Most Viewed Videos

Lawyers who support the broad free speech protections that Sullivan and other legal precedents guarantee say that the risk to a free and impartial press is not only that it could be held liable for honest mistakes.

If public figures are no longer required to meet a high legal bar for proving harm from an unflattering article, press freedom advocates warn, journalists, especially those without the resources of a large news organization behind them, will self-censor.

“We worry a lot about the risk that public officials and other powerful figures can use threats of defamation suits to deter news gathering and suppress important conversations on matters of public concern,” said RonNell Andersen Jones, a law professor at the University of Utah who has documented the judiciary’s increasingly dim view of the media. “It’s a trend that press freedom scholars find deeply troubling.”

Ms. Jones said she and many other legal scholars considered Mr. Trump’s insistence in 2016 that libel laws be reopened “deeply improbable, even laughable.” But now she regrets her indifference. And she said she is looking at the Palin case as a test of how harshly a jury — in today’s tribal political climate — will judge media companies for their mistakes.

Ms. Palin’s suit was initially dismissed by the judge, Jed S. Rakoff, soon after it was filed. But a three-judge appeals court panel overturned that decision in 2019 and reinstated the case. Elizabeth Locke, who represented Ms. Palin during the appeal but is no longer involved in the case, has argued on behalf of several high-profile clients in defamation suits against major media outlets and been at the forefront of the conservative effort to make the rethinking of libel laws more mainstream. Ms. Locke said in an interview that while the Sullivan precedent is not worth scrapping entirely, it fails in today’s media culture.

“How do you balance free speech rights with the right to your individual reputation, and in the context of public officials who have volunteered for public service and do need to be held to account?” she said.

“Redrawing that balance does not mean that we lock up journalists or that any falsehood should result in a huge jury verdict,” Ms. Locke added. “But imposing the potential for legal liability, which is virtually nonexistent with the Sullivan standard in place, would create self-restraint.”

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2022/01/23/business/media/sarah-palin-libel-suit-nyt.html

In an interview on “60 Minutes” Sunday night, President Biden said the COVID-19 pandemic is “over” in the United States.

“The pandemic is over. We still have a problem with COVID. We’re still doing a lotta work on it. … But the pandemic is over,” Mr. Biden said. 

The interview was done as he walked the floor of the Detroit Auto Show last week. Gesturing around the hall, Mr. Biden observed, “If you notice, no one’s wearing masks. Everybody seems to be in pretty good shape. And so I think it’s changing. And I think this is a perfect example of it.”

Mr. Biden’s comments came only a few weeks after his administration asked Congress for billions of dollars to maintain its testing and vaccination efforts.

The remark contradicts statements made by his own aides earlier this month, as they have urged Americans to seek out an updated booster ahead of a feared fall and winter wave of the virus. 

“The pandemic isn’t over. And we will remain vigilant, and of course, we continue to look for and prepare for unforeseen twists and turns,” Dr. Ashish Jha, the White House’s top COVID-19 official, told reporters on September 6.

COVID-19 deaths are still averaging around 400 a day nationwide, levels that federal health officials have decried as “still too high.” 

Officials have also signaled that a public health emergency declaration for COVID-19 is expected to be renewed at least once more this year.

But COVID restrictions have been largely eliminated in the U.S. by local health departments and travel is back at pre-pandemic levels. 

The pace of new hospitalizations from the virus have now also slowed dramatically in the wake of the summer wave driven by the BA.4 and BA.5 subvariants of Omicron. Officials have credited widespread immunity from vaccines and prior infections, as well as growing use of COVID-19 treatments like Pfizer’s Paxlovid, for helping to arrest the toll claimed by the virus despite a summer wave of infections.

Jha and others have painted the fall booster push as part of helping ensure Americans can continue to “get back to school, get back to work, and get back into their regular routines after the summer.” 

But with the president’s pandemic funding requests still languishing in Congress, administration officials say they are now working to wind down most of the federally subsidized arms of the COVID-19 response.

The president pointed to the pandemic as a big reason his approval rating has been well below 50%.

“This is a really difficult time,” he remarked to CBS News correspondent Scott Pelley. “We’re at an inflection point in the history of this country. We’re gonna make decisions, and we’re making decisions now, that are gonna determine what we’re gonna look like the next ten years from now. I think you’d agree that the impact on the psyche of the American people as a consequence of the pandemic is profound.”

“Think of how that has changed everything. You know, people’s attitudes about themselves, their families, about the state of the nation, about the state of their communities. And so there’s a lot of uncertainty out there, a great deal of uncertainty.  And we lost a million people. A million people to COVID,” the president said.

“When I got in office, when I— I got elected, only 2 million people had been vaccinated. I got 220 million— my point is, it takes time. We were left in a very difficult situation. it’s been a very difficult time. Very difficult.”

CBS News’ Alexander Tin contributed reporting.

Source Article from https://www.cbsnews.com/news/biden-covid-pandemic-over/

A wind farm in Wyoming generates electricity for a region that used to be more dependent on coal-fired power plants. A new study finds that millions of lives could be saved this century by rapidly reducing greenhouse gas emissions.

Matt Young/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Matt Young/AP

A wind farm in Wyoming generates electricity for a region that used to be more dependent on coal-fired power plants. A new study finds that millions of lives could be saved this century by rapidly reducing greenhouse gas emissions.

Matt Young/AP

Cutting greenhouse gas emissions quickly would save tens of millions of lives worldwide, a new study finds. It’s the latest indication that climate change is deadly to humans, and that the benefits of transitioning to a cleaner economy could be profound.

In recent years, the connection between a hotter planet and human death and disease has become clearer, thanks to a series of research papers. A study published in 2021 found that about a third of heat-related deaths worldwide can be directly attributed to human-caused climate change. A 2020 Lancet report warned that climate change is the biggest global public health threat of the century.

But those findings have not been factored into one of the three major computer models that scientists, economists and the federal government use to calculate the societal costs of carbon emissions. That means economists and policymakers may be underestimating the cost of climate change to human life.

“One key takeaway is that there are a significant number of lives that can be saved by reducing emissions,” says R. Daniel Bressler, a Ph.D. candidate at Columbia University who is the author of the new study, published Thursday in the journal Nature Communications.

When he factored in the latest mortality research, Bressler found that about 74 million lives could be saved this century if humans cut greenhouse gas emissions to zero by 2050, compared with a scenario in which the Earth experiences a catastrophic 4 degrees Celsius (about 7 degrees Fahrenheit) of warming by the end of the century.

He hopes the findings will be helpful to a federal working group currently reassessing how the government calculates the costs and benefits of climate policies. Since 2010, the federal government has calculated the “social cost of carbon” — a dollar amount that represents the cost associated with emitting 1 metric ton of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. Those costs include changes to agricultural productivity, energy use, species extinction, sea level rise and human health.

The social cost of carbon informs trillions of dollars of federal policy, including regulations about vehicle tailpipe emissions, power plants and appliance efficiency standards.

“There have been over 100 U.S. government regulations where the social cost of carbon was used,” says Maureen Cropper, a climate economist at the University of Maryland, who co-chaired a 2017 National Academies of Sciences committee on the social cost of carbon.

At least 11 states also use the social cost of carbon to inform decisions about their power grids, efficiency regulations and other climate policies, Cropper says, and Canada based its own cost number on the original U.S. calculations.

Having an accurate cost number is especially important at a time when Congress and state governments are considering major infrastructure investments, Bressler says.

“Imagine you’re looking at the cost-benefit analysis of building a new power plant,” Bressler says. “You’re trying to compare a coal plant to a wind farm. And that coal-fired power plant is producing a lot more carbon dioxide emissions. How do we think about the costs associated with that?”

It depends on whom you ask. Under the Obama administration, the cost associated with emitting carbon was calculated to be at least seven times higher than under the Trump administration, mostly because the latter purposely ignored the effects of U.S. emissions on the rest of the world.

President Biden reinstated the Obama-era cost number and directed a federal working group to reexamine the calculation to make sure it includes the most up-to-date research about the costs of climate change. A new cost number is expected in early 2022.

Source Article from https://www.npr.org/2021/07/29/1021247014/cutting-carbon-pollution-quickly-would-save-millions-of-lives-study-finds

CHICAGO (CBS) – A Chicago police officer was shot and killed Saturday night, and a second was critically wounded in the shooting in the West Englewood neighborhood.

“This evening, Chicago mourns the loss of one of its bravest and finest, and we have another officer who is struggling and fighting for his very life,” CPD First Deputy Superintendent Eric Carter said early Sunday morning outside University of Chicago Medical Center, where the wounded officers were taken after the shooting.

READ MORE: Chicago Weather: Heat And Humidity Continue; Risk Of Severe Thunderstorms Later Sunday

Carter said officers with the Community Safety Team conducted a traffic stop around 9 p.m. near 63rd and Bell. Three people were in the car, two males and a female.

During the traffic stop, someone in the vehicle opened fire on police, who returned fire.

Two officers and one of the people in the car were wounded. Police said the two men who were in the car were in custody, including one who was shot and taken to Advocate Christ Medical Center in serious condition. Police were searching for the female who was in the car.

The wounded officers were taken to University of Chicago Medical Center. A 29-year-old female officer later was pronounced dead, and the male officer was in critical condition early Sunday morning.

The name of the officer who died has not been released.

“We ask the city of Chicago to pray for both officers, their families, their fellow officers who are struggling with the facts of this,” Carter said. “This is just another example of how the Chicago Police Department and these officers put their lives above that of others to protect the city day in and day out, selflessly. They go out here and do their jobs thanklessly. They do it without asking for anything. They do it because they love it. They do it because it’s something a higher calling for. And they do it because it’s the right thing to do.”

Mayor Lori Lightfoot said she spent time with the slain officer’s family at the hospital.

“Obviously our hearts ache for the loss of life who succumbed to her injuries. She was very young on the job, but incredibly enthusiastic to do the work,” Lightfoot said. “We must remind ourselves every single day, our officers are fearless in the face of danger. They run into danger to protect us. We can never forget, never forget the sacrifices that they make every single day, as we speak, to protect people and neighborhoods, even in the face of violence.”

“It’s a very sad day, not just for the Chicago Police Department, but it is a very sad and tragic day for our city,” Lightfoot added.

“Tonight, we mourn,” the Chicago Fraternal Order of Police posted on Twitter.

READ MORE: 5 Killed, 25 Wounded So Far In Weekend Shootings Across Chicago

Earlier, before the officer’s death had been announced, the union tweeted, “Lord, please look over these two Officers, keep them and every Officer out in the 8th District safe tonight. This career of service we all chose is one of sacrifice, but please Lord, not tonight. Not tonight.”

Scores of officers gathered outside University of Chicago Medical Center overnight. A procession was expected to take the slain officer’s body to the Cook County Medical Examiner’s office, where an autopsy will be conducted Sunday morning.

Meantime, at the scene of the shooting, officers were seen actively searching bushes, with police helicopters hovering overhead. Police also had blocked traffic on several streets around the scene of the shooting.

One woman who lives in the area said the block where the shooting happened is typically quiet.

“It’s an industrial area, so there are never any issues. No trouble whatsoever,” she said. “We’re usually worried about Western, down the street, but not right here.”

The officer who died is the fifth female Chicago Police officer to die in the line of duty, and the first woman CPD officer to die in the line of duty in 21 years.

Officer Alane Stoffregen, a police rescue diver, died during a training accident in June 2000.

MORE NEWS: Pastors, Community Groups Seek To Promote Peace With ‘No Crime Day’ On South And West Sides

The last female officer shot and killed in the line of duty in Chicago was Officer Irma Ruiz, who was killed in 1988 while confronting a gunman at Moses Montefiore School.

Source Article from https://chicago.cbslocal.com/2021/08/08/chicago-police-officers-shot-west-englewood-63rd-bell/