Most Viewed Videos

Containers of Moderna vaccines donated by the U.S. arrived in Bogota, Colombia, on July 25.

Leonardo Munoz/AFP via Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Leonardo Munoz/AFP via Getty Images

Containers of Moderna vaccines donated by the U.S. arrived in Bogota, Colombia, on July 25.

Leonardo Munoz/AFP via Getty Images

The U.S. is on track to deliver 110 million COVID-19 vaccine doses to more than 50 countries from Afghanistan to Zambia, two officials told NPR — a milestone that President Biden is expected to formally announce at the White House Tuesday.

But these initial U.S. donated doses are just a first step for the projected 11 billion vaccines needed to vaccinate 70% of the world’s population and bring the pandemic under control, according to the World Health Organization.

And providing doses to other countries is a quasi-Herculean task. “Sharing vaccine doses isn’t quite as easy as just putting them on a plane and calling somebody at the other end and telling them when they’ll arrive,” says Gayle Smith, the global COVID response coordinator at the State Department.

There have been some delays. Biden first announced that the U.S. would distribute 80 million doses to countries in need by the end of June, only to later say the goal had simply been to “allocate” them by the end of June.

Legal and regulatory hurdles loom for such sophisticated medical goods, Smith explains — both for the U.S. to export them and for countries to receive them. And it’s an urgent matter: Doses must be distributed before their expiration date, with cold chains set up to keep them from spoiling. Solutions have to be devised country by country, sometimes with elaborate legal agreements.

On this global stage, the Biden administration can’t call all the shots. “In some countries it’s actually required … to take new laws to their parliaments so they can accept these vaccines, so it’s a complicated logistical exercise, but I think we’ve shown it’s entirely doable,” Smith said in an interview with NPR.

These first 100 million deliveries reflect Biden’s effort to establish the U.S. as “the world’s arsenal of vaccines” and are essentially a warm-up for the hundreds of millions of shots that the U.S. has pledged to deliver later this year and next year.

The number of doses delivered so far puts the U.S. ahead of every other country making donations, but the pace of the shipments is much slower than it should be, says Dr. Krishna Udayakumar, founding director of the Duke Global Health Innovation Center.

“When the world needs 10 billion doses to get to where we need to go, it puts that in context,” he said. “We’re a hundred times off where we need to be.”

And certain parts of the world are severely lacking in vaccines. The breakdown of distribution at this point illustrates how far many countries are from any meaningful level of protection. Worldwide, fewer than 1% of vaccines have gone to people in low-income countries, while more than 80% have been given to people in high- and upper middle-income countries.

More shots, more money

As the highly contagious delta variant surges, global health experts are calling for a bigger investment in the pandemic response.

“Right now it doesn’t seem like the effort is matching the level of crisis that some parts of the world are seeing,” says Jenny Ottenhoff, senior policy director for global health at the ONE Campaign.

The speed with which those doses arrive could determine the trajectory of the pandemic — and how many more people will die.

The numbers are daunting. At least 800,000 COVID fatalities are projected in the next two months, according to new estimates from the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation at the University of Washington.

In an open letter released on Tuesday, a group of prominent global health experts write that the Biden administration and its G-7 allies have “taken important but modest steps to close the global vaccine gap,” which still “fall far short of the true scale and urgency required.”

The letter urges the White House to quickly ramp up U.S. donations by at least 1 billion doses by mid-2022, strengthen global coordination of vaccine supply chains and pour resources into ensuring that “doses are translated into vaccinations.”

A man walks past donated Johnson & Johnson vaccines after their arrival at the Phnom Penh International Airport in Cambodia on July 30 — the first batch of 1 million shots.

Heng Sinith/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Heng Sinith/AP

A man walks past donated Johnson & Johnson vaccines after their arrival at the Phnom Penh International Airport in Cambodia on July 30 — the first batch of 1 million shots.

Heng Sinith/AP

Logistics challenges loom

As the Biden administration prepares to move hundreds of millions of more doses, the challenges in delivering these first 100 million doses should serve as a wake-up call, says Prashant Yadav, a senior fellow at the Center for Global Development who studies health care supply chains.

“Just having surplus doses and a plan on how to allocate them is not sufficient. It requires a lot of other things to fall in place,” says Yadav. “Similar types of logistical challenges will remain in place for that massive quantity. And so the bigger question is, are we now planning based on what we’ve learned?”

In July, the White House released a “framework” for the global pandemic response, but the Biden administration still seems to lack the kind of “superstructure” needed to manage the complex demands of the global vaccination campaign, says Stephen Morrison at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, who also signed the letter.

“It’s been somewhat ad hoc,” he says. “We need to be staffed up at a higher level with a command type approach similar to what we’ve taken domestically, and we don’t have that yet.”

The U.S. has the opportunity to take on a “more engaged” role with the global vaccination rollout, says Yadav. But that would require a much larger investment in the federal agencies currently orchestrating the vaccine sharing programs, he said.

A health worker vaccines a woman in Thimpu, Bhutan on July 26.

Upasana Dahal/AFP via Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Upasana Dahal/AFP via Getty Images

A health worker vaccines a woman in Thimpu, Bhutan on July 26.

Upasana Dahal/AFP via Getty Images

White House plans to “accelerate, accelerate, accelerate”

Biden is expected to talk about coming plans to boost shipments. The U.S. announced earlier this year that it secured 500 million Pfizer doses to distribute to poorer countries. That distribution is beginning in earnest this month. Smith says the aim is to “accelerate, accelerate, accelerate” to get more vaccines to more people faster.

“I don’t want to understate in any way how proud all of us are that we not only hit the 80 million but we are at 110,” says Smith. “But I think none of us thinks that we can check the box now. There’s still a massive amount to do. This last quarter of 2021 is critical. So we’ve got to keep going, and we’ve got to do more in any possible way we can do it.”

As long as the virus is moving faster than the drive to vaccinate the world, it is winning, she says.

And that puts more pressure on the Biden administration. “Without U.S. leadership, I don’t see another plausible pathway where we’re going to turn the corner on this pandemic any time in the next six, 12 or 18 months,” says Udayakumar.

Source Article from https://www.npr.org/sections/goatsandsoda/2021/08/03/1023822839/biden-is-sending-110-million-vaccines-to-nations-in-need-thats-just-a-first-step

Democratic presidential candidate Pete ButtigiegPeter (Pete) Paul ButtigiegColbert links large 2020 Dem field to Avengers: ‘A group of every available person in the universe’ The Hill’s Morning Report – Trump tells House investigators ‘no’ Buttigieg draws new scrutiny, criticism MORE said he doubts fellow hopeful Sen. Bernie SandersBernard (Bernie) SandersElection analyst says Biden could face uphill battle attracting small-dollar donors Gillibrand ‘not worried’ about being ‘discounted’ in 2020 race Biden’s sloppy launch may cost him MORE (I-Vt.) can beat President TrumpDonald John TrumpForget the spin: Five unrefuted Mueller Report revelations Lara Trump: Merkel admitting migrants ‘one of the worst things that ever happened to Germany’ Financial satisfaction hits record high: survey MORE in a general election. 

“I have a hard time seeing the coalition ultimately coming together there,” the South Bend, Ind., mayor told The New York Times

Buttigieg added that at the time “people were refreshed by the novelty of that boldness” of Sanders’s ideas, but that they are now less exciting. 

Buttigieg has been criticized this week for saying that in 2016 voters wanted to “blow up the system,” adding that this mentality “could lead you to somebody like Bernie and it could lead you to somebody like Trump. That’s how we got where we are.”

Sanders’s campaign manager, Faiz Shakir, pushed back on Buttigieg’s assertion, touting Sanders’s record of fighting for the working class as the reason he will be able to win in 2020. 

“At a time when Trump has lied to millions of Americans and sold out workers, voters are looking for a leader who they can trust will fight for them,” he said in a statement to The Hill.

“He is committed to standing up to powerful corporate interests, taking on the billionaire class, defeating Trump and creating a government that works for all people,” he added.

Sanders, a self-described democratic socialist, and Buttigieg are seen as front-runners among the 20 candidates vying for the 2020 Democratic nomination.

In recent polls, the pair and former Vice President Joe BidenJoseph (Joe) Robinette BidenElection analyst says Biden could face uphill battle attracting small-dollar donors Biden’s announcement was a general election message, says political analyst Gillibrand ‘not worried’ about being ‘discounted’ in 2020 race MORE, who is expected to enter the race Thursday, sit in the top three spots of Democratic presidential contenders.

Updated at 3:34 p.m.

Source Article from https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/440398-buttigieg-says-he-doubts-sanders-can-win-general-election

Para comentar las noticias debes iniciar sesión con el usuario y contraseña elegidos al momento de registrarte.

Si no estas registrado todavia, puedes hacerlo ingresando a
Registro de Usuarios

No recuerdas tu contraseña? puedes acceder a Registro de Usuarios y solicitar que te la enviemos a tu email como recordatorio.

Source Article from http://www.elpais.com.uy/divertite/musica/rolling-stones-ya-montevideo.html

“I do not consider the investigation to be corrupt, but I certainly understand the president’s frustration given the outcome,” Rosenstein told senators, referencing Mueller’s conclusions as part of his nearly two-year investigation.

In his opening statement, which was obtained by POLITICO in advance of his Senate testimony, Rosenstein said it was necessary to appoint a special counsel after Trump fired FBI Director James Comey because “I was concerned that the public would not have confidence in the investigation.”

He said Comey’s immediate replacement atop the FBI, Andrew McCabe, was “not the right person to lead” that probe. He later said McCabe was “not fully candid with me” and “certainly wasn’t forthcoming,” in particular because McCabe did not share with him Comey’s memos about his conversations with Trump for at least a week after becoming acting director.

“I decided that appointing a Special Counsel was the best way to complete the investigation appropriately and promote public confidence in its conclusions,” Rosenstein said.

The hearing is the first of what is likely to be several as part of the committee’s Republican-led investigation into the origins of the Russia investigation. Trump has cheered the probe, while Democrats have said it is an improper use of the Senate’s oversight authority — and one intended to boost the president’s re-election bid.

The former Justice Department No. 2 also defended his role as the supervisor of Mueller’s investigation, telling senators that he “established a supervisory chain of command” and that he and “highly qualified department attorneys” regularly met with Mueller’s team to review investigate recommendations and “to approve significant steps.”

His remarks are meant to reassure Republicans in particular, who have criticized the appointment of a special counsel in light of Mueller’s findings — namely, that he could not establish a criminal conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Russian operatives.

Rosenstein also defended his role in efforts to seek surveillance warrants on Carter Page, a former Trump campaign adviser. Those applications, which were approved by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance court, were the subject of an inspector general investigation which found that there were significant errors and omissions in the applications.

In his opening statement, Rosenstein laid the blame on the FBI, essentially asserting that he was duped.

“Every application that I approved appeared to be justified based on the facts it alleged, and the FBI was supposed to be following protocols to ensure that every fact was verified,” he said, later adding that he would not have signed the fourth and final application to surveil Page if he knew what he knows today.

Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), the chairman of the committee, lambasted FBI leadership over the genesis and management of the probe into Russian election interference.

“There are millions of Americans pretty upset about this,” Graham said. “There are people on our side of the aisle who believe that this investigation, Crossfire Hurricane, was one of the most corrupt, biased criminal investigations in the history of the FBI, and we would like to see something done about it.”

“We’re going to be talking about how it got off the rails, who’s responsible for it getting off the rails, and making sure that they’re punished appropriately and the system is changed so that in the future no other candidate for president, no other sitting president has to go through this,” he added.

Graham zeroed in on the use of the Steele dossier — a series of reports from a former British intelligence officer that he produced while working for a firm contracting with Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign — in an FBI application to surveil Page.

“What kind of country is this?” Graham asked. “What happens to people who do that?”

Graham also pressed Rosenstein on a memo he wrote in August 2017 detailing the scope of Mueller’s probe. When he wrote the memo, Rosenstein said, the department had “suspicions” about potential coordination between members of Trump World and the Kremlin. Mueller ultimately found no evidence of such coordination.

“There was no there there in August 2017,” Graham said, arguing that Mueller’s team defined the scope of their own investigation. “Do you agree with that general statement or not?”

“I agree with that general statement,” Rosenstein replied.

The hearing became heated at times, especially as Democrats dismissed the legitimacy of re-litigating the Russia investigation. Their dismissal of the committee’s GOP-helmed probe led Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) to compare the actions of the Obama administration to those of Richard Nixon.

“By any measure, what the Obama-Biden administration did in 2016 and 2017 makes everything Richard Nixon even contemplated pale in comparison,” Cruz said, prompting a fiery response from Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.), who said Obama left the White House with “grace.”

Source Article from https://www.politico.com/news/2020/06/03/rod-rosenstein-testimony-russia-probe-298253

Image copyright
Chris Jackson/Getty

Image caption

Las nuevas medidas de Facebook para combatir su “crisis de noticias falsas” se apoyan en las denuncias de los usuarios.

Durante todo este año, el tema de las noticias falsas se ha convertido una nube negra que ha ensombrecido de forma intermitente la imagen de Facebook.

Y ha disparado una serie de preguntas sobre la influencia de la red social en la política y su creciente transformación en un medio informativo (no siempre confiable).

De hecho, muchos denunciaron que la difusión de noticias falsas en la red social pudio haber influido en la victoria del republicano Donald Trump en las elecciones presidenciales de Estados Unidos.

La Red Internacional de Chequeo de Datos (IFCN, por sus siglas en inglés), que cuenta con 43 organizaciones en todo el mundo, le escribió una carta abierta al fundador y director ejecutivo de Facebook, Mark Zuckerberg, urgiéndole a que tomara medidas para poner fin a la situación.

Finalmente, Zuckerberg tomó cartas en el asunto ante esta “crisis de noticias falsas”que afecta a su empresa (la de mayor influencia jamás creada, según el periodista tecnológico David Kirkpatrick), la cual ya maneja datos de 1.800 millones de personas en todo el mundo.

Y una parte importante del peso de esta medida recae sobre los propios usuarios de la plataforma.

Image copyright
Reuters

Image caption

Con un simple clic, puedes reportar el contenido que creas que es falso.

¿Y qué puedes hacer tú?

Si ves una noticia que podría ser engañosa o falsa, a partir de ahora podrás reportarlo en Facebook muy fácilmente. Para ello, deberás seguir dos pasos:

PASO 1: Denuncia

Primero, deberás hacer clic en la esquina superior derechade la publicación y elegir la opción “noticia falsa” entre las opciones de denuncia del contenido (la cual Facebook aún está implementando y estará disponible en los próximos días para todos los usuarios):

  • Es molesto o no es interesante
  • Creo que no debería estar en Facebook
  • Es spam
  • Es una noticia falsa

Image copyright
Facebook

Image caption

Elige la cuarta opción: “Es una noticia falsa”.

PASO 2: Actúa

En segundo lugar, tendrás que elegir una acción a tomar para resolver el problema:

  • Marcar la publicación como “noticia falsa”, detallando si crees que es falsa a propósito o si es una noticia engañosa
  • Enviar un mensaje a la persona para que sepa que crees que su publicación es falsa
  • Bloquear a la persona que publicó esa noticia supuestamente falsa

Image copyright
Chris Jackson/Getty

Image caption

Podrás decidir si quieres marcar el contenido como “falso” , enviar un mensaje a la persona que difundió la noticia o bloquearla.

“Creemos en darle voz a la gente y en que no podemos convertirnos nosotros mismos en árbitros de la verdad, así que estamos afrontando este problema con cuidado”, explicó la compañía en un comunicado.

“Es importante para nosotros que las historias que ven en Facebook sean auténticas y significativas. Nos emociona este progreso, pero sabemos que queda mucho por hacer“, explicaron.

Hay quien, sin embargo, señala que este plan basado en la “sabiduría de las masas” tal vez no sea muy buena idea.

“Cuando hay que evaluar la calidad o veracidad de una cuestión, la cosa se pone difícil. Es algo de lo que saben mucho los responsables de la creación de agregadores de noticias como Reddit o Digg“, explican los especialistas del blog tecnológico Xataka.

“Facebook se enfrenta, por tanto, a una tarea titánica”, sostienen, pues sus usuarios “podrán marcar cualquier noticia que aparezca en sus cuentas como falsa”.

Image copyright
Justin Sullivan

Image caption

Zuckerberg dice que seguirá combatiendo el problema.

Sin embargo, el peso de la decisión no recaerá solamente en el juicio de los usuarios.

Una vez que las publicaciones sean denunciadas, Facebook remitirá el contenido a organizaciones de la IFCN -como Chequeado (Argentina), El Deber Data (Bolivia), Factcheck.org (EE.UU.), Ojo Público (Perú) o UY Check (Uruguay)-para verificar si es verdadero o falso (y por qué).

El objetivo final es crear “alertas” o etiquetas para que todos puedan ver el contenido que fue catalogado como “falso”.

Además, la empresa penalizará a las páginas web que distribuyan noticias falsas, retirándoles los incentivos financieros e impidiéndoles usar la plataforma.

“Haremos todo lo posible hasta solucionar el problema por completo”, explicaron.

¿Cómo saber si una noticia es falsa?

  1. Analiza si la fuente es de confianza: pregúntate siempre si la fuente donde ves la noticia es confiable o no
  2. ¿Es demasiado extraño para ser real?: si se parece más a la ficción que a la realidad, probablemente sea lo primero
  3. Comprueba si está disponible en algún sitio de verificación de datos. Por ejemplo, Ecuador Chequea, El Sabueso (México) o Chequeado (Argentina)

Source Article from http://www.bbc.com/mundo/noticias-38366192

President Trump speaks before signing the “Buy American, Hire American” executive order in April 2017 in Kenosha, Wis.

Saul Loeb/AFP via Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Saul Loeb/AFP via Getty Images

President Trump speaks before signing the “Buy American, Hire American” executive order in April 2017 in Kenosha, Wis.

Saul Loeb/AFP via Getty Images

President Trump is extending a freeze on new temporary work visas for tech and other highly skilled workers.

The extension means hundreds of thousands of foreigners looking to work in the United States will continue to have to wait until at least the end of March before having another chance to attain coveted visas to enter the country.

It is also another example of how the Trump administration is trying to box President-elect Joe Biden in on challenging policy matters.

Trump signed the original proclamation in June, citing the need to protect the U.S. labor force during the coronavirus pandemic. It affects workers in a wide variety of fields, including tech workers who want to enter the country on H-1B visas, seasonal workers in the tourism industry and certain au pairs on J-1 visas.

It was an extension of Trump’s earlier “Buy American, Hire American” executive order, which called for federal agencies to take stronger action to enforce immigration laws to protect U.S. workers.

The halt was set to expire Thursday, and there was a clash within the White House about what to do about the expiring moratorium.

It was aggressively opposed by business groups such as the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and National Associations of Manufacturers, which filed lawsuits and argued it hurt U.S. economic interests.

But advocates who favored tighter immigration restrictions argued the ongoing needs created by the pandemic warranted an extension.

RJ Hauman, head of government relations at the Federation for American Immigration Reform, said Americans should take note if Biden tries to lift the moratorium prematurely.

“While the unemployment rate has fallen, too many Americans are still looking for work and the economic impact outlook remains bleak,” he said. “If this proclamation was allowed to lapse, then companies could easily return to exploiting cheap foreign labor.”

Source Article from https://www.npr.org/2020/12/31/952550071/president-trump-extends-freeze-on-many-worker-visas

In the days after the Jan. 6 insurrection at the Capitol, it appeared Republican leaders had decided to take a stand against Trump, with House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy saying Trump bore “responsibility” and that he must accept blame for the riot.

But GOP members have begun heading back to the former president. On Thursday, McCarthy met with Trump at his Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida, in a meeting that was later described as “very good and cordial.” The readout was released with a photo of the two men smiling.

“I was disappointed over the last few weeks to see what seemed like the Republican Party waking up and then kind of falling asleep again and saying, ‘Well, you know, what matters if we can win in two years and we don’t want to tick off the base,’” Kinzinger said.

“The photo,” he added, “shows that the former president is desperate to continue looking like he’s leading the party.”

Kinzinger has launched a website, Country1st.com, as an effort to refocus the Republican Party’s “conservative principles.”

“I think the Republican Party has lost its moral authority in a lot of areas,” he said. “How many people think that conservative principles are things like build the wall, and you know, charge the Capitol and have an insurrection? That’s what Country1st … is all about — is just going back and saying, ‘Here’s what conservative principles are.'”

The Illinois Republican Party is expected to censure Kinzinger for his vote to impeach the president — what he referred to as “GOP cancel culture.” The same has happened for others like GOP Rep. Tom Rice of South Carolina after his vote to impeach. And last week, Rep. Matt Gaetz, (R-Fla.) went to Wyoming to rally against GOP. Rep. Liz Cheney for her moves against Trump.

“If you look at Matt Gaetz going to Wyoming because, what, a tough woman has an independent view and he doesn’t want to have to go out and explain why he didn’t vote for impeachment, that’s totally GOP cancel culture,” Kinzinger said. “What we’re standing for, and I think what, frankly, a significant part of the base wants, is to say, ‘Look, we can have a diversity of opinion.’”

Outside of the intraparty chaos surrounding the former president’s impeachment, Republicans are also butting heads over the behavior of one of their own.

House Republicans are trying to distance themselves from Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) after hours of Facebook videos surfaced in which she expresses racist, Islamophobic and anti-Semitic views.

Kinzinger said the people have the right to choose their representatives, and that he isn’t sure he supports evicting the congresswoman. But he said he would vote her off committees to “take a stand.”

Source Article from https://www.politico.com/news/2021/01/31/adam-kinzinger-republican-party-464140

California businesses will be limited in their use of independent contracts under a closely watched proposal signed into law by Gov. Gavin Newsom on Wednesday, a decision that is unlikely to quell a growing debate over the rules and nature of work in the 21st century economy.

Newsom signed Assembly Bill 5 in a private ceremony in his state Capitol office. Legislators gave final approval to the sweeping employment rules before adjourning for the year last week.

The new law “will help reduce worker misclassification — workers being wrongly classified as ‘independent contractors’ rather than employees, which erodes basic worker protections like the minimum wage, paid sick days and health insurance benefits,” Newsom wrote in a signing message released by his office.

“As one of the strongest economies in the world, California is now setting the global standard for worker protections for other states and countries to follow,” Assemblywoman Lorena Gonzalez (D-San Diego), the author of AB 5, said in a written statement.

The bill was one of the most hotly debated by the Legislature this year, legislation that began as a way to clarify state law following a 2018 ruling by the California Supreme Court that found a number of workers across the state should be considered employees of a business who are entitled to various benefits. During the legislative process, a variety of powerful business interests sought specific exclusions from AB 5, an effort to ensure those industries could continue to rely on non-employees in a variety of functions.

Those in the most prominent industry left out of those final changes to the bill, California’s app-based technology sector, insisted they would continue to seek exemptions from any new mandate to classify workers as employees. Three companies — Uber, Lyft and DoorDash — opened a campaign committee last month with a $90-million contribution toward taking the issue to California voters in a 2020 ballot measure.

Newsom pledged on Wednesday to continue the discussion with business groups worried about the new law, which takes effect next year. In particular, he cited the need to ensure workers in the new tech sector businesses can join labor unions.

“I will convene leaders from the Legislature, the labor movement and the business community to support innovation and a more inclusive economy,” he wrote in his signing message.

Source Article from https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2019-09-18/gavin-newsom-signs-ab5-employees0independent-contractors-california

  • Rep. Kevin McCarthy on Saturday said he’d bet his home on the odds that the GOP secures a majority in 2022.
  • “I would bet my house. My personal house. Don’t tell my wife, but I will bet it,” he said. 
  • Democrats have a slim majority in the House. Republicans will need to flip five seats to regain control.
  • Visit the Business section of Insider for more stories.

Rep. Kevin McCarthy on Saturday said he’d wager his own home on Republicans reclaiming a House majority in 2022. 

“We’re going to get the majority back. We’re five seats away,” he told a crowd at the Conservative Political Action Conference.

“I would bet my house. My personal house. Don’t tell my wife, but I will bet it,” he continued. “This is the smallest majority the Democrats have had in 100 years.”

In the 2020 elections, Democrats retained control of the House. Democrats now have a slim majority in the lower chamber, and Republicans need to flip just five seats to regain control. Democrats also took back the Senate from the Republicans, giving President Joe Biden a Democratic stronghold in Congress. 

McCarthy also said there’s “not a chance” the Republicans will lose in 2022. 

Since the days surrounding Biden’s formal inauguration into office, other Republicans have also begun to clamor about a potential GOP win in 2022. 

Earlier this month, for example, Sen. Lindsey Graham said he’d try to leverage former President Donald Trump’s influence to ensure that the Republican party takes back the House and Senate in 2022. 

In an interview with Politico, Graham said he planned to meet with Trump to discuss the future of the GOP and his role in it.

“I’m going to try and convince him that we can’t get there without you, but you can’t keep the Trump movement going without the GOP united,” Graham said.

“If we come back in 2022, then, it’s an affirmation of your policies,” he said about Trump. “But if we lose again in 2022, the narrative is going to continue that not only you lost the White House, but the Republican Party is in a bad spot.”

McCarthy’s office did not immediately return a request for comment. 

But House Speaker Nancy Pelosi fired back at McCarthy’s remarks in a statement to Insider:

“No one should be surprised the Minority Leader is willing to wager his home,” said Robyn Patterson, deputy communications director. “McCarthy doesn’t have much to give after sacrificing his integrity trying to cancel $1,400 survival checks for Americans trying to make ends meet during a deadly pandemic.”

Democrats and Republicans are once again clashing on the contents of the next stimulus bill. House Democrats this weekend approved a $1.9 trillion coronavirus relief package containing $1,400 stimulus checks for Americans.  

McCarthy, the House minority leader, was one of the bill’s dissenters, saying on the House floor that its price tag was untenable.

“The Democrats’ spending bill is too costly, too corrupt, and too liberal for the country,” the California Republican said. 

Source Article from https://www.businessinsider.com/kevin-mccarthy-bets-his-house-that-gop-takes-majority-back-2021-2

Derechos de autor de la imagen
Reuters

Image caption

Otto Warmbier murió este lunes tras haber sido liberado por Corea del Norte la semana pasada.

Otto Warmbier, el joven estadounidense que estuvo preso en Corea del Norte durante 17 meses y que fue liberado la semana pasada, falleció este lunes en un hospital de Cincinnati, Ohio, según confirmó su familia.

Warmbier, de 22 años, había sido trasladado a Estados Unidos el pasado 13 de junio en estado de coma.

No está claro cómo el joven cayó en coma aunque su familia presume que estuvo en ese estado durante el último año.

Corea del Norte dijo que Warmbier contrajo botulismo y le dieron una “píldora para dormir” que lo dejó en ese estado, pero los médicos estadounidenses contradicen esa afirmación.

El presidente de Estados Unidos, Donald Trump, ofreció sus condolencias a la familia y condenó “la brutalidad del régimen de Corea del Norte”.

“El destino de Otto profundiza la determinación de mi administración de evitar que tales tragedias a manos de regímenes que no respetan el estado de derecho o la decencia humana básica lleguen a personas inocentes”, dijo el mandatario en un comunicado.

La agencia de viajes que organizó la visita de Warmbier y sus amigos a Pyongyang anunció el martes que dejaría de prestar sus servicios para estadounidenses que quisieran ir a Corea del Norte.

“Hemos estado luchando para procesar la noticia”, expresó en un mensaje en Facebook la compañía Young Pioneer Tours, con sede en China.

Derechos de autor de la imagen
Reuters

Image caption

Otto Warmbier fue detenido en Corea del Norte en enero de 2016.

“Ha completado su viaje a casa”

Warmbier fue condenado en marzo de 2016 a 15 años de trabajo forzado en Corea del Norte por intentar robar un cartel de propaganda en un hotel.

El joven sufrió graves daños cerebrales y fue evacuado de Corea del Norte a un hospital en su ciudad natal, Cincinnati, Ohio.

La familia Warmbier culpó de su muerte a lo que ellos llamaron el maltrato y tortura que recibió su hijo en manos de los norcoreanos.

“Es nuestro triste deber informar que nuestro hijo, Otto Warmbier, ha completado su viaje a casa, rodeado por su amorosa familia. Otto murió hoy a las 2:20 pm”, informó la familia en un comunicado.

En el mismo se informa que el joven era “incapaz de hablar, de ver y de reaccionar a las órdenes verbales”.

Derechos de autor de la imagen
Reuters

Image caption

La familia de Otto Warmbier culpa al tortuoso maltrato que recibió su hijo de Corea del Norte.

“Parecía muy incómodo, casi angustiado. Aunque nunca volvimos a oír su voz, en un día cambió la expresión de su rostro, estaba en paz, estaba en casa y creemos que podía sentirlo”, agregaron sus allegados.

“Vigilia sin respuesta”

La familia descubrió la situación médica de Otto Warmbier en los días previos a su liberación.

Poco antes de ser liberado, la familia informó al diario The Washington Post que habían sido informados por las autoridades norcoreanas de que su hijo había contraído botulismo, una enfermedad rara que causa parálisis, poco después de su juicio en marzo de 2016.

Y que se le suministró una pastilla para dormir y había estado en coma desde entonces, dijo el diario.

Pero un equipo de médicos que lo evaluó en Cincinnati dijo que no había encontrado “ningún signo de botulismo” en el estudiante.

“Su condición neurológica puede ser mejor descrita como un estado de vigilia sin respuesta”, dijo el doctor Daniel Kanter en un parte médico.

Los médicos también confirmaron que no había ninguna señal de que hubiera sido maltratado físicamente durante su detención, según los resultados de estudios con escáneres.

¿Quién fue Otto Warmbier?

Derechos de autor de la imagen
AFP

Image caption

Otto Warmbier, visiblemente afectado, en su última aparición pública antes de caer en coma.

El estudiante de economía de la Universidad de Virginia viajó a Corea del Norte como turista cuando fue arrestado el 2 de enero de 2016.

Un mes más tarde, apareció visiblemente consternado en una conferencia de prensa, en la cual confesó el intento de robo del cartel a pedido de una iglesia protestante metodista de Ohio.

“Mi objetivo era dañar la motivación y la ética de trabajo del pueblo coreano”, explicó el estudiante en la confesión divulgada por la agencia estatal KCNA.

Otros exdetenidos extranjeros en Corea del Norte se han retractado de las confesiones, diciendo que fueron hechas bajo presión.

Corea del Norte dijo que había liberado a Warmbier “por razones humanitarias”.

Source Article from http://www.bbc.com/mundo/noticias-internacional-40335306

May 21 at 6:46 PM

A confidential Internal Revenue Service legal memo says tax returns must be given to Congress unless the president takes the rare step of asserting executive privilege, according to a copy of the memo obtained by The Washington Post.

The memo contradicts the Trump administration’s justification for denying lawmakers’ request for President Trump’s tax returns, exposing fissures in the executive branch.

Trump has refused to turn over his tax returns but has not invoked executive privilege. Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin has instead denied the returns by arguing there is no legislative purpose for demanding them.

But according to the IRS memo, which has not been previously reported, the disclosure of tax returns to the committee “is mandatory, requiring the Secretary to disclose returns, and return information, requested by the tax-writing Chairs.”

The 10-page document says the law “does not allow the Secretary to exercise discretion in disclosing the information provided the statutory conditions are met” and directly rejects the reason Mnuchin has cited for withholding the information.

“[T]he Secretary’s obligation to disclose return and return information would not be affected by the failure of a tax writing committee . . . to state a reason for the request,” it says. It adds that the “only basis the agency’s refusal to comply with a committee’s subpoena would be the invocation of the doctrine of executive privilege.”

The memo is the first sign of potential dissent within the administration over its approach to the tax returns issue. The IRS said the memo, titled “Congressional Access to Returns and Return Information,” was a draft document written by a lawyer in the Office of Chief Counsel and did not represent the agency’s “official position.” The memo is stamped “DRAFT,” it is not signed, and it does not reference Trump.

The agency says the memo was prepared in the fall. At the time, Democrats were making clear they probably would seek copies of Trump’s tax returns under a 1924 law that states that the treasury secretary “shall furnish” tax returns to Congress.

Precisely who wrote the memo and reviewed it could not be learned. The agency says IRS Commissioner Charles Rettig and current chief counsel Michael Desmond, who was confirmed by the Senate in February, were not familiar with it until a Post inquiry this week. The IRS says it was never forwarded to Treasury.

Executive privilege is generally defined as the president’s ability to deny requests for information about internal administration talks and deliberations.

On Friday, Mnuchin rejected a subpoena from the House Ways and Means Committee to turn over the tax returns, a move that probably will now lead to a court battle. Mnuchin has criticized the demands as harassment that could be directed against any political enemy, arguing Congress lacks a “legitimate legislative purpose” in seeking the documents.

Breaking with precedent, Trump has refused to provide tax returns, saying without evidence they are under audit.

Mnuchin and other senior staff members never reviewed the IRS memo, according to a Treasury spokesman. But the spokesman said it did not undermine the department’s argument that handing over the president’s tax returns would run afoul of the Constitution’s mandate that information given to Congress must pertain to legislative issues.

The spokesman said the secretary is following a legal analysis from the Justice Department that he “may not produce the requested private tax return information.” Both agencies have denied requests for copies of the Justice Department’s advice to Treasury.

Some legal experts said the memo provides further evidence that the Trump administration is using shaky legal foundations to withhold the tax returns.

“The memo is clear in its interpretation of the law that the IRS shall furnish this information,” said William Lowrance, who served for about two decades as an attorney in the IRS chief counsel’s office and reviewed the memo at the request of The Post.

Daniel Hemel, a professor at the University of Chicago Law School who also reviewed the memo for The Post, said the document suggests a split over Trump’s returns between career staffers at the IRS and political appointees at that agency and the Treasury Department.

“The memo writer’s interpretation is that the IRS has no wiggle room on this,” Hemel said. “Mnuchin is saying the House Ways and Means Committee has not asserted a legitimate legislative purpose. The memo says they don’t have to assert a legitimate legislative purpose — or any purpose at all.”

The administration has resisted a range of House inquiries, although a federal judge on Monday ruled the president’s accounting firm must turn over his financial records to Congress.

Treasury Department officials said there had been extensive discussions about the tax return issue, with one official saying the issue put the agency in a difficult spot because Trump has predetermined the outcome — and because Mnuchin is a Trump ally who was the finance chair of his 2016 campaign. 

“The decision has been made,” this official said, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss private conversations. “Now it’s up to us to try to justify it.”

Trump has told advisers he will battle the issue to the Supreme Court, according to people familiar with the matter. Trump recently has argued that the tax returns were an issue in the 2016 election but that because he won they should no longer be of concern. 

Last week, Mnuchin told a Senate panel that Treasury Department lawyers held an early discussion about disclosing the tax returns long before Democrats officially demanded the documents in April. He did not reveal details of that deliberation or say what, if any, legal memos he had reviewed.

Some legal experts have held that the law is clear in giving Congress the power to compel the provision of the returns. But other former government lawyers, including two who served in the Reagan and George H.W. Bush administrations, have argued that the law is unconstitutional and could lead to widespread abuses of taxpayer privacy for political aims.

The IRS memo describes how and why Congress has the authority to access tax returns, explaining the origin of the provision and how it has been interpreted over the decades.

It highlights the special powers given to three committees for compelling the release of tax returns: the House Ways and Means Committee, the Senate Finance Committee, and the Joint Committee on Taxation. Other congressional committees, the memo emphasizes, do not have the same authority.

When it comes to the Ways and Means Committee, the obligation to divulge the returns “would not be affected by the failure” to give a reason for the request. By contrast, other committees “must include a purpose for their request for returns and return information when seeking access,” the memo states.

“One potential basis” for refusing the returns, the memo states, would be if the administration invoked the doctrine of executive privilege.

But the IRS memo notes that executive privilege is most often invoked to protect information, such as opinions and recommendations, submitted as part of formulating policies and decisions. It even says the law “might be read to preclude a claim of executive privilege,” meaning the law could be interpreted as saying executive privilege cannot be invoked to deny a subpoena. 

Earlier this month, the nonpartisan Congressional Research Service published a review of Section 6103 of the Internal Revenue Code that found the code “evinces no substantive limitations” on the Ways and Means Committee’s authority to receive the tax returns. 

But, the CRS report added, the committee’s authority “arguably is subject to the same legal limitations that generally attach to Congress’ use of other compulsory investigative tools,” including the need to serve some “legislative purpose” and not breach constitutional rights.

Damian Paletta contributed to this report. 

Source Article from https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/confidential-draft-irs-memo-says-tax-returns-must-be-given-to-congress-unless-president-invokes-executive-privilege/2019/05/21/8ed41834-7b1c-11e9-8bb7-0fc796cf2ec0_story.html

The most significant hopes and gains unlocked by the Berlin Wall’s fall, which was 30 years ago Saturday, are all at risk.

They included a historic expansion of democracies and open markets, a wave of globalization that created the greatest prosperity and largest global middle class the world has ever seen, and the enlargement the European Union, to 28 from 12 members, and NATO, to 29 from 16 – deepening ties among the world’s leading democracies.

That all brought with it the hope of what then-President George H.W. Bush called in 1989 “A Europe Whole and Free,” in which Russia could find its proper and peaceful place. Bush went even further in September 1990, after the UN Security Council had blessed the U.S.-led coalition’s war to free Kuwait from Iraqi invasion, envisioning a New World Order, “an era in which the nations of the world, East and West, North and South, can prosper and live in harmony.”

The idea had been hatched a month earlier by President Bush and General Brent Scowcroft, his national security adviser, while fishing near the president’s vacation home at Kennebunkport, Maine. They came home with three bluefish and an audacious vision that the Cold War’s end and the Persian Gulf Crisis presented a unique chance to build a global system against aggression “out of the collapse of the US-Soviet antagonisms,” in the words of General Scowcroft.

Reflecting on those heady days, Scowcroft recently told me that he felt everything he had worked for in his life was now at risk. If U.S. and European leaders don’t recover the common purpose they shared at that time – and there is yet little sign they will – this weekend’s Berlin Wall anniversary is more a moment for concern than celebration.

“Look at what is happening in the world,” French President Emmanuel Macron said in a freshly published interview in the Economist. “Things that were unthinkable five years ago. To be wearing ourselves out over Brexit, to have Europe finding it so difficult to move forward, to have an American ally turning its back on us so quickly on strategic issues; nobody would have believed this possible.”

This weekend’s 30th anniversary of the Berlin Wall’s fall provides a good moment to reflect on four reasons that event – one of freedom’s greatest historic triumphs – has failed to deliver on its full potential. Understanding that, might unlock a better path forward.

Source Article from https://www.cnbc.com/2019/11/09/new-world-order-at-risk-30-years-after-berlin-wall-fell.html

Donald Trump stepped off Air Force One at Moffett Field in a dark suit and bold yellow tie Tuesday for his first presidential visit to the San Francisco Bay Area, tapping Silicon Valley campaign wealth in seeming defiance of his unpopularity in the Democratic stronghold.

His arrival in Mountain View, not far from House Speaker and political nemesis Nancy Pelosi’s San Francisco district, was greeted by a small group of party officials and supporters chanting “USA!” before he headed to a tech mogul’s Portola Valley mansion for a fundraising luncheon.

“Coming here makes great political sense,” said David McCuan, a politics professor at Sonoma State University. “He’s showing he can come into the center of anti-Trump energy, right into Nancy Pelosi’s backyard, thumb his nose at her and still walk away with a wad of cash.”

Before Trump’s arrival, his campaign and local GOP officials had been tight-lipped about the location of the fundraiser, citing violent demonstrations that broke out during Trump’s visits to the Bay Area as a presidential candidate in 2016.

Though word had spread by mid-morning that the event would be held in Portola Valley and protesters began to gather there, the demonstrations were uneventful, and there were no reports of arrests.

The Bay Area voted against Trump by the highest margin of any large metro area in 2016, and his trip comes amid acrimonious and escalating battles with California leaders on a host of issues, from sanctuary cities to greenhouse gas emission standards to high speed rail. State officials have sued the Trump administration more than 50 times since he stepped into the presidency. Most recently, Trump criticized the California Democratic leaders over the state’s growing homelessness problem and suggested he could take federal action to “clean it up.”

“What they are doing to our beautiful California is a disgrace to our country,” he said at a campaign rally last month.

But there are plenty of big Republican donors in the Bay Area. Trump’s campaign and joint fundraising committee received more than $6.5 million in large-dollar donations from Californians in the first six months of the year, more than many other Democratic presidential candidates.

Trump’s four events in California today and tomorrow are expected to raise $15 million for his joint fundraising committee with the RNC, a GOP source said. Today’s Bay Area luncheon will bring in $3 million, the source said.

McCuan said that for Trump, California “is the Golden State because of the money, the coverage and the contrast it lets him draw” between him and the state’s Democratic leaders.

“He’s able to use California as a symbol of brokenness across the country,” McCuan said. “He uses us as a foil.”

After headlining the Portola Valley fundraiser, a luncheon for which tickets ranged from $1,000 to $100,000, Trump left for other fundraising events in Los Angeles and San Diego.

The fundraiser was held at the 32,000 square-foot mansion that Sun Microsystems co-founder Scott McNealy put on the market last year for nearly $100 million. The five-bedroom house, completed in 2008, sits on 13.35 acres and offers “four floors of seemingly infinite amenities,” according to real estate agents. Among them: a 110-yard golf practice area with putting greens, an indoor hockey rink and tennis pavilion, and a large “social room” for hosting events. If the home sells at its $96.8 million asking price, it would more than triple the previous record for the most expensive home ever sold in Santa Clara County.

State and federal campaign finance records show Scott and Susan McNealy have given nearly $1 million to Republican candidates in state and federal races since 2000 but don’t list any contributions to Trump. The couple has supported Republicans who have sparred with Trump — they gave $156,600 to committees supporting Mitt Romney’s 2012 presidential campaign and $88,500 to committees associated with former House Speaker Paul Ryan, according to the Federal Election Commission.

Their only contribution from the 2016 presidential campaign, according to the FEC, was $2,000 Susan McNealy gave to a committee supporting Carly Fiorina before the Republican primary. Within California, state campaign finance records show they contributed to the gubernatorial campaigns of Arnold Schwarzenegger and Meg Whitman.

Scott McNealy did not respond to efforts to reach him for comment by phone or email after the fundraiser.

Trump touched down at 11:02 a.m. at Mountain View’s Moffett Field, where several dozen supporters had gathered on the tarmac, some wearing red Make America Great Again hats and carrying a big Trump 2020 banner.

Trump waved to his fans, who were chanting “USA,” as he descended the steps from the jet. He shook hands with RNC committeewoman Harmeet Dhillon, her spouse Sarvjit Randhawa, and Robin Aube-Warren, the associate director of NASA Ames Research Center, before getting into his car as the motorcade sped away. He did not take questions or talk to reporters.

“There’s such a thrill in being here,” said Rick Carraher, 71, who with his wife, Janis, got up at 4:30 a.m. and went to Moffett Field from their Antioch home to greet the president. “We finally have somebody who’s doing a great job for Americans, and we wanted to show our support.”

About a mile from the fundraiser, a crowd that at one point grew to about 100 people gathered at Rossetti Field on Alpine Road along the motorcade’s route to the fundraiser. A balloon shaped like a baby Trump, mounted by the protesters, flew overhead.

Yolando Sanchez, of Sacramento, joined four friends from the immigration advocacy group Abuelas Responden, or Grannies Respond, to protest. The five women spent the night in Newark, then drove around Tuesday morning until organizers told them to go to Alpine Road in Portola Valley.

There they joined others who held signs and chanted slogans as officers stood sentry between the crowd and the road where Trump’s motorcade drove past.

“We wanted to send him a message with how unhappy we are with him,” Sanchez said.

The motorcade arrived at the McNealy’s home at 11:40 a.m. Along the street, more than a dozen protesters standing behind secret service officers held banners depicting Trump as a baby, as Pinocchio, and in a straitjacket. Kira Od, a local artist who made the banners, urged her fellow demonstrators to keep things civil.

“This isn’t going to change the world, don’t get me wrong,” Od said. “But he’s so protected from criticism that I really wanted to be here so that he couldn’t avoid me and see this.”

Ralph King, a filmmaker who lives up the street, held a hand-written sign declaring, “You are not welcome here” and said, “It’s offensive that Trump is bringing his toxic message into our backyard.”

A few feet away, three Trump supporters unfurled an American flag and a Trump campaign banner.

“People think that to be conservative, you’ve got to be racist or rich,” said Kenny Camacho, 24, who came from Union City to catch a glimpse of the president. “It’s the complete opposite — we’re a silent majority in this country that supports him.”

The event was closed to the press. The White House pool report said attendees were served salmon and vegetables, there was a golf hole in the backyard with a Stanford flag, and at one point a cheer went up from inside the house.

But Dhillon said in an interview afterward that Trump “was incredibly funny and relaxed.”

“People were on their feet several times during his speech,” she said, adding that she thought the event went so well because the secrecy around its location prevented larger protests. Trump didn’t seem to notice the demonstrators, she said.

“He didn’t even make eye contact with any of that garbage,” she said.

She added that Trump talked about how he was fighting for Americans and responded to several questions from attendees. He said California is “a beautiful state” but claimed its elections are unfair, and he blamed Democrats for homelessness that is bringing back “medieval diseases,” according to Dhillon.

Trump’s motorcade swung out of the Portola Valley estate at 2:32 p.m. as a small group of protesters who had been waiting across the street for more than an hour chanted “shame on you!”

Expand

 

 

His last visit to the Bay Area was for a June 2016 campaign rally in San Jose, during which protesters attacked and scuffled with Trump supporters, leaving some bloody. Several Trump supporters attacked at the event have sued the city for not providing adequate police protection, and the case is still working its way through the courts.

Before that, protesters surrounding an April 2016 Trump campaign event in Burlingame forced him to jump over a highway median to get into the hotel where he was speaking.

Traffic was snarled along Alpine Road following Tuesday’s presidential visit, annoying several residents.

“I realize this is a First World problem — I live in Portola Valley,” said one Portola Valley woman who did not want to be identified. “This will be over in a couple of hours. But this is a terrible inconvenience.”

Staff Writer Elliott Almond and Linda Zavoral contributed to this report.

 

Source Article from https://www.mercurynews.com/2019/09/17/trump-arrives-in-bay-area-for-fundraiser-in-first-visit-as-president/