Most Viewed Videos

La Policía tenía la sospecha que un depósito ubicado en Malvín Norte, en las inmediaciones de Iguá e Hipólito Yrigoyen, era utilizado para guardar armas, drogas, dinero y chalecos antibalas. Pero tenían que confirmarlo. El Juzgado Penal de 7° Turno libró una orden de allanamiento para que los investigadores ingresaran a la propiedad.

Se montó el operativo que terminó de confirmar la sospecha de las autoridades. Además fueron detenidas dos personas que quedaron a disposición judicial y se libró una orden de captura para un tercer sospechoso, informó la Unidad de Comunicación del Ministerio del Interior (Unicom).

En el depósito fueron incautados varios kilos de diferentes tipos de droga, cinco armas de fuego, un chaleco antibalas, cientos de proyectiles así como una importante suma de de dinero en pesos.

Lo incautado.

La Policía encontró cinco armas de fuego: tres revólveres calibre 22, 38 y 357, además de una pistola calibre 45 con la numeración limada y otra calibre 765 con numeración ilegible. También hallaron un chaleco antibalas color negro, sin numeración ni logo.

Junto a las armas había cientos de proyectiles vivos: 65 calibre 45, 124 calibre 9 milímetros, 155 calibre 22, 165 calibre 38 y 146 calibre 380.

En cuanto a las drogas, se incautaron 2231 gramos de cocaína en seis envoltorios, 1984 gramos de marihuana en cinco ladrillos, 1753 gramos de pasta base que estaba contenida en siete envoltorios y otros 332 gramos de la misma droga contenida en 827 envoltorios.

Finalmente la Policía encontró 158.000 pesos en billetes y 6.990 pesos en monedas de diferente nominación.

Source Article from http://www.elpais.com.uy/informacion/incautaron-armas-proyectiles-drogas-dinero.html

● The White House said President Trump’s earlier suggestion that he regretted escalating the trade war with China was “misintrepeted” and that what he regrets is not raising tariffs higher.

●Trump said North Korea has not violated any rules with recent missile tests, during meeting with Japanese Prime Minister Abe, who said the tests clearly violate U.N. Security Council resolutions.

●Trump said it is “certainly possible” he will invite Russian President Vladimir Putin to next year’s G-7 meeting in the United States, a move that would almost certainly be opposed by allies.

President Trump conceded regret about his escalating trade war with China Sunday morning before reversing course in the afternoon and saying he only wished he’d raised the tariffs higher.

It was a head spinning about-face after the president showed rare second thoughts on a key issue, even as White House officials said his comments had been “misinterpreted.”

“The president was asked if he had ‘any second thought on escalating the trade war with China.’ His answer has been greatly misinterpreted. President Trump responded in the affirmative — because he regrets not raising the tariffs higher,” press secretary Stephanie Grisham said.

Trump, who is acutely attuned to media coverage and public perception of his presidency, makes a usual practice of not ever apologizing or admitting that he was wrong — and prides being seen as “strong” above all, according to current and former administration officials. 

During a morning breakfast with British Prime Minister Boris Johnson, a reporter asked Trump if he had any “second thoughts” regarding his escalating trade war with China. Trump responded “yeah, sure. Why not.”

“Might as well,” he said. “Might as well. I have second thoughts about everything.”

Trump then claimed talks were going well with China and that he planned to back away from some of his recent threats, such as seeking to force companies to leave China. 

The comments drew immediate international attention because Trump had been so defiant with his unilateral decision to engage in a trade war with China.

The confusing change reflects Trump’s wildly shifting approach to China, which has had a major impact on the U.S. economy and could impact his reelection chances next year. But it was also part of a stark counter narrative Trump offered during the summit, as he presented a different version of private talks than virtually every one else attending. And those differences spilled into public view multiple times at the picturesque seaside summit. 

For example, Trump claimed to have not discussed a joint approach to Iran, even though French officials insisted an agreement had been reached between each of the leaders Saturday night. “I haven’t discussed that,” Trump said. “We will do our own outreach, but I can’t stop people from talking. If they want to talk they can talk.” Trump administration officials have previously criticized the French for talking to Iran.

He quipped to reporters that North Korea hadn’t violated any rules by launching missiles, only to be quickly corrected by Japanese leader Shinzo Abe.

“We’re in the world of missiles folks, whether you like it or not,” Trump said, adding he understands how Abe “feels that way.”

 “I’m not happy about it,” he said of North Korea’s launches, but continued to praise Kim Jong Un. 

He suggested that multiple foreign leaders had told him they agreed that Russia should be readmitted to the G-7, when Europeans have been adamant that Russia should remain ostracized and argued with Trump about it at a dinner Saturday evening. Trump declined to specify who had agreed with him. “I could but I don’t believe that’s necessary,” he said.

And he said his lunch Saturday with French President Emmanuel Macron was “the best hour and half I’ve ever spent with him.” But while they were having lunch by the sea, Trump administration officials were criticizing Macron and France to U.S. reporters, saying there was too much on “niche” issues like climate change and African development instead of on the global economy.

His shifting views on China were striking, though it is unclear what the vacillations will signify. In recent days, China has slapped new tariffs on U.S. goods, and Trump responded by jacking up tariff rates on more than $500 billion in Chinese products. These actions have rattled investors and stoked fears that a prolonged standoff could lead to a global recession.

Despite his brief expressions of regret earlier Sunday, Trump showed no willingness to reverse the tariffs. “I think they respect the trade war,” he said about his G-7 allies, who have urged against their escalation. “It has to happen.”

“I think they want to make a deal much more than I do,” Trump said before a breakfast with British Prime Minister Boris Johnson. Trump claimed negotiations with China were ongoing, but a few days ago he suggested that Chinese leader Xi Jinping was an “enemy” of the United States.

Still, his tactics with China appear to be shifting. On Friday, Trump had said “I hereby order” U.S. companies to prepare to stop doing business with China, a shocking statement that drew rebuke from a range of U.S. firms. When he was pressed on whether he actually had the power to make such a directive, Trump cited a 1977 law that — during an emergency — gives the president broad latitude to intervene.

In a reversal, Trump on Sunday said he had no plans to invoke this law, making it appear that he is also backing down from his push for companies to withdraw from China.

“I have no plans right now,” Trump said. “Actually we’re getting along very well with China right now.”

Trump did appear sensitive to the growing international anxiety about his showdown with China. He told reporters Sunday morning that so far no foreign leader had challenged him on his approach. Second later, Johnson did. 

“Just to register the faint, sheeplike note of our view on the trade war,” the British prime minister said, “we’re in favor of trade peace on the whole. We think that on the whole the U.K. has profited massively in the last 200 years from free trade.”

Other world leaders, including E.U. President Donald Tusk, have repeatedly urged a de-escalation of the trade tiffs.

Britain has long been a free trade superpower, and British diplomats complain as bitterly as their French and German peers about Trump’s tactics on China. But Johnson, who is mired in negotiations to pull his country out of the European Union, desperately wants a trade deal with Trump to bolster his own prospects at home.

It was a rare moment of a foreign leader challenging Trump’s tactics while sitting across the table from the U.S. president, delivered in the gentlest of forms.

At their first joint meeting — a dinner of regional Basque specialties — leaders had “constructive discussions” about Amazonian deforestation and Iran, according to a senior European official. But the conversation turned “rough and tumble” when it started on Trump’s desire to bring Russia back into the group next year.

Russia was kicked out in 2014 after it invaded Ukraine and annexed Crimea.

The other G-7 leaders have been deeply opposed to Trump’s effort to bring Russian President Vladimir Putin back to their table, saying it would reward bad behavior and give a green light to the annexation and ongoing war in eastern Ukraine.

Over dinner, Trump spent some time bashing former president Barack Obama about the decision to kick out Russia, repeating his public statements that Putin had only been kicked out because he outsmarted Obama, according to the official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss the private meeting.

In a clear sign that their differences were not resolved during the dinner, Trump told reporters on Sunday that it was “certainly possible” that he would invite Putin to the G-7 next year. The G-7 in 2020 is set to be held in the United States, giving Trump more power to decide who is invited.

Aides say Trump was hoping to refocus discussions on the economy and could even skip some of the sessions Macron has planned.

Trump has at times boasted that the U.S. economy is performing much better than other countries, and he has said there is a global recession that is harming most of the major nations except for the United States. Other leaders have countered that Trump’s trade war is causing global supply chains to seize up, and there is evidence the U.S. economy is slowing much more quickly than anticipated. 

Just in the past week, Trump has swung dramatically in his approach to the economy, saying he is contemplating tax cuts, then saying tax cuts aren’t needed, and then on Saturday saying he planned to pursue tax cuts in 2021. 

Trump’s attempt to create a sort of alternate version of the summit came as other world leaders, in public statements, described the global dynamic as being in a state of crisis. 

The G-7 countries include the United States, France, Britain, Germany, Italy, Japan, and Canada. The gatherings are typically capped off with a joint statement, known as a communique, that is meant to reflect the leaders’ shared values and goals.

Early Sunday morning, Trump remarked on his initial meetings at the summit by saying “Progress being made!” He spent considerable time attacking the news media — one of his most frequent activities whether he is home or abroad. 

“Such False and Inaccurate reporting thus far on the G-7. The Fake News knows this but they can’t help themselves!” Trump wrote.

It wasn’t immediately clear what his concerns were, and White House officials did not respond to a request for comment. 

Source Article from https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-for-first-time-signals-regret-china-trade-war-has-escalated/2019/08/25/c942ea78-c67a-11e9-b5e4-54aa56d5b7ce_story.html

\n”},ko=function(){var a=[],b=document.getElementsByTagName(“base”);if(b)for(var c=0,d=b.length;cw;w++){if(0\x3c/script>’,im(a,c,f,c))}b.I=!0;Wl();a.j||(a.ra[M(e[0])]=window.setTimeout(z(a.sb,a),F.getInstance().get(13)));lk(vo.getInstance(),Hg.Ha)},km=function(a,b,c,d){var e=””;d&&(e=e+’

Source Article from http://noticias.caracoltv.com/colombia/asi-amanece-manizales-tras-tragedia-provocada-por-deslizamientos

LIVE UPDATES

This is CNBC’s live blog tracking developments on the war in Ukraine. See below for the latest updates. 

It was a day of high-level meetings on Thursday, with an extraordinary NATO summit taking place in Brussels, as well as meetings of EU leaders and the G-7.

NATO committed extra troops along its eastern flank, with Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg telling CNBC ahead of the summit that Russian President Vladimir Putin had made “a big mistake.”

The U.K. and U.S. rolled out more sanctions against Russian elites and government officials, while the U.S. announced billions more in aid and said it would take up to 100,000 Ukraine refugees.

U.S. President Joe Biden sent Russian leader Vladimir Putin a stern warning, saying NATO would respond “in kind” if Russia uses chemical or biological weapons in Ukraine.

Ukraine strikes ‘high value’ logistics targets

The Ukrainian military has launched strikes against “high value targets in Russian-occupied areas of Ukraine,” including ammunition depots and a landing ship, the U.K. Ministry of Defence said on Thursday evening.

In its latest intelligence update, the ministry said it expects Ukrainians to continue targeting logistics-related targets held by Russian invaders.

“This will force the Russian military to priortise the defence of their supply chain and deprive them of much needed resupply for forces,” the Defence Ministry said.

Ukrainian officials said on Thursday that they sank the Orsk, a large Russian amphibious vessel, off Berdyansk, Ukraine, earlier this week.

Russian military authorities had expected the Orsk to boost their logistics capabilities in the Berdyansk port, according to comments from an officer of the Russian Black Sea Fleet which were translated by NBC News.

Berdyansk is about 40 miles (64 km) west of the Black Sea city of Mariupol, which Russians are destroying with artillery.

A Russian embassy contacted for comment did not immediately respond to CNBC.

Moscow’s inability to adequately resupply its troops, combined with fierce Ukrainian resistance, have largely brought Russian advances to a halt in the month-old war.

— Ted Kemp

Humanitarian crisis grows for thousands trapped in Mariupol

People stand in a long queue during the distribution of humanitarian aid near a damaged store of wholesaler Metro in the besieged southern port city of Mariupol, Ukraine.

Reuters

Ukraine to feature heavily in Blinken travel to Middle East, North Africa

U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken will travel to the Middle East and North Africa starting on Saturday in a trip that will be heavily dominated by discussion of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

Blinken is set to visit Israel, the West Bank, Morocco, and Algeria from Saturday to Wednesday, the State Department announced on Thursday, in a trip that will focus on Iran and the conflict in Ukraine.

“Both of those are going to be really at the top of the agenda,” top U.S. diplomat for Near Eastern affairs Yael Lempert told reporters.

Lempert said that Blinken will discuss Israel’s role as mediator between Russia and Ukraine during his visit over the weekend.

— Reuters

Biden says U.S. would ‘respond’ to Russia if Putin uses chemical or biological weapons

U.S. President Joe Biden said NATO would respond “in kind” if Russia uses weapons of mass destruction in Ukraine.

“We will respond if he uses it,” Biden said, referring to Russian President Vladimir Putin. “The nature of the response depends on the nature of the use.”

The president spoke after a marathon of summit meetings with the European Union, G-7 partners and NATO allies.

Biden also said he would support an effort to expel Russia from the G-20 group of economies.

— Christina Wilkie

At least 977 killed and 1,549 injured in Ukraine, UN says

Russian forces have killed at least 977 civilians since it began its invasion of Ukraine, according to the United Nations.

At least an additional 1,594 people have been injured, including 64 children, from Feb. 24 through March 22, the Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights said.

The majority of deaths recorded have been caused by the use of explosive weapons with a “wide impact area,” the office said. That includes shelling from heavy artillery and airstrikes.

The agency said it believes the actual number of casualties are “considerably higher,” since information from areas with intense fighting is delayed and some reports are being corroborated.

– Amanda Macias

EU leaders send a message to China to stop Putin

EU leaders had one message for Beijing as they gathered in Brussels to discuss new sanctions against Russia: Stop President Vladimir Putin.

Speaking to CNBC Thursday, Italy’s Prime Minister Mario Draghi said: “China is [the] most important country, they can be crucial in the peace process, they have lots of leverage, a lot of leverage, and so we are all waiting.”

Latvia’s Prime Minister Arturs Karins also told CNBC: “China has a choice, it’s rather a simple choice: put your lot in with Russia — that is waging war against Ukraine, bombing women, children, hospitals — or find a way to work with Europe, with the U.S. and with western democracies.”

Finland’s Prime Minister Sanna Marin also called China a “major player” and said the European Union had to make sure “China is on the right side of history with this war.”

Read the story here.

— Matt Clinch

UN calls for an immediate end to war, blames Russia for humanitarian crisis

The United Nations General Assembly, in a two-day emergency meeting, adopted a resolution that formally blames Russia for causing the humanitarian crisis in Ukraine and calls for a peaceful and immediate end to the war.

France and Mexico proposed the resolution which was supported by dozens of other UN member states. Russia created its own humanitarian proposal which the U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations described as a “flimsy fabrication.”

“It really is unconscionable that Russia would have the audacity to put forward a resolution asking the international community to solve a humanitarian crisis that Russia alone created,” U.S. Ambassador to the UN Linda Thomas-Greenfield said.

The adopted resolution, “Deplores in the strongest terms the aggression by the Russian Federation against Ukraine” and “urges the immediate peaceful resolution of the conflict.”

– Amanda Macias

‘We are entering an unprecedented food crisis,’ Macron warns

French President Emmanuel Macron urged the G-7 heads of state to invest in ways to alleviate the mounting food crisis triggered by Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

“We are entering an unprecedented food crisis,” Macron told G-7 leaders in Brussels, adding that it should be an “imperative that Russia doesn’t create a famine.”

The war “makes countries have difficulty getting supplies of wheat and more generally cereals,” Macron said. He noted that Russian and Ukraine are two of the world’s largest cereal producers.

Earlier in the day, U.S. President Joe Biden met with Macron on the sidelines of the NATO leaders’ meeting. The two discussed ways to continue holding Russia accountable, as well as additional ways to support the Ukrainian government, according to a White House readout of the meeting.

– Amanda Macias

U.S. makes plans in case Russia uses chemical, nuclear weapons

The White House has set up a team of experts to plan how the United States could respond should Russia use weapons of mass destruction – chemical, biological or nuclear – during its invasion of Ukraine, senior administration officials said on Thursday.

Russia has repeatedly raised the prospect of using nuclear weapons as it struggles to overcome Ukraine’s military during the month-old war that the Russian government calls a “special operation.” This week, the Kremlin said such weapons would only be used in the case of an “existential threat.”

U.S. officials have warned that Russia’s accusations that Ukraine might use chemical weapons are a lie, and also an indication Moscow may resort to their use, given past precedent.

The White House National Security Council sent an internal memo to agencies on Feb. 28 to create a strategy group to examine major geopolitical shifts that are occurring as a result of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, officials said. A second group, known internally as the “Tiger Team,” is looking at what the next three months look like.

— Reuters

NATO boosts defenses in Europe, says it faces ‘gravest threat’ to its security in decades

NATO said it will strengthen its defenses in Europe in the face of Russia’s continuing aggression toward Ukraine.

NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg said the organization has collectively agreed to reinforce its defense capabilities in the region following an extraordinary summit of the military alliance in Brussels earlier Thursday.

“Today NATO leaders agreed to reset our deterrents and defense for the longer term to face a new security reality. On land, we will have substantially more forces in the eastern part of the alliance at higher readiness, with more pre-positioned equipment and supplies,” he said.

“In the air, we will deploy more jets and strengthen our integrated air and missile defense. At sea, we will have carrier strike groups, submarines and significant numbers of combat ships on a persistent basis,” he added, with members also set to strengthen their cyber defenses.

Holly Ellyatt

Ukraine says it sank Russian warship Orsk

Ukrainian authorities said they destroyed a Russian warship that entered the port of Berdyansk earlier this week.

“In the temporarily occupied Berdyansk, our soldiers destroyed a large Russian landing ship, the Orsk, and damaged a number of other ships,” said Anrdii Yermak, head of the office of the president of Ukraine, in comments translated by NBC News.

The ship was used to deliver military equipment, including tanks, weapons, ammunition and humanitarian supplies, according to the Russian Federation.

“The arrival of a large amphibious ship in the port of Berdyansk is a truly epoch-making event that opens up opportunities for the Black Sea Fleet in logistical matters, to use the infrastructure of the port of Berdyansk in full,” one of the officers of the Black Sea Fleet of the Russian Federation said in a statement announcing the ship’s arrival that was translated by NBC. The ship “will go to strengthen our group operating in the direction indicated by the higher command.”

— Dawn Kopecki

 

Stoltenberg extends term at NATO as Russia’s war wages on

NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg will extend his term as head of the alliance for one more year.

Stoltenberg’s term, which was set to expire in September, comes as the world’s most powerful military alliance works to end Russia’s war in Ukraine.

“Honoured by the decision of #NATO Heads of State and Government to extend my term as Secretary General until 30 September 2023,” Stoltenberg wrote in a tweet.

“As we face the biggest security crisis in a generation, we stand united to keep our alliance strong and our people safe,” he said.

White House national security adviser Jake Sullivan told reporters on Air Force One that President Joe Biden thinks “very highly of Secretary General Stoltenberg.”

– Amanda Macias

NATO calls on China to ‘join the rest of the world and clearly condemn the brutal war’

The leaders of the 30-member NATO alliance called on China to “uphold the international order” and abstain from supporting Russia’s war effort in any way.

“Our message to China is that they should join the rest of the world and clearly condemn the brutal war against Ukraine,” NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg said during a press conference following the leaders’ meeting.

In a joint statement, NATO leaders said they were “concerned by recent public comments by PRC officials and call on China to cease amplifying the Kremlin’s false narratives, in particular on the war and on NATO.”

A senior administration official, who declined to be named in order to share details of the NATO meeting, said China was a big topic among allies. The official said that there was “a recognition that China needs to live up to its responsibilities within the international community as a UN Security Council member,” the official said.

“We need to continue to call on China not to support Russia and its aggression against Ukraine, and that we need China to call for a peaceful end to the conflict as a responsible member of the international community,” the official added.

– Amanda Macias

NATO Secretary-General Stoltenberg briefs press following extraordinary meeting

NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg briefs the press following the organization’s extraordinary meeting in Brussels.

He said NATO was sending more troops on the ground as well as committing more naval and air warfare capabilities to Ukraine.

“It’s a new reality, it’s a new normal,” he said, adding that the alliance is making military plans to respond to a potential long-term threat from Russia.

— Dawn Kopecki

Zelenskyy calls on NATO for more swift military support

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy urged NATO leaders to supply his besieged country with more weaponry as the Russian invasion in Ukraine entered its second month.

“Ukraine does not have powerful air defense system, we have far less aviation than Russians do,” Zelenskyy said in a virtual address. “I ask you to reassess your positions and think about security in Europe and in the whole world. You can give us just 1% of all of your airplanes, just 1% of your tanks,” he added.

A senior Biden administration official, who declined to be named in order to speak about the NATO meeting, said Zelenskyy’s message was “very much focused on the efforts of the Ukraine military and people to defend their country.”

The official said that the Ukrainian leader did not request a no-fly zone nor did he request NATO membership as he has previously done.

– Amanda Macias

U.S. set to announce plans to welcome up to 100,000 Ukrainians

President Joe Biden is slated to announce plans of welcoming up to 100,000 Ukrainians and others fleeing the war in Ukraine, a source familiar with the matter confirmed to NBC News.

The admissions would be facilitated through a range of pathways, including through the U.S. Refugee Admissions Program as well as nonimmigrant and immigrant visas. The source said that additional details are expected to be announced in the next few weeks.

Since Russia’s Feb. 24 invasion of Ukraine, more than 3.6 million people have fled the country with more than 2 million fleeing to Poland.

– Amanda Macias

Ukraine’s Zelenskyy claims Russia has used phosphorus bombs in Ukraine

Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelenskyy claimed, during a speech to NATO members today, that Russia has used phosphorus bombs in an attack.

“This morning we had phosphorus bombs from Russia, people were killed, children were killed,” Zelenskyy said during an address via videolink to the NATO summit taking place in Brussels.

Separately, early on Thursday, the governor of the eastern Luhansk region claimed that four people had been killed after shelling and the use of phosphorus. The governor attached stills and a video, which have not been verified, that he claimed show buildings destroyed in the attack.  

It has not been possible to independently verify the claims made by Zelenskyy and the governor of Luhansk. Zelenskyy provided no evidence in his address.

On Wednesday, the Pentagon was unable to confirm the use of phosphorous when contacted by NBC’s Dan DeLuce.

Zelenskiy also appealed to NATO leaders on Thursday to increase military support for the country.

Russia “wants to go further. Against eastern members of NATO. The Baltic states. Poland for sure,” Zelenskiy said in a pre-recorded video address to the NATO summit, Reuters reported.

“NATO has yet to show what the alliance can do to save people,” he said.

Holly Ellyatt

Russian market partially reopens after monthlong shutdown

Russia’s stocks moved sharply after the market partially reopened for limited trading after its longest shutdown since the fall of the Soviet Union.

The Moscow Exchange resumed trading in 33 Russian equities, including some of its biggest names like Gazprom and Sberbank, between 10 a.m. and 2 p.m. Moscow time (3 a.m. and 7 a.m. ET) following an announcement from the Central Bank of Russia on Wednesday. The MOEX Russia Index was up more than 5% by around 1 p.m. Moscow time, having pared earlier gains of more than 10%.

Short-selling on stocks will be banned, however, and foreign investors will not be able to sell stocks or OFZ ruble bonds until April 1.

The country’s stock exchange had been closed since Feb. 25 as Russian assets plunged across the board following the country’s invasion of Ukraine and in anticipation of the punishing international sanctions.

– Elliot Smith

The UK has now sanctioned more than 1,000 Russian banks, businesses and people

The U.K. has announced 65 new Russian sanctions today targeting a range of key strategic industries and individuals that are supporting Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

The sanctions have targeted Russian Railways and defense company Kronshtadt, the main producer of Russian drones, as well as the Wagner Group — the organization of Russian mercenaries reportedly tasked with assassinating Ukrainian President Zelenskyy, the U.K.’s Foreign Office said in a statement Thursday.

Six more banks are being targeted too, including Alfa Bank whose co-founders include previously sanctioned oligarchs Mikhail Fridman, Petr Aven and German Khan, and the world’s largest diamond producer Alrosa.

Sanctioned individuals include the billionaire oil tycoon Eugene Shvidler as well as the founder of Tinkoff bank Oleg Tinkov. In addition, Herman Gref, the chief executive of Russia’s largest bank Sberbank, and Polina Kovaleva, Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov’s step daughter have also been sanctioned.

Galina Danilchenko, who was installed by Russia as the “mayor” of Ukraine’s Melitopol is also sanctioned — the first time an individual has been sanctioned for collaboration with Russian forces currently in Ukraine.

The U.K. has now sanctioned over 1,000 individuals and businesses under the Russia sanctions regime since the invasion, the foreign office said.

Holly Ellyatt

President Putin has made a ‘big mistake’ invading Ukraine, NATO chief says

President Putin has made “a big mistake” in invading Ukraine, NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg said ahead of an extraordinary meeting of the transatlantic military alliance in Brussels.

“President Putin has made a big mistake and that is to launch a war, to wage a war, against an independent sovereign nation,” he told CNBC’s Hadley Gamble on Thursday.

Speaking further to the press, Stoltenberg said the meeting was taking place as leaders faced “the most serious security crisis in a generation.”

He said leaders would address this crisis and its implications “for Ukraine, for NATO and for the whole international rules-based order.”

Stoltenberg said NATO has increased its military presence in the eastern part of the alliance and today will “address the need for a reset of our deterrence and defense in the longer term.”

“The first step is the establishment of four new battlegroups in the eastern part of the Alliance in Bulgaria, Romania, Hungary and Slovakia,” he said, saying NATO members need to invest more in defense.

Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelensky is due to address NATO leaders today.

Holly Ellyatt

Putin’s invasion is seen as his biggest ever mistake — and will harm Russia for years

Russian President Vladimir Putin has been in power for more than two decades and during that time has carefully cultivated an image of himself as a tough, strongman leader, fighting for Russia’s interests and reinstating the country as a geopolitical and economic superpower.

With his decision to invade neighboring Ukraine, however, analysts say Putin has made the biggest mistake of his political career and has weakened Russia for years to come.

The country and its strongman leader are now pariahs on the global stage, and Russia’s economy is facing more pain with further sanctions to be discussed by world leaders meeting today.

The Institute of International Finance has said it expects Russia’s economy to contract by 15% in 2022, driven by both official sanctions and the “self-sanctioning” of foreign companies that have pulled out of Russia.

Predicting a further economic decline of 3% in 2023, the IIF said Wednesday that the war “will wipe out fifteen years of economic growth.”

Holly Ellyatt

Quad looks past India’s refusal to condemn invasion

One month into the war in Ukraine, the liberal, democratic West is aggressively wooing India, curiously willing to look past its “neutral” stance on Russia’s invasion. 

Over the past week, India’s partners in the Quadrilateral Security Dialogue (Quad) — the United States, Australia and Japan — have come calling on New Delhi, in-person and virtually. 

Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida, Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison and U.S. State Department officials met Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and other senior Indian officials, discussing bilateral and Indo-Pacific issues while skipping mention of India’s refusal to condemn Russia’s attack. 

India has so far abstained on four United Nations resolutions related to the Ukraine war. But the latest — an abstention on a Russian-sponsored vote on Wednesday — was the first attempt by the country to align itself with broader international opinion against the Ukraine invasion. Only China and Russia voted in favor of the resolution that referred to a “humanitarian crisis” while making no mention of an invasion. It failed to pass.

The war is creating interesting geopolitical options for India, a democracy with a cultural and political affinity to the West. At the same time, it also has decades-old ties with Russia on whom it depends for most of its arms supplies. The West has been more understanding of India’s predicament.

— Ravi Buddhavarapu

Leaders set for NATO, EU and G-7 meetings focused on Ukraine

The war in Ukraine is top of the agenda as leaders from the world’s most advanced nations prepare to meet on Thursday.

There are three key meetings ahead with an extraordinary NATO summit taking place in Brussels, as well as meetings of EU leaders and the Group of Seven (G-7).

U.S. President Joe Biden is attending the meetings and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy is expected to address the NATO summit via videolink.

NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg said the alliance is expected to commit to “major increases” in the number of troops it has along its eastern flank. Additional arms and humanitarian assistance for Ukraine is also expected to be on the agenda.

Possible extra sanctions on Russia will be discussed when President Biden meets his EU counterparts at a session of the European Council.

Holly Ellyatt

Russian forces halt advance on Kyiv, establish defensive positions instead, Pentagon says

Russian forces are beginning to set up defensive positions about 10 to 12 miles away from Kyiv’s city center, according to a senior U.S. Defense official.

The official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to share details from the Pentagon’s ongoing assessment of the war, said that Russians have been largely stalled outside of Kyiv for weeks now.

“We are starting to see now that they are basically digging in and they are establishing defensive positions,” the official said of Russian forces.

“So it’s not that they’re not advancing, they’re actually not trying to advance right now,” the official said, adding that Russian troops do not appear to continue an advance on Kyiv anytime soon.

– Amanda Macias

Ukrainian forces make counterattacks near Kyiv, may have regained ground

Ukrainian defenders in the vicinity of Kyiv are mounting successful counterattacks near the capital and appear to be retaking lost ground, the British Defence Ministry said Wednesday night, though reports from the area partially contradicted those claims.

The ministry said in an intelligence update that Ukraine is bringing “increasing pressure” northeast of Kyiv, where a long-stalled advance by Russian troops has left them facing “considerable supply and morale issues.”

Ukrainian forces have probably retaken the towns of Makariv and Moschun, said the ministry.

Moschun is close to Kyiv and due north, while Makariv is about 20 miles (32 km) due west of the capital.

The Ukrainian government first claimed to have retaken Makariv on Tuesday. Journalists from the Washington Post who were in the vicinity reported on Wednesday evening that Ukrainian soldiers were in the town, but it was still being struck by Russian artillery.

The U.K. ministry added that there is “a realistic possibility that Ukrainian forces are now able to encircle Russian units in Bucha and Irpin.” Both of those towns border Kyiv’s western city limits.

CNBC was unable to independently corroborate the ministry’s claims. The situation on the ground in Ukraine is fluid and often impossible to verify.

“It is likely that successful counter attacks by Ukraine will disrupt the ability of Russian forces to reorganise and resume their own offensive towards Kyiv,” the Defence Ministry said.

— Ted Kemp

Russia to expel more U.S. diplomats, State says

The Kremlin has informed U.S. officials that more American diplomats will be ordered to leave Russia, a State Department spokesman said.

“The U.S. Embassy received a list of diplomats declared ‘persona non grata’ from the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs on March 23,” a spokesperson wrote in an evening statement.

“This is Russia’s latest unhelpful and unproductive step in our bilateral relationship. We call on the Russian government to end its unjustified expulsions of U.S. diplomats and staff. Now more than ever, it is critical that our countries have the necessary diplomatic personnel in place to facilitate communication between our governments,” the spokesperson wrote.

Earlier in the week, the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs told U.S. Ambassador John Sullivan in Moscow that relations between Washington and Moscow were on the “verge of rupture.

Biden has previously called Russian leader Vladimir Putin a war criminal for his attacks on Ukraine. It was the first time Biden had publicly branded the Russian leader with that phrase.

– Amanda Macias

UK set to announce arms package of 6,000 missiles and an additional $528 million for Ukraine

Prime Minister Boris Johnson is slated to announce a major new arms package for Ukraine at the NATO and G7 leaders’ meetings on Thursday.

The UK will provide Ukraine with 6,000 missiles, including anti-tank and high explosive weapons as well as $33 million or £25 million in financial backing.

“This more than doubles the defensive lethal aid provided to date to more than 10,000 missiles and comes on top of the £400 million ($528 million) the UK has committed in humanitarian and economic aid for the crisis,” 10 Downing Street wrote in a statement announcing the measure.

The UK has sent more than 4,000 anti-tank weapons to Ukraine’s armed forces, including Javelin missiles and Starstreak high-velocity anti-air missiles to help defend against aerial bombings.

Additionally, Johnson is committing $5.4 million or £4.1 million to the BBC World Service in order to help tackle Russian disinformation. Johnson is also expected to announce some financial support for the International Criminal Court’s investigation into war crimes.

– Amanda Macias

Read CNBC’s previous live coverage here

NATO to OK ‘major increases’ of troops; Ukraine appears to be retaking ground near Kyiv

Source Article from https://www.cnbc.com/2022/03/24/-russia-ukraine-live-updates.html

The heart-rending image of a Salvadoran father and his young daughter who drowned crossing the Rio Grande on their way to the U.S. highlighted the human cost of the humanitarian crisis at the border.

The image, taken Monday by Julia Le Duc and published by Mexican newspaper La Jornada, showed the young daughter of Óscar Alberto Martínez Ramírez wrapped in his shirt and clinging to his neck.

Martínez Ramírez was reportedly frustrated because his Salvadoran family was unable to immediately present themselves to U.S. authorities as they sought asylum, leading him to risk the dangerous river-crossing with his family.

Between the Sonoran Desert, which boasts regular temperatures over 100 degrees Fahrenheit, and a fast-moving Rio Grande river, the 2,000-mile U.S.-Mexico border is an often fatal crossing between ports of entry.

A total of 283 migrant deaths were recorded last year, according to the Associated Press. The toll for 2019 has yet to be released.

The bodies of Salvadoran migrant Oscar Alberto Martínez Ramírez and his nearly 2-year-old daughter Valeria lie on the bank of the Rio Grande in Matamoros, Mexico.

“Very regrettable that this would happen,” Mexican President Andrés Manuel López Obrador said Tuesday, responding to a question about the photograph. “We have always denounced that as there is more rejection in the United States, there are people who lose their lives in the desert or crossing [the river.]”

Last week, a shelter director noted how long waits were for those seeking asylum to meet with U.S. officials and have their cases heard, saying that there were only 40-45 cases heard per week in Matamoros. Meanwhile, anywhere from 800-1,700 names are on the waiting list.

“With greater crackdowns and restrictions,” said Cris Ramón, senior immigration policy analyst at the Bipartisan Policy Center think tank in Washington, “we could see more desperate measures by people trying to enter Mexico or the U.S.”

Source Article from https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/searing-photo-of-dead-toddler-with-arm-around-her-fathers-neck-after-both-drowned-in-rio-grande-highlights-perils-of-border-crossing

Una ola de calor en India provocó la muerte de más de 1.100 personas esta semana, con temperaturas que se situaron por encima de los 47 grados centígrados.

La mayoría de los muertos son personas mayores o trabajadores que dijeron no tener más opción que seguir con sus labores y sufrieron insolación o deshidratación.

Lea también: Más de 1.000 muertos por ola de calor en India

El servicio de meteorología de India advirtió que las temperaturas extremas continuarán al menos hasta el 2 de junio.

Vea cómo los pobladores en ciudades y zonas rurales intentan sobrevivir en condiciones extaordinarias.


Todo sirve para protegerse del calor. Rostros cubiertos como el de esta joven se han vuelto comunes esta semana en India.


Hasta el asfalto se derritió en las calles de Delhi. La mayoría de las muertes fue en en sur del país, en los estados de Andhra Pradesh y Telangana. Sólo en Andhra Pradesh fallecieron cerca de 900 personas.


Los vendedores callejeros evitan el sol siempre que se pueda. Mayo y junio son los meses más calurosos en India, con temperaturas que superan los 40 grados. Pero los meteorólogos dicen que el número de días con temperaturas cercanas y superiores a 45 grados se incrementó en los últimos 15 años.


Un negocio floreciente esta semana. Se espera que la llegada inminente de las lluvias del monzón lleve a una leve reducción de la temperatura.


Visitantes afortunados al parque de diversiones de nieve en la ciudad de Ahmedabad, en el oeste del país


Es difícil resistir el letargo provocado por el calor. El gobierno hizo un llamado a la población para que beba más agua y evite el sol directo si es posible.


Pescadores en un lago que se seca gradualmente. Para estos trabajadores que deben ganarse la vida y alimentar a sus familias, descansar no es una opción. Los animales también están muriendo y en las ciudades hasta los murciélagos caen dede las ramas de los árboles.


Muchos debieron ser asistidos por deshidratación. El gobierno canceló las licencias de los médicos y anunció compensaciones de poco más de US$1.500 para las familias de los fallecidos.


Quienes pueden compran equipos de aire acondicionado, aunque hubo numerosos cortes de electricidad por el aumento en la demanda.


No todos tienen la resistencia de estos niños. Una mujer dijo a la prensa: “Nada sirve para aliviar al agobio. Hoy me bañé más de 10 veces pero el calor es insoportable”.

Source Article from http://www.bbc.co.uk/mundo/noticias/2015/05/150528_galeria_india_calor_am

Democrats say President Trump has inflamed racial tensions and — in the words of rival Joe Biden on Monday — “fomented” violence through his comments and rhetoric amid the ongoing unrest in cities across the country.

But some Democrats and critics of Trump also have a history of encouraging supporters to be confrontational with counter-protesters and even local law enforcement.

The most memorable example is that of Rep. Maxine Waters, D-Calif., who in the summer of 2018 urged people to “absolutely harass” members of Trump’s staff when they’re spotted in public.

Speaking on MSNBC at the time, the California congresswoman said administration officials who defend Trump “know what they’re doing is wrong” and said they soon won’t be able to peacefully appear in public without being harassed.

BIDEN CONDEMNS RIOTING, BLASTS TRUMP’S RESPONSE IN FIERY POST-CONVENTION SPEECH

“They’re not going to be able to go to a restaurant, they’re not going to be able to stop at a gas station, they’re not going to be able to shop at a department store,” Waters said. “The people are going to turn on them, they’re going to protest, they’re going to absolutely harass them.”

Waters told supporters at a rally in Los Angeles that she wanted “history to record that we stood up, that we pushed back, that we fought that we did not consider ourselves victims of this president.” She called on people to “create a crowd” and “push back.”

The comments from Waters came as some key members of Trump’s administration were harassed while in public, amid controversy over separations of migrant families.

Former Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen was confronted by an angry mob at a Mexican restaurant in Washington and later was taunted outside her townhouse in Virginia. Then-White House press secretary Sarah Sanders was also asked to leave a restaurant in Virginia after the co-owner said it “has certain standards that I feel it has to uphold, such as honesty, and compassion, and cooperation.”

Waters’ comments, however, did draw criticism from now-House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif.

“In the crucial months ahead, we must strive to make America beautiful again,” Pelosi, then the House minority leader, tweeted alongside a link to a story about Waters’ comments. “Trump’s daily lack of civility has provoked responses that are predictable but unacceptable.”

More recently, Rep. Ayanna Pressley, D-Mass., another Democratic lawmaker, has called for “unrest in the streets” over both racial injustice and Trump and his political allies turning a “deaf ear” to Americans’ concerns, including those about the “dismantling” of the U.S. Postal Service.

AYANNA PRESSLEY CALLS FOR ‘UNREST IN THE STREETS’ OVER TRUMP-ALLIED POLITICIANS IGNORING AMERICANS’ CONCERNS

“This is as much about public outcry, organizing and mobilizing and applying pressure,” Pressley said on MSNBC’s “AM Joy” earlier this month, after mentioning steps Democratic lawmakers can take, “so that this GOP-led Senate and these governors that continue to carry water for this administration, putting American people in harm’s way, turning a deaf ear to the needs of our families and our communities – hold them accountable.”

“Make the phone calls, send the emails, show up,” she continued. “You know, there needs to be unrest in the streets for as long as there’s unrest in our lives.”

Pressley also called on Postmaster General Louis DeJoy, whom the Postal Service Board of Governors appointed in May, to resign for “corruption” over his restructuring of the Postal Service.

Protesters gathered outside DeJoy’s home in mid-August amid concerns that Postal Service changes could make mail-in voting more difficult and disenfranchise voters, Washington’s WUSA-TV reported.

FATAL PORTLAND SHOOTING WITNESS: ‘APPALLED’ BY ‘PEOPLE IN THE STREET CELEBRATING’ VICTIM’S DEATH

It’s not just Democrats in Congress who have encouraged more active unrest: Local officials and even television personalities have voiced their support for the turbulence gripping some American cities.

CNN anchor Chris Cuomo — the brother of New York Democratic Gov. Andrew Cuomo — questioned in June why people expect protests to be “polite and peaceful.”

“Please, show me where it says that protests are supposed to be polite and peaceful,” he said. “Because I can show you that outraged citizens are what made the country what she is and led to any major milestone. To be honest, this is not a tranquil time.”

Cuomo’s comments came as cities across the country saw widespread protests following the death of George Floyd, a Black man who died while in Minneapolis police custody.

Following the death of another Black man, Freddie Gray, in 2015 while in Baltimore police custody, then-Mayor Stephanie Rawlings-Blake was heavily criticized for a comment she made about giving protesters “who wished to destroy space to do that.”

“I’ve made it very clear that I work with the police and instructed them to do everything they could to make sure that the protesters were able to exercise their right to free speech,” Rawlings-Blake said

She added: “It’s a very delicate balancing act because while we try to make sure that they were protected from the cars and the other things that were going on, we also gave those who wished to destroy space to do that as well, and we work very hard to keep that balance and to put ourselves in the best position to de-escalate.”

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

After a swift backlash, Rawlings-Blake tried to clarify her comments and blamed the media for misconstruing her meaning.

“I did not instruct police to give space to protesters who were seeking to create violence or destruction of property,” she clarified. “Taken in context, I explained that, in giving peaceful demonstrators room to share their message, unfortunately, those who were seeking to incite violence also had space to operate.”

While Democrats have not been as quick to criticize their fellow party members amid the current unrest following the death of Floyd and the shooting of Jacob Blake in Kenosha, Wis., Biden has openly condemned the violence that engulfed Portland over the weekend. One person was shot and killed late Saturday in the city, as a large caravan of Trump supporters and Black Lives Matter protesters clashed in the streets.

“The deadly violence we saw overnight in Portland is unacceptable. Shooting in the streets of a great American city is unacceptable. I condemn this violence unequivocally. I condemn violence of every kind by anyone, whether on the left or the right,” Biden said over the weekend.

“And I challenge Donald Trump to do the same. It does not matter if you find the political views of your opponents abhorrent, any loss of life is a tragedy,” Biden added. “We must not become a country at war with ourselves. A country that accepts the killing of fellow Americans who do not agree with you. A country that vows vengeance toward one another. But that is the America that President Trump wants us to be, the America he believes we are.”

On Monday, Biden again challenged Trump, saying, “This president long ago forfeited any moral leadership in this country. He can’t stop the violence – because for years he has fomented it … fires are burning and we have a president who fans the flames rather than fighting the flames.”

Fox News’ Paul Steinhauser, Nicole Darrah and Brie Stimson contributed to this report.

Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/politics/biden-trump-history-confrontation

“There is language being used to describe Israel that is heading us on a path to arguments about delegitimization, that Israel should not exist, that the issue is that it exists,” said Rubin, executive director of the American Jewish Congress. “Words are being used about Israel that are incredibly unsettling to the Jewish community that go further, and in a direction that makes the community feel very vulnerable. And that vulnerability is not a good place to be.”

Source Article from https://www.washingtonpost.com/religion/2021/05/21/jews-antisemitic-attack-los-angeles-times-square-biden-israel-palestine/

São Paulo – Abu Dhabi’s Etihad Airways and Italy’s state-owned airline Alitalia have signed an agreement this Friday (8th) for the purchase of a 49% by the former in the latter, which is experiencing financial difficulties. The deal provides for a 560 million-euro investment by Etihad. Further measures will be implemented to rescue Alitalia from crisis and create new routes.

In a press statement, the two companies claim that in addition to a capital injection by the Arab airline, the agreement will lead to 300 million euros worth of investment by Alitalia’s current stakeholders, 300 million euros in loans from Italian banks and restructuring of the company’s 598 million euro debt.

Out of the investment to be made by Etihad, 387.5 million euros concern the purchase of a 49% stake in the company, 112.5 million concern the purchase of 75% of Alitalia’s mileage program and 60 million euros refer to the purchase of five pairs of slots, i.e., takeoff and landing permits, at London’s Heathrow Airport. The slots will be leased to Alitalia.

The deal involves a total sum of 1.758 billion euros. The deal is pending approval from regulatory authorities in Italy and the European Union. According to a press release from Etihad, the agreement should be completed by December 31st this year.

In the press statement, Etihad’s CEO and president James Hogan says the goal is to have Alitalia attain sustainable profit levels by 2017. “We believe in Alitalia. It is great a brand with enormous potential. With the right level of capitalisation and a strong, strategic business plan, we have confidence the airline can be turned around and repositioned as a premium global airline once again.”

Changes

According to the press release, as early as the European winter, late this year, the frequency of Alitalia’s flights from Rome to Abu Dhabi will be increased from five to daily flights. Direct flights will also connect Abu Dhabi and the Milan Malpensa Airport. Etihad already flies to these cities on a daily basis.

Beginning in the European summer 2015, Alitalia will start flying between Abu Dhabi and other Italian cities, including Venice, Catania and Bologna. From the Rome Airport, Alitalia will begin operating five new routes over the next four years, and Milan will have double the international departures per week by 2018. The long-range jet fleet should increase, and the regional jet fleet should be “readapted,” according to the statement, to match the new route plan.

The Italian news agency Ansa has reported that 2,000 Alitalia employees should be dismissed.

*Translated by Gabriel Pomerancblum

Source Article from http://www2.anba.com.br/noticia/21864546/tourism/etihad-alitalia-announce-billion-dollar-deal/

Chile asegura que las marcas peruanas no pueden participar como “pisco” porque no tienen la denominación de origen en ese país. | Fuente: RPP – ANDINA

Wilfredo Angulo, enviado especial.

Valparaíso (Chile). Gran indignación ha generado la noticia de que 18 marcas de pisco peruano han aceptado renunciar a su nombre para denominarse “aguardiente de uva” del Perú, con el objetivo de participar en el Concurso Mundial de Bruselas que se realizará entre el 23 y el 25 de agosto en Chile.

El director de Turismo de Coquimbo, la región chilena donde se llevará a cabo el certamen mundial de bebidas espirituosas, explicó a RPP Noticias que nuestra bebida de bandera no cuenta con la denominación de origen pisco en ese país y por lo tanto no puede ingresar bajo ese nombre a la competición.

Medida recíproca. Tras su participación en la Macrorrueda de Turismo de la Alianza del Pacífico que se desarrolla en Valparaíso, Alberto Duarte agregó que tomaron esta decisión por un acto de reciprocidad, pues cuando los denominados piscos chilenos ingresan al Perú lo hacen bajo el nombre de aguardientes. 

“La información que me entregó la Asociación Gremial de Pisqueros de Chile es que también este es un acto de reciprocidad, cuando el pisco chileno ingresa al Perú tampoco puede tener la denominación de pisco y por lo tanto eso hace que nosotros también hagamos valer la denominación de origen pisco con ese nombre en Chile”, detalló.

Añadió además que la denominación de pisco solo se puede dar a aquellos productos que se desarrollan en la provincia y en la región de Atacama y Coquimbo, “lo cual hace que ningún otro producto pueda llevar el nombre o esa marca”.

Este año Chile será la sede de este concurso mundial, que exhibirá y contara con la presencia de más de 1,400 bebidas espirituosas de todo el orbe, más de 80 catadores especializados y en distintas categorías.

El pisco peruano ha participado durante más de 10 años en este concurso mundial de bebidas espirituosas, sin restricción alguna. | Fuente: ANDINA
El evento se realizará del 23 al 25 de agosto de este año. | Fuente: ANDINA

Source Article from http://rpp.pe/economia/economia/piscos-peruanos-participaran-en-concurso-mundial-como-aguardientes-noticia-1053223

(SAN DIEGO) — The Trump administration wants up to two years to find potentially thousands of children who were separated from their families at the border before a judge halted the practice last year, a task that it says is more laborious than previous efforts because the children are no longer in government custody.

The Justice Department said in a court filing late Friday that it will take at least a year to review about 47,000 cases of unaccompanied children taken into government custody between July 1, 2017 and June 25, 2018 — the day before U.S. District Judge Dana Sabraw halted the general practice of splitting families. The administration would begin by sifting through names for traits most likely to signal separation — for example, children under 5.

The administration would provide information on separated families on a rolling basis to the American Civil Liberties Union, which sued to reunite families and criticized the proposed timeline on Saturday.

“We strongly oppose a plan that could take up to two years to locate these families,” said Lee Gelernt, the ACLU’s lead attorney. “The government needs to make this a priority.”

Sabraw ordered last year that more than 2,700 children in government care on June 26, 2018 be reunited with their families, which has largely been accomplished. Then, in January, the U.S. Health and Human Services Department’s internal watchdog reported that thousands more children may have been separated since the summer of 2017. The department’s inspector general said the precise number was unknown.

The judge ruled last month that he could hold the government accountable for families that were separated before his June order and asked the government submit a proposal for the next steps. A hearing is scheduled April 16.

Sheer volume makes the job different than identifying children who were in custody at the time of the judge’s June order, Jonathan White, a commander of the U.S. Public Health Service and Health and Human Services’ point person on family reunification, said in an affidavit.

White, whose work has drawn strong praise from the judge, would lead the effort to identify additional families on behalf of Health and Health and Human Services with counterparts at Customs and Border Protection and U.S. Immigration and Customs and Enforcement. Dr. Barry Graubard, a statistics expert at the National Cancer Institute, developed a system to flag for early attention those most likely to have been separated.

The vast majority of separated children are released to relatives, but many are not parents. Of children released in the 2017 fiscal year, 49 percent went to parents, 41 percent to close relatives such as an aunt, uncle, grandparent or adult sibling and 10 percent to distant relatives, family friends and others.

The government’s proposed model to flag still-separated children puts a higher priority on the roughly half who were not released to a parent. Other signs of likely separation include children under 5, younger children traveling without a sibling and those who were detained in the Border Patrol’s El Paso, Texas, sector, where the administration ran a trial program that involved separating nearly 300 family members from July to November 2017.

Saturday marks the anniversary of the administration’s “zero tolerance” policy to criminally prosecute every adult who enters the country illegally from Mexico. The administration retreated in June amid an international uproar by generally exempting adults who come with their children. The policy now applies only to single adults.

Contact us at editors@time.com.

Source Article from http://time.com/5565525/identify-children-separated-border/

Should President Trump follow through on a proposal to release migrants in U.S. “sanctuary cities,” it would be a major departure from the way federal agencies are handling detainees. It could also be prohibitively costly and make it more difficult to deport migrants once they reach those cities.

The plan — which Trump tweeted Friday is under “strong consideration” — would have the Department of Homeland Security moving migrants from detention centers to cities scattered across the country in vans, buses and airplanes. It would require a massive investment in transportation infrastructure, something that Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials told the White House would be “an unnecessary operational burden.”

It also would mean placing those detainees in cities that limit their cooperation with federal immigration enforcement, meaning it could be very difficult to arrest them again.

During the recent surge of Central American families crossing into the United States, most were apprehended at or near the southern border with Mexico. With a deficit of detention beds, the U.S. government mainly releases the families to shelters or bus depots. Detainees are sometimes released directly to the streets of border towns, allowing immigration authorities to focus staffing and funding on deportations and criminal operations.

Trump’s proposal, which government officials said is aimed at punishing Democratic strongholds for their positions on immigration policy, calls for sending the detainees to sanctuary cities, where they can live without fear of local authorities reporting them to federal immigration officials. There are hundreds of sanctuary jurisdictions nationwide, ranging from tiny rural counties to New York City and the entire state of California.

The idea, DHS officials said, seemed predicated on the belief that an influx of migrants would be a burden to sanctuary cities. Trump has long maintained that killers, rapists and drug dealers are streaming across the border and that releasing migrants into U.S. society is a security risk. In fact, studies show immigrants are less likely to commit crimes than native-born citizens.

Mayors of such cities condemned the White House plan on Friday, with most dismissing it as an unrealistic political stunt. Some already have waged successful legal battles against the Trump administration’s threat two years ago to slash federal funding to sanctuary cities.

Libby Schaaf, the mayor of Oakland, Calif., called the plan “an outrageous abuse of power — using human beings to settle political scores.” San Francisco Mayor London Breed said it “is just another in a long line of scare tactics and half-baked ideas.”

Mayor Joseph A. Curtatone of Somerville, Mass.,which has a population of 81,000, said he would welcome any immigrants the government wants to send his way.

“Fine by me,” he said on Twitter, firing back at Trump. “But does he realize that the moment after people get ‘placed’ they’ll start moving to wherever they want to go? Every city has an open border.”

Homeland Security prefers to detain immigrants until they are eligible for deportation, but officials are releasing tens of thousands every year because of mass migration from Central America, rising numbers of families, limited detention space and legal restrictions on how long the government can detain children.

U.S. Customs and Border Protection apprehended 103,000 migrants last month — double the number in March 2018 — including nearly 60,000 family members.

CBP typically transfers migrants to ICE for detention, though this year holding cells grew so crowded that border agents started releasing some families at the border. ICE can also release migrants on bond or ankle-monitoring devices after verifying their future address and handing them a notice to appear in immigration court. Unaccompanied migrants are sent to Health and Human Services shelters, where case workers find a parent or guardian for them to live with in the United States.

Congress has allocated billions of dollars for this system, and none of it involves transporting immigrants to sanctuary cities — which some say makes the president’s plan illegal.

“It makes no sense,” said John Sandweg, an acting ICE director in 2013 and 2014 in the Obama administration, adding that it would violate federal law by diverting money “for political purposes.”

“At a time like this, when ICE is just overwhelmed by the number of Central Americans arriving, having to divert further resources to send a political message is outrageous,” he said.

Sandweg said the government “would pay big money” for the White House’s plan to deliver migrants to sanctuary cities. In addition to transportation costs, officials would have to assign immigration agents to escort them to their destinations. Currently, migrants usually buy their own bus or airline tickets.

“It’s ludicrous,” Sandweg said. “It’s meddling in operations at an extreme level.”

Matthew Albence, ICE’s acting deputy director, questioned the proposal in an email to the White House in November after it was first raised as a possibility, saying that arranging for transportation would strain the department and weaken its enforcement efforts.

“As a result of the influx at the border and the record number of aliens in detention, we have already had to decrease our interior operational footprint to manage these cases, resulting in less officers out on the streets making arrests of criminal aliens, public safety threats, fugitives, and other immigration violators,” Albence wrote in an email reviewed by The Washington Post. “Not sure how paying to transport aliens to another location to release them — when they can be released on the spot — is a justified expenditure.”

After heeding Albence’s advice not to pursue the idea, the White House went back to DHS in February to try again. Legal advisers rejected it.

Jessica Vaughan, director of policy studies for the Center for Immigration Studies, which favors less immigration, said the plan would give migrants a free ride to their destinations. Because sanctuary cities often refuse to turn over migrants arrested for crimes to ICE, sending them there could make it more difficult to apprehend for deportation later, she said.

Vaughan said White House officials who are new to immigration policy have likely overstepped in this case.

“There are a lot of immigration policy amateurs in senior positions at the White House, and some of them should stay in their lane — which is not immigration,” she said.

On the campaign trail in 2016, Trump said blocking funding for sanctuary cities would be a top priority, saying at the time: “Cities that refuse to cooperate with federal authorities will not receive taxpayer dollars, and we will work with Congress to pass legislation to protect those jurisdictions that do assist federal authorities.”

But Congress has not passed any such legislation, and Trump’s other efforts to stem migration have faced legal challenges. At least seven federal courts have blocked the Trump administration from broadly cutting off funds to sanctuary jurisdictions.

Vaughan said the Trump administration has conditioned some Justice Department crime-fighting grants on local cooperation with immigration enforcement. But generally that is limited to a provision in federal law that says local governments cannot prohibit communication between police and federal immigration agents.

The law does not require localities to detain immigrants after police have arrested them for an unrelated crime, but ICE can pick them up when a judge releases them from their criminal cases.

After Trump took office, sanctuary jurisdictions were initially fearful that he would restrict their federal funding for school lunches, fuel aid and other essential programs. But those fears faded as they prevailed in court.

Hundreds of localities have since strengthened their sanctuary policies, according to the San Francisco-based Immigrant Legal Resource Center. California passed a slate of new laws and the highest court in Massachusetts said local law enforcement cannot detain someone based solely on an immigration detainer.

Curtatone, Somerville’s mayor, said that the city is “always going to be a sanctuary and welcoming city for all” and that an influx of immigrants wouldn’t change much for cities such as his.

“Somerville has experienced a continuous wave of immigration now for well over a century of Europeans and those from the Caribbean and Central and South America,” he said in a telephone interview. “We speak more than 52 languages in our neighborhoods and our schools. We embrace it.”

Fred Barbash contributed to this report.

Source Article from https://www.washingtonpost.com/immigration/trumps-plan-to-send-migrant-detainees-to-sanctuary-cities-draws-concerns-about-cost-legality/2019/04/12/0ecec7d2-5d4a-11e9-842d-7d3ed7eb3957_story.html

We’ve detected unusual activity from your computer network

To continue, please click the box below to let us know you’re not a robot.

Source Article from https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2019-02-20/trump-mccabe-whitaker-and-the-fbi-test-presidential-authority

Rickey Kanter, from Mequon, Wis., pleaded guilty in 2011 to a single count of mail fraud for selling therapeutic shoe inserts that he misrepresented as Medicare-approved through his “Dr. Comfort” business. He was sentenced to a year and one day in prison, ordered to pay $50,000 and to reimburse Medicare over $27 million in a related civil settlement.

Source Article from https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/courts_law/supreme-court-barrett-gun-laws/2020/10/10/3845995e-0976-11eb-9be6-cf25fb429f1a_story.html


House Financial Services Committee Chairwoman Maxine Waters said in a statement that the potential use of the U.S. financial system for illicit purposes was a “very serious concern.” | Zach Gibson/Getty Images

Financial Services

House Democrats on Monday issued a subpoena to the German lender Deutsche Bank seeking information on President Donald Trump’s finances, a major escalation of their investigation into his business dealings.

In addition to the Deutsche Bank subpoena, House Democrats subpoenaed other banks — including JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America and Citigroup — seeking information on Russian money laundering. The issuance of the subpoenas was first reported by The New York Times.

Story Continued Below

The House Intelligence and Financial Services committees, which authorized the subpoenas, were expected to issue additional subpoenas targeting Trump’s finances soon, Democratic aides said.

Democrats are ratcheting up their coordinated investigations into Trump’s business dealings as the Justice Department prepares to release findings from special counsel Robert Mueller’s probe on Thursday.

“As part of our oversight authority and authorized investigation into allegations of potential foreign influence on the U.S. political process, the House Intelligence Committee today issued subpoenas to multiple financial institutions in coordination with the House Financial Services Committee, including a friendly subpoena to Deutsche Bank, which has been cooperative with the Committees,” said Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), the House Intelligence chairman. “We look forward to their continued cooperation and compliance.”

The subpoenas are the latest example of House Democrats‘ crossing the “red line“ Trump has drawn when it comes to investigators looking into his finances and business transactions. Trump‘s attorneys have already started fighting back, warning the accounting firm Mazars USA that it should not comply with a House Oversight and Government Reform Committee subpoena seeking the president‘s financial records.

Deutsche Bank has long been a top target for Democrats. The bank lent Trump hundreds of millions of dollars over the years for property development, and it has also been under scrutiny for its role in Russian money laundering. Democrats have said they want to know whether Russia has had financial leverage over the president via Deutsche Bank and other loans.

Rep. Maxine Waters (D-Calif.), chairwoman of the Financial Services Committee, said in a statement Monday that the potential use of the U.S. financial system for illicit purposes was a “very serious concern.”

“The Financial Services Committee is exploring these matters, including as they may involve the President and his associates, as thoroughly as possible pursuant to its oversight authority, and will follow the facts wherever they may lead us,” she said.

Republicans — as expected — lashed out at the Democratic subpoenas, calling them part of “partisan fishing expeditions“ designed to hurt Trump and the GOP.

“My colleagues across the aisle continue to politicize the banking industry and set out on partisan fishing expeditions,“ said Rep. Patrick McHenry (N.C.), the top Republican on the Financial Services Committee. “All while ignoring the issues the American people need our committee to be focused on. Republicans have repeatedly expressed our desire to work in a bipartisan manner, but today‘s actions seem driven solely by a political agenda.“

Other financial institutions had been expecting Democrats to seek further information about their relationships with Deutsche Bank, a representative of another bank said.

Deutsche Bank in a statement said that it was “in a productive dialogue with the House Financial Services and Intelligence Committees.”

“We remain committed to providing appropriate information to all authorized investigations in a manner consistent with our legal obligations,” the bank said.

Source Article from https://www.politico.com/story/2019/04/15/democrats-subpoena-deutsche-bank-1277199