Most Viewed Videos

Grupos familiares y de amigos llegan de a poco al balneario de General Villamil, cantón de la provincia del Guayas, para despedir el 2016 y recibir el 2017.

Una de estas familias, es la familia Plaza. Este año llegaron 20 de sus miembros. Ellos tienen una forma particular de despedir el año.

Desde hace ocho años visitan esta playa. “Al mediodía nos metemos al agua, todos en familia, oramos para que el siguiente año sea de muchos éxitos y de ahí brindamos con champaña”, cuenta José Rivera, cerca del rompeolas.

Se trata de una familia alegre. Gina Plaza, de 54 años, comenta que esta tradición los ha unido más. Ella bromea con Laifon Kuon Yeng, su prima política. Dice riendo, al describir el parentezco de cada miembro en la playa, que la hallaron como náufraga proveniente de un barco de un país oriental y que la apañaron.

Después de unas horas tienen previsto regresar a Guayaquil, a la 19 y Callejón Parra, en el suburbio, para quemar al viejo.

El jefe del Cuerpo de Salvavidas del Municipio de Playas, Manuel Crespín, dijo que a medida que transcurra el día se incrementará la afluencia de turistas. La asistencia de bañistas dista mucho de otros feriados, como el de Carnaval o Semana Santa.

En este balneario habrá, esta noche, un show de salsa, con artistas internacionales.

El espectáculo de fuegos articiales también atraen a visitantes. Cerca del mercado de mariscos de esta playa, José Báez, le indica que vino con su familia de Riobamba y que se regresará mañana para disfrutar del resto del feriado en su tierra.

“Aquí hay tranquilidad, se puede disfrutar del bonito clima”, indica Báez, mientras sigue con su mirada el paso de sus dos canes, unos labradores.

En las cabañas restaurantes de este balneario se encuentran platos, como corvina frita con patacones en $5. El ceviche mixto, entre $5 y $7. Y sobre la arena caliente, los granizados se venden en $0,75. (I)

Source Article from http://www.eluniverso.com/noticias/2016/12/31/nota/5976265/playas-ya-se-vive-fin-ano-2016

Melania Trump made a surprise trip to Iraq on Wednesday with her husband President Donald Trump to meet with American troops stationed at Al Asad Air Base.

For the visit, which was unscheduled, Melania broke first lady precedent by traveling to an active combat zone. To take selfies with soldiers and speak military members, FLOTUS wore a suede mustard belted blouse with dark green pants.

See the Trumps in Iraq:

President Donald Trump, accompanied by National Security Adviser John Bolton, third from left, first lady Melania Trump, fourth from right, US Ambassador to Iraq Doug Silliman, third from right, and senior military leadership, speaks to members of the media at Al Asad Air Base, Iraq, Wednesday, Dec. 26, 2018. (AP Photo/Andrew Harnik)




It’s Melania’s shoe choice that really stood out though. The Timberland boots are being called an “out of touch” style selection by some on Twitter.

One person even suggested that putting on Timberlands was a last-ditch effort by FLOTUS after getting critiqued for her other shoe choices — including the infamous “storm stilettos.”

However, it wouldn’t be the first time that Melania wore a pair of the brand’s boots, and similarly got mocked for them.

RELATED: See FLOTUS’ most divisive looks

As part of her first solo international trip as first lady, Melania visited Nairobi National Park in a white pith helmet, which drew criticism for its colonial-era past. 

Read more here

Melania Trump attended the General Debate of the 73rd session of the General Assembly at the United Nations alongside her husband. Her black dress was thought to be a slight towards President Trump as many people on the internet saw her outfit as a gesture of support for sexual assault survivors.

Read more here.

The Trumps welcomed Polish President Andrzej Duda and his wife Agata Kornhauser-Duda to the White House in September. The problem? Melania was wearing a wool coat while it was still 80 degrees outside. Furthermore, she didn’t remove her coat while dining inside with the Polish first lady, which Twitter deemed not the best hostess tactic. 

Read more here

Melania Trump tried her hand at gardening for the second time to plant an Eisenhower Oak at the White House in August. The $4000 skirt and sky-high Louboutin heels she wore to dig soil sent the internet aflame. 

“Melania is launching her new line of Gardening Attire, accompanied by the standard 4-inch heels,” joked one Twitter user. 

Read more here

FLOTUS stepped out on August 20th in Maryland to promote her Be Best initiative and discuss cyberbullying. To the event, she wore the once-controversial pussy-bow blouse — the same style she sported during the 2016 presidential debate after the Access Hollywood leak. 

Read more here.

Arguably her most controversial outfit yet, Melania sported a jacket emblazoned with the words “I Really Don’t Care Do You” to visit migrant children separated from their parents in Texas. The Zara jacket retails for $39.

Read more here.  

Melania arrived at POTUS’ State of the Union at the start of the new year in a white Dior pantsuit. Many members of Congress chose to wear black in solidarity with sexual assault survivors and in protest of the Trump administration: Melania stood out in all white. 

Read more here

Following Ivana Trump’s controversial interview in October, Melania donned an emerald green shirtdress from British brand Cefinn to an official visit to Lily’s Place to visit with families affected by addiction. It’s the first non-profit infant recovery center in the world. 

The dress was designed by former first lady of Britain Samantha Cameron. Is she reminding everyone of her status? 

Read more here

Alongside President Trump, FLOTUS arrived in Vegas in October to pay their respects to the 50 victims of the Las Vegas shooting. Her all-black, closed-off look drew some major criticism on Twitter. 

“I’m making a public plea to Melania Trump: stop with the sunglasses (and the heels at disaster areas),” one Twitter user wrote.

Read more here

Twitter had a lot to say about this picture of FLOTUS getting down and dirty in the garden established by former first lady Michelle Obama. 

Her $1380 Balmain shirt wasn’t the most appropriate choice for the event.

Read more here

Though this photo was taken at the White House Congressional Picnic in June, the Trumps tweeted a photo from the event to wish the country a happy Labor Day the following September. 

“We are building our future with American hands, American labor, American iron, aluminum and steel,” POTUS wrote. Ironically, Melania’s dress was designed by Mary Katrantzou, a Greek-born British designer. Twitter had *a lot* to say. 

Read more here.

Off to help Hurricane Harvey victims, Melania made headlines when she boarded Air Force One in sky-high stilettos.

“God grant me the serenity not to comment on the shoes,” wrote one Twitter user.

Read more here

FLOTUS turned heads in a $51,500 floral jacket by Dolce & Gabbana for the G7 summit in Italy. 

Read more here

While visiting Yad Vashem, Israel’s Holocaust Memorial, Melania sported a white sleeveless dress. Twitter wasn’t happy with her sporting bare shoulders at the memorial.

Wrote one user, “Melania cover your arms up, show some respect.”

“Geez. The lambasted Michelle Obama for baring her arms and her is Melania Trump in conservative Israel with a sleeveless dress,” said another. 

Read more here

Just days after President Trump landed in hot water following the leaked Access Hollywood recordings, Melania sported a pussy bow shirt to the second presidential debates.

Read more here.




Read more from Yahoo Lifestyle:

Melania Trump’s spokeswoman claims ‘absurdity abounds’ in media coverage of first lady
See the top 10 fashion controversies of 2018, from Melania Trump’s jacket to D&G’s runway fiasco
Fox News host: ‘No other modern first lady has been treated’ as badly as Melania Trump. The internet begs to differ.

Follow us on Instagram, Facebook, and Twitter for nonstop inspiration delivered fresh to your feed, every day.

Source Article from https://www.aol.com/article/lifestyle/2018/12/27/melania-trump-gets-mocked-for-wearing-timberland-boots-while-visiting-the-troops/23627920/

<!– –>

If you ask any Republican member of the U.S. House of Representatives or the U.S. Senate what is the most significant fiscal accomplishment of the Trump presidency, the overwhelming answer would be the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, or TCJA.

When passed in December 2017, the TCJA did not have majority American support. Despite this lack of early support, the GOP believed that once the tax bill was fully implemented, the American taxpayers would be impressed with their large tax savings, and public opinion on the TCJA would become overwhelmingly positive.

To that point, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., dismissed early criticism, saying, “We’ll see how unpopular it is when people start noticing they’re paying less in taxes, the economy’s growing, there are more jobs and opportunity.”

Well, April 15 is here, tax returns are being filed and Americans remain unconvinced of the equity and the value of the TCJA.

Results from a recent NBC News/Wall Street Journal Poll said just 17% believe their own taxes will go down. By contrast, 28% believe they’ll pay more, 27% expect to pay about the same, and 28% don’t know enough to say.

Unfortunately for McConnell, Americans did not rejoice at the small incremental change in their monthly take-home pay, made possible by the changes in withholding tables.

A Morning Consult/Politico poll taken in December 2018 reported that, of those polled, only 23% saw an increase in their take-home pay, and 60% did not. Now, as Americans file their returns, they similarly are not seeing anything that will improve their opinion of the TCJA.

As of the end of March, the IRS paid out $6 billion less in total refunds this year compared with last, and the average tax refund amount is $20 less than last year. This does not look like the huge tax reduction promised to middle-class America.

Yes, I know the reality is that most Americans did, in fact, receive a tax reduction, with estimates of average tax savings from $1,000 to $2,000 per return filed. But in taxes, as in most political things, perception is reality. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., said the TCJA was “simply theft — monumental, brazen theft — from the American middle class and from every person who aspires to reach it.”

Sixteen months since the TCJA passage and now well into the 2018 filing season, it appears the American public agrees.

More from Invest in You:
This tax mistake in college left me owing the IRS
Here’s what we need to do to improve financial literacy
America’s juiciest money secrets, as told to CNBC

It cannot be overstated that what also continues to drive these negative poll numbers is a core belief that the income-tax system benefits the rich at the expense of the middle class. Polling has begun on a number of Democratic presidential candidates’ proposals that would increase taxes on the richest Americans. The results are not good for the wealthy.

Almost all these proposals have majority support, with the wealth-tax proposal of Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., earning 74% approval. Interestingly, some of the proposals also have majority Republican support.

“Americans who believe the tax system is rigged for the rich and against the middle class want the system fixed. They clearly do not believe the fix can be found in the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act.”
-Heidi Heitkamp, former U.S. senator (D) from North Dakota

The Republican tax bill architects will argue that the opinions reflected in these poll numbers are misguided, and that the TCJA and the current tax burden on wealthy Americans is not widely understood.

But as President Ronald Reagan once said: “If you’re explaining, you’re losing.”

Americans who believe the tax system is rigged for the rich and against the middle class want the system fixed. They clearly do not believe the fix can be found in the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. That is bad news for any Republican candidate, including President Donald Trump, who want to make the TCJA the centerpiece of their argument for reelection.


Heidi Heitkamp
, a CNBC contributor, is a former U.S. Senator (D) North Dakota

Disclosure: NBCUniversal and Comcast Ventures are investors in Acorns.—

Source Article from https://www.cnbc.com/2019/04/12/americans-are-unhappy-with-tax-overhaul-and-the-gop-should-be-worried.html

One of the loudest voices emerging from House Democrats impeachment inquiry about President TrumpDonald John Trump Comey: Mueller ‘didn’t succeed in his mission because there was inadequate transparency’ During deposition, official says he made several efforts to advocate for Marie Yovanovitch Bolton looms large as impeachment inquiry accelerates MORE’s alleged abuse of power has come from a man who has yet to utter a word publicly about the probe: former national security adviser John BoltonJohn BoltonBolton looms large as impeachment inquiry accelerates US restores trade benefit to Ukraine after delay Key witness in impeachment investigation asks federal judge to rule on testifying MORE.

Testifying witnesses have placed Bolton at the center of some of the most explosive scenes related to questions of abuse of power by the president and officials he tasked with a shadow foreign policy in Ukraine, described by one witness as an “irregular channel.”

This includes Trump’s personal lawyer Rudy GiulianiRudy GiulianiDuring deposition, official says he made several efforts to advocate for Marie Yovanovitch Bolton looms large as impeachment inquiry accelerates Giuliani associate used small town in Ukraine to gain influence with American figures: report MORE, Ambassador to the European Union Gordon Sondland, Energy Secretary Rick PerryRick PerryBolton looms large as impeachment inquiry accelerates White House official to corroborate diplomat’s version of Ukraine events: report GOP lawmakers express concerns about Giuliani’s work in Ukraine MORE and then-special envoy for Ukraine Kurt VolkerKurt VolkerWhite House official to corroborate diplomat’s version of Ukraine events: report Five takeaways from US envoy’s explosive testimony Democrats say they have game changer on impeachment MORE.

In witness testimony, Bolton is presented as a key figure countering the efforts of those accused of pressuring a foreign government to influence the 2020 U.S. presidential election on behalf of Trump.

Bolton could soon appear before House investigators soon; his lawyers are in talks with impeachment investigators about testifying behind closed doors. And while he is one of almost two dozen potential witnesses on investigators’ wish list, his testimony could prove to be the most damaging depending on where he comes down on the ideological spectrum.

Bolton is a staunch conservative who views the president’s powers as expansive and has defended preemptive military strikes. But it’s unclear whether any testimony from him would defend Trump’s actions as an extension of executive powers or if he would paint those actions as an abuse of power that’s damaging to the rule of law and order.

“He’s not a friendly guy, but he does know right from wrong,” one former colleague said of Bolton. “He’s been around the national security scene for a long time. He knows what’s appropriate and what isn’t.”

Bolton has so far made known he’s no personal friend of the president. His last public statement, posted on Twitter, was a swift rebuke of Trump’s characterization that he had “fired” Bolton.

“I offered to resign last night,” Bolton tweeted, “and President Trump said, ‘Let’s talk about it tomorrow.’’”

Shortly after leaving the White House, Bolton was described as disparaging the president at a private event in New York. Attendees recalled Bolton did not have “anything positive to say about Trump,” and criticized the president’s policy on Iran, North Korea and Afghanistan.

He also called Trump’s plan to invite the Taliban to Camp David on the 9/11 anniversary “disrespectful.”

If he testifies, lawmakers are likely to ask Bolton if he has evidence, or reason to believe, the president acted in political self-interest at the expense of national security in pressuring Ukraine to open investigations into Vice President Joe BidenJoe BidenDuring deposition, official says he made several efforts to advocate for Marie Yovanovitch Bolton looms large as impeachment inquiry accelerates Giuliani associate used small town in Ukraine to gain influence with American figures: report MORE, his son Hunter Biden, their involvement with the energy company Burisma Holdings and alleged Ukrainian interference in the 2016 U.S. elections.

Trump has maintained that raising those issues were part of a U.S. policy focused on weeding out corruption in Ukraine. But testimony in the impeachment inquiry paints a starkly different picture.

Chief of Mission to Ukraine William Taylor, who has provided some of the most detailed testimony in the probe, described key moments between many of the major players embroiled in the controversy and centered on the question of the decision to delay military assistance to Ukraine for the promise of going after one of Trump’s political opponents.

Taylor also raised the question of the involvement of Giuliani, who was allegedly directed by Trump to follow through on efforts to open investigations into the Bidens, Burisma and 2016 election interference.

Sondland, in his testimony, corroborated that the president had directed Giuliani to take on this mission, and investigators are working to understand the former New York City’s mayor efforts to influence White House foreign policy. Two of Giuliani’s associates were indicted for allegedly attempting to make political contributions on behalf of foreign governments without disclosing the source.

Former National Security Council (NSC) Director for European Affairs Fiona Hill testified that Bolton had called Giuliani a “hand grenade” and was going to “blow everything up.” Taylor corroborated those statements and offered his own assessment of the danger of jeopardizing Ukraine relations, calling it “folly.”

One of Bolton’s descriptions, according to testimony, likened it to a “drug deal.”

Bolton is regarded as extremely disciplined in his work ethic, having an almost photographic memory and encyclopedic knowledge of world affairs. Should he testify, he’s likely to provide detailed and even colorful testimony.

Investigators will be keen to understand Bolton’s motivation to direct NSC staff to alert White House lawyers after a July meeting between administration officials and Ukrainian representatives.

That meeting, described in testimony, has Sondland connecting a future Oval Office visit by Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky with “investigations” – referring to the conspiracy theories surrounding the Bidens and 2016 election interference.

Stay away from domestic politics, Bolton told NSC staffers, directing them to the lawyers, according to testimony. The account puts further emphasis on the argument that administration officials were using their positions to pressure a foreign government to disparage a domestic political opponent.

Sondland, in his testimony, said no one told him he was acting inappropriately. He said he realized there was a “difference of opinion” between the NSC staff and the track that he was pursuing with Perry and Volker.

“We had regular communications with the NSC about Ukraine, both before and after the July meeting,” Sondland testified, “and neither Ambassador Bolton, Dr. Hill, nor anyone else on the NSC staff ever expressed any concerns to me about our efforts, any complaints about coordination between State and the NSC, or, most importantly, any concerns that we were acting improperly.”

Lawmakers will also ask Bolton for more details about why military assistance to Ukraine was delayed.

Taylor has testified that even though he was aware of a hold on military assistance, he was never given an appropriate reason.

House investigators have sent out subpoenas for more witnesses, including Tim Morrison, who took over at the NSC after Hill’s departure; two officials from the Office of Management and Budget, likely questioned over instructions to withhold military aid to Ukraine; and State Department officials.

Bolton has yet to give any media interviews since leaving the White House but has reportedly signed a deal to publish a tell-all book, though a publication date has not been announced.

Source Article from https://thehill.com/policy/national-security/467547-bolton-looms-large-as-impeachment-inquiry-accelerates

Media captionRoger Stone speaks to reporters reacting to Trump’s decision to grant clemency

Former US special counsel Robert Mueller has made a rare public intervention to defend his indictment of former Trump adviser Roger Stone.

Stone was found guilty on charges linked to an investigation led by Mr Mueller that found Russia tried to boost the Trump 2016 election campaign.

President Donald Trump commuted Stone’s 40-month jail sentence on Friday saying he was the victim of a “witch-hunt”.

In the Washington Post, Mr Mueller said Stone was rightly a convicted felon.

Stone was convicted of obstruction, witness tampering and lying to Congress.

The president’s move – sparing Stone from jail but not granting him a pardon – came just after a court denied Stone’s request to delay the start date of his prison term.

Leading Democrats and a few Republicans have condemned Mr Trump’s decision, saying it undermined the justice system.

The White House said that Department of Justice prosecutors under Mr Mueller only charged Stone out of frustration after failing to prove the “fantasy” that the Trump campaign had colluded with the Kremlin.

What do Mueller and others say?

Mr Mueller writes that he felt compelled to respond to claims that his investigation had been illegitimate, his motives improper, and Stone a victim.

Image copyright
Reuters

Image caption

Mr Mueller’s article is his first public statement since he gave testimony to Congress last year

“The Russia investigation was of paramount importance. Stone was prosecuted and convicted because he committed federal crimes. He remains a convicted felon, and rightly so,” he wrote.

He said that finding evidence of Russian interference was a complex task that took “two years and substantial effort” and resulted in a number of charges and prosecutions. Stone’s obstruction may have impeded efforts to find the truth and hold wrongdoers accountable, he added.

“We made every decision in Stone’s case, as in all our cases, based solely on the facts and the law and in accordance with the rule of law,” he concluded. “The women and men who conducted these investigations and prosecutions acted with the highest integrity. Claims to the contrary are false.”

Mr Mueller rarely makes public statements about the investigation, and the article is the first since he gave testimony in Congress in July 2019.

His reaction follows strong condemnation by senior Democrats, with presidential contender Joe Biden’s spokesman accusing Mr Trump of abuse of power and “laying waste” to US values.

Democratic Senator Elizabeth Warren said it showed Mr Trump was the most corrupt president in history.

Some Republican critics of Mr Trump have also spoken out, with Senator Mitt Romney describing the president’s decision as “unprecedented, historic corruption”.

What does the president say?

In a tweet on Saturday, Mr Trump said: “Roger Stone was targeted by an illegal Witch Hunt that never should have taken place.”

Earlier, the White House said in a statement that Stone was “a victim of the Russia Hoax that the Left and its allies in the media perpetuated for years in an attempt to undermine the Trump Presidency”.

It also suggested that the FBI had tipped off CNN about their pre-dawn raid on Stone’s house, noting that a camera crew for the cable network was on the scene to record the arrest.

Mr Trump had been hinting about a reprieve for Stone for months, including on Thursday night in an interview with a Fox News host.

Trump ally Senator Lindsey Graham was among those welcoming the decision. He said Stone was convicted of a “nonviolent, first-time offense” and the president was “justified” in commuting the sentence.

Stone himself told reporters that under the terms of the commutation he could now appeal against his sentence, and was confident that he could expose “an enormous amount of corruption” at his trial.

What was Stone convicted of?

The president’s commutation does not void a criminal conviction as a pardon does.

Stone was found guilty of lying to the House Intelligence Committee about his attempts to contact Wikileaks, the website that released damaging emails about Mr Trump’s 2016 Democratic election rival Hillary Clinton.

US intelligence officials have concluded the messages were stolen by Russian hackers.

Stone had acknowledged during the 2016 campaign that he was in contact with Wikileaks founder Julian Assange.

He also intimated that he knew the website would disclose more than 19,000 emails hacked from the Democratic National Committee servers.

Media captionTrump: ‘I’d love to see Roger Stone exonerated’

Stone’s sentence fell short of an initial seven-to-nine-year recommendation from prosecutors.

In a remarkable move, US Attorney General William Barr had overruled that sentencing guideline following a Trump tweet, and instead recommended a more lenient punishment.

That intervention led to the entire Stone prosecution team resigning from the case.

Source Article from https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-53379593

We’ve detected unusual activity from your computer network

To continue, please click the box below to let us know you’re not a robot.

Source Article from https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-04-30/biden-bans-travel-from-india-as-coronavirus-cases-surge

Fernando Zavala, primer ministro, conforme con la decisión de resolver el contrato con Kuntur Wasi. | Fuente: Andina

El ministro de Transportes, Bruno Giuffra, anunció este domingo por la mañana en RPP Noticias que la construcción del aeropuerto de Chinchero se hará como obra pública. Por la tarde, el primer ministro, Fernando Zavala, se pronunció sobre el hecho.

“Buena decisión ministro. Sigamos avanzando”, escribió en su cuenta de Twitter. Con esto, el contrato que firmó el gobierno con el consorcio Kuntur Wasi quedó disueldo de mutuo acuerdo, según informó Giuffra.

Cambios. El Gobierno va a seguir con la fase 1 del proyecto en la que se contempla la remoción del terreno, esta vez como obra pública. Luego, se convocará a una nueva licitación para las obras de infraestructura. 

Según los funcionarios del Ejecutivo, la gestión de Pedro Pablo Kuczynski tiene como prioridad solucionar las controversias y sacar adelante los proyectos de desarrollo, entre ellos este terminal aéreo que los cusqueños esperan.

El Gobierno puso fin a la controversia sobre el aeropuerto. | Fuente: Andina

Source Article from http://rpp.pe/politica/gobierno/zavala-felicita-la-decision-de-giuffra-para-hacer-chinchero-como-obra-publica-noticia-1055432

Media captionDonald Tusk: I hope Boris Johnson will not want to go down in history as Mr No Deal

European Council President Donald Tusk and Prime Minister Boris Johnson have clashed over who would be to blame in the case of a no-deal Brexit.

Mr Tusk said Mr Johnson risked being remembered as “Mr No Deal” – but the PM responded by saying it was Mr Tusk who would become “Mr No-Deal Brexit”.

The pair are due to meet for talks at the G7 summit in France on Sunday.

Mr Tusk added the EU was “willing to listen” to the PM’s ideas for Brexit – as long as they are “realistic”.

But speaking at his press conference in Biarritz, Mr Tusk said he would “not co-operate on [a] no-deal”.

Since becoming PM, Mr Johnson has said the UK will leave the EU on 31 October.

Mr Johnson has repeatedly stated he would prefer to leave the EU with a deal, but insists the backstop – the insurance policy designed to avoid a hard border on the island of Ireland – must be removed from the withdrawal agreement.

“I’ve made it absolutely clear I don’t want no deal and that we’ve got to get rid of the backstop from the treaty and if Mr Tusk doesn’t want to go down as Mr No-Deal Brexit I hope that point will be borne in mind too,” he said.

Earlier in the day, Mr Tusk had used the same moniker when talking about Mr Johnson.

“I still hope Prime Minister Johnson will not like to go down in history as Mr No Deal,” he said.

“The EU has always been open to co-operation. One thing I will not co-operate on is a no deal.

“We are willing to listen to ideas that are operational, realistic and acceptable to all EU member states.”

‘All signs point to a no-deal Brexit’

Analysis by BBC diplomatic correspondent James Landale

When Boris Johnson met President Emmanuel Macron and Chancellor Angela Merkel this week, he got a relatively positive response.

Both leaders indicated they were willing to listen to any ideas the prime minister may have to avoid a no-deal Brexit.

But Mr Johnson’s meeting with Donald Tusk at the G7 summit on Sunday may now prove more problematic.

The spat between both men – both of them warning they could go down in history as Mr No Deal – shows that both sides are engaged in a blame game.

Neither side wishes to be seen as the intransigent partner in a negotiation that leads to no deal.

Mr Macron and Ms Merkel were implicit in this, while Mr Tusk was explicit, prompting an equally blunt response from Mr Johnson.

It is, of course, still possible that some political space may be carved out to allow for a compromise at the last minute. But all the signs still point towards a no-deal Brexit at the end of October.

The G7 summit – a get-together of most of the leaders of the world’s largest economies – comes with just over two months until the UK is scheduled to leave the EU at the end of October.

Mr Johnson wants to renegotiate the Irish backstop – a key Brexit sticking point – but the EU has consistently ruled this out.

Speaking on Saturday, Mr Johnson said: “We’ve made it very clear we won’t be instituting any kind of checks or controls at the Northern Irish border. We don’t think such controls are necessary.

“There are a large range of alternative arrangements – these we will be discussing in the coming weeks.”

If implemented, the backstop – a last resort should the UK and the EU not agree a trade deal after Brexit – would see Northern Ireland staying aligned to some rules of the EU single market.

It would also see the UK stay in a single customs territory with the EU, and align with current and future EU rules on competition and state aid.

At a news conference on Wednesday with Mr Johnson, German Chancellor Merkel suggested an alternative to the backstop might be achievable, adding that the onus was on the UK.

Image copyright
Getty Images

Image caption

Boris Johnson met with French President Emmanuel Macron at the Elysee Presidential Palace this week

But the next day French President Macron said the backstop was “indispensable” to preserving political stability and the single market.

After visiting his counterparts in Paris and Berlin this week, Mr Johnson said there was “new mood music”, but reaching a new deal would not be “a cinch”.

He has insisted the UK will leave the EU on 31 October, whether or not a new deal is reached.

Mr Johnson will also meet with US President Donald Trump, who arrived in France around Saturday lunchtime.

Asked if he would be telling Mr Trump not to escalate the US-China trade war, Mr Johnson said: “You bet.”

He added one of his priorities for the summit was “the state of global trade”.

Source Article from https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-49458293

Cocodrilos en las calles, edificios multimillonarios a punto de caerse, efectos devastadores de plantas hidroeléctricas y supuestos apagones nacionales fueron los elementos protagonistas de una tormenta de noticias falsas que también azotó las redes sociales y se llevó en banda a más de un incauto, medios de comunicación incluidos.

En medio de las inundaciones por el desbordamiento de ríos, con efectos fatales en algunos casos, usuarios de redes sociales se aprovecharon para repartir a diestra y siniestra imágenes y supuestas noticias sin constatar que se tratara de hechos domésticos y, al compartirlos en redes, crearon un efecto viral que llegó hasta medios internacionales.

A través de su oficina de prensa, el Gobierno indicó que se mantiene vigilando todo tipo de informaciones generadas en las redes sociales y en los medios, para evitar que se difundan noticias falsas que generen confusión entre la población, sobre todo entre la gente afectada por las lluvias.

Como suele suceder con muchas de las mentiras que circulan por Internet, algunas de estas falsedades se originaron en datos parcialmente reales, pero la vorágine de tener evidencia gráfica originó las falacias.

Eso pasó con los cocodrilos que nunca anduvieron campantes por las calles o, al menos, no hay evidencia gráfica de ello, pues las fotografías que compartieron decenas de usuarios en las redes eran de otros países, en particular de México.

Cocodrilos.
(Captura de pantalla.)

Algo de verdad podría haber habido en esa noticia, puesto que el Ministerio de Ambiente, Energía y Telecomunicaciones (Minaet) lanzó una alerta preventiva sobre la posibilidad de que los cocodrilos del río Tárcoles, en Garabito, Puntarenas, llegaran a sitios habitados por personas producto del desbordamiento.

Eso fue suficiente para que la gente compartiera fotos de otros países y dijera, incluso, que los cocodrilos (hasta lagartos les llamaron) del Tárcoles se paseaban por las calles de Liberia, Guanacaste. Así de lejos se hacía creer a los usuarios que se los había llevado la corriente.

Francesco Di Palma, vocero del Sistema Nacional de Áreas de Conservación (Sinac), negó que hubiera reportes de avistamiento de cocodrilos, pero enfatizó que era una alerta preventiva.

Una mezcla de fotos ajenas a Costa Rica y las informaciones del Minae se reprodujo, entonces, en medios panameños como PanamáAmérica y La Estrella, así como en el dominicano CDN37, los venezolanos La Patilla y Noticias24, el Diario Tiempo de Honduras, La Nueva Radio YA de Nicaragua y La Prensa Gráfica, de El Salvador.

Las informaciones no habrían sido falsas, de no ser porque muchas de ellas iban acompañadas de fotografías que no corresponden a los cocodrilos domésticos.

Más cocodrilos.
(Captura de pantalla.)

Las mentiras también intentaron generar pánico desde el miércoles, por un supuesto apagón nacional, o culpar a la planta hidroeléctrica Pirrís por las inundaciones en Parrita.

En el caso de esta última información, el Instituto Costarricense de Electricidad (ICE) negó la acusación a través de un comunicado de prensa en el que enfatizó que, tanto Pirrís como Reventazón, Cachí, Peñas Blancas y La Angostura, cumplieron funciones de regulación del nivel del embalse, para amortiguar el efecto en las poblaciones y “garantizar la infraestructura”.

Sobre el supuesto apagón nacional, al ICE no le quedó de otra que tratar de minimizar los efectos de la viralización de las mentiras: “Son falsos los rumores que circulan en redes sociales sobre la suspensión general del servicio eléctrico. No existe ninguna situación que afecte el sistema de transmisión de energía”.

Ante la emergencia por las lluvias, esa institución y la Compañía Nacional de Fuerza y Luz activaron sus protocolos para atender averías. A las 3 p. m. del jueves, se encontraban 35.000 personas sin luz y se atendían averías en todo el territorio, solamente.

El supuesto edificio falseado

Una de las informaciones más delicadas fue la que se lanzó respecto a los supuestos apuros de un edificio de condominios en Sabana Oeste, publicada en el sitio web elguardian.cr.

Luego, ese sitio web publicó que la empresa RC Inmobiliaria negó que un deslizamiento de tierra ocurrido a 150 metros de la obra hubiera afectado la torre de 18 pisos de la estructura llamada Bambú 106. 

De hecho, los propietarios de la desarrolladora tuvieron que salir al paso de las diversas reacciones que generó la noticia original y que los señaló a ellos como los supuestos afectados del presunto deslizamiento.

La foto en la publicación original corresponde con una obra que se denomina Paradisus, cuyos desarrolladores, Inmobiliaria ConstruReal negaron que el movimiento de tierras que aparece en la imagen fuese producto de deslave, inestabilidad o deslizamiento alguno, sino “del proceso que se realiza para remover la maleza y dar un mejor tratamiento a la tierra”.

Al final, ninguno de los dos edificios estaba en riesgo de caerse y la torre de condominios de la noticia original se confundió con la de otro proyecto.

Torre de condominios.
(Captura de pantalla)

Los profetas del fútbol

Una nota aparecida este jueves por la mañana, en un sitio web llamado 12minutos, anunciaba la suspensión del partido entre Costa Rica y Honduras de este viernes. Cuando se originó era mentira y fue desmentida, pero finalmente resultó ser toda una profecía, porque horas después efectivamente se canceló el encuentro y se programó para un día después, sábado 7, a las 4 p. m.

Sin redactor, sin fuentes oficiales, sin declaraciones y falsamente atribuida a un origen en Zurich, Suiza, el pequeño artículo de un párrafo causó un traspié a Telenoticias, donde lanzaron el anuncio y procedieron a llamar al presidente de la Federación Costarricense de Fútbol (Fedefútbol), Rodolfo Villalobos, quien por la mañana negó que se hubiera tomado esa decisión.

A pesar de que era originalmente una noticia falsa, finalmente se concretó como una realidad.

Aunque con menos impacto, también circularon dos noticias que casi levantan alarma. La primera, una advertencia del Centro Nacional de Huracanes (NHC, por sus siglas en inglés) de la Administración Nacional Oceánica y Atmosférica (NOAA) de Estados Unidos.

Foto vieja del puente.
(Captura de pantalla.)

En el mensaje, un texto atribuido a esa entidad distribuido por WhatsApp, se adviertía de que había un 90% de posibilidades de que la depresión tropical se convirtiera en un huracán que “podría incluso incursionar tierra adentro”. Eso nunca fue cierto, pero era creíble pues hace casi un año el ciclón Otto pasó el territorio costarricense de lado a lado.

En el sitio web de dicha organización no hay ninguna referencia a esa posibilidad, salvo los registros de posibles afectaciones e inundaciones en esos dos países y el curso que llevaría Nate como tormenta tropical. Lo que ocurrió fue que quien alteró el texto tomó como machote textos usuales del NHC y los acomodó a su antojo.

Una foto de una supuesta socavación en el puento sobre el río Virilla, entre Tibás y Santo Domingo de Heredia, también circuló por Facebook, pero se trata de una imagen vieja.

Source Article from http://www.nacion.com/nacional/tormenta-noticias-falsas-azoto-sociales_0_1662433847.html

Rudy Giuliani, attorney to President Donald Trump, got into it with CNN’s Chris Cuomo during a raucous interview on Thursday night.

The former New York City mayor shouted at Cuomo, repeatedly contradicted himself, declared Cuomo to be “the enemy” and at one point, placed his head on his hand and closed his eyes, showing off a New York Yankees World Series ring:

Cuomo began the segment by recapping the latest news about a whistleblower complaint, which both The New York Times and The Washington Post reported on Thursday involved Trump’s contact with Ukraine. The news was released amid House Democrats’ investigation of allegations that Trump and Giuliani “sought to manipulate the Ukrainian government into helping the Trump reelection campaign.”  




Earlier this year, Giuliani canceled a trip to Ukraine in which he was allegedly planning to pressure the government to investigate former Vice President Joe Biden and his son, Hunter Biden. The elder Biden is seeking the Democratic nomination to run against Trump during next year’s presidential election.  

Giuliani told Cuomo that it was a “scandal of major proportions which all of you have covered up for five or six months.” He also revived right-wing conspiracy theories about billionaire George Soros, claiming he was in on the “major” scandal with Biden. 

But Giuliani first denied trying to encourage Ukraine to investigate Biden. 

“Did you ask the Ukraine to investigate Joe Biden?” Cuomo asked. 

“No,” Giuliani said. “Actually, I didn’t.” 

Giuliani said he asked Ukraine to investigate if that country tried to help Hillary Clinton in the 2016 election.

“You never asked anything about Hunter Biden? You never asked anything about Joe Biden?” Cuomo asked. 

Giuliani then admitted he asked Ukraine to look into a conspiracy theory related to Biden.

“So you did ask Ukraine to look into Joe Biden?” Cuomo asked again. 

“Of course I did!” Giuliani said. 

“You just said you didn’t!” Cuomo said.

“No, I didn’t ask them to look into Joe Biden,” Giuliani replied. 

Watch the exchange below:

  • This article originally appeared on HuffPost.

Source Article from https://www.aol.com/article/news/2019/09/20/rudy-giuliani-melts-down-on-live-tv-in-bizarre-chris-cuomo-interview/23816702/

More than a week after a trio of historic wildfires around the Bay Area prompted their first evacuation orders, some residents got the OK to return home, and more approvals were on the horizon.

But that return home could still be a week away or more for those in the most affected areas — and there were still some new evacuation orders being issued north of the Bay Area late in the week, even as firefighters largely wrangled the three fires under control.

Altogether, they have burned nearly 820,000 acres, damaged or destroyed more than 2,000 structures and forced tens of thousands to flee. Six deaths have been attributed to the fires.

The CZU Lightning Complex, in the Santa Cruz Mountains, had burned 81,333 acres and was 21% contained Thursday morning. It had destroyed 646 structures and claimed the life of one Santa Cruz County man.

The LNU Lightning Complex, in the North Bay, had burned 368,868 acres and was 33% contained Thursday morning. It had damaged or destroyed more than 1,300 structures and killed five people. It trails only the 2018 Mendocino Complex fires as the largest in California’s history.

The SCU Lightning Complex, in the South Bay and further east, had burned 368,671 acres and was 35% contained Thursday morning. It trails only the LNU Complex and the 2018 Mendocino Complex fires as the largest in California’s history.

Follow below for the latest updates, and explore the map to see where fires are burning.

Cal Fire estimates another month before CZU Complex fully contained | Update 1:30 p.m.

Although an absence of significant wind and a break from hot, dry weather is helping firefighters control the fire above Ben Lomond in Santa Cruz County, “We’re not completely out of the woods yet,” said Cal Fire spokesman Dan Olson.

Crews have cut, scraped and burned a firebreak that runs across the mountainside above the town, but the fire up beyond it is still burning and as of Thursday afternoon it was not clear when evacuated Ben Lomond residents might be able to return, Olson said.

All in all, it could be about a month before the CZU Complex is controlled and mopped up to the point that the battle can be handed off to local departments now working under the agency’s command. Many firefighters will continue to be away from their homes and families indefinitely, as the fire is still burning and far from contained.

“We’re dealing with large, 100-year-old redwoods that once they start to burn it takes a lot to suppress,” Olson said. Mop-up will be a “long and drawn-out process,” he added. “This isn’t something that will be resolved in days or even weeks.”

— Ethan Baron

Swaths of San Mateo County reopen for residents to return | 12 p.m.

Evacuation orders for the La Honda, Pescadero, and San Gregorio parts of San Mateo County have been lifted as of noon Thursday, allowing residents to go home after days away.

“The local crews in La Honda have done such a great job with holding back this fire and also addressing and protecting the towns that are there,” said Sheriff’s Office Detective Rosemerry Blankswade in a briefing. “We feel confident … to be able to let the neighbors back in those areas without creating any danger or risk.”

Blankswade would not estimate when other evacuation orders may be lifted, noting Cal Fire crews still expect a “long haul” along the most active parts of the burn zone in Bonny Doon and Boulder Creek. Details of the noon changes are below.

More Lake and Solano County residents expected to head home in next two days | Update 11 a.m.

Evacuees across parts of Lake and Solano counties who fled from the LNU Complex may be homeward bound over the next 72 hours, Cal Fire officials said Thursday morning.

As crews corral the southern edges of the fire, officials are making plans to repopulate more areas near Fairfield and Winters, according to Chief Sean Kavanaugh. To the north, the Hennessey fire just south of Middletown remains firefighters’ main priority after it jumped Highway 16; those flames are largely contained on a plateau above the highway.

As for the Walbridge fire that had threatened Healdsburg and Calistoga earlier this week, Cal Fire Chief Waters said that Wednesday’s cooler weather and marine layer made for a “very good day.”

“We hope to make significant progress today,” Waters added.

Parts of Colusa County told to evacuate | Update 9 a.m.

While residents of Vacaville and Atlas Peak began heading home, fresh evacuation orders and warnings were handed down further north in Colusa County Thursday morning — including all residents those north of the Yolo County line, east of Highway 16, west of Sand Creek and south of Spring Valley Road.

LNU Complex overtakes SCU Complex in size | Update 7:45 a.m.

The LNU Complex burned another 8,000 acres overnight and fire crews’ containment of the fires remained at 33%, CalFire officials said in a Thursday morning update, enough to overtake the SCU Complex, which is burning simultaneously in Santa Clara and Alameda counties, and further east.

The blaze had grown in total size to 368,868 acres and damaged 1,080 structures, with another 272 damaged and more than 30,000 still threatened by the flames. Its growth overnight made it just larger than the SCU Complex, making it the second-largest wildfire in the state’s history, behind only the 2018 Mendocino Complex fires.

Both zones in the LNU Complex, the Hennessey Fire to the east and the Walbridge Fire to the west, were still burning strong Thursday morning. West of Healdsburg, the Walbridge Fire grew to 55,353 acres and remained at 19% containment. Near Lake Berryessa, the Hennessey Fire also grew in size overnight to 311,222 acres and remained 33% contained.

As recently as Wednesday evening, new evacuation orders and warnings were issued in parts of Yolo and Lake counties, on the northern edges of the LNU blazes.

Meanwhile, the SCU Complex grew by about 1,000 acres overnight, increasing its total acreage to 368,671 — about 200 acres smaller than the LNU Complex burning north of it. Crews increased their containment of the SCU Complex to 35%, the most of any of the fires currently burning around the Bay Area.

More progress made vs. CZU Complex, despite complications | Update 6:45 a.m.

Changes in the weather forced firefighters to call an audible Wednesday in their strategy to contain the CZU Lightning Complex fires burning in the Santa Cruz Mountains.

The fire has grown by about 1,200 acres in the last 24 hours and crews have increased their containment to 21%, but they weren’t able to proceed with the controlled burn on the south edge of the flames, nor were they able to use the same level of air support as in recent days.

But still they have had “a lot of success” over the past few days and were moving “toward the potential of repopulation,” fire chief Mark Brunton said Wednesday morning. Fire officials were hopeful they would get an even tighter grip on the flames before the weather shifts again this weekend, with more hot, dry air and winds from the north.

Evacuation orders for parts of the UC Santa Cruz campus were lifted Wednesday evening, and the community of Scotts Valley could soon follow. It, however, is likely to be a longer wait for those in Bonny Doon, Boulder Creek and other harder-hit areas. Residents can see if they’ve been cleared to return on this official map.

“Over the course of the next 48 hours we’re going to be looking at repopulating different areas in and around this fire,” said incident commander Billy See. “It has to be a coordinated and methodical process.”

Multiple agencies have to coordinate to reactivate power and water to the evacuated areas, as well as inspect roadways for any possible damage. Crews were still working to gain access to Highway 236, which runs through Big Basin State Park.

Damage inspection crews discovered another 100 structures destroyed by the CZU fires in Santa Cruz County. These were places that burned previously and are only now being evaluated. The total destruction was at 646 structures Thursday morning, with another 23,000 under threat from the flames. CalFire officials said they had completed about 55% of the damage inspection.

Officials also said they had located one of the three people still unaccounted for, Henry Reinke, and they didn’t believe the other two were victims of the fires.

Catch up on all the updates from Wednesday here.

Source Article from https://www.mercurynews.com/bay-area-wildfire-updates-evacuation-orders-lifted-for-parts-of-czu-complex-including-uc-santa-cruz

“I guess I’m fortunate enough to go to real prison, so I’ll have more material,” she said.

After her release, she is likely to be deported to Germany, but she said she then hoped to move to London.

She said she had already made some “smaller investments” in technology and cryptocurrency with personal money routed through an L.L.C.

Ms. Sorokin said she was also interested in criminal justice reform, artificial intelligence and the banking industry, adding: “Ideally, if all goes well, I’ll have my own investment fund.”

Mr. Spodek, her lawyer, said: “I don’t know how realistic some of these business endeavors are. But I’m confident that this won’t be the last time we hear from Anna, and I know that she will go on to great things.”

Others are also writing Ms. Sorokin’s story: Ms. Williams has deals with HBO and Simon & Schuster. And Netflix purchased the rights to the New York magazine story for an undisclosed amount. Shonda Rhimes, the creator of “Grey’s Anatomy” and “Scandal,” has been tapped to dramatize it.

As guards signaled the end of the visit before her sentencing, Ms. Sorokin was asked if, given the chance, she would do the same things again.

Ms. Sorokin shrugged. “Yes, probably so,” she said, laughing.

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/10/nyregion/anna-delvey-sorokin.html

  • The House GOP conference devolved into Twitter chaos on Tuesday morning. 
  • Greene called Mace “trash” after Mace condemned Islamophobia from Rep. Lauren Boebert. 
  • Mace used three emojis to insult Greene as other members chimed in.

House GOP members descended into an intraparty Twitter quarrel on Tuesday morning, which was sparked by Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene denouncing her colleague Rep. Nancy Mace as “the trash in the GOP conference” and pushing Islamophobic stereotypes by accusing the South Carolina lawmaker of being “gal pals” with the “Jihad Squad.” 

At the heart of this digital fight were Islamophobic comments GOP Rep. Lauren Boebert recently made about Democratic Rep. Ilhan Omar. Boebert called Omar, who is Muslim, part of a “Jihad Squad” and said a Capitol Police officer had “fret all over his face” when he stepped into an elevator with Boebert and Omar. 

Boebert said she told the officer, “Well, she doesn’t have a backpack. We should be fine.” The comment implied Omar could be a terrorist.

Mace rebuked Boebert for her comments in a Monday appearance on “CNN Newsroom.”

“I have time after time condemned my colleagues on both sides of the aisle for racist tropes and remarks that I find disgusting and this is no different than any other,” Mace told CNN, adding: “We all have a responsibility … to lower the temperature, and this does not do that.”

Greene lashed out at Mace on Tuesday, writing on Twitter: “@NancyMace is the trash in the GOP Conference. Never attacked by Democrats or RINO’s (same thing) because she is not conservative, she’s pro-abort.

“Mace you can back up off of @laurenboebert or just go hang with your real gal pals, the Jihad Squad. Your out of your league.”

 The “Jihad Squad” is an Islamophobic insult referring to Omar and her progressive allies.

Mace hit back at Greene by correcting her spelling of “you’re” and doubling down on her criticism of Boebert as a “religious bigot” and “racist.”

Mace did not clarify who from the left criticized her for going on a bipartisan congressional delegation to Taiwan. The routine trip, called a “codel,” was a show of support for Taiwanese interests that spurred backlash from China.

In a subsequent tweet, Mace also used three emojis to call Greene a common insult for describing someone as out of touch with reality and a clown.

GOP Rep. Adam Kinzinger, a vocal critic of his more far-right colleagues, chimed in with another insult directed at Greene. The Illinois Republican, who is retiring next year, also criticized House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy for not forcefully condemning members like Greene and Boebert.

“I love this, but worth noting that while this battle between Nancy Mace and the unserious circus barker McSpacelaser, @GOPLeader continues his silent streak that would make a monk blush,” Kinzinger tweeted.

The “McSpacelaser” moniker is a reference to how Greene, before being elected to Congress, shared a conspiracy theory on social media saying that California’s devastating 2018 wildfires were caused by a laser sent from space by the Rothschild family. Theories that place powerful, wealthy Jewish families behind natural disasters or accuse them of shaping worldwide events from the shadows play into common, pernicious antisemitic tropes.

Democratic Rep. Eric Swalwell of California also got in on the Tuesday Twitter action, saying, “I would say this feels like high school. But high schoolers know how to spell ‘you’re.'”

Greene later replied: “*You’re for the spellcheck police.”

Greene and Mace’s fight is representative of larger fissures within the Republican conference over both policy and substance between members like Greene and more moderate members. If Republicans win back the House in 2022, McCarthy has his work cut out for him: He would first have to navigate those competing factions to get elected as speaker and then lead the caucus as it roils with tension.

Later on Tuesday morning, Mace made another dig at Greene by repeating word for word a November 26 tweet in which Greene said she “got off a good call” with McCarthy.

“We spent time talking about solving problems not only in the conference, but for our country. I like what he has planned ahead,” Mace wrote.

Source Article from https://www.businessinsider.com/marjorie-taylor-greene-nancy-mace-descend-into-chaotic-twitter-fight-2021-11


Managing member at Crustacean Restaurant wears a face mask while speaking on the phone at the restaurant. | AP Photo

OAKLAND — Californians could attend church services and get their hair trimmed in the coming weeks, while the vast majority of counties can allow restaurant dining soon, Gov. Gavin Newsom said Monday as he eased reopening standards due to continued improvements in California’s coronavirus trend lines.

The governor cited declining hospitalization and intensive care unit rates as indicators that California can move deeper into its nascent economic reopening. Newsom said the state is prepared to allow roughly 53 of 58 counties to enter the next phase of reopening, which include restaurant dining and in-store shopping with social distancing recommendations.

Advertisement

Newsom also said California could allow pro sporting events to resume by June, although games would be without spectators and with “very prescriptive conditions.” In the preceding months, Newsom has been wary of major sporting events functioning as hubs for transmission.

Newsom also said relief could come to reeling cosmeticians and shaggy-headed residents in the weeks ahead if the trend lines of declining cases hold. His reopening framework put cosmetology services in a later phase, after manufacturing and curbside retail, but Newsom said encouraging numbers could accelerate the process.

Churches and other religious institutions could also start welcoming back the faithful for in-person services in the coming weeks, Newsom said, if trend lines hold. Defiant religious leaders have opened their doors and sued Newsom for halting such services.

Under the new regional guidelines, counties would need a test positivity rate of less than 8 percent or a rate of 25 cases per 100,000 residents or less. Newsom said the state would account for “hot spots within counties” like skilled-nursing facilities that are often viral epicenters driving up counties’ overall numbers.

Newsom did not name the five counties that would remain ineligible, but said he believes Los Angeles will be more cautious.

“We are empowering our local health directors and county officials,” Newsom said, noting that areas with more dire outbreaks like Los Angeles and the Bay Area can retain tougher controls.

Source Article from https://www.politico.com/states/california/story/2020/05/18/newsom-dining-to-begin-soon-in-most-california-counties-haircuts-and-church-a-few-weeks-away-1284509


<!–

–>

var docUrl = document.URL;
var urlInfo = docUrl.split(“/”);
if ((urlInfo != null) && (urlInfo.length >= 4))
{
var seccion = urlInfo[3].toLowerCase();

switch (seccion) {

case “finanzas-personales”:
var cX = cX || {}; cX.callQueue = cX.callQueue || [];
cX.callQueue.push([‘insertWidget’, {
widgetId: ’61ed6820cb015fa491fc6fabda0a2f4927ca7127′,
insertBeforeElementId: ‘cx_61ed6820cb015fa491fc6fabda0a2f4927ca7127’,
width: 202, height: 137, renderTemplateUrl: ‘auto’
}]);

// Async load of cx.js
(function(d,s,e,t){e=d.createElement(s);e.type=’text/java’+s;e.async=’async’;
e.src=’http’+(‘https:’===location.protocol?’s://s’:’://’)+’cdn.cxense.com/cx.js’;
t=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];t.parentNode.insertBefore(e,t);})(document,’script’);
break;}}

–>

1. ¿Cómo se calcula la tasa de interés hipotecario en México?

Supongamos tienes la intención de comprar un departamento este año. Cuentas con algunos ahorros pero no puedes pagar aún de contado el precio del inmueble. Para comprar, tendrías que buscar ayuda de una institución que te pueda prestar el monto que te hace falta y esa institución te prestará el dinero con una tasa de interés. Esa tasa ya fue calculada utilizando factores específicos.

Después de hacer las cuentas de cuánto dinero necesitas pedir prestado, analizas críticamente a qué tasa de interés hipotecario le conviene más adquirir su crédito.
La tasa de interés o precio del dinero es la cantidad extra que se abona durante cierto tiempo por cada unidad de capital que ya se haya invertido. Es uno de los precios más importantes de la economía. En el caso de la tasa de interés hipotecario, es el costo de haber adquirido un crédito para un inmueble.

2. Interjet dará descuentos de hasta 50% en su outlet

Con el fin de impulsar al sector turístico, luego de las vacaciones de verano, Interjet anunció su venta Outlet de agosto, que incluye promociones para viajar en rutas nacionales e internacionales.

Las ofertas son válidas para viajes a partir del 15 de agosto al 30 de junio de 2018 en temporada baja y contraflujos de temporada alta, así como los paquetes Interjet Vacations con todo incluido.

Los viajeros podrán documentar hasta 75 kilos de equipaje en México y Latinoamérica y 50 kilos para Estados Unidos y Canadá, en los que se puede incluir equipo deportivo y mascotas, sin ningún cargo extra, añadió.

3. Todos contra Ticketmaster por los boletos del Pats vs Raiders

El sistema Ticketmaster ha causado controversia ante los usuarios de redes sociales debido a que este martes en la preventa de entradas para el encuentro de NFL entre los Patriots de Nueva Inglaterra y los Raiders de Oakland que se disputará el próximo 19 de noviembre en el Estadio Azteca, se agotaron en minutos.

Según los usuarios, la mayor parte de las entradas para dicho partido habrían tenido como destino la reventa, y los precios ya estarían en rangos exorbitantes como se acostumbra en dicha práctica. Hasta el momento la empresa de boletaje no ha emitido ningún comunicado o respuesta hacia los usuarios inconformes.

4. Grupo Multimedios apantalla en licitación de TV

Grupo Multimedios, Francisco Aguirre, presidente de Grupo Radio Centro, y Telsusa Televisión fueron quienes más ofertaron por algunas de las frecuencias de televisión en las principales plazas del país que licita el Instituto Federal de Telecomunicaciones.

En conjunto, ofertaron 1,302 millones de pesos por 17 lotes, de los 1,521 millones que se generaron por 28 lotes. Quedan cuatro canales más, cuyo procedimiento de presentación de ofertas continuará este martes a partir de las 10 de la mañana.

5. Negociar el TLCAN 2.0 en tiempo récord, el objetivo

México, Estados Unidos y Canadá iniciarán este miércoles la primera ronda de negociaciones del Tratado de Libre Comercio de América del Norte (TLCAN) con la indicación de sus gobiernos de acelerar el proceso desde el primer día para concluirlo tan pronto como sea posible.

La Secretaría de Economía informó que los tres países ya han establecido las mesas en las que se subdividirá la negociación, las cuales comenzarán a trabajar desde un principio en Washington DC. Ninguno de los tres países ha tenido una negociación comercial con plazos entre rondas tan cortos, alrededor de una cada 20 días, como se pretende en este caso.



var docUrl = document.URL;
var urlInfo = docUrl.split(“/”);
if ((urlInfo != null) && (urlInfo.length >= 4))
{
var seccion = urlInfo[3].toLowerCase();

switch (seccion) {

case “finanzas-personales”:
$(“#tecmon”).attr(“style”, “width:516px !important;height:194px;overflow:hidden;float:right;margin-bottom:-10px”);
var cX = cX || {}; cX.callQueue = cX.callQueue || [];
cX.callQueue.push([‘insertWidget’, {
widgetId: ‘bf09f9d581b1a89cfa1a414f3c30acebdc299ab6’,
insertBeforeElementId: ‘cx_bf09f9d581b1a89cfa1a414f3c30acebdc299ab6’,
width: 516, height: 185, renderTemplateUrl: ‘auto’
}]);

// Async load of cx.js
(function(d,s,e,t){e=d.createElement(s);e.type=’text/java’+s;e.async=’async’;
e.src=’http’+(‘https:’===location.protocol?’s://s’:’://’)+’cdn.cxense.com/cx.js’;
t=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];t.parentNode.insertBefore(e,t);})(document,’script’);
break;}}

–>

Source Article from http://eleconomista.com.mx/politica/2017/08/15/5-noticias-dia-15-agosto

Image copyright
Getty Images

Image caption

Experts released two orcas from the so-called “whale jail” on Thursday

Russia has started to release a group of nearly 100 captive whales which have been kept in small pens in the far east of the country.

It comes after the so-called “whale jail” provoked an international outcry, with marine scientists and celebrities calling for the mammals to be released.

In total, 11 killer whales (orcas) and 87 belugas are being kept in cramped enclosures on the Sea of Japan.

They will be released in stages and the process will take several months.

“We have taken the only sensible decision at the recommendation of scientists to release the animals to their natural habitat where they were caught,” Deputy Prime Minister Alexei Gordeyev told reporters on Thursday.

“This operation will take about four months,” he added. Eight whales will reportedly be freed in the first stage of the process.

President Vladimir Putin praised the decision during his annual televised phone-in in which he fields questions from members of the public.

“The killer whales alone – as far as I know – are worth around 100 million dollars,” he said. “When it’s big money, problems are always hard to solve. Thank God things have started moving.”

What was the “whale jail”?

The juvenile whales were caught last year in the Sea of Okhotsk. They were then transported more than 1,300km (800 miles) south and kept in cramped pens near the port town of Nakhodka.

Although Russia allows the capture of whales for scientific purposes, experts feared the animals were bound for theme parks or aquariums in China.

Individual orcas, often caught illegally, can fetch millions of dollars. Belugas are sold for tens of thousands of dollars.

Image copyright
Getty Images

Image caption

The belugas are in cramped pens which are taking a toll on their health

Greenpeace Russia, an environmental group, raised the alarm about the animals last October. They believe at least four of the whales died while in captivity.

Many are known to be in poor health and some have shown signs of hypothermia. In the wild whales swim tens of kilometres every day – and that keeps them warm – but in small pens they get cold.

In January, Greenpeace also reported that some of the whales were showing skin lesions and flipper deterioration. Some of those injuries may have been caused by bumping into the sea ice.

Who campaigned for their release?

The confined whales scandalised scientists, politicians and activists around the world.

Environmental groups demanded the release of the mammals and celebrities have also campaigned to rescue them.

Image copyright
Getty Images

Image caption

The whale pens are at a remote site by the Sea of Japan

Hollywood star Leonardo DiCaprio urged his social media followers to sign a petition – and more than 1.5m people have done so.

Pamela Anderson, the former model and Baywatch TV star, wrote to President Vladimir Putin, urging action to release the whales. She is active in the International Fund for Animal Welfare (IFAW).

Earlier this month, the companies that caught the whales were fined for breaking fishing rules. One company – White Whale – was fined 28.1 million rubles ($433,000; £430,000).

Charles Vinick, executive director of the Whale Sanctuary Project, said the release should be conducted “as humanely as possible”.

“We have provided extensive recommendations [about how to do this],” he told the BBC. “While they are not able to follow all of our recommendations, we hope they can follow as many as possible.”

“It’s all about the welfare of the animals,” he added.

Source Article from https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-48709809

President Donald Trump’s personal lawyer Rudy Giuliani said that he “forced” former Ukraine Ambassador Marie Yovanovitch out of her role and leveled another round of allegations against the ousted diplomat in a series of recent interviews.

Speaking to multiple media outlets over the last few days, Giuliani shed light on his influence in removing Yovanovitch, who was recalled from her post after she was targeted by what impeachment witnesses described as a “smear campaign.”

Giuliani told The New Yorker in a November interview published Monday that he believed Yovanovitch was in the way of his attempts to pursue investigations Trump wanted.

The president is accused of putting pressure on Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky to open investigations into 2020 frontrunner and former Vice President Joe Biden and his son, Hunter Biden, who had ties to a Ukrainian company. Two articles of impeachment on abuse of power and obstruction of Congress are up for a House vote this week.

Source Article from https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2019/12/17/giuliani-discusses-influence-marie-yovanovitchs-ouster/2676124001/