Top Rated Videos

President Trump has given Attorney General William Barr “full and complete authority to declassify information” related to the origins of the federal investigation into possible ties between the Trump campaign and Russia.

The move is the strongest sign yet that Trump is taking serious action to “investigate the investigators” and has found a willing champion in Barr, who rankled Democrats last month when he said “spying did occur” on the Trump campaign.

The White House issued a memorandum to the heads of several agencies Thursday instructing them to cooperate with Barr’s inquiry, including the Central Intelligence Agency, the Defense Department, the State Department, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, the Treasury Department, the Homeland Security Department, and the Energy Department.

“Today, at the request and recommendation of the Attorney General of the United States, President Donald J. Trump directed the intelligence community to quickly and fully cooperate with the Attorney General’s investigation into surveillance activities during the 2016 Presidential election,” White House press secretary Sarah Sanders said in a statement.

“The Attorney General has also been delegated full and complete authority to declassify information pertaining to this investigation, in accordance with the long-established standards for handling classified information,” she added. “Today’s action will help ensure that all Americans learn the truth about the events that occurred, and the actions that were taken, during the last Presidential election and will restore confidence in our public institutions.”

The inquiry could provide clarity to questions GOP investigators have been eager to answer for more than a year, including whether the FBI’s counterintelligence investigation began earlier than July 2016; the scope of special counsel Robert Mueller’s Russia investigation; the full extent of the FBI’s use of British ex-spy Christopher Steele’s unverified dossier containing salacious claims about Trump’s ties to Russia by various agencies; what role, if any, foreign intelligence agencies played; who pushed for the dossier to be included in the intelligence community assessment on Russian election interference; the full extent of the use of spies or confidential informants against the Trump campaign; and matters related to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court.

While much of this information may one day be released to the public, the memorandum from the White House suggests some of it will remain concealed in accordance with established policy on handling classified national security information.

“With respect to any matter classified under Executive Order 13526 of December 29, 2009 (Classified National Security Information), the Attorney General may, by applying the standard set forth in either section 3.1(a) or section 3.1(d) of Executive Order 13526, declassify, downgrade, or direct the declassification or downgrading of information or intelligence that relates to the Attorney General’s review referred to in section 1 of this memorandum,” the memo said. “Before exercising this authority, the Attorney General should, to the extent he deems it practicable, consult with the head of the originating intelligence community element or department. This authority is not delegable and applies notwithstanding any other authorization or limitation set forth in Executive Order 13526.”

The FBI is believed to have begun its counterintelligence investigation into the Trump campaign, code-named Crossfire Hurricane, in July 2016. It was launched after Australian diplomat Alexander Downer informed the U.S. government that former Trump campaign adviser George Papadopoulos had told him that Russia had damaging information about Hillary Clinton, Trump’s Democratic rival in the 2016 election. Several Trump campaign associates came under scrutiny, including onetime Trump campaign adviser Carter Page. The FBI applied for a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act warrant against Page in October 2016 and got three extensions stemming into 2017.

One obstacle against Trump’s declassification order could be FBI Director Christopher Wray, who opposed declassifying the Page warrant materials. Trump partially declassified hundreds of pages of FISA documents related to Page in July 2018.

Trump’s order on Thursday was panned by David Laufman, who was chief of the Justice Department’s Counterintelligence and Export Control Section when the Trump-Russia investigation was launched. In a statement to MSNBC he called it “a grotesque abuse of the intelligence community to further his goal of political retribution, made worse by the spectacle of the Justice Department as his handmaiden.”

House Judiciary Chairman Jerry Nadler, D-N.Y., called the move part of a “plot to dirty up the intelligence community, to pretend that there’s something wrong with the beginning of the Mueller investigation and to persecute and bring into line the intelligence agencies.”

House Intelligence Chairman Adam Schiff, D-Calif., referring to a broader Democratic complaint that the Trump administration is obstructing a wide array of congressional investigations, said, “The coverup has entered a new and dangerous phase.”

Trump indicated to Fox News host Sean Hannity in April he was ready to declassify more material with the completion of Mueller’s investigation into Russian election interference. “I’m glad I waited because I thought that maybe they would obstruct if I did it early and I think I was right. So I’m glad I waited,” Trump said when asked if he would fully declassify the FISA applications, relevant Gang of Eight material, summaries (302s) of interviews with witnesses, and more. “Now the attorney general can take a very strong look at whatever it is. But it will be declassified and more than what you just mentioned.”

Trump has been promising action like this for nearly a year now. On Sept. 17, 2018, the White House said that “the President has directed the Office of the Director of National Intelligence and the Department of Justice (including the FBI) to provide for the immediate declassification of the following materials: (1) pages 10-12 and 17-34 of the June 2017 application to the FISA court in the matter of Carter W. Page; (2) all FBI reports of interviews with Bruce G. Ohr prepared in connection with the Russia investigation; and (3) all FBI reports of interviews prepared in connection with all Carter Page FISA applications.” And Trump also ordered the public release of “all text messages relating to the Russia investigation, without redaction, of James Comey, Andrew McCabe, Peter Strzok, Lisa Page, and Bruce Ohr.”

But he backed away a few days later. “I met with the DOJ concerning the declassification of various UNREDACTED documents. They agreed to release them but stated that so doing may have a perceived negative impact on the Russia probe. Also, key Allies’ called to ask not to release,” Trump tweeted. “Therefore, the Inspector General has been asked to review these documents on an expedited basis. I believe he will move quickly on this (and hopefully other things which he is looking at). In the end I can always declassify if it proves necessary. Speed is very important to me — and everyone!”

After Mueller completed his investigation in March and with the release of his report in April that showed no criminal conspiracy between the Trump campaign and the Kremlin or obstruction charges, Trump declared “total exoneration.” Since then allies of the president have been clamoring to turn the tables on the investigators, who they allege were working to undermine Trump as a presidential candidate.

Over the weekend former Rep. Trey Gowdy said there was a potential “game changer” in transcripts between FBI informants and Papadopoulos. Rep. Mark Meadows said on Wednesday that Democrats are in a panic because “there is information coming that will curl your hair” that would incriminate the likes of Schiff, a vocal Trump critic.

Barr has been reviewing the counterintelligence investigation into the Trump campaign for weeks now. Barr tasked U.S. Attorney John Durham with reviewing the origins of the Trump-Russia investigation, after which it was reported the attorney general had enlisted the help of CIA Director Gina Haspel, Director of National Intelligence Dan Coats, and FBI Director Christopher Wray.

During a hearing in March Barr riled Washington when he said “spying did occur” on the Trump campaign. He clarified that he hasn’t proven there was any wrongdoing and is looking into alleged misconduct within the Justice Department and FBI, but his “spying” declaration riled Democrats and others.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said Barr went “off the rails.” Former FBI Director James Comey, who led the bureau when it opened its counterintelligence investigation into the Trump campaign in the summer of 2016, said “the FBI doesn’t spy, the FBI investigates.” Even Trump’s own handpicked FBI director, Wray, disputed Barr’s use of the word “spying,” saying, “That’s not the term I would use.”

At least three federal investigations into alleged FISA abuse and other matters related to the way the FBI and the Justice Department conducted the Trump-Russia investigation and several top ex-officials, including former CIA Director John Brennan and Comey, are under increasing scrutiny.

Barr has said he is working closely with Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz, who is expected to wrap up a FISA abuse investigation in the coming days. U.S. Attorney John Huber is also conducting an investigation into potential FBI misconduct.

Source Article from https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/ag-william-barr-given-power-to-declassify-documents-on-surveillance-activities-into-trump-campaign

“We have placed a public interest notice on this Tweet from @mattgaetz. The Tweet is in violation of our glorification of violence policy,” a Twitter spokesperson told POLITICO in an email. “As is standard with this notice, engagements with the Tweet will be limited. People will be able to Retweet with Comment, but will not be able to Like, Reply or Retweet it.”

In response, Gaetz called the warning his “badge of honor” and vowed not to relent on his rhetoric.

“Antifa is a terrorist organization, encouraging riots that hurt Americans,” he tweeted. “Our government should hunt them down. Twitter should stop enabling them. I’ll keep saying it.”

The social network has faced a firestorm of criticism from Trump and his allies, including Gaetz, for taking the same action against a recent Trump tweet that appeared to urge the shooting of looters in Minnesota.

Gaetz’s tweet sparked outcry from advocates for stricter gun restrictions, who said his post could incite violence.

“Take the Gaetz tweet down right now @twitter. RIGHT NOW,” tweeted Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.), whose state was the site of the Sandy Hook Elementary School massacre. “The survivors of mass shootings are lighting up my phone. They are scared to death this will inspire someone to start shooting into a crowd tonight. They are right.”

David Hogg, an advocate for tighter gun regulations and a survivor of the Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School shooting in Parkland, Fla., also took umbrage at Gaetz’s comment. “Imagine saying you love your country but embracing the extrajudicial killing of your fellow citizens,” he tweeted in response to Gaetz.

Gaetz took exception with Murphy’s remarks. “Spare me your woke virtue signaling,” he tweeted in response.

“Governments go after terrorists. Individuals don’t,” he added. “We — the government — should continue to do so. And Antifa is rightly on the list!”

After Twitter’s ruling Monday, Gaetz also tweeted in support of Trump’s call to revoke the online industry’s legal immunity over user content, Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. The 1996 law has come under fire from conservatives who accuse Silicon Valley of suppressing their voices.

There’s no evidence of systemic political bias by Twitter and other social media companies, but rolling back Section 230 has become a rallying for Trump and his allies who allege there is.

Source Article from https://www.politico.com/news/2020/06/01/twitter-gaetz-antifa-violence-295116

A lone cross country skier pushes through deep snow and blowing winds in Chicago’s Lincoln Park on Wednesday.

Charles Rex Arbogast/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Charles Rex Arbogast/AP

A lone cross country skier pushes through deep snow and blowing winds in Chicago’s Lincoln Park on Wednesday.

Charles Rex Arbogast/AP

A multi-day winter storm is dropping freezing rain and snow over much of the central U.S. in the second blast of severe weather in a week. This time, a lot more Americans are expected to be affected, with the storm’s path spanning more than 2,000 miles.

The National Weather Service on Tuesday issued winter storm warnings and watches from Texas counties near the Mexican border, stretching northeast to the Great Lakes and along the Canadian border, and extending to the northern tip of Maine, with about 100 million people in its path.

As much as 14 inches of snow had been projected to fall on parts of Illinois and Indiana on Wednesday. By the afternoon, Chicago’s Midway airport recorded 11 inches. Lewistown, in central Illinois, saw more than 14 inches of snowfall, and observers in the northeastern Missouri city of Hannibal reported more than 11 inches.

While snow has tapered off across Illinois, according to NWS, winds clocking as high as 40 mph could blow snow south, posing a hazard to already-icy roads.

With the region’s heaviest snowfall moving eastward, forecasters estimated that another foot of snow could cover parts of Indiana by Thursday evening.

In a Wednesday morning briefing, Indiana Gov. Eric Holcomb urged residents to give city snowplows trucks the space to clear and treat the roads.

The combination of rain and snow, particularly in southern Indiana, will make for slick roads, said Indiana Department of Transportation Commissioner Joe McGuinness. While advising against traveling, McGuinness told reporters that evening commuters should take extra caution, since city workers won’t be able to treat the roads effectively under current weather conditions.

John Tapko clears snow at his house in Overland Park, Kan., on Wednesday.

Charlie Riedel/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Charlie Riedel/AP

John Tapko clears snow at his house in Overland Park, Kan., on Wednesday.

Charlie Riedel/AP

Officials said that some 240 National Guard members are being deployed to patrol the roads and assist any stranded drivers.

In neighboring Illinois, Gov. J.B. Pritzker announced a disaster proclamation and said he’d activate more than 100 members of the Illinois National Guard. The Illinois Department of Transportation told people to stay home, warning of as much as 20 inches of snow before the storm ends.

Missouri Gov. Mike Parson signed a disaster declaration that he said would enable “emergency management professionals to have every tool and resource available to aid Missourians, protect lives, and respond to this winter storm.”

“Severe winter weather isn’t something we are strangers to,” he said in a written statement. “But we must be prepared for the worst.”

The storm could also bring crippling ice to an area from eastern Arkansas to western Kentucky that could last into the weekend, the Weather Service warned — likely knocking out power and causing tree damage and dangerous travel conditions.

In preparation, Kentucky Gov. Andy Beshear ordered state government offices to close on Thursday.

“If everything holds to where it is right now, this is the real deal,” Beshear said at a Wednesday afternoon news conference.

Much of northern Texas was under a winter storm warning as of Wednesday evening and up to 3 inches of ice and sleet could fall in the Dallas-Forth Worth area. Through Saturday, wind chills in the area could be as low as -10 degrees.

Last February, a winter storm there with record cold temperatures left millions of people without power for days. Water treatment plants closed, forcing people to boil water.

Snow-covered roads and low visibility created dangerous driving conditions. In Missouri, officials are pleading with motorists to reduce their speed, posting photos of the consequences. In central Missouri, crashes shut down parts of Interstate 70 at least twice on Wednesday.

More than 2,300 flights within, into and out of the U.S. had been canceled as of Wednesday night, according to the website Flight Aware, and another 3,500 had been canceled for Thursday.

The storm will reach the Northeast on Thursday, potentially bringing up to 3 feet of snow in parts of New York, Vermont, New Hampshire, and Maine by Saturday morning. A storm across the region last weekend left thousands of people without power, which has since been restored.

Source Article from https://www.npr.org/2022/02/02/1077509660/another-winter-storm-now-threatens-a-large-swath-of-central-and-eastern-u-s



El tribunal de disciplina de la Asociación Nacional de Fútbol Profesional tenía buenas noticias para la UC. El delantero Nicolás Castillo no fue castigado y podrá disputar la novena fecha del Torneo de Apertura 2016-2017.


Con esto el director técnico cruzado, Mario Salas, podrá contar con el atacante para enfrentar a Unión Española el sábado, desde las 19:30 horas en el Estadio Santa Laura. Eso sí, el jugador de la Roja recibirá una amonestación escrita por sus dichos.



 


Las buenas nuevas también llegaron a Colo Colo, porque el gerente deportivo Óscar Meneses se libró tras sus dichos en una conferencia de prensa, y a Universidad de Chile, porque el asistente técnico Cristian Castañeda vio su caso archivado.


Informa AS Chile que la concesionaria Blanco y Negro SADP fue beneficiada por el ente de la ANFP, luego de que no fuera sancionado porque el hijo de Esteban Paredes vio un partido de la Copa Chile en la banca técnica del Cacique.











Source Article from http://www.adnradio.cl/noticias/deportes/buenas-noticias-cruzadas-castillo-no-fue-castigado/20161012/nota/3272746.aspx

Source Article from https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/431154-graham-handful-of-gop-senators-will-vote-to-block-trumps-emergency

Hotel owner Gordon Sondland, who is scheduled to testify before Congress on Wednesday, is a pivotal witness in the impeachment inquiry.

Carlos Jasso/Reuters


hide caption

toggle caption

Carlos Jasso/Reuters

Hotel owner Gordon Sondland, who is scheduled to testify before Congress on Wednesday, is a pivotal witness in the impeachment inquiry.

Carlos Jasso/Reuters

When Gordon Sondland arrived at the Capitol last month to provide what would be pivotal testimony in the Trump impeachment inquiry, a reporter asked the U.S. ambassador to the European Union, “Are you here to salvage your reputation?”

“I don’t have a reputation to salvage,” Sondland shot back.

Until recently, Sondland, 62, had a pretty low profile outside his hometown of Portland, Ore., where he and his wife, Katy Durant, are big Republican donors and contributors to numerous arts and civic organizations.

Now, as Sondland prepares to testify publicly before congressional investigators Wednesday, he finds himself in the middle of a Category 5 political storm.

Congressional investigators are looking into whether President Trump withheld security assistance from Ukraine to pressure the government to say it was investigating former Vice President Joe Biden’s son Hunter, who served on the board of a Ukrainian gas company.

Sondland, who helped reach out to the Ukrainian government on Trump’s behalf, first told Congress that the president was simply interested in battling corruption. He had demanded no favors in exchange for security assistance, he claimed.

But Sondland later amended his testimony, saying the aid package was in fact contingent on an investigation into the Bidens.

A strive for prominence

The impeachment inquiry has given Sondland a notoriety he never bargained for when he became EU ambassador.

The son of Holocaust survivors, Sondland dropped out of college early and got into commercial real estate. At just 28, he bought and renovated the bankrupt Roosevelt Hotel in Seattle, where he was born.

Today, his company, Provenance Hotels, owns 14 hotels, including six in Portland.

“He sees a good property that’s kind of in the right location and makes enough of an investment in it to make it a highly desirable place to stay,” says Len Bergstein, a public affairs consultant who has worked with Sondland.

Sondland has worked hard to be seen as a civic leader and cares a lot about how he is seen, Bergstein says. When Sondland worked out a deal with local government to acquire some land for a hotel, he insisted that he be referred to as a “pillar of the community” in the press release the city put out, Bergstein says.

“He was in many ways exercising his political muscles to try and up his profile, to take him from a kind of a noted and successful businessperson in a relatively narrow sense to much larger circles of prominence in the community,” Bergstein says.

According to Oregon Business, Sondland is a big fan of Ayn Rand, whose books promoting free market capitalism are popular with many libertarian conservatives.

But he has mainly donated to moderate Republicans like Jeb Bush and even a few Democrats, according to Sheila Krumholz, executive director of the Center for Responsive Politics.

A complicated relationship with Trump

His relationship with Trump is complicated. Sondland publicly broke with him following the then-presidential candidate’s attack on a Gold Star Muslim family. Yet Sondland also became a “bundler” for Trump, using his network of Portland political donors to help Trump get elected.

“In that election he gave nothing to Trump but he was listed as one of Trump’s bundlers in 2016, and of course being a bundler gives you more clout than just giving a single donation,” Krumholz says.

Sondland also donated $1 million to Trump’s inauguration through four companies Sondland controls.

A lot of people in liberal Portland have been taken aback by Sondland’s willingness to work in the Trump administration, Bergstein says.

“It was a surprise when Gordon found Donald Trump as an acceptable candidate. That wasn’t his type of Republican that he supported,” he says.

And Sondland has already paid a price for that support.

He is sometimes confronted by demonstrators when he goes out in public. And Democratic Rep. Earl Blumenauer, who represents the Portland area, has called for a boycott of his hotels.

Source Article from https://www.npr.org/2019/11/19/780937794/gordon-sondland-was-a-low-profile-hotel-owner-until-he-went-to-work-for-trump

Though the transition has begun, President Trump remains largely holed up in the White House tweeting false accusations of a rigged election from behind a crumbling wall of lawsuits. No legal challenge, no recount, no audit has changed the outcome in any state. Mr. Trump’s claim that millions of votes were deleted or switched is denied by the official he chose to secure the nation’s election systems. Christopher Krebs called the 2020 vote “the most secure in American history” which promptly got him fired. Tonight, in his first interview since he was dismissed, Krebs tells us why he believes the vote was accurate and why saying otherwise puts the country in danger.

Chris Krebs: I have confidence in the security of this election because I know the work that we’ve done for four years in support of our state and local partners. I know the work that the intelligence community has done, the Department of Defense has done, that the FBI has done, that my team has done. I know that these systems are more secure. I know based on what we have seen that any attacks on the election were not successful.

Two years ago, President Trump put Christopher Krebs in charge of the new Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency. Krebs, a lifelong Republican, was confirmed unanimously by the Senate. 

Chris Krebs

His agency, known by its acronym, “CISA” helps secure computer systems anywhere that a security breach could be catastrophic, nuclear power plants for example, and the election hardware in all 50 states.

Scott Pelley: Why are you speaking to us?

Chris Krebs: I’m not a public servant anymore, but I feel I still got some public service left in me. And, you know, it’s hard once you take that oath to uphold and defend the constitution from threats foreign and domestic, it’s hard to walk away from that. And if I can reinforce or confirm for one person that the vote was secure, the election was secure, then I feel like I’ve done my job.

Krebs, who’s 43, worked on cybersecurity in the Bush administration, became director of cybersecurity policy at Microsoft and joined the Trump Department of Homeland Security in 2017. His priority was to stop anyone from repeating Russia’s 2016 election hacking and disinformation. 

Chris Krebs: So we spent something on the order of three and a half years of gaming out every possible scenario for how a foreign actor could interfere with an election. Countless, countless scenarios.

Scott Pelley: So back in 2017, as you’re looking ahead to the election in 2018 and then ultimately the election in 2020, you have a to-do list. And the to-do list includes what?

Chris Krebs: Paper ballots. Paper ballots give you the ability to audit, to go back and check the tape and make sure that you got the count right. And that’s really one of the keys to success for a secure 2020 election. 95% of the ballots cast in the 2020 election had a paper record associated with it. Compared to 2016, about 82%.

Scott Pelley: And with a paper record, you can go back and verify what the machine is saying by physically counting the paper?

Chris Krebs: That gives you the ability to prove that there was no malicious algorithm or hacked software that adjusted the tally of the vote, and just look at what happened in Georgia. Georgia has machines that tabulate the vote. They then held a hand recount and the outcome was consistent with the machine vote.

Scott Pelley: And that tells you what?

Chris Krebs: That tells you that there was no manipulation of the vote on the machine count side. And so that pretty thoroughly, in my opinion, debunks some of these sensational claims out there– that I’ve called nonsense and a hoax, that there is some hacking of these election vendors and their software and their systems across the country. It’s– it’s just– it’s nonsense.

Before the election, as the president called mail-in ballots a fraud, Krebs’ team released a report highlighting the safeguards built into mail-in voting. His agency knocked down rumors and exposed an Iranian plot to intimidate voters. On Election Day, Krebs assembled a team in his command center to defend the vote.

Krebs in the Oval Office with President Trump. Mr. Trump put Krebs in charge of the agency handling election security two years ago.

Chris Krebs: We had the Department of Defense Cyber Command. We had the National Security Agency. We had the FBI. We had the Secret Service. We also had representatives from the Election Assistance Commission, which is the federal independent agency that supports the actual administration of elections. We had representatives from some of the– vendors, the election equipment vendors. And they’re critical because they’re the ones out there that know what’s going on on the ground if there’s any sort of issue with some of their systems. And we had representatives from state and local governments. 

Scott Pelley: How did the day go?

Chris Krebs: It was quiet. And there was no indication or evidence that there was any sort of hacking or compromise of election systems on, before or after November 3rd.

And yet, this was the president, November 5.

President Trump on November 5: And this is a case where they’re trying to steal an election, they’re trying to rig an election.

Nine days after Election Day, Mr. Trump tweeted falsely that machines from Dominion Voting Systems deleted millions of votes. Krebs couldn’t remain silent. His agency and its election security partners answered with a public statement.

Scott Pelley: To quote from the November 12th statement that CISA and its partners put out, “The November 3rd election was the most secure in American history. There is no evidence that any voting system deleted or lost votes or changed votes or was in any way compromised.”

Chris Krebs: Yeah, I stand by that.

Scott Pelley: The president tweeted after that statement, quote, “The recent statement by Chris Krebs on the security of the 2020 election was highly inaccurate, in that there were massive improprieties and fraud.” Do you remember what the president said at the end of that tweet?

Chris Krebs: Oh, I was terminated? Is that– yes. I recall that.

Scott Pelley: Were you surprised?

Chris Krebs: I don’t know if I was necessarily surprised. It’s not how I wanted to go out. I think I– the thing that upsets me the most about that is I didn’t get a s– chance– to say goodbye to my team. And I’d worked with them for three and a half years, in the trenches. Building an agency, putting CISA on the national stage. And I love that team. And I didn’t get a chance to say goodbye, so that’s what I’m most upset about.

Since he was fired, about a dozen Republican senators have vouched for Krebs’ work. 

Scott Pelley: The president’s essentially saying in that tweet that you did a lousy job, that you and your team blew it, and allowed massive fraud, all across the country.

Chris Krebs: We did a good job. We did it right. I’d do it a thousand times over. 

Still, the president’s lawyers have filed at least a dozen suits and spun conjecture without evidence. 

Rudy Giuliani on November 19: And you should be more astounded by the fact that our votes are counted in Germany and in Spain…

Scott Pelley: As you watched Rudy Giuliani’s news conference at the Republican National Committee headquarters, what were you thinking?

Chris Krebs: It was upsetting because what I saw was a apparent attempt to undermine confidence in the election, to confuse people, to scare people. It’s not me, it’s not just CISA. It’s the tens of thousands of election workers out there that had been working nonstop, 18-hour days, for months. They’re getting death threats for trying to carry out one of our core democratic institutions, an election. And that was, again, to me, a press conference that I just– it didn’t make sense. What it was actively doing was undermining democracy. And that’s dangerous.

Scott Pelley: Let me ask for your reaction to some of the vote fraud that the president and his team have been alleging. Votes tabulated in foreign countries.

Chris Krebs: So all votes in the United States of America are counted in the United States of America. I don’t– I don’t understand this claim. All votes in the United States of America are counted in the United States of America. Period.

Scott Pelley: Voting machines corrupted by mysterious actors in Venezuela.

Chris Krebs: So again, there’s no evidence that any machine that I’m aware of has been manipulated by a foreign power. Period.

Scott Pelley: Communist money from China and Cuba used to influence the election.

Chris Krebs: Look, I think these– we can go on and on with all the farcical claims that– alleging– interference in the 2020 election, but the proof is in the ballots. The recounts are consistent with the initial count, and to me, that’s further evidence, that’s confirmation that the systems used in the 2020 election performed as expected, and the American people should have 100% confidence in their vote.

Scott Pelley: In a news conference a lawyer who was representing the president at the time, Sidney Powell, said specifically that the Dominion Company’s voting machines, quote…

Sidney Powell on November 19: It can set and run an algorithm that probably ran all over the country to take a certain percentage of votes from President Trump and flip them to President Biden.

Chris Krebs: Votes were cast in Georgia, for instance, again, on paper. They were counted by a machine. They were subsequently recounted by hand. The outcomes of that count were consistent. If there was an algorithm that was flipping votes or changing votes, it didn’t work. I think the more likely explanation, though, is that there is no algorithm, that the systems performed as intended. That the series of security controls before, during, and after an election protected those systems from any sort of misbehavior.

Most elections are run by each state’s secretary of state. But not one of them, Democrat or Republican has reported ballot rigging that would change the election. Some are paying a price for integrity.

Chris Krebs: And it’s, in my view, a travesty what’s happening right now with all these death threats to election officials, to secretaries of state. I want everybody to look at Secretary Boockvar in Pennsylvania, Secretary Benson in Michigan, Secretary Cegavske in Nevada, Secretary Hobbs in Arizona. All strong women that are standing up, that are under attack from all sides, and they’re defending democracy. They’re doin’ their jobs. Look at– look at Secretary Raffensperger in Georgia, lifelong Republican. He put country before party in his holding a free and fair election in that state. There are some real heroes out there. There are some real patriots.

At the Capitol, the stage is going up for Inauguration Day, January 20. Well before that, on December 14 the presidential electors will cast their ballots—which should settle the election. Christopher Krebs told us it’s ironic that the disruption and disinformation he feared from abroad came, instead, from Pennsylvania Avenue. 

Scott Pelley: The president says you’re dead wrong about election security, and to him you say what?

Chris Krebs: There is no foreign power that is flipping votes. There’s no domestic actor flipping votes. I did it right. We did it right. This was a secure election.

Produced by Rachael Morehouse. Associate producers, Jacqueline Kalil and Cassidy McDonald. Broadcast associates, Ian Flickinger and Sheena Samu. Edited by Sean Kelly.

Source Article from https://www.cbsnews.com/news/chris-krebs-presidential-election-security-60-minutes-2020-11-29/