Most Viewed Videos

Muy lejos de ser un secreto se encuentra el hecho de que en nuestro país existe un pésimo resultado del sistema de capitalización individual para otorgar pensiones. Las empresas privadas de giro único y con fines de lucro creadas bajo los criterios del Decreto de Ley 3.500 de José Piñera, comúnmente llamadas AFP, han sido las que mayormente se han favorecido a lo largo de más de tres décadas que lleva en funcionamiento el sistema.

Más de 3,75 billones de pesos han obtenido como ganancia de este lucrativo negocio, de ingreso obligatorio mediante el descuento a quienes trabajan. Mientras tanto, 9 de cada diez personas jubiladas recibe menos de 150 mil pesos como pensión en la modalidad de vejez retiro programado.

Según el acuerdo firmado, la entidad a cargo de hipotecar las viviendas de los jubilados sería una entidad estatal, pues algo que no debe pasar inadvertido es que el proyecto de resolución con número 333 fue ingresado el 9 de abril de este año a la Cámara y su idea central es solicitar a la Presidenta de la República que amplíe el giro de lo establecido en el DFL N°16 de 1986 a bienes inmuebles.

Si bien el Gobierno salió a anunciar que no apoyaría dicho acuerdo, es necesario dimensionar de qué se trata este mecanismo de hipoteca, pues, pese a ser una iniciativa de la derecha, fueron 13 los parlamentarios de la Nueva Mayoría que votaron a favor.

La llamada hipoteca revertida ha sido utilizada desde los años 80 en países como Estados Unidos e Inglaterra y desde 2006 ha comenzado a implementarse en España. Estos países han desarrollado complejos sistemas de endeudamiento que contribuyen de manera mucho más activa a la concentración financiera de capital y reducción de las contribuciones al Estado, pues hay una modalidad de préstamo sin carga tributaria.

Es importante tener en cuenta que en nuestro país la mayor referencia a este modelo de hipoteca la podemos encontrar en los análisis de CIEDES, un centro de estudios para la Seguridad Social que depende de la Cámara Chilena de la Construcción, organismo que ya ha tenido experiencia en materia de financiarización de derechos con la AFP Habitat y la Caja de Compensación Los Andes.

De forma sencilla, podemos entender este tipo de hipoteca como un negocio financiero que se aplica de forma inversa a la forma normal de hipoteca, de ahí su nombre. Esto quiere decir que si en la hipoteca tradicional el monto de deuda va disminuyendo, debido al pago de amortización mensual, en la hipoteca revertida la deuda se incrementa con el paso de los años y además posee límite, tanto de años como de monto, lo cual va en relación con la expectativa de vida del deudor. No obstante esto, es posible que el monto del crédito supere incluso al valor de tasación comercial de la casa; además, se debe considerar que es la entidad prestamista la que fija la tasación.

Esta fórmula ha sido implementada en Estados Unidos generando un panorama nuevo a la participación de entidades financieras, incluso con la participación de una agencia estatal, la que posteriormente fue privatizada.

Finalmente, todos los caminos apuntan hacia los bancos y otras entidades financieras, pues un efecto que sí provoca este mecanismo es el de dinamizar la participación social en el incremento de la deuda, generando con esto una válvula de oxígeno para la acumulación bancaria; en este sentido, resulta coherente que frente a las cifras de este año para el ciclo bancario se plantee este mecanismo.

En palabras sencillas y tomando como referencia un informe del BBVA Research de 2013, la hipoteca inversa es un préstamo que se realiza considerando la edad de quien lo recibe, el tipo de interés y las proyecciones de precios de la vivienda.

Es importante tener en cuenta que la garantía para el préstamo es la vivienda, asunto por el cual una vez que la persona fallece, la entidad financiera puede hacerse dueña del inmueble, a menos que sus herederos paguen el préstamo. Incluso se puede señalar que los beneficios sociales financiados por el Estado pueden disminuir en razón del aumento de la riqueza al no hacer gasto inmediato del préstamo otorgado a los jubilados.

El mismo informe antes señalado recomienda que el mejor segmento para incentivar este instrumento es el de los bajos ingresos, pues los quintiles más altos presentan una saturación de herramientas financieras y son un sector más reducido, lo cual da cuenta de la concentración de riqueza. Por lo demás, los sectores bajos y medios son los que mediante un crédito tradicional adquirieron un inmueble, el cual a la edad de jubilar se encuentra completamente financiado y listo para volver a ser hipotecado bajo la fórmula de hipoteca inversa.

Según cifras de la Superintendencia de Pensiones, a diciembre del año 2014 casi 7 de cada 10 personas entre 55 y 60 años de edad tenía en su cuenta de capitalización individual una suma de ahorro que no superaba los 20 millones de pesos. Esto difícilmente asegura para estas personas en edad de jubilar una pensión autofinanciada superior a 100 mil pesos. Sin duda, esto explica que –según un estudio de la OCDE publicado por El Mercurio– la edad efectiva de jubilación para hombres y mujeres esté por sobre la edad legal establecida, siendo de 69 años para los hombres y 70 años para las mujeres.

Existen alternativas viables al modelo de capitalización individual y que se hacen presentes en casi la totalidad de las organizaciones sociales, sindicales y en las conclusiones de diversos centros de estudios. Esta alternativa es el sistema de reparto solidario, tripartito, lo cual no implica un retroceso ni una vuelta al pasado, sino que por lejos significa una fórmula probada y pensada para otorgar pensiones suficientes y bajo los márgenes planteados por organismos como la OIT.

Actualmente, solo 9 países del mundo tienen un sistema de pensiones similar al chileno. Esto nos demuestra que las pensiones son una materia realmente sensible en las sociedades y que, en nuestro caso, el extremo neoliberal ha pretendido eliminar el horizonte de sentido vinculado con una alternativa. Esto resulta coherente con los casos de financiamiento político de campañas, la baja aprobación y alta conflictividad social, la distancia de la sociedad y la cercanía al capital con tendencia monopólica que se hace cada vez más evidente por parte de quienes utilizan el velo que impide ver alternativas sociales.

Avanzar en derechos sociales es una forma de avanzar hacia una sociedad más democrática y a la recuperación de un mínimo de valor que es arrebatado a quienes viven de su trabajo.

Lista de parlamentarios que aprobaron proyecto de acuerdo que permitiría que jubilados hipotequen sus viviendas para aumentar jubilación:

 

 

Source Article from http://www.elmostrador.cl/noticias/opinion/2015/07/08/la-polemica-hipoteca-de-los-viejos-y-la-precariedad-de-las-jubilaciones-en-chile/

Derechos de autor de la imagen
KCNA / vía Reuters

Image caption

El misil balístico intercontinental lanzando este martes permaneció en el aire 37 minutos.

El lanzamiento de un misil balístico intercontinental realizado este martes por Corea del Norte “representa una nueva escalada de la amenaza a Estados Unidos” y “el mundo”.

Así lo afirmó el secretario de Estado estadounidense, Rex Tillerson, en un comunicado donde condenó la prueba de un misil norcoreano de largo alcance.

Tillerson adviritó que “Washington nunca aceptará una Corea del Norte con armas nucleares”.

En respuesta a dicho lanzamiento, en la tarde del martes EE.UU. y Corea del Sur realizaron sus propios ejercicios militares, disparando misiles en aguas territoriales surcoreanas.

La alianza de EE.UU. y Corea del Sur tiene capacidad para realizar un “ataque de precisión” a “toda la gama de objetivos importantes, en todas las condiciones climáticas”, informó la portavoz del Pentágono, Dana White.

La autocontención, que es una elección, es todo lo que separa el armisticio y la guerra“, advirtieron en una declaración conjunta ambos países al gobierno de Pyongyang y agregaron que sus ejercicios militares demuestran que “somos capaces de cambiar nuestra elección”.

La Guerra de Corea (1950-1953) terminó en un armisticio, por lo que ambas Coreas técnicamente todavía están en guerra.

Estados Unidos llamó a convocar una reunión urgente del Consejo de Seguridad de Naciones Unidas. Está previsto que este miércoles haya una sesión del Consejo a puerta cerrada.

Anteriormente Rusia había asegurado que el cohete era de alcance medio y no largo. La diferencia para países como el propio Estados Unidos es crucial.

Según Pyongyang, el misil balístico intercontinental lanzando este martes permaneció en el aire 37 minutos, más que ningún otro hasta la fecha, recorrió más de 930 kilómetros y alcanzó una altitud de 2.802 kilómetros antes de caer en el Mar de Japón.

El físico David Wright, miembro de la estadounidense Unión de Científicos Preocupados (UCS, por sus siglas en inglés), cree que si el misil no hubiera volado tan alto y su trayectoria hubiera sido más regular, entonces su alcance habría sido mucho mayor de los 930 kilómetros.

“Ese rango podría no ser suficiente para llegar a los otros 48 estados o a las islas de Hawái, pero le permitiría arribar a Alaska“, en el extremo noroccidental de Estados Unidos, dijo Wright.

Derechos de autor de la imagen
KCNA

Image caption

El líder de Corea del Norte, Kim Jong-un, siguió de cerca la prueba del misil balístico intercontinental.

Pedido de acción global

En su comunicado, Tillerson agregó: “Se requiere una acción global para frenar una amenaza global”.

El secretario de Estado también afirmó que el gobierno de Kim Jong-un es “un régimen peligroso”, y que EE.UU. buscará la aplicación de “medidas más severas” en la reunión de emergencia del Consejo de Seguridad de la ONU a realizarse este miércoles.

Derechos de autor de la imagen
Reuters

Image caption

La nación asiática informó que sus misiles tienen la capacidad de llegar a cualquier parte del mundo.

Por su parte, los presidentes de Rusia, Vladimir Putin, y de China, Xi Jinping, pidieron a Corea del Norte que anuncie de manera voluntaria “una moratoria de las pruebas nucleares y de los ensayos de misiles balísticos”.

Rusia y China, países que comparten fronteras terrestres con Corea del Norte, indicaron en un comunicado que el lanzamiento es “inadmisible” porque contradice las resoluciones del Consejo de Seguridad de la ONU y expresaron su rechazo al uso de la fuerza.

No obstante, Putin y Xi también pidieron a Estados Unidos y Corea del Sur “que se abstengan de realizar maniobras militares conjuntas a gran escala”.

Derechos de autor de la imagen
EPA

Image caption

Los presidentes de China, Xi Jinping (izquierda) y de Rusia, Vladimir Putin (derecha) brindaron una dura respuesta conjunta a Corea del Norte.

En particular, los mandatarios insistieron en que el despliegue del escudo antimisiles estadounidense en el sureste de Asia, el poderoso Thaad, “representa un grave perjuicio para los intereses de seguridad estratégica de los países de la región, incluidos Rusia y China”.

“Las preocupaciones de Corea del Norte deben ser respetadas. Otros países deben realizar esfuerzos para la reanudación de las negociaciones, crear conjuntamente una atmósfera de paz y de confianza mutua”, señalaron.

Antes, el presidente de EE.UU., Donald Trump, había escrito en Twitter: “¿Es que este hombre no tiene nada mejor que hacer con su vida?”, haciendo referencia al líder de Corea del Norte, Kim Jong-un.

“Es difícil creer que Corea del Sur y Japón vayan a postergar esto mucho más. Quizá China tome medidas contundentes contra Corea del Norte y acabe con esta tontería de una vez por todas”, agregó en otro mensaje.

Derechos de autor de la imagen
Getty Images

Image caption

La nueva prueba balística de Corea del Norte fue realizada el 4 de julio, fecha en que EE.UU. celebra su Día de la Independencia.

Pero EE.UU. no puede contar con una futura acción de China contra Cora del Norte, informa James Robbins, corresponsal de la BBC para asuntos diplomáticos.

China “no siempre ve a EE.UU. como un aliado ni piensa que Corea del Norte sea hoy una amenaza mayor que si llegara a colapsar”, escribe Robbins.

Este colapso, analiza Robbins, podría significar la reunificación de la península coreana y su transición a una nación amiga de Washington en su frontera.

Alcance de misiles

  • Alcance corto: 1.000 kilómetros o menos.
  • Alcance medio: 1.000 a 3.000 kilómetros.
  • Alcance intermedio: 3.000 a 5.500 kilómetros.
  • Alcance intercontinental: más de 5.500 kilómetros.

Fuente: Federación de Científicos estadounidenses.

Source Article from http://www.bbc.com/mundo/noticias-internacional-40498899

Gilberto Olivas-Bejarano walks through his neighborhood in León, in the Mexican state of Guanajuato. Olivas-Bejarano was deported to Mexico after residing in the U.S. for 26 years.

Alicia Vera for NPR


hide caption

toggle caption

Alicia Vera for NPR

Gilberto Olivas-Bejarano walks through his neighborhood in León, in the Mexican state of Guanajuato. Olivas-Bejarano was deported to Mexico after residing in the U.S. for 26 years.

Alicia Vera for NPR

When 29-year-old Gilberto Olivas-Bejarano first returned to his birth home, the Mexican city of León, he didn’t speak the native language.

“I barely speak Spanish now,” he says.

He arrived in León alone, and today, nearly two years since his deportation, Olivas-Bejarano has still not seen his family in person.

Sitting in his small apartment, furnished with hand-me-downs, he pores over a homemade photo album of pictures printed off Facebook. It’s filled with memories from his former life in America — picnics, a Pride parade, birthdays with his family back in Tulsa, Oklahoma.

In his home in León, Olivas-Bejarano looks through an album with photographs of his time in the United States.

Alicia Vera for NPR


hide caption

toggle caption

Alicia Vera for NPR

In his home in León, Olivas-Bejarano looks through an album with photographs of his time in the United States.

Alicia Vera for NPR

Now, he’s more than 1,000 miles away from them and part of something new: a generation of young people who are neither Mexican nor American, neither undocumented nor fully able to participate in the society around them. And they’re bringing a different attitude, and expectations, to the country of their birth.

Olivas-Bejarano’s parents left León for the United States when he was 2 years old. They ended up in Oklahoma, where Olivas-Bejarano and his U.S.-born siblings were raised.

Growing up in Oklahoma, Olivas-Bejarano’s parents had warned him that one day his citizenship might come into question.

But it wasn’t until he saw other students taking a drivers education course that it hit him: He was undocumented, and that meant he’d be afforded fewer opportunities than his American peers.

“I was all excited, like, ‘Oh, I get to sign up for this class.’ I would get my driver’s license. And that’s when my parents were like, ‘Well, no. You’re not going to go through the normal steps like everybody else. Things aren’t gonna be the same as everybody else.’ “

The sun enters Olivas-Bejarano’s kitchen in his León home, furnished with hand-me-downs.

Alicia Vera for NPR


hide caption

toggle caption

Alicia Vera for NPR

The sun enters Olivas-Bejarano’s kitchen in his León home, furnished with hand-me-downs.

Alicia Vera for NPR

That was his life, living in limbo, until a shift in immigration policy gave him a chance to stay in the United States.

The shift came with the creation of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, known as DACA, in 2012. The program allowed Olivas-Bejarano — and hundreds of thousands like him who were brought to the U.S. as children — to remain in the U.S. legally, free from the threat of having to leave the country they called home.

Olivas-Bejarano says he remembers the day that DACA was announced by then-President Barack Obama.

“I literally called my boss, and she didn’t even have to know what I was calling about. She was just like, ‘I know, I heard! I’m so excited, I’m so excited!’ “

“I was just like crying in my car after work, just like, ‘Oh my God, something’s finally happening.’ “

But then in 2014 and 2016, he was caught driving drunk, misdemeanors that the Obama administration didn’t prioritize as deportable offenses.

Those standards changed, however, with the Trump presidency. In January 2017, President Trump signed an executive order that expanded the reach of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement to apprehend undocumented immigrants, regardless of any criminal record. Later that year, the president announced he would be phasing out DACA.

That June, Olivas-Bejarano’s DUI charges caught up to him. He’d just had a job interview for a bartender position, and when he walked outside and headed toward his car, he saw an ICE agent approaching him.

“As soon as I saw him it was kind of like this gut feeling. You’re like, ‘Oh crap.’ Like, ‘I hope he doesn’t come talk to me. I hope he doesn’t come talk to me.’ “

He wanted to run away. The agent proceeded to pull him out of his car and, as the restaurant staff looked on, put him in handcuffs.

Olivas-Bejarano says the toughest part about his immigration status is being apart from his family in Oklahoma. But he says the risk of reentering the U.S. illegally is too great for him.

Alicia Vera for NPR


hide caption

toggle caption

Alicia Vera for NPR

Olivas-Bejarano says the toughest part about his immigration status is being apart from his family in Oklahoma. But he says the risk of reentering the U.S. illegally is too great for him.

Alicia Vera for NPR

He describes that day as earth shattering.

“I had to come to this realization within like 15 minutes that, you know, you’re about to be deported.”

ICE detained him for several weeks, first in Oklahoma, then in Texas. Eventually, on his lawyer’s advice, he left the country voluntarily to leave open the possibility that he could one day legally return.

He was shackled and put on a bus that dropped him off at the southern border. He recalled pausing at the border crossing in Laredo, Texas, to take in an otherworldly scene.

“I remember looking over and seeing Texas and then looking over and seeing Mexico,” he says, “and just being like, ‘I wish I could just stay here and not have to worry about going anywhere.’ “

“And then actually crossing onto the Mexican border, it felt like going to another planet. It was two different worlds.”

In his new world, the country where he was born, he was again an outsider.

In November 2017, he moved to León, the center of the Mexican shoe industry, where there’s a large bilingual community that supports it. Still, Olivas-Bejarano’s accent stood out.

“Eventually my neighbors would start calling me ‘gringo,’ ” he says, amused. “Which is really weird to me because I always thought gringos were white people and then, here I am, obviously Mexican.”

He spent his first year in Mexico in denial, until part of his life in the U.S. entered his new world. On his 29th birthday, his friend Elise visited him in León.

“Actually seeing her in my house, actually holding her and hugging her and being like, ‘You’re here!’ It made it real. It was like, ‘No, this is your life now. You’re actually here, and your friend came to visit you. This isn’t a dream. Wake up.’ “

Nights are the loneliest, he says. When he calls his parents, about twice a week, he doesn’t talk about his life in León — he likes to pretend he’s just around the corner.

In reality, if his parents were to visit him in Mexico, they wouldn’t be able to return to the U.S., to their other children.

“The family part was probably the hardest thing … not being able to hug my mom or hug my dad or harass my brother,” he says, through laughter and tears.

Olivas-Bejarano shops for fruit at a market in León this month. His Spanish has improved in the nearly two years he has lived in Mexico, but his American accent is noticeable among a large bilingual community.

Alicia Vera for NPR


hide caption

toggle caption

Alicia Vera for NPR

Olivas-Bejarano shops for fruit at a market in León this month. His Spanish has improved in the nearly two years he has lived in Mexico, but his American accent is noticeable among a large bilingual community.

Alicia Vera for NPR

Despite the loss and sadness, he says he has no desire to sneak back into the United States.

For the first time in his life, he wants to make his own choice about crossing the border. “I’m actually against illegal immigration,” he says. “Too much of a risk for me. I wouldn’t want to end up in jail for 10 years.”

Instead, he says there should be better pathways to legal migration so that people don’t have to put their lives at risk.

But back in Washington, Congress and the Trump administration have struggled to identify what those pathways might look like. While DACA remains in place amid legal challenges to phase it out, the program doesn’t provide a track to citizenship. Meanwhile, the president’s latest immigration proposal, announced this past week, doesn’t address what to do with immigrants who have entered the country illegally.

Olivas-Bejarano walks home in León.

Alicia Vera for NPR


hide caption

toggle caption

Alicia Vera for NPR

Olivas-Bejarano walks home in León.

Alicia Vera for NPR

For now, Olivas-Bejarano’s English and his education have landed him a customer support position at Charly, a multimillion-dollar Mexican sportswear company.

Six months into the job, Olivas-Bejarano is already in the running for a promotion.

As he forges a new life for himself in León, Olivas-Bejarano says that, along with his young, educated immigrant peers, he has got a lot to offer Mexico.

“I mean, you can teach kids here in Mexico English just like you can teach kids in the States Spanish, but you can’t teach American culture, you can’t teach Hispanic culture.

“And that’s what I bring, is a different viewpoint,” he says. “Fresh ideas and … a drive.”

A drive that’s beginning to make its mark on Mexico.

NPR has been collaborating with PBS NewsHour, which will feature reporting by Lulu Garcia-Navarro on its broadcast on Monday, May 20, 2019.

NPR’s Emma Bowman produced this story for the Web.

Source Article from https://www.npr.org/2019/05/19/723739490/deported-after-living-in-the-u-s-for-26-years-he-navigates-a-new-life-in-mexico

An Afghan interpreter that helped rescue then-Sen. Joe Biden and two other senators from Afghanistan thirteen years ago is now pleading with the president to rescue him and his family, warning that the Taliban will likely kill him on sight.

In 2008, the man known only as Mohammed was part of a team that helped ensure Joe Biden’s safety after their Black Hawk helicopter was forced to make an emergency landing during a snowstorm. 

Taliban insurgents had been spotted in the remote Afghan valley around the same time.

Thirteen years later, with Biden in the driver’s seat, Mohammed is asking the president to return the favor. 

“Do not forget me and my family,” said Mohammed, while speaking by telephone to “Fox & Friends First” co-host Jillian Mele.

REPORTED TEXTS CLAIM AMERICANS STRANDED AT KABUL AIRPORT WAVED PASSPORTS; WEREN’T LET IN: SOLOMON

“Just give him my hello and tell him—if possible, tell him or send a message. Do not let me and my family [sic] behind.”

Mohammed was one of an unknown number of people unable to reach the Kabul International airport before the final U.S. flight took off prior to the August 31 withdrawal deadline.

“It’s very scary, mam. We are under great risk,” Mohammed said, adding that his situation is both “hard” and “horrifying.” 

With reports of door-to-door executions taking place and an anti-U.S. forces sentiment running through the Taliban ranks, the Afghan interpreter has remained trapped indoors – warning that, at any moment, they could find and kill him through tracking and information-gathering.

Without the ability to travel outside and gather necessities, Mohammed fears he may die inside. His family gathered around the telephone in total darkness as he spoke.

“It’s too easy for them,” said Mohammed, referring to the Taliban.

CLICK TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Despite the dire circumstances, Mohammed is confident President Biden will find a way to get him out of Afghanistan.

“I trust him. He can do everything. He’s the power of the United States. He controls the power and [sic] use power right now. He can do everything for me, and, like me, other people.”

Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/media/afghanistan-man-who-rescued-biden-now-pleads-for-rescue

Numerous significant questions are left unanswered, including what, if anything, Mr. Assange knew about the identity of Guccifer 2.0, a mysterious hacker who American intelligence and law enforcement officials have identified as a front for Russian military intelligence operatives.

Court documents have revealed that it was Russian intelligence — using the Guccifer persona — that provided Mr. Assange thousands of emails hacked from the Democratic National Committee and the personal account of John D. Podesta, the chairman of the Clinton campaign.

Another question is whether Mr. Assange was a conduit between the Russian hackers and the Trump campaign. Mr. Assange exchanged emails with Donald Trump Jr., Mr. Trump’s eldest son, during the campaign, and a Trump campaign official sent Roger J. Stone Jr., a longtime adviser to the president, to get information about the hacked Democratic emails, according to a January indictment by Robert S. Mueller III, the special counsel.

Mr. Mueller concluded his investigation without an indictment that directly connected WikiLeaks, the Russians and the Trump campaign, suggesting that prosecutors did not find sufficient evidence that Mr. Assange knowingly engaged in a conspiracy with Russia to help the Trump campaign.

But the report drafted by Mr. Mueller’s team, and expected to be released next week, could have additional details about the ties between the Trump campaign and Mr. Assange. Those details could be redacted by the Justice Department, however, if officials believe the material includes classified intelligence, said Carrie Cordero, a former official with the Justice Department’s National Security Division and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence.

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/11/us/politics/wikileaks-clinton-emails-russia-trump.html

Source Article from https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2020/09/30/trump-says-he-doesnt-know-proud-boys-after-criticism-debate/5870564002/


<!–

–>

var docUrl = document.URL;
var urlInfo = docUrl.split(“/”);
if ((urlInfo != null) && (urlInfo.length >= 4))
{
var seccion = urlInfo[3].toLowerCase();

switch (seccion) {

case “finanzas-personales”:
var cX = cX || {}; cX.callQueue = cX.callQueue || [];
cX.callQueue.push([‘insertWidget’, {
widgetId: ’61ed6820cb015fa491fc6fabda0a2f4927ca7127′,
insertBeforeElementId: ‘cx_61ed6820cb015fa491fc6fabda0a2f4927ca7127’,
width: 202, height: 137, renderTemplateUrl: ‘auto’
}]);

// Async load of cx.js
(function(d,s,e,t){e=d.createElement(s);e.type=’text/java’+s;e.async=’async’;
e.src=’http’+(‘https:’===location.protocol?’s://s’:’://’)+’cdn.cxense.com/cx.js’;
t=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];t.parentNode.insertBefore(e,t);})(document,’script’);
break;}}

–>

En las noticias más leídas del día, VivaAerobus busca un crecimiento y se convierte en la primera aerolínea mexicana de bajo costo en intentar operar un vuelo transatlántico y entre sus principales objetivos están Europa y Canadá. Después de los aranceles que EU busca imponer a México, la cámara azucarera de México e informó que harán un freno a la fructuosa proveniente de ese país.

1. VivaAerobus busca operar vuelos transatlánticos

La aerolínea mexicana, VivaAerobus, busca ser la primera del país de bajo costo en realizar un vuelo transatlántico. Entre sus objetivos está volar hacia Europa y Canadá saliendo de Acapulco, Cancún, Guadalajara, la Ciudad de México y Mazatlán, entre otros destinos, con escala en alguna ciudad de Estados Unidos.

Esto cuando hace un par de semanas, la aerolínea mexicana solicitó al Departamento de Transporte de EU su autorización para volar diversas rutas de México hacia ese país y más allá, como lo permite el nuevo convenio aéreo bilateral, que entró en vigor el año pasado.

Dentro de esta petición incluye la exención de la autorización correspondiente por un periodo de dos años o hasta que emita el permiso solicitado, lo que ocurra primero, con lo cual VivaAerobus manifiesta el interés de su pronta expansión internacional, a pesar de que no precisa cuáles serían las rutas con las que llegaría a sus nuevos mercados.

2. Municipios con alta dependencia económica, los más afectados

Después de las políticas proteccionistas que busca aplicar el gobierno de Estados Unidos, éstas podrían significar un freno a la captación de remesas por parte de los municipios del país, particularmente para aquellos donde este indicador, determinante del consumo de los hogares, juega un papel importante en su dinámica económica.

Según Fitch Ratings, los controles de inmigración más estrictos, las deportaciones mayores y los impuestos al envío de remesas por parte de la principal economía del mundo podrían tener efectos significativos en el flujo de estos recursos hacia México, debido a que ambas naciones comparten la principal ruta migratoria en el mundo y tienen los mayores flujos de remesas entre dos países. Si quieres conocer más sobre el destino de las remesas y la economía de México, entra a la nota completa.

3. México frenará fructosa de EU si se imponen aranceles

Juan Cortina, presidente de la cámara azucarera de México, indicó que si Estados Unidos impone aranceles al azúcar mexicana, ellos pedirán frenar la entrada de fructosa estadounidense al país, mientras los gobiernos han dicho que iniciarán un diálogo por un nuevo acuerdo.
Asimismo agregaron que se necesitan reglas claras y de largo plazo en el comercio del azúcar entre ambos países, un sector que por años ha sido objeto de disputas.

El secretario de Comercio de Estados Unidos, Wilbur Ross, y el de Economía de México, Ildefonso Guajardo, dijeron el viernes que las conversaciones buscan retomar las importaciones de Estados Unidos desde México, luego de que se detuvieron porque se alcanzó un límite temporal.

4. La FMF cede (por ahora)…

El comunicado emitido por la Federación Mexicana de Futbol consta tan sólo de dos párrafos y no se utilizan las palabras “ceder”, “recular”, “aceptar”… pero el mensaje es todo eso.

En este comunicado, la Comisión de Apelaciones de la Federación Mexicana de Fútbol informó que la Comisión de Árbitros apeló las sanciones impuestas por la Comisión Disciplinaria a los jugadores Enrique Triverio del Club Toluca y Pablo Aguilar del Club América. La Comisión de Apelaciones se reunirá, analizará las pruebas presentadas y determinará lo conducente en el caso.

En las instalaciones de la FMF acudieron los integrantes de la Comisión de Desarrollo Deportivo, incluyendo a directivos de Toluca y América, quienes minutos antes de darse a conocer el comunicado, Francisco Sinuaga y Yon de Luisa salieron visiblemente molestos.

5. Conoce la mejor opción para liquidar las deudas de tu tarjeta

Cuando hablamos de tarjetas de crédito es común relacionarlas con situaciones de deuda, en algunos casos son extremas, y a pesar de que diversos especialistas e incluso las mismas entidades financieras han advertido que el plástico es un medio de pago mas no una extensión del ingreso, en ocasiones el endeudamiento simplemente se sale de control.

Para liquidar tus deudas de una tarjeta de crédito regularmente tienes tres opciones: reestructuración, consolidación y quita de la deuda, las cuales van en función de dónde se encuentra el usuario en términos de ingresos, gastos y el monto de la deuda, pero también otras prioridades que pueda tener el usuario, como su historial crediticio. Si un poco de este tema te es familiar, entra a la nota completa y entérate de más.



var docUrl = document.URL;
var urlInfo = docUrl.split(“/”);
if ((urlInfo != null) && (urlInfo.length >= 4))
{
var seccion = urlInfo[3].toLowerCase();

switch (seccion) {

case “finanzas-personales”:
$(“#tecmon”).attr(“style”, “width:516px !important;height:194px;overflow:hidden;float:right;margin-bottom:-10px”);
var cX = cX || {}; cX.callQueue = cX.callQueue || [];
cX.callQueue.push([‘insertWidget’, {
widgetId: ‘bf09f9d581b1a89cfa1a414f3c30acebdc299ab6’,
insertBeforeElementId: ‘cx_bf09f9d581b1a89cfa1a414f3c30acebdc299ab6’,
width: 516, height: 185, renderTemplateUrl: ‘auto’
}]);

// Async load of cx.js
(function(d,s,e,t){e=d.createElement(s);e.type=’text/java’+s;e.async=’async’;
e.src=’http’+(‘https:’===location.protocol?’s://s’:’://’)+’cdn.cxense.com/cx.js’;
t=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];t.parentNode.insertBefore(e,t);})(document,’script’);
break;}}

–>

Source Article from http://eleconomista.com.mx/politica/2017/03/13/5-noticias-dia-13-marzo

Vice President Kamala Harris will meet Tuesday with Texas Democratic legislators who fled the state in an effort to block a Republican-backed election bill that they say is discriminatory, a White House official told NBC News.

Sen. Joe Manchin, D-W.Va., is also expected to meet with the Democratic members of the Texas legislature, though a date and time have not yet been set, according to a spokesperson. 

At least 51 Democratic legislators from the Texas House of Representatives fled the state Monday en route to Washington, in a bid to deny Republicans the quorum needed to conduct business in the chamber. Seven more Democratic legislators were expected to join them in the nation’s capital.

Only 26 days remain in a special session called by GOP Gov. Greg Abbott to pass changes to Texas voting rules. The Texas Democrats arrived in Washington without a set return date. 

“We, as Democrats, we were united, we said we are going to kill any undemocratic efforts in the state legislature. And if that meant leaving the state we were going to do it,” said state Rep. Rafael Anchia, one of the Democrats who fled. 

Over the weekend, Texas lawmakers passed two voting measures, House Bill 3 and Senate Bill 1, after extensive hours of debate and testimony. The House was set to reconvene Tuesday morning for a final vote, but the absent Democrats could stall this. 

Manchin did not answer Tuesday when asked if he would support a carve-out in the Senate filibuster to pass voting rights legislation, stating only that he is “anxious to meet” with the Texas Democrats. The West Virginia senator has previously expressed steadfast opposition to changing the filibuster.

“Texas Democrats’ decision to break a quorum of the Texas Legislature and abandon the Texas State Capitol inflicts harm on the very Texans who elected them to serve,” Abbott said in a statement. “As they fly across the country on cushy private planes, they leave undone issues that can help their districts and our state.”

The Democrats’ departure ups the ante in the state legislative fight and national debate over voting rights. Texas is among several states that have pushed to implement voting measures, which critics say are discriminatory and restrictive, in the aftermath of repeated false claims by former President Donald Trump that the 2020 election was stolen through widespread voter fraud.

Source Article from https://www.cnbc.com/2021/07/13/harris-manchin-to-meet-with-texas-democrats-trying-to-block-gop-election-law.html

Sen. Cory BookerCory Anthony BookerBooker on Trump reportedly floating pardon for border official: ‘That should shake every American’ Georgetown students vote overwhelmingly to approve fee for slavery reparations Two dozen Dem senators urge Trump to extend nuclear treaty with Russia MORE (D-N.J.) hammered President TrumpDonald John TrumpAppeals court rules Trump admin can temporarily continue to send asylum seekers back to Mexico Federal investigation finds rampant sexual harassment at company led by Trump nominee: report Booker on Trump reportedly floating pardon for border official: ‘That should shake every American’ MORE for reportedly telling the head of Customs and Border Protection (CBP) that he would pardon him if he were jailed for violating immigration law. 

“That should shake every American. We basically have a president telling people to break the law and that he will pardon you,” Booker, one of more than a dozen Democrats running for president, told MSNBC host Joy Reid.

“And again, we’re sitting in Newark where kids are going to prison for things that two of the last three presidents admitted to doing and nobody’s pardoning them,” he said, referring to smoking marijuana. 

CNN first reported Friday that Trump made the remark to CBP Commissioner Kevin McAleenan during a visit to the border at Calexico, Calif. McAleenan is now Trump’s pick to serve as acting Homeland Security Secretary following Kirstjen NielsenKirstjen Michele NielsenBooker on Trump reportedly floating pardon for border official: ‘That should shake every American’ Nadler on new Trump ‘sanctuary cities’ plan: ‘morally repugnant and probably illegal’ Trump told border official he’d pardon him if he went to jail over immigration moves: CNN MORE’s resignation.

Trump reportedly told McAleenan he ”would pardon him if he ever went to jail for denying U.S. entry to migrants,” according to two anonymous officials briefed on the conversation. 

“At no time has the President indicated, asked, directed or pressured the Acting Secretary to do anything illegal,” a Department of Homeland Security spokesman said in a statement to The Hill. “Nor would the Acting Secretary take actions that are not in accordance with our responsibility to enforce the law.” 

It was reported earlier this week that during his trip to Calexico, Trump also urged CBP agents to block migrants from entering the U.S., which would break federal immigration laws and court orders.

Trump has doubled down on his hard-line immigration tendencies in recent weeks, threatening to close the border with Mexico, cutting off funding to El Salvador, Guatemala and Honduras, and overseeing a purge at the Department of Homeland Security.

Source Article from https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/438734-booker-on-trump-reportedly-floating-pardon-for-border-official-that-should

After New York’s June 23 primaries, a few of the Democratic Party’s highest-profile and longest-serving House members could be picked off.

Rep. Eliot Engel, who chairs the House Foreign Affairs Committee and has been in Congress since 1989, appears to be the most vulnerable member on Tuesday. His chief challenger, Bronx middle school founding principal Jamaal Bowman, has mounted a formidable campaign and has picked up a number of big endorsements from progressives, including Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Bernie Sanders, and Elizabeth Warren. The Democratic establishment has stepped in to try to save Engelhe was Hillary Clinton’s first House primary endorsement of the cycle — but it’s not clear if it will be enough.

While Engel has more money overall, Bowman has put up strong fundraising numbers, and both have outside groups spending on their behalf. Engel has also been criticized for his absence from his district — New Rochelle, which is in his district, was an early hot spot for Covid-19. And then there’s Engel’s “hot mic” moment, when at a news conference in the Bronx about civil unrest, he was overheard saying twice, “If I didn’t have a primary, I wouldn’t care.” Engel has tried to explain the remarks, saying he was just trying to convey he felt it was important to hear him speak, but it’s helped Bowman, who is well-connected in the community and has broken through in local media, gain more momentum.

“He already has the idea of what the systemic changes are that we need so that people are not slipping through the gaps,” said Sochie Nnaemeka, New York state director for the Working Families Party, which has endorsed Bowman.

The Engel-Bowman race isn’t the only competitive one, or the only one that is at least interesting to watch. Reps. Yvette Clarke, Carolyn Maloney, and Jerry Nadler are all facing significant challengers, though of those, Clarke’s seat appears to be the only one that might be at risk. And the crowded primaries to fill the seats of Reps. Jose Serrano and Nita Lowey, neither of whom is running for reelection, have uncertain outcomes.

Many of New York’s congressional districts encompass diverse communities with significant splits along socioeconomic and racial lines, which will also come into play on Tuesday. The 16th District, which Engel represents, contains parts of both the Bronx and Westchester County. And New York’s entire delegation is emblematic of the inequalities of New York: Both the highest-income congressional district in the country (Maloney’s District 12) and the lowest-income (Serrano’s, District 15) are seeing competitive races right now.

Ocasio-Cortez, who has some upstart primary challengers of her own, skyrocketed to the spotlight in 2018 after her surprise defeat of Joe Crowley, and in the 2020 primaries, New York could deliver another such surprise. Here are 15 congressional races to keep an eye on, what’s at stake, and, how they’re shaking out. Because so many people are likely voting absentee by mail, it will likely take a while to get results.

New York’s First Congressional District: A scientist and a business leader compete to take on Rep. Lee Zeldin

Who are the Democrats? A crowded field of Democrats is competing to take on incumbent Republican Lee Zeldin in New York’s coastal Long Island district, which Cook Political Report has rated “Likely Republican” this cycle.

The Democrats in this year’s primary are business leader Perry Gershon (who is running again), Stony Brook University chemistry professor Nancy Goroff, consultant Greg Fischer, and Suffolk County legislator Bridget Fleming. As of the end of March, Gershon and Goroff were leading the field in fundraising, bringing in more than $1 million each, according to City and State New York.

Who are the Republicans? Rep. Lee Zeldin, a staunch Trump ally, is an incumbent who’s vying for his fourth term.

What’s the background on the race? The district — which backed President Barack Obama in 2012 before voting for Donald Trump in 2016 — is seen as a battleground in 2020. Zeldin won by roughly 4 points against Gershon in 2018, but a Democrat had held the seat from 2003 to 2014.

Both leading Democrats, Gershon and Goroff, are focused on critiquing Zeldin’s allegiance to Trump (he’s voted with the president 88 percent of the time, according to FiveThirtyEight), and have leaned into their respective expertise: Goroff, for example, was the chair of the Stony Brook chemistry department before taking leave to run for Congress and has emphasized the importance of having scientists as elected officials. Gershon, too, has argued that his expertise in real estate development and in business indicate that he’s able to produce results in a way that politicians have not.

Given how narrow Zeldin’s margins were in 2018 compared to the previous election year, whoever wins the Democratic primary this week is expected to give him a tough fight in November.

New York’s Second Congressional District: Peter King’s open seat prompts contested races among both Republicans and Democrats

Who are the Democrats? Former Babylon Town Council member Jackie Gordon and advertising executive Patricia Maher are competing to flip Rep. Peter King’s seat. Gordon is seen as the frontrunner given the backing she’s gained from regional Democratic Party members.

Who are the Republicans? State Assembly member Andrew Garbarino and Michael LiPetri are on the ballot on the GOP side. Garbarino has picked up local party support as well as King’s endorsement.

What’s the background on the race? Both Democrats and Republicans have competitive primaries in this South Shore Long Island district, held by King, who has opted not to run again. King has held the seat ever since he won in 2012, and Cook Political Report rates it as Lean Republican, a sign that it could be a potential pickup for Democrats this cycle. In 2018, King beat Democratic competitor Liuba Grechen Shirley by approximately 6 points.

New York’s Fifth Congressional District: Shaniyat Chowdhury faces an uphill battle in trying to unseat Rep. Gregory Meeks

Who are the Democrats? Rep. Gregory Meeks represents New York’s Fifth Congressional District, which encompasses part of Queens and Nassau County. He’s being challenged from the left by Shaniyat Chowdhury, an activist and former Marine.

Who are the Republicans? No candidates have filed to run on the Republican ticket.

What’s the background on the race? Meeks has been in Congress since 1998 and is well-established in local and national politics. He’s a senior member of the House Financial Services Committee and the chair of the Queens County Democratic Party.

His challenger, Chowdhury, 28, was born and raised in Queens to Bangladeshi parents. He lives in NYCHA housing in Queens, has worked in local politics and organizing, and appears, like many challengers, to be modeling himself after Ocasio-Cortez — he worked on her insurgent 2018 campaign. He’s been endorsed by Nassau County’s division of Democratic Socialists of America, but not the Queens division.

Meeks has never really faced a serious primary challenge, and his seat looks very solid. In the 2018 primary election, he had two challengers and still got more than 80 percent of the vote, and he has consistently easily won reelection. In other words, Chowdhury faces an uphill battle.

New York’s Ninth Congressional District: Rep. Yvette Clarke tries to fend off Adem Bunkeddeko in a 2018 repeat

Who are the Democrats? New York’s Ninth Congressional District in central Brooklyn is represented by Rep. Yvette Clarke. In 2018, Adem Bunkeddeko, the son of Ugandan refugees who has worked in economic development, came close to defeating Clarke in the Democratic primary, and he’s running again in 2020. Isiah James, Chaim Deutsch, and Lutchi Gayot are in the primary as well.

Who is the Republican? Flatbush-born Constantin Jean-Pierre is running as a Republican in the Ninth District.

What’s the background on the race? This race is likely to be a tight one between Clarke and Bunkeddeko.

Clarke is one of the most progressive members of Congress, so Bunkeddeko, 32, isn’t exactly running to her left but instead is positioning himself as a fresh face who will go to Washington and get things done. His background is compelling: He was born to Ugandan refugees, earned an MBA from Harvard Business School, and worked for the Empire State Development Corporation. He received the endorsement of the New York Times’s editorial board. Clarke, the only black woman in New York’s congressional delegation, is taking the challenge seriously.

Isiah James, an Army veteran and member of the Democratic Socialists of America, is also challenging Clarke, and he could draw votes from Bunkeddeko. It’s unclear whether Chaim Deutsch, a Brooklyn City Council member who is trying to court the Orthodox Jewish parts of the district, will pull votes from Clarke, or what impact Lutchi Gayot may have.

Clarke, Bunkeddeko, and James faced off in a debate in early June. Clarke’s opponents tried to cast her as someone who has failed to get things done on Capitol Hill. She pushed back, also bringing up her gender. “These men have appropriated what I have done,” she said, “which is pretty typical of men.”

New York’s 10th Congressional District: Rep. Jerry Nadler faces two challengers, one a former Cuomo adviser, the other Andrew Yang-inspired

Who are the Democrats? New York’s 10th Congressional District, which encompasses much of the West Side of Manhattan and parts of Brooklyn, is represented by Rep. Jerry Nadler, also the House Judiciary Committee chair. He’s being challenged by Lindsey Boylan and Jonathan Herzog.

Who is the Republican? Cathy Bernstein will be on the ballot in November.

What’s the background on the race? Nadler appears well-positioned to beat back both his challengers in this race.

Herzog worked for Andrew Yang’s presidential campaign before quitting to run for Congress and has focused much of his bid on universal basic income. Boylan, a former state economic development official and adviser to Gov. Andrew Cuomo, has mounted a pretty serious campaign, raised a lot of money, and generated media buzz. She’s not exactly running to Nadler’s left — as mentioned, she worked for the governor — but rather as a sort of resistance figure who will bring fresh blood to Washington.

“No one is entitled to keep their seat,” Boylan told Vox in 2019.

Whereas progressive Democrats have rallied behind some congressional challengers, that’s not been the case for those trying to take on Nadler. Elizabeth Warren, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, and the Working Families Party endorsed Nadler. “He has been a real leader and champ for working people for a long time,” Nnaemeka, of the Working Families Party, said.

New York’s 11th Congressional District: Republicans face off to try to unseat Rep. Max Rose in November

Who is the Democrat? Rep. Max Rose, who unseated Republican Daniel Donovan in 2018, represents the district, which encompasses Staten Island and parts of south Brooklyn.

Who are the Republicans? Assembly member Nicole Malliotakis and former prosecutor Joe Caldarera are competing to go up against Rose in November.

What’s the background on the race? Republicans are hoping to flip this seat back to red in 2020. Rose, a military veteran, unseated Republican incumbent Dan Donovan during the 2018 midterms, winning by about 10 points. Trump won the district in 2016 by about 15 points.

Trump has endorsed Malliotakis, who made an unsuccessful run for New York City mayor in 2017. According to the Associated Press, she has suggested that New York is getting less federal aid for coronavirus relief compared to other states “because of our leadership,” and said she believes it’s important for the city to have a Republican voice in Congress. Caldarera has accused Malliotakis of being “one of the most left-leaning liberal Republicans” in New York. The New York Post has endorsed Malliotakis, while Caldarera has the support of the National Rifle Association.

Cook Political Report rates New York’s 11th Congressional District as a toss-up, so whoever wins on Tuesday will face a tight race in November.

New York’s 12th Congressional District: Rep. Carolyn Maloney benefits from a crowded field of challengers

Who are the Democrats? Rep. Carolyn Maloney represents this district, which encompasses much of the East Side of Manhattan and parts of Brooklyn and Queens. Maloney has three challengers: Lauren Ashcroft, Peter Harrison, and Suraj Patel.

Who is the Republican? Carlos Santiago-Cano, who runs a coffee company, will be on the Republican ticket in the general election.

What’s the background on the race? Suraj Patel, an attorney and NYU professor, ran against Maloney in the 2018 primary and lost to her by about 20 points. Now, he and two other candidates — comedian and former JPMorgan project manager Lauren Ashcroft, and housing activist and democratic socialist Peter Harrison — are trying to take her out. The multiple challengers could wind up being to Maloney’s benefit.

“Maloney would have been vulnerable — she’s one of the most vulnerable members of the New York congressional delegation — but she very much benefited from a split field, and she has spent incredible amounts,” said Sean McElwee, the executive director of Data for Progress. Maloney, who chairs the House Oversight Committee, will likely do well on the Upper East Side, and the other candidates may very well split the vote in more progressive areas of the district.

The race has become heated. Patel has accused Maloney’s ads of being racist, and she has questioned his use of Tinder banking, where campaigns use fake profiles on dating apps to try to reach voters, in 2018.

New York’s 14th Congressional District: Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is now the incumbent, with Democratic challengers of her own

Who are the Democrats? Two years after she upset former Rep. Joe Crowley as an insurgent challenger in her Bronx- and Queens-based district, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is running for reelection and facing some challengers of her own.

Widely viewed as the favorite in the primary, Ocasio-Cortez is up against three Democrats including former CNBC anchor Michelle Caruso-Cabrera, activist Badrun Khan, and chess player Samuel Sloan. Caruso-Cabrera, a former Republican who is running to the right of Ocasio-Cortez on issues including health care, has fundraised the most of the challengers and has picked up the backing of the US Chamber of Congress.

Who is the Republican? Former police officer and current Catholic school teacher John Cummings is mounting a long-shot bid to unseat Ocasio-Cortez.

What’s the background on the race? Despite the pushback she’s received both from Republicans and some members of the Democratic establishment, Ocasio-Cortez continues to have strong support both in her district and beyond. According to a report from the Hill, Ocasio-Cortez has raised a staggering $10.5 million this cycle, a hefty chunk of which is small-dollar donations. She’s likely to beat her primary challengers.

Given the heavy Democratic lean of the district, Ocasio-Cortez is expected to win by a significant margin in November, much like she did in 2018 when she beat Republican Anthony Pappas by more than 60 points.

New York’s 15th Congressional District: A dozen candidates compete for Rep. José Serrano’s seat

Who are the Democrats? Rep. José Serrano announced last year he is retiring, citing the effects of Parkinson’s disease. There are a lot of people running for his seat: Tomas Ramos, Samelys López, Frangell Basora, Melissa Mark-Viverito, Michael Blake, Rubén Díaz Sr., Mark Escoffery-Bey, Ritchie Torres, Chivona Newsome, Ydanis Rodriguez, Julio Pabón, and Marlene Tapper.

Who is the Republican? Orlando Molina will be on the Republican ticket in the general election.

What’s the background on the race? The 15th District encompasses the South Bronx and some of the West Bronx and is among the lowest-income congressional districts in the country. It is very blue, but it could wind up sending a super-conservative Democrat — Ruben Diaz Sr. — to Congress.

Diaz, who is on the New York City Council and previously served in the New York state Senate, is a socially conservative Christian pastor. He opposes abortion and same-sex marriage and has a long history of making insensitive remarks. In 2019, he was roundly criticized for saying he wouldn’t report sexual harassment because he wouldn’t be a “rat.”

Progressives sounded the alarm at the possibility that Diaz might win. The problem is, nobody can agree who is the best person to take him on. Ritchie Torres, a member of the New York City Council and the first openly gay candidate to hold elected office in the Bronx, might be best positioned against Diaz. A Data for Progress poll found Diaz leading the field with 22 percent support, followed by Torres at 20 percent. The New York Times editorial board and the New York Daily New have both endorsed Torres.

However, there’s hardly a consensus. Bernie Sanders, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, and the Working Families Party are backing housing advocate Samelys Lopez. Assembly member Michael Blake, who is also vice chair of the Democratic National Committee, has been endorsed by the Congressional Black Caucus. Former City Council speaker Melissa Mark-Viverito, City Council member Ydanis Rodriguez, and Blake all had 6 percent support in the Data for Progress poll, and 34 percent of voters were undecided.

“There’s a lot at stake in terms of representation,” Nnaemeka said. “A lot of the clearest crises we’re facing are really playing out in the Bronx.”

New York’s 16th Congressional District: Jamaal Bowman looks to pick off Rep. Eliot Engel

Who are the Democrats? Middle school principal Jamaal Bowman is the main challenger trying to unseat Rep. Eliot Engel. Chris Fink and Sammy Ravelo are also running.

Who are the Republicans? No Republicans have filed to run in this general election.

What’s the background on the race? This is shaping up to be the New York congressional race with the most national attention and progressive momentum.

Justice Democrats, the group that helped launch Ocasio-Cortez’s congressional career, recruited Bowman to run last year. The primary was initially a relatively crowded one, but it’s now whittled down, and one of the candidates, Andom Ghebreghiorgis, dropped out and backed Bowman earlier this month.

Bowman has sought to paint Engel as absent from his district and especially disconnected during the pandemic and amid protests against police brutality and racism. “I just don’t understand the lack of urgency from our leaders in Washington, or on the state or city level,” he told Vox in an interview last year.

Progressives have also taken aim at Engel over his vote in support of invading Iraq and his opposition to the Iran nuclear deal. Engel insists he remains connected to the community and that his record is progressive. He has said Bowman is “not a real Democrat,” noting that he only registered as a Democrat in 2018.

If Bowman wins, it will be a big deal.

New York’s 17th Congressional District: A crowded field to take over the seat held by retiring Rep. Nita Lowey

Who are the Democrats? This is another crowded field to take over the seat currently held by Rep. Nita Lowey, who is retiring. The names in the mix: David Buchwald, David Carlucci, Asha Castleberry-Hernandez, Evelyn Farkas, Allison Fine, Mondaire Jones, Catherine Parker, and Adam Schleifer.

Who are the Republicans? Yehudis Gottesfeld and Maureen McArdle-Schulman are competing in the Republican primary for this seat.

What’s the background on the race? This race is a bit of a wily one.

Progressive Mondaire Jones, who had already planned to primary Lowey before she announced her retirement, is seeking to be the first black gay man in Congress. The Harvard law graduate and first-time candidate has picked up multiple high-profile endorsements from progressive politicians, and he’s been endorsed by the Times. “Mondaire is absolutely the progressive in this district,” Nnaemeka said.

But there are multiple others in the mix, and the limited polling there has been shows the race is a tight one. State Sen. David Carlucci, who was a member of the Independent Democratic Conference (IDC) that aligned with Republicans in the New York state Senate, is a strong contender, though he’s been criticized for his role in the IDC. Evelyn Farkas, a former Defense Department official, has the backing of Emily’s List. Assembly member David Buchwald, who pushed to change state law to get Trump’s tax returns, was endorsed by the Daily News. Adam Schleifer, a former prosecutor and son of a billionaire, has been able to dump tons of money into his campaign.

The 17th District, which includes Rockland County and parts of Westchester County, is reliably blue, but two Republicans are running in the primary in the hope of flipping it red: Yehudis Gottesfeld, a 25-year-old chemical engineer, and Maureen McArdle Schulman, a 61-year-old former firefighter.

New York’s 19th Congressional District

Who is the Democrat? Rep. Antonio Delgado, who flipped the district blue in 2018.

Who are the Republicans? Army veteran Kyle Van De Water and entrepreneur Ola Hawatmeh.

What’s the background on the race? Delgado is another member of the first-year House class of 2018, who flipped a formerly red district in upstate New York once held by Republican Rep. John Faso. Faso is not running for his old seat again, but Republicans Kyle Van De Water and Ola Hawatmeh are facing off in a contested primary to challenge Delgado. Hawatmeh, a fashion designer and business leader, has more money, but Van De Water has racked up local GOP endorsements, according to the local newspaper the Times Union. As a member of the House, Delgado has focused on issues like lowering health care costs and campaign finance reform. The nonpartisan Cook Political Report rates Delgado’s seat Lean Democratic.

New York’s 22nd Congressional District

Who is the Democrat? Rep. Anthony Brindisi, a moderate Democrat who flipped the district in 2018.

Who are the Republicans? Former Rep. Claudia Tenney is vying to take on Brindisi and see if she can win her old seat back. Also running is George Phillips, who challenged Tenney in a 2016 primary for the seat.

What’s the background on the race? The 2020 race will likely be a rematch between Brindisi and Tenney, after the Democrat narrowly won the district, which encompasses Utica and Binghamton. Brindisi is seen as one of the most moderate Democrats in the House. He touts his commitment to working with Republicans, but he also voted to impeach Trump along with most House Democrats, which Republicans will likely attack him for in the general election. Brindisi won against Tenney by a little over 4,400 votes in 2018, and the district could be close again this year. Cook rates this district a toss-up.

New York’s 24th Congressional District

Who is the Republican? Rep. John Katko, first elected to the House in 2014.

Who are the Democrats? Educator Dana Balter, who was the 2018 Democratic nominee in this district, and Navy veteran Francis Conole.

What’s the background on the race? Democrats fell short in this district around Syracuse in 2018; Balter lost to Katko by about 5 points. Katko is viewed as a more moderate Republican, and he’s held on to his seat in the district although the voters have supported Democrats including Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama in recent presidential cycles. The primary between Balter and Conole will be a test of what kind of Democrat Katko faces in the fall. Balter is in favor of progressive policies like Medicare-for-all, while Conole prefers a public option. While her race last year helped boost Balter’s name ID, Conole is a serious challenger.

New York’s 27th Congressional District

Who are the Republicans? After former Rep. Chris Collins was sentenced to 26 months in prison, a number of Republicans are vying to replace him. New York state Sen. Chris Jacobs, attorney Beth Parlato, and Erie County Comptroller Stefan Mychajliw are all running.

Who is the Democrat? Attorney Nate McMurray, who narrowly lost to Collins in 2018 before Collins was sentenced and resigned.

What’s the background on the race? There are two races set in New York’s 27th Congressional District this Tuesday. One is a special election to replace embattled Rep. Chris Collins, currently serving a sentence for insider trading. The other is a primary to determine who will run for Collins’s seat this fall.

The special election is between Jacobs — the Republican state senator who has the backing of Trump — and McMurray, who narrowly lost to Collins in 2018 as the insider trading allegations broke. The winner will serve out the remainder of Collins’s term. But the wrinkle here is that Jacobs has two other challengers — Parlato and Mychajliw — in the Republican primary to decide who will challenge McMurray for the seat in the fall.

New York may be a blue state, but the 27th Congressional District is one of its reddest spots. Situated between Buffalo and Rochester, the district voted for Trump in 2016 by 25 points, and voters narrowly stuck with Collins in 2018. While Jacobs is expected to win the GOP primary, it’s not a sure bet. Meanwhile, McMurray, the Democrat who challenged and came within about 1,100 votes of Collins in 2018, is back and hoping to succeed against a new Republican opponent in an area that is still pretty red.


Support Vox’s explanatory journalism

Every day at Vox, we aim to answer your most important questions and provide you, and our audience around the world, with information that has the power to save lives. Our mission has never been more vital than it is in this moment: to empower you through understanding. Vox’s work is reaching more people than ever, but our distinctive brand of explanatory journalism takes resources — particularly during a pandemic and an economic downturn. Your financial contribution will not constitute a donation, but it will enable our staff to continue to offer free articles, videos, and podcasts at the quality and volume that this moment requires. Please consider making a contribution to Vox today.

Source Article from https://www.vox.com/2020/6/23/21296086/new-york-primaries-results-eliot-engel-jamaal-bowman-aoc

  • Trump directly called a GOP leader in Arizona twice while he was trying to overturn the election. 
  • Clint Hickman, chairman of the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors sent him to voicemail. 
  • “I told people, ‘Please don’t have the president call me,'” he told The New York Times.

Former President Donald Trump called the GOP chairman of the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors, Clint Hickman, twice during the time he was trying to overturn the results of the election, The New York Times reported. 

Hickman told the Times he had Trump’s calls go straight to voicemail. 

“I told people, ‘Please don’t have the president call me,'” he said.

The calls were made in late December and early January, he told the Times. The first call came on New Year’s Eve with a voicemail from the White House switchboard noting that Trump wanted to speak with him. The next call came four days later and was also sent to voicemail. 

Hickman said at that point he had already read a transcript of Trump’s call with Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger, where Trump asked him to ‘find’ votes to overturn Biden’s statewide win, and the county was already in litigation over the election results. 

“I had seen what occurred in Georgia and I was like, ‘I want no part of this madness and the only way I enter into this is I call the president back,'” Mr. Hickman said.

Read more: Michigan’s Democrats in Congress face an ethics complaint after hanging with Biden and voting from afar

For months following the election, Trump and his allies waged lawsuits all across the country to try and reverse President Joe Biden’s win. 

In a close race, Biden won Arizona but Hickman said the state Republican Party chairwoman and Trump’s lawyer Rudy Giuliani were pressuring him to investigate fraud in his county’s election. Biden won in Maricopa county.

A Freedom of Information Act request filed by The Arizona Republic showed records of phone calls to Hickman from Trump and Giuliani. 

Arizona’s State Senate called for an audit of all 2.1 million votes cast in the county, which is still underway. 

Trump and his allies waged dozens of unsuccessful lawsuits trying to overturn the election and have repeatedly made false claims he would be reinstated. 

Source Article from https://www.businessinsider.com/trump-called-arizona-gop-leader-persuade-him-alter-election-votes-2021-7

Members of the Taliban delegation gather ahead of Saturday’s signing ceremony with the United States in the Qatari capital of Doha.

Giuseppe Cacace/AFP via Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Giuseppe Cacace/AFP via Getty Images

Members of the Taliban delegation gather ahead of Saturday’s signing ceremony with the United States in the Qatari capital of Doha.

Giuseppe Cacace/AFP via Getty Images

Updated at 10:22 a.m. ET

The U.S. and the Taliban have struck a deal that paves the way for eventual peace in Afghanistan. U.S. Special Representative Zalmay Khalilzad and the head of the militant Islamist group, Mullah Abdul Ghani Baradar, signed the potentially historic agreement Saturday in Doha, Qatar, where the two sides spent months hashing out its details.

Under the terms of the deal, the U.S. commits to withdrawing all of its military forces and supporting civilian personnel, as well as those of its allies, within 14 months. The drawdown process will begin with the U.S. reducing its troop levels to 8,600 in the first 135 days and pulling its forces from five bases.

The rest of its forces, according to the agreement, will leave “within the remaining nine and a half months.”

The Afghan government also will release up to 5,000 Taliban prisoners as a gesture of goodwill, in exchange for 1,000 Afghan security forces held by the Taliban.

“We owe a debt of gratitude to America’s sons and daughters who paid the ultimate sacrifice in Afghanistan, and to the many thousands who served over the past nearly 19 years,” Gen. Mark A. Milley, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said in a statement celebrating the deal, which comes on the heels of a seven-day “Reduction in Violence” agreement in Afghanistan.

“The only responsible way to end the war in Afghanistan is through a negotiated political settlement. Today is a reflection of the hard work of our Nation’s military, the U.S. Department of State, intelligence professionals, and our valued partners,” he added. “The United States is committed to the Afghan people, and to ensuring that Afghanistan never becomes a safe haven for terrorists to threaten our homeland and our Allies.”

The U.S. intends, along with members of the United Nations Security Council, to “remove members of the Taliban from the sanctions list with the aim of achieving this objective by May 29, 2020” — and Washington, in particular, aims to remove the group from U.S. sanctions by Aug 27, 2020.

The U.S. has pledged to seek the Security Council’s recognition and endorsement of the plan.

The Afghan government will also begin negotiations with the Taliban to map out a political settlement which would establish the role the Taliban would play in a future Afghanistan. These negotiations are expected to start next month. One of the first tasks in these intra-Afghan talks will be to achieve a lasting ceasefire in Afghanistan.

Separately, in Kabul, Afghanistan, U.S. Defense Secretary Mark Esper and NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg signed a joint declaration with the Afghan government — represented by President Ashraf Ghani — that commits the Afghans to these up-coming negotiations with the Taliban and to provide Afghanistan with security guarantees as this process unfolds.

The deal signed Saturday has been 18 months in the making.

There were nine rounds of on-again, off-again talks in Doha — the Qatari capital where the Taliban maintains an office — which began in 2018. The U.S. and Taliban had reached an agreement last summer, but President Trump walked away from those talks after a U.S. service member was killed in a September car bombing in the Afghan capital, Kabul.

Only the U.S., led by its chief representative, Khalilzad, and the Taliban have taken part in the negotiations, an arrangement that New York University’s Barnett Rubin says was designed by the Taliban and resisted until recently by the U.S.

“Since 2010 [the Taliban] always insisted there would be two stages: international and then intra-Afghan,” says Rubin, who served from 2009-2013 as special advisor to the State Department’s Special Representative for Afghanistan and Pakistan and now directs the Afghanistan Pakistan Regional Program at NYU’s Center on International Cooperation.

The Taliban’s rule in Afghanistan, which lasted just five years, ended abruptly with the invasion of a U.S.-led military coalition shortly after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks. Their overthrow was a reprisal for having harbored Osama bin Laden, the leader of al-Qaida, whose militants hijacked and crashed four American airliners in those attacks.

President Trump has repeatedly vowed to end America’s involvement in the war in Afghanistan, the most prolonged of all U.S. conflicts. Within months of assuming the presidency, though, Trump added 4,000 U.S. troops to the 8,900 American forces already deployed there.

More than 2,400 Americans have died in Afghanistan during nearly 18 years of fighting, at an estimated cost to the U.S. Treasury of nearly $1 trillion. In recent years, despite the surge in troop levels, the Taliban have fought U.S. and Afghan forces to what Milley has called “a state of strategic stalemate.”

This past month has seen less bloodshed than usual in the country, as Taliban fighters promised to suspend major attacks and U.S. forces agreed to suspend offensive operations — except attacks against Islamic State insurgents — during the recent weeklong “reduction in violence” period.

“We have seen just these last six days a significant reduction in violence in Afghanistan,” Secretary of State Mike Pompeo told the House Committee on Foreign Affairs on Friday, shortly before flying to the Doha signing ceremony. Earlier in the week, Pompeo called the partial truce “imperfect,” but said “it’s working.”

Here are some of the key elements in that political resolution:

1. A withdrawal of U.S. troops

Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, left, meets with Qatari Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Foreign Affairs Sheikh Mohammed bin Abdulrahman al-Thani ahead of Saturday’s signing ceremony between the U.S. and the Taliban in Qatar’s capital, Doha.

Giuseppe Cacace/AFP via Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Giuseppe Cacace/AFP via Getty Images

Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, left, meets with Qatari Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Foreign Affairs Sheikh Mohammed bin Abdulrahman al-Thani ahead of Saturday’s signing ceremony between the U.S. and the Taliban in Qatar’s capital, Doha.

Giuseppe Cacace/AFP via Getty Images

The success of February’s seven-day partial truce has been seen as a crucial first step to the eventual withdrawal of U.S. troops, with aspirations for a full pullout contingent on the Taliban’s “performance” over the coming months, according to a senior State Department official who spoke on the condition of anonymity.

“Part of the process of making peace is to begin to take down the edifice [of sanctions], but the language is carefully constructed to be conditional, depending on Taliban performance,” says the official. “If the Taliban don’t do what we hope they’ll do, our requirements to begin to take down that edifice are vitiated.”

Michael O’Hanlon, a Brookings Institution scholar and longtime supporter of the U.S. intervention in Afghanistan, points out that the initial drawdown brings the troop levels back to roughly the same number that were in the country under President Obama.

“So, it’s not a huge change,” O’Hanlon tells NPR. “It’s just a reduction from the sort of mini-Trump buildup.”

He warns this agreement cannot repeat what the U.S. signed with the North Vietnamese in the 1973 Paris peace talks, “where we basically take on faith that the enemy is going to behave itself once we’re gone.”

A senior Afghan official tells NPR that the U.S. forces that do remain would focus on the three missions they are currently carrying out: counter-terrorism operations, training of Afghan forces and air support for Afghan ground forces.

A drawdown of the approximately 7,000 forces from other NATO member states in Afghanistan would take place in tandem with the departure of U.S. troops.

2. A commitment by the Taliban to end support for U.S.-deemed “terrorist organizations”

U.S. officials insist the troop withdrawal timeline will depend primarily on one condition: the degree to which the Taliban fulfills its commitment in the peace deal not to allow Afghanistan to be used as a base of operations by insurgencies such as al-Qaida and the Islamic State.

“The Taliban must respect the agreement, specifically regarding their promises of severing ties with terrorists,” Pompeo said earlier this week at the State Department. “We have our deep counterterrorism interest there, making sure that the homeland is never attacked. It’s one of the central underpinnings of what President Trump has laid before us.”

The Taliban’s renunciation of ties with al-Qaida, though, may be more easily said than done.

“This is a complex issue because the Haqqani network is often seen as a strong affiliate of al-Qaida and it’s also part of the Taliban leadership,” says O’Hanlon. “So we don’t really quite know what that means, but presumably, core al-Qaida and the Taliban would not be allowed to speak [to each other] and we would be listening with all of our electronic capabilities to make sure that was the case.”

The Haqqani network is one of Afghanistan’s most experienced insurgent groups, long thought to be responsible for some of the more sophisticated and large scale attacks, especially in Kabul. Its leader, Sirajuddin Haqqani, is the Taliban’s current deputy and recently penned an op-ed in the The New York Times.

The State Department recognizes there are concerns about the Taliban’s historical bonds with al-Qaida.

“We think this is a decisive and historic first step in terms of their public acknowledgment that they are breaking ties with al-Qaida,” says one official. “That’s going to be a work in progress.”

Just as the withdrawal of U.S. forces from Afghanistan is the Taliban’s main demand in this agreement, the U.S. has made the Taliban’s forswearing of ties to other insurgencies its top ask.

“We went into Afghanistan with NATO after 9/11 because of the threat to the United States and our allies,” the State Department official says. “We are still there because we are concerned about the terrorist threat.”

But one former senior U.S. official suggests the Trump administration may be exaggerating that threat.

“In my estimation, we have largely achieved our counter-terrorism objective today. Al-Qaida is much diminished in Afghanistan and Pakistan, with most of its senior leaders killed and those who remain marginalized,” retired Army Gen. Douglas Lute, who served as point man for the Afghan war effort in both the Bush and Obama White Houses, recently wrote in prepared Congressional testimony.

“There is a branch of the so-called Islamic State in Afghanistan, but I have seen no evidence that it presents a threat to the U.S. and it is under pressure from the Afghans, including from the Taliban.”

3. Maintaining a communications channel

Mullah Abdul Salam Zaeef, the Taliban’s former ambassador to Pakistan, speaks to the press ahead of Saturday’s signing ceremony with the United States in Qatar.

Giuseppe Cacace/AFP via Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Giuseppe Cacace/AFP via Getty Images

Mullah Abdul Salam Zaeef, the Taliban’s former ambassador to Pakistan, speaks to the press ahead of Saturday’s signing ceremony with the United States in Qatar.

Giuseppe Cacace/AFP via Getty Images

The U.S. and the Taliban are expected to continue the lines of communications they have already established during the talks in Doha, both to support implementation of the agreement and to de-conflict their respective military operations against ISIS in eastern Afghanistan.

Suspicions that there was a secret annex to the deal that also involved sharing intelligence with the Taliban prompted a cautionary letter to Pompeo and Defense Secretary Mark Esper this week from 22 House Republicans. They demanded that any deal between the U.S. and the Taliban be made public with no secret annexes or side deals, including one for intelligence sharing or a joint counterterrorism center with the Taliban.

“This would be a farce,” the lawmakers wrote, “and put American lives at risk.”

A State Department official on Thursday denied the U.S. was entering into any kind of “cooperative partnership” with the Taliban.

4. Prisoner swaps

The exchange of prisoners between the Afghan government and the Taliban is intended as a way of building trust between the two sides.

A State Department official expressed admiration for the care Taliban leaders have shown for freeing their fighters, adding: “The agreement makes explicit that those who are released need to make commitments that they won’t go back to the battlefield and that they will support the agreement.”

While noting the need for early action on releasing prisoners to build confidence among the Taliban in the peace process, the official said both the numbers of prisoners and the timeline for their release are “aspirational” and will depend on “Taliban performance.”

5. Intra-party talks among Afghans

A second phase of the peace process would bring together Afghan government officials, opposition figures, civil society representatives and the Taliban to discuss a political road map for bringing an end to the war.

The talks are expected to take place in Oslo, Norway, to begin around mid-March. The U.S. will be present along with others, including Germany, Indonesia and the U.N., but only in the role of supporting and facilitating the talks.

“It’s not like the Taliban are endlessly evil or that this will bring flowers and roses and doves overnight,” says one U.S. official. “We’ve reached a point where there’s a critical mass on all sides where people want to change, want a better future, want a better option, and our job is to continue to create the incentives, continue to create the momentum for people to move forward and change the negative trajectory.”

A host of difficult issues are to be addressed in the intra-Afghan talks, including:

a. A long-term cease-fire

The reduction in violence of the past week is intended to be a step toward an overall cessation of hostilities to be worked out in Oslo.

“The agreement explicitly calls on the Taliban to sit down with the other Afghans in the intra-Afghan negotiations, where they will discuss the modalities and the timing of a comprehensive and permanent cease-fire,” says a State Department official. “There’s a lot of mistrust, decades of fighting, so it’s not going to be easy.”

This would likely entail a dismantling of the Taliban’s military force with the aim of either demobilizing or integrating its members into the Afghan security forces — a goal O’Hanlon considers daunting.

“I think the only realistic way to handle the security forces is that you keep all the different forces more or less in place,” he says. “The Taliban continue to hold the parts of the country where they’re most influential in certain rural areas, the Afghan army and police control the cities and major highways, and maybe there’s a U.N. observation force making sure they don’t fight each other.”

b. Power sharing

Yet to be determined is the role the Taliban might play in Afghanistan’s political future.

The nation continues to roil over results of the disputed September presidential election. Ghani was declared the winner in mid-February. But that result is not recognized by his challenger, Chief Executive Abdullah Abdullah, and a planned swearing-in of Ghani for a second term has been postponed until March 10, at the request of the U.S.

“You have a very fragmented country right now within Afghanistan, even apart from the Taliban and the central government who are clearly at war,” says Bahar Jalali, who directs the women’s mentoring program at the American University of Afghanistan.

“There’s a lot of consternation with the Taliban coming back and re-emerging as viable political actors. What’s going to happen with that?”

c. Women’s rights

After women were prohibited under Taliban rule from attending school, working or appearing in public without a male relative as escort, they’ve won back those rights and gained others in areas no longer dominated by the Taliban.

In his opinion piece last week, Haqqani, the deputy Taliban leader, appeared to play down concerns that women would lose their restored freedoms.

“I am confident that, liberated from foreign domination and interference, we together will find a way to build an Islamic system in which all Afghans have equal rights,” Haqqani wrote, “where the rights of women that are granted by Islam — from the right to education to the right to work — are protected, and where merit is the basis for equal opportunity.”

But many are skeptical of the Taliban’s intentions and doubt such assurances.

“We saw what the Taliban’s version of Islam looked like in the late 1990s and early 2000s, right before the U.S. military intervention,” says Jalali. “That gives nobody any good sense of comfort about the Taliban upholding the rights of women under Islamic law.”

Jalali fears the U.S. is simply looking for a way out of Afghanistan before November’s election.

“That really speaks to Trump’s burning desire to exit from Afghanistan and to say, hey, I ended the Forever War, you know, I can claim credit for that,” she says. “I keep saying [it’s a] low threshold for peace and a low threshold for ending the war.”

For O’Hanlon, the Doha peace agreement is only a start.

“It’s a tiny step forward,” he says. “It’s a good step forward, but it doesn’t really mean that phase two or round two is going to follow naturally.”

Source Article from https://www.npr.org/2020/02/29/810537586/u-s-signs-peace-deal-with-taliban-after-nearly-2-decades-of-war-in-afghanistan

Source Article from https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2021/03/24/kamala-harris-lead-biden-admin-stemming-migration-border/6984000002/

(CNN) – Investigadores estadounidenses creen que hackers rusos ingresaron al sistema la agencia de noticias estatal de Qatar y plantaron una noticia falsa que contribuyó a una crisis entre los aliados más cercanos en el Golfo Pérsico de Estados Unidos, según funcionarios estadounidenses informados sobre la investigación.

El FBI envió recientemente a un equipo de investigadores a Doha para ayudar al gobierno de Qatar a investigar el presunto incidente de piratería, informaron funcionarios de los gobiernos estadounidense y qatarí.

La inteligencia recopilada por las agencias de seguridad estadounidenses indica que los hackers rusos estaban detrás de la intrusión reportada por el gobierno de Qatar hace dos semanas, dijeron funcionarios estadounidenses. Qatar alberga una de las bases militares estadounidenses más grandes de la región.

La supuesta participación de piratas informáticos rusos intensifica las preocupaciones por parte de las agencias de inteligencia y agencias de la ley de Estados Unidos sobre que Rusia sigue intentando contra aliados estadounidenses algunas de las mismas medidas cibernéticas que —según las agencias de inteligencia — se usaron para inmiscuirse en las elecciones de 2016.

Funcionarios estadounidenses dicen que el objetivo de los rusos parece ser causar divisiones entre EE.UU. y sus aliados. En los últimos meses, presuntas actividades cibernéticas rusas, incluido el uso de noticias falsas, han aparecido en medio de elecciones en Francia, Alemania y otros países.

Aún no está claro si EE.UU. ha rastreado a los hackers en el incidente de Qatar para determinar si tienen vínculos con organizaciones criminales rusas o con los servicios de seguridad rusos culpados por los ciberataques de las elecciones estadounidenses. Un funcionario señaló que basándose en la inteligencia pasada, “no ocurre mucho en ese país sin la bendición del gobierno”.

El FBI y la CIA se negaron a comentar. Una portavoz de la embajada de Qatar en Washington dijo que la investigación está en curso y que sus resultados se publicarán pronto.

El gobierno de Qatar señaló el 23 de mayo que un noticiero de su agencia de noticias de Qatar atribuyó falsas declaraciones al gobernante de la nación que parecían amables con Irán e Israel y en que cuestionaba si el presidente Donald Trump duraría en el cargo.

El ministro de Relaciones Exteriores de Qatar, el jeque Mohammed Bin Abdulrahman al-Thani, dijo a CNN que el FBI ha confirmado del ciberataque y la plantación de noticias falsas.

Source Article from http://cnnespanol.cnn.com/2017/06/06/investigadores-de-ee-uu-sospechan-que-hackers-rusos-plantaron-noticias-falsas-para-desatar-la-crisis-de-qatar/

Los videos de seguridad muestran las rutas que siguió Rafael Uribe Noguera durante el día en el que supuestamente asesinó a Yuliana Samboní y que prueban que era consciente del crimen que estaba cometiendo.

En los registros de video de cámaras de seguridad se observa cuando Rafael Uribe Noguera sale del edificio Equus 64 a las 9:20 de la mañana del 4 de diciembre. Luego realiza un recorrido hasta el barrio Bosque Calderón, donde rapta a Yuliana Samboní.

Al volver a los alrededores del edificio Equus 64, Uribe Noguera realiza una labor de reconocimiento del sector, ya con la menor en su poder. 

Luego, las cámaras de seguridad registran que a las 9:41 de la mañana la camioneta ingresa al edificio con la menor a bordo. Noticias RCN se abstiene de mostrar a Yuliana Samboní dentro del vehículo por respeto a su memoria y la dignidad de su familia. 

Sin embargo, la camioneta solo dura tres minutos dentro del parqueadero del edificio y vuelve a salir a las 9:44 a.m. Otro detalle desconocido hasta ahora es que, 10 minutos después, Uribe Noguera vuelve a intentar entrar a la edificación pero esta vez usa la entrada del parqueadero del sótano. 

Tres personas se encontraban cerca de la camioneta, al parecer, esto hizo que Uribe Noguera retrocediera en su intento por entrar a la edificación. Luego cambia de rumbo. 

Hacia el mediodía, las cámaras muestran que el hoy detenido y acusado del asesinato de Yuliana Samboní entra caminado al edificio Equus 64. Tras 11 minutos, vuelve a la calle pero esta vez con ropa distinta con la que ingresó. 

Finalmente, a las 2:48 de la tarde los agentes del Gaula llegan en una patrulla al edificio donde reside Uribe Noguera. 

Un nuevo dato revelador muestra el ingreso de los familiares del acusado antes de las 3:00 p.m., sin embrago, permanecen con los investigadores mientras realizan llamadas por celular, aparentemente, tratando de que Uribe Noguera conteste su móvil. 

A esto se suman más de 20 testimonios, entre ellos el del portero del edificio Equus 64 a donde el 4 de diciembre intentó llevar primero a la niña.

NoticiasRCN.com

Source Article from http://www.noticiasrcn.com/nacional-bogota/exclusivo-nuevos-videos-ponen-al-descubierto-los-pasos-siguio-rafael-uribe-el-dia

Image copyright
Thinkstock

Image caption

Muchos dirán que, en todo caso, las noticias siempre han sido mentira, pero este fenómeno quizás merece una reflexión que vaya un poco más allá.

Inventar noticias deliberadamente para engañar o entretener no es algo nuevo. Pero la llegada de las redes sociales hizo que las historias reales y las ficticias se puedan presentar de una manera tan similar que a veces es difícil distinguir entre ellas.

Si bien es cierto que internet ha permitido el intercambio de conocimiento a una escala con la que generaciones previas sólo podían soñar, también ha fundamentado lo que el ensayista Jonathan Swift escribió en 1710:

La falsedad vuela y la verdad viene cojeando tras ella”

En Estados Unidos, por ejemplo, una investigación del Pew Centre reveló que el 62% de los estadounidenses adultos reciben noticias a través de las redes sociales, de manera que es cada vez más probable que más de nosotros estemos viendo -y creyendo- información que no sólo no es precisa sino que a veces es totalmente inventada.

Hay cientos de sitios web de noticias falsas, desde las que imitan diarios reales, hasta sitios de propaganda gubernamental, y otras que se mueven por la fina línea que divide la sátira con la desinformación.

Image copyright
National Report

Image caption

Una historia falsa sobre las elecciones en EE.UU. que asegura que los marihuaneros votan por Hillary Clinton.

Uno de esos medios es The National Report, que se promociona como “la primera fuente de noticias independientes de EE.UU.”, fundada por Allen Montgomery (no es su nombre real).

“Hay veces que es como una droga”, le dijo Montgomery a la BBC.

“Es genial ver cómo el tráfico sube y cómo pescaste a la gente con la historia. ¡Me divierte mucho!”.

Una de las más grandes de esas historias fue sobre una ciudad de EE.UU. que supuestamente estaba siendo acordonada debido a una enfermedad mortal.

Según explica Montgomery, han perfeccionado el arte de hacer que la gente lea y comparta las noticias falsas que The National Report les ofrece.

“El nombre mismo del sitio es parte de la fórmula: tienes que tener un sitio para tus noticias falsas que se vea lo más legítimo posible”.

“Obviamente, el titular es clave. La gente deja de leer después del titular y los dos primeros párrafos, así que si estos suenan como noticias legítimas, puedes hacer lo que quieras con el final de la historia, hasta volverla ridícula”.

Pero, ¿por qué lo hacen?

La respuesta es: serias cantidades de dinero.

Sitios como The National Report atraen publicidad de manera que pueden ser muy lucrativos.

Esas potencialmente abultadas recompensas seducen a los dueños de páginas web a abandonar los chistes satíricos y empezar a producir contenido más creíble que tiene posibilidades de ser más ampliamente compartido.

Y a las agencias de publicidad les interesa eso: que la gente comparta, pues la idea es que más personas vean lo que venden, sin importar si lo ven acompañado de mentiras.

“Algunas de nuestras noticias nos han dado US$10,000. Cuando damos en el clavo e impulsamos esas historias, ganamos miles de dólares”, dice Montgomery.

¿Debe preocuparnos que existan estos sitios de noticias falsas?

Brooke Binkowski de Snopes, uno de los sitios más grandes de chequeo de información que lucha contra la desinformación, piensa que aunque puede que no sea peligroso que circulen una que otra historia falsa su potencial para causar daño aumenta con el tiempo.

Image copyright
Empire News

Image caption

Titular: “Hombre que murió en casa embrujada no fue descubierto por semanas: todos pensaron que era ‘un maniquí muy realista'”… ¿Broma o regalito?

“Hay mucho sesgo de confirmación: mucha gente queriendo probar que su visión del mundo es la apropiada y correcta”, explica.

Y es precisamente eso lo que Allen Montgomery dice que su sitio de noticias falsas trata de explotar: la idea de reforzar las creencias y confirmar con mentiras los prejuicios de la gente.

“Constantemente tratamos de sintonizarnos con los sentimientos que sospechamos que la gente tiene o quiere tener”.

“Recientemente publicamos una historia que decía que a Hillary Clinton le habían dado las respuestas antes de un debate. Ya había algunos rumores sobre eso -todos falsos-, pero ese tipo de titulares entra en la burbuja de los de derecha y son ellos los que mantienen viva la historia”.

El camino de la mentira a la verdad es corto

Craig Silverman, quien trabaja en Buzzfeed liderando el equipo que estudia los efectos de las noticias falsas, explica cuán fácil es que ese tipo de historias terminen siendo reportadas como ciertas en los medios tradicionales.

“Una página de noticias falsas publica un embuste y, como recibe mucha atención en las redes sociales, otro sitio web lo toma, escribe la historia como si fuera verdad y no la vincula a la página de noticias falsas original”.

“Eso provoca una reacción en cadena hasta que algún periodista de un medio creíble la ve y escribe algo sobre ella. Como los periodistas ahora tratan de escribir tantas historias como sea posible y de que esas historias atraigan muchos lectores y atención en las redes, la tendencia es producir más y chequear menos“, dice Silverman.

Image copyright
Clickhole

Image caption

Lejos de la verdad. Según el titular, el senador estadounidense Paul Ryan tuvo visiones de un nuevo partido republicano tras probar ayahuasca.

Además, señala Anthony Adornato, del departamento de periodismo del Ithaca College en New York, muchos medios tradicionales no están al día en cuestión de políticas de verificación.

“Es común hoy en día que los medios dependan del contenido compartido pero no todas las salas de redacción tienen una política respecto a cómo autenticar esa información”.

Un estudio reciente dirigido por Adornato en estaciones de televisión locales de EE.UU. reveló que casi el 40% de las políticas editoriales no incluían guías sobre cómo manejar la información de las redes sociales a pesar de que los jefes de noticias admitieron que más del 30% de sus boletines habían reportado información proveniente de esa fuente que luego resultó falsa o imprecisa.

¿Perdimos la batalla contra las mentiras entonces?

Image copyright
Thinkstock

Image caption

¿Cómo distinguir la información falsa si la escriben como fidedigna?

Según Allen Montgomery, Facebook ya tomó medidas para reducir el impacto de sitios falsos.

“Hemos sido uno de los blancos específicos de los cambios en el algoritmo de suministro de noticias. Han ahogado nuestras historias para que no sean compartidas ni gustadas, y no dudo que estén haciendo lo mismo con otros sitios de noticias falsas”.

“Pero la verdad es que si se trata de algo que produce dinero – y esto lo produce- uno apela a la creatividad“.

Es por eso que Montgomery ahora tiene 9 sitios de noticias falsas por los que mueve el contenido para tratar de burlar la censura de Facebook.

*Parte o todo lo que le dijo a la BBC Allen Montgomery puede ser falso.

Source Article from http://www.bbc.com/mundo/noticias-37910450