Most Viewed Videos

PORTLAND, Ore. – A persistent crowd of protesters remained outside the federal courthouse in Portland, Oregon, into the early hours of Saturday as fireworks were shot at the building and plumes of tear gas, dispensed by U.S. agents, lingered above.

Thousands of people gathered in Portland streets hours after a U.S. judge denied Oregon’s request to restrict federal agents’ actions when they arrest people during protests that have roiled the city and pitted local officials against the Trump administration.

By 8 p.m. hundreds of people, most wearing masks and many donning helmets, had already gathered near a fountain, one spot where groups meet before marching to the Hatfield Federal Courthouse and the federal agents there. They chanted and clapped along to the sound of thunderous drums, pausing to listen to speakers.

Source Article from https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2020/07/25/portland-protests-tear-gas/5509229002/

The United States called on Israel and Palestinians to de-escalate the explosive conflict ravaging infrastructure and incurring a mounting death toll on territory held by both sides.

“We call on all sides to exercise restraint, exercise calm,” State Department spokesperson Ned Price told reporters on Tuesday. “The United States will continue to remain engaged with senior Israeli officials and Palestinian leadership in the days and weeks ahead.”

But he warned there may be only so much Washington could do.

“The United States is doing what we can,” Price said, “knowing that…our ability in certain situations is going to be, in some cases, limited.”

Price emphasized that “Israel has the right to defend itself and to respond to rocket attacks” and “the Palestinian people also have the right to safety and security, just as Israelis do.”

While he referred to the rocket attacks by Palestinian movements Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad as a form of “horrific terrorist attack,” he declined to respond to journalists’ questions on whether the U.S. considered Israeli airstrikes in Gaza to be acceptable.

The death toll, estimated by each side, is said to include 30 Palestinians, by the Gaza-based Ministry of Health, and two Israelis, according to the Israel Defense Forces. Scores more have been injured.

White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki said Tuesday that President Joe Biden‘s “support for Israel’s security—for its legitimate right to defend itself and its people—is fundamental and will never waiver.”

She also said that the U.S. leader was in talks with top officials from both sides of the deadly feud.

“[Biden] has directed his team to engage intensively with senior Israeli and Palestinian officials, as well as leaders throughout the Middle East,” Psaki told reporters Tuesday. “His team is communicating a clear and consistent message in support of de-escalation, and that is our primary focus.”

The White House also later released a readout of a call between national security adviser Jake Sullivan and his Israeli counterpart Meir Ben Shabbat.

Sullivan “condemned the ongoing rocket attacks by Hamas and other terrorist groups, including against Jerusalem and Tel Aviv,” “conveyed the President’s unwavering support for Israel’s security and for its legitimate right to defend itself and its people, while protecting civilians,” and “also conveyed the United States’ encouragement of steps toward restoring a sustainable calm.”

Secretary of State Antony Blinken also spoke with his Israeli counterpart Gabi Ashkenazi, later releasing a readout in which the top U.S. diplomat said he “expressed his concerns regarding rocket attacks on Israel and his condolences for the lives lost as a result.”

The two men “also discussed the violence in Jerusalem, in particular on the Haram al-Sharif/Temple Mount and in Sheikh Jarrah,” a dispute seen as the catalyst for what has spiralled into some of the worst Israeli-Palestinian violence in years. Blinken “reiterated his call on all parties to deescalate tensions and bring a halt to the violence, which has claimed the lives of Israeli and Palestinian civilians, including children” and “emphasized the need for Israelis and Palestinians to be able to live in safety and security, as well as enjoy equal measures of freedom, security, prosperity, and democracy.”

Biden, for his part, has yet to issue any public remarks himself, and the two belligerents seemed set on intensifying the fight rather than cooling down.

One of the latest barrages by Hamas sent what it estimated to be 130 rockets toward the metropolitan city of Tel Aviv in response to an Israeli air raid that took down an entire apartment building. The IDF claimed the multi-story structure “housed military intelligence, research and development offices” belonging to Hamas.

This adds to some 630 rockets fired by the Palestinian fighters and over 100 airstrikes conducted by up to 80 Israeli aircraft, according to the latest IDF count provided to Newsweek.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu delivered a televised address warning that both Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad would pay a “very heavy price for their belligerence” and that “their blood is on their own hands.” The conflict, he said, “will take time.”

Rockets sirens continue to sound regularly in Israel, especially in Ashkelon and areas close to the Gaza Strip. The IDF also continued to conduct aerial operations.

“Over the last several hours, the IDF has struck a number of significant terror targets and terror operatives across the Gaza Strip,” the Israeli armed forces said in a statement sent to Newsweek. “The strikes are continuing at this time.”

Rockets are launched from Gaza City, controlled by the Palestinian Hamas movement, in response to an Israeli air strike on a 12-story building in the city, towards the coastal city of Tel Aviv, on May 11.
ANAS BABA/AFP/Getty Images

Israelis and Palestinians have been locked in an intractable conflict over territory since the end of the United Kingdom’s post-Ottoman Empire colonial mandate and the establishment of the State of Israel in 1948 on land also claimed by Palestinians. In the decades since, Israel has fought with both Palestinian groups as well as other Arab forces and nations backing Palestinian claims within Israel’s proclaimed borders, which have increasingly eroded Palestinian control through conflict and settlement over the years.

The latest unrest erupted as Israelis attempted to evict Palestinians living in the Sheikh Jarrah neighborhood of the sacred city of Jerusalem, which both Israelis and Palestinians consider their capital. The situation escalated rapidly with an Israeli crackdown on massive Palestinian demonstrations and a storming of the revered Al-Aqsa Mosque, a move that Hamas said motivated its ongoing rocket assault.

“The reason for the demonstrations and the firing of the rocket is trying to deter the Israeli occupation and its settlers and extremist Knesset Members who insist on desecrating Al-Aqsa Mosque, which is the third holiest place for all Muslims around the world and the holiest site for us as the Palestinians,” a Hamas spokesperson recently told Newsweek. “In addition, to deter the Israeli authorities who have been working along with the settlers’ organizations to expel the Palestinian families in Sheikh Jarrah from their homes and replace them with settlers.”

The U.S. and Israel consider Hamas to be a terrorist organization. The group has received calls of support from Turkey and Iran, which has supplied the organization with weapons technology.

Arab countries, including the six with which Israel has diplomatic ties, have largely condemned Israel’s actions in regards to the Sheikh Jarrah dispute and the raid on Al-Aqsa. On Tuesday, the 22-nation Arab League condemned Israel’s airstrikes on Gaza as well.

Mayhem appeared to be extending elsewhere in Israel as well, as rival communities took to the streets. The mayor of the mixed city of Lod told The Times of Israel that there has been “a complete loss of control” around him, warning that “a civil war has erupted.”

The U.S. has played a key mediating role between Israelis and Palestinians in past decades, including in the 1993 Oslo Accords that set the stage for modern relations between Israel and Palestinian leadership represented today by Palestine National Authority President Mahmoud Abbas. The accords ultimately fell apart at the turn of the century, however, and efforts to establish peace were further stymied by a 2006 rift between Abbas’ leading Fatah party and Hamas, which saw widespread gains that ultimately helped to establish its control over Gaza.

The two Palestinian factions remain at odds to this day despite successive reconciliation attempts. Abbas announced late last month that he was postponing what would have been the first Palestinian elections in the nearly 15 years since the original falling out, fueling further tensions with Hamas.

U.S. relations with Palestinian leadership were severed during the administration of former President Donald Trump, who aligned himself closely with Israel by recognizing Jerusalem as the country’s capital and moving the U.S. embassy despite the Palestinian counterclaims to the contested city. Biden has sought to carefully balance rebuilding ties with the Palestinian side while also maintaining the alliance with Israel.

U.S. officials have also offered some security assurances to Israel as the Biden administration pursues ongoing talks in Vienna geared toward a potential reentry into a nuclear deal reached with Iran and other major world powers in 2015 but abandoned three years ago under Trump.

Smoke billows from an Israeli airstrike on the Hanadi compound in Gaza, the city and coastal enclave in which the Palestinian Hamas movement is based, on May 11. Israel said the building was used by the group to house military operations, while Hamas said it was a residential structure.
MAHMUD HAMS/AFP/Getty Images

This is a developing news story. More information will be added as it becomes available.

Source Article from https://www.newsweek.com/us-says-it-has-limited-ability-stop-raging-israeli-palestinian-conflict-1590652

Chat with us in Facebook Messenger. Find out what’s happening in the world as it unfolds.

Source Article from https://www.cnn.com/2019/05/30/politics/roger-stone-hearing/index.html

President TrumpDonald John TrumpAdvocate calls for fundamental shift in criminal justice system Shame on Europe at the G-7 Senate GOP pledges to oppose any efforts to ‘pack’ Supreme Court MORE on Thursday said former FBI Director James ComeyJames Brien ComeyTrump allies blast Comey on Twitter after watchdog report Comey on DOJ IG report: A ‘sorry we lied about you’ would be nice READ: Watchdog says Comey violated FBI policies in handling of memos MORE “should be ashamed of himself” after a Justice Department watchdog report faulted Comey for his handling of official memos about his interactions with Trump. 

“Perhaps never in the history of our Country has someone been more thoroughly disgraced and excoriated than James Comey in the just released Inspector General’s Report. He should be ashamed of himself!” Trump tweeted.

The Justice Department inspector general report released earlier Thursday said Comey violated FBI policies and his employment agreement with his handling of memos he wrote detailing his interactions with Trump before being fired as FBI director.

The watchdog passed its findings to the Justice Department without making a recommendation on whether Comey should be prosecuted, but Attorney General William BarrWilliam Pelham BarrFBI examining broken cameras outside Epstein jail cell: report Trump allies blast Comey on Twitter after watchdog report DOJ watchdog says Comey violated FBI policies MORE declined to bring charges against Comey.

Trump’s decision to fire Comey in May 2017 as the bureau investigated Russian interference in the presidential election triggered questions about whether the president was trying to obstruct justice. Comey has said he provided one of his memos to a friend with the hope of triggering the appointment of a special counsel to investigate Russian meddling and any connection between Moscow’s effort and the Trump campaign.

His hope was realized weeks later when the Justice Department appointed Robert MuellerRobert (Bob) Swan MuellerMueller report fades from political conversation Trump calls for probe of Obama book deal Democrats express private disappointment with Mueller testimony MORE as special counsel.

The White House doubled down on Trump’s criticism of Comey on Thursday, saying Comey’s actions triggered a “politically motivated, two-year witch hunt,” referring to Mueller’s investigation.

“The Inspector General’s report shows Comey violated the most basic obligations of confidentiality that he owed to the United States Government and to the American people, ‘in order to achieve a personally desired outcome,’” White House press secretary Stephanie GrishamStephanie GrishamMSNBC’s O’Donnell retracts report alleging Trump banking ties to Russian oligarchs Overnight Energy: Greens scoff at Trump claim he’s an ‘environmentalist’ | Endangered animals get new protections globally | Fires, climate on centerstage at G-7 | BLM’s move west gets complicated Trump lawyer demands MSNBC retract report alleging banking ties to Russian oligarchs MORE said in a statement, quoting from the inspector general report.  

The inspector general faulted Comey for passing the memo, which was unclassified but determined to contain sensitive material about ongoing investigations, to his friend, Columbia University professor Daniel Richman, with the instructions to share its contents with a journalist.

The memo detailed a conversation between Comey and Trump during which the former FBI director says the president asked him to let go of the investigation into Michael Flynn, his onetime national security adviser. It was reported on by The New York Times in May 2017, after Comey’s ouster. 

The report notes that investigators did not find evidence that Comey leaked classified information from the memos to the press.

The inspector general also found that Comey passed four of the memos to his private lawyers in violation of bureau rules, and faulted him for not immediately alerting the bureau about the disclosure when he learned that it had determined one of the memos included classified material.

Comey has argued that the memos were personal recollections and not official records, something the inspector general refuted in the newly released report.

Comey was unapologetic on Twitter, noting that the investigation found no evidence that he or his attorneys shared classified information with the news media and accusing his critics of “defaming” him.

“I don’t need a public apology from those who defamed me, but a quick message with a ‘sorry we lied about you’ would be nice,” Comey tweeted.

“And to all those who’ve spent two years talking about me ‘going to jail’ or being a ‘liar and a leaker’—ask yourselves why you still trust people who gave you bad info for so long, including the president,” he wrote.

Comey and Trump have engaged in an extended war of words since the FBI chief’s ouster. In June 2017, Comey testified before the Senate Intelligence Committee about his interactions with the president and revealed that Trump had asked him to let go of the Flynn investigation.

“I asked a friend of mine to share the content of the memo with a reporter. Didn’t do it myself, for a variety of reasons. But I asked him to, because I thought that might prompt the appointment of a special counsel. And so I asked a friend of mine to do it,” Comey told the committee.

Trump has refuted Comey’s account and called him a liar, an assertion the White House repeated on Thursday. The president and his allies have attacked Comey and other top Justice Department officials over the Russia investigation, accusing agents of being motivated by bias against Trump in their decisions with respect to the probe.

Mueller concluded his two-year investigation earlier this year, without finding evidence to charge associates of Trump’s presidential campaign with conspiring with Russia. Mueller did not make a decision one way or another as to whether Trump obstructed the investigation. 

Source Article from https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/459319-trump-calls-comey-thoroughly-disgraced-after-scathing-doj-watchdog

WASHINGTON/NEW YORK, Jan 15 (Reuters) – U.S. Senator Kirsten Gillibrand told CBS’ “The Late Show With Stephen Colbert” that she would file paperwork on Tuesday night to explore a run for the Democratic presidential nomination in the 2020 election.

Colbert, during the taping of an episode that will air on Tuesday night, asked Gillibrand, who has been taking the steps to begin a presidential campaign, if she had anything she would like to announce.

“Yes,” the lawmaker from New York said. “I’m filing an exploratory committee for president of the United States tonight.”

The formation of an exploratory committee will allow Gillibrand, 52, who is known for spearheading efforts to change how Congress handles allegations of sexual harassment and became a prominent voice in the #MeToo movement, to begin fundraising and organizing her campaign.

Senator Kirsten Gillibrand, a Democrat from New York, speaks during the Women’s Convention in Detroit, Michigan, U.S., on Friday, Oct. 27, 2017. The Women’s Convention will bring together first time activists and movement leaders, rising political stars that reflect our nation’s changing demographics, and thousands of women for a weekend of workshops, strategy sessions, and inspiring forums. Photographer: Anthony Lanzilote/Bloomberg via Getty Images




“I’m going to run for president of the United States because as a young mom I’m going to fight for other people’s kids as hard as I would fight for my own,” Gillibrand said to applause.

She has hired several top political aides in recent weeks, fueling speculation her jump into the 2020 fray was imminent.

There is no dominant early front-runner in what is expected to be a crowded Democratic nominating race to take on President Donald Trump, the likely Republican nominee.

Texas Democrat Julian Castro, a former San Antonio mayor and top U.S. housing official, formally launched his White House bid on Saturday. Former U.S. Representative John Delaney has been running for more than a year. U.S. Senator Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts formed an exploratory committee last month and Representative Tulsi Gabbard said Friday that she will run for president.

Some in the party believe an establishment figure who can appeal to centrist voters is the way to victory. Others argue a fresh face, and particularly a diverse one, is needed to energize the party’s increasingly left-leaning base.

Gillibrand was a member of the centrist and fiscally conservative Blue Dog Coalition while in the House of Representatives. Her positions became more liberal after she was appointed to fill the Senate seat vacated by Hillary Clinton in New York when Clinton became former President Barack Obama’s secretary of state.

Gillibrand then won the seat in a special election and was re-elected to six-year terms in 2012 and 2018. She has attributed the ideology shift to representing a liberal state versus a more conservative district.

As a senator, Gillibrand was outspoken about rape in the military and campus sexual assault years before the #MeToo movement against sexual harassment and assault first arose in 2017.

Former Vice President Joe Biden

(Photo by Patrick T. Fallon/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.)

(Photo by Scott Eisen/Getty Images)

Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.)

(Photo by Craig F. Walker/The Boston Globe via Getty Images)

Sen. Kamala Davis (D-Calif.)

(Photo By Bill Clark/CQ Roll Call)

Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.)

(Photo by Zach Gibson/Getty Images)

Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.)

(Photo by Drew Angerer/Getty Images)

Facebook CEO and founder Mark Zuckerberg

(Photo by David Paul Morris/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

Sen. Cory Booker (D-N.J.)

(Photo by Jason LaVeris/FilmMagic)

Former U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry (D)

(Photo by: REUTERS/Gonzalo Fuentes)

Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.)

(Photo by: Lloyd Bishop/NBC/NBCU Photo Bank via Getty Images)

Colorado Gov. John Hickenlooper

(Photo By Bill Clark/CQ Roll Call)

New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo

(Photo credit MENAHEM KAHANA/AFP/Getty Images)

Former Maryland Gov. Martin O’Malley

(Photo credit NICHOLAS KAMM/AFP/Getty Images)

Former Housing and Urban Development Secretary Julian Castro

(Photo by Pete Marovich/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

Sen. Tim Kaine (D-Va.)

(Photo by Daniel Acker/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

Sen. Al Franken (D-Minn.)

(Photo by Zach Gibson/Getty Images)

Sen. Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio)

(Photo credit ZACH GIBSON/AFP/Getty Images)

Former Massachusetts Gov. Deval Patrick

(Photo by Suzanne Kreiter/The Boston Globe via Getty Images)

New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio

(Photo by James Keivom/NY Daily News via Getty Images)

Dallas Mavericks owner Mark Cuban

(Photo by Andrew Harrer/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

Environmental activist Tom Steyer

(Photo by David Paul Morris/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

Democratic National Committee Chairman Tom Perez

(Photo by Taylor Hill/FilmMagic)

Minnesota Gov. Mark Dayton 

(Photo by Stephen Maturen/Getty Images)

Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe

(Photo by Drew Angerer/Getty Images)

California Lt. Gov. Gavin Newsom

(Photo by Yichuan Cao/NurPhoto via Getty Images)

Facebook COO Sheryl Sandberg

(Photo credit FABRICE COFFRINI/AFP/Getty Images)

Starbucks CEO Howard Schultz

(Photo credit should read JASON REDMOND/AFP/Getty Images)

Dwayne “The Rock” Johnson

(Photo by Donna Ward/Getty Images)

Rep. Tulsi Gabbard (D-Hawaii)

(Photo credit TIMOTHY A. CLARY/AFP/Getty Images)

Rep. Keith Ellison (D-Minn.)

(Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images)

Rep. Sean Patrick Maloney (D-N.Y)

(Photo By Tom Williams/CQ Roll Call)

California Gov. Jerry Brown

(Photo by Tiffany Rose/Getty Images for Caruso )

Media mogul Oprah Winfrey

(Photo by Moeletsi Mabe/Sunday Times/Gallo Images/Getty Images)

Former Sen. Russ Feingold (D-Wis.)

(Photo By Tom Williams/CQ Roll Call)

Former Vermont Gov. Howard Dean

(Marcus Yam / Los Angeles Times)

Former Vice President Al Gore

(Photo credit DAVID MCNEW/AFP/Getty Images)

Sen. Mark Warner (D-Va.)

(Photo by Katherine Frey/The Washington Post via Getty Images)

Former Sen. Jim Webb (D-Va.)

(Photo by Andrew Harrer/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti

(Photo by Rodin Eckenroth/Getty Images,)

Rep. Seth Moulton (D-Mass.)

(Photo by Craig F. Walker/The Boston Globe via Getty Images)

New Orleans Mayor Mitch Landrieu

Albin Lohr-Jones/Pool via Bloomberg

Sen. Tammy Duckworth (D-Ill.)

(Photo by Scott Olson/Getty Images)

Washington Gov. Jay Inslee

(Photo by Karen Ducey/Getty Images)

Texas Rep. Beto O’Rourke

(AP Photo/Eric Gay)

Michael Bloomberg

(Christopher Smith/Invision/AP)




In late 2017, as she pushed for a bill changing how Congress processes and settles sexual harassment allegations made by staffers, some prominent party leaders criticized her for being the first Democratic senator to urge the resignation of Senator Al Franken, who was accused of groping and kissing women without their consent.

During the same period, Gillibrand said Hillary Clinton’s husband, former President Bill Clinton, should have resigned from the White House after his affair with intern Monica Lewinsky, which led to his impeachment by the House. Some criticized the senator for attacking the Clintons, who had supported her political career.

Gillibrand backs a Medicare-for-all bill championed by Democratic Party liberals. She was the first senator to call in June 2018 for the abolishment of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) amid controversy over Trump’s separation of families entering the country at the U.S.-Mexico border.

“I believe healthcare should be a right and not a privilege,” Gillibrand told Colbert.

In a dig at Trump, Gillibrand said the first thing she would do if elected to the White House is “restore what’s been lost” like the “integrity and compassion of this country.”

“You have to start by restoring what’s been lost, restoring our leadership in the world, addressing things like global climate change and being that beacon of light and hope in the world,”Gillibrand said.

Trump and Gillibrand have sparred publicly in the past. In December 2017, the president targeted her with a sexually tinged tweet, calling her a “total flunky” who had “come to my office ‘begging’ for campaign contributions not so long ago (and would do anything for them).”

Gillibrand shot back immediately on Twitter.

“You cannot silence me or the millions of women who have gotten off the sidelines to speak out about the unfitness and shame you have brought to the Oval Office,” she wrote.

(Reporting by Amanda Becker in Washington and Daniel Trotta in New York Editing by Colleen Jenkins, Jonathan Oatis and James Dalgleish)

Source Article from https://www.aol.com/article/news/2019/01/15/democratic-us-senator-gillibrand-to-launch-2020-white-house-bid/23643458/

Derechos de autor de la imagen
Getty Images

Image caption

Las lluvias y desbordamientos de ríos que trajo el huracán a su paso por Puerto Rico han provocado que la presa quedara por encima de su capacidad.

Las autoridades de Puerto Rico ordenaron este viernes evacuar los pueblos de Isabela y Quebradilla, situados en las proximidades de la represa de Guajataca, afectada por el huracán María.

La presa, que está perdiendo agua por una fractura, se encuentra ubicada en la región noroeste de la isla, a unos 85 kilómetros al oeste de San Juan.

Las lluvias y desbordamientos de ríos que trajo la tormenta tropical a su paso por Puerto Rico han provocado que la represa quedara por encima de su capacidad, lo que llevó a su estructura a comenzar a ceder.

Esta es una situación EXTREMADAMENTE PELIGROSA“, advirtió la oficina de San Juan del Servicio Nacional de Meteorología en Twitter.

“Hay autobuses evacuando los pobladores del área lo más rápido que pueden”, agregó.

La misma fuente advirtió que la presa ya estaba fallando y provocando inundaciones en el área. Y les pidió a quienes estaban en el lugar trasladarse a zonas altas.

La evacuación puede afectar a unas 70.000 personas.

Sin electricidad

El huracán María dejó al menos 13 muertos en Puerto Rico y en total hasta 30 en diferentes islas del Caribe.

Derechos de autor de la imagen
Getty Images

Image caption

María ha devastado Puerto Rico.

María es el segundo huracán de categoría mayor que alcanza Puerto Rico este año y el más potente en tocar tierra en ese estado asociado de Estados Unidos en casi 90 años.

La tormenta dejó a toda la isla sin electricidad y numerosos ríos alcanzaron niveles históricos.

El gobernador Ricardo Rosselló describió el huracán como “la tormenta más devastadora en un siglo”.

Rosselló dijo que María había afectado al sistema de distribución eléctrica que podría tomar meses restaurarla.

En redes sociales se vieron imágenes de árboles caídos y techos volando por los vientos de hasta 225 km/h.

Derechos de autor de la imagen
AFP

Image caption

El huracán María deja más de 30 muertos en su paso destructor por el Caribe

Source Article from http://www.bbc.com/mundo/noticias-america-latina-41368325

But after Moderna filed a similar request on Wednesday, officials began debating whether to speed that authorization along as well, the people with knowledge of the matter said.

The FDA declined to comment.

Moderna reported earlier this summer that its booster is 93 percent effective when given six months after the second dose, and the company has been in close touch with the FDA since then about an eventual authorization of its shot for all adults.

With Covid-19 cases up more than 20 percent in the U.S. over the past two weeks, some administration officials also argued that clearing the shot prior to Thanksgiving would allow all adults to quickly seek a booster no matter which vaccine they originally received.

The FDA is now expected to finalize authorization for both vaccines on Friday morning, ahead of an afternoon meeting of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s vaccine advisory panel, according to the people with knowledge of the matter.

Still, it’s unclear how the CDC panel will react to the rapid authorization of Moderna’s booster shot. The outside advisers — who are charged with recommending who should receive the vaccines — were originally scheduled only to consider expanded eligibility for Pfizer’s booster. The FDA’s move could raise concerns among some advisers that they’re being asked to endorse the distribution of a second vaccine on a more accelerated timetable than they originally planned.

The CDC is not required to follow the panel’s advice on how vaccines should be rolled out, but it has traditionally followed its recommendations.

Source Article from https://www.politico.com/news/2021/11/18/fda-ready-to-endorse-pfizer-moderna-boosters-covid-523002

The offshore oil drilling platform ‘Gail,’ operated by Venoco, Inc., is shown off the coast of Santa Barbara, Calif. in 2009. A Trump administration plan to greatly expand offshore drilling is on hold after a setback in court.

Chris Carlson/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Chris Carlson/AP

The offshore oil drilling platform ‘Gail,’ operated by Venoco, Inc., is shown off the coast of Santa Barbara, Calif. in 2009. A Trump administration plan to greatly expand offshore drilling is on hold after a setback in court.

Chris Carlson/AP

The Trump administration is postponing controversial plans to greatly expand oil and gas drilling off of the nation’s coasts, following a recent setback in court and months of pushback from coastal communities.

Last month, a federal judge in Alaska ruled that President Trump exceeded his authority when he signed an executive order to lift an Obama-era ban on oil and gas drilling in parts of the Arctic and Atlantic oceans.

The decision immediately reinstated those protections, and was a major blow to the administration’s efforts to boost oil and gas development across the country.

While the Trump administration is expected to appeal the decision, a resolution could be a long ways off. That makes it uncertain where new oil leases may eventually be allowed.

In an interview with the Wall Street Journal, published Thursday, newly confirmed Interior Secretary David Bernhardt said that his agency may wait for the court process to play out before moving forward with plans to open up more than 90 percent of all federal waters to offshore oil and gas leasing.

“By the time the court rules, that may be discombobulating to our plan,” Bernhardt told the newspaper.

Last year, the Trump administration said it would move to allow offshore oil and gas leasing in nearly all of the nation’s coastal waters. The proposal was met with instant criticism from environmental groups and governors’ offices along the East and West coasts.

Even some Republican lawmakers joined in the backlash.

All had been waiting months for a new version of the plan, which had been expected anytime. But during his confirmation hearing last month, Bernhardt told lawmakers that the plan was still in its beginning stages.

His interview with the Wall Street Journal was his first since being confirmed as the nation’s top land steward, and appeared to put the proposal on indefinite hold.

“Given the recent court decision, the Department is simply evaluating all of its options to determine the best pathway to accomplish the mission entrusted to it by the President,” Interior spokeswoman Molly Block confirmed in an email.

The plan’s critics are celebrating the delay.

“This decision is the result of constant pressure from coastal communities, environmental groups, and elected official who made it abundantly clear that offshore oil and gas drilling is dangerous, unwanted, and a threat to our economy and way of life,” said Virginia Democratic Congressman Joe Cunningham in a statement.

Jacqueline Savitz, chief policy officer at Oceana, says that she is encouraged by the move, “but until the Trump plan is final, the President is positioned to open up our coasts at a moment’s notice.”

Source Article from https://www.npr.org/2019/04/25/717214683/trump-administration-puts-offshore-drilling-plan-on-hold-after-setback-in-court

Source Article from https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/health/2022/02/09/covid-mask-mandates-cases-vaccinations/6712215001/

p,h3,h4,.grey-bg{clear:both}#article-body article>h3:not([class]){text-align:center;font-family:’PostoniWide’,’Bodoni 72′,’Bodoni MT’,Didot,’Didot LT STD’,’Hoefler Text’,Garamond,Georgia,serif;font-size:2.25em;margin-top:0;padding-top:2em;margin-bottom:0}#article-body article>h4:not([class]){font-weight:normal;color:#737373;text-align:center;margin-bottom:2em;border-bottom:1px solid #EEE}p.message{position:relative;width:100%;max-width:55% !important;padding:20px 20px;border-radius:25px;background:#efefef;font-family:’FranklinPro’,’FranklinITCProLight’,’Franklin Gothic Medium’,’Franklin Gothic’,’ITC Franklin Gothic’,’Apple SD Gothic Neo’,’Myriad Set Pro’,’Helvetica Neue’,’Helvetica Neue Light’,Helvetica,Arial,’Lucida Grande’,sans-serif !important;line-height:1.3em !important;overflow-wrap:break-word;font-weight:200}@media (max-width:724px){p.message{max-width:280px !important}}.message-left{float:left}.message-right{float:right}.message b,.message i{margin-left:60px;line-height:1.2em}.message b::before{width:50px;height:50px;content:” “;position:absolute;top:12px;left:20px}.message-yermak b::before{background-image:url(https://wp-stat.s3.amazonaws.com/graphics/ai2html/whoswho/EYVG5PGMFNDOTACTRIRMEGFQ34/CIRCLE-HEADS/yermak.png)}.message-volker b::before{background-image:url(https://wp-stat.s3.amazonaws.com/graphics/ai2html/whoswho/EYVG5PGMFNDOTACTRIRMEGFQ34/CIRCLE-HEADS/volker.png)}.message-sondland b::before{background-image:url(https://wp-stat.s3.amazonaws.com/graphics/ai2html/whoswho/EYVG5PGMFNDOTACTRIRMEGFQ34/CIRCLE-HEADS/sondland.png)}.message-taylor b::before{background-image:url(https://wp-stat.s3.amazonaws.com/graphics/ai2html/whoswho/EYVG5PGMFNDOTACTRIRMEGFQ34/CIRCLE-HEADS/taylor.png)}.message-giuliani b::before{background-image:url(https://wp-stat.s3.amazonaws.com/graphics/ai2html/whoswho/EYVG5PGMFNDOTACTRIRMEGFQ34/CIRCLE-HEADS/giuliani.png)}p.message-timeless b{margin-bottom:28px}.message b{display:block;margin-top:8px}.message i{display:block;color:#737373;font-size:0.85em;font-style:normal;margin-bottom:14px}.message::before{content:” “;display:table;clear:both}.message::after{content:” “;display:table;clear:both}@media (max-width:600px){#article-body article>h3:not([class]){font-size:1.3em;text-align:left}#article-body article>h4:not([class]){text-align:left}}@media only screen and (max-width:750px){#article-topper{padding-left:0}}@media (max-width:480px){#article-topper{padding-left:0;text-align:left}}]]>

A new cache of text messages released late Thursday reveals that top U.S. diplomats believed President Trump would not meet with Ukraine’s president unless the country launched investigations into Trump’s political enemies. Over several weeks, they coordinated with a top aide to new leader Volodymyr Zelensky and with Trump’s personal lawyer Rudolph W. Giuliani to try to accomplish both, the texts show.

Ukraine

Trump circle

Andrey Yermak

Rudolph W.

Giuliani

Aide to Ukrainian

President Volodymyr

Zelensky

President Trump’s

personal attorney

U.S. diplomats

Kurt Volker

Gordon

Sondland

Former U.S. Special

Envoy for Ukraine

U.S. Ambassador

to the European

Union

William “Bill”

Taylor

Charges d’Affaires

at the U.S. embassy

in Ukraine

Ukraine

Trump circle

Andrey Yermak

Rudolph W.

Giuliani

Aide to Ukrainian

President Volodymyr

Zelensky

President Trump’s

personal attorney

U.S. diplomats

Kurt Volker

Gordon

Sondland

William “Bill”

Taylor

Former U.S. Special

Envoy for Ukraine

U.S. Ambassador

to the European

Union

Charges d’Affaires

at the U.S. embassy

in Ukraine

Ukraine

U.S. diplomats

Trump circle

Kurt Volker

Gordon

Sondland

William “Bill”

Taylor

Rudolph W.

Giuliani

Andrey Yermak

Aide to Ukrainian

President Volodymyr

Zelensky

Former U.S. Special

Envoy for Ukraine

U.S. Ambassador

to the European

Union

Charges d’Affaires

at the U.S. embassy

in Ukraine

President Trump’s

personal attorney

The excerpts were provided by Kurt Volker, the special envoy to Ukraine until his resignation last week. They were released by House Democratic investigators following Volker’s 10-hour deposition on Thursday as part of the fast-moving impeachment inquiry into Trump. Among those involved were Volker, U.S. ambassador to the European Union Gordon Sondland, and William “Bill” Taylor, the U.S. Charges D’affaires in Ukraine. They show that Volker connected Andrey Yermak, the aide to Zelensky, and Giuliani, Trump’s personal lawyer.

Rep. Adam B. Schiff (D-Calif.), the House Intelligence Committee chairman leading the investigation, and Rep. Eliot Engel (D-N.Y.), said in a letter that the texts released were “only a subset” of all the messages. Read the messages released below.

Volker introduces Giuliani to Yermak

July 19, 2019

Kurt Volker 4:48 p.m. Mr Mayor — really enjoyed breakfast this morning. As discussed, connecting you here with Andrey Yermak, who is very close to President Zelensky. I suggest we schedule a call together on Monday — maybe 10am or 11am Washington time? Kurt

“Mr. Mayor” in this exchange refers to President Trump’s personal lawyer, former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani. At this point, Giuliani had already been pushing the idea that Ukraine should pursue specific investigations for months. His efforts included multiple meetings with two of the country’s prosecutors general, according to media reports and the whistleblower complaint.

Giuliani has pointed to such text messages as indicating the State Department was aware of and even supported his efforts in Ukraine.

Officials discuss goals for the Trump-Zelensky call

July 19, 2019

Kurt Volker 4:49 p.m. Can we three do a call tomorrow-say noon WASHINGTON?

Gordon Sondland 6:50 p.m. Looks like Potus call tomorrow. I spike [sic] directly to Zelensky and gave him a full briefing. He’s got it.

Gordon Sondland 6:52 p.m. Sure!

Kurt Volker 7:01 p.m. Good. Had breakfast with Rudy this morning-teeing up call w Yermak Monday. Must have helped. Most impt is for Zelensky to say that he will help investigation-and address any specific personnel issues-if there are any

These texts provide the earliest known example of the participants suggesting Zelensky will need to promise Trump something – without raising the other side of a potential quid pro quo, though. Sondland suggests he has briefed Zelensky on what to expect on his upcoming call with Trump. In response, Volker refers to the specific idea that Zelensky should tell Trump that “he will help investigation.”

Concerns about Ukraine becoming an ‘instrument’

July 21, 2019

Bill Taylor 1:45 a.m. Gordon, one thing Kurt and I talked about yesterday was Sasha Danyliuk’s point that President Zelenskyy is sensitive about Ukraine being taken seriously, not merely as an instrument in Washington domestic, reelection politics.

Gordon Sondland 4:45 a.m. Absolutely, but we need to get the conversation started and the relationship built, irrespective of the pretext. I am worried about the alternative.

Here comes the first indication that this was understood as relating to Trump’s political prospects. “Sasha Danyliuk” appears to refer to Oleksandr Danylyuk, Ukraine’s former finance minister who recently resigned as Zelensky’s secretary of the national security and defence council. Per Taylor, he said Zelensky was wary of it looking like the United States dictated its business to Ukraine. Sondland, interestingly, responds by referring to the “pretext” of the two countries’ conversation and relationship. It’s not clear to what he is referring.

Officials plan Trump and Zelensky’s July 25 call

July 22, 2019

Kurt Volker 4:27 p.m. Orchestrated a great phone call w Rudy and Yermak. They are going to get together when Rudy goes to Madrid in a couple of weeks.

Kurt Volker 4:28 p.m. In the meantime Rudy is now advocating for phone call.

Kurt Volker 4:28 p.m. I have call into Fiona’s replacement and will call Bolton if needed.

Kurt Volker 4:28 p.m. But I can tell Bolton and you can tell Mick that Rudy agrees on a call if that helps.

Gordon Sondland 4:30 p.m. I talked to Tim Morrison Fiona’s replacement. He is pushing but feel free as well.

Volker sends along word that Giuliani is approving of Trump speaking with Zelensky by phone, and the two of them talk about how they will set it up. (“Fiona” refers to Fiona Hill, a former top Russia adviser in the White House. “Bolton” refers to then-national security adviser John Bolton. “Mick” refers to acting White House chief of staff Mick Mulvaney.)

Volker and Yermak discuss the call before and after

July 25, 2019

Kurt Volker 8:36 a.m. Good lunch – thanks. Heard from White House-assuming President Z convinces trump he will investigate / “get to the bottom of what happened” in 2016, we will nail down date for visit to Washington. Good luck! See you tomorrow- kurt

Andrey Yermak 10:15 a.m. Phone call went well. President Trump proposed to choose any convenient dates. President Zelenskiy chose 20,21,22 September for the White House Visit. Thank you again for your help! Please remind Mr. Mayor to share the Madrid’s dates

Kurt Volker 10:16 a.m. Great-thanks and will do!

Here’s the big one. For the first time that we know of, a U.S. official ties Zelensky’s investigative promise to getting a White House visit – a potential quid pro quo. Volker, importantly, also indicates this was a message conveyed from the White House. And this came before the Trump-Zelensky call, so this was more coaching from U.S. diplomats of what Zelensky was supposed to say.

Yermak responds after the call and floats a few dates. These dates have now passed, though, and the trip has still not been planned.

U.S. officials advise Ukrainians on investigation language

Aug. 9, 2019

Gordon Sondland 5:35 p.m. Morrison ready to get dates as soon as Yermak confirms.

Kurt Volker 5:46 p.m. Excellent!! How did you sway him? 🙂

Gordon Sondland 5:47 p.m. Not sure i did. I think potus really wants the deliverable

Kurt Volker 5:48 p.m. But does he know that?

Gordon Sondland 5:48 p.m. Yep

Gordon Sondland 5:48 p.m. Clearly lots of convos going on

Kurt Volker 5:48 p.m. Ok—then that’s good it’s coming from two separate sources

Gordon Sondland 5:51 p.m. To avoid misundestandings [sic], might be helpful to ask Andrey for a draft statememt [sic] (embargoed) so that we can see exactly what they propose to cover. Even though Ze does a live presser they can still summarize in a brief statement. Thoughts?

Kurt Volker 5:51 p.m. Agree!

Here, Volker and Sondland plot out a potential statement Ukraine might make, in addition to a live press conference where Zelensky (they’ve apparently been led to believe) would make an announcement. Sondland also refers to a “deliverable” – apparently a reference to the end result of Ukraine actually announcing the investigations – and suggests Trump is anxious to get it.

Giuliani’s input sought on Ukraine statement

Aug. 9, 2019

Kurt Volker 11:27 a.m. Hi Mr Mayor! Had a good chat with Yermak last night. He was pleased with your phone call. Mentioned Z making a statement. Can we all get on the phone to make sure I advise Z correctly as to what he should be saying? Want to make sure we get this done right. Thanks!

Gordon Sondland Good idea Kurt. I am on Pacific time.

Rudy Giuliani Yes can you call now going to Fundraiser at 12:30

Volker loops Giuliani in on what the Ukraine statement might say. Again, Giuliani has suggested this meant the State Department was on-board with his efforts.

Yermak seeks date for White House visit

Aug. 10, 2019

Andrey Yermak 4:56 p.m. Hi Kurt. Please let me know when you can talk. I think it’s possible to make this declaration and mention all these things. Which we discussed yesterday. But it will be logic to do after we receive a confirmation of date. We inform about date of visit and about our expectations and our guarantees for future visit. Let discuss it

Kurt Volker 5:01 p.m. Ok! It’s late for you—why don’t we talk in my morning, your afternoon tomorrow? Say 10am/5pm?

Kurt Volker 5:02 p.m. I agree with your approach. Let’s iron out statement and use that to get date and then Prez can go forward with it?

Andrey Yermak 5:26 p.m. Ok

Kurt Volker 5:38 p.m. Great. Gordon is available to join as well

Andrey Yermak 5:41 p.m. Excellent

Andrey Yermak 5:42 p.m. Once we have a date, will call for a press briefing, announcing upcoming visit and outlining vision for the reboot of US­-UKRAINE relationship, including among other things Burisma and election meddling in investigations

Kurt Volker 5:42 p.m. Sounds great!

Yermak has apparently been given a list of things that should be included in the statement. But – and this is the key – he wants to get a date for a White House visit before Ukraine makes the commitments. This, again, suggests that the meeting was used as leverage. Volker proposes that they could finalize the statement and then use that to convince Trump to schedule the meeting.

Also important here is that Yermak refers explicitly to the investigations into the origins of the Russia investigation and the Bidens (Burisma).

Desire for specific references in Ukrainian statement

Aug. 13, 2019

Kurt Volker 10:26 a.m. Special attention should be paid to the problem of interference in the political processes of the United States especially with the alleged involvement of some Ukrainian politicians. I want to declare that this is unacceptable. We intend to initiate and complete a transparent and unbiased investigation of all available facts and episodes, including those involving Burisma and the 2016 U.S. elections, which in tum will prevent the recurrence of this problem in the future.

Gordon Sondland 10:27 a.m. Perfect. Lets send to Andrey after our call

They appear to be reviewing language intended for Ukraine’s statement.

Aug. 17, 2019

Gordon Sondland 3:06 p.m. Do we still want Ze to give us an unequivocal draft with 2016 and Boresma?

Kurt Volker 4:34 p.m. That’s the clear message so far …

Kurt Volker 4:34 p.m. I’m hoping we can put something out there that causes him to respond with that

Gordon Sondland 4:41 p.m. Unless you think otherwise I will return Andreys call tomorrow and suggest they send us a clean draft.

Volker suggests someone is giving a “clear message” that the Ukraine statement should be specific about the two investigations. It’s not clear who that message is coming from.

Yermak shares report of U.S. withholding assistance

Aug. 29, 2019

Andrey Yermak 2:28 a.m. Need to talk with you

Andrey Yermak 3:06 a.m. https://www.politico.corn/story/2019/08/28/trump-ukraine-military-aid-russia-1689531

Kurt Volker 6:55 a.m. Hi Andrey — absolutely. When is good for you?

The link here is to a Politico story about the Trump administration deciding to withhold $250 million in military aid to Ukraine. Reporting has suggested Ukraine might not have known it was being withheld, though Yermak doesn’t specifically indicate that this is the first time they are finding out about it.

U.S officials discuss Trump’s trip, withholding military assistance for Ukraine

Aug. 30, 2019

Bill Taylor 12:14 a.m. Trip canceled

Kurt Volker 12:16 a.m. Hope VPOTUS keeps the bilat — and tees up WH visit…

Kurt Volker 12:16 a.m. And hope Gordon and Perry still going …

Gordon Sondland 5:31 a.m. I am going. Pompeo is speaking to Potus today to see if he can go.

“The bilat” refers to Vice President Pence’s visit to Poland, where he would meet Zelensky.

Sept. 1, 2019

Bill Taylor 12:08 p.m. Are we now saying that security assistance and WH meeting are conditioned on investigations?

Gordon Sondland 12:42 p.m. Call me

For the first time, one of the diplomats suggests the military aid — separate from the meeting — is being withheld as leverage. It’s not clear why Taylor believes that. It could simply be that he saw the newspaper stories like the one Yermak shared.

Sondland’s response – “Call me” – suggests he knows they shouldn’t discuss things in a written form which could wind up in inquiries like this.

Sept. 8, 2019

Gordon Sondland 11:20 a.m. Guys multiple convos with Ze, Potus. Lets talk

Bill Taylor 11:21 a.m. Now is fine with me

Kurt Volker 11:26 a.m. Try again—could not hear

Bill Taylor 11:40 a.m. Gordon and I just spoke. I can brief you if you and Gordon don’t connect

Bill Taylor 12:37 p.m. The nightmare is they give the interview and don’t get the security assistance. The Russians love it. (And I quit.)

The three of them seem to try to salvage the situation. Taylor against suggests exasperation.

Sept. 9, 2019

Bill Taylor 12:31 a.m. The message to the Ukrainians (and Russians) we send with the decision on security assistance is key. With the hold, we have already shaken their faith in us. Thus my nightmare scenario.

Bill Taylor 12:34 a.m. Counting on you to be right about this interview, Gordon.

Gordon Sondland 12:37 a.m. Bill, I never said I was “right”. I said we are where we are and believe we have identified the best pathway forward. Lets hope it works.

Bill Taylor 12:47 a.m. As I said on the phone, I think it’s crazy to withhold security assistance for help with a political campaign.

Gordon Sondland 5:19 a.m. Bill, I believe you are incorrect about President Trump’s intentions. The President has been crystal clear no quid pro quo’s of any kind. The President is trying to evaluate whether Ukraine is truly going to adopt the transparency and reforms that President Zelensky promised during his campaign I suggest we stop the back and forth by text If you still have concerns I recommend you give Lisa Kenna or S a call to discuss them directly. Thanks.

Another big moment: Taylor repeats his concern that military aid is being withheld for bad reasons – this time suggesting it’s “for help with a political campaign.” Sondland again suggests they talk about it rather than text, and delivers a lengthy defense of Trump that again suggests he’s mindful of who might see these texts one day.

This conversation, notably, came eight days after Taylor first raised this prospect, and he apparently hadn’t been disavowed of it during that time period.

Ann Gerhart contributed to this report.

Read more:

What’s next in the Trump impeachment inquiry, and will Trump cooperate with it?

Three deeply problematic aspects of newly released text messages centered on the Ukraine scandal

Live updates: Trump says the Democratic-led House has the votes to impeach him

Source Article from https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2019/10/04/read-text-message-excerpts-between-us-diplomats-giuliani-ukrainian-aide/

CLOSE

Senator Chuck Schumer lambasted President Donald Trump over his demand that American taxpayers pay for a border wall which has led to a partial government shutdown.
USA TODAY

WASHINGTON – As the partial government shutdown continues, the White House and congressional Republicans awaited a Democratic response to their “counteroffer” in negotiations over President Donald Trump’s demand for $5 billion for a southern border wall.

Acting White House Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney said Sunday that the offer fell between the $1.3 billion for border security that Democrats supported in legislation and the $5 billion for border-wall construction that Trump seeks.

But because the Senate won’t meet to debate until at least Thursday, Mulvaney said the shutdown could continue into the new Congress, which begins Jan. 3.

“I don’t think things are going to move very quickly,” Mulvaney told “Fox News Sunday.”

The White House provided what he called a counteroffer Saturday to Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y. “The ball right now is in their corner,” Mulvaney said.

Spending talks continued amid a weekend of football and basketball games, with little outcry over the shutdown. But Mulvaney said because Monday and Tuesday are federal holidays, “Wednesday is really the first day that this kicks in.”

To keep Grand Canyon National Park open for a week, Arizona Gov. Doug Ducey signed an executive order to provide $64,000 that will keep the park and essential functions such as trash collection, restrooms and ranger services. Tracking of Santa’s sleigh on Christmas eve will continue, according to the North American Aerospace Defense Command. 

Trump postponed his end-of-the-year trip to Florida and most lawmakers have left the capital ahead of the Christmas holiday. He tweeted Sunday morning that a wall would help stop drugs, gangs and criminal elements from entering the country.

“This is what having a president who is nontraditional, who’s a different kind of president looks like,”  Mulvaney said. “He is not going to be an ordinary president, and that’s not what people wanted when they elected him.”  

Sen. Bob Corker, R-Tenn., the outgoing chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee, told CNN’s “State of the Union”  the shutdown was “unnecessary” and “juvenile” because both parties want to work on immigration issues.

Corker noted that Democrats and Republicans supported legislation to provide $25 billion for border security while also dealing with young immigrants who arrived with parents who entered the country illegally. The legislation wasn’t ultimately approved. But in contrast, Corker said the shutdown fight is over much less.

“This is a made-up fight,” Corker said. “This is something that is unnecessary. It’s a spectacle. And, candidly, it’s juvenile.”

The shutdown takes place during an especially chaotic time in the Trump administration, including the resignation Thursday of Defense Secretary Jim Mattis after Trump announced withdrawal of U.S. troops from Syria, a plunging stock market and Trump attacks on Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell.

Schumer had blamed the shutdown on Trump’s “two-week temper tantrum” over border-wall funding and said the Senate has no interest “in swindling American taxpayers for an unnecessary, ineffective and wasteful policy.”

“President Trump, if you want to open the government, you must abandon the wall, plain and simple,” he said.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., said senators would be told when a vote was scheduled and that “negotiations will continue” in the meantime. The Senate next plans to meet Thursday for debate. The House has instructed lawmakers no votes are expected until at least Thursday.

At the White House, Trump  huddled Saturday with his advisers and with a small group of GOP lawmakers to discuss border security but did not include any Democrats in the meeting. Among the Republicans who were invited were members of the hard-line conservative House Freedom Caucus, which has urged Trump not to abandon the fight for border wall funding.

“This is not about the wall for Democrats. It’s not even about immigration for Democrats,” tweeted Rep. Matt Gaetz, R-Florida, who was invited to the meeting. “This is about denying (Trump) a win on a signature agenda item that he promised the American people.”

The latest shutdown is the third one this year – and the third of Trump’s presidency – and was triggered just after midnight Friday when the budget standoff caused funding to lapse for nine federal departments and several smaller agencies. A quarter of the government shut down, and some 800,000 government employees were forced to go on furlough or work without pay.

Agencies impacted include the FBI, the Bureau of Prisons, Customs and Border Patrol and the IRS, as well as national parks and forests. In all, the nine departments affected are Agriculture, Commerce, Justice, Homeland Security, Interior, State, Transportation, Treasury and Housing and Urban Development.

The White House said federal employees in those departments would be paid for days worked before the shutdown began. The pay period ended on Saturday, and those checks will go out on Dec. 28. Employees deemed “essential” and forced to work during the shutdown will be paid once federal funds start flowing again, the Trump administration said, although that would require congressional action.

Meanwhile, behind-the-scenes negotiations continue – primarily at the staff level – in an attempt to break the funding impasse and end the shutdown. The House has passed a bill that includes $5.7 billion in funding for border security, including a wall. But the proposal is stalled in the Senate and cannot pass without the support of Democrats.

On Saturday, Trump tweeted a border wall is needed to keep the country safe.

More: The government shutdown is here. How does it affect you?

More: A look at what public services will – and won’t – be interrupted during the government shutdown

More: Will NORAD’s Santa Tracker still monitor St. Nick’s journey even if there’s a government shutdown?

More: Government shutdown: History suggests stock market can weather storm

 

Source Article from https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2018/12/24/white-house-awaits-democratic-reply-counteroffer-during-shutdown/2402106002/

President Donald Trump has mused about closing down the US-Mexico border entirely. He’s reportedly talked about restarting the family separation policy (which he denies). And now, Trump has added another line to his stop-immigration-at-all-costs rhetoric.

The president is saddened by the fact that the military can’t be more “rough” with migrants coming to America.

After telling reporters in Texas on Wednesday that he wants more troops at the US-Mexico border, the president added, “our military, don’t forget, can’t act like a military would act. Because if they got a little rough, everybody would go crazy.”

The reason? “They have all these horrible laws that the Democrats won’t change [and] they will not change them,” the president said, without explaining what laws he means, or how his political opponents thwarted him.

It’s easy to dismiss this as another off-the-cuff, tough-guy Trump comment. But one can’t lose sight that this is the commander in chief — the head of all American forces — saying he kind of wishes the military could have more freedom to hurt men, women, and children.

That, to put it mildly, is horrifying.

The military can’t do what Trump wishes it could. That’s a good thing.

It’s unclear what laws the president was referencing when he spoke to reporters, but we do know that there are laws in place to ensure a president doesn’t use the US troops the way Trump clearly wants to.

Here’s the big one: The US military is barred from using its capabilities directly to enforce US domestic laws — including immigration laws — unless Congress specifically authorizes it to do so. This stipulation, known as “posse comitatus,” is why US troops can only support US border agents, but not take direct action themselves.

When Trump sent 5,000 troops to the border last year, Gen. Terrence O’Shaughnessy, the head of military command overseeing North American operations, said the military will conduct all of its operations at the border “in adherence to posse comitatus.”

The reason this law exists, and the military follows it, is simple: The president shouldn’t use the military for his own personal reasons to “execute the law” at home.

The military is mainly designed to fight foreign adversaries — and unarmed families looking for a better life in the US don’t come close to counting as enemies. This is why military leaders are typically clear about how they would disobey an illegal order, even if it comes from the president.

And, of course, you don’t want a military that’s wiling to do just anything the president asks, otherwise it becomes his own personal, heavily armed, well-trained police force. That’s about as undemocratic and un-freedom-y as it gets.

After I sent the full Trump quote to the Pentagon, a spokesperson simply wrote back: “Border security is a critical element of our national security. DOD is committed to supporting CBP’s border security mission with the right capabilities at the right locations.”

That’s promising. Still, that doesn’t take away Trump’s own comments which were wrongheaded, cruel — and downright scary.

Source Article from https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2019/4/10/18305175/trump-border-immigration-military-texas

Submit your calendar items and notices to…
mlopez@lasvegasoptic.com
_______________

• If you are a non-profit or church and need volunteers on a regular basis, contact the San Miguel County DWI Office at 425-7998.

• The “Si Se Puede” group of Narcotics Anonymous meets at 7:30 p.m. on Tuesday and Thursday nights at 310 Mills Ave. Everyone is welcome. For more information, call the NA helpline: 800-925-4186 or Frances at 575-815-8544.



If you subscribe to the newspaper, you receive FREE access to all the exclusive content of the web site! Simply register to receive uninterrupted access to our award-winning and in-depth local online content!


Renew Current or Past Subscription / Register for Online Subscription

If you currently subscribe or have subscribed in the past to the Las Vegas Optic, then simply find your account number on your mailing label and enter it below.

Click the question mark below to see where your account ID appears on your mailing label.

Newspaper Acct. ID:
Street Address:
(exactly as it appears on the label)

If you are a subscriber and you do not know your account ID or don’t have a copy of your newspaper available that shows the information on the address label you can click continue below to search for your account.

<!–

–>

Special Offer

You have used all your free page views for the month however if you wish to create a FREE limited access account you will be able to view a additional 3 pages per month.

You can also purchase a subscription and have full access to the site. To purchase a subscription simply enter your zipcode below

Las Vegas Optic | circulation@lasvegasoptic.com | 505-425-6796
P.O. Box 2670, 720 University Ave Suite B, Las Vegas, NM 87701
Office Hours are 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday



Source Article from http://www.lasvegasoptic.com/content/noticias-march-10-2017

KABUL, Afghanistan (AP) — Grieving families buried their dead Sunday following a horrific bombing at a girls’ school in the Afghan capital that killed 50 people, many of them pupils between 11 and 15 years old.

The number of wounded in Saturday’s attack climbed to more than 100, said Interior Ministry spokesman Tariq Arian. In the western neighborhood of Dasht-e-Barchi, families buried their dead amid angry recriminations at a government they said has failed to protect them from repeated attacks in the mostly Shiite Muslim neighborhood.

“The government reacts after the incident, it doesn’t do anything before the incident,” said Mohammad Baqir, Alizada, 41, who had gathered to bury his niece, Latifa, a Grade 11 student the Syed Al-Shahda school.

Three explosions outside the school entrance struck as students were leaving for the day, said Arian. The blasts targeted Afghanistan’s ethnic Hazaras who dominate the Dasht-e-Barchi neighborhood, where the bombings occurred. Most Hazaras are Shiite Muslims. The Taliban denied responsibility, condemning the attack and the many deaths.

The first explosion came from a vehicle packed with explosives, followed by two others, said Arian, adding that the casualty figures could still rise.

In the capital rattled by relentless bombings, Saturday’s attack was among the worst. Criticism has mounted over lack of security and growing fears of even more violence as the U.S. and NATO complete their final military withdrawal from Afghanistan.

At Vatican City, in his traditional Sunday remarks to faithful in St. Peter’s Square, Pope Francis cited the bombing. “Let us pray for the victims of the terrorist attack in Kabul, an inhumane action that struck so many girls as they were coming out of school.” He said. The pontiff then added: “May God give Afghanistan peace.”

The Dasht-e-Barchi area has been hit by several incidents of violence targeting minority Shiites and most often claimed by the Islamic State affiliate operating in the country. No one has yet claimed Saturday’s bombings.

In this same neighborhood in 2018, a school bombing killed 34 people, mostly students. In September 2018 a wrestling club was attacked killing 24 people and in May 2020 a maternity hospital was brutally attacked killing 24 people, including pregnant women and infants. And in October 2020, the Kawsar-e-Danish tutoring center was attacked, killing 30 people.

Most of the attacks were claimed by the Islamic State affiliate operating in Afghanistan.

The radical Sunni Muslim group has declared war on Afghanistan’s Shiites. Washington blamed IS for a vicious attack last year in a maternity hospital in the same area that killed pregnant women and newborn babies.

Soon after the bombing, angry crowds attacked ambulances and even beat health workers as they tried to evacuate the wounded, Health Ministry spokesman Ghulam Dastigar Nazari said. He had implored residents to cooperate and allow ambulances free access to the site.

Arian, the Interior Ministry spokesman, blamed the attack on the Taliban despite their denials.

Bloodied backpacks and schools books lay strewn outside the Syed Al-Shahda school. In the morning, boys attend classes in the sprawling school compound and in the afternoon, it’s girls’ turn.

On Sunday, Hazara leaders from Dasht-e- Barchi met to express their frustration with the government failure to protect ethnic Hazaras, deciding to cobble together a protection force of their own from among the Hazara community.

The force would be deployed outside schools, mosques and public facilities and would cooperate with government security forces. The intention is to supplement the local forces, said Parliamentarian Ghulam Hussein Naseri.

The meeting participants decided that “there is not any other way, except for people themselves to provide their own security alongside of the security forces,” said Naseri, who added that the government should provide local Hazaras with weapons.

Naseri said Hazaras have been attacked in their schools, in their mosques and “it is their right to be upset. How many more families lose their loved ones? How many more attacks against this minority has to occur in this part of the city before something is done?”

One of the students fleeing the school recalled the attack, the girls’ screams of the girls, the blood.

“I was with my classmate, we were leaving the school, when suddenly an explosion happened, “ said 15-year-old Zahra, whose arm had been broken by a piece of shrapnel.

“Ten minutes later there was another explosion and just a couple of minutes later another explosion,” she said. “Everyone was yelling and there was blood everywhere, and I couldn’t see anything clearly.” Her friend died.

Most of the dozens of injured brought to the EMERGENCY Hospital for war wounded in the Afghan capital, “almost all girls and young women between 12 and 20 years old,” said Marco Puntin, the hospital’s program coordinator in Afghanistan.

In a statement following the attack, the hospital, which has operated in Kabul since 2000, said the first three months of this year have seen a 21 per cent increase in war-wounded.

Even as IS has been degraded in Afghanistan, according to government and US officials, it has stepped-up its attacks particularly against Shiite Muslims and women workers.

The attack comes days after the remaining 2,500 to 3,500 American troops officially began leaving the country. They will be out by Sept. 11 at the latest. The pullout comes amid a resurgent Taliban, who control or hold sway over half of Afghanistan.

The top U.S. military officer said Sunday that Afghan government forces face an uncertain future and possibly some “bad possible outcomes” against Taliban insurgents as the withdrawal accelerates in the coming weeks.

_____

Associated Press photographer Rahmat Gul and video journalist Ahmad Seir in Kabul, Afghanistan and Kathy Gannon in Islamabad, Pakistan and Frances D’Emilio contributed to this report.

Source Article from https://apnews.com/article/afghanistan-girls-school-bombing-fb0c565cc4c9be32ee9612981db400a7

Source Article from https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/california-gop-rep-duncan-hunter-admits-he-s-taken-photo-n1010596

El movimiento “El Sur es mi País” realizó el sábado un plebiscito informal para consultar a los habitantes de los estados Rio Grande do Sul, Santa Catarina y Paraná, al sur de Brasil, la posibilidad de independizarse del territorio nacional.

Hasta este lunes se habían contabilizado unos 341.566 votos, lo que representa el 85,82 por ciento de las urnas, de los cuales 328.346 apoyaron el “sí” mientras 13.220 eligieron el “no”, según el sitio oficial de Plebisul 2017.

Pese a los resultados obtenidos, el total de votos computarizados fue menor al registrado el año anterior, cuando el número de votantes era más de 600 mil personas. 

Foto: Nodal

 

A los participantes se les preguntó si “¿Quieres que Paraná, Santa Catarina y Rio Grande do Sul formen un país independiente?”.

La votación es de carácter simbólico por lo que no tiene valor legal. Sin embargo, invitaron a los participantes a firmar una propuesta para ser llevada al Congreso y proceder a discutir el tema.

Por su parte, la coordinadora del movimiento, Anidria Rocha, expresó que “el movimiento separatista está creciendo cada vez más y la crisis política y económica de Brasil favorece nuestra posición”.

Consulta anterior

El movimiento realizó una consulta informal en octubre de 2016, donde participaron 616 mil personas y el 95,74 por ciento afirmó estar a favor de que los tres estados se separaran del resto del país. Sin embargo, solo el Congreso de Brasil puede proponer un plebiscito si se trata de asuntos de interés nacional.

Uno de los portavoces del movimiento, Celso Deucher, aseguró que no son un partido político tradicional, sino un movimiento de ciudadanos insatisfechos con las “arbitrariedades” del Gobierno nacional.

>> PT: Vetos de Temer benefician a millonarios en las elecciones

Source Article from https://www.telesurtv.net/news/El-sur-de-Brasil-vota-por-su-independencia-en-consulta-informal-20171009-0056.html