Most Viewed Videos

After being captured by Mexican forces, the Sinaloa cartel managed to wrest El Chappo’s son free from government control with a stunning show of force complete with machine guns and rocket launchers.

The events unfolded in the city of Culiacán on Thursday after troops captured the son of jailed drug lord Joaquín Guzmán Loera, known as El Chapo. His son, Ovidio Guzmán Lopez, is one of many of the notorious kingpin’s children who live in the area. Another one of El Chapo’s sons called up cartel members to begin a siege on Culiacán, according to the New York Times.

Trucks with large mounted machine guns were spotted, as were videos showing rocket launchers and rocket-powered grenades. Many civilians in the city were able to capture the staccato of gunfire during the prolonged battle, which ended in the deaths of at least seven and injured more than a dozen.

The Mexican forces who arrested the younger Guzmán released him after eight of their members were taken hostage. Part of the effort by the cartel to get Guzmán released reportedly included not only taking armed forces hostage, but also kidnapping their families.

Given that they were surrounded, the violence was continuing to rise, and there were hostages, the government surrendered and let Guzmán go.

“Decisions were made that I support, that I endorse because the situation turned very bad and lots of citizens were at risk, lots of people and it was decided to protect the life of the people,” said President Andrés Manuel López Obrador on Friday. “You cannot value the life of a delinquent more than the lives of the people.”

Raúl Benítez, a security expert at the National Autonomous University of Mexico, said that this another example of extreme violence displayed by the cartels this year. He criticized the president for his decision to pull back and surrender to the cartel.

“The government was forced to accept the cartel’s control over the city and not confront them,” Benítez said. “To the people of Culiacán, the president is sending a very tough message: The cartel is in charge here.”

Videos captured the violence unfolding and were posted on social media.

Source Article from https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/the-cartel-is-in-charge-here-narcos-overpower-authorities-and-release-el-chapo-son-in-massive-show-of-force

SAN DIEGO (AP) — More than 900 children have been separated from their families at the border since a judge ordered that the practice be sharply curtailed, the American Civil Liberties Union said Tuesday.

One parent was separated for property damage valued at $5, the ACLU said. Six parents were separated for convictions of marijuana possession. Eight were split up for fraud and forgery offenses.

A 2-year-old Guatemalan girl was separated from her father after authorities examined her for a fever and diaper rash and found she was malnourished and underdeveloped, the ACLU said. The father, who came from an “extraordinarily impoverished community” rife with malnutrition, was accused of neglect.

About 20% of the 911 children separated from June 28, 2018, to June 29 of this year were under 5 years old, including babies, the ACLU said. They include 678 whose parents faced allegations of criminal conduct. Other reasons include alleged gang affiliation, unfitness or child safety concerns, “unverified familial relationship” or parent illness.

In June 2018, U.S. District Judge Dana Sabraw ordered that the practice of splitting up families at the border be halted except in limited circumstances, like child-safety concerns. He told the administration to reunite the more than 2,700 children who were in government custody at the time, which has largely been accomplished.

The ACLU, which based its findings on reports that the administration provided, asked that the judge order the government to clarify its criteria for splitting families.

“It is shocking that the Trump administration continues to take babies from their parents,” ACLU attorney Lee Gelernt said. “The administration must not be allowed to circumvent the court order over infractions like minor traffic violations.”

The Justice Department didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment.

The 218-page court filing details separations that are sure to raise scrutiny of U.S. Customs and Border Protection. The ACLU said a 4-year-old boy was split from his family because his father’s speech impediment prevented him from answering questions, despite evidence that he was the parent.

A 2-year-old girl was split from her father after Customs and Border Protection questioned a birth certificate’s authenticity. The father, who speaks an indigenous language and didn’t have an interpreter, was reunited after a DNA test confirmed he was a parent.

The government also took children from women whom they believed had gang ties but who in fact had been gang targets, the ACLU said.

One woman from El Salvador said a gang member forced her to be his girlfriend until he was arrested in late 2018. She came to the U.S. in February and was separated from her 3-year-old son for three months while an attorney tracked down Salvadoran documents showing she had been a victim, not a criminal.

Another Salvadoran woman was separated from her 2-year-old daughter on the toddler’s birthday because of suspected gang ties. But the woman’s attorney says her client had been raped repeatedly by a gangster who forced her to deliver marijuana inside a prison. The woman refused and turned the pot into authorities, but she was arrested anyway.

In other cases, families were separated for minor crimes that, if committed by people living in the U.S., would never result in a child being taken away.

Attorneys say a 17-year-old girl spent four months in custody after being separated from her father. The father had served a six-day jail sentence for a charge of destruction of property valued at $5.

A 7-year-old girl has been in custody since June after being separated from her father because he had a conviction of driving without a license and had previously entered the country without authorization.

The ACLU said 14 parents were separated based on immigration convictions combined with driving under the influence or unspecified traffic offenses.

Source Article from https://www.snopes.com/ap/2019/07/30/aclu-911-children-split-at-border-since-2018-court-order/

Thousands of fires are ravaging the Amazon rainforest in Brazil – the most intense blazes for almost a decade.

The northern states of Roraima, Acre, Rondônia and Amazonas as well as Mato Grosso do Sul have been particularly badly affected.

However, images purported to be of the fires – including some shared under the hashtag #PrayforAmazonas – have been shown to be decades old or not even in Brazil.

So what’s actually happening and how bad are the fires?

There have been a lot of fires this year

Brazil’s Amazon rainforest has seen a record number of fires in 2019, Brazilian space agency data suggests.

The National Institute for Space Research (Inpe) says its satellite data shows an 85% increase on the same period in 2018.

The official figures show more than 75,000 forest fires were recorded in Brazil in the first eight months of the year – the highest number since 2013. That compares with 39,759 in all of 2018.

Forest fires are common in the Amazon during the dry season, which runs from July to October. They can be caused by naturally occurring events, such as by lightning strikes, but also by farmers and loggers clearing land for crops or grazing.

Activists say the anti-environment rhetoric of Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro for has encouraged such tree-clearing activities.

In response, Mr Bolsonaro, a long-time climate sceptic, accused non-governmental organisations of starting the wildfires themselves to damage his government’s image.

He later said the government lacked the resources to fight the flames.

The north of Brazil has been badly affected

Most of the worst-affected regions are in the north.

Roraima, Acre, Rondônia and Amazonas all saw a large percentage increase in fires when compared with the average across the last four years (2015-2018).

Roraima saw a 141% increase, Acre 138%, Rondônia 115% and Amazonas 81%. Mato Grosso do Sul, further south, saw a 114% increase.

Amazonas, the largest state in Brazil, has declared a state of emergency.

The fires are emitting large amounts of smoke and carbon

Plumes of smoke from the fires have spread across the Amazon region and beyond.

According to the European Union’s Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (Cams), the smoke has been travelling as far as the Atlantic coast. It has even caused skies to darken in São Paulo – more than 2,000 miles (3,200km) away.

Image copyright
Planet Labs Inc

Image caption

Some of the wildfires, such as this one in Pará, Brazil, cover a number of acres

The fires have been releasing a large amount of carbon dioxide, the equivalent of 228 megatonnes so far this year, according to Cams, the highest since 2010.

They are also emitting carbon monoxide – a gas released when wood is burned and does not have much access to oxygen.

Maps from Cams show this carbon monoxide – toxic at high levels – being carried beyond South America’s coastlines.

The Amazon basin – home to about three million species of plants and animals, and one million indigenous people – is crucial to regulating global warming, with its forests absorbing millions of tonnes of carbon emissions every year.

But when trees are cut or burned, the carbon they are storing is released into the atmosphere and the rainforest’s capacity to absorb carbon emissions is reduced.

Other countries have also been affected by fires

A number of other countries in the Amazon basin – an area spanning 7.4m sq km (2.9 sq miles) – have also seen a high number of fires this year.

Venezuela has experienced the second-highest number, with more than 26,000 fires, with Bolivia coming in third, with more than 17,000.

The Bolivian government has hired a fire-fighting airtanker to help extinguish wildfires in the east of the country. They have so far spread across 2.3 sq miles (6 sq km) of forest and pasture.

Extra emergency workers have also been sent to the region, and sanctuaries are being set up for animals escaping the flames.

By Mike Hills, Lucy Rodgers and Nassos Stylianou

Source Article from https://www.bbc.com/news/world-latin-america-49433767

The White House, intelligence officials and lawmakers from both parties argue that China has already shaped its telecommunications and that tech industries have also given rise inside Chinese territory to facial recognition, constant surveillance of the population and human rights abuses.

American officials have also warned that China’s exports of Huawei and other tech products have allowed other authoritarian nations to spy on their citizens and access sensitive security and trade secrets.

“We must have a cleareyed view of the threats that we face and be prepared to do what is necessary to counter those threats,” Ajit Pai, the chairman of the Federal Communications Commission, said in a statement. “Today’s executive order does just that.”

But even if Huawei is banned from the United States, it will likely control 40 to 60 percent of the networks around the world. It has made a strong marketing pitch in Africa, Latin America and parts of Asia where it holds huge economic influence. American officials have said China has offered subsidized prices and low-interest loans to outmaneuver the few Western competitors, chiefly Nokia and Ericsson, both European firms.

The United States will have to connect to those nations — and must prepare for a day when the American government and companies will have to live in “dirty networks,” Sue Gordon, the deputy director of national intelligence, recently warned.

In January, prosecutors in Washington State charged two units of Huawei of conspiring to steal trade secrets from T-Mobile and of wire fraud.

Senator Lindsey Graham, Republican of South Carolina and the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, said he doubted that Chinese companies could meet American standards and laws on surveillance.

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/15/business/huawei-ban-trump.html

Iran’s decision to remove missiles from two of its boats indicated the rogue nation was de-escalating tensions surrounding its nuclear program, former CIA Chief of Station Daniel Hoffman said on Saturday.

Hoffman told “America’s News HQ” that the removal was “an encouraging sign.” “I think Iran is trying to de-escalate.

Foreign minister [Mohammad Javad] Zarif has also stated that Iran has stated publicly that Iran has no interest whatsoever in war with the United States,” he added while speaking with Fox News host Leland Vittert.

Hoffman was responding to news that Iran unloaded those missiles from boats sailing in Iranian waters. Iran and the United States faced rising tensions in May as Iran loosened its compliance with the nuclear deal and appeared to target U.S. commercial interests in the region.

US WARNS COMMERCIAL FLIGHTS NEAR PERSIAN GULF COULD BE ‘MISIDENTIFIED,’ AMID TENSIONS WITH IRAN

The U.S., having already angered Iran after abandoning the nuclear deal, slapped additional sanctions on the country and sent a naval fleet as an apparent warning to Iran’s military.

Referring to the U.S. military presence in the region, Hoffman said “this was a clear message of deterrence to Iran.”

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

“If you take a shot at us with one of your Shiite proxy militias or you mine the Persian Gulf or attack our military or our shipping in the Persian Gulf, there will be a response,” Hoffman said of the U.S.’s signal.

His comments echoed those of President Donald Trump who warned that Iran would “suffer greatly” if they acted up in the region. “We will see what happens with Iran. If they do anything, it’ll be a big mistake,” he said.

Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/world/cia-chief-iran-missiles-boats

Parecería ser que la reunión no fue demasiado buena para Ferrari. Malone quería saber de la propia fuente, cuáles eran los términos exactos del ventajoso contrato que la categoría tiene actualmente con el equipo más antiguo del certamen mundial.

Luego de que Marchionne le explicó a Malone, cómo y porqué a Ferrari se le pagaba mucho más que a otros equipos, Malone le explicó que esa no era una política que él iba a mantener cuando se renovaran los contratos para el año 2020.

¿Dos gladiadores enfrentados?

Por otra parte, Monza ha aceptado un nuevo contrato de tres años con la Fórmula Uno, para ser la sede del Gran Premio de Italia. No ha sido firmado, hasta que se complete el traspaso de CVC a LIberty Media, pero sí arreglado de palabra. Las primas se han elevado de siete a veintidós millones de dólares anuales, que los organizadores esperan cubrir, con la instalación de mayor cantidad de sitios para espectadores, en las partes del circuito donde no hay gradas.

Source Article from http://www.ovaciondigital.com.uy/automovilismo/parrado-opinion-automovilismo-21.html

Only heart disease and cancer killed more people in the U.S. than Covid-19 in 2020 — heart disease killed 690,882 people and cancer killed 598,932.

Covid-19 replaced suicide among the top 10 leading cause of death in the U.S., the study found. Overall, the annual death rate increased by nearly 16% in 2020 compared with a year earlier, the first time it’s grown since 2017, the CDC said.

The highest annual death rates were reported among men, people ages 85 and older, and people who are non-Hispanic Black and American Indian and Alaskan Native, the CDC said.

However, when looking at Covid-19 alone, Hispanic and American Indian and Alaskan Native people, as well as those ages 85 and older, died from the disease at higher rates compared with every other group. Men died from Covid-19 at a higher rate than women.

CDC Director Dr. Rochelle Walensky said following the study’s release that the findings should serve “as a catalyst” for Americans to drive down the spread of the virus and get vaccinated once it’s their turn.

“I know this is not easy and so many of us are frustrated with the disruption this pandemic has had on our everyday lives, but we can do this as a nation working together,” Walensky said during a White House Covid-19 press briefing

The agency’s early findings were published months ahead of schedule due to “improvements in timeliness and the pressing need for updated, quality data during the global COVID-19 pandemic,” researchers wrote.

It typically takes researchers 11 months after the end of the calendar year to investigate “certain causes of death and to process and review data.” While the daily total Covid death figures reported by the CDC are timely, they can underestimate the actual number of deaths because of “incomplete or delayed reporting.”

“Provisional death estimates provide an early indication of shifts in mortality trends and can guide public health policies and interventions aimed at reducing numbers of deaths that are directly or indirectly associated with the COVID-19 pandemic,” researchers wrote.

Some have tried to sow doubt about the true amount of deaths caused by Covid-19, claiming they may have been overstated. However, in a separate CDC study published Wednesday, the agency found that the death certificates accurately reflected the number of reported coronavirus fatalities.

The agency examined death certificates listing Covid-19 and at least one other co-occurring condition. The CDC found that in 97% of the deaths, Covid-19 was reported alongside another condition that was possibly caused by the virus, such as pneumonia or respiratory failure, or significantly contributed to its severity, like diabetes or hypertension.

A small proportion of them — 2.5% of the certificates — documented conditions that aren’t currently associated with Covid-19, the CDC found.

“These findings support the accuracy of COVID-19 mortality surveillance in the United States using official death certificates,” the researchers said.

Source Article from https://www.cnbc.com/2021/03/31/covid-was-third-leading-cause-of-death-in-us-in-2020-behind-heart-disease-and-cancer-cdc-says.html

Derechos de autor de la imagen
Getty Images

Image caption

La última de las profecías sobre el apocalipsis se hizo pública hace algunos años y sigue circulando en la red.

Ya existe una nueva fecha que anuncia, otra vez, el fin del mundo.

La última amenaza de apocalipsis afirma que un cuerpo desconocido llamado Nibiru o Planeta X chocará con la Tierra el 23 de septiembre de 2017.

La nueva profecía, que se hizo pública hace algunos años y circula especialmente en la red durante las últimas semanas, asegura combinar astronomía, investigación científica y pasajes de la Biblia para respaldar su predicción.

Incluso el último eclipse total, que a menudo es fuente de miedos y supersticiones populares, es utilizado como argumento para sustentar esta creencia y es definido como “el presagio del apocalipsis”.

Inicialmente, la teoría que defiende la existencia de Nibiru aseguraba que la catástrofe ocurriría en mayo de 2003. Cuando nada sucedió, sus seguidores hicieron una nueva interpretación para programarla en diciembre de 2012, realizando la conexión con el fin de uno de los ciclos del calendario maya.

Derechos de autor de la imagen
Reuters

Image caption

Eclipses como el del pasado 21 de agosto eran interpretado por culturas antiguas como un evento dramático o un mal presagio que anunciaba sucesos negativos.

Pero ¿tiene esta profecía alguna evidencia científica? La NASA lo tiene claro.

“Un engaño de internet”

La agencia estadounidense encargada de la investigación aeronáutica y espacial afirmó ya en repetidas ocasiones que el planeta Nibiru no existe ni hay fundamentos para creerlo. “Es un engaño de internet”, aseguró.

Ya en un artículo publicado en 2012 con motivo del supuesto apocalipsis previsto aquel año, la agencia fue tajante. “Si Nibiru o Planeta X fuera real y se dirigiera hacia la Tierra, los astrónomos lo estarían siguiendo durante al menos la última década, y ahora sería visible a simple vista. Obviamente, no existe”.

David Morrison es uno de los científicos de la NASA que más crítico se muestra públicamente con esta leyenda. En 2011 llegó a asegurar que recibía hasta cinco e-mails diarios de personas preguntando por el supuesto planeta.

Derechos de autor de la imagen
YouTube

Image caption

El científico de la NASA, David Morrison, realizó numerosos artículos y vídeos para descartar la existencia de Nibiru.

Morrison definió como “absurdas” algunas teorías que aseguran que Nibiru podría no haber sido aún localizado por estar escondido detrás del sol, o por solo poder ser visible desde el Polo Sur.

En una entrevista con el diario The Washington Post el pasado mes de enero, Morrison lamentó que aún existan unos 2 millones de páginas web informando sobre la supuesta colisión de Nibiru con la Tierra.

Source Article from http://www.bbc.com/mundo/noticias-41077996

President Donald Trump’s attack on his own health experts’ guidance for safely reopening schools cracked open for public display a power struggle within the administration that has been building for months.

Trump blasted the guidance issued by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention on Wednesday as “very tough & expensive” and “asking schools to do very impractical things.”

But CDC Director Dr. Robert Redfield said on Thursday the guidance would stand, and his staff would provide some new documents to clarify the recommendations.  

Wednesday’s flare-up punctuates a conflict escalating for months, with the nation’s top scientists publicly sidelined in the Trump administration’s initial coronavirus response. Earlier disagreements delayed the release of the reopening guidance for schools and businesses.

Public health leaders who worked at the CDC under prior presidents said they had never seen anything like this week’s open discord. Those signals can impair the guidance and the White House coronavirus task force itself, the experts said. 

“It undermines leadership for everyone involved,” said Dr. Jeffrey Koplan, vice president for global health at Emory University and a former CDC director, who bristled at the idea that expense should drive school decisions. “I don’t remember hearing that for the airports and bars.”

Source Article from https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/investigations/2020/07/09/trump-attacks-cdc-scientists-over-covid-19-school-reopening-guidelines/5405407002/

Image copyright
Reuters

Image caption

El terremoto rompió varias calles y carreteras en la Isla Sur.

Un segundo potente terremoto de magnitud 6,3 golpeó en la madrugada de este lunes a la Isla Sur de Nueva Zelanda, tal como había sucedido 24 horas antes en la misma zona.

El primero había sido de magnitud 7,8 y ocurrió a la medianoche local de este domingo (11:02 GMT), dejando dos personas muertas, informó el primer ministro, John Key.

Los movimientos sísmicos causaron una brecha en un dique en la Isla Sur liberando una “gran pared de agua”, por lo que las autoridades urgieron a quienes residen en torno a Clarence River, al norte de la localidad de Kaikoura, que se trasladen inmediatamente a tierras más altas.

Desde que ocurrió el primer sismo se han producido centenares de réplicas fuertes que han provocado cortes en el suministro eléctrico y en el servicio de agua potable.

Alerta de tsunami

El primer sismo desató una alerta de tsunami, lo que provocó que las personas en la costa este abandonaran sus hogares hacia el interior o a tierras más altas.

Image copyright
Getty Images

Image caption

La alerta de tsunami movilizó a la población que vive en la costa este de Nueva Zelanda.

En un momento dado el ministro de Defensa Civil sugirió que en la costa oriental podían llegar a impactar olas de hasta 5 metros de alto,

“Puede que la primera oleada no sea la más fuerte. La actividad de tsunamis continuará por horas”, advirtieron las autoridades neozelandesas.

No obstante, en la ciudad de Kaikoura, ubicada en la zona de alerta de tsunami, hasta ahora las olas alcanzaron una altura máxima de 2,5 metros, según el sitio Weatherwatch.co.nz.

Luego, la alerta de tsunami fue cancelada y rebajada a advertencia costera.

Image copyright
Getty Images

Image caption

Las autoridades evacuaron a miles de personas en la mitad de la noche.

El primer movimiento telúrico tuvo el epicentro a 91 kilómetros al nordeste de Christchurch, que ya fue golpeada por un fuerte terremoto en 2011 y que dejó 185 muertos.

Christchurch se ubica aproximadamente a 300 kilómetros al sur de la capital, Wellington, en la costa este de la Isla Sur.

Image copyright
USGS

“Ha sido terrorífico”

Estábamos durmiendo pero la casa empezó a temblar y nos despertamos. El temblor seguía y seguía. Parecía que la casa se iba a caer”, le dijo un habitante de Christchurch a la agencia de noticias AFP.

Otro neozelandés, Hayley Colgan, lo describió en Twitter como “el más terremoto más terrorífico que he sentido en Nueva Zelanda en 23 años”.

Image copyright
Getty Images

Image copyright
Fresh Choice Nelson City

Por su parte, el diario local The Herald informó que el temblor se sintió hasta en la capital, Wellington, donde saltaron las sirenas y los ciudadanos salieron a las calles.

Y según los primeros reportes, en Cheviot, un pueblo cercano al epicentro, algunas casas sufrieron daños.

Chrus Hill, un bombero de Cheviot, dijo en la emisora local RadioNZ que fueron puerta por puerta para evacuar a los residentes y que “todo el mundo parecía estar bien”.

Hay un montón de escombros en las casas, pero por ahora no parece que haya pasado nada muy malo”.

Image copyright
Twitter

Image copyright
Twitter

En septiembre pasado otro sismo de magnitud 7.1 volvió a azotar el país. Tuvo el epicentro a 169 kilómetros al nordeste de Gisborne, en la Isla del Norte.

Le siguió una alerta de tsunami pero, aunque no dejó víctimas, sí causó daños materiales.

Nueva Zelanda está situada sobre el que se conoce como el Cinturón de Fuego del Pacífico, también conocido como Cinturón Circumpacífico o Anillo de Fuego.

Source Article from http://www.bbc.com/mundo/noticias-internacional-37966293

Judge Jeanine Pirro told “Tucker Carlson Tonight” Wednesday that U.S. District Judge Emmet Sullivan‘s decision to allow a third party to present arguments opposing the Justice Department’s motion to dismiss the case against former national security adviser Michael Flynn was “absolutely foreign.”

“The judge has an obligation to rule on the case before him,” Pirro told host Tucker Carlson. “It is not complicated. It is a motion to dismiss with one of the most fact-laden affidavit[s] … behind it to support the application to dismiss. It’s a ministerial move that this judge apparently doesn’t want to make.”

JUDGE IN FLYNN CASE APPOINTS THIRD PARTY TO ‘PRESENT ARGUMENTS’ AGAINST DISMISSAL

Earlier Wednesday, Sullivan appointed retired New York federal judge John Gleeson as an “amicus curiae,” or friend of the court. On Tuesday, Sullivan issued an order indicating he’ll soon accept “amicus” submissions in the case — drawing immediate scrutiny and a planned ethics complaint against Sullivan, who had previously refused to hear amicus briefs in the case.

“Now, they want to bring in the clowns,” the “Justice with Judge Jeanine” host told Carlson. “This morning, it was all the retired Watergate attorneys who want to come in and now we’re going to bring in someone else to tell the judge how to rule. He’s [Sullivan’s] been a judge for 30 years.”

CLICK HERE FOR THE FOX NEWS APP

Pirro called on for Sullivan to “recuse himself,” adding that he “should be embarrassed to put a robe on.”

“This judge doesn’t belong on that case,” Pirro said. “And now what he’s doing is he’s poisoning the 2020 election … He’s trying to destroy the whole thing so that [Attorney General William] Barr looks like the villain here.”

Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/media/jeanine-pirro-emmet-sullivan-should-be-embarrassed

São Paulo – Qatari music, dancing, art and cuisine will be on show for São Paulo audiences from this Thursday (18th) until next Sunday (21st) at the city’s Villa Lobos Park. The attractions are part of the Qatari Week SP, which will bring a sample of the Gulf country’s cultural and social life to Brazil.

Aurea Santos/ANBA

Al-Hajri: best artists were picked to come to Brazil

“Over the next few days we will present part of the culture of Qatar. We will also present other parts in upcoming events,” said Faleh Al-Hajri, the Qatari deputy minister of Culture during a visit to the Arab Brazilian Chamber of Commerce this Wednesday (17th). Al-Hajri, Rafah Barakat, the head of the Brazil-Qatar 2014 Year of Culture, and a delegation of 16 artists were welcomed by the Arab Chamber’s CEO Michel Alaby and Culture director Silvia Antibas.

“The Arab Chamber has implemented a very active Culture department because it is aware of the importance of showcasing the culture of Arab countries in order to strengthen ties with Brazil,” said Antibas. Alaby offered the Arab Chamber’s full support to the Year of Culture events.

The deputy minister said that the best artists in her country have been chosen to come to Brazil, and music is a highpoint. “Our music is different. Our artists have created many beautiful works, and Qatari food will also be showcased during the event. Our music will sound amazing to the Brazilian people. It resembles samba, but with an Arab twist to it,” she said.

According to Barakat, the Qatari culture week took three months to prepare. “We will display a lot of Qatar’s culture: how coffee is prepared, the handicraft, a workshop about wedding parties. We will serve food and showcase jewels. We will hold many fun activities, such as henna painting and show cooking,” she said.

Aurea Santos/ANBA

Delegation of artists paid visit to the Arab Chamber

She also underscored how successful the Year of Culture activities are being in other Brazilian cities. “We have had great success in Belém, Brasília and Rio de Janeiro. Now, in São Paulo, we want more and more,” she remarked. The week in São Paulo is part of the Brazil-Qatar 2014 Year of Culture, involving similar actions in various municipalities across Brazil.

Barakat also expounded on the interest her country’s culture commands from Brazilians. “People are very curious about how Arab weddings take place. They ask a lot of questions. We have held seminars at schools in Belém and it was a very interesting experience to us. We discussed women in Qatar. People think that in Qatar, all women do is tend to children, but our women work. I, for one, am the manager of a big project involving Qatar and Brazil,” she said.

Science for students

Another event of the Brazil-Qatar 2014 Year of Culture is set to begin this month in the state of São Paulo: Programa 1001 Invenções (Portuguese for 1001 Inventions Program), an educational project showing the science produced by Ancient Arab and Islamic civilizations.

The program will be launched in Brazil on the 23rd this month at São Paulo’s Instituto Butantã, with the attendance of state governor Geraldo Alckmin (affiliated with political party PSDB). The educational project is designed to showcase inventions created by Muslims over 1,000 years ago, and tell the story of these creations and their creators.

“There will be a live presentation where a group of volunteers will play the role of scientists and discuss Arab inventions of the past,” said Malak Hassan, the projects specialist for the Qatar Museums Authority, which organizes the Year of Culture.

Following the guests-only launch event, the program’s presentations will be taken to several state schools.

Service
Qatari Week SP
September 18th to 21st
Villa-Lobos Park
Avenida Professor Fonseca Rodrigues, 2001 – Alto dos Pinheiros, São Paulo – SP
The activities are free of charge and will take place from 11am to 5pm

*Translated by Gabriel Pomerancblum

Source Article from http://www2.anba.com.br/noticia/21864946/arts/qatari-culture-week-begins-on-thursday/

On Saturday, women and their allies will take to the streets in cities around the world for the third annual Women’s March.

But this year, the leaders of Women’s March Inc. — one of the organizations that grew out of the original march, and the most visible public face of the march today — are facing calls to step down. The reasons include criticisms of their association with Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan and allegations that they made anti-Semitic remarks in planning meetings.

Women’s March Inc. is a national organization led by four activists from New York City — Tamika Mallory, Linda Sarsour, Carmen Perez, and Bob Bland — who helped organize the first march in Washington, DC, in 2017. The group also has local chapters that are planning marches in cities around the country this year, though other local marches are not affiliated with Women’s March Inc.

The controversy has contributed to the cancellation of at least one city march, and a number of progressive groups, including the Southern Poverty Law Center, have dropped their partnerships with the Women’s March, according to the Jewish News Syndicate.

Meanwhile, the Democratic National Committee appears to have been removed from a list of partners on the Women’s March website.

Women’s March Inc. co-chairs Tamika Mallory and Bob Bland denied allegations of anti-Semitism in an appearance on The View on Monday. Asked by co-host Meghan McCain why she would publicly associate with Farrakhan, given his anti-Semitic remarks, Mallory said, “I don’t agree with many of Minister Farrakhan’s statements.”

“Do you condemn them?” McCain asked.

“I don’t agree with these statements,” Mallory reiterated.

She also resisted calls to step down. “I am willing to lead until my term at Women’s March is up,” she said.

“Women’s March exists to fight all forms of oppression and bigotry, including anti-Semitism, misogyny, homophobia, transphobia, racism, white supremacy, ableism, xenophobia, Islamophobia, classism, and ageism,” Women’s March Inc. said in a statement to Vox, in response to a question about groups dropping partnerships. “That work continues with the release of our Women’s Agenda and lobby day this week in Washington, and our anniversary Marches happening all over the country this Saturday.”

No matter what happens at those marches, the influence of the Women’s March on American feminism — and on the left more broadly — is undeniable. And a groundswell of women’s activism in the wake of the 2016 election has led to an unprecedented number of women in the halls of political power; earlier this month, a record 117 women were sworn into Congress.

The future of Women’s March Inc., and of women’s marches around the country, may be in doubt. But the impact of the Women’s March as a broader movement on American politics endures.

The controversies have caused some to distance themselves from the Women’s March

Women’s March Inc. is no stranger to controversy, having weathered debates over representation of women of color and the inclusion (or exclusion) of a variety of groups from its official platform. But criticism of the group intensified in March 2018 when Mallory attended a Nation of Islam event at which Farrakhan made anti-Semitic remarks. In November, as controversy grew over the issue, Teresa Shook, whose 2016 Facebook post kicked off the first march, called on Mallory and the other co-chairs of Women’s March Inc. to step down.

Then in December, Leah McSweeney and Jacob Siegel at Tablet reported that, according to others involved in planning the march, Mallory and fellow Women’s March Inc. co-chair Carmen Perez had made anti-Semitic comments themselves. At a meeting to plan the first Women’s March, Mallory and Perez “asserted that Jewish people bore a special collective responsibility as exploiters of black and brown people,” sources told Tablet.

Mallory and the Women’s March have denied these allegations. But the Tablet report, as well as Mallory’s association with Farrakhan, has led some groups to drop their affiliation with Women’s March Inc.

In December, the Washington state chapter of the Women’s March announced that it would disband and affiliate with a different progressive group, Smart Politics. Organizers in Spokane, Washington, still plan to hold a march.

Meanwhile, earlier this month, organizers of the New Orleans Women’s March announced they were canceling this Saturday’s event.

“Many of the sister marches have asked the leaders of Women’s March Inc. to resign but as of today, they have yet to do so,” said the National Organization for Women’s Baton Rouge chapter, which organized the New Orleans march. “The controversy is dampening efforts of sister marches to fundraise, enlist involvement, [and] find sponsors, and attendee numbers have drastically declined this year. New Orleans is no exception.”

A number of progressive organizations, from the SPLC to Moms Demand Action for Gun Sense, have dropped their affiliations with Women’s March Inc. over concerns about anti-Semitism, according to the Jewish News Syndicate.

“Moms Demand Action isn’t an official sponsor of the Women’s March, but plenty of chapters have chosen to participate in the locally organized events,” Taylor Maxwell, a spokesperson for Moms Demand Action, told Vox. The SPLC has not responded to Vox’s request for comment.

The DNC, once listed as a march sponsor on the Women’s March Inc. website, no longer appears there, according to CNN.

“The DNC stands in solidarity with all those fighting for women’s rights and holding the Trump administration and Republican lawmakers across the country accountable,” said DNC deputy communications director Sabrina Singh in a statement to Vox. “Women are on the front lines of fighting back against this administration and are the core of our Democratic Party.”

Asked if the relationship between the DNC and the Women’s March had changed from last year to this year, a DNC official declined to comment further.

Women’s activism today is about more than marches

Women’s March Inc. has been working to repair relationships with the Jewish community. According to the Washington Post, since anti-Semitism charges were first leveled at the organization, it has added three Jewish women to its steering committee and updated its platform to include a message of support for Jewish women.

It remains to be seen whether this will be enough to convince those concerned about the anti-Semitism allegations to turn out to march on Saturday. Sociology professor Dana R. Fisher, who studies protest movements, told the Post that turnout in Washington, DC, will probably number in the tens of thousands, far fewer than the estimated 470,000 people who attended the first Women’s March following the inauguration of President Trump in 2017.

But those who marched in 2017 may also be engaging in other forms of activism. Instead of a march on Saturday, Women’s March Chicago has organized Operation Activation, which encourages women and their allies to participate in community actions like neighborhood cleanups and postcard-writing campaigns advocating for progressive legislation. The decision to hold a day of action instead of a march wasn’t inspired by controversy around Women’s March Inc., according to a Women’s March Chicago fact sheet provided to Vox. Rather, the Chicago group chose to hold a march in October 2018 to mobilize voters for the midterm elections, and decided not to host two marches back to back. The group plans to march again in 2020.

And in addition to the march on Saturday, Women’s March Inc. is releasing a federal policy platform called the Women’s Agenda and organizing a day of lobbying on Capitol Hill on Friday in support of Medicare-for-all.

Through their platform, their marches, and their Women’s Convention in October 2017 in Detroit, the Women’s March organizers changed the mainstream conversation around feminism and left-wing politics in America, prompting a wider swath of women than ever before to think about women’s rights as part of a larger set of civil rights, including racial and economic justice.

That conversation will no doubt continue at marches on Saturday. But it will also continue at community actions and other events throughout the year — and in the halls of Congress, where more women than ever before now have the opportunity to craft legislation that affects all Americans.

Whatever happens in the streets on Saturday, the legacy of the women who marched all over the world in 2017 will persist for a long time to come.

Source Article from https://www.vox.com/2019/1/18/18185829/womens-march-2019-dnc-tamika-mallory-view

President TrumpDonald John TrumpBillionaire investor says he’d back primary challenger to Trump: report Trump donates 0,000 from salary to alcoholism research How the government will reopen MORE on Sunday blasted a pair of Fox News reporters over their coverage of the border wall negotiations, claiming that they have “less understanding” than journalists at “fake news CNN & NBC.”

“Never thought I’d say this but I think [John Roberts] and [Gillian Turner] have even less understanding of the Wall negotiations than the folks at FAKE NEWS CNN & NBC!” Trump tweeted, referring to two of the news network’s  top correspondents. 

“Look to final results! Don’t know how my poll numbers are so good, especially up 19% with Hispanics?” Trump continued, referring to a poll published earlier this month that found a growing number of Latino adults approved of Trump’s job performance. 

The Marist poll, published in partnership with PBS and NPR, found that 50 percent of Latino adults approve of Trump’s job as president, up from 31 percent in December. The survey also found that just 39 percent of adults approved of Trump’s job performance. 

It is unclear what specific coverage Trump was referring to. Roberts filled in for Fox News anchor Chris Wallace on “Fox News Sunday.” Fox News did not immediately respond to a request for comment from The Hill. 

The comments from Trump come only days after he signed a continuing resolution to temporarily reopen the government following a 35-day shutdown. The funding lapse was triggered after Congress failed to reach an agreement on a new spending bill. 

Trump has repeatedly demanded that a long-term bill include funds for a border wall, which Democrats oppose. The president expressed doubts to The Wall Street Journal on Sunday that lawmakers could reach an agreement on the issue.

“I personally think it’s less than 50-50, but you have a lot of very good people on that board,” Trump told The Journal, adding that  another shutdown is “certainly an option.”

Source Article from https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/427195-trump-rips-into-fox-news-over-shutdown-border-wall-coverage

President Ivan Duque of Colombia meets President Trump at the White House on Wednesday. I believe Trump may use Duque’s visit or its immediate aftermath to announce the deployment of a limited number of U.S. Army or Marine personnel to the Colombian border with Venezuela.

Interim Venezuelan President Juan Guaido has now set a Feb. 23 date for when his followers will attempt to force U.S. aid convoys through the Colombian-Venezuelan border. Venezuela’s pretender-president Nicolas Maduro has blocked those border crossings with his military. But while it was originally expected that the opposition might attempt an aid crossing on Tuesday, Guaido instead announced that Feb. 23 would be the crunch date. This invites the question: Why the delay from Tuesday to Feb. 23?

I think it’s because the U.S. and Guaido know that they have not yet been able to persuade a sufficient critical mass of Venezuelan military officers to flip towards Guaido. They assessed that, had Guaido attempted to force through the aid on Tuesday, Maduro’s forces would have violently subdued them. The key here, then, is what changes between now and Feb. 23. In the context of pre-existing Trump administration interests in sending a small military force to Colombia (remember John Bolton’s accidental 5,000 troops to Colombia note a couple of weeks back?), I suspect the Trump administration has now indicated to Guaido that it will deploy a limited military force to the border before Feb. 23.

That action would certainly be proportionate and justified in defense of U.S. diplomat and USAID officials at the border. Of course, it would also provide eyeball-to-eyeball pressure on the Venezuelan military and Maduro’s Cuban intelligence service base. It would challenge them to choose between either allowing the aid convoys through, or firing on Venezuelan civilians and perhaps even U.S. diplomats and facing the consequences.

Remember, the Trump administration’s Venezuela strategy is focused far more on breaking the military’s link to Maduro than on influencing Maduro per se. Of course, any new U.S. military deployment to Colombia would require that nation’s assent. And that speaks to a second “why now” issue: Duque’s evolving position.

Certainly, Duque is under increasing U.S. pressure to more aggressively confront Maduro’s regime. Although Duque’s administration is heavily critical of Maduro, it is cautious about being enveloped in a spiral towards war. Still, with Duque in Washington to seek new U.S. aid support for Colombian domestic security initiatives, and U.S. forces already present on Colombian soil for counter-drug operations, it is far from unfeasible that a new, limited U.S. border deployment might be authorized. Colombia might even welcome that deployment to deter the increasingly unpredictable Maduro.

As I say, I expect a near-term Trump announcement on a limited U.S. military deployment to Colombia.

Source Article from https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/why-trump-is-likely-to-announce-hes-sending-troops-to-the-colombian-venezuelan-border

El exdiputado y excandidato presidencial Jorge Crespo Toral falleció a los 94 años, el pasado 6 de agosto.

Doctor en jurisprudencia, Crespo Toral fue un político que desempeñó diversas funciones públicas y defendió organizaciones sindicales.

En la década de los sesenta estuvo vinculado al movimiento político Acción Revolucionaria Nacionalista Ecuatoriana (ARNE). Fue elegido diputado a la Constituyente de 1966 y postulado como candidato presidencial por esa tienda política en 1968.

Contrajo matrimonio con Laura Romo Rivera, quien laboró por más de sesenta años en la Casa de la Cultura Ecuatoriana Benjamín Carrión, desde su fundación. Con ella tuvo a su hijo, Santiago. (I)

Source Article from http://www.eluniverso.com/noticias/2017/08/21/nota/6340891/fallecio-excandidato-presidencial-1968

Foreign leaders heaped nearly $140,000 worth of gifts on President Trump and his family in 2017, according to a new report by the State Department’s Office of the Chief of Protocol.

In other words, Trump got the same treatment as every other U.S. president dating back to at least Herbert Hoover. Weirdly enough, the Associated Press’ write-up of the State Department report makes no mention of that part. It turns out that the world did not begin in January 2017, and that there is a history of world leaders showering U.S. presidents and their families with flattering and expensive tributes.

The AP report begin first by focusing on the gifts from China and the Saudi and Gulf Arab states: A calligraphy box valued at $14,400 and a porcelain dinnerware set worth $16,250, a $6,400 ruby and emerald necklace, a gold-plated model of a fighter jet valued at around $4,850, a $3,700 bronze statue, $1,610 worth of gold-plated Kuwaiti coins, and “royal” perfume valued at around $1,260.

The report also includes this curious passage [emphasis added]:

Other lines in this putatively objective AP report seem designed to cast shade, such as, “Some gifts seemed designed to appeal to the president’s ego.” The supposedly flattering gifts include a portrait of Trump from Vietnam’s prime minister and a photo album of Trump and Trump Tower in New York City from Poland’s president.

Because it’s an AP story, it was soon aggregated and cross-posted at other news websites, including NBC News’. The reaction on social media was about you’d expect from a story framed the way the AP did with this one: “While Americans struggle to make ends meet, getting screwed by the #TrumpTaxScam, Foreign leaders, including from Saudi Arabia and China, lavish Trump with $140,000 in gifts,” complained Miami Herald columnist Lesley Abravanel.

This sort of reaction seems almost reasonable — so long as you know nothing about the history and context of gifts to U.S. presidents from foreign heads of state. And if all you read were the AP report, you really wouldn’t know anything about it.

You wouldn’t know, for example, that the Obamas received nearly $1.3 million in gifts from the Saudis in 2014, including a set of wristwatches valued at more than $43,000 and a diamond and emerald jewelry set for first lady Michelle Obama valued at around $560,000. You wouldn’t know about the thousands and thousands of dollars in gifts the Clintons received, some of which they reportedly absconded with when they left the White House. You wouldn’t know that Ronald Reagan was gifted an actual baby elephant in 1984 by Sri Lanka’s president. You wouldn’t know that John F. Kennedy was given, among many other things, a chair made of hand-carved 400-year-old mahogany taken from a Santo Domingo castle by the Dominican Republic’s Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs, while Jackie Kennedy was given a horse by the governor of Pakistan.

As for the AP, why not add at least one line noting the history for foreign leaders showering presidents with gifts? USA Today had no problem doing it.

Source Article from https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/ap-story-on-pricey-gifts-to-trump-white-house-never-once-mentions-precedent-for-such-gifts

At least one person has died as a result of a raging wildfire tearing through the LA area Friday, according to a report.

The man had cardiac arrest triggered by the wind-swept blaze in Sylmar — which destroyed dozens of homes and prompted more than 100,000 residents to evacuate the San Fernando Valley, according to ABC 7.

The man’s name was not immediately revealed by Los Angeles Fire Chief Ralph Terrazas at a press conference Friday.

The so-called Saddleridge Brush Fire, which broke out just north of downtown LA on Thursday night, rapidly spread from 60 acres to 4,700 acres (7.3 square miles), damaging at least 45 homes, according to the station.

Officials evacuated 25,000 homes and pleaded with other residents to leave the area.

“I saw people firsthand attempting to fight the fire with garden hoses,” said Terrazas, according to CNN. “Those individuals placed not only themselves in imminent peril” but first responders as well, he said.

Los Angeles firefighters battle the Saddleridge fire near homes in Sylmar, Calif.

AP

Firefighters battle the Sandalwood Fire as it destroys homes in the Villa Calimesa Mobile Home Park in Calimesa, Calif., on Oct. 10, 2019.

AP

Jerry Rowe uses a garden hose to save his home on Beaufait Avenue from the Saddleridge Fire in Granada Hills, Calif., on Oct. 11.

AP

Firefighters try to protect surrounding homes as they battle the Sandalwood Fire in the Villa Calimesa Mobile Home Park in Calimesa, Calif., on Oct. 10.

AP

A helicopter drops water on a brushfire in the Santa Monica Mountains in Newbury Park, Calif., on Oct. 10.

AP

Los Angeles Police Chief Michel Moore tells resident Jerry Rowe that firefighters are coming after the roof of Rowe’s home caught fire from the Saddleridge Fire in Granada Hills, Calif., on Oct. 11.

AP

The Saddleridge Fire flares up near a firefighter in Sylmar, Calif., on Oct. 10.

AP

A woman evacuates her home with her cat as the Saddleridge Fire threatens homes in Granada Hills, Calif., on Oct. 11.

AP

The Saddleridge Fire advances into Granada Hills, Calif., on Oct. 11.

AP

Residents watch a brushfire in the Santa Monica Mountains in Newbury Park, Calif., on Oct. 10.

AP

Water is dropped on a large brushfire Oct. 11 in Sylmar, Calif.

AP

Firefighters arrive to help fight a wind-driven wildfire in Sylmar, Calif., on Oct. 10.

REUTERS

Firefighters work to extinguish a house on fire and prevent it from spreading to other homes during the Saddleridge Fire in Porter Ranch, Calif., on Oct. 11.

EPA

According to the latest reports, the fire is progressing quickly due to the strong winds, prompting an evacuation of the nearby inhabitants.

EPA

Firefighters go door to door making sure residents have evacuated during the Saddleridge Fire in Sylmar, Calif.

EPA

Smoke and strong winds from the Saddleridge Fire result in low visibility in Sylmar, Calif.

EPA

Texas Canyon Station firefighters battle the Saddleridge Fire in Sylmar, Calif., on Oct. 10.

EPA

17

View Slideshow

Source Article from https://nypost.com/2019/10/11/raging-la-wildfire-leaves-at-least-1-person-dead/

“Quien se mete con México, se mete con Venezuela” dice Maduro a Trump

El presidente Nicolás Maduro pronunció duras críticas hacia el mandatario estadounidense Donald Trump, por sus políticas dirigidas hacia los mexicanos, sobre todo respecto a materia de inmigración.

“América Latina y el Caribe deben alzar su voz por los migrantes mexicanos que acaban de ser amenazados por una expresión de Donald Trump, desde Venezuela levantamos nuestra voz, yo como presidente de Venezuela, de la Venezuela de Bolívar y de Chávez, levanta su voz en defensa del pueblo de México ofendido por este magnate, por este pelucón, es un verdadero pelucón Donald Trump”, dijo Maduro en conferencia de prensa.

“Que indignación, quién se mete con México se mete con Venezuela, quien se mete con los mexicanos se mete con los venezolanos, repudio total a las declaraciones de Donald Trump, bandido, ladrón, cómo te vas a meter con nuestros hermanos de México, que bastante perseguidos y explotados son por ustedes” dijo Maduro en una entrevista televisada la semana pasada y difundida por Youtube.

Cabello ordena no hablar mal de Chávez

Diosdado Cabello, primer vicepresidente del Partido Socialista Unido de Venezuela (PSUV) lanzó este miércoles una campaña titulada “Aquí no se habla mal de Chávez”, con la que invitó a todos los seguidores del oficialismo a colgar en sus casas, oficinas o vehículos un cartel que aclare que no se hablará mal del fallecido presidente venezolano Hugo Chávez.

El dirigente chavista lanzó la iniciativa en su programa Con el mazo dando, que se emite todos los miércoles por el canal estatal Venezolana de Televisión (VTV).

De manera casi inmediata, en Mérida, las instituciones públicas cumplieron la orden y -desde las instalaciones del Sistema Teleférico de Mérida (STM) “Mukumbarí”- pintaron un mural en letras negras donde se lee “En MUKUMBARI no se habla mal de CHÁVEZ”, así como un cartel en letras rojas pegado en las taquillas donde se lee: “En el TELEFERICO NO se habla MAL de CHÁVEZ”.

De esta forma hacen caso expreso a la orden de Cabello, la cual indica que quien se suba al atractivo turístico, no puede hablar mal del fallecido presidente, o al menos advierte a las personas que se suben a él a que no lo hagan.

Nuevos billetes en Venezuela entran en circulación este lunes, anunció Maduro

Nicolás Maduro, el presidente venezolano informó que a partir de hoy entran en circulación los nuevos billetes de 5.000 y 10.000 bolívares. Durante el programa Los Domingos Con Maduro, el presidente indicó que junto al billete de 5.000 y 10.000 bolívares también se comenzarán a incorporar progresivamente las monedas de 10 y 50 y 100 bolívares.

Según anunció en ese momento el Banco Central de Venezuela, “la ampliación del cono monetario hará más eficiente el sistema de pagos, facilitará las transacciones comerciales y minimizará los costos de producción, reposición y traslado de especies monetarias, lo que se traducirá en beneficios para la banca, el comercio y la población en general”.

Asimismo en su Twitter, el BCV indicó que los billetes de Bs. 2.000, 5.000, 10.000 y 20.000 cuentan con el elemento de seguridad “tinta ópticamente variable”.

Detienen en Venezuela a uno de los fugitivos más buscados de España

La Policía Nacional detuvo en Venezuela a uno de los fugitivos más buscados de España, Rafael Rubén Núñez Cencerrado, un empresario valenciano que lideraba una de las bandas de narcotraficantes más importantes de España, informó el medio ABC.

Según han informado a Efe fuentes policiales, su arresto se produjo en la tarde del jueves pasado en las proximidades de Valencia, la capital del estado venezolano de Carabobo.

Núñez Cencerrado, natural de Sagunto, fue arrestado en septiembre de 2011 como cabecilla de una banda de narcotraficantes por hechos que se remontaban a 2008.

Venezuela quedó fuera del top 13 del concurso Miss Universo

La representante de Venezuela, Mariam Habach, no figuró en la lista de semifinalistas a pesar de haber ganado las bandas de Mejor Cuerpo, Piel y Miss Elegancia en las preliminares en la ciudad de Manila, Filipinas.

Esta eliminación provocó la indignación de los venezolanos quienes expresaron -a través de las redes sociales- su desacuerdo con la decisión del jurado de Miss Universo.

Cabe resaltar que Venezuela no quedaba afuera de esta instancia, desde la edición Miss Universo 2010.

La Gran Época recomienda también: La Comuna de París: cuando el espectro vino a la Tierra

Source Article from http://www.lagranepoca.com/ultimas-noticias/112540-ultimas-noticias-venezuela-hoy-30-enero.html