Most Viewed Videos

A United Nations Security Council report released in June estimated that Al Qaeda still had a presence in at least 15 of Afghanistan’s 34 provinces. The Defense Department’s Office of Inspector General said in a report released on Wednesday that “the Taliban continued to maintain its relationship with Al Qaeda, providing safe haven for the terrorist group in Afghanistan.”

After Mr. Biden spoke, John F. Kirby, a Pentagon spokesman, confirmed in a news conference that Al Qaeda had a presence in Afghanistan.

What Mr. Biden said

“We have no indication that they haven’t been able to get — in Kabul — through the airport. We’ve made an agreement with the, with the Taliban. Thus far, they’ve allowed them to go through. It’s in their interest for them to go through. So, we know of no circumstance where American citizens are — carrying an American passport — are trying to get through to the airport.”

This is misleading. Reports from Afghanistan contradict this statement, and other government officials have been more cautious when describing the conditions for American citizens traveling to the airport.

The United States Embassy in Kabul sent a security alert on Wednesday warning American citizens, legal residents and their families that the “United States government cannot ensure safe passage to the Hamid Karzai International Airport.”

Asked about Mr. Biden’s claim that no American had been denied access to the airport, Ned Price, a spokesman for the State Department, said in a news conference on Friday that the department “has received only a small number of reports from American citizens that their access has been impeded in some way, that they have faced any sort of hardship or resistance, getting to the airport.”

Mr. Kirby, the Pentagon spokesman, also said in the news conference that he was aware of “sporadic reports of some Americans not being able to get through checkpoints,” but that they were able to get through “by and large.”

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2021/08/20/us/politics/biden-afghanistan-fact-check.html

The media told us that President Trump was callous, uninformed, indifferent to facts, unwilling to listen to experts, willing to inflict incalculable damage to our interests — leaving allies abandoned, enemies emboldened and America with its reputation in tatters. 

But now, in a tragic turn of events, so much of what the press said about Donald Trump applies to Joe Biden. 

Biden’s disaster in Afghanistan — which has cost the lives of 13 US service members and scores of civilians — places this dynamic in stark relief. Announcing in April that the US would leave Afghanistan, the president took no cognizance of the actual terms of Trump’s negotiated deal with the Taliban. Whatever its shortcomings, the so-called Doha Agreement regulated the Taliban’s military actions, while requiring good faith negotiations between it and the Afghan government of President Ashraf Ghani. Given that the Taliban was in breach of Doha, and the required negotiations were unsuccessful, the United States was entitled to leave the pact. It certainly could not be held to any specific evacuation deadline. 

Biden, ignoring all these policy “details” — like Trump was once said to do — simply decreed that the United States would depart Afghanistan by the anniversary of 9/11, no conditions attached. He thereby placed optics over substance, politicizing what is sacred in the process — as Trump was also once said to do. (At the same time, by changing the withdrawal deadline from Trump’s date of May 1 not once but twice, to Sept. 11 and then to Aug. 31, Biden clearly found flexibility in Doha where he wanted it.) 

Members of the US Navy transport the casket of Maxton Soviak, one of 13 troops killed in a suicide bombing in Afghanistan during the botched US pullout.
AP

Even as US intelligence warned of the Taliban’s advance, and even as the estimated timetable for its victory was radically foreshortened, Biden and his administration continued to spin. Another way of putting it: They spurned the experts, choosing instead to live inside a bubble of “alternative facts.” 

Pentagon press secretary John Kirby talked about “very capable” and “very sophisticated” Afghan military units, while White House press secretary Jen Psaki said that Afghan forces “have what they need.” In a phone call with Ghani, Biden went further still, pressuring the Afghan leader to claim that military conditions were positive “whether it is true or not.” One must wonder: While building false confidence in the Afghan military — the better to blame it later — did Biden ever consider the consequences of giving US citizens in Afghanistan, or our Afghan allies, false confidence in their continued safety? 

Biden’s response to the Taliban’s victory and the Afghan government’s collapse is in line with the caricature the media gave Trump, that of an uncaring leader acting unilaterally in the world. 

Uninformed, indifferent to facts, unwilling to listen to experts. All of what was said about Trump is now true of Biden.
Getty Images

As chaos ensued in Afghanistan, with American citizens trapped, Afghan allies betrayed, and scenes at the Kabul airport reminiscent of Saigon in 1975, Biden mustered little empathy to go along with all his finger-pointing and fact-ignoring. The president complained of Trump’s Doha deal, which he “inherited,” as if it afforded no opportunity to pivot. He conveniently derided the Afghan military’s “will to fight.” He claimed, fantastically, to “have seen no question of our credibility from our allies around the world.” 

Perhaps Biden missed the speech of Tom Tugendhat, a combat veteran of Afghanistan and chairman of the UK’s parliamentary Foreign Affairs Committee. Tugendhat expressed his “grief and rage — the feeling [of] abandonment of not just a country but the sacrifice that my friends made.” Or perhaps the president was unaware of German Chancellor Angela Merkel’s statement, lamenting the “bitter, dramatic, and awful” conquest of Afghanistan by the Taliban. 

As the Afghanistan disaster shows, what the mainstream media said of Trump is true of Biden. And the consequences have only begun to unfold. 

Augustus Howard is a columnist focusing on national politics and foreign policy.

Source Article from https://nypost.com/2021/09/11/much-of-what-the-press-said-about-trump-now-applies-to-biden/

The offshore oil drilling platform ‘Gail,’ operated by Venoco, Inc., is shown off the coast of Santa Barbara, Calif. in 2009. A Trump administration plan to greatly expand offshore drilling is on hold after a setback in court.

Chris Carlson/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Chris Carlson/AP

The offshore oil drilling platform ‘Gail,’ operated by Venoco, Inc., is shown off the coast of Santa Barbara, Calif. in 2009. A Trump administration plan to greatly expand offshore drilling is on hold after a setback in court.

Chris Carlson/AP

The Trump administration is postponing controversial plans to greatly expand oil and gas drilling off of the nation’s coasts, following a recent setback in court and months of pushback from coastal communities.

Last month, a federal judge in Alaska ruled that President Trump exceeded his authority when he signed an executive order to lift an Obama-era ban on oil and gas drilling in parts of the Arctic and Atlantic oceans.

The decision immediately reinstated those protections, and was a major blow to the administration’s efforts to boost oil and gas development across the country.

While the Trump administration is expected to appeal the decision, a resolution could be a long ways off. That makes it uncertain where new oil leases may eventually be allowed.

In an interview with the Wall Street Journal, published Thursday, newly confirmed Interior Secretary David Bernhardt said that his agency may wait for the court process to play out before moving forward with plans to open up more than 90 percent of all federal waters to offshore oil and gas leasing.

“By the time the court rules, that may be discombobulating to our plan,” Bernhardt told the newspaper.

Last year, the Trump administration said it would move to allow offshore oil and gas leasing in nearly all of the nation’s coastal waters. The proposal was met with instant criticism from environmental groups and governors’ offices along the East and West coasts.

Even some Republican lawmakers joined in the backlash.

All had been waiting months for a new version of the plan, which had been expected anytime. But during his confirmation hearing last month, Bernhardt told lawmakers that the plan was still in its beginning stages.

His interview with the Wall Street Journal was his first since being confirmed as the nation’s top land steward, and appeared to put the proposal on indefinite hold.

“Given the recent court decision, the Department is simply evaluating all of its options to determine the best pathway to accomplish the mission entrusted to it by the President,” Interior spokeswoman Molly Block confirmed in an email.

The plan’s critics are celebrating the delay.

“This decision is the result of constant pressure from coastal communities, environmental groups, and elected official who made it abundantly clear that offshore oil and gas drilling is dangerous, unwanted, and a threat to our economy and way of life,” said Virginia Democratic Congressman Joe Cunningham in a statement.

Jacqueline Savitz, chief policy officer at Oceana, says that she is encouraged by the move, “but until the Trump plan is final, the President is positioned to open up our coasts at a moment’s notice.”

Source Article from https://www.npr.org/2019/04/25/717214683/trump-administration-puts-offshore-drilling-plan-on-hold-after-setback-in-court

El origen de la fanesca no ha sido esclarecido del todo, sin embargo, esta comida ceremonial demuestra el sincretismo alimentario de las culturas asentadas en el territorio nacional junto con las costumbres gastronómicas traídas desde España.

La ushucuta -término kichwa que significa ‘granos tiernos cocidos con ají’ sería el plato prehispánico que dio origen a la fanesca, según el Ministerio de Cultura y Patrimonio de Ecuador.

En la actualidad, este exponente de la gastronomía ecuatoriana, se convirtió en un plato culinario tradicional a escala nacional para la familia, al punto de considerarlo como un elemento que identifica la herencia cultural y sintetiza la diversidad alimentaria.

Revise también: Fanesca, el plato sagrado de Ecuador

Para la preparación de la fanesca, se incluyen múltiples ingredientes de variados sabores y provenientes de distintas zonas, además, su elaboración obedece a todo un entramado social desplegado en un tiempo específico y con la connotación de unir, compartir y construir lazos entre los participantes.

Potaje de Semana Santa

Su tiempo de producción y disfrute se inserta en la Semana Mayor del catolicismo, el cual conmemora la muerte y resurrección de Cristo, y dentro de las festividades andinas del Pawkar Raymi (Fiesta del Florecimiento), incluido el ritual del Mushuk Nina (Fuego Nuevo).

En ambos casos, es el mismo gusto culinario: la fanesca, que es un potaje de 12 granos y legumbres tiernas (fréjol, haba, chocho, choclo, arveja, lenteja, melloco, garbanzo, zapallo, cebolla y sambo) y pescado seco.

Lea aquí: Receta de Fanesca

Los primigenios habitantes de la sierra ecuatoriana la preparaban al cocinar granos con calabazas y con la influencia española, nuevos ingredientes, como las habas, la leche, el queso y el pescado, y técnicas de cocción fueron incluidos.

De esta mezcla de productos, saberes y sabores surge la fanesca, una expresión del mestizaje y diversidad cultural del país. Incluso el término fue incluido y reconocido como un ecuatorianismo por la Real Academia de la Lengua Española en el año 2001.  

En Guayaquil

Algunas de las huecas que prepararán Fanesca, según informó la Empresa Pública Municipal de Turismo, Promoción Cívica y Relaciones Internacionales del Municipio de Guayaquil.

– El Mesón de Don Suco
Calle Luque 203 y Av. Pedro Carbo

– El Pez Volador: Humitas y mazamorra de choclo
Aguirre entre Esmeraldas y José Mascote.

– El Rincón del Café: Humitas
Chimborazo y Argentina.

– El Jardín: Fanesca
Chimborazo y Venezuela. (F)

Source Article from http://www.eluniverso.com/noticias/2017/04/11/nota/6134269/fanesca-expresion-cultural-patrimonio-gastronomico-ecuador

Ecuador inició este jueves un programa para ayudar a través de empleos y créditos a los 12.000 connacionales para facilitar su reinserción laboral, explicó la subsecretaria de la Comunidad Ecuatoriana Migrante de la Cancillería, Jeanneth Sosa.

Decenas de migrantes acudieron a las instalaciones del Ministerio de Deporte ecuatoriano en busca de capacitación y de ayuda en sus trámites para la revalidación de sus títulos obtenidos en el exterior.

La canciller de Ecuador, María Fernanda Espinosa, indicó que construirá el plan nacional de los migrantes en conjunto con ellos. Recordó además que el gobierno de la Revolución Ciudadana otorgó derechos políticos a los migrantes que actualmente tienen representación política en la Asamblea Nacional y que es su prioridad darles empleo. 

Aseguró que las deudas hipotecarias de los migrantes en España no serán transferidas a la banca privada nacional y que se seguirá apoyando a los ecuatorianos en el exterior con asesoría legal. Este respaldo será para las madres que perdieron a sus hijos en Italia y los ecuatorianos en Estados Unidos que tengan dificultades migratorias.  

Los representantes del Ministerio de Relaciones Exteriores y Trabajo del Ecuador firmaron un convenio para garantizar y promover la inclusión laboral de las personas en situación de movilidad.

El ministro del Trabajo precisó que este año se abrirán más de 52.000 concursos públicos de méritos y oposición y los migrantes tendrán puntos afirmativos frente al resto de personas que participen. Comentó que existen alianzas público- privadas a las que se les solicitó priorizar a los migrantes retornados una categoría que se incluirá en la red SocioEmpleo.

En esta Feria participaron 20 empresas entre públicas y privadas y se espera que en otros eventos similares también acudan otras empresas. El mes anterior ya se insertaron laboralmente 2.000 personas.

Source Article from https://www.telesurtv.net/news/Plan-de-empleos-para-migrantes-inicia-este-jueves-en-Ecuador-20170914-0045.html

(Caracas, 30 de marzo. Noticias24).- Aíslan 78 ADN distintos del avión de Germanwing; 23 personas resultaron heridas tras aterrizaje forzoso en Canadá; alerta de tsunami en el pacífico; 17 víctimas mortales por inundaciones en Chile y por último en la República de Yemen es bombardeado por quinto día, estas son las noticias más importantes en el mundo en este momento.

Source Article from http://www.noticias24.com/venezuela/noticia/279242/en-breve-las-cinco-noticias-internacionales-que-han-marcado-pauta-en-el-mundo/

Image copyright
CBS

Image caption

Kendrick Castillo, 18, was killed in the shooting at his school

A teenager died in a shooting at a Colorado high school – days before his graduation – while charging one of the attackers, his classmates say.

Eighteen-year-old Kendrick Castillo was the only fatality in Tuesday’s assault allegedly by two students near Denver.

Eight other pupils were injured before the assailants were arrested.

The attack took place just 8km (5 miles) from Columbine High School, the site of one of the country’s most notorious shootings 20 years ago.

America’s latest school shooting unfolded at the STEM – science, technology, engineering and math – School Highlands Ranch in an affluent suburb of Denver.

Image copyright
The Denver Post via Getty Images

Image caption

A school staff member comforts a child after the shooting

‘I wish he had gone and hid’

Classmate Nui Giasolli told US media she was in her British literature class when one of the suspects turned up late and pulled out a gun.

Kendrick lunged at the gunman, “giving us all enough time to get underneath our desks to get ourselves safe, to run across the room to escape”, she said.

John Castillo, Kendrick’s father, described him as “the best kid in the world”, in an interview with the Denver Post.

He said it was not surprising to him that Kendrick was said to have charged one of the shooters as they entered a classroom.

“I wish he had gone and hid,” said Mr Castillo, “but that’s not his character.

“His character is about protecting people, helping people.”

Kendrick was an only child. Mr Castillo said he and his wife are “in a haze”.

The 18-year-old was passionate about science and robotics.

He was going to study at a local college in the autumn, planning to major in engineering, his father said.

Another STEM senior, Brendan Bialy, is also being praised as a hero for helping subdue one of the gunmen.

Image copyright
Brendan Bialy/Instagram

Image caption

Brendan tackled one of the gunmen

Brendan is a recruit for the US Marine Corps but was not trained specifically on active shooter protocols.

Marine Capt Michael Maggitti said in a statement that Brendan’s admirable courage “resulted in the safety and protection of his teachers and fellow classmates”.

Kendrick and Brendan are not the only examples of student heroism recently during a shooting.

Last month at the University of North Carolina at Charlotte, a 21-year-old student, Riley Howell, died while tackling a gunman, buying classmates crucial moments to escape, said police.

Image copyright
Facebook, courtesy of Devon Erickson

Image caption

Devon Erickson, 18, has been named as one of the suspects

How did the Colorado shooting unfold?

Douglas County Sheriff Tony Spurlock said the attack happened just before 14:00 local time (20:00 GMT) on Tuesday.

He told reporters the two attackers came in through an entrance that did not have a metal detector and attacked students in two locations.

Both suspects were pupils at the charter school.

There were around 1,800 students on campus at the time of the attack, Sheriff Spurlock said.

Officers arrived on scene within minutes.

“We did struggle with the suspects to take them into custody,” the sheriff said.

More on US gun violence

Media captionHow much do US students fear school shootings?

What is known about the suspects?

Police initially misidentified the younger one – a juvenile not named by police – as male.

“We originally thought the juvenile was a male by appearance,” Sheriff Spurlock said.

He declined to comment on local media reports that the suspect is transgender and transitioning from female to male.

The other suspect has been identified by police as 18-year-old Devon Erickson.

He made his first court appearance on Wednesday, facing one count of first-degree murder and 29 of attempted first-degree murder.

The defendant hung his head as he sat between two lawyers.

Image copyright
Reuters/Courtesy Shreya Nallapati

Image caption

Students and staff wait outside near the STEM School during the shooting

The sheriff said it is not yet clear if anyone was deliberately targeted. Search warrants have been issued for both suspects’ homes.

One student at the school told CBS News Mr Erickson had talked about inflicting harm and sadness.

“I always thought he was just messing around and stuff, but sometimes he did hint at it here and there,” Michael Schwartz said.

One parent, named in local media as Fernando Montoya, said his 17-year-old son was shot three times and wounded.

“He said a guy pulled a pistol out of a guitar case and started to shoot,” Mr Montoya told ABC affiliate Denver 7.

Josh Dutton, 18, told AP news agency he used to be friends with Mr Erickson at a former school but had not seen him in four years.

He said he bumped into Mr Erickson, who was wearing all black, at a railway station on Sunday and he was much thinner and did not seem interested in talking.

Source Article from https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-48207677

Suspects arrested in last week’s spree of eight anti-Semitic attacks are being quickly released right back into the neighborhoods they terrorized thanks to “bail reform” legislation — which doesn’t even take effect until Jan. 1.

The most recent case of revolving-door justice came Saturday morning, with the release, with no bail, of a woman charged with punching and cursing at three Orthodox women, ages 22, 26 and 31, in Crown Heights, Brooklyn at dawn the day before.

The accused assailant, Tiffany Harris, was hauled in handcuffs before a Brooklyn judge on 21 menacing, harassment and attempted assault charges.

“F-U, Jews!” Harris, 30, of Flatbush, allegedly shouted during the attack.

“Yes, I was there,” Harris later admitted to cops, according to the criminal complaint against her.

“Yes, I slapped them. I cursed them out. I said ‘F-U, Jews.”

As she stood before a judge in Brooklyn Criminal Court with the hood to a navy blue jacket over her head, Harris was in familiar territory.

She still has an open harassment and assault case on the Brooklyn docket from November 2018.

And last month, she was sentenced to no jail time for felony criminal mischief in Manhattan, court records show — a case for which she had repeatedly failed to make court appearances.

Brooklyn prosecutors didn’t even bother requesting bail Saturday, as they could have, given that the reform law, approved in April, technically doesn’t take effect until Jan. 1.

“The de Blasio administration has made it clear that we all need to get into compliance with bail reform now,” said a law enforcement source.

“If prosecutors had asked for bail, corrections would release them immediately,” or they would be sprung on Jan. 1, the source said.

But the de Blasio administration responded that the DOC does nothing without a court order and can’t decide to release anyone.

Brooklyn Criminal Court Judge Laura Johnson even made mention of the coming bail reform legislation in ordering Harris freed.

Ayana Logan, the suspect in another recent anti-Semitic attack.Kevin C. Downs For The New York Post

“So I’m releasing her on consent and also because it will be required under the statute in just a few days,” the judge said.

“Ms. Harris you’re being released on your own recognizance.”

She was issued an order of protection barring contact with the three victims — and a court date of Jan. 10.

Harris broke into a grin when approached by a reporter. “Why do you want to know?” she said. ”Goodbye.”

The legislation requires arraignment judges to set free suspects in any non-sexual assault that doesn’t actually cause a physical injury, even in cases of hate crime attacks.

“If there is an injury, then bail could be requested, because then it would be considered a violent felony,” explained Insha Rahman, who, as director of strategy and new initiatives at the Vera Institute of Justice, worked closely with legislators and the governor’s office in drafting the controversial reforms.

The no-injury loophole will mean a quick get-out-of-jail-free card for all but one of the accused attackers in the eight Hanukkah-timed, anti-Semitic bias crimes that have terrified the city’s Orthodox communities.

“You have to beat the hell out of somebody — or murder them — for there to be any consequences,” said former state lawmaker Dov Hikind, founder of Americans Against Anti-Semitism. “Otherwise, you are set free.”

He continued: “It’s open season in New York — open season on innocent people. On Jews, on Muslims, on gay people. It applies to anybody. But it’s the Jewish people in particular who have been targeted.”

Only one of last week’s eight attacks resulted in an actual physical injury — that of a 65-year-old Jewish man who was punched and kicked on Monday morning at East 41st Street and Third Avenue in Manhattan.

“F–k you, Jew bastard!” the petrified victim told cops his assailant shouted.

The suspect in that crime, Steven Jorge, 28, is indeed alleged to have injured his victim, and so was ordered locked up with no bail pending a psychological examination.

Jorge, though, is the exception.

On Friday night, a suspect in another of the hate attacks was similarly sprung with no bail, though in her case she was at least ordered to attend twice-monthly mental health appointments.

“You f—king Jew, the end is coming for you!” that suspect, Ayana Logan, 43, allegedly shouted as she swung a handbag at a 34-year-old Orthodox mom in Gravesend.

The mother had been holding the hand of her 3-year-old son when the unprovoked attack happened, according to the criminal court complaint against Logan.

By Saturday night, Logan, Harris, and Jorge remained the only suspects apprehended in the hate spree. The assailants in the remaining five attacks remain at large.

Rahman and other reformers argue that the vast majority of suspects in minor assaults are quickly released anyway — and that the new bail reform lets judges set conditions for release that can address the underlying mental health issues.

“That can be mental health counseling, a stay-away order, which wasn’t readily available before, as conditions for release,” said Rahman.

Suspects are getting none of that during their pretrial stays in city jails, Rahman noted.

“Money bail, and keeping someone temporarily detained with no care, doesn’t address at all the long term concerns” of community safety and the well-being of suspects, she said.

But in the city’s Orthodox neighborhoods, there was outrage in learning that even when violent bigots are caught, they’ll be immediately released.

“They were released on no bail?” a 32-year-old Orthodox man asked a Post reporter near where the three women were attacked. “Disgusting.”

Steve Benjamin, 30, of Borough Park, said, “We’re scared to walk at night in the street.

“There is a lot of hate here and I don’t know why. People in the community are scared. It’s very dangerous. It’s just like remembering the days before World War II. I don’t let my kids out alone.

“It should be more justice — they arrest them, but they let them out of jail a day later.”

Source Article from https://nypost.com/2019/12/28/suspects-released-without-bail-after-shocking-attacks-on-jews/

Instead, he said in an interview, the agents asked for march routes and other plans in order to separate the Proud Boys from counterprotesters. Other times, he said, agents warned that they had picked up potential threats from the left against him or his associates.

But before the Jan. 6 event, no one contacted the leaders of the Proud Boys, Mr. Tarrio said, even though their gatherings at previous Trump rallies in Washington had been marred by serious violence.

“They did not reach out to us,” he said.

In summer 2017, neo-Nazis, Klansmen and other white supremacists gathered in Charlottesville, Va., to announce their resurgence at the “Unite the Right” rally. Its organizer, Jason Kessler, was a member of the Proud Boys.

The group had been founded a year earlier by Gavin McInnes, now 50, the co-creator of the media outlet Vice. (The company has long since severed all ties.) He was a Canadian turned New Yorker with a record of statements attacking feminists and Muslims, and he often expressed a half-ironic appetite for mayhem. “Can you call for violence generally?” he once asked in an online video. “’Cause I am.”

The Proud Boys had been volunteering as body guards for right-wing firebrands like Ann Coulter and Milo Yiannopoulos and frequently clashed with left-wing crowds, especially at college campuses. Proud Boys “free speech” rallies in bastions of the left like Seattle, Portland or Berkeley, Calif., routinely ended in street fights.

Yet Mr. McInnes shunned the Unite the Right gathering, saying in an online video: “Disavow, disavow, disavow.” By his account, the Proud Boys were not white supremacists but merely “Western chauvinists.” That stance helped the Proud Boys evade scrutiny from federal law enforcement.

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2021/03/14/us/proud-boys-law-enforcement.html

Washington — The Interior Department’s inspector general said in a report released Wednesday that evidence it obtained “did not support a finding” that federal authorities forcibly cleared protesters from Lafayette Park last year so then-President Trump could walk from the White House and pose for a photo outside the historic St. John’s Church.

The watchdog, which examined the incident that occurred June 1, 2020, during protests against racial injustice and police brutality in Washington, D.C., instead found the U.S. Park Police had the authority to clear the park and surrounding areas, and did so to allow a contractor to install anti-scale fencing after several nights of violent clashes. U.S. Park Police also did not know that Mr. Trump would potentially be leaving the White House and crossing Lafayette Park until “mid-to late afternoon” on June 1, hours after the contractor had arrived to begin installation, according to the report.

“The evidence we obtained did not support a finding that the USPP cleared the park to allow the president to survey the damage and walk to St. John’s Church,” the report from the Interior Department’s inspector general states.

The watchdog further found that U.S. Park Police used a “sound amplifying long-range acoustic device” to issue three warnings telling the crowd to disperse, though acknowledged not all could hear the warning, and some police units began moving to clear protesters before the third and final warning was given. Additionally, the report states there were communication issues between U.S. Park Police and law enforcement agencies brought in to assist during the demonstrations, which were sparked by the death of George Floyd in Minneapolis.

“We found that the USPP and the Secret Service did not use a shared radio channel to communicate, that the USPP primarily conveyed information orally to assisting law enforcement entities, that an assisting law enforcement entity arrived late and may not have received a full briefing on the rules of engagement, and that several law enforcement officers could not clearly hear the incident commander’s dispersal warnings,” the report says. “These weaknesses in communication and coordination may have contributed to confusion during the operation and the use of tactics that appeared inconsistent with the incident commander’s operational plan.”

In a statement, Mr. Trump claimed the inspector general “totally exonerat[ed] me.” 

“As we have said all along, and it was backed up in today’s highly detailed and professionally written report, our fine Park Police made the decision to clear the park to allow a contractor to safely install antiscale fencing to protect from Antifa rioters, radical BLM protestors, and other violent demonstrators who are causing chaos and death to our cities,” he said. 

Mr. Trump was condemned for the incident on June 1, 2020, during which law enforcement officers used pepper balls and chemical irritants to disperse the crowd of protesters gathered in Lafayette Park, located outside the White House, just before the city’s 7 p.m. curfew took effect.

Shortly after the area was cleared, Mr. Trump, flanked by some members of his Cabinet and White House staff, walked across the park to St. John’s Church, a part of which had been set on fire the prior night. 

The then-president delivered brief remarks outside the church and then held up a Bible as photos of the impromptu visit were taken.

President Donald Trump holds a Bible as he visits outside St. John’s Church across Lafayette Park from the White House on Monday, June 1, 2020.

AP


Then-Attorney General Bill Barr said the protesters were removed from the park to expand the security perimeter around the White House, a move that was planned before Mr. Trump decided to walk through the area.

Video footage and news reports from June 1 raised questions about the events leading up to Mr. Trump’s walk from the White House, as Barr was spotted speaking with the U.S. Park Police operations commander on the scene. 

Asked about the exchange, the operations commander told the watchdog’s team he warned Barr the area was unsafe and asked him to move away from the crowd.

“The USPP operations commander said the attorney general asked him, ‘Are these people still going to be here when POTUS [President of the United States] comes out?'” according to the report. “The USPP operations commander told us he had not known until then that the president would be coming out of the White House and into Lafayette Park. He said he replied to the attorney general, ‘Are you freaking kidding me?’ and then hung his head and walked away. The attorney general then left Lafayette Park. The USPP operations commander denied that the attorney general ordered him to clear Lafayette Park and H Street.”

The incident commander with the Park Police told the inspector general’s office that he, too, was never informed of Mr. Trump’s specific plans or when he planned to leave the White house. 

“It was just a, ‘Hey, here he comes.’ And all of a sudden I turn around and there’s the entourage,” the incident commander told investigators, as detailed in the report. 

The Park Police’s acting police chief also said he did not know of Mr. Trump’s plans to visit St. John’s Church, though the incident commander told him the president might assess the damage at an unspecified time, according to the report.

Narrow in scope, the investigation from the Interior Department’s inspector general focused on the U.S. Park Police actions and did not examine individual uses of force by officers, which are at the center of ongoing lawsuits or separate investigations. The watchdog said its authority to obtain documents or statements from entities outside the Interior Department was limited, though the office received radio transmissions and other information from the Metropolitan Police Department and Arlington County Police Department, as well as videos from Secret Service observation cameras in the Lafayette Park area and documents from the agency.

The inspector general said the office did not seek to interview Barr, White House personnel, Federal Bureau of Prisons officers, or personnel from the Secret Service or Metropolitan Police Department.

The report recommended the U.S. Park Police develop a detailed policy laying out procedures for operations involving protests that may require the use of force and improve field communication procedures. 

Interior Secretary Deb Haaland told Inspector General Mark Greenblatt in a letter last month that she is establishing a task force to review and improve its law enforcement programs.

“The challenges our officers face every day are many, and the need to coordinate closely across jurisdictions in a manner that promotes transparency, accountability and public trust is paramount,” she said.

The National Park Service and U.S. Park Police said they have taken steps to address both recommendations from the inspector general.

Source Article from https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-photo-op-lafayette-park-protesters-report/

“);var a = g[r.size_id].split(“x”).map((function(e) {return Number(e)})), s = u(a, 2);o.width = s[0],o.height = s[1]}o.rubiconTargeting = (Array.isArray(r.targeting) ? r.targeting : []).reduce((function(e, r) {return e[r.key] = r.values[0],e}), {rpfl_elemid: n.adUnitCode}),e.push(o)} else l.logError(“Rubicon bid adapter Error: bidRequest undefined at index position:” + t, c, d);return e}), []).sort((function(e, r) {return (r.cpm || 0) – (e.cpm || 0)}))},getUserSyncs: function(e, r, t) {if (!A && e.iframeEnabled) {var i = “”;return t && “string” == typeof t.consentString && (“boolean” == typeof t.gdprApplies ? i += “?gdpr=” + Number(t.gdprApplies) + “&gdpr_consent=” + t.consentString : i += “?gdpr_consent=” + t.consentString),A = !0,{type: “iframe”,url: n + i}}},transformBidParams: function(e, r) {return l.convertTypes({accountId: “number”,siteId: “number”,zoneId: “number”}, e)}};function m() {return [window.screen.width, window.screen.height].join(“x”)}function b(e, r) {var t = f.config.getConfig(“pageUrl”);return e.params.referrer ? t = e.params.referrer : t || (t = r.refererInfo.referer),e.params.secure ? t.replace(/^http:/i, “https:”) : t}function _(e, r) {var t = e.params;if (“video” === r) {var i = [];return t.video && t.video.playerWidth && t.video.playerHeight ? i = [t.video.playerWidth, t.video.playerHeight] : Array.isArray(l.deepAccess(e, “mediaTypes.video.playerSize”)) && 1 === e.mediaTypes.video.playerSize.length ? i = e.mediaTypes.video.playerSize[0] : Array.isArray(e.sizes) && 0