Top Rated Videos

asdf

asdf

 São Paulo – Over 30 companies have expressed interest in the auction for concession of Highway SP-099 (Tamoios Highway), in the state of São Paulo. The tender is scheduled to take place in July at the latest. According to the São Paulo State Transport Agency (Artesp), from Friday (Feb 28), when the call for tender for the public-private partnership (PPP) for the Nova Tamoios (New Tamoios) was made public, until Tuesday (1st), over 30 companies have collected the documentation to bid for the tender. 

The winner will carry out duplication works in the highway’s mountain stretch, renovation in the flat stretch, and manage the highway for the next 30 years. Nearly R$ 4 billion (US$ 1.76 billion) should be invested during the period. In the first five years, R$ 2.9 billion (US$ 1.2 billion) will be invested. Brazilian and foreign companies, complementary social security companies and investment funds are eligible.

According to the Artesp special projects advisor Isadora Cohen, the strong demand for information on the auction was a “pleasant surprise,” however the Artesp was already anticipating much interest in the highway’s concession. “We had realized during our road shows that there was widespread interest from the market,” Cohen told ANBA this Wednesday (2nd).

Similar to other tenders floated in the state of São Paulo, foreign companies will be eligible for the “Nova Tamoios” auction. This was the case with the Anchieta-Imigrantes system auctions, which connects the city of São Paulo and the southern coast of the state; the Anhanguera-Bandeirantes system auctions, connecting the capital to the countryside, and the auctions of the Rodoanel ring road, around the Greater Metropolitan Area of São Paulo, among others.

“From our past experiences we have ascertained that the participation [of foreign enterprises] is not significant yet,” said Cohen. According to her, however, Tamoios has a strong potential for technology usage, and requires “robust” investment. “It may attract people from overseas,” he added.

The concession provides for duplication of the mountain portion comprehended between kilometres 60.48 and 82, and the operation, maintenance and conservation of the stretch between kilometres 11.5 an d 83.4, as well as roundabouts in Caraguatatuba and São Sebastião, northern coast cities to which the traffic from the capital and the Paraíba valley flows via the highway. Duplication of the mountain stretch will span approximately 21.5 kilometres, of which 12.7 will be tunnels. The road will include the longest tunnel in Brazil, at 3.675 kilometres. The flatland stretch between kilometres 11.5 and 60.48, has been duplicated and was delivered in January this year.

The concession scheme for this project is the sponsored concession. Under this scheme, the toll charged from users will not suffice to repay the investment made by the operator. Therefore, the state will have to make annual payments so the winning company does not incur losses, and so the toll is not too high. The government of São Paulo will transfer a maximum of R$ 156.8 million per year to the winning company. The bid that demands the lowest payment from the state government will win the auction.

There will be toll booth plazas at kilometres 15.7 and 56.6 of the flatland stretch, and another one in the Caraguatatuba roundabout. The toll will be R$ 0.077 per kilometre in single-lane stretches, and R$ 0.108 in double-lane portions. It will be charged starting on the contract’s second year. Interested parties are required to provide proof of former management and operation of highways with an average daily traffic of 8,000 vehicles per hour, among other requirements.

International companies willing to bid are not required to have a Brazilian partner, and may bid solo, as long as they have a legal representative in Brazil. If they decide on having a local partner or entering into a consortium, however, the venture’s leader must be the Brazilian partner.

As per the schedule, interested parties will have 45 days as of February 28 to peruse the call for tender. On May 14th, all bidders will be required to submit envelopes containing registration documents, bid bonds, licensing documents, construction work methods, commercial proposal, and business plan. They will also need to prove their capacity to make the investment and complete the works.

The bid envelopes will only be opened once the Artesp has reviewed the other envelopes, which should take place in June and July this year, after which the winner should be announced. The signing of the concession contract is scheduled for September, and works should start in the last two months of 2014.

For additional information go to: http://www.artesp.sp.gov.br/rodovias-ppp-nova-tamoios.html.

*Translated by Gabriel Pomerancblum

Source Article from http://www2.anba.com.br/noticia/21863371/business-opportunities/tamoios-highway-auction-has-over-30-potential-bidders/

Paris, France – Holding signs that read “What about the poor?” and chanting “Justice for all,” France’s yellow vest protesters, ignoring the displays of unity by the French political class in the wake of the Notre Dame fire, marched through the streets of Paris and other cities on Saturday, vowing to persevere in what they called “Ultimatum 2”.

“These [protests] are very important for social justice,” said Jean-Baptiste Redde at the Saturday protest on Republique Square in central Paris. “We have to help the poor, the disabled people, those who don’t have roofs to live under. It’s important to hold on.”

Hundreds were arrested and dozens injured as violence broke out between demonstrators and police.

The French capital quickly became the epicentre of Saturday’s violence, with 9,000 protesters reported in Paris alone, according to the French Ministry of the Interior, and police sealed off entire sections of the city.

While the protests started out peacefully, almost with a carnival-like atmosphere, violence erupted as thousands of demonstrators approached the Place de la Republique.

People threw rocks at police who responded with tear gas and stun grenades.



With 9,000 protesters, Paris quickly became the epicentre of Saturday’s violence [Mustafa Yalcin/Anadolu]

It was the twenty-third demonstration by the loosely organised, disparate movement that is mainly united in its resentment over the lack of economic equality in France and displeasure with President Emmanuel Macron, whom many see as a “president of the rich”.

The grassroots movement that started on social media has proven to be one of the biggest tests of Macron’s presidency, with protesters refusing to let this week’s fire at Notre Dame pause their demonstrations, even as the president and French political parties put aside politics and halted campaigning for the upcoming European Parliament elections.

In fact, in some ways, the fire on Monday inflamed some protesters because of the hundreds of millions of euros raised immediately afterwards to restore the 850-year-old Notre Dame.


Some of that money was pledged by French billionaires such as French luxury group Kering’s CEO Francois-Henri Pinault and LVMH head Bernard Arnault as well as companies such as French oil giant Total.

“I would like us to get back to reality,” said Ingrid Levavasseur, one of the informal leaders of the movement, speaking on French BFM TV last week.

Levavasseur said it was important to criticise “the inertia of large companies and [billionaires] in the face of social misery as they display their ability to raise a crazy amount of money in a single night for Notre Dame”.

Her comments and others were widely shared on social media. Many agreed.

“If they are able to give tens of millions to rebuild Notre Dame, then they should stop telling us that there is no money to counter social inequality,” Philippe Martinez, head of France’s CGT workers union, told French radio last week.

The sentiment was reflected on the streets of Paris on Saturday.

“Billions should also be given to the poor, to help the environment, to promote biodiversity,” said Redde holding a sign that read, “Millions for Notre Dame – and what about the poor?”

“But Macron and this government only want to help the rich, so we can’t stop.”



Jean-Baptiste Redde at the Yellow Vest protests in Republique square holds a sign reading ‘Millions for Notre Dame – and what about the poor?’ [Jabeen Bhatti/Al Jazeera]

‘A pointless debate’

The fire at Notre Dame, which is revered by all French people – Catholics, Muslims and Jews – as part of France’s cultural and historical legacy, set off a national outpouring of grief.

As a result, the anger at the donations set off a backlash within the government and among the public.

“It is a pointless debate,” said Culture Minister Franck Riester, interviewed on RMC radio. “To say, ‘there’s too much money for Notre Dame and there is need elsewhere’ – of course, there is need elsewhere for healthcare, the fight against climate change. But Notre Dame is not only a collection of old stones. It’s a part of our identity.”

France’s Minister of the Interior Christophe Castaner was more pointed.

“The rioters have not been visibly moved by what happened at Notre Dame,” he said angrily, shortly before the ministry announced that France would deploy 60,000 police officers on Saturday and prevent any protesters from getting near Notre Dame and the Champs-Elysees where, in March, they set fire to a bank, smashed the front of a renowned restaurant, and looted stores.

It’s difficult to say the protests are no longer legitimate because of the Notre Dame fire. Life goes on. And so do the yellow vests.

Jean-Michel Aphatie, political commentator

Meanwhile, the public is already growing weary of the protesters – recent polls show support for the yellow vests has dropped by half from 80 percent. An Odoxa poll released on Friday indicated that a slim majority of French wanted the demonstrations suspended.

“I’m tired of this,” a clothing shop owner in the Marais, a major tourist district next to Republique Square, told Al Jazeera privately. “For five months, we have had almost no business – the tourists are not coming here because of the protests.”

Notre Dame even gave pause to some within the movement. Many in the movement on Tuesday called for protests to be delayed in deference to the “national tragedy” at Notre Dame.

‘Too little, too late’

Monday’s fire broke out just an hour before Macron was scheduled to give a televised address detailing a series of policy reforms in response to the yellow vest protesters and their grievances. The speech was cancelled at the last minute and rescheduled for next Thursday.

Even so, copies of the taped speech sent to reporters were leaked. In it, Macron promised to lower taxes for the middle class, reconsider his decision to cut a “fortune solidarity tax” on top earners, and make adjustments to the lowest pensions for inflation.

Macron was also set to announce the closure of the highly prestigious Ecole nationale d’administration, a college that trains public servants. Many have criticised the school as a place reserved for the elite. 



A closed shoe store on Saturday near the busy retail district of the Marais [Jabeen Bhatti/Al Jazeera]

The Odoxa poll showed the majority of French citizens supported these changes. But many yellow vest demonstrators and others continued their chant of “too little, too late” and vowed to continue protesting for weeks to come.

“Pfff – blah, blah, blah,” was the reaction of Catherine Lopis when asked about Macron’s plans.

“I voted for him (Macron) – had no choice but him or [far-right leader Marine] Le Pen. But he isn’t interested in helping anyone other than bankers. Our problems are not his problems so it is easy for him to turn away.”

Jerome Rodrigues, a leader in the movement, said on Saturday the postponement of Macron’s speech was calculated.

“The world stops turning when there is a fire in France?” he wondered during an interview on French television.

“I think it was a government strategy to get some information leaked to buy time to then better sell us his new programme, changes he wants to make that we are denouncing here at the demonstration.”

‘Protesters have a point’

“These protests aren’t going to end any time soon,” said French radio personality and political commentator Jean-Michel Aphatie.

But without concrete goals and a clear leader, Aphatie said the movement is struggling to be effective and bring concrete change.

“The only thing they know for sure is that they want to go out every Saturday to protest,” he said, referring to the fact the protests have run continuously every Saturday since November 17, even though they have grown smaller.

Even so, he added the protest did have legitimacy. The French have seen their purchasing power decline over the years and many are struggling to make ends meet.

“It’s difficult to say the protests are no longer legitimate because of the Notre Dame fire,” Aphatie said. “Life goes on. And so do the Yellow Vests.”

Source Article from https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2019/04/notre-dame-fire-pledges-inflame-yellow-vest-protesters-190420171251402.html

“You have to open an office in the White House. Name a director,” he can be heard saying. Much of his shouting was inaudible at the outdoor event hosted on the White House’s South Lawn.

The president responded to Oliver’s demands, saying that “we have one” in regards to the call for a federal office dedicated to gun violence. But the president acknowledged that more needs to be done to prevent mass shootings and said “let him talk” before Oliver was escorted out by White House security.

“This legislation is real progress but more has to be done. The provision of this new legislation is going to save lives and it’s proof that today’s politics we can come together on a bipartisan basis and get important things done. Even on an issue as tough as guns.”

Oliver has been on the front lines of gun-control activism since losing his son in 2018, and was among other gun control activists who criticized the bill, arguing it does not go far enough to prevent mass shootings.

“It’s been a while that I’ve been calling out that using the words ‘celebration,’ getting together, it’s like we’re going to a party, to a wedding today, you know, we all received invitations. And meanwhile, you can see these mothers in Uvalde that just saw how their kids were massacred inside a school,” Oliver said in an interview with CNN on Monday.

“I really wish there was more in this package of bills and I will do everything whatever I can to get more in this package of bills. … We are celebrating and getting together in the White House. There’s no space for that word.”

Source Article from https://www.politico.com/news/2022/07/11/parkland-father-biden-gun-control-00045120

President Biden’s approval numbers have taken a hit in seven Democrat-controlled swing districts, according to a new poll commissioned by conservative advocacy group American Action Network released on Tuesday. 

The survey — conducted by Remington Research Group — showed the president underwater by an average of 7 percentage points on the economy and 9 percent on foreign policy in the areas polled, which include California’s 10th Congressional District, Florida’s 7th Congressional District, Iowa’s 3rd Congressional District, Michigan’s 8th and 11th Congressional Districts, Virginia’s 2nd Congressional District and Washington’s 8th Congressional District. 

The surveys found that Biden and the Democrats’ plan to move forward with a $3.5 trillion social spending could prove to be a liability for the party’s members that serve in the battleground districts, with an average of just 36 percent approving on average to the 55 percent that said they disapprove of the proposal. 

A new poll shows President Biden’s approval numbers have dropped in seven Democrat-controlled swing districts.
REUTERS/Elizabeth Frantz

According to the poll, when asked whether they believed the $3.5 trillion in spending is “unnecessary and wasteful … in addition to the $6 trillion that has already been passed for COVID recovery and other programs,” just 35 percent of respondents said they believed the spending is necessary while 55 percent said they feel it is unnecessary.

The polling was conducted from Aug. 28-Aug. 30 in the seven districts, with 800 likely voters participating. 

As House Republicans grow more optimistic about their odds of flipping the majority in the House in 2022, the poll found that Democratic representatives are also trailing behind generic Republican challengers by an average of 6 percent.

President Joe Biden’s handling of Afghanistan received criticism from both Democrats and Republicans.
ZUMAPRESS.com

The numbers come shortly after Biden received criticism from both sides of the aisle on his handling of the withdrawal from Afghanistan, and the GOP making inflation and lower-than-expected job growth central components of their messaging strategy as they look toward the 2022 midterm election cycle. 

Rep. Elissa Slotkin (D-Mich.) — who represents an R+4 district on the Cook Partisan Voting Index scale — and Rep. Cindy Axne (D-Iowa) —who holds an R+3 seat — are shown to be hit the hardest, with the poll showing them at a 9 percent disadvantage when matched up against a generic GOP candidate, with Biden receiving the lowest marks in their districts out of the seven surveyed. 

A Taliban fighter stands guard as people move past him at a market with shops dealing with currency exchange in Kabul on Sept. 5, 2021.
AFP via Getty Images

The poll found Rep. Josh Harder (D-Calif.) down by 7 percent, Rep. Haley Stevens (D-Mich.) trailing by 6 percent, Rep. Kim Schrier (D-Wash.) down by 4 percent and a Republican leading by 3 percent in both Reps. Stephanie Murphy (D-Fla.) and Elaine Luria’s (D-Va.) districts. 

Members with named challengers fared slightly better in the polls, showing them within the three-point margin of error, with Murphy up by 3 percent, Luria up one percent, Axne trailing by 2 percent and Schrier down by 1 percent. 

Source Article from https://nypost.com/2021/09/07/biden-tanks-in-7-democratic-districts-as-poll-says-3-5t-spending-too-big/

Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg on Tuesday told employees that he was standing firm in the company’s decision not to moderate a post in which President Donald Trump said “when the looting starts, the shooting starts.”

Zuckerberg announced this to employees during a virtual all-hands meeting on Tuesday, according to The New York Times. The decision comes despite public criticism from dozens of employees, many of whom argue that the post from Trump violates Facebook’s community standards, which prohibit language that incites serious violence.

Brandon Dail, a Facebook user interface engineer, tweeted on Tuesday in criticism of Facebook’s leaders.

Zuckerberg’s decision not to moderate the post is in contrast to that of rival Twitter, which placed a label warning users about the president’s violent rhetoric, which they have to dismiss before they can view the tweet. Twitter is also preventing users from liking or retweeting the tweet.

Aside from criticism of the decision, at least two Facebook employees posted on social media that they were leaving the company as a result of the refusal to moderate Trump.

“I cannot stand by Facebook’s continued refusal to act on the president’s bigoted messages aimed at radicalizing the American public,” software engineer Timothy Aveni posted on LinkedIn.

Others in the tech industry also criticized the company for its inaction. Data scientist Ayodele Odubela on Tuesday tweeted a screenshot of her response to a Facebook recruiter, saying she refused to work for a company with policies that she fundamentally disagrees with.  

“Your CEO refuses to do anything about the hate speech and violence glorified by our ‘president’ on Facebook,” she wrote. 

Facebook has also been criticized by at least two of its partners.

After speaking with Zuckerberg and Facebook COO Sheryl Sandberg on Monday, Color of Change President Rashad Robinson tweeted that he was “disappointed and stunned by his incomprehensible explanations for allowing Trump’s incitement of violence against Black people to remain up.” Color of Change is a racial justice organization that has been working with Facebook on a civil rights audit of the social network.

“If regular citizens can get removed from social media sites for inciting violence … we have to have a standard for the most powerful person in the world whose harassments and attacks can lead to the deep levels of violence that we know,” Robinson told CNBC. 

Talkspace, a company that provides online therapy, on Monday announced that it was ending a partnership agreement with Facebook after the company’s decision not to moderate Trump’s post.

Source Article from https://www.cnbc.com/2020/06/02/zuckerberg-stands-firm-in-refusal-to-moderate-trump-facebook-posts.html

Senate Democrats are racing to finalize a new tax provision that would penalize large companies that pay low wages. The move comes after Senate Parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough ruled Thursday night that a $15 minimum wage hike cannot be included in the Senate COVID relief package, which is currently being pushed through the chamber through a process known as budget reconciliation. 

The plan being drafted by aides to Senate Finance Committee chair Ron Wyden of Oregon — in close consultation with Senate Budget Chair Bernie Sanders of Vermont — would impose a 5% payroll tax penalty on “very large” companies that do not pay workers a certain amount. That amount is still unclear: Wyden favors $15 an hour, but is currently seeking feedback from fellow Democrats on that figure and on exactly which companies would face the penalties. 

“Everyone in the caucus is envisioning ‘very large’ companies – think Walmart, Amazon,” a Senate Democratic aide told CBS News.

Under the proposal, which Senate Democrats hope to finish crafting by early next week, smaller businesses that raise their workers’ wages would be eligible for income tax credits equal to 25% of wages — up to $10,00 per employer to year — tax incentives to increase wages. 

“Basically we’re having the stick approach for the very big companies at the top, and the carrot approach for the smallest of small businesses to try to encourage them to raise wages on their own,” the aide said.

Democratic aides, anticipating an adverse ruling from the Senate parliamentarian, began quietly working on the “Plan B” proposal several weeks ago. The tax penalties would apply not only to large companies that pay their own employees low wages, but also to those that hire contractors – such as security guards – who earn low wages for work they do on premises. 

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi on Friday stressed the importance of the minimum wage hike, saying at a press conference that “we will not rest until we pass the $15 minimum wage.”

The new push comes one day after Sanders announced that he would introduce an amendment to the COVID relief package to “take tax deductions away from large, profitable corporations that don’t pay workers at least $15 an hour and to provide small businesses with the incentives they need to raise wages.”

The White House acknowledged the new effort Friday without endorsing or rejecting it. “We haven’t reviewed the measure. We are certainly aware… But we have not reviewed and we don’t have a final conclusion on that proposal,” White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki told reporters aboard Air Force One. 

House Ways and Means Chairman Richard Neal, whose House COVID relief bill does contain a $15 federal minimum wage hike, was also reluctant to weigh in. “I hesitate to, you know, to say anything until they decide on a strategy. I don’t want to be perceived as second guessing what they’re doing,” Neal said Friday. 

Jason Furman, who served as chair of President Obama’s Council of Economic Advisers, sounded a note of caution, tweeting “this is a really big, complicated, brand new proposal. It is *possible* that it works. It is also *possible* that another tax version works. But I would be extremely nervous about trying out a brand new idea like this with virtually no vetting.”

House progressives were more enthusiastic about the tax proposal, but cautioned that it was no substitution for a true minimum wage increase. “I’m very supportive of doing whatever we can, but at the end of the day we promised a $15 minimum wage, so if that $15 min wage isn’t in this package, we are going to have to figure out a way to get it through and if that means reforming the filibuster, then we should reform the filibuster,” Congresswoman Pramila Jayapal (D-WA) told reporters.

This tax measure, which would be included in the $1.9 trillion COVID relief bill, would have to win the support of two moderate Democrats – West Virginia’s Joe Manchin and Arizona’s Kyrsten Sinema – who opposed including an across-the-board $15 minimum wage in the COVID relief bill.

Republicans are likely to balk at any proposal that involves imposing new taxes, even if those penalties would only apply to the nation’s largest companies. On Friday, House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy called the proposal “stupid,” and Senator Pat Toomey of Pennsylvania slammed it as “wealth redistribution and social engineering. It is a bad idea.”

Democratic Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez told reporters on Friday that the inclusion of a minimum wage hike had “smoothed over the negotiation on this process” for progressives in the House.

“I think that Senator Sanders is doing the right thing by trying to include something, last minute, because the fact of the matter is that these negotiations, the entire negotiations of this package, for a lot of people, were predicated on the $15 minimum wage,” Ocasio-Cortez said.

Ocasio-Cortez also challenged Democratic Senator Joe Manchin of West Virginia, who has expressed opposition to raising the minimum wage to $15 and has instead suggested that it be raised to $11 per hour.

“His own constituents, West Virginians, want a $15 minimum wage. So I don’t even see what kind of leg he’s standing on here where the majority of his own state doesn’t agree with him,” Ocasio-Cortez said. A February poll by the One Fair Wage Coalition, a group which supports a minimum wage hike, found that 63% of West Virginians support raising the minimum wage by 2025.

Raising the minimum wage is widely popular across the country, with a 2019 poll by the Pew Research Center showing that 67% of Americans support raising the minimum wage to $15. It even has support in some red states, as demonstrated by a ballot initiative in Florida to increase the minimum wage increase to $15 by 2026, which passed with support from more than 60% of voters in the last election. 

Some Republicans have taken note of the public support for a minimum wage hike. On Friday, Republican Senator Josh Hawley of Missouri announced a proposal to require companies with revenues of $1 billion or more to pay their employees $15 per hour.  

Under Hawley’s plan, small business employees who earn less than $15 per hour would qualify for a “Blue Collar Bonus” in the form of an automatic tax credit. “Mega-corporations can afford to pay their workers $15 an hour, and it’s long past time they do so,” Hawley said, “but this should not come at the expense of small businesses already struggling to make it.

Sarah Ewall-Wice contributed reporting.

Source Article from https://www.cbsnews.com/news/minimum-wage-hike-senate-democrats-plan-b/

Conservatives complain about government constantly. But if there’s one agency hated by people across the political spectrum, it is the Transportation Security Administration.

This agency, created in late 2001, is known by alternative acronyms such as “Thousands Standing Around,” and anyone who has flown on a busy day understands why. On every trip, one inevitably gets the perception that innumerable TSA workers are lounging in the background.

This complaint should resonate now, at a time when a government shutdown subtly threatens everyone’s ability to travel. Although both TSA and air traffic control workers are being made to work without pay, some TSA workers have already been caught staging sickouts and many are just quitting.

One cannot blame them for insisting on jobs that actually pay. It’s fundamentally unjust that the nation’s transportation system should hinge for weeks or months on thousands of people working without a paycheck.

That’s just one more reason the TSA should be privatized.

The continued movement of passengers in the U.S. should not be left to something as fickle as the demands of politicians. Instead, let it depend upon the bottom lines of businesses that cannot afford a shutdown because they must turn a profit to survive.

Note that even now, amid this shutdown, security screeners are getting paid at the nearly two dozen airports that wisely privatized.

TSA is a total failure as an agency. Its workers have frequently been caught exceeding their authority: for example, stopping people carrying cash on domestic flights. They have opened people’s luggage to indulge their prurient curiosity. Several have even been caught stealing, either behind the scenes or flagrantly in the sight of passengers waiting in line.

The worst part of all is that the TSA fails to stop real and perceived threats. Some pundits tried to blame the government shutdown for the recent failure by TSA in Atlanta to detect a gun in an international passenger’s carry-on. But the agency’s track record is no better when the government is open.

In various tests, undercover inspectors have successfully smuggled mock explosives and banned weapons past security checkpoints as much as 70 percent or even 95 percent of the time. Think about that next time you’re forced into secondary screening because you accidentally left toothpaste or a shampoo bottle in your carry-on bag.

We propose privatization not because we know that a private security firm would do the job better (private sector workers can be incompetent, corrupt, and power-hungry, too) but because we are certain that a private screening company could not do any worse.

Airline security workers in the private sector would probably cost the taxpayers less, but that is beside the point. Even if an agreement were struck grandfathering in all current TSA workers at their current pay and benefits, they would have much greater incentive to show up for work, conduct themselves honorably, and be vigilant at their posts. The same aversion to getting fired that every private-sector worker in America feels at all times would be a great motivator for those who might otherwise sloppily overlook a gun or a bundle of dynamite in a carry-on bag.

Meanwhile, their airport employers would also have a natural incentive that the federal government lacks — the profit motive — to avoid shutting themselves down for large stretches over personal or political disagreements.

As many younger readers might have forgotten already, private airport security was the norm before 9/11. When debating the creation of TSA afterward, many members of Congress pointed out that although major reforms were needed in airport security protocols, there was no specific reason to think that government screeners would do a better job. They were right then, and they have been proven right in the intervening years.

Private airline security already exists at 22 airports today, as of August, including some large ones, such as San Francisco and Kansas City. It’s time to privatize the rest so that commercial aviation is no longer at the mercy of the brinkmanship of politicians.

Source Article from https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/editorials/heres-how-to-get-airport-screeners-paid-during-government-shutdowns-privatize-the-tsa

BILLINGS, Mont. — A subsidiary of one of the largest U.S. providers of renewable energy pleaded guilty to criminal charges and was ordered to pay over $8 million in fines and restitution after at least 150 eagles were killed at its wind farms in eight states, federal prosecutors said Wednesday.

NextEra Energy subsidiary ESI Energy was also sentenced to five years probation after being charged with three counts of violating the Migratory Bird Treaty Act during a court appearance in Cheyenne, Wyoming. The charges arose from the deaths of nine eagles at three wind farms in Wyoming and New Mexico.

In addition to those deaths, the company acknowledged the deaths of golden and bald eagles at 50 wind farms affiliated with ESI and NextEra since 2012, prosecutors said. Birds were killed in eight states: Wyoming, California, New Mexico, North Dakota, Colorado, Michigan, Arizona and Illinois.

NextEra, based in Juno Beach, Florida, bills itself as the world’s largest utility company by market value. It has more than 100 wind farms in the U.S. and Canada and also generates natural gas, nuclear and solar power

Almost all of the eagles killed at the NextEra subsidiary’s facilities were struck by the blades of wind turbines, prosecutors said. Some turbines killed multiple eagles and because the carcasses are not always found, officials said the number killed was likely higher than the 150 birds cited in court documents.

Prosecutors said the company’s failure to take steps to protect eagles or to obtain permits to kill the birds gave it an advantage over competitors that did take such steps — even as ESI and other NextEra affiliates received hundreds of millions of dollars in federal tax credits from the wind power they produced.

NextEra spokesperson Steven Stengel said the company didn’t seek permits because it believes the law didn’t require them for unintentional bird deaths. The company said its guilty plea will resolve all allegations over past fatalities and allow it to move forward without a continued threat of prosecution.

The criminal case comes amid a push by President Joe Biden for more renewable energy from wind, solar and other sources to help reduce climate changing emissions. It also follows a renewed commitment by federal wildlife officials under Biden to enforce protections for eagles and other birds under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act. Criminal prosecutions had been halted under former President Donald Trump for birds killed inadvertently by industry.

It’s illegal to kill or harm eagles under the migratory bird act. However, a wide range of industries — from energy firms to manufacturing companies — have lobbied for years against enforcing the law for accidental bird deaths.

The bald eagle — the U.S. national symbol since the 1700s — saw its populations widely decimated last century due to harmful pesticides such as DDT and other problems. Following a dramatic recovery, it was removed from protection under the Endangered Species Act in 2007. Biologists say more than 300,000 bald eagles now occupy the U.S., not including Alaska.

Golden eagles have not fared as well, with populations considered stable but under pressure from wind farms, collisions with vehicles, illegal shootings and poisoning from lead ammunition.

Most of the eagles killed at the ESI and NextEra wind farms were golden eagles, according to court documents.

There are an estimated 31,800 golden eagles in the Western U.S. with an estimated 2,200 killed annually due to human causes, or about 60% of all deaths, according to a study released last week by leading eagle researchers from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and other entities.

The study concluded that golden eagle deaths “will likely increase in the future” because of wind energy development and other human activities.

Companies historically have been able to avoid prosecution under the century-old Migratory Bird Treaty law if they take steps to avoid deaths and seek permits for those that occur.

Charging documents said company representatives, including ESI’s president, were warned that eagles would be killed if the company built two wind farms in central and southeastern Wyoming, and also knew about a risk to eagles when they authorized the repowering of a New Mexico wind farm, about 170 miles (274 kilometers) from Albuquerque.

The company proceeded anyway and at times ignored further advice from federal wildlife officials about how to minimize the deaths, according to court documents.

“For more than a decade, ESI has violated (wildlife) laws, taking eagles without obtaining or even seeking the necessary permit,” said Assistant Attorney General Todd Kim of the Justice Department’s Environment and Natural Resources Division in a statement.

ESI agreed under a plea deal to spend up to $27 million during its five-year probationary period on measures to prevent future eagle deaths. That includes shutting down turbines at times when eagles are more likely to be present.

Despite those measures, wildlife officials anticipate that some eagles still could die. When that happens, the company will pay $29,623 per dead eagle under the plea deal.

NextEra President Rebecca Kujawa said collisions of birds with wind turbines are unavoidable accidents that should not be criminalized. She said the company is committed to reducing damage to wildlife from its projects.

“We disagree with the government’s underlying enforcement activity,” Kujawa said in a statement. “Building any structure, driving any vehicle, or flying any airplane carries with it a possibility that accidental eagle and other bird collisions may occur.”

———

On Twitter follow Matthew Brown: @MatthewBrownAP

Source Article from https://abcnews.go.com/Technology/wireStory/wind-energy-company-kills-150-eagles-us-pleads-83916292

Pedophilic predator Jeffrey Epstein may have managed to die before facing justice, but his satanic sidekick and supposed “socialite” partner Ghislaine Maxwell may still prove capable of crushing the house of cards complicit in the pair’s sex trafficking.

That is, if we can find where on Earth she is.

Once upon a time, Maxwell, the British daughter of publishing tycoon Robert Maxwell, was a fixture in Manhattan high society. She counted everyone from Ivana and Donald Trump to Prince Andrew and Bill Clinton as friends over the years, but most crucially, Epstein became a cross between a boyfriend and a business partner. Media reports have salaciously referred to her as a “madame.” More realistically, it seems she was a slave catcher who recruited children for Epstein’s sex ring and participated in such pedophilic encounters.

A lawsuit before Epstein’s death accuses Maxwell of firsthand sexual abuse, not simply aiding and abetting Epstein’s predations. Unsealed records from Virginia Giuffre’s testimonies against Maxwell are frankly too disturbing to relay here, but they make clear that while Maxwell prioritized using their victims to fulfill Epstein’s daily sexual quotas, she used them for her own perverse pleasure.

So Maxwell knows where all the bodies are buried. We just have to find her.

Maxwell, who moved to Manhattan in 1991 after her father fell off a boat and died, remained in the city’s social scene for many years even after Epstein’s publicized case privately secured a non-prosecution deal that protected Maxwell and friends. Even though she had been closely linked to Epstein, she faced even less public blowback than him, remaining a tabloid fixture until Giuffre pursued a bold civil lawsuit against Maxwell. The suit was settled in the plaintiff’s favor. The settlement size remains undisclosed, but Maxwell’s legal costs lead her to sell her $15 million New York residence.

As of 2017, her lawyers claim she’s likely in London, but given the threat she poses to Prince Andrew, that seems unlikely. If pressed, no one could provide a more damning testimony to the United States against the accused royal, and it seems unlikely that Maxwell would gamble on her safety by remaining a sitting duck in a city dominated by people with a vested interest in her death.

In an ambiguously sourced report, the Daily Mail claimed that Maxwell has already begun cooperating with prosecutors. Maybe it’s wishful thinking, but securing Maxwell’s testimony ought to become priority No. 1 for authorities attempting to clinch justice from the jaws of defeat.

Source Article from https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/where-the-hell-is-ghislaine-maxwell

WASHINGTON – The Wisconsin Supreme Court decision overturning the state’s stay-at-home orders added fuel Thursday to a widening U.S. debate over how and when to lift restrictions put in place to limit the spread of the coronavirus.

President Donald Trump in a tweet called the Wisconsin ruling a win for the state, adding that “people want to get on with their lives.” But Wisconsin Gov. Tony Evers, a Democrat, warned that the decision by the court – an elected body that tilts conservative – would put “public health and lives at serious risk.”

Across the country, tensions have flared as people experienced months of restrictions to combat a virus that has infected 1.4 million and killed more than 85,000. Health experts such as Dr. Anthony Fauci, the nation’s leading infectious disease specialist, have credited the lockdowns with saving lives and have said the death rate could march higher if the restrictions are eased too quickly.

Source Article from https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2020/05/14/coronavirus-wisconsin-supreme-court-enters-widening-fight-pandemic/5192518002/






David Rondón.- Al menos nueve fallecidos y unos 60 detenidos, fue el saldo de un operativo desplegado desde las 4 am de hoy en la parte alta de las calles principales de Jardines del Valle (DC).

La cifra, obtenida de manera extraoficial hasta las 12 del mediodía, puede ascender, porque hasta esa hora se mantenían tomadas algunas barriadas de la zona.

Los muertos perecieron durante intercambio de disparos contra los efectivos. Sus identidades no habían sido reveladas. Trascendió que al menos uno de ellos era un fugado del centro penitenciario de Tocorón, relacionados a bandas de secuestros en la zona. Otro era apodado el Cara de Rata.

El operativo contó con la participación de unos 250 uniformados, distribuidos en diversas divisiones de la Polinacional, con el apoyo del Cicpc, la Guardia Nacional y la Dirección General de Contrainteligencia Militar (Dgcim).

Durante el operativo las fuerzas de seguridad estaban tras la búsqueda de Carlos Luis Revette, alias el Coqui, quien se distribuye en la montaña con las zonas aledañas de El Valle, El Cementerio y la Cota 905, lugar donde lidera una banda dedicada al homicidio, secuestro y extorsión. Se maneja que es el hombre involucrado en los ataques a policías ocurridos en Caracas en las últimas semanas.




Source Article from http://www.ultimasnoticias.com.ve/noticias/sucesos/nueve-muertos-dejo-operativo-jardines-del-valle/