Top Rated Videos

Israel has confirmed more than 1.3 million Covid infections since the start of the pandemic, with over 8,100 deaths, according to America’s Johns Hopkins university.

Source Article from https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-59448547

On the Bharat Biotech vaccine, called Covaxin, the group said it was “baffled to understand what scientific logic has motivated the top experts” to authorize a vaccine still in clinical trials.

Dr. Somani, the regulator, said the vaccine had so far been administered to 22,500 trial participants, and “has been found to be safe.”

Both the AstraZeneca vaccine and the Bharat Biotech vaccine require two doses, Dr. Somani said. He did not specify whether the participants in Bharat Biotech’s continuing clinical trials had received both doses.

Already the effort has faced setbacks. The Serum Institute, an Indian drug maker that struck a deal to produce the Oxford vaccine even before its effectiveness had been proven, has managed to make only about one-tenth of the 400 million doses it had committed to manufacturing before the end of the year.

The government says it is ready. To get the vaccine across a country famous for its size and its sometimes unreliable roads, officials will tap into knowledge from nationwide polio vaccination and newborn immunization campaigns, and the skill and flexibility employed in India’s mammoth general elections, where ballot boxes are delivered to the furthest reaches of the country.

The Serum Institute says it is on track to increase production of the vaccine, which is known as Covishield in India. With $270 million of its own funds and $300 million from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Serum plans to ramp up manufacturing capacity to 100 million doses per month by February, said Mayank Sen, a company spokesman.

Initially, the Serum Institute signed a pact with AstraZeneca to make one billion doses of the vaccine for low-and-middle-income countries. The vaccine holds appeal to developing countries because it is cheaper to make and easier to transport than those that require colder temperatures during storage and transportation.

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2021/01/03/world/asia/india-covid-19-vaccine.html

TITULARES

Vladimir Sierra secretario Jurídico y Juan José Casasfranco gerente de la Agencia de Infraestructura del Meta AIM acompañarán a la gobernadora Marcela Amaya García en su la citación hoy a las 2 y 30 de la tarde ante la Procuraduría General de la Nación, donde pese a que no se trata de una diligencia formal porque no existe aún proceso disciplinario en etapa preliminar, sí se trata de una función preventiva que ejerce la Procuraduría. La gobernadora dará las explicaciones que le requiera el órgano de control luego de que mediante un fax el día viernes 16 de septiembre en la tarde le llegara dicha citación horas después de que el vicepresidente Germán Vargas Lleras pidiera a los entres de control que investigaran la contratación en el Meta especialmente la realizada al parecer por más de 400 mil millones de pesos con el primo de su esposo Carmelo Pérez

La Auditoría General de la República reveló que entre los años 2014 y 2016 la empresa MC Construcciones ha contratado con la Gobernación del Meta 432.86 millones de pesos a través de 17 uniones temporales y dos contratos directos. Asimismo, que de esa cifra, 260 mil millones se contrataron con el otrora Instituto de Desarrollo del Meta (hoy AIM) y que esta firma obtuvo contratos tanto por 125 mil millones con la Gobernación del Meta como por 24 mil millones con la Empresa de Servicios Públicos del Meta. Igualmente, que el pasado 10 de febrero, y a través del Consorcio Distrito Norte se firmó un contrato con EDESA, con anticipos del 50%, por 24.466 millones de pesos según reveló Carlos Felipe Córdoba Larrarte, auditor general de la República

Las direcciones nacionales de los partidos Alianza Verde y Liberal salieron a defender y respaldar públicamente a la gobernadora del Meta Marcela Amaya García luego de los señalamientos en su contra del vicepresidente Germán Vargas Lleras quien insiste en incumplimientos de parte de la mandataria y pidió a través de redes sociales que investigaran la contratación en el departamento

En medio de la pelea entre la Gobernación del Meta y el Vicepresidente de la República, los metenses siguen esperando que alguien diga cómo y cuándo se va a construir la malla vial del Meta, tema realmente transcendente e importante para el departamento. A días de terminarse el plazo para el cierre financiero de la APP nadie a nivel nacional o local da razón de su ejecución

Cielo Usme ex directora del SENA, Urbano Herrera ex director de la entidad, Alejandro Vargas Cuellar también ex director y Carlos Alberto López son algunos de los personajes famosos de la región que presentaron ayer la prueba de conocimiento para ser director del ICBF en el Meta. A la prueba que fue en el colegio Departamental la Esperanza debían asistir 156 preseleccionados. Los resultados saldrán el 4 de octubre a partir de cuando los mejores resultados conformarán la terna sobre la que escogerá Cristina Plazas directora nacional del ICBF

Se restableció de manera normal el suministro de agua para los diferentes barrios y comunas de Villavicencio, luego de superarse la emergencia en la Quebrada la Honda provocada por un derrumbe y una bombada sobre la parte alta del río Guatiquía el 18 de agosto que dejó a 110 mil usuarios sin agua potable durante un mes. Durante más de 30 días el personal de la empresa de acueducto y alcantarillado de Villavicencio trabajaron permanentemente para restablecer el servicio, que se prestó con plantas alternas y con carrotanques. “La emergencia al día de hoy ha sido superada” dijo el alcalde Wilmar Barbosa

La Procuraduría Provincial de Villavicencio archivó investigación disciplinaria que adelantaba contra los concejales de Restrepo, Meta, Marcos Saboyá, Arbey Ramos, Danny Linares, Germán Jiménez, Paola Bobadilla, Paola Peña y Pedro Lesmes por denuncias anónimas sobre presuntas irregularidades cometidas en la aprobación de un empréstito solicitado por el mandatario local. Según el Ministerio Público no hay méritos para iniciar un proceso disciplinario contra los cabildantes de ese municipio

Clínicas públicas y privadas tanto en el Meta como en todo el país no podrán negarse a atender a los pacientes para presionar y exigir el pago a cargo de sus aseguradoras que obstaculicen el acceso al servicio de salud así lo hizo saber la SuperSalud mediante circular externa 000013 del 15 de septiembre de 2016

“En sus manos está el futuro de Colombia”: Timochenko a guerrilleros en conferencia de las Farc que se realiza en los llanos del Yari, límites entre el departamento del Meta y Caquetá.

Capturaron en el Caquetá a 24 personas entre ellos a integrantes activos de la Policía quienes al parecer se encontraban buscando una caleta de las Farc en la Macarena Meta. El general Nicasio de Jesús Martínez comandante de la Omega aseguró que los sujetos serán presentados nuevamente este martes ante la Fiscalía para que respondan por los delitos

Niño de 14 años se suicidó en el barrio el retiro de Villavicencio. La Sijin de Villavicencio se encargó del levantamiento y a esta ahora adelanta las investigaciones para esclarecer los hechos.

A partir de hoy los ingenieros del ejército comenzaran las labores de adecuación de dos puentes sobre el río Charte que comunica a departamentos del Meta y Casanare

Source Article from http://www.rcnradio.com/audios/noticias-del-meta-septiembre-19-2016/

Chat with us in Facebook Messenger. Find out what’s happening in the world as it unfolds.

Source Article from https://www.cnn.com/2019/06/18/us/philadelphia-cocaine-bust/index.html

The administration also dramatically narrowed the number of places where air travelers returning from Europe could enter the U.S. — currently just 13 airports. At the same time, Customs and Border Protection and health officials on Friday began doing “enhanced screening” for those passengers, consisting of temperature checks and questions about travel history and symptoms, without having enough staff on hand to process them quickly.

Customs staffing levels have been inadequate for some time. The union representing Customs screeners said at a hearing in December that the force was short 2,700 officers, partly as a result of the administration’s decision to temporarily reassign people to the U.S.-Mexican border.

In the early weeks of the outbreak, the administration was slow to ramp up screening at international airports, even for travelers re-entering the United States from known coronavirus hot spots. Harvard public health researchers warned in early March that the screening procedures in place then would miss as many as two-thirds of U.S.-bound passengers entering the U.S.

Now, public health officials are expressing concern that the passengers crammed shoulder-to-shoulder in airport screening lines are at higher risk for catching and then spreading the virus.

“It’s not good public health policy to have crowds of people in tight spaces, especially people who are returning from places where we know there’s widespread transmission occurring,” said John Auerbach, president and CEO of Trust for America’s Health. He added that there should be serious consideration of unintended consequences of the policies being implemented.

With O’Hare among the hardest hit, Illinois leaders blamed the Trump administration for the latest mess, saying it was apparently unprepared to carry out its own orders.

“Appears source of delays all federal and Admin was unprepared after Presidential ban on travel from Europe,” said Illinois Democratic Sen. Dick Durbin on Twitter. The state’s governor, JB Pritzker, wrote: “The federal government needs to get its s@#t together. NOW.”

Durbin and Sen. Tammy Duckworth (D-Ill.) later Sunday jointly called on the administration to direct additional resources to the 13 airports where international passengers from coronavirus-impacted countries are being shunted. They called the response “unacceptable,” and noted that the airport hasn’t had any contact from DHS, HHS or Customs “to discuss how to accommodate these new travel restrictions, now in effect for travelers coming from 26 additional countries.

Chicago Mayor Lori Lightfoot called on the Trump administration to immediately send more personnel to airports, calling the situation “solely the responsibility of the federal government for not listening.”

“When the federal government doesn’t listen and when it doesn’t bring the considerations of mayors and governors and other local officials into the equation, not only are you creating a disaster, not only are you creating a hazardous circumstance that threatens the public, you risk causing serious illness and death,” she said at a press conference Sunday.

Acting Homeland Security Secretary Chad Wolf said Saturday that the added screenings are only taking around 60 seconds per passenger. But that doesn’t help if not enough screeners are on duty. And some passengers complained on social media that they waited as long as six or seven hours to be screened.

CBP’s acting commissioner, Mark Morgan, said in a statement Sunday that the agency is “working diligently to address the longer than usual delays” and several airports are already improving. A spokesperson was not able to provide details about any specific steps the agency had taken to get lines under control.

“We appreciate the patience of the traveling public as we deal with this unprecedented situation,” Morgan said. “We’re continuing to balance our efficiencies with ensuring the health and safety of all American citizens through enhanced medical screening.”

Trump noted the long lines in a tweet on Sunday.

“We are doing very precise Medical Screenings at our airports. Pardon the interruptions and delays, we are moving as quickly as possible, but it is very important that we be vigilant and careful. We must get it right. Safety first!” he wrote.

The opposite of social distancing

The thousands of people who have been jammed into close quarters while waiting for their bags and customs checks could be at a greater health risk because of the situation.

Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, said on Fox News Sunday the crowds are “countermanding” the administration’s own mitigation efforts. Public health officials have frequently stressed the importance of social distancing to prevent the spread of the virus.

“What people need to understand is if you’re an American is if you’re an American citizen, you can get back,” Fauci said. “You don’t need to rush back, you will be able to get back but it’s understandable how when people see the travel ban, they immediately want to hunker and get home.

“Hopefully we don’t have more of that, but I think we probably unfortunately will see that,” he said.

Mike Fraser, executive director for the Association of State and Territorial Health Officials, said the large crowds at ports of entry are concerning.

“While travel home is essential for these individuals, I would hope federal and airport authorities would work with the airlines and state and local health agencies to practice appropriate infection control measures everywhere, but especially in places were crowds are gathered and recommend staggered arrivals to reduce the number of people congregating in one place, “Fraser said.

“At this time, the goal is to prevent transmission of disease. Any crowded space — churches, grocery stores, airports — all increase the probability of transmission,” said Joyce Johnson, a senior retired U.S. Public Health Service Commissioned Corps officer.

Too little, too late?

These enhanced screenings are also starting too late, following weeks while the virus was already rapidly spreading around the world. The administration’s initial screening efforts focused on travelers from China, even after it had become clear that the virus had spread to other countries.

Marc Lipsitch, head of the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health’s Center for Communicable Disease Dynamics, has said the lax screening of infected travelers may have led to the outbreak in Washington state, the first U.S. state the virus swept through.

Before this weekend, alarmed passengers had reported on social media what they considered lax screening as they returned to the U.S.

Jenn Bartick, a California attorney, told POLITICO that she flew back from Italy two weeks ago and went through “no screening of any type.” She said no one asked her if she had been in the parts of Italy that have been hardest hit by the virus, a spread that since prompted Italian authorities to shut down the entire country.

She said when she boarded the plane in Italy, “they asked if I had been to China in the past 14 days. No further screening.” She’s been unable to get a test because she doesn’t have symptoms and is self-quarantining.

A U.S. businessman who flew recently from Hong Kong told POLITICO that the screening he underwent at Los Angeles International Airport was “a joke.”

Source Article from https://www.politico.com/news/2020/03/15/air-passengers-crush-coronavirus-trump-130251

Los alumnos del Posgrado en Periodismo de Investigación que la Editorial Perfil realiza junto a la Universidad del Salvador (USAL) visitarán la próxima semana las redacciones de la revista Noticias y del Diario Perfil. Los estudiantes serán testigos privilegiados de cómo se edita la tapa de Noticias y cómo se produce el cierre de PERFIL. Luego, visitarán la planta de impresión KBA de la Editorial Perfil para observar cómo se imprimen los ejemplares del diario.

Estas visitas forman parte de la formación periodística que contempla el Posgrado Perfil-USAL. Los alumnos realizan prácticas periodísticas en los principales medios de la editorial: Diario Perfil; revistas Noticias, Caras y Fortuna; Perfil.com, y las revistas especializadas Supercampo, Weekend y Parabrisas. Y, al finalizar el curso, se seleccionará a los estudiantes que hayan obtenido los mejores promedios para que amplíen sus prácticas  en la editorial. Actualmente, un grupo de egresados del Posgrado se encuentra realizando becas rentadas en PERFIL, Noticias, Caras y Perfil.com.

Entre los periodistas a cargo del dictado de clases se encuentra Jorge Fontevecchia, CEO y cofundador de Editorial Perfil; Gustavo González, director periodístico de Editorial Perfil; Edi Zunino, director de Noticias; Javier Calvo, jefe de redacción del diario PERFIL; Liliana Castaño, directora de Caras; Ceferino Reato, director de Fortuna; y Germán Angeli, editor general de Perfil.com.

También dictan clases los principales columnistas de Perfil, entre los que se destacan Beatriz Sarlo, Magdalena Ruiz Guiñazú, Nelson Castro, Carlos Ares, Carlos Gabetta y Pablo Marchetti. Mientras que Robert Cox, exdirector del Buenos Aires Herald, es docente de la materia Ética Periodística, a la vez que integra el Comité Académico con Juan Tobías, rector de USAL, y Guillermo Jaim Etcheverry, exrector de la UBA.

Asimismo, los principales editores de los distintos medios de Perfil también participan del Posgrado encargando a los alumnos la elaboración de artículos e investigaciones periodísticas como si fueran redactores que deben cubrir la actualidad del país y el mundo en tiempo real.

Se encuentra disponible un Fondo de Becas financiado por las siguientes empresas que apuestan a la formación de nuevos periodistas: Syngenta, Grupo Techint, Banco Galicia, Massalin Particulares, Aeropuertos Argentina, Banco Ciudad, Odebrecht, Banco Provincia y Provincia Seguros.

Ya se inició la inscripción para el tercer ciclo del Posgrado en Periodismo de Investigación Perfil-USAL. El proceso de selección de alumnos culminará en diciembre con la selección de los 28 estudiantes que formarán parte del ciclo 2016.

Los interesados deben llamar al 4811-2270, enviar un mail a posgrado.perfil@usal.edu.ar o visitar la página www.posgradoperfilusal.com.ar

Source Article from http://www.perfil.com/empresas-y-protagonistas/Los-alumnos-del-Posgrado-en-Periodismo-visitaran-Noticias-y-Diario-PERFIL-20150916-0045.html

More than a year before the killing of journalist Jamal Khashoggi, Saudi Arabia’s powerful Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, also known as MBS, approved a secret campaign to silence dissenters, the New York Times has reported.

The campaign included surveillance, kidnapping, detention and torture of Saudis, said the report published on Sunday citing the US officials who have read classified intelligence reports about the effort.

American officials referred to it as the Saudi Rapid Intervention Group, the Times said.

One of the victims of this group was a university lecturer who reported on the situation of women and was tortured last year, prompting her to attempt suicide.

Saudi Arabia has a long history of pursuing dissidents, including those based outside the country, but this practice has seen a major upsurge following Prince Mohammed’s promotion as the crown prince in 2017.

At least some of the clandestine missions were carried out by the members of the team that killed and dismembered Khashoggi in October at the Saudi consulate in Istanbul, suggesting his murder was part of a wider campaign against dissidents, the report said, citing the US officials and associates of some Saudi victims.

These members were involved in at least a dozen operations beginning in 2017, the officials said, including forcibly repatriating Saudis from other Arab countries.

Authorised by MBS

The murder of Khashoggi, a Washington Post contributing columnist, generated global outrage, leading to a call by some US senators for President Donald Trump to designate and punish those responsible.

Trump did not comply.

The senators, briefed by the heads of US intelligence agencies, said they were convinced that Prince Mohammed was responsible for the Khashoggi killing.

Saudi Arabia has stressed the prince was not involved.

The kingdom initially said it had no knowledge of Khashoggi’s fate but later blamed its rogue agents for his gruesome murder.

Saudi Arabia’s public prosecutor has charged 11 people over his murder.

The Rapid Intervention Group was authorised by Prince Mohammed and overseen by Saud al-Qahtani, a royal court insider, American officials told the Times.

US intelligence reports did not specify how involved Prince Mohammed was with the group’s work, but said that the operatives saw al-Qahtani as a “conduit” to the prince, the report said.

Al-Qahtani has been sacked over Khashoggi’s murder but Saudi authorities have not said if he was among those charged. Five of the accused face the death penalty.

Harassing rights activists

According to the New York-based newspaper, the Rapid Intervention Group has been involved in the harassment of arrested prominent human rights activists and women’s rights defenders, including Loujain al-Hathloul, Aziza al-Yousef and Iman al-Najfan.

Alia al-Hathloul says that al-Qahtani attended several such sessions to torture her sister. He also threatened to kill Loujain and throw her body into the sewers, Alia says.

According to the newspaper, the women were beaten, subjected to electric shocks, waterboarding, and threatened with death and rape during the interrogations.

Loujain’s sister says that at first the Saudi authorities did not send the arrested women to jail, but in a secret location in the Red Sea city of Jeddah.

According to US intelligence assessment, the brutal interrogations prompted university professor al-Najfan to attempt suicide.

The women’s trial began last Wednesday after nearly a year in detention, but the Saudi government did not announce the charges against them.

Saudi denial

The intervention team was so busy that in June its leader asked a top adviser to Prince Mohammed whether he would give them bonuses for Eid-ul-Fitr, a major festival at the end of the Muslim holy month of Ramadan.

Saudi officials declined to confirm or deny that such a team existed, or answer questions from the Times about its work.

According to a spokesperson for the Saudi embassy in Washington, the kingdom “takes any allegations of ill-treatment of defendants awaiting trial or prisoners serving their sentences very seriously”.

Source Article from https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2019/03/mbs-approved-intervention-dissidents-nyt-report-190318075621971.html

India’s Parliament has approved a controversial citizenship bill that grants citizenship to minorities facing persecution from three neighbouring countries – but excludes Muslims.

A day after clearing the lower house, the Citizenship Amendment Bill was passed on Wednesday by the upper house, with 125 members voting in its favour and 105 against it.

More:

The bill brings sweeping changes to India’s 64-year-old citizenship law by giving citizenship to “persecuted” minorities – Hindus, Sikhs, Buddhists, Jains, Parsis and Christians – from Bangladesh, Afghanistan and Pakistan.

But critics say the legislation put forward by the Hindu nationalist ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) undermines the country’s secular constitution, with opposition parties, minority groups, academics and a US federal panel calling it discriminatory against Muslims.

“Muslim citizens of this country have no reason to worry,” Amit Shah, the federal home minister, said in Parliament. “This bill is intended to give citizenship, not take away citizenship.”

Several opposition parliamentarians said the bill would be challenged in court.

“The passage of the Citizenship Amendment Bill marks the victory of narrow-minded and bigoted forces over India’s pluralism,” said Sonia Gandhi, leader of the main opposition Congress party.

Meanwhile, Prime Minister Narendra Modi said it was a “landmark day for India” and the passage of the bill would “alleviate the suffering of many who faced persecution for years”.

“Glad that the #CAB2019 has been passed in the #RajyaSabha. Gratitude to all the MPs who voted in favour of the Bill,” Modi tweeted after the vote in the Rajya Sabha, the upper house.



Al Jazeera’s Anchal Vohra, reporting from the capital New Delhi, said, “There is a palpable sense of fear in areas where Muslim Indian citizens live.”

Protests against the measure have flared in various parts of India, including the ethnically diverse northeast, where people fear that undocumented Hindu migrants from neighbouring Bangladesh could be granted citizenship.

In Assam state, thousands of people protested overnight across several towns and cities, some joining processions carrying torches. Police said they used tear gas to push back protesters in at least two cities.


“We have seen massive protests in the northeast of India today that have turned violent. Police reacted and fired tear gas at them. We have also learned that the Indian army is on standby in the state of Assam,” Vohra said.

“Some of these people are protesting, saying they don’t want any migrant to be given Indian citizenship – whether Hindus or Muslims – because they want to protect their indigenous culture,” she added.

Faizan Mustafa, an expert on constitutional law and vice chancellor at NALSAR University of Law in Hyderabad, said the bill goes against the country’s constitution.

“It is arbitrary because it’s not based on reasonable classification, it doesn’t have rational objective to achieve, it does not cover all the neighbours, it doesn’t cover all the persecuted minorities,” Mustafa told Al Jazeera.

“It is constitutionally suspect and legally untenable but let’s see what the Supreme Court does in this case,” Mustafa added.

‘Second-class citizens’

Modi’s government – re-elected in May and under pressure over a slowing economy – said Muslims from Afghanistan, Bangladesh and Pakistan are excluded from the legislation because they do not face discrimination in those countries.

Also left out are other minorities fleeing political or religious persecution elsewhere in the region such as Tamils from Sri Lanka, Rohingya from Myanmar and Tibetans from China.

Many Muslims in India say they have been made to feel like second-class citizens since Modi came to power in 2014.

Several cities perceived to have Islamic-sounding names have been renamed, while some school textbooks have been altered to downplay Muslims’ contributions to India.

In August, Modi’s administration rescinded the partial autonomy of Jammu and Kashmir, India’s only Muslim-majority state, and split it into two union territories.

A citizens’ register in Assam finalised earlier this year left 1.9 million people, many of them Muslims, facing possible statelessness, detention camps and even deportation.

Modi’s government has said it intends to replicate the register nationwide with the aim of removing all “infiltrators” by 2024.

Bilal Kuchay contributed to this report from New Delhi


Source Article from https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2019/12/india-parliament-approves-contentious-citizenship-law-191211152439609.html

But if the debate was the marquee event of a campaign for the Texas governor’s mansion that is likely to cost more than $100 million, it did not seem to deliver a key moment that would significantly propel or hobble either candidate. That outcome appeared likely to benefit Mr. Abbott, who has been leading in the polls and has commanded a larger campaign war chest going into the final stretch.

The hectic pace of the exchanges — strictly limited by the moderators to 30 or 60 seconds — devolved at times into rhetorical finger-pointing between the two politicians over whose beliefs, diametrically opposed, were more outside the mainstream.

“Beto’s position is the most extreme,” Mr. Abbott said, suggesting that his Democratic rival supported allowing abortions at any point in a pregnancy.

“It’s completely a lie,” Mr. O’Rourke responded. “I never said that, and no one thinks that in the state of Texas.” He added: “He’s saying this because he signed the most extreme abortion ban in America. No exception for rape, no exception for incest.”

For weeks, the two candidates have clashed repeatedly on the airwaves, but they had yet to spar in person. Mr. O’Rourke tried to confront Mr. Abbott during a news conference in Uvalde after the massacre at an elementary school there in May, accusing him of doing nothing to prevent such violence, before Mr. O’Rourke was escorted out. Mr. Abbott did not respond at the time.

On Friday, Mr. Abbott similarly tried to ignore Mr. O’Rourke’s attacks as much as possible, rarely looking at his opponent as he spoke or listened.

Mr. O’Rourke went after Mr. Abbott from the start, blaming the governor’s “hateful rhetoric” for the killing of an undocumented migrant in West Texas this week and saying that the governor had “lost the right to serve this state” because of the police failures in the response to the Uvalde shooting.

Mr. Abbott repeatedly accused his challenger of misrepresenting facts. “He just makes this stuff up,” he said.

Mr. O’Rourke, a polished debater, appeared more at ease with the fast format of the debate. Mr. Abbott at times seemed to rush to make his points, and struggled with a question about whether he believed that emergency contraception was the “alternative” for someone who became pregnant from rape or incest in Texas, given that abortion is banned even in those cases.

“An alternative, obviously, is to do what we can to assist and aid the victim,” Mr. Abbott said. “They’re going to know that the state, through our Alternatives to Abortion program, provides living assistance, baby supplies, all kinds of things that can help them.”

It appeared clear that Mr. O’Rourke was the strongest challenger Mr. Abbott has had in his political career, stretching back into the 1990s. Mr. Abbott has never faced a primary opponent of note, and in his previous runs for governor, he easily swept aside Democratic opposition.

The hourlong debate was held in the border city of Edinburg, far from the large population centers of this increasingly urbanizing state but deep in the heart of Hispanic South Texas, where Mr. Abbott and Republicans have increasingly made inroads.

The location also put a spotlight on a topic that has been among the most effective issues for Mr. Abbott: the record numbers of unauthorized migrants continuing to arrive at the southern border.

The candidates, both in red ties, debated from a sitting position; Mr. Abbott has used a wheelchair since he was 26, when an oak tree fell on him while he was jogging, paralyzing him below the waist.

The candidates received no time for introductory comments and gave 30-second closing remarks, a format that played to Mr. Abbott’s strengths as a direct, often terse speaker, and limited Mr. O’Rourke’s tendency to build long rhetorical flourishes.

And the timing, on a Friday evening when many Texans are more consumed with high school football, appeared likely to reduce the number of people watching live.

Chris Evans, a spokesman for Mr. O’Rourke, said before the debate that the Abbott campaign had proposed the terms and would not accept any changes. “They declined to have voters in the audience,” he said. An Abbott spokesman, Mark Miner, said that Mr. O’Rourke was in “no position to run the state if he can’t even comprehend simple debate rules.”

Democrats in Texas have pinned their hopes on Mr. O’Rourke before, but so far he has managed only to be victorious in defeat. In his name-making 2018 run for Senate, he came within three percentage points of unseating Senator Ted Cruz, a strong showing in Republican-dominated Texas, but still a losing one.

Friday’s debate, just a few weeks before early voting begins in Texas, came at a crucial moment for both campaigns, especially Mr. O’Rourke’s. Over the summer, some polls had suggested a tightening race after the Uvalde killings and the Supreme Court’s decision overturning Roe v. Wade. But more recent surveys show Mr. Abbott more firmly in control, with a lead of about seven percentage points.

For Mr. O’Rourke, the former congressman from El Paso and a Democratic presidential candidate in 2020, the debate was a chance to recapture momentum and his most direct opportunity to prosecute his case against Mr. Abbott, a two-term incumbent who has led the state for eight years under unified Republican control of state government.

For Mr. Abbott, it was a night to make it through unscathed. His campaign had prepared for weeks for the encounter, seeing Mr. O’Rourke as a skilled debater with significant experience from his run for president in 2020.

The governor navigated tough questions, including one that in many ways launched Mr. O’Rourke into this race: the failure of the energy grid last February. Mr. Abbott stuck to his talking points — “the grid is more resilient and reliable than it’s ever been,” he said — and Mr. O’Rourke did not appear able to capitalize on the exchange.

“It seemed pretty even, and a bit of a tie probably benefits Governor Abbott in this case,” said Álvaro J. Corral, an assistant professor of political science at the University of Texas Rio Grande Valley in Edinburg. “I didn’t see a moment that indicated a change in that underlying dynamic.”

As the campaign entered its final months, Mr. Abbott has pressed his fund-raising advantage — $45 million on hand as of the last filing in mid-July, versus $23 million for Mr. O’Rourke — and went statewide with television ads at least two weeks before Mr. O’Rourke did so. Now both campaigns are bombarding Texans with messages, often negative, on television and online.

Before the debate, Mr. O’Rourke held a news conference in a playground in Edinburg with several parents and relatives from Uvalde whose children were shot and killed at Robb Elementary School. The families rode a bus together from Uvalde that morning to press for action on gun control; Mr. O’Rourke criticized Mr. Abbott for setting rules that would not allow the parents to watch from inside the hall.

The massacre took up significant time early in the debate. Mr. O’Rourke, who during the 2019 campaign urged taking away AR-15-style rifles after a deadly mass shooting in El Paso, emphasized his moderated position, calling to raise the age to buy an AR-15 to 21 from 18.

Mr. Abbott said that was unrealistic, citing recent court decisions striking down gun restrictions.

“We want to end school shootings,” he said. “But we cannot do that by making false promises.”

Reid J. Epstein contributed reporting.

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/live/2022/09/30/us/texas-debate-greg-abbott-beto-orourke

A high-profile social justice activist in Boston and her husband used a nonprofit they founded to scam at least $185,000 from donors who included a Black Lives Matter chapter and the local district attorney’s office, federal authorities allege.

Monica Cannon-Grant and Clark Grant allegedly treated their Violence in Boston organization as a personal piggy bank to pay for rent, shopping sprees, delivery meals, visits to a nail salon and a summer vacation trip to Maryland.

Cannon-Grant, 41, and Grant, 38, established the nonprofit in 2017, the same year she made headlines for helping organize a “Fight Supremacy” march in Boston following the deadly “Unite the Right” rally in Charlottesville, Va.

In a 2019 interview, she boasted of having the personal cellphone numbers of then-Mayor Marty Walsh, now the US secretary of labor; the current mayor, Michelle Wu, who was a council member at the time; and the local district attorney.

Monica Cannon-Grant, 41, founder of the nonprofit Violence in Boston, was charged Tuesday — along with her husband, Clark Grant.
AP

The following year, she was named “Best Social Justice Advocate” by Boston magazine and one of the Boston Globe’s “Bostonians of the Year.”

One of the earliest victims of the alleged fraud scheme was the Cambridge, Mass., chapter of Black Lives Matter, according to an 18-count indictment unsealed against the couple in Boston federal court on Tuesday.

The BLM chapter made a $3,000 donation via PayPal to support Violence in Boston’s program to feed needy children in August 2017, only to have the money secretly transferred two days later to a bank account belonging to one of Cannon-Grant’s family members, the indictment says.

In June 2019, Cannon-Grant also took part in a ceremony at the Suffolk County (Mass.) District Attorney’s Office, where her nonprofit was awarded $6,000 in forfeited assets to take “10 at risk young men” from Boston’s crime-ridden Roxbury neighborhood to a three-day “Violence Prevention Retreat” in Philadelphia.

Monica Cannon-Grant and her husband have been charged with using a $6,000 grant for at-risk youth for a getaway to Maryland, restaurants and a shopping spree.
Matt Stone/MediaNews Group/Boston Herald

But instead of using the money that way, Cannon-Grant and her hubby — who at the time had balances of just $1.35 and $21.01 in their personal checking accounts, respectively — allegedly blew it on a trip to Columbia, Md., the following month.

The spending included more than $1,200 at a Sonesta Suites hotel, as well as hundreds more for a rental car, fuel, parking and meals at the Bubba Gump Shrimp Co., Shake Shack and other restaurants in Connecticut, New Jersey and Maryland, according to the indictment.

At the time, the Suffolk DA was Rachael Rollins, who last year was named the US attorney for Massachusetts and whose office brought the charges against Cannon-Grant and her husband.

Monica Cannon-Grant received the grant money to show at-risk youth “communities outside of the violence-riddled neighborhoods that they navigate daily.”
Erin Clark/The Boston Globe via AP

Rollins is recused from the case due to the Justice Department’s policy on conflicts of interest and declined to comment, a spokeswoman told the Boston Globe.

Black Lives Matter Cambridge didn’t immediately return a request for comment.

The couple’s alleged fundraising fraud allegedly accelerated in 2020 when their nonprofit began raking in donations of up to $50,000 a month, with some of the proceeds withdrawn in cash from ATMs or transferred to investment accounts at the Robinhood and E-Trade websites, according to the indictment.

Cannon-Grant and Grant are also accused of scamming a total of more than $100,000 in federal pandemic-related unemployment benefits.

During that time, she collected more than $27,000 in consulting fees for assisting an unidentified media company with “diversity, equity and inclusion” training and later paid herself a $2,788 weekly salary from Violence in Boston, and he had a full-time job with a commuter services company, according to the indictment,

At one point in March 2021, Cannon-Grant allegedly texted her husband, “Unemployment caught my a–! Asked me to provide documents by June unless I’ll have to pay it all back.”

Monica Cannon-Grant and her husband, Clark Grant, were charged with defrauding donors, lying on a mortgage application and illegally collecting about $100,000 in pandemic unemployment benefits.
Joseph Prezioso/AFP via Getty Images

Grant allegedly told her to have an unidentified associate write a letter falsely claiming that Violence in Boston’s headquarters was closed.

The associate — who previously created fake letters so the couple could qualify for housing benefits and also attend a Boston Celtics game on the basis of negative COVID-19 test results — didn’t draft that document but did prepare a back-dated, four-page letter that Grant allegedly used to scam unemployment payments, according to the indictment.

In addition, the couple is accused of using Violence in Boston assets to qualify for a mortgage to purchase a house in the Boston suburb of Taunton.

Cannon-Grant was arrested Tuesday and was released without bail following a court appearance at which the judge allowed her to continue working at Violence in Boston, which runs a twice-weekly food pantry, but said she can’t handle its finances, the Globe reported.

She declined to comment afterward but her lawyer, Robert Goldstein, accused prosecutors of having “rushed to judgment” and said Cannon-Grant and Violence in Boston “have been fully cooperating and their production of records remains ongoing.”

“Drawing conclusions from an incomplete factual record does not represent the fair and fully informed process a citizen deserves from its government, especially someone like Monica who has worked tirelessly on behalf of her community,” Goldstein said in a prepared statement.

A judge released Monica Cannon-Grant on personal recognizance and told her she may continue to work her nonprofit but cannot handle its finances.
Suzanne Kreiter/The Boston Globe via Getty Images

“We remain fully confident Monica will be vindicated when a complete factual record emerges.”

The arraignment of her husband, who was busted last year in the alleged pandemic-relief and mortgage scams, has yet to be scheduled, according to the Boston US Attorney’s Office.

Source Article from https://nypost.com/2022/03/16/boston-blm-leader-husband-charged-with-fraud-conspiracy/

Secretary of State Mike Pompeo on Monday revealed the Trump administration is considering banning Chinese social media applications including TikTok, the popular short video-sharing social network, from being used in the United States.

“We’re taking this very seriously. We’re certainly looking at it,” Pompeo told Fox News’ Laura Ingraham, citing the administration’s actions against the Chinese-based telecommunications companies Huawei and ZTE.

“With respect to Chinese apps on people’s cellphones, I can assure you the United States will get this one right too, Laura. I don’t want to get out in front of the president, but it’s something we’re looking at,” Pompeo said.

Source Article from https://www.politico.com/news/2020/07/07/mike-pompeo-tiktok-ban-350384

“Whether the attack was at law enforcement, or whoever, we have a responsibility to get to the bottom of it and we’ll do that,” Robert Contee, the acting chief of Washington DC’s Metropolitan Police Department, said at a news conference on Friday.

Source Article from https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-56620113

WASHINGTON — With backing from progressive Rep.-elect Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, activists have taken Congress by storm in recent weeks with rallies demanding radical action to prevent a climate catastrophe. On Monday, over 100 protesters were arrested at the offices of House Democratic leaders.

But 3,800 miles away in Paris, there’s a very different set of climate-related protests going on as French activists, angered by a fuel tax, have plunged President Emmanuel Macron’s administration into crisis.

The French “yellow vest” protests have ignited a debate on the left in the U.S. over how to avoid a similar backlash if Democrats get the chance to enact new environmental laws. And the demonstrations come as environmental issues are taking on more prominence amid dire reports from the United Nations and U.S. government warning lawmakers they have only limited time to minimize the damage.

At the center of the debate is whether Democrats should pursue a carbon tax as part of their climate plan or whether they might risk enraging low- and middle-income voters, particularly those in rural and suburban America, by raising the cost of living.

Watching the news in France unfold, Center for American Progress President Neera Tanden chastised some on the left for expressing sympathy with the protesters “amassing against a carbon tax.” That drew a sharp response from the Democratic Socialists of America, who accused Tanden of defending “regressive taxes that don’t make the rich and fossil fuel companies pay their fair share.”

Activists and academics in America wonder whether what’s happening in France might foreshadow struggles at home someday, especially after Donald Trump rode populist resentment of his own to victory in 2016. Trump, who has dismissed his own government’s climate reports, has already claimed the Paris demonstrations as validation of his decision to abandon the Paris Climate Agreement. What’s more, the U.S. is currently defending the use of fossil fuels at the ongoing United Nations climate talks in Poland.

While not the same as the French fuel tax, the carbon tax has long been touted by many climate experts as a simple way to push companies and consumers toward a green economy by making pollution more expensive.

But the newest wave of American climate activists, including Ocasio-Cortez, have taken a different approach.

Although not explicitly opposed to a carbon tax, they’ve focused their energy on what they call a “Green New Deal” that would put federal spending on renewable energy on par with wartime military budgets.

“Any sort of Macron-style carbon tax that’s coupled with extreme austerity measures handing more wealth to those on top is not progressive,” Waleed Shahid, a spokesman for Justice Democrats, told NBC News. “This mistaken and elite-driven approach to climate is exactly what the Green New Deal aims to combat through massive public investment and economic mobilization.”

The details of the Green New Deal are still vague. Ocasio-Cortez is calling for a House Select Committee to study the issue and come up with a plan to move quickly to a renewable energy economy rather than begin with one specific approach.

That gives lawmakers some flexibility, and activists see it as a more sustainable political message as well. Rather than lead with a punitive tax, they are instead pitching their plan as a way to create jobs at home.

“The Green New Deal would not only tackle climate change, but poverty and unemployment in a way we’ve never seen in our lifetimes,” Stephen O’Hanlon, interim communications director for the Sunrise Movement said, while participating in the climate change sit-in at House minority leader Nancy Pelosi’s office on Monday.

On the other hand, carbon tax supporters say it’s not fair to lump their ideas in with Macron’s fuel tax, nor to treat them as mutually exclusive to a Green New Deal.

The “Yellow Jacket” demonstrations come as environmental issues are taking on more prominence amid dire reports warning lawmakers they have limited time to minimize the damage.Lucas Barioulet / AFP – Getty Images

Proposed carbon taxes on the left, like a plan by economists Mark Paul and Anders Fremstad at the People’s Policy Project, and on the right, like a plan backed by former George W. Bush adviser Greg Mankiw and former Ronald Reagan adviser Martin Feldstein, take into account the impact on working people. Both plans propose using revenue from the tax to pay dividends to Americans that would at least partially offset increases in the cost of living.

“If leftists can’t get behind a carbon tax (properly designed, of course), we’re in real trouble,” Michael S. Linden, a fellow at the Roosevelt Institute, tweeted on Monday.

But there could be limits to a carbon tax as well.

While France’s situation is unique, Kristina Costa, a fellow at the Center for American Progress, said it pointed to the challenge of tackling pollution from cars and trucks, which she noted is an urgent need but harder to achieve than other emission cuts, including at power plants. Because large swaths of America are dependent on cars, a carbon tax could raise the cost of commuting, but not always change their behavior.

“It will increase prices and people will feel that, but if you live in rural Indiana, you don’t have a choice but to drive a car,” she said.

To soften the blow, policymakers could keep raising fuel standards on vehicles and pumping research dollars and tax credits into electric vehicles so that owners are less affected by changes in oil prices. But that runs into dangerous territory: Consumers might see higher prices from a carbon tax before they see the benefits from new technologies.

Lex Paulson, a political science professor at Sciences Po Paris and strategist for Macron’s En Marche movement, said the protest’s roots were complex and fed into a broader revolt beyond the fuel tax alone, but he still saw important lessons for the climate debate in America. Getting buy-in from voters on an overall plan is important, and Macron set the stage for a populist backlash in part by imposing the fuel tax while cutting taxes for the wealthy at the same time.

“Unless everyday people feel like the change being asked of them is fair and fits into a coherent vision, they will reject it as something by an elite for an elite,” Paulson said.

Source Article from https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/paris-protests-open-rift-american-left-spark-u-s-climate-n946296