Most Viewed Videos

Source Article from https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2022/08/30/midwest-storms-michigan-indiana-power-outages/7937311001/

Liz Truss became the third female prime minister in British history on Tuesday and pledged to immediately set about tackling the United Kingdom’s spiraling cost of living crisis, saying she was confident that “together we can ride out of the storm” of economic problems facing the nation.

Truss, 47, took office on a day of ceremony that saw her scandal-plagued predecessor Boris Johnson bow out in a defiant speech at Downing Street in London before both politicians flew to meet the Queen in Scotland for a transfer of power.

Truss, who served as foreign minister in the previous government, enters office after winning the most votes in the Conservative Party leadership contest to replace Johnson, who announced his resignation in July in the wake of a series of scandals. Her appointment fills a monthslong leadership void that the UK has endured as its worst economic crisis in decades has worsened.

Truss’s to-do list is long, with the country facing a deepening cost-of-living crisis, a crumbling healthcare service, and a seemingly endless wave of labor strikes.

Speaking on the steps of Downing Street on Tuesday evening, Truss said her priorities were delivering tax cuts to grow the economy, improving Britain’s energy security amid soaring prices, and fixing the National Health Service, thoug she did not outline any specific policies.

She also said she would defend freedom and democracy in the face of Russia’s war in Ukraine.

“I will deal hands on with the energy crisis forged by Putin’s war. I will take action this week to deal with energy bills and to secure our future energy supply,” Truss said. “By delivering on the economy, on energy and on the NHS, we will put our nation on the path to long-term success.”

She ended on an optimistic note, acknowledging the many difficulties the UK faced at the moment.

“We should not be daunted by the challenges we face. As strong as the storm may be, I know that the British people are stronger,” Truss said. “Our country was built by people who get things done. We have huge reserves of talent, of energy and determination and I am confident that together we can ride out the storm.”

The most urgent problem Truss must address is the skyrocketing cost of energy, which could unleash a wave of business closures and force millions of Britons to choose between putting food on the table and heating their homes this winter. Experts have warned that people will become destitute and cold-weather deaths will rise unless something is done fast.

The Bank of England anticipates that inflation in the UK will jump to 13% as the energy crisis intensifies, and that the country will enter recession before the end of the year. Goldman Sachs has warned inflation could even reach 22% if natural gas prices “remain elevated at current levels.”

Truss was formally installed as prime minister on Tuesday after visiting Queen Elizabeth II at Balmoral Castle, one the royal estates in Scotland, in a break with norms.

Traditionally, the Queen invites a new prime minister to form a government during an audience at London’s Buckingham Palace – but for the first time in her 70-year reign, the monarch chose not to travel to the British capital as a precaution due to her mobility issues.

Truss’s meeting with the monarch took place shortly after Johnson met with the Queen to officially resign as prime minister.

Liz Truss has many challenges ahead of her — including a party now well versed in regicide

In his farewell speech outside Downing Street early Tuesday, Johnson touted his achievements, made no mention of failures, and pledged to support Truss’ new government.

“Like Cincinnatus, I am returning to my plow, and I will be offering this government nothing but my fervent support,” referring to a Roman statesman who according to legend devoted himself to the republic during times of crisis. “It’s time for us all to get behind Liz Truss and her team and her program.”

Truss will now set out to appoint a Cabinet, and will be expected to promote many allies who backed her leadership campaign. Kwasi Kwarteng and Suella Braverman are tipped for promotions; two Johnson loyalists, Nadine Dorries and Priti Patel, have quit.

Truss will also be expected to outline her plans for dealing with the UK’s urgent cost-of-living crisis as soon as possible. Her political opponents, both inside and outside the Conservative Party, will not deem it acceptable if the new leader fails to outline specific policies in the next 48 hours.

Truss will then face the leader of the opposition Labour Party, Keir Starmer, for her first Prime Minister’s Questions in the House of Commons on Wednesday afternoon, which will be seen by her team as an important moment to set the tone of her leadership.

Particular attention will be paid to how much Truss deviate’s from Johnson’s legislative agenda, particularly as she was seen as the Johnson continuity candidate in the leadership race.

Who is Liz Truss?

Truss, who served most recently as foreign minister in Johnson’s government, follows Margaret Thatcher and Theresa May to become Britain’s third female premier.

In recent years, Truss has been compared to Thatcher, who, for many on the right, remains the benchmark for Conservative leaders. She was a tax-cutting, hard-nosed leader who took on the unions and played a large role in ending the Cold War. Like Thatcher, Truss has come from relatively humble beginnings to dominate a world inhabited largely by men.

Truss ran her leadership campaign on a classic Conservative platform, promising tax cuts for citizens and no new taxes for businesses, including ruling out a windfall tax on energy companies to deal with the UK’s cost-of-living crisis.

Analysts are skeptical that Truss’s tax-cutting policies will do much help citizens, especially after a decade of Conservative austerity policies. The Institute for Fiscal Studies, an independent research group focusing on public finances, said last month that Truss and leadership rival Rishi Sunak, who were both promising tax cuts and smaller government spending, “need to recognise this even greater-than-usual uncertainty in the public finances.”

Despite voting to remain in the European Union back in 2016, in recent years she has emerged as one of the most vocal critics of the European Union and staunchest supporters of Brexit.

Britain’s new prime minister, Liz Truss, is a political shape-shifter. Now she’s set for her toughest transformation yet

But critics have accused her new-found hardline Brexit stance of being a cynical ploy. They have pointed to the fact that throughout her adult life Truss has evolved, from being an anti-monarchist Liberal Democrat in favor of legalizing drugs in her youth to the embodiment of the Conservative right today.

Before the Brexit referendum, Truss said that she was “backing remain as I believe it is in Britain’s economic interest and means we can focus on vital economic and social reform at home.” Cabinet colleagues at the time said she never voiced any opposition to staying in the EU, despite having ample opportunities to do so.

These days, Truss is more than happy to pick fights with Brussels and to claim that it was the EU all along that held the British economy back.

Truss’ victory over Sunak, the former finance secretary, was smaller than expected, which means she may have to accommodate a wider range of views from her party. That could entail embracing more of Sunak’s ideas around the cost-of-living crisis, and a less aggressive approach to tax cuts.

Many Conservative MPs are privately worried that Truss’ modern-day Thatcherism could cost them the next election, and will be leaping on the surprisingly low margin of victory to encourage her to soften her economic stance.

Source Article from https://www.cnn.com/2022/09/06/uk/liz-truss-officially-new-prime-minister-uk-gbr-intl/index.html

WASHINGTON, Sept 7 (Reuters) – A federal judge has given the U.S. Justice Department and Donald Trump’s lawyers until Friday to come up with a list of potential candidates to serve as a special master to review records the FBI seized from the former president’s Florida estate.

But finding people who have the necessary experience and security clearances to handle the highly classified documents — and the willingness to enter the political brushfire surrounding the probe — will be no small task, legal experts said.

“If we’re talking about highly classified material, there’s only a relatively small number of individuals who would satisfy the requirements of the job,” said attorney Kenneth Feinberg, who served as a special master for the 9/11 Victims Compensation Fund.

“It would have to be somebody willing to take on the hurricane. It’s not purely a security issue. It’s become a political issue,” he said.

One illustration of the challenge: the nonprofit law firm National Security Counselors last week provided the court with a list of four potential candidates with expertise on executive privilege. All four have since made public comments that either suggest they don’t want the job or that could be used to argue against them by lawyers for the Justice Department or Trump.

U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon on Monday ruled that a special master should review the records seized from Trump’s Palm Beach home to weed out anything that should be kept from prosecutors, either due to attorney-client privilege or executive privilege – a legal doctrine that shields some White House communications from disclosure.

The U.S. Supreme Court last year side-stepped the question of how far a former president’s privilege claims can go in rejecting Trump’s bid to keep White House records from the Jan. 6 select committee.

However, the U.S. National Archives, after conferring with the Justice Department, told Trump’s lawyers earlier this year that he cannot assert privilege against the executive branch to shield the records from the FBI.

SPECIAL MASTER

A special master is an independent outside expert who is sometimes tapped to review records seized by the government in sensitive cases where some of the material might be privileged.

Whoever is picked will likely need to have a top-level security clearance because more than 100 of the 11,000-plus documents are marked as top secret, secret or confidential.

A special master has never before been called on to determine whether records are covered by executive privilege, particularly in the unique circumstance of a former president asserting the right over the prerogative of the current president, Joe Biden.

“Appointing a special master I think may be harder than people think,” said John Bolton, Trump’s former national security adviser who previously also served at the Justice Department. “How many people with TS/SCI clearance are out there? And how many of them are experts on executive privilege?”

SOME OPT OUT

None of the four potential candidates identified by National Security Counselors in a court filing last week have openly embraced the idea.

One of them, Mark Rozell, the dean of the public policy school at George Mason University, has asked for his name to be removed from the list, telling Reuters: “Flattered that someone thinks I’m qualified, but I prefer analyzing from the outside of events.”

A second, former Justice Department attorney Jonathan Shaub, has not said whether he would take the job, but criticized Cannon’s order in an interview with Reuters on Monday, saying it was “filled with inaccuracies about the law” and that the judge seemed to be “bending over backwards to help Trump.”

Northwestern University law professor Heidi Kitrosser, the third, told Reuters that she believes she is unlikely to be selected, after some conservative media outlets and Trump supporters on social media pointed to her prior political comments.

The fourth person, Mitchel Sollenberger of the University of Michigan-Dearborn, said he does not have a security clearance.

A Justice Department spokesman on Monday said the government is reviewing Cannon’s order without commenting on next steps. Attorneys for Trump did not respond to requests for comment.

Most prior cases involving special masters related to practicing attorneys who had a duty to keep their clients’ records confidential.

A special master was appointed, for instance, after the FBI searched the homes and offices of former Trump attorneys Rudy Giuliani and Michael Cohen.

Some legal experts said the best bet is to look for recently retired judges from Washington, D.C., or Florida who have handled national security cases and could easily get their clearance restored.

Robert Costello, an attorney for Giuliani, said that after the FBI seized items from his client’s home and office, the government and the defense team were able to quickly agree on a special master candidate: retired judge Barbara Jones.

“They will try to whittle it down to one,” he said, noting that they will look for someone who can be “neutral and fair.”

If they can’t agree, he said, the judge can pick someone herself.

“The judge would be wise to make sure that it’s a consensus candidate,” said Feinberg. “She may end up appointing somebody over the objection of one side or the other, but at least she’s made an effort to determine and calibrate the degree of opposition.”

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

Thomson Reuters

Jacqueline Thomsen, based in Washington, D.C., covers legal news related to policy, the courts and the legal profession. Follow her on Twitter at @jacq_thomsen and email her at jacqueline.thomsen@thomsonreuters.com.

Source Article from https://www.reuters.com/legal/finding-special-master-trump-classified-documents-case-no-easy-task-2022-09-07/

Ukraine, battling a fierce Russian invasion, would benefit immensely from NATO’s defining credo, which says that “an armed attack” against any NATO ally is considered an attack against them all. But President Vladimir V. Putin has tried to justify his invasion by saying that Ukraine’s potential NATO membership threatens Russia, and Washington and its European allies do not want to further antagonize Russia and risk transforming the conflict into an expanded war.

Even without the high-stakes geopolitical risks, Ukraine, a former Soviet republic that has struggled with endemic corruption since gaining independence, would find it difficult to meet several necessary requirements to join NATO, including the need to demonstrate a commitment to the rule of law. Sweden and Finland, in contrast, have developed over decades into vibrant and healthy liberal democracies.

And any decision to admit a country to NATO requires unanimous consent from all of NATO’s 30 member states, which Ukraine is very unlikely to secure.

Here’s why Ukraine faces an uphill struggle to join one of the century’s most-vaunted security clubs:

Mired in war, Ukraine has set aside the goal of joining NATO.

President Volodymyr Zelensky of Ukraine has signaled Ukraine might have to accept never joining NATO.Credit…Daniel Berehulak for The New York Times

Finland joined NATO’s Partnership for Peace program along with Sweden in 1994 and has become ever closer to the alliance without joining it. Finland’s leaders have declared their support for joining NATO, and those in Sweden are expected to do the same within a matter of days.

But for Ukraine, being mired in an all-out war with Russia makes its NATO aspirations far more complicated. In February, President Volodymyr Zelensky of Ukraine stressed the ambition to join NATO, an aspiration fixed in Ukraine’s constitution since 2019. But this March, as war with Russia raged, Mr. Zelensky backed down from that hope, signaling that his country needed to accept that it may never join NATO.

The comments appeared to be a nod to the Kremlin’s demand that Ukraine give up the aim of joining NATO as a precondition to stopping the war. That intention was reiterated during peace talks in late March in Istanbul between Ukraine and Russia, during which Ukrainian officials said their country was ready to declare itself permanently neutral — forsaking the prospect of joining NATO, a key Russian demand.

Even if Ukraine still wanted to join NATO, it may not meet the requirements.

Ukrainian Army soldiers scrambled as Russian artillery shells hit near their position in the Kharkiv region of Ukraine on Wednesday.Credit…Lynsey Addario for The New York Times

To meet one of the three main criteria for entry into NATO, a European nation must demonstrate a commitment to democracy, individual liberty and support for the rule of law. While Ukrainian leaders say they have met that threshold, some American and European officials argue otherwise.

In a 2020 analysis, Transparency International, an anticorruption watchdog, ranked Ukraine 117th out of 180 countries on its corruption index, lower than any NATO nation at the time.

Some Western officials also question whether Ukraine could meet another criterion to contribute to the collective defense of NATO nations, even though Ukraine sent troops to the U.S.-led wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and has also shown its military prowess during the Russian invasion.

Whatever Ukraine’s military capabilities, there are other geopolitical hurdles. The alliance wants to avoid greater Russian hostility, and Ukraine would almost certainly have trouble meeting the third criterion: winning approval from all of NATO’s members. France and Germany have in the past opposed Ukraine’s inclusion, and other European members are skeptical — a likely dealbreaker if Ukraine wanted to join.

The United States has been lukewarm about Ukraine joining NATO.

While President Biden has repeatedly sent weapons packages to Ukraine, he has not appeared ready to welcome the nation into NATO.Credit…Doug Mills/The New York Times

President Vladimir V. Putin’s insistence that he needed to prevent Ukraine from joining NATO appeared to be a pretext for the war. But the United States has also been deeply wary of Ukraine joining the alliance.

In 2008, NATO promised Ukraine and Georgia that they could someday become members, without specifying a date. But the alliance has done little to make that promise a reality.

American officials say they will not appease Mr. Putin by undermining a policy enshrined in NATO’s original 1949 treaty, which grants any European nation the right to ask to join. The White House insists it will not allow Moscow to quash Kyiv’s ambition to join the alliance.

Nevertheless, in January, a month before Mr. Putin launched his full-scale invasion, difficult negotiations between the United States, Russia and European members of NATO made it clear that the Biden administration had no immediate plans to help bring the former Soviet republic into NATO.

President Biden, wary of expanding U.S. military commitments, has been reluctant to support Ukraine’s membership. Analysts say two decades of war in Iraq and Afghanistan have cooled his fervor for expanding NATO.

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/live/2022/05/12/world/russia-ukraine-war-news

Source Article from https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2022/05/17/ukraine-russia-invasion-live-updates/9803125002/

(CNN)How a teen with an assault-style rifle walked into an unlocked Texas elementary school and stayed nearly an hour — turning a classroom into a killing field as desperate parents begged officers outside to let them in — has emerged as a key horrifying question about the police response to the deadliest US school shooting in almost a decade.

    Source Article from https://www.cnn.com/2022/05/27/us/uvalde-texas-elementary-school-shooting-friday/index.html