Recently Added Videos

CLOSE

Veterans recall D-Day horror and triumph
AP

WASHINGTON – President Donald Trump will take part in a tradition for modern presidents that dates back four decades when he stands at the edge of Omaha Beach in Normandy on Thursday to commemorate the 75th anniversary of the D-Day invasion.

But while the ceremony will honor the sacrifices made on June 6, 1944, some fear Trump’s “America First” presidency and the international drama he has carried with him as he begins his third trip to France will complicate the hallowed observance. 

Like his predecessors, Trump will pay homage to the 160,000 American and Allied troops who landed on D-Day, altering the course of World War II. But in a break with past U.S. presidents, he is unlikely to use his remarks in France to embrace institutions such as NATO that rose out of the ashes of the fighting.

The American president has accused those institutions of “ripping off” the United States. 

“It’s going to be a tough challenge for him,” said Nicholas Burns, a professor at Harvard’s Kennedy School of Government and a former U.S. ambassador to NATO who served presidents of both parties. “What we learned from D-Day and the Second World War is that we need allies.”

As on past international trips, Trump has also drawn considerable attention to his Twitter feed and overseas media interviews. He attacked singer-songwriter Bette Midler, blasted 2020 Democratic candidate Joe Biden and continued to drive news coverage by referring to Meghan Markle’s  comments about him as “nasty.” 

Trump, who was feted with a formal state visit by Queen Elizabeth II earlier in the week, gathered with British officials Wednesday on Britain’s south coast, where thousands of ships involved in Operation Overlord assembled before crossing the English Channel. Trump read a prayer that President Franklin Roosevelt delivered in a radio address on June 6, 1944.

“Almighty God, our sons, pride of our nation, this day, have set upon a mighty endeavor, a struggle to preserve our republic, our religion and our civilization and to set free a suffering humanity,” Trump read. 

On Thursday, the president will deliver remarks at an international ceremony at the Normandy American Cemetery and Memorial, where some 9,388 American military dead are buried.

The president is not expected to attend D-Day events taking place on Thursday evening, according to a senior administration official who was not authorized to speak publicly about the president’s schedule. Instead, Trump will meet with French President Emmanuel Macron, with whom he has had a testy relationship.

“The whole event is structured around the American Cemetery,” the official said. 

‘Boys of Pointe du Hoc’

Presidents have long used D-Day remarks to link the sacrifices made by the soldiers who landed in France to their own times and to apply lessons from the war to their own foreign policies. President Ronald Reagan’s 1984 address is often cited for his vivid retelling of the Army Ranger effort to scale the Omaha Beach cliffs – the “boys of Point du Hoc” – but he also notably laid out a vision for U.S. engagement in Europe. 

Speaking during a time of heightened tension between the U.S. and the Soviet Union, Reagan used the 40th Anniversary of D-Day to condemn Moscow for occupying Eastern Bloc countries – “uninvited, unwanted,” he said – and vowed that the United States would remain a global force in defending democracy.  

“We in America have learned bitter lessons from two World Wars: It is better to be here ready to protect peace than to take shelter across the sea, rushing to respond only after freedom is lost,” Reagan said. “We’ve learned that isolationism never was and never will be an acceptable response to tyrannical governments.” 

President Barack Obama’sD-Day remarks in 2014 came just months after Russia’s invasion of Crimea shocked Europe, ultimately prompting sanctions from the U.S. and other countries. Obama and Russian leader Vladimir Putin held their first face-to-face meeting about the Ukrainian crisis during a lunch break amid the D-Day ceremonies.

Obama did not mention Russia’s action directly, though he used his second address on the shores of Normandy – his first was in 2009 – to defend U.S. efforts to build Europe’s economy after the war. Speaking at the 70th anniversary of Operation Overlord, Obama noted the U.S. “stood with the people of this continent” through the Cold War, and hinted at the wave of isolationism taking hold at the end of his term.   

“In a time when it has never been more tempting to pursue narrow self-interest, to slough off common endeavor, this generation of Americans, a new generation – our men and women of war – have chosen to do their part as well,” Obama said.  

Trump split with allies 

Trump ran for office in 2016 vowing to shake up much of the global order that emerged following World War II to prevent another global conflict and keep the Soviet Union – and communism – at bay. He has criticized NATO members for treating the United States like a “piggy bank,” engaged in high-profile Twitter spats with allies, including leaders in France, and has imposed stiff tariffs on the European Union, Canada and others.

Most recently, Trump’s administration has threatened 5% tariffs on all Mexican imports unless that country does more to stop the flow migrants to the U.S.  

The president has faced pushback at home from some veterans groups. The White House remains embroiled in a controversy over an apparent order to block from view the USS John S. McCain during Trump’s recent trip to Japan. Others have blasted Trump for pardoning – or considering pardons for – those accused of war crimes

“He’s probably the worst president in our history to commemorate this moment,” said Jon Soltz, chairman of VoteVets, a left-leaning veterans group. “He’s undermined the alliances which gave us peace in Europe for over 70 years.”

Dan Caldwell, executive director of Concerned Veterans for America, countered that Trump has pursued the same foreign policy he campaigned on in 2016. Many of those arguments, including Trump’s remarks on NATO, generated news coverage at the time, so his positions should not have been a surprise to voters. 

“He should talk about how the world has changed since the end of World War II, and why he is pursuing a foreign policy that is much different than his predecessors,” said Caldwell, whose group leans conservative.

“I think he can do that in a positive way,” he said, “explaining the world is changed and that it requires us to look at problems differently than we did 25 years or 75 years ago.” 

Focus on veterans 

Trump’s address will mark one of the last times an American president speaks to a group of D-Day veterans on the beaches of Normandy. The Department of Veterans Affairs estimates that just under 500,000 U.S. World War II veterans were still living in late 2018.

A U.S. president delivering remarks at the memorial is a relatively recent phenomena. An American president didn’t visit Normandy until Jimmy Carter made the trip in January 1978. Carter pledged to defend Western Europe during the Cold War.

“We are determined, with our noble allies here, that Europe’s freedom will never again be endangered,” he said.   

President Dwight Eisenhower, who organized the D-Day invasion eight years before his election to the White House, issued a short statement on its 10th anniversary. 

Craig Symonds, a maritime history professor at the U.S. Naval War College who wrote a book on the invasion, said Eisenhower “knew viscerally and instinctively that it’s important for us to listen to the legacy” of what happened on that day. 

“It’s important for a president to have a sense of history,” he said. 

Like what you’re reading? Download the USA TODAY app for more

Contributing: David Jackson 

Source Article from https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2019/06/05/d-day-75th-anniversary-donald-trump-normandy-speech/1301411001/

Assume for a second that Rep. Maxine Waters, D-Calif., is speaker of the House and that she’s agreed to go forward with the Democrats who want to immediately begin the impeachment process for President Trump. What is the specific crime or action they would cite to justify the proceeding?

Has anyone heard the exact crime or action that Trump engaged in that would justify impeachment? Democrats talk generally about “obstruction of justice,” or Trump’s “conduct,” but the specifics are curiously light, considering the gravity of what they propose.

Republicans complained about former President Bill Clinton’s “conduct” in office, but they at least had some specific charge — Clinton’s under-oath lie to a grand jury about his sexual affair with a White House intern and his efforts to conceal evidence from investigators.

Sometimes, Democrats talk about the “10 instances” or “10 episodes” in the special counsel report related to obstruction, but which one is an impeachable offense? Most often cited is Trump’s June 2017 phone call to his lawyer, Don McGahn, wherein, according to the report, Trump “directed him to call the Acting Attorney General and say that the Special Counsel had conflicts of interest and must be removed.” But McGahn refused the request, and Mueller wasn’t removed. The special counsel remained in place for another two years and completed his investigation. He found no conspiracy between the Trump 2016 campaign and Russia.

That has been the final result ever since the special counsel report was released in April. Yes, Trump fired FBI Director James Comey (which the report says was within his authority as president); he asked former Attorney General Jeff Sessions to reassert some control over the special counsel (that didn’t happen); and he publicly criticized associates once they were in legal jeopardy and might offer damaging information to prosecutors as part of a plea deal. (Importantly, this is not a crime.)

Impeaching Trump for any one of these, or all of them, would have been like impeaching Clinton for even just thinking about having an affair or for asking his lawyer whether he should lie to the grand jury.

I know that House Democrats are angry and don’t like Trump, but there’s a reason that the standard for impeachment is “treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors,” and not just “I really, really hate the orange man!” The process isn’t supposed to be a political plaything.

Source Article from https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/democrats-cant-name-the-specific-action-trump-should-be-impeached-for

COLUMBUS, Ohio (WBNS) – A grand jury has indicted Dr. William Husel on charges stemming from the deaths of 25 patients in an overdose scandal that has rocked the Mount Carmel Health System and the families of nearly three dozen patients.

Both the Franklin County Prosecutor’s Office and the Columbus Division of Police have been investigating since early December – when the hospital fired Husel after concerns were raised about his patient care. Husel pleaded not guilty on all counts during his arraignment Wednesday afternoon. His bond was set at $1 million.

To date, 35 patients have been identified as having received excessive doses of pain medication – 29 of the patients, the hospital says, received potentially lethal doses of pain medications.



Prosecutors and police updated reporters on the status of its investigation Wednesday morning – focusing on the deaths of 25 of the 35 patients who died under Husel’s care.

COMPLETE COVERAGE: Mount Carmel patient deaths investigation

In most cases, the highly powerful synthetic opioid fentanyl was administered to intensive care patients as they were being removed from ventilators.

In interviews with 10 Investigates, several family members acknowledged that their loved ones were in bad shape – and may have died anyway – but claim they were not consulted about the large doses of pain medications that were about to be administered to their loved ones. Many of them died after receiving doses of fentanyl while others were given fentanyl along with other drugs like dilaudid, versed and paralytics like vecuronium.

Attorneys representing these patients have claimed that the combination of drugs like fentanyl and versed or dilaudid accelerated these patients’ deaths or that the use of paralytics gave an inaccurate picture of the patients’ true conditions – making it appear as though they were brain dead.

10 Investigates first broke the news of the patient overdose scandal on January 14 – the same day the first of 28 wrongful death lawsuits were filed. That same day, Mount Carmel Health System President and CEO Ed Lamb issued a taped video apology, saying that the actions of the doctor were unacceptable and not in line with the hospital’s standards of care.

The hospital has said that its internal processes were not sufficient to stop these actions from happening. The hospital has since adopted a series of changes – including now requiring that nurses and doctors receive pharmacy approval before administering drugs when a patient is being removed from a ventilator.

Ed Lamb, president & CEO, Mount Carmel Health System sent 10TV the following after the indictment was announced Wednesday:

We appreciate the County Prosecutor’s leadership and his ongoing commitment to justice in this case. Following the discovery of the actions of Dr. Husel, we notified appropriate authorities, including law enforcement. We have shared information with them and will continue to fully cooperate throughout their investigation.

Mount Carmel has made and will continue to implement meaningful changes throughout our system to ensure events like these never happen again.

There is nothing more important to Mount Carmel than the safety of our patients and their trust in us. Providing compassionate care to patients and their families is one of our most sacred responsibilities. Our thoughts and prayers continue to be with the families of patients affected by this tragedy.

At the request of the County Prosecutor, and because this is now an ongoing criminal proceeding, Mount Carmel will not comment further on the specific facts or circumstances surrounding the care provided by Dr. Husel. For more information about Mount Carmel’s previous statements and actions relating to Dr. Husel, visit the fact page on MountCarmelHealth.com.

10 Investigates has assembled the most comprehensive timeline of the Mount Carmel patient overdose scandal:

June 2013 – Dr. William Husel applies to work at Mount Carmel Health System.

September 2013 – Dr. William Husel is granted credentials to work as a critical care intensivist. Sources have raised questions about if Husel met the hospital’s own criteria to work as in the intensive care unit as an intensivist. They point to the hospital’s own documents that show you must be an MD or DO; have a residency in internal medicine; a fellowship in critical care; and be eligible to take the board exam in internal medicine. Husel met just two of the four requirements because he had a residency in anesthesiology. The hospital has disputed this claim, saying Husel met the qualifications for appointment as a critical care specialist and that its bylaws trump any conflict that may have existed with his application for clinical privileges. The sources allege the hospital was negligent in its credentialing process.

September 2014 – Patient suspected of receiving excessive dose of fentanyl dies at Mount Carmel West Hospital. The attorneys representing this person have confirmed the date but have not released the person’s identity.

March 1, 2015 – Patient Jan Thomas dies at Mount Carmel West Hospital. Her medical records show she received 800 micrograms of fentanyl. Her family’s attorney, David Shroyer, and son Chris Thomas, told reporters that Jan Thomas had a previous hospital stay prior to being taken to Mount Carmel West on February 28, 2015. She died on March 1, 2015. Shroyer says she was given a lethal dose of fentanyl as she was being removed from a ventilator.

May 10, 2015 – Joanne Bellisari, 71, an auxiliary nun was given 1,000 microgram push of fentanyl through her IV, her medical records show. Her attorneys allege in their wrongful death lawsuit that Bellisari was given a “grossly inappropriate dose.” The attorneys allege, as they have in other patient lawsuits, that Mount Carmel’s electronic medical records failed to flag or alert Joanne Bellisari’s medical providers that such an order appeared to be in error. Alternatively, the complaint read, “this excessive dose of fentanyl was flagged and/or alerted by the system as inappropriate, but Defendants ignored the alerts because the order was intended to hasten the termination of Joanne Bellisari’s life.”

October 9, 2017 – Six patients are alleged to have died between Oct. 9, 2017 and Dec. 11, 2017, including two separate sets of patients who died during the same shifts, attorneys allege.

Timothy Fitzpatrick and Beverlee Schirtzinger were the two patients identified by their attorneys who both died on October 9, 2017.

December 10, 2017 – Patient Larry Brigner dies at Mount Carmel West Hospital. A lawsuit filed says he received 500 micrograms of fentanyl.

December 11, 2017 – Janet Kavanaugh dies at Mount Carmel West Hospital after her attorneys allege that she was given 1,000 micrograms of fentanyl through her IV. The attorneys allege that both Kavanaugh and Brigner died on the same overnight shift.

April 1, 2018 – Jeremia “Sue” Hodge died at Mount Carmel West Hospital. Her attorneys allege in a wrongful death lawsuit that she went from the cath lab to the ICU. Her sons had a conversation with Dr. Husel about her health and the family made a decision to withdraw life support. She was given a dose of fentanyl believed to be in excess of 500 micrograms.

May 28, 2018 – Jim Allen received 1,000 micrograms of fentanyl, according to his medical records. He died the same day.

July 15, 2018 – 44-year old Troy Allison dies after his attorneys alleged that he was given 1,000 micrograms of fentanyl.

September 30, 2018 – Bonnie Austin dies at Mount Carmel West Hospital after her attorneys allege she was given 600 micrograms of fentanyl less than an hour before midnight. Her medical records show the order was not reviewed by another physician, nurse or pharmacist.

October 24, 2018 – James Nickolas Timmons, 39, dies after receiving 1,000 micrograms of fentanyl.

October 25, 2018 – Mount Carmel West says it received a “formal report” concerning an allegation about Dr. Husel’s patient care.

October 25, 2018 to Nov. 21, 2018 – Three more patients die

November 21, 2018 – Dr. Husel is removed from patient care.

November 26, 2018 – Dr. Husel was inexplicably re-credentialed and re-appointed to the active medical roster at the hospital.

December 4, 2018 – Memo goes out to Mount Carmel staffers expressing concerns that some employees didn’t live up to the hospital’s standards of care.

December 5, 2018 – Dr. William Husel is fired.

December 7, 2018 – Mount Carmel West President Sean McKibben and his wife call Dublin Police and the Delaware County Sheriff’s Office requesting escorts to their home, saying Husel was upset after being fired from the hospital. Husel made no threats following his termination, according to police records.

December 13, 2018 – Additional memo goes out to Mount Carmel staff

December 27, 2018 – Mount Carmel begins notifying patient families

January 14, 2019 – WBNS-TV’s 10 Investigates breaks story of patient deaths. First wrongful death lawsuit is filed. Hospital’s CEO and President Ed Lamb releases first of two video statements. Reached by phone, Dr. William Husel declines to comment and refers questions to his attorneys.

January 15, 2019 – Centers for Medicare and Medicaid begins process to start site survey through the Ohio Department of Health.

January 18, 2019 – CMS receives a report of substantial allegation survey conducted by the Ohio Department of Health at Mount Carmel West. CMS determines that Mount Carmel West was not in compliance with Medicare standards involving pharmaceutical services. “We have determined that the deficiencies are so serious that they constitute an immediate threat to patient health and safety.”

January 24, 2019 – CMS receives a report of substantial allegation survey conducted by the Ohio Department of Health at Mount Carmel St. Ann’s. CMS determines that Mount Carmel West was not in compliance with Medicare standards involving pharmaceutical services. “We have determined that the deficiencies are so serious that they constitute an immediate threat to patient health and safety.”

January 24, 2019 – Mount Carmel releases updated statement announcing that the number of patients believed to have received potentially fatal doses of fentanyl has increased from 27 to 34.

The hospital also released this: “We received a formal report on October 25, 2018, that related to Dr. Husel’s care. Based on what we learned about that report, we should have begun a more expedited process to investigate and consider immediate removal of Dr. Husel from patient care at that time. Dr. Husel was removed from patient care on November 21, 2018. We are aware of three patients who died between October 25 and November 21 after receiving excessive and potentially fatal doses of medication ordered by Dr. Husel. We are sorry for this tragedy, and we will continue to investigate how we responded to this report and whether there is any other information that should have led us to investigate sooner into Dr. Husel’s practices.

“We are investigating whether Dr. Husel ordered excessive doses of medication when there was still opportunity to explore if there were reversible causes of patients’ immediate conditions.”

January 25, 2019 – State medical board announces that it is suspending the medical license of Dr. William Husel. The Ohio Department of Medicaid suspends the provider agreement with Dr. William Husel, accusing him of fraud for billing Medicaid for “medically unnecessary procedures involving grossly inappropriate doses of fentanyl.”

January 30, 2019 – CMS sends letter to Mount Carmel West notifying the hospital that its Medicare and Medicaid funding will be terminated unless they submit an acceptable plan of correction.

February 1, 2019 – CMS sends letter to Mount Carmel St. Ann’s notifying the hospital that its Medicare and Medicaid funding will be terminated unless they submit an acceptable plan of correction.

February 4, 2019 – Mount Carmel employee speaks out regarding the scandal to 10 Investigates. He alleges that Dr. Husel is responsible for ordering the high doses, but that the hospital’s lack of training of staff and lax internal controls led to a “systemic failure.”

February 5, 2019 – Correspondence between Dr. Husel and state medical board show that he apologized for his 1996 misdemeanor conviction for improperly storing a destructive device or pipe bomb while attending college in West Virginia. He also admits in a 2013 addendum to his medical license application that he got caught up in the wrong crowd, broke into cars and that his arrest more than 20 years ago is not reflective of the person he is today. Husel wrote: “my passion is taking care of sick patients in the ICU. Please give me the opportunity to practice what I love doing.”

February 5, 2019 – Mount Carmel acknowledges it has sent its plan of correction to CMS. Its federal funding hangs in the balance on whether CMS will accept its plan. Pharmacy manager Janet Whittey tells the state pharmacy board that she is no longer employed at Mount Carmel. The hospital has not said if she was fired or quit.

February 6, 2019 – Law firm identifies Melissa Penix as the patient who died on Nov. 20, 2018. The law firm of Leeseberg & Valentine alleges that Penix’s death may have triggered the hospital’s internal investigation. Three patients died between Oct. 25, 2018 – when the hospital said it received a formal report with concerns about Husel’s patient care and Nov. 21, 2018 – when the hospital removed Husel from patient care.

*(A total of 28 wrongful death lawsuits are filed against Mount Carmel and Dr. Husel).

February 12, 2019 – The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services accepts plans of correction for Mount Carmel to fix its deficiencies. State health inspectors noted that Mount Carmel “failed to ensure that a system was in place to monitor and prevent large doses of medications” from being accessed via overrides from the hospital’s automated medication dispensing machines. Inspectors noted that inn 24 of the 27 patient cases it reviewed, Husel used an override to access the pain medications. The hospital announced it is changing policies – including capping doses of fentanyl and requiring that physicians and nurses get pharmacy approval before using medications during ventilator removals. Staffers were also being re-educated on what to look for and ask questions if they have concerns about dosing.

March 29, 2019 – Mount Carmel Health System President and CEO Ed Lamb defends the hospital in an impromptu interview with 10 Investigates. 10 Investigates reporter Bennett Haeberle was covering another news story in downtown Columbus when he encountered Lamb and asked him to address criticism that Mount Carmel could have addressed the patient overdosing scandal sooner.

Ed Lamb: “I think we’ve been very transparent. We want to make sure that we are doing everything we can to let the public know what’s going on.”

10 Investigates: “Was the hospital aware before October?”

Ed Lamb: “We’ve been discovering things all along as we’ve been learning through the investigation.”

10 Investigates: “Was there any chance to remove (Husel) before October.

Ed Lamb: “Not before October, no.”

April 22, 2019 – Three wrongful death lawsuits filed by the families of the patients are settled.

May 7, 2019 – Two more wrongful death lawsuits are settled.

June 4, 2019 – Another wrongful death lawsuit is settled.

Source Article from https://www.10tv.com/article/officials-update-mount-carmel-deaths-dr-husel-investigation-11-am-presser-conference-2019

As he seeks a second term in the 2020 election, President Trump should be able to lean on his advantage in the Electoral College — in 2016, as you might remember, he lost the national popular vote but won enough states (and the right states) to secure 270 electors and take the presidency.

But new polling of his state-by-state approval ratings suggests the president is unpopular in some of the most important battleground states for 2020, an ill omen if the trends hold until Election Day 2020.

Trump has been unpopular since his first day in office. The question now is whether he’s so unpopular that it overrides his advantage as an incumbent and a pretty strong US economy. The new state polls from Morning Consult don’t bode well for him.

Here are the raw numbers for Trump in the states that are expected to be competitive in the 2020 election:

  • New Hampshire: 39 percent approval, 58 percent disapproval
  • Wisconsin: 42 percent approval, 55 percent disapproval
  • Michigan: 42 percent approval, 54 percent disapproval
  • Iowa: 42 percent approval, 54 percent disapproval
  • Arizona: 45 percent approval, 51 percent disapproval
  • Pennsylvania 45 percent approval, 52 percent disapproval
  • Ohio: 46 percent approval, 50 percent disapproval
  • North Carolina: 46 percent approval, 50 percent disapproval
  • Florida: 48 percent approval, 48 percent disapproval
  • Indiana: 49 percent approval, 46 percent disapproval

It’s a grim picture. Wisconsin and Michigan were critical Midwestern pieces of Trump’s Electoral College puzzle and he is now deeply unpopular in both states. Pennsylvania was maybe his most surprising win in 2016, and now he is seven points underwater. Perhaps Trump can take solace in his even job approval rating in Florida, but that is the only swing state where the president looks as strong as he did on Election Day 2016. Everywhere else, his support has deteriorated.

Maybe the most striking finding is in Iowa, where Trump beat Hillary Clinton by nearly 10 points. Iowans disapprove of his job performance by a 12-point margin now, in a farming state that’s been hit hard by Trump’s trade war. That would suggest the president’s cult of personality will not totally inoculate him from the unpopular parts of his policy agenda.

We still have a year and a half to go before the 2020 election. These approval numbers aren’t the same as a head-to-head match-up with a specific Democratic candidate (though those have not been very encouraging for Trump either). But they do indicate the unusual weakness of the president heading into his reelection campaign.

Trump’s presidential approval rating has been stubbornly low

Head-to-head polling between Trump and any prospective Democratic nominee seems nearly useless at this point. Aside from Joe Biden and Bernie Sanders, many Americans haven’t yet formed their opinions on the various Democrats seeking their party’s nomination.

But presidential approval ratings have always been strongly linked to voting behavior, and everybody knows Trump. Here is the RealClearPolitics average of the president’s approval rating, from the start of his presidency to now:


Real Clear Politics

Trump has been consistently unpopular throughout his first two years. At his best, so far, he was seven points more unpopular than popular. A recent uptick has swiftly eroded. And as Vox’s Ezra Klein wrote last summer, this has been in defiance of a relatively solid economy:

“Trump’s poll numbers are probably 20 points below where a president would typically be with consumer sentiment as high as it is now,” says John Sides, a political scientist at George Washington University who has done work benchmarking presidential approval to economic indicators.

So here, then, is what we can say: Judged on the economy, which is the traditional driver of presidential approval, Donald Trump’s poll numbers should be much, much higher than they are now. Far from finding a winning strategy, he seems to have found a losing one despite holding a winning hand.

Trump’s approval rating is the metric to watch as we endure all the unpredictable twists and turns that will precede the 2020 election. The new numbers from Morning Consult show it isn’t just the Democratic states that are down on Trump; the states he would need to win reelection aren’t very happy with the president, either.

Source Article from https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2019/6/5/18653800/trump-approval-rating-by-state-2020-election-odds

The U.S. and Mexico failed to reach an agreement Wednesday to avert tariffs after a meeting between officials of the two countries.

President Trump said progress is being made, but if no agreement is reached, 5% tariffs on Mexican goods will be instituted Monday.

“The higher the Tariffs go, the higher the number of companies that will move back to the USA!” he tweeted.

The talks held at the White House were an attempt to reach a deal over the impending tariffs, which would increase an additional 5% each month until Mexico addresses illegal immigration at the U.S. border.

The news comes the day after Mexican President Andrés Manuel López Obrador said he believed a deal to be close that would end the administration’s threat to impose tariffs on Mexico in response to illegal immigration. Trump has said he wants Mexico to stop the flow of immigrants from Central America through the country and to the U.S. border.

Speaking from Ireland on Wednesday, Trump expressed confidence that Mexico would beef up its immigration policies in order to prevent the economic squeeze the tariffs would entail.

“Mexico can stop it. They have to stop it. Otherwise, we just won’t be able to do business. It’s a very simple thing,” Trump said Wednesday. “And I think they will stop it. I think they want to do something. I think they want to make a deal. And they sent their top people to try.”

Source Article from https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/no-resolution-on-mexico-tariffs-at-white-house-meeting

On Wednesday, the Department of Health and Human Services announced it would end the use of human fetal tissue from elective abortions for medical research. This is yet another victory for the Trump administration in the never-ending battle to protect human life.

For over 25 years, Congress has allowed the National Institutes of Health to dole out what now amounts to more than $100 million each year to researchers who utilize the fetal tissue of aborted babies. There is little to show for this money. As a House select investigative panel found, fetal tissue research didn’t fulfill any promises of major scientific discoveries. As Sean Duffy and Kathleen Schmainda write in The Federalist, “the panel investigation further discredits the claim that fetal tissue plays an indispensable role in ‘life-saving’ research.”

Pro-abortion lobbyists falsely claim there are no alternatives to fetal tissue obtained from elective abortions. Yet, as Tara Sander Lee testified before Congress last December, “After over 100 years of research, no therapies have been discovered or developed that require aborted fetal tissue.” In fact, only three out of the 75 vaccines available in America still utilize legacy fetal cell lines, and none require the use of new fetal samples.

In the field of neuroscience, there is excitement over the use of fetal tissue transplants to replace failing dopaminergic neurons in patients suffering from Parkinson’s disease, yet Sander Lee points out that induced pluripotent stem cells (a type of cell derived from adult tissue) offer a promising alternative. Just last fall, researchers in Japan transplanted induced pluripotent stem cells into a Parkinson’s patient for the first time. Additionally, the NIH has pledged $20 million towards research that advances alternatives to fetal tissue.

If the Trump administration were to continue to pour taxpayer dollars into fetal tissue research while ignoring viable alternatives, the demand for the body parts of aborted babies would only climb.

Already, we have seen instances of greedy entrepreneurs eyeing the fetal tissue marketplace. In 2010, Cate Dyer, an employee of a nonprofit fetal tissue processing company, formed her own for-profit company called StemExpress. Her former bosses called her “totally unethical,” recalling that “she went into our office one night, looked around, and took everything we had, and started her own business.”

Dyer’s company featured heavily in an undercover video sting that surfaced in 2015. In response to footage of herself laughing about shipping the severed heads of fetuses to laboratories, she claimed her “tiny” fetal tissue business was actually costing her money. She subsequently refused to cooperate with congressional investigators who turned up evidence that her 37-employee company was aggressively marketing its need for fetuses to abortion clinics, promising the endeavor would be “financially profitable” for all involved.

From 2010 to 2014, StemExpress increased their revenue from $156,312 to a whopping $4.5 million (see page 155).

It’s not difficult to see the temptation for profiteers. Abortion clinics sell deceased babies to fetus processors for as little as $30 while the processing companies sell each “component” of the baby to researchers for up to $550.

The clinics also stand to profit from the increased demand for aborted babies, but their marketing strategies are less obvious: discounted procedures, the promise of future medical care — all targeted at poor women and minorities. According to Biola University ethics professor Scott Rae, methods like these are “difficult to detect and impossible to adequately police.”

Finally, the acceptance of fetal tissue as a research tool or “miracle cure” undermines long-standing Hyde Amendment protections, which prevent taxpayers from being forced to financially support an industry that many find abhorrent.

The importance of the Hyde Amendment, which Democrats have promised to repeal, cannot be overstated. Prior to the Supreme Court’s finding in favor of the amendment, approximately 300,000 pregnancies were terminated with taxpayer funds every single year — a state of affairs that can never be allowed to reoccur.

It’s clear that due to the availability of fetal tissue alternatives and the fragility of our current protections against taxpayer funding of abortions, this current administration made the right and moral call today and ruled to protect our nation’s unborn.

Mary Vought (@MaryVought) is a contributor to the Washington Examiner’s Beltway Confidential blog. She is a Republican strategist and executive director of the Senate Conservatives Fund. Previously she was press secretary to the House Republican Conference under then-Chairman Mike Pence.

Source Article from https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/fetal-tissue-research-an-abhorrent-and-needless-use-of-taxpayer-money-is-done

The Trump administration has told operators of shelters for immigrant children to cut back on or end education, legal services and recreation, citing funding problems as it has taken more children into custody.

The administration said the directive was necessary because of a spike in the number of children in its custody. The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) said that it is required by law to take certain actions to avoid deficiency in funding — including cutting resources to other programs.

“Additional resources are urgently required to meet the humanitarian needs created by this influx — to both sustain critical child welfare and release operations and increase capacity,” Evelyn Stauffer, spokeswoman for the Administration of Children and Families at HHS, said in a statement to NBC News.

The request could violate federal law dictating conditions for holding immigrant children in government custody. A longstanding U.S. Supreme Court ruling dictates that immigrant children in the United States have a right to education.

The move was widely denounced by humanitarian and advocacy organizations.

“It’s bad enough that the Trump administration is trying to normalize the warehousing of children,” Denise Bell, a researcher with Amnesty International, said in a statement to NBC News. “It’s unconscionable that they would so blatantly try to strip them of their rights.”

Wendy Young, president of Kids in Need of Defense, which advocates for immigrant children, also criticized the directive. She said she was aware the agency was facing a funding deficit “because the numbers continue to pick up and so many policy changes have been made, so kids are staying in custody longer and bed space is not freeing up quickly.”

She said that education and recreation are essential services for the children and legal services are a lifeline. Having a lawyer to argue a child’s case in court may be the determining factor in whether they can return to their home country safely or be protected by remaining in the United States.

Ending legal services will leave many children to go through asylum proceedings with no lawyer, she said.

“Last month we represented a six-month old child,” Young said.

Domingo Garcia, president of League of United Latin American Citizens, told NBC News his group received a call from a shelter worker concerned about how cuts to the services will affect the children and also concerned about jobs of workers.

Garcia said it would be devastating for children to have no chance for outside activities and the equivalent of child neglect.

News of the directive comes after NBC News reported Wednesday that children have been sleeping on concrete benches or outside Border Patrol Stations as Health and Human Services’ shelters are nearing or at capacity.

FOLLOW NBC LATINO ON FACEBOOK, TWITTER AND INSTAGRAM.

Source Article from https://www.nbcnews.com/news/latino/trump-administration-cutting-education-recreation-legal-help-migrant-children-shelters-n1014316

“It really smacks, I think, of how desperate these candidates are, and what desperate straits the party is in, that they’re prepared to indulge Trump in the kind of things he’s saying and doing,” said Tim Bale, a professor of politics at Queen Mary, University of London. “A lot of the constraints have come off British politics. Whether they’ve come off permanently, or whether it’s because the Conservative Party is at panic stations, is something only time can tell.”

The Conservative Party’s fondness for Republican politics goes back generations, and affections have grown in recent years as Brexiteers have held up a prospective American trade deal as the reward for a sharp split from the European Union.

But some analysts were struck this week by just how obsequious some of the leadership contenders’ appeals to Mr. Trump had become. Enthusiasm for the president, once confined to the party’s rightmost wing, seemed to travel to the mainstream as lawmakers vied for the votes of some 160,000 party members who tend to be stridently anti-Europe.

Mr. Gove, the environment secretary and a leadership hopeful from the moderate wing, once called Mr. Trump “an intemperate, bullying, foul-mouthed panderer.” Mr. Trump asked to meet with him anyway, though Mr. Gove said the two only managed to chat briefly at a banquet on Monday night.

Another candidate, Sajid Javid, the home secretary, met Mr. Trumpfor a short time on Wednesday.

Mr. Hunt, the foreign secretary, sat down with Mr. Trump on Tuesday night, a few hours after Mr. Trump singled him out as a potential prime minister. Mr. Hunt has repaid the president’s affection, defending him after Mr. Trump greeted his hosts by calling London’s mayor, Sadiq Khan, a “stone-cold loser” and making fun of his short stature on Twitter.

“Well,” Mr. Hunt said, “the elected mayor of London has made some pretty choice insults about Donald Trump.”

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2019/06/05/world/europe/trump-london-visit-uk.html

A critical-care doctor in Ohio who authorities believe “purposely caused the death” of 25 hospital patients that overdosed on the opioid painkiller fentanyl was arrested and charged with murder Wednesday.

Dr. William Husel, 43, pleaded not guilty to 25 counts of murder charged against him by the Franklin County Grand Jury. A lawyer for Husel has said he did not intend to kill anyone.

The charges make up one of the biggest murder cases brought against a doctor in the United States. A judge posted bail at $1 million and Husel surrendered his passport at the request of prosecutor Ron O’Brien.

DISGRACED FRENCH DOCTOR ACCUSED OF POISONING 24 PATIENTS AS YOUNG AS FOUR TO SHOW OFF HIS TALENTS IN MEDICINE

O’Brien’s office said in a statement that Husel ordered that patients receive doses of fentanyl “in various amounts between 500 and 2000 micrograms … that shortened their life and hastened or caused their death.”

The suspicious deaths occurred at Mount Carmel and St. Ann’s Hospitals in Columbus between Feb. 11, 2015, and Nov. 20, 2018, according to the statement.

Husel was fired from the Columbus-area Mount Carmel Health System in December 2018 and stripped of his medical license when allegations against him began to surface and an internal investigation by the hospital uncovered his fatal prescriptions.

More than two dozen wrongful-death lawsuits have been filed against Husel and the hospital system, some of which have been settled by the hospital for hundreds of thousands of dollars, according to the Associated Press.

Mount Carmel has admitted that Husel wasn’t removed from patient care until four weeks after concerns about him were raised last fall and that three patients died during that gap after receiving excessive doses he ordered.

As a precautionary measure, all employees who worked with Husel to administer medication to the patients who died were removed from patient care. Forty-eight nurses and pharmacists were reported to their respective professional boards, 30 of whom were put on leave, and 18 no longer work at Mount Carmel, including some who left years before allegations surfaced.

CLICK HERE FOR THE FOX NEWS APP

The prosecutor’s office has said it does not intend to charge any other hospital employees and has not disclosed any possible motive.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/us/ohio-doctor-accused-of-murdering-25-patients-in-painkiller-overdoses

YouTube has lost the plot on free speech.

As my colleague Brad Polumbo explains, YouTube was absolutely right to allow Steven Crowder to maintain his channel. Crowder’s insults to Vox.com journalist Carlos Maza were deeply unpleasant, but Crowder framed those insults within a broader political narrative. But YouTube made a terrible mistake in its later decision on Wednesday, following a social media uproar mob, to demonetize Crowder’s channel.

It is embarrassing that a media publication such as Vox supports this censorship of Crowder’s speech. Vox’s supposedly liberal writers should know that subjective interpretations of offensive speech mean that truly objective judges of acceptable speech are near-impossible to find.

Sadly, YouTube on Wednesday made another bad move. It announced that it will start:

prohibiting videos alleging that a group is superior in order to justify discrimination, segregation or exclusion based on qualities like age, gender, race, caste, religion, sexual orientation or veteran status. This would include, for example, videos that promote or glorify Nazi ideology, which is inherently discriminatory. Finally, we will remove content denying that well-documented violent events, like the Holocaust or the shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary, took place.

This is a big mistake.

As a private company YouTube has the right to choose which content it hosts. But YouTube also has a moral and social responsibility to the maximal exchange of information and ideas. History tells us that it is a bad idea to censor ideas most of us consider bad, Nazis included.

Consider some of the risks YouTube entertains here.

For one, the loss of otherwise valuable historical scholarship by individuals who hold some idiotic views. As Christopher Hitchens noted, the Holocaust denier historian David Irving has produced important research into the Third Reich. Irving’s delusions aside, should YouTube remove all Irvine’s scholarship because of his delusions? What of future flawed historians?

In preventing viewers from witnessing the evil absurdities of neo-Nazi videos, YouTube will also obstruct those who know little about the Nazis from knowing why Nazism is so bad. Remember, the source of Nazi power is the ability of its agents to present its immorality as a cause of necessary virtue. The best weapon against that effort is maximal public debate of Nazism. Its nature, unveiled, is rightly repellent to most.

Finally there’s the concern that comedy and satire might soon depart from YouTube. The risk here is probably more centered in algorithms and automatic removals, but it is real nonetheless. Take the Nazi jokes, for example, as offered by Ricky Gervais, or even humorous creations from the Jewish genius Larry David.

So don’t listen to YouTube and authoritarian censors who cloak themselves in moral language. Freedom of speech is sacred in and of itself, but also in the cause of defeating the worse ideologies.

Source Article from https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/why-youtube-is-wrong-to-censor-nazis-and-demonetize-steven-crowder

U.S. World War II D-Day veteran Tom Rice, from Coronado, Calif., parachutes in a tandem jump into a field in Carentan, Normandy, France, on Wednesday. Approximately 200 parachutists participated in the event, replicating a jump made by U.S. soldiers on June 6, 1944 — D-Day.

AP


hide caption

toggle caption

AP

U.S. World War II D-Day veteran Tom Rice, from Coronado, Calif., parachutes in a tandem jump into a field in Carentan, Normandy, France, on Wednesday. Approximately 200 parachutists participated in the event, replicating a jump made by U.S. soldiers on June 6, 1944 — D-Day.

AP

The first time Tom Rice jumped out of a plane over the Normandy coast, German soldiers were firing into the sky and about to launch a deluge of bullets and gunfire into the sea. Seventy-five years later it was nothing but smooth sailing.

Rice, who is 97 years old and was a U.S. World War II paratrooper, was one of a group of about 200 parachutists commemorating the 75th anniversary of D-Day, which began on June 6, 1944. The invasion of Europe marked a turning point in the war for the Allied forces.

“It went perfect, perfect jump,” Rice said afterward, according to the Associated Press. “I feel great. I’d go up and do it all again.”

It is a stark contrast to his previous voyage through the sky, which he called “the worst jump I ever had.”

“I got my left armpit caught in the lower left-hand corner of the door so I swung out, came back and hit the side of the aircraft, swung out again and came back, and I just tried to straighten my arm out and I got free,”

Tom Rice said later it was a perfect jump: “I feel great. I’d go up and do it all again.”

AP


hide caption

toggle caption

AP

Tom Rice said later it was a perfect jump: “I feel great. I’d go up and do it all again.”

AP

When Rice and his contemporaries first descended on Normandy, France and much of Europe were in the clutches of the Nazi occupation. But on Wednesday, when he floated in a tandem jump from a C-47 transporter, he was met by cheering crowds.

And he wasn’t the only nonagenarian to make the leap.

Harry Read, 95, and John Hutton, 94, both British, also jumped into the misty sky over what was once enemy territory.

“I thought the jump was brilliant. The jump was wonderful in every way. I feel good. My health is good and my mind is still ticking away,” Read told reporters, according to The Guardian.

Meanwhile, Hutton wondered why he doesn’t “have more sense at 94.”

Source Article from https://www.npr.org/2019/06/05/730133581/d-day-vets-in-their-90s-parachute-into-normandy-75-years-later-this-time-to-chee


Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell said his caucus does not support President Donald Trump’s proposed tariffs on Mexico, though he did not pledge to help block it. | Susan Walsh/AP Photo

congress

The divide risks embarrassing the president and his party.

President Donald Trump’s threats to impose blunt new tariffs on Mexico has unleashed a circular firing squad among Republicans in Congress.

A bloc of Senate Republicans is threatening to put up a veto-proof majority to block the tariffs if Trump moves forward by using his national emergency powers. But most House Republicans and another faction of GOP senators say their colleagues are making a mistake by undercutting the president on one of his signature issues.

Story Continued Below

I’m disappointed that so many of my colleagues are quick to announce their opposition,” said Sen. Kevin Cramer (R-N.D.). “By so publicly rebuking the president’s strategy you undermine the very leverage that could end this thing quickly. That’s the irony to me.”

The public split not only risks embarrassing the president and his party. It undercuts the shared goal Republicans have in avoiding the tariffs that Trump seems eager to deploy.

At issue is a conflict over strategy. Some GOP lawmakers hope to pressure Trump with the prospect of a rebellion that far exceeds the dozen defections on his national emergency declaration this winter, while others argue for a quieter persuasion campaign.

The dual approaches are scrambling ideologies and voting blocs on Capitol Hill. Take Sens. Joni Ernst (R-Iowa) and Thom Tillis (R-N.C.), both up for reelection in red-hued states but who have far different conclusions about the president’s tactics.

“I’m not in favor of this. The president needs to rethink it,” warned Ernst, who backed Trump’s national emergency on the border. “The president needs to understand that we’re opposed to these tariffs. We don’t think it’s a smart way forward. The president has his own opinion, he’s a tariff guy but I think we have a lot of folks in opposition.”

Tillis made clear his disagreement with his colleagues’ critiques of the tariffs.

“We’re making a mistake if we oppose the tariffs. Because we’re already seeing positive movement,” said Tillis, who vowed to oppose the last national emergency declaration before ultimately voting to uphold it. “You could lead Mexico to believe that all they have to do is wait out a resolution of disapproval. So I think it slows down the pace of negotiations.”

Tariffs are the longest-running GOP dispute with the president, particularly among Senate Republicans, and the president’s vow to impose 5 percent tariffs each month until Mexico tightens up the border has alarmed them more than ever given the broad economic impacts. Fundamentally, most Republicans hate tariffs and do not believe they are effective tools, and many would join Democrats to overturn a national emergency declaration from Trump.

“Why suffer a losing vote that maybe they’d put up here in the Senate?” said Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.), who is close to Trump. “I think [new tariffs are] a bad idea and I think there’s a possibility that there could be a veto proof-majority,”

But congressional Republicans are not coordinating to send the president a unified message about what the consequences might be if Trump moves forward. Even if the Senate is able to muster 67 votes to override a presidential veto, it would be all for naught if the House Republicans are working in the exact opposite direction.

“There would be a few [Republicans voting against the president], but nowhere near the 55 threshold,” said Freedom Caucus Chairman Mark Meadows (R-N.C.), one of Trump’s top allies on Capitol Hill. “Absolutely not.”

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) did not hide his caucus’ displeasure on Tuesday after meeting with Trump administration officials about the tariffs. On Wednesday in an interview with Fox News, he professed a “lack of enthusiasm among Senate Republican for what would amount to a tax increase, frankly, on working class people.”

House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy has acknowledged that his caucus shares the Senate GOP’s concern over the Mexico tariffs. But the California Republican has taken an entirely differently approach to the situation.

The GOP leader is not only urging his members to rally around the president, but he is even turning his fire on his Senate colleagues for undermining Trump.

“We should empower the president to be able to have a strong hand in negotiation,” McCarthy told reporters Wednesday. “If members here were undercutting him, it only hurts.”

“We should be united so there won’t be tariffs,” he added.

And it’s clear that Trump feels like McCarthy is in his corner. The president appeared to erroneously attribute a quote to McCarthy on Twitter that offered a far stronger defense of Trump than what McCarthy has actually said. McCarthy, however, did not push back.

The different approaches within the House and Senate GOP reflect a broader contrast with how Republicans in each chamber have dealt with Trump as well as their different incentives.

House Republicans have been far more reluctant to publicly rebuke the president than their Senate colleagues. Representatives are elected every two years, and those worried about job security have less room to maneuver politically. Most of them are more concerned about pro-Trump primary challengers rather than a Democrat in a general election.

“Republicans are primarily free-traders. Trump is obviously tariffing a lot of things, it’s hurting some of our producers, some of our manufacturers,” said Rep. John Shimkus (R-Ill.). “But he’s also well-loved in many districts. So it will be a tough vote for some folks… We struggle with this tariff issue.”

Senators, who serve six-year terms and represent entire states, seem to have far fewer reservations about panning Trump’s tariffs or going after him on other matters as well. And harsh tariffs on Mexico are far more alarming than the steel and aluminum tariffs on allies that Republicans have already repeatedly threatened to block.

“I’m not for the tariffs,” said Sen. Johnny Isakson (R-Ga.). The number of Republicans in opposition “is significant.”

“Tariffs are not the right way to go and there’s no reason that millions of farmers and ranchers and manufacturers and small businesses in Texas should pay the price and face billions in additional taxes,” said Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas).

At the Tuesday lunch with administration officials, no senator spoke in support of the president’s position. But that doesn’t mean Senate Republicans are united. Far from it.

Some Senate Republicans are disappointed their colleagues are resorting to such public warnings. They feel that the president has tried everything he can on Mexico, with no help from Congress, so that panning the tariffs does little to make positive change.

“I understand what the president is trying to do, and I understand where he’s coming from. I would say to my colleagues and others: ‘If you have a better idea, fantastic,'” said Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.).

For McConnell and his deputies, the divergent views in the caucus makes for an awkward spot. Like McCarthy, they know their leadership roles mean they generally must be supportive of the president.

McCarthy, who has faced challenges from the conservative Freedom Caucus and could face a leadership fight one day from Minority Whip Steve Scalise, has clung particularly close to Trump.

But it’s clear Republican leaders don’t like the tariffs either. And the last thing they want to do is referee another intraparty feud about the president’s unilateral actions on the border as the primary season draws ever closer for their members.

“The message was pretty clear coming out of the lunch that there are a lot of concerns about it,” said GOP Sen. John Thune of South Dakota, the party whip. “Hopefully we’ll see coming out of the next couple of days whether or not this idea can be turned off.”

Source Article from https://www.politico.com/story/2019/06/05/firingsquad-gop-1354652

Today is a day that ends in y, so the outrage mob is in full-swing once again. The latest victim of cancel-culture is comedian Steven Crowder, a polemicist whose unfiltered style has made him the target of a deplatforming campaign.

Left-wing Vox journalist Carlos Maza, a frequent target of Crowder’s mockery, is trying to get YouTube to ban the conservative comedian from their platform, where he has amassed nearly 4 million subscribers.

After Maza created a video calling for the removal of right-of-center perspectives from news coverage (he specifically praised “gatekeeping” as a function of journalism), Crowder shot back with a scathing takedown in which he kept referring to him as “gay Latino” or some variation. Maza shot back with a lengthy clip of samples of Crowder calling him a number of other names, including “lispy” and “queer.” He called on YouTube to ban Crowder, and later began discussing the need to keep advertisers off his videos on the platform. (Note that most of Crowder’s content is subscription-based.)

Maza has described Crowder’s mockery as “dehumanizing,” and thousands of his supporters are calling for censorship. Yet Crowder is a comedian and frequently speaks in hyperbolic and inflammatory language — that’s the point of comedy. It’s supposed to be offensive and provocative.

Maza and his mob apparently can’t take a joke. They have appealed to YouTube’s “hate speech” policy to try to get Crowder removed, which bans “content promoting violence or hatred against individuals or groups.”

This continues a disturbing trend of left-wing journalists (who of all people should understand the importance of free speech) treating mockery and derision as if it were an actual incitement to violence. Sure, Crowder’s words are going to offend some people; it’s part of his comedic style. He refers to his co-hosts as “half-Asian lawyer Bill Richmond” and “quarter-black Garrett.”

Crowder’s follow-up video to Maza’s complaint was a tongue-in-cheek apology for years of deliberately offensive comments, all of which he took the occasion to repeat in the space of 21 minutes. It quickly went viral, and the response has been overwhelmingly positive.

Is it hurtful to some people when you make fun of their taking offense? Sure. But none of this is a reason to deplatform Crowder. Millions of people have voted with their viewership, and it isn’t the place of outrage mobs or cowardly Big Tech companies to decide what we’re allowed to watch or what ideas are acceptable.

At first, YouTube made the right call and refused to cave to the mob:

UPDATE: Alas, it was not to last. YouTube caved under fire from left-wing activists who accused the company of “validating targeted harassment.” Maza himself called their basic defense of free speech a “batshit policy that gives bigots free license.” He called on all gay and transgender YouTube employees to resign in protest and is trying to get gay content creators to boycott the site as well. Maza and his illiberal cohorts hope (surely in vain) to browbeat YouTube further into submission.

Source Article from https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/the-mobbing-of-steven-crowder-shows-the-perils-of-pc-culture

Updated 6:01 PM ET, Wed June 5, 2019

Chat with us in Facebook Messenger. Find out what’s happening in the world as it unfolds.

Washington (CNN)The US government has obtained intelligence that Saudi Arabia has significantly escalated its ballistic missile program with the help of China, three sources with direct knowledge of the matter said, a development that threatens decades of US efforts to limit missile proliferation in the Middle East.

          ‘);$vidEndSlate.removeClass(‘video__end-slate–inactive’).addClass(‘video__end-slate–active’);}};CNN.autoPlayVideoExist = (CNN.autoPlayVideoExist === true) ? true : false;var configObj = {thumb: ‘none’,video: ‘politics/2019/06/04/senate-foreign-relations-kaine-pompeo-mh-orig.cnn’,width: ‘100%’,height: ‘100%’,section: ‘domestic’,profile: ‘expansion’,network: ‘cnn’,markupId: ‘body-text_50’,theoplayer: {allowNativeFullscreen: true},adsection: ‘const-article-inpage’,frameWidth: ‘100%’,frameHeight: ‘100%’,posterImageOverride: {“mini”:{“width”:220,”type”:”jpg”,”uri”:”//cdn.cnn.com/cnnnext/dam/assets/190603223415-senate-foreign-relations-kaine-pompeo-mh-orig-00000000-small-169.jpg”,”height”:124},”xsmall”:{“width”:307,”type”:”jpg”,”uri”:”//cdn.cnn.com/cnnnext/dam/assets/190603223415-senate-foreign-relations-kaine-pompeo-mh-orig-00000000-medium-plus-169.jpg”,”height”:173},”small”:{“width”:460,”type”:”jpg”,”uri”:”http://www.noticiasdodia.onlinenewsbusiness.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/190603223415-senate-foreign-relations-kaine-pompeo-mh-orig-00000000-large-169.jpg”,”height”:259},”medium”:{“width”:780,”type”:”jpg”,”uri”:”//cdn.cnn.com/cnnnext/dam/assets/190603223415-senate-foreign-relations-kaine-pompeo-mh-orig-00000000-exlarge-169.jpg”,”height”:438},”large”:{“width”:1100,”type”:”jpg”,”uri”:”//cdn.cnn.com/cnnnext/dam/assets/190603223415-senate-foreign-relations-kaine-pompeo-mh-orig-00000000-super-169.jpg”,”height”:619},”full16x9″:{“width”:1600,”type”:”jpg”,”uri”:”//cdn.cnn.com/cnnnext/dam/assets/190603223415-senate-foreign-relations-kaine-pompeo-mh-orig-00000000-full-169.jpg”,”height”:900},”mini1x1″:{“width”:120,”type”:”jpg”,”uri”:”//cdn.cnn.com/cnnnext/dam/assets/190603223415-senate-foreign-relations-kaine-pompeo-mh-orig-00000000-small-11.jpg”,”height”:120}}},autoStartVideo = false,isVideoReplayClicked = false,callbackObj,containerEl,currentVideoCollection = [],currentVideoCollectionId = ”,isLivePlayer = false,mediaMetadataCallbacks,mobilePinnedView = null,moveToNextTimeout,mutePlayerEnabled = false,nextVideoId = ”,nextVideoUrl = ”,turnOnFlashMessaging = false,videoPinner,videoEndSlateImpl;if (CNN.autoPlayVideoExist === false) {autoStartVideo = false;if (autoStartVideo === true) {if (turnOnFlashMessaging === true) {autoStartVideo = false;containerEl = jQuery(document.getElementById(configObj.markupId));CNN.VideoPlayer.showFlashSlate(containerEl);} else {CNN.autoPlayVideoExist = true;}}}configObj.autostart = CNN.Features.enableAutoplayBlock ? false : autoStartVideo;CNN.VideoPlayer.setPlayerProperties(configObj.markupId, autoStartVideo, isLivePlayer, isVideoReplayClicked, mutePlayerEnabled);CNN.VideoPlayer.setFirstVideoInCollection(currentVideoCollection, configObj.markupId);videoEndSlateImpl = new CNN.VideoEndSlate(‘body-text_50’);function findNextVideo(currentVideoId) {var i,vidObj;if (currentVideoId && jQuery.isArray(currentVideoCollection) && currentVideoCollection.length > 0) {for (i = 0; i 0) {videoEndSlateImpl.showEndSlateForContainer();if (mobilePinnedView) {mobilePinnedView.disable();}}}}callbackObj = {onPlayerReady: function (containerId) {var playerInstance,containerClassId = ‘#’ + containerId;CNN.VideoPlayer.handleInitialExpandableVideoState(containerId);CNN.VideoPlayer.handleAdOnCVPVisibilityChange(containerId, CNN.pageVis.isDocumentVisible());if (CNN.Features.enableMobileWebFloatingPlayer &&Modernizr &&(Modernizr.phone || Modernizr.mobile || Modernizr.tablet) &&CNN.VideoPlayer.getLibraryName(containerId) === ‘fave’ &&jQuery(containerClassId).parents(‘.js-pg-rail-tall__head’).length > 0 &&CNN.contentModel.pageType === ‘article’) {playerInstance = FAVE.player.getInstance(containerId);mobilePinnedView = new CNN.MobilePinnedView({element: jQuery(containerClassId),enabled: false,transition: CNN.MobileWebFloatingPlayer.transition,onPin: function () {playerInstance.hideUI();},onUnpin: function () {playerInstance.showUI();},onPlayerClick: function () {if (mobilePinnedView) {playerInstance.enterFullscreen();playerInstance.showUI();}},onDismiss: function() {CNN.Videx.mobile.pinnedPlayer.disable();playerInstance.pause();}});/* Storing pinned view on CNN.Videx.mobile.pinnedPlayer So that all players can see the single pinned player */CNN.Videx = CNN.Videx || {};CNN.Videx.mobile = CNN.Videx.mobile || {};CNN.Videx.mobile.pinnedPlayer = mobilePinnedView;}if (Modernizr && !Modernizr.phone && !Modernizr.mobile && !Modernizr.tablet) {if (jQuery(containerClassId).parents(‘.js-pg-rail-tall__head’).length) {videoPinner = new CNN.VideoPinner(containerClassId);videoPinner.init();} else {CNN.VideoPlayer.hideThumbnail(containerId);}}},onContentEntryLoad: function(containerId, playerId, contentid, isQueue) {CNN.VideoPlayer.showSpinner(containerId);},onContentPause: function (containerId, playerId, videoId, paused) {if (mobilePinnedView) {CNN.VideoPlayer.handleMobilePinnedPlayerStates(containerId, paused);}},onContentMetadata: function (containerId, playerId, metadata, contentId, duration, width, height) {var endSlateLen = jQuery(document.getElementById(containerId)).parent().find(‘.js-video__end-slate’).eq(0).length;CNN.VideoSourceUtils.updateSource(containerId, metadata);if (endSlateLen > 0) {videoEndSlateImpl.fetchAndShowRecommendedVideos(metadata);}},onAdPlay: function (containerId, cvpId, token, mode, id, duration, blockId, adType) {/* Dismissing the pinnedPlayer if another video players plays an Ad */CNN.VideoPlayer.dismissMobilePinnedPlayer(containerId);clearTimeout(moveToNextTimeout);CNN.VideoPlayer.hideSpinner(containerId);if (Modernizr && !Modernizr.phone && !Modernizr.mobile && !Modernizr.tablet) {if (typeof videoPinner !== ‘undefined’ && videoPinner !== null) {videoPinner.setIsPlaying(true);videoPinner.animateDown();}}},onAdPause: function (containerId, playerId, token, mode, id, duration, blockId, adType, instance, isAdPause) {if (mobilePinnedView) {CNN.VideoPlayer.handleMobilePinnedPlayerStates(containerId, isAdPause);}},onTrackingFullscreen: function (containerId, PlayerId, dataObj) {CNN.VideoPlayer.handleFullscreenChange(containerId, dataObj);if (mobilePinnedView &&typeof dataObj === ‘object’ &&FAVE.Utils.os === ‘iOS’ && !dataObj.fullscreen) {jQuery(document).scrollTop(mobilePinnedView.getScrollPosition());playerInstance.hideUI();}},onContentPlay: function (containerId, cvpId, event) {var playerInstance,prevVideoId;if (CNN.companion && typeof CNN.companion.updateCompanionLayout === ‘function’) {CNN.companion.updateCompanionLayout(‘restoreEpicAds’);}clearTimeout(moveToNextTimeout);CNN.VideoPlayer.hideSpinner(containerId);if (Modernizr && !Modernizr.phone && !Modernizr.mobile && !Modernizr.tablet) {if (typeof videoPinner !== ‘undefined’ && videoPinner !== null) {videoPinner.setIsPlaying(true);videoPinner.animateDown();}}},onContentReplayRequest: function (containerId, cvpId, contentId) {if (Modernizr && !Modernizr.phone && !Modernizr.mobile && !Modernizr.tablet) {if (typeof videoPinner !== ‘undefined’ && videoPinner !== null) {videoPinner.setIsPlaying(true);var $endSlate = jQuery(document.getElementById(containerId)).parent().find(‘.js-video__end-slate’).eq(0);if ($endSlate.length > 0) {$endSlate.removeClass(‘video__end-slate–active’).addClass(‘video__end-slate–inactive’);}}}},onContentBegin: function (containerId, cvpId, contentId) {if (mobilePinnedView) {mobilePinnedView.enable();}/* Dismissing the pinnedPlayer if another video players plays a video. */CNN.VideoPlayer.dismissMobilePinnedPlayer(containerId);CNN.VideoPlayer.mutePlayer(containerId);if (CNN.companion && typeof CNN.companion.updateCompanionLayout === ‘function’) {CNN.companion.updateCompanionLayout(‘removeEpicAds’);}CNN.VideoPlayer.hideSpinner(containerId);clearTimeout(moveToNextTimeout);CNN.VideoSourceUtils.clearSource(containerId);jQuery(document).triggerVideoContentStarted();},onContentComplete: function (containerId, cvpId, contentId) {if (CNN.companion && typeof CNN.companion.updateCompanionLayout === ‘function’) {CNN.companion.updateCompanionLayout(‘restoreFreewheel’);}navigateToNextVideo(contentId, containerId);},onContentEnd: function (containerId, cvpId, contentId) {if (Modernizr && !Modernizr.phone && !Modernizr.mobile && !Modernizr.tablet) {if (typeof videoPinner !== ‘undefined’ && videoPinner !== null) {videoPinner.setIsPlaying(false);}}},onCVPVisibilityChange: function (containerId, cvpId, visible) {CNN.VideoPlayer.handleAdOnCVPVisibilityChange(containerId, visible);}};if (typeof configObj.context !== ‘string’ || configObj.context.length 0) {configObj.adsection = window.ssid;}CNN.autoPlayVideoExist = (CNN.autoPlayVideoExist === true) ? true : false;CNN.VideoPlayer.getLibrary(configObj, callbackObj, isLivePlayer);});CNN.INJECTOR.scriptComplete(‘videodemanddust’);

Source Article from https://www.cnn.com/2019/06/05/politics/us-intelligence-saudi-arabia-ballistic-missile-china/index.html

As of last year, the N.I.H. spent about $100 million of its $37 billion annual budget on research projects involving fetal tissue. The tissue is used to test drugs, develop vaccines and study cancer, AIDS, Parkinson’s disease, birth defects, blindness and other disorders. For much of that work, scientists say there is no substitute for fetal tissue.

“Claims that other cells can be used to replace fetal tissue in biomedical research are patently incorrect,” dozens of scientific and medical groups wrote in a letter to Mr. Azar in December. “While there have been some advances in recent years that have reduced the need for fetal tissue in certain areas of research, it remains critically important in many other areas.”

Scientists at the University of California, San Francisco, have been using fetal tissue to create so-called humanized mice — engrafted with the tissue to make them respond more like humans — which can then be used to test drugs and vaccines. But opponents of fetal tissue research say alternatives, such as donated thymus tissue from infants who undergo heart surgery, or adult stem cells, are better.

“There are ample ethically derived sources and alternatives,” said David Prentice, vice president and research director for the Charlotte Lozier Institute, the research arm of the Susan B. Anthony List, an anti-abortion group. He called the move by the Health and Human Services Department “a good step, but a preliminary step,” adding that he hoped the administration would end federal funding to all universities for research involving fetal tissue from abortions.

Equity Forward, a watchdog group that promotes abortion rights, questioned why the Health and Human Services Department had not made public any results of its review of fetal tissue research. Mary Alice Carter, the group’s senior adviser, said in a statement that Mr. Azar “is putting millions of dollars in lifesaving research at risk to please a small group of anti-abortion extremists.”

“The fact is, there is no scientific reason to endanger this vital research funding,” Ms. Carter said. “Congress should use the power of the purse to put science ahead of ideology and continue funding these vital programs.”

According to the Health and Human Services Department, the N.I.H. has three active research projects involving fetal tissue from abortions, out of 3,065 internal projects.

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2019/06/05/us/politics/fetal-tissue-research.html

Miranda Schaup-Werner had just checked into her Grand Bahia Principe hotel, in the Dominican Republic town of San Pedro de Macoris, and was taking pictures from her room balcony on May 25 when she started to feel ill. Less than two hours later, she was dead, local authorities said.

The 41-year-old Pennsylvania woman is the third American known to have died suddenly and under mysterious circumstances at two sister resorts in the Caribbean island nation within a week, according to local authorities and the U.S. State Department.

Cynthia Ann Day, 49 and Nathaniel Edward Holmes, 63, both of Prince George’s County, Md., were found dead inside their room at the Grand Bahia Principe La Romana on May 30. Relatives had become suspicious after they didn’t check out from the resort, located about 60 miles from the tourist-heavy Punta Cana area. The resort, and the Luxury Bahia Principe Bouganville, where Schaup-Werner was staying, are adjacent to one another on the island’s southern coast.

The Dominican Republic’s National Police is investigating all three deaths and awaiting toxicology results, officials said. Initial autopsy results for Day and Holmes showed they died of pulmonary edema and respiratory failure, police said. Investigators said they found blood pressure medication and three prescription pill bottles in the room, one of which contained five-milligram doses of the painkiller oxycodone.

Jay McDonald, a spokesman for the Schaup-Werner family, told The Washington Post that Dominican police indicated that his sister-in-law died of pulmonary edema and respiratory failure. The family declined to comment further. Hotel officials said in a statement Wednesday that the woman died of a heart attack and that her husband, Daniel Frank Werner, confirmed to them that she had a history of heart conditions.

Local authorities initially did not run toxicology tests for Schaup-Werner because there were no signs of violence, said Ramon Brito, a spokesman for the National Police’s special tourism unit. After the Maryland couple was found dead, investigators ordered a set of tests to determine whether anything the three Americans consumed may have led to their deaths, Brito said.

Dominican authorities have not released autopsy results for Schaup-Werner, who was visiting the country with her husband to celebrate their 10th wedding anniversary. They declined to confirm or clarify any details about the woman’s death until the investigation was complete.

Hotel officials said their medical staff team responded to Schaup-Werner in her room and began treating her immediately. Before they could take her to a hospital, she was pronounced dead.

“During the event and in the days that followed we provided our complete support to Mr. Werner in collaboration with local authorities and the U.S. Embassy,” the statement from Bahia Principe Hotel and Resorts said. “We once again express our condolences to Mr. Werner and his family and friends on the passing of Mrs. Schaup-Werner.”

Holmes, of Temple Hills, and Day, of Upper Marlboro, were found five days later. An autopsy showed that both died when their lungs filled with fluid, leading to respiratory failure, according to a news release from the Dominican Republic’s National Police.

There were no signs of violence, according to Dominican officials.

The couple had posted photos of themselves on Facebook enjoying time on the beach, wading in the turquoise blue waters of the Caribbean, riding all-terrain vehicles and cruising on a boat. On May 26, Holmes posted: “Can somebody please loan me $250,000 bcuz I don’t want to come home!!!!!”

More than 2 million North American tourists flock to the Dominican Republic every year. After an attack on a Delaware woman inside her resort near Punta Cana in mid-April, the U.S. State Department alerted travelers to exercise “increased caution in the Dominican Republic due to crime.”

This report has been updated to reflect new information about the deaths, including that the three victims were staying at two adjacent Bahia Grand Principe resorts. In addition, an earlier version of this report incorrectly stated that oxycodone is used to treat high blood pressure. Oxycodone is a painkiller that was among several medications police say were found in the hotel room of Nathaniel Holmes and Cynthia Ann Day, including blood pressure medication.

Read more:

Toxicology report pending for Maryland couple who died at Caribbean resort

‘He is still out there’: Delaware mother details brutal attack at Dominican Republic resort

Source Article from https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2019/06/05/americans-found-dead-same-dominican-republic-resort-within-days/

The number of migrants apprehended at America’s southern border skyrocketed last month to levels not seen in over a decade, with U.S. Customs and Border Protection reporting nearly 133,000 arrests in May.

The number surpassed 144,000 when counting migrants deemed inadmissible — more than a 30 percent increase from the prior month and double the influx recorded at the beginning of the year.

OPERATION TARGETING MS-13 GANG IN TEXAS NETS NEARLY 2 DOZEN ARRESTS, OFFICIALS SAY

“We are in full-blown emergency,” a CBP official said Wednesday.

The number of apprehensions was the highest monthly total in more than 13 years. In April, authorities recorded 99,304 arrests.

The latest figures could embolden President Trump amid tense negotiations with Mexico over the immigration crisis.

Last week, in an effort to force Mexico to do more to “stop the invasion” of migrants into the U.S., the president vowed to impose a new 5 percent tariff on all Mexican imports. The tariffs, set to go into effect on June 10 absent an agreement, would increase over time, reaching 25 percent by Oct. 1.

U.S. Customs and Border Protection apprehended more than 144,000 migrants at the U.S. southern border in May.
(CBP)

So far in fiscal 2019, which began last October, border officials have apprehended 593,507 migrants—a number higher than the total apprehensions in each of the past five fiscal years.

“We are bursting at the seams,” a CBP official told reporters Wednesday. “It is unsustainable and can’t continue.”

Administration officials insisted the CBP is unable to house this many people.

“When we have 4,000 in custody, we consider it high, when we have 6,000, it’s a crisis,” an official said. “Right now, we have 19,000 in custody. It’s just off the charts.”

CBP officials told reporters Wednesday that the crisis is forcing the agency to divert resources, which is contributing to longer waits on the border for both recreational and commercial travel.

Typically during the late spring and summer months, there is a drop-off in migration due to the heat, but CBP officials said this week they have not seen any evidence of that so far.

The Trump administration for months has warned of a humanitarian crisis at the U.S.-Mexico border. President Trump, earlier this year, even declared a national emergency on the southern border in a bid to divert billions of dollars toward the construction of his long-promised border wall.

TRUMP SAYS MEXICO IS AN ‘ABUSER’ OF THE US, AMID TARIFF NEGOTIATIONS

But he opened a new phase in the debate with his tariff threat against Mexico.

The announcement came after more than 1,000 illegal immigrants were apprehended at once last month by U.S. Customs and Border Protection agents near the U.S.-Mexico border—the largest ever group of migrants ever apprehended at a single time, sources told Fox News.

The group of 1,036 illegal immigrants found in the El Paso sector included migrants from Guatemala, El Salvador and Honduras, according to sources.

There were 58,474 families apprehended last month, according to CBP. In March, the agency said that there was an increase of nearly 106 percent over the same period last year.

Since the president announced the tariffs, Mexican President Andrés Manuel López Obrador dispatched his foreign relations secretary to Washington in an effort to negotiate a solution with the U.S.

MEXICO OFFICIALS PREPARE TO INTERCEPT ABOUT 1,000 MIGRANTS

Obrador said he expects “good results” from the upcoming talks in Washington and reportedly suggested he is open to reinforcing efforts to stem illegal immigration. Obrador said that Mexican officials plan to convey to the Trump administration what they have been doing to stop illegal immigration, and added that they are open to additional  measures “without violating human rights.”

On Wednesday, Mexico’s foreign minister was slated to meet with Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, Homeland Security Acting Secretary Kevin McAleenan, U.S. Trade Rep. Robert Lighthizer and Vice President Mike Pence at the White House.

“.@SecPompeo, @DHSMcAleenan, & I will meet shortly with Mexican Secretary of Foreign Affairs @M_ebrard at the @WhiteHouse. We have a crisis on our Southern Border. @POTUS has made clear that Mexico must do more,” Pence tweeted Wednesday ahead of the meeting.

Meanwhile, on Wednesday, Mexican officials prepared to intercept a group of another 1,000 migrants who said they aimed to reach the U.S. southern border to request asylum. Many of the migrants say they’re fleeing gang violence, oppressive extortion, and corruption in Guatemala, Honduras and El Salvador.

Fox News’ Sarah Tobianski and The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/politics/border-patrol-made-highest-number-of-apprehensions-in-may-in-more-than-five-years

But Mexico has maintained that it is already taking action to stem the flow of migrants.

Mexico’s ambassador to the United States, Martha Bárcena, said in a press conference Monday that without Mexico’s efforts, many more migrants would be arriving at American borders.

“There is a clear limit to what we can negotiate,” Ms. Bárcena said. “And that limit is Mexican dignity.”

On Tuesday, Mr. Ebrard met for a half-hour with Speaker Nancy Pelosi and several other Democratic lawmakers.

Republican senators are also mobilizing to prevent the White House from moving ahead with tariffs, warning Mr. Trump on Tuesday that they were almost uniformly opposed to his plans to tax Mexican imports.

Several big states would be hit hard by the proposed tariffs on Mexican products, including Texas, Michigan, California, Illinois and Ohio, according to the U.S. Chamber of Commerce.

“We’re holding a gun to our own heads,” said Senator John Cornyn, Republican of Texas.

Officials at Customs and Border Protection were making preparations on Wednesday to begin imposing the tariffs just after midnight on Monday morning.

In an interview, a Customs spokesman said the department was waiting for Mr. Trump to issue a presidential proclamation, which would then by followed by a Federal Register notice, outlining the basis for the tariffs and the universe of Mexican products to which they would apply. But even without a formal order establishing the tariffs, Customers workers are already building up the informational technology infrastructure needed to apply the tariffs on Monday morning to importers bringing in goods from Mexico.

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2019/06/05/us/politics/mexico-tariffs.html

The Trump administration is canceling English classes, recreational programs and legal aid for unaccompanied minors staying in federal migrant shelters nationwide, saying the immigration influx at the southern border has created critical budget pressures.

The Office of Refugee Resettlement has begun discontinuing the funding stream for activities — including soccer — that have been deemed “not directly necessary for the protection of life and safety, including education services, legal services, and recreation,” said U.S. Health and Human Services spokesman Mark Weber.

Federal officials have warned Congress that they are facing “a dramatic spike” in unaccompanied minors at the southern border and have asked Congress for $2.9 billion in emergency funding to expand shelters and care. The program could run out of money in late June, and the agency is legally obligated to direct funding to essential services, Weber said.

The move — revealed in an email an HHS official sent to licensed shelters last week, a message that has been obtained by The Washington Post — could run afoul of a federal court settlement and state licensing requirements that mandate education and recreation for minors in federal custody. Carlos Holguin, a lawyer who represents minors in a long-running lawsuit that spurred a 1997 federal court settlement that sets basic standards of care for children in custody, immediately slammed the cuts as illegal.

“We’ll see them in court if they go through with it,” Holguin said. “What’s next? Drinking water? Food? . . . Where are they going to stop?”

More than 40,800 unaccompanied children have been placed into HHS custody after crossing the U.S.-Mexico border this year, a 57 percent increase from last year that is putting ORR on track to care for the largest number of minors in the program’s history. Federal law requires the Department of Homeland Security to move unaccompanied minors from austere border jails to more child-appropriate shelters, and they must do so swiftly.

An average of 12,500 children and youths were held in federal shelters nationwide in April, according to HHS. They stayed an average of 48 days until a case worker could place them with a sponsor, usually a relative. While they wait in the shelters, minors attend school, study math and English and participate in extracurricular activities such as ping-pong, soccer or other sports.

Most of the minors are teenagers fleeing violence and poverty in Guatemala, Honduras and El Salvador.

An HHS official sent an email Thursday to shelters across the country notifying them that the government will not pay for education or recreational activities retroactive to May 22, including related personnel costs. The official characterized those costs as “unallowable.”

Holguin said schooling and exercise are “fundamental to the care of youngsters.”

A shelter employee who spoke on the condition of anonymity to address the internal government directive, said the Trump administration’s cuts have alarmed workers, who fear the quality of care for the children will suffer. The employee said the classes and sports activities are crucial to maintaining physical and mental health while the children are in custody.

“What are you going to do all day?” the shelter employee said. “If you’re not going to have any sort of organized recreation or physical activity, what are you going to do, just let them sit in their rooms?”

Trump declared a national emergency at the border in February, as a record number of Central American families and unaccompanied minors surged across the southern border. Many are seeking asylum in the United States, and most are released into the U.S. interior while they await interviews and court hearings.

The White House had attempted to attach a $4.5 billion emergency spending request for the border — which includes $2.9 billion for HHS — to the disaster bill that passed this week, but lawmakers were unable to reach an agreement.

Source Article from https://www.washingtonpost.com/immigration/trump-administration-cancels-english-classes-soccer-legal-aid-for-unaccompanied-child-migrants-in-us-shelters/2019/06/05/df2a0008-8712-11e9-a491-25df61c78dc4_story.html