Most Viewed Videos



















 

 

LOS ANGELES, July 30, 2015 /PRNewswire/ — KWHY-TV Noticias 22, the MundoFOX Los Angeles television network affiliate’s award-winning newscast, Noticias 22, “La voz de Tu Ciudad,” “The voice of your city”, scored as the fastest growing late Spanish language newscast in Nielsen’s recently completed July 2015 Sweeps for Los Angeles, the city with the largest Hispanic market in the nation.

“Our growth is a strong statement of relevance and support to our news team and editorial direction,” stated Palmira Perez, Noticias 22 MundoFOX News Anchor. “Noticias 22 continues to produce the most engaging, compelling news and information daily for our community, and as part of Meruelo Media, together we’re committed to journalistic excellence,” added Otto Padron, President of Meruelo Media.

KWHY-TV Noticias 22 MundoFOX Los Angeles July 2015 Sweeps Highlights:

  • KWHY-TV Noticias 22 MundoFOX at 10:00 p.m. posted significant “year-to-year” growth in average ratings among the key demographic Adults 18-49, up 35% from the July 2014 Sweeps.
    • All the other Spanish-language late local newscasts were down, including those on KRCA/Estrella (-22%), KVEA/Telemundo (-1%) and KMEX/Univision (-2%). (Based on Monday to Friday average ratings.)
  • Among Adults 25-54, ratings for KWHY-TV Noticias 22 MundoFOX at 10:00 p.m. were up 34% from the July 2014 Sweeps, more than the late newscast on KMEX/Univision (+15%) and KVEA/Telemundo (+7%), with KRCA/Estrella falling 19%.

Source: Los Angeles NSI Ratings, July 2015

For more information on KWHY-TV Noticias 22 MundoFOX, please visit www.mundofox22.com.

About Meruelo Media

Meruelo Media (MM) is the media division of The Meruelo Group.  MM currently operates two Southern California Legendary media platforms; the classic hip-hop and R&B radio station, 93.5 KDAY and one of Los Angeles’ oldest Hispanic TV stations, KWHY-TV Canal 22, which is currently the flagship of MundoFOX Television Network.  MM also owns the first and only US Hispanic Super Station, Super 22, airing on its KWHY-TV second digital stream and reaching over 6 Million Homes over various multiple video delivery providers.  MM also broadcasts in Houston and Santa Barbara.  The Meruelo Group is a minority owned, privately-held management company serving a diversified portfolio of affiliated entities with interests in banking and financial services; food services, manufacturing, distribution and restaurant operations; construction and engineering; hospitality and gaming; real estate management; media, public and private equity investing. For more information please visit www.meruelogroup.com.

Rebekah Salgado
rsalgado@meruelogroup.com 
562.228.8191

 

 

 

SOURCE Meruelo Group / Meruelo Media

RELATED LINKS
http://www.meruelogroup.com

Source Article from http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/kwhy-tv-noticias-22-mundofox-reigns-as-las-fastest-growing-late-spanish-newscast-in-july-2015-sweeps-300121156.html

Sean Bryant, Cyrus Clark III and Xavier Mackey, members of the Omega Psi Phi Fraternity Inc., came out to recruit Black residents to get vaccinated at an event in Miami Gardens on May 8.

Verónica Zaragovia/WLRN


hide caption

toggle caption

Verónica Zaragovia/WLRN

Sean Bryant, Cyrus Clark III and Xavier Mackey, members of the Omega Psi Phi Fraternity Inc., came out to recruit Black residents to get vaccinated at an event in Miami Gardens on May 8.

Verónica Zaragovia/WLRN

On a recent Monday morning, Miami International Airport looked hectic as people rushed to their flights. You could hear baggage claim announcements, passengers frantically asking about the zone for their international flights and personnel directing them. But airport staff and some travelers were stepping away from the chaos to get a COVID-19 vaccine.

Nearby, Miami-Dade County Mayor Daniella Levine Cava spoke during a press conference about offering vaccines here to make it easy.

“It’s pop up, pop up — wherever people are that’s where we will be to make sure that no one has an excuse to not take the shot,” she said.

In most of the U.S., the initial scramble to get a coronavirus vaccine is over, so the campaign to convince or reach those who haven’t gotten shots yet continues to ramp up. People who study infectious disease worry that the numbers for first doses are slowing down, so efforts are underway to persuade more people to roll up their sleeves in Miami-Dade, the state’s largest county.

Outside the airport, near lines of parked yellow cabs, you could hear Haitian Creole spoken and dominoes being slammed onto a table.

One of the domino players was Tony Brutus, who was finally able to play with other drivers because he had gotten his first Pfizer dose at this airport parking lot. Brutus wasn’t allowed to play till he got inoculated.

He had tried before to get a shot but one site ran out of vaccines and another had already closed.

“One customer from New York told me that last week — every taxi driver in New York is taking the vaccine already,” Brutus said. “So that means we were behind in Miami, in Florida.”

Florida’s vaccination numbers have been dropping since April. They’re low for younger adults, who now make up most of COVID-19 patients at hospitals.

People who work multiple jobs or who don’t earn much struggle to get to vaccination sites, said Cindy Prins, an epidemiologist at the University of Florida.

“Now it really is about understanding the nuances of our populations, of their needs, of their motivating factors and reaching them where they are, bringing it to them,” Prins said.

Angel Sánchez, a busy single dad who works construction, didn’t have a chance to look for a vaccine site.

“I had the luck to come to the beach and get vaccinated here,” he said as he sat down for 15 minutes after getting his Johnson & Johnson shot.

On this trip to Miami Beach with his two sons, the city was offering shots right on the sand.

“I’m really happy I got one. My sons are with me so I took advantage of it and I feel good because of this,” Sánchez said.

Miami Beach had a vaccination event on the sand for people to walk up and get a Johnson & Johnson shot on May 2.

Verónica Zaragovia/WLRN


hide caption

toggle caption

Verónica Zaragovia/WLRN

Miami Beach had a vaccination event on the sand for people to walk up and get a Johnson & Johnson shot on May 2.

Verónica Zaragovia/WLRN

Vaccination rates for Hispanic Floridians are far behind those for white residents, while even further behind is the vaccination rate for Black people. Of the more than 9.4 million people vaccinated in Florida, about 7% are Black, while two-thirds are White.

In Miami Gardens, Florida’s largest majority Black city, members of Black fraternities and sororities, called the Divine Nine, were recruiting people with food and “get vaccinated” posters.

People were dancing near a DJ who played music and urged people to tell others to come out and get their COVID-19 vaccine. The site has a Black doctor and Black nurses to help people feel comfortable.

Florida state Rep. Christopher Benjamin, whose district includes Miami Gardens, was wearing his purple Omega Psi Phi shirt.

“We want to dispel myths about the vaccine,” Benjamin said. “We want to encourage folks in the Black community to come out and get vaccinated because we know that there’s some vaccine hesitancy in our community. So the leaders of our community are out here to say it’s OK, it’s safe.”

Now that 12- to 15-year-olds are eligible for the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccines, epidemiologists say, that will help boost Florida’s rates. Miami-Dade County is offering shots at some high schools and the University of Miami has a mobile pediatric unit heading to churches and underserved neighborhoods so that parents don’t have to go far.

Source Article from https://www.npr.org/2021/05/17/996912899/miami-tries-to-make-vaccinations-easy-wherever-people-are-thats-where-we-will-be

La Armada del Ecuador, en conjunto con su par de Colombia, capturó un semisumergible en el sector fronterizo Las Delicias.

Esta acción -a cargo del Comando de Operaciones Norte, en la que también se encontró dos escopetas y una radio- se dio aproximadamente a las 14:30 del sábado.

Se informó que hasta el momento el Batallón de Infantería de Marina San Lorenzo (Esmeraldas) mantiene la custodia del sumergible en territorio colombiano, hasta que las autoridades realicen el procedimiento respectivo.

La Armada indica que el trabajo que realiza para el control de las actividades ilícitas deja excelentes resultados en este sector del país. (I)

Source Article from http://www.eluniverso.com/noticias/2017/08/06/nota/6318574/armada-ecuador-captura-semisumergible-frontera-norte

Christensen: It did not impact me as far as the trial went. However, only being about six blocks from the police department, I could hear everything. When I came home, I could hear the helicopters flying over my house… I could hear the flash bangs going off. If I stepped outside, I could see the smoke from the grenades. One day, the trial ran a little late, and I had trouble getting to my house, because the protesters were blocking the interstate, so I had to go way around. I was aware, but it did not affect me at all.

Source Article from https://www.kare11.com/article/news/local/george-floyd/derek-chauvin-trial-alternate-juror-lisa-christensen/89-97b74eb1-c875-4ed5-93ad-5c72620b9f18

President Joe Biden became the first US president to formally refer to atrocities committed against Armenians as a “genocide” on Saturday, 106 years after the 1915 start of an eight-year-long campaign of ethnic cleansing carried out by the Ottoman Empire that left between 1 and 1.5 million Armenians dead.

Previous presidents have refrained from using the word “genocide” in connection with the mass atrocities committed against the Armenian people in the early 20th century, and Turkey categorically denies that a genocide took place. So Biden’s declaration marks a major break from precedent, and could signal an increase in tensions with Turkey, a longtime US and NATO ally.

“Each year on this day, we remember the lives of all those who died in the Ottoman-era Armenian genocide and recommit ourselves to preventing such an atrocity from ever again occurring,” Biden said in a statement Saturday. “And we remember so that we remain ever-vigilant against the corrosive influence of hate in all its forms.”

The move is the fulfillment of a campaign promise for Biden, who pledged on April 24 last year to recognize the genocide if elected. It also comes on a symbolic date: April 24 is Armenian Genocide Remembrance Day, a holiday observed in Armenia and by members of the Armenian diaspora.

And it’s emblematic of the Biden administration’s desire to center human rights in its foreign policy agenda, even at the cost of worsening relations with Turkey.

Biden is the first US leader in decades to use the word “genocide” in connection with the events of 1915-1923. Previous presidents, including George W. Bush and Barack Obama, made similar campaign promises to recognize the Armenian genocide, but never followed through while in office, and Bush later called on Congress to reject such a designation. In 1981, Ronald Reagan made a passing reference to “the genocide of the Armenians” during a speech commemorating victims of the Holocaust.

The Trump administration, meanwhile, accidentally recognized the genocide last year when White House press secretary Kayleigh McEnany made reference to an “Armenian Genocide Memorial” in Denver, Colorado — but rejected nonbinding resolutions by the House and Senate to declare it such.

Both the House and Senate measures, though not approved by Trump, passed overwhelmingly in 2019, paving the way for Biden’s action on Saturday.

With the addition of the US on Saturday, 30 countries — including France, Germany, and Russia — now recognize the genocide, according to a list maintained by the Armenian National Institute in Washington, DC.

Biden spoke with Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan on Friday ahead of the official US announcement. It was the first conversation between the two allied leaders since Biden took office more than three months ago, which some regional experts have taken as a sign of cooling relations between the countries. According to a readout of the call released by the White House, the leaders agreed to hold a bilateral meeting “on the margins of the NATO Summit in June.” And according to news reports — but not the readout — Biden told Erdogan of his intentions to recognize the genocide.

Saturday’s statement officially recognizing the genocide nonetheless elicited a harsh response from Turkey.

“We reject and denounce in the strongest terms the statement of the President of the US regarding the events of 1915 made under the pressure of radical Armenian circles and anti-Turkey groups on April 24,” Turkey’s foreign ministry said in a statement Saturday that called on Biden to “correct this grave mistake.”

“This statement of the US … will never be accepted in the conscience of the Turkish people, and will open a deep wound that undermines our mutual friendship and trust,” the foreign ministry said.

Prominent Armenians, however, including Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan, welcomed the news on Saturday. Pashinyan tweeted a brief statement, and, in a letter to Biden, said that the president’s words both paid “tribute” to victims of the genocide and also would help to prevent “the recurrence of similar crimes against mankind.”

“I highly appreciate your principled position, which is a powerful step on the way to acknowledging the truth, historical justice, and an invaluable of support for the descendants of the victims of the Armenian Genocide,” he wrote.

American lawmakers also welcomed Biden’s decision. New Jersey Sen. Bob Menendez, who chairs the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, celebrated the statement in a tweet Saturday.

“Thankful that @POTUS will align with congressional & scholarly consensus,” Menendez wrote from the Senate Foreign Relations Committee Twitter account. “As I said in 2019 when our resolution to recognize & commemorate the genocide passed the Senate, to overlook human suffering is not who we are as a people. It is not what we stand for as a nation.”

Former Sen. Bob Dole, who advocated for recognition of the Armenian genocide throughout his career, also tweeted his appreciation for Biden’s words — alongside documents showing his own attempts at gaining recognition of the genocide in Congress in the 1970s and ’80s.

“This is a proud and historically significant moment for the United States, for Armenia, and for Armenians around the globe,” the 97-year-old former presidential candidate wrote. “It’s been a long time coming.”

Biden is taking a new approach to the US-Turkey relationship

The vehemence of Turkey’s response to the US recognition of the Armenian genocide isn’t particularly surprising, as the topic has long been a point of international contention for Turkey.

Specifically, allegations of genocide are viewed as “insulting Turkishness” by Turkey — an offense that has elicited criminal charges in the past — because they implicate people who helped found the modern state of Turkey after the Ottoman Empire collapsed in 1922.

Turkey’s aggressive efforts to push back on attempts to recognize atrocities committed against Armenians during World War I as genocide makes Biden’s decision all the more exceptional.

Previously, Turkey has responded to countries acknowledging the genocide by recalling diplomats, including ambassadors to Germany and the Vatican. On Tuesday, in anticipation of a statement from Biden on the matter, Turkish Foreign Minister Mevlut Cavusoglu warned that there could be consequences to Biden’s words.

“Statements that have no legal binding will have no benefit, but they will harm ties,” Cavusoglu said. “If the United States wants to worsen ties, the decision is theirs.”

As Vox’s Amanda Taub explained in 2015, such concerns over strategic interests in the region have long meant that the US and allies like the United Kingdom have avoided designating mass atrocities against Armenians as a genocide.

Turkey is a key US ally — especially now, as the US relies on Turkey’s cooperation in the fight against ISIS in Syria. US officials have compromised on how they refer to the killings. When Obama makes a speech to commemorate the anniversary of the genocide on Friday, White House officials say he will use the term “Meds Yeghern” instead of “genocide.”

Likewise, the United Kingdom has not recognized the genocide, apparently out of concern that doing so would jeopardize its relationship with Turkey. A leaked Foreign Office briefing from 1999 stated that Turkey was “neuralgic and defensive about the charge of genocide.” Therefore, the “only feasible option” was for the United Kingdom to continue to refuse to recognize the killings as genocide, because of “the importance of our relations (political, strategic and commercial) with Turkey.”

However, the Biden administration has already taken a harder line on the US relationship with Turkey than previous administrations. As a candidate, Biden labeled Erdogan an “autocrat” in an interview with the New York Times, and last month his administration condemned “significant human rights issues” in modern-day Turkey, including the jailing and alleged torture of journalists, activists, and political dissidents.

While it’s unclear exactly what the fallout from Saturday’s announcement will look like, other factors have already chilled the US-Turkey relationship. In December of last year, for example, shortly before Biden took office, the US imposed sanctions on Turkey for purchasing Russian military hardware. In 2019, the US also removed Turkey from its joint F-35 stealth fighter program over the same purchase.

On Saturday, former US ambassador to the UN Samantha Power, who is also Biden’s nominee to run the US Agency for International Development (USAID) and the author of the Pulitzer Prize-winning book “A Problem from Hell”: America and the Age of Genocide, argued that the decision was an important step in pushing back on Erdogan’s growing authoritarianism.

“Turkey is a powerful country in a critical region,” Power wrote on Twitter. “It is part of NATO. Our relationship matters. But President Erdogan’s success in blackmailing & bullying the US (and other countries) not to recognize the Armenian Genocide likely emboldened him as he grew more repressive.”

Source Article from https://www.vox.com/2021/4/24/22400851/armenian-genocide-turkey-biden-erdogan

La preventa del Fifa 2017, así como el lanzamiento del OnePlus3 para el 14 de junio y el procesador de 24 núcleos de Intel, se convirtieron en las noticias más leídas de la semana.

PC World en Español

Aunque el Fifa 2017 saldrá a la venta en septiembre próximo, desde hace unos días puedes precomprarlo y garantizarte no sólo el ser uno de los primeros en tenerlo ese día, sino que, además, el juego será descargado en tu librería de juegos el mismo día del lanzamiento. La preventa es sólo para Xbox One y PlayStation 4.

Lee otra vez la noticia

El martes próximo será lanzado el OnePLus3, el cuarto equipo de la compañía china y el tercero de la generación OnePlus. El dispositivo, que ha logrado colarse entre los grandes por ser un equipo robusto a precios accesibles, será el primero en lanzarse vía Realidad Virtual y, por primera vez, la empresa lo venderá más allá del sitio Web, en donde comenzó su comercialización.

Revive la noticia

El lanzamiento del procesador de Intel de 24 núcleos, se convirtió en la tercera noticia más leída de la semana. La compañía presentó un robusto equipo para alto rendimiento, con el que espera seguir manteniendo el liderazgo que detenta en ese segmento del mercado, el más exigente. El Xeon E7-8890 está capacitado para proteger contra fraudes bancarios.

Vuelve a leer la noticia más leída de la semana



Source Article from http://www.pcworldenespanol.com/2016/06/12/las-tres-noticias-la-semana-6/

Former New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg’s entrance into the crowded presidential race hasn’t caused big changes in polling for the top three Democratic candidates Joe Biden, Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders. It has, however, brought a number of media cheerleaders for the city’s richest resident out of the woodwork.

In the New York Post (11/9/19), columnist Michael Goodwin said that Bloomberg’s record of raising “student test scores, creating jobs and cutting crime,” while being liberal on “abortion, climate change and gun control,” is the kind of sensible centrism needed to counter the “militant class warfare” he sees in candidates like Warren, who he called an “Occupy Wall Street brat.”

Thomas Friedman (New York Times, 11/12/19) says Michael Bloomberg “will forcefully put a Democratic pro-growth, pro-innovation, pro-business agenda on the table.”

In the New York Times (11/12/19), Thomas Friedman yammered on about Israeli politics before he celebrated Bloomberg as an industrialist, which he described as a more virtuous form of making billions of dollars than investing or trading, and claimed that Bloomberg would be well-positioned to address inequality, because doing so requires “celebrating and growing entrepreneurs and entrepreneurship — and fostering a culture of accountability, lifelong learning and self-motivation.”

Columnist Bret Stephens (New York Times, 11/8/19) took a similar tone, contrasting Bloomberg’s real business leadership with Trump’s fakery, and asserting that the former mayor is immune to the right’s usual rallying cries against liberals:

The right’s charge-sheet against today’s Democrats is that they hate capitalism, hate Israel, hate the cops, think of America as a land of iniquity, and never met a tax or regulation they didn’t love. Against Bloomberg it all falls flat.

At the New York Daily News (11/13/19), contributor Judi Zirin scoffed at anti-billionaire zealotry, saying it was Bloomberg’s business acumen that allowed him to turn the city’s “budget deficit into a huge surplus.”

There’s a clear theme emerging: In a world where Sanders and Warren are moving the Overton window to the left on economic issues, and Republicans are lockstep behind a white nationalist incumbent, a new pro-business centrist is needed to restore sanity to our discourse. In a world where it’s fun to hate billionaires, a money-maker who gives to nice causes, hates guns and supports environmentalism is the person who can give capitalism a good name again.

Better yet, Bloomberg, at least on the surface, appears to be a kind of tough, successful executive, of both a major company and the nation’s largest city, in a Democratic field dominated either by legislators or candidates with smaller-town executive experience. (Sanders was mayor of Burlington, Vermont, for example.)

But if the media are going to celebrate Bloomberg’s achievements as a private and public executive, they  need to address his baggage in those roles as well. The media crowing for Bloomberg’s sensible executive skills leave out several notable scandals during his mayoralty.

The CityTime scandal, which federal Judge George Daniels called “the largest city corruption scandal in decades,” was a 2011 debacle in which digitizing the city’s payroll system resulted in ballooning costs and the conviction of three contractors for bilking the city. Unions had rallied against the system, but Bloomberg, who oversaw and championed the overhaul, pressed on.

The Daily News‘ Judi Zirin (11/13/19) says  “Bloomberg’s personal success doesn’t preclude his candidacy; it endorses it.”

As longtime city reporter (and Salon contributor) Bob Hennelly noted on WNYC (6/29/11), even though Bloomberg never faced prosecution in the mess, this was his responsibility:

The irony here is rich. “The massive scheme” started as an outsourced city contract to design a payroll system that would precisely track the hours worked by city employees. After a couple of false starts with other vendors, defense contractor Scientific Applications International Corporation was awarded the job in a no-bid contract by the Giuliani Administration.

Under Mayor Bloomberg, the contract ballooned from $63 million where it had started out in the Giuliani years , to more than $700 million. Federal prosecutors now say at least $600 million of that was “tainted.” At every level, federal prosecutors allege grafters had honeycombed CityTime into a paragon of corruption.

Daily News columnist Juan Gonzalez, one of the main journalists to focus on the ripoff, called it the “biggest scandal of the entire Bloomberg era” (Democracy Now!, 12/23/10). But the late investigative journalist Wayne Barrett, in the now-defunct Village Voice (7/22/09), proposed another contender for that title: the deadly Deutsche Bank fire in Lower Manhattan, which he argued was a scandal that went up to the highest reaches of city power.

For months, Lower Manhattan residents and worker advocates had raised alarm bells about the controversial simultaneous decontamination and demolition of the former Deutsche Bank Building, which had been badly damaged on 9/11. They alleged that shoddy contracting could endanger the community, but the city pressed on despite these loud objections. On Aug. 18, 2017, faulty construction work led to a fire that killed two firefighters, largely because the contractors had violated construction codes that would have allowed for quicker emergency exits. The incident soured relations between the Lower Manhattan community and the administration, and inflamed tensions between Bloomberg and the firefighter unions.

Then we have Bloomberg’s long record of sexism as a boss, which often seems forgotten. The Washington Examiner (11/11/19):

For instance, a New York Magazine journalist reported that in his time spent with Bloomberg, he degraded women based on their appearance, in one instance ignoring the conversation they were in to gesture at a woman and say, “Look at the ass on her.” The same article recounts a female politician detailing how the mayor shamed her for wearing flats rather than heels and demeaned the gray streaks in her hair.

New York Magazine also reported on a list of “Bloombergisms,” common phrases and quips the mayor used to make. These reportedly included “If women wanted to be appreciated for their brains, they’d go to the library instead of to Bloomingdale’s,” and “I know for a fact that any self-respecting woman who walks past a construction site and doesn’t get a whistle will turn around and walk past again and again until she does get one.”

This matters not just because we live in a world of #MeToo, but if part of the outrage of Donald Trump is that his governance is intertwined with sexism, why is it so different that Bloomberg is similar, just behind closed doors? (Hint: It’s not.)

In the New York Post, Michael Goodwin (11/9/19) says Bloomberg “could help save the party from following Sanders or Warren into the political wilderness.”

“As Bloomberg’s New York Prospered, Inequality Flourished Too” (New York Times, 11/9/19) is corporate media’s ambivalent way of acknowledging that Bloomberg’s tenure benefited the few at the expense of the many, with the “growth and prosperity” the Times illustrated with the controversial Atlantic Yards/Barclays Center project in Brooklyn accompanied by increases in rents, gentrification and homelessness.

Finally, elite media celebrating Bloomberg as “our best chance to bring America together again,” as Judge Judy Scheindlin did in a USA Today op-ed (10/16/19), can only do so by downplaying the severity of the harm done by his eager expansion of the NYPD’s racist and unconstitutional stop-and-frisk program. Charles Blow (New York Times, 11/10/19) used his column to denounce as a “non-negotiable deal breaker” Bloomberg’s support for the scheme, which targeted black and Latino males as young as 13, making their routine harassment and humiliation “just a fact of life in New York” (New York Times, 11/17/19). But news articles and profiles still prevaricate, like the Times explainer (11/17/19) that referred to stop-and-frisk as a “crime-prevention strategy,” though it acknowledged that research revealed the stops no more successful at finding weapons than simple chance, and the city’s crime rate famously declined with the program’s phaseout.

Bloomberg defended stop and frisk up until it “emerged as a vulnerability for him on the campaign trail,” and his “apology” (“Our focus was on saving lives”) rings false.

Put it all together and you have a pretty good picture of the kind of executive Bloomberg was: the kind who would tolerate criminal negligence and excessive waste, all to make some absurd point about workplace efficiency. The kind who led an administration whose obsession with thrift and lack of appreciation for safety near the World Trade Center contributed to the needless deaths of two of New York’s Bravest.

All of this had an effect on real New Yorkers, especially working-class, and in the case of policing, non-white New Yorkers. That narrative often gets left out of the narrative that he’s a “get things done” type who can run the U.S. government like a successful business.

For Bloomberg’s cheerleaders in the press, the reality of his record as a governing executive is left out of their case that he’s the one to cure the nation of populism across the political spectrum. This is shoddy journalism, even if it’s partisan and on the opinion pages, largely because none of these things are secrets — these are stories that were doggedly covered by city reporters at the time.

These omissions show just how out of touch the punditry around Bloomberg is — not just with regular New Yorkers, but with journalism itself.

Source Article from https://www.salon.com/2019/11/30/mike-bloombergs-media-cheerleaders-dont-want-to-talk-about-his-scandals/

Seattle Police Officers Guild President Michael Solan told “Outnumbered Overtime” Friday that the city is now the “closest I’ve ever seen …  to becoming a lawless state.”

Solan called for local leaders to help restore order after anti-cop protesters declared a six-block section of the city’s Capitol Hill neighborhood to be an “autonomous” area and a “cop-free zone.”

SEATTLE POLICE UNION CHIEF: CITY LEADERS HAVE ‘LOST ALL POLITICAL WILL TO ENFORCE THE RULE OF LAW’

Solan told host Harris Faulkner that legitimate issues of police brutality and racism had been “stolen by unreasonable activists in the city of Seattle.

“And now, they control six square blocks,” he added. “They control the precinct. And that is a direct result of our city-elected officials lacking the political willpower to enforce the rule of law.”

“And, this is the closest I’ve ever seen our country, let alone the city here, to becoming a lawless state when public safety issues are deeply, deeply concerning,” Solan went on.

People walk near a sign that reads “You are entering free Capitol Hill,” Thursday in Seattle. (AP Photo/Ted S. Warren)

“And, if…unreachable activists have taken over an East Precinct voluntarily given up by an elected officials’ decisions, what’s to stop them from taking another precinct?” he asked. “And…West Precinct — where 300 protesters marched on it two nights ago, where officers were ordered back inside, outside the perimeter — If we lose that flagship precinct, that houses the 911 communications center. Therefore, if that becomes disabled, how do we provide public safety services to the entire city?”

“This is how serious this conversation is,” he asserted.

Seattle’s Democratic mayor, however, had a different take on the demonstration. On Thursday, Jenny Durkan told CNN that the Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone (CHAZ) was more akin to a patriotic “block party.”

In an exclusive interview with Fox News’ Harris Faulkner earlier Thursday, President Trump described Durkan’s handling of the situation as “pathetic,” and assured that his administration is “not going to let Seattle be occupied by anarchists.”

“I will tell you, if they don’t straighten that situation out, we’re going to straighten it out,” he promised.

“We need leadership from somebody. Because it’s not occurring in the city right now,” Solan urged.

“The overall Seattle community, the reasonable people, fully support reasonable activism. Not this unreasonable activism that, sadly, has taken our city hostage,” he told Faulkner.

CLICK HERE FOR THE FOX NEWS APP

‘We need rule of law here. And, as a Seattle resident, I am so embarrassed,” he added. “And, as a proud professional public safety officer, we are more than willing to be brought to the table as a stakeholder. But, we have yet to be invited, and our open letter to the mayor has yet to [be] publicly acknowledged.”

“We need some serious help in Seattle,” Solan concluded.

Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/media/seattle-police-union-chief-city-close-lawlessness

D.C. Police Chief Robert Contee says that four people, including a 15-year-old male, two adult civilians and a police officer, were shot at the intersection of 14th and U Streets in Northwest. The teenager has died.

The shooting was first reported to WTOP after 8 p.m. in the area near a “Moechella” event — a downtown Juneteenth celebration not approved by D.C. officials.

A fight broke out and causing people to disperse shortly before officers shut the event down in the area. Contee said some weapons were obtained in the event area just before the shooting took place.

Mayor Muriel Bowser offered condolences to the family who lost their child in the shooting and shared concerns over crowd control issues with unapproved events and the presence of guns in heavily populated, public areas.

“We need some accountability here,” she said.

The other two adults injured in the shooting have been hospitalized and several firearms were discovered in the area. Police are currently seeking a suspect.

Police announced several street closures as a result of the shooting in Northwest. The investigation is ongoing.

A map of the approximate shooting location is shown below.

 This is a developing story.

Source Article from https://wtop.com/dc/2022/06/dc-police-reports-of-multiple-people-shot-including-officer/

CLOSE

President Donald Trump is denying an accusation of improper contact with a foreign leader.
USA TODAY

WASHINGTON – A whistleblower complaint and concerns over President Donald Trump’s discussions with the Ukrainian president have sparked yet another inquiry into Trump’s interactions with foreign leaders and has spilled over into the 2020 presidential campaign.

The story, which has been reported in bits and pieces from a number of news outlets, folds together diplomatic efforts from both the Obama and Trump administrations. Here we’ve attempted to breakdown what everyone is talking about.

First, it’s important to know the players, who include familiar and some not-so-familiar names. They are: Trump, his personal lawyer Rudy Giuliani, former Vice President Joe Biden, his son Hunter Biden, Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky, former Ukrainian prosecutor general Viktor Shokin and current Ukrainian secretary general Yuriy Lutsenko. 

At the heart of the matter is an August whistleblower complaint by a U.S. intelligence community official and ongoing efforts by Democrats to learn more about Trump’s contacts with Ukraine. Democrats have demanded access to the whistleblower complaint. 

Little is known about the complaint but The Washington Post and The New York Times have reported that at least part of it involved Ukraine.

Democrats separately have been investigating whether Trump sought to put pressure on Ukraine to investigate Joe Biden, the Democratic 2020 presidential candidate, and his son, Hunter, who served on the board of Burisma Group, an energy company in Ukraine. They contend that using official diplomatic contacts to try to undermine a political rival would amount to an abuse of power.

On Friday, Trump said it “doesn’t matter” if he asked Ukraine to investigate Biden and that the matter warrants scrutiny. The president also said his conversations with world leaders are “always appropriate, at the highest level always appropriate.” On the same day, The Wall Street Journal reported that Trump asked Zelensky eight times to investigate Hunter Biden.

Hunter Biden in Ukraine

The New York Times reported in May that Biden, while in office in 2016, threatened to withhold $1 billion in U.S. loan guarantees unless Ukraine reduced its corruption. Part of that demand called for removing the country’s top prosecutor, Shokin, who was investigating the oligarch behind an energy company where Hunter Biden served on the board. 

Shokin was accused by U.S. officials of ignoring corruption in his own office. The Ukrainian Parliament eventually voted him out.

But Lutsenko, Ukraine’s current prosecutor, told Bloomberg News Service in May that he had no evidence of wrongdoing by Biden or his son.

“Hunter Biden did not violate any Ukrainian laws — at least as of now, we do not see any wrongdoing,” Lutsenko told Bloomberg. “A company can pay however much it wants to its board.”

Hunter Biden told the Times in May that he had “no role whatsoever” in the Ukrainian investigation of the company or any of its officers. The Post has reported there is “no evidence” Biden was trying to help his son.

Trump’s call with Zelensky

On July 25, Trump called Zelensky, the Ukrainian president. Trump allegedly told Zelensky he could improve that country’s image by pursuing corruption cases, according to a letter from House Democrats investigating the call.

Trump also withheld more than $250 million in security assistance that Congress had appropriated and that Ukraine desperately needed. But the Trump administration made the funding available earlier this month.

The day after Trump’s call, Ambassador Kurt Volker, the U.S. special representative for Ukraine, was dispatched to meet with Zelensky. And days later, Giuliani met in Spain with Andriy Yermak, a Zelensky aide, to discuss a possible meeting between Trump and Zelensky.

Giuliani has tweeted allegations of Biden corruption repeatedly, at one point alleging “bribery, extortion, money laundering and fraud” by the Biden family in China and Ukraine.

Biden spokeswoman Kate Bedingfield told The New York Times in May that Biden acted “without any regard for how it would or would not impact any business interests of his son, a private citizen.”

The whistleblower complaint

Democrats are in a standoff with the Trump administration, which is refusing to turn over to Congress an Aug. 12 complaint from a whistleblower within the intelligence community. The conflict intensified after The Washington Post reported that the whistleblower had raised concerns over Trump’s contact with the foreign leader, including a “promise” he made to the leader.

The inspector general for the director of national intelligence (DNI), Michael Atkinson, said in a Sept. 9 letter that the matter involves an “urgent concern,” which is defined as “a serious or flagrant problem, abuse, violation of the law,” but “does not include differences of opinions concerning public policy matters.” Atkinson said a preliminary review found the complaint credible.

Such complaints are typically reported to Congress within seven days. But Atkinson said he hit an impasse with Joseph Maguire, the acting director of national intelligence, over sharing the complaint with Congress. Atkinson said he was told by the legal counsel for the intelligence director that the complaint did not meet the definition of an “urgent concern.” And he said the Justice Department said it did not fall under the director’s jurisdiction because it didn’t involve allegations concerning  a member of the intelligence community or intelligence activity.

Atkinson said in a letter to Maguire he disagreed with that Justice Department view.

“I set forth my reasons for concluding that the subject matter involved in the complainant’s disclosure not only falls within the DNI’s jurisdiction, but relates to one of the most significant and important of the DNI’s responsibilities to the American people,” Atkinson wrote.

The inspector general said he requested authorization to at the very least disclose the “general subject matter” to Congress but had not been allowed to do so. He said the information was “being kept” from Congress.

Democrats say they have “grave” concerns about the Trump administration’s refusal to allow the complaint to be disclosed to members of Congress.

“Reports of a reliable whistle-blower complaint regarding the President’s communications with a foreign leader raise grave, urgent concerns for our national security,” House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., said in a statement. “The president and acting DNI’s stonewalling must end immediately, and the whistle-blower must be provided with every protection guaranteed by the law to defend the integrity of our government and ensure accountability and trust.”

Giuliani admits he talked to Ukraine about Biden

Congressional Democrats were troubled by the appearance of Trump urging a foreign government to investigate a political rival.

“If the President, in his official capacity, asked a foreign government to dig up dirt on a political opponent,” Sen. Christopher Murphy, D-Conn., a member of the Foreign Relations Committee, said in a tweet. “Congress cannot let that stand. Our silence could doom the republic.”

The dispute had been simmering as Congress investigated what was said during the call. But it boiled over Thursday, when Giuliani first denied that he urged Ukraine to investigate and then acknowledged it.

“Of course I did,” Giuliani said during a rambling interview on CNN.

Giuliani said he visited Ukraine on his own and then told Trump.

“I did what I did on my own,” Giuliani said. “I told him about it afterward.”

Three congressional chairmen – Foreign Affairs Chairman Eliot Engel, D-N.Y.; Intelligence Chairman Adam Schiff, D-Calif.; and Oversight and Reform Chairman Elijah Cummings, D-Md. – had announced Sept. 9 that they were demanding records from the White House and State Department about alleged attempts to manipulate Ukraine’s judicial system.

“As the 2020 election draws closer, President Trump and his personal attorney appear to have increased pressure on the Ukrainian government and its justice system in service of President Trump’s reelection campaign, and the White House and the State Department may be abetting this scheme,” said the letter from the Democratic chairmen.

The State Department has insisted that President Trump’s attorney is “a private citizen” who “does not speak on behalf of the U.S. Government.” Yermak publicly stated that “it was not clear to him whether Mr. Giuliani was representing Mr. Trump in their talks.”

The IG meets with the House Intelligence Committee

The inspector general met privately Thursday with members of the House Intelligence Committee. But Schiff, the committee chairman, said the official refused to describe the complaint, but called it “both credible and urgent.”

The committee plans to hold a public hearing with Maguire, the acting director of national intelligence, on Sept. 26. Maguire and Atkinson also are expected next week at the Senate Intelligence Committee.

Schiff said the prospect of misconduct at the highest levels of government “raises grave concerns that your office, together with the Department of Justice and possibly the White House, are engaged in an unlawful effort to protect the President and conceal from the Committee information related to his possible ‘serious or flagrant’ misconduct, abuse of power, or violation of law.”

Rep. David Cicilline, D-R.I., tweeted that withholding the complaint could become another part of the House Judiciary Committee’s impeachment investigation.

“This is deadly serious,” Cicilline said. “If the President does not allow the whistleblower complaint against him to be turned over to Congress, we will add it to the Articles of Impeachment.”

Trump said the complaint was partisan, although he later said he didn’t know who made it.

“It’s a partisan whistleblower,” Trump said.

Trump’s response

Trump has said Biden should be investigated, but when speaking to reporters in the Oval Office on Friday, Trump refused to describe his July call with the Ukrainian president and he dismissed the whistleblower complaint as a partisan attack.

“Somebody ought to look into Joe Biden’s statement, because it was disgraceful, where he talked about billions of dollars that he’s not giving to a certain country unless a certain prosecutor is taken off the case,” Trump said. “It’s a disgrace.”

Trump denied any impropriety in the call.

“I’ve had conversations with many leaders. They’re always appropriate,” Trump said. “It’s just another political hack job.”

Biden’s response

Biden lashed out Friday at Trump’s effort to push Ukraine to investigate him.

“Not one single credible outlet has given credibility to these assertions. Not one single one,” Biden said during a campaign stop in Cedar Rapids, Iowa.. “So I have no comment other than the president should start to be president.”

Biden then put out a statement Friday evening.

“If these reports are true, then there is truly no bottom to President Trump’s willingness to abuse his power and abase our country,” the statement said. “This behavior is particularly abhorrent because it exploits the foreign policy of our country and undermines our national security for political purposes. It means that he used the power and resources of the United States to pressure a sovereign nation — a partner that is still under direct assault from Russia — pushing Ukraine to subvert the rule of law in the express hope of extracting a political favor.”

Biden said on Saturday he has never spoken to his son about his business dealings overseas.

“Here’s what I know,” he said. “Trump should be investigated.”

More about President Donald Trump’s clashes with Congress:

Impeach Trump? House Democrats face delicate choice as lawmakers, but not public, push for action

‘Slow-motion constitutional car crash’: Trump, Congress battle over investigations with no end in sight

Source Article from https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2019/09/22/donald-trump-joe-biden-ukraine-whistleblower-standoff-explained/2388648001/

Image copyright
AP

Image caption

¿Qué pasará en Venezuela en 2016?

Una de las preguntas más frecuentes que se hacen en Venezuela es “¿y tú qué crees que va a pasar?”

La tensión política de la última década ha hecho que los venezolanos se conviertan en adictos a las predicciones.

Y el año 2016 será un año más en el que vivirán entre la incertidumbre y la especulación.

La victoria de la oposición en las parlamentarias del 6 de diciembre dejó un escenario político incluso más complejo del que había antes.

Lo que algunos han llamado una “batalla” en este inédito tablero de juego no será solamente una noticia de orden político, sino económica, judicial y, probablemente, social.

Porque la crisis que vive Venezuela se puede profundizar o resolver dependiendo de lo que pase en el ámbito político: ¿continuarán las filas para comprar productos? ¿Seguirá la inflación disparada? ¿Hasta cuando habrá escasez?

Esas son las interrogantes que se plantean los venezolanos de cara al 2016.

Y para resolverlas, al menos en términos generales, BBC Mundo les preguntó a 5 expertos.

(La famosa tuitera y analista política de línea chavista Larissa Costas se abstuvo de participar porque, dijo, “tengo una diferencia ética y política con la visión que BBC ofrece de mi país”.)

Image copyright
Getty

Image caption

Con el precio del petróleo tan bajo, el 2016 será difícil para Venezuela.

1. @luisvicenteleon “Económicamente hablando, el año 2016 vamos a extrañar este 2015”.

El economista y presidente de la influyente encuestadora Datanalisis, Luis Vicente León, dice que “el deterioro de la economía ha sido muy importante en los últimos dos años, pero no ha llegado a su clímax”.

Image copyright
Other

Image caption

Luis Vicente León es presidente de Datanálisis, profesor y articulista. Foto: Archivo personal

Las razones de la crisis, según este consultor especializado en prever escenarios, se encuentran en el modelo de control e intervencionismo y la caída del precio del petróleo, que “le ha impedido al gobierno seguir maquillando sus errores”.

El analista, que cuenta con una influyente cuenta de Twitter seguida por más de 700.000 usuarios, dice que “ninguna de las dos causas de la crisis se han atendido y, lejos de eso, se agudizan, por lo que nada hace prever mejoras en el 2016”.

Image copyright
Getty

Image caption

Con la victoria de la oposición en las parlamentarias, la historia de Venezuela en 2016 será de corte legal.

2. @ignandez “2016 será un choque institucional entre un Gobierno resistente a la soberanía popular expresada el 6D y una Asamblea representante de esa soberanía”.

José Ignacio Hernández es abogado, constitucionalista y profesor de la Universidad Central de Venezuela. Pero también un asiduo tuitero que usa la red social para explicar los entramados legales de este complejo país.

Image copyright
Other

Image caption

Jose Ignacio Hernandez es profesor de derecho administrativo, constitucionalista y escritor en el portal Prodavinci. Foto: Archivo personal

Dos condiciones afectarán el 2016 en Venezuela, dice: “La crisis económica y social y la crisis institucional, derivada de los resultados del 6 de diciembre”.

Para él, ambas condiciones interactuarán entre sí: “Crisis institucional afectará negativamente la gobernabilidad y, por ello, impactará negativamente en la toma de decisiones para afrontar la crisis económica y social”.

Que la oposición tenga el control de uno de los órganos del poder nacional, dice, “originará un conflicto de poderes entre la Asamblea, por un lado, y, por el otro, el Poder Ejecutivo y el Tribunal Supremo de Justicia, lo que llevará a exigir, desde la ciudadanía, la defensa de la Constitución”.

Image copyright
AFP

Image caption

Muchos vaticinan un divorcio entre Maduro y Cabello de cara al futuro.

3. @LuisCarlos “En 2016 los venezolanos contarán sus monedas mientras Maduro y la revolución contarán por separado las municiones de su capital político”.

El analista político Luis Carlos Díaz, uno de los tuiteros más influyentes del país, dice que el cierre del 2015 para Venezuela “fue de película”, porque la gente votó “de forma espectacular contra el gobierno de Maduro y años de crisis”.

Image copyright
Other

Image caption

Luis Carlos Díaz es analista político, activista de derechos humanos e integrante de la mesa del programa de radio de José Miguel Rondón. Fotos: Archivo Personal

Muchos venezolanos, asegura, “escogieron el voto en lugar de echarse a la calle, pero Maduro ha decidido hacerse el sordo y no termina de encajar el golpe”.

Y la oposición, dice Díaz, “no le ha hecho el favor de la estridencia ni el desespero”.

Así que las preguntas, estima, son: “¿La revolución sacrificará a Maduro para preservar algo del legado de Chávez? ¿Cómo se sostiene un modelo populista sin petrodólares ni carisma?”

Los chavistas en el poder “tendrán que contar sus municiones y sus capitales congelados en el extranjero y sobre eso decidirán qué hacer”, dice.

“El pueblo ya habló”, concluye.

Image copyright
AFP

Image caption

Muchos venezolanos celebraron la victoria de la oposición, pero al día siguiente se volvieron a enfrentar a la crisis.

4. @mlopezmaya “Los venezolanos en 2016 buscarán enderezar su gran entuerto desde un camino muy pedregoso, pero divisando un horizonte de ligero optimismo”.

Image copyright
Other

Image caption

Margarita López Maya es historiadora y profesora de la Universidad Central de Venezuela. Foto: Contrapunto.

La historiadora Margarita López Maya, que es reconocida por haber apoyado al gobierno en su primera etapa y desde hace unos años criticarlo, explica que el proyecto chavista “ofreció sacar a Venezuela de la profunda y global crisis que padecía a fines del siglo XX”, pero “desvió su camino con la radicalización que se produjo hacia 2005”.

Según la analista, el chavismo “nunca produjo en lo económico una alternativa al rentismo petrolero, y más bien en lo político y social empeoró el autoritarismo y el clientelismo”, produciendo lo que ella llama “un entuerto”.

Los resultados de las parlamentarias para la historiadora “abrieron la posibilidad de transitar un camino muy pedregoso, pero no imposible, hacia una transición democrática”.

Y remata: “No será fácil”.

5. @ChiguireBipolar

Image copyright
Other

Image caption

El Chiguire Bipolar es una parodia de noticiero.

—”2016 será un año de conflictivi…

—No.

—Que sí.

—¡Que no!

—¡¡¡Que sí te dije ya!!!”.

No hay analista en Venezuela que no siga –y cite– al Chigüire Bipolar, una parodia de noticiero, no sólo porque es chistoso, sino porque el fondo de sus noticias resulta tener un inteligente análisis del país.

Y la “conflictivi… ¡Que te calles!”, será, para el Chigüire, el 2016 en Venezuela.

Source Article from http://www.bbc.com/mundo/noticias/2016/01/151228_venezuela_2016_twitter_dp

For Mr. Rosselló, the funding fight is a question of fairness. For every long-term rebuilding project underway in Puerto Rico at this point after Hurricane Maria, there were 28 projects underway in Texas for damage from Hurricane Harvey, and 32 projects in Louisiana after Hurricane Katrina, the governor said. “Puerto Rico is getting much fewer and much lower resources than any comparable jurisdiction in the United States.”

A University of Michigan analysis published in the journal BMJ Global Health in January found it took twice as long — four months — for Hurricane Maria survivors in Puerto Rico to receive a comparable amount of individual aid (about $1 billion) as Hurricane Harvey survivors in Texas and Hurricane Irma survivors in Florida, though Maria was stronger and more devastating. Maria killed an estimated 2,975 people in Puerto Rico.

In addition to the slow disbursement of aid, a report last month from the Government Accountability Office found that the Department of Housing and Urban Development lacked a robust plan to monitor disaster relief grants, including $20 billion approved for Puerto Rico.

In Vieques, with the hospital out of commission, dialysis patients had to travel to the big island three times a week to get treatment for more than a year after the storm. Several patients died. Finally, in November, a mobile dialysis unit in a shiny trailer arrived at the temporary clinic, allowing local treatments to resume.

“It wasn’t easy,” said Edwin Alvarado Cordero, a 58-year-old diabetic. Standing across the street from the pharmacy in Isabel Segunda, the bigger of the island’s two towns, Mr. Alvarado recounted his thrice-weekly trips from Vieques to Humacao, which began at 4 a.m. and ended at 5:30 p.m.

Last year, on the ferry to the big island, Mr. Alvarado suffered a heart attack. He had open-heart surgery and survived. Though he can now receive dialysis in Vieques, he still travels to San Juan periodically to see his cardiologist. Specialists visit Vieques infrequently.

“It’s far, but it’s better there,” Mr. Alvarado said. “What’s left of the hospital here is grass and horses. They abandoned it.”

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/07/us/puerto-rico-trump-vieques.html

Daniel Ortega, presidente inconstitucional de Nicaragua, decretó concederle la Orden Augusto C. Sandino, máxima condecoración otorgada por el país, al presidente de Venezuela, Nicolás Maduro.

La vocera del Gobierno de Nicaragua, Rosario Murillo, leyó el decreto presidencial e indicó que Nicaragua reconoce en Maduro “un héroe de nuestros tiempos, un soldado de la paz”.

Nicolás Maduro, presidente de Venezuela, llegó a Nicaragua “en una visita relámpago”, como anunció Rosario Murillo, la noche de este viernes 13 de marzo a participar de un acto convocado por el Gobierno de Nicaragua en solidaridad con Venezuela.

Maduro fue recibido en el Aeropuerto Internacional de Managua por el presidente inconstitucional de Nicaragua, Daniel Ortega, y la primera dama, Rosario Murillo.

“Es momento de unidad”, dijo Maduro a su llegada a Managua.

El mandatario venezolano llegó a la Rotonda Hugo Chávez, saludó a quienes se estaban concentrados desde las 4 de la tarde, sin embargo su estadía ahí duró pocos minutos, luego se trasladó junto a Ortega a la Plaza de la Revolución, donde se hará el acto principal.

Marcha en la Avenida Bolívar

Desde las 4 p.m. del viernes 13 de marzo se comenzaron a concentrar en la Avenida Bolívar trabajadores públicos convocados por el Gobierno de Nicaragua para la marcha en solidaridad con Venezuela.

La marcha en la Avenida Bolívar, sumado al Teletón 2015 están causando embotellamiento en las vías de tránsito en los alrededores del noroeste de la capital. Además, desde el mediodía de este viernes buses que conforman el Transporte Urbano Colectivo (TUC) de Managua han abandonado las rutas debido a la orden de dirigentes en trasladar a quienes van a participar en la marcha de la Avenida Bolívar.

Según anuncian a través de megáfonos en la concentración que se está formando en la Rotonda Hugo Chávez, se esperan delegaciones de todos los departamentos del país.

Al lugar se ven llegar buses de diferentes departamentos con personas ondeando banderas rojinegro, azul y blanco, y banderas tricolor de Venezuela.

También hay personas que cargan megafotografías de Hugo Chávez.

Se espera que la primera dama y vocera del Gobierno lea nuevamente la declaratoria de solidaridad con Venezuela debido a las sanciones impuestas por el Gobierno de Estados Unidos que implica negarle la entrada al país de 7 funcionario venezolanos.

 

Source Article from http://www.laprensa.com.ni/2015/03/13/politica/1798627-marchan-en-solidaridad-con-venezuela

Image copyright
Getty

Image caption

Analistas y especialistas debaten si el nombramiento de Lula fue o no el peor error político de Rousseff.

La presidenta brasileña, Dilma Rousseff, apenas dijo “buen día” este jueves en el acto para investir a su antecesor Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva como ministro de la Casa Civil, cuando estalló la confusión en el mismo salón donde transcurría la ceremonia oficial.

Un diputado federal crítico de la designación de Lula gritó “vergüenza” y fue expulsado del palacio presidencial de Planalto, mientras partidarios del gobierno coreaban: “¡No va a haber golpe!”.

La escena fue un reflejo de la crispación que el nombramiento de Lula genera en Brasil, donde este jueves hubo manifestaciones a favor y en contra suya en varias ciudades, con algunos incidentes violentos en la capital.

En paralelo, un juez federal suspendió la nominación del expresidente como jefe de gabinete, argumentando que hay indicios de crimen de responsabilidad en la misma, ya que Lula es investigado por corrupción.

El gobierno anunció que recurrirá la medida del juez Itagiba Catta Preta Neto, quien ha sido visto participando en protestas contra el gobierno del izquierdista Partido de los Trabajadores (PT).

Image copyright
AP

Image caption

“Fuera Dilma”, dice la camiseta de este manifestante que protestó frente a la puerta del palacio presidencial de Planalto este jueves.

Rousseff presentó la investidura de Lula como un refuerzo clave para su administración, en medio de la grave crisis político-económica brasileña que amenaza su propio mandato.

Cuento con la experiencia del expresidente Lula, cuento con la identidad que tiene con el pueblo”, sostuvo la mandataria durante la ceremonia. “Su presencia aquí prueba que tiene la grandeza del estadista”.

Pero otros creen que Rousseff tan solo intenta evitar el arresto de Lula, que como ministro tendría un fuero judicial especial, y las sospechas crecieron al conocerse un diálogo grabado entre ambos donde la presidenta le anuncia que le enviaría el acta de su designación para usar “en caso de necesidad”.

Esto intensificó las críticas contra Rousseff, así como las advertencias de que tener a su antecesor en el gabinete podría resultar demasiado costoso para ella misma.

El día en que la Cámara de Diputados de Brasil inició el trámite para un eventual juicio con miras a la destitución de Rousseff, en el aire flota una pregunta: ¿es la nominación ministerial de Lula el peor error político de la mandataria?

“El fin”

Algunos analistas sostienen que la presidenta sí cometió una equivocación mayúscula al incorporar a su gobierno a su “amigo y compañero de luchas“, como ella misma llamó a Lula este jueves.

Image copyright
AP

Image caption

Un hombre que apoya a Lula llora durante el nombramiento del expresidente como ministro de la Casa Civil.

“Todo muestra que fue un error político”, dijo David Fleischer, profesor emérito de ciencia política en la Universidad de Brasilia, en diálogo con BBC Mundo.

Y agregó que, además de las dudas sobre el fuero judicial privilegiado de Lula, han surgido acusaciones de que Rousseff cometió “obstrucción de la justicia” al designar al expresidente cuando era investigado.

Algunos de los principales periódicos brasileños también publicaron editoriales este jueves criticando a la mandataria.

“Ya se decía que, con la nominación de Lula, el gobierno (de) Dilma Rousseff llegaba al fin. Tal vez la frase deba ser encarada, a partir de los próximos días, de una forma más literal de lo que se pensaba”, indicó un editorial del diario Folha de Sao Paulo.

“Al nombrar al expresidente una especie de primer ministro con amplios poderes, la presidente colocó (la causa judicial por sobornos denominada) Lava-Jato dentro del Palacio, a su lado”, sostuvo un texto de opinión del diario O Globo.

Los críticos recuerdan, además, que la designación de Lula fue anunciada apenas horas después de las manifestaciones antigubernamentales del domingo, que batieron récords de asistencia en la historia del país.

Image copyright
Reuters

Image caption

El expresidente mantiene una amplia popularidad luego de sus ocho años de gobierno.

Y señalan que en los próximos días pueden surgir más datos comprometedores para Lula y Rousseff, como la delación que hizo ante la justicia el exlíder del gobierno en el Senado, Delcídio Amaral, acusando a ambos de obstruir investigaciones de corrupción.

Lula y Rousseff niegan esto, pero muchos creen ahora que el expresidente podría hundir por inercia a su sucesora en caso de caer en un proceso judicial.

Con amplia popularidad

En cambio, otros analistas dudan de que haber acudido a Lula pueda considerarse un error estratégico de Rousseff, cuyos índices de aprobación se desplomaron con los escándalos y la fuerte recesión económica.

El expresidente mantiene una parte de la amplia popularidad con que dejó el cargo a fin de 2010, tras un mandato de ocho años durante el cual la economía de Brasil creció y decenas de millones salieron de la pobreza.

Además, Lula tiene influencia en partidarios y aliados.

Algunos observadores creen que Rousseff apostó a él para reconstruir su deteriorada base de apoyo en el Congreso y parar el proceso de juicio político que puede acabar con su mandato.

Image copyright
AFP

Image caption

En la noche del miércoles hubo incidentes violentos frente al edificio del Congreso en Brasilia.

“El expresidente tiene un tránsito muy grande en el Congreso, en relación a los liderazgos y los movimientos sociales”, dijo Vera Chaia, profesora de ciencia política en la Universidad Católica de São Paulo.

Aunque agregó que la designación también ofrece a Lula un foro privilegiado para ser juzgado sólo por la máxima corte de justicia de Brasil, Chaia criticó como “muy oportunista” la divulgación de grabaciones telefónicas al expresidente.

Los registros fueron realizados por la policía y liberados el miércoles para su publicación por el juez federal Sérgio Moro, que conduce la causa de sobornos en la petrolera estatal Petrobras y está a cargo de las investigaciones de Lula.

Moro, convertido en ídolo de los manifestantes antigubernamentales, sostuvo que el levantamiento del secreto de las grabaciones propiciaría “el saludable escrutinio público” sobre la actuación de los políticos.

Pero Rousseff criticó duramente las escuchas telefónicas durante el acto de investidura de Lula este jueves, afirmando que violaron la Constitución y pueden propiciar un quiebre del Estado de derecho.

“Convulsionar a la sociedad brasileña con base en falsedades, métodos oscuros y prácticas criticables viola principios y garantías constitucionales y los derechos de los ciudadanos, y abre precedentes gravísimos”, sostuvo.

Image copyright
Getty

Image caption

Algunos analistas piensan que Lula podría hundir a Dilma, mientras que para otros es una forma de reconstruir apoyos.

Los golpes comienzan así”, continuó.

Cristiano Noronha, vicepresidente y analista político de la consultora Arko Advice en Brasilia, descartó que la designación de Lula sea el mayor error de Rousseff, aunque hoy tampoco luzca como un acierto.

“Inicialmente la ida del ex presidente (al ministerio de) Casa Civil tenía potencial de conseguir revertir algunos votos contrarios a la presidenta y a favor del impeachment“, dijo Noronha a BBC Mundo.

“El problema”, añadió, “es que toda esta confusión puede anular ese beneficio”.

Source Article from http://www.bbc.com/mundo/noticias/2016/03/160317_brasil_lula_ministro_error_politico_rousseff_ap