Recently Added Videos

Maputo — The European Union election observation mission, which observed the 16 October general elections in Mozambique, has accused the publicly owned television channel TVM, and the pro-government daily “Noticias” of serious bias in their coverage.

The final report from the EU mission carries an analysis of press coverage of the election campaign, concluding that TVM’s reporting on the campaign was “clearly tendentious” in favour of the presidential candidate of the ruling Frelimo Party, Filipe Nyusi. 64 per cent of TVM’s presidential campaign coverage was devoted to Nyusi, 19 per cent to Daviz Simango, candidate of the Mozambique Democratic Movement (MDM), and 17 per cent to Afonso Dhlakama, leader of the former rebel movement Renamo.

The TVM coverage of the political parties was also unbalanced – 56 per cent of the time went to Frelimo, 22 per cent to Renamo, 17 per cent to the MDM and five per cent to minor parties.

The imbalance was truly startling when it came to TVM panel discussions – overwhelmingly the guests TVM chose to invite were pro-Frelimo, and hostile to both opposition parties. The EU Mission report divided the tone used in these talk shows into positive, negative and neutral. It found that all the mentions of Nyusi were positive, while nothing positive was said about the other two candidates.

80 per cent of the mentions of Dhlakama in these programmes were negative and 20 per cent neutral. For Simango, the TVM panels were unrelentingly hostile, with 100 per cent negative mentions.

As for “Noticias”, the EU report found that 60 per cent of its presidential coverage went to Nyusi, 23 per cent to Dhlakama and 17 per cent to Simango. For the parties, 60 per cent of the coverage went to Frelimo, 14 per cent to the MDM, 12 per cent to Renamo and an astounding 14 per cent to the gaggle of 27 minor parties most of whom ran no campaign at all.

The report found Radio Mozambique and the main independent media group, SOICO, much fairer in their coverage. Thus in the presidential campaign, 39 per cent of the Radio’s coverage went to Nyusi, 33 per cent to Dhlakama and 28 per cent to Simango. But Nyusi was always the first candidate mentioned in the radio newscasts.

The EU mission thought that the radio’s coverage of the parties was also “reasonably balanced” – although Frelimo took 47 per cent of the time, compared with 23 per cent each for Renamo and the MDM and seven per cent for others.

The SOICO television channel, STV, was clearly making a serious attempt at balance.

The Report found that 41 per cent of its presidential campaign coverage went to Nyusi, 32 per cent to Simango and 27 per cent to Dhlakama. As for the parties, STV gave 37 per cent of the time to Frelimo, 33 per cent to Renamo, 28 per cent to the MDM and two per cent to the minor parties.

The coverage by the SOICO daily paper, “O Pais”, came close to equality between the three presidential candidates: Simango received somewhat more coverage than either of his opponents, with 37 per cent, compared to 33 per cent for Nyusi and 30 per cent for Dhlakama.

As for the parties, “O Pais” gave 39 per cent to Renamo, 38 per cent to Frelimo, 16 per cent to the MDM, and seven per cent to the most serious of the minor parties, the PDD (Party for Peace, Democracy and Development).

Source Article from http://allafrica.com/stories/201502190175.html

Maputo — The European Union election observation mission, which observed the 16 October general elections in Mozambique, has accused the publicly owned television channel TVM, and the pro-government daily “Noticias” of serious bias in their coverage.

The final report from the EU mission carries an analysis of press coverage of the election campaign, concluding that TVM’s reporting on the campaign was “clearly tendentious” in favour of the presidential candidate of the ruling Frelimo Party, Filipe Nyusi. 64 per cent of TVM’s presidential campaign coverage was devoted to Nyusi, 19 per cent to Daviz Simango, candidate of the Mozambique Democratic Movement (MDM), and 17 per cent to Afonso Dhlakama, leader of the former rebel movement Renamo.

The TVM coverage of the political parties was also unbalanced – 56 per cent of the time went to Frelimo, 22 per cent to Renamo, 17 per cent to the MDM and five per cent to minor parties.

The imbalance was truly startling when it came to TVM panel discussions – overwhelmingly the guests TVM chose to invite were pro-Frelimo, and hostile to both opposition parties. The EU Mission report divided the tone used in these talk shows into positive, negative and neutral. It found that all the mentions of Nyusi were positive, while nothing positive was said about the other two candidates.

80 per cent of the mentions of Dhlakama in these programmes were negative and 20 per cent neutral. For Simango, the TVM panels were unrelentingly hostile, with 100 per cent negative mentions.

As for “Noticias”, the EU report found that 60 per cent of its presidential coverage went to Nyusi, 23 per cent to Dhlakama and 17 per cent to Simango. For the parties, 60 per cent of the coverage went to Frelimo, 14 per cent to the MDM, 12 per cent to Renamo and an astounding 14 per cent to the gaggle of 27 minor parties most of whom ran no campaign at all.

The report found Radio Mozambique and the main independent media group, SOICO, much fairer in their coverage. Thus in the presidential campaign, 39 per cent of the Radio’s coverage went to Nyusi, 33 per cent to Dhlakama and 28 per cent to Simango. But Nyusi was always the first candidate mentioned in the radio newscasts.

The EU mission thought that the radio’s coverage of the parties was also “reasonably balanced” – although Frelimo took 47 per cent of the time, compared with 23 per cent each for Renamo and the MDM and seven per cent for others.

The SOICO television channel, STV, was clearly making a serious attempt at balance.

The Report found that 41 per cent of its presidential campaign coverage went to Nyusi, 32 per cent to Simango and 27 per cent to Dhlakama. As for the parties, STV gave 37 per cent of the time to Frelimo, 33 per cent to Renamo, 28 per cent to the MDM and two per cent to the minor parties.

The coverage by the SOICO daily paper, “O Pais”, came close to equality between the three presidential candidates: Simango received somewhat more coverage than either of his opponents, with 37 per cent, compared to 33 per cent for Nyusi and 30 per cent for Dhlakama.

As for the parties, “O Pais” gave 39 per cent to Renamo, 38 per cent to Frelimo, 16 per cent to the MDM, and seven per cent to the most serious of the minor parties, the PDD (Party for Peace, Democracy and Development).

Source Article from http://allafrica.com/stories/201502190175.html

Maputo — The European Union election observation mission, which observed the 16 October general elections in Mozambique, has accused the publicly owned television channel TVM, and the pro-government daily “Noticias” of serious bias in their coverage.

The final report from the EU mission carries an analysis of press coverage of the election campaign, concluding that TVM’s reporting on the campaign was “clearly tendentious” in favour of the presidential candidate of the ruling Frelimo Party, Filipe Nyusi. 64 per cent of TVM’s presidential campaign coverage was devoted to Nyusi, 19 per cent to Daviz Simango, candidate of the Mozambique Democratic Movement (MDM), and 17 per cent to Afonso Dhlakama, leader of the former rebel movement Renamo.

The TVM coverage of the political parties was also unbalanced – 56 per cent of the time went to Frelimo, 22 per cent to Renamo, 17 per cent to the MDM and five per cent to minor parties.

The imbalance was truly startling when it came to TVM panel discussions – overwhelmingly the guests TVM chose to invite were pro-Frelimo, and hostile to both opposition parties. The EU Mission report divided the tone used in these talk shows into positive, negative and neutral. It found that all the mentions of Nyusi were positive, while nothing positive was said about the other two candidates.

80 per cent of the mentions of Dhlakama in these programmes were negative and 20 per cent neutral. For Simango, the TVM panels were unrelentingly hostile, with 100 per cent negative mentions.

As for “Noticias”, the EU report found that 60 per cent of its presidential coverage went to Nyusi, 23 per cent to Dhlakama and 17 per cent to Simango. For the parties, 60 per cent of the coverage went to Frelimo, 14 per cent to the MDM, 12 per cent to Renamo and an astounding 14 per cent to the gaggle of 27 minor parties most of whom ran no campaign at all.

The report found Radio Mozambique and the main independent media group, SOICO, much fairer in their coverage. Thus in the presidential campaign, 39 per cent of the Radio’s coverage went to Nyusi, 33 per cent to Dhlakama and 28 per cent to Simango. But Nyusi was always the first candidate mentioned in the radio newscasts.

The EU mission thought that the radio’s coverage of the parties was also “reasonably balanced” – although Frelimo took 47 per cent of the time, compared with 23 per cent each for Renamo and the MDM and seven per cent for others.

The SOICO television channel, STV, was clearly making a serious attempt at balance.

The Report found that 41 per cent of its presidential campaign coverage went to Nyusi, 32 per cent to Simango and 27 per cent to Dhlakama. As for the parties, STV gave 37 per cent of the time to Frelimo, 33 per cent to Renamo, 28 per cent to the MDM and two per cent to the minor parties.

The coverage by the SOICO daily paper, “O Pais”, came close to equality between the three presidential candidates: Simango received somewhat more coverage than either of his opponents, with 37 per cent, compared to 33 per cent for Nyusi and 30 per cent for Dhlakama.

As for the parties, “O Pais” gave 39 per cent to Renamo, 38 per cent to Frelimo, 16 per cent to the MDM, and seven per cent to the most serious of the minor parties, the PDD (Party for Peace, Democracy and Development).

Source Article from http://allafrica.com/stories/201502190175.html

Maputo — The European Union election observation mission, which observed the 16 October general elections in Mozambique, has accused the publicly owned television channel TVM, and the pro-government daily “Noticias” of serious bias in their coverage.

The final report from the EU mission carries an analysis of press coverage of the election campaign, concluding that TVM’s reporting on the campaign was “clearly tendentious” in favour of the presidential candidate of the ruling Frelimo Party, Filipe Nyusi. 64 per cent of TVM’s presidential campaign coverage was devoted to Nyusi, 19 per cent to Daviz Simango, candidate of the Mozambique Democratic Movement (MDM), and 17 per cent to Afonso Dhlakama, leader of the former rebel movement Renamo.

The TVM coverage of the political parties was also unbalanced – 56 per cent of the time went to Frelimo, 22 per cent to Renamo, 17 per cent to the MDM and five per cent to minor parties.

The imbalance was truly startling when it came to TVM panel discussions – overwhelmingly the guests TVM chose to invite were pro-Frelimo, and hostile to both opposition parties. The EU Mission report divided the tone used in these talk shows into positive, negative and neutral. It found that all the mentions of Nyusi were positive, while nothing positive was said about the other two candidates.

80 per cent of the mentions of Dhlakama in these programmes were negative and 20 per cent neutral. For Simango, the TVM panels were unrelentingly hostile, with 100 per cent negative mentions.

As for “Noticias”, the EU report found that 60 per cent of its presidential coverage went to Nyusi, 23 per cent to Dhlakama and 17 per cent to Simango. For the parties, 60 per cent of the coverage went to Frelimo, 14 per cent to the MDM, 12 per cent to Renamo and an astounding 14 per cent to the gaggle of 27 minor parties most of whom ran no campaign at all.

The report found Radio Mozambique and the main independent media group, SOICO, much fairer in their coverage. Thus in the presidential campaign, 39 per cent of the Radio’s coverage went to Nyusi, 33 per cent to Dhlakama and 28 per cent to Simango. But Nyusi was always the first candidate mentioned in the radio newscasts.

The EU mission thought that the radio’s coverage of the parties was also “reasonably balanced” – although Frelimo took 47 per cent of the time, compared with 23 per cent each for Renamo and the MDM and seven per cent for others.

The SOICO television channel, STV, was clearly making a serious attempt at balance.

The Report found that 41 per cent of its presidential campaign coverage went to Nyusi, 32 per cent to Simango and 27 per cent to Dhlakama. As for the parties, STV gave 37 per cent of the time to Frelimo, 33 per cent to Renamo, 28 per cent to the MDM and two per cent to the minor parties.

The coverage by the SOICO daily paper, “O Pais”, came close to equality between the three presidential candidates: Simango received somewhat more coverage than either of his opponents, with 37 per cent, compared to 33 per cent for Nyusi and 30 per cent for Dhlakama.

As for the parties, “O Pais” gave 39 per cent to Renamo, 38 per cent to Frelimo, 16 per cent to the MDM, and seven per cent to the most serious of the minor parties, the PDD (Party for Peace, Democracy and Development).

Source Article from http://allafrica.com/stories/201502190175.html

Maputo — The European Union election observation mission, which observed the 16 October general elections in Mozambique, has accused the publicly owned television channel TVM, and the pro-government daily “Noticias” of serious bias in their coverage.

The final report from the EU mission carries an analysis of press coverage of the election campaign, concluding that TVM’s reporting on the campaign was “clearly tendentious” in favour of the presidential candidate of the ruling Frelimo Party, Filipe Nyusi. 64 per cent of TVM’s presidential campaign coverage was devoted to Nyusi, 19 per cent to Daviz Simango, candidate of the Mozambique Democratic Movement (MDM), and 17 per cent to Afonso Dhlakama, leader of the former rebel movement Renamo.

The TVM coverage of the political parties was also unbalanced – 56 per cent of the time went to Frelimo, 22 per cent to Renamo, 17 per cent to the MDM and five per cent to minor parties.

The imbalance was truly startling when it came to TVM panel discussions – overwhelmingly the guests TVM chose to invite were pro-Frelimo, and hostile to both opposition parties. The EU Mission report divided the tone used in these talk shows into positive, negative and neutral. It found that all the mentions of Nyusi were positive, while nothing positive was said about the other two candidates.

80 per cent of the mentions of Dhlakama in these programmes were negative and 20 per cent neutral. For Simango, the TVM panels were unrelentingly hostile, with 100 per cent negative mentions.

As for “Noticias”, the EU report found that 60 per cent of its presidential coverage went to Nyusi, 23 per cent to Dhlakama and 17 per cent to Simango. For the parties, 60 per cent of the coverage went to Frelimo, 14 per cent to the MDM, 12 per cent to Renamo and an astounding 14 per cent to the gaggle of 27 minor parties most of whom ran no campaign at all.

The report found Radio Mozambique and the main independent media group, SOICO, much fairer in their coverage. Thus in the presidential campaign, 39 per cent of the Radio’s coverage went to Nyusi, 33 per cent to Dhlakama and 28 per cent to Simango. But Nyusi was always the first candidate mentioned in the radio newscasts.

The EU mission thought that the radio’s coverage of the parties was also “reasonably balanced” – although Frelimo took 47 per cent of the time, compared with 23 per cent each for Renamo and the MDM and seven per cent for others.

The SOICO television channel, STV, was clearly making a serious attempt at balance.

The Report found that 41 per cent of its presidential campaign coverage went to Nyusi, 32 per cent to Simango and 27 per cent to Dhlakama. As for the parties, STV gave 37 per cent of the time to Frelimo, 33 per cent to Renamo, 28 per cent to the MDM and two per cent to the minor parties.

The coverage by the SOICO daily paper, “O Pais”, came close to equality between the three presidential candidates: Simango received somewhat more coverage than either of his opponents, with 37 per cent, compared to 33 per cent for Nyusi and 30 per cent for Dhlakama.

As for the parties, “O Pais” gave 39 per cent to Renamo, 38 per cent to Frelimo, 16 per cent to the MDM, and seven per cent to the most serious of the minor parties, the PDD (Party for Peace, Democracy and Development).

Source Article from http://allafrica.com/stories/201502190175.html

Maputo — The European Union election observation mission, which observed the 16 October general elections in Mozambique, has accused the publicly owned television channel TVM, and the pro-government daily “Noticias” of serious bias in their coverage.

The final report from the EU mission carries an analysis of press coverage of the election campaign, concluding that TVM’s reporting on the campaign was “clearly tendentious” in favour of the presidential candidate of the ruling Frelimo Party, Filipe Nyusi. 64 per cent of TVM’s presidential campaign coverage was devoted to Nyusi, 19 per cent to Daviz Simango, candidate of the Mozambique Democratic Movement (MDM), and 17 per cent to Afonso Dhlakama, leader of the former rebel movement Renamo.

The TVM coverage of the political parties was also unbalanced – 56 per cent of the time went to Frelimo, 22 per cent to Renamo, 17 per cent to the MDM and five per cent to minor parties.

The imbalance was truly startling when it came to TVM panel discussions – overwhelmingly the guests TVM chose to invite were pro-Frelimo, and hostile to both opposition parties. The EU Mission report divided the tone used in these talk shows into positive, negative and neutral. It found that all the mentions of Nyusi were positive, while nothing positive was said about the other two candidates.

80 per cent of the mentions of Dhlakama in these programmes were negative and 20 per cent neutral. For Simango, the TVM panels were unrelentingly hostile, with 100 per cent negative mentions.

As for “Noticias”, the EU report found that 60 per cent of its presidential coverage went to Nyusi, 23 per cent to Dhlakama and 17 per cent to Simango. For the parties, 60 per cent of the coverage went to Frelimo, 14 per cent to the MDM, 12 per cent to Renamo and an astounding 14 per cent to the gaggle of 27 minor parties most of whom ran no campaign at all.

The report found Radio Mozambique and the main independent media group, SOICO, much fairer in their coverage. Thus in the presidential campaign, 39 per cent of the Radio’s coverage went to Nyusi, 33 per cent to Dhlakama and 28 per cent to Simango. But Nyusi was always the first candidate mentioned in the radio newscasts.

The EU mission thought that the radio’s coverage of the parties was also “reasonably balanced” – although Frelimo took 47 per cent of the time, compared with 23 per cent each for Renamo and the MDM and seven per cent for others.

The SOICO television channel, STV, was clearly making a serious attempt at balance.

The Report found that 41 per cent of its presidential campaign coverage went to Nyusi, 32 per cent to Simango and 27 per cent to Dhlakama. As for the parties, STV gave 37 per cent of the time to Frelimo, 33 per cent to Renamo, 28 per cent to the MDM and two per cent to the minor parties.

The coverage by the SOICO daily paper, “O Pais”, came close to equality between the three presidential candidates: Simango received somewhat more coverage than either of his opponents, with 37 per cent, compared to 33 per cent for Nyusi and 30 per cent for Dhlakama.

As for the parties, “O Pais” gave 39 per cent to Renamo, 38 per cent to Frelimo, 16 per cent to the MDM, and seven per cent to the most serious of the minor parties, the PDD (Party for Peace, Democracy and Development).

Source Article from http://allafrica.com/stories/201502190175.html

Maputo — The European Union election observation mission, which observed the 16 October general elections in Mozambique, has accused the publicly owned television channel TVM, and the pro-government daily “Noticias” of serious bias in their coverage.

The final report from the EU mission carries an analysis of press coverage of the election campaign, concluding that TVM’s reporting on the campaign was “clearly tendentious” in favour of the presidential candidate of the ruling Frelimo Party, Filipe Nyusi. 64 per cent of TVM’s presidential campaign coverage was devoted to Nyusi, 19 per cent to Daviz Simango, candidate of the Mozambique Democratic Movement (MDM), and 17 per cent to Afonso Dhlakama, leader of the former rebel movement Renamo.

The TVM coverage of the political parties was also unbalanced – 56 per cent of the time went to Frelimo, 22 per cent to Renamo, 17 per cent to the MDM and five per cent to minor parties.

The imbalance was truly startling when it came to TVM panel discussions – overwhelmingly the guests TVM chose to invite were pro-Frelimo, and hostile to both opposition parties. The EU Mission report divided the tone used in these talk shows into positive, negative and neutral. It found that all the mentions of Nyusi were positive, while nothing positive was said about the other two candidates.

80 per cent of the mentions of Dhlakama in these programmes were negative and 20 per cent neutral. For Simango, the TVM panels were unrelentingly hostile, with 100 per cent negative mentions.

As for “Noticias”, the EU report found that 60 per cent of its presidential coverage went to Nyusi, 23 per cent to Dhlakama and 17 per cent to Simango. For the parties, 60 per cent of the coverage went to Frelimo, 14 per cent to the MDM, 12 per cent to Renamo and an astounding 14 per cent to the gaggle of 27 minor parties most of whom ran no campaign at all.

The report found Radio Mozambique and the main independent media group, SOICO, much fairer in their coverage. Thus in the presidential campaign, 39 per cent of the Radio’s coverage went to Nyusi, 33 per cent to Dhlakama and 28 per cent to Simango. But Nyusi was always the first candidate mentioned in the radio newscasts.

The EU mission thought that the radio’s coverage of the parties was also “reasonably balanced” – although Frelimo took 47 per cent of the time, compared with 23 per cent each for Renamo and the MDM and seven per cent for others.

The SOICO television channel, STV, was clearly making a serious attempt at balance.

The Report found that 41 per cent of its presidential campaign coverage went to Nyusi, 32 per cent to Simango and 27 per cent to Dhlakama. As for the parties, STV gave 37 per cent of the time to Frelimo, 33 per cent to Renamo, 28 per cent to the MDM and two per cent to the minor parties.

The coverage by the SOICO daily paper, “O Pais”, came close to equality between the three presidential candidates: Simango received somewhat more coverage than either of his opponents, with 37 per cent, compared to 33 per cent for Nyusi and 30 per cent for Dhlakama.

As for the parties, “O Pais” gave 39 per cent to Renamo, 38 per cent to Frelimo, 16 per cent to the MDM, and seven per cent to the most serious of the minor parties, the PDD (Party for Peace, Democracy and Development).

Source Article from http://allafrica.com/stories/201502190175.html

Maputo — The European Union election observation mission, which observed the 16 October general elections in Mozambique, has accused the publicly owned television channel TVM, and the pro-government daily “Noticias” of serious bias in their coverage.

The final report from the EU mission carries an analysis of press coverage of the election campaign, concluding that TVM’s reporting on the campaign was “clearly tendentious” in favour of the presidential candidate of the ruling Frelimo Party, Filipe Nyusi. 64 per cent of TVM’s presidential campaign coverage was devoted to Nyusi, 19 per cent to Daviz Simango, candidate of the Mozambique Democratic Movement (MDM), and 17 per cent to Afonso Dhlakama, leader of the former rebel movement Renamo.

The TVM coverage of the political parties was also unbalanced – 56 per cent of the time went to Frelimo, 22 per cent to Renamo, 17 per cent to the MDM and five per cent to minor parties.

The imbalance was truly startling when it came to TVM panel discussions – overwhelmingly the guests TVM chose to invite were pro-Frelimo, and hostile to both opposition parties. The EU Mission report divided the tone used in these talk shows into positive, negative and neutral. It found that all the mentions of Nyusi were positive, while nothing positive was said about the other two candidates.

80 per cent of the mentions of Dhlakama in these programmes were negative and 20 per cent neutral. For Simango, the TVM panels were unrelentingly hostile, with 100 per cent negative mentions.

As for “Noticias”, the EU report found that 60 per cent of its presidential coverage went to Nyusi, 23 per cent to Dhlakama and 17 per cent to Simango. For the parties, 60 per cent of the coverage went to Frelimo, 14 per cent to the MDM, 12 per cent to Renamo and an astounding 14 per cent to the gaggle of 27 minor parties most of whom ran no campaign at all.

The report found Radio Mozambique and the main independent media group, SOICO, much fairer in their coverage. Thus in the presidential campaign, 39 per cent of the Radio’s coverage went to Nyusi, 33 per cent to Dhlakama and 28 per cent to Simango. But Nyusi was always the first candidate mentioned in the radio newscasts.

The EU mission thought that the radio’s coverage of the parties was also “reasonably balanced” – although Frelimo took 47 per cent of the time, compared with 23 per cent each for Renamo and the MDM and seven per cent for others.

The SOICO television channel, STV, was clearly making a serious attempt at balance.

The Report found that 41 per cent of its presidential campaign coverage went to Nyusi, 32 per cent to Simango and 27 per cent to Dhlakama. As for the parties, STV gave 37 per cent of the time to Frelimo, 33 per cent to Renamo, 28 per cent to the MDM and two per cent to the minor parties.

The coverage by the SOICO daily paper, “O Pais”, came close to equality between the three presidential candidates: Simango received somewhat more coverage than either of his opponents, with 37 per cent, compared to 33 per cent for Nyusi and 30 per cent for Dhlakama.

As for the parties, “O Pais” gave 39 per cent to Renamo, 38 per cent to Frelimo, 16 per cent to the MDM, and seven per cent to the most serious of the minor parties, the PDD (Party for Peace, Democracy and Development).

Source Article from http://allafrica.com/stories/201502190175.html
















<!— BANNER PARA NAVIDAD 2014 DE UN

–>



<!— BANNER PARA 73 ANIVERSARIO DE UN

FIN BANNER PARA 73 ANIVERSARIO DE UN —>


<!—->
<!–


–>






<!–

–>



Caracas,
20/02/2015
Iniciar sesión| Registrarse






























9762 lectura(s)















Irene Sarabia M. | ÚN.- La tarde de este jueves efectivos policiales del Sistema Bolivariano de Inteligencia Nacional (Sebin) detuvieron al alcalde metropolitano, Antonio Ledezma, tras realizar un allanamiento en su oficina, ubicada en la Torre Exxa, en el municipio Chacao. 

Fotos: Cortesía

Fotos: Cortesía

Fotos: Cortesía

<!–
***********2121493 True 20/02/2015 05:08:37 a.m.–>


www.ultimasnoticias.com.ve
















<!– UN_DETALLENOTICIA_INTERMEDIOADSENSE_468X60

googletag.display(‘div-gpt-ad-1359320209797-5’);

–>










Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.


Publicidad

<!– N_DETALLENOTICIA_VENTANA1_300X250

googletag.display(‘div-gpt-ad-1359320209797-0’);

–>



Publicidad

<!– UN_DETALLENOTICIA_LATERALHORIZONTAL1_300X100

googletag.display(‘div-gpt-ad-1359320209797-6’);

–>

















Publicidad

<!– N_DETALLENOTICIA_VENTANA2_300X250

googletag.display(‘div-gpt-ad-1359320209797-1’);

–>



Publicidad

<!– UN_DETALLENOTICIA_LATERALVERTICAL1_135X240

googletag.display(‘div-gpt-ad-1359320209797-7’);

–>


<!– UN_DETALLENOTICIA_LATERALVERTICAL2_135X240

googletag.display(‘div-gpt-ad-1359320209797-8’);

–>



Publicidad

<!– N_DETALLENOTICIA_VENTANA3_300X250

googletag.display(‘div-gpt-ad-1359320209797-2’);

–>



Publicidad

<!– UN_DETALLENOTICIA_VENTANAADSENSE_250X250

googletag.display(‘div-gpt-ad-1359320209797-9’);

–>














Source Article from http://www.ultimasnoticias.com.ve/noticias/actualidad/politica/sebin-detiene-al-alcalde-antonio-ledezma-tras-alla.aspx

Maputo — The European Union election observation mission, which observed the 16 October general elections in Mozambique, has accused the publicly owned television channel TVM, and the pro-government daily “Noticias” of serious bias in their coverage.

The final report from the EU mission carries an analysis of press coverage of the election campaign, concluding that TVM’s reporting on the campaign was “clearly tendentious” in favour of the presidential candidate of the ruling Frelimo Party, Filipe Nyusi. 64 per cent of TVM’s presidential campaign coverage was devoted to Nyusi, 19 per cent to Daviz Simango, candidate of the Mozambique Democratic Movement (MDM), and 17 per cent to Afonso Dhlakama, leader of the former rebel movement Renamo.

The TVM coverage of the political parties was also unbalanced – 56 per cent of the time went to Frelimo, 22 per cent to Renamo, 17 per cent to the MDM and five per cent to minor parties.

The imbalance was truly startling when it came to TVM panel discussions – overwhelmingly the guests TVM chose to invite were pro-Frelimo, and hostile to both opposition parties. The EU Mission report divided the tone used in these talk shows into positive, negative and neutral. It found that all the mentions of Nyusi were positive, while nothing positive was said about the other two candidates.

80 per cent of the mentions of Dhlakama in these programmes were negative and 20 per cent neutral. For Simango, the TVM panels were unrelentingly hostile, with 100 per cent negative mentions.

As for “Noticias”, the EU report found that 60 per cent of its presidential coverage went to Nyusi, 23 per cent to Dhlakama and 17 per cent to Simango. For the parties, 60 per cent of the coverage went to Frelimo, 14 per cent to the MDM, 12 per cent to Renamo and an astounding 14 per cent to the gaggle of 27 minor parties most of whom ran no campaign at all.

The report found Radio Mozambique and the main independent media group, SOICO, much fairer in their coverage. Thus in the presidential campaign, 39 per cent of the Radio’s coverage went to Nyusi, 33 per cent to Dhlakama and 28 per cent to Simango. But Nyusi was always the first candidate mentioned in the radio newscasts.

The EU mission thought that the radio’s coverage of the parties was also “reasonably balanced” – although Frelimo took 47 per cent of the time, compared with 23 per cent each for Renamo and the MDM and seven per cent for others.

The SOICO television channel, STV, was clearly making a serious attempt at balance.

The Report found that 41 per cent of its presidential campaign coverage went to Nyusi, 32 per cent to Simango and 27 per cent to Dhlakama. As for the parties, STV gave 37 per cent of the time to Frelimo, 33 per cent to Renamo, 28 per cent to the MDM and two per cent to the minor parties.

The coverage by the SOICO daily paper, “O Pais”, came close to equality between the three presidential candidates: Simango received somewhat more coverage than either of his opponents, with 37 per cent, compared to 33 per cent for Nyusi and 30 per cent for Dhlakama.

As for the parties, “O Pais” gave 39 per cent to Renamo, 38 per cent to Frelimo, 16 per cent to the MDM, and seven per cent to the most serious of the minor parties, the PDD (Party for Peace, Democracy and Development).

Source Article from http://allafrica.com/stories/201502190175.html

Maputo — The European Union election observation mission, which observed the 16 October general elections in Mozambique, has accused the publicly owned television channel TVM, and the pro-government daily “Noticias” of serious bias in their coverage.

The final report from the EU mission carries an analysis of press coverage of the election campaign, concluding that TVM’s reporting on the campaign was “clearly tendentious” in favour of the presidential candidate of the ruling Frelimo Party, Filipe Nyusi. 64 per cent of TVM’s presidential campaign coverage was devoted to Nyusi, 19 per cent to Daviz Simango, candidate of the Mozambique Democratic Movement (MDM), and 17 per cent to Afonso Dhlakama, leader of the former rebel movement Renamo.

The TVM coverage of the political parties was also unbalanced – 56 per cent of the time went to Frelimo, 22 per cent to Renamo, 17 per cent to the MDM and five per cent to minor parties.

The imbalance was truly startling when it came to TVM panel discussions – overwhelmingly the guests TVM chose to invite were pro-Frelimo, and hostile to both opposition parties. The EU Mission report divided the tone used in these talk shows into positive, negative and neutral. It found that all the mentions of Nyusi were positive, while nothing positive was said about the other two candidates.

80 per cent of the mentions of Dhlakama in these programmes were negative and 20 per cent neutral. For Simango, the TVM panels were unrelentingly hostile, with 100 per cent negative mentions.

As for “Noticias”, the EU report found that 60 per cent of its presidential coverage went to Nyusi, 23 per cent to Dhlakama and 17 per cent to Simango. For the parties, 60 per cent of the coverage went to Frelimo, 14 per cent to the MDM, 12 per cent to Renamo and an astounding 14 per cent to the gaggle of 27 minor parties most of whom ran no campaign at all.

The report found Radio Mozambique and the main independent media group, SOICO, much fairer in their coverage. Thus in the presidential campaign, 39 per cent of the Radio’s coverage went to Nyusi, 33 per cent to Dhlakama and 28 per cent to Simango. But Nyusi was always the first candidate mentioned in the radio newscasts.

The EU mission thought that the radio’s coverage of the parties was also “reasonably balanced” – although Frelimo took 47 per cent of the time, compared with 23 per cent each for Renamo and the MDM and seven per cent for others.

The SOICO television channel, STV, was clearly making a serious attempt at balance.

The Report found that 41 per cent of its presidential campaign coverage went to Nyusi, 32 per cent to Simango and 27 per cent to Dhlakama. As for the parties, STV gave 37 per cent of the time to Frelimo, 33 per cent to Renamo, 28 per cent to the MDM and two per cent to the minor parties.

The coverage by the SOICO daily paper, “O Pais”, came close to equality between the three presidential candidates: Simango received somewhat more coverage than either of his opponents, with 37 per cent, compared to 33 per cent for Nyusi and 30 per cent for Dhlakama.

As for the parties, “O Pais” gave 39 per cent to Renamo, 38 per cent to Frelimo, 16 per cent to the MDM, and seven per cent to the most serious of the minor parties, the PDD (Party for Peace, Democracy and Development).

Source Article from http://allafrica.com/stories/201502190175.html

Maputo — The European Union election observation mission, which observed the 16 October general elections in Mozambique, has accused the publicly owned television channel TVM, and the pro-government daily “Noticias” of serious bias in their coverage.

The final report from the EU mission carries an analysis of press coverage of the election campaign, concluding that TVM’s reporting on the campaign was “clearly tendentious” in favour of the presidential candidate of the ruling Frelimo Party, Filipe Nyusi. 64 per cent of TVM’s presidential campaign coverage was devoted to Nyusi, 19 per cent to Daviz Simango, candidate of the Mozambique Democratic Movement (MDM), and 17 per cent to Afonso Dhlakama, leader of the former rebel movement Renamo.

The TVM coverage of the political parties was also unbalanced – 56 per cent of the time went to Frelimo, 22 per cent to Renamo, 17 per cent to the MDM and five per cent to minor parties.

The imbalance was truly startling when it came to TVM panel discussions – overwhelmingly the guests TVM chose to invite were pro-Frelimo, and hostile to both opposition parties. The EU Mission report divided the tone used in these talk shows into positive, negative and neutral. It found that all the mentions of Nyusi were positive, while nothing positive was said about the other two candidates.

80 per cent of the mentions of Dhlakama in these programmes were negative and 20 per cent neutral. For Simango, the TVM panels were unrelentingly hostile, with 100 per cent negative mentions.

As for “Noticias”, the EU report found that 60 per cent of its presidential coverage went to Nyusi, 23 per cent to Dhlakama and 17 per cent to Simango. For the parties, 60 per cent of the coverage went to Frelimo, 14 per cent to the MDM, 12 per cent to Renamo and an astounding 14 per cent to the gaggle of 27 minor parties most of whom ran no campaign at all.

The report found Radio Mozambique and the main independent media group, SOICO, much fairer in their coverage. Thus in the presidential campaign, 39 per cent of the Radio’s coverage went to Nyusi, 33 per cent to Dhlakama and 28 per cent to Simango. But Nyusi was always the first candidate mentioned in the radio newscasts.

The EU mission thought that the radio’s coverage of the parties was also “reasonably balanced” – although Frelimo took 47 per cent of the time, compared with 23 per cent each for Renamo and the MDM and seven per cent for others.

The SOICO television channel, STV, was clearly making a serious attempt at balance.

The Report found that 41 per cent of its presidential campaign coverage went to Nyusi, 32 per cent to Simango and 27 per cent to Dhlakama. As for the parties, STV gave 37 per cent of the time to Frelimo, 33 per cent to Renamo, 28 per cent to the MDM and two per cent to the minor parties.

The coverage by the SOICO daily paper, “O Pais”, came close to equality between the three presidential candidates: Simango received somewhat more coverage than either of his opponents, with 37 per cent, compared to 33 per cent for Nyusi and 30 per cent for Dhlakama.

As for the parties, “O Pais” gave 39 per cent to Renamo, 38 per cent to Frelimo, 16 per cent to the MDM, and seven per cent to the most serious of the minor parties, the PDD (Party for Peace, Democracy and Development).

Source Article from http://allafrica.com/stories/201502190175.html




















MIAMI, 17 de febrero de 2015 /PRNewswire/ — Motorsport.com anunció hoy que el aclamado periodista de noticias, Jonathan Noble se ha unido a la compañía como editor de Fórmula 1. El nombramiento se hará efectivo el 14 de mayo de 2015.

Foto – http://photos.prnewswire.com/prnh/20150217/175983

Noble ha pasado los últimos 16 años en Autosport, con sede en el Reino Unido, en donde de manera más reciente se desempeñó como Editor de Fórmula 1 del Grupo.

“Jonathan tiene una posición única en el mundo de la Fórmula 1 como persona de referencia en lo relacionado a noticias de último momento”, dijo Charles Bradley, Jefe Editor de Motorsport.com. “Su experiencia es literalmente inigualable, y su decisión de unirse a Motorsport.com es una declaración de nuestro objetivo de ser los mejores del rubro”.

El anuncio de hoy se da tras importantes incorporaciones al departamento editorial de Motorsport.com, incluso Bradley, quien se unió en enero a Motorsport.com desde Autosport.

“La incorporación de Jonathan a nuestro equipo editorial es una muestra de nuestro compromiso con ofrecer cobertura de noticias y contenido de Fórmula 1 de primer nivel a nuestros lectores”, dijo Eric Gilbert, vicepresidente de operaciones de Motorsport.com. “Como el proveedor de contenido en línea de todos los deportes de motor con más rápido crecimiento, continuamos posicionándonos como el recurso por excelencia para todo lo vinculado a deportes de motor. Jonathan es una de las fuentes de mayor confianza en el rubro de la Fórmula 1. Su liderazgo y capacidad editorial proveerán la visión y el contenido de cobertura de Fórmula 1 de primer nivel que nuestros lectores merecen”.

“Hemos trabajado juntos (o enfrentados) en el último milenio, por lo que sé exactamente lo que él aporta a nuestra solidez editorial con miras al futuro, y es excelencia en periodismo de noticias del más alto nivel”, agregó Bradley. “Este es un movimiento radical de Motorsport.com“.

En su nuevo rol, Noble liderará la dirección de todo el contenido de noticias de Fórmula 1 para Motorsport.com y reportará directamente al Jefe Editor, Charles Bradley.

Acerca de Motorsport.com
Creada en 1994, Motorsport.com es una compañía premiada de tecnología avanzada con distribución digital de primer nivel, contenido interactivo multimedia y la base de datos de fotos de carreras de motor más grande del mundo. Con sede en el Distrito de Diseño de Miami, Florida, Motorsport.com es el líder mundial de contenido de noticias de deportes de motor, cobertura detallada, al minuto, sobre todo el espectro de carreras de motor, que incluye más de 450.000 artículos de noticias.

FUENTE Motorsport.com

SOURCE Motorsport.com

RELATED LINKS
http://www.motorsport.com

Source Article from http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/destacado-periodista-a-nivel-mundial-de-noticias-de-formula-1-se-une-a-motorsportcom-292259351.html

São Paulo – The first Arabian horse specimens arrived in Brazil in the 19th century, but there used to be no comprehensive records of their origins, use, and dissemination across the country. Now there are. Released in late 2014, the book O Cavalo Árabe no Brasil (The Arabian horse in Brazil) recounts the history of the animal in the country and features photo essays portraying the ways in which it is used throughout the Brazilian territory. The book features texts by Mario Braga, photos by Marco Terranova and editing from Andrea Jakobsson.

Marco Terranova

The Arabian horse is bred all over Brazil

According to Braga, the book was one of the actions designed to celebrate the 50th anniversary of the Brazilian Association of Arabian Horse Breeders (ABCCA), in 2014. “We had no accounts available of the history of the animal in these parts, and Brazil is a landmark when it comes to breeding Arabian horses. We raise and export the animal,” Braga said. In a bid to retrieve the race’s history in the country, the author resorted to foreign publications, research works, and old newspapers.

Braga claims the earliest documentation of the animal’s arrival in Brazil date from 1860, but there is little information regarding importation and utilization from that time. The first official Arabian horse breeder was Guilherme Echenique Filho, who imported seven specimens in the 1920s from a stud farm in Argentina to Brazil’s Rio Grande do Sul state.

The race was only bred in the South, with a few specimens in other regions, until ABCCA was founded in 1964 by banker Aloysio Faria, one of the owners of Banco Real, which has since been incorporated into Santander. The association was established in Belo Horizonte and then implemented in São Paulo. Echenique joined Faria and then the Arabian horse started being used in the entire Brazilian territory.

The photos in the book show the Arabian horse in the pampas (lowlands) area of Rio Grande do Sul, among buffalo herds in Marajó, Pará, in Midwestern cattle farms, and even in the Northeastern caatinga (savannah). These pictures are testimony to one of the animal’s main features: its resistance.

“It is the oldest horse there is, the father to all races. The thoroughbred, the quarter horse, the Andalusian and the domestic horse all derive from the Arabian horse,” said Braga. According to information from ABCCA, the earliest records of the animal’s existence were found in Egyptian bas reliefs from the 16th century BC, and the race originated in the desert.

Arabian horses are bred in many countries, among them Argentina, United States, Egypt and Poland. Arab countries Saudi Arabia and United Arab Emirates invest in breeding and hold contests. In addition to racing, Arabian horses are used in genetic improvement.

Service

Book O cavalo árabe no Brasil (The Arabian Horse in Brazil)
Authors: Mario Braga and Marco Terranova
Price: R$ 140.00 (roughly US$ 44)
Information: www.abcca.com.br or (+55 11) 3674-1744

*Translated by Gabriel Pomerancblum

Source Article from http://www2.anba.com.br/noticia/21866793/arts/book-recounts-arabian-horse-history-in-brazil/

Principal premiação da música, o Grammy Awards 2015 aconteceu na noite deste domingo (08.02) em Los Angeles, nos Estados Unidos. Se você não conseguiu acompanhar o ritmo frenético de postagem das divas no Instagram, fique tranquilo: nós selecionamos fotos dos principais looks da noite (e algumas imagens divertidas) para você ficar atualizado. Veja (ou reveja) clicando na galeria de fotos.

Source Article from http://ffw.com.br/noticias/red-carpet/o-tapete-vermelho-do-grammy-2015-visto-pelo-instagram/

Al registrarse en alguno de los sitios de Dominio de ARTE GRAFICO EDITORIAL ARGENTINO S.A. (en adelante AGEA), EL USUARIO deberá brindar información personal, prestando su consentimiento para que la misma sea almacenada directamente en una BASE DE DATOS, encontrándose protegida electrónicamente, utilizando los mecanismos de seguridad informática de protección de la información más completos y eficaces para mantenerla en total confidencialidad, conforme a la Ley Nº 25.326 de Hábeas Data, no obstante lo cual, el Usuario puede informarse al respecto en http://www.jus.gov.ar/datospersonales/pdf/ley_ 25326.pdf, siendo la Dirección Nacional de Protección de Datos Personales, del Ministerio de Justicia, Seguridad y Derechos Humanos, el órgano de control de la citada norma legal (http://www.jus.gov.ar/datospersonales/).

AGEA se reserva el derecho a modificar la presente política para adaptarla a novedades legislativas o jurisprudenciales así como a prácticas de la industria. En dichos supuestos, anunciará en esta página los cambios introducidos con razonable antelación a su puesta en práctica.

Mediante el presente, toda persona que se registra en un sitio de Internet de dominio de AGEA (en adelante USUARIO) y vuelque información respecto de su nombre, domicilio, documento nacional de identidad, identificación tributaria, teléfono, dirección de correo electrónico y/o datos vinculados a productos financieros (DATOS PERSONALES), presta su consentimiento para que dicha información sea almacenada directamente en una BASE DE DATOS de propiedad de AGEA.

El Usuario garantiza que los Datos Personales facilitados a AGEA son veraces y se hace responsable de comunicar a ésta cualquier modificación en los mismos.

Se deja expresamente aclarado que ciertos Servicios prestados por éste sitio u otros sitios vinculados pueden contener Condiciones Particulares con previsiones específicas en materia de protección de Datos Personales.

Los Datos Personales serán incorporados a una base de datos que es de titularidad de AGEA (la “Base”).

EL USUARIO presta su consentimiento para que AGEA realice operaciones y procedimientos sistemáticos, electrónicos o no, que permitan la recolección, conservación, ordenación, almacenamiento, modificación, evaluación, bloqueo y en general, el procesamiento de sus DATOS PERSONALES (en adelante TRATAMIENTO DE DATOS PERSONALES).

AGEA podrá contratar a terceros para el tratamiento de Datos Personales.

La finalidad de la recogida y tratamiento de los Datos Personales es la que se detalla a continuación:

• Para habilitar su participación en promociones, premios o concursos en línea.

• Para el desarrollo de nuevos productos y servicios que satisfagan las necesidades del Usuario.

• Para contactarse, vía mail o telefónicamente, con el Usuario a fin de relevar opiniones sobre el servicio y para informar sobre productos y servicios de cualquiera de los sitios editoriales o productos de AGEA.

AGEA ha adoptado los niveles de seguridad de protección de los Datos Personales legalmente requeridos, y ha instalado todos los medios y medidas técnicas a su alcance para evitar la pérdida, mal uso, alteración, acceso no autorizado y robo de los Datos Personales facilitados a AGEA. Ello no obstante, el Usuario debe ser consciente de que las medidas de seguridad en Internet no son inexpugnables. Por tal motivo, debe tener presente que siempre que divulguen voluntariamente información personal online, ésta puede ser recogida y utilizada por otros. Por lo tanto, si bien ponemos nuestro mayor esfuerzo por proteger su información personal, AGEA no será responsable por la difusión de los datos personales de nuestros visitantes efectuada por fuentes ajenas a ésta ni será responsable por los daños y perjuicios que la misma genere.

El Usuario tiene reconocidos los derechos de acceso, cancelación, rectificación y oposición, así como tienen reconocido el derecho a ser informados de los permisos de acceso realizados contactándose con AGEA a través del correo electrónico datospersonales@agea.com.ar

El Usuario puede modificar sus Datos Personales en cualquier momento, accediendo directamente a “Editar Perfil”, valiéndose de su Usuario y Contraseña, podrá dar de alta, modificar y/o dar de baja los datos personales que hubieran ingresado en la Base.

Las estructuras de la Base no requiere ni permite el ingreso de datos ‘sensibles’ en los términos del artículo 7° y concordantes de la Ley 25.326 de Protección de Datos Personales y su Reglamentación.

Source Article from http://www.ole.com.ar/blogs/francotirador/Noticias-Torre_7_1302539737.html

Karl Lagerfeld lança linha infantil de roupa e acessórios ©Reprodução

Karl Lagerfeld é o mais novo nome a adentrar o universo do varejo infantil: foi anunciado na quarta-feira (11.02) que o estilista vai lançar uma linha de roupas e acessórios voltados para o público jovem, desde recém-nascidos até os 16 anos, com duas coleções anuais – a primeira deve sair no Verão 2016 internacional. A empreitada é uma parceria entre a grife Karl Lagerfeld e o grupo Children Worldwide Fashion, que também faz licenciamentos para sete grandes marcas: Burberry, Chloé, DKNY, Boss, Lee, Little Marc Jacobs e Timberland.

O presidente e CEO da Karl Lagerfeld, Pier Paolo Righi, afirmou ao “WWD” que a expansão da marca para o segmento infantil é “natural” devido à personalidade “cool e irônica” da empresa, e destacou que a Europa, Oriente Médio e Coreia são mercados chave para este lançamento.

Source Article from http://ffw.com.br/noticias/moda/karl-lagerfeld-lanca-linha-infantil-de-roupas-e-acessorios-357/

Se unió a esa cadena a principios de 2011 como vicepresidente y director del noticiero.

Por: 
 | 

7:54 p.m. | 12 de febrero de 2015

Source Article from http://www.eltiempo.com/estilo-de-vida/gente/daniel-coronell-nuevo-vicepresidente-ejecutivo-de-noticias-univision/15239862