Recently Added Videos

Image copyright
Getty Images

Image caption

Mick Mulvaney called the bid to see President Trump’s tax returns a “political stunt”

One of US President Donald Trump’s top aides has said that opposition Democrats will “never” see his tax returns.

White House acting chief of staff Mick Mulvaney said the call for the records to be released was a “political stunt”.

On Wednesday a Congressional tax committee submitted a request for six years of the president’s returns from the Internal Revenue Service (IRS).

Unlike previous presidents, Mr Trump has refused to publish his tax details.

During an interview on Fox News, Mr Mulvaney was asked if Congress would ever see the president’s tax returns.

“No, never,” he replied. “Nor should they.”

He added: “Democrats are demanding that the IRS turn over the documents. That is not going to happen, and they know it. This is a political stunt.”

What have Democrats said?

In response, Democrats said that the request by tax committee chairman Bill Neal was both legal and necessary.

Dan Kildee, a Democrat and a tax committee member, told ABC: “This is a legitimate authority that the Congress has. This president, by the way, is the least transparent president we’ve had in half a century.”

Every US presidential candidate since 1976 has released their tax returns, but there is no law requiring it.

The Democrats gained control of the House of Representatives in mid-term elections last year, giving them the ability to launch investigations into Mr Trump’s administration and business affairs.

Image copyright
Reuters

Image caption

Unlike previous presidents, Mr Trump has not published his tax details

It comes after one of Mr Trump’s lawyers said it was “harassment” to keep asking for his tax returns, and hinted at possible legal action in the future.

“His request is a transparent effort by one political party to harass an official from the other party because they dislike his politics and speech,” attorney William Consovoy said of Mr Neal.

He said the request was a “misguided attempt” to politicise tax laws and could also end up interfering with audits. He said the US Treasury should not comply with the demand.

Mr Trump also added that he believed the law was “100% on my side”.

Why hasn’t Trump released his tax returns?

Mr Trump has in the past said that he is unable to release his tax returns because they were being audited by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS).

However the IRS has said that he could release the returns even if they are under audit.

In February Mr Trump’s former lawyer Michael Cohen suggested during testimony to Congress that Mr Trump’s taxes were not under audit during the 2016 presidential campaign – when Mr Trump said they were.

Mr Trump had not wanted to release the tax returns because the resulting scrutiny could have led to an audit and “he’ll ultimately have taxable consequences, penalties and so on”.

Source Article from https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-47847022

“);var a = g[r.size_id].split(“x”).map((function(e) {return Number(e)})), s = u(a, 2);o.width = s[0],o.height = s[1]}o.rubiconTargeting = (Array.isArray(r.targeting) ? r.targeting : []).reduce((function(e, r) {return e[r.key] = r.values[0],e}), {rpfl_elemid: n.adUnitCode}),e.push(o)} else l.logError(“Rubicon bid adapter Error: bidRequest undefined at index position:” + t, c, d);return e}), []).sort((function(e, r) {return (r.cpm || 0) – (e.cpm || 0)}))},getUserSyncs: function(e, r, t) {if (!A && e.iframeEnabled) {var i = “”;return t && “string” == typeof t.consentString && (“boolean” == typeof t.gdprApplies ? i += “?gdpr=” + Number(t.gdprApplies) + “&gdpr_consent=” + t.consentString : i += “?gdpr_consent=” + t.consentString),A = !0,{type: “iframe”,url: n + i}}},transformBidParams: function(e, r) {return l.convertTypes({accountId: “number”,siteId: “number”,zoneId: “number”}, e)}};function m() {return [window.screen.width, window.screen.height].join(“x”)}function b(e, r) {var t = f.config.getConfig(“pageUrl”);return e.params.referrer ? t = e.params.referrer : t || (t = r.refererInfo.referer),e.params.secure ? t.replace(/^http:/i, “https:”) : t}function _(e, r) {var t = e.params;if (“video” === r) {var i = [];return t.video && t.video.playerWidth && t.video.playerHeight ? i = [t.video.playerWidth, t.video.playerHeight] : Array.isArray(l.deepAccess(e, “mediaTypes.video.playerSize”)) && 1 === e.mediaTypes.video.playerSize.length ? i = e.mediaTypes.video.playerSize[0] : Array.isArray(e.sizes) && 0

(CNN)Former Texas Democratic Rep. Beto O’Rourke offered sweeping criticism of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Sunday, outright calling him “racist” and an obstacle to peace.

Source Article from https://www.cnn.com/2019/04/07/politics/beto-orourke-israel-netanyahu/index.html

CLOSE

President Donald Trump says his administration is ensuring the country knows “this is an actual emergency” at the U.S.-Mexico border. (April 5)
AP

As the Trump administration works to address what it describes as a growing “crisis” at the U.S.-Mexico border, officials said in a court filing that it may take two years for the government to identify thousands of migrant children who were separated from their families. 

The filing Friday outlined the government’s plan to use data analysis and manual reviews to sift through the cases of about 47,000 children who were apprehended by U.S. immigration officials from July 1, 2017, to June 25, 2018, to identify which children might have been taken from family members. It estimated the process “would take at least 12 months, and possibly up to 24 months.” 

Last month, U.S. District Judge Dana Sabraw expanded the number of migrant families that the government may be forced to reunite under his previous order after an inspector general report revealed that the administration had an undisclosed family separation pilot program in place starting in July of 2017. The ruling was made as part of a lawsuit led by the American Civil Liberties Union. 

Judge: Trump administration may have to reunite thousands of additional migrant families

“The administration refuses to treat the family separation crisis it created with urgency, ” the ACLU said in a statement Saturday. “We strongly oppose any plan that gives the government up to two years to find kids. The government swiftly gathered resources to tear families apart. It must do the same to fix the damage.”

In recent months, the number of families crossing into the U.S. has climbed to record highs, putting severe strains on an already overburdened immigration system. In the past, most of those seeking to illegally cross the border were single, mostly male, Mexican nationals coming in search of work.

More than half are now parents and children fleeing impoverished Central American countries where violent crime is rampant. 

“The numbers are overwhelming right now,” Gregory Archambault, the director of enforcement and removal operations in San Diego for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, told The Associated Press. “Everybody is stressed because there are these mass numbers of people.” 

“More and more people now accepting the fact that it’s a real crisis,” acting White House chief of staff Mick Mulvaney said Sunday during an interview with Fox News. 

Mulvaney said the issues of migrant families and unaccompanied migrant children required congressional action because “there’s legally nothing that the (Department of Homeland Security) can do with the children.”   

Rep. Ben Ray Luján, D-N.M., said Democrats want to work with the president on a solution.

“Separating children from their families at the border is not humane. It’s not what the United States should be doing, and we continue to see this administration engage in those policies,” Luján said on “Fox News Sunday.”

Friday’s court filing came the same day President Donald Trump declared that there is “indeed an emergency on our southern border,” during a tour of the border in Calexico, California. He cited an upturn in the number of migrants arriving at the border in recent months. 

“It’s a colossal surge and it’s overwhelming our immigration system, and we can’t let that happen,” Trump said.

“We can’t take you anymore. We can’t take you. Our country is full,” he warned those who might attempt to come to the U.S.

Like Trump, Mulvaney applauded Mexico for its apprehension of migrants in recent days, which he claimed was sparked by Trump’s threats to close the border or impose tariffs on Mexico’s auto exports if the country did not do more to stem the flow of northbound migrants.

But despite the White House’s claims that Mexico was apprehending migrants for the “first time in decades,” Mexico has taken hundreds of thousands of migrants into custody in the past four years from the “Northern Triangle” countries of Guatemala, El Salvador and Honduras. Mexico said its numbers in recent months were “about average.” 

“There is no very substantive change,” Mexico’s foreign secretary, Marcelo Ebrard, said this week. “There has not been a drastic change.”

Fact check: Trump is wrong on Mexico’s migrant apprehensions

Luján said Trump “continues to use immigration as a distraction.” He questioned whether the Department of Homeland Security was “accurately describing” its apprehension statistics because he said many families were voluntarily turning themselves in to seek asylum status.

“This is not the national security crisis that the president continues to describe,” Luján said. “There is a humanitarian crisis but it’s created by President Donald Trump.” 

Some immigration experts agree with Luján’s assessment. They say Trump’s policies have caused so much chaos along the border that they may be encouraging illegal crossings.

For example, the family separation controversy helped to highlight the fact that families won’t be detained for long in the U.S. if they’re detained at all.

And metering, in which people are asked to return to a busy port of entry on another day to seek asylum, may have encouraged asylum-seekers to cross illegally, said Andrew Selee, president of the Migration Policy Institute, a nonpartisan think tank.

“This policy chaos, coupled with a sense that the U.S. government may at some point really shut down the border, has generated an urgency to migrate now while it is still possible,” Selee said.

More: Fourth person in six months dies in ICE immigration detention center

Contributing: Alan Gomez, USA TODAY; The Associated Press

 

 

 

 

Source Article from https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2019/04/07/immigration-family-separations-may-take-2-years-identify-children/3393536002/

In a period of a little over 24 hours this weekend, 24 people were shot in Chicago, including three children under 13 — and three of the adults shot died from their injuries, according to police.

Beginning at 4 a.m. Saturday through about 10 a.m. Sunday, Chicago police were investigating shooting cases that included the homicides and a mass shooting of six people outside an afternoon baby shower in West Englewood in which an 8-year-old boy was shot in the chest and back and a 10-year-old girl was struck in the shin.

Three people also were shot in East Garfield Park about 3:30 a.m. Sunday as they stood outside in the 3900 block of West Wilcox Street. A 34-year-old was taken to Mount Sinai Hospital with a gunshot wound to the right leg; a 26-year-old was taken to Norwegian American Hospital with a gunshot wound to his right foot; and a 33-year-old was taken to Rush University Medical Center for a gunshot wound to his left arm.

Two of the three homicide investigations were launched Sunday morning, according to police. About 8:30 a.m. officers were called to the 6700 block of South Normal Boulevard in Englewood and found a man, 52, with a gunshot wound to his head. He was pronounced dead at the scene, officials said.

Source Article from https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/breaking/ct-met-citywide-shootings-20190407-story.html

HAWTHORNE, Calif. (KABC) — A Hawthorne police officer and a gunman were both shot and wounded Sunday morning in an incident that involved two separate exchanges of gunfire, authorities said.

The violent series of events began about 9:20 a.m. when officers responded to a report of a man chasing a woman in the lobby of a hotel in the 14400 block of South Aviation Boulevard, according to Hawthorne Police Chief Michael Ishii. The officers arrived to find the suspect running across the street and into a shopping center.

The officers confronted the man and twice exchanged gunfire with him, Ishii said at a news conference.

A 15-year veteran of the Police Department was struck in the leg and transported to a hospital by Los Angeles County firefighter-paramedics. The suspect, wearing military fatigues, was taken into custody without incident.

The injured officer was alert when visited at the medical center, said the police chief, who expressed hope that the policeman would make a full recovery. Neither he nor the suspect were publicly identified.

The female victim who had been chased was described by authorities as “OK” after the incident. The possible relationship between her and the suspect was unknown.

Ishii said the gunman was armed with “some sort of assault rifle or a TEC-9-type high-powered or high-capacity weapon.”

Source Article from https://abc7.com/hawthorne-shootout-leaves-officer-and-suspect-wounded/5237604/


Crime

Mexican telenovela star will return to Miami as ordered for court hearing, lawyer says


Telenovela star Pablo Lyle will return to Miami from Mexico as ordered by a Miami-Dade judge for a hearing on Monday that will re-examine Lyle’s bond after the death of a 63-year-old man, who Lyle punched at a Miami intersection March 31.

“Mr Lyle will appear each and every time required by the court,” Lyle’s attorney, Bruce Lehr of Lehr Levi & Mendez, wrote in a Sunday email to the Miami Herald.

Lyle, 32, plays Rodrigo Villavicencio, the male lead on the Mexican telenovela “Mi Adorable Maldición” (My Adorable Curse).

When arrested last Monday, Lyle was charged with battery, a third-degree felony. The last line of Lyle’s arrest report said Juan Ricardo Hernandez, of whom Lyle told police he punched out of fear for his family, was already “unconscious, intubated and suffering from a brain injury.”

He posted $5,000 bond Monday and, on Tuesday, requested permission to travel. It was granted Tuesday by the judge covering the court for Judge Lisa Walsh.

Lyle entered a plea of not guilty plea on Thursday. Later Thursday, Hernandez died at Jackson Memorial Hospital.

Upon reading of Hernandez’s death in the Miami Herald Friday morning, Walsh rescinded the travel order and ordered Lyle, his attorney and his bail bondsman to appear at a Monday 9 a.m. hearing to address Lyle’s bond.

“The bond contract at issue is vitiated by the victim’s death and the likelihood of enhanced charges.”

Lehr wrote in his Sunday email he didn’t know what criminal charges would be added and “the state has until May 1 to make that decision.”

The Miami-Dade state attorney’s office said Friday it would view autopsy results before making any decisions on more charges.

Former longtime prosecutor and current criminal defense attorney David Weinstein, who isn’t associated with this case, didn’t think it was a certainty that Lyle would appear and said making sure he does is the smart legal move.

“This will allow them to argue against an increase in amount of bond and additional travel restrictions,” Weinstein Tweeted. “I suspect that the Judge will require him to stay in the U.S. until his arraignment and then revisit the bond again when additional charges are filed.”

Source Article from https://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/crime/article228943044.html

President Donald Trump’s attorney Jay Sekulow on Sunday accused Democrats of using the IRS as a “political weapon” to obtain the president’s tax returns and promised to fight the move if necessary.

In an interview on ABC’s “This Week,” Sekulow said a request for Trump’s tax returns announced by the chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee last week could set a precedent whereby Republicans began demanding the tax returns of top Democrats.

“What is the legitimate legislative purpose?” Sekulow said of the request, which committee Chairman Richard Neal, D-Mass., made Wednesday. He added, “So this idea that you’re using a hearing, a Ways and Means hearing, about IRS enforcement as a way to get to the president’s private individual and business tax returns makes no sense both constitutionally and statutorily. And, look, I think this is going to be — if necessary, we’re not at that point yet — if it has to be litigated, it will be litigated.”

Asked if the president will order the IRS commissioner, Charles Rettig, not to turn over the information, Sekulow said Trump “isn’t ordering anything.”

Neal requested six years of Trump’s personal and business tax filings under a statute that allows him to demand an individual’s tax returns. If the Treasury Department denies his request, Democrats will then be faced with whether to take legal action. If obtained, they would not simply be made public. Rather, Neal would have to designate panel members to read the returns and they would then have to vote on making the returns public.

Responding to the news, Trump told reporters he was “under audit” and would not be releasing the returns.

“I’m always under audit, it seems,” he said. “Until such time as I’m not under audit, I would not be inclined to do that.”

Trump has been saying he is under audit since the 2016 election cycle and has been using that explanation as his rationale for not releasing his returns. Although the IRS has regularly audited presidents and vice presidents since the 1970s, being under audit does not preclude Trump from making his tax information public, nor did it stop past presidents from doing so.

Trump is the only major presidential candidate of either party since the early 1970s not to release his tax returns, and Democrats have pushed for him to release his taxes since the 2016 election.

Last month, Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin said at a Ways and Means hearing that he would protect Trump’s privacy if a request like Neal’s were made.

“I have discussed with the legal department in the Treasury that we will most likely receive this request,” he said. “As I have said, based upon the request we’ll examine it and we will follow the law. And we will protect the president as we would protect any individual taxpayer under their rights.”

Speaking on the same program Sunday, Michigan Rep. Dan Kildee, a Democratic member of the Ways and Means Committee, said the request was made “mainly because previous presidents in the last half century have released their tax returns and it would be easy for not just Congress but any member of the public to take a look at that and make determinations as to whether or not the tax laws of the United States are being properly administered and properly applied to the president.”

“In this case, and particularly in this case, where you have a president that not only has very significant wealth, but made the unusual decision to continue to control that wealth and not to have a blind trust but to actually pass on to his family with his full involvement with his full involvement the ability to control his wealth, there’s a real question … as to whether the president’s personal financial interests impact his public decision-making,” Kildee added. “The public has a right to know whether their president’s interests are impacting the decisions that he makes using the authority that we have granted him by electing him as president.”

On “Fox News Sunday,” Rep. Ben Ray Luján, D-N.M., said the request “is not political, as our Republican colleagues are making it out to be.”

“No other president in modern time has had to have their tax returns requested under 6103, because they’ve all voluntarily shared them,” Luján, the assistant speaker of the House, added.

Sen. Mitt Romney, R-Utah, told NBC’s “Meet the Press” that he’d “like the president to follow through and show his tax returns,” which Romney noted that Trump promised in 2016 that he would do.

“So I wish he’d do that,” Romney, the 2012 GOP presidential nominee, said. He added that he thought the Democrats’s decision to seek Trump’s “tax returns through a legislative action is moronic.”

“That’s not going to happen,” Romney continued. “The courts won’t say that you can compel a person running for office to release their tax returns. So he’s going to win this victory.”

On “Fox News Sunday,” acting White House chief of staff Mick Mulvaney seemed certain that Democrats would not be able to obtain the returns, adding that Democrats should “never” be able to.

“Keep in mind, that was an issue that was already litigated during the election,” he said. “Voters knew the president could have given his tax returns, they knew he didn’t, and they elected him anyway, which is of course what drives the Democrats crazy.”

Source Article from https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/trump-s-attorney-promises-fight-over-trump-s-taxes-n991786

“);var a = g[r.size_id].split(“x”).map((function(e) {return Number(e)})), s = u(a, 2);o.width = s[0],o.height = s[1]}o.rubiconTargeting = (Array.isArray(r.targeting) ? r.targeting : []).reduce((function(e, r) {return e[r.key] = r.values[0],e}), {rpfl_elemid: n.adUnitCode}),e.push(o)} else l.logError(“Rubicon bid adapter Error: bidRequest undefined at index position:” + t, c, d);return e}), []).sort((function(e, r) {return (r.cpm || 0) – (e.cpm || 0)}))},getUserSyncs: function(e, r, t) {if (!A && e.iframeEnabled) {var i = “”;return t && “string” == typeof t.consentString && (“boolean” == typeof t.gdprApplies ? i += “?gdpr=” + Number(t.gdprApplies) + “&gdpr_consent=” + t.consentString : i += “?gdpr_consent=” + t.consentString),A = !0,{type: “iframe”,url: n + i}}},transformBidParams: function(e, r) {return l.convertTypes({accountId: “number”,siteId: “number”,zoneId: “number”}, e)}};function m() {return [window.screen.width, window.screen.height].join(“x”)}function b(e, r) {var t = f.config.getConfig(“pageUrl”);return e.params.referrer ? t = e.params.referrer : t || (t = r.refererInfo.referer),e.params.secure ? t.replace(/^http:/i, “https:”) : t}function _(e, r) {var t = e.params;if (“video” === r) {var i = [];return t.video && t.video.playerWidth && t.video.playerHeight ? i = [t.video.playerWidth, t.video.playerHeight] : Array.isArray(l.deepAccess(e, “mediaTypes.video.playerSize”)) && 1 === e.mediaTypes.video.playerSize.length ? i = e.mediaTypes.video.playerSize[0] : Array.isArray(e.sizes) && 0

(CNN)American tourist Kimberly Sue Endicott and her tour guide, who were abducted in Uganda’s Queen Elizabeth National Park on Tuesday, have been rescued by security forces, a Ugandan government spokesperson said Sunday.

Source Article from https://www.cnn.com/2019/04/07/africa/uganda-american-tourist-found/index.html

A suspected rhino poacher in South Africa was killed by an elephant before his body was apparently devoured by lions, authorities said. A search team in Kruger National Park was only able to recover a skull and a pair of pants.

South African National Parks said Friday that the victim and four accomplices were trying to poach a rhino Tuesday evening. The accomplices called the victim’s family and said he had been killed by an elephant. 

An initial search party was unable to locate the body. During a search Thursday morning, authorities found the few remains of the suspected poacher. “Indications found at the scene suggested that a pride of lions had devoured the remains,” the park service said.

The South African Police Service said two of his alleged accomplices were arrested with rifles and ammunition in their possession.

“Entering Kruger National Park illegally and on foot is not wise, it holds many dangers and this incident is evidence of that,” Kruger National Park Managing Executive Glenn Phillips said in a statement. “It is very sad to see the daughters of the [deceased] mourning the loss of their father, and worse still, only being able to recover very little of his remains.”

The suspected poacher has not been identified. His four accomplices are due in court, and the death is still being investigated. 

Source Article from https://www.cbsnews.com/news/poaching-in-south-africa-suspected-rhino-poacher-killed-by-elephant-eaten-by-lions-in-kruger-national-park/

President Trump’s personal attorney Rudy Giuliani said on Sunday that he’s upset with the media for reporting on leaks from Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s team that Attorney General William Barr failed to properly summarize the contents of the highly anticipated inquiry.

Giuliani, who told Fox News’ Howard Kurtz on “MediaBuzz” that he would like to see the Mueller report released in its entirety, slammed The New York Times’ sources for saying there were concerns raised by some members of Mueller’s team that the report was more damning of Trump than Barr has publicly indicated.

“That leak really indicates all you need to know about Mueller’s prosecutors,” Giuliani said on the Times’ unnamed sources. “Leaking like that…that’s been the biggest canard in this investigation.”

READ THE MUELLER REPORT FINDINGS

Giuliani’s comments come just days after The New York Times reported on the upset among some Mueller staffers over Barr’s handling of the report – particularly the attorney general’s four-page summary that noted there was no evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia, and Barr’s decision not to proceed with obstruction of justice charges against Trump. Mueller’s decision to skip prosecutorial judgment “leaves it to the attorney general to determine whether the conduct described in the report constitutes a crime,” Barr wrote.

The newspaper’s sources did not explain why some in Mueller’s team thought the findings were more damaging to Trump than Barr has revealed, but the report is expected to outline the president’s attempts to thwart the investigation.

“There is nothing wrong with the newspaper, there is something wrong with the prosecutor,” Giuliani said. “This tells me they don’t have anything, because if they were malicious enough to do that and they had a smoking gun, they wouldn’t say in general it’s very damaging.”

Barr has faced criticism since penning his letter that he unduly sanitized the full report in Trump’s favor, including on the key question of whether the president obstructed justice. House Democrats on Wednesday approved subpoenas for

Mueller’s entire report and any exhibits and other underlying evidence that the Justice Department might withhold.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

In a statement on Thursday, Barr defended the decision to release a brief summary letter two days after receiving the report on March 22. He has previously said he did not believe it would be in the public’s interest to release the full document in piecemeal or gradual fashion, and that he did not intend for his letter summarizing Mueller’s “principal conclusions” to be an “exhaustive recounting” of the special counsel’s investigation.

Barr is now expected to release the entire report, with redactions, by mid-April.

“Given the extraordinary public interest in the matter, the Attorney General decided to release the report’s bottom-line findings and his conclusions immediately — without attempting to summarize the report — with the understanding that the report itself would be released after the redaction process,” the Justice Department statement said.

The Associated Press contributed to this report. 

Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/politics/giuliani-slams-leaks-from-mueller-team-about-barrs-handling-of-obstruction-of-justice

People walk by election campaign billboards showing Israeli Prime Minister and head of the Likud party Benjamin Netanyahu (left) alongside the Blue and White party leaders, including Benny Gantz. Ahead of Tuesday’s election, Netanyahu has pledged to annex Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank.

Oded Balilty/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Oded Balilty/AP

People walk by election campaign billboards showing Israeli Prime Minister and head of the Likud party Benjamin Netanyahu (left) alongside the Blue and White party leaders, including Benny Gantz. Ahead of Tuesday’s election, Netanyahu has pledged to annex Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank.

Oded Balilty/AP

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has said that he will annex Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank if he is re-elected.

Netanyahu staked out the position on television on Saturday, ahead of Tuesday’s election where he faces a challenge from his former army chief of staff Benny Gantz

The first-time move from the prime minister appears to be aimed at galvanizing support among his nationalist base and right-wing political allies. The annexation of parts of the West Bank would likely be considered the final blow to the possibility of a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

Netanyahu was asked on Israeli Channel 12 TV why he hasn’t annexed Israeli settlement blocs in occupied territory, as NPR’s Daniel Estrin reports from Jerusalem.

The prime minister replied: “Will we go to the next phase? The answer is yes. We will go to the next phase to extend Israeli sovereignty.”

“I will impose sovereignty, but I will not distinguish between settlement blocs and isolated settlements,” he continued, The Associated Press reports. “From my perspective, any point of settlement is Israeli, and we have responsibility, as the Israeli government. I will not uproot anyone, and I will not transfer sovereignty to the Palestinians.”

On Sunday, Palestinian Foreign Minister Riad Malki responded to that pledge and accused the U.S. of encouraging Netanyahu.

“If Netanyahu wants to declare Israeli sovereignty over the West Bank, then you know he has to face a real problem, the presence of 4.5 million Palestinians, what to do with them,” Malki told the AP while attending the World Economic forum in Jordan, apparently citing the combined total of Palestinians living in the occupied West Bank, East Jerusalem and the Gaza Strip.

He said Israel cannot expel the Palestinians, adding, “The international community has to deal with us.”

Netanyahu has actively supported the growth of Israeli settlements in the West Bank, which Israel has occupied since the Six-Day War in 1967. But Israel has so far stopped short of formally annexing the West Bank, leaving the door open for further negotiations with Palestinians.

Some 400,000 Israeli settlers and 2.8 million Palestinians now live in in the West Bank.

The Israeli settlements – which include large subdivisions and cities full of middle-class villas – have long complicated efforts for a two-state solution: Palestinians have said the settlements would make it impossible to create a viable state in the West Bank, as NPR’s Greg Myre has reported.

Another 200,000 Israelis live in East Jerusalem, part of the West Bank that Israel annexed shortly after the 1967 war.

Saeb Erekat, chief negotiator for the Palestine Liberation Organization, criticized Netanyahu’s statement on Saturday.

“Such a statement by Netanyahu is not surprising,” Erekat wrote on Twitter. “Israel will continue to brazenly violate international law for as long as the international community will continue to reward Israel with impunity, particularly with the Trump Administration’s support and endorsement of Israel’s violation of the national and human rights of the people of Palestine.”

Netanyahu’s political campaign has emphasized his close ties with President Trump, Estrin reports. In his prime time interview on Saturday, Netanyahu portrayed those moves of support from the Trump administration as his own achievements, the AP reports.

Last month, Trump recognized Israeli sovereignty over the Golan Heights, which Israel seized from Syria in 1967. In his first year in office, Trump had also recognized Jerusalem — the disputed city claimed as capital by both Israeli and Palestinian people — as Israel’s capital, breaking with decades of U.S. foreign policy.

Polls indicate a close race, though Netanyahu’s Likud Party and its traditional allies, smaller right-wing parties, are predicted to win a slight majority of the votes. That gives Netanyahu the edge on forming a ruling coalition over Gantz’s Blue and White political alliance – unless some right-wing parties choose to side with Gantz, Estrin reports.

Gantz has accused Netanyahu of inciting against Israel’s Palestinian Arab citizens and embracing extremists by allying with the far-right Jewish Power Party.

Source Article from https://www.npr.org/2019/04/07/710799152/ahead-of-israeli-election-netanyahu-pledges-to-annex-west-bank-settlements

A police officer was shot in Los Angeles Sunday morning and transported to a local trauma center, police said.

The Hawthorne Police Department confirmed that one of its officers was shot in the leg, and is expected to make a full recovery.

“Officer down,” the department tweeted. “We had an officer involved shooting at Rosecrans and Aviation.”

“Still working to secure the area,” it added. “We have possible 1 suspect detained.”

At a news conference, Michael Ishii, the chief of Hawthorne police, said that the department received a call about a domestic dispute at around 9:20 a.m. at a local Marriott hotel. When officers responded, the suspect ran across the street into a shopping center. Officers confronted him, after which he shot at them and fled.

Officials have not released the name of the officer, but said the male suspect is in custody. The suspect also suffered a gunshot wound.

The LA County Sheriff’s Office warned people in a tweet to avoid the area of Rosencrans Ave and Aviation Boulevard.

This a developing story. Please check back for updates.

Source Article from https://abcnews.go.com/US/police-officer-shot-los-angeles-suspect-custody-report/story?id=62234493

CHICAGO — At least six people were shot, including two children, when gunfire erupted at a West Englewood baby shower, police and witnesses said.

According to the Chicago Police Department, the shooting occurred at a family gathering about 6:20 p.m. in the 6300 block of South Seeley Avenue.

Witnesses said it was a baby shower.

An 8-year-old boy was shot in the chest and back and taken to Comer Children’s Hospital, according to police.

A spokesman for the Chicago Fire Department said the boy suffered at least one collapsed lung — and that paramedics performed a life-saving needle decompression procedure in the ambulance.

Police said a 10-year-old girl was shot in the shin and taken to Comer, where her condition had stabilized.

A 29-year-old woman is in critical condition after being shot in the shoulder and chest. She was taken to Advocate Christ Medical Center.

A 42-year-old man was shot twice in the hip. A 23-year-old man was shot in the left foot. A 28-year-old man was shot in his right shoulder. All of their conditions had stabilized, authorities said.

Chicago police spokesman Anthony Guglielmi said witnesses on the scene were not being cooperative.

No one was in custody. Detectives are investigating.

Source Article from https://wgntv.com/2019/04/06/at-least-5-wounded-in-west-englewood-shooting-police-say/

Acting White House Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney told “Fox News Sunday” in an exclusive interview that Democrats will “never” see President Trump’s tax returns, days after a House Democrat committee chairman made the unprecedented demand that the IRS provide the documents.

Mulvaney’s comments marked an apparent escalation in the White House’s rhetoric on the issue. On Wednesday, Trump responded with a dismissive taunt to Democrats’ renewed push for his tax information, but suggested he might be willing to provide the information pending the conclusion of an audit.

“Oh no, never — nor should they,” Mulvaney told Bill Hemmer, who is filling in for host Chris Wallace, when asked if Democrats will ever see the president’s tax returns. “That’s an issue that was already litigated during the election. Voters knew the president could have given his tax returns. They knew that he didn’t and they elected him anyway.”

Mulvaney added that Democrats “know” they won’t get the returns, and “just want attention on the issue because they don’t want to talk to us about policy.” A “fundamental” purpose of tax law, Mulvaney continued, is to protect the privacy of tax filers.

“If they don’t get what they want in the Mueller report, they’re going to ask for the taxes,” Mulvaney said. “If they don’t get what they want in the taxes, they’re going to ask for something else. It doesn’t surprise anybody.”

House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Richard Neal, D-Mass., arrives for a Democratic Caucus meeting at the Capitol in Washington, on April 2, 2019. Rep. Neal, whose committee has jurisdiction over all tax issues, has formally requested President Donald Trump’s tax returns from the Internal Revenue Service for the past 6 years. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)

Told by a reporter on Wednesday at the White House that Democrats wanted six years of his tax returns, Trump didn’t rule out the possibility permanently.

“Is that all? Usually it’s 10,” Trump responded. “So I guess they’re giving up. We’re under audit, despite what people said, and we’re working that out — I’m always under audit, it seems, but I’ve been under audit for many years, because the numbers are big, and I guess when you have a name, you’re audited. But until such time as I’m not under audit, I would not be inclined to do that.”

One of the president’s personal lawyers later wrote a forceful four-page letter to the Treasury Department to oppose the Democrats’ request, saying it would set a “dangerous precedent.”

WHAT DID TRUMP ATTORNEY SAY IN LETTER OPPOSING DEMS’ TAX RETURN DEMAND?

The request Wednesday by Massachusetts Rep. Richard Neal, who heads the tax-writing House Ways and Means Committee, was the first such demand for a sitting president’s tax information in 45 years. The move set up a virtually certain legal showdown with the White House.

Neal made the request in a letter to IRS Commissioner Charles Rettig, asking for Trump’s personal and business returns for 2013 through 2018. Neal told Rettig that Democrats have a duty “to ensure that the Internal Revenue Service is enforcing the laws in a fair and impartial manner.”

“It is critical to ensure the accountability of our government and elected officials,” Neal said in a statement. “To maintain trust in our democracy, the American people must be assured that their government is operating properly, as laws intend.”

Neal specifically demanded the federal income tax returns from eight entities, including Trump National Golf Club-Bedminster, as well as statements specifying whether the returns were ever under audit. Neal also demanded all administrative files, including affidavits, related to each return.

Also on Sunday, Ways and Means committee member Dan Kildee, D-Mich., backed up Neal’s request.

“It is not up to President Trump to determine whether or not this coequal branch of government has the tools available to it to make the deliberations necessary in order to make policy,” Kildee told ABC News’ “This Week” on Sunday.

And speaking later to Hemmer, Rep. Ben Ray Luján, D-N.M., said that Trump had promised to release his tax returns during the 2016 presidential campaign.

“This is not political,” Luján insisted.

The president’s congressional allies registered immediate and fierce disapproval to Neal’s request throughout the week. The top Republican on the House Ways and Means Committee, Kevin Brady, R-Texas, wrote to Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin to decry what he called Democrats’ “abuse” of their authority.

That provision of tax law generally prohibits the disclosure of personal tax information.

Brady wrote that while “transparency in our government is enormously important,” the “privacy and freedom” of all taxpayers is paramount — and that Congress should pass new disclosure laws if it sees a problem. Violating the privacy rights of one taxpayer, Brady asserted, “begins the process of eroding and threatening the privacy rights of all taxpayers.”

FILE – In this Dec. 10, 2018, file photo, people look on from the Mexican side, left, as U.S. Border Patrol agents on the other side of the U.S. border wall in San Diego prepare for the arrival of hundreds of pro-migration protestors, seen from Tijuana, Mexico. The southern border is nearly 2,000 miles long and already has about 650 miles of different types of barriers, including short vehicle barricades and tall, steel fences that go up to 30 feet high. (AP Photo/Rebecca Blackwell, File)

Mulvaney, on Sunday, echoed those concerns.

“They know one of the fundamental principles of the IRS is to protect the confidentiality of you and me and everybody else who files taxes. They know that,” Mulvaney said. “They know the terms under law by which the IRS can give them the documents, but political hit job is not one of those reasons.”

CLICK TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Separately, Mulvaney charged that Democrats suffer from “Trump Derangement Syndrome” and were “blindsided” by Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s findings that the Trump team had not colluded illegally with Russia.

Mulvaney also sounded a critical note on the 2020 Democrat presidential field, telling Hemmer “it’s fun watching them implode,” and that the party’s leading candidates seem to want to “Make America Apologize Again” on an array of issues.

And asked whether Herman Cain is still up for a position on the Federal Reserve board despite longstanding sexual harassment allegations against him, Mulvaney responded, “Yes, and I think Herman would be a great member of the Fed.”

Fox News’ Bill Hemmer, Mike Emanuel, Chad Pergram and The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/politics/mulvaney-dems-will-never-see-trumps-tax-returns

Jerusalem – Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has said that he would annex illegal Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank if he wins another term in office, in an attempt to win over right-wing voters.

He made the statement in an interview with Israeli Channel 12 News on Saturday, three days before the April 9 election.

Reuters news agency reported that he was asked why he had not extended sovereignty to West Bank settlements since Israel had annexed East Jerusalem and the Golan Heights without international recognition during the 1967 war.

“Who says that we won’t do it? We are on the way and we are discussing it,” Netanyahu said, according to Reuters.

“You are asking whether we are moving on to the next stage – the answer is yes, we will move to the next stage. I am going to extend [Israeli] sovereignty and I don’t distinguish between settlement blocs and the isolated settlements.”


Mitchell Barak, an Israeli political pollster and analyst, told Al Jazeera he classifies Netanyahu’s comments as nothing more than election talk.

“Whatever happens in the election, stays in the election. I don’t think he has any real intention of [annexing settlements]. We don’t know. It’s highly unlikely that this will turn into policy,” Barak said.

“If [voters] see him embracing this policy, they may move to vote for him, but it’s nothing more than an election gimmick at this point.”

However, many Palestinians have been taking his words seriously, including Aida Touma-Suleiman, a member of the Knesset (MK) running for the joint Arab Haddash-Ta’al party.

On the eve of the last election in 2015, Netanyahu similarly made waves by stating that if he returned to the office he would never establish a Palestinian state, reversing his previous endorsement of a two-state solution.

Since then, he has done precisely what he said, Touma-Suleiman told Al Jazeera.

“Everyone thought it was election talk. But for four years he has step by step almost accomplished the mission he stated … In my opinion, he is going to annex the settlements,” Touma-Suleiman said.

“I hope we’ll be able to see a government that’s more rational at least. I don’t believe that [Benny] Gantz is an alternative. I don’t believe that generals will bring hope to this country but I can see the damage that Netanyahu is doing, which is long-term damage and I would like to see it stopped immediately.”

‘Creeping annexation’

Over the years, reports have highlighted the “creeping annexation” that has been enfolding, with the government also initiating legislative measures that sought to apply Israeli law to the West Bank and the 2017 settlement regularisation law, which retroactively legalises settlements.

Currently, there are some 600,000 to 750,000 illegal settlers living in about 150 settlements across the West Bank and East Jerusalem, built on land the Palestinians had envisioned for a future state.

Netanyahu has made significant achievements in the past two years.

Most recently, during Netanyahu’s visit to Washington on March 25, US President Donald Trump signed a proclamation recognising Israel’s sovereignty over the Golan Heights, reversing 52 years of official US policy.

Israel has occupied Golan Heights since 1967 when it seized the Syrian territory along with East Jerusalem and the West Bank.

Many saw the move as paving the way for the subsequent annexation of the West Bank.


During Netanyahu’s term, Trump also recognised Jerusalem as Israel’s capital in December 2017, a catastrophic declaration for Palestinians who had envisioned East Jerusalem as the capital of their future state.

MK Ahmad Tibi, running as the second candidate on the Hadash-Ta’al list, told Al Jazeera that Netanyahu’s latest statement is a “direct continuation” of his declaration made in 2015 that he would never agree to a Palestinian state.

“An annexation of Palestinian land, he considers it an issue in the elections [because] it brings him more votes [among the right]. This is the real Netanyahu,” Tibi said.

“If he will lead the next government, it will be more right, more extreme and more ready to annex the land with Donald Trump in the White House.”

There has been a surge of tenders for settlement construction in the past two years since President Trump took office, according to the Israeli organisation Peace Now.

In 2017 and 2018, there were tenders for 3,154 and 3,808 settlement housing units, respectively, compared with just 42 in 2016.

However, Akiva Eldar, a senior columnist for Al-Monitor, told Al Jazeera that annexing the illegal settlements outright would be difficult to do; Netanyahu’s statement may be just a last-minute spin like in the previous election.

“It [would be] breaking the status quo … it’s going to rock the boat. I don’t think Netanyahu is interested,” Eldar said.

“He’s very satisfied with the political status quo in diplomatic negotiations and the creeping annexation. He’s been making statements but doing it one by one, one centimetre at a time, changing facts on the ground without having to pay a price in the diplomatic arena.”

Source Article from https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2019/04/netanyahu-annex-illegal-settlements-west-bank-190407110322201.html

Image copyright
EPA

Image caption

Forces from Misrata arrived in Tripoli to defend it from rebel troops

Libya’s UN-backed government says 21 people have been killed and 27 wounded in fighting near the capital, Tripoli.

Earlier the UN called for a two-hour truce so casualties and civilians could be evacuated, but it was unclear if there was any lull.

Rebel forces under Gen Khalifa Haftar have advanced from the east with the aim of taking Tripoli.

Prime Minister Fayez al-Serraj has accused him of attempting a coup and says rebels will be met with force.

Among the dead was a Red Crescent doctor killed on Saturday. Gen Haftar’s forces said they had lost 14 fighters.

International powers have begun evacuating personnel from Libya amid the worsening security situation.

Libya has been torn by violence and political instability since long-time ruler Muammar Gaddafi was deposed and killed in 2011.

What’s the situation on the ground?

Gen Haftar’s Libyan National Army (LNA) forces have been carrying out a multi-pronged attack from the south and west of the city since Thursday.

On Sunday the LNA said it had carried out its first air strike, a day after the UN-backed Government of National Accord (GNA) hit them with air strikes on Saturday.

Fighting has continued around the disused international airport south of the capital that Gen Haftar earlier said his forces had seized.

Forces loyal to the GNA have slowed the advance and on Sunday a GNA spokesman told Al-Jazeera TV that the GNA now intended to “cleanse” the whole of the country.

What evacuations have already taken place?

US Africa Command, responsible for US military operations and liaison in Africa, said that due to the “increased unrest” it had relocated a contingent of US forces temporarily, but gave no further details on numbers.

There were reports of a fast amphibious craft being used in the operation.

India’s External Affairs Minister Sushma Swaraj said its full contingent of 15 Central Reserve Police Force peacekeepers had been evacuated from Tripoli because the “situation in Libya has suddenly worsened”.

Image copyright
Reuters

Image caption

A market in Tripoli. Residents are said to be stocking up on supplies

The Italian multinational oil and gas company, Eni, decided to evacuate all its Italian personnel from the country.

The UN is also due to pull out non-essential staff.

Residents of Tripoli have reportedly begun stocking up on food and fuel. But BBC Arab affairs editor Sebastian Usher says many of those near the fighting are remaining in their homes for now, for fear of looting should they leave.

Some fear a long operation, which Gen Haftar mounted to take the eastern city of Benghazi from Islamist fighters.

Who are the opposing forces?

Libya has been wracked by unrest since the overthrow of Col Gaddafi. Dozens of militias operate in the country.

Image copyright
AFP

Image caption

Gen Haftar has ordered his forces to advance on Tripoli

Recently they have been allying either with the UN-backed GNA, based in Tripoli, or the LNA of Gen Haftar, a tough anti-Islamist who has the support of Egypt and the UAE and is strong in eastern Libya.

Gen Haftar helped Col Gaddafi seize power in 1969 before falling out with him and going into exile in the US. He returned in 2011 after the uprising against Gaddafi began and became a rebel commander.

The unity government was created at talks in 2015 but has struggled to assert national control.

Prime Minister Fayez al-Serraj delivered a TV address on Saturday, saying he would defend the capital.

Mr Serraj said he had offered concessions to Gen Haftar to avoid bloodshed, only to be “stabbed in the back”.

Back to square one?

Analysis by Rana Jawad, BBC North Africa correspondent, in Tunis

The rogue general’s defiance suggests that, despite international condemnation of his recent moves, he believes he can only secure a place in Libya’s future political makeup through militarily means.

Diplomats are worried, because the manner and timing of the attack means he is unlikely to back down unless he is defeated.

Few thought he would go ahead and launch this operation – which he has long threatened to do – because they believed ongoing talks that saw him go from Paris to Palermo and the UAE for more than a year would buy time until a new political settlement was reached through negotiations and an eventual electoral process.

Today, Western nations have few cards to play to de-escalate the violence and once again find themselves in a position where they may need to start from scratch.

Are peace talks planned?

UN-backed talks aimed at drawing up a road map for new elections have been scheduled for 14-16 April in the Libyan city of Ghadames.

UN envoy Ghassan Salame insisted the talks would go ahead, unless serious obstacles prevented it, saying “we won’t give up this political work quickly”.

UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres was in Tripoli just last Thursday to discuss the situation.

But Gen Haftar has said his troops will not stop until they have defeated “terrorism”.

Source Article from https://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-47844513

Theresa May’s mutinous MPs are warning her that they will move to oust her within weeks if the UK is forced to take part in European elections next month and extend its EU membership beyond the end of June.

Tory MPs are increasingly angry at the prospect of voters being asked to go to the polls to elect MEPs three years after the Brexit referendum, in an election they fear will be boycotted by many Conservatives and be a gift to the far right and Nigel Farage’s new Brexit party. Senior Tories said one silver lining of a long extension would be that it would allow them to move quickly to force May out, and hold a leadership election starting as soon as this month.

The warnings came as the prime minister made a last desperate appeal on Saturday night to MPs to back a deal, saying there was an increasing danger Brexit would “slip though our fingers”. May said: “Because parliament has made clear it will stop the UK leaving without a deal, we now have a stark choice: leave the European Union with a deal or do not leave at all.

“The longer this takes, the greater the risk of the UK never leaving at all. It would mean letting the Brexit that the British people voted for slip through our fingers. I will not stand for that. It is essential we deliver what people voted for, and to do that we need to get a deal over the line.”

Conservative MP Nigel Evans, an executive member of the 1922 Committee of backbenchers said on Saturday night that, if May failed to deliver Brexit and all she could do was secure a long extension at an EU summit on Wednesday, she would face overwhelming pressure to step down. “At the moment there is focus on delivering Brexit, but if a long delay becomes a reality I believe the noises off about removing the prime minister will become a cacophony,” he said. “I and many other Conservatives would prefer leaving the EU on World Trade Organisation terms to any humiliating long extension that forces us to take part in the European elections.”

Nigel Adams, a former minister who quit last week over May’s decision to hold talks on Brexit with Jeremy Corbyn, said: “Over 170 Conservative MPs including cabinet ministers signed a letter to the PM last week urging her to ensure the UK does not take part in the European elections. Doing so will not end well.”

With discussions on Brexit between the government and Labour appearing to have stalled on Friday, there are fears among senior Conservatives that EU leaders will demand the UK remains in the EU for up to a year and takes part in European elections, unless parliament can agree a Brexit deal before 22 May.

Last month May told Tory MPs that she would stand down once Brexit had been delivered. If there was a lengthy extension to membership, the Tory party rulebook means she could not be forced out before December if she wished to go on. But an increasing number of her MPs and ministers believe her time would be up.

It is also understood that the foreign secretary, Jeremy Hunt, a potential frontrunner to succeed May, has been informing backbenchers that he would prefer to leave on WTO terms rather than accept a long extension and made this clear in cabinet discussions last week.

Sir Graham Brady, chair of the 1922 Committee, told the Observer: “British participation in European elections three years after a majority of the British people voted to leave the EU would be a massive political mistake. The results for the mainstream parties would be likely to be poor and more extreme parties would be looking forward to a massive opportunity.

“Everything should be done to ensure the UK leaves in the near future, obviating the need to participate in the European elections.”

On Saturday night Downing Street said discussions with Labour to find a Brexit compromise that could pass through parliament before Wednesday’s EU summit were “ongoing” at a technical level, but declined to be drawn on whether there were any plans to hold votes tomorrow or Tuesday, before May heads to Brussels.

In an attempt to persuade Labour to sign up to a deal, No 10 is offering to enshrine in law a plan that would hand parliament a say in future trade talks with the EU. They believe it would stop a new Tory leader, such as Boris Johnson, shifting to a harder Brexit once May has been replaced.

Meanwhile the new Independent Group of 11 former Labour and Tory MPs said it had been approached by more than 200 people, including one former Tory minister, who wanted to stand for the embryonic party in the European elections. It sees the elections as a chance to mobilise remain voters and make its first electoral breakthrough.

Source Article from https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2019/apr/06/furious-tory-mps-will-bid-to-oust-may-if-uk-fights-euro-poll

For more than four years, President Donald Trump has refused to release his federal income tax returns. Friday, his attorney said the president plans to continue doing so, despite pressure from House Democrats to make the returns public.

In a letter to the Treasury Department, Trump’s attorney William Consovoy called on the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) to reject a request from the House Ways and Means Committee to release the president’s personal and business tax returns.

“It would be a gross abuse of power for the majority party to use tax returns as a weapon to attack, harass, and intimidate their political opponents,” Consovoy wrote on Friday. “Once this Pandora’s box is opened, the ensuing tit-for-tat will do lasting damage to our nation.”

Rep. Richard Neal (D-MA), who chairs the House Ways and Means Committee, demanded Trump’s returns on Wednesday, following months of a slow and meticulous start to a number of investigations into the Trump White House by Democrats newly in control of the House of Representatives.

Neal wants six years worth of Trump’s personal federal income tax returns and returns for business entities tied to his name, spanning 2013 through 2018. The chairman set an April 10 deadline for returns’ release.

The president’s legal team made clear this week that it has every intention to fight House Democrats tooth and nail over the issue. The team has already indicated a willingness to bring the issue all the way to the Supreme Court.

Trump’s argument for why he shouldn’t release his returns keeps changing

Trump defied decades of precedent in refusing to release his returns — every modern presidential party nominee has made their tax returns public at one point or another. The president has justified his refusal to follow suit, but his justifications keep changing.

Over the course of his 2016 presidential campaign, Trump waffled over whether he’d actually make his returns available to the public. Before formally announcing his campaign, Trump promised conservative radio host Hugh Hewitt he would release his returns should he run for president. The president then punted on the issue after he formally declared his candidacy months later, saying in August 2015 that he’d release them “at some point.”

Trump teased of a big tax return reveal during the Republican primary season. But as Vox’s Andrew Prokop notes, Trump’s storyline started to shift around the time he edged closer to clinching the party’s nomination. Trump began arguing that he was barred from releasing his returns because he was being audited by the IRS. Only after the audit was finished would he be able to make the returns public, he claimed.

Tax experts, including at the IRS, debunked these claims as bogus. Nevertheless, it’s a justification Trump continues to use today. “Until such time as I am not under audit, I will not be doing that, thank you,” Trump said this week, according to Politico.

House Democrats are now trying to use the audit process against the president. They’re using a somewhat novel approach, working to obtain Trump’s returns by checking on whether the IRS is properly auditing his taxes.

In a letter to the IRS Commissioner Charles Rettig on Wednesday, Neal wrote that although the agency has historically audited the tax returns of sitting presidents and vice presidents, little is known about the process. The chairman argued the House needed the returns in order to fulfill Congress’ duty in conducting “oversight of departments and officials.”

Trump’s legal team responded by calling on the Justice Department to weigh in; it also asked the Treasury Department to deny Neal’s request until the DOJ submits a formal legal opinion.

As New York Times reporter Maggie Haberman points out, central to the attorneys’ argument is a claim that Trump is both a regular citizen and sitting president. On one hand, they argue he is a private citizen and that Neal’s committee has “no power to conduct its own examination of the individual taxpayers.” On the other hand, Trump has used his authority as president to fill federal agencies with political appointees, including Rettig.

As Vox’s Emily Stewart reports, before he led the IRS, Rettig said he wouldn’t advise Trump to release his returns while being audited. “Would any experienced tax lawyer representing Trump in an IRS audit advise him to publicly release his tax returns during the audit? Absolutely not,” Rettig said in 2016.

The almost certain impending legal battle over the president’s tax returns will likely stretch out for months, meaning there is a high chance that even if Democrats do get their hands on them, it won’t be until after the 2020 presidential election.

Trump has been able to stall on releasing his returns for this long — odds are, even with House Democrats turning up the pressure, this won’t be his last stand.

Source Article from https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2019/4/6/18298327/trump-tax-returns-audit-house-democrats

U.S. Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., called President Trump’s recent barb about her being a “young bartender” a compliment and lashed out at Amazon while speaking with constituents Saturday.

“There’s nothing wrong with being a bartender,” Ocasio-Cortez said at a joint event in the New York City borough of Queens alongside New York state Sen. Michael Gianaris. “It’s so crazy to at once mock someone for being from a working-class background, for being a bartender, for shaming me for where I was born and where I’m from and on the other hand, when I lean into my identity and who I am and all of that, people are saying that’s not true either.”

The freshman congresswoman said her work as a bartender gave her first-hand experience with health care issues, the New York Daily News reported. She said that unlike Trump, she bought into health care public exchanges.

“He’s never had to actually see the rising premiums month to month, and you have a $6,000 deductible for a $2,000 health insurance plan,” she said, according to the paper.

Ocasio-Cortez also responded to New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo, who has blamed her and other Amazon critics for the company’s decision to scrap a proposal to open a second headquarters in the Long Island City neighborhood of Queens, according to the New York Post. Amazon promised the facility would bring 25,000 jobs to the city.

OCASIO-CORTEZ SLAMMED AS ‘FINANCIALLY ILLITERATE’ AT SHARPTON EVENT OVER AMAZON, FACES CALLS TO BE OUSTED FROM OFFICE

The retail giant pulled out of the deal in February after backlash from some progressives over the $3 billion in tax breaks and subsidies the city was prepared to offer the company.

“[A] small group [of] politicians put their own narrow political interests above their community — which poll after poll showed overwhelmingly supported bringing Amazon to Long Island City,” Cuomo said in a statement at the time.

Some local residents also blasted the progressives, saying the area needed the Amazon jobs.

“I felt like people should have gotten the jobs,” Susie Scaretta-Enright of Woodside told the New York Post. “There are people that are struggling.”

“I felt like people should have gotten the jobs. There are people that are struggling.”

— Susie Scaretta-Enright, resident opposing Ocasio-Cortez stand on Amazon plan in New York City

The governor recently said the fallout has wrecked the city’s ability to attract new businesses.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

“What’s wild to see is how when the community tried to sit down at the table and negotiate … any small demand was immediately met with a ‘no’,” Ocasio-Cortez said. “So it’s not about being blanket ‘pro’ or ‘anti’ Amazon, it’s the fact that … we can’t just be allowed to govern by bullying.”

“People are unhappy, and they should be unhappy with those who were in secret rooms making the deal — not anyone else asking questions and trying to protect the community,” Gianaris added.

Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ocasio-cortez-responds-to-trump-over-bartender-comment-lashes-out-at-amazon

Authorities were responding to reports of six people shot Saturday evening in the West Englewood neighborhood.

The incident occurred around 6:21 p.m. in 6300 block of South Seeley Ave., according to police.

Authorities said two of those individuals were children; a 10-year-old girl who was shot in the shin and an 8-year-old boy who was shot in the chest and back. Both were taken to Comer Children’s Hospital in stable condition, police said.

A 29-year-old woman who was shot in the shoulder and chest area was taken to Christ Hospital in critical condition, along with a 42-year-old man who was shot twice in the hip, officials confirmed.

Two other males, a 23-year-old shot in the left foot though in stable condition and a 28-year-old shot in the right shoulder, were taken to Holy Cross Hospital. The 28-year-old was later transported to Mount Sinai Hospital for further evaluation.

“The shooting occured at a family gathering,” CPD Spokesman Anthony Guglielmi later tweeted.

Guglielmi also mentioned on Twitter that individuals on the scene were not being cooperative with detectives. 

At the moment, no offenders were taken into custody.

No other details were immediately known.

Source Article from http://www.necn.com/news/national-international/Reports-of-Multiple-People-Shot-in-West-Englewood-508219401.html

Secretary of State Mike Pompeo suggested Friday that Yujing Zhang, the woman who breached security at President Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago, Florida club, may have been a Chinese spy.

Pompeo said on “CBS This Morning” that there was an active investigation into the incident where 32-year-old Zhang was arrested.

“I think this tells the American people the threat that China poses, the efforts they’re making inside the United States, not only against government officials but more broadly,” Pompeo said.

Zhang’s arrest has surfaced broader security concerns across several law enforcement agencies, as she has reportedly been charged by federal prosecutors and is under investigation by the FBI’s Counterintelligence Division in South Florida for possible ties to Chinese intelligence services, according to the Miami Herald.

Read more: The arrest of a woman carrying a USB stick with malware into Mar-a-Lago exposes glaring flaws in the resort’s security, as FBI reportedly investigates whether she is a Chinese spy

Zhang was on resort property after showing two Taiwanese passports to Secret Service agents and telling them she was a club member trying to use the pool, Secret Service Agent Samuel Ivanovich said in a Saturday court filing.

Upon her arrest, agents discovered she was carrying a laptop, a hard drive, and a thumb drive containing “malicious malware” and spoke better English than she had initially presented to security.

The private property presents a unique security challenge to federal agents, as Trump has previously hosted official visits on the property, in close proximity to resort guests.

The Secret Service said in a statement after Zhang’s arrest that it “does not determine who is invited or welcome at Mar-a-Lago; this is the responsibility of the host entity. The Mar-a-Lago club management determines which members and guests are granted access to the property.”

Zhang is due to appear in court next week

Watch Pompeo’s full interview below »

Source Article from https://www.businessinsider.com/pompeo-chinese-woman-arrested-at-mar-a-lago-example-of-china-threat-2019-4