Top Rated Videos


Los ejercicios se describen como “una masiva inspección sorpresiva” para revisar la preparación para combate.

Las fuerzas armadas rusas comenzaron un enorme ejercicio militar con cerca de 250 aviones y 12.000 efectivos, indicó el Ministerio de Defensa de ese país.

El ministerio describió las maniobras de cuatro días como “una masiva inspección sorpresa”, para revisar la preparación para combate.

Las pruebas comenzaron el mismo día en que la OTAN y algunos de sus países miembros también iniciaron un ejercicio de entrenamiento en el Ártico.

Lea: Cómo Rusia quiere dominar el Ártico

Las acciones de Rusia en Ucrania, y sus incursiones en el espacio aéreo occidental, han llevado a un incremento de tensiones con Occidente.


Desde la anexión de Crimea se han incrementado las tensiones entre Rusia y Occidente.

Según informes de las agencias de noticias rusas Interfax y Tass, la inspección del grupo de aviación y fuerzas de defensa aérea en el distrito militar central involucra casi 700 armas y piezas de equipo militar.

Pruebas de misiles

Durante el ejercicio, se espera que los aviones de largo alcance de Rusia lleven a cabo disparos con misiles de crucero contra blancos de práctica en la república de Komi.

La corresponsal de la BBC en Moscú, Caroline Wyatt, afirma que estos ejercicios se llevan a cabo como preparación de un conjunto de maniobras más amplias, conocidas como Centro-2015, que tendrán lugar en los próximos meses.


Los aviones rusos llevaron a cabo en meses recientes varias incursiones en el espacio aéreo de otros países.

Cuando en una entrevista en la TV se le preguntó al viceprimer ministro Dmitry Rogozin sobre la autoafirmación de Rusia, éste bromeó: “Los tanques no necesitan visas”.

El franco funcionario, quien está en las “listas negras” de la Unión Europea y EE.UU. como parte de las sanciones impuestas a Rusia por la anexión de Crimea el año pasado, tiene limitadas sus opciones de viaje.

Rusia ha sido severamente criticada en meses recientes por el incremento en su actividad aérea en los países nórdicos, la cual ha incluido varias violaciones del espacio aéreo.

El ejercicio de entrenamiento de dos semanas de la OTAN –el llamado Ejercicio de Desafío Ártico–, que comenzó el mismo día que las pruebas rusas, tendrá lugar en el norte de Noruega, Suecia y Finlandia.


“Los tanques no necesitan visas” bromeó Dmitry Rogozin.

En este participarán 115 aviones de combate y 3.600 soldados de nueve países.

Las maniobras también involucrarán a soldados y aviones de Estados Unidos, Reino Unido, Alemania, Francia y Holanda –todos miembros de la OTAN– y Suiza, que es neutral.

Este es el segundo ejercicio de este tipo. El primero fue llevado a cabo en 2013.

Los ministros de Defensa de Noruega, Suecia, Finlandia y Dinamarca, junto con el canciller de Islandia, firmaron una declaración conjunta en abril en la cual califican a la agresión militar rusa como “el mayor desafío a la seguridad europea”.

Source Article from http://www.bbc.co.uk/mundo/noticias/2015/05/150526_rusia_ejercicios_militares_men

Mr Scholz, a soft-spoken 63-year-old, steered the Social Democrats to election victory in late September, positioning himself as the continuity candidate because he played a key role in the Merkel government as vice-chancellor.

Source Article from https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-59575773

Former Vice President Joe BidenJoe BidenSchiff: Bolton ‘refused’ to submit affidavit on Trump’s involvement in Ukraine controversy Pence celebrates Trump’s acquittal: ‘It’s over, America’ Biden offers advice to young people with stutters: It’s important ‘to not let that define them’ MORE slammed President TrumpDonald John TrumpSchiff: Bolton ‘refused’ to submit affidavit on Trump’s involvement in Ukraine controversy Yang congratulates Romney for ‘voting his conscious and character’ in convicting Trump McConnell ‘disappointed’ by Romney impeachment vote, but ‘I’m going to need his support’ MORE for awarding conservative talk show host Rush Limbaugh with the Presidential Medal of Freedom on Wednesday, saying it was a move to maintain Trump’s “right-wing political credentials.”

“The idea that he is at the State of the Union [and] receives a medal that is of the highest honor that can be given to a civilian, I find quite frankly, driven more by trying to maintain your right-wing political credentials than it is anything else,” Biden told CNN’s Anderson Cooper at a town hall in Manchester, New Hampshire. 

“If you read some of the things Rush has said about people, their backgrounds, their ethnicity, how he speaks to them, I don’t think he understands the American code of decency and honor,” he continued. “But look, this is Donald Trump.”  

Trump broke with tradition at Tuesday’s State of the Union, awarding Limbaugh with the Medal of Freedom. 

“Rush, in recognition of all that you have done for our nation, the millions of people a day that you speak to and inspire, and all of the incredible work that you have done for charity, I am proud to announce tonight that you will be receiving our country’s highest civilian honor, the Presidential Medal of Freedom,” Trump said. 

The award was met with cheers from Republicans, while Democrats remained seated, and later slammed the decision to award Limbaugh with the highest civilian honor. 

The move came days after Limbaugh announced he was battling stage 4 lung cancer. 

Biden jokingly made the sign of the cross when asked what he thought about Trump’s decision, but offered his sympathy amid Limbaugh’s cancer diagnoses. 

 “I do feel badly, and I mean this sincerely that he is suffering from a terminal illness,” Biden said. “So he has my empathy and my sympathy no matter what is background is.” 

Source Article from https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/481764-biden-trump-awarding-limbaugh-medal-of-honor-was-move-to-maintain-right



















 

 

LOS ANGELES, July 30, 2015 /PRNewswire/ — KWHY-TV Noticias 22, the MundoFOX Los Angeles television network affiliate’s award-winning newscast, Noticias 22, “La voz de Tu Ciudad,” “The voice of your city”, scored as the fastest growing late Spanish language newscast in Nielsen’s recently completed July 2015 Sweeps for Los Angeles, the city with the largest Hispanic market in the nation.

“Our growth is a strong statement of relevance and support to our news team and editorial direction,” stated Palmira Perez, Noticias 22 MundoFOX News Anchor. “Noticias 22 continues to produce the most engaging, compelling news and information daily for our community, and as part of Meruelo Media, together we’re committed to journalistic excellence,” added Otto Padron, President of Meruelo Media.

KWHY-TV Noticias 22 MundoFOX Los Angeles July 2015 Sweeps Highlights:

  • KWHY-TV Noticias 22 MundoFOX at 10:00 p.m. posted significant “year-to-year” growth in average ratings among the key demographic Adults 18-49, up 35% from the July 2014 Sweeps.
    • All the other Spanish-language late local newscasts were down, including those on KRCA/Estrella (-22%), KVEA/Telemundo (-1%) and KMEX/Univision (-2%). (Based on Monday to Friday average ratings.)
  • Among Adults 25-54, ratings for KWHY-TV Noticias 22 MundoFOX at 10:00 p.m. were up 34% from the July 2014 Sweeps, more than the late newscast on KMEX/Univision (+15%) and KVEA/Telemundo (+7%), with KRCA/Estrella falling 19%.

Source: Los Angeles NSI Ratings, July 2015

For more information on KWHY-TV Noticias 22 MundoFOX, please visit www.mundofox22.com.

About Meruelo Media

Meruelo Media (MM) is the media division of The Meruelo Group.  MM currently operates two Southern California Legendary media platforms; the classic hip-hop and R&B radio station, 93.5 KDAY and one of Los Angeles’ oldest Hispanic TV stations, KWHY-TV Canal 22, which is currently the flagship of MundoFOX Television Network.  MM also owns the first and only US Hispanic Super Station, Super 22, airing on its KWHY-TV second digital stream and reaching over 6 Million Homes over various multiple video delivery providers.  MM also broadcasts in Houston and Santa Barbara.  The Meruelo Group is a minority owned, privately-held management company serving a diversified portfolio of affiliated entities with interests in banking and financial services; food services, manufacturing, distribution and restaurant operations; construction and engineering; hospitality and gaming; real estate management; media, public and private equity investing. For more information please visit www.meruelogroup.com.

Rebekah Salgado
rsalgado@meruelogroup.com 
562.228.8191

 

 

 

SOURCE Meruelo Group / Meruelo Media

RELATED LINKS
http://www.meruelogroup.com

Source Article from http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/kwhy-tv-noticias-22-mundofox-reigns-as-las-fastest-growing-late-spanish-newscast-in-july-2015-sweeps-300121156.html

In his remarks Saturday morning on the Senate floor, McConnell warned against dragging the talks out and urged for a swift agreement that includes more federal unemployment aid, as well as funding for schools, direct stimulus checks for Americans, vaccines, and the Paycheck Protection Program.

“There’s a kind of gravitational pull here in Congress. Unless we are careful any major negotiation can slide into an unending catalogue of disagreements,” McConnell said. “Let’s guard against that.”

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) said negotiators are close to a deal but blamed the Federal Reserve dispute as “the only significant hurdle to completing an agreement.”

“Republicans need to make a decision,” Schumer said. “We’re quickly approaching an all or nothing situation. Everybody needs to make a decision about whether we’re going to pass this much needed relief or not and about 11th hour demands and whether they’re worth holding up the entire bill.”

Senate Republicans are set to talk with Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin at 1 p.m.

If and when an accord is reached, House and Senate leaders will need to move at lightning speed — with virtually no room for dissent within their parties — to muscle through the massive package before government funding expires midnight Sunday.

Both chambers cleared a two-day stopgap funding bill Friday night, buying more time for a deal that has remained elusive for months.

“I’m still somewhat hopeful we could wrap this up if the House moves quickly and we gotta take it up and do it tomorrow night,” said Senate Majority Whip John Thune (R-S.D.). “But I would say it’s also very possible that it rolls into Monday.”

The Senate will hold its first set of votes at 12 p.m. on an unrelated Trump nomination, where lawmakers hope to learn details of the still-evolving package, which is expected to include roughly $900 billion in small business loans, unemployment aid and direct payments for most Americans.

House Democratic leaders, meanwhile, will brief their members on a conference call at noon. With no deal in hand by Friday night, Hoyer told members that the House would not vote until 1 p.m. on Sunday, at the earliest.

Pressure, meanwhile, is mounting on leaders of both parties as the U.S. again surpasses its daily record of new cases and deaths continue to surge.

And even while the first vaccines have arrived on Capitol Hill in recent days, fears spread of a new outbreak as some House members and reporters tested positive for the virus.

“I’m wondering why we can’t get a bill that we’re all reading about in the paper done, and it could’ve been passed in July since everybody agrees with everything it in, pretty much,” Rep. Tom Cole (R-Okla.), a senior appropriator, said in an interview Friday.

“But hopefully we’re in visual sight of the finish line here,” Cole said. “It’s Christmas, I’m determined to be optimistic.”

The recovery package will be merged on the floor with a must-pass, $1.4 trillion government funding bill in one of the biggest legislative packages of the 116th Congress. The final measure is also expected to include a slew of year-end tax and health extenders, as well as long-awaited legislation to address “surprise” medical bills.

Rank-and-file lawmakers have complained they’ve been largely kept in the dark on the talks, and expect to have little time to review the deal before it comes for a vote.

“The fact that these are just negotiations that happen, backdoor, and we’re hearing secondhand what’s in this, should be unacceptable,” a frustrated Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez said in an interview Friday, just after lawmakers left the Capitol without a deal.

“We’ll get the final text, they’ll call a vote 30 minutes after the text is released, and you’re frantically trying to sift through,” Ocasio-Cortez said. “It’s terrible.”

Source Article from https://www.politico.com/news/2020/12/19/coronavirus-stimulus-saturday-448631

Trump has publicly invoked “treason” or “treasonous” on 26 occasions, according to the Factba.se compilation of Trump utterances. That’s in addition to various and sundry “traitor” references. He began by accusing the likes of Bowe Bergdahl, Edward Snowden and Chelsea Manning, then moved on to include the executives of Univision and Macy’s, Republicans who didn’t support him, Democratic lawmakers who didn’t applaud him, the failing New York Times, the media generally, people in his administration who leak, and Barack Obama, Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton, John Podesta, Eric Holder, Loretta Lynch, Huma Abedin, James Comey, James Clapper, Rod J. Rosenstein, Robert Mueller, Andrew McCabe, Lisa Page and Peter Strzok.

Source Article from https://www.sltrib.com/opinion/commentary/2019/04/16/dana-milbank-its-season/

The widespread destruction caused by extreme weather coast to coast, with Hurricane Ida spreading devastation from Louisiana to New York while record wildfires scorch California, prompted Joe Biden to level with America this week, saying it was “yet another reminder that … the climate crisis is here”.

“We need to be much better prepared. We need to act,” Biden said in a speech on Thursday at the White House.

The last week saw Hurricane Ida come ashore from the Gulf of Mexico as the fifth largest hurricane on record to hit the US.

The massive storms spawned in its aftermath battered states on the Gulf coast and all the way up into the north-east, killing at least 48 so far in New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania and Connecticut after historic flooding, where officials admitted they were surprised by the tempest’s suddenness and ferocity.

In Louisiana, many fewer were killed, just over a dozen at the most recent count, but almost a million people have been left without electricity, some indefinitely, because of the storm.

Meanwhile, the Caldor wildfire in California has burned over 200,000 acres and is threatening more than 35,000 structures, edging close to the Lake Tahoe area and becoming one of few wildfires to rage from one side of the Sierra Nevada mountains to the other.

While the US president first laid out details of emergency relief efforts being deployed around the country, he ended his speech by talking about how the natural disasters will continue to happen, more often and with greater intensity, because of the climate crisis.

“This isn’t about politics. Hurricane Ida didn’t care if you were a Democrat or Republican, rural or urban,” he said. “It’s destruction everywhere. It’s a matter of life and death, and we’re all in this together,” he said, a day before he planned to fly to Louisiana to view the damage and returning via Philadelphia, which was flooded by the same vast storm system.

Biden’s remarks were a notable departure from what Americans had become accustomed to hearing about the climate crisis under Donald Trump, who as recently as last year denied that natural disasters in the US were increasingly related to human-caused climate change.

When pressed to consider the climate crisis as a main cause of the California wildfires last year, Trump responded: “I don’t think science knows.” He fluctuated between calling the phenomenon a hoax, making jokes about it and then sowing ambiguity and doubt throughout his election campaign and one-term presidency.

“It’ll start getting cooler,” he said after the deadly wildfires. “You watch.”

In contrast, Biden this summer released the most ambitious clean energy and environmental justice plans yet seen from the White House through his flagship “Build Back Better” infrastructure and budget proposals.

Last month, the Senate passed a $1tn bipartisan infrastructure bill that includes investments in improving roads, bridges, the electric grid and public transit, among other things, to make them more energy efficient, sustainable and resistant to extreme weather.

The bill still has to pass the House of Representatives and after good progress faces further contentious arguments on its details later this month. A related, massive $3.5tn budget bill that promises a 10-year cascade of federal resources for family support, health and education programs and an aggressive drive to heal the climate, can be passed without Republican support but needs every Democratic senator to vote for it and is currently in jeopardy.

Biden on Thursday said that when Congress goes back into session this month, he plans to push the Build Back Better plan.

“That’s going to make historic investments in electrical infrastructure, modernizing our roads, bridges, our water systems, sewer and draining systems, electric grids and transmission lines and make them more resilient to these superstorms, wildfires and floods that are going to happen with increasing frequency and ferocity,” he said.

Despite his advocacy for his infrastructure bill, Biden has been coming under criticism after the White House announced this week that it will open tens of millions of acres in the Gulf of Mexico for oil and gas exploration. Environmental groups have filed a lawsuit against the federal government for the leases.

“How does this align with [the] Biden Administration’s commitment to take ‘bold steps to combat the climate crisis?” tweeted environmental group Ocean Conservancy on Wednesday.

Source Article from https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/sep/03/climate-crisis-joe-biden-floods-wildfires-storms

For Donald Trump, the path is fairly clear: the Democratic House will vote to impeach him, the Republican Senate will acquit him and the country will remain as bitterly divided as it is now.

But all the candidates are, in a very real sense, are facing the Impeachment Primary.

For the 2020 Democrats, their ability to navigate an environment that is almost completely dominated by an effort to remove the president will help determine who wins the nomination—and whether that person can beat Trump at the ballot box.

We’ve already been through the Invisible Primary (opinion leaders deciding which candidates are plausible, though that matters far less than it once did). We’ve been through the Money Primary (several Democrats, not including Joe Biden, have been money machines, though that also is less crucial in the digital media era). And we’ve been through the Media Primary (first won by Beto O’Rourke, who quickly crashed and burned, and Pete Buttigieg, who’s still on the edge of the top tier).

IMPEACHMENT VOTE AGAINST TRUMP DRAWS SATURATION COVERAGE

The Impeachment Primary is inescapable. It’s already become the overwhelming focus for Trump: no more talk of legislative compromise, and even the killing of the world’s top terrorist is quickly overshadowed. And it’s diverted the spotlight from all but the top-tier Democrats and could well spill over into the February primaries and caucuses.

The media impact on this primary is, like everything else about the press, subject to heated debate.

Hugh Hewitt, the pro-Trump conservative radio host, argues in a Washington Post op-ed that certain journalists and pundits could make or break impeachment.

The inevitable acquittal of Trump could change if commentators that Hewitt defines as largely supportive of the president “came upon evidence they thought sufficiently damning to overcome the obvious procedural assaults on the country’s shared understanding of fair play.” He cites as examples my colleague Mollie Hemingway of the Federalist, and Wall Street Journal columnist Kimberly Strassel.

The same would be true, says the MSNBC analyst, if a handful of “middle-of-the-spectrum” journalists began to lean one way and break the partisan deadlock. Hewitt suggests veteran Post reporter and columnist Dan Balz and veteran White House correspondent Peter Baker of the New York Times.

But he says that if anti-Trump commentators, such as MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow and Times columnist Nick Kristof, were to criticize the House proceedings as a show trial, it would tilt the scales the other way.

SUBSCRIBE TO HOWIE’S MEDIA BUZZMETER PODCAST, A RIFF OF THE DAY’S HOTTEST STORIES

I happen to think that Hugh totally overestimates the media’s importance. He argues that such defections would reflect a shift in opinion in the communities they serve. But if the media big shots were even half as influential as Hewitt believes, Trump would have lost the 2016 election.

John Harris, a co-founder of Politico, offers a very different viewpoint. In one of several things to watch in 2020, he points to “The Big Bet: No one cares what we think.”

The “we,” in this case, is not just Politico scribes, but other news outlets, political operatives and analysts, and “the embedded assumptions that tend to inform our work.”

Any Democrat not in the top tier (including Kamala Harris, Amy Klobuchar, Cory Booker, Julian Castro and others) is essentially betting against the media conclusion that they have only an implausible chance of being president. They are forced to believe they just need to get hot at the right time. (The press corps has been wrong many times, betting against McCain and Obama in the 2008 primaries as well as you-know-who throughout 2016.)

As for Trump, Harris writes, “the media-operative class believes: You know, on balance, it might not be a great idea to promiscuously shred norms about how presidents are supposed to comport themselves, to gratuitously insult people who don’t support you and even some who do, to lurch daily from outrage to uproar to scandal, all culminating in a likely impeachment trial in the winter before your reelection campaign.

“Trump says: I don’t care.”

He doesn’t care about the media’s assumptions, true. But Trump does care, in the sense that he consumes an enormous amount of cable coverage and is relentlessly attacking “fake news” and “corrupt media.”

While Harris is right that the media are hardly infallible, only a fool would bet that they don’t matter. We live in a polarized atmosphere that is saturated with more media, and social media, than ever before. We carry this around in our pockets. It’s a business that is widely distrusted but can’t be ignored—even if its practitioners can’t wave a wand and move public opinion on impeachment.

Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/media/the-impeachment-primary-is-inescapable-for-trump-and-the-democrats

CLOSE

According to new polls, President Donald Trump and the Republican party is losing the battle on who is to blame for the partial government shutdown.
Wochit

By a wide margin, Americans blame the longest government shutdown in U.S. history on President Donald Trump, according to a Washington Post-ABC News poll published Sunday. 

The partial shutdown affects about a quarter of the U.S. government and approximately 800,000 federal workers. Now in its fourth week, the shutdown is the result of an impasse between the president and congressional Democrats over funding for a border wall, which Trump promised during the 2016 campaign. 

When asked, “Who do you think is mainly responsible for this situation?” 53 percent of Americans told pollsters they blamed Trump and congressional Republicans. A much smaller 29 percent blamed Democrats and another 13 percent said both sides were equally responsible. Four percent had no opinion. 

On Saturday, Trump indicated during a Fox News interview that he believed it was himself, not the Democrats, who was winning the battle for public opinion over the shutdown and the wall. 

“I’m ready, willing and able to get a deal done. But they don’t,” he said, referring to congressional Democrats. “They think it’s politics. I think it’s bad politics. This country wants to have protection at the border.” 

Historic shutdown: Government shutdown sets record as longest in U.S. history. When will it finally end?

More: Trump tours border, claims Democrats ‘losing the argument’

Unsurprisingly, there was a wide partisan divide in opinion. While 85 percent of Democrats blamed Trump and congressional Republicans, 68 percent of Republican voters blamed congressional Democrats. Among Republicans, 15 percent blamed Trump and their own party and another 15 percent blamed both sides equally. Independents blamed Trump and Republicans over Democrats by a 30-point margin. 

Respondents were essentially split on whether Democrats should reach a compromise that included funding of Trump’s wall in order to reopen the government. Forty-eight percent said to continue denying the president’s request, even if it extended the shutdown, while 45 percent said they should compromise to end it. 

A majority, 54 percent, said they oppose the construction of a border wall, while 42 percent said they are in favor of it. Among those who support the wall, 52 percent said the president should keep demanding the funds even if it prolongs the shutdown. Forty-one percent favored compromise. 

Trump had floated the idea of declaring a national emergency and using the powers granted to the president under an emergency to go around Congress to secure the funds for the wall. Two-thirds of respondents said they opposed such a move. Only 24 percent said the current border situation amounts to a “crisis” while 47 percent said it is “a serious problem, but not a crisis” and 26 percent said it is not a serious problem. 

Shutdown: Trump says he’s not looking to declare emergency for border wall ‘right now’

Although 82 percent said the shutdown has not affected them personally, 38 percent said the shutdown would constitute a “crisis” if it continues and another 41 percent said it would be a serious problem but not a crisis. Eighteen percent said an ongoing shutdown would not be a serious problem. 

The poll of 788 Americans was conducted from Jan 8-11 with a margin of error of plus or minus 4.5 percent. 

 

Source Article from https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/onpolitics/2019/01/13/shutdown-abc-washington-post-poll/2564178002/

CHICAGO — Mayor Lori Lightfoot alongside city leaders on Thursday announced that prepaid gas and CTA cards would be made available to qualifying Chicagoans amid rising gas prices.

In a Thursday press conference, Lightfoot announced the Chicago Moves program which will dedicate about $12.5 million to help Chicago residents with transportation options as they continue to deal with inflation. If the program is passed by City Council, about 150,000 Chicago households will receive assistance.

Up to 50,000 prepaid gas cards of $150 will be distributed to eligible residents via a lottery system. Applications are limited to one per household. Beginning in May, cards will be distributed in five monthly waves of 10,000 residents.  

To be eligible for these, applicants must be residents of the city, at least 18 years old, have a current and valid city sticker with correct mailing information for their vehicle, and have a household income at or below 140% of the Area Median Income for Chicago.

In addition to the prepaid gas cards, the city will also distribute or add value to 100,000 cards for use on CTA in the amount of $50 each.

In order for the program to go into effect, it must first get City Council approval. If it passes, applications for the cards will open on April 27.

Chicago businessman Willie Wilson blasted Lightfoot’s plan, calling on city leaders to suspend the state’s gas tax while criticizing the plan’s lottery system.

Source Article from https://wgntv.com/news/chicago-news/prepaid-gas-cta-cards-will-be-available-to-some-chicagoans-pending-city-council-approval/

LAX officials told NPR that FlyLAX.com was partially disrupted early Monday morning. The service interruption did not compromise internal airport systems and there were no operational disruptions, according to authorities.

Ashley Landis/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Ashley Landis/AP

LAX officials told NPR that FlyLAX.com was partially disrupted early Monday morning. The service interruption did not compromise internal airport systems and there were no operational disruptions, according to authorities.

Ashley Landis/AP

A pro-Russian hacker group is taking credit for temporarily taking down several U.S. airport websites on Monday, though there appeared to be no impact on flight operations.

The cyberattacks claimed by Killnet impacted the websites for Los Angeles International, Chicago O’Hare, and Hartsfield-Jackson International in Atlanta, among others.

The group posted a list of airports on Telegram, urging hackers to participate in what’s known as a DDoS attack — a distributed denial-of-service caused when a computer network is flooded by simultaneous data transmissions.

The group’s call to action included airports across the country, including Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, and Missouri.

It was not immediately clear how many of the airports were actually hit and whether all victims’ sites suffered any disruptions.

In a statement, LAX officials told NPR that FlyLAX.com was partially disrupted early Monday morning.

“The service interruption was limited to portions of the public facing FlyLAX.com website only. No internal airport systems were compromised and there were no operational disruptions,” a spokeswoman said in an emailed statement.

She added that the airport’s information technology team has restored all services and is investigating the cause. Officials have also notified the FBI and the Transportation Security Administration.

By about 1 p.m. in Atlanta, authorities said ATL.com was “up and running after an incident early this morning that made it inaccessible to the public.” But people on Twitter continued to complain about parts of the site being inaccessible for several hours after the announcement had been made.

Atlanta airport officials said no airport operations had been impacted.

In an earlier post on Monday, Killnet noted other vulnerable U.S. sites that could succumb to similar DDoS strikes, include sea terminals and logistics facilities, weather monitoring centers, health care systems, subway systems, and exchanges and online trading systems.

The group congratulated a handful of teams they claimed helped push the sites offline, writing, “Who is participated in the liquidation of the United States of America, Do not stop!!”

The attacks come on the heels of another spate of cyberattacks allegedly launched by the group last week. In that instance, the group has taken credit for rallying hackers to down state government sites.

Both campaigns appear to have been prompted by anti-U.S. sentiment for the country’s involvement in the ongoing war in Ukraine, as Russian President Vladimir Putin presses on with the invasion despite severe economic sanctions.

Source Article from https://www.npr.org/2022/10/10/1127902795/airport-killnet-cyberattack-hacker-russia

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell is not making light of drug abuse. He is not making light of drug cartels.

You would think otherwise, though, based on recent reporting.

“Mitch McConnell wants to raise money off the nickname ‘Cocaine Mitch.’ Yes, really,” the Washington Post tut-tutted in a headline.

The article itself includes quotes from experts whose opinion amounts to: That is not funny.

“McConnell Fundraising With ‘Cocaine Mitch’ Shirts in Kentucky, State With Third-Highest OD Rate,” reported New York magazine’s Intelligencer.

And so on.

Here is the backstory to these scolding headlines: Failed West Virginia senatorial candidate Don Blankenship in 2018 attacked McConnell’s family. In one ad, the then-GOP candidate said, “One of my goals as U.S. senator will be to ditch Cocaine Mitch.” A second ad saw Blankenship say, “Swamp captain Mitch McConnell has created millions of jobs for China people. While doing so, Mitch has gotten rich. In fact, his China family has given him tens of millions of dollars.”

By “China family,” he means McConnell’s wife, U.S. Secretary of Transportation Elaine Chao.

The second ad concludes: “[We’ll] ditch Cocaine Mitch for the sake of the kids.”

The “cocaine” storyline dates back to 2014. Back then, Colombian officials discovered cocaine aboard a bulk carrier in the service of a New York shipping company. The shipping company belongs to Chao’s family. Not McConnell or ever Elaine Chao herself. Her family. That is the entire basis for Blankenship’s “Cocaine Mitch” nickname. The “China family” stuff was racist icing on the stupid cake.

The senator’s campaign has since appropriated Blankenship’s idiocy for its own purposes. It now markets products that say “Cocaine Mitch,” turning a smear campaign into a positive. Smart. Embracing an attack or an insult is one of the surest ways to kneecap an assailant. If that assailant also happens to be a weird racist, even better.

If you can believe it, though, members of the press have taken offense to the “Cocaine Mitch” campaign swag.

While McConnell’s “campaign was high-fiving supporters, drug policy experts said McConnell downplayed the drug-addiction crisis in the nation, which is particularly acute in his state,” the Washington Post said this week in the trolliest of concern trolls.

It adds, “And that story line of McConnell’s perceived insensitivity is what made it into the national press.”

My, did that storyline get “into the national press” all by itself?

“The Bluegrass State had the nation’s fifth-highest age-adjusted drug overdose death rate in 2017, according to federal data,” the Courier-Journal added on an even more somber note. “That year 1,566 Kentuckians, or 37.2 people per 100,000, died of drug overdose, according to the National Center for Health Statistics.”

It added, “The Kentucky Office of Drug Control Policy attributed 51 of those deaths to cocaine.”

“[S]ome are speaking out against the shirts, suggesting they are inappropriate or hypocritical,” said ABC News. More than half of the report is dedicated to giving the senator’s critics a platform.

Spare me the fake concern.

Imagine taking this tone when President Barack Obama joked about birtherism. Imagine accusing Obama of making light of racism. Imagine quoting “experts” who say Obama’s jokes come even as people of color suffer every day.

McConnell’s family faced dumb, racist attacks in 2018. He is laughing it off now. Good for him. Journalists should do their jobs and leave the scolding to Democratic partisans.

Source Article from https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/reporters-are-very-upset-that-mitch-mcconnells-campaign-jokes-about-the-bizarre-racist-attacks-against-his-family