Most Viewed Videos

The chairman of the House Judiciary Committee says there is no doubt President Trump has obstructed justice.

“It’s very clear that the president obstructed justice,” Democratic Rep. Jerrold Nadler told ABC Sunday. “It’s very clear — 1,100 times he referred to the Mueller investigation as a witch hunt, he tried to — he fired — he tried to protect Flynn from being investigated by the FBI. He fired Comey in order to stop the Russian thing, as he told NBC News. He — he’s dangled part — he’s threat — he’s intimidated witnesses. In public.”

Think what you will about the reasons — calling an investigation a “witch hunt” is obstruction of justice? — but Nadler sounded less like a man weighing the evidence than a man who has has made up his mind. Given that, Nadler’s ABC interview led to a question: President Nixon was threatened with impeachment for obstruction of justice. President Clinton was impeached for obstruction of justice. Why is Nadler, who heads the committee in the House that originates articles of impeachment, not moving forward with impeaching President Trump right now?

“We don’t have the facts yet,” Nadler said — a perplexing admission for a man who had just confidently enumerated the president’s crimes. “Impeachment is a long way down the road.”

As National Review’s Rich Lowry pointed out a short time later, no one should believe Nadler’s caution. “Don’t be fooled,” Lowry tweeted. “Being a ‘long way’ from impeachment is their first step to impeaching [Trump].”

Indeed, in that revealing ABC interview, Nadler went on to explain why Democrats have not yet moved to impeach the president. Essentially, Nadler explained, the party doesn’t yet have its ducks in a row. There is preparatory work, such as evidence gathering and a creating a communications strategy, to be done before going forward.

“We have to — we have to do the investigations and get all this,” Nadler said. “We do not now have the evidence all sorted out and everything to do — to do an impeachment. Before you impeach somebody, you have to persuade the American public that it ought to happen. You have to persuade enough of the — of the opposition party voters, Trump voters, that you’re not just trying to … that you’re not just trying to steal the last — to reverse the results of the last election.”

Nadler’s talk with ABC was the clearest indication yet that Democrats have decided to impeach Trump and are now simply doing the legwork involved in making that happen. And that means the debate among House Democrats will be a tactical one — what is the best time and way to go forward — rather than a more fundamental discussion of whether the president should be impeached.

On Monday morning Nadler released a list of 81 names of Trump associates from whom the Judiciary Committee is requesting documents in what Nadler called “the first steps of an investigation into the alleged corruption, obstruction, and other abuses of power by President Trump, his associates and members of his administration.”

Other House Democrats are sending similar messages. “There is abundant evidence of collusion,” House Intelligence Committee Chairman Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., said on CBS Sunday. Schiff has launched a new Trump-Russia investigation to re-cover the territory covered in the probes done by his own committee, by the Senate Intelligence Committee, and by Trump-Russia special counsel Robert Mueller.

“I have said that I think we should await the evidence from Bob Mueller as well as our own work,” Schiff said. That could mean almost anything; Schiff’s committee can, and most certainly will, investigate Trump for the rest of the president’s term. What Schiff did not say is at what point House Democrats will decide to pull the trigger.

There will be other House leaders involved, too. A few days ago, NBC reported that Ways and Means Committee Chairman Rep. Richard Neal, D-Mass., has told his staff to prepare a request to the Internal Revenue Service for the president’s tax returns. It will in fact be a demand, “We will take all necessary steps, including litigation, if necessary to obtain them,” a spokesman for House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., told NBC. The administration will likely resist the unprecedented House “request” and the process could take time, but Democrats believe, as Pelosi’s spokesman said, that “all roads lead[] back to President Trump’s finances.”

So now the Democratic plan is coming into sharper relief. The impeachment decision has been made. Various committee chairs are moving forward in gathering and organizing the formal justification for removing the president. The timing decision is still up in the air, as is an overarching communications plan — selling impeachment to the American public, or more specifically those Americans who don’t already support impeachment.

The sales campaign will most certainly be high minded. “It’s our job to protect the rule of law,” Nadler said Sunday, echoing the Republicans who impeached Bill Clinton in the 1990s. But whatever the stated rationale, impeachment is on.

Source Article from https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/columnists/byron-york-house-dems-send-message-impeachment-is-on

Los hechos políticos fueron los que más se destacaron en esta jornada. Pero también hubo sucesos deportivos y de espectáculos que captaron la atención de nuestros lectores. Te los resumimos a continuación:

1. Horacio González sostuvo durante una entrevista con el diario español El País que subestimó al presidente Mauricio Macri: “Se ha peronizado, nos sorprendió”, expresó. El exdirector de la Biblioteca Nacional y uno de los intelectuales referentes del kirchnerismo opinó además sobre las elecciones legislativas de octubre y el rol de la expresidenta, y candidata a senadora, Cristina Fernández de Kirchner.

2. Un día después de las elecciones legislativas del 22 de octubre empezarán a producirse aumentos en distintos servicios y precios. La primer suba será en los combustibles, en la semana del 23, y a partir del 1 de noviembre se daría vía libre a los incrementos ya previstos para Edenor y Edesur para la tarifa de luz y en diciembre será el turno de la del gas.

3. La ex presidenta y candidata a senadora nacional por la provincia de Buenos Aires, Cristina Fernández de Kirchner, admitió que el detenido ex jefe de la UOCRA filial La Plata, Juan Pablo “Pata” Medina, “es un personaje nefasto”.

4. El repaso de algunos partidos históricos de Argentina contra el rival de turno, Perú. El agónico gol de Gareca, el triste empate en la Bombonera, el polémico 6-0 y la hazaña de Palermo.

5. En su intimidad, Wanda Nara dejó una frase contundente que grafica el mal momento que vive con el futbolista Mauro Icardi, luego de que la despreciara dos veces en público.

Source Article from http://www.perfil.com/trends/las-5-noticias-mas-destacadas-de-este-jueves-5-de-octubre.phtml

CLOSE

President Donald Trump said Thursday he had nothing to with directing the U.S. Navy to keep a warship named for the late Sen. John McCain out of sight during his visit to Japan this week, insisting, “I would never do a thing like that.” (May 30)
AP, AP

WASHINGTON – The U.S, Navy acknowledged Saturday it had received a request to shield a U.S. warship bearing the name of former political rival John McCain from President Donald Trump’s view during the commander-in-chief’s visit to Japan last week – but did not comply.

“A request was made to the U.S. Navy to minimize the visibility of USS John S. McCain, however, all ships remained in their normal configuration during the President’s visit,” according to a statement from Rear Adm. Charlie Brown, Chief of Navy Information, that the Pentagon released.

The one-paragraph statement did not mention who made the request and a Pentagon spokesperson did not respond to a request for further information.

In his statement, Brown also said there were “no intentional efforts” to exclude sailors on the McCain from attending the president’s address on Memorial day aboard the USS Wasp at Yokosuka Naval Base, south of Tokyo. The McCain is docked there for repairs.

The Wall Street Journal was the first to report that White House officials wanted the guided-missile destroyer to be kept “out of sight” during Trump’s visit to Japan, apparently fearful that the president would be upset at having to see the name of the late Arizona senator, a frequent target of the president’s anger.

The ship was named after McCain’s father and grandfather, both decorated admirals. The Navy added the name of Sen. McCain, a prisoner of war in Vietnam who emerged from captivity a war hero, to the ship in 2018, according to the Journal.

Trump on Thursday said he had no knowledge of the request to keep the ship from view, saying, “I would never do a thing like that.” He described the aides that made the request as “well meaning.”

McCain’s daughter weighs in: Meghan McCain calls out Trump on warship controversy, says troops ‘afraid’ to show her father’s name

‘Tremendous disservice’: President Donald Trump on the late Sen. John McCain: ‘He did the nation a tremendous disservice’

Acting Defense Secretary Patrick Shanahan announced Thursday that he asked his chief of staff to investigate what was behind obscuring the name of the USS John McCain during President Donald Trump’s visit to Japan.

“The Navy is fully cooperating with the review of this matter tasked by the Secretary of Defense,” Brown said in the statement released by the Pentagon.  

Source Article from https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2019/06/01/navy-we-were-asked-hide-uss-john-mccain-from-trumps-view-in-japan/1313053001/

  • Georgia is investigating a call Donald Trump made as his presidency wound down.
  • On the call, Trump asked Georgia’s secretary of state to “find votes” to help him win.
  • David Worley, a Democratic state election official, said the inquiry could preface criminal charges.
  • Visit the Business section of Insider for more stories.

Georgia’s secretary of state, Brad Raffensperger, has opened an investigation into former President Donald Trump over his efforts to pressure Georgia state officials to illegally overturn legitimate election results, Reuters reported.

Raffensperger’s office said that the inquiry was “fact-finding and administrative in nature” and that findings would be referred to the Republican-majority Georgia board of elections.

The investigation centers on a call Trump made to Raffensperger in January, during Trump’s final days in office, when the president asked the state’s top official to “find 11,780 votes” to help him win Georgia.

Raffensperger, a Republican, pushed back against Trump’s claims during the call that cast doubt on the integrity of the election. Election officials across Georgia disputed Trump’s claims that the election was fraudulent or unfair.

Once the state completes its investigation into the call, it could refer findings to the state’s attorney general or elsewhere for prosecution.

“The secretary of state’s office investigates complaints it receives,” Walter Jones, a spokesman for the office, told Reuters in a statement Monday. “The investigations are fact-finding and administrative in nature. Any further legal efforts will be left to the attorney general.”

The New York Times reported that Fani Willis, the Democratic district attorney of Fulton County, was also considering launching a criminal inquiry into Trump’s actions.

Trump also repeatedly called and pressured Georgia’s Republican governor, Brian Kemp, and taunted him on Twitter in an attempt to have Kemp call a special legislative session to overturn the state’s election results.

David Worley, the only Democrat on Georgia’s elections board, told Reuters the administrative inquiry could preface criminal charges.

“Any investigation of a statutory violation is a potential criminal investigation depending on the statute involved,” he said, adding, “The complaint that was received involved a criminal violation.”

Worley also said he would initiate a motion at Wednesday’s elections board meeting to formally refer the inquiry to the Fulton County district attorney’s office.

Jason Miller, a senior advisor to Trump, told the Associated Press there was “nothing improper or untoward about a scheduled call between President Trump, Secretary Raffensperger and lawyers on both sides.”

Insider has reached out to the Trump Organization, the Georgia secretary of state’s office, and the state election board for comment.

Source Article from https://www.businessinsider.com/ga-secretary-of-state-opens-investigation-into-trump-2021-2

CLOSE

A magnitude 4.5 earthquake in the San Francisco Bay Area Monday evening rattled residents, mere days before the 30th anniversary of one of the most dangerous earthquakes in the area’s history.

The quake occurred at 10:33 p.m., with the epicenter in Pleasant Hill and Walnut Creek, just over 25 miles from San Francisco, according to the U.S. Geological Survey.

Weak shaking was felt in San Francisco, Oakland and San Jose, per the USGS. A 2.5 magnitude foreshock also took place 10 minutes earlier near Pleasant Hill.

Scientists don’t anticipate major structural damage, but people who reside by the epicenter reported minor damage.

USGS geologist Keith Knudsen, who serves as the deputy director of the agency’s Earthquake Science Center said that the earthquake had a preliminary depth of about 9 miles underneath the surface, which he says is fairly deep for this area. The more shallow the earthquake, the more damaging they tend to be, according to the USGS. 

Mark Ulicki, a Walnut Creek resident, tweeted that there was a “big shaking” that caused broken glass and “lots of car and business alarms going off.” 

The quake took place three days before the 30th anniversary of the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake. The 6.9 magnitude earthquake killed 63 people and injured thousands.

Many locals took to Twitter to share their unease at Monday’s earthquake taking place almost exactly three decades after the deadly shock. 

Consider this: California power lines spark wildfires and prompt blackouts. Why not just bury them?

Assistant Chief Chris Bachman of the Contra Costa County Fire Protection District said that there were no reports of injuries or property damage caused by Monday’s earthquake as of 11 p.m. that day.

In early October, a magnitude 3.5 earthquake shook the Bay Area in the town of Colma, located just south of San Francisco.

Contributing: The Associated Press. Follow Joshua Bote on Twitter: @joshua_bote

Source Article from https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2019/10/15/earthquake-shakes-san-francisco-bay-area/3983253002/

We’ve detected unusual activity from your computer network

To continue, please click the box below to let us know you’re not a robot.

Source Article from https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-03-28/ukraine-update-negotiators-set-for-talks-lavrov-due-in-india

Sanctions on Myanmar’s military need to get tougher as the regime escalates violence on the ground, the country’s special envoy to the United Nations told CNBC this week.

“We need immediately international targeted, coordinated, tougher sanctions, both economically and diplomatically,” said Dr. Sasa.

Beyond punishing sanctions, the UN Security Council also needs to send a “unified and strong message” to stop this “crime against humanity” in Myanmar, he said.

The Southeast Asian country has been in turmoil since the military seized power from a democratically elected government on Feb. 1. Thousands have taken to the streets to protest against the coup for weeks, and more than 500 have died, according to advocacy group Assistance Association for Political Prisoners.

Countries around the world have condemned the violence, while the U.S. and Europe have sanctioned individuals or companies related to the military.

‘Shame’ on the international community

Sasa also called on Russia and China to halt arms sales to Myanmar’s army.

“It’s very clear they should stop selling the weapons to Burmese military generals,” he told CNBC’s “Street Signs Asia” on Tuesday.

“What they are doing is terrorizing 54 million … people of Myanmar every day, every moment, every second,” he said.

He said Moscow and Beijing, which have close ties with the junta, have the power to stop the violence.

“It’s for them to decide right now,” Sasa said. Otherwise, it is a “shame” for the two countries, the international community and the UN Security Council, he said.

China and Russia, along with India and Vietnam, have helped to soften the UNSC’s criticism of the military regime. They requested that a UNSC statement remove references to a coup and the threat of further action.

“History will judge us harshly, there’s no doubt,” he added. “They have to make decisions. They will have to live with the decision that they make.”

The council is meeting on Wednesday to discuss the situation.

Economic pressure

Asked why he believes the military would cave to pressure, Sasa said international sanctions would help cut off income.

He said the military is taking money from national companies to buy bullets and weapons, and economic restrictions would mean less money, fewer weapons and fewer deaths of civilians.

Sasa also said a national unity government will be formed in the coming days and “will not rest” until democracy and freedom is restored in Myanmar.

“We will work hard bilaterally. We will be working very closely with our friends and our (allies) around the world,” he said, adding that there will be “no future” for the military generals when the country achieves democracy.

Source Article from https://www.cnbc.com/2021/03/31/history-will-judge-us-harshly-myanmar-special-envoy-to-the-un.html

One of the loudest voices emerging from House Democrats impeachment inquiry about President TrumpDonald John Trump Comey: Mueller ‘didn’t succeed in his mission because there was inadequate transparency’ During deposition, official says he made several efforts to advocate for Marie Yovanovitch Bolton looms large as impeachment inquiry accelerates MORE’s alleged abuse of power has come from a man who has yet to utter a word publicly about the probe: former national security adviser John BoltonJohn BoltonBolton looms large as impeachment inquiry accelerates US restores trade benefit to Ukraine after delay Key witness in impeachment investigation asks federal judge to rule on testifying MORE.

Testifying witnesses have placed Bolton at the center of some of the most explosive scenes related to questions of abuse of power by the president and officials he tasked with a shadow foreign policy in Ukraine, described by one witness as an “irregular channel.”

This includes Trump’s personal lawyer Rudy GiulianiRudy GiulianiDuring deposition, official says he made several efforts to advocate for Marie Yovanovitch Bolton looms large as impeachment inquiry accelerates Giuliani associate used small town in Ukraine to gain influence with American figures: report MORE, Ambassador to the European Union Gordon Sondland, Energy Secretary Rick PerryRick PerryBolton looms large as impeachment inquiry accelerates White House official to corroborate diplomat’s version of Ukraine events: report GOP lawmakers express concerns about Giuliani’s work in Ukraine MORE and then-special envoy for Ukraine Kurt VolkerKurt VolkerWhite House official to corroborate diplomat’s version of Ukraine events: report Five takeaways from US envoy’s explosive testimony Democrats say they have game changer on impeachment MORE.

In witness testimony, Bolton is presented as a key figure countering the efforts of those accused of pressuring a foreign government to influence the 2020 U.S. presidential election on behalf of Trump.

Bolton could soon appear before House investigators soon; his lawyers are in talks with impeachment investigators about testifying behind closed doors. And while he is one of almost two dozen potential witnesses on investigators’ wish list, his testimony could prove to be the most damaging depending on where he comes down on the ideological spectrum.

Bolton is a staunch conservative who views the president’s powers as expansive and has defended preemptive military strikes. But it’s unclear whether any testimony from him would defend Trump’s actions as an extension of executive powers or if he would paint those actions as an abuse of power that’s damaging to the rule of law and order.

“He’s not a friendly guy, but he does know right from wrong,” one former colleague said of Bolton. “He’s been around the national security scene for a long time. He knows what’s appropriate and what isn’t.”

Bolton has so far made known he’s no personal friend of the president. His last public statement, posted on Twitter, was a swift rebuke of Trump’s characterization that he had “fired” Bolton.

“I offered to resign last night,” Bolton tweeted, “and President Trump said, ‘Let’s talk about it tomorrow.’’”

Shortly after leaving the White House, Bolton was described as disparaging the president at a private event in New York. Attendees recalled Bolton did not have “anything positive to say about Trump,” and criticized the president’s policy on Iran, North Korea and Afghanistan.

He also called Trump’s plan to invite the Taliban to Camp David on the 9/11 anniversary “disrespectful.”

If he testifies, lawmakers are likely to ask Bolton if he has evidence, or reason to believe, the president acted in political self-interest at the expense of national security in pressuring Ukraine to open investigations into Vice President Joe BidenJoe BidenDuring deposition, official says he made several efforts to advocate for Marie Yovanovitch Bolton looms large as impeachment inquiry accelerates Giuliani associate used small town in Ukraine to gain influence with American figures: report MORE, his son Hunter Biden, their involvement with the energy company Burisma Holdings and alleged Ukrainian interference in the 2016 U.S. elections.

Trump has maintained that raising those issues were part of a U.S. policy focused on weeding out corruption in Ukraine. But testimony in the impeachment inquiry paints a starkly different picture.

Chief of Mission to Ukraine William Taylor, who has provided some of the most detailed testimony in the probe, described key moments between many of the major players embroiled in the controversy and centered on the question of the decision to delay military assistance to Ukraine for the promise of going after one of Trump’s political opponents.

Taylor also raised the question of the involvement of Giuliani, who was allegedly directed by Trump to follow through on efforts to open investigations into the Bidens, Burisma and 2016 election interference.

Sondland, in his testimony, corroborated that the president had directed Giuliani to take on this mission, and investigators are working to understand the former New York City’s mayor efforts to influence White House foreign policy. Two of Giuliani’s associates were indicted for allegedly attempting to make political contributions on behalf of foreign governments without disclosing the source.

Former National Security Council (NSC) Director for European Affairs Fiona Hill testified that Bolton had called Giuliani a “hand grenade” and was going to “blow everything up.” Taylor corroborated those statements and offered his own assessment of the danger of jeopardizing Ukraine relations, calling it “folly.”

One of Bolton’s descriptions, according to testimony, likened it to a “drug deal.”

Bolton is regarded as extremely disciplined in his work ethic, having an almost photographic memory and encyclopedic knowledge of world affairs. Should he testify, he’s likely to provide detailed and even colorful testimony.

Investigators will be keen to understand Bolton’s motivation to direct NSC staff to alert White House lawyers after a July meeting between administration officials and Ukrainian representatives.

That meeting, described in testimony, has Sondland connecting a future Oval Office visit by Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky with “investigations” – referring to the conspiracy theories surrounding the Bidens and 2016 election interference.

Stay away from domestic politics, Bolton told NSC staffers, directing them to the lawyers, according to testimony. The account puts further emphasis on the argument that administration officials were using their positions to pressure a foreign government to disparage a domestic political opponent.

Sondland, in his testimony, said no one told him he was acting inappropriately. He said he realized there was a “difference of opinion” between the NSC staff and the track that he was pursuing with Perry and Volker.

“We had regular communications with the NSC about Ukraine, both before and after the July meeting,” Sondland testified, “and neither Ambassador Bolton, Dr. Hill, nor anyone else on the NSC staff ever expressed any concerns to me about our efforts, any complaints about coordination between State and the NSC, or, most importantly, any concerns that we were acting improperly.”

Lawmakers will also ask Bolton for more details about why military assistance to Ukraine was delayed.

Taylor has testified that even though he was aware of a hold on military assistance, he was never given an appropriate reason.

House investigators have sent out subpoenas for more witnesses, including Tim Morrison, who took over at the NSC after Hill’s departure; two officials from the Office of Management and Budget, likely questioned over instructions to withhold military aid to Ukraine; and State Department officials.

Bolton has yet to give any media interviews since leaving the White House but has reportedly signed a deal to publish a tell-all book, though a publication date has not been announced.

Source Article from https://thehill.com/policy/national-security/467547-bolton-looms-large-as-impeachment-inquiry-accelerates

Grupos familiares y de amigos llegan de a poco al balneario de General Villamil, cantón de la provincia del Guayas, para despedir el 2016 y recibir el 2017.

Una de estas familias, es la familia Plaza. Este año llegaron 20 de sus miembros. Ellos tienen una forma particular de despedir el año.

Desde hace ocho años visitan esta playa. “Al mediodía nos metemos al agua, todos en familia, oramos para que el siguiente año sea de muchos éxitos y de ahí brindamos con champaña”, cuenta José Rivera, cerca del rompeolas.

Se trata de una familia alegre. Gina Plaza, de 54 años, comenta que esta tradición los ha unido más. Ella bromea con Laifon Kuon Yeng, su prima política. Dice riendo, al describir el parentezco de cada miembro en la playa, que la hallaron como náufraga proveniente de un barco de un país oriental y que la apañaron.

Después de unas horas tienen previsto regresar a Guayaquil, a la 19 y Callejón Parra, en el suburbio, para quemar al viejo.

El jefe del Cuerpo de Salvavidas del Municipio de Playas, Manuel Crespín, dijo que a medida que transcurra el día se incrementará la afluencia de turistas. La asistencia de bañistas dista mucho de otros feriados, como el de Carnaval o Semana Santa.

En este balneario habrá, esta noche, un show de salsa, con artistas internacionales.

El espectáculo de fuegos articiales también atraen a visitantes. Cerca del mercado de mariscos de esta playa, José Báez, le indica que vino con su familia de Riobamba y que se regresará mañana para disfrutar del resto del feriado en su tierra.

“Aquí hay tranquilidad, se puede disfrutar del bonito clima”, indica Báez, mientras sigue con su mirada el paso de sus dos canes, unos labradores.

En las cabañas restaurantes de este balneario se encuentran platos, como corvina frita con patacones en $5. El ceviche mixto, entre $5 y $7. Y sobre la arena caliente, los granizados se venden en $0,75. (I)

Source Article from http://www.eluniverso.com/noticias/2016/12/31/nota/5976265/playas-ya-se-vive-fin-ano-2016

<!– –>

If you ask any Republican member of the U.S. House of Representatives or the U.S. Senate what is the most significant fiscal accomplishment of the Trump presidency, the overwhelming answer would be the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, or TCJA.

When passed in December 2017, the TCJA did not have majority American support. Despite this lack of early support, the GOP believed that once the tax bill was fully implemented, the American taxpayers would be impressed with their large tax savings, and public opinion on the TCJA would become overwhelmingly positive.

To that point, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., dismissed early criticism, saying, “We’ll see how unpopular it is when people start noticing they’re paying less in taxes, the economy’s growing, there are more jobs and opportunity.”

Well, April 15 is here, tax returns are being filed and Americans remain unconvinced of the equity and the value of the TCJA.

Results from a recent NBC News/Wall Street Journal Poll said just 17% believe their own taxes will go down. By contrast, 28% believe they’ll pay more, 27% expect to pay about the same, and 28% don’t know enough to say.

Unfortunately for McConnell, Americans did not rejoice at the small incremental change in their monthly take-home pay, made possible by the changes in withholding tables.

A Morning Consult/Politico poll taken in December 2018 reported that, of those polled, only 23% saw an increase in their take-home pay, and 60% did not. Now, as Americans file their returns, they similarly are not seeing anything that will improve their opinion of the TCJA.

As of the end of March, the IRS paid out $6 billion less in total refunds this year compared with last, and the average tax refund amount is $20 less than last year. This does not look like the huge tax reduction promised to middle-class America.

Yes, I know the reality is that most Americans did, in fact, receive a tax reduction, with estimates of average tax savings from $1,000 to $2,000 per return filed. But in taxes, as in most political things, perception is reality. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., said the TCJA was “simply theft — monumental, brazen theft — from the American middle class and from every person who aspires to reach it.”

Sixteen months since the TCJA passage and now well into the 2018 filing season, it appears the American public agrees.

More from Invest in You:
This tax mistake in college left me owing the IRS
Here’s what we need to do to improve financial literacy
America’s juiciest money secrets, as told to CNBC

It cannot be overstated that what also continues to drive these negative poll numbers is a core belief that the income-tax system benefits the rich at the expense of the middle class. Polling has begun on a number of Democratic presidential candidates’ proposals that would increase taxes on the richest Americans. The results are not good for the wealthy.

Almost all these proposals have majority support, with the wealth-tax proposal of Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., earning 74% approval. Interestingly, some of the proposals also have majority Republican support.

“Americans who believe the tax system is rigged for the rich and against the middle class want the system fixed. They clearly do not believe the fix can be found in the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act.”
-Heidi Heitkamp, former U.S. senator (D) from North Dakota

The Republican tax bill architects will argue that the opinions reflected in these poll numbers are misguided, and that the TCJA and the current tax burden on wealthy Americans is not widely understood.

But as President Ronald Reagan once said: “If you’re explaining, you’re losing.”

Americans who believe the tax system is rigged for the rich and against the middle class want the system fixed. They clearly do not believe the fix can be found in the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. That is bad news for any Republican candidate, including President Donald Trump, who want to make the TCJA the centerpiece of their argument for reelection.


Heidi Heitkamp
, a CNBC contributor, is a former U.S. Senator (D) North Dakota

Disclosure: NBCUniversal and Comcast Ventures are investors in Acorns.—

Source Article from https://www.cnbc.com/2019/04/12/americans-are-unhappy-with-tax-overhaul-and-the-gop-should-be-worried.html

They turned away and gave her their backs.

Mayor Lori Lightfoot was given the cold shoulder by CPD rank and file about midnight Saturday at the University of Chicago Medical Center when she approached them on the 7th floor as they grappled with the shootings of two fellow officers.

Chicago Police Officer Ella French was shot and killed during a traffic stop Saturday night in West Englewood, while her partner continues to fight for his life at the hospital. Three people are in custody.

Just moments before about 30 officers turned their backs on the mayor, Lightfoot tried to talk to the male officer’s father, who himself is a retired Chicago police officer. He clearly wanted nothing to do with Lightfoot, according to two sources who were there.

The father excoriated the mayor and blamed her for what had happened. One source said Lightfoot handled herself well as the father yelled at her. She listened and treated him with respect.

It was then suggested that Lightfoot say a few words to nearby grieving officers, but as she approached, they all walked away from her and to the other side of a bank of chairs — and turned their backs, the sources said.

“They did the about-face — it looked like it had been choreographed,” said one of the sources present, calling it “astounding.”

Lightfoot then went downstairs to speak to reporters at a news conference about the shooting.

“The police officers’ decision to turn their backs on the mayor while waiting with the family on the 7th floor was significant,” FOP President John Catanzara told me in an interview.

“Turning their backs on the mayor was an excellent example of how the hundreds of police officers felt waiting outside the hospital,” Catanzara said.

Officers no longer support Lightfoot’s leadership, Catanzara said.

“They have had enough and are no longer going to remain silent anymore.”

In a statement released Monday afternoon, the mayor’s office said in part: “The mayor was present at the emergency room to offer support and condolences to the families involved and the hundreds of line officers and exempts who were there, which she did. In a time of tragedy, emotions run high and that is to be expected. The mayor spoke to a range of officers that tragic night and sensed the overwhelming sentiment was about concern for their fallen colleagues.

“As the mayor stated . . . now is not the time for divisive and toxic rhetoric or reporting. This is a time for us to come together as a city. We have a common enemy and it is the conditions that breed the violence and the manifestations of violence, namely illegal guns, and gangs.”

Mayor Lori Lightfoot speaks at a news conference Sunday after two police officers were shot in West Englewood.
Anthony Vazquez/Sun-Times

Source Article from https://chicago.suntimes.com/city-hall/2021/8/9/22616490/chicago-cops-give-cold-shoulder-mayor-lori-lightfoot-hospital-ella-french

Media captionRoger Stone speaks to reporters reacting to Trump’s decision to grant clemency

Former US special counsel Robert Mueller has made a rare public intervention to defend his indictment of former Trump adviser Roger Stone.

Stone was found guilty on charges linked to an investigation led by Mr Mueller that found Russia tried to boost the Trump 2016 election campaign.

President Donald Trump commuted Stone’s 40-month jail sentence on Friday saying he was the victim of a “witch-hunt”.

In the Washington Post, Mr Mueller said Stone was rightly a convicted felon.

Stone was convicted of obstruction, witness tampering and lying to Congress.

The president’s move – sparing Stone from jail but not granting him a pardon – came just after a court denied Stone’s request to delay the start date of his prison term.

Leading Democrats and a few Republicans have condemned Mr Trump’s decision, saying it undermined the justice system.

The White House said that Department of Justice prosecutors under Mr Mueller only charged Stone out of frustration after failing to prove the “fantasy” that the Trump campaign had colluded with the Kremlin.

What do Mueller and others say?

Mr Mueller writes that he felt compelled to respond to claims that his investigation had been illegitimate, his motives improper, and Stone a victim.

Image copyright
Reuters

Image caption

Mr Mueller’s article is his first public statement since he gave testimony to Congress last year

“The Russia investigation was of paramount importance. Stone was prosecuted and convicted because he committed federal crimes. He remains a convicted felon, and rightly so,” he wrote.

He said that finding evidence of Russian interference was a complex task that took “two years and substantial effort” and resulted in a number of charges and prosecutions. Stone’s obstruction may have impeded efforts to find the truth and hold wrongdoers accountable, he added.

“We made every decision in Stone’s case, as in all our cases, based solely on the facts and the law and in accordance with the rule of law,” he concluded. “The women and men who conducted these investigations and prosecutions acted with the highest integrity. Claims to the contrary are false.”

Mr Mueller rarely makes public statements about the investigation, and the article is the first since he gave testimony in Congress in July 2019.

His reaction follows strong condemnation by senior Democrats, with presidential contender Joe Biden’s spokesman accusing Mr Trump of abuse of power and “laying waste” to US values.

Democratic Senator Elizabeth Warren said it showed Mr Trump was the most corrupt president in history.

Some Republican critics of Mr Trump have also spoken out, with Senator Mitt Romney describing the president’s decision as “unprecedented, historic corruption”.

What does the president say?

In a tweet on Saturday, Mr Trump said: “Roger Stone was targeted by an illegal Witch Hunt that never should have taken place.”

Earlier, the White House said in a statement that Stone was “a victim of the Russia Hoax that the Left and its allies in the media perpetuated for years in an attempt to undermine the Trump Presidency”.

It also suggested that the FBI had tipped off CNN about their pre-dawn raid on Stone’s house, noting that a camera crew for the cable network was on the scene to record the arrest.

Mr Trump had been hinting about a reprieve for Stone for months, including on Thursday night in an interview with a Fox News host.

Trump ally Senator Lindsey Graham was among those welcoming the decision. He said Stone was convicted of a “nonviolent, first-time offense” and the president was “justified” in commuting the sentence.

Stone himself told reporters that under the terms of the commutation he could now appeal against his sentence, and was confident that he could expose “an enormous amount of corruption” at his trial.

What was Stone convicted of?

The president’s commutation does not void a criminal conviction as a pardon does.

Stone was found guilty of lying to the House Intelligence Committee about his attempts to contact Wikileaks, the website that released damaging emails about Mr Trump’s 2016 Democratic election rival Hillary Clinton.

US intelligence officials have concluded the messages were stolen by Russian hackers.

Stone had acknowledged during the 2016 campaign that he was in contact with Wikileaks founder Julian Assange.

He also intimated that he knew the website would disclose more than 19,000 emails hacked from the Democratic National Committee servers.

Media captionTrump: ‘I’d love to see Roger Stone exonerated’

Stone’s sentence fell short of an initial seven-to-nine-year recommendation from prosecutors.

In a remarkable move, US Attorney General William Barr had overruled that sentencing guideline following a Trump tweet, and instead recommended a more lenient punishment.

That intervention led to the entire Stone prosecution team resigning from the case.

Source Article from https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-53379593

That resolve to resist has led many voters to define their own beliefs in opposition to Trump’s. On immigration, for example, “every Trump outrage increased the proportion of Americans who said, ‘We are an immigrant country,’” writes Greenberg. Indeed, according to recent Pew data, 62% of Americans say that immigrants strengthen the country, while 28%, a near record low, see them as a burden.

Source Article from https://www.sltrib.com/opinion/commentary/2019/09/06/michelle-goldberg-dare-we/

Fernando Zavala, primer ministro, conforme con la decisión de resolver el contrato con Kuntur Wasi. | Fuente: Andina

El ministro de Transportes, Bruno Giuffra, anunció este domingo por la mañana en RPP Noticias que la construcción del aeropuerto de Chinchero se hará como obra pública. Por la tarde, el primer ministro, Fernando Zavala, se pronunció sobre el hecho.

“Buena decisión ministro. Sigamos avanzando”, escribió en su cuenta de Twitter. Con esto, el contrato que firmó el gobierno con el consorcio Kuntur Wasi quedó disueldo de mutuo acuerdo, según informó Giuffra.

Cambios. El Gobierno va a seguir con la fase 1 del proyecto en la que se contempla la remoción del terreno, esta vez como obra pública. Luego, se convocará a una nueva licitación para las obras de infraestructura. 

Según los funcionarios del Ejecutivo, la gestión de Pedro Pablo Kuczynski tiene como prioridad solucionar las controversias y sacar adelante los proyectos de desarrollo, entre ellos este terminal aéreo que los cusqueños esperan.

El Gobierno puso fin a la controversia sobre el aeropuerto. | Fuente: Andina

Source Article from http://rpp.pe/politica/gobierno/zavala-felicita-la-decision-de-giuffra-para-hacer-chinchero-como-obra-publica-noticia-1055432