Most Viewed Videos

Derechos de autor de la imagen
AFP / Getty Images

Image caption

Los vínculos entre Donald Trump y varios de sus asesores más cercanos con Vladimir Putin persiguen al actual gobierno de EE.UU.

De todas las controversias que han rodeado a Donald Trump desde su campaña electoral hasta su actual rol como presidente de Estados Unidos, hay una de la cual no consigue desmarcarse: Rusia.

La repentina renuncia del asesor de seguridad nacional Michael Flynn presentada este lunes fue la última de una serie de polémicas que vinculan al gobierno de Trump con aparentes intereses rusos.

Pero esa no esa la última “controversia rusa” del entorno de Trump: este martes el diario The New York Times reveló que, según llamadas interceptadas por los servicios de inteligencia del país durante la campaña, el equipo del magnate mantuvo repetido contacto con funcionarios rusos.

“Agentes de autoridad y de inteligencia interceptaron las comunicaciones más o menos cuando descubrieron que Rusia estaba intentando alterar la elección presidencial hackeando al Partido Demócrata”, afirma el diario.

Este miércoles, Trump volvió a responder a través de Twitter.

“La comunidad de inteligencia (¿NSA y FBI?) le está dando información de forma ilegal al fracasado @nytimes & @washingtonpost, Justo como Rusia”, escribió el mandatario, quien atribuyó la noticia sobre los contactos de su equipo con Rusia a intentos por ocultar las fallas en la campaña presidencial de Hillary Clinton.

“El verdadero escándalo aquí es que se está entregando información clasificada de forma ilegal por la “inteligencia” como si fueran caramelos”, agregó.

Pero hay más.

Derechos de autor de la imagen
Getty Images

Image caption

Una semana después de asumir la presidencia de EE.UU., Trump habló por teléfono con Putin, rodeado de sus entonces principales asesores. Entre ellos está Flynn (derecha).

Primeras señales

En mayo de 2016 surgieron los primeros informes que señalaban que el Partido Demócrata había sido atacado por piratas informáticos.

Durante los siguientes dos meses se informó que las agencias de inteligencia de EE.UU. habían rastreado el origen de los ciberataques a Rusia.

En julio, en la antesala de la Convención Nacional Demócrata, el sitio de filtraciones WikiLeaks publicó 20.000 correos electrónicos internos de ese partido, que habían sido robados por hackers.

Agentes de inteligencia estadounidenses se mostraron “muy confiados” de que Rusia estaba detrás de la operación, pero Trump rechazó públicamente esos hallazgos.

Derechos de autor de la imagen
Getty Images

Image caption

El gobierno de Barack Obama acusó a su contraparte rusa y en particular al presidente Putin de haber querido interferir en las elecciones de Estados Unidos.

Aunque lo que de verdad causó malestar fue que invitara públicamente a los piratas informáticos rusos a atacar el servidor de correos electrónicos privado de Hillary Clinton.

Su rival demócrata en la campaña electoral estaba siendo investigada por haber usado su cuenta personal para asuntos gubernamentales cuando era secretaria de Estado.

Rusia, si me estás escuchando, espero que logres encontrar los 30.000 correos que están faltando“, dijo el entonces candidato republicano.

La primera víctima

Al mismo tiempo que transcurría el escándalo del hackeo, el entonces jefe de campaña de Trump, Paul Manafort, fue acusado de haber aceptado millones de dólares en efectivo para defender intereses rusos.

Concretamente, a Manafort se le habría pagado para representar los intereses de Rusia en Ucrania y en EE.UU.

También se lo acusó de haber hecho negocios con un oligarca muy cercano a Putin.

Derechos de autor de la imagen
Getty Images

Image caption

Manafort se vio obligado a apartarse de la jefatura de la campaña de Trump.

Sospechosamente, mientras Manafort lideraba la campaña de Trump, el Partido Republicano modificó un manifiesto que había escrito sobre el conflicto en Ucrania y removió todo sentimiento antiruso.

Manafort fue investigado por el FBI y renunció a su puesto en la campaña de Trump.

Al igual que Flynn, Manafort -que tenía más de 40 años de experiencia como operador político- había sido contratado para ayudar a la lidiar con las controversias que rodeaban a Trump, pero al final sucumbió a una de ellas.

Derechos de autor de la imagen
Getty Images

Image caption

Los enfrentamientos en el este de Ucrania entre los rebeldes separatistas apoyados por Rusia y las fuerzas del gobierno se renovaron tras la asunción de Trump.

Enfrentado con la inteligencia

En octubre de 2016, un mes antes de las elecciones, las agencias de inteligencia de EE.UU. emitieron un comunicado unánime acusando formalmente a Rusia de haber sido el responsable del hackeo al Comité Nacional Demócrata.

Trump siguió cuestionándolo, afirmando en un debate presidencial que “podría ser Rusia, pero también podría ser China o muchos otros.

“Podría incluso ser una persona sentada en su cama, que pesa 180 kilos”.

Derechos de autor de la imagen
Getty Images

Image caption

Los correos de Hillary Clinton y el Partido Demócrata robados y publicados por Wikileaks dañaron la campaña de la principal competidora de Trump a la presidencia.

En el mismo día que las agencias de inteligencia publicaron su comunicado, la cadena de televisión NBC dio el conocer la explosiva grabación de 2005 en la que se escucha a Trump presumiendo entre obscenidades de poder propasarse sexualmente con las mujeres.

Una hora más tarde, WikiLeaks empezó a publicar miles de correos nuevos de Clinton.

Trump siguió refutando el consenso de que Rusia estaba detrás de la filtración.

“¡Siempre supe que Putin era listo!”

En diciembre, tras la elección de Trump, el FBI y el Departamento de Seguridad Nacional publicaron un informe con las conclusiones que vinculaban a Rusia con el ciberataque al Partido Demócrata.

En respuesta, el presidente Obama expulsó a 35 diplomáticos rusos e impuso nuevas sanciones contra Rusia.

El mundo entero esperó la reacción de Putin, pero el líder ruso decidió no tomar represalias.

El presidente electo Trump apoyó al presidente ruso, afirmando en su cuenta de Twitter: “Gran movida lo del retraso (por V.Putin). ¡Siempre supe que era muy listo!“.

Derechos de autor de la imagen
AFP

Image caption

Flynn estaba en contacto con la embajada rusa cuando Obama aprobó el último paquete de sanciones.

Muchos consideraron que la decisión de Putin fue una astuta maniobra de relaciones públicas, pero entre las agencias de inteligencia generó sospechas de si no tendría confianza en que las sanciones serían eliminadas en cuanto asumiera Trump.

Ahora sabemos que en ese momento, antes de que Trump asumiera la presidencia, Flynn estaba en contacto con la embajada rusa en Estados Unidos.

Flynn renunció luego de admitir que había dado “información incompleta” al presidente y al vicepresidente, Mike Pence, sobre conversaciones que mantuvo con el embajador ruso en EE.UU., Sergey Kislyak, antes de asumir su puesto.

El militar retirado, según versiones filtradas a los medios, habló telefónicamente con el diplomático ruso acerca de las sanciones que el gobierno del entonces presidente Barack Obama había impuesto ese mismo día a Rusia por los ciberataques ocurridos durante la campaña electoral estadounidense.

De esta forma, violó una ley que prohíbe a civiles intervenir en disputas diplomáticas de EE.UU. con otros países.

Derechos de autor de la imagen
AP

Image caption

Rex Tillerson, jefe de la diplomacia de Estados Unidos, fue condecorado por Putin en 2013 con la “orden de la Amistad”.

Ese mismo mes, Trump eligió como su secretario de Estado (el puesto más importante en su gabinete) a Rex Tillerson, presidente de la petrolera ExxonMobil.

¿La principal objeción que enfrentó Tillerson? Sus vínculos cercanos con Putin.

Como ejecutivo petrolero, Tillerson cultivó una relación personal con el líder ruso, llevando a muchos a cuestionar si estaba calificado para servir como el principal representante diplomático de EE.UU.

Tillerson juró en su cargo el pasado 2 de febrero.

El comprometido dossier

En enero, el sitio Buzzfeed publicó un documento compilado por Christopher Steele, un exagente de inteligencia británico y experto en Rusia, que sostenía que Moscú tenía información comprometedora sobre Trump, que lo podría hacer susceptible al chantaje.

Entre los varios memos del expediente había uno que afirmaba que las agencias de seguridad rusas habían filmado a Trump con prostitutas en un hotel de la capital rusa.

Derechos de autor de la imagen
Getty Images

Image caption

Un hombre toma fotos de un mural en Vilna, la capital de Lituania, en el que se ve a Putin y Trump besándose.

El presidente electo refutó las afirmaciones, asegurando que era información falsa.

El canal CNN reveló que tanto Trump como el entonces presidente Obama habían sido informados por agentes de inteligencia sobre la existencia del documento.

El informe cayó como una granada en medio de un escenario político ya caldeado y generó una respuesta negativa contra Buzzfeed por haber publicado lo que en esencia eran afirmaciones no confirmadas.

La evidencia contra Flynn

No obstante, el escándalo más concreto y dañino en torno al tema de Rusia surgió en febrero, después de meses de especulación sobre el tema.

Un informe del diario The Washington Post reveló que el asesor de seguridad nacional Michael Flynn había discutido con el embajador ruso sobre la posibilidad de levantar las sanciones impuestas por el gobierno de Obama a Rusia, antes de que Trump asumiera la presidencia.

Flynn, quien había aparecido varias veces en el canal de televisión internacional del gobierno ruso RT e incluso fue retratado en 2015 cenando con Putin, renunció a su cargo este lunes.

Derechos de autor de la imagen
AP

Image caption

Flynn fue visto en diciembre de 2015 en Moscú, en una cena a la que asistió el presidente Putin.

Al día siguiente, el portavoz de la Casa Blanca, Sean Spicer, aseguró que Flynn no hizo nada ilegal y que su renuncia fue producto de la “erosión” de la confianza del presidente y no por las conversaciones con Kislyak en sí.

De todos modos, según medios estadounidenses, este y otros vínculos del gobierno de Trump están siendo investigados por el FBI, al tiempo que varios legisladores están solicitando que se estudie el tema también en el Congreso.

En su campaña y sus semanas como presidente, Trump no ha escondido su aprecio por Putin y su deseo de establecer vínculos más cercanos con Rusia.

La pregunta que muchos se hacen -y la polémica de la que no logra desprenderse Trump- es cuán cercanos ya eran y siguen siendo esos vínculos.

Source Article from http://www.bbc.com/mundo/noticias-internacional-38974595

Suddenly, many Arab American viewers (and plenty of others) were collectively doing a double-take on the Internet. Did Biden — yes, the 77-year-old, gaffe-prone, Roman Catholic native of Scranton, Pa. — really just use “inshallah,” arguably the most ubiquitous phrase in Arabic?

Source Article from https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2020/09/30/inshallah-biden-debate-trump-taxes/

via press release:

NOTICIAS  TELEMUNDO  PRESENTS:

“MURIENDO POR CRUZAR,” AN INVESTIGATION INTO THE INCREASING NUMBER OF IMMIGRANT DEATHS ALONG THE BORDER, THIS SUNDAY, AUGUST 3 AT 6 P.M./5 C

Carmen Dominicci and Neida Sandoval present the Telemundo and The Weather Channel co-production

Miami – July 31, 2014 – Telemundo presents “Muriendo por Cruzar”, a documentary that investigates why increasing numbers of immigrants are dying while trying to cross the US-Mexican border near the city of Falfurrias, Texas, this Sunday, August 3 at 6PM/5 C.  The Telemundo and The Weather Channel co-production, presented by Noticias Telemundo journalists Carmen Dominicci and Neida Sandoval, reveals the obstacles immigrants face once they cross into US territory, including extreme weather conditions, as they try to evade the border patrol.  “Muriendo por Cruzar” is part of Noticias Telemundo’s special coverage of the crisis on the border and immigration reform.

 

“‘Muriendo por Cruzar’” dares to ask questions that reveal the actual conditions undocumented immigrants face as they try to start a new life in the United States,” said Alina Falcón, Telemundo’s Executive Vice President for News and Alternative Programming.  “Our collaboration with The Weather Channel was very productive. They have a unique expertise in covering the impact of weather on people’s lives, as we do in covering immigration reform and the border crisis. The result is a compelling documentary that exposes a harrowing reality.”

“Muriendo por Cruzar” is the first co-production by Telemundo and The Weather Channel.  Both networks are part of NBCUniversal.

Source Article from http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2014/07/31/noticias-telemundo-presents-muriendo-por-cruzar-this-sunday-august-3-at-6pm/289119/

(Bloomberg).- Facebook presentó en detalle su plan para combatir las noticias falsas. En la práctica, tercerizará la revisión de la veracidad de aquellas noticias identificadas por los usuarios como posiblemente falsas con grupos que deberían, como mínimo, ser signatarios de un código desarrollado en el Poynter Institute, una organización de capacitación periodística con sede en Florida.

Pero al convertir un pequeño grupo de inspectores en los árbitros de la “verdad”, Facebook socava su propia imparcialidad y podría allanar el camino para la censura en las redes sociales.

En una publicación, Adam Mosseri, el vicepresidente de Facebook responsable de la sección de noticias, explicó cómo funcionará el esquema. Los usuarios podrán identificar una noticia falsa, que luego Facebook enviará a un grupo que haya firmado el Código de Principios Internacionales de Verificación de Hechos.

Si el grupo decide que la noticia es en efecto falsa, Facebook la marcará como “disputada” con un enlace a la explicación de los verificadores. La gente todavía podrá compartir las noticias tras leer la advertencia de que son polémicas, pero Facebook “podría” ponerla más abajo en la sección de noticias y las volverá inelegibles para promociones pagas.

En un principio, se probará el sistema en Estados Unidos, donde solo un puñado de organizaciones —ABC News, Associated Press, Climate Feedback, Factcheck.org, PolitiFact, Snopes y The Washington Post Fact Checker— han firmado el código. El Poynter Institute ha aclarado que no admitirá así sin más a más firmantes: la “función filtradora” que ahora tendrá el código, exige, según el instituto, “un mecanismo de verificación más formal detrás del código de principios”.

El socio elegido por Facebook ya descarta inmediatamente a una gran franja de lectores conservadores. La International Fact-Checking Network de Poynter, sede del código de principios, está financiada, entre otros donantes, por las Open Society Foundations de George Soros, suficiente como para que muchos de los que comparten noticias de Breitbart News y sitios conservadores más extremos la vean como parte de una conspiración globalista.

Además, esa gente —o incluso conservadores menos virulentos— tampoco va a tomar como la verdad revelada las evaluaciones de, digamos, PolitiFact. Este último es el blanco favorito de los blogueros conservadores; incluso hay un sitio llamado PolitiFact Bias (El sesgo de PolitiFact) que cuestiona regularmente el trabajo de los que verifican hechos, muchas veces con argumentos válidos.

Por ejemplo, hace poco explicó que examinar la veracidad de la descripción que hizo un republicano de la victoria de Trump en el Colegio Electoral como “arrasadora” no tiene sentido porque una “victoria arrasadora” es cuestión de opinión, no de hechos. El sitio también afirmó que detectó inconsistencias en los miembros del equipo de PolitiFact.

Breitbart también se mete en peleas con PolitiFact. En julio, discutieron el análisis de cómo Donald Trump utilizó una historia de “Clinton Cash”, un best seller de Peter Schweizer, sobre la venta de una empresa de uranio con minas en Estados Unidos a una compañía estatal rusa. Schweizer ayudó a Breitbart a armar su refutación. PolitiFact publicó una réplica punto por punto en la que afirmó repetidamente que el contexto aportado por Schweizer no era relevante para la revisión específica. El ida y vuelta podría haber continuado si Breitbart hubiera señalado que cualquier contexto podría ser relevante para una historia compleja.

Si Facebook se tomara en serio la solidez de su esquema tercerizado para examinar la veracidad, tendría que poner enlaces para cada parte polemizada en su marca de “noticia disputada”.

¿Ayudaría esto a los lectores a determinar la verdad? Yo sé que yo estaría más confundido que iluminado. ¿Cuántos lectores tienen el tiempo, el interés o, de hecho, las habilidades periodísticas para examinar la fuente de la noticia y seguir investigando?

Incluso sin tener en cuenta la posibilidad de sesgos, a veces los signatarios del código de principios del Poynter pueden discrepar sobre la veracidad de una misma afirmación. En un artículo sobre el análisis de realidades polémicas publicado en 2015, Morgan Marietta, de la Universidad de Massachusetts, y sus colaboradores mencionan tres casos específicos de discrepancias.

Por ejemplo, en 2012, Factcheck.org describió la afirmación del senador Dick Durbin de que “el Seguro Social no suma un centavo a nuestra deuda” como falsa, pero The Washington Post Fact Checker la calificó como “en gran parte verdadera”. En 2013, el presidente Barack Obama dijo que los déficits estaban cayendo al ritmo más veloz en 60 años. PolitiFact estuvo de acuerdo, pero Factcheck.org calificó la afirmación de falsa.

“Examinándolos desde la perspectiva de las realidades discutidas de nuestra política, los verificadores no se ponen de acuerdo sobre las preguntas hechas o las respuestas ofrecidas”, escribieron los investigadores, que les dieron a los tres principales grupos de verificación de hechos de Estados Unidos —PolitiFact, Factcheck.org y The Washington Post Fact Checker— “dos o tres Pinochos” según la escala del Washington Post, o “media verdad/en gran parte falsa”. En realidad, un país políticamente polarizado no está en la postverdad, sino que a veces la verdad es complicada e intrincada.

La comunidad cada vez más grande de verificadores de hechos, alentada por instituciones como Poynter, surgió en respuesta a reducciones de costos en los medios dominantes. Muchas organizaciones de noticias no pueden permitirse hacer revisiones meticulosas; incluso evitan a los correctores que podrían quitar errores de tipeo.

Sin embargo, al fin y al cabo, los verificadores de veracidad sólo son periodistas, con sus propios sesgos y defectos profesionales. Su trabajo resulta útil para la comunidad periodística como servicio público que sustituye la atención rigurosa que se dedicaba al detalle dentro de las organizaciones de noticias, pero no puede funcionar como base para “degradar” ciertas historias y aprobar otras. Sin embargo, es precisamente así que Facebook quiere usarlos.

Las banderillas de “disputado” no son particularmente preocupantes. Algunas fuentes de noticias de derecha probablemente las usarían como insignia de honor y sus lectores estarían de acuerdo, si bien a algunos adictos a las noticias podría interesarles el contexto más amplio que aportan los que verifican la veracidad. Es bueno ver una noticia y su crítica juntas. Pero si Facebook realmente degrada el contenido “polémico” y hace imposible que se promocione, eso restringiría la distribución de ciertas noticias legítimas. E incluso las falsas pueden tener su valor. Como alguien que sigue a Rusia, debo ver qué noticias comparten y discuten los miembros de sitios propagandísticos del Kremlin en Europa y Estados Unidos. La nueva política de Facebook podría dificultarlo, porque los enlaces quedarán más abajo en mi sección de noticias.

Facebook está presionada para hacer algo con las noticias falsas: la International Fact Checking Network, los demócratas en Estados Unidos y políticos europeos que pronto enfrentarán sus propias elecciones están en pie de guerra contra las noticias engañosas. De aplicarse con coherencia, el nuevo procedimiento probablemente le saque los críticos de encima a Zuckerberg. Sin embargo, también devaluará a Facebook como plataforma omnívora e imparcial de distribución de noticias, hará que algunos lectores se encierren más en sus opiniones y que otros salgan a buscar otras formas de recibir contenidos de varias fuentes. Twitter parece ser una buena alternativa hasta que ceda a la presión como Facebook.

Por Leonid Bershidsky.

Source Article from http://gestion.pe/tecnologia/facebook-socava-su-propia-imparcialidad-verificadores-noticias-falsas-2177395

But over the weekend, the communist-run island nation became an unavoidable subject. Thousands of Cubans took to the streets on Sunday to protest food and medicine shortages amid a worsening economic crisis, while calling for an end to the 62-year-old dictatorship. And while Biden voiced support for the protesters, describing the protests as a “clarion call for freedom,” much of his policy toward Cuba remains a mystery.

Will Biden encourage more demonstrations? Does his team support adding new sanctions or keeping in place Trump-era sanctions? Is the idea of bolstering diplomatic and trade ties now out of the question? The White House’s painstaking review of Cuba policy now risks being overtaken by current events.

“The easy political thing to do is to issue demands for freedom from America while doing nothing,” said Ben Rhodes, who served as a senior aide to former President Barack Obama and helped craft the Obama administration’s diplomatic opening to Cuba. “I just don’t think that’s the approach that’s going to be constructive here.”

The protests in Cuba were another example of the Biden administration being forced by realities on the ground to grapple with an issue after trying to deprioritize it. Earlier this year, Biden and his aides found themselves scrambling to deal with clashes between Israel and Palestinian militants after signaling a desire to minimize U.S. engagement in that long-running conflict.

The questions on Cuba policy come as Biden has left largely intact Trump’s high-pressure, sanctions-heavy campaign against Cuba’s regime, despite campaign promises to the contrary.

And they come as concerns within the White House about Cuba have grown in recent days, according to two people in touch with administration officials. Before the protests, U.S. officials were looking at what they could do to ease the Cuban people’s suffering, one of the people, a Cuba analyst, told POLITICO. That included possibly easing travel restrictions as well as limits on people’s ability to send money to relatives and others on the island — changes Biden himself discussed on the campaign trail.

“They are concerned about the humanitarian crisis unfolding in Cuba and the possibility that it could spill over into a migratory crisis,” said the analyst, who spoke on condition of anonymity to describe sensitive conversations. “I know that the White House is finally paying attention.”

In recent months, the number of Cuban migrants coming by land and sea has grown significantly. More than 500 Cuban migrants have been intercepted and repatriated this fiscal year, up from 49 in 2020 and 313 in 2019, according to the U.S. Coast Guard.

Some Republicans, including Florida’s Sen. Marco Rubio, have expressed concern that the Cuban government will begin to encourage mass migration to the United States, as it did in 1994 when Cuba last saw large-scale protests. However, U.S.-Cuba experts say that level of migration by sea is less likely to happen this time around, given that Washington no longer has an immigration policy in place that welcomes Cubans when they reach U.S. soil.

So far, some of Biden’s biggest allies on Capitol Hill have been supportive of his move to keep Trump-era sanctions and restrictions in place.

“The regime needs to understand that change [in Cuba] will bring about a change in sanctions” — not change in who occupies the U.S. presidency, Sen. Bob Menendez (D-N.J.) said, adding that it’s important that Biden has not weakened the sanctions.

Menendez, chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, defended the administration for not making Cuba a foreign policy priority, saying it’s “understandable” given ongoing challenges with China, Russia and Iran.

“But now that the Cuban people have taken to the streets, I think the administration will have to look at options they can exercise in support of the Cuban people,” Menendez said, noting that he has been in touch with administration officials and they already have a list of his policy suggestions that are under consideration.

Others closely following the situation worry that the protests will only make it less likely that the Biden administration rolls back Trump-era restrictions. They say Biden’s ability to maneuver on Cuba policy will only get more restricted as the 2022 midterm elections get closer.

“They’re just not going to make themselves politically vulnerable by lifting the sanctions, rolling back the Trump policies, when the Republicans will immediately hammer away at it and say it is a gift to the Cuban regime,” said Michael Shifter, president of the Inter-American Dialogue.

The domestic considerations for Biden were on display Sunday as hundreds of Cuban Americans took to the streets in Miami to protest in solidarity with the Cuban people. Meanwhile, Republican leaders like Rubio, who played a major role in the Trump administration’s hardline Cuba policy, were already hammering Biden for not having an immediate response to the protests.

“President Biden’s lack of comment yesterday made clear that he has no interest in standing with the Cuban people as they rise up against the authoritarian regime,” Rubio said in a written statement to POLITICO. “The Biden Administration’s decision to remain silent during decisive hours harms the protesters bravely demonstrating for their God-given rights.”

Meanwhile in Havana, Cuban leaders sought to crack down on the widespread protests across the island. President Miguel Díaz-Canel on Sunday declared that “the order to combat is given.” Security forces were deployed, government supporters were called on to take back control of the streets and internet access was restricted in an apparent effort to prevent protestors from sharing information. There are numerous reports of beatings and arrests by security forces, including widely known dissidents like Luis Manuel Otero Alcántara, leader of the Movimiento San Isidro.

On Monday, Díaz-Canel, who only three months ago took over as head of Cuba’s Communist Party, a job he was being groomed for since becoming president in 2019, blamed U.S. policy toward Cuba as the reason for the unprecedented demonstrations, refusing to acknowledge Cubans’ frustration with his government.

The Cuba protests come amid a political crisis in nearby Haiti that is spurring U.S. concerns of a Haitian exodus as well.

“Neither was on the agenda. But they’ve been forced back on the front burner,” said Shifter. “Biden was caught off guard and [the administration has] to figure out the right narrative for this and get out in front of it.”

It remains to be seen whether the protests are a unique event that will be quashed by Cuba’s authoritarian regime or if they are the start of a meaningful movement. Cuba’s government exercises strict control over its population, but Cubans’ patience has been sorely tested by the coronavirus pandemic, which has added to their existing economic misery.

Biden administration officials did not immediately respond to questions about whether they were surprised by the demonstrations, had been warned they were coming, or what the administration’s Cuba-related plans are in the days ahead.

Speaking Monday, Psaki said she’s not aware of any immediate U.S. policy shift toward Cuba. “We’re assessing how we can be helpful to the people of Cuba,” she said.

In their statements, Biden administration officials appeared to try to walk a fine line: voicing support for the protesters and asking the Cuban government to be responsive to the people’s demands, but stopping far short of encouraging regime change.

At times, it made for a confusing overall message.

On Twitter, for instance, Julie Chung, the acting assistant secretary in the Bureau of Western Hemisphere Affairs at the Department of State, repeatedly called on all sides to refrain from violence and for the Cuban government to “listen to their citizens’ demands.” But at one point, she seemed to channel a revolutionary spirit, writing: “The Cuban people have waited long enough for ¡Libertad!”

Republican lawmakers seized the moment to attack both the Cuban regime and Biden.

“President Biden, freedom in #Cuba needs you now! Don’t be AWOL,” tweeted Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.).

Chung, who was the first U.S. official to tweet about the situation in Cuba on Sunday, was at the center of Republican criticism over her initial tweet, in which she said the protests were to “express concern about rising COVID cases/deaths & medicine shortages.”

Rep. Carlos Giménez, a Cuban American Republican representing South Florida, on Monday urged Biden, in a letter shared with POLITICO, to remove Chung from her position leading Western Hemisphere affairs at the State Department for what he called a “disjointed and foolish statement.”

Biden “should be sure we stay on the side of the Cuban people against this vicious regime,” said Elliott Abrams, a veteran Latin America watcher and former senior State Department official under President Donald Trump. “That means rhetorical support, support in international organizations, and an absolute refusal to weaken sanctions as the regime brutalizes the population.”

On the left, however, there’s a belief that American sanctions on Cuba are no more likely to succeed now than they have over the past six decades.

The administration should “figure out ways to engage the Cuban people, which necessitate taking off some sanctions both to improve their lives and [deal with] things like Covid,” Rhodes said. “I think ultimately that engaging Cubans is more empowering than thinking you can keep them in this pressure cooker.”

Still, former administration officials and experts on the region say Biden will have to be careful not to get too involved publicly. Díaz-Canel and Cuban leaders have already sought to spin the protests as a product of “Yankee imperialism,” despite protesters emphasizing that they took to the streets over desperation caused by Cuba’s own policies.

Secretary of State Antony Blinken dismissed allegations that the United States orchestrated the protests, saying the demonstrations were a “reflection” of the Cuban people’s exhaustion with government repression and mismanagement.

“It would be a grievous mistake for the Cuban regime to interpret what is happening in dozens of towns and cities across the island as a result or product of anything the United States has done,” Blinken said during a news briefing Monday. “It would show they simply are not hearing the voices and will of the Cuban people.”

“It is a balancing act for Biden in the end,” said Eric Farnsworth, vice president of the think tank Council of the Americas and a former U.S. government official. “You have to come out in support of democracy, in support of respect for peaceful protestors and human rights … without creating difficulties for the protestors.”

“The Cuban regime is very good at painting protesters as stooges of the United States,” Farnsworth added. “They are not. And that is clearly not the case here.”

Source Article from https://www.politico.com/news/2021/07/12/biden-cuba-response-499400

São Paulo – Tunisia plans on increasing its phosphate production to 12 million tonnes by 2020. The manufactured volume was lower than 3 million tonnes last year. The information was supplied by Kamel Ben Naceur, the Tunisian minister of Industry, Mines and Energy, while attending the Brazil-Tunisia Economic forum this Tuesday (6th) at the headquarters of the Federation of Industry of the State of São Paulo (Fiesp), in the namesake capital.

Aurea Santos/ANBA

Naceur wants partnership with Vale

“Output is down from eight million (tonnes) in 2010 to less than three million in 2013. The target this year is to go back to 5 or 5.5 million tonnes, then 8 million by 2016, and finally 12 million by 2020”, said Naceur.

The minister also said he is in talks for an eventual cooperation in the area with Brazil’s mining company Vale, in whose offices he attended a meeting last Monday (5th). “We are talking about excellent opportunities, first of all in technology, since Vale boasts experience in pipeline transportation of fertilizers with water. This type of system could be very interesting for us, for mines with outputs ranging from 2 to 3 million per annum,” he said.

Another potential area for cooperation with the Brazilian company, said Naceur, is a project for a phosphate mine in Midwest Tunisia. “The investment is US$ 2.5 billion. We will see how we can streamline the whole cycle by using the knowledge of companies such as Vale,” he said.

He also pointed out other sectors in which the two countries could work in tandem. “The opportunities for cooperation with Brazil lie in sectors such as electrical, mechanical, textiles, leathers and shoes, agrifoods, pharmaceutical, aeronautical, third-party services, tourism, and logistics services,” he asserted.

Aurea Santos/ANBA

Sallum (center): trade can grow

Marcelo Sallum, the president of the Arab Brazilian Chamber of Commerce, attended the meeting at Fiesp and gave bilateral trade figures between Brazil and Tunisia, noting that there are possibilities for growth. “In 2013, trade between the two countries amounted to US$ 426 million. That is still a fairly low volume. We truly believe there are opportunities for business to increase on both sides,” he stated.

Michel Alaby, the Arab Chamber CEO, highlighted the importance of Brazilian companies being international-minded, i.e. setting up operations in another country. “Exports from Brazil (to Tunisia) hinge mostly on raw materials and foods, but we could also produce foodstuffs in Tunisia, whose labour force is productive and effecetive.” As case in points of Brazilian companies already operating from the Arab country, he listed footwear company Dumond and cement manufacturer Votorantim.

Sabri Bachtobji, the Tunisian ambassador in Brasília, mentioned the event’s importance to bringing companies together. “Today’s event will help the Brazilian industry to become a privileged partner of the Tunisian industry,” he said.

Aurea Santos/ANBA

Audience of businessmen at the Fiesp

Ricardo Schaefer, the executive secretary to the Brazilian Ministry of Industry, Development and Foreign Trade, spoke on Tunisia’s current political scenario and how Brazil could benefit from it. “Boosting trade and cooperation with African countries is one of the Brazilian government’s goals,” he said.

Khalil Labidi, CEO of the Tunisian Foreign Investment Promotion Agency (Fipa), mentioned the advantages available to companies once they set up a base in his country. “Tunisia offers major fiscal and financial advantages to investors. Exporting companies in Tunisia sell 70% of their output to the foreign market, and 30% locally,” he said.

The event was also attended by Rubens Hannun, the honorary consul of Tunisia in São Paulo and Arab Chamber Foreign Trade vice president, and by Heinz Huyer, honorary consul of Tunisia in the state of Rio Grande do Sul.

*Translated by Gabriel Pomerancblum

Source Article from http://www2.anba.com.br/noticia/21863658/business-opportunities/tunisia-wants-to-quadruplicate-phosphate-production/



















 

 

LOS ANGELES, July 30, 2015 /PRNewswire/ — KWHY-TV Noticias 22, the MundoFOX Los Angeles television network affiliate’s award-winning newscast, Noticias 22, “La voz de Tu Ciudad,” “The voice of your city”, scored as the fastest growing late Spanish language newscast in Nielsen’s recently completed July 2015 Sweeps for Los Angeles, the city with the largest Hispanic market in the nation.

“Our growth is a strong statement of relevance and support to our news team and editorial direction,” stated Palmira Perez, Noticias 22 MundoFOX News Anchor. “Noticias 22 continues to produce the most engaging, compelling news and information daily for our community, and as part of Meruelo Media, together we’re committed to journalistic excellence,” added Otto Padron, President of Meruelo Media.

KWHY-TV Noticias 22 MundoFOX Los Angeles July 2015 Sweeps Highlights:

  • KWHY-TV Noticias 22 MundoFOX at 10:00 p.m. posted significant “year-to-year” growth in average ratings among the key demographic Adults 18-49, up 35% from the July 2014 Sweeps.
    • All the other Spanish-language late local newscasts were down, including those on KRCA/Estrella (-22%), KVEA/Telemundo (-1%) and KMEX/Univision (-2%). (Based on Monday to Friday average ratings.)
  • Among Adults 25-54, ratings for KWHY-TV Noticias 22 MundoFOX at 10:00 p.m. were up 34% from the July 2014 Sweeps, more than the late newscast on KMEX/Univision (+15%) and KVEA/Telemundo (+7%), with KRCA/Estrella falling 19%.

Source: Los Angeles NSI Ratings, July 2015

For more information on KWHY-TV Noticias 22 MundoFOX, please visit www.mundofox22.com.

About Meruelo Media

Meruelo Media (MM) is the media division of The Meruelo Group.  MM currently operates two Southern California Legendary media platforms; the classic hip-hop and R&B radio station, 93.5 KDAY and one of Los Angeles’ oldest Hispanic TV stations, KWHY-TV Canal 22, which is currently the flagship of MundoFOX Television Network.  MM also owns the first and only US Hispanic Super Station, Super 22, airing on its KWHY-TV second digital stream and reaching over 6 Million Homes over various multiple video delivery providers.  MM also broadcasts in Houston and Santa Barbara.  The Meruelo Group is a minority owned, privately-held management company serving a diversified portfolio of affiliated entities with interests in banking and financial services; food services, manufacturing, distribution and restaurant operations; construction and engineering; hospitality and gaming; real estate management; media, public and private equity investing. For more information please visit www.meruelogroup.com.

Rebekah Salgado
rsalgado@meruelogroup.com 
562.228.8191

 

 

 

SOURCE Meruelo Group / Meruelo Media

RELATED LINKS
http://www.meruelogroup.com

Source Article from http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/kwhy-tv-noticias-22-mundofox-reigns-as-las-fastest-growing-late-spanish-newscast-in-july-2015-sweeps-300121156.html

Kyle Rittenhouse, the man at the center of a recently concluded high-profile murder trial, will appear on “Tucker Carlson Tonight” for his first interview following his acquittal. 

Rittenhouse, who a Wisconsin jury found not guilty on all five charges, will be joining Fox News’ Tucker Carlson for an exclusive sitdown airing Monday at 8 p.m. ET. 

TUCKER CARLSON: MEDIA AND BIG TECH LIED ABOUT THE KYLE RITTENHOUSE CASE – HERE’S THE TRUTH

Rittenhouse will also be appearing in a “Tucker Carlson Originals” documentary on Fox Nation set to premiere in December.

The documentary will include additional portions of the interview as well as exclusive behind-the-scenes access to Rittenhouse and his defense team.

Kyle Rittenhouse puts his hand over his face after he is found not guilty on all counts at the Kenosha County Courthouse in Kenosha, Wisconsin, on Friday, Nov. 19, 2021. The jury came back with its verdict after more than three days of deliberation. 
(Associated Press)

Rittenhouse, an Illinois resident, was accused of murdering two people and injuring another amid riots that took place in Kenosha, Wisconsin, following the police-involved shooting of Jacob Blake. 

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

The defense in the trial argued that Rittenhouse was acting in self-defense. 

The 18-year-old shocked the nation when he took the witness stand and shared his recollection of the events leading up to the deadly shootings. 

Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/media/kyle-rittenhouse-tucker-carlson-tonight-exclusive-interview

Image copyright
AFP

Image caption

Alan García served as president of Peru from 1985 to 1990 and again from 2006 to 2011

Former Peruvian President Alan García has died after shooting himself as police arrived at his home to arrest him over bribery allegations.

Mr García was rushed to hospital in the capital, Lima. His death was confirmed by current President Martín Vizcarra.

A crowd of supporters gathered outside the hospital and were held back by a line of police.

Mr García was accused of taking bribes from Brazilian construction company Odebrecht – claims he denied.

Mr García served as president from 1985 to 1990 and again from 2006 to 2011.

What happened at his home?

Officers had been sent to arrest him in connection with the allegations.

Interior Minister Carlos Morán told reporters that when police arrived, Mr García asked to make a phone call and went into a room and closed the door.

Minutes later, a shot rang out, Mr Morán said. Police forced the door open and found Mr García sitting on a chair with a bullet wound to his head.

Mr García underwent emergency surgery in the Casimiro Ulloa hospital in Lima.

Image copyright
AFP

Image caption

Supporters of Mr García gathered outside the hospital in Lima

Health Minister Zulema Tomás said Mr García had to be resuscitated three times after suffering cardiac arrests before finally succumbing to his injuries.

In a post on Twitter, Mr Vizcarra said he was “shocked” by the former president’s death and sent his condolences to his family.

What was Mr García accused of?

Investigators say he took bribes from Odebrecht during his second term in office, linked to a metro line building project in the capital.

Odebrecht has admitted paying almost $30m (£23m) in bribes in Peru since 2004.

But Mr García maintained he was the victim of political persecution, writing in a tweet on Tuesday that there was “no clue or evidence” against him.

In November last year he unsuccessfully applied for political asylum in Uruguay.

Alan García – ‘Latin America’s Kennedy’

Image copyright
AFP

  • Born on 23 May 1949 in Lima
  • Studied law and sociology
  • Elected to Peru’s Chamber of Deputies for the Aprista Party of Peru (APRA)
  • Became Peru’s youngest ever president in 1985 at the age of 36
  • A gifted orator, he was described by some as “Latin America’s Kennedy”
  • Served two terms as president, first from 1986-1990, then from 2006-2011

Source: BBC Monitoring

What is the Odebrecht scandal?

Odebrecht is a Brazilian construction giant behind major infrastructure projects around the world, including venues for the 2016 Olympics and 2014 World Cup in its home country.

But under the glare of anti-corruption investigators the company admitted paying bribes in more than half of the countries in Latin America, as well as in Angola and Mozambique in Africa.

Investigators say Odebrecht bribed officials or electoral candidates in exchange for lucrative building contracts.

BBC South America business correspondent Daniel Gallas says the scandal shows no sign of abating almost four years since it was uncovered.

No other company in Latin America has had such an ability to sustain so many high-level connections across so many different parties and countries for such a long period of time, he says.

How is Peru affected?

Four of Peru’s most recent presidents are all being investigated for alleged corruption, with a fifth – Alberto Fujimori – serving a prison sentence for corruption and human rights abuses.

Ex-leader Pedro Pablo Kuczynski was taken to hospital with high blood pressure on Wednesday just days after his own arrest in connection with Odebrecht charges. Reports said he was in intensive care.

The current leader of the opposition, Keiko Fujimori, is also in pre-trial detention on charges of taking $1.2m (£940,000) in bribes from Odebrecht.

In October, an opinion poll by Datum showed 94% of Peruvians believed the level of corruption in their country was either high or very high.

The scandal embroiling Peru’s presidents

  • Pedro Pablo Kuczynski, in office 2016-2018, resigned over a vote-buying scandal and detained last week
  • Ollanta Humala, in office 2011-2016, accused of taking bribes from Odebrecht to bankroll his election campaign, in pre-trial detention in Peru
  • Alan García, in office 2006-2011, suspected of taking kickbacks from Odebrecht, sought asylum in Uruguay’s Lima embassy but had his request denied
  • Alejandro Toledo, in office 2001-2006, accused of taking millions of dollars in bribes from Odebrecht, currently a fugitive in the US

Source Article from https://www.bbc.com/news/world-latin-america-47965867

ORLAND PARK, IL — Authorities say a man was shot and killed at a suburban Chicago mall and the suspect remains at large.

Orland Park Deputy Police Chief Joseph Mitchell says the 19-year-old was shot in the center of Orland Square Mall and ran away before collapsing outside a clothing store Monday evening. The man later died at the hospital.

Mitchell says security video showed the shooter fleeing the mall but it’s unclear if the suspect continued on foot or got into a vehicle. He calls the shooting an “isolated incident,” saying video shows the two people involved knew each other and that the victim was “targeted.”

Police departments from several neighboring towns responded to the mall about 20 miles (32.2 kilometers) southwest of Chicago

Source Article from https://www.abc15.com/national/police-1-person-killed-at-illinois-mall-shooter-at-large

“Fox News Sunday” anchor Chris Wallace said on Tuesday that President Trump and Sen. Bernie Sanders are the only two candidates who have a base with a “genuine grassroots enthusiasm” from ardent supporters that will “walk through fire for them.”

“You can’t beat that,” the host of “Fox News Sunday” told “Outnumbered Overtime.”

“With [Joe Biden] and with [Michael Bloomberg], we haven’t seen that,” Wallace.

CNN, MSNBC RATCHET UP ATTACKS AGAINST SANDERS AS BIDEN SURGES AS DEM ALTERNATIVE

Wallace stressed that Super Tuesday is “so important” because Bloomberg will actually face voters in the national race for the first time.

“We’re going to see whether or not those half-billion dollars in ads actually get support when people go to the polls,” Wallace said.

Wallace’s comments came after Trump claimed Monday that the race is being “ rigged against Bernie.” Trump added that Sanders could still “pull through” and win the nomination.

Democrats began coalescing around Biden after he won handily in the crucial South Carolina primary on Saturday, while CNN and MSNBC appear to be renewing their hostile coverage of Sanders, I-Vt., who the Democratic establishment reportedly fears will run away with the nomination.

There has been a bitter feud between MSNBC and the Sanders campaign in recent weeks as the self-described socialist began emerging as the clear 2020 front-runner.

“Meet The Press” anchor Chuck Todd suggested that Sanders supporters were part of a “digital brownshirt brigade,” which was condemned by the Anti-Defamation League.

CLICK HERE FOR THE FOX NEWS APP

“Hardball” host Chris Matthews, who suddenly retired from the network Monday night, similarly invoked the Holocaust by comparing Sanders’ victory in Nevada to the Nazi takeover of France. He later apologized for those remarks.

Both MSNBC and CNN gave continuous coverage of Biden’s Texas rally on Monday evening, featuring his former competitors Pete Buttigieg, Amy Klobuchar and Beto O’Rourke, all of whom have given their endorsements to the ex-vice president.

Fox News’ Joseph A. Wulfsohn contributed to this report.

Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/media/chris-wallace-bernie-trump-voters

The New York Times was accused of “carrying water for Iran” over the weekend for echoing the nation’s talking point that its “nuclear ambitions are for peaceful purposes” after the leader of Tehran’s military nuclear program was killed in a shooting.

State TV on Friday cited sources confirming the death of Mohsen Fakhrizadeh, who was dubbed the leader of Tehran’s military nuclear program until it was ended in the early 2000s.

“Iranian officials, who have always maintained that their nuclear ambitions are for peaceful purposes, not weapons, expressed fury and vowed revenge over the assassination, calling it an act of terrorism and warmongering,” the New York Times World tweeted from its verified account to accompany an article headlined “Gunmen Assassinate Iran’s Top Nuclear Scientist in Ambush, Provoking New Crisis.”

IRANIAN SCIENTIST TIED TO NUCLEAR PROGRAM ASSASSINATED; TEHRAN ALLEGES ISRAELI INVOLVEMENT

The tweet was quickly ridiculed, and human rights lawyer Arsen Ostrovsky responded, “NY Times, ‘Paper of Record’ for … the #Iran regime.”

Sen. Tom Cotton, R-Ark. — who caused chaos inside the paper earlier this year when he penned an op-ed that offended liberals — slammed the Times as propaganda.

BIDEN SECRETARY OF STATE PICK BLINKEN OPPOSED TERRORIST LABEL FOR IRAN’S REVOLUTIONARY GUARD

“What was once the self-styled newspaper of record is now just a well-funded left-wing blog, relentlessly hostile to America and Israel, and always ready to propagandize for their enemies,” Cotton wrote.

Journalist Shiri Moshe added, “Iranian officials also maintain that their regime doesn’t subjugate women or massacre political dissidents — is the NYT going to prominently and uncritically feature those lies in their coverage as well?”

Many others condemned the Times for the tweet:

Fakhrizadeh led Iran’s so-called “Amad,” or “Hope,” program, which Israel and the West described as a military operation to build a nuke. The U.N. atomic agency said the program ended in the early 2000s.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Fakhrizadeh’s death will be another major blow to the Tehran regime, which has struggled amid “maximum pressure” from the Trump administration and saw the U.S. leave the 2015 Iran nuclear deal and impose waves of sanctions on the Islamic dictatorship.

In January, the U.S. took out Iranian General Qassem Soleimani in a strike in what the Trump administration described as an act of self-defense against an “imminent” attack.

The Associated Press and Fox News’ Adam Shaw contributed to this report

Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/media/new-york-times-mocked-iranian-talking-point

J.J. Watt is giving back to his hometown community following a tragedy on Sunday.

The Arizona Cardinals defensive end will cover the funeral costs for the six people who died when a man drove a car into the crowd at a Christmas parade in Waukesha, Wis. Watt was born in Waukesha and also played college football at the University of Wisconsin.

Darrell Brooks Jr., 39, was behind the wheel of the SUV that sped through a parade route in Waukesha on Sunday. He was charged with five counts of first-degree intentional homicide on Tuesday, according to the Waukesha County District Attorney’s Office, and prosecutors will consider a sixth charge after a young boy died later at an area hospital.

Along with six deaths, 62 people were injured. 

Watt has given back to his communities before. The former Houston Texans star raised $41.6 million for Hurricane Harvey relief back in 2018, making it the largest crowd-sourced fundraiser in history.

Derek Watt, J.J.’s brother, also helped set up a community fund through the United Way and Waukesha County Community Foundation.

For anyone looking to assist the victims, check out the United for Waukesha Community Fund page here and additional resources compiled by WISN here.

Source Article from https://www.nbcchicago.com/news/sports/j-j-watt-to-cover-funeral-expenses-for-waukesha-parade-crash-victims/2693178/

Drop-off voting sites around the Twin Cities reported heavy turnout and in some cases long lines Saturday after the website Minnesotans use to track their absentee ballots experienced hardware problems.

A spokeswoman for Secretary of State Steve Simon said access to the public-facing tools were restored midmorning, after an apparent “hardware issue impacting the online tools for voters.” The problem also affected the Statewide Voter Registration System. By late afternoon, all systems were restored.

Spokeswoman Risikat Adesaogun said voters were still able to cast absentee ballots during the outage thanks to a backup process for administering ballots when the voter registration system is down.

The ballot tracking site, mnvotes.org/track, has seen an increase in interest as a record number of Minnesotans vote early this year.

Officials expected to see more Minnesotans drop off ballots or vote early in person this weekend following a federal court ruling leaving open challenges to the validity of mail-in ballots that arrive after Election Day, even if they are postmarked by Tuesday.

Given the uncertainty, state officials are now urging voters who have not submitted their absentee ballots to drop them off or vote in person.

Saturday’s problem created longer-than-normal wait times for voters dropping off ballots in some parts of the metro area, while hardly affecting voting in others.

At the Carver County government centers, voters had to wait from 1½ to four hours depending on what time they showed up, said Kendra Olson, the elections manager.

“We always have a high turnout before the election,” she said. “What was unusual was the long line,” she said, that got longer due to social distancing.

Normally, she said, election workers check whether a voter is preregistered against a computerized state list. The computer then generates a label with a bar code that is affixed to the absentee ballot application.

But with the glitch, names had to be checked by election workers against a master list that the county generated, and the information then was filled out by hand.

Voters had to wait up to an hour at the Hennepin County Government Center, said Ginny Gelms, the county’s elections manager. She said the county had a “virtual queue” for voters to wait, and they were sent a text when they were next in line so they did not have to stand in an actual physical line.

Once the state system came back up, labels were generated and put on envelopes to ensure that people don’t vote twice.

Andy Lokken, elections director for Dakota County, said waits at the county administration center in Hastings were no more than 20 minutes. Dakota County has 14 locations to vote, he said. That compares to two in Carver County.

Lokken said only three sites will be open in Dakota County on Sunday: Apple Valley, West St. Paul and Hastings. Election workers will spend part of the day catching up by generating labels from the state website to affix to outer envelopes containing ballots.

Source Article from https://www.startribune.com/minnesota-voter-site-experiencing-outages-just-days-before-election/572936182/

VICTIMS of the deadly condo collapse in Florida will receive at least $150million in compensation after a judge ruled a class action suit in their favor – and revealed all the rubble has been cleared from the site.

Those affected by the Champlain Towers building collapse in June will be paid millions of dollars first from insurance and then from the sale of the building’s property.

The cleared site of the condo collapse. Over $150 million will be paid out to families who were affected during the Surfside building collapseCredit: Twitter/Senator Jason Pizzo

Miami-Dade Circuit Judge Michael Hanzman ruled that any survivors, visitors and families of those who died in the Surfside building will be eligible for the funds.

Hanzman ruled that the owners of the original 12-story building will owe the families of at least 97 people who were killed in the collapse – and over 100 families whose apartments were left in the rubble.

The sum does not include funds that would be paid due to a growing number of lawsuits that have been filed since the June 24 collapse, where the building has stood for just 40 years.

All the suits are being filed into a single class-action lawsuit, Hanzman said.

“The court’s concern has always been the victims here,” he said. “Their rights will be protected.”

Attorney Michael Goldberg will act as a receiver to handle the building’s cash during a multi-agency investigation into the property.

RUBBLE CLEARED

Goldberg said the property is clear of debris and any rubble that is considered evidence will be sent to a warehouse in Miami.

The National Institute of Standards and Technology is leading the federal review of the case.

Attorneys and engineers are waiting until the institute grants them the okay to carry on with their own investigation as they await to go through 22 million tons of rubble.

“It may take years for their report to become public,” Goldberg said.

Since the collapse and subsequent rescue effort, only 95 of the 97 bodies have been identified.

The property, which is worth about $100 million, is being contested by residents and authorities alike.

Some would like the building to be rebuilt so they can move back onto the property.

Others want it to become a park and memorial for those who lost their lives.

“I personally would never set foot in a building. That’s a gravesite,” owner Raysa Rodriguez said during the hearing.

“I wake up in the middle of the night thinking of everyone who perished.”

Miami-Dade Circuit Judge Michael Hanzman ruled that the pending lawsuits will be filed into a single class action caseCredit: AP
Only 95 of the 97 bodies have been identifiedCredit: AP
Some would like the property turned into a memorial for those who lost their livesCredit: AFP

Source Article from https://www.the-sun.com/news/3326644/miami-condo-collapse-victims-150million-compensation/

The Florida man who mailed homemade bombs to leading Democrats and other critics of President Trump broke down in court on Thursday while pleading guilty to charges that may send him to prison for life.

“MAGA bomber” Cesar Sayoc, 57, claimed he never intended for the devices — which he packed with explosive powder from fireworks, fertilizer, pool chemicals and broken glass — to actually blow up and hurt anyone.

None of the crude pipe bombs detonated, but Sayoc admitted in Manhattan federal court that “I was aware of the risk” they would.

“In October 2018, I made devices that were designed to look like bombs and sent them in the US Mail,” he said softly, while reading from a prepared statement.

“I sent 16 devices to people around the country.”

Sayoc also listed his targets as financier George Soros, Hillary Clinton, former CIA Director Jonn Brennan, actor Robert DeNiro, former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, ex-President Barack Obama, Rep. Maxine Waters (D-Calif.), former Attorney General Eric Holder, Sen. Cory Booker (D-New Jersey), Sen. Kamala Harris (D-California), hedge-fund billionaire Tom Steyer and CNN.

“I also put pictures of the recipients with a red Xs over their faces inside the package,” the muscle-bound former stripper added.

Near the end of his statement, Sayoc’s voice choked up with emotion as his body shook and he scrunched up his face, apparently holding back tears.

“I am extremely sorry,” he said in a voice barely above a whisper.

He then pleaded guilty to 65 counts of use of a weapon of mass destruction, interstate transportation of an explosive device, conveying a threat through interstate commerce, illegal mailing of an explosive device and carrying an explosive during the commission of a felony.

Sayoc’s plea agreement says both the prosecution and defense agree that sentencing guidelines call for life in prison, plus 120 years, and a fine of up to $500,000.

But the deal lets either side argue for more or less time in the slammer at Sayoc’s scheduled Sept. 12 sentencing.

Sayoc was busted Oct. 26 outside an AutoZone store in Plantation, Fla., following the FBI’s discovery of his fingerprint on the package he sent to Waters.

The arrest came just four days after the first of his bombs was discovered at Soros’ Westchester County estate, and law-enforcement sources have told The Post that Sayoc had a target list with hundreds of more names on it.

At the time, Sayoc was living in a white van with its windows covered with pro-Trump images and messages, and others attacking the president’s critics — including ones that showed red crosshairs over Obama and Clinton.

The dashboard was also covered with baseball caps featuring American flag motifs and Trump’s signature “Make America Great Again” slogan.

Source Article from https://nypost.com/2019/03/21/maga-bomber-cesar-sayoc-breaks-down-as-he-pleads-guilty-faces-life-in-prison/

via press release:

NOTICIAS  TELEMUNDO  PRESENTS:

“MURIENDO POR CRUZAR,” AN INVESTIGATION INTO THE INCREASING NUMBER OF IMMIGRANT DEATHS ALONG THE BORDER, THIS SUNDAY, AUGUST 3 AT 6 P.M./5 C

Carmen Dominicci and Neida Sandoval present the Telemundo and The Weather Channel co-production

Miami – July 31, 2014 – Telemundo presents “Muriendo por Cruzar”, a documentary that investigates why increasing numbers of immigrants are dying while trying to cross the US-Mexican border near the city of Falfurrias, Texas, this Sunday, August 3 at 6PM/5 C.  The Telemundo and The Weather Channel co-production, presented by Noticias Telemundo journalists Carmen Dominicci and Neida Sandoval, reveals the obstacles immigrants face once they cross into US territory, including extreme weather conditions, as they try to evade the border patrol.  “Muriendo por Cruzar” is part of Noticias Telemundo’s special coverage of the crisis on the border and immigration reform.

 

“‘Muriendo por Cruzar’” dares to ask questions that reveal the actual conditions undocumented immigrants face as they try to start a new life in the United States,” said Alina Falcón, Telemundo’s Executive Vice President for News and Alternative Programming.  “Our collaboration with The Weather Channel was very productive. They have a unique expertise in covering the impact of weather on people’s lives, as we do in covering immigration reform and the border crisis. The result is a compelling documentary that exposes a harrowing reality.”

“Muriendo por Cruzar” is the first co-production by Telemundo and The Weather Channel.  Both networks are part of NBCUniversal.

Source Article from http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2014/07/31/noticias-telemundo-presents-muriendo-por-cruzar-this-sunday-august-3-at-6pm/289119/


House Financial Services Committee Chairwoman Maxine Waters said in a statement that the potential use of the U.S. financial system for illicit purposes was a “very serious concern.” | Zach Gibson/Getty Images

Financial Services

House Democrats on Monday issued a subpoena to the German lender Deutsche Bank seeking information on President Donald Trump’s finances, a major escalation of their investigation into his business dealings.

In addition to the Deutsche Bank subpoena, House Democrats subpoenaed other banks — including JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America and Citigroup — seeking information on Russian money laundering. The issuance of the subpoenas was first reported by The New York Times.

Story Continued Below

The House Intelligence and Financial Services committees, which authorized the subpoenas, were expected to issue additional subpoenas targeting Trump’s finances soon, Democratic aides said.

Democrats are ratcheting up their coordinated investigations into Trump’s business dealings as the Justice Department prepares to release findings from special counsel Robert Mueller’s probe on Thursday.

“As part of our oversight authority and authorized investigation into allegations of potential foreign influence on the U.S. political process, the House Intelligence Committee today issued subpoenas to multiple financial institutions in coordination with the House Financial Services Committee, including a friendly subpoena to Deutsche Bank, which has been cooperative with the Committees,” said Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), the House Intelligence chairman. “We look forward to their continued cooperation and compliance.”

The subpoenas are the latest example of House Democrats‘ crossing the “red line“ Trump has drawn when it comes to investigators looking into his finances and business transactions. Trump‘s attorneys have already started fighting back, warning the accounting firm Mazars USA that it should not comply with a House Oversight and Government Reform Committee subpoena seeking the president‘s financial records.

Deutsche Bank has long been a top target for Democrats. The bank lent Trump hundreds of millions of dollars over the years for property development, and it has also been under scrutiny for its role in Russian money laundering. Democrats have said they want to know whether Russia has had financial leverage over the president via Deutsche Bank and other loans.

Rep. Maxine Waters (D-Calif.), chairwoman of the Financial Services Committee, said in a statement Monday that the potential use of the U.S. financial system for illicit purposes was a “very serious concern.”

“The Financial Services Committee is exploring these matters, including as they may involve the President and his associates, as thoroughly as possible pursuant to its oversight authority, and will follow the facts wherever they may lead us,” she said.

Republicans — as expected — lashed out at the Democratic subpoenas, calling them part of “partisan fishing expeditions“ designed to hurt Trump and the GOP.

“My colleagues across the aisle continue to politicize the banking industry and set out on partisan fishing expeditions,“ said Rep. Patrick McHenry (N.C.), the top Republican on the Financial Services Committee. “All while ignoring the issues the American people need our committee to be focused on. Republicans have repeatedly expressed our desire to work in a bipartisan manner, but today‘s actions seem driven solely by a political agenda.“

Other financial institutions had been expecting Democrats to seek further information about their relationships with Deutsche Bank, a representative of another bank said.

Deutsche Bank in a statement said that it was “in a productive dialogue with the House Financial Services and Intelligence Committees.”

“We remain committed to providing appropriate information to all authorized investigations in a manner consistent with our legal obligations,” the bank said.

Source Article from https://www.politico.com/story/2019/04/15/democrats-subpoena-deutsche-bank-1277199

The offshore oil drilling platform ‘Gail,’ operated by Venoco, Inc., is shown off the coast of Santa Barbara, Calif. in 2009. A Trump administration plan to greatly expand offshore drilling is on hold after a setback in court.

Chris Carlson/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Chris Carlson/AP

The offshore oil drilling platform ‘Gail,’ operated by Venoco, Inc., is shown off the coast of Santa Barbara, Calif. in 2009. A Trump administration plan to greatly expand offshore drilling is on hold after a setback in court.

Chris Carlson/AP

The Trump administration is postponing controversial plans to greatly expand oil and gas drilling off of the nation’s coasts, following a recent setback in court and months of pushback from coastal communities.

Last month, a federal judge in Alaska ruled that President Trump exceeded his authority when he signed an executive order to lift an Obama-era ban on oil and gas drilling in parts of the Arctic and Atlantic oceans.

The decision immediately reinstated those protections, and was a major blow to the administration’s efforts to boost oil and gas development across the country.

While the Trump administration is expected to appeal the decision, a resolution could be a long ways off. That makes it uncertain where new oil leases may eventually be allowed.

In an interview with the Wall Street Journal, published Thursday, newly confirmed Interior Secretary David Bernhardt said that his agency may wait for the court process to play out before moving forward with plans to open up more than 90 percent of all federal waters to offshore oil and gas leasing.

“By the time the court rules, that may be discombobulating to our plan,” Bernhardt told the newspaper.

Last year, the Trump administration said it would move to allow offshore oil and gas leasing in nearly all of the nation’s coastal waters. The proposal was met with instant criticism from environmental groups and governors’ offices along the East and West coasts.

Even some Republican lawmakers joined in the backlash.

All had been waiting months for a new version of the plan, which had been expected anytime. But during his confirmation hearing last month, Bernhardt told lawmakers that the plan was still in its beginning stages.

His interview with the Wall Street Journal was his first since being confirmed as the nation’s top land steward, and appeared to put the proposal on indefinite hold.

“Given the recent court decision, the Department is simply evaluating all of its options to determine the best pathway to accomplish the mission entrusted to it by the President,” Interior spokeswoman Molly Block confirmed in an email.

The plan’s critics are celebrating the delay.

“This decision is the result of constant pressure from coastal communities, environmental groups, and elected official who made it abundantly clear that offshore oil and gas drilling is dangerous, unwanted, and a threat to our economy and way of life,” said Virginia Democratic Congressman Joe Cunningham in a statement.

Jacqueline Savitz, chief policy officer at Oceana, says that she is encouraged by the move, “but until the Trump plan is final, the President is positioned to open up our coasts at a moment’s notice.”

Source Article from https://www.npr.org/2019/04/25/717214683/trump-administration-puts-offshore-drilling-plan-on-hold-after-setback-in-court

Para comentar las noticias debes iniciar sesión con el usuario y contraseña elegidos al momento de registrarte.

Si no estas registrado todavia, puedes hacerlo ingresando a
Registro de Usuarios

No recuerdas tu contraseña? puedes acceder a Registro de Usuarios y solicitar que te la enviemos a tu email como recordatorio.

Source Article from http://www.elpais.com.uy/informacion/hay-alerta-amarilla-vientos-fuertes.html