Recently Added Videos

Earlier this year, BJP’s efforts to return to power looked to be on shaky grounds, especially after the party lost three key state elections in December. People across India have had mixed reactions to some of Modi’s landmark economic reforms and policies. They include the introduction of the Goods and Services Tax and demonetization — where the government unexpectedly withdrew all its 500 and 1,000-rupee notes, and replaced them with 500 and 2,000-rupee denomination currencies.

Then, a terrorist attack in Kashmir, and India’s subsequent response to it, shifted the momentum in Modi’s favor.

“That reinvigorated the campaign and took the attention away from, quite frankly, the not-so-great economic record,” Bery told CNBC’s “Squawk Box ” on Thursday.

“You had a slowing economy and also the leaked jobs report, which showed that India’s unemployment rate was at a 45-year high. By shifting to national security, Prime Minister Modi was able to take attention away from those negative stories, ” he added.

Still, Modi’s government will likely have its work cut out: India’s economy is slowing down, its shadow banking sector is in crisis, credit lending from banks is still relatively weak. More needs to be done to spur private investments so that the country doesn’t only rely on consumption to grow, according to analysts.

“Modi 2.0 will inhabit the roles of both economic moderniser and economic populist, contrary to his supporters and critics who have often sought to characterise him as either one or the other,” Control Risks’ Rao wrote.

He added that Modi will likely continue with his efforts to streamline the GST while continuing to empower India’s insolvency and bankruptcy code to tame the massive amounts of debts sitting in the banking sector — but he would not carry out a wholesale privatization of state-owned banks or loosen political control over lending decisions.

“At the same time, increased pressure over rural distress and unemployment will stoke Modi’s economic populist instincts, which will likely see an increased focus on rural spending and handouts aimed at supporting small and medium-sized enterprises,” Rao said.

This is a developing story. Please check back for updates.

Source Article from https://www.cnbc.com/2019/05/23/india-lok-sabha-elections-results.html

ALEXANDRIA, Va. (AP) — John Walker Lindh, the young Californian who became known as the American Taliban after he was captured by U.S. forces in the invasion of Afghanistan in late 2001, is set to go free after nearly two decades in prison.

But conditions imposed recently on Lindh’s release, slated for Thursday, make clear that authorities remain concerned about the threat he could pose once free.

Lindh, now 38, converted to Islam as a teenager after seeing the film “Malcolm X” and went overseas to study Arabic and the Quran. In November 2000, he went to Pakistan and from there made his way to Afghanistan. He joined the Taliban and was with them on Sept. 11, 2001, when al-Qaida terrorists attacked the World Trade Center and the Pentagon.

The U.S. attacked Afghanistan after the country failed to turn over al-Qaida leader Osama bin Laden. Lindh was captured in a battle with Northern Alliance fighters in late 2001. He was present when a group of Taliban prisoners launched an attack that killed Johnny Micheal “Mike” Spann, a CIA officer who had been interrogating Lindh and other Taliban prisoners.

Television footage of a bearded, wounded Lindh captured among Taliban fighters created an international sensation, and he was brought to the U.S. to face charges of conspiring to kill Spann and providing support to terrorists. Eventually, he struck a plea bargain in which he admitted illegally providing support to the Taliban but denied a role in Spann’s death.

Lindh received a 20-year prison sentence. He served roughly 17 years and five months, including two months when he was in military detention. Federal inmates who exhibit good behavior typically serve 85 percent of their sentence.

His probation officer asked the court to impose additional restrictions on Lindh while he remains on supervised release for the next three years. Lindh initially opposed but eventually acquiesced to the restrictions, which include monitoring software on his internet devices; requiring that his online communications be conducted in English and that he undergo mental health counseling; and forbidding him from possessing or viewing extremist material, holding a passport of any kind or leaving the U.S.

Authorities never specified their rationale for seeking such restrictions. A hearing on the issue was canceled after Lindh agreed to them.

The Bureau of Prisons said Lindh rejected an interview request submitted by The Associated Press, and his lawyer declined to comment. But there have been reports that Lindh’s behavior in prison has created cause for concern. Foreign Policy magazine reported in 2017 that an investigation by the National Counterterrorism Center found that Lindh “continued to advocate for global jihad and to write and translate violent extremist texts.”

A former inmate who knew Lindh from the time they spent at the same federal prison said he never heard Lindh espouse support for al-Qaida or indicate a risk for violence, but he found Lindh to be anti-social and awkward around others, with an unyielding, black-and-white view of religion. The inmate spoke to The Associated Press on condition of anonymity because he wanted to avoid further stigmatization from his time in Lindh’s prison unit.

Michael Jensen, a terrorism researcher at the University of Maryland’s National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism, said it’s clear the government has concerns about Lindh’s mindset.

“For three years he’s going to be watched like a hawk,” Jensen said.

He said Lindh represents an interesting test case, as he is on the leading edge of dozens of inmates who were convicted on terror-related offenses in the aftermath of Sept. 11 and are eligible for release in the next five years. He said there’s little research to indicate the efficacy of de-radicalizing inmates with connections to radical Islam, but he said the research shows that recidivism rates for those connected to white supremacy and other forms of extremism are high.

Lindh has been housed in Terre Haute, Indiana, with other Muslim inmates convicted on terror-related charges. The rationale was to keep those inmates from radicalizing others in the general prison population, Jensen said. Those inside the unit were supposed to be limited in their ability to communicate with each other.

“But the reality is these guys still talk to each other,” he said.

Lindh, for his part, admitted his role and his wrongdoing in supporting the Taliban, but he and his family have bristled at any notion that he should be considered a terrorist. When he was sentenced, Lindh said he never would have joined the Taliban if he fully understood what they were about. He also issued a short essay condemning acts of violence in the name of Islam that kill or harm innocent civilians.

Lindh’s time in prison has provided only a few clues about his current outlook. He filed multiple lawsuits, which were largely successful, challenging prison rules he found discriminatory against Muslims. In the more recent lawsuits, he used the name Yahya Lindh. One lawsuit won the right to pray in groups at the prison in Terre Haute. A second lawsuit reversed a policy requiring strip searches for inmates receiving visitors, and a third won the right to wear prison pants above the ankle, which Lindh said is in accordance with Islamic principles.

In the strip-search lawsuit, Lindh offered a discussion of Islamic rules prohibiting exposure of the body. If he’s compelled to reveal himself, he said, he’s also compelled under his religion to fight the rules requiring him to sin.

Some have criticized Lindh’s pending release. In March, the legislature in Alabama, where Spann grew up, adopted a resolution calling it “an insult” to Spann’s “heroic legacy and his remaining family members.”

In addition, Republican Alabama Sen. Richard Shelby and Democratic New Hampshire Sen. Maggie Hassan wrote a letter last week to the Bureau of Prisons expressing concern.

“We must consider the security and safety implications for our citizens and communities who will receive individuals like John Walker Lindh who continue to openly call for extremist violence,” they wrote.

On Monday, Spann’s father, Johnny Spann, wrote a letter requesting that Lindh be investigated before he’s released, citing the National Counterterrorism Center’s investigation as his rationale for concern.




Source Article from https://www.aol.com/article/news/2019/05/22/american-taliban-john-walker-lindh-set-to-be-released/23733225/

Chat with us in Facebook Messenger. Find out what’s happening in the world as it unfolds.

Source Article from https://www.cnn.com/2019/05/22/politics/2020-blue-red-state-abortion-politics/index.html

Is the president to blame for being unable to work with Democratic leaders?

Not according to Rep. Doug Collins, R-Ga., who said Wednesday the only thing House Speaker Nancy Pelosi is concerned with is keeping her job.

“Why would the blame be thrown at the president when you have the speaker of the House accusing him, basically, of a crime today before she ever gets there? The president is like anyone — he wants to do business, he wants to try, but when you have people kicking sand in his face or accusing him of a crime he is going to react,” Collins said on “The Story with Marth MacCallum.”

ANGRY DEM SAYS TRUMP ‘RAPING THE COUNTRY,’ AS IMPEACHMENT PUSH NEARS CRITICAL MASS

Trump on Wednesday demanded Democrats end what he called their “phony investigations” before he’ll negotiate with them on issues like infrastructure, after cutting a meeting short with House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer.

Moments before that sit-down, Pelosi accused Trump of having “engaged in a cover-up” regarding the Russia probe.

Collins noted the president’s passion for his job and took a shot at Democrats for not wanting to work with those across the aisle and only being concerned with the 2020 elections.

“This president is passionate about the American people, he’s passionate about putting Americans back to work, he’s passionate about doing infrastructure, and what we’ve seen so far, the Democrats, especially the speaker, is passionate about keeping her job and telling everyone else what they’ve done wrong and that is just the wrong idea. They want to see him defeated in 2020, instead of actually having an agenda here in the House,” Collins said.

The congressman also noted a split within the Democratic Party saying that some Democrats just want to move on from anti-Trump actions.

TRUMP DEMANDS END TO ‘PHONY INVESTIGATIONS’ IN FIERY ROSE GARDEN STATEMENT, AFTER MEETING WITH DEMS CUT SHORT

“They have to feed two different bases. One says impeach. One says, go after Trump, do everything they can to destroy the president. While the others in their caucus are saying we don’t want this, our voters don’t want this and they want to move slowly,” Collins said.

“They lose on the politics, they lose on the facts and so now the American people are the ones losing in the end because they are not doing anything with the majority they have in the house.”

Fox News’ Alex Pappas contributed to this report.

Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/politics/rep-collins-pelosi-dems-trump-impeachment-jobs

‘):””},e.getDefinedParams=function(t,e){return e.filter(function(e){return t[e]}).reduce(function(e,n){return i(e,function(t,e,n){return e in t?Object.defineProperty(t,e,{value:n,enumerable:!0,configurable:!0,writable:!0}):t[e]=n,t}({},n,t[n]))},{})},e.isValidMediaTypes=function(t){var e=[“banner”,”native”,”video”];return!!Object.keys(t).every(function(t){return X()(e,t)})&&(!t.video||!t.video.context||X()([“instream”,”outstream”,”adpod”],t.video.context))},e.getBidderRequest=function(t,e,n){return Z()(t,function(t){return 0n[t]?-1:0}};var H,K=n(3),$=n(90),Y=n.n($),J=n(10),Z=n.n(J),Q=n(8),X=n.n(Q),tt=n(11),et=n(4),nt=!1,rt=”Array”,it=”String”,ot=”Function”,at=”Number”,ut=”Object”,st=”Boolean”,ct=Object.prototype.toString,ft=Boolean(window.console),dt=Boolean(ft&&window.console.log),lt=Boolean(ft&&window.console.info),pt=Boolean(ft&&window.console.warn),ht=Boolean(ft&&window.console.error),gt={checkCookieSupport:V,createTrackPixelIframeHtml:B,getWindowSelf:p,getWindowTop:l,getAncestorOrigins:d,getTopFrameReferrer:f,getWindowLocation:h,getTopWindowLocation:c,insertUserSyncIframe:R,insertElement:C,isFn:w,triggerPixel:D,logError:y,logWarn:b,logMessage:g,logInfo:v},vt={},bt=function(t,e){return e}.bind(null,1,vt)()===vt?Function.prototype.bind:function(t){var e=this,n=Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments,1);return function(){return e.apply(t,n.concat(Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments)))}},yt=(H=0,function(){return++H}),mt=function(){if(Array.prototype.indexOf)return Array.prototype.indexOf}(),_t=function(t,e){return t.hasOwnProperty?t.hasOwnProperty(e):void 0!==t[e]&&t.constructor.prototype[e]!==t[e]},Et=z(“timeToRespond”,function(t,e){return es;)r(u,n=e[s++])&&(~o(c,n)||c.push(n));return c}},141:function(t,e,n){var r=n(18).document;t.exports=r&&r.documentElement},142:function(t,e,n){var r=n(25),i=n(41),o=n(49)(“IE_PROTO”),a=Object.prototype;t.exports=Object.getPrototypeOf||function(t){return t=i(t),r(t,o)?t[o]:”function”==typeof t.constructor&&t instanceof t.constructor?t.constructor.prototype:t instanceof Object?a:null}},143:function(t,e,n){n(144);for(var r=n(18),i=n(20),o=n(28),a=n(15)(“toStringTag”),u=”CSSRuleList,CSSStyleDeclaration,CSSValueList,ClientRectList,DOMRectList,DOMStringList,DOMTokenList,DataTransferItemList,FileList,HTMLAllCollection,HTMLCollection,HTMLFormElement,HTMLSelectElement,MediaList,MimeTypeArray,NamedNodeMap,NodeList,PaintRequestList,Plugin,PluginArray,SVGLengthList,SVGNumberList,SVGPathSegList,SVGPointList,SVGStringList,SVGTransformList,SourceBufferList,StyleSheetList,TextTrackCueList,TextTrackList,TouchList”.split(“,”),s=0;s=t.length?(this._t=void 0,i(1)):i(0,”keys”==e?n:”values”==e?t[n]:[n,t[n]])},”values”),o.Arguments=o.Array,r(“keys”),r(“values”),r(“entries”)},145:function(t,e,n){“use strict”;var r=n(146),i=n(78);t.exports=n(148)(“Set”,function(t){return function(){return t(this,0=l.syncsPerBidder)return o.logWarn(‘Number of user syncs exceeded for “‘.concat(e,'”‘));if(l.filterSettings){if(function(t,e){var n=l.filterSettings;if(function(t,e){if(t.all&&t[e])return o.logWarn(‘Detected presence of the “filterSettings.all” and “filterSettings.’.concat(e,'” in userSync config. You cannot mix “all” with “iframe/image” configs; they are mutually exclusive.’)),!1;var n=t.all?t.all:t[e],r=t.all?”all”:e;if(!n)return!1;var i=n.filter,a=n.bidders;return i&&”include”!==i&&”exclude”!==i?(o.logWarn(‘UserSync “filterSettings.’.concat(r,”.filter\” setting ‘”).concat(i,”‘ is not a valid option; use either ‘include’ or ‘exclude’.”)),!1):!!(“*”===a||Array.isArray(a)&&0t.getTimeout()+y.config.getConfig(“timeoutBuffer”)&&t.executeCallback(!0)}function u(t,e){var n=t.getBidRequests(),r=S()(n,function(t){return t.bidderCode===e.bidderCode});!function(t,e){var n;if(t.bidderCode&&(0n&&(e=!1)),!e}),e&&t.run(),e}function a(t,e){void 0===t[e]?t[e]=1:t[e]++}var c=this;u=D,i=Date.now();var f=O.makeBidRequests(v,i,w,z,b);I.logInfo(“Bids Requested for Auction with id: “.concat(w),f),f.forEach(function(t){var e;e=t,_=_.concat(e)});var d={};if(f.lengthe.max?t:e},{max:0}),a=u()(e.buckets,function(e){if(t>i.max*n){var o=e.precision;void 0===o&&(o=c),r=(e.max*n).toFixed(o)}else if(t=e.min*n)return e});return a&&(r=function(t,e,n){var r=void 0!==e.precision?e.precision:c,i=e.increment*n,o=e.min*n,a=Math.pow(10,r+2),u=(t*a-o*a)/(i*a),s=Math.floor(u)*i+o;return(s=Number(s.toFixed(10))).toFixed(r)}(t,a,n)),r}function o(t){
if(s.isEmpty(t)||!t.buckets||!Array.isArray(t.buckets))return!1;var e=!0;return t.buckets.forEach(function(t){void 0!==t.min&&t.max&&t.increment||(e=!1)}),e}n.d(e,”a”,function(){return r}),n.d(e,”b”,function(){return o});var a=n(10),u=n.n(a),s=n(0),c=2,f={buckets:[{min:0,max:5,increment:.5}]},d={buckets:[{min:0,max:20,increment:.1}]},l={buckets:[{min:0,max:20,increment:.01}]},p={buckets:[{min:0,max:3,increment:.01},{min:3,max:8,increment:.05},{min:8,max:20,increment:.5}]},h={buckets:[{min:0,max:5,increment:.05},{min:5,max:10,increment:.1},{min:10,max:20,increment:.5}]}},52:function(t,e){t.exports=function(t){if(“function”!=typeof t)throw TypeError(t+” is not a function!”);return t}},53:function(t,e,n){var r=n(16),i=n(18).document,o=r(i)&&r(i.createElement);t.exports=function(t){return o?i.createElement(t):{}}},54:function(t,e,n){var r=n(31);t.exports=Object(“z”).propertyIsEnumerable(0)?Object:function(t){return”String”==r(t)?t.split(“”):Object(t)}},55:function(t,e,n){var r=n(31);t.exports=Array.isArray||function(t){return”Array”==r(t)}},56:function(t,e,n){var r=n(14),i=n(18),o=”__core-js_shared__”,a=i[o]||(i[o]={});(t.exports=function(t,e){return a[t]||(a[t]=void 0!==e?e:{})})(“versions”,[]).push({version:r.version,mode:n(57)?”pure”:”global”,copyright:”© 2019 Denis Pushkarev (zloirock.ru)”})},57:function(t,e){t.exports=!0},58:function(t,e,n){var r=n(44),i=n(33),o=n(88);t.exports=function(t){return function(e,n,a){var u,s=r(e),c=i(s.length),f=o(a,c);if(t&&n!=n){for(;fe.cpm/e.video.durationBucket?-1:0};var c=n(0),f=n(36),d=n(64),l=n(46),p=n(17),h=n(63),g=n(3),v=n(2),b=n(133),y=n.n(b),m=n(10),_=n.n(m),E=n(156),S=”hb_pb_cat_dur”,w=”hb_cache_id”,T=50,A=5,x=function(){function t(t){e[t]={},e[t].bidStorage=new y.a,e[t].queueDispatcher=function(t){var e,n=1;return function(r,i,o,a){var u=this,s=function(){(function(t,e,n){(function(t){for(var e=0;e”):””;return’\n \n \n prebid.org wrapper\n \n “).concat(n,”\n \n \n \n “)}(t.vastUrl,t.vastImpUrl),ttlseconds:Number(t.ttl)};return”string”==typeof t.customCacheKey&&””!==t.customCacheKey&&(e.key=t.customCacheKey),e}e.b=function(t,e){var n={puts:t.map(r)};Object(i.a)(o.config.getConfig(“cache.url”),function(t){return{success:function(e){var n;try{n=JSON.parse(e).responses}catch(e){return void t(e,[])}n?t(null,n):t(new Error(“The cache server didn’t respond with a responses property.”),[])},error:function(e,n){t(new Error(“Error storing video ad in the cache: “.concat(e,”: “).concat(JSON.stringify(n))),[])}}}(e),JSON.stringify(n),{contentType:”text/plain”,withCredentials:!0})},e.a=function(t){return””.concat(o.config.getConfig(“cache.url”),”?uuid=”).concat(t)};var i=n(5),o=n(3)},64:function(t,e,n){“use strict”;function r(t){return(r=”function”==typeof Symbol&&”symbol”==_typeof(Symbol.iterator)?function(t){return void 0===t?”undefined”:_typeof(t)}:function(t){return t&&”function”==typeof Symbol&&t.constructor===Symbol&&t!==Symbol.prototype?”symbol”:void 0===t?”undefined”:_typeof(t)})(t)}function i(){return(i=Object.assign||function(t){for(var e=1;e (eg mediaTypes.banner.sizes).”),t.sizes=n);if(e&&e.video){var i=e.video;if(i.playerSize)if(Array.isArray(i.playerSize)&&1===i.playerSize.length&&i.playerSize.every(function(t){return Object(f.isArrayOfNums)(t,2)}))t.sizes=i.playerSize;else if(Object(f.isArrayOfNums)(i.playerSize,2)){var o=[];o.push(i.playerSize),x.logInfo(“Transforming video.playerSize from [“.concat(i.playerSize,”] to [[“).concat(o,”]] so it’s in the proper format.”)),t.sizes=i.playerSize=o}else x.logError(“Detected incorrect configuration of mediaTypes.video.playerSize. Please specify only one set of dimensions in a format like: [[640, 480]]. Removing invalid mediaTypes.video.playerSize property from request.”),delete t.mediaTypes.video.playerSize}if(e&&e.native){var a=e.native;a.image&&a.image.sizes&&!Array.isArray(a.image.sizes)&&(x.logError(“Please use an array of sizes for native.image.sizes field. Removing invalid mediaTypes.native.image.sizes property from request.”),delete t.mediaTypes.native.image.sizes),a.image&&a.image.aspect_ratios&&!Array.isArray(a.image.aspect_ratios)&&(x.logError(“Please use an array of sizes for native.image.aspect_ratios field. Removing invalid mediaTypes.native.image.aspect_ratios property from request.”),delete t.mediaTypes.native.image.aspect_ratios),a.icon&&a.icon.sizes&&!Array.isArray(a.icon.sizes)&&(x.logError(“Please use an array of sizes for native.icon.sizes field. Removing invalid mediaTypes.native.icon.sizes property from request.”),delete t.mediaTypes.native.icon.sizes)}}),t},”checkAdUnitSetup”);T.getAdserverTargetingForAdUnitCodeStr=function(t){if(x.logInfo(“Invoking pbjs.getAdserverTargetingForAdUnitCodeStr”,arguments),t){var e=T.getAdserverTargetingForAdUnitCode(t);return x.transformAdServerTargetingObj(e)}x.logMessage(“Need to call getAdserverTargetingForAdUnitCodeStr with adunitCode”)},T.getAdserverTargetingForAdUnitCode=function(t){return T.getAdserverTargeting(t)[t]},T.getAdserverTargeting=function(t){return x.logInfo(“Invoking pbjs.getAdserverTargeting”,arguments),v.b.getAllTargeting(t)},T.getNoBids=function(){return x.logInfo(“Invoking pbjs.getNoBids”,arguments),a(“getNoBids”)},T.getBidResponses=function(){return x.logInfo(“Invoking pbjs.getBidResponses”,arguments),a(“getBidsReceived”)},T.getBidResponsesForAdUnitCode=function(t){return{bids:g.a.getBidsReceived().filter(function(e){return e.adUnitCode===t}).map(f.removeRequestId)}},T.setTargetingForGPTAsync=function(t,e){if(x.logInfo(“Invoking pbjs.setTargetingForGPTAsync”,arguments),Object(f.isGptPubadsDefined)()){var n=v.b.getAllTargeting(t);v.b.resetPresetTargeting(t),v.b.setTargetingForGPT(n,e),Object.keys(n).forEach(function(t){Object.keys(n[t]).forEach(function(e){“hb_adid”===e&&g.a.setStatusForBids(n[t][e],A.BID_STATUS.BID_TARGETING_SET)})}),O.emit(P,n)}else x.logError(“window.googletag is not defined on the page”)},T.setTargetingForAst=function(){x.logInfo(“Invoking pbjs.setTargetingForAn”,arguments),v.b.isApntagDefined()?(v.b.setTargetingForAst(),O.emit(P,v.b.getAllTargeting())):x.logError(“window.apntag is not defined on the page”)},T.renderAd=function(t,e){if(x.logInfo(“Invoking pbjs.renderAd”,arguments),x.logMessage(“Calling renderAd with adId :”+e),t&&e)try{var n=g.a.findBidByAdId(e);if(n){n.status=A.BID_STATUS.RENDERED,n.ad=x.replaceAuctionPrice(n.ad,n.cpm),n.adUrl=x.replaceAuctionPrice(n.adUrl,n.cpm),g.a.addWinningBid(n),O.emit(R,n);var r=n.height,i=n.width,a=n.ad,s=n.mediaType,c=n.adUrl,f=n.renderer,d=document.createComment(“Creative “.concat(n.creativeId,” served by “).concat(n.bidder,” Prebid.js Header Bidding”));if(x.insertElement(d,t,”body”),Object(S.c)(f))Object(S.b)(f,n);else if(t===document&&!x.inIframe()||”video”===s){var l=”Error trying to write ad. Ad render call ad id “.concat(e,” was prevented from writing to the main document.”);u(U,l,n)}else if(a)t.open(“text/html”,”replace”),t.write(a),t.close(),o(t,i,r),x.callBurl(n);else if(c){var p=x.createInvisibleIframe();p.height=r,p.width=i,p.style.display=”inline”,p.style.overflow=”hidden”,p.src=c,x.insertElement(p,t,”body”),o(t,i,r),x.callBurl(n)}else{var h=”Error trying to write ad. No ad for bid response id: “.concat(e);u(M,h,n)}}else{var v=”Error trying to write ad. Cannot find ad by given id : “.concat(e);u(q,v)}}catch(t){var b=”Error trying to write ad Id :”.concat(e,” to the page:”).concat(t.message);u(z,b)}else{var y=”Error trying to write ad Id :”.concat(e,” to the page. Missing document or adId”);u(L,y)}},T.removeAdUnit=function(t){x.logInfo(“Invoking pbjs.removeAdUnit”,arguments),t?(x.isArray(t)?t:[t]).forEach(function(t){for(var e=0;eObject(u.timestamp)()},_=function(t){return t&&(t.status&&!h()([v.BID_STATUS.BID_TARGETING_SET,v.BID_STATUS.RENDERED],t.status)||!t.status)},E=function(t){function e(e){return”string”==typeof e?[e]:g.isArray(e)?e:t.getAdUnitCodes()||[]}function n(){var e=t.getBidsReceived();return s.config.getConfig(“useBidCache”)||(e=e.filter(function(t){return T[t.adUnitCode]===t.auctionId})),a(e=e.filter(function(t){return Object(u.deepAccess)(t,”video.context”)!==l.a}).filter(function(t){return”banner”!==t.mediaType||Object(d.c)([t.width,t.height])}).filter(_).filter(m),u.getOldestHighestCpmBid)}function f(){return t.getStandardBidderAdServerTargeting().map(function(t){return t.key}).concat(y).filter(u.uniques)}function p(t,e,n,r){return Object.keys(e.adserverTargeting).filter(E()).forEach(function(n){t.length&&t.filter(function(t){return function(n){return n.adUnitCode===e.adUnitCode&&n.adserverTargeting[t]}}(n)).forEach(function(t){return function(n){g.isArray(n.adserverTargeting[t])||(n.adserverTargeting[t]=[n.adserverTargeting[t]]),n.adserverTargeting[t]=n.adserverTargeting[t].concat(e.adserverTargeting[t]).filter(u.uniques),delete e.adserverTargeting[t]}}(n))}),t.push(e),t}function E(){var t=f();return function(e){return-1===t.indexOf(e)}}function S(t){return o({},t.adUnitCode,Object.keys(t.adserverTargeting).filter(E()).map(function(e){return o({},e.substring(0,20),[t.adserverTargeting[e]])}))}var w={},T={};return w.setLatestAuctionForAdUnit=function(t,e){T[t]=e},w.resetPresetTargeting=function(n){if(Object(u.isGptPubadsDefined)()){var r=e(n),i=t.getAdUnits().filter(function(t){return h()(r,t.code)});window.googletag.pubads().getSlots().forEach(function(t){b.forEach(function(e){i.forEach(function(n){n.code!==t.getAdUnitPath()&&n.code!==t.getSlotElementId()||t.setTargeting(e,null)})})})}},w.resetPresetTargetingAST=function(t){e(t).forEach(function(t){var e=window.apntag.getTag(t);if(e&&e.keywords){var n=Object.keys(e.keywords),r={};n.forEach(function(t){h()(b,t.toLowerCase())||(r[t]=e.keywords[t])}),window.apntag.modifyTag(t,{keywords:r})}})},w.getAllTargeting=function(t){var d=1=e.length?{value:void 0,done:!0}:(t=r(e,n),this._i+=t.length,{value:t,done:!1})})},68:function(t,e,n){
var r=n(24),i=n(138),o=n(69),a=n(49)(“IE_PROTO”),u=function(){},s=”prototype”,c=function(){var t,e=n(53)(“iframe”),r=o.length;for(e.style.display=”none”,n(141).appendChild(e),e.src=”javascript:”,(t=e.contentWindow.document).open(),t.write(“

Source Article from https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2019/05/trump-subpoena-deutsche-bank-house-democrats.html

ALEXANDRIA, Va. (AP) — John Walker Lindh, the young Californian who became known as the American Taliban after he was captured by U.S. forces in the invasion of Afghanistan in late 2001, is set to go free after nearly two decades in prison.

But conditions imposed recently on Lindh’s release, slated for Thursday, make clear that authorities remain concerned about the threat he could pose once free.

Lindh, now 38, converted to Islam as a teenager after seeing the film “Malcolm X” and went overseas to study Arabic and the Quran. In November 2000, he went to Pakistan and from there made his way to Afghanistan. He joined the Taliban and was with them on Sept. 11, 2001, when al-Qaida terrorists attacked the World Trade Center and the Pentagon.

The U.S. attacked Afghanistan after the country failed to turn over al-Qaida leader Osama bin Laden. Lindh was captured in a battle with Northern Alliance fighters in late 2001. He was present when a group of Taliban prisoners launched an attack that killed Johnny Micheal “Mike” Spann, a CIA officer who had been interrogating Lindh and other Taliban prisoners.

Television footage of a bearded, wounded Lindh captured among Taliban fighters created an international sensation, and he was brought to the U.S. to face charges of conspiring to kill Spann and providing support to terrorists. Eventually, he struck a plea bargain in which he admitted illegally providing support to the Taliban but denied a role in Spann’s death.

Lindh received a 20-year prison sentence. He served roughly 17 years and five months, including two months when he was in military detention. Federal inmates who exhibit good behavior typically serve 85 percent of their sentence.

His probation officer asked the court to impose additional restrictions on Lindh while he remains on supervised release for the next three years. Lindh initially opposed but eventually acquiesced to the restrictions, which include monitoring software on his internet devices; requiring that his online communications be conducted in English and that he undergo mental health counseling; and forbidding him from possessing or viewing extremist material, holding a passport of any kind or leaving the U.S.

Authorities never specified their rationale for seeking such restrictions. A hearing on the issue was canceled after Lindh agreed to them.

The Bureau of Prisons said Lindh rejected an interview request submitted by The Associated Press, and his lawyer declined to comment. But there have been reports that Lindh’s behavior in prison has created cause for concern. Foreign Policy magazine reported in 2017 that an investigation by the National Counterterrorism Center found that Lindh “continued to advocate for global jihad and to write and translate violent extremist texts.”

A former inmate who knew Lindh from the time they spent at the same federal prison said he never heard Lindh espouse support for al-Qaida or indicate a risk for violence, but he found Lindh to be anti-social and awkward around others, with an unyielding, black-and-white view of religion. The inmate spoke to The Associated Press on condition of anonymity because he wanted to avoid further stigmatization from his time in Lindh’s prison unit.

Michael Jensen, a terrorism researcher at the University of Maryland’s National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism, said it’s clear the government has concerns about Lindh’s mindset.

“For three years he’s going to be watched like a hawk,” Jensen said.

He said Lindh represents an interesting test case, as he is on the leading edge of dozens of inmates who were convicted on terror-related offenses in the aftermath of Sept. 11 and are eligible for release in the next five years. He said there’s little research to indicate the efficacy of de-radicalizing inmates with connections to radical Islam, but he said the research shows that recidivism rates for those connected to white supremacy and other forms of extremism are high.

Lindh has been housed in Terre Haute, Indiana, with other Muslim inmates convicted on terror-related charges. The rationale was to keep those inmates from radicalizing others in the general prison population, Jensen said. Those inside the unit were supposed to be limited in their ability to communicate with each other.

“But the reality is these guys still talk to each other,” he said.

Lindh, for his part, admitted his role and his wrongdoing in supporting the Taliban, but he and his family have bristled at any notion that he should be considered a terrorist. When he was sentenced, Lindh said he never would have joined the Taliban if he fully understood what they were about. He also issued a short essay condemning acts of violence in the name of Islam that kill or harm innocent civilians.

Lindh’s time in prison has provided only a few clues about his current outlook. He filed multiple lawsuits, which were largely successful, challenging prison rules he found discriminatory against Muslims. In the more recent lawsuits, he used the name Yahya Lindh. One lawsuit won the right to pray in groups at the prison in Terre Haute. A second lawsuit reversed a policy requiring strip searches for inmates receiving visitors, and a third won the right to wear prison pants above the ankle, which Lindh said is in accordance with Islamic principles.

In the strip-search lawsuit, Lindh offered a discussion of Islamic rules prohibiting exposure of the body. If he’s compelled to reveal himself, he said, he’s also compelled under his religion to fight the rules requiring him to sin.

Some have criticized Lindh’s pending release. In March, the legislature in Alabama, where Spann grew up, adopted a resolution calling it “an insult” to Spann’s “heroic legacy and his remaining family members.”

In addition, Republican Alabama Sen. Richard Shelby and Democratic New Hampshire Sen. Maggie Hassan wrote a letter last week to the Bureau of Prisons expressing concern.

“We must consider the security and safety implications for our citizens and communities who will receive individuals like John Walker Lindh who continue to openly call for extremist violence,” they wrote.

On Monday, Spann’s father, Johnny Spann, wrote a letter requesting that Lindh be investigated before he’s released, citing the National Counterterrorism Center’s investigation as his rationale for concern.




Source Article from https://www.aol.com/article/news/2019/05/22/american-taliban-john-walker-lindh-set-to-be-released/23733225/

Ayatollah Khamenei has compared negotiating with the United States to “drinking poison.”

“The parts of the government that wanted to engage with America have been proven wrong, and are not going to have an opportunity to engage anytime soon,” said Narges Bajoghli, an assistant professor at the Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies who frequently speaks with people in hard-line Iranian circles.

Iranian officials have tried to drive a wedge between President Trump, who has frequently expressed the desire to disentangle the United States from the Middle East, and his foreign policy team, which takes a harder line. National Security Adviser John Bolton has long advocated regime change, while Secretary of State Mike Pompeo has also appeared to endorse it.

Iranian leaders have singled out Mr. Bolton as a warmonger who is getting ahead of his boss.

“Bolton May Be Sacked,” read a recent headline in Javan, a hard-line newspaper, referring to American reports that Mr. Trump was not pleased with Mr. Bolton. “Infighting in Washington,” echoed Arman-e Emrooz, a more moderate paper.

Analysts said the Iranians may have been hoping to lay low until the 2020 American presidential election when a friendlier administration might come to power. They were thinking, “maybe we can wait this guy out,” said Dina Esfandiary, a Century Foundation fellow who focuses on Iran. Most of the Democratic presidential candidates support rejoining the nuclear deal.

But there are no guarantees that a Democrat will win, or that a new president would automatically embrace the deal without new demands.

While Iranian officials may be able to rely on rainy-day funds, oil smuggling and trade with friendly countries until the end of 2020, they are not likely to carry it through 2024, analysts said.

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/22/world/middleeast/us-iran-trump-administration.html

CLOSE

Tough, new abortion laws in Alabama and several other states face legal battles in court… and that’s the point. We explain how they take aim at Roe v. Wade.
Just the FAQs, USA TODAY

Do conservative women have abortions? 

The answer is, obviously, yes. But it’s not often we hear from them. 

Nearly one in four women in the United States will have an abortion by age 45 — and they don’t all share the same values and political views. Cultural stigma can make it difficult for any woman to talk about her abortion, but the particular pressures facing conservative women mean that stigma often equals silence. 

“Republicans don’t have fewer abortions than Democrats or liberals or anarchists or communists. It’s that our political rhetoric paints people who have abortions as largely the same — poor women, young women, irresponsible women, women who hate children,” said Amanda Reyes, president of the Yellowhammer Fund, which provides funding for women seeking care at any of Alabama’s three abortion clinics. “It’s gotten us to a point where we can’t see the fact that we’re all having abortions, and we’re doing it for reasons we personally think matters — and that’s all that matters. Pro-life women are having abortions, too.”

If you just read the headlines, it would seem Democrats are on one side of the abortion debate and Republicans are on the other. But the issue is more complicated, and less partisan than one might think. 

Polling shows about a third of Republicans believe abortion should be legal in all or most cases, according to the Pew Research Center, and more than half of Republican women support keeping Roe v. Wade, according to a 2018 poll from the non-partisan public opinion research firm PerryUndem. Nearly 90% of voters say they would support a friend or family member if they had an abortion. 

In 2019, four states enacted abortion bans after six weeks of pregnancy and Alabama passed a law banning abortions at any time period with exceptions only when the mother’s health is at risk. 

INTERACTIVE MAP: Where is abortion legal? Everywhere. But …

“If you look at national polling, this isn’t where the American public is and it frankly isn’t even where mainstream Republicans are,” said Debbie Walsh, director of the Center for American Women and Politics at Rutgers University. “The harshness of it is pretty shocking.”

Lawmakers expect the bans will lead to lawsuits that could push the Supreme Court to consider overturning Roe v. Wade, which recognizes a woman’s constitutional right to abortion. 

ENDING ROE V. WADE: It wouldn’t end abortion. This is what would happen next.

The bills have received vocal support from many conservative women.

Alabama’s near-total ban “stands as a powerful testament to Alabamians’ deeply held belief that every life is precious and that every life is a sacred gift from God,” said Republican Gov. Kay Ivey, who signed the most restrictive abortion law in the nation last week.

ALABAMA BAN: Out of line with beliefs of most Americans

But some other conservative women, even abortion opponents, find such laws draconian.

South Carolina state Rep. Nancy Mace is a pro-life Republican, but she said she was stunned by the lack of “compassion” her colleagues showed when they voted to pass a six-week “fetal heartbeat” abortion ban without including exceptions for rape and incest. She introduced an amendment to change the bill and in a pair of 10-minute floor speeches cited her own personal experience as a rape victim as the reason why. It was the first time in 25 years she had spoken publicly about her rape at 16, which she says was perpetrated by someone she believed was a friend. 

“I was gripping the podium so hard I thought I was going to pull it out of the floor,” Mace said. “I was angry at the language my colleagues were using. They were saying rape was the fault of the woman. They called these women baby killers and murderers. That language is so degrading toward women, particularly victims of rape or incest. And I said to myself I’m not going to put up with that bull—-. I was nearly yelling into the mic. I gave a very passionate speech to my colleagues and that is what got the exception through.”

Then she was chastised. 

South Carolina state Rep. Josiah Magnuson put a card from Personhood SC, an anti-abortion group, on Mace’s statehouse desk that read: “It is a twisted logic that would kill the unborn child for the misdeed of the parent.”

Mace notes that Republican men at the highest levels are pro-life with exceptions. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, which recently banned abortion when a fetal heartbeat is detected with no exceptions for rape and incest, said he supported the exceptions. House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-California) said the same.

“I don’t see them being attacked for having the same position,” Mace said. “The only difference is I’m a woman, and I’m a victim of rape. And you would think that that would be a legitimate voice in the discussion of abortion in South Carolina and across the US.”

Not only is it difficult for Republican women to speak about abortion, but it’s also become nearly impossible for Republican female politicians to get elected unless they’re unequivocally pro-life.

“It’s become harder and harder for pro-choice Republican women or men to get elected, because in the primaries the most conservative voters are who show up,” Walsh said.

In the Senate, there are two pro-choice Republican women: Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine) and Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska). In the House there are none. 

‘It’s OK to support abortion as long as people don’t know’

Conservative politicians aren’t the only ones attacked. Some supporters of abortion rights also report struggling with stigma.

Last year, Jenna King-Shepherd decided to host a get-together at her home. It was intended as a coming out of sorts. There would be wine and cheese, but the conversation would be anything but light. King-Shepherd decided she would tell the 25 women she had invited from her community of Guntersville, Alabama, how she had had an abortion at 17. 

King-Shepherd was hoping to persuade the women to vote no on Amendment 2, which would add language to Alabama’s Constitution making it state policy to “recognize and support the sanctity of unborn life and the rights of unborn children, including the right to life.”

All the women RSVPed yes. But on the day of the gathering, excuses trickled in. One woman said her husband didn’t want her to attend. Another said while she supported what King-Shepherd was doing, she couldn’t risk people recognizing her car in the driveway. Of the 25 women who said they’d come, only two showed.

In November, Amendment 2 passed.

“I felt frustrated and defeated,” she said. “It feels like an uphill battle that can never be won because you’re dealing with culture and how do you fix that? Because it’s systemic. … I just think it speaks to the stigma here. In the South, it’s OK to support abortion, as long as people don’t know.”

King-Shepherd grew up in Guntersville, which she describes as a town with a church on every corner. Her father is a Baptist preacher. Abortion was never discussed in her home. She was conservative, identified as a Republican and said she did all she could to fulfill her family’s expectations of a good Southern girl.

But right before she was set to leave for college at the University of Alabama, King-Shepherd learned she was pregnant. She knew she wouldn’t have the baby. 

“It’s really easy to think you believe something until it happens to you and you really understand the gravity of the situation,” she said. “It’s easy to say you shouldn’t have a choice until you’re left without one.”

King-Shepherd shared her story publicly for the first time with AL.com in January, and says while she’s received some supportive messages, she’s also been harassed. A direct message on Facebook read, “Keeping your legs closed before college was an option.” People told her parents they were “disturbed” by her choice. 

Laurie Bertram Roberts also had a conservative, religious upbringing. She was raised in a fundamentalist Baptist church and when she got pregnant with twins at 16, abortion wasn’t on the table. The only option, she said, was to marry the father. So she did.

Roberts would go on to have five more children (though she eventually split from her husband), and considered herself pro-life until the day she found herself in a Planned Parenthood clinic seeking an abortion. An ultrasound revealed her pregnancy was not viable, and she was told she would eventually miscarry. 

“I realized then I’m not actually better or different,” she said. “I was sitting in the waiting room with all of these women who were just as scared as me. None of us looked like we wanted to be there. Some looked ready to get it over with. Life brought us to be at this spot, on this day, and it wasn’t a value judgment.”

Roberts has since co-founded the Mississippi Reproductive Freedom Fund, a reproductive justice organization that helps fund abortion access in Mississippi, primarily serving low-income black women. Mississippi has one abortion clinic. 

Roberts says most of the women she takes calls from are religious. 

“We’re always going to encounter some callers, it doesn’t matter what we say, they are going to believe what they did is a sin — that they’re murderers,” Roberts said. She recalled a woman who “proceeded to tell me why her abortion was different than everybody else’s. Folks who are entrenched in their anti-choice views think they are the exception to the rule. Their abortion is a good abortion, and once it’s done, they’ll go back to shaming other women.”

Reyes and Roberts work closely together. Even though they run funds in different states, the dearth of abortion clinics in the South means getting women access to care often requires coordination. 

Both lament how an issue they see as personal has become so politicized, preventing nuanced conversations about not only how complex abortion can be, but also how practical it becomes under certain circumstances, regardless of political or cultural beliefs. 

“A lot of people I talk to have never considered or thought they would be the kind of person who would get an abortion,” Reyes said. “We explain this is a choice that you’re making for you — it’s not a political choice.”

You may also be interested in:

Source Article from https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2019/05/22/abortion-law-republican-and-conservative-women-dont-all-agree/3749202002/

Michael Cohen, President Donald Trump’s former attorney and fixer, exchanged hundreds of phone calls and text messages with Columbus Nova, the American financial firm tied to Russian oligarch Viktor Vekselberg, according to court document unsealed Wednesday.

The communications began the day Donald Trump was elected and lasted for the next eight months, the document said.

“Telephone records related to Cohen’s cellular telephone show that on or about November 8, 2016, the day of the presidential election, a telephone registered to Cohen exchanged the first in a series of text messages with the CEO of Columbus Nova, LLC,” the document said, referring to the company’s chief executive officer.

“Between approximately November 8, 2016 and July 14, 2017, telephone records showed over 230 telephone calls and 950 text messages were exchanged between Cohen’s cellular telephone and the CEO of Columbus Nova.”

The document was among a total of five search warrant applications were unsealed by the order of a federal judge in Washington, D.C. on Wednesday at the request of news organizations. They show how federal prosecutors were initially suspicious of Cohen’s Russia contacts and possible violations of the Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA), though ultimately those were not part of the charges that sent Cohen to prison for three years.

FARA requires agents working on behalf of a foreign government “political or quasi-political capacity” to identify themselves as such and provide information relating to their activities and financing to the U.S. government.

The feds were also curious, the documents show, about Columbus Nova’s payments of nearly a half million dollars to a consulting company that Cohen established.

“The United States continues to investigate if any of the payments or financial relationships…were connected to Cohen’s involvement in the distribution of a plan to lift Russian sanctions,” the document said.

Cohen’s attorney, Lanny Davis, declined to comment on the newly-unsealed documents.

Earlier this month Cohen, who pleaded guilty in 2018 to charges of campaign finance violations, lying to Congress and a bevy of financial crimes, reported to the federal corrections facility in Otisville, New York, to begin serving his sentence.

Federal prosecutors implicated the president in Cohen’s campaign finance violation, writing in court documents that then-candidate Trump directed Cohen to make payments in an effort to keep adult film actress Stormy Daniels and former Playboy playmate Karen McDougal from making their allegations of affairs with Trump public. Trump has denied directing Cohen to break the law.

ABC News’ Chris Francescani contributed to this report.

Source Article from https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/prosecutors-michael-cohen-exchanged-hundreds-emails-texts-russian/story?id=63211948

Rep. Josh Gottheimer, D-N.J., called President Trump’s meeting cancelation a “stunt’ Wednesday and called on the president to take a more bipartisan approach.

“We’re doing plenty. We have to get the Senate to act and the White House to act,” Gottheimer said on “The Daily Briefing with Dana Perino,” dismissing claims that Democrats are too focused on impeachment.

ANGRY DEM SAYS TRUMP ‘RAPING THE COUNTRY,’ AS IMPEACHMENT PUSH NEARS CRITICAL MASS

Trump on Wednesday demanded Democrats end what he called their “phony investigations” before he’ll negotiate with them on issues like infrastructure, as he delivered a fiery statement from the Rose Garden after cutting a meeting short with House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer.

The president had met for minutes with the two Democratic leaders in a session scheduled to discuss a possible bipartisan infrastructure package. But moments before that sit-down, Pelosi accused Trump of having “engaged in a cover-up” regarding the Russia probe.

Perino pressed Gottheimer on the continued focus on the Mueller report from some inside his party, which he dismissed before criticizing the president’s actions Wednesday.

“It’s not just Democrats, Dana. The stunt at the White House, that’s just a stunt,” Gottheimer said.

LAST MONTH, SCHUMER SAID TRUMP AGREED TO $2T INFRASTRUCTURE PACKAGE 

“We have to be happy warriors here. That’s what people want. If you read the tweets out of the White House, you’d say, ‘oh come on.’ But you have to ignore all the noise and focus on getting things done back home,” Gottheimer said.

Fox News’ Alex Pappas contributed to this report.

Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/politics/rep-gottheimer-presidents-cancellation-a-stunt

NEW YORK (AP) — Attorney Michael Avenatti has been charged with ripping off porn star Stormy Daniels, the client who made him famous.

The allegations against Avenatti were revealed in charges filed Wednesday in New York.

SEE ALSO: Avenatti expects imminent indictment in Nike extortion case

Federal prosecutors say Avenatti took money Daniels was supposed to get from a book deal.

Daniels isn’t named in the court filing, but the details of the case make it clear that she is the client involved in the case.

Avenatti rocketed to fame representing Daniels when she sued to be released from a non-disclosure agreement involving an alleged tryst with President Donald Trump.

Avenatti was previously charged in New York and Los Angeles with trying to extort money from Nike and stealing millions of dollars from clients.

He has denied all the allegations.




Source Article from https://www.aol.com/article/news/2019/05/22/michael-avenatti-charged-with-defrauding-stormy-daniels/23733095/

Ben Carson has fired back at Rep. Ilhan Omar, D-Minn., after the controversial freshman congresswoman criticized him after a hearing Tuesday.

Omar knocked the Housing and Urban Development (HUD) secretary over his conduct during an appearance before the House Financial Services Committee.

“Not sure he was fully awake, maybe he meant to reclaim his time back to sleep,” she quipped. She was playing off of Carson’s request for time during a testy exchange with Rep. Ayanna Pressley, D-Mass.

DEMS USE HEARING TO REPEATEDLY QUIZ, STUMP BEN CARSON ON OBSCURE ACRONYMS

Carson, a renowned doctor and John’s Hopkins University’s former director of pediatric neurosurgery, fired back by touting his endurance during marathon surgeries.

“Since you brought it up… I know what it’s like to actually be sleepy, especially after 18-hour surgeries and operating on babies in the womb,” he said.

While he was at it, Carson also took a shot at Omar’s position on abortion. “I hope @IlhanMN knows I care about all people, even those she doesn’t recognize as having a right to life.”

Omar, in May, defended abortion access as a slew of states — particularly Alabama — passed laws imposing major restrictions on the practice. “Women’s rights are human rights,” she previously tweeted.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

“No child or woman should be forced to have pregnancy against her own will. These laws do not protect women’s rights it protects the violator committing these crimes,” she said alongside an article about Alabama’s ban.

Carson, ironically, received similar criticism from the same person who appointed him to lead HUD. When Carson and President Trump were competitors during the 2016 election cycle, Trump derided him as “super low energy.

Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ben-carson-ilhan-omar-house-hearing

There’s no doubt President Trump pulled a stunt on Wednesday.

He invited congressional leaders House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., and Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., to the White House under the pretext of negotiating an infrastructure bill, only to emerge minutes later declaring there would be no deal unless Democrats stop their endless charade about Russia and tax returns.

But at least the public knows that Democrats have a choice: They can legislate and secure a win on an agenda item they’ve been pushing for since the Obama years, or they can keep up the political game over the nonexistent Russia conspiracy and continue digging for Trump’s tax papers.

No, they can’t have it all. Politics is a business of trade-offs, and I don’t know a single person who would give me something I want if they know I’m going to go on TV immediately after and call them a lying criminal. But that’s what Democrats are asking for.

The endless probes into Trump’s 2016 campaign and the Russia collusion that never was, his tax history, and his personal business is exactly today what it was two years ago: political.

It has worked. Trump’s presidency is handicapped by the accusation that he worked with Russia to steal the 2016 election, even if he was cleared. There’s a perpetual cloud over the White House with Democrats pushing conspiracy theories about Trump and his family, their businesses, and personal lives.

And for that he’s supposed to do what? Hand Democrats a $2 trillion package on national infrastructure? The legislation has upsides for everyone but more so for Democrat who have pushed the cause for years. But what does Trump have to gain from it if Democrats are going to attempt to embarrass him at every turn before the 2020 election?

Pelosi left the meeting Wednesday stating that she will “pray” for Trump. Well, I’m sure he’s grateful for that.

Source Article from https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/democrats-arent-interested-in-legislating-and-trump-knows-it

Embattled attorney Michael Avenatti was charged by federal prosecutors in New York Wednesday with defrauding adult-film star Stormy Daniels, the client who propelled Avenatti into the national spotlight.

Avenatti, 48, faces one count of wire fraud and one count of aggravated identity theft. He faces up to 22 years in prison if convicted of those charges. Daniels is not named in the indictment, but a federal law enforcement official confirmed to Fox News that she is the client prosecutors claimed Avenatti defrauded.

Avenatti rocketed to fame representing Daniels when she sued to be released from a non-disclosure agreement involving an alleged tryst with President Trump in 2006. He parlayed his notoriety into numerous cable news appearances and even was floated as a potential Democratic presidential candidate in 2020.

Michael Avenatti, right, and Stormy Daniels speaking to reporters outside Manhattan federal court in April 2018.
(Reuters, File)

MICHAEL AVENATTI HIRES LAWYER TO DEFEND HIM IN FEDERAL FRAUD CASE IN CALIFORNIA

According to prosecutors, Avenatti stole “a significant portion” of an advance Daniels was supposed to receive from a book deal in the summer of 2018 by sending a doctored letter with Daniels’ signature to her literary agent that instructed the agent to divert the money to an account controlled by Avenatti. The lawyer then spent the money — $148,750 — “on airfare, hotels, car services, restaurants and meal delivery, online retailers, payroll for his law firm and another business he owned, and insurance.”

The indictment said that after Daniels asked Avenatti why she had not received the money, Avenatti falsely claimed he was still trying to extract the payment from the publisher. Weeks later, the lawyer allegedly “used funds recently received from another source” to pay Daniels the money she was owed.

“Michael Avenatti abused and violated the core duty of an attorney – the duty to his client,” Manhattan U.S. Attorney Geoffrey Berman said in a statement. “As alleged, he used his position of trust to steal an advance on the client’s book deal.  As alleged, he blatantly lied to and stole from his client to maintain his extravagant lifestyle, including to pay for, among other things, a monthly car payment on a Ferrari.  Far from zealously representing his client, Avenatti, as alleged, instead engaged in outright deception and theft, victimizing rather than advocating for his client.”

AVENATTI ACCUSED OF TRYING TO EXTORT NIKE FOR UP TO $25M, FEDS SAY

In an emailed statement to Fox News, Avenatti said: “I look forward to a jury hearing all of the evidence and passing judgment on my conduct. At no time was any money misappropriated or mishandled. I will be fully exonerated once the relevant emails, contracts, text messages, and documents are presented.”

Avenatti also tweeted a defense of his conduct toward Daniels, writing: “No monies relating to Ms. Daniels were ever misappropriated or mishandled. She received millions of dollars worth of legal services and we spent huge sums in expenses. She directly paid only $100.00 for all that she received. I look forward to a jury hearing the evidence.”

MARK STEYN: AVENATTI A ‘FLIMFLAM’ LAWYER WHO WILL BE LUCKY TO AVOID PRISON TIME

Prosecutors on Wednesday also formally indicted Avenatti on charges that he tried to extort up to $25 million from Nike by threatening to expose claims that the shoemaker paid off high school basketball players to steer them to Nike-sponsored colleges. Avenatti also has been facing a multi-count federal indictment in Los Angeles alleging that he stole millions of dollars from clients, didn’t pay taxes, committed bank fraud and lied during bankruptcy proceedings.

Avenatti has denied the allegations against him on both coasts, saying he expects to be exonerated. The Los Angeles charges alone carry a potential penalty of more than 300 years in prison, while he could face over 60 years behind bars on the New York charges.

AVENATTI PLEADS NOT GUILTY IN FEDERAL WIRE, BANK FRAUD CASE

Daniels, whose real name is Stephanie Clifford, initially raised concerns about Avenatti’s conduct in November when she claimed he’d launched a fundraising effort to raise money for her legal case without telling her. She also said he had filed a defamation lawsuit against Trump, on her behalf, against her wishes.

“For months I’ve asked Michael Avenatti to give me accounting information about the fund my supporters so generously donated to for my safety and legal defense. He has repeatedly ignored those requests,” she said at the time. “Days ago I demanded again, repeatedly, that he tell me how the money was being spent and how much was left. Instead of answering me, without my permission or even my knowledge Michael launched another crowdfunding campaign to raise money on my behalf. I learned about it on Twitter.”

EMAILS SHOW AVENATTI CLIENT RACING TO FIND SETTLEMENT FUNDS HE NOW SAYS LAWYER USED FOR ‘PONZI-LIKE’ SCHEME

At the time, Avenatti responded that he was still Daniels “biggest champion.” He said that under his retention agreement, he was entitled to keep all the money he raised for her legal defense to defray what he said were substantial costs of her case.

He repeated that statement on social media Wednesday, tweeting: “I look forward to a jury hearing all of the evidence and passing judgment on my conduct.  At no time was any money misappropriated or mishandled. I will be fully exonerated once the relevant emails, contracts, text messages, and documents are presented. I was entitled to any monies retained per my agreement with the client. My agreement for representation and compensation included a percentage of any book proceeds.”

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

The defamation case initiated by Avenatti against Trump backfired, with a judge ordering her to pay the president’s legal bills.

When Avenatti was first charged with defrauding other clients and extorting Nike in March, Daniels said she was “saddened but not shocked,” adding on Twitter that she had fired Avenatti a month earlier after “discovering that he had dealt with me extremely dishonestly.” At the time, she did not elaborate.

Fox News’ Jake Gibson, Brooke Singman and The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/us/michael-avenatti-indicted-defrauding-stormy-daniels-identity-theft

On Wednesday, the Ways and Means Committee said it was focused on pursuing Mr. Trump’s federal tax information, regardless of New York’s action and the potential for getting the president’s state returns.

“Our request to the Internal Revenue Service was in furtherance of an investigation into the mandatory presidential audit program at the I.R.S.,” said Daniel Rubin, a spokesman for the committee, which is led by Representative Richard E. Neal, the Massachusetts Democrat. “State returns would not help us evaluate this program.”

At the same time, Steven M. Rosenthal, a tax lawyer and senior fellow at the Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center, said he would not be surprised if the president fought the state law, though he believed it passed legal muster.

“Of course, the Legislature was motivated by Donald Trump’s current refusals,” Mr. Rosenthal said, but added that he thought the bill was written broadly enough to avoid the “bill of attainder” accusation.

That opinion was echoed by Brian Galle, a law professor at Georgetown University Law School, who said that “bills of attainder have been interpreted really narrowly by the courts,” and noted that legislation often describes targeted industries or municipalities in vague terms. (In New York, for instance, state bills aimed at New York City are typically described as those affecting “a city with a population of one million or more,” as New York is the only such city in the state.)

“The bill doesn’t say you can release Donald Trump’s, and only Donald Trump’s, tax returns,” Mr. Galle said.

Lawmakers took steps to safeguard the bill from legal challenges, amending the wording so that it covered an array of public officials, federal executive branch employees and political party leaders.

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/22/nyregion/trump-state-tax-returns.html

Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin says he has not reviewed an IRS memo that says the agency must turn over a president’s tax returns to Congress.

Mark Wilson/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Mark Wilson/Getty Images

Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin says he has not reviewed an IRS memo that says the agency must turn over a president’s tax returns to Congress.

Mark Wilson/Getty Images

Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin said he has “not yet” reviewed a confidential draft Internal Revenue Service memo, which reportedly says the agency must turn over a president’s tax returns to Congress unless the president asserts executive privilege.

Appearing before the House Financial Services Committee on Wednesday, Mnuchin said he looked at the memo for the first time “literally on the way up here.”

According to the memo, obtained by the Washington Post, disclosure of the president’s tax forms “is mandatory, requiring the Secretary to disclose returns, and return information, requested by the tax-writing Chairs.”

Mnuchin has refused to allow the IRS to turn over President Trump’s tax returns, saying Congress has no legitimate legislative purpose in seeing them. But the draft memo says the law “does not allow the Secretary to exercise discretion in disclosing the information provided the statutory conditions are met.”

Mnuchin said he is looking into why the draft memo had not reached his desk.

Breaking with recent precedent, Trump never disclosed his tax returns while a candidate for president, claiming it was because they were under audit. But that would not prevent Trump from releasing them if he so chose. IRS Commissioner Charles Rettig testified last month that there is no rule prohibiting Trump from releasing his tax returns.

Rep. Sanford Bishop of Georgia asked, “If anybody’s tax return is under audit, is there a rule that would prohibit that taxpayer from releasing it?”

Rettig replied, “I think I’ve answered that question. No.”

Mnuchin also told the panel on Tuesday that he has “had no conversations ever with the president or anyone in the White House about delivering the president’s tax returns to Congress.”

Echoing Trump, Mnuchin said voters knew the president was not releasing his tax returns and elected him anyway.

Release of his tax returns is one of many inquiries by congressional Democrats that Trump is resisting. On Monday, a federal court ruled that Trump cannot block his accounting firm from turning over his financial records, a decision Trump said he will appeal.

The issue of releasing his tax returns is also likely to be resolved by the courts.

Source Article from https://www.npr.org/2019/05/22/725702479/mnuchin-says-he-has-not-yet-reviewed-memo-mandating-irs-turn-over-trump-tax-retu

Investigations will not hold up must-pass debt ceiling hike,…

Despite the president’s claim that “you can’t investigate and legislate simultaneously,” certain must-pass pieces of legislation, including a debt ceiling hike, will…

read more

Source Article from https://www.cnbc.com/2019/05/22/trade-war-forcing-china-to-rethink-economic-ties-with-the-us.html

Source Article from https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/schiff-says-justice-department-agrees-turn-over-mueller-documents-n1008771

Sen. Bill Cassidy, R-La., is cosponsoring legislation with Sen. Maggie Hassan, D-N.H., to curtail surprise medical bills.

Susan Walsh/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Susan Walsh/AP

Sen. Bill Cassidy, R-La., is cosponsoring legislation with Sen. Maggie Hassan, D-N.H., to curtail surprise medical bills.

Susan Walsh/AP

Surprise medical bills — those unexpected and often pricey bills patients face when they get care from a doctor or hospital that isn’t in their insurance network — are the health care problem du jour in Washington, with President Trump and congressional lawmakers from both sides of the aisle calling for action.

These policymakers agree on the need to take patients out of the middle of the fight over charges, but crafting a legislative solution will not be easy.

A hearing of the House Ways and Means health subcommittee Tuesday, for example, quickly devolved into finger-pointing as providers’ and insurers’ testimony showed how much they don’t see eye to eye.

“I’m disappointed that all participants that are going to be here from critical sectors of our economy could not come to find a way to work together to protect patients from these huge surprise bills,” Rep. Devin Nunes, R-Calif., the ranking Republican on the subcommittee, in his opening statement.

As Congress weighs addressing the problem, here’s a guide to the bills and what to watch for.

Senate: Cassidy and Hassan

Last week, Sen. Bill Cassidy, R-La., and Sen. Maggie Hassan, D-N.H., introduced their version of surprise-billing legislation. It would set out specific protections for patients who are at risk of surprise bills in the following scenarios: receiving emergency care from an out-of-network facility or provider; getting elective care from an out-of-network doctor at a facility that is in the patient’s insurance network; or receiving additional, post-emergency health care at an out-of-network facility because the patient cannot travel without medical transport.

The protections would mean that people in these situations could not be billed by their health providers for amounts outside of what their insurance covered. Similar protections would also be put in place for laboratory and imaging services as well as providers who aren’t physicians, such as nurse anesthetists.

Patients would still have to pay their insurance plan’s usual deductibles and copayments, which would count toward their health plan’s out-of-pocket maximum.

Doctors would be automatically paid a predetermined amount based on what other health plans in the area are paying for a similar service. It’s called the “median in-network rate.”

House: “No Surprises Act”

On the House side, the “No Surprises Act” has emerged as the primary bill. Though it has not yet been formally introduced, drafts include many of the same protections as in the Cassidy-Hassan measure, including curbs on out-of-network bills for emergency care.

Co-authored by Reps. Frank Pallone, D-N.J., and Greg Walden, R-Ore., respectively the chairman and ranking member of the Energy and Commerce Committee, the measure would require health care facilities to provide 24-hour notice to patients seeking elective treatment that they are about to see an out-of-network provider. It would prohibit the facility or provider from billing patients for whatever amount their insurance companies did not cover for that service. And it would set provider payment rates based on the market in that specific area.

One key difference between the House and Senate proposals: The Cassidy-Hassan measure includes a mechanism by which health providers can challenge that basic median pay rate They would have 30 days to initiate an independent dispute resolution between only the health plan and the provider; patients would be exempted.

“The patient needs to be the reason for care, not the excuse for a bill,” Cassidy said at a press conference when the bill was unveiled.

The approach is often referred to as “baseball-style” arbitration because it’s the model used by Major League Baseball for some salary negotiations. Here’s how it works: The plan and the provider each present a final offer to an independent arbitrator for what the procedure should cost. The arbitrator then picks one of those two options.

Senate, Coming Soon: Alexander and Murray Health Care Bill

The Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee has primary jurisdiction over the way the federal government regulates employer-sponsored plans, and Chairman Lamar Alexander, R-Tenn., and Sen. Patty Murray, D-Wash., the top Democratic member, are preparing legislation.

That legislative package is being billed as a broader measure designed to address health care costs, which would likely include provisions aimed at surprise medical bills.

If Alexander does proceed on the broader path, his legislation could also incorporate elements such as curbs on drug pricing and price transparency, according to some industry lobbyists.

But this triggers concerns that expanding the measure’s focus — which could perhaps draw more opposition — could slow the momentum behind surprise-billing legislation.

“There’s a lot of other things going on that aren’t directly related to surprise bills,” says Molly Smith, the vice president for coverage and state issues at the American Hospital Association. “We’re paying attention to what else is getting glommed on.”

Alexander and Murray are expected to unveil details of their proposal Thursday. And, at a White House event earlier this month, Alexander said he’d like to pass it through the committee by July.

That won’t be the end of players joining in the debate.

The House Education and Labor Committee also held a hearing on the issue, with an eye toward legislation in the future. Ways and Means Subcommittee Chairman Lloyd Doggett, D-Texas, is also focused on this issue, having introduced surprise-billing legislation in the last three congressional sessions.

Issues to watch

Some Capitol Hill insiders, say arbitration provisions such as those proposed in the Cassidy-Hassan measure could become a hurdle to getting surprise-bill legislation over the finish line.

At the Ways and Means hearing, for instance, a representative from the trade group that represents employer plans called the idea a “snipe hunt” used by providers and hospitals to distract Congress from fixing the problem.

But the idea of the government setting payment rates for doctors is also sensitive. Groups such as the American Medical Association have already pushed back on this idea.

“Proposals that use in-network rates as a guideline should be avoided,” said Dr. Bobby Mukkamala, an American Medical Association board member, in testimony to the Ways and Means panel. “Setting payments at these discounted rates would further disrupt the increasing market imbalance favoring health insurers.”

Cassidy, though, was optimistic at the press conference announcing his bill’s introduction.

“Greg Walden on the House side … said that he would be OK with arbitration, so obviously this is a process, we’re in negotiations,” he said at a press conference.

In fact, negotiations between the House and Senate versions of the proposed bills could lead to promising outcomes, says Claire McAndrew, the director of campaigns and partnerships at Families USA, a nonprofit group that advocates for accessible and affordable health care: “There could be an interesting potential to merge these two bills and do a really forward-thinking, consumer-friendly piece of legislation.”

What’s missing

Expensive air and ground ambulance bills have caused controversy in the past, but neither the Senate nor the House proposals appear to address them.

Helicopters are sometimes deployed to get patients in dire need to a hospital quickly, or to service patients in remote areas, often at exorbitant costs.

In addition, Smith, from the hospital association, says none of the bills address insurance network adequacy.

“At the end of the day, surprise billing happens because they don’t have access to an in-network provider,” Smith says.

At some point, legislators will also have to hammer out how the federal law will interact with the more than 20 state laws that address surprise billing, says Adam Beck, the vice president of employer health policy and strategic initiatives at America’s Health Insurance Plans, or AHIP, the trade group representing health insurance plans.

Some states have stricter protections for patients, some use a different method to determine how doctors will be paid, and states want to preserve those extra protections when necessary.

“They’re not necessarily sticking points, but there are real questions they’ll have to figure out,” Beck says.

Kaiser Health News is a nonprofit news service covering health issues. It is an editorially independent program of the Kaiser Family Foundation that is not affiliated with Kaiser Permanente.

Source Article from https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2019/05/22/725796114/surprise-medical-bills-are-driving-people-into-debt-will-congress-act-to-stop-th

CLOSE

A war of words outside the U.S. Capitol between Attorney General Bill Bar and Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi.
Buzz60

WASHINGTON — House Speaker Nancy Pelosi accused President Donald Trump of “a cover-up” moments before he broke off infrastructure talks and held an impromptu Rose Garden press conference to attack ongoing investigations involving him. 

“We do believe it’s important to follow the facts, we believe that no one is above the law, including the President of the United States, and we believe that the President of the United States is engaged in a cover-up,” Pelosi said following a meeting with House Democrats on Wednesday to discuss their investigations of the president.

The president would reference the speaker’s missive, saying, “I don’t do cover-ups.”

The tense exchange came as Pelosi, Trump and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer planned to hold a White House meeting on infrastructure Wednesday morning.

Pelosi has been trying to tamp down a growing clamor from Democrats who want to impeach the president. Many in the party, including some of Pelosi’s allies, are saying it’s time for Democrats to open an impeachment inquiry

Pelosi did not make the case against impeachment herself during the caucus meeting, said Rep. Gerald Connolly, instead she presided over presentations from the chairmen of the committees who are investigating the Trump administration. 

Many members walking out of the meeting insisted Democrats were unified in their approach, but accounts from some lawmakers showed not everyone was on board with the wait-and-see strategy. 

Connolly said that Financial Services Committee Chairwoman Maxine Waters, D-Calif., who has long pushed for impeachment gave an update on her committee’s investigations before saying the caucus should impeach Trump. 

“After she finished a long, long report she quickly said ‘we should impeach him’ and sat down and everyone laughed,” Connolly said.

Lawmakers may have laughed at Waters’ attempt to get the conversation going, but a growing number of Democrats view the administration’s stonewalling as serious enough to open an impeachment inquiry.

Rep. Jamie Raskin, D-Md., a member of the committee which would handle impeachment, said members were” totally unified” in their approach to getting information from the Trump administration “and we all understand this to be an historic moment.”

However, he also said “lots of members want to put an impeachment inquiry onto the table and we want to use whatever means are necessary in order to defend the constitution, the rule of law.”

Raskin was one of a trio of senior members who pushed Pelosi to start an impeachment inquiry on Monday after the White House instructed former White House counsel Don McGahn to ignore a subpoena to appear before Congress Tuesday.

McGahn Tuesday defied the congressional subpoena and did not show up for a hearing where lawmakers had planned to press him on his interactions with Trump regarding special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation of Russian interference in the 2016 election. The White House instructed McGahn to ignore the subpoena after the Department of Justice on Monday released a legal opinion that said he was not required to appear.

“This president – as a result of his decision to direct Mr. McGahn not to appear – has engaged in an effort to obstruct and impede and to cover up,” said Rep. David Cicilline, D-R.I., the chairman of the Democratic Policy and Communications Committee, the House Democrats’ messaging arm.

“I think the time has come to begin the formal process of considering impeachment as an option,” said Cicilline, a member of the House Judiciary Committee. He said the inquiry should be opened to communicate to the administration the “heightened level of seriousness” of the Democrats’ investigations. But he also acknowledged that such a decision was ultimately up to Pelosi, who, so far, is not on board

Beto on impeachment: O’Rourke says he’ll risk consequences on 2020 campaign if Trump impeached

Joe Biden: Democrats may have ‘no alternative’ but to impeach President Trump

On Monday, a trio of Democratic leaders, including Cicilline, pushed Pelosi, during different meetings to move forward with an impeachment inquiry, but she held firm, according to a Democratic aide who was in the room during the meetings. The interactions were first reported by Politico.

Top House Democrats spent Tuesday insisting that the lawmakers who were calling for impeachment were still the minority of the party – for now.

Majority Leader Steny Hoyer, D-Md., said Tuesday he thinks every Democrat “in their gut” feels Trump has “done some things that probably justify impeachment.”

“Having said that, this is the important point, I think the majority of Democrats continue to believe that we need to continue to pursue the avenue that we’ve been on,” he added. “If facts lead us to a broader action, so be it,” Hoyer said.

Pelosi has long said impeachment is divisive. In an exclusive interview with USA TODAY in March, she said impeachment would be “a gift” to the president if it was not bipartisan. But after a redacted version of Mueller’s report was made public, she said impeachment was possible if facts led there. 

“I see a lot more people who have seen what has occurred who would like to see an impeachment inquiry,” Tennessee Democratic Rep. Steve Cohen said Tuesday. Cohen, a member of the House Judiciary Committee, said he has articles of impeachment drafted, but would like to see Mueller come in to testify before he files them.

‘There is a big picture here’:Democrats offer roadmap on Barr, Trump and what comes next

More investigations: Federal judge refuses to block House subpoena for Trump’s financial records

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., said Tuesday that Democrats had “no choice” but to open an impeachment inquiry “at the very least.”

Ocasio-Cortez said she didn’t speak for all of her colleagues but she noted that she had not seen “a lot of overt expression of opposition” to impeachment. 

“I think it’s really just a matter of leadership” who oppose the move, she said. Ocasio-Cortez has long supported getting Trump out of office, but she has become increasingly vocal about her desire for an impeachment inquiry after Mueller’s report was released. 

Over the weekend, Rep. Justin Amash, R-Mich., said he had read the Mueller report and determined that the president had committed impeachable offenses. However, no other Republicans have followed Amash in calling for impeachment.

Contributing: Bart Jansen for USA TODAY

Like what you’re reading?Download the USA TODAY app for more

Source Article from https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2019/05/22/democrats-pelosi-meet-impeachment-trump/3752337002/