Most Viewed Videos

Image copyright
Getty

Image caption

En Shilinxia, Pekín, inauguraron un mirador transparente a 800 metros del nivel del mar.

¿Sufres de vértigo? ¿Buscas nuevos desafíos?

En este mirador no solo podrás apreciar el paisaje sino que podrás poner a prueba tu tolerancia a las alturas.

En Shilinxia, un área turística del distrito chino de Pinggu, en Pekín, acaban de inaugurar un mirador transparente de 32,8 metros de longitud, 11,4 metros más largo que la pasarela del Gran Cañón en Arizona, EE.UU.

Image copyright
Getty

Image caption

La plataforma transparente tiene 32,8 metros de largo.

El observatorio también es 6,12 metros más extenso que el “Puente de las nubes” en el parque geológico Yunyang Longgang, en el municipio de Chongqing, en el sudoeste de China, hasta ahora considerado el más largo del mundo.

Desde principios de mayo está abierto al público.

Image copyright
Getty

Image caption

El mirador tiene paneles de vidrio blindado.

Caminar en el aire

La plataforma transparente está construida con una combinación de titanio, acero, cable y vidrio blindado.

El titanio reduce el peso de la estructura hasta la mitad comparado con aquellas construidas con acero, pero es el doble de fuerte, explicó al canal de noticias CCTV Plus He Yunchang, diseñador de la plataforma.

Image copyright
Getty

Image caption

Puede soportar hasta 1.900 personas a la vez.

El mirador está a una altura promedio de 800 metros sobre el nivel del mar y a 400 metros de la parte inferior del valle.

Tiene una superficie de 713 metros cuadrados, pesa 151,9 toneladas y puede soportar a 1.900 personas a la vez.

Image copyright
Getty

Image caption

¿Te impresiona?

¿Te animarías a caminar sobre el?

Image copyright
Getty

Image caption

No hay duda de que los visitantes se lo pasan bien tomando fotos.

Source Article from http://www.bbc.com/mundo/noticias/2016/05/160505_mirador_transparente_china_grande_mundo_all

In a new National Republican Senatorial Committee fundraising video, former President Donald Trump vowed that “we’re gonna take back the White House… sooner than you think” amid false speculation that he’ll be reinstated in August.

“I want to thank everybody for the tremendous support you’ve shown. We’re gonna take back the Senate, take back the House, we’re gonna take back the White House and sooner than you think,” Trump said in the 30-second clip, released ahead of his highly-anticipated speech to the North Carolina Republican Party convention on Saturday.

“It’s going to be really something special,” he continued. “The love and the affection and the respect that you’ve given all of us, it’s really important, the Republican Party is stronger than it’s ever been and it’s going to be a lot stronger than it is right now.”

Trump added: “We’re going to turn it around, we’re going to turn it around fast. Thank you all very much, that support has been so incredible.”

On Tuesday, New York Times journalist Maggie Haberman reported that Trump has been telling a number of contacts that “he expects he will get reinstated by August” to the presidency. Haberman’s report was based on information from unnamed sources. Newsweek could not independently verify the claim.

One day later, The Washington Post reported that pro-Trump lawyer Sidney Powell said she believed Trump should be “reinstated” this year.

MyPillow CEO Mike Lindell, a Trump loyalist who has been aggressively pushing his baseless claim that the 2020 presidential election was stolen, told the Daily Beast on Wednesday: “If Trump is saying August, that is probably because he heard me say it publicly.”

“It is my hope that Donald Trump is reinstated, after all the proof comes out, by the end of August, but I don’t know if it’ll be that month, specifically,” Lindell continued. “That was my estimation. I spoke about it with my lawyers who said that they should have something ready for us to bring before the U.S. Supreme Court by July.”

He added: “So, in my mind, I hope that means that we could have Donald Trump back in the White House by August. That’s how I landed on August, and I’m hopeful that that is correct.”

Lara Trump, the former president’s daughter-in-law, dismissed the reports and speculation, telling Fox News that “there are no plans for Donald Trump to be in the White House in August.”

“Maybe there’s something I don’t know,” she said. “I think that’s a lot of folks getting a little worked up about something just because there wasn’t enough pushback from the Republican side.”

Newsweek reached out to the White House for comment. This story will be updated with any response.

In a video released Saturday, former President Donald Trump vowed that Republicans will take back the White House “sooner than you think.”
Joe Raedle/Getty Images

Source Article from https://www.newsweek.com/trump-vows-were-gonna-take-back-white-house-sooner-you-think-after-reinstated-speculation-1597925

House impeachment investigators on Friday heard from a new witness claiming first-hand knowledge of President TrumpDonald John TrumpButtigieg surges ahead of Iowa caucuses Biden leads among Latino Democrats in Texas, California Kavanaugh hailed by conservative gathering in first public speech since confirmation MORE‘s effort to enlist Ukrainian leaders to dig up dirt on his domestic political opponents.

David Holmes, a State Department veteran now based in Kyiv, testified privately that he overheard a July phone conversation between Trump and Gordon SondlandGordon SondlandThe Hill’s Morning Report — Public impeachment drama resumes today Experts: Trump phone call with Sondland likely intercepted by Russians Trump knocks testimony from ‘Never Trumpers’ at Louisiana rally MORE, the U.S. ambassador to the European Union, in which the president sought an update on “the investigation” — and Sondland delivered the news Trump had wanted, according to the opening remarks obtained by CNN.

“So, he’s gonna do the investigation?” Trump asked, according to Holmes’s testimony.

“He’s gonna do it,” Sondland replied.

The call, Holmes said, occurred at a restaurant in Kyiv on July 26, one day after Trump’s now-famous phone conversation with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in which Trump asked Zelensky for “a favor” in the form of investigations into former Vice President Joe BidenJoe BidenButtigieg surges ahead of Iowa caucuses GOP eager for report on alleged FBI surveillance abuse Biden leads among Latino Democrats in Texas, California MORE and the 2016 elections.

Both of those probes could have helped Trump politically, and the Democrats’ impeachment inquiry is focused on whether Trump abused his office by recruiting a foreign leader for help in a U.S. election.

Trump’s Republican allies have criticized many of the witnesses who’ve testified in the investigation, saying their accounts lean too heavily on second- or third-hand information and are therefore unreliable. Holmes’s account was purportedly first-hand, and Democrats hailed his arrival in the Capitol.

“We always learn more when witnesses come in, and today we learned a lot more,” Rep. Eric SwalwellEric Michael SwalwellKey takeaways from first public impeachment hearing Kent, Taylor say they’re not ‘Never Trumpers’ after Trump Twitter offensive Live coverage: House holds first public impeachment hearing MORE (D-Calif.), a member of the Intelligence Committee, said Friday night as he left the closed-door deposition.

“The arrows continue to point in the direction of a shakedown scheme, led by the president of the United States [and] operated by agents like Rudy GiulianiRudy GiulianiTrump knocks testimony from ‘Never Trumpers’ at Louisiana rally Jordan calls Pelosi accusing Trump of bribery ‘ridiculous’ Giuliani under investigation for alleged campaign finance, lobbying breaches: report MORE, Gordon Sondland and Mick MulvaneyJohn (Mick) Michael MulvaneyTrump files to dismiss lawsuit from Bolton aide on impeachment testimony OMB official to testify in impeachment probe if subpoenaed after others refused Kent, Taylor say they’re not ‘Never Trumpers’ after Trump Twitter offensive MORE,” he continued.

On the July 26 call, Holmes testified, Sondland told Trump that Zelensky would do anything the president asked – including comply with the investigation requests – because the Ukrainian leader “loves your a–.”

Holmes also testified that he asked Sondland after the call if it was true that Trump “did not ‘give a shit about Ukraine.’”

Sondland responded that Trump only cares about “big stuff,” Holmes testified. Holmes said he noted plenty of big things happening in Ukraine, including a five-year-old war with Russia in the east.

“He meant ‘big stuff’ that benefits the President, like the Biden investigation that Mr. [Rudy] Giuliani was pushing,” Holmes said, paraphrasing Sondland.

Holmes said Sondland’s cell phone was not on speaker mode, but he could nonetheless hear Trump’s words because “the president’s voice was very loud and recognizable.”

The account was the latest twist in the fast-developing impeachment inquiry into Trump’s handling of foreign policy in Ukraine. Just days ago, the Trump-Sondland phone conversation was not widely known, but on Wednesday, William Taylor, the top U.S. diplomat in Ukraine, testified publicly that Holmes relayed the story to him last week.

Holmes, the counselor for political affairs at the U.S. Embassy in Ukraine, is one of Taylor’s top staffers in Kyiv.

Holmes was the 16th witness to be interviewed behind closed doors in the Capitol basement since Democrats began the private depositions on Oct. 3.

His appearance came on the heels of the testimony of another witness, Marie YovanovitchMarie YovanovitchLive coverage: Ex-Ukraine ambassador testifies in public impeachment hearing Ex-Trump Russia expert told lawmakers she’s gotten death threats Giuliani lawyers up amid impeachment inquiry MORE, who appeared in public before the Intelligence Committee for roughly five hours earlier in the day on Friday.

Yovanovitch, the former U.S. ambassador to Ukraine, was deposed privately last month, but returned to Capitol Hill as the third witness to testify as part of the public hearing phase of the Democrats’ impeachment inquiry.

The former ambassador, who was removed abruptly from Kyiv in May, painted a bleak picture of career diplomats fighting to salvage U.S.-Ukraine relations in the face of a shadow foreign policy, led by Giuliani, to secure business deals and political favors at all costs.

“How could our system fail like this?” she testified. “How is it that foreign corrupt interests could manipulate our government?”

Source Article from https://thehill.com/homenews/house/470761-new-witness-claims-first-hand-account-of-trumps-push-for-ukraine-probes

  • Fighting has reached the centre of the besieged Ukrainian city of Mariupol, where 350,000 civilians have been stranded with little food or water. The Russian defence ministry said its forces were “tightening the noose” around the city, and that “fighting against nationalists” was taking place in the city centre. Mariupol’s mayor, Vadym Boichenko, said fighting was “very active”. Hundreds of people remain buried under the rubble of a theatre that was hit by a Russian airstrike on Wednesday, Zelenskiy said. In a video address, he said more than 130 people had been rescued so far.

  • Source Article from https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/mar/19/russia-ukraine-war-what-we-know-on-day-24-of-the-invasion

    via press release:

    NOTICIAS  TELEMUNDO  PRESENTS:

    “MURIENDO POR CRUZAR,” AN INVESTIGATION INTO THE INCREASING NUMBER OF IMMIGRANT DEATHS ALONG THE BORDER, THIS SUNDAY, AUGUST 3 AT 6 P.M./5 C

    Carmen Dominicci and Neida Sandoval present the Telemundo and The Weather Channel co-production

    Miami – July 31, 2014 – Telemundo presents “Muriendo por Cruzar”, a documentary that investigates why increasing numbers of immigrants are dying while trying to cross the US-Mexican border near the city of Falfurrias, Texas, this Sunday, August 3 at 6PM/5 C.  The Telemundo and The Weather Channel co-production, presented by Noticias Telemundo journalists Carmen Dominicci and Neida Sandoval, reveals the obstacles immigrants face once they cross into US territory, including extreme weather conditions, as they try to evade the border patrol.  “Muriendo por Cruzar” is part of Noticias Telemundo’s special coverage of the crisis on the border and immigration reform.

     

    “‘Muriendo por Cruzar’” dares to ask questions that reveal the actual conditions undocumented immigrants face as they try to start a new life in the United States,” said Alina Falcón, Telemundo’s Executive Vice President for News and Alternative Programming.  “Our collaboration with The Weather Channel was very productive. They have a unique expertise in covering the impact of weather on people’s lives, as we do in covering immigration reform and the border crisis. The result is a compelling documentary that exposes a harrowing reality.”

    “Muriendo por Cruzar” is the first co-production by Telemundo and The Weather Channel.  Both networks are part of NBCUniversal.

    Source Article from http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2014/07/31/noticias-telemundo-presents-muriendo-por-cruzar-this-sunday-august-3-at-6pm/289119/

    (Bloomberg).- Facebook presentó en detalle su plan para combatir las noticias falsas. En la práctica, tercerizará la revisión de la veracidad de aquellas noticias identificadas por los usuarios como posiblemente falsas con grupos que deberían, como mínimo, ser signatarios de un código desarrollado en el Poynter Institute, una organización de capacitación periodística con sede en Florida.

    Pero al convertir un pequeño grupo de inspectores en los árbitros de la “verdad”, Facebook socava su propia imparcialidad y podría allanar el camino para la censura en las redes sociales.

    En una publicación, Adam Mosseri, el vicepresidente de Facebook responsable de la sección de noticias, explicó cómo funcionará el esquema. Los usuarios podrán identificar una noticia falsa, que luego Facebook enviará a un grupo que haya firmado el Código de Principios Internacionales de Verificación de Hechos.

    Si el grupo decide que la noticia es en efecto falsa, Facebook la marcará como “disputada” con un enlace a la explicación de los verificadores. La gente todavía podrá compartir las noticias tras leer la advertencia de que son polémicas, pero Facebook “podría” ponerla más abajo en la sección de noticias y las volverá inelegibles para promociones pagas.

    En un principio, se probará el sistema en Estados Unidos, donde solo un puñado de organizaciones —ABC News, Associated Press, Climate Feedback, Factcheck.org, PolitiFact, Snopes y The Washington Post Fact Checker— han firmado el código. El Poynter Institute ha aclarado que no admitirá así sin más a más firmantes: la “función filtradora” que ahora tendrá el código, exige, según el instituto, “un mecanismo de verificación más formal detrás del código de principios”.

    El socio elegido por Facebook ya descarta inmediatamente a una gran franja de lectores conservadores. La International Fact-Checking Network de Poynter, sede del código de principios, está financiada, entre otros donantes, por las Open Society Foundations de George Soros, suficiente como para que muchos de los que comparten noticias de Breitbart News y sitios conservadores más extremos la vean como parte de una conspiración globalista.

    Además, esa gente —o incluso conservadores menos virulentos— tampoco va a tomar como la verdad revelada las evaluaciones de, digamos, PolitiFact. Este último es el blanco favorito de los blogueros conservadores; incluso hay un sitio llamado PolitiFact Bias (El sesgo de PolitiFact) que cuestiona regularmente el trabajo de los que verifican hechos, muchas veces con argumentos válidos.

    Por ejemplo, hace poco explicó que examinar la veracidad de la descripción que hizo un republicano de la victoria de Trump en el Colegio Electoral como “arrasadora” no tiene sentido porque una “victoria arrasadora” es cuestión de opinión, no de hechos. El sitio también afirmó que detectó inconsistencias en los miembros del equipo de PolitiFact.

    Breitbart también se mete en peleas con PolitiFact. En julio, discutieron el análisis de cómo Donald Trump utilizó una historia de “Clinton Cash”, un best seller de Peter Schweizer, sobre la venta de una empresa de uranio con minas en Estados Unidos a una compañía estatal rusa. Schweizer ayudó a Breitbart a armar su refutación. PolitiFact publicó una réplica punto por punto en la que afirmó repetidamente que el contexto aportado por Schweizer no era relevante para la revisión específica. El ida y vuelta podría haber continuado si Breitbart hubiera señalado que cualquier contexto podría ser relevante para una historia compleja.

    Si Facebook se tomara en serio la solidez de su esquema tercerizado para examinar la veracidad, tendría que poner enlaces para cada parte polemizada en su marca de “noticia disputada”.

    ¿Ayudaría esto a los lectores a determinar la verdad? Yo sé que yo estaría más confundido que iluminado. ¿Cuántos lectores tienen el tiempo, el interés o, de hecho, las habilidades periodísticas para examinar la fuente de la noticia y seguir investigando?

    Incluso sin tener en cuenta la posibilidad de sesgos, a veces los signatarios del código de principios del Poynter pueden discrepar sobre la veracidad de una misma afirmación. En un artículo sobre el análisis de realidades polémicas publicado en 2015, Morgan Marietta, de la Universidad de Massachusetts, y sus colaboradores mencionan tres casos específicos de discrepancias.

    Por ejemplo, en 2012, Factcheck.org describió la afirmación del senador Dick Durbin de que “el Seguro Social no suma un centavo a nuestra deuda” como falsa, pero The Washington Post Fact Checker la calificó como “en gran parte verdadera”. En 2013, el presidente Barack Obama dijo que los déficits estaban cayendo al ritmo más veloz en 60 años. PolitiFact estuvo de acuerdo, pero Factcheck.org calificó la afirmación de falsa.

    “Examinándolos desde la perspectiva de las realidades discutidas de nuestra política, los verificadores no se ponen de acuerdo sobre las preguntas hechas o las respuestas ofrecidas”, escribieron los investigadores, que les dieron a los tres principales grupos de verificación de hechos de Estados Unidos —PolitiFact, Factcheck.org y The Washington Post Fact Checker— “dos o tres Pinochos” según la escala del Washington Post, o “media verdad/en gran parte falsa”. En realidad, un país políticamente polarizado no está en la postverdad, sino que a veces la verdad es complicada e intrincada.

    La comunidad cada vez más grande de verificadores de hechos, alentada por instituciones como Poynter, surgió en respuesta a reducciones de costos en los medios dominantes. Muchas organizaciones de noticias no pueden permitirse hacer revisiones meticulosas; incluso evitan a los correctores que podrían quitar errores de tipeo.

    Sin embargo, al fin y al cabo, los verificadores de veracidad sólo son periodistas, con sus propios sesgos y defectos profesionales. Su trabajo resulta útil para la comunidad periodística como servicio público que sustituye la atención rigurosa que se dedicaba al detalle dentro de las organizaciones de noticias, pero no puede funcionar como base para “degradar” ciertas historias y aprobar otras. Sin embargo, es precisamente así que Facebook quiere usarlos.

    Las banderillas de “disputado” no son particularmente preocupantes. Algunas fuentes de noticias de derecha probablemente las usarían como insignia de honor y sus lectores estarían de acuerdo, si bien a algunos adictos a las noticias podría interesarles el contexto más amplio que aportan los que verifican la veracidad. Es bueno ver una noticia y su crítica juntas. Pero si Facebook realmente degrada el contenido “polémico” y hace imposible que se promocione, eso restringiría la distribución de ciertas noticias legítimas. E incluso las falsas pueden tener su valor. Como alguien que sigue a Rusia, debo ver qué noticias comparten y discuten los miembros de sitios propagandísticos del Kremlin en Europa y Estados Unidos. La nueva política de Facebook podría dificultarlo, porque los enlaces quedarán más abajo en mi sección de noticias.

    Facebook está presionada para hacer algo con las noticias falsas: la International Fact Checking Network, los demócratas en Estados Unidos y políticos europeos que pronto enfrentarán sus propias elecciones están en pie de guerra contra las noticias engañosas. De aplicarse con coherencia, el nuevo procedimiento probablemente le saque los críticos de encima a Zuckerberg. Sin embargo, también devaluará a Facebook como plataforma omnívora e imparcial de distribución de noticias, hará que algunos lectores se encierren más en sus opiniones y que otros salgan a buscar otras formas de recibir contenidos de varias fuentes. Twitter parece ser una buena alternativa hasta que ceda a la presión como Facebook.

    Por Leonid Bershidsky.

    Source Article from http://gestion.pe/tecnologia/facebook-socava-su-propia-imparcialidad-verificadores-noticias-falsas-2177395

    But over the weekend, the communist-run island nation became an unavoidable subject. Thousands of Cubans took to the streets on Sunday to protest food and medicine shortages amid a worsening economic crisis, while calling for an end to the 62-year-old dictatorship. And while Biden voiced support for the protesters, describing the protests as a “clarion call for freedom,” much of his policy toward Cuba remains a mystery.

    Will Biden encourage more demonstrations? Does his team support adding new sanctions or keeping in place Trump-era sanctions? Is the idea of bolstering diplomatic and trade ties now out of the question? The White House’s painstaking review of Cuba policy now risks being overtaken by current events.

    “The easy political thing to do is to issue demands for freedom from America while doing nothing,” said Ben Rhodes, who served as a senior aide to former President Barack Obama and helped craft the Obama administration’s diplomatic opening to Cuba. “I just don’t think that’s the approach that’s going to be constructive here.”

    The protests in Cuba were another example of the Biden administration being forced by realities on the ground to grapple with an issue after trying to deprioritize it. Earlier this year, Biden and his aides found themselves scrambling to deal with clashes between Israel and Palestinian militants after signaling a desire to minimize U.S. engagement in that long-running conflict.

    The questions on Cuba policy come as Biden has left largely intact Trump’s high-pressure, sanctions-heavy campaign against Cuba’s regime, despite campaign promises to the contrary.

    And they come as concerns within the White House about Cuba have grown in recent days, according to two people in touch with administration officials. Before the protests, U.S. officials were looking at what they could do to ease the Cuban people’s suffering, one of the people, a Cuba analyst, told POLITICO. That included possibly easing travel restrictions as well as limits on people’s ability to send money to relatives and others on the island — changes Biden himself discussed on the campaign trail.

    “They are concerned about the humanitarian crisis unfolding in Cuba and the possibility that it could spill over into a migratory crisis,” said the analyst, who spoke on condition of anonymity to describe sensitive conversations. “I know that the White House is finally paying attention.”

    In recent months, the number of Cuban migrants coming by land and sea has grown significantly. More than 500 Cuban migrants have been intercepted and repatriated this fiscal year, up from 49 in 2020 and 313 in 2019, according to the U.S. Coast Guard.

    Some Republicans, including Florida’s Sen. Marco Rubio, have expressed concern that the Cuban government will begin to encourage mass migration to the United States, as it did in 1994 when Cuba last saw large-scale protests. However, U.S.-Cuba experts say that level of migration by sea is less likely to happen this time around, given that Washington no longer has an immigration policy in place that welcomes Cubans when they reach U.S. soil.

    So far, some of Biden’s biggest allies on Capitol Hill have been supportive of his move to keep Trump-era sanctions and restrictions in place.

    “The regime needs to understand that change [in Cuba] will bring about a change in sanctions” — not change in who occupies the U.S. presidency, Sen. Bob Menendez (D-N.J.) said, adding that it’s important that Biden has not weakened the sanctions.

    Menendez, chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, defended the administration for not making Cuba a foreign policy priority, saying it’s “understandable” given ongoing challenges with China, Russia and Iran.

    “But now that the Cuban people have taken to the streets, I think the administration will have to look at options they can exercise in support of the Cuban people,” Menendez said, noting that he has been in touch with administration officials and they already have a list of his policy suggestions that are under consideration.

    Others closely following the situation worry that the protests will only make it less likely that the Biden administration rolls back Trump-era restrictions. They say Biden’s ability to maneuver on Cuba policy will only get more restricted as the 2022 midterm elections get closer.

    “They’re just not going to make themselves politically vulnerable by lifting the sanctions, rolling back the Trump policies, when the Republicans will immediately hammer away at it and say it is a gift to the Cuban regime,” said Michael Shifter, president of the Inter-American Dialogue.

    The domestic considerations for Biden were on display Sunday as hundreds of Cuban Americans took to the streets in Miami to protest in solidarity with the Cuban people. Meanwhile, Republican leaders like Rubio, who played a major role in the Trump administration’s hardline Cuba policy, were already hammering Biden for not having an immediate response to the protests.

    “President Biden’s lack of comment yesterday made clear that he has no interest in standing with the Cuban people as they rise up against the authoritarian regime,” Rubio said in a written statement to POLITICO. “The Biden Administration’s decision to remain silent during decisive hours harms the protesters bravely demonstrating for their God-given rights.”

    Meanwhile in Havana, Cuban leaders sought to crack down on the widespread protests across the island. President Miguel Díaz-Canel on Sunday declared that “the order to combat is given.” Security forces were deployed, government supporters were called on to take back control of the streets and internet access was restricted in an apparent effort to prevent protestors from sharing information. There are numerous reports of beatings and arrests by security forces, including widely known dissidents like Luis Manuel Otero Alcántara, leader of the Movimiento San Isidro.

    On Monday, Díaz-Canel, who only three months ago took over as head of Cuba’s Communist Party, a job he was being groomed for since becoming president in 2019, blamed U.S. policy toward Cuba as the reason for the unprecedented demonstrations, refusing to acknowledge Cubans’ frustration with his government.

    The Cuba protests come amid a political crisis in nearby Haiti that is spurring U.S. concerns of a Haitian exodus as well.

    “Neither was on the agenda. But they’ve been forced back on the front burner,” said Shifter. “Biden was caught off guard and [the administration has] to figure out the right narrative for this and get out in front of it.”

    It remains to be seen whether the protests are a unique event that will be quashed by Cuba’s authoritarian regime or if they are the start of a meaningful movement. Cuba’s government exercises strict control over its population, but Cubans’ patience has been sorely tested by the coronavirus pandemic, which has added to their existing economic misery.

    Biden administration officials did not immediately respond to questions about whether they were surprised by the demonstrations, had been warned they were coming, or what the administration’s Cuba-related plans are in the days ahead.

    Speaking Monday, Psaki said she’s not aware of any immediate U.S. policy shift toward Cuba. “We’re assessing how we can be helpful to the people of Cuba,” she said.

    In their statements, Biden administration officials appeared to try to walk a fine line: voicing support for the protesters and asking the Cuban government to be responsive to the people’s demands, but stopping far short of encouraging regime change.

    At times, it made for a confusing overall message.

    On Twitter, for instance, Julie Chung, the acting assistant secretary in the Bureau of Western Hemisphere Affairs at the Department of State, repeatedly called on all sides to refrain from violence and for the Cuban government to “listen to their citizens’ demands.” But at one point, she seemed to channel a revolutionary spirit, writing: “The Cuban people have waited long enough for ¡Libertad!”

    Republican lawmakers seized the moment to attack both the Cuban regime and Biden.

    “President Biden, freedom in #Cuba needs you now! Don’t be AWOL,” tweeted Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.).

    Chung, who was the first U.S. official to tweet about the situation in Cuba on Sunday, was at the center of Republican criticism over her initial tweet, in which she said the protests were to “express concern about rising COVID cases/deaths & medicine shortages.”

    Rep. Carlos Giménez, a Cuban American Republican representing South Florida, on Monday urged Biden, in a letter shared with POLITICO, to remove Chung from her position leading Western Hemisphere affairs at the State Department for what he called a “disjointed and foolish statement.”

    Biden “should be sure we stay on the side of the Cuban people against this vicious regime,” said Elliott Abrams, a veteran Latin America watcher and former senior State Department official under President Donald Trump. “That means rhetorical support, support in international organizations, and an absolute refusal to weaken sanctions as the regime brutalizes the population.”

    On the left, however, there’s a belief that American sanctions on Cuba are no more likely to succeed now than they have over the past six decades.

    The administration should “figure out ways to engage the Cuban people, which necessitate taking off some sanctions both to improve their lives and [deal with] things like Covid,” Rhodes said. “I think ultimately that engaging Cubans is more empowering than thinking you can keep them in this pressure cooker.”

    Still, former administration officials and experts on the region say Biden will have to be careful not to get too involved publicly. Díaz-Canel and Cuban leaders have already sought to spin the protests as a product of “Yankee imperialism,” despite protesters emphasizing that they took to the streets over desperation caused by Cuba’s own policies.

    Secretary of State Antony Blinken dismissed allegations that the United States orchestrated the protests, saying the demonstrations were a “reflection” of the Cuban people’s exhaustion with government repression and mismanagement.

    “It would be a grievous mistake for the Cuban regime to interpret what is happening in dozens of towns and cities across the island as a result or product of anything the United States has done,” Blinken said during a news briefing Monday. “It would show they simply are not hearing the voices and will of the Cuban people.”

    “It is a balancing act for Biden in the end,” said Eric Farnsworth, vice president of the think tank Council of the Americas and a former U.S. government official. “You have to come out in support of democracy, in support of respect for peaceful protestors and human rights … without creating difficulties for the protestors.”

    “The Cuban regime is very good at painting protesters as stooges of the United States,” Farnsworth added. “They are not. And that is clearly not the case here.”

    Source Article from https://www.politico.com/news/2021/07/12/biden-cuba-response-499400

    São Paulo – Tunisia plans on increasing its phosphate production to 12 million tonnes by 2020. The manufactured volume was lower than 3 million tonnes last year. The information was supplied by Kamel Ben Naceur, the Tunisian minister of Industry, Mines and Energy, while attending the Brazil-Tunisia Economic forum this Tuesday (6th) at the headquarters of the Federation of Industry of the State of São Paulo (Fiesp), in the namesake capital.

    Aurea Santos/ANBA

    Naceur wants partnership with Vale

    “Output is down from eight million (tonnes) in 2010 to less than three million in 2013. The target this year is to go back to 5 or 5.5 million tonnes, then 8 million by 2016, and finally 12 million by 2020”, said Naceur.

    The minister also said he is in talks for an eventual cooperation in the area with Brazil’s mining company Vale, in whose offices he attended a meeting last Monday (5th). “We are talking about excellent opportunities, first of all in technology, since Vale boasts experience in pipeline transportation of fertilizers with water. This type of system could be very interesting for us, for mines with outputs ranging from 2 to 3 million per annum,” he said.

    Another potential area for cooperation with the Brazilian company, said Naceur, is a project for a phosphate mine in Midwest Tunisia. “The investment is US$ 2.5 billion. We will see how we can streamline the whole cycle by using the knowledge of companies such as Vale,” he said.

    He also pointed out other sectors in which the two countries could work in tandem. “The opportunities for cooperation with Brazil lie in sectors such as electrical, mechanical, textiles, leathers and shoes, agrifoods, pharmaceutical, aeronautical, third-party services, tourism, and logistics services,” he asserted.

    Aurea Santos/ANBA

    Sallum (center): trade can grow

    Marcelo Sallum, the president of the Arab Brazilian Chamber of Commerce, attended the meeting at Fiesp and gave bilateral trade figures between Brazil and Tunisia, noting that there are possibilities for growth. “In 2013, trade between the two countries amounted to US$ 426 million. That is still a fairly low volume. We truly believe there are opportunities for business to increase on both sides,” he stated.

    Michel Alaby, the Arab Chamber CEO, highlighted the importance of Brazilian companies being international-minded, i.e. setting up operations in another country. “Exports from Brazil (to Tunisia) hinge mostly on raw materials and foods, but we could also produce foodstuffs in Tunisia, whose labour force is productive and effecetive.” As case in points of Brazilian companies already operating from the Arab country, he listed footwear company Dumond and cement manufacturer Votorantim.

    Sabri Bachtobji, the Tunisian ambassador in Brasília, mentioned the event’s importance to bringing companies together. “Today’s event will help the Brazilian industry to become a privileged partner of the Tunisian industry,” he said.

    Aurea Santos/ANBA

    Audience of businessmen at the Fiesp

    Ricardo Schaefer, the executive secretary to the Brazilian Ministry of Industry, Development and Foreign Trade, spoke on Tunisia’s current political scenario and how Brazil could benefit from it. “Boosting trade and cooperation with African countries is one of the Brazilian government’s goals,” he said.

    Khalil Labidi, CEO of the Tunisian Foreign Investment Promotion Agency (Fipa), mentioned the advantages available to companies once they set up a base in his country. “Tunisia offers major fiscal and financial advantages to investors. Exporting companies in Tunisia sell 70% of their output to the foreign market, and 30% locally,” he said.

    The event was also attended by Rubens Hannun, the honorary consul of Tunisia in São Paulo and Arab Chamber Foreign Trade vice president, and by Heinz Huyer, honorary consul of Tunisia in the state of Rio Grande do Sul.

    *Translated by Gabriel Pomerancblum

    Source Article from http://www2.anba.com.br/noticia/21863658/business-opportunities/tunisia-wants-to-quadruplicate-phosphate-production/

    WASHINGTON—The U.S. is closing its embassy in the Ukrainian capital of Kyiv and relocating operations 340 miles west to Lviv near the Polish border, as allies warn that an attack by Russian forces on Ukraine may be imminent.

    Secretary of State Antony Blinken described the relocation as a temporary move to protect embassy staff.

    Source Article from https://www.wsj.com/articles/u-s-is-closing-kyiv-embassy-relocating-diplomatic-operations-to-western-ukraine-11644864455

    Derechos de autor de la imagen
    AFP / Getty Images

    Image caption

    Los vínculos entre Donald Trump y varios de sus asesores más cercanos con Vladimir Putin persiguen al actual gobierno de EE.UU.

    De todas las controversias que han rodeado a Donald Trump desde su campaña electoral hasta su actual rol como presidente de Estados Unidos, hay una de la cual no consigue desmarcarse: Rusia.

    La repentina renuncia del asesor de seguridad nacional Michael Flynn presentada este lunes fue la última de una serie de polémicas que vinculan al gobierno de Trump con aparentes intereses rusos.

    Pero esa no esa la última “controversia rusa” del entorno de Trump: este martes el diario The New York Times reveló que, según llamadas interceptadas por los servicios de inteligencia del país durante la campaña, el equipo del magnate mantuvo repetido contacto con funcionarios rusos.

    “Agentes de autoridad y de inteligencia interceptaron las comunicaciones más o menos cuando descubrieron que Rusia estaba intentando alterar la elección presidencial hackeando al Partido Demócrata”, afirma el diario.

    Este miércoles, Trump volvió a responder a través de Twitter.

    “La comunidad de inteligencia (¿NSA y FBI?) le está dando información de forma ilegal al fracasado @nytimes & @washingtonpost, Justo como Rusia”, escribió el mandatario, quien atribuyó la noticia sobre los contactos de su equipo con Rusia a intentos por ocultar las fallas en la campaña presidencial de Hillary Clinton.

    “El verdadero escándalo aquí es que se está entregando información clasificada de forma ilegal por la “inteligencia” como si fueran caramelos”, agregó.

    Pero hay más.

    Derechos de autor de la imagen
    Getty Images

    Image caption

    Una semana después de asumir la presidencia de EE.UU., Trump habló por teléfono con Putin, rodeado de sus entonces principales asesores. Entre ellos está Flynn (derecha).

    Primeras señales

    En mayo de 2016 surgieron los primeros informes que señalaban que el Partido Demócrata había sido atacado por piratas informáticos.

    Durante los siguientes dos meses se informó que las agencias de inteligencia de EE.UU. habían rastreado el origen de los ciberataques a Rusia.

    En julio, en la antesala de la Convención Nacional Demócrata, el sitio de filtraciones WikiLeaks publicó 20.000 correos electrónicos internos de ese partido, que habían sido robados por hackers.

    Agentes de inteligencia estadounidenses se mostraron “muy confiados” de que Rusia estaba detrás de la operación, pero Trump rechazó públicamente esos hallazgos.

    Derechos de autor de la imagen
    Getty Images

    Image caption

    El gobierno de Barack Obama acusó a su contraparte rusa y en particular al presidente Putin de haber querido interferir en las elecciones de Estados Unidos.

    Aunque lo que de verdad causó malestar fue que invitara públicamente a los piratas informáticos rusos a atacar el servidor de correos electrónicos privado de Hillary Clinton.

    Su rival demócrata en la campaña electoral estaba siendo investigada por haber usado su cuenta personal para asuntos gubernamentales cuando era secretaria de Estado.

    Rusia, si me estás escuchando, espero que logres encontrar los 30.000 correos que están faltando“, dijo el entonces candidato republicano.

    La primera víctima

    Al mismo tiempo que transcurría el escándalo del hackeo, el entonces jefe de campaña de Trump, Paul Manafort, fue acusado de haber aceptado millones de dólares en efectivo para defender intereses rusos.

    Concretamente, a Manafort se le habría pagado para representar los intereses de Rusia en Ucrania y en EE.UU.

    También se lo acusó de haber hecho negocios con un oligarca muy cercano a Putin.

    Derechos de autor de la imagen
    Getty Images

    Image caption

    Manafort se vio obligado a apartarse de la jefatura de la campaña de Trump.

    Sospechosamente, mientras Manafort lideraba la campaña de Trump, el Partido Republicano modificó un manifiesto que había escrito sobre el conflicto en Ucrania y removió todo sentimiento antiruso.

    Manafort fue investigado por el FBI y renunció a su puesto en la campaña de Trump.

    Al igual que Flynn, Manafort -que tenía más de 40 años de experiencia como operador político- había sido contratado para ayudar a la lidiar con las controversias que rodeaban a Trump, pero al final sucumbió a una de ellas.

    Derechos de autor de la imagen
    Getty Images

    Image caption

    Los enfrentamientos en el este de Ucrania entre los rebeldes separatistas apoyados por Rusia y las fuerzas del gobierno se renovaron tras la asunción de Trump.

    Enfrentado con la inteligencia

    En octubre de 2016, un mes antes de las elecciones, las agencias de inteligencia de EE.UU. emitieron un comunicado unánime acusando formalmente a Rusia de haber sido el responsable del hackeo al Comité Nacional Demócrata.

    Trump siguió cuestionándolo, afirmando en un debate presidencial que “podría ser Rusia, pero también podría ser China o muchos otros.

    “Podría incluso ser una persona sentada en su cama, que pesa 180 kilos”.

    Derechos de autor de la imagen
    Getty Images

    Image caption

    Los correos de Hillary Clinton y el Partido Demócrata robados y publicados por Wikileaks dañaron la campaña de la principal competidora de Trump a la presidencia.

    En el mismo día que las agencias de inteligencia publicaron su comunicado, la cadena de televisión NBC dio el conocer la explosiva grabación de 2005 en la que se escucha a Trump presumiendo entre obscenidades de poder propasarse sexualmente con las mujeres.

    Una hora más tarde, WikiLeaks empezó a publicar miles de correos nuevos de Clinton.

    Trump siguió refutando el consenso de que Rusia estaba detrás de la filtración.

    “¡Siempre supe que Putin era listo!”

    En diciembre, tras la elección de Trump, el FBI y el Departamento de Seguridad Nacional publicaron un informe con las conclusiones que vinculaban a Rusia con el ciberataque al Partido Demócrata.

    En respuesta, el presidente Obama expulsó a 35 diplomáticos rusos e impuso nuevas sanciones contra Rusia.

    El mundo entero esperó la reacción de Putin, pero el líder ruso decidió no tomar represalias.

    El presidente electo Trump apoyó al presidente ruso, afirmando en su cuenta de Twitter: “Gran movida lo del retraso (por V.Putin). ¡Siempre supe que era muy listo!“.

    Derechos de autor de la imagen
    AFP

    Image caption

    Flynn estaba en contacto con la embajada rusa cuando Obama aprobó el último paquete de sanciones.

    Muchos consideraron que la decisión de Putin fue una astuta maniobra de relaciones públicas, pero entre las agencias de inteligencia generó sospechas de si no tendría confianza en que las sanciones serían eliminadas en cuanto asumiera Trump.

    Ahora sabemos que en ese momento, antes de que Trump asumiera la presidencia, Flynn estaba en contacto con la embajada rusa en Estados Unidos.

    Flynn renunció luego de admitir que había dado “información incompleta” al presidente y al vicepresidente, Mike Pence, sobre conversaciones que mantuvo con el embajador ruso en EE.UU., Sergey Kislyak, antes de asumir su puesto.

    El militar retirado, según versiones filtradas a los medios, habló telefónicamente con el diplomático ruso acerca de las sanciones que el gobierno del entonces presidente Barack Obama había impuesto ese mismo día a Rusia por los ciberataques ocurridos durante la campaña electoral estadounidense.

    De esta forma, violó una ley que prohíbe a civiles intervenir en disputas diplomáticas de EE.UU. con otros países.

    Derechos de autor de la imagen
    AP

    Image caption

    Rex Tillerson, jefe de la diplomacia de Estados Unidos, fue condecorado por Putin en 2013 con la “orden de la Amistad”.

    Ese mismo mes, Trump eligió como su secretario de Estado (el puesto más importante en su gabinete) a Rex Tillerson, presidente de la petrolera ExxonMobil.

    ¿La principal objeción que enfrentó Tillerson? Sus vínculos cercanos con Putin.

    Como ejecutivo petrolero, Tillerson cultivó una relación personal con el líder ruso, llevando a muchos a cuestionar si estaba calificado para servir como el principal representante diplomático de EE.UU.

    Tillerson juró en su cargo el pasado 2 de febrero.

    El comprometido dossier

    En enero, el sitio Buzzfeed publicó un documento compilado por Christopher Steele, un exagente de inteligencia británico y experto en Rusia, que sostenía que Moscú tenía información comprometedora sobre Trump, que lo podría hacer susceptible al chantaje.

    Entre los varios memos del expediente había uno que afirmaba que las agencias de seguridad rusas habían filmado a Trump con prostitutas en un hotel de la capital rusa.

    Derechos de autor de la imagen
    Getty Images

    Image caption

    Un hombre toma fotos de un mural en Vilna, la capital de Lituania, en el que se ve a Putin y Trump besándose.

    El presidente electo refutó las afirmaciones, asegurando que era información falsa.

    El canal CNN reveló que tanto Trump como el entonces presidente Obama habían sido informados por agentes de inteligencia sobre la existencia del documento.

    El informe cayó como una granada en medio de un escenario político ya caldeado y generó una respuesta negativa contra Buzzfeed por haber publicado lo que en esencia eran afirmaciones no confirmadas.

    La evidencia contra Flynn

    No obstante, el escándalo más concreto y dañino en torno al tema de Rusia surgió en febrero, después de meses de especulación sobre el tema.

    Un informe del diario The Washington Post reveló que el asesor de seguridad nacional Michael Flynn había discutido con el embajador ruso sobre la posibilidad de levantar las sanciones impuestas por el gobierno de Obama a Rusia, antes de que Trump asumiera la presidencia.

    Flynn, quien había aparecido varias veces en el canal de televisión internacional del gobierno ruso RT e incluso fue retratado en 2015 cenando con Putin, renunció a su cargo este lunes.

    Derechos de autor de la imagen
    AP

    Image caption

    Flynn fue visto en diciembre de 2015 en Moscú, en una cena a la que asistió el presidente Putin.

    Al día siguiente, el portavoz de la Casa Blanca, Sean Spicer, aseguró que Flynn no hizo nada ilegal y que su renuncia fue producto de la “erosión” de la confianza del presidente y no por las conversaciones con Kislyak en sí.

    De todos modos, según medios estadounidenses, este y otros vínculos del gobierno de Trump están siendo investigados por el FBI, al tiempo que varios legisladores están solicitando que se estudie el tema también en el Congreso.

    En su campaña y sus semanas como presidente, Trump no ha escondido su aprecio por Putin y su deseo de establecer vínculos más cercanos con Rusia.

    La pregunta que muchos se hacen -y la polémica de la que no logra desprenderse Trump- es cuán cercanos ya eran y siguen siendo esos vínculos.

    Source Article from http://www.bbc.com/mundo/noticias-internacional-38974595

    Suddenly, many Arab American viewers (and plenty of others) were collectively doing a double-take on the Internet. Did Biden — yes, the 77-year-old, gaffe-prone, Roman Catholic native of Scranton, Pa. — really just use “inshallah,” arguably the most ubiquitous phrase in Arabic?

    Source Article from https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2020/09/30/inshallah-biden-debate-trump-taxes/

    ORLAND PARK, IL — Authorities say a man was shot and killed at a suburban Chicago mall and the suspect remains at large.

    Orland Park Deputy Police Chief Joseph Mitchell says the 19-year-old was shot in the center of Orland Square Mall and ran away before collapsing outside a clothing store Monday evening. The man later died at the hospital.

    Mitchell says security video showed the shooter fleeing the mall but it’s unclear if the suspect continued on foot or got into a vehicle. He calls the shooting an “isolated incident,” saying video shows the two people involved knew each other and that the victim was “targeted.”

    Police departments from several neighboring towns responded to the mall about 20 miles (32.2 kilometers) southwest of Chicago

    Source Article from https://www.abc15.com/national/police-1-person-killed-at-illinois-mall-shooter-at-large

    “Fox News Sunday” anchor Chris Wallace said on Tuesday that President Trump and Sen. Bernie Sanders are the only two candidates who have a base with a “genuine grassroots enthusiasm” from ardent supporters that will “walk through fire for them.”

    “You can’t beat that,” the host of “Fox News Sunday” told “Outnumbered Overtime.”

    “With [Joe Biden] and with [Michael Bloomberg], we haven’t seen that,” Wallace.

    CNN, MSNBC RATCHET UP ATTACKS AGAINST SANDERS AS BIDEN SURGES AS DEM ALTERNATIVE

    Wallace stressed that Super Tuesday is “so important” because Bloomberg will actually face voters in the national race for the first time.

    “We’re going to see whether or not those half-billion dollars in ads actually get support when people go to the polls,” Wallace said.

    Wallace’s comments came after Trump claimed Monday that the race is being “ rigged against Bernie.” Trump added that Sanders could still “pull through” and win the nomination.

    Democrats began coalescing around Biden after he won handily in the crucial South Carolina primary on Saturday, while CNN and MSNBC appear to be renewing their hostile coverage of Sanders, I-Vt., who the Democratic establishment reportedly fears will run away with the nomination.

    There has been a bitter feud between MSNBC and the Sanders campaign in recent weeks as the self-described socialist began emerging as the clear 2020 front-runner.

    “Meet The Press” anchor Chuck Todd suggested that Sanders supporters were part of a “digital brownshirt brigade,” which was condemned by the Anti-Defamation League.

    CLICK HERE FOR THE FOX NEWS APP

    “Hardball” host Chris Matthews, who suddenly retired from the network Monday night, similarly invoked the Holocaust by comparing Sanders’ victory in Nevada to the Nazi takeover of France. He later apologized for those remarks.

    Both MSNBC and CNN gave continuous coverage of Biden’s Texas rally on Monday evening, featuring his former competitors Pete Buttigieg, Amy Klobuchar and Beto O’Rourke, all of whom have given their endorsements to the ex-vice president.

    Fox News’ Joseph A. Wulfsohn contributed to this report.

    Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/media/chris-wallace-bernie-trump-voters



















     

     

    LOS ANGELES, July 30, 2015 /PRNewswire/ — KWHY-TV Noticias 22, the MundoFOX Los Angeles television network affiliate’s award-winning newscast, Noticias 22, “La voz de Tu Ciudad,” “The voice of your city”, scored as the fastest growing late Spanish language newscast in Nielsen’s recently completed July 2015 Sweeps for Los Angeles, the city with the largest Hispanic market in the nation.

    “Our growth is a strong statement of relevance and support to our news team and editorial direction,” stated Palmira Perez, Noticias 22 MundoFOX News Anchor. “Noticias 22 continues to produce the most engaging, compelling news and information daily for our community, and as part of Meruelo Media, together we’re committed to journalistic excellence,” added Otto Padron, President of Meruelo Media.

    KWHY-TV Noticias 22 MundoFOX Los Angeles July 2015 Sweeps Highlights:

    • KWHY-TV Noticias 22 MundoFOX at 10:00 p.m. posted significant “year-to-year” growth in average ratings among the key demographic Adults 18-49, up 35% from the July 2014 Sweeps.
      • All the other Spanish-language late local newscasts were down, including those on KRCA/Estrella (-22%), KVEA/Telemundo (-1%) and KMEX/Univision (-2%). (Based on Monday to Friday average ratings.)
    • Among Adults 25-54, ratings for KWHY-TV Noticias 22 MundoFOX at 10:00 p.m. were up 34% from the July 2014 Sweeps, more than the late newscast on KMEX/Univision (+15%) and KVEA/Telemundo (+7%), with KRCA/Estrella falling 19%.

    Source: Los Angeles NSI Ratings, July 2015

    For more information on KWHY-TV Noticias 22 MundoFOX, please visit www.mundofox22.com.

    About Meruelo Media

    Meruelo Media (MM) is the media division of The Meruelo Group.  MM currently operates two Southern California Legendary media platforms; the classic hip-hop and R&B radio station, 93.5 KDAY and one of Los Angeles’ oldest Hispanic TV stations, KWHY-TV Canal 22, which is currently the flagship of MundoFOX Television Network.  MM also owns the first and only US Hispanic Super Station, Super 22, airing on its KWHY-TV second digital stream and reaching over 6 Million Homes over various multiple video delivery providers.  MM also broadcasts in Houston and Santa Barbara.  The Meruelo Group is a minority owned, privately-held management company serving a diversified portfolio of affiliated entities with interests in banking and financial services; food services, manufacturing, distribution and restaurant operations; construction and engineering; hospitality and gaming; real estate management; media, public and private equity investing. For more information please visit www.meruelogroup.com.

    Rebekah Salgado
    rsalgado@meruelogroup.com 
    562.228.8191

     

     

     

    SOURCE Meruelo Group / Meruelo Media

    RELATED LINKS
    http://www.meruelogroup.com

    Source Article from http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/kwhy-tv-noticias-22-mundofox-reigns-as-las-fastest-growing-late-spanish-newscast-in-july-2015-sweeps-300121156.html

    Kyle Rittenhouse, the man at the center of a recently concluded high-profile murder trial, will appear on “Tucker Carlson Tonight” for his first interview following his acquittal. 

    Rittenhouse, who a Wisconsin jury found not guilty on all five charges, will be joining Fox News’ Tucker Carlson for an exclusive sitdown airing Monday at 8 p.m. ET. 

    TUCKER CARLSON: MEDIA AND BIG TECH LIED ABOUT THE KYLE RITTENHOUSE CASE – HERE’S THE TRUTH

    Rittenhouse will also be appearing in a “Tucker Carlson Originals” documentary on Fox Nation set to premiere in December.

    The documentary will include additional portions of the interview as well as exclusive behind-the-scenes access to Rittenhouse and his defense team.

    Kyle Rittenhouse puts his hand over his face after he is found not guilty on all counts at the Kenosha County Courthouse in Kenosha, Wisconsin, on Friday, Nov. 19, 2021. The jury came back with its verdict after more than three days of deliberation. 
    (Associated Press)

    Rittenhouse, an Illinois resident, was accused of murdering two people and injuring another amid riots that took place in Kenosha, Wisconsin, following the police-involved shooting of Jacob Blake. 

    CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

    The defense in the trial argued that Rittenhouse was acting in self-defense. 

    The 18-year-old shocked the nation when he took the witness stand and shared his recollection of the events leading up to the deadly shootings. 

    Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/media/kyle-rittenhouse-tucker-carlson-tonight-exclusive-interview