Most Viewed Videos

Este martes, en la Clínica del Country del norte de Bogotá, se apagó hacia las 7:50 p. m. la luz de uno de los más queridos presentadores de la televisión colombiana, Fernando González Pacheco.


Pacheco, como le conocían todos los colombianos, había venido sufriendo serios problemas respiratorios, aunque todavía se desconoce la causa cierta de su deceso. Por cuenta de esas complicaciones de salud ya había sido internado en ese mismo centro hospitalario a mediados del año pasado.





Indudablemente él está en la lista del colombianos de todos los tiempos aunque haya nacido en España. Es reconocido desde hace más de 40 años por ser uno de los primeros presentadores de televisión en el país, es recordado por programas como ‘Animalandia’, ‘Charlas con Pacheco’, ‘Compre la Orquesta’, y ‘¿Quiere cacao?’, entre otros.


Se trata de uno de los pioneros de la televisión colombiana, quien, junto a Gloria Valencia de Castaño y Jota Mario Valencia, se convirtió en icono de una televisión que se hacía a pulso y no con la fastuosa tecnología de hoy.


El presidente Juan Manuel Santos expresó su pesar por el fallecimiento de Pacheco: “Lamentamos de veras la muerte de ese gran personaje de la televisión que fue Pacheco. Se nos fue un gran hombre y un gran señor”, trinó en su perfil de Twitter.


Después de más de treinta años de carrera, en los que fue sin discusión el hombre más popular de la televisión, Pacheco se había alejado de la pantalla chica por cuestiones personales y de salud. Pero aunque pase el tiempo, Pacheco siempre será Pacheco, presente para siempre, con su voz ronca y su risa bonachona, en el corazón de los colombianos.


Este fue el despacho de prensa oficial de la clínica:


COMUNICADO DE PRENSA


La Clínica del Country lamenta informar que el señor FERNANDO GONZALEZ PACHECO falleció hoy a las 19:50 luego de haber sido tratado en nuestra institución a causa de una enfermedad crónica que lo venía aquejando desde hacía mucho tiempo.


La Clínica del Country siente la pérdida de esta figura entrañable para los colombianos y expresa sus condolencias sus los familiares y amigos.


11 de febrero de 2014

Entrevistas célebres de Pacheco (Charlas con Pacheco)







Source Article from http://www.semana.com/gente/articulo/muere-fernando-gomez-pacheco/376905-3

President Trump ended 2019 with a strong economy, a string of domestic policy achievements—and the notoriety of becoming the third president to be impeached by the House.

The mix of political highs and lows that has characterized Mr. Trump’s presidency was especially pronounced in his third year. He welcomed a special counsel report that found insufficient evidence the Trump campaign conspired with Russia to interfere in the 2016 election, though it drew no conclusion about whether the president obstructed justice. But his…

Source Article from https://www.wsj.com/articles/trumps-tumultuous-year-from-policy-wins-to-impeachment-11577883601

(CNN)Three men convicted Wednesday in the death of Ahmaud Arbery each faced nine possible charges that stemmed from their involvement in the 2020 shooting near Brunswick, Georgia. But the verdicts rendered by the jury on some of the allegations differed.

          ‘);$vidEndSlate.removeClass(‘video__end-slate–inactive’).addClass(‘video__end-slate–active’);}};CNN.autoPlayVideoExist = (CNN.autoPlayVideoExist === true) ? true : false;var configObj = {thumb: ‘none’,video: ‘us/2021/11/24/ahmaud-arbery-defendants-guilty-bakari-sellers-reaction-vpx.cnn’,width: ‘100%’,height: ‘100%’,section: ‘domestic’,profile: ‘expansion’,network: ‘cnn’,markupId: ‘body-text_25’,theoplayer: {allowNativeFullscreen: true},adsection: ‘const-article-inpage’,frameWidth: ‘100%’,frameHeight: ‘100%’,posterImageOverride: {“mini”:{“width”:220,”type”:”jpg”,”uri”:”//cdn.cnn.com/cnnnext/dam/assets/211124141350-sellers-small-169.jpg”,”height”:124},”xsmall”:{“width”:307,”type”:”jpg”,”uri”:”//cdn.cnn.com/cnnnext/dam/assets/211124141350-sellers-medium-plus-169.jpg”,”height”:173},”small”:{“width”:460,”type”:”jpg”,”uri”:”http://www.noticiasdodia.onlinenewsbusiness.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/211124141350-sellers-large-169.jpg”,”height”:259},”medium”:{“width”:780,”type”:”jpg”,”uri”:”//cdn.cnn.com/cnnnext/dam/assets/211124141350-sellers-exlarge-169.jpg”,”height”:438},”large”:{“width”:1100,”type”:”jpg”,”uri”:”//cdn.cnn.com/cnnnext/dam/assets/211124141350-sellers-super-169.jpg”,”height”:619},”full16x9″:{“width”:1600,”type”:”jpg”,”uri”:”//cdn.cnn.com/cnnnext/dam/assets/211124141350-sellers-full-169.jpg”,”height”:900},”mini1x1″:{“width”:120,”type”:”jpg”,”uri”:”//cdn.cnn.com/cnnnext/dam/assets/211124141350-sellers-small-11.jpg”,”height”:120}}},autoStartVideo = false,isVideoReplayClicked = false,callbackObj,containerEl,currentVideoCollection = [],currentVideoCollectionId = ”,isLivePlayer = false,mediaMetadataCallbacks,mobilePinnedView = null,moveToNextTimeout,mutePlayerEnabled = false,nextVideoId = ”,nextVideoUrl = ”,turnOnFlashMessaging = false,videoPinner,videoEndSlateImpl;if (CNN.autoPlayVideoExist === false) {autoStartVideo = false;autoStartVideo = typeof CNN.isLoggedInVideoCheck === ‘function’ ? CNN.isLoggedInVideoCheck(autoStartVideo) : autoStartVideo;if (autoStartVideo === true) {if (turnOnFlashMessaging === true) {autoStartVideo = false;containerEl = jQuery(document.getElementById(configObj.markupId));CNN.VideoPlayer.showFlashSlate(containerEl);} else {CNN.autoPlayVideoExist = true;}}}configObj.autostart = CNN.Features.enableAutoplayBlock ? false : autoStartVideo;CNN.VideoPlayer.setPlayerProperties(configObj.markupId, autoStartVideo, isLivePlayer, isVideoReplayClicked, mutePlayerEnabled);CNN.VideoPlayer.setFirstVideoInCollection(currentVideoCollection, configObj.markupId);videoEndSlateImpl = new CNN.VideoEndSlate(‘body-text_25’);function findNextVideo(currentVideoId) {var i,vidObj;if (currentVideoId && jQuery.isArray(currentVideoCollection) && currentVideoCollection.length > 0) {for (i = 0; i 0) {videoEndSlateImpl.showEndSlateForContainer();if (mobilePinnedView) {mobilePinnedView.disable();}}}}callbackObj = {onPlayerReady: function (containerId) {var playerInstance,containerClassId = ‘#’ + containerId;CNN.VideoPlayer.handleInitialExpandableVideoState(containerId);CNN.VideoPlayer.handleAdOnCVPVisibilityChange(containerId, CNN.pageVis.isDocumentVisible());if (CNN.Features.enableMobileWebFloatingPlayer &&Modernizr &&(Modernizr.phone || Modernizr.mobile || Modernizr.tablet) &&CNN.VideoPlayer.getLibraryName(containerId) === ‘fave’ &&jQuery(containerClassId).parents(‘.js-pg-rail-tall__head’).length > 0 &&CNN.contentModel.pageType === ‘article’) {playerInstance = FAVE.player.getInstance(containerId);mobilePinnedView = new CNN.MobilePinnedView({element: jQuery(containerClassId),enabled: false,transition: CNN.MobileWebFloatingPlayer.transition,onPin: function () {playerInstance.hideUI();},onUnpin: function () {playerInstance.showUI();},onPlayerClick: function () {if (mobilePinnedView) {playerInstance.enterFullscreen();playerInstance.showUI();}},onDismiss: function() {CNN.Videx.mobile.pinnedPlayer.disable();playerInstance.pause();}});/* Storing pinned view on CNN.Videx.mobile.pinnedPlayer So that all players can see the single pinned player */CNN.Videx = CNN.Videx || {};CNN.Videx.mobile = CNN.Videx.mobile || {};CNN.Videx.mobile.pinnedPlayer = mobilePinnedView;}if (Modernizr && !Modernizr.phone && !Modernizr.mobile && !Modernizr.tablet) {if (jQuery(containerClassId).parents(‘.js-pg-rail-tall__head’).length) {videoPinner = new CNN.VideoPinner(containerClassId);videoPinner.init();} else {CNN.VideoPlayer.hideThumbnail(containerId);}}},onContentEntryLoad: function(containerId, playerId, contentid, isQueue) {CNN.VideoPlayer.showSpinner(containerId);},onContentPause: function (containerId, playerId, videoId, paused) {if (mobilePinnedView) {CNN.VideoPlayer.handleMobilePinnedPlayerStates(containerId, paused);}},onContentMetadata: function (containerId, playerId, metadata, contentId, duration, width, height) {var endSlateLen = jQuery(document.getElementById(containerId)).parent().find(‘.js-video__end-slate’).eq(0).length;CNN.VideoSourceUtils.updateSource(containerId, metadata);if (endSlateLen > 0) {videoEndSlateImpl.fetchAndShowRecommendedVideos(metadata);}},onAdPlay: function (containerId, cvpId, token, mode, id, duration, blockId, adType) {/* Dismissing the pinnedPlayer if another video players plays an Ad */CNN.VideoPlayer.dismissMobilePinnedPlayer(containerId);clearTimeout(moveToNextTimeout);CNN.VideoPlayer.hideSpinner(containerId);if (Modernizr && !Modernizr.phone && !Modernizr.mobile && !Modernizr.tablet) {if (typeof videoPinner !== ‘undefined’ && videoPinner !== null) {videoPinner.setIsPlaying(true);videoPinner.animateDown();}}},onAdPause: function (containerId, playerId, token, mode, id, duration, blockId, adType, instance, isAdPause) {if (mobilePinnedView) {CNN.VideoPlayer.handleMobilePinnedPlayerStates(containerId, isAdPause);}},onTrackingFullscreen: function (containerId, PlayerId, dataObj) {CNN.VideoPlayer.handleFullscreenChange(containerId, dataObj);if (mobilePinnedView &&typeof dataObj === ‘object’ &&FAVE.Utils.os === ‘iOS’ && !dataObj.fullscreen) {jQuery(document).scrollTop(mobilePinnedView.getScrollPosition());playerInstance.hideUI();}},onContentPlay: function (containerId, cvpId, event) {var playerInstance,prevVideoId;if (CNN.companion && typeof CNN.companion.updateCompanionLayout === ‘function’) {CNN.companion.updateCompanionLayout(‘restoreEpicAds’);}clearTimeout(moveToNextTimeout);CNN.VideoPlayer.hideSpinner(containerId);if (Modernizr && !Modernizr.phone && !Modernizr.mobile && !Modernizr.tablet) {if (typeof videoPinner !== ‘undefined’ && videoPinner !== null) {videoPinner.setIsPlaying(true);videoPinner.animateDown();}}},onContentReplayRequest: function (containerId, cvpId, contentId) {if (Modernizr && !Modernizr.phone && !Modernizr.mobile && !Modernizr.tablet) {if (typeof videoPinner !== ‘undefined’ && videoPinner !== null) {videoPinner.setIsPlaying(true);var $endSlate = jQuery(document.getElementById(containerId)).parent().find(‘.js-video__end-slate’).eq(0);if ($endSlate.length > 0) {$endSlate.removeClass(‘video__end-slate–active’).addClass(‘video__end-slate–inactive’);}}}},onContentBegin: function (containerId, cvpId, contentId) {if (mobilePinnedView) {mobilePinnedView.enable();}/* Dismissing the pinnedPlayer if another video players plays a video. */CNN.VideoPlayer.dismissMobilePinnedPlayer(containerId);CNN.VideoPlayer.mutePlayer(containerId);if (CNN.companion && typeof CNN.companion.updateCompanionLayout === ‘function’) {CNN.companion.updateCompanionLayout(‘removeEpicAds’);}CNN.VideoPlayer.hideSpinner(containerId);clearTimeout(moveToNextTimeout);CNN.VideoSourceUtils.clearSource(containerId);jQuery(document).triggerVideoContentStarted();},onContentComplete: function (containerId, cvpId, contentId) {if (CNN.companion && typeof CNN.companion.updateCompanionLayout === ‘function’) {CNN.companion.updateCompanionLayout(‘restoreFreewheel’);}navigateToNextVideo(contentId, containerId);},onContentEnd: function (containerId, cvpId, contentId) {if (Modernizr && !Modernizr.phone && !Modernizr.mobile && !Modernizr.tablet) {if (typeof videoPinner !== ‘undefined’ && videoPinner !== null) {videoPinner.setIsPlaying(false);}}},onCVPVisibilityChange: function (containerId, cvpId, visible) {CNN.VideoPlayer.handleAdOnCVPVisibilityChange(containerId, visible);}};if (typeof configObj.context !== ‘string’ || configObj.context.length 0) {configObj.adsection = window.ssid;}CNN.autoPlayVideoExist = (CNN.autoPlayVideoExist === true) ? true : false;CNN.VideoPlayer.getLibrary(configObj, callbackObj, isLivePlayer);});CNN.INJECTOR.scriptComplete(‘videodemanddust’);

    Source Article from https://www.cnn.com/2021/11/25/us/ahmaud-arbery-killing-trial-malice-felony-murder/index.html

    Senator David Perdue and Jon Ossoff are headed for a close election, although polls have shifted in the incumbent senator’s favor in recent days.

    Mail-in and early in-person voting for the Georgia runoff election has already begun and there’s just about two weeks until Election Day. With control of the Senate on the line, Democrats and Republicans have a vested interest in the outcome of the race between Perdue and Ossoff and Georgians have already cast about 500,000 ballots.

    On average, Perdue has a .8 point lead over his Democratic challenger, according to FiveThirtyEight, a margin that makes for a statistical tie. The most recent poll came out on Thursday from Emerson College and gave Perdue a 3 point advantage, a lead that’s within the poll’s margin of error.

    Of the 600 people polled, 51 percent said they were going to vote for Perdue and 48 percent were planning on supporting Ossoff. Democrats have the lead among younger voters and Republicans have an advantage with those over the age of 45.

    Given that there are a limited number of voters who plan to cast votes for a Republican in one race and a Democrat in another, Spencer Kimball, Director of Emerson College Polling, suspected one party would win both seats.

    If Ossoff and Reverend Raphael Warnock, who is challenging Republican Senator Kelly Loeffler for her seat in a runoff election, oust the two Republicans from office, there will be a 50-50 split in the Senate. This effectively gives Democrats control because Vice President-elect Kamala Harris will cast any necessary tie-breaking votes.

    Senator David Perdue has a slight edge over Democratic candidate Jon Ossoff but the race is still too close to call. Perdue addresses the crowd during a campaign rally at Peachtree Dekalb Airport on Monday in Atlanta, Georgia.
    Jessica McGowan/Getty

    President-elect Joe Biden benefitted from mail-in voting and it turned the tide of the election in his favor. President Donald Trump largely dissuaded voters from casting their ballots by mail, but this time around, the president and vice president have pushed Georgians to vote by any available method.

    Emerson’s poll found 61 percent of people who already voted went for Ossoff and 39 percent cast ballots for Perdue. However, 68 percent of those polled who plan to vote on January 5 are planning on casting ballots for Perdue.

    One of the top priorities for voters in the Georgia election is the COVID-19 response and in that area, Ossoff leads among voters. The Democratic candidate has been a vocal advocate for a second round of stimulus checks and has hit Perdue for not having the same level of enthusiasm about the measure.

    Perdue voted in favor of the Coronavirus Aid Relief and Economic Security (CARES) Act in March, but said he opposed direct payments on a personal level.

    In November, Perdue received about 80,000 more votes than Ossoff, but because he fell short of the 50 percent threshold needed to win an election in Georgia, it forced the race into a runoff. Although he had the advantage in November, nothing is guaranteed come January and pollsters expect the race to come down to the wire.

    Source Article from https://www.newsweek.com/what-polls-say-about-david-perdue-jon-ossoff-2-weeks-before-georgia-election-1556055

    During the first House Judiciary Committee impeachment hearing on Wednesday, Republicans led by ranking member Doug Collins made it clear almost immediately that their strategy would be to interrupt the proceedings at every available opportunity and dismiss testimony from a panel of law professors as meaningless.

    But during her opening statement, one of those law professors — Pamela Karlan, a Stanford law professor and appellate attorney — made clear that she had little patience for Collins’s tactics in particular.

    “Here Mr. Collins I would like to say to you, sir, that I read transcripts of every one of the witnesses who appeared in the live hearing because I would not speak about these things without reviewing the facts,” she said. “So I’m insulted by the suggestion that as a law professor I don’t care about those facts.”

    Karlan was responding to comments Collins made in his opening statement, including this shot at her profession:

    America will see why most people don’t go to law school. No offense to our professors. But please, really, we’re bringing you in here today to testify on stuff most of you have already written about, all four, for the opinions that we already know out of the classrooms that maybe you’re getting ready for finals in, to discuss things that you probably haven’t had a chance — unless you’re really good on TV of watching the hearings over the last couple of weeks, you couldn’t have possibly actually digested the Adam Schiff report from yesterday or the Republican response in any real way.

    On Tuesday, the House Intelligence Committee voted along party lines to approve a report summing up its weeks of investigation, which included scores of hours of testimony both behind closed doors and broadcast to the American public. The report’s conclusion was damning — “that President Trump, personally and acting through agents within and outside of the U.S. government, solicited the interference of a foreign government, Ukraine, to benefit his reelection” — but easy to anticipate if you’d been paying attention to the two months of the impeachment inquiry.

    The opening statements offered by Karlan and three other law professors made it clear why Republicans are focused on procedural distractions and making a mockery of the proceedings instead of defending Trump on the merits: Each of them with the exception of Jonathan Turley explicitly said that based on the record of last month’s witness testimony, they’ve concluded that Trump committed impeachable offenses.


    The news moves fast. To stay updated, follow Aaron Rupar on Twitter, and read more of Vox’s policy and politics coverage.

    Source Article from https://www.vox.com/2019/12/4/20995296/pamela-karlan-doug-collins-impeachment-hearing-house-judiciary

    São Paulo – In 2013, Brazilian companies became more international than in 2012. According to a survey conducted by Dom Cabral Foundation, last year Brazilian companies attained 22.9% of internationalization. In 2012, the rate was 21.3%. The study covered 52 multinational companies and 14 companies which operate abroad via franchises.

    The internationalization or transnationality index is the result of three calculations performed by the Dom Cabral Foundation: ratio of assets abroad to total assets; ratio of foreign revenue to total revenue; and ratio of foreign workforce to total workforce.

    As per these ratios, construction company Norberto Odebrecht was the most international business in 2013, with a 0.549 score. Next on the list are Gerdau (steel), InterCement (cement), Stefanini (software consulting), Metalfrio (refrigerators), Magnesita (steel), Marfrig (meat), JBS (meat), Artecola (chemicals) and Ibope (statistics institute). This was the first time in the last four editions of the ranking that JBS did not top the list.

    The ranking of companies active in the highest number of countries is topped by Stefanini, operating in 32 countries, followed by the electric engine manufacturer WEG, active in 31 countries, the mining company Vale, in 27 countries, bus manufacturer Marcopolo (25) and the bank Banco do Brasil (24).

    In revenues, JBS leads the ranking, followed by Norberto Odebrecht, Magnesita, Marfrig and Gerdau. The ranking by assets is topped by Magnesita, followed by the meat plant Minerva Foods, Stefanini, Metalfrio and Gerdau. In the workforce index, the most international company is InterCement, followed by Marfrig, JBS, Metalfrio and Gerdau.

    The ranking has shown that the Brazilian multinationals surveyed operate in 89 countries. The United States has the strongest Brazilian presence: 39 companies in total, followed by Argentina, Chile, Uruguay, Colombia, Peru, Mexico, China, Venezuela, Paraguay, Portugal, Bolivia and the United Kingdom.

    Countries and franchises

    Among the Arab countries, Brazilian companies are present in Algeria, Egypt, Libya, Morocco, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, United Arab Emirates, Lebanon and Oman. In Kuwait, Brazilian companies operate via franchises only. The survey shows that in 2013 five Brazilian companies fled Argentina due to its struggling economy. Brazilian companies did not flee Arab countries; in fact Saudi Arabia, the Emirates and Lebanon received one new Brazilian company each.

    The most internationalized franchise-based company was car rental group Localiza, followed by the natural food store chain Mundo Verde, grooming parlor chain DepylAction, eyewear retailer Chilli Beans, shoe retailer Datelli, clothes manufacturer Hering, fast food chain Giraffas, yoghurt store chain Yogoberry, shoe store chain Arezzo and beauty spa Magrass.

    As regards franchises, the index is calculated based on ratio of stores abroad to total number of stores; royalties from foreign operations to total royalties; and revenue from foreign franchisees’ sales in comparison to total franchisees’ sales.

    According to the survey, 65.1% of the companies surveyed plan on expanding their operations in countries they already operate in this year, and 55.6% plan on entering new countries. The survey’s coordinator, Sherban Cretoiu, said the companies were more optimistic about sales abroad than domestic sales, which may be related to the slowdown in Brazil’s economy.

    *Translated by Rodrigo Mendonça

    Source Article from http://www2.anba.com.br/noticia/21864728/industry/odebrecht-outranks-jbs-as-brazils-most-international-company/

    Tunisian children participate in the
    reopening of the Bardo Museum

    after a terror attack targeting one of the Arab world’s most successful

    democracies killed 21 people, mostly European tourists.

     

     

    Evidence that
    Muslims are Indeed Capable of Democracy (Diário de Notícias, Portugal)

     

    “The
    democratic experience of the Arab world remains a fragile one. … Nevertheless,
    the Arab world and the Islamic world are not synonymous. … It is not hard to
    find examples of democracy in Islamic countries. Turkey is the most obvious,
    even if it didn’t make the demanding Index of 24 countries listed by The
    Economist as full democracies. Indonesia, Malaysia and Senegal are also the
    scenes of competition between parties and pluralism in the media – two
    indicators of democracy. What to say about Pakistan, despite having half of its
    history marked by generals as presidents? It’s not a lack of parties or an
    absence of an alternating government that so bedevil the country, which is also
    a reminder that democracy is never perfect.”

     

    By Leonídio Paulo Ferreira

                                                 

     

    Translated By Brandi Miller

     

    March 26, 2015

     

    Portugal – Diário
    de Notícias – Original Article (Portuguese)

    On the promise of the Arab Spring, listen to a man born
    during the First World War: “We have a much better chance of establishing
    – I hesitate to use the word democracy – but some sort of open, tolerant
    society, if it’s done within their systems, according to their
    traditions.” British scholar Bernard Lewis, nearly a century old, is one
    of the most famous Islamologists. Four years ago that
    was his response to The Wall Street
    Journal
    when the fall of dictators in Tunisia and Egypt led us to
    believe that a wave of democracy was rippling through the Arab world. Lewis’
    caution is understandable today, especially a week after Tunisia
    suffered an attack
    designed to undermine the most successful of the Arab
    Spring countries – perhaps not by chance where it all began.

     

    “These terrorists in Tunisia were targeting
    democracy,” denounced Lina
    Ben Mhenni in the Guardian
    .
    In 2011 she became famous as the Tunisian Girl: an account of how an Arab
    blogger helped in the fall of Ben Ali.

     

    Mubarak was deposed and arrested shortly after Ben Ali went
    into exile in Saudi Arabia. There were free elections and an old Mubarak
    opponent, Mohamed Morsi of the Muslim Brotherhood,
    won. However, the military showed who in Egypt was really in charge and deposed
    the first civilian president in the history of the country. The strongman of
    the armed forces, General Sissi, then took off his
    uniform and was elected. That is how the Arab Spring was synthesized in Egypt,
    where the absence of tourists left the economy in tatters – a crisis eased only
    by the injection of Saudi and Kuwaiti capital.

     

    After months of a civil war thrown out of balance by a
    U.N.-approved bombardment, the forces faithful to Mohammar Qaddafi were
    defeated in Libya with the dictator, in power since 1967, killed. If it quickly
    became apparent that some of the rebels hesitated between banditry and
    al-Qaeda, the victory of liberals in the first elections brought hope. Today,
    though, there are two governments, everyone seems to be fighting everybody
    else, and a branch of Islamic State is persecuting Christians. A sad synthesis
    of the Arab Spring in a Libya with a sparse population and such an abundance of
    oil wells that it should be an oasis.

     

    A year after the start of the Arab Spring, Ali Abdullah Saleh negotiated his departure from Yemen. Before that
    he was injured in an attack. His deputy succeeded him in February 2012 and was
    elected president with promises of democracy, but with the country divided
    between tribes and al-Qaeda cells, a Shiite rebellion took power and is now
    under attack by Islamic State bombs – another bleak synthesis.

     

    That’s to say nothing of Bahrain, where a popular revolt
    against the king was framed by an old rivalry between Shiites and Sunnis and,
    facing the threat of Iranian influence, Saudi Arabia quickly sent troops. Nor
    will we return to the much-discussed issue of Syria, where an uprising against
    Assad transformed into a jihadi revolution that the regime has successfully
    confronted for the past four years, particularly since the world has realized
    that a secular Arab dictator might be the lesser evil in comparison to the
    Islamic State.

     

    Let’s look at how even someone like Tahar
    ben Jelloun,
    the Moroccan author of The Spark – Revolt in the Arab Countries
    [L’Étincelle – Révolte dans
    les pays arabes
    ], allowed himself
    to get carried away with enthusiasm over the Arab Spring:

     

    “The liberating violence of the riots will not be
    halted by repression. It is vibrant and creative. It embodies a new generation
    of young people, some of whom have lived abroad and who, unlike their parents,
    have opened up windows facing the world. They saw how other young people live
    and have proven that freedom is synonymous with life. As in a dream, they
    suddenly glimpsed that they, too, have a chance to live better, of ending
    dictatorships, of regaining their dignity.”

     

    Utopias aside, Tunisia will succeed. Habib
    Bourguiba
    , the father of Tunisian independence, made Tunisia a
    modern state. He gave rights to women and opened the country. Tunisians learned
    in school that if their society is Muslim, it had older roots, whether Carthage
    or Rome which defeated it. It is inspiring that so many people took to the
    streets of Tunis after the attack on the Bardo Museum, even if at the
    same time they were frightened that thousands of Tunisians have joined the
    Islamic State.

     

    The democratic experience of the Arab world remains a
    fragile one. Morocco is on the right path and already had a socialist prime
    minister. But the king’s role means it is a neutered form of democracy. In
    Lebanon the situation is different: political pluralism must coexist with a
    constitution that reserves the presidency to a Christian and the government to
    a Sunni. As for Algeria, parties exist, elections are held, but generals give
    the orders.

     

    Nevertheless, the Arab world and the Islamic world are not
    synonymous, and this is the mistake of those with elaborate theories about the
    incompatibility of Islam with democracy and who sometimes raise the issue of
    the Hijri year, a calendar that begins in 622AD, to
    argue that Muslims live in the Middle Ages and therefore never experienced the
    equivalent of the Renaissance or the Enlightenment.

     

    It is not hard to find examples of democracy in Islamic
    countries. Turkey is the most obvious, even if it didn’t make the demanding
    Index of 24 countries listed by The Economist
    as full democracies.
    Indonesia, Malaysia and Senegal are also the scenes of competition between
    parties and pluralism in the media – two indicators of democracy. What to say
    about Pakistan, despite having half of its history marked by generals as
    presidents? It’s not a lack of parties or an absence of an alternating
    government that so bedevil the country, which is also a reminder that democracy
    is never perfect. A Pakistani newspaper, Dawn,
    dedicated an editorial to Tunisia after secular Beji
    Caid Essebsi
    was elected: Tunisia’s
    Example was the title
    .
    May the Tunisians, secular and Islamic parties alike such as those from the Ennahda Movement [aka/Renaissance
    Party
    ], continue to believe that democracy can be Arab – and for
    them to surprise Lewis, aged 98.

     

     

    SEE ALSO ON THE ARAB SPRING:


    Folha, Brazil: Disproportionate Anti-U.S. Reaction Threatens the Arab Spring

    Al Watan, Libya: If the Prophet Can be Insulted, then Holocaust can be Questioned

    Le Quotidien d’Oran, Algeria: Why Insulting the Prophet Always ‘Pays Off Big’

    Der Spiegel, Germany: Muslim Protests Show
    Limits of Free Speech

    Frankfurter Rundschau, Germany: Islam in Turmoil: Religion as ‘Ersatz-Identity’

    Al Watan, Libya: Libyan Fatwa Court Calls Attack on Americans an ‘Offense to Islam’

    The Independent, U.K.: Obama’s Foreign Policy of Reconciliation Lies in ‘Tatters’

    Die Zeit, Germany: Romney’s ‘Nostalgia’ Ill-Suited to Reality of Fast-Changing World

    Die Tageszeitung, Germany: Muslim Unrest Raises Stakes of U.S. Election Even Higher

    Independent, U.K.: ‘Inside Story’ of U.S.
    Envoy’s Assassination


    Global Times, China:
    America is ‘Disrespectful’ of Other Cultures


    Daily Star, Lebanon: Influential Lebanon MP
    Says Israel Backed
    Film to Defeat Obama


    Debka File, Israel: Al-Qaeda Chief Zawahri
    ‘Personally Ordered’ Murder
    of U.S. Envoy

    Independent, U.K.: ‘Provocateurs’ East and West Know: Politics and Religion Don’t Mix ’


    Telegraph, U.K.: Arab Spring Turns Sour for United States


    Telegraph, U.K.: Ambassador Chris
    Stevens: Man of Drive, Passion


    Independent, U.K.:
    Fear and Loathing:
    Another Unholy Row about Islam

    Guardian, U.K.:
    Attack in Libya Underlines
    Threat of Salafi Islamists

    Global Times, China: America ‘Disqualified’ as Global Human Rights Judge

    Xinhua, China: Human Rights Record of the United States in 2011

    Rodong Sinmun, North Korea: America by Far World’s Leading Human Rights Abuser

    Yezhednevniy Zhurnal, Russia: Putin is Mistaken to Favor China Over the United States


    Huanqiu, China: U.S. Should Keep its Nuclear Weapons Away from Koreas

    Guardian, U.K.: It Should
    Have Been Clear – Deposing
    Qaddafi was the Easy Part

     

    CLICK HERE FOR
    PORTUGUSE VERSION

    Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.
    blog comments powered by Disqus

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    [Posted By Worldmeets.US, March 26, 2015, 6:15pm]

    Source Article from http://worldmeets.us/diariodenoticias000017.shtml

    La caminata denominada “43×43, ni un desaparecido más” es encabezada por el Consejo Estatal de Organizaciones de la Ciudad de México (CEO-CDMX), la cual es considerada como parte del reclamo social por la desaparición de 43 estudiantes de la Normal Rural de Ayotzinapa.

    Pepe Alcaraz, dirigente del CEO-CDMX, expresó que la caminata forma parte de la exigencia para que los estudiantes aparezcan vivos, según informó el diario El Milenio.

    Por su parte, Carlos Eduardo Pérez Ventura, líder del CEO nacional, explicó que la caminata “es el inicio de una acción que corresponde al pueblo entero. La ciudadanía deberá de tomar en sus manos la construcción de un México en paz”.

    “Los asaltos a mano armada, en casas habitación, a vehículos, secuestros, extorsiones, en una palabra la inseguridad, pasó de ser algo atípico a ser algo típico y común contra la ciudadanía, por lo cual decimos ya basta y como sociedad civil es necesario que ya dejemos la pasividad, la indiferencia y la comodidad de nuestros hogares para ser causa en lugar de efecto”.

    Ruta de la caminata

    • Lunes 3 de noviembre: De Iguala a Buenavista de Cuéllar con 28 kilómetros de recorrido.
    • Martes 4 de noviembre: De Buenavista de Cuéllar a Amacuzac, con 25 kilómetros.
    • Miércoles 5 de noviembre: De Amacuzac a Alpuyeca, con 26 kilómetros.
    • Jueves 6 de noviembre: De Alpuyeca a Cuernavaca Norte, con 27 kilómetros.
    • Viernes 7 de noviembre: De Cuernavaca Norte a Tres Marías, con 30 kilómetros.
    • Sábado 8 de noviembre: De Tres Marías a Centro de Tlalpan, con 40 kilómetros.
    • Domingo 9 de noviembre: De Centro de Tlalpan al Zócalo del Distrito Federal, con 18 kilómetros.

    La caminata busca exigir justicia por la desaparición de 43 estudiantes normalistas en Iguala.

    Source Article from http://noticias.starmedia.com/mexico/ultimas-noticias-normalistas-desaparecidos-en-iguala-hoy-3-noviembre-2014.html

    A family staying in an Airbnb in Ireland discovered they were being livestreamed by a hidden camera.

    The Barkers found the camera concealed in the living room after father of five Andrew tried to connect his phone to the Wifi and saw a device labelled “IP camera”.

    “He scanned that device’s ports and found the live video feed,” his wife Nealie told Stuff. “We were all watching ourselves on his mobile phone.”

    The camera was in the lounge, positioned so it had a view of the dining and kitchen area as well.

    “We have encountered lots of weird and wonderful things and like to think we take most things in our stride,” added Nealie. “However, this was shocking.”

    The Barkers had checked in with their children on 3 March, having paid in full for three nights’ accommodation.

    “It was late at night, but we decided fairly quickly we didn’t feel comfortable about staying at the house,” said Nealie.

    They immediately left and checked into a nearby hotel.

    When the Barkers subsequently asked the Airbnb host about the camera, he refused to answer their questions at first and denied the device’s existence.

    However, when Andrew said they could see themselves on the camera, the host “became flustered and hung up”.

    He rang back later and said that he had only installed the camera to “protect his asset”.

    Nealie said Airbnb’s response was initially “hopeless”: it took weeks to hear back about the outcome of the investigation.

    An Airbnb spokesperson said: “We have permanently removed this bad actor from our platform.

    “Our original handling of this incident did not meet the high standards we set for ourselves, and we have apologised to the family and fully refunded their stay. There have been over half a billion guest arrivals in Airbnb listings to date and negative incidents are incredibly rare.” 

    Airbnb has strict policies governing the use of cameras in listings – they are never allowed in bathrooms or bedrooms or to be hidden – and has a zero tolerance stance when it comes to violations.

    There have been several high profile cases of holidaymakers finding hidden cameras in Airbnb properties in recent years.

    Dougie Hamilton was on holiday with his girlfriend in Toronto, Canada, in 2018 when he found one hidden in a digital clock.

    The Scottish holidaymaker told the Daily Record: “We were only in the place for 20 minutes when I noticed the clock. There was just something in my head that made me feel a bit uneasy.

    “I took the charger out of it and saw there was a lithium battery in the back. At this point, I slid the front facing off the clock and could see there actually was a camera. The hidden camera was facing into the living area and open-plan bedroom, so it could see everything. We didn’t know if the owner had been watching. It just felt really creepy and we didn’t want to stay.”

    Source Article from https://www.independent.co.uk/travel/news-and-advice/airbnb-hidden-camera-live-stream-wifi-family-a8854341.html

    <!– –>

    China’s top trade negotiator, Liu He, will meet with President Donald Trump‘s trade team on Thursday without the title “special envoy” for President Xi Jinping, a role he has held in previous talks, suggesting the vice premier may have diminished authority to make concessions that could be key to striking a deal.

    A source on the Chinese side told CNBC’s Eunice Yoon that Liu’s demotion suggests that he may not have much leeway to make compromises on his own.

    That could leave negotiations to happen at a higher level. On Thursday afternoon, Trump said that Xi had written him a “beautiful letter” that he had “just received,” and said he will probably speak to Xi by phone.

    The news of Liu’s title change comes as Washington and Beijing wrestle over the contours of a trade deal that has faced a number of setbacks in recent days.

    Trump over the weekend set a Friday deadline to more than double the rate for existing tariffs on $200 billion in Chinese goods, a turnaround after weeks in which the administration signaled that negotiations were moving forward.

    U.S. Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer and other officials are scheduled to meet with Liu for dinner just hours before those tariffs are set to take effect.

    Stocks continued to tumble Thursday after Trump said at a rally the night before that China “broke the deal” and reiterated his tariff threats. Meanwhile, China has signaled it is unlikely to back down in the face of American pressure.

    Part of the China’s calculus has involved the suspicion that Trump’s public pressuring of Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell to lower the central bank’s benchmark interest rate is motivated by the president’s belief that the U.S. economy is weaker than he has claimed, The Wall Street Journal reported.

    China backtracked on nearly every commitment that it had made in previous negotiations in a diplomatic cable sent Friday, according to Reuters.

    In response, on Sunday, Trump issued his threat to raise tariffs on the country in a post on Twitter.

    “The Trade Deal with China continues, but too slowly, as they attempt to renegotiate,” Trump wrote. “No!”

    Source Article from https://www.cnbc.com/2019/05/09/chinas-top-negotiator-may-have-diminished-role-in-trade-talks.html

    New York State issued an air quality health advisory for Tuesday, lasting until midnight, because of high levels of fine particulate matter in the air, which wildfires contribute to.

    By late afternoon, the Air Quality Index for New York City had reached 170, well above average. The concentration of microscopic particulate pollution called PM2.5 was nine times above exposure recommendations from the World Health Organization.

    In a statement, the Department of Environmental Conservation noted that while it was not rare for traveling wildfire smoke to reach the New York region, the smoke usually stayed high in the atmosphere. But in this case, “data showed that the smoke is extending down to the ground level,” since much of it is coming from relatively nearby fires in western Ontario and eastern Manitoba.

    Climate change is making wildfires larger and more intense, with results visible from satellites and on the ground. The Bootleg Fire in Oregon now covers more than 388,000 acres and is so intense that it is essentially making its own weather. Satellite images from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration show smoke from that fire and others making its way across wide swaths of the United States and Canada. It first reached New York City around July 15.

    Mr. Cristantello said that a cold front pushing through the New York City area on Wednesday should clear out the haze, but it could return if the fires persist.

    Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2021/07/20/us/wildfire-smoke-new-york-city.html

    Attorney General Chris Carr on Thursday announced the indictment of former District Attorney Jackie Johnson, who was strongly criticized over the way she handled the Ahmaud Arbery case.

    Johnson was indicted on charges of violation of oath of public officer and obstruction of a police officer. The charges, as alleged in the indictment, are related to the investigation surrounding the deadly shooting of Arbery.

    Specifically, the indictment (in full at end of the article) accuses Johnson in February 2020 of violating her oath as district attorney “by showing favor and affection to Greg McMichael during the investigation…”

    Johnson also failed “to treat Ahmaud Arbery and his family fairly and with dignity,” the indictment states. It alleges that after Arbery’s death, Johnson sought the assistance of Waycross Judicial Circuit District Attorney George Barnhill and, after disqualifying her for office, recommended Barnhill to the Attorney General’s Office for appointment as the case prosecutor without disclosing that she had previously sought Barnhill’s assistance on the case.

    “Our office is committed to ensuring those who are entrusted to serve are carrying out their duties ethically and honestly,” Carr said in a prepared statement. “While an indictment was returned today, our file is not closed, and we will continue to investigate in order to pursue justice.”

    If convicted, the violation of oath of public officer is a felony charge that carries a sentence of one to five years. The obstruction and hindering a law enforcement officer charge is a misdemeanor that carries up to 12 months.

    Gregory and Travis McMichael, a father and son, and their neighbor William “Roddie” Bryan Jr. are awaiting trial this fall for chasing and killing 25-year-old Arbery last year as he ran in their neighborhood outside coastal Brunswick. Jury selection is scheduled to start Oct. 18.

    Source Article from https://www.news4jax.com/news/local/2021/09/02/ex-prosecutor-indicted-for-misconduct-in-ahmaud-arbery-death/

    Media captionWhy no charge of obstruction of justice? A law professor breaks down the legal questions.

    The US attorney general spent five acrimonious hours in front of a congressional committee explaining his handling of the Mueller report. The intensity of some of the exchanges suggests multiple legal and battles lie ahead between the Democrats in Congress and President Donald Trump.

    A day after Attorney General William Barr traded blows with senators, the stakes ramped up considerably as he refused to testify to another committee and the Democratic leadership accused him of lying under oath.

    Here’s a look at five areas where the fighting could be the most heated – and where they could be headed.

    Waiting for Mueller

    Mr Barr’s Senate testimony on Wednesday may have prompted as many questions as it answered, raising to a fevered pitch Democratic calls to hear from Robert Mueller himself.

    They want to ask him why he failed to reach a conclusion on whether the president obstructed justice, and what he thinks about the attorney general’s handling of his report.

    They’ll also want to question him about the contacts between the Trump campaign team and Russians – and how close they may have come to being a criminal conspiracy.

    Although Republican Senate Judiciary Chair Lindsey Graham says he has no interest in calling Mr Mueller before his committee – insisting that the matter is closed – House Democrats have other ideas.

    Media captionThe Mueller report – in 60 seconds

    The chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, Jerrold Nadler, said negotiations are continuing over finding a date, perhaps in May, when the special counsel can testify before his committee.

    Mr Barr has said he has no objection to Mr Mueller making such an appearance and Trump adviser Kellyanne Conway also said that Mr Mueller – who is still, technically, a Justice Department employee – can testify.

    But increasing conflict between the White House and Congress could change this calculus.

    Outlook: Mueller spent most of his time as special counsel shrouded in secrecy and silence. It seems unlikely, however, that he will be able to quietly disappear from the national stage.

    Punishing Bill Barr

    In a press conference on Thursday morning, Democratic Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi straight-up accused William Barr of committing a crime.

    She was specifically referring to the attorney general’s claims, during congressional testimony in early April, that he was unaware of reports of dissatisfaction with his handling of the Mueller report expressed by members of the special counsel’s office.

    Democrats now believe this was a lie – based on a recent revealed letter from Mr Mueller to Mr Barr complaining that the attorney general’s four-page summary did not “fully capture the context, nature and substance” of his work.

    Image copyright
    Reuters

    Image caption

    Attorney General Barr wrote a summary of the Russia report before the full version was released

    Mr Barr countered that his communications were with Mr Muller himself, not his team, and the dissatisfaction had to do with the media coverage of his letter, not how he relayed Mr Mueller’s findings.

    Needless to say, Democrats aren’t buying it.

    Then there are other reasons Democrats are angry at Mr Barr – such as his refusal to testify before the House Judiciary Committee and his decision to ignore congressional document subpoenas.

    What are Democrats going to do about it? Mrs Pelosi only made vague references to a “process”, but they have several options if they want to punish the attorney general.

    They could make a criminal referral for lying to Congress, which would be forwarded to a US attorney in Mr Barr’s Justice Department. They could hold Mr Barr in contempt of Congress, which would have to be enforced by US attorneys in the Trump administration.

    Image copyright
    Getty Images

    Image caption

    Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi says Mr Barr committed a crime

    The House of Representatives could also vote to formally censure the attorney general, putting a black mark on his record but not much more.

    Finally, they could try to impeach the attorney general and have him removed from office. The process would be similar to that for removing a US president – a majority vote in the House of Representatives followed by a trial in the US Senate requiring a two-thirds vote to “convict”.

    Only one White House cabinet official has ever been impeached – Ulysses S Grant’s Secretary of War William Belknap in 1876 – and he was ultimately acquitted of corruption charges by the Senate.

    Outlook: Legal proceedings seem unlikely. Censorship appears pointless. Impeachment would be an uphill fight, but it could also serve as proxy battle for the impeaching Mr Trump himself, venting frustration for Democrats who are itching for a fight but wary of taking on the president directly.

    The McGahn subpoena

    While Mr Mueller’s appearance before the US Congress would be a blockbuster occasion, he’s not the only individual Democrats want to question in open testimony. The special counsel’s report detailed how former White House Counsel Don McGahn felt the president pressured him to fire Mr Mueller and, later, write a memo saying that Mr Trump issued no such directive.

    When Mr Barr was questioned about the matter by Senate Democrats, he said the president only suggested Mr Mueller be “replaced” because of a perceived conflict of interest – and then instructed Mr McGahn to write a memo to correct inaccurate media reports.

    Democrats, needless to say, aren’t buying this, viewing the episode as one of the most obvious instances of possible obstruction of justice. Mr Nadler has issued a subpoena calling on Mr McGahn to testify before his committee on 21 May so his committee can get the former Trump aide’s account directly.

    Image copyright
    Getty Images

    Image caption

    Doug McGahn left the White House, but Democrats still want to hear from him

    That’s not the end of the matter, of course. Mr Trump has said he plans to fight all the congressional subpoenas his administration is receiving, with Mr McGahn’s probably high on the list.

    The White House could claim “executive privilege”, a legal principle that protects the confidentiality of advice a president receives from his aides. Although that privilege was waived when Mr McGahn spoke with Mr Mueller’s office, a recently revealed letter from White House lawyer Emmet Flood to Mr Barr indicates the president intends to preserve those protections going forward.

    If both sides dig in, Mr McGahn’s freedom to talk to Congress could end up a matter for the courts to decide.

    Outlook: Executive privilege is a controversial legal principle, but there are plenty of judges – and Supreme Court justices – who could be eager to see these presidential protections strengthened. Mr McGahn would be a blockbuster witness – but the Mueller report may end up being his only public account.

    An unredacted report

    While most of the Mueller report was made public in mid-April, there are still roughly 36 pages that the Justice Department has redacted – because of sensitive intelligence data, grand jury information, material relevant to ongoing investigations or matters concerning “peripheral third parties”.

    Democrats in Congress want to see the entire report and have issued a subpoena – again courtesy of House Judiciary Chair Nadler – to force the Justice Department to hand it over.

    Image copyright
    Getty Images

    Image caption

    Congressman Nadler is leading the Democratic charge in Congress

    The White House has said the report was produced by the special counsel for the attorney general, and Congress has no right to see it in its entirety. There’s an unstated concern that if the report receives wider distribution, its sensitive contests will leak to the public.

    Attorney General Barr said in his Senate testimony, however, that there were no significant areas of disagreement between Mr Mueller and himself over what to redact. There’s no guarantee that the blacked-out portions of the report contain any new, explosive information.

    Still, it could very well end up another battle between two branches of government, the executive and legislative, that will have to be decided by the third, the judiciary.

    Outlook: This could end up being a fierce battle over a hill that doesn’t matter in the larger war.

    Trump’s tax returns and other documents

    There are two separate legal battles brewing over congressional requests for Donald Trump’s business records and – that holy grail for many on the left – his tax returns.

    A month ago, Richard Neal, the Democrat in charge of the House Ways and Means Committee, formally requested that the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) provide him with copies of the president’s tax returns for six years, citing a seldom-used 1924 law as authority.

    So far Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin, whose department oversees the IRS, has only said he’s reviewing the matter.

    Image copyright
    Getty Images

    Image caption

    Steven Mnuchin says the treasury department is reviewing the tax request

    The president and his lawyers, on the other hand, have called the request improper and insisted that the IRS not comply.

    “The Democrats are demanding that the IRS turn over the documents, and that is not going to happen and they know it,” acting White House Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney said a few days after the first committee request was filed.

    If the Treasury Department continues to drag its feet, the Democrats could start court proceedings that eventually determine the constitutionality of that old federal law and the legality of the Democratic action.

    Meanwhile, Mr Trump’s personal lawyers have filed a flurry of lawsuits to prevent an accounting firm and two banks used by Mr Trump’s businesses – Deutsche Bank and Capital One – from complying with requests by several Democratic-controlled House committees for Trump organisation financial records.

    Courts have previously given Congress broad subpoena powers as part of their legislative and investigatory responsibilities, but Mr Trump’s lawyers are painting the move as a partisan fishing expedition that intrudes on the privacy of the president and his family.

    Democrats counter that a thorough inspection of Trump businesses is the only way to ensure that he doesn’t have financial involvements that are illegal or make him susceptible to foreign influence.

    Outlook: This appears set for another long, drawn-out legal battle. Democrats could find a way to circumvent the federal government, however, if New York state – which possesses the president’s state tax returns and oversees many big financial institutions – hands over what they have to Congress.

    Follow Anthony on Twitter

    Source Article from https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-48138636

    Image copyright
    Getty

    Image caption

    Danilo Medina, el actual presidente, encabeza el conteo.

    El presidente de República Dominicana, Danilo Medina, es el que encabeza el conteo de papeletas y se vislumbra como posible ganador de las elecciones generales, celebradas este domingo.

    Medina, quien representa al Partido de la Liberación Dominicana y a sus formaciones aliadas, lleva una ventaja de más de veinte puntos con respecto a su principal contrincante, el empresario Luis Abinader, del Partido Revolucionario Moderno.

    El tercer boletín oficial emitido por la Junta Central Electoral (JCE) a las 10:30am hora local (14:30 GMT), otorga a Medina el 61,99% de los votos, mientras que Luis Abinader del Partido Revolucionario Moderno (PRM), su principal adversario, obtuvo el 35,18%.

    Sin embargo, aún no se ha terminado el conteo.

    Image copyright
    EPA

    Image caption

    Además del favorito Danilo Medina, los candidatos a presidente son (de izquierda a derecha): Hatuey De Camps (Partido Revolucionario Social Demócrata), Soraya Aquino (Partido de Unión Nacional), Guillermo Moreno (Alianza País), Luis Abinader (Partido Revolucionario Moderno), Pelegrín Castillo (Fuerza Nacional Progresista), Minerva Tavárez Mirabal (Alianza por la Democracia) y Elías Wessin Chávez (Partido Quisqueyano Demócrata Cristiano).

    Para que Medina fuera proclamado vencedor tendría que acumular más del 50% de los votos una vez contadas todas la papeletas.

    Y si ninguno de los candidatos obtiene más del 50%, tendrá que celebrarse una segunda vuelta.

    La jornada de votación se extendió una hora más por los retrasos causados por fallas técnicas en algunos centros y por la renuncia de 3.000 técnicos contratados para el montaje de las mesas.

    Por este motivo la Junta Central Electoral (JCE), el órgano electoral del país, continúa contabilizando votos manuales y electrónicos.

    En estas elecciones generales, también se elige al vicepresidente, a los representantes municipales y a congresistas y diputados.

    Source Article from http://www.bbc.com/mundo/noticias/2016/05/160515_resultados_elecciones_republica_dominicana_2016_ps

    Derechos de autor de la imagen
    Getty Images

    Image caption

    La oposición de Venezuela ha sido muy critica con el banco Goldman Sachs por la operación reportada por “The Wall Street Journal”.

    El gobierno socialista de Venezuela siempre presume de pagar sus compromisos de deuda con Wall Street.

    Este lunes, esa contradictoria relación entre Caracas y la gran meca del capitalismo indignó a la oposición, que desde hace dos meses promueve protestas casi diarias contra el gobierno, en el marco de las cuales ya han muerto alrededor de 60 personas.

    Este lunes hubo también manifestaciones, pero la noticia del día fue otra.

    Julio Borges, presidente de la Asamblea Nacional de Venezuela, controlada por la oposición desde las legislativas de 2015, envió una carta al director ejecutivo del banco inversor estadounidense Goldman Sachs.

    La razón de la misiva es el reporte publicado el fin de semana por el diarioThe Wall Street Journalen el que se aseguraba que el banco compró US$2.800 millones en bonos de la petrolera estatal PDVSA al Banco Central de Venezuela. Goldman Sachs pagó apenas US$865 millones por una deuda que vence en 2022.

    Derechos de autor de la imagen
    Getty Images

    Image caption

    Julio Borges, presidente de la Asamblea Nacional, envió una carta al director ejecutivo de Goldman Sachs para criticar la operación.

    BBC Mundo no pudo conseguir una confirmación del banco al ser un día festivo en Estados Unidos. Tampoco PDVSA ni el Banco Central de Venezuela se pronunciaron al respecto.

    Que un banco inversor compre deuda a una empresa estatal pasa todos los días. Pero dos aspectos hacen especial la operación de la que habla el medio estadounidense:

    Primero, el momento en el que llega, con un gobierno en una situación muy comprometida y con escaso flujo de caja

    En segundo lugar, la tremenda rentabilidad para Goldman Sachs y el consiguiente perjuicio para las arcas futuras del Estado Venezolano.

    Ya en la primera línea de la misiva, escrita en inglés a Lloyd Blankfein, director ejecutivo de Goldman Sachs, Julio Borges dice estar “preocupado” e “indignado”.

    Luego califica la operación como un “salvavidas financiero” para el gobierno de Nicolás Maduro, al que define como “dictador”.

    El presidente de la Asamblea acusa al banco de ayudar a financiar la “brutal represión” contra los manifestantes, que este mismo lunes volvieron a la calle.

    Y le recuerda que el Parlamento investigará una operación que podría ir en contra del propio código de ética del banco, según el cual Goldman Sachs identifica potenciales violaciones de derechos humanos antes de hacer una transacción.

    Ni reconocer ni pagar

    Borges y la oposición denuncian así presuntas violaciones de derechos humanos por parte del gobierno, que a su vez califica como “operaciones terroristas” las protestas de la “ultraderecha”, a la que acusa de fomentar un golpe de Estado con ayuda de Estados Unidos.

    Derechos de autor de la imagen
    Getty Images

    Image caption

    El presidente de la Asamblea Nacional de Venezuela, Julio Borges, envió una carta al director ejecutivo de Goldman Sachs, Lloyd Blankfein.

    “Una cosa es que quieras aprovecharte del mercado. El dinero no tiene corazón y nadie le pide eso a los inversionistas. Pero es que las operaciones con la república están financiado delitos de lesa humanidad”, dijo a BBC Mundo Rafael Guzmán, diputado opositor y miembro de la comisión de finanzas de la Asamblea Nacional.

    Tras esa estrategia hay una amenaza para los compradores de bonos. “Pretendo recomendar a cualquier futuro gobierno democrático no reconocer ni pagar esos bonos”, expresó Borges en la carta a Goldman Sachs.

    Guzmán confirmó a BBC Mundo que la oposición ya ha hablado de ese asunto en los últimos meses con varios bancos de inversión.

    “Muchos bancos se han echado para atrás. Otros no. Que cada quien asuma las consecuencias”, afirmó el diputado.

    Problema de liquidez

    El gobierno recurre a este tipo de operaciones porque se enfrenta a un grave problema de liquidez.

    La caída de los precios del petróleo y la merma en su producción han supuesto una severo recorte de divisas: 96 de los 100 dólares que llegan al país los aporta el crudo.

    Derechos de autor de la imagen
    Reuters

    Image caption

    Los bonos de PDVSA vencen en 2022 y podrán dar una alta rentabilidad a Goldman Sachs.

    Además, entre sus principales compradores de petróleo sólo Estados Unidos paga en efectivo.

    Todo ello afecta a las arcas de un gobierno que ha tenido que restringir severamente sus importaciones. En enero, el presidente Maduro admitió en 2016 una caída de importaciones del más de 50% respecto a 2015.

    Y esa es la principal razón de la actual escasez de alimentos y medicinas, uno de los problemas más graves del país con las mayores reservas de petróleo del mundo.

    A pesar de todo, el gobierno es buen pagador de una deuda que cada vez coloca en los mercados a mayor coste.

    Y en ese sentido se enmarca la operación de Goldman Sachs, que la compró con un descuento del 69%.

    “Es el rendimiento más grande de la historia de los mercado financieros internacionales”, dijo a BBC Mundo el economista Alejandro Grisanti, experto en deuda.

    Derechos de autor de la imagen
    Getty Images

    Image caption

    Queda por conocer quién fue el intermediario de la operación entre el Banco Central y Goldman Sachs.

    Grisanti afirmó que el hecho de que el Banco Central haya vendido “muy por debajo del precio de mercado” habla del mal momento por el que pasa la economía del país y la necesidad de liquidez del gobierno.

    El economista cree clave conocer quién fue el intermediario, ya que Goldman Sachs no compró los bonos directamente al Estado.

    Grisanti opinó, sin embargo, que el banco no se puede escudar en que la operación fue en el mercado secundario.

    “Es muy difícil que unos banqueros con la experiencia que tienen en esta compra y venta de bonos no supieran que están financiando de manera indirecta al Estado”, dijo.

    “No es oxígeno, es heroína”

    Esos márgenes, aseguran los expertos consultados, pueden ser indicador de que no hay intención de pagar la deuda, por lo que Venezuela se vería obligada pronto a una reestructuración.

    “No es oxigeno, es heroína. Es endeudarse al 48%. El que se endeuda y no tiene cómo salir del hueco se mete más hondo”, dijo a BBC Mundo el economista venezolano Ricardo Hausmann, profesor en Harvard, exministro de Planificación y muy crítico con el gobierno de Maduro.

    Hausmann califica de “inmoralidad” la operación de Goldman Sachs. “Son nuevas heridas en la piel de Wall Street”, afirmó.

    Derechos de autor de la imagen
    AFP

    Image caption

    La noticia llega en plena ola de protestas que han dejado ya casi 60 muertes.

    Pero más allá de las consideraciones éticas de las finanzas internacionales, este momento de zozobra en un país, como el que vive ahora Venezuela, es el más rentable para los inversores, que se aprovechan de una alta probabilidad de impago.

    Así lo reconoce Mike Conelius. El fondo que dirige, T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Bond Fund, es uno de los principales tenedores de deuda de Venezuela.

    Conelius atisba pronto un cambio de gobierno en Venezuela. Y en eso se basa su tesis para comprar bonos, aunque de alguna manera ayude a mantenerse a ese mismo gobierno.

    El momento de acumular exposición

    “Por difícil de aceptar que parezca poseer riesgo de Venezuela, es precisamente el momento en el que los inversores a largo plazo normalmente quieren acumular su exposición”, escribió en un mail, según informó Bloomberg el 5 de mayo.

    La alta probabilidad de impago alienta a los bancos de inversión, que se aprovechan de un gobierno que está necesitado y que emite deuda a una tasa de interés muy alta.

    Derechos de autor de la imagen
    Getty Images

    Image caption

    La oposición de Venezuela busca crear un problema de reputación al banco Goldman Sachs.

    “Cuando llegue el cambio, las valoraciones de hoy serán muy difíciles, por no decir imposibles, de encontrar”, escribió el inversor Conelius.

    Goldman Sachs también prevé que un cambio de gobierno puede duplicar el valor de la deuda, según The Wall Street Journal.

    Es esa expectativa de cambio la que alimenta las ganancias futuras de los inversores capitalistas. Y lo que paradójicamente da algo de oxígeno en Venezuela al gobierno socialista.

    Source Article from http://www.bbc.com/mundo/noticias-america-latina-40088829

  • What if somebody in my family gets sick?

    If the family member doesn’t need hospitalization and can be cared for at home, you should help him or her with basic needs and monitor the symptoms, while also keeping as much distance as possible, according to guidelines issued by the C.D.C. If there’s space, the sick family member should stay in a separate room and use a separate bathroom. If masks are available, both the sick person and the caregiver should wear them when the caregiver enters the room. Make sure not to share any dishes or other household items and to regularly clean surfaces like counters, doorknobs, toilets and tables. Don’t forget to wash your hands frequently.

  • Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2020/05/11/us/virus-fort-worth-park-shooting.html

    Esta semana ha sido poco menos que el Apocalipsis periodístico del sexenio.

    Es impresionante la cantidad de notas, todas ellas delicadísimas, que han estado circulando por nuestras diferentes plataformas.

    Pero hay una que yo no le puedo dejar de comentar: el video de Eliseo Caballero, corresponsal de Televisa, recibiendo dinero de Servando Gómez Martínez, La Tuta, líder de Los caballeros templarios.

    ¿Por qué? Porque es un tema que quedó incompleto.

    Levantar una denuncia de hechos contra don Eliseo no resuelve el problema.

    ¿Y cuál es el problema? Una serie de irregularidades que, más que con Televisa, tienen que ver con la prensa mexicana en general.

    Carmen Aristegui, la periodista que sacó esto a la luz, hizo un gran trabajo y tan bien lo hizo que lo primero que dijeron los señores de avenida Chapultepec cuando reaccionaron fue que la reportera había buscado a Eliseo para entrevistarlo por su participación en ese material.

    En resumen, Carmen no estaba iniciando una campaña de desprestigio contra Noticieros Televisa. Estaba haciendo una investigación profesional.

    Y no, yo no estoy de acuerdo con la lectura que se le dio ni a esta nota ni al boletín que Televisa sacó casi inmediatamente.

    Esto no es un escándalo de: ¡Mira hasta dónde ha llegado el crimen organizado! ¡La Tuta está metida hasta con los medios! ¡Qué horror! ¡Nadie se salva!

    No, esto es un escándalo de: ¡Mira lo que está pasando con la prensa mexicana!

    ¿Y qué es lo que está pasando? Que, salvo honrosas excepciones, vivimos en la más completa vulnerabilidad.

    Y por vulnerabilidad no me refiero a que andemos por la vida con armas y guardaespaldas, me refiero a nuestras condiciones de trabajo.

    A lo mejor usted no lo sabe, pero la mayoría de los corresponsales de los medios del Distrito Federal que trabajan en los diferentes estados de la República, incluyendo a Televisa, cuando ganan, ganan una miseria.

    ¿Por qué le digo esto de “cuando ganan”? Porque no está usted para saberlo ni yo para contarlo, pero casi siempre se les paga por nota publicada.

    ¿Qué significa esto? Que usted puede trabajar como esclavo de sol a solo durante semanas, usted puede arriesgar su vida y la de su familia parándose en los peores escenarios noticiosos de este país, y si no le transmiten nada, pues se amoló, no le van a pagar. Trabajó de a gratis.

    Y cuando le pagan, de aquí a que pase su recibo de honorarios, de aquí a que se procese y de aquí a que la famosa gente de “contabilidad” se le dé la gana depositarle, pasaron años.

    Obviamente esto es poco menos que una invitación a la corrupción y se lo tengo que decir en estos términos porque es muy fácil, incluso para las estrellas de las noticias, despedazar a los reporteros que constantemente arriesgan su pellejo.

    Ojo, la pobreza no lleva al delito, pero si no nos solidarizamos con el gremio, esto no va a cambiar jamás.

    Ahora, a lo mejor el video de Eliseo Caballero con La Tuta no va por ahí.

    ¿Qué haría usted si fuera corresponsal de algún medio en una zona y lo “invitan” a visitar a algún capo? ¿Se negaría? ¡A poco cree que el delincuente en cuestión no lo va a obligar!

    ¿Qué haría usted si estuviera frente a frente con un delincuente y le sacara un fajo de billetes? ¿Se haría el digno?

    ¿Se haría el digno a sabiendas de que si no lo acepta lo pueden matar o le pueden asesinar a alguien?

    ¿O qué haría, iría corriendo a avisarle a un cliente o a la mismísima autoridad sabiendo que en ese preciso instante le van a volar la cabeza?

    Esto es más complejo de lo que parece. Por favor, reflexionemos y hagamos algo por mejorar las condiciones de todos los eslabones de la cadena periodística.

    Encontremos salidas más allá de los pactos que prohíben la publicación de determinadas imágenes.

    Yo, por ejemplo, creo mucho en los códigos de ética, en los manuales de procedimientos y en los cursos de capacitación.

    ¿Cuántos medios de comunicación, en México, saben qué hacer ante una situación como la que denunció Aristegui?

    ¿Cuántos periodistas, en este país, han tomado algún curso que les diga qué hacer en caso de que les suceda algo como lo que le pasó a Eliseo?

    ¿Por qué no nos unimos y empezamos por ahí antes de atacar a un medio o a un corresponsal? ¿Por qué no le damos a cada cosa su justo lugar en esta industria?

    ¡atrévase a opinar!

     

    alvarocueva@milenio.com

    Source Article from http://www.milenio.com/firmas/alvaro_cueva_ojoporojo/Tuta-noticias_18_381141911.html