Most Viewed Videos

Há exatos 2 anos e 11 meses a Honda lançava no Brasil a terceira geração do Fit. O monovolume nipônico, que chegou ao país em 2003, vai completar em abril seu terceiro aniversário sem alterações visuais. Porém, como já se sabe, o ciclo de vida de cada geração contempla uma atualização de meia idade até a chegada da próxima geração.

Assim como o City, o Fit deve ser atualizado também para seguir até a quarta geração, esperada para 2019 no Japão. O modelo deve enfim receber o motor de três cilindros 1.0 i-VTEC Turbo Earth Dream de até 130 cv e quem sabe até uma caixa de dupla embreagem com sete ou mais marchas. Por ora, o compacto da Honda – aqui no Brasil – vai de 1.5 i-VTEC FlexOne com até 116 cv.

Nessas imagens, feitas por um leitor no interior do Brasil, o Honda Fit aparece levemente camuflado, ocultando naturalmente mais a parte dianteira. Uma atualização visual, pura e simples ou quem sabe uma versão Touring? Este último por conta do conjunto ótico de LED presente no carro flagrado.

No entanto, enxertos nos para-choques indicam mudanças muito além dos faróis que, por sinal, mantêm seu formato atual, mudando-se apenas a parte interna. No caso dos protetores, eles devem ganhar um aspecto bem diferente dos atuais, mas o que chama atenção é o traseiro, prolongado em relação ao Honda Fit presente no mercado.

Mas não para por aí. Repare na grade frontal com uma única barra, assim como visto no Novo Civic, tendo a parte inferior aberta e dotada de grelha diferente. Como se sabe desde o lançamento, o protetor é bem rente à tampa do bagageiro, inclusive também em seu derivado, o recém-chegado WR-V. Por dentro, alguns itens poderão ser atualizados, tais como padronagem e qualidade dos tecidos, cluster com grafismo diferenciado ou multimídia com GPS, por exemplo.

Mas e o conjunto de LED, incluindo parte das lanternas traseiras? Atualmente o Honda Fit é vendido entre R$ 57,7 mil e R$ 78,9 mil. Provavelmente uma versão Touring com faróis de LED, LEDs diurnos, lanternas em LED, retrovisor eletrocrômico, seis airbags, sensor de chuva e sensor de estacionamento, elevaria seu preço para R$ 83.400, se a mesma diferença do HR-V EXL para o Touring fosse aplicada.

Honda Fit – Galeria de fotos

Source Article from https://www.noticiasautomotivas.com.br/honda-fit-com-visual-atualizado-e-flagrado-no-interior-do-brasil/


<!–

–>

var docUrl = document.URL;
var urlInfo = docUrl.split(“/”);
if ((urlInfo != null) && (urlInfo.length >= 4))
{
var seccion = urlInfo[3].toLowerCase();

switch (seccion) {

case “finanzas-personales”:
var cX = cX || {}; cX.callQueue = cX.callQueue || [];
cX.callQueue.push([‘insertWidget’, {
widgetId: ’61ed6820cb015fa491fc6fabda0a2f4927ca7127′,
insertBeforeElementId: ‘cx_61ed6820cb015fa491fc6fabda0a2f4927ca7127’,
width: 202, height: 137, renderTemplateUrl: ‘auto’
}]);

// Async load of cx.js
(function(d,s,e,t){e=d.createElement(s);e.type=’text/java’+s;e.async=’async’;
e.src=’http’+(‘https:’===location.protocol?’s://s’:’://’)+’cdn.cxense.com/cx.js’;
t=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];t.parentNode.insertBefore(e,t);})(document,’script’);
break;}}

–>

En las noticias más leídas del día, la llegada de la doble palomita azul a WhatsApp, marcó un antes y un después en el uso de la aplicación, ya que antes de su existencia nadie sabía si el mensaje enviado había sido leído o no, pero nosotros descubrimos una forma en burlar a las famosas “palomitas azules”. Al parecer, jugar en México le sienta bien a Raúl Ruidíaz, bicampeón de goleo, el héroe de una región y de paso quien revalora el precio de su carta.

1. Cómo leer mensajes de WhatsApp sin que nadie se entere

Con el paso del tiempo la famosa aplicación de mensajería WhatsApp ha ido evolucionando y desde que se inició como una simple herramienta para chatear con nuestros contactos, hemos visto como cada vez más usuarios han ido haciendo uso de ella, integrado nuevas funciones y utilidades.

La llegada de las palomitas azules marcó un antes y un después en el uso de la aplicación, ya que mientras que antes de su existencia nadie sabía si el mensaje enviado había sido leído o no por el receptor y por lo tanto no vivíamos tan pendientes de las respuestas de nuestros mensajes.

Después del “double check” se fue perdiendo la privacidad en la aplicación de mensajería. Ahora WhatsApp permite saber si el destinatario ha recibido o no el mensaje, si lo leyó y no ha contestado e incluso es posible saber la hora y minuto exacto en el que el receptor vio el mensaje. Aquí viene lo interesante, si yo te dijera que puedes leer esos mensajes sin necesidad de que las palomitas se pongan en azul, ¿te interesaría? Entra a leer la nota completa donde te explicamos cómo hacerlo.

2. Si le tocan utilidades y no se las quieren dar, sepa proceder

En mayo, las empresas deben realizar el reparto pertinente de utilidades a sus trabajadores, pero no a todos les corresponde, ya que sólo los empleados de compañías privadas que declararon ganancias en el ejercicio fiscal del 2016 y que laboraron más de 60 días pueden cobrar esta prestación.

Si sabes de antemano que te corresponde este beneficio, pero tu empleador se rehúsa a entregártelo, no estás solo, ya que hay instancias que le apoyan para reclamar este derecho constitucional, aquí te explicamos los pasos a seguir.

3. Ruidíaz rescata un negocio millonario

El jugador, Raúl Ruidíaz, apareció ante el público por primera ocasión en la Liga MX, el primero de julio del 2016. Aquel día dijo que se sentía muy contento por llegar a México, pero el ahora bicampeón de goleo lanzó una frase que se ha convertido en un lugar común para todos aquellos jugadores foráneos que llegan a México: “Me comprometo a entregar buenos resultados”.

Gracias a su gol que marcó el sábado al minuto 93 se proclamó campeón de goleo y con el triunfo 2-1 ante Monterrey rescató un negocio que supera 26 millones de dólares. Si quieres saber cómo lo hizo entra a la nota completa.

4. Van 87 fusiones y compras en lo que va del año en México

Las adquisiciones y fusiones empresariales en México suman un total de 87 en lo que va del año, 4.84% más que el mismo periodo del año pasado, y en 34 de ellas el importe alcanza los 8,666 millones de dólares, un 2.46% menos.

La firma especializada Transactional Track Record, en su informe de abril, indicó que tan sólo el mes pasado se registraron 31 operaciones, de las que nueve suman un importe de 1,921 millones de dólares, un 439.19 por ciento en la cifra monetaria sobre abril de 2016.

En los primeros cuatro meses del año, de las operaciones, 18 son pequeñas transacciones con importes inferiores a 100 millones de dólares, 10 son medianas de entre 100 y 500 millones de dólares y seis son grandes con cifras superiores a 500 millones de dólares.

5. Ghostbuster

Un cartón de Nerilicón.

@davee_son

javier.cisneros@eleconomista.mx



var docUrl = document.URL;
var urlInfo = docUrl.split(“/”);
if ((urlInfo != null) && (urlInfo.length >= 4))
{
var seccion = urlInfo[3].toLowerCase();

switch (seccion) {

case “finanzas-personales”:
$(“#tecmon”).attr(“style”, “width:516px !important;height:194px;overflow:hidden;float:right;margin-bottom:-10px”);
var cX = cX || {}; cX.callQueue = cX.callQueue || [];
cX.callQueue.push([‘insertWidget’, {
widgetId: ‘bf09f9d581b1a89cfa1a414f3c30acebdc299ab6’,
insertBeforeElementId: ‘cx_bf09f9d581b1a89cfa1a414f3c30acebdc299ab6’,
width: 516, height: 185, renderTemplateUrl: ‘auto’
}]);

// Async load of cx.js
(function(d,s,e,t){e=d.createElement(s);e.type=’text/java’+s;e.async=’async’;
e.src=’http’+(‘https:’===location.protocol?’s://s’:’://’)+’cdn.cxense.com/cx.js’;
t=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];t.parentNode.insertBefore(e,t);})(document,’script’);
break;}}

–>

Source Article from http://eleconomista.com.mx/politica/2017/05/08/5-noticias-dia-8-mayo

via press release:

NOTICIAS  TELEMUNDO  PRESENTS:

“MURIENDO POR CRUZAR,” AN INVESTIGATION INTO THE INCREASING NUMBER OF IMMIGRANT DEATHS ALONG THE BORDER, THIS SUNDAY, AUGUST 3 AT 6 P.M./5 C

Carmen Dominicci and Neida Sandoval present the Telemundo and The Weather Channel co-production

Miami – July 31, 2014 – Telemundo presents “Muriendo por Cruzar”, a documentary that investigates why increasing numbers of immigrants are dying while trying to cross the US-Mexican border near the city of Falfurrias, Texas, this Sunday, August 3 at 6PM/5 C.  The Telemundo and The Weather Channel co-production, presented by Noticias Telemundo journalists Carmen Dominicci and Neida Sandoval, reveals the obstacles immigrants face once they cross into US territory, including extreme weather conditions, as they try to evade the border patrol.  “Muriendo por Cruzar” is part of Noticias Telemundo’s special coverage of the crisis on the border and immigration reform.

 

“‘Muriendo por Cruzar’” dares to ask questions that reveal the actual conditions undocumented immigrants face as they try to start a new life in the United States,” said Alina Falcón, Telemundo’s Executive Vice President for News and Alternative Programming.  “Our collaboration with The Weather Channel was very productive. They have a unique expertise in covering the impact of weather on people’s lives, as we do in covering immigration reform and the border crisis. The result is a compelling documentary that exposes a harrowing reality.”

“Muriendo por Cruzar” is the first co-production by Telemundo and The Weather Channel.  Both networks are part of NBCUniversal.

Source Article from http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2014/07/31/noticias-telemundo-presents-muriendo-por-cruzar-this-sunday-august-3-at-6pm/289119/

Wilbur Scoville ganhou um Doodle do Google com direito a um jogo que simula o ‘teste da escala quente’ de pimentas. Hoje, o Google celebra o nascimento do químico há 151 anos (1865-1942). Scoville, além de receber a homenagem desta sexta-feira (22), é conhecido por ter inventado um método de avaliação do nível de ardência de vários tipos de pimenta, a famosa Escala de Scoville, disponível abaixo em app. 

Escala Scoville; app salva de pimenta ‘muito quente’

O Doodle do Google, além de animado, é interativo. No jogo, os usuários devem fazer com que um sorvete acerte a pimenta para acabar com a ardência na boca de Scoville, após o químico prová-la. O leite, muito presente no sorvete, é um dos principais componentes neutralizadores do ardor da pimenta.

Doodle de Wilbur Scoville brinca com jogo que usa ‘teste da pimenta’ (Foto: (Foto: Reprodução/Google))

A cada degustação que Wilbur Scoville prova, uma pimenta diferente e as suas propriedades e curiosidades também são reveladas. Após terminar as “lutas”, que você pode ganhar (e aí desbloquear “novas pimentas” para enfrentar) ou perder (e fazer com que Scoville caia no chão com a boca “pelando”), um sistema de compartilhamento dos resultados do jogo nas redes sociais é exibido.

Ralador de pimenta bloqueia Wi-Fi e deixa todo mundo ’em família

O Doodle foi produzido pela artista e doodler do Google Olivia Huynh. Para a designer, a melhor parte do trabalho foi desenhar as pimentas e as reações de Scoville. “O conceito de picante é universal, cômico, e foi o que tentei usar para criar esse jogo de luta”, explica Huynh, em post do Google.

“Fiz storyboards de como poderia ser, rascunhos e testamos um protótipo. Depois vieram os cenários e animações. Desenhar as pimentas e as reações de Scoville foram minhas partes favoritas”, conta. 

Doodle também é informativo, detalhando tipos de pimentas  (Foto: Reprodução/Google)

Escala de Scoville

Wilbur Lincoln Scoville nasceu em Bridgeport, nos Estados Unidos, em 22 de janeiro de 1865 e morreu em 10 de março de 1942. O trabalho do americano como farmacêutico é reconhecido mundialmente: criou o Teste Organoléptico de Scoville, que gerou a já conhecida Escala de Scoville.

Com este método, Wilbur Lincoln Scoville definiu o grau de pungência de vários tipos de pimenta, através da detecção da concentração de capsaicina, substância responsável pela ardência da pimenta.

Qual é o melhor Doodle do Google? Comente no Fórum do TechTudo. 

O teste é um Procedimento de Diluição e Prova. Scoville misturava as pimentas puras com uma solução de água com açúcar, e quanto mais solução fosse necessária para diluir a pimenta, mais alta seria sua picância. Depois disso, o método foi melhorado e foram criadas as unidades de calor Scoville (Scoville Heat Units, ou SHU).

Doodle Wilbur Scoville (Foto: Reprodução/Google)

Uma xícara de pimenta que equivale a 1.000 xícaras de água é uma unidade na escala de Scoville. A substância Capsaicina, que gera a ardência nas pimentas, equivale a 15 milhões de unidades Scoville.

A pimenta mexicana Habanero chega a 300 mil, uma “Red Savina Habanero”, modificada, tem 577 mil, e a Tezpur indiana, 877 mil.

Entretanto, este não foi o único trabalho de Scoville. “The Art of Compounding” (A Arte dos Compostos), de 1895, é um de seus livros, que foi usado como referência na farmacologia até os anos 60.

Scoville também publicou um livro com centenas de fórmulas de perfumes e outras essências, que foi chamado de “Extract and Perfumes” (Extratos e perfumes).

Em 1922, Scoville recebeu o Prêmio Ebert, e em 1929 ganhou a sua Medalha de Honra Remington e o título de Doutor honoris causa em Ciências pela Universidade de Columbia. O pesquisador morreu no dia 10 de março de 1942, deixando mulher e dois filhos.

Download grátis do app do TechTudo: receba dicas e notícias de tecnologia no Android ou iPhone

Curtiu o Doodle? Veja a história dos Doodles do Google; vídeo

Via Google Doodles

*Colaborou Roberto Caligari

Source Article from http://www.techtudo.com.br/noticias/noticia/2016/01/wilbur-scoville-ganha-homenagem-do-doodle-em-seu-151-aniversario.html

Image copyright
Getty Images

Image caption

The US issued more than 8,000 immigration visas to Nigerians in 2018

The US has announced it is expanding its curbs on immigration to include six more countries, including Nigeria, Africa’s most populous nation.

Citizens from Nigeria, Eritrea, Sudan, Tanzania, Kyrgyzstan and Myanmar will now be blocked from obtaining certain types of visas.

People from those countries will still be able to visit the US as tourists.

In 2018 the US issued twice as many immigration visas to Nigeria than to the other five nations combined.

An official said the new measures were the result of failures by the six countries to meet US security and information-sharing standards.

“These countries, for the most part, want to be helpful but for a variety of different reasons simply failed to meet those minimum requirements that we laid out,” acting Homeland Security Secretary Chad Wolf told reporters on Friday.

He said officials would work with the countries on bolstering their security requirements to help them get off the list.

US President Donald Trump first introduced a travel ban in 2017. It currently closes US borders to citizens from seven countries, most of them with Muslim majorities.

In 2018 the US issued more than 8,000 immigration visas to citizens of Nigeria. That same year, just over 2,000 were issued to Sudanese nationals, 290 to Tanzanians, and just 31 to Eritreans.

The US had previously announced a ban on certain types of visas for Eritreans in 2017.

What are the new rules?

The US said it would suspend the issuance of visas that can lead to permanent residency for nationals of Nigeria, Eritrea, Kyrgyzstan, and Myanmar.

Sudanese and Tanzanian nationals will no longer be allowed to apply for “diversity visas”, which are available by lottery for applicants from countries with low rates of immigration to the US.

Mr Wolf said non-immigrant visas given to people for temporary stays – including visitors, those doing business or people seeking medical treatment – would not be impacted by the new rules.

Of the new nationalities facing visa restrictions, Nigerians account for the most immigration to the US.

According to US government statistics, the State Department issued 8,018 immigrant visas to Nigerians in the fiscal year 2018.

Kyrgyzstan and Sudan have large Muslim majorities, while around 50% of people in Nigeria and Eritrea are Muslim. Tanzania also has a sizable Muslim community.

What is the travel ban?

Mr Trump signed a controversial travel ban just seven days after taking office in January 2017, arguing it was vital to protect Americans.

The ban initially excluded people from seven majority-Muslim countries but the list was modified following a series of court challenges.

It now restricts citizens of Iran, Libya, Somalia, Syria, Yemen, Venezuela and North Korea.

While the government has suspended most immigrant and non-immigrant visas to applicants from those countries, exceptions are available for students and those with “significant contacts” in the US.

Media caption‘We trust President Trump on travel ban’

Source Article from https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-51335011

‘);eIFD.close();
var s = eIFD.createElement(‘SCRIPT’); s.src = ‘http://’ + (eS2?eS2:eS1) +’/layers/epl-41.js’;
eIFD.body.appendChild(s);
if (!eS2) {
var ss = eIFD.createElement(‘SCRIPT’);
ss.src = ‘http://ads.us.e-planning.net/egc/4/1b7f’;
eIFD.body.appendChild(ss);
}
eplLL = true;
return false;
}
}
eplCheckStart();
function eplSetAdM(eID,custF) {
if (eplCheckStart()) {
if (custF) { document.epl.setCustomAdShow(eID,eplArgs.custom[eID]); }
document.epl.showSpace(eID);
} else {
var efu = ‘eplSetAdM(“‘+eID+'”, ‘+ (custF?’true’:’false’) +’);’;
setTimeout(efu, 250);
}
}

function eplAD4M(eID,custF) {
document.write(‘

‘);
if (custF) {
if (!eplArgs.custom) { eplArgs.custom = {}; }
eplArgs.custom[eID] = custF;
}
eplSetAdM(eID, custF?true:false);
}
function eplSetAd(eID) {
if (eplCheckStart()) {
var opts = (eplArgs.sOpts && eplArgs.sOpts[eID]) ? eplArgs.sOpts[eID] : {};
if (opts.custF) { document.epl.setCustomAdShow(eID,opts.custF); }
document.epl.setSpace(eID, opts);
} else {
setTimeout(‘eplSetAd(“‘+eID+'”);’, 250);
}
}
function eplAD4(eID, opts) {
document.write(‘

‘);
if (!opts) opts = {t:1};
if (!eplArgs.sOpts) { eplArgs.sOpts = {}; }
eplArgs.sOpts[eID] = opts;
eplSetAd(eID);
}




‘;
}

function govideo(idvideo,id,image,file,tipo,titulo,creditos)
{
document.getElementById(‘incrustado’+id).className=’news_media_b’;
if (tipo==’video’ || tipo==’audio’)
{
var bgplayer=image;
var skinplayer=’swf/rpp.zip’;
var h=413;
var w=550;
if (tipo==’audio’){ h=123; /*bgplayer=”tmp/img/player_audio-dummy_mm.jpg”;*/ }

var fileyt = file.replace(‘watch?v=’,’v/’);





setJW6(idvideo,fileyt,bgplayer,titulo,id);

$(‘#incrustado’+id).prepend(‘X‘);
$(‘#’+idvideo+’_wrapper’).css(‘float’, ‘left’);

} else
if (tipo==’galeria’)
{
document.getElementById(idvideo).innerHTML=’X‘;
}
}







Viernes, 18 de Setiembre 2015  |  10:35 pm




Créditos: Captura ATV

Dos pequeos de menos de 10 aos llegaron al reality y les demostraron a la mayora de participantes que les falta mucho por aprender.







La prueba ‘Yo sé más que tú’ fue la elegida por la producción de Combate para dejar en ridículo a sus combatientes, luego que la mayo´ría de estos perdió en la competencia de cultura general contra dos niño que a penas están en primaria.

Macarena Vélez, Paloma Fiuza, Pablo Morcillo y Diana Sánchez fueron algunos de los modelos, por no mencionar a casi todos, que recibieron ‘paliza’ por parte de los pequeños estudiosos en el set de ATV.

“No sabes nada. ¿Qué, el papi no te enseña?, le gritó uno de los menores a Paloma Fiuza, luego que perdiera ante la preguta de “¿qué era un archipiélago?”.

Sin embargo, los combatientes que “destacaron” y les ganaron a los niños fueron Mario Irivarren, Yidda Slava y Karen Dejo. Todos los demás dejaron mucho qué pensar.








<!–

–>










<!– –>



Avisos
PERRED
Anuncia aqu

<!–%

if (data && data.searchResult && data.searchResult.spaces && data.searchResult.spaces[0] && data.searchResult.spaces[0].ads) {
var ads = data.searchResult.spaces[0].ads;
for (var i = 0; i < ads.length; i++) {
var ad = ads[i];

if (ad.creative && ad.creative.content && ad.creative.content.length && ad.creative.images) {
var titularText = '';
var cuerpoText = '';
var displayUrlText = '';

var content = ad.creative.content;
for (var j = 0; j < content.length; j++) {
var contentItem = content[j];
if (contentItem.key === 'Titulo')
titularText = cX.library.getAllText(contentItem.value);
if (contentItem.key === 'Cuerpo')
cuerpoText = cX.library.getAllText(contentItem.value);
if (contentItem.key === 'DisplayUrl')
displayUrlText = cX.library.getAllText(contentItem.value);
}
var images = ad.creative.images;
var imgSrc = '';
var textWidth = 295;
for (var k = 0; k









{{cuerpoText}}


{{displayUrlText}}













Source Article from http://www.rpp.com.pe/2015-09-18-combate-ninos-dejan-en-ridiculo-a-combatientes-en-cultura-general-noticia_837083.html

California businesses will be limited in their use of independent contracts under a closely watched proposal signed into law by Gov. Gavin Newsom on Wednesday, a decision that is unlikely to quell a growing debate over the rules and nature of work in the 21st century economy.

Newsom signed Assembly Bill 5 in a private ceremony in his state Capitol office. Legislators gave final approval to the sweeping employment rules before adjourning for the year last week.

The new law “will help reduce worker misclassification — workers being wrongly classified as ‘independent contractors’ rather than employees, which erodes basic worker protections like the minimum wage, paid sick days and health insurance benefits,” Newsom wrote in a signing message released by his office.

“As one of the strongest economies in the world, California is now setting the global standard for worker protections for other states and countries to follow,” Assemblywoman Lorena Gonzalez (D-San Diego), the author of AB 5, said in a written statement.

The bill was one of the most hotly debated by the Legislature this year, legislation that began as a way to clarify state law following a 2018 ruling by the California Supreme Court that found a number of workers across the state should be considered employees of a business who are entitled to various benefits. During the legislative process, a variety of powerful business interests sought specific exclusions from AB 5, an effort to ensure those industries could continue to rely on non-employees in a variety of functions.

Those in the most prominent industry left out of those final changes to the bill, California’s app-based technology sector, insisted they would continue to seek exemptions from any new mandate to classify workers as employees. Three companies — Uber, Lyft and DoorDash — opened a campaign committee last month with a $90-million contribution toward taking the issue to California voters in a 2020 ballot measure.

Newsom pledged on Wednesday to continue the discussion with business groups worried about the new law, which takes effect next year. In particular, he cited the need to ensure workers in the new tech sector businesses can join labor unions.

“I will convene leaders from the Legislature, the labor movement and the business community to support innovation and a more inclusive economy,” he wrote in his signing message.

Source Article from https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2019-09-18/gavin-newsom-signs-ab5-employees0independent-contractors-california

President Trump speaks before signing the “Buy American, Hire American” executive order in April 2017 in Kenosha, Wis.

Saul Loeb/AFP via Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Saul Loeb/AFP via Getty Images

President Trump speaks before signing the “Buy American, Hire American” executive order in April 2017 in Kenosha, Wis.

Saul Loeb/AFP via Getty Images

President Trump is extending a freeze on new temporary work visas for tech and other highly skilled workers.

The extension means hundreds of thousands of foreigners looking to work in the United States will continue to have to wait until at least the end of March before having another chance to attain coveted visas to enter the country.

It is also another example of how the Trump administration is trying to box President-elect Joe Biden in on challenging policy matters.

Trump signed the original proclamation in June, citing the need to protect the U.S. labor force during the coronavirus pandemic. It affects workers in a wide variety of fields, including tech workers who want to enter the country on H-1B visas, seasonal workers in the tourism industry and certain au pairs on J-1 visas.

It was an extension of Trump’s earlier “Buy American, Hire American” executive order, which called for federal agencies to take stronger action to enforce immigration laws to protect U.S. workers.

The halt was set to expire Thursday, and there was a clash within the White House about what to do about the expiring moratorium.

It was aggressively opposed by business groups such as the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and National Associations of Manufacturers, which filed lawsuits and argued it hurt U.S. economic interests.

But advocates who favored tighter immigration restrictions argued the ongoing needs created by the pandemic warranted an extension.

RJ Hauman, head of government relations at the Federation for American Immigration Reform, said Americans should take note if Biden tries to lift the moratorium prematurely.

“While the unemployment rate has fallen, too many Americans are still looking for work and the economic impact outlook remains bleak,” he said. “If this proclamation was allowed to lapse, then companies could easily return to exploiting cheap foreign labor.”

Source Article from https://www.npr.org/2020/12/31/952550071/president-trump-extends-freeze-on-many-worker-visas

May 21 at 6:46 PM

A confidential Internal Revenue Service legal memo says tax returns must be given to Congress unless the president takes the rare step of asserting executive privilege, according to a copy of the memo obtained by The Washington Post.

The memo contradicts the Trump administration’s justification for denying lawmakers’ request for President Trump’s tax returns, exposing fissures in the executive branch.

Trump has refused to turn over his tax returns but has not invoked executive privilege. Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin has instead denied the returns by arguing there is no legislative purpose for demanding them.

But according to the IRS memo, which has not been previously reported, the disclosure of tax returns to the committee “is mandatory, requiring the Secretary to disclose returns, and return information, requested by the tax-writing Chairs.”

The 10-page document says the law “does not allow the Secretary to exercise discretion in disclosing the information provided the statutory conditions are met” and directly rejects the reason Mnuchin has cited for withholding the information.

“[T]he Secretary’s obligation to disclose return and return information would not be affected by the failure of a tax writing committee . . . to state a reason for the request,” it says. It adds that the “only basis the agency’s refusal to comply with a committee’s subpoena would be the invocation of the doctrine of executive privilege.”

The memo is the first sign of potential dissent within the administration over its approach to the tax returns issue. The IRS said the memo, titled “Congressional Access to Returns and Return Information,” was a draft document written by a lawyer in the Office of Chief Counsel and did not represent the agency’s “official position.” The memo is stamped “DRAFT,” it is not signed, and it does not reference Trump.

The agency says the memo was prepared in the fall. At the time, Democrats were making clear they probably would seek copies of Trump’s tax returns under a 1924 law that states that the treasury secretary “shall furnish” tax returns to Congress.

Precisely who wrote the memo and reviewed it could not be learned. The agency says IRS Commissioner Charles Rettig and current chief counsel Michael Desmond, who was confirmed by the Senate in February, were not familiar with it until a Post inquiry this week. The IRS says it was never forwarded to Treasury.

Executive privilege is generally defined as the president’s ability to deny requests for information about internal administration talks and deliberations.

On Friday, Mnuchin rejected a subpoena from the House Ways and Means Committee to turn over the tax returns, a move that probably will now lead to a court battle. Mnuchin has criticized the demands as harassment that could be directed against any political enemy, arguing Congress lacks a “legitimate legislative purpose” in seeking the documents.

Breaking with precedent, Trump has refused to provide tax returns, saying without evidence they are under audit.

Mnuchin and other senior staff members never reviewed the IRS memo, according to a Treasury spokesman. But the spokesman said it did not undermine the department’s argument that handing over the president’s tax returns would run afoul of the Constitution’s mandate that information given to Congress must pertain to legislative issues.

The spokesman said the secretary is following a legal analysis from the Justice Department that he “may not produce the requested private tax return information.” Both agencies have denied requests for copies of the Justice Department’s advice to Treasury.

Some legal experts said the memo provides further evidence that the Trump administration is using shaky legal foundations to withhold the tax returns.

“The memo is clear in its interpretation of the law that the IRS shall furnish this information,” said William Lowrance, who served for about two decades as an attorney in the IRS chief counsel’s office and reviewed the memo at the request of The Post.

Daniel Hemel, a professor at the University of Chicago Law School who also reviewed the memo for The Post, said the document suggests a split over Trump’s returns between career staffers at the IRS and political appointees at that agency and the Treasury Department.

“The memo writer’s interpretation is that the IRS has no wiggle room on this,” Hemel said. “Mnuchin is saying the House Ways and Means Committee has not asserted a legitimate legislative purpose. The memo says they don’t have to assert a legitimate legislative purpose — or any purpose at all.”

The administration has resisted a range of House inquiries, although a federal judge on Monday ruled the president’s accounting firm must turn over his financial records to Congress.

Treasury Department officials said there had been extensive discussions about the tax return issue, with one official saying the issue put the agency in a difficult spot because Trump has predetermined the outcome — and because Mnuchin is a Trump ally who was the finance chair of his 2016 campaign. 

“The decision has been made,” this official said, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss private conversations. “Now it’s up to us to try to justify it.”

Trump has told advisers he will battle the issue to the Supreme Court, according to people familiar with the matter. Trump recently has argued that the tax returns were an issue in the 2016 election but that because he won they should no longer be of concern. 

Last week, Mnuchin told a Senate panel that Treasury Department lawyers held an early discussion about disclosing the tax returns long before Democrats officially demanded the documents in April. He did not reveal details of that deliberation or say what, if any, legal memos he had reviewed.

Some legal experts have held that the law is clear in giving Congress the power to compel the provision of the returns. But other former government lawyers, including two who served in the Reagan and George H.W. Bush administrations, have argued that the law is unconstitutional and could lead to widespread abuses of taxpayer privacy for political aims.

The IRS memo describes how and why Congress has the authority to access tax returns, explaining the origin of the provision and how it has been interpreted over the decades.

It highlights the special powers given to three committees for compelling the release of tax returns: the House Ways and Means Committee, the Senate Finance Committee, and the Joint Committee on Taxation. Other congressional committees, the memo emphasizes, do not have the same authority.

When it comes to the Ways and Means Committee, the obligation to divulge the returns “would not be affected by the failure” to give a reason for the request. By contrast, other committees “must include a purpose for their request for returns and return information when seeking access,” the memo states.

“One potential basis” for refusing the returns, the memo states, would be if the administration invoked the doctrine of executive privilege.

But the IRS memo notes that executive privilege is most often invoked to protect information, such as opinions and recommendations, submitted as part of formulating policies and decisions. It even says the law “might be read to preclude a claim of executive privilege,” meaning the law could be interpreted as saying executive privilege cannot be invoked to deny a subpoena. 

Earlier this month, the nonpartisan Congressional Research Service published a review of Section 6103 of the Internal Revenue Code that found the code “evinces no substantive limitations” on the Ways and Means Committee’s authority to receive the tax returns. 

But, the CRS report added, the committee’s authority “arguably is subject to the same legal limitations that generally attach to Congress’ use of other compulsory investigative tools,” including the need to serve some “legislative purpose” and not breach constitutional rights.

Damian Paletta contributed to this report. 

Source Article from https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/confidential-draft-irs-memo-says-tax-returns-must-be-given-to-congress-unless-president-invokes-executive-privilege/2019/05/21/8ed41834-7b1c-11e9-8bb7-0fc796cf2ec0_story.html

A man who was allegedly shot in the arm by Kyle Rittenhouse during a deadly Wisconsin protest testified on Monday that he thought he was going to die as he faced the barrel of a semiautomatic rifle and saw the teenager “re-racking” the weapon.

Gaige Grosskreutz, 27, took the witness stand for the prosecution in the double homicide trial and testified that as a trained emergency medical technician and working paramedic, he went to Kenosha, Wisconsin, on Aug. 25, 2020, to provide medical aid to people who were injured during the protest as he had done at 75 demonstrations that summer.

Grosskreutz testified that as a legal observer for the American Civil Liberties Union, he was also recording the protest in Kenosha in that capacity for a Facebook Live broadcast.

A resident of Milwaukee, Grosskreutz testified that in addition to bringing his medical supplies to the protest, he brought his Glock-27 handgun despite having an expired concealed weapon permit.

‘You shot somebody?’

He said he had treated several people for minor injuries at the demonstration, which began after a Kenosha police officer shot and paralyzed Jacob Blake, a 29-year-old Black man, during a domestic incident. He said one of the protesters he treated had been shot in the arm with a rubber bullet he assumed was fired by the police.

Just before midnight, Grosskreutz testified that he was recording a live stream when he heard gunshots coming from the south of where he was and then saw Rittenhouse running in his direction being chased by people.

Grosskreutz’s video was played for the jury and he said he took it while running alongside the armed Rittenhouse and asking him, “Hey, what are you doing. You shot somebody?”

Rittenhouse continued to run while answering, “I’m going to get the police,” according to the video.

Grosskreutz said he briefly started to go back to where Rittenhouse was running from to see if he could find the person who was shot but then decided to follow Rittenhouse when people started yelling he had just shot someone.

“I thought that the defendant was an active shooter,” Grosskreutz said.

‘High likelihood I would be shot myself’

Prosecutors allege that at that point, Rittenhouse had already shot and killed Joseph Rosenbaum, 36, during an encounter at a car lot the teenager was helping to guard with other similarly armed men who answered an online call to come to Kenosha and help protect lives and property.

Grosskreutz said when he turned back to Rittenhouse’s direction, he saw Anthony Huber, 26, who video showed hitting Rittenhouse in the head with a skateboard, being fatally shot by the then-17-year-old gunman, who had been knocked to the ground and had also fired shots at an unidentified man who appeared to kick him in the face.

Video footage played for the jury by prosecutor Thomas Binger showed Grosskreutz holding his Glock handgun in his right hand and his cellphone in his left hand as he approached Rittenhouse, who was still on the ground.

Grosskreutz said that he saw Rittenhouse point his rifle at him but the gun didn’t go off. He said he then witnessed Rittenhouse “re-racking” the gun to prepare it to fire. The video showed Grosskreutz raising both hands in the air as he came within a few feet of Rittenhouse.

“I was very close to the defendant and I thought there was a high likelihood I would be shot myself,” Grosskreutz said. “By re-racking the weapon, I inferred that the defendant wasn’t accepting my surrender.”

‘I was never trying to kill the defendant’

Binger asked why he didn’t just shoot Rittenhouse.

Grosskreutz said that such a lethal response would have gone against the medical ethics ingrained in his mind and tattooed on his arm to “Do no harm.”

“I do know, though, I was never trying to kill the defendant. That was never something that I was trying to do,” Grosskreutz said looking directly at the jurors. “In that moment, I was trying to preserve my own life, but doing so while also taking the life of another is not something that I’m capable of or comfortable with doing.”

He said he was attempting to use a “non-lethal way to end that interaction” when, according to the video, he lowered his arms and moved toward Rittenhouse, who shot him in the right bicep.

Binger showed graphic photos of the gaping wound in Grosskreutz’s arm, an injury that has caused Grosskreutz to undergo multiple surgeries and physical therapy to recover from. The witness said he still has no feeling in his right arm from the elbow to his thumb.

During cross-examination from Rittenhouse’s attorney Corey Chirafisi, Grosskreutz said that he initially told investigators that he lost his gun that night before he was shot and the fact that he was armed was not mentioned in a $10 million lawsuit he filed against the city and county of Kenosha over the shooting.

“The way this case turns out has an impact on your ability to collect your $10 million, right?” Chirafisi asked.

Grosskreutz responded, “That is correct.”

“When you were standing 3 to 5 feet from him with your arms up in the air, he never fired, right?” Chirafisi asked Grosskreutz, referring to Rittenhouse.

“Correct,” Grosskreutz responded.

“It wasn’t until you pointed your gun at him, advanced on him, with your gun, now your hands down pointed at him, that he fired, right?” Chirafisi asked.

“Correct,” Grosskreutz said.

Source Article from https://abcnews.go.com/US/kyle-rittenhouse-homicide-trial-key-takeaways-day/story?id=81034238

Image copyright
Chris Jackson/Getty

Image caption

Las nuevas medidas de Facebook para combatir su “crisis de noticias falsas” se apoyan en las denuncias de los usuarios.

Durante todo este año, el tema de las noticias falsas se ha convertido una nube negra que ha ensombrecido de forma intermitente la imagen de Facebook.

Y ha disparado una serie de preguntas sobre la influencia de la red social en la política y su creciente transformación en un medio informativo (no siempre confiable).

De hecho, muchos denunciaron que la difusión de noticias falsas en la red social pudio haber influido en la victoria del republicano Donald Trump en las elecciones presidenciales de Estados Unidos.

La Red Internacional de Chequeo de Datos (IFCN, por sus siglas en inglés), que cuenta con 43 organizaciones en todo el mundo, le escribió una carta abierta al fundador y director ejecutivo de Facebook, Mark Zuckerberg, urgiéndole a que tomara medidas para poner fin a la situación.

Finalmente, Zuckerberg tomó cartas en el asunto ante esta “crisis de noticias falsas”que afecta a su empresa (la de mayor influencia jamás creada, según el periodista tecnológico David Kirkpatrick), la cual ya maneja datos de 1.800 millones de personas en todo el mundo.

Y una parte importante del peso de esta medida recae sobre los propios usuarios de la plataforma.

Image copyright
Reuters

Image caption

Con un simple clic, puedes reportar el contenido que creas que es falso.

¿Y qué puedes hacer tú?

Si ves una noticia que podría ser engañosa o falsa, a partir de ahora podrás reportarlo en Facebook muy fácilmente. Para ello, deberás seguir dos pasos:

PASO 1: Denuncia

Primero, deberás hacer clic en la esquina superior derechade la publicación y elegir la opción “noticia falsa” entre las opciones de denuncia del contenido (la cual Facebook aún está implementando y estará disponible en los próximos días para todos los usuarios):

  • Es molesto o no es interesante
  • Creo que no debería estar en Facebook
  • Es spam
  • Es una noticia falsa

Image copyright
Facebook

Image caption

Elige la cuarta opción: “Es una noticia falsa”.

PASO 2: Actúa

En segundo lugar, tendrás que elegir una acción a tomar para resolver el problema:

  • Marcar la publicación como “noticia falsa”, detallando si crees que es falsa a propósito o si es una noticia engañosa
  • Enviar un mensaje a la persona para que sepa que crees que su publicación es falsa
  • Bloquear a la persona que publicó esa noticia supuestamente falsa

Image copyright
Chris Jackson/Getty

Image caption

Podrás decidir si quieres marcar el contenido como “falso” , enviar un mensaje a la persona que difundió la noticia o bloquearla.

“Creemos en darle voz a la gente y en que no podemos convertirnos nosotros mismos en árbitros de la verdad, así que estamos afrontando este problema con cuidado”, explicó la compañía en un comunicado.

“Es importante para nosotros que las historias que ven en Facebook sean auténticas y significativas. Nos emociona este progreso, pero sabemos que queda mucho por hacer“, explicaron.

Hay quien, sin embargo, señala que este plan basado en la “sabiduría de las masas” tal vez no sea muy buena idea.

“Cuando hay que evaluar la calidad o veracidad de una cuestión, la cosa se pone difícil. Es algo de lo que saben mucho los responsables de la creación de agregadores de noticias como Reddit o Digg“, explican los especialistas del blog tecnológico Xataka.

“Facebook se enfrenta, por tanto, a una tarea titánica”, sostienen, pues sus usuarios “podrán marcar cualquier noticia que aparezca en sus cuentas como falsa”.

Image copyright
Justin Sullivan

Image caption

Zuckerberg dice que seguirá combatiendo el problema.

Sin embargo, el peso de la decisión no recaerá solamente en el juicio de los usuarios.

Una vez que las publicaciones sean denunciadas, Facebook remitirá el contenido a organizaciones de la IFCN -como Chequeado (Argentina), El Deber Data (Bolivia), Factcheck.org (EE.UU.), Ojo Público (Perú) o UY Check (Uruguay)-para verificar si es verdadero o falso (y por qué).

El objetivo final es crear “alertas” o etiquetas para que todos puedan ver el contenido que fue catalogado como “falso”.

Además, la empresa penalizará a las páginas web que distribuyan noticias falsas, retirándoles los incentivos financieros e impidiéndoles usar la plataforma.

“Haremos todo lo posible hasta solucionar el problema por completo”, explicaron.

¿Cómo saber si una noticia es falsa?

  1. Analiza si la fuente es de confianza: pregúntate siempre si la fuente donde ves la noticia es confiable o no
  2. ¿Es demasiado extraño para ser real?: si se parece más a la ficción que a la realidad, probablemente sea lo primero
  3. Comprueba si está disponible en algún sitio de verificación de datos. Por ejemplo, Ecuador Chequea, El Sabueso (México) o Chequeado (Argentina)

Source Article from http://www.bbc.com/mundo/noticias-38366192

In the days after the Jan. 6 insurrection at the Capitol, it appeared Republican leaders had decided to take a stand against Trump, with House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy saying Trump bore “responsibility” and that he must accept blame for the riot.

But GOP members have begun heading back to the former president. On Thursday, McCarthy met with Trump at his Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida, in a meeting that was later described as “very good and cordial.” The readout was released with a photo of the two men smiling.

“I was disappointed over the last few weeks to see what seemed like the Republican Party waking up and then kind of falling asleep again and saying, ‘Well, you know, what matters if we can win in two years and we don’t want to tick off the base,’” Kinzinger said.

“The photo,” he added, “shows that the former president is desperate to continue looking like he’s leading the party.”

Kinzinger has launched a website, Country1st.com, as an effort to refocus the Republican Party’s “conservative principles.”

“I think the Republican Party has lost its moral authority in a lot of areas,” he said. “How many people think that conservative principles are things like build the wall, and you know, charge the Capitol and have an insurrection? That’s what Country1st … is all about — is just going back and saying, ‘Here’s what conservative principles are.'”

The Illinois Republican Party is expected to censure Kinzinger for his vote to impeach the president — what he referred to as “GOP cancel culture.” The same has happened for others like GOP Rep. Tom Rice of South Carolina after his vote to impeach. And last week, Rep. Matt Gaetz, (R-Fla.) went to Wyoming to rally against GOP. Rep. Liz Cheney for her moves against Trump.

“If you look at Matt Gaetz going to Wyoming because, what, a tough woman has an independent view and he doesn’t want to have to go out and explain why he didn’t vote for impeachment, that’s totally GOP cancel culture,” Kinzinger said. “What we’re standing for, and I think what, frankly, a significant part of the base wants, is to say, ‘Look, we can have a diversity of opinion.’”

Outside of the intraparty chaos surrounding the former president’s impeachment, Republicans are also butting heads over the behavior of one of their own.

House Republicans are trying to distance themselves from Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) after hours of Facebook videos surfaced in which she expresses racist, Islamophobic and anti-Semitic views.

Kinzinger said the people have the right to choose their representatives, and that he isn’t sure he supports evicting the congresswoman. But he said he would vote her off committees to “take a stand.”

Source Article from https://www.politico.com/news/2021/01/31/adam-kinzinger-republican-party-464140

Source Article from https://www.cnn.com/2022/02/28/us/sacramento-church-shooting/index.html

Image copyright
AFP

Image caption

Leonardo Boff fue sancionado por el Vaticano en 1985.

El permiso temporal concedido por el papa Francisco para que los sacerdotes perdonen a mujeres que hayan abortado supone “abrir una puerta” que “ya no se cierra” para la iglesia católica, afirmó el teólogo brasileño Leonardo Boff.

Uno de los principales referentes de la Teología de la Liberación, condenado al ostracismo en 1985 por el Vaticano por su libro “Iglesia, carisma y poder”, Boff expresó su entusiasmo con el actual pontífice durante una charla con BBC Mundo.

“El Papa está inaugurando otro tipo de Iglesia, adecuada a la globalización”, dijo el exsacerdote, quien contó que colaboró con la encíclica sobre ecología que Francisco divulgó este año.

Lea: El papa da permiso para perdonar durante el Año Santo a las mujeres que hayan abortado

Lo que sigue es un resumen del diálogo telefónico con este escritor de 76 años, que vive en una zona campestre del estado de Río de Janeiro.

¿Qué opina del permiso temporal que concedió el papa Francisco para que los sacerdotes puedan absolver del “pecado de aborto a quienes lo han practicado y que estén arrepentidos”?

Esta decisión está ligada directamente al concepto fundamental que el Papa tiene del evangelio como misericordia. Dios tiene un amor incondicional y su misericordia no tiene límites. Solamente un cristianismo doctrinario, apologético, yo diría casi machista y sin misericordia, es duro en eso.

Este Papa ha declarado claramente: yo no voy a dirigir la Iglesia por el poder sino por el amor y la misericordia. Esta decisión es absolutamente coherente con su mensaje.

Image copyright
AFP

Image caption

Boff es uno de los principales exponentes de la Teología de la Liberación.

Usted habla de una misericordia sin límites, pero el perdón se podrá conceder sólo durante el Año Santo (entre el 8 de diciembre próximo y el 20 de noviembre de 2016). Visto así no parece un cambio duradero…

Sí, pero esto es abrir una puerta. Y una vez abierta la puerta, ya no se cierra. Significa que él tiene cierta pedagogía, cierto sentido de proceso. No es un proceso que va a retroceder. Empezó ahora y el Año Santo es una ocasión muy oportuna, porque es el año de la misericordia y del perdón de todas las deudas. Se abre una puerta y esta será una actitud pastoral permanente en la Iglesia.

Lea también: Perdón de la Iglesia a las mujeres que abortaron: ¿cambio profundo o retoque estético?

¿Cree que esto anticipa un cambio doctrinario dentro de la Iglesia?

Creo que el Papa no va a discutir las doctrinas. Él dice siempre que la realidad está por encima de las doctrinas. Si la realidad dice que hoy hay muchos divorcios, el concepto de familia está cambiando cada vez más, y para él lo importante es que hay amor. Donde hay amor, sea en el primero o segundo matrimonio, ahí hay algo de Dios.

La Iglesia rechaza por ejemplo que aborte una niña de 10 años violada y embarazada, como ocurrió en Paraguay. ¿Cómo se coloca la realidad sobre las doctrinas ahí?

Creo que el Papa no iba a hacer eso; él iba a entender. El obispo local o la iglesia local pueden hacer eso porque hacen deducciones: no se puede cometer aborto porque importan las personas. Eso es abstracto.

Image copyright
AFP

Image caption

Según Boff, Francisco I está inaugurando un nuevo tipo de iglesia.

La pregunta es cuán reformista es el papa Francisco: algunos creen que está impulsando cambios de fondo y otros que son apenas actos cosméticos de alguien que en definitiva es el guardián de la doctrina católica…

El es guardián de la tradición de Jesús. Porque la doctrina católica es una invención de teólogos. Cada época elabora su teología. Pero hay valores que marcan una ruptura. Es decir: aquí empieza algo nuevo. Y este Papa vive de esa ruptura. No es populista, no es nada. Él vive su profunda convicción como hombre religioso. Ya lo vivía como cardenal en Argentina fuera del palacio, utilizando los medios comunes, el bus y el metro, iba solo a las villas miseria.

El papa también dijo que no era quién para juzgar a una persona gay, pero su Iglesia sigue condenando la práctica homosexual y oponiéndose al matrimonio gay. ¿Cómo ve eso?

El Papa en eso está innovando en la línea de la misericordia y la comprensión. Él dice: hay que hacer una revolución pastoral, el pastor tiene que tener olor de oveja, caminar junto con su pueblo. Y él entiende la condición humana, entonces no tiene nada de rigidez.

Y respecto a los abusos sexuales dentro de la Iglesia, ¿está haciendo todo lo que debe para atacar este problema grave?

Ahí el Papa es implacable, es tolerancia cero. Ese nuncio apostólico de Santo Domingo fue inmediatamente condenado. Un cardenal de Irlanda fue inmediatamente dimitido y enviado a un convento a hacer penitencia. Es rígido porque es pecar contra un inocente, abusar de quien no puede defenderse. Ese crimen tiene que ser juzgado por la justicia civil, y el Papa tiene claro eso. Un crimen no puede ser ocultado como fue en los dos pontificados anteriores.

Image copyright
AFP

Image caption

Muchos en la iglesia católica se oponen tajantemente al aborto.

En marzo hubo una polémica en Chile porque el Vaticano defendió el nombramiento de un obispo acusado de encubrir abusos sexuales. Hay quienes señalan que en los hechos no se ven tantos cambios…

Todos los cambios necesitan procesos, no se hacen de la noche al día. Se hacen con prácticas nuevas y es un proceso pedagógico donde las mentes van madurando. Muchos se quedan atrás y otros que son muy conservadores serán cada vez más aislados.

El Papa está inaugurando otro tipo de Iglesia, adecuada a la globalización. No puede ser una iglesia occidental, porque Occidente es cada vez más un accidente en la historia y la iglesia no puede ser rehén de esa cultura occidental.

¿El Papa consultó sus escritos para preparar la encíclica que lanzó este año sobre ecología?

No es bueno hablar sobre esto. Pero tres veces fui solicitado a enviar materiales mediante el embajador argentino en la Santa Sede. Con gran alegría he constatado que muchas cosas fueron aprovechadas. Pero la encíclica es del Papa, no es mía. Lo nuevo de la encíclica es superar la visión de la ecología como ambientalismo. No es una encíclica verde, es una encíclica de la ecología integral, política, económica, espiritual, no solamente de la relación con la naturaleza. El Papa parte ya del nuevo paradigma.

Image copyright
AFP

Image caption

Boff está entusiasmando con el nuevo Papa.

¿Hay algún cambio con este Papa en la Iglesia respecto a la Teología de la Liberación?

La Teología de la Liberación tiene varias tendencias. En Argentina a raíz de la represión militar y la furia antimarxista no utilizaba ninguna categoria de clase, pero era la teología del pueblo oprimido y la cultura silenciada. Es lo mismo. Y Bergoglio nunca fue contra la Teología de la Liberación. Estuvo siempre del lado de los pobres que son oprimidos, a favor de la justicia social.

Pero usted mismo había criticado a Bergoglio como un exponente de conservadurismo de la Iglesia, alguien que apoyó al régimen militar argentino que cometió crímenes de lesa humanidad. ¿Quién cambió, él o usted?

No hay que olvidar que (en Argentina) la Iglesia católica es la iglesia oficial del Estado, entonces todos los obispos y sacerdotes tenían dificultad en oponerse al régimen. Y Bergoglio sufrió con eso. Pero no se puede decir que él sencillamente ha adherido a eso. Ha salvado a muchísimas personas, como jesuitas que envió a Brasil, Uruguay y otras partes. Pero la Iglesia como sigue hoy todavía es en gran parte conservadora, a excepción de algunos.

En 2005 usted no opinaba eso. Cuando el diario “Página/12” le preguntó sobre la candidatura del cardenal Bergoglio, dijo que debía ser descartada ad limine, porque “un papa no puede haber estado ligado a los militares como lo estuvo él”…

Pero eso es de 2005. Estamos en 2015. Hay 10 años de diferencia. No doy valor a eso. Estaba pensando que en el contexto global era difícil que viniera alguien de América Latina —en Chile era mucho peor, en Brasil menos— donde de alguna manera muchos habían colaborado con regímenes porque eran anticomunistas, por temor al comunismo, etcétera. Pero no era en el sentido de decir que Bergoglio estaba comprometido; pertenecía a una Iglesia que en su conjunto tiene mucho que pedir perdón al pueblo argentino por no haber sido suficientemente profética y denunciadora de los crímenes.

Source Article from http://www.bbc.com/mundo/noticias/2015/09/150901_brasil_iglesia_leonardo_boff_entrevista_gl


La caída de los precios del petróleo ha exacerbado la devaluación del bolívar en el mercado paralelo o negro.

El dólar del mercado negro en Venezuela sobrepasó la barrera de los 400 bolívares por unidad, más de 60 veces el precio de la tasa oficial más baja.

La falta de acceso a divisas dentro del sistema de control de cambios adoptado por el gobierno y la alta demanda para reponer inventarios dentro de la industria nacional son algunos de los factores que dan los economistas como causa del violento ascenso de la cotización en el llamado mercado paralelo.

En todo caso, el presidente Nicolás Maduro afirma que se trata de una “guerra económica” cuyo reflejo más importante es la escasez.

A través del sistema de control cambiario con tres tasas oficiales diferentes, el Estado es el rector oficial del dólar en Venezuela y el único autorizado para otorgar esas divisas.

La tasa oficial más baja de las tres existentes se ubica en 6,3 y es asignada para alimentos básicos y medicinas.

Desde que se implantó el sistema hace 12 años, ha habido un mercado negro de dólares en el país.


El presidente Maduro asegura que el dólar paralelo es un mecanismo de lo que él llama “guerra económica”.

Reservas

Sin embargo, la caída de las reservas internacionales de Venezuela como consecuencia del descenso abrupto de los precios internacionales del petróleo, ha hecho que existan restricciones en el presupuesto nacional, que depende casi exclusivamente de la venta de crudo.

Esto ejerce presiones sobre la demanda de divisas y por consiguiente se dispara el dólar negro.

La página Dolar Today, que según el oficialismo es parte de este plan conspirativo, es el mayor referente del dólar paralelo en el país y basa su tasa en operaciones realizadas en la ciudad colombiana de Cúcuta, en la frontera de Venezuela.

Lea también: En busca del “dólar libre” en Venezuela

Source Article from http://www.bbc.co.uk/mundo/noticias/2015/05/150521_venezuela_dolar_negro_400_ao

En un esfuerzo conjunto entre Policía y el CTI se logró desarticular la banda que tenía su centro de operaciones en la localidad de Fontibón. De las 22 personas capturadas, 13 eran mujeres.

Según el general Humberto Guatibonza, la líder de La saga de los González llevaba 20 años dedicada a negocios relacionados con el tráfico de los estupefacientes.

A través de sus nueve hijos distribuía la droga en parques y vías públicas. La banda tendría nexos directos con narcotraficantes del norte del Valle del Cauca.

Durante los allanamientos se decomisaron varios kilos de marihuana, bazuco, dinero en efectivo y dos armas de fuego, con las cuales realizaban los cobros e intimidaban a otras bandas de microtráfico.  

Source Article from http://www.noticiascaracol.com/colombia/desmantelan-banda-delincuencial-dirigida-por-una-mujer-de-70-anos

Image copyright
Reuters

Image caption

Lisa Murkowski has described the impeachment trial as “rushed”

Republican Senator Lisa Murkowski has said she is “disturbed” by her party’s stance before President Donald Trump’s impeachment trial.

Mr Trump was this month impeached by the Democrat-run House for abuse of power and obstruction of Congress.

He now faces trial in the Republican-dominated Senate, whose members are supposed to remain impartial.

However, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell has pledged “total co-ordination” with the White House.

Mr Trump, the third president in US history to be impeached, is unlikely to be removed from office because of the Republican control of the Senate.

The president has repeatedly described the impeachment proceedings as a “witch-hunt”.

What did Ms Murkowski say?

Ms Murkowski told Alaska’s KTUU news channel that she was uncomfortable with Mr McConnell’s comments about “total co-ordination”.

“When I heard that I was disturbed,” she said.

Media captionWhat does it take to impeach a president?

The senator also said there should be distance between the White House and the Senate over how the trial is conducted. “To me it means that we have to take that step back from being hand in glove with the defence,” she said.

At the same time, she described the impeachment proceedings as “rushed”.

Ms Murkowski, a moderate Republican, has criticised President Trump on a number of policy issues. In October 2018, she opted not to vote to confirm Mr Trump’s nominee for the Supreme Court, after sexual assault allegations.

What about Mr McConnell’s role?

Mr McConnell will play a key role in how the impeachment trial – which is supposed to be impartial – will be conducted.

But he publicly stated last week that he was not “an impartial juror” in the proceedings.

Image copyright
Getty Images

Image caption

Mitch McConnell is confident that President Trump will be acquitted

“This is a political process. There is not anything judicial about it. Impeachment is a political decision,” he said.

And Mr McConnell also said he was confident that Mr Trump would be acquitted in the Republican-led Senate. “We will have a largely partisan outcome,” he said.

Republican and Democratic leaders in the Senate have repeatedly clashed over the rules of the trial.

Democrats want assurances witnesses and documents will be allowed, to enable what they term a fair trial.

Mr McConnell has so far stopped short of agreeing ahead of time to take testimony during the trial.

What is President Trump accused of?

Mr Trump is accused of pressuring Ukraine’s president to start an investigation into his political rival, Democratic presidential front runner, Joe Biden.

Mr Trump is accused of doing this by withholding military aid and making a White House visit contingent on co-operation.

The trial could begin next month, after the holiday break.

Media captionThe story of impeachment by a Christmas choir

Want to find out more?

Source Article from https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-50913932