Most Viewed Videos

Incredible GoPro footage takes you inside the gunfire-heavy raid that ended drug lord Joaquin “El Chapo” Guzman’s six months on the run.

The video, obtained from Mexican authorities, looks as if it’s from an action movie. The camera follows the armed men as they storm the house, unleash grenades and bullets, and search room to room.

The Friday raid was called “Operation Black Swan,” according to the Mexican show “Primero Noticias.” Authorities decided to launch the raid Thursday after they got a tip about where Guzman was sleeping, the show reported.

Seventeen elite unit Mexican Marines launched their assault on the house in the city of Los Mochis at 4:40 a.m., “Primero Noticias” said.

They were met by about one dozen well-armed guards inside who were prepared for a fight, the show said.

The Marines moved from room to room, clearing the house. Upstairs they found two men in one room and found two women on the floor of a bathroom. All were captured, “Primero Noticias” said.

After 15 minutes, the Marines controlled the entire house, according to “Primero Noticias.”

In the end, five guards were killed and two men and two women were detained. One of the women was the same cook Guzman had with him when he was detained a couple years ago, according to “Primero Noticias.”

Eventually the marines determined that the only bedroom on the first floor was Guzman’s and they began pounding on the walls and moving furniture, finding hidden doors, the show said.

His room had a king-sized bed, bags from fashionable clothing stores, bread and cookie wrappers, and medicine including injectable testosterone, syringes, antibiotics and cough syrups, the show said. The two-story house had four bedrooms and five bathrooms. There were flat-screen TVs and Internet connection throughout the house, according to “Primero Noticias.”

The Marines eventually found a hidden passageway behind a mirror, with a handle hidden in the light fixture. The handle opened a secret door, leading down into the escape tunnel, the show explained.

The escape tunnel was fully lit and led to an access door for the city sewage system, “Primero Noticias” said, adding that Guzman had at least a 20-minute head start on the Marines.

The address where Guzman was captured had been monitored for a month, Mexican Attorney General Arely Gomez has said. According to Gomez, Guzman and his lieutenant escaped through that drainage system.

“Primero Noticias” said it obtained surveillance footage showing Guzman and his lieutenant emerging from the manhole cover, where they then stole two cars to flee, the show said.

Guzman was finally caught when he and the lieutenant were stopped on a highway by Mexican Federal Police, the show said.

Authorities took them to a motel to wait for reinforcement. The men were then taken to Los Mochis airport and transfered to Mexico City.

Rebecca Blackwell/AP PHOTO
Mexican drug lord Joaquin “El Chapo” Guzman is escorted by soldiers and marines to a waiting helicopter, at a federal hangar in Mexico City, Jan. 8, 2016.

Guzman is now back in prison as his lawyers fight his extradition to the U.S.

The drug kingpin escaped from the Altiplano prison near Mexico City on July 11, launching an active manhunt. When guards realized that he was missing from his cell, they found a ventilated tunnel and exit had been constructed in the bathtub inside Guzman’s cell. The tunnel extended for about a mile underground and featured an adapted motorcycle on rails that officials believe was used to transport the tools used to create the tunnel, Monte Alejandro Rubido, the head of the Mexican national security commission, said in July.

Guzman had been sent there after he was arrested in February 2014. He spent more than 10 years on the run after escaping from a different prison in 2001. It’s unclear exactly how he had escaped, but he did receive help from prison guards who were prosecuted and convicted.

Guzman, the leader of the Sinaloa cartel, was once described by the U.S. Treasury as “the most powerful drug trafficker in the world.” The Sinaloa cartel allegedly uses elaborate tunnels for drug trafficking and has been estimated to be responsible for 25 percent of all illegal drugs that enter the U.S. through Mexico.

Source Article from http://abcnews.go.com/International/inside-dramatic-raid-el-chapo/story?id=36216172

In accordance with the advice House officials gave to all members, Mr. Gonzalez had a security consultant walk through his home to ensure it was well protected.

“It’s a reflection of where our politics looked like it was headed post-Jan. 6,” he said.

Neither Mr. Trump nor any of his intermediaries have sought to push him out of the race, Mr. Gonzalez said.

Asked about Mr. Trump’s inevitable crowing over his exit from the primary, Mr. Gonzalez dismissed the former president.

“I haven’t cared what he says or thinks since Jan. 6, outside when he continues to lie about the election, which I have a problem with,” he said.

What clearly does bother him, though, are the Republicans who continue to abet Mr. Trump’s election falsehoods, acts of appeasement that he said were morally wrong and politically foolhardy after the party lost both chambers of Congress and the White House under the former president’s leadership.

“We’ve learned the wrong lesson as a party,” Mr. Gonzalez said, “but beyond that, and more importantly, it’s horribly irresponsible and destructive for the country.”

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2021/09/16/us/politics/anthony-gonzalez-ohio-trump.html

<!– –>

The EU has hit back at new U.S. proposals to target European goods with tariffs, following a World Trade Organization (WTO) ruling over subsidies for Airbus.

Trade tensions between the EU and U.S. flared Monday after the U.S. said it’s considering $11 billion worth of retaliatory tariffs on a range of goods in response to illegal subsidies the EU granted to the aerospace firm.

The WTO ruled last year that these allowances had caused “adverse effects” to the U.S., with the decision coming after a long-running litigation battle between the Washington and Brussels over their respective aviation giants.

Shares of Airbus were trading 2.3% lower Tuesday after the tariffs were proposed. A spokesman for the company said there is no legal basis for the U.S. move to impose sanctions, and said the EU had complied with WTO rulings. The European Commission criticized the proposals.

“The EU is confident that the level of countermeasures on which the notice is based is greatly exaggerated. The amount of WTO authorized retaliation can only be determined by the WTO-appointed arbitrator,” a Commission spokesman said.

On Monday, the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative said it would slap tariffs on EU goods ranging from aircraft to fish, dairy products to binoculars, olive oil and wine, according to a preliminary list.

It said it estimates “the harm from the EU subsidies as $11 billion in trade each year,” although the amount is subject to an arbitration at the WTO, the result of which is expected to be issued this summer.

“This case has been in litigation for 14 years, and the time has come for action. The Administration is preparing to respond immediately when the WTO issues its finding on the value of U.S. countermeasures,” U.S. Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer said in a statement Monday.

Double standards

Both sides have now been found guilty of paying billions of dollars of subsidies to gain advantage in the global aircraft manufacturing business.

The EU is still waiting to hear from the WTO about what “retaliation rights” it has after the organization found in 2012 that Boeing too had received billions of dollars in illegal subsidies that had been to the detriment of Airbus. The WTO also ruled in March that the U.S. had failed to comply fully with its earlier ruling to remove all illegal subsidies that Boeing had received.

The European Commission spokesman also said Tuesday that Brussels is ready to retaliate in kind, noting that in the parallel Boeing dispute, “the determination of EU retaliation rights is also coming closer and the EU will request the WTO-appointed arbitrator to determine the EU’s retaliation rights.”

Some analysts have accused the U.S. of double standards. GAM’s Investment Director for Global Equities, Ali Miremadi, said the U.S.’ tariff proposal was “quite bold.”

“I have to say the country which is the home to Boeing accusing Europe of state subsidies for Airbus — this is quite bold,” he told CNBC’s “Squawk Box Europe” Tuesday.

“It’s very well established that both Boeing and Airbus exist only at the discretion of their respective hosts or host governments.”

President Donald Trump tweeted Tuesday that “the EU has taken advantage of the U.S. on trade for many years.”

UBS’ Global Wealth Management’s Chief Economist Paul Donovan noted wryly that Trump had accepted the WTO ruling much more readily than usual.

“The WTO has ruled that Airbus received unfair subsidies from the EU and U.S. President Trump has, rather unusually, decided to agree with the WTO,” Donovan said in a regular podcast Tuesday.

“Whether U.S. President Trump would be quite so willing to accept the verdict of the WTO about unfair assistance from the U.S. to Boeing, which is an ongoing case, is a rather different matter.”

Trade wars

The latest U.S. threat comes as tensions are already simmering with the EU over possible tariffs on its cars and auto parts. A final decision has not yet been made.

The U.S. is currently negotiating with China over a trade deal after almost a year of escalating retaliatory tariffs on each other’s imports. Europe could be next in line for some rough treatment.

“Even once we are done with the U.S. and China, the U.S. will turn to Europe,” Laurence Boone, chief economist at OECD, told CNBC’s Steve Sedgwick at the Ambrosetti Workshop in Italy on Friday.

“So, I think by undermining the multi-lateral rules-based system on trade, we have just injected a massive dose of uncertainty in the world that will stay with us for a long time.”

Strategists warn that tariffs could not come at a worse time for the EU, with growth and industrial production looking vulnerable. Tariffs “are still a very important dark cloud when it comes to European growth,” Luis Costa, head of CEEMEA FX strategy at Citi, told CNBC Tuesday.

“This is coming at a time when German factory orders are down by 4 to 5 percent and output is still in danger, some of those regional manufacturing indices are still in contraction territory, so this is coming at a very delicate time,” he told CNBC’s “Squawk Box Europe.”

Source Article from https://www.cnbc.com/2019/04/09/europe-slams-latest-us-tariff-threat-as-greatly-exaggerated.html

America should give the peace agreement with the Taliban a chance, Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., said Saturday.

In an interview on “Fox & Friends Weekend” with hosts Dean Cain, Pete Hegseth and Jedidiah Bila, Graham said he will believe there is peace when he sees it, but he wants to applaud President Trump for getting the Taliban to the table.

“Let’s give it a try,” he urged. “Eighteen years is a long time, but you’ve gotta remember why we still talk about Afghanistan… That’s the place where the Al Qaeda was invited in by the Taliban as their honored guests to attack us. Without a safe haven in Afghanistan, there would be no 9/11.”

JIM HANSON: TRUMP’S TALIBAN PEACE DEAL IS RIGHT MOVE — AFTER ALMOST 20 YEARS IT’S TIME TO EXIT AFGHANISTAN

After nearly two decades of conflict, the United States and the Taliban signed a peace agreement Saturday that is aimed at ending America’s longest war and will bring U.S. troops home more than 18 years after they invaded in the wake of the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.

The deal, which was signed by chief negotiators and witnessed by Secretary of State Mike Pompeo in Doha, Qatar, could see the withdrawal of all American and allied forces in the next 14 months and allow the president to keep one of his key 2016 campaign pledges to extract the U.S. from an “endless war.”

From left, U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo meets with Qatar’s Foreign Minister Sheikh Mohammed bin Abdulrahman Al Thani before a peace signing ceremony between the U.S. and the Taliban in Doha on Saturday, Feb. 29, 2020. The U.S. is poised to sign a peace agreement with Taliban militants on Saturday aimed at bringing an end to 18 years of bloodshed in Afghanistan and allowing U.S. troops to return home from America’s longest war. (Giuseppe Cacace/Pool photo via AP)

Under the deal, the U.S. would draw its forces down to 8,600 from 13,000 in the next three to four months — a number Graham told the “Friends Weekend” hosts was “enough.” A complete retraction would depend on the Taliban’s ability to meet its promises.

Another condition of the agreement calls for the release of 5,000 Taliban members from Afghan-run jails, although it was not clear if the Afghan government will comply with that.

Additionally, a senior administration official told reporters earlier this week that the deal “explicitly mentions al Qaeda” and calls for the Taliban to cut all ties.

“Today, we are realistic,” Pompeo told reporters. “We are seizing the best opportunity for peace in a generation.”

To date, according to The Associated Press, the United States has spent nearly $1 trillion in Afghanistan and more than 3,500 U.S. and coalition soldiers have died there. More than 2,400 of them were Americans.

Saturday’s agreement sets the stage for March 10 intra-Afghan talks in Oslo, with the aim of forming a power-sharing agreement between rival Afghan groups.

Pompeo said that while “the chapter of American history on the Taliban is written in blood,” the pact represented “the best opportunity for peace in a generation.”

Simultaneously, U.S. Defense Secretary Mark Esper and Afghan President Ashraf Ghani signed a joint statement committing the Afghan government to support the U.S.-Taliban deal.

However, not everyone was on board with the move.

Former National Security Adviser John Bolton attacked his former boss’s historic treaty, arguing it posed an “unacceptable risk to American civilians.”

“Signing this agreement with Taliban is an unacceptable risk to America’s civilian population,” Bolton tweeted on Saturday.

“This is an Obama-style deal,” he wrote, referring to Trump’s predecessor. “Legitimizing Taliban sends the wrong signal to ISIS and al Qaeda terrorists, and to America’s enemies generally.”

President Donald Trump speaks about the coronavirus in the press briefing room at the White House, Saturday, Feb. 29, 2020, in Washington as Health and Human Services Secretary Alex Azar, National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Diseases Director Dr. Anthony Fauci, Vice President Mike Pence, Robert Redfield, director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and U.S. Surgeon General Dr. Jerome Adams listen. (AP Photo/Carolyn Kaster)

In a news conference Saturday afternoon, the president hailed the deal and said he would be personally meeting leaders of the Taliban in the near future.

In addition, Trump said that Afghanistan’s neighbors should help maintain stability following the agreement.

Many expect the forthcoming intra-Afghan talks to be more complicated than the initial deal, but the president said he thought the negotiations would be a success because “everyone is tired of war.”

CLICK HERE FOR THE FOX NEWS APP

“The Taliban are part of Afghanistan. The Taliban didn’t attack us on 9/11, but they set the conditions for us to be attacked. They are very radical in their philosophy, but they don’t want to govern the world — they just want to take over Afghanistan,” Graham remarked.

“So, here’s what’s going to happen,” he said, “We’re going to have a negotiation with the Taliban who is at 15 percent approval, with the rest of Afghanistan. I’m looking for reconciliation that protects the rights of women and I’m looking for residual American force to stay in Afghanistan for a long time to make sure that ISIS-K and Al Qaeda never come back.”

“So, it is in our interests to have a footprint,” he concluded.

Fox News’ Paulina Dedaj, Sam Dorman, and The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/media/lindsey-graham-us-taliban-peace-deal-pompeo-trump

Imagen: cortesía @BomberosBogota

Cinco personas murieron y otras quince resultaron heridas hoy al estrellarse en el occidente de Bogotá un pequeño avión bimotor, dijeron a Efe fuentes del Instituto Distrital de Gestión de Riesgos y Cambio Climático (Idiger), dependiente de la Alcaldía de la capital colombiana.

La aeronave se precipitó a tierra alrededor de las 16:20 hora local (21.20 GMT) en los alrededores de la Avenida Ciudad de Cali, en la localidad de Engativá, muy cerca del aeropuerto internacional El Dorado, desde donde despegó minutos antes, indicó la Aeronaútica Civil (Aerocivil) en su página de Facebook.

El aparato accidentado es un Beechcraft 60, de matrícula HK-3917, según la Aerocivil, que identificó a uno de sus ocupantes como el capitán Juan Pablo Ángulo Reyes.

A bordo viajaban cuatro personas, si bien se desconoce por el momento si los fallecidos son los ocupantes o personas que se encontraban en tierra, pues el aparato cayó sobre una panadería y hay tres viviendas afectadas, detalló el Cuerpo de Bomberos de Bogotá en Twitter.

La Aerocivil indicó que el bimotor tenía como destino el aeropuerto de Guaymaral, en el norte la capital colombiana, desde donde operan vuelos privados.

El pasado 3 de octubre dos personas murieron y una resultó herida al caer a tierra cerca de la localidad de Chía, aledaña a Bogotá, una avioneta que acababa de despegar de Guaymaral.

El Cuerpo de Bomberos de Bogotá controló el fuego originado por el accidente.

Los lesionados fueron trasladados a la clínica Partenón con graves quemaduras. 

Una de las víctimas es una pequeña de 12 años, de quien se conoce tiene quemaduras en el 60% de su cuerpo. La pequeña fue llevada inicialmente a la clínica Partenón, pero ante la gravedad de sus heridas fue remitida al hospital Simón Bolívar.

Source Article from http://www.noticiascaracol.com/colombia/cinco-heridos-deja-accidente-de-avioneta-en-localidad-de-engativa-en-bogota

For Mr. Rosselló, the funding fight is a question of fairness. For every long-term rebuilding project underway in Puerto Rico at this point after Hurricane Maria, there were 28 projects underway in Texas for damage from Hurricane Harvey, and 32 projects in Louisiana after Hurricane Katrina, the governor said. “Puerto Rico is getting much fewer and much lower resources than any comparable jurisdiction in the United States.”

A University of Michigan analysis published in the journal BMJ Global Health in January found it took twice as long — four months — for Hurricane Maria survivors in Puerto Rico to receive a comparable amount of individual aid (about $1 billion) as Hurricane Harvey survivors in Texas and Hurricane Irma survivors in Florida, though Maria was stronger and more devastating. Maria killed an estimated 2,975 people in Puerto Rico.

In addition to the slow disbursement of aid, a report last month from the Government Accountability Office found that the Department of Housing and Urban Development lacked a robust plan to monitor disaster relief grants, including $20 billion approved for Puerto Rico.

In Vieques, with the hospital out of commission, dialysis patients had to travel to the big island three times a week to get treatment for more than a year after the storm. Several patients died. Finally, in November, a mobile dialysis unit in a shiny trailer arrived at the temporary clinic, allowing local treatments to resume.

“It wasn’t easy,” said Edwin Alvarado Cordero, a 58-year-old diabetic. Standing across the street from the pharmacy in Isabel Segunda, the bigger of the island’s two towns, Mr. Alvarado recounted his thrice-weekly trips from Vieques to Humacao, which began at 4 a.m. and ended at 5:30 p.m.

Last year, on the ferry to the big island, Mr. Alvarado suffered a heart attack. He had open-heart surgery and survived. Though he can now receive dialysis in Vieques, he still travels to San Juan periodically to see his cardiologist. Specialists visit Vieques infrequently.

“It’s far, but it’s better there,” Mr. Alvarado said. “What’s left of the hospital here is grass and horses. They abandoned it.”

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/07/us/puerto-rico-trump-vieques.html

Politicians just interrupted regularly scheduled programming to bring you a message they’ve been repeating ad nauseum for the last three weeks.

President Trump went first. Sitting behind the Resolute Desk in the Oval Office, he read a watered-down stump speech from a teleprompter. Illegal immigrants and a flood of drugs are streaming across the border, the president said in so many words. The shutdown is the fault of Democrats, he continued, and the solution is some variation of a wall.

Notably lacking? Fireworks.

Trump was presidential in that Trump was unusually low key. He didn’t declare a national emergency, a move which would have thrown Congress and the courts into an immediate crisis. He just repeated the boilerplate language from his campaign.

Democrats offered their rebuttal next, with House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., and Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., standing cadaver-like behind a shared podium. They may haunt the dreams of any child who was unlucky enough to be awake during prime time, but aside from that they didn’t accomplish anything new.

Pelosi said the president was holding the country hostage. Schumer followed up arguing that the president was appealing to fear, not facts, and that Democrats and Republicans agree border security is necessary. They just disagree, Schumer posited, on how to do it.

Pundits promised that this would be a clash of the political titans, a rough-and-tumble exchange of fire worthy of the last two years of hysteria. It was instead a 20-minute dud with all the drama of a “Friends” rerun.

And believe it or not, that is a good thing.

Nothing bad happened tonight, because nothing dramatic went down and nothing changed. Governing from crisis leads to unforeseen outcomes and extra-constitutional actions. Instead, both sides laid out their battle lines after kicking a little dust in prime time.

Source Article from https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/trump-pelosi-schumer-kick-a-little-dust-during-prime-time-accomplish-little-else

Image copyright
EPA

Image caption

En 2004, Hadid ganó el premio Pritzker, el más importante de la arquitectura.

La arquitecta iraquí Zaha Hadid, cuyos diseños incluyen el Centro Acuático Olímpico de Londres, murió este jueves en Miami a la edad de 65 años.

Hadid murió de un ataque cardiaco en un hospital donde era tratada por una bronquitis.

Este año Hadid se convirtió en la primera mujer en recibir la Medalla de Oro del Instituto Real de Arquitectos Británicos en reconocimiento a su trabajo.

“Ahora vemos más mujeres arquitectas establecidas”, indicó cuando recibió el premio del cual se sentía orgullosa.

Image copyright
Getty

Image caption

Hadid decía estar convencida de que los edificios deben alimentar el alma.

Eso no significa que es fácil. Algunas veces los desafíos son inmensos. En los años recientes ha habido un cambio tremendo y continuaremos este progreso”.

Hadid, quien también poseía la nacionalidad británica, era considerada una de las arquitectas más destacadas del siglo XXI.

Decía estar convencida de que los edificios deben alimentar el alma.

“Las ideas fuertes nunca fallan”, dijo en 2004.

Internacional

Sus diseños han sido comisionados en varias partes del mundo.

Image copyright
PA

Image caption

El Centro Acuático Olímpico de Londres, que abrió sus puertas en las Olimpiadas de 2012, fue diseñado por Hadid.

Entre los países en que se pueden encontrar están: China, Alemania, Qatar y Azerbaiyán.

Sus creaciones incluyen: la Serpentine Gallery en Londres, el Museo Riverside en Glasgow y el Opera House de Cantón, China.

Image copyright
Reuters

Image caption

Hadid cuando recibió la Excelentísima Orden del Imperio Británico en 2012.

El editor de Arte de la BBC, Will Gompertz, describió su estilo como una mezcla reconocible de curvas sensuales y modernismo geométrico.

Su estilo también ha sido catalogado como “neofuturista” y se caracteriza por poderosas formas curvas y estructuras alongadas.

Una diva de la arquitectura

Fue la primera mujer en recibir el famoso premio Pritzker (considerado el Nobel de la Arquitectura) en 2004 y en 2008 la revista Forbes la incluyó en su lista de las mujeres más poderosas del mundo.

Image copyright
AFP

Image caption

Zaha Hadid frente a una de sus creaciones, la Serpentine Sackler Gallery en Londres.

En una entrevista realizada por la BBC en 2004, la periodista Caroline Frost describió a Hadid como una diva de la arquitectura: “su personalidad tiene la fuerza de cualquiera de sus diseños“, dijo entonces.

Nacida en Bagdad y educada por monjas francesas, Hadid llegó a Inglaterra cuando tenía 20 años. Pero antes pasó por Beirut, donde estudió matemáticas.

Bajo el auspicio del ambicioso arquitecto holandés Rem Koolhaas, Hadid consiguió crear dibujos con lenguaje propio.

Cuando se graduó en 1977, Koolhaas la describió como “un planeta en su propia e inimitable órbita“.

Image copyright
PA

Image caption

Esta es la parte externa del Centro Acuático Olímpico de Londres.

Hadid diseñó uno de los principales estadios donde se celebrará el Mundial de Fútbol de Qatar 2022, cuyos organizadores han sido acusados de no respetar los derechos humanos de los empleados que trabajan en las construcciones destinadas al evento.

El año pasado, el gobierno de Japón dejó a un lado su propuesta de diseñar un estadio de apariencia futurista para las Olimpiadas de Tokio 2020 y optó por un diseño menos ambicioso y menos costoso.

Source Article from http://www.bbc.com/mundo/noticias/2016/03/160331_arquitecta_iraqui_zaha_hadid_mr

Democrats are rejecting a backup proposal to temporarily fund the government if a broader border security deal falls through.

A senior Democratic aide said Monday that Democrats will not agree to a yearlong spending bill to keep the Homeland Security Department funded because Democrats believe it would allocate too much money for Immigration and Customs Enforcement, and too much money for barriers along the southern border.

The opposition to such a plan might make it even more difficult for Congress to meet a Feb. 15 deadline to agree to some kind of spending deal that includes border security funding. Republicans are pushing for even more border security spending, including funds for a border wall, in the ongoing talks.

But with little progress in those talks and Democratic threats to spike the level-funding backup plan, the chances are rising again that a partial government shutdown will happen at the end of this week. With no deal by Friday, dozens of agencies and nine departments would partially shutter for the second time this year.

Democrats are saying specifically that they can’t agree to a continuing spending resolution unless it puts more limits on funding for ICE and a border barrier.

“A so-called ‘clean’ full-year CR for Homeland Security would allow the Trump administration to increase funding for both physical barriers and ICE detention beds,” the Democratic aide said.

Democrats want to limit ICE detentions to 16,500 between now and the end of the fiscal year, which is Sept. 30. That’s now a major sticking point in the bipartisan talks among lawmakers seeking a border security funding deal.

Democrats want to cut the number of detention beds, which would prevent ICE from holding detainees.

“Under a full-year CR, the Trump administration would fund ICE adult detention beds at a level of 46,000 or even higher,” the aide said. “In contrast, in conference negotiations, Democrats and Republicans had narrowed down the potential funding level for ICE to a range that would require ICE to ramp down the number of detention beds to between 34,000 and 38,500 by the end of the year.”

The aide said the Trump administration also believes it would be able to use $2 billion in the CR for physical barriers along the U.S. Mexican border.

“An acceptable compromise will fund border security without being overly reliant on physical barriers, and will include curbs on the Trump administration’s cruel immigration policies,” the aide said.

On Monday afternoon, a group of bipartisan negotiators were huddled in the Capitol, attempting to revive talks that stalled after Democrats insisted on capping ICE detentions.

Source Article from https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/congress/democrats-reject-backup-plan-to-fund-government-if-border-talks-fail

El español Fernando Alonso (Ferrari), que abandonó este domingo el Gran Premio de Japón ganado por el inglés Lewis Hamilton (Mercedes), declaró tras la lluviosa y accidentada carrera, que “lo único bueno” fue no haber gastado un motor que espera que aguante “hasta final de año”. No obstante, su cara delataba que su mente estaba puesta en otro sitio, con Bianchi tras su evacuación de Suzuka en estado “insconsciente”, tal y como informó la FIA. “Ahora mismo estamos más pendientes de Bianchi. Estaba cambiándome y comiendo algo cuando vi por la tele que enfocaban el ‘motorhome’ de Marussia. No sé nada aún”, comentó Alonso en Suzuka, nada más darse por concluida la carrera”. Su estado “es crítico”, apuntó el padreo del piloto de la Ferrari Academy Driver.

El golpe de Bianchi se llevó por delante las noticias sobre su futuro -“hace meses que tomé una decisión y la daré a conocer cuando corresponda. Ahora lo único que pretendo es ayudar al equipo para poder asegurar la tercera plaza en el Mundial de constructores”- y que Ferrari, por primera vez en 82 carreras, se marchase de un trazado sin puntuar. “Debe haber sido un cortocircuito o algo, todo se quedó sin corriente, el volante se apagó. Una pena, porque la carrera se disputó en unas condiciones que podían salir bien o mal, pero en la que no teníamos nada que perder y en la que, como mínimo, nos hubiéramos divertido”, explicó el doble campeón mundial asturiano este domingo en Suzuka, quien también recordó que “cuando no se está en la pista es difícil sumar puntos para el equipo“, en alusión al duodécimo puesto de Kimi Raikkonen. Y eso que reconoció que “había opciones de subir al podio”.

“La única noticia buena es que al menos no hemos desgastado más este motor. Así que a ver si podemos aguantar con él hasta final de año, porque así nos evitaríamos tener que salir desde el ‘pit lane’ o algo así”. El reglamento indica que el propulsor sólo puede cambiarse cinco veces durante la temporada, así que una hipotética nueva sustitución implicaría la pérdida de diez puestos en parrilla.

Source Article from http://www.elconfidencial.com/deportes/formula-1/2014-10-05/alonso-mas-pendiente-de-bianchi-que-del-cortocircuito-de-ferrari_227301/

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., walks out of the Senate chamber after Thursday’s proceedings in the impeachment trial of President Trump.

Steve Helber/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Steve Helber/AP

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., walks out of the Senate chamber after Thursday’s proceedings in the impeachment trial of President Trump.

Steve Helber/AP

President Trump’s impeachment trial could end in acquittal as soon as Friday evening, following the announcement from a crucial Republican senator that he would not be supporting witnesses.

Sen. Lamar Alexander, R-Tenn., said late Thursday that he will not join Democrats in their push to subpoena witnesses. The news dashed House managers’ hopes of beginning a new phase of the trial, potentially airing testimony from witnesses who could have proved politically damaging to Trump.

The looming acquittal for the president was long anticipated, but it still marks a striking setback for Democrats, who at times appeared hopeful that they would be able to persuade enough Republicans to join them in voting to call witnesses, thereby prolonging the trial if not the altering its outcome.

The president faces two articles of impeachment: abuse of power and obstruction of Congress related to accusations that he held up military aid to Ukraine until the country announced investigations into potential political rival former Vice President Joe Biden and his son Hunter.

Former national security adviser John Bolton has been mentioned as a witness after reports that he can verify those accusations.

Senators on Friday, starting at 1 p.m., will hold four hours of debate equally divided between House managers prosecuting the case and Trump’s defense lawyers.

Afterward, a vote will be held on a motion to consider evidence or witness testimony. The Democratic caucus needs four Republicans to defy their party in order to succeed, and Alexander’s decision to vote with his party all but guarantees that the witnesses will not be part of the trial.

Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, on Thursday announced she plans to for vote for witnesses, writing: “I believe hearing from certain witnesses would give each side the opportunity to more fully and fairly make their case, resolve any ambiguities, and provide additional clarity.”

A spokeswoman for Sen. Mitt Romney, R-Utah, said on Twitter that Romney “wants to hear from Ambassador Bolton, and he will vote in favor of the motion today to consider witnesses.”

The one other moderate Republican who signaled she may be open to voting for witnesses is Lisa Murkowski of Alaska. With 53 Republicans, 45 Democrats and two independents who caucus with Democrats, there is the prospect of a 50-50 vote on whether to call witnesses. Such a vote would fail, as the presiding officer, U.S. Chief Justice John Roberts, is seen as unlikely to insert himself into what is essentially a political process.

On Thursday, after two days of questions from senators, which included forays into foreign election interference and broad interpretations of executive power, both sides dug deep in their respective positions. Democrats argued that Trump solicited the help of a foreign country in order to tilt this year’s presidential election in his favor and that he should therefore be removed from office. Yet Trump’s defense team said the prosecution was a politically driven effort to reverse the result of the 2016 election.

“Now it’s up to the Senate to decide what the facts are,” Alan Dershowitz, one of the president’s impeachment lawyers, told NPR’s Steve Inskeep on Friday. “But my position was very clearly that if a president is charged with abuse of power or obstruction of Congress, that the charges should be dismissed. They are not within the constitutional criteria.”

The focus on Bolton was triggered by media reports describing portions of his forthcoming book in which he purportedly wrote that he had a conversation with Trump in which the president said the release of security assistance to Ukraine would be contingent on the country announcing investigations into the Bidens.

Trump, speaking at a campaign rally in Des Moines, Iowa, on Thursday night, attacked Democrats for charging him with high crimes and misdemeanors.

“Can you believe these people? I got impeached. They impeached Trump,” said Trump. “They want to nullify your ballots, poison our democracy and overthrow the entire system of government.”

Democrats, who have maintained throughout the trial that a proceeding without witnesses and evidence would not be a fair process, sought Thursday to undercut the president’s likely imminent acquittal.

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., said a trial “without the evidence, without witnesses and documents would render the president’s acquittal meaningless,” adding Trump’s impeachment trial will have a “giant asterisk next to it, because the trial was so rigged in his favor.”

Source Article from https://www.npr.org/2020/01/31/799372257/republicans-ready-for-likely-acquittal-in-trump-impeachment-trial

Image copyright
Getty Images

Image caption

Barack Obama tried unsuccessfully to tighten gun controls in the US

Former US President Barack Obama has called on Americans to reject language from any of their leaders that feeds hatred or normalises racism.

Mr Obama did not name anyone but his rare comments came after President Donald Trump sought to deflect criticism that his anti-immigrant rhetoric had fuelled violence.

In a speech on Monday, Mr Trump condemned hatred and white supremacy.

He was speaking after 31 people died in mass shootings in Texas and Ohio.

While in office, Mr Obama fought unsuccessfully to restrict gun ownership. He told the BBC in 2015 that his failure to pass “common sense gun safety laws” had been the greatest frustration of his presidency.

He has refrained from commenting on Mr Trump’s controversial rhetoric regarding migrants but on Monday issued a statement.

“We should soundly reject language coming out of the mouths of any of our leaders that feeds a climate of fear and hatred or normalises racist sentiments; leaders who demonise those who don’t look like us, or suggest that other people, including immigrants, threaten our way of life, or refer to other people as sub-human, or imply that America belongs to just one certain type of people,” he said.

Media captionMr Obama told the BBC that gun control was his biggest frustration

“It has no place in our politics and our public life. And it’s time for the overwhelming majority of Americans of goodwill, of every race and faith and political party, to say as much – clearly and unequivocally.”

During his presidential campaign Mr Trump said Mexican immigrants included drug dealers, criminals and rapists.

More recently, he caused widespread anger by suggesting that four US congresswomen of colour “go back and help fix the totally broken and crime-infested places from which they came”. He denied his comments were racist.

Media captionEl Paso victim’s father says he ‘forgives’ his son’s killer

What did President Trump say?

In a statement from the White House on Monday, Mr Trump called for mental health gun control reforms; the death penalty for those who commit mass murder and more bi-partisan co-operation over gun laws.

“Mental illness and hate pull the trigger, not the gun,” Mr Trump said.

He did not express support for gun control measures proposed in Congress.

“In one voice, our nation must condemn racism, bigotry and white supremacy,” Mr Trump said. “These sinister ideologies must be defeated. Hate has no place in America.”

The president also outlined a number of policies, including more co-operation between government agencies and social media companies, changes to mental health laws as well as ending the “glorification of violence” in American culture.

Media caption“Mental illness pulls the trigger, not guns” – Trump’s five solutions to combat mass shootings.

He called for red flag laws that would allow law enforcement authorities to take away weapons from individuals believed to be a threat to themselves or others.

Mr Trump said government agencies must work together and identify individuals who may commit violent acts, prevent their access to firearms and also suggested involuntary confinement as a way to stop potential attackers.

He also said he directed the justice department to propose legislation to ensure those who commit hate crimes and mass murders face the death penalty.

The president criticised the internet and “gruesome” video games for promoting violence in society.

“It is too easy today for troubled youth to surround themselves with a culture that celebrates violence,” he said. “We must stop or substantially reduce this and it has to begin immediately.”

But he did not address the criticisms of his own harsh rhetoric against illegal immigration, which opponents say has contributed to a rise in racially-motivated attacks.

Mr Trump drew criticism after he incorrectly referred to the Ohio city of Dayton – where nine people were killed in one of two mass shootings that occurred just 13 hours apart – as Toledo.

“May God bless the memory of those who perished in Toledo, may God protect them. May God protect all of those from Texas to Ohio,” he said before walking off stage.

Image copyright
Reuters

Image caption

A vigil for the victims was held in Brooklyn, New York, on Monday

President Trump will visit El Paso on Wednesday.

What happened in Texas and Ohio?

Saturday’s shooting at a Walmart store in El Paso, Texas, left 22 people dead and 26 wounded.

The suspect was arrested and has been named as Patrick Crusius, a resident of the city of Allen, near Dallas. He is believed to be the author of a document posted online before the shooting which said the attack was “a response to the Hispanic invasion of Texas”.

Then in the early hours of Sunday, a gunman killed his sister and eight others in Dayton, Ohio. Twenty-seven others were injured.

The suspect, 24-year-old Connor Betts, was shot dead by police. Officials have not yet suggested a motive for the attack and police said on Monday it was unclear whether he had intended to kill his sister.

Media caption‘My heart hurts on every level’

Source Article from https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-49244602

NEW YORK–(BUSINESS WIRE)–Today, Time Warner Cable News NY1 Noticias, New York City’s only 24-hour
Spanish language local news network, announced it will commemorate the
10-year anniversary of Pura Política, with a special documentary
with highlights from the past decade of the longest-running local
Spanish language political talk show in New York City, on Friday, June 5th
at 6 p.m. and 11p.m.

The documentary special will feature guests including, Congresswoman,
Nydia Velazquez, State Senator, Adriano Espaillat, and City Council
Speaker, Melissa Mark-Viverito,
who will explore the highs and lows
for Latinos during the past decade. The commemorative program will also
include an exclusive sit-down interview with New York City Mayor Bill
de Blasio
where he is asked to name one Latino politician he
believes would be a strong candidate for New York City Mayor in the near
future.

Pura Política first premiered as a weekly political talk show on
June 3, 2005, with then Mayor Michael Bloomberg as its first guest.
Bloomberg had just kicked off his re-election campaign with a
Spanish-language commercial.

“Since we aired our first program, Hispanic influence has grown
tremendously and the Spanish language has become ubiquitous in city
politics. Pura Política is a key platform for political leaders looking
to engage Latinos and talk about their issues. We look forward to many
more decades of great interviews and political analysis,” said program
host, Juan Manuel Benitez.

NY1 Noticias’ Pura Política’s 10th
Anniversary Special
will air Friday, June 5th at 6 p.m.
and 11p.m. on channel 95 and channel 831 on Time Warner Cable in New
York, and channel 194 on Cablevision in New York City.

Time Warner Cable News (TWC News) provides in-depth local news
programming exclusively for Time Warner Cable video customers. Time
Warner Cable’s 17 news networks operate in Texas (Austin, San Antonio);
New York (Rochester, Buffalo, Albany, Hudson Valley, Central New York
and the Southern Tier); North Carolina (Raleigh, Charlotte, Greensboro,
Wilmington); Antelope Valley, CA, and the group’s flagship network NY1
and Spanish language network TWC News NY1 Noticias in New York City. NY1
Noticias is also available online at http://ny1noticias.com.
Viewers can follow the news team on twitter @NY1Noticias or visit www.ny1noticias.com
for the latest news coverage on NY1 Noticias including real-time
updates.

Time Warner Cable

Time Warner Cable Inc. (NYSE: TWC) is among the largest providers of
video, high-speed data and voice services in the United States,
connecting 15 million customers to entertainment, information and each
other. Time Warner Cable Business Class offers data, video and voice
services to businesses of all sizes, cell tower backhaul services to
wireless carriers and enterprise-class, cloud-enabled hosting, managed
applications and services. Time Warner Cable Media, the advertising
sales arm of Time Warner Cable, offers national, regional and local
companies innovative advertising solutions. More information about the
services of Time Warner Cable is available at www.twc.com,
www.twcbc.com
and www.twcmedia.com.

Source Article from http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20150604006481/en/Time-Warner-Cable-NY1-Noticias%E2%80%99-%E2%80%9CPura-Polit%C3%ADca%E2%80%9D

In a huge blow to Democrats’ hopes of passing sweeping voting rights protections, the West Virginia senator Joe Manchin said on Sunday he would not support his party’s flagship bill – because of Republican opposition to it.

The West Virginia senator is considered a key vote to pass the For the People Act, which would ensure automatic and same-day registration, place limits on gerrymandering and restore voting rights for felons.

Many Democrats see the bill as essential to counter efforts by Republicans in state government to restrict access to the ballot and to make it more easy to overturn election results.

It would also present voters with a forceful answer to Donald Trump’s continued lies about electoral fraud, which the former president rehearsed in a speech in North Carolina on Saturday.

In a column for the Charleston Gazette-Mail, Manchin said: “I believe that partisan voting legislation will destroy the already weakening binds of our democracy, and for that reason, I will vote against the For the People Act.”

Manchin’s opposition to the bill also known as HR1 could prove crucial in the evenly split Senate. His argument against the legislation focused on Republican opposition to the bill and did not specify any issues with its contents.

Manchin instead endorsed the John Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act, a measure named for the late Georgia Democratic congressman and campaigner which would reauthorize voting protections established in the civil rights era but eliminated by the supreme court in 2013.

Manchin also reiterated his support for the filibuster, which gives 41 of 100 senators the ability to block action by the majority.

Democrats are seeking to abolish the filibuster, arguing that Republicans have repeatedly abused it to support minority positions on issues like gun control and, just last month, to block the establishment of an independent commission to investigate the attack on the US Capitol.

Republicans have used the filibuster roughly twice as often as Democrats to prevent the other party from passing legislation, according to a study by the Center for American Progress.

“I have always said, ‘If I can’t go home and explain it, I can’t vote for it,’” Manchin wrote. “And I cannot explain strictly partisan election reform or blowing up the Senate rules to expedite one party’s agenda.”

In a sign of growing frustration within Manchin’s own party, Mondaire Jones, a progressive congressman from New York, tweeted that his op-ed “might as well be titled, ‘Why I’ll vote to preserve Jim Crow.’”

Jim Crow was the name given to the system of legalised segregation which dominated southern states between the end of the civil war in 1865 and the civil rights era of the 1960s.

On the Sunday talk shows, hosts pressed Manchin on whether his expectations of a bipartisan solution on voting rights were realistic in such a divided Congress, and with a Republican party firmly in thrall to Donald Trump.

Fox News Sunday host Chris Wallace told him that if he were to threaten to vote against the filibuster, it could incentivize Republicans to negotiate on legislation.

“Haven’t you empowered Republicans to be obstructionists?” Wallace asked.

“I don’t think so,” Manchin said. “Because we have seven brave Republicans that continue to vote for what they know is right and the facts as they see them, not worrying about the political consequences.”

Seven Republican defections from the pro-Trump party line is not enough to beat the filibuster, even if all 50 Democrats remain united. Manchin said he was hopeful other Republicans would “rise to the occasion”.

Wallace asked if he was being “naive”, noting that the Republican Senate minority leader, Mitch McConnell, said in May: “One hundred percent of our focus is on stopping this new administration.”

“I’m not being naive,” Manchin said. “I think he’s 100% wrong in trying to block all the good things that we’re trying to do for America. It would be a lot better if we had participation and we’re getting participation.”

With the Arizona senator Kyrsten Sinema, Manchin has emerged as one of the most powerful figures in Washington, by virtue of his centrist views in a Senate split on starkly partisan lines. In Tulsa this week, in a remark that risked angering Manchin, Biden said the two senators “vote more with my Republican friends”, though their voting record does not actually reflect this.

On CBS’s Face the Nation, host John Dickerson asked Manchin if his bipartisan ideals were outdated.

Dickerson noted that since the 2020 election put Democrats in control of Washington, Republicans in the states have introduced more than 300 bills featuring voting restrictions. Furthermore, Republicans who embraced baseless claims about the election being stolen are now running to be chief elections officials in several states.

Dickerson asked: “Why would Republicans, when they’re making all these gains in the statehouses and achieving their goals in the states, why would they vote for a bill someday in the Senate that’s going to take away all the things they’re achieving right now in those statehouses?”

Manchin said those state-level successes could ultimately damage Republicans.

“The bottom line is the fundamental purpose of our democracy is the freedom of our elections,” Manchin said. “If we can’t come to an agreement on that, God help us.”

Source Article from https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/jun/06/joe-manchin-opposes-for-the-people-act-democrats-voting-rights