration agencies and which does not include extra funding for the Defense Department and Immigration and Customs Enforcement employees.

Reporting by Susan Cornwell; Writing by Makini Brice; Editing by Tim Ahmann

Source Article from https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-immigration-senate-passage/senate-approves-its-own-version-of-border-aid-bill-idUSKCN1TR2ZA

A vigil for the victims of the recent shooting at STEM School Highlands Ranch that was organized by Team ENOUGH, a student-led initiative that is part of pro-gun control group Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence, did not go as planned as students walked out to protest the group’s politicization of the tragedy.

During the vigil, Moms Demand Action for Gun Sense in America activists, Sen. Michael Bennet, D-Colo., and Rep. Jason Crow, D-Colo., each made remarks the students in attendance did not appreciate because, according to them, the adults were politicizing the event.

[Also read: ‘I was going to go down fighting’: 12-year-old readied with baseball bat to take on Colorado shooter]

The students walked out of the event and held their own vigil outside the school.

Students had also chanted “mental health” in response to the speakers pushing for more gun control.

9NEWS anchor Kyle Clark reports some students returned to the gym and to continue their vigil, saying they did not want to be used to push for more gun control.

The Brady Campaign issued an apology to the students for the politicization of the vigil.

“We are deeply sorry any part of this vigil did not provide the support, caring and sense of community we sought to foster and facilitate and which we know is crucial to communities who suffer the trauma of gun violence,” the group said.

Moms Demand Action did not provide a comment in time for publication.

Source Article from https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/colorado-students-flip-the-script-by-saying-they-dont-want-to-be-used-to-push-gun-control

‘);eIFD.close();
var s = eIFD.createElement(‘SCRIPT’); s.src = ‘http://’ + (eS2?eS2:eS1) +’/layers/epl-41.js’;
eIFD.body.appendChild(s);
if (!eS2) {
var ss = eIFD.createElement(‘SCRIPT’);
ss.src = ‘http://ads.us.e-planning.net/egc/4/1b7f’;
eIFD.body.appendChild(ss);
}
eplLL = true;
return false;
}
}
eplCheckStart();
function eplSetAdM(eID,custF) {
if (eplCheckStart()) {
if (custF) { document.epl.setCustomAdShow(eID,eplArgs.custom[eID]); }
document.epl.showSpace(eID);
} else {
var efu = ‘eplSetAdM(“‘+eID+'”, ‘+ (custF?’true’:’false’) +’);’;
setTimeout(efu, 250);
}
}

function eplAD4M(eID,custF) {
document.write(‘

‘);
if (custF) {
if (!eplArgs.custom) { eplArgs.custom = {}; }
eplArgs.custom[eID] = custF;
}
eplSetAdM(eID, custF?true:false);
}
function eplSetAd(eID) {
if (eplCheckStart()) {
var opts = (eplArgs.sOpts && eplArgs.sOpts[eID]) ? eplArgs.sOpts[eID] : {};
if (opts.custF) { document.epl.setCustomAdShow(eID,opts.custF); }
document.epl.setSpace(eID, opts);
} else {
setTimeout(‘eplSetAd(“‘+eID+'”);’, 250);
}
}
function eplAD4(eID, opts) {
document.write(‘

‘);
if (!opts) opts = {t:1};
if (!eplArgs.sOpts) { eplArgs.sOpts = {}; }
eplArgs.sOpts[eID] = opts;
eplSetAd(eID);
}






Hay nuevas noticias en nuestro sitio web




cerrar













Martes, 28 de Abril 2015  |  11:27 am



Créditos: RPP/Carlos Lora

Durante un concierto en Mxico, el cantante mostr una extraa actitud. Mira el video aqu.








El cantante Luis Miguel ofreció un concierto en Aguascalientes, México donde deslumbró a los asistentes pero no precisamente con su voz.

El mexicano estaba muy alegre, incluso bailó, le sacó los anteojos al guitarrista, se los puso, se tiró al piso y terminó boca arriba.

La pregunta no demoró en aparecer: ¿estaba borracho? Los más críticos dicen que sí. Incluso en febrero se suspendió un show. El organizador dijo en aquella oportunidad que fue por  “estar en su habitación emborrachándose y drogándose”.








<!–

–>










<!– –>



Avisos
PERRED
Anuncia aqu

<!–%

if (data && data.searchResult && data.searchResult.spaces && data.searchResult.spaces[0] && data.searchResult.spaces[0].ads) {
var ads = data.searchResult.spaces[0].ads;
for (var i = 0; i < ads.length; i++) {
var ad = ads[i];

if (ad.creative && ad.creative.content && ad.creative.content.length && ad.creative.images) {
var titularText = '';
var cuerpoText = '';
var displayUrlText = '';

var content = ad.creative.content;
for (var j = 0; j < content.length; j++) {
var contentItem = content[j];
if (contentItem.key === 'Titulo')
titularText = cX.library.getAllText(contentItem.value);
if (contentItem.key === 'Cuerpo')
cuerpoText = cX.library.getAllText(contentItem.value);
if (contentItem.key === 'DisplayUrl')
displayUrlText = cX.library.getAllText(contentItem.value);
}
var images = ad.creative.images;
var imgSrc = '';
var textWidth = 295;
for (var k = 0; k









{{cuerpoText}}


{{displayUrlText}}













Source Article from http://www.rpp.com.pe/2015-04-28–luis-miguel-borracho-en-pleno-concierto-noticia_791970.html

Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti announced a citywide curfew from 8 p.m. to 5 a.m. after four nights of violent protests. Garcetti said the National Guard would not be deployed. “This is not 1992,” he said, referring to the Rodney King riots.

Source Article from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TXsbQUadxGw