Most Viewed Videos

Source Article from https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/health/2022/02/09/covid-mask-mandates-cases-vaccinations/6712215001/

Submit your calendar items and notices to…
mlopez@lasvegasoptic.com
_______________

• If you are a non-profit or church and need volunteers on a regular basis, contact the San Miguel County DWI Office at 425-7998.

• The “Si Se Puede” group of Narcotics Anonymous meets at 7:30 p.m. on Tuesday and Thursday nights at 310 Mills Ave. Everyone is welcome. For more information, call the NA helpline: 800-925-4186 or Frances at 575-815-8544.



If you subscribe to the newspaper, you receive FREE access to all the exclusive content of the web site! Simply register to receive uninterrupted access to our award-winning and in-depth local online content!


Renew Current or Past Subscription / Register for Online Subscription

If you currently subscribe or have subscribed in the past to the Las Vegas Optic, then simply find your account number on your mailing label and enter it below.

Click the question mark below to see where your account ID appears on your mailing label.

Newspaper Acct. ID:
Street Address:
(exactly as it appears on the label)

If you are a subscriber and you do not know your account ID or don’t have a copy of your newspaper available that shows the information on the address label you can click continue below to search for your account.

<!–

–>

Special Offer

You have used all your free page views for the month however if you wish to create a FREE limited access account you will be able to view a additional 3 pages per month.

You can also purchase a subscription and have full access to the site. To purchase a subscription simply enter your zipcode below

Las Vegas Optic | circulation@lasvegasoptic.com | 505-425-6796
P.O. Box 2670, 720 University Ave Suite B, Las Vegas, NM 87701
Office Hours are 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday



Source Article from http://www.lasvegasoptic.com/content/noticias-march-10-2017

Source Article from https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/california-gop-rep-duncan-hunter-admits-he-s-taken-photo-n1010596

El movimiento “El Sur es mi País” realizó el sábado un plebiscito informal para consultar a los habitantes de los estados Rio Grande do Sul, Santa Catarina y Paraná, al sur de Brasil, la posibilidad de independizarse del territorio nacional.

Hasta este lunes se habían contabilizado unos 341.566 votos, lo que representa el 85,82 por ciento de las urnas, de los cuales 328.346 apoyaron el “sí” mientras 13.220 eligieron el “no”, según el sitio oficial de Plebisul 2017.

Pese a los resultados obtenidos, el total de votos computarizados fue menor al registrado el año anterior, cuando el número de votantes era más de 600 mil personas. 

Foto: Nodal

 

A los participantes se les preguntó si “¿Quieres que Paraná, Santa Catarina y Rio Grande do Sul formen un país independiente?”.

La votación es de carácter simbólico por lo que no tiene valor legal. Sin embargo, invitaron a los participantes a firmar una propuesta para ser llevada al Congreso y proceder a discutir el tema.

Por su parte, la coordinadora del movimiento, Anidria Rocha, expresó que “el movimiento separatista está creciendo cada vez más y la crisis política y económica de Brasil favorece nuestra posición”.

Consulta anterior

El movimiento realizó una consulta informal en octubre de 2016, donde participaron 616 mil personas y el 95,74 por ciento afirmó estar a favor de que los tres estados se separaran del resto del país. Sin embargo, solo el Congreso de Brasil puede proponer un plebiscito si se trata de asuntos de interés nacional.

Uno de los portavoces del movimiento, Celso Deucher, aseguró que no son un partido político tradicional, sino un movimiento de ciudadanos insatisfechos con las “arbitrariedades” del Gobierno nacional.

>> PT: Vetos de Temer benefician a millonarios en las elecciones

Source Article from https://www.telesurtv.net/news/El-sur-de-Brasil-vota-por-su-independencia-en-consulta-informal-20171009-0056.html

KABUL, Afghanistan (AP) — Grieving families buried their dead Sunday following a horrific bombing at a girls’ school in the Afghan capital that killed 50 people, many of them pupils between 11 and 15 years old.

The number of wounded in Saturday’s attack climbed to more than 100, said Interior Ministry spokesman Tariq Arian. In the western neighborhood of Dasht-e-Barchi, families buried their dead amid angry recriminations at a government they said has failed to protect them from repeated attacks in the mostly Shiite Muslim neighborhood.

“The government reacts after the incident, it doesn’t do anything before the incident,” said Mohammad Baqir, Alizada, 41, who had gathered to bury his niece, Latifa, a Grade 11 student the Syed Al-Shahda school.

Three explosions outside the school entrance struck as students were leaving for the day, said Arian. The blasts targeted Afghanistan’s ethnic Hazaras who dominate the Dasht-e-Barchi neighborhood, where the bombings occurred. Most Hazaras are Shiite Muslims. The Taliban denied responsibility, condemning the attack and the many deaths.

The first explosion came from a vehicle packed with explosives, followed by two others, said Arian, adding that the casualty figures could still rise.

In the capital rattled by relentless bombings, Saturday’s attack was among the worst. Criticism has mounted over lack of security and growing fears of even more violence as the U.S. and NATO complete their final military withdrawal from Afghanistan.

At Vatican City, in his traditional Sunday remarks to faithful in St. Peter’s Square, Pope Francis cited the bombing. “Let us pray for the victims of the terrorist attack in Kabul, an inhumane action that struck so many girls as they were coming out of school.” He said. The pontiff then added: “May God give Afghanistan peace.”

The Dasht-e-Barchi area has been hit by several incidents of violence targeting minority Shiites and most often claimed by the Islamic State affiliate operating in the country. No one has yet claimed Saturday’s bombings.

In this same neighborhood in 2018, a school bombing killed 34 people, mostly students. In September 2018 a wrestling club was attacked killing 24 people and in May 2020 a maternity hospital was brutally attacked killing 24 people, including pregnant women and infants. And in October 2020, the Kawsar-e-Danish tutoring center was attacked, killing 30 people.

Most of the attacks were claimed by the Islamic State affiliate operating in Afghanistan.

The radical Sunni Muslim group has declared war on Afghanistan’s Shiites. Washington blamed IS for a vicious attack last year in a maternity hospital in the same area that killed pregnant women and newborn babies.

Soon after the bombing, angry crowds attacked ambulances and even beat health workers as they tried to evacuate the wounded, Health Ministry spokesman Ghulam Dastigar Nazari said. He had implored residents to cooperate and allow ambulances free access to the site.

Arian, the Interior Ministry spokesman, blamed the attack on the Taliban despite their denials.

Bloodied backpacks and schools books lay strewn outside the Syed Al-Shahda school. In the morning, boys attend classes in the sprawling school compound and in the afternoon, it’s girls’ turn.

On Sunday, Hazara leaders from Dasht-e- Barchi met to express their frustration with the government failure to protect ethnic Hazaras, deciding to cobble together a protection force of their own from among the Hazara community.

The force would be deployed outside schools, mosques and public facilities and would cooperate with government security forces. The intention is to supplement the local forces, said Parliamentarian Ghulam Hussein Naseri.

The meeting participants decided that “there is not any other way, except for people themselves to provide their own security alongside of the security forces,” said Naseri, who added that the government should provide local Hazaras with weapons.

Naseri said Hazaras have been attacked in their schools, in their mosques and “it is their right to be upset. How many more families lose their loved ones? How many more attacks against this minority has to occur in this part of the city before something is done?”

One of the students fleeing the school recalled the attack, the girls’ screams of the girls, the blood.

“I was with my classmate, we were leaving the school, when suddenly an explosion happened, “ said 15-year-old Zahra, whose arm had been broken by a piece of shrapnel.

“Ten minutes later there was another explosion and just a couple of minutes later another explosion,” she said. “Everyone was yelling and there was blood everywhere, and I couldn’t see anything clearly.” Her friend died.

Most of the dozens of injured brought to the EMERGENCY Hospital for war wounded in the Afghan capital, “almost all girls and young women between 12 and 20 years old,” said Marco Puntin, the hospital’s program coordinator in Afghanistan.

In a statement following the attack, the hospital, which has operated in Kabul since 2000, said the first three months of this year have seen a 21 per cent increase in war-wounded.

Even as IS has been degraded in Afghanistan, according to government and US officials, it has stepped-up its attacks particularly against Shiite Muslims and women workers.

The attack comes days after the remaining 2,500 to 3,500 American troops officially began leaving the country. They will be out by Sept. 11 at the latest. The pullout comes amid a resurgent Taliban, who control or hold sway over half of Afghanistan.

The top U.S. military officer said Sunday that Afghan government forces face an uncertain future and possibly some “bad possible outcomes” against Taliban insurgents as the withdrawal accelerates in the coming weeks.

_____

Associated Press photographer Rahmat Gul and video journalist Ahmad Seir in Kabul, Afghanistan and Kathy Gannon in Islamabad, Pakistan and Frances D’Emilio contributed to this report.

Source Article from https://apnews.com/article/afghanistan-girls-school-bombing-fb0c565cc4c9be32ee9612981db400a7

CLOSE

Senator Chuck Schumer lambasted President Donald Trump over his demand that American taxpayers pay for a border wall which has led to a partial government shutdown.
USA TODAY

WASHINGTON – As the partial government shutdown continues, the White House and congressional Republicans awaited a Democratic response to their “counteroffer” in negotiations over President Donald Trump’s demand for $5 billion for a southern border wall.

Acting White House Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney said Sunday that the offer fell between the $1.3 billion for border security that Democrats supported in legislation and the $5 billion for border-wall construction that Trump seeks.

But because the Senate won’t meet to debate until at least Thursday, Mulvaney said the shutdown could continue into the new Congress, which begins Jan. 3.

“I don’t think things are going to move very quickly,” Mulvaney told “Fox News Sunday.”

The White House provided what he called a counteroffer Saturday to Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y. “The ball right now is in their corner,” Mulvaney said.

Spending talks continued amid a weekend of football and basketball games, with little outcry over the shutdown. But Mulvaney said because Monday and Tuesday are federal holidays, “Wednesday is really the first day that this kicks in.”

To keep Grand Canyon National Park open for a week, Arizona Gov. Doug Ducey signed an executive order to provide $64,000 that will keep the park and essential functions such as trash collection, restrooms and ranger services. Tracking of Santa’s sleigh on Christmas eve will continue, according to the North American Aerospace Defense Command. 

Trump postponed his end-of-the-year trip to Florida and most lawmakers have left the capital ahead of the Christmas holiday. He tweeted Sunday morning that a wall would help stop drugs, gangs and criminal elements from entering the country.

“This is what having a president who is nontraditional, who’s a different kind of president looks like,”  Mulvaney said. “He is not going to be an ordinary president, and that’s not what people wanted when they elected him.”  

Sen. Bob Corker, R-Tenn., the outgoing chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee, told CNN’s “State of the Union”  the shutdown was “unnecessary” and “juvenile” because both parties want to work on immigration issues.

Corker noted that Democrats and Republicans supported legislation to provide $25 billion for border security while also dealing with young immigrants who arrived with parents who entered the country illegally. The legislation wasn’t ultimately approved. But in contrast, Corker said the shutdown fight is over much less.

“This is a made-up fight,” Corker said. “This is something that is unnecessary. It’s a spectacle. And, candidly, it’s juvenile.”

The shutdown takes place during an especially chaotic time in the Trump administration, including the resignation Thursday of Defense Secretary Jim Mattis after Trump announced withdrawal of U.S. troops from Syria, a plunging stock market and Trump attacks on Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell.

Schumer had blamed the shutdown on Trump’s “two-week temper tantrum” over border-wall funding and said the Senate has no interest “in swindling American taxpayers for an unnecessary, ineffective and wasteful policy.”

“President Trump, if you want to open the government, you must abandon the wall, plain and simple,” he said.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., said senators would be told when a vote was scheduled and that “negotiations will continue” in the meantime. The Senate next plans to meet Thursday for debate. The House has instructed lawmakers no votes are expected until at least Thursday.

At the White House, Trump  huddled Saturday with his advisers and with a small group of GOP lawmakers to discuss border security but did not include any Democrats in the meeting. Among the Republicans who were invited were members of the hard-line conservative House Freedom Caucus, which has urged Trump not to abandon the fight for border wall funding.

“This is not about the wall for Democrats. It’s not even about immigration for Democrats,” tweeted Rep. Matt Gaetz, R-Florida, who was invited to the meeting. “This is about denying (Trump) a win on a signature agenda item that he promised the American people.”

The latest shutdown is the third one this year – and the third of Trump’s presidency – and was triggered just after midnight Friday when the budget standoff caused funding to lapse for nine federal departments and several smaller agencies. A quarter of the government shut down, and some 800,000 government employees were forced to go on furlough or work without pay.

Agencies impacted include the FBI, the Bureau of Prisons, Customs and Border Patrol and the IRS, as well as national parks and forests. In all, the nine departments affected are Agriculture, Commerce, Justice, Homeland Security, Interior, State, Transportation, Treasury and Housing and Urban Development.

The White House said federal employees in those departments would be paid for days worked before the shutdown began. The pay period ended on Saturday, and those checks will go out on Dec. 28. Employees deemed “essential” and forced to work during the shutdown will be paid once federal funds start flowing again, the Trump administration said, although that would require congressional action.

Meanwhile, behind-the-scenes negotiations continue – primarily at the staff level – in an attempt to break the funding impasse and end the shutdown. The House has passed a bill that includes $5.7 billion in funding for border security, including a wall. But the proposal is stalled in the Senate and cannot pass without the support of Democrats.

On Saturday, Trump tweeted a border wall is needed to keep the country safe.

More: The government shutdown is here. How does it affect you?

More: A look at what public services will – and won’t – be interrupted during the government shutdown

More: Will NORAD’s Santa Tracker still monitor St. Nick’s journey even if there’s a government shutdown?

More: Government shutdown: History suggests stock market can weather storm

 

Source Article from https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2018/12/24/white-house-awaits-democratic-reply-counteroffer-during-shutdown/2402106002/

p,h3,h4,.grey-bg{clear:both}#article-body article>h3:not([class]){text-align:center;font-family:’PostoniWide’,’Bodoni 72′,’Bodoni MT’,Didot,’Didot LT STD’,’Hoefler Text’,Garamond,Georgia,serif;font-size:2.25em;margin-top:0;padding-top:2em;margin-bottom:0}#article-body article>h4:not([class]){font-weight:normal;color:#737373;text-align:center;margin-bottom:2em;border-bottom:1px solid #EEE}p.message{position:relative;width:100%;max-width:55% !important;padding:20px 20px;border-radius:25px;background:#efefef;font-family:’FranklinPro’,’FranklinITCProLight’,’Franklin Gothic Medium’,’Franklin Gothic’,’ITC Franklin Gothic’,’Apple SD Gothic Neo’,’Myriad Set Pro’,’Helvetica Neue’,’Helvetica Neue Light’,Helvetica,Arial,’Lucida Grande’,sans-serif !important;line-height:1.3em !important;overflow-wrap:break-word;font-weight:200}@media (max-width:724px){p.message{max-width:280px !important}}.message-left{float:left}.message-right{float:right}.message b,.message i{margin-left:60px;line-height:1.2em}.message b::before{width:50px;height:50px;content:” “;position:absolute;top:12px;left:20px}.message-yermak b::before{background-image:url(https://wp-stat.s3.amazonaws.com/graphics/ai2html/whoswho/EYVG5PGMFNDOTACTRIRMEGFQ34/CIRCLE-HEADS/yermak.png)}.message-volker b::before{background-image:url(https://wp-stat.s3.amazonaws.com/graphics/ai2html/whoswho/EYVG5PGMFNDOTACTRIRMEGFQ34/CIRCLE-HEADS/volker.png)}.message-sondland b::before{background-image:url(https://wp-stat.s3.amazonaws.com/graphics/ai2html/whoswho/EYVG5PGMFNDOTACTRIRMEGFQ34/CIRCLE-HEADS/sondland.png)}.message-taylor b::before{background-image:url(https://wp-stat.s3.amazonaws.com/graphics/ai2html/whoswho/EYVG5PGMFNDOTACTRIRMEGFQ34/CIRCLE-HEADS/taylor.png)}.message-giuliani b::before{background-image:url(https://wp-stat.s3.amazonaws.com/graphics/ai2html/whoswho/EYVG5PGMFNDOTACTRIRMEGFQ34/CIRCLE-HEADS/giuliani.png)}p.message-timeless b{margin-bottom:28px}.message b{display:block;margin-top:8px}.message i{display:block;color:#737373;font-size:0.85em;font-style:normal;margin-bottom:14px}.message::before{content:” “;display:table;clear:both}.message::after{content:” “;display:table;clear:both}@media (max-width:600px){#article-body article>h3:not([class]){font-size:1.3em;text-align:left}#article-body article>h4:not([class]){text-align:left}}@media only screen and (max-width:750px){#article-topper{padding-left:0}}@media (max-width:480px){#article-topper{padding-left:0;text-align:left}}]]>

A new cache of text messages released late Thursday reveals that top U.S. diplomats believed President Trump would not meet with Ukraine’s president unless the country launched investigations into Trump’s political enemies. Over several weeks, they coordinated with a top aide to new leader Volodymyr Zelensky and with Trump’s personal lawyer Rudolph W. Giuliani to try to accomplish both, the texts show.

Ukraine

Trump circle

Andrey Yermak

Rudolph W.

Giuliani

Aide to Ukrainian

President Volodymyr

Zelensky

President Trump’s

personal attorney

U.S. diplomats

Kurt Volker

Gordon

Sondland

Former U.S. Special

Envoy for Ukraine

U.S. Ambassador

to the European

Union

William “Bill”

Taylor

Charges d’Affaires

at the U.S. embassy

in Ukraine

Ukraine

Trump circle

Andrey Yermak

Rudolph W.

Giuliani

Aide to Ukrainian

President Volodymyr

Zelensky

President Trump’s

personal attorney

U.S. diplomats

Kurt Volker

Gordon

Sondland

William “Bill”

Taylor

Former U.S. Special

Envoy for Ukraine

U.S. Ambassador

to the European

Union

Charges d’Affaires

at the U.S. embassy

in Ukraine

Ukraine

U.S. diplomats

Trump circle

Kurt Volker

Gordon

Sondland

William “Bill”

Taylor

Rudolph W.

Giuliani

Andrey Yermak

Aide to Ukrainian

President Volodymyr

Zelensky

Former U.S. Special

Envoy for Ukraine

U.S. Ambassador

to the European

Union

Charges d’Affaires

at the U.S. embassy

in Ukraine

President Trump’s

personal attorney

The excerpts were provided by Kurt Volker, the special envoy to Ukraine until his resignation last week. They were released by House Democratic investigators following Volker’s 10-hour deposition on Thursday as part of the fast-moving impeachment inquiry into Trump. Among those involved were Volker, U.S. ambassador to the European Union Gordon Sondland, and William “Bill” Taylor, the U.S. Charges D’affaires in Ukraine. They show that Volker connected Andrey Yermak, the aide to Zelensky, and Giuliani, Trump’s personal lawyer.

Rep. Adam B. Schiff (D-Calif.), the House Intelligence Committee chairman leading the investigation, and Rep. Eliot Engel (D-N.Y.), said in a letter that the texts released were “only a subset” of all the messages. Read the messages released below.

Volker introduces Giuliani to Yermak

July 19, 2019

Kurt Volker 4:48 p.m. Mr Mayor — really enjoyed breakfast this morning. As discussed, connecting you here with Andrey Yermak, who is very close to President Zelensky. I suggest we schedule a call together on Monday — maybe 10am or 11am Washington time? Kurt

“Mr. Mayor” in this exchange refers to President Trump’s personal lawyer, former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani. At this point, Giuliani had already been pushing the idea that Ukraine should pursue specific investigations for months. His efforts included multiple meetings with two of the country’s prosecutors general, according to media reports and the whistleblower complaint.

Giuliani has pointed to such text messages as indicating the State Department was aware of and even supported his efforts in Ukraine.

Officials discuss goals for the Trump-Zelensky call

July 19, 2019

Kurt Volker 4:49 p.m. Can we three do a call tomorrow-say noon WASHINGTON?

Gordon Sondland 6:50 p.m. Looks like Potus call tomorrow. I spike [sic] directly to Zelensky and gave him a full briefing. He’s got it.

Gordon Sondland 6:52 p.m. Sure!

Kurt Volker 7:01 p.m. Good. Had breakfast with Rudy this morning-teeing up call w Yermak Monday. Must have helped. Most impt is for Zelensky to say that he will help investigation-and address any specific personnel issues-if there are any

These texts provide the earliest known example of the participants suggesting Zelensky will need to promise Trump something – without raising the other side of a potential quid pro quo, though. Sondland suggests he has briefed Zelensky on what to expect on his upcoming call with Trump. In response, Volker refers to the specific idea that Zelensky should tell Trump that “he will help investigation.”

Concerns about Ukraine becoming an ‘instrument’

July 21, 2019

Bill Taylor 1:45 a.m. Gordon, one thing Kurt and I talked about yesterday was Sasha Danyliuk’s point that President Zelenskyy is sensitive about Ukraine being taken seriously, not merely as an instrument in Washington domestic, reelection politics.

Gordon Sondland 4:45 a.m. Absolutely, but we need to get the conversation started and the relationship built, irrespective of the pretext. I am worried about the alternative.

Here comes the first indication that this was understood as relating to Trump’s political prospects. “Sasha Danyliuk” appears to refer to Oleksandr Danylyuk, Ukraine’s former finance minister who recently resigned as Zelensky’s secretary of the national security and defence council. Per Taylor, he said Zelensky was wary of it looking like the United States dictated its business to Ukraine. Sondland, interestingly, responds by referring to the “pretext” of the two countries’ conversation and relationship. It’s not clear to what he is referring.

Officials plan Trump and Zelensky’s July 25 call

July 22, 2019

Kurt Volker 4:27 p.m. Orchestrated a great phone call w Rudy and Yermak. They are going to get together when Rudy goes to Madrid in a couple of weeks.

Kurt Volker 4:28 p.m. In the meantime Rudy is now advocating for phone call.

Kurt Volker 4:28 p.m. I have call into Fiona’s replacement and will call Bolton if needed.

Kurt Volker 4:28 p.m. But I can tell Bolton and you can tell Mick that Rudy agrees on a call if that helps.

Gordon Sondland 4:30 p.m. I talked to Tim Morrison Fiona’s replacement. He is pushing but feel free as well.

Volker sends along word that Giuliani is approving of Trump speaking with Zelensky by phone, and the two of them talk about how they will set it up. (“Fiona” refers to Fiona Hill, a former top Russia adviser in the White House. “Bolton” refers to then-national security adviser John Bolton. “Mick” refers to acting White House chief of staff Mick Mulvaney.)

Volker and Yermak discuss the call before and after

July 25, 2019

Kurt Volker 8:36 a.m. Good lunch – thanks. Heard from White House-assuming President Z convinces trump he will investigate / “get to the bottom of what happened” in 2016, we will nail down date for visit to Washington. Good luck! See you tomorrow- kurt

Andrey Yermak 10:15 a.m. Phone call went well. President Trump proposed to choose any convenient dates. President Zelenskiy chose 20,21,22 September for the White House Visit. Thank you again for your help! Please remind Mr. Mayor to share the Madrid’s dates

Kurt Volker 10:16 a.m. Great-thanks and will do!

Here’s the big one. For the first time that we know of, a U.S. official ties Zelensky’s investigative promise to getting a White House visit – a potential quid pro quo. Volker, importantly, also indicates this was a message conveyed from the White House. And this came before the Trump-Zelensky call, so this was more coaching from U.S. diplomats of what Zelensky was supposed to say.

Yermak responds after the call and floats a few dates. These dates have now passed, though, and the trip has still not been planned.

U.S. officials advise Ukrainians on investigation language

Aug. 9, 2019

Gordon Sondland 5:35 p.m. Morrison ready to get dates as soon as Yermak confirms.

Kurt Volker 5:46 p.m. Excellent!! How did you sway him? 🙂

Gordon Sondland 5:47 p.m. Not sure i did. I think potus really wants the deliverable

Kurt Volker 5:48 p.m. But does he know that?

Gordon Sondland 5:48 p.m. Yep

Gordon Sondland 5:48 p.m. Clearly lots of convos going on

Kurt Volker 5:48 p.m. Ok—then that’s good it’s coming from two separate sources

Gordon Sondland 5:51 p.m. To avoid misundestandings [sic], might be helpful to ask Andrey for a draft statememt [sic] (embargoed) so that we can see exactly what they propose to cover. Even though Ze does a live presser they can still summarize in a brief statement. Thoughts?

Kurt Volker 5:51 p.m. Agree!

Here, Volker and Sondland plot out a potential statement Ukraine might make, in addition to a live press conference where Zelensky (they’ve apparently been led to believe) would make an announcement. Sondland also refers to a “deliverable” – apparently a reference to the end result of Ukraine actually announcing the investigations – and suggests Trump is anxious to get it.

Giuliani’s input sought on Ukraine statement

Aug. 9, 2019

Kurt Volker 11:27 a.m. Hi Mr Mayor! Had a good chat with Yermak last night. He was pleased with your phone call. Mentioned Z making a statement. Can we all get on the phone to make sure I advise Z correctly as to what he should be saying? Want to make sure we get this done right. Thanks!

Gordon Sondland Good idea Kurt. I am on Pacific time.

Rudy Giuliani Yes can you call now going to Fundraiser at 12:30

Volker loops Giuliani in on what the Ukraine statement might say. Again, Giuliani has suggested this meant the State Department was on-board with his efforts.

Yermak seeks date for White House visit

Aug. 10, 2019

Andrey Yermak 4:56 p.m. Hi Kurt. Please let me know when you can talk. I think it’s possible to make this declaration and mention all these things. Which we discussed yesterday. But it will be logic to do after we receive a confirmation of date. We inform about date of visit and about our expectations and our guarantees for future visit. Let discuss it

Kurt Volker 5:01 p.m. Ok! It’s late for you—why don’t we talk in my morning, your afternoon tomorrow? Say 10am/5pm?

Kurt Volker 5:02 p.m. I agree with your approach. Let’s iron out statement and use that to get date and then Prez can go forward with it?

Andrey Yermak 5:26 p.m. Ok

Kurt Volker 5:38 p.m. Great. Gordon is available to join as well

Andrey Yermak 5:41 p.m. Excellent

Andrey Yermak 5:42 p.m. Once we have a date, will call for a press briefing, announcing upcoming visit and outlining vision for the reboot of US­-UKRAINE relationship, including among other things Burisma and election meddling in investigations

Kurt Volker 5:42 p.m. Sounds great!

Yermak has apparently been given a list of things that should be included in the statement. But – and this is the key – he wants to get a date for a White House visit before Ukraine makes the commitments. This, again, suggests that the meeting was used as leverage. Volker proposes that they could finalize the statement and then use that to convince Trump to schedule the meeting.

Also important here is that Yermak refers explicitly to the investigations into the origins of the Russia investigation and the Bidens (Burisma).

Desire for specific references in Ukrainian statement

Aug. 13, 2019

Kurt Volker 10:26 a.m. Special attention should be paid to the problem of interference in the political processes of the United States especially with the alleged involvement of some Ukrainian politicians. I want to declare that this is unacceptable. We intend to initiate and complete a transparent and unbiased investigation of all available facts and episodes, including those involving Burisma and the 2016 U.S. elections, which in tum will prevent the recurrence of this problem in the future.

Gordon Sondland 10:27 a.m. Perfect. Lets send to Andrey after our call

They appear to be reviewing language intended for Ukraine’s statement.

Aug. 17, 2019

Gordon Sondland 3:06 p.m. Do we still want Ze to give us an unequivocal draft with 2016 and Boresma?

Kurt Volker 4:34 p.m. That’s the clear message so far …

Kurt Volker 4:34 p.m. I’m hoping we can put something out there that causes him to respond with that

Gordon Sondland 4:41 p.m. Unless you think otherwise I will return Andreys call tomorrow and suggest they send us a clean draft.

Volker suggests someone is giving a “clear message” that the Ukraine statement should be specific about the two investigations. It’s not clear who that message is coming from.

Yermak shares report of U.S. withholding assistance

Aug. 29, 2019

Andrey Yermak 2:28 a.m. Need to talk with you

Andrey Yermak 3:06 a.m. https://www.politico.corn/story/2019/08/28/trump-ukraine-military-aid-russia-1689531

Kurt Volker 6:55 a.m. Hi Andrey — absolutely. When is good for you?

The link here is to a Politico story about the Trump administration deciding to withhold $250 million in military aid to Ukraine. Reporting has suggested Ukraine might not have known it was being withheld, though Yermak doesn’t specifically indicate that this is the first time they are finding out about it.

U.S officials discuss Trump’s trip, withholding military assistance for Ukraine

Aug. 30, 2019

Bill Taylor 12:14 a.m. Trip canceled

Kurt Volker 12:16 a.m. Hope VPOTUS keeps the bilat — and tees up WH visit…

Kurt Volker 12:16 a.m. And hope Gordon and Perry still going …

Gordon Sondland 5:31 a.m. I am going. Pompeo is speaking to Potus today to see if he can go.

“The bilat” refers to Vice President Pence’s visit to Poland, where he would meet Zelensky.

Sept. 1, 2019

Bill Taylor 12:08 p.m. Are we now saying that security assistance and WH meeting are conditioned on investigations?

Gordon Sondland 12:42 p.m. Call me

For the first time, one of the diplomats suggests the military aid — separate from the meeting — is being withheld as leverage. It’s not clear why Taylor believes that. It could simply be that he saw the newspaper stories like the one Yermak shared.

Sondland’s response – “Call me” – suggests he knows they shouldn’t discuss things in a written form which could wind up in inquiries like this.

Sept. 8, 2019

Gordon Sondland 11:20 a.m. Guys multiple convos with Ze, Potus. Lets talk

Bill Taylor 11:21 a.m. Now is fine with me

Kurt Volker 11:26 a.m. Try again—could not hear

Bill Taylor 11:40 a.m. Gordon and I just spoke. I can brief you if you and Gordon don’t connect

Bill Taylor 12:37 p.m. The nightmare is they give the interview and don’t get the security assistance. The Russians love it. (And I quit.)

The three of them seem to try to salvage the situation. Taylor against suggests exasperation.

Sept. 9, 2019

Bill Taylor 12:31 a.m. The message to the Ukrainians (and Russians) we send with the decision on security assistance is key. With the hold, we have already shaken their faith in us. Thus my nightmare scenario.

Bill Taylor 12:34 a.m. Counting on you to be right about this interview, Gordon.

Gordon Sondland 12:37 a.m. Bill, I never said I was “right”. I said we are where we are and believe we have identified the best pathway forward. Lets hope it works.

Bill Taylor 12:47 a.m. As I said on the phone, I think it’s crazy to withhold security assistance for help with a political campaign.

Gordon Sondland 5:19 a.m. Bill, I believe you are incorrect about President Trump’s intentions. The President has been crystal clear no quid pro quo’s of any kind. The President is trying to evaluate whether Ukraine is truly going to adopt the transparency and reforms that President Zelensky promised during his campaign I suggest we stop the back and forth by text If you still have concerns I recommend you give Lisa Kenna or S a call to discuss them directly. Thanks.

Another big moment: Taylor repeats his concern that military aid is being withheld for bad reasons – this time suggesting it’s “for help with a political campaign.” Sondland again suggests they talk about it rather than text, and delivers a lengthy defense of Trump that again suggests he’s mindful of who might see these texts one day.

This conversation, notably, came eight days after Taylor first raised this prospect, and he apparently hadn’t been disavowed of it during that time period.

Ann Gerhart contributed to this report.

Read more:

What’s next in the Trump impeachment inquiry, and will Trump cooperate with it?

Three deeply problematic aspects of newly released text messages centered on the Ukraine scandal

Live updates: Trump says the Democratic-led House has the votes to impeach him

Source Article from https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2019/10/04/read-text-message-excerpts-between-us-diplomats-giuliani-ukrainian-aide/

President Donald Trump has mused about closing down the US-Mexico border entirely. He’s reportedly talked about restarting the family separation policy (which he denies). And now, Trump has added another line to his stop-immigration-at-all-costs rhetoric.

The president is saddened by the fact that the military can’t be more “rough” with migrants coming to America.

After telling reporters in Texas on Wednesday that he wants more troops at the US-Mexico border, the president added, “our military, don’t forget, can’t act like a military would act. Because if they got a little rough, everybody would go crazy.”

The reason? “They have all these horrible laws that the Democrats won’t change [and] they will not change them,” the president said, without explaining what laws he means, or how his political opponents thwarted him.

It’s easy to dismiss this as another off-the-cuff, tough-guy Trump comment. But one can’t lose sight that this is the commander in chief — the head of all American forces — saying he kind of wishes the military could have more freedom to hurt men, women, and children.

That, to put it mildly, is horrifying.

The military can’t do what Trump wishes it could. That’s a good thing.

It’s unclear what laws the president was referencing when he spoke to reporters, but we do know that there are laws in place to ensure a president doesn’t use the US troops the way Trump clearly wants to.

Here’s the big one: The US military is barred from using its capabilities directly to enforce US domestic laws — including immigration laws — unless Congress specifically authorizes it to do so. This stipulation, known as “posse comitatus,” is why US troops can only support US border agents, but not take direct action themselves.

When Trump sent 5,000 troops to the border last year, Gen. Terrence O’Shaughnessy, the head of military command overseeing North American operations, said the military will conduct all of its operations at the border “in adherence to posse comitatus.”

The reason this law exists, and the military follows it, is simple: The president shouldn’t use the military for his own personal reasons to “execute the law” at home.

The military is mainly designed to fight foreign adversaries — and unarmed families looking for a better life in the US don’t come close to counting as enemies. This is why military leaders are typically clear about how they would disobey an illegal order, even if it comes from the president.

And, of course, you don’t want a military that’s wiling to do just anything the president asks, otherwise it becomes his own personal, heavily armed, well-trained police force. That’s about as undemocratic and un-freedom-y as it gets.

After I sent the full Trump quote to the Pentagon, a spokesperson simply wrote back: “Border security is a critical element of our national security. DOD is committed to supporting CBP’s border security mission with the right capabilities at the right locations.”

That’s promising. Still, that doesn’t take away Trump’s own comments which were wrongheaded, cruel — and downright scary.

Source Article from https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2019/4/10/18305175/trump-border-immigration-military-texas

New York City mayoral candidate Eric Adams’ complaint about possible irregularities in the 2021 Democratic primary drew outrage from some prominent liberal writers, but the city’s beleaguered Board of Elections acknowledged a huge disparity in the count Tuesday.

The Brooklyn Borough president and former police chief currently holds a lead in the ranked choice primary, where voters ranked their top five preferred candidates rather than just choosing one, but Adams said the vote total on Tuesday was 100,000 more than the total counted on election night. The NYC Board of Elections acknowledged a “discrepancy” in Tuesday’s ranked choice voting count, revealing it counted “both test and election night results, producing approximately 135,000 additional records” and would have to re-tabulate the results.

ERIC ADAMS RAISES QUESTIONS ABOUT LATEST NYC MAYORAL RESULTS, ELECTIONS BOARD ACKNOWLEDGES ‘DISCREPANCY’

But before Adams’ concerns were validated, left-wing writers attacked him as no better than former President Donald Trump claiming the 2020 election was rigged against him. Their outlets also notably did not push back and even promoted Georgia Democrat Stacey Abrams’ claims that her 2018 gubernatorial defeat was rigged by Republican opponent Brian Kemp. 

Vox writer Ian Millhiser called Adams’ statement “some Donald Trump s–t.”

MSNBC’s Chris Hayes reacted to the situation, “Something to consider is that the corrosive Big Lie conspiracy-theorizing and delegitimization of elections that Trump and the GOP have unleashed, won’t necessarily just stay contained to them.”

Like many of his MSNBC colleagues, Hayes was receptive to Abrams’ repeated argument that she lost a rigged election to Kemp. On Hayes’ podcast in 2020, she told him, “I can’t prove I would have won, but it’s a pretty solid thing that I would have been the governor of Georgia” if voter suppression, in her view, hadn’t taken place.

NYC MAYORAL PRIMMARY LEADER ADAMS CALLS HIMSELF ‘FACE OF THE NEW DEMOCRATIC PARTY’

“It was a 50,000-vote margin,” Hayes said sympathetically.

Hayes went onto criticize the Board of Elections on Tuesday as news of the number discrepancy broke.

Another liberal writer, Jeet Heer, wrote sarcastically, “Big shout out to the pundits who celebrated Adams as a “‘normie’ and the sensible centrist” in response to Adams’ statement.

“Everyone’s ‘Eric Adams is like Trump’ tweets could use an edit function right now,” writer Anthony Fisher tweeted Tuesday night.

Under New York City’s new ranked-choice voting system, voters can choose their top five candidates in order. If no candidate receives a majority of votes in the first round, election officials knock off the candidate with the least amount of first-choice votes and count the second-choice option on the ballots that ranked the losing candidate highest. 

It won’t be known until July at the earliest who won the Democratic primary. The winner will be the favorite to win the general election this fall to succeed term-limited Bill de Blasio, D.

The fiasco is not only frustrating the candidates and New York City voters who want to know who the Democratic nominee will be, but also CNN.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

The liberal outlet fretted Wednesday that “in flubbing the exercise, the board also risked handing additional fodder to right-wingers in states and municipalities across the country, who might now seek to parlay the error into momentum for suppressive new voting laws.”

Fox News’ Morgan Phillips contributed to this report.

Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/media/liberal-writers-eric-adams-new

Michael Cohen, eager masochist and former gofer to President Trump, couldn’t go to prison without one last act of self-humiliation.

Everything ever written about Cohen paints a cautionary tale for young boys. Now, son, here’s a man you don’t want to become. Whether he’s confessing his unrequited love for his boss (“I’m the guy who would take a bullet for the president”) or taking “responsibility” for his years of bank fraud and his taxi medallion scheme (he also neglected to claim income from the sale of a luxury purse), there is no redeeming quality to Cohen’s public life.

And yet he insists on making it public, like some weird, degrading kink.

Before going away to federal prison for three years, Cohen had yet another embarrassment to bring on himself.

“I hope that when I rejoin my family and friends that the country will be in a place without xenophobia, injustice, and lies at the helm of our country,” he read from prepared remarks, no doubt feeling his heart pound with adrenaline. “There still remains much to be told and I look forward to the day that I can share the truth.”

The day that he could “share the truth” was apparently not any of the days since Nov. 29, 2018, the day he pleaded guilty to a litany of charges. “Much to be told” was apparently too much for his two days of congressional testimony in February.

Cohen is apparently under the impression that the public is desperate to hear more from the guy who once dreamed like a child of being mayor of New York. We’ll all certainly be on the edge of our seats for three years to hear once again from the guy who stupidly pleaded guilty to a ridiculous campaign finance violation — in addition to tax evasion, bank fraud, and lying to Congress.

It’s as if Cohen googled “media expert,” clicked on the first result and then paid $1,000 for advice on what to say before going to prison. The result was his condemnation of Trump’s “xenophobia, injustice, and lies.”

How very novel. We haven’t heard any of that before on CNN, MSNBC, the New York Times, the Washington Post, Time magazine, the Associated Press, ABC, CBS …

Go away, Michael Cohen. There are, I’m guessing, equally exhilarating ways to embarrass yourself in prison.

Source Article from https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/michael-cohen-has-one-last-self-embarrassment-before-three-year-prison-sentence

Los Angeles County will likely stop requiring people to mask up at most indoor settings on Friday, the county’s health director announced.

The county is currently categorized as having high COVID-19 risk by the CDC, but it’s expected to move to the low risk category on Thursday, L.A. County Health Director Barbara Ferrer told county supervisors Tuesday.

If that happens, the county will modify its health officer order to strongly recommend — but no longer require — masks for both vaccinated and unvaccinated people in most indoor places starting Friday, Ferrer announced.

“We are pretty clear that by this Thursday, when CDC updates their community levels table, we will have moved either to medium or low risk,” Ferrer said.

The change would align L.A. County with California state rules, which on Tuesday stopped mandating indoor masking for unvaccinated people.

Mirroring the state, L.A. County will still be requiring masks — regardless of vaccination status — for everyone on public transit, at emergency shelters, health care settings, correctional detention facilities, homeless shelters and long term care facilities.

Masks will still be required indoors at schools until March 11, when both the county and state plan to drop the requirement.

Ferrer also announced that COVID-19 vaccine verification at outdoor “mega” events like at Dodger Stadium or the Hollywood Bowl and indoor areas of bars, nightclubs and lounges will go from being required to just strongly recommended, Ferrer said.

Vaccination verification will, however, still be required at indoor mega events, and at health care and congregate care settings.

The change would come just a week after L.A. County modified its health officer order to allow businesses and venues verifying everyone’s vaccination status and checking COVID-19 test results to make masking optional for fully vaccinated people only.

The update expected Friday would relax masking rules even further.

L.A. County would also be dropping its mask mandate earlier than anticipated.

The county had originally planned on lifting the mandate when the county hits the “moderate” transmission level on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s old framework for seven consecutive days — a milestone the county was expected to hit in mid-March.

But last week, the CDC announced it is shifting to a new system that depends on both coronavirus case numbers and on hospital admissions, easing mask requirements for much of the country.

L.A. County brought back its indoor mask mandate in July 2021, because of an increase in coronavirus case numbers and concerns over the delta variant.

The mandate had remained in place since, spanning two different surges fueled by different variants, delta and omicron.

 L.A. County in recent weeks has seen case numbers decline steadily after the latest winter surge sent infection numbers skyrocketing to record highs.

Still, many in the county remain unvaccinated and the region still contends with disparities in case rates tied to race and poverty levels.

Though the county is expected to soon loosen its requirements, Ferrer urged residents to voluntarily keep masking up indoors.

“Masks are one of the easiest things we can do to prevent COVID-19 transmission and provide strong protection to the person wearing as well as to the people around them,” she said.

Source Article from https://ktla.com/news/local-news/l-a-county-expected-to-stop-requiring-unvaccinated-to-mask-up-indoors-friday/

Russia is intentionally targeting Ukrainian civilians in its attack on the country, the US President alleged Wednesday, adding to mounting Western warnings of Moscow’s brutality as the human toll of the seven-day war creeps higher.

Despite the accusation, President Joe Biden stopped short of formally saying Moscow is committing war crimes, though his envoy to the United Nations accused Russia of preparing to use banned weapons, including “cluster munitions and vacuum bombs,” in Ukraine. And she issued a stark warning to invading Russian soldiers.

“Your leaders are lying to you. Do not commit war crimes,” US Ambassador to the UN Linda Thomas-Greenfield said during remarks to an emergency session of the General Assembly.

“Do everything you can to put down your weapons and leave Ukraine,” she implored.

Her warnings reflected the growing fear among Western officials that Russian President Vladimir Putin could be employing brutal new tactics in his war after failing to advance as quickly as expected during the invasion’s earliest days.

Russia’s bombing of civilian targets has intensified in the past days, sending death counts higher and leading to new fears for the capital Kyiv.

Ukraine’s State Emergency Service said Wednesday more than 2,000 Ukrainian civilians have so far been killed amid Russia’s ongoing invasion, though United Nations estimates have put that number much lower. The agency said some transport infrastructures, houses, hospitals and kindergartens have been “destroyed” by Russian forces over the last seven days.

Biden said it was evident civilians were being targeted by Russia.

“It’s clear they are,” he said, echoing an accusation made earlier by British Prime Minister Boris Johnson that Putin’s forces are dropping munitions on innocent people.

Unlike Johnson, however, Biden stopped short of labeling Russia’s actions a war crime.

“We are following it very closely,” Biden said. “It’s too early to say that.”

Inside the General Assembly hall at the United Nations, Thomas-Greenfield warned Russia is “preparing to increase the brutality of its campaign,” citing videos showing Russian forces moving “exceptionally lethal weaponry into Ukraine.”

Her references to cluster munitions and vacuum bombs are the first US acknowledgment of those weapons being moved into the country. country. They are banned under the Geneva Convention for their destructive capacity.

A Russian thermobaric multiple rockets launcher was spotted by a CNN team south of Belgorod, Russia, near the Ukrainian border early Saturday afternoon.

These types of weapons do not use conventional ammunition. Instead, they are filled with high-temperature, high-pressure explosive. They are sometimes called “vacuum bombs” because they suck in the oxygen from the surrounding air to generate a powerful explosion and a large pressure wave that can have enormous destructive effects.

Biden was speaking a day after delivering a harsh condemnation of Putin during his annual State of the Union address. He generated bipartisan applause for his denunciation of the Russian invasion and the united response from the West in imposing punishing economic sanctions.

On Wednesday, Biden reiterated that sanctioning Russian oil exports remained a possibility, though officials have cautioned they will work to minimize the impact of such a move on US and global oil prices.

“Nothing is off the table,” Biden said when specifically pressed on banning Russian oil exports.

White House press secretary Jen Psaki told CNN earlier the administration would strongly weigh the possibility of significant disruption to US and global oil markets when making a decision.

Ukrainian President Volodomyr Zelensky, who has remained in the capital Kyiv as it comes under fire, has called on the US and other Western nations to step up their sanctions packages. He has also asked for the US and other nations to enforce a no-fly zone over Ukraine, a prospect that’s been rejected by the US.

Operating from a bunker, Zelensky has repeatedly said he plans to remain in the country, even as he describes himself as Russia’s top target during the invasion. The US has said previously it is providing a broad range of support for Zelensky, though hasn’t detailed what measures it’s taking to protect him.

Biden said Wednesday it is up to Zelensky whether he wants to remain in his country as it comes under siege by Russia.

“I think it’s his judgment to make and we’re doing everything we can to help him,” Biden said.

CNN has reported previously that the US has discussed contingency plans with Zelensky about leaving Ukraine or relocating to Lviv. Zelensky has stated repeatedly he wants to stay in the capital.

Biden and Zelensky spoke for 30 minutes on Tuesday.

Source Article from https://www.cnn.com/2022/03/02/politics/biden-ukraine/index.html

CHICAGO (WLS) — Two Chicago police officers were shot Sunday morning in Lawndale on the West Side.

The shooting happened about 7:30 a.m. in the 1500 block of South Lawndale Avenue, Chicago police said.

A man fired shots at the two officers who approached him, according to Chicago police.

The officers were transported to Mt. Sinai Hospital, according to CPD spokesman Tom Ahern.

One officer is in critical, but stable after being shot in the hip and shoulder-upper chest area, according to police. The other is in good condition after being struck in the hand, police added.

Police officials and Mayor Lori Lightfoot addressed the shooting Sunday morning at Mt. Sinai Hospital.

“This is the 29th officer in 2021 with the Chicago Police Department shot at or shot,” said CPD Supt. David Brown. “The fifth and sixth officers shot in 2021. This totals for the last 15 months a 108 shot at or shot. Sixteen shot in the last 15 months.”
“It just underscores the danger the men and women in the police department face every single day,” Mayor Lightfoot said.

The person who fired shots at the officers was also struck, according to Ahern. One of the officers returned fire and struck him on the leg, police said.

A weapon was recovered and the offender was then placed into custody, according to a preliminary statement from Supt. Brown.

That offender’s condition is stable at Stroger Hospital, police said.

The specifics of the incident, including the comprehensive use of force investigation, are being investigated by the Civilian Office of Police Accountability with full cooperation of the Chicago Police Department, the statement said. The officers involved will be placed on routine administrative duties for a period of 30 days, the statement added.

Sun-Times Media contributed to this report.

Source Article from https://abc7chicago.com/chicago-police-officer-shooting-lawndale/10644294/

Image copyright
Reuters

Image caption

Donald Trump ha ganado muchas batallas, pero todavía no la guerra.

Donald Trump sigue acumulando victorias y en el camino hacia la candidatura republicana a la presidencia de EE.UU. cada vez quedan menos contrincantes.

Al derrotar claramente a Marco Rubio en su propio estado de Florida el martes, Trump obligó al cubanoamericano a convertirse en el noveno precandidato en abandonar la contienda.

Y después de sus victorias en Misuri, Carolina del Norte e Illinois, el millonario no sólo extendió aún más su ventaja sobre su más cercano perseguidor, Ted Cruz, sino que también más que cuadruplica en número de delegados al tercero en contienda, John Kasich.

De hecho, todo indica que nadie va llevar más delegados que Trump a la convención del Partido Republicano.

Pero eso no significa que el magnate tenga la nominación asegurada.

Antes bien, para algunos analistas, su derrota de Trump ante Kasich en Ohio –la primera victoria de este último en lo que va de las primarias– podría incluso terminar siendo aquella que termine costándole la candidatura del “Great Old Party”.

Image copyright
AFP

Image caption

La victoria de Kasich en Ohio podría ser una derrota decisiva para las aspiraciones Trump.

La razón: la continuidad del gobernador de Ohio en la carrera aumenta las probabilidades de que el polémico millonario no logre los 1.237 delegados necesarios para asegurarse la nominación.

Y eso desembocaría en lo que se conoce como una “convención negociada”, en la que Cruz, Kasich, o incluso un nuevo nominado de última hora, podrían resultar electos, si logran convencer a una mayoría de delegados que ellos tienen más posibilidades de derrotar al eventual candidato del Partido Demócrata.

Un asunto de delegados

Parte del problema para Trump es que si bien el magnate se ha impuesto en 20 de los 31 estados disputados hasta la fecha, de estos solamente Florida, Illinois y Ohio le dan todos sus delegados al ganador, en lugar de repartirlos entre los candidatos.

Y hasta el momento de redactar este artículo eso le ha significado a Trump un total de 673 delegados. De lejos le siguen Cruz (411) y Kasich (143).

Image copyright
AFP

Image caption

En una convención negociada la mayoría de los delegados están en libertad de votar por cualquier candidato. Pero lo que acostumbra ser una fiesta puede terminar convirtiéndose en una batalla.

De hecho, como hace notar la revista Time, a pesar de su arrolladora marcha, Trump no ha conseguido igualar los resultados que, para estas fechas, habían conseguido John McCain y Mitt Romney en las primarias de 2008 y 2012, respectivamente.

Y, para evitar una convención negociada, el millonario tendría que obtener casi 55% de los delegados todavía en disputa. A la fecha su promedio es 47%.

“Hasta el momento Trump se ha mostrado fuerte en primarias abiertas y los estados del sur”, explica Time.

“Pero el resto de la carrera no le va a ser tan favorable”, afirma la publicación, que destaca que Cruz y Kasich están bien posicionados para arrebatarle delegados a Trump, especialmente en los estados del medio oeste y la zona de las Montañas Rocallosas.

Y algo parecido piensa el sitio de información política en internet The Hill, que proyecta que Trump podría quedarse a unos 100 delegados de los 1.237 necesarios.

“Un verdadero desastre”

No todos, sin embargo, coinciden en este análisis.

Según The New Tork Times, Trump nada más necesita mantener su actual nivel de apoyo para garantizarse la nominación, aunque victorias en California, Arizona y Nueva York parecen indispensables.

Y el empresario ya ha demostrado su capacidad para superar las expectativas y sorprender a los analistas más experimentados.

Image copyright
Getty

Image caption

Thomas E. Dewey (a la derecha) fue el último candidato republicano electo en una “convención negociada”, en 1948. Luego perdió las elecciones frente a Harry S. Truman.

Pero además, aunque la animadversión entre el millonario y el establishment republicano está bien documentada, todavía está por verse si los líderes del partido realmente están dispuestos a ir contra la voluntad de la mayoría de los votantes.

Trump ya advirtió que una decisión en ese sentido podría terminar generando violencia y caos. “Habrían disturbios”, le dijo el millonario este miércoles al programa News Day de CNN.

“Yo no los lideraría, pero creo que pasarían cosas malas”, dijo el candidato, quien ha sido acusado por sus rivales de promover la violencia durante la campaña.

“Represento a muchos millones de personas… Si les roban sus derechos, creo que habría problemas como no se han visto nunca antes”, advirtió el magnate, quien también podría decidir presentarse a las presidenciales como independiente.

Y el mismo Ted Cruz también habló en contra de una convención negociada, calificando esa posibilidad de “verdadero desastre”.

Image copyright
Gett

Image caption

Trump ha dicho que negarle la nominación en una convención negociada podría generar violencia.

“Hay algunos en Washington que tienen sueños febriles de una convención negociada. Están descontentos con la forma en la que la gente está votando y quieren tirar en paracaídas a su candidato favorito”, dijo Cruz.

La gente tendría todo el derecho a rebelarse“, agregó el senador tejano.

Esa opinión, sin embargo, no la comparte el gobernador Kasich, quien tras ganar en Ohio aspira a convertirse en el candidato del establishment republicano.

“Si no puedes ganar en Ohio, no puedes ser presidente (de EE.UU.)”, declaró después de su victoria Kasich, repitiendo el aforsimo según el cuál ese estado es un buen indicador de la intención de voto en la nación norteamericana.

Lo que sugiere que la carrera por la nominación republicana, lejos de definirse el martes, en realidad sólo se volvió más interesante.

Source Article from http://www.bbc.com/mundo/noticias/2016/03/160316_primarias_republicanas_eeuu_convencion_negociada_perspectivas_trump_analisis_aw

Utah Sen. Mitt RomneyWillard (Mitt) Mitt RomneyKaine: GOP senators should ‘at least’ treat Trump trial with seriousness of traffic court Des Moines Register endorses Elizabeth Warren as Democratic presidential nominee Romney: ‘It’s very likely I’ll be in favor of witnesses’ in Trump impeachment trial MORE (R) said Saturday that it is “very likely” he will be in favor of calling witnesses in the Senate impeachment trial against President TrumpDonald John TrumpKaine: Obama called Trump a ‘fascist’ during 2016 campaign Kaine: GOP senators should ‘at least’ treat Trump trial with seriousness of traffic court Louise Linton, wife of Mnuchin, deletes Instagram post in support of Greta Thunberg MORE.

However, the GOP lawmaker said he will hold off on making his final decision until after Democratic impeachment managers and the president’s defense lawyers conclude their opening arguments.

“I think it’s very likely I’ll be in favor of witnesses, but I haven’t made a decision finally yet and I won’t until the testimony is completed,” the Utah Republican said Saturday after the first day of the Trump team’s opening arguments, CNN reported.

Romney declined to say whether he thought the president’s defense team was effective in the opening hours of their arguments, saying, “I just don’t have any comments on the process or the evidence until the trial is over,” CNN reported.

Earlier this month, Romney was the first GOP lawmaker to specifically say that he wanted to hear from former White House national security adviser John BoltonJohn BoltonRomney: ‘It’s very likely I’ll be in favor of witnesses’ in Trump impeachment trial George Conway: Witness missing from impeachment trial is Trump Democrats see Mulvaney as smoking gun witness at Trump trial MORE in the course of the impeachment trial.

Romney told reporters at the Capitol that he wants to find out “what he knows” about Trump’s contacts with Ukraine, the central issue in the impeachment effort against the president.

“I would like to be able to hear from John Bolton. What the process is to make that happen, I don’t have an answer for you,” Romney said.

Bolton has yet to be subpoenaed by lawmakers in the trial, and Democrats will need four Republicans to support their efforts if they are going to call the former Trump administration officials or other witnesses. 

Bolton has said he would testify if subpoenaed by the Senate.

Fellow GOP Sens. Susan CollinsSusan Margaret CollinsKaine: GOP senators should ‘at least’ treat Trump trial with seriousness of traffic court Romney: ‘It’s very likely I’ll be in favor of witnesses’ in Trump impeachment trial Schumer: Trump’s team made case for new witnesses ‘even stronger’ MORE (Maine) and Lisa MurkowskiLisa Ann MurkowskiKaine: GOP senators should ‘at least’ treat Trump trial with seriousness of traffic court Romney: ‘It’s very likely I’ll be in favor of witnesses’ in Trump impeachment trial Trump defense team signals focus on Schiff MORE (Alaska) have also both indicated an openness to hearing from further witnesses.

Source Article from https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/479933-romney-its-very-likely-ill-be-in-favor-of-witnesses-in-trump-impeachment

The New York Post, which has supported Mr. Trump for years, proclaimed on Monday: “Give it up, Mr. President — for your sake and the nation’s.”

Mr. Trump has continued to falsely claim that Mr. Biden unfairly won the election because of widespread voter fraud and has demanded that congressional Republicans work to overturn the results. Attorney General William P. Barr has acknowledged that the Justice Department had uncovered no such fraud that would have changed the outcome and the Supreme Court, as well as courts in at least eight key states across the country, has refused or rejected challenges waged by the Trump campaign in an attempt to throw out the results of the election. Those challenges have not come close to overturning the results in a single state.

Still there is a substantial rift in the party. While a steady stream of House Republicans have announced their willingness to object to the electoral votes of critical states, Mr. Hawley is the first senator to do so. He hinted on Wednesday that other senators could soon join his effort, telling reporters “a number of offices have reached out via staff to ours and said, ‘We’re interested.’”

On Thursday, he blasted out a fund-raising pitch highlighting his plan. “We must ensure that one vote means one vote in America,” read the message, which was positioned alongside a photo of Mr. Hawley and Mr. Trump. “I plan to object to the results of the Electoral College on Jan. 6, but I need your help.”

It is unclear how many — if any — of his Senate colleagues will rally to his side.

His announcement on Wednesday was met with a distinct lack of enthusiasm in many conservative circles. On the private conference call on Thursday with Senate Republicans, Senator Patrick J. Toomey of Pennsylvania, who is retiring in 2022, spoke up to make clear his “strong” disagreement with Mr. Hawley’s plan, a spokesman for Mr. Toomey confirmed.

On that same call, details of which were earlier reported by Axios, Mr. McConnell pressed Mr. Hawley to explain how he expected his objection to play out, according to a person familiar with the conversation. But Mr. Hawley was absent from the call and did not respond, prompting him to email members of the conference later, explaining that he intended to force a debate on the issue of election security and noting that the election had left many of his constituents at home disillusioned.

Mr. Hawley’s objection will force the Senate to debate his claim for up to two hours, followed by a vote on Mr. Biden’s victory. With every Senate Democrat expected to certify the election, along with at least several Republicans, the Senate is likely to affirm Mr. Biden’s victory. The House, which must also conduct the same vote, is controlled by Democrats, making certification a certainty.

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2020/12/31/us/politics/ben-sasse-election-results.html