Diario de Noticias

Trump supporter attacks a group of Native Americans at border wall protest – Daily Mail

Screaming ‘Karen’ attacks Native Americans staging a protest against Trump’s border wall – and then mocks them when they refuse to fight back and start praying to their ancestors

Group of Southern California Native Americans were attacked by irate woman
She is filmed shouting at the group and hurling xenophobic remarks at them
The peaceful protesters respond in a non-violent manner and attempt to restrain the woman

Published: 10:23 EDT, 22 September 2020 | Updated: 10:59 EDT, 22 September 2020

A screaming ‘Karen’ was filmed attacking a group of Native Americans opposing the Mexico border wall construction.

The unnamed woman then mocks them when they refuse to fight back and start praying to their ancestors.

Video footage shows the woman pushing and shoving the Southern California Native Americans, who are part of a group called Defend Kumeyaay Land.

They had gathered at the site of the wall in San Diego County, California, to peacefully protest against the construction of the Mexico border wall.

The maskless woman shouts at the group, telling them to ‘get the f*** out of here’ and saying they are ‘disturbing the job

She hurls xenophobic remarks at them, telling them the land is hers and not theirs, but the protesters refuse to engage in a fight with her

‘You’re being recorded,’ one of the group members tells the irate woman in the video

The maskless woman shouts at the group, telling them to ‘get the f*** out of here’ and saying they are ‘disturbing the job’ of constructing Trump’s border wall.

She hurls xenophobic remarks at them, telling them the land is hers and not theirs, but the protesters refuse to engage in a fight with her.

Kumeyaay land lies between San Diego and Baja California in Mexico.

According to an Instagram post written by the group, the woman had also tried to tear down their tent.

‘You’re being recorded,’ one of the group members tells the irate woman in the video. She replies ‘I don’t give a f***,’ as she lunges at the person recording the scene.

The peaceful protesters respond in a non-violent manner and attempt to restrain the woman.

Later in the footage, as the group begin praying to their ancestors and singing and chanting, the Trump supporter appears to mock them by hopping around and mimicking their Native American dance rituals.

The peaceful protesters respond in a non-violent manner and attempt to restrain the woman

Later in the footage, as the group begin singing and chanting, the Trump supporter appears to mock them

The protest group describe themselves as a ‘small indigenous initiative that is rooted in prayer’ .

They say they are protesting against the border wall construction on behalf of ‘the land and indigenous sovereignty’.

The caption of the Instagram post reads: ‘Tonight we experienced a violent woman who tried to tear our tents down. We de-escalated and stayed non-violent.

‘We used songs and prayers again just like how we non violently stop desecration to the land.’

Comments 295

Share what you think

The comments below have been moderated in advance.

The views expressed in the contents above are those of our users and do not necessarily reflect the views of MailOnline.

Source Article from https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8760087/Trump-supporter-attacks-group-Native-Americans-border-wall-protest.html

47 views no comments

¡Deje de compartir mentiras! Claves para detectar noticias falsas en … – El Nuevo Herald

El Papa Francisco apoyó a Donald Trump para la presidencia.

Abuso de menores y pedofilia dentro del partido demócrata tramado desde una pizzería en Washington (pizzagate).

Bill Gates ofreció a los usuarios de Facebook $5,000 por compartir un enlace.

Usain Bolt donó $10 millones y Shakira, $15 millones para ayudar a Haití luego del Huracán Matthew.

¿Verdad o mentira?

Todas falsas, pero que muchos creyeron y compartieron en su momento vía Facebook,Twitter, WhatsApp, blogs o por cualquier otra vía digital.

Si durante 2016 estas y otras centenares de “noticias” cobraron protagonismo, el bombardeo de mentiras, exageraciones, desinformación y calumnias que vienen para 2017 será abrumador, esto debido al lucrativo negocio que genera para muchos la creación de contenidos digitales falsos, al acceso global a la internet y a los 1,650 millones de usuarios activos por mes en Facebook, quienes usan esta red como una, o quizás, la principal fuente de noticias.

Según una encuesta de Ipsos, el 75 por ciento de los estadounidenses considera ciertas las noticias falsas que lee en internet. La encuesta realizada a casi 3,000 personas en el país muestra además que quienes consideran a Facebook como una fuente importante de noticias son más propensos a creer que los titulares falsos que lee son reales.

Millones de personas ya han caído en los hoax o noticias falsas, incluso, se ha llegado a decir que los contenidos falsos difundidos en las redes sociales fueron decisivos en los resultados de eventos trascendentales como el Brexit, el plebiscito en Colombia y las elecciones en Estados Unidos.

El 75% de los estadounidenses considera ciertas las noticias falsas que lee en Internet, según una encuesta de Ipsos

Para que en este 2017 no sea víctima de las mentiras en Internet, tenga en cuenta estas claves y herramientas que le ayudarán a detectar entre lo real y lo ficticio en medio de la avalancha de contenidos que surgirán durante el próximo año.

Le preguntamos a Mauricio Jaramillo, periodista en tecnología y consultor digital sobre las claves para no caer en un hoax y las siguientes son sus recomendaciones:

Señales de alerta de que una noticia es falsa:

Parece increíble.

La noticia no presenta fuentes o usa fuentes poco confiables. (Si usa fuentes confiables, se puede ir directamente a ellas para confirmar).

Los datos en la noticia son vagos o incompletos (lugar, fecha, nombres de personas u organizaciones, etc.).

¿Qué hacer como usuarios para no caer en un ‘hoax’ o noticia falsa?

Siempre desconfiar de lo que leemos o vemos. Ya sea de una cuenta desconocida, de una de baja reputación o incluso de la fuente más creíble.

Desconfiar implica contrastar, verificar, buscar otras fuentes. ¿Cómo? “Googlear” las palabras clave de la noticia falsa, para ver si se ha publicado en medios de comunicación u organizaciones confiables.

Si hay pocos resultados, o estos son de sitios web y medios de poca reputación, esto casi confirma que es un hoax. Si hay muchos resultados y de medios respetados, aumentan las posibilidades de que sea una noticia real, pero no sobra buscar la fuente primaria, pues estos también pueden haber sido engañados.

Usar búsquedas avanzadas de Google

En redes sociales, buscar qué publican los periodistas y líderes de opinión sobre esas noticias sobre las que se desconfía de su veracidad. (Es posible que ellos caigan en una noticia falsa, pero lo más probable es que las ignoren o las desmientan).

Si no se está totalmente seguro de la veracidad de una noticia, no se debe compartir. Hacerlo pone en entredicho la credibilidad de la persona que lo hace.

Por último, Jaramillo recomienda que si en Facebook, Twitter, WhatsApp u otras plataformas los amigos y demás contactos difunden una noticia falsa, conviene corregirlos y “educarlos” sobre la importancia de verificar la veracidad de las noticias que se comparten.

¿Y qué hacer con las noticias en Facebook ?

Recientemente Facebook añadió una nueva alerta que, en colaboración con los usuarios, busca detectar las noticias falsas que se difunden en esta red social. Funciona en dos pasos:

1. Reporte del usuario Cada vez que el usuario vea noticias que considera que podrían ser engañosas las puede reportar haciendo click en el extremo superior derecho de la publicación . Un equipo de Facebook revisará si esta publicación viene de medios reales o de webs que intentan dar la impresión de serlo (por ejemplo, bbc.co en lugar de bbc.com).

2. Identificación y evaluación: Si la noticia procede de un medio real, pero el contenido es dudoso, Facebook remitirá la información a sus organizaciones aliadas como Snopes, Factcheck.org y Politifact, además de algunos medios como ABC News y la agencia de noticias AP, que comprobarán si se trata o no de una noticia falsa. Si al menos dos de estos medios aliados dudan de la veracidad de la información, las historias aparecerán marcadas como “cuestionadas”.

¿Cómo filtrar la información en Google ?

Google también cuenta con su propio sistema de verificación de hechos, la etiqueta Fact Check permitirá a los usuarios contrastar con Google News si el artículo que está leyendo es veraz, accediendo a bases de datos de la organización Schema.org. Para saber que una noticia es Fact check o “hecho comprobado”, esta contará con una etiqueta gris hacia el lado superior derecho. Su presencia indicará que ha superado una serie de filtros y que se trata de información real y fiable.

La herramienta filtrará el acceso a fuentes primarias, la transparencia a la hora de obtenerlas, una redacción imparcial, referencias, datos verificados y hasta el título.

Hoaxy, una plataforma para detectar noticias falsas

Aunque actualmente está en una versión preliminar (beta), la plataforma genera un listado con cerca de 132 resultados sobre los principales sitios que se dedican a difundir noticias falsas. Cualquier persona puede ingresar a la página, introducir un tema y obtendrá resultados inmediatos. Rumores, noticias falsas y teorías de la conspiración son los principales objetivos de Hoaxy. La herramienta está siendo desarrollada por expertos de la Universidad de Indiana.

Detectores de mentiras

Snopes, es una de las herramientas disponibles para detectar contenidos falsos en la red, y una de las organizaciones aliadas de Facebook en su lucha contra la difusión de noticias falsas. Si hay alguna información que te genera desconfianza, puedes indagar sobre su veracidad con esta plataforma cuyo propósito es desenmascarar engaños o rumores que hay en la Red.

FactCheck, las noticias falsas pueden camuflarse bajo “medias-verdades” que distorsionan la realidad. Fact Check es otro verificador de hechos del Centro de Políticas Públicas Annenberg de la Universidad de Pensilvania. Su objetivo consiste en reducir el nivel de decepción y confusión de las personas sobre la política de Estados Unidos.

Otros sitios que se dedican a desenmarcarar mentiras virtuales PolitiFact.com, del diario Tampa Bay Times, ganador de un Premio Pulitzer, y el Washington Post cuenta con su propio Fact Checker como una guía para detectar noticias falsas.

Siga a Silvia Parra en twitter @silvia_parra

Source Article from http://www.elnuevoherald.com/noticias/tecnologia/article123768029.html

47 views no comments

Oxford High School shooting: 3 students dead, 8 hurt including 1 teacher – FOX 2 Detroit

OXFORD, Mich. (FOX 2) – The Oakland County Sheriff said three students were killed and eight others have been hurt when someone started shooting inside Oxford High School on Tuesday.

According to Oakland County Undersheriff Michael McCabe, three students were killed in the shooting and there were at least eight other victims including a teacher. The sheriff also said that the suspect is a 15-year-old sophomore at the school and has invoked his right to remain silent.

McCabe said the first of more than 100 calls came into 911 at 12:51 p.m. to a report of a shooting. Deputies immediately responded to the scene and took the suspect into custody but not until after he shot 10 people, killing three.

The suspect did not resist officers when they arrived. McCabe said he asked for an attorney and would offer no details regarding a possible motive.

Around 2:00 p.m., medical helicopters including the University of Michigan’s Survival Flight had landed in the parking lot of the school as a secondary search was being conducted around the perimeter of the school.

Isabel Flores, a 15-year-old freshman, was inside the school when the gunshots were fired. She told FOX 2’s Charlie Langton they heard gunshots and saw another student bleeding from the face before they all ran from the area through the back of the school.

Another student we spoke with, identified only as Savannah, said that the school conducts mass shooting training and they knew what to do.

Continuing coverage of active shooter at Oxford High School in Michigan

FOX 2’s Jess Dupnack provides update on active shooter situation at Oxford High School

After the lockdown was lifted, students from the high school were sent to the Meijer parking lot across the street from the school.

A parent sitting in a car told FOX 2 that his student inside had to barricade inside a classroom when they heard the gunshots being fired inside the school. He said his son was not physically hurt.

( )

According to an alert sent out to Oxford parents, an active emergency was reported at the school around 1 p.m. and it has gone into emergency protocols and put the school into lockdown.

By 2 p.m., students were being released and dozens of ambulances and emergency personnel arrived at the scene.

The alert sent to parents urged them not to come to the school at this time.

There are multiple units on the scene including SWAT and the aviation unit and the sheriff said the scene is still active.

Oxford is a village population of just under 3,400 about 30 miles north of Detroit.

Oxford High School Shooting: At least four hurt after gunman opens fire in Michigan

FOX 2’s Deena Centofanti gives an update on student pickup after Oxford High School in Michigan was placed on lockdown Tuesday in regards to an active shooter situation.

Source Article from https://www.fox2detroit.com/news/oxford-high-school-locked-down-due-to-active-emergency-oakland-county-sheriff-on-scene

47 views no comments

La iglesia que resurgió de las aguas en México – BBC Mundo

Image copyright
AP

Como si fuera un espectáculo de ilusionismo orquestado por la naturaleza, las ruinas de una imponente iglesia del siglo XVI emergieron del río Grijalva en el estado de Chiapas, en el sur de México.

Image copyright
AP

El tempo de Santiago se hizo visible días atrás por la bajada de 25 metros de las aguas, causada por una persistente sequía.

Había quedado sumergida bajo la superficie del Grijalva hace cerca de medio siglo, cuando se levantó la represa Nezahualcóyotl.

No es la primera vez que el templo vuelve a emerger de entre las aguas.

Image copyright
AP

Hace unos 12 años el nivel del río bajó tanto que hasta era posible caminar por el interior de la iglesia.

Source Article from http://www.bbc.com/mundo/noticias/2015/10/151018_america_latina_cultura_mexico_iglesia_emerge_aguas_nc

47 views no comments

Airbnb proyecta que ganará US$ 3.500 millones al año en 2020 – Diario El País

Tras nueve años de funcionamiento, Airbnb está demostrando que las plataformas de economía colaborativa son un negocio más que rentable. Es así como la compañía, fundada por Brian Chesky, proyecta que para 2020 ganará US$ 3.500 millones al año. La cifra supera las ganancias del 85% de las compañías del índice Fortune 500 y supera en 3.400% las ganancias de la compañía en 2016.

Según los expertos, la fortaleza económica que está demostrando el portal de arriendo de viviendas privadas la convertirá en la primera compañía de economía colaborativa en convertirse en un éxito financiero, superando incluso a Uber, otra de las más populares del mundo.

A pesar de las proyecciones de crecimiento, la compañía todavía enfrenta varios inconvenientes, especialmente en lo que se refiera a regulación en los diferentes mercados en los que opera. (El Mercurio / GDA)

Source Article from http://www.elpais.com.uy/economia/empresas/airbnb-proyecta-que-ganara-us.html

47 views no comments

See tornadoes rip through South, damaging churches and destroying homes – Fox Weather

47 views no comments

US acting ambassador to Ukraine, Bill Taylor, to step down – BBC News

Image copyright
AFP

Image caption

Bill Taylor testified that President Trump had directly asked about a Ukrainian investigation into Joe Biden

Acting US Ambassador to Ukraine Bill Taylor, whose testimony helped build the case for impeaching Donald Trump, is to leave his post next month.

Mr Taylor will step down in January when his temporary appointment is due to expire, the New York Times reported.

His tenure could have been extended by the Republican-controlled Senate but no such move has been made.

Mr Taylor took up the post in June after Mr Trump controversially withdrew the then ambassador, Marie Yovanovitch.

Ms Yovanovitch has said she was the victim of a smear campaign by Mr Trump’s personal lawyer, Rudy Giuliani.

A replacement for Mr Taylor has not yet been announced.

News of his departure was met with concern by Senator Robert Menendez, the most senior Democrat on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.

He said he feared it would create a vacuum in Ukraine, which is still grappling with Russian-backed separatists.

In his testimony before the impeachment inquiry last month, Mr Taylor said that a member of his staff overheard a telephone call in which President Trump inquired about “the investigations” into Mr Biden.

Media captionTrump could be impeached – how did we get here?

The call was with Gordon Sondland, US ambassador to the European Union, who reportedly told the president over the phone from a restaurant in Kyiv that “the Ukrainians were ready to move forward”.

After the call, the staff member “asked Mr Sondland what President Trump thought about Ukraine”, Mr Taylor said.

Mr Taylor said: “Ambassador Sondland responded that President Trump cares more about the investigations of Biden.”

President Trump is accused of withholding US military aid to Ukraine in order to pressure the country’s president to publicly announce a corruption inquiry into Mr Biden. He denies any wrongdoing and has described the impeachment inquiry as a “witch hunt”.

A majority of House Democrats are expected to vote to impeach Mr Trump on Wednesday.

Source Article from https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-50831743

47 views no comments

Fox Business suddenly cancels ‘Lou Dobbs Tonight,’ its highest-rated show – CNN

By Brian Stelter and Oliver Darcy, CNN Business

Updated 10:36 AM ET, Sat February 6, 2021

Source Article from https://www.cnn.com/2021/02/05/media/lou-dobbs-fox-show-canceled/index.html

47 views no comments

Democrats conflicted over how to limit Trump’s war powers | TheHill – The Hill

Senate and House Democrats have different strategies over how to limit President TrumpDonald John Trump Iran says it ‘unintentionally’ shot down Ukrainian plane Puerto Rico hit with another major earthquake as aftershocks continue Trump empathizes with Queen Elizabeth II after Harry and Meghan’s royal exit MORE’s power to take military action against Iran.

Senate Democrats are debating among themselves whether to take up a concurrent resolution passed by the House on Thursday limiting Trump’s war powers, or to stick with a proposal sponsored by Sens. Tim KaineTimothy (Tim) Michael Kaine Dem senators say Iran threat to embassies not mentioned in intelligence briefing Democrats brace for round two of impeachment witness fight Overnight Defense: House passes measure to limit Trump on Iran | Pelosi vows vote to end 2002 war authorization | Officials believe Iran accidentally shot down passenger plane MORE (D-Va.) and Dick DurbinRichard (Dick) Joseph Durbin Overnight Health Care: Kansas leaders reach deal to expand Medicaid | California to launch own prescription drug label | Dem senator offers bill banning e-cigarette flavors Pressure building on Pelosi over articles of impeachment Democrats call for updates on US troop deployments MORE (D-Ill.).

As a concurrent resolution, the House measure doesn’t require Trump’s signature. But it’s not clear whether it would actually tie Trump’s hands. The Supreme Court may ultimately have to decide if it has the binding force of law.

The Senate bill would have the force of law, and it would be significant if approved by the GOP-controlled chamber. But it does require Trump’s signature and has almost no chance of becoming law since it would be vetoed, and would then need 67 votes to override a veto.

“I know it’s being wrestled with, I haven’t heard any update,” said Sen. Jeff MerkleyJeffrey (Jeff) Alan Merkley Overnight Health Care: Kansas leaders reach deal to expand Medicaid | California to launch own prescription drug label | Dem senator offers bill banning e-cigarette flavors Senators introduce resolution warning that Congress has not authorized Iran war On The Money: Senate panel advances Trump’s new NAFTA despite GOP gripes | Trade deficit falls to three-year low | Senate confirms Trump pick for small business chief MORE (D-Ore.), a member of the Foreign Relations Committee.

Speaker Nancy PelosiNancy Pelosi Overnight Health Care: Trump officials want Supreme Court to delay ObamaCare case | Medicaid expansion linked to decline in opioid deaths | Drug price outrage threatens to be liability for GOP Impeachment trial weighs on 2020 Democrats Voters see slightly more GOP partisanship on impeachment: Poll MORE (D-Calif.) on Thursday touted her chamber’s proposal as having “real teeth.” She said it was significant that Trump could not veto it, as he did to a war powers resolution Congress passed last year requiring him to withdraw U.S. forces from the civil war in Yemen.

“We’re taking this path because it does not require a signature of the president of the United States,” she added. “This is a statement of the Congress of the United States and I will not have that statement be diminished by whether the president will veto it or not.”

Key Democratic senators, however, aren’t convinced this is the way to go.

Kaine said that he will press ahead with his own resolution, which has the support of GOP Sens. Mike LeeMichael (Mike) Shumway Lee Overnight Defense: Pompeo defends intel on Soleimani strike | Iraqi PM tells US to start working on plan for withdrawal | Paul, Graham feud deepens over Trump war powers White House spokesman roasted over Obama tweet Gabbard: Appearing on Fox News allows me to speak to Trump MORE (Utah) and Rand PaulRandal (Rand) Howard Paul Overnight Defense: Pompeo defends intel on Soleimani strike | Iraqi PM tells US to start working on plan for withdrawal | Paul, Graham feud deepens over Trump war powers White House spokesman roasted over Obama tweet The Hill’s 12:30 Report: Pelosi plans to send impeachment articles next week MORE (Ky.).

“The one that I have would go to the president’s desk, if it passes,” he said. “I’m likely to call up mine.”

Kaine noted that his resolution, which is privileged and cannot be blocked from receiving a floor vote, is due to be automatically discharged out of the Foreign Relations Committee on Tuesday.

“Mine is on time clock where I could call it up starting next week. Theirs would not be,” he said. “I can get it up promptly and I can get it [passed] on a majority vote.”

Democratic aides in both chambers say that the House-passed war powers resolution would also be considered a privileged measure and guaranteed a vote in the GOP-controlled Senate, but Kaine said it would have to be put on a later timeline since the House just approved it Thursday.

The timing of the war powers debate is in flux because of Trump’s looming impeachment trial.

Pelosi says she will meet with the House Democratic caucus on Tuesday to discuss naming a team of prosecutors and sending the articles of impeachment across the Capitol. As soon as she does, the trial is set to begin immediately.

Even so, there will be a lull between when senators get sworn in as jurors and the start of opening arguments, when lawmakers will have a chance to act on legislative business.

Kaine has already shopped his legislation to about ten Senate Republicans who are in various stages of reviewing it.

Kaine acknowledged Trump may well veto his war powers resolution but argued that the act of putting it on the president’s desk will send a more powerful message than the concurrent resolution.

“I want to put it on the president’s desk. We did that with the Yemen resolution and even though the president vetoed, they stopped fueling the Saudi jets on the way to bombings. They actually stopped doing the thing we ordered them not to do,” he said, referring to U.S. support of a Saudi-backed coalition fighting in Yemen.

Senate Democrats say they’re keeping their options open and may try to advance both Kaine’s and Pelosi’s competing measures.

“Those conversations are going on right now,” said a Democratic senator, who requested anonymity to talk about internal discussions. “It doesn’t have to be either/or but I think at some point we should figure out what we’re going to prioritize.”

Lee, who backs the Kaine-Durbin bill, disputes Pelosi’s argument that the House-passed resolution will have the force of law.

He pointed to the 1983 Supreme Court decision in INS v. Chadha in which the high court ruled in an opinion penned by then Chief Justice Warren Burger that legislation affecting persons outside the legislative branch must be presented to the president for his signature.

“I was surprised when I saw that that resolution was styled as a [House concurrent resolution.] It makes me wonder why they did it that way or whether it might have been a mistake from the outset,” Lee said.

“Prior to the decision by the Supreme Court in INS v. Chadha 1983, you had had an opportunity for Congress through a concurrent resolution to alter the legal status quo that didn’t require presentment to the president. Post Chadha that went away,” he said.

Lee said the House-passed resolution “could never be more than akin to a sense of the House or a sense of the Senate.”

A senior House Democratic aide said that legal question may have to be decided anew by the federal courts.

“There are arguments for why this part of the war powers resolution might not be binding, but we decided to follow the process in the war powers resolution as our first step. It makes Congressional intent crystal clear and the President should respect that,” the aide said.

Source Article from https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/477763-democrats-conflicted-over-how-to-limit-trumps-war-powers

47 views no comments

‘He still considers himself to be in the hospitality business’: Mulvaney explains Trump’s Doral decision – USA TODAY

CLOSE

In announcing the Doral pick just days earlier, White House acting chief of staff Mick Mulvaney described the resort as “the best place”.
Wochit, Wochit

Acting White House Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney said Sunday that President Donald Trump was “honestly surprised at the level of pushback” on plans to host next year’s G-7 summit at his Doral resort in Miami.

Democrats and some Republicans, as well as government watchdogs, decried the administration’s decision to award the event to one of the president’s properties. Critics rejected Mulvaney’s claim that Doral had been selected as the “perfect” location after an exhaustive search. Many, including former White House officials, said it had the appearance of impropriety and others said it was a violation of the Constitution.

Trump backed down in the wake of the criticism and declared the event would not be held at his resort “based on both Media & Democrat Crazed and Irrational Hostility.”

‘There’s a perception of impropriety’: Former White House officials say Doral G-7 breaks precedent

Opinion: G-7 at Trump’s Doral resort? The original sin of this presidency is failure to divest.

I thought I was doing something very good for our Country by using Trump National Doral, in Miami, for hosting the G-7 Leaders. It is big, grand, on hundreds of acres, next to MIAMI INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT, has tremendous ballrooms & meeting rooms, and each delegation would have…

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) October 20, 2019

…..its own 50 to 70 unit building. Would set up better than other alternatives. I announced that I would be willing to do it at NO PROFIT or, if legally permissible, at ZERO COST to the USA. But, as usual, the Hostile Media & their Democrat Partners went CRAZY!

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) October 20, 2019

….Therefore, based on both Media & Democrat Crazed and Irrational Hostility, we will no longer consider Trump National Doral, Miami, as the Host Site for the G-7 in 2020. We will begin the search for another site, including the possibility of Camp David, immediately. Thank you!

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) October 20, 2019

Mulvaney said on “Fox News Sunday” that “we are all surprised at the level of pushback” and that it was “the right decision to change.”

“We’ll have to find someplace else. And my guess is we’ll find someplace else that the media won’t like either for another reason,” he said.

Mulvaney said Trump “saw an opportunity to take the biggest leaders from around the world, and he wanted to put on the absolute best show.”

“At the end of the day, you know, he still considers himself to be in the hospitality business,” Mulvaney explained.

“He’s the president of the United States,” host Chris Wallace replied.

“Yes, but that’s his background. It’s like, I used to be in the real estate business,” Mulvaney said. He tried to get Wallace, the son of “60 Minutes” reporter Mike Wallace, to relate by asking him what he did “before you were in the media.”

“Nothing. That’s all I’ve ever done,” Wallace said.

“But he wanted to put on a show. He wanted to take care of folks,” Mulvaney said. “He’s in the hotel business, or at least he was before he was the president.”

Wallace asked Mulvaney if Trump understood that at the very least, it was a bad choice in terms of appearance.

“Well, I think he knows. He thinks people think it looks lousy,” Mulvaney said.

More: House Judiciary Committee to investigate Trump’s desire to use his Doral resort to host next G-7 summit

1 of 48
2 of 48
3 of 48
4 of 48
5 of 48
6 of 48
7 of 48
8 of 48
9 of 48
10 of 48
11 of 48
12 of 48
13 of 48
14 of 48
15 of 48
16 of 48
17 of 48
18 of 48
19 of 48
20 of 48
21 of 48
22 of 48
23 of 48
24 of 48
25 of 48
26 of 48
27 of 48
28 of 48
29 of 48
30 of 48
31 of 48
32 of 48
33 of 48
34 of 48
35 of 48
36 of 48
37 of 48
38 of 48
39 of 48
40 of 48
41 of 48
42 of 48
43 of 48
44 of 48
45 of 48
46 of 48
47 of 48
48 of 48

Last Slide Next Slide

Source Article from https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2019/10/20/trump-surprised-pushback-g-7-doral/4047431002/

47 views no comments

2 California police officers who shot unarmed black man won’t face charges, prosecutors say – Fox News

Video

Sacramento police officers won’t be charged in shooting death of Stephon Clark

Two Sacramento police officers won’t be charged in deadly shooting of Stephon Clark.

Prosecutors in California have decided not to charge two police officers who fatally shot an unarmed black man last year, saying the “shooting was lawful.”

Sacramento County District Attorney Marie Schubert announced on Saturday that Officers Terrance Mercadal and Jared Robinet would not face criminal charges in the March 18 death of Stephon Clark after an independent review of the case found that the pair used lethal force lawfully.

The 61-page review conducted by the prosecutor’s office stated that Mercadal and Robinet “had honest and reasonable belief that they were in imminent danger of death or great bodily injury.”

Schubert said the decision “does not diminish in any way the tragedy, the anger and the frustration that we heard since the time of his death.”

She added: “We cannot ignore that there is rage within our community.”

Reaction to the decision came swiftly on Saturday. Among the first to weigh in was Clark’s mother, Sequette, who refused to accept prosecutors’ judgment. “They executed my son,” she said, according to The Associated Press. “It’s not right.”

Also on Saturday, Gov. Gavin Newsom and civil rights activists called for criminal justice reforms concerning use of deadly force. Newsom called it a hard truth that “our criminal justice system treats young black and Latino men and women differently than their white counterparts. That must change.”

How the community at large will react to prosecutors’ decision remained an open question early Saturday evening, though Sacramento has been bracing for protests; business owners were warned by a business association and state government workers told by legislative officials in recent days to stay away from downtown at least through the weekend.

STEPHON CLARK SHOOTING: A TIMELINE OF EVENTS

Clark was shot and killed March 18; the two officers were responding to a report of somebody breaking car windows. Police said they believed Clark was the suspect, and that he ran when a police helicopter responded and failed to obey officers’ orders.

Police said they thought Clark was holding a gun when he moved toward them with his arms extended and an object in his hands. He was later found to only have a cellphone on him.

Video

Police video of the shooting does not clearly capture all that happened after Clark ran into his grandmother’s backyard.

It showed him initially moving toward the officers, who were peeking out from behind a corner of the house, but it’s not clear whether he was facing them or that he knew the officers were there when they opened fire after shouting “gun, gun, gun.” The video showed Clark staggering sideways and falling on his stomach as the officers continued shooting.

OUTRAGE GROWS OVER POLICE KILLING OF STEPHON CLARK IN SACRAMENTO: ‘20 SHOTS OVER A CELLPHONE’

“We must recognize that they are often forced to make split-second decisions and we must recognize that they are under tense, uncertain and rapidly evolving circumstances,” Schubert said on Saturday.

A review of the district attorney’s findings stated that “the law recognizes an inherent right to use deadly force to protect oneself or others from death or great bodily harm.”

It continued: “This fundamental legal principle is known as the right of ‘self-defense.’ A police officer does not lose his fundamental right by virtue of becoming a police officer.”

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Clark’s family, including his two sons, his parents and his grandparents, filed a wrongful-death lawsuit in January seeking more than $20 million from the city, Mercadal and Robinet. The suit alleges that the use of force was excessive, and that Clark was a victim of racial profiling.

One of the officers who shot Clark is black and the other is white, police said.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/us/2-california-police-officers-who-shot-unarmed-black-man-wont-face-charges-prosecutors-say

47 views no comments

German far-right party wins a state election for the first time since the Nazis – NBC News

47 views no comments

Facebook, Google y Twitter no pudieron contener noticias falsas sobre la masacre en Las Vegas – El Comercio

“),f.close(),b=f.createElement(“SCRIPT”),b.src=document.location.protocol+”//”+(a?a:d)+”/layers/epl-41.min.js”,f.body.appendChild(b),a||(a=f.createElement(“SCRIPT”),a.src=document.location.protocol+”//ads.us.e-planning.net/egc/4/2912″,f.body.appendChild(a)),c=!0,!1}function g(a,b){f()?(b&&document.epl.setCustomAdShow(a,e.custom[a]),document.epl.showSpace(a)):setTimeout(‘eplSetAdM(“‘+a+'”, ‘+(b?”true”:”false”)+”);”,250)}function h(a,b){document.write(‘

‘),b&&(e.custom||(e.custom={}),e.custom[a]=b),g(a,!!b)}function i(a){if(f()){var b=e.sOpts&&e.sOpts[a]?e.sOpts[a]:{};b.custF&&document.epl.setCustomAdShow(a,b.custF),document.epl.setSpace(a,b)}else setTimeout(‘eplSetAd(“‘+a+'”);’,250)}function j(a,b){document.write(‘

‘),b||(b={t:1}),e.sOpts||(e.sOpts={}),e.sOpts[a]=b,i(a)}”undefined”==typeof window.adptkwresp&&(window.adptkwresp=””),”undefined”==typeof window.ecsegm&&(window.ecsegm=””);var b=document,c=!1,d=”us.img.e-planning.net”,e={iIF:1,sV:document.location.protocol+”//ads.us.e-planning.net/”,vV:”4″,sI:a.eplSi,sec:a.eplSec,ss:a.eplSs||””,kVs:{ecid:adptkwresp,ecsegm:ecsegm, kw:”facebook”},eIs:a.eplEis};e.kVs.conZocalos=e.eIs.indexOf(“Zocalo1”)>=0&&e.eIs.indexOf(“Zocalo2”)>=0,window.eplDoc=b,window.eplLL=c,window.eS1=d,window.eplArgs=e,window.eplSetAdM=g,window.eplAD4M=h,window.eplSetAd=i,window.eplAD4=j,f()});

últimas notícias

Ultimas Noticias

Most Viewed Videos

Screaming ‘Karen’ attacks Native Americans staging a protest against Trump’s border wall – and then mocks them when they refuse to fight back and start praying to their ancestors

Comments 295

¿Verdad o mentira?

Señales de alerta de que una noticia es falsa:

¿Y qué hacer con las noticias en Facebook ?

¿Cómo filtrar la información en Google ?

Hoaxy, una plataforma para detectar noticias falsas

Detectores de mentiras

Continuing coverage of active shooter at Oxford High School in Michigan

Oxford High School Shooting: At least four hurt after gunman opens fire in Michigan

Posted!

Sacramento police officers won’t be charged in shooting death of Stephon Clark

Las últimas

Más destacadas

Más en EEUU

Te puede interesar

Hoy en portada

Por qué lo condenan

López y la oposición

Los retos de la oposición

últimas notícias

Ultimas Noticias

Most Viewed Videos

Screaming ‘Karen’ attacks Native Americans staging a protest against Trump’s border wall – and then mocks them when they refuse to fight back and start praying to their ancestors

Comments 295

¿Verdad o mentira?

Señales de alerta de que una noticia es falsa:

¿Y qué hacer con las noticias en Facebook ?

¿Cómo filtrar la información en Google ?

Hoaxy, una plataforma para detectar noticias falsas

Detectores de mentiras

Continuing coverage of active shooter at Oxford High School in Michigan

Oxford High School Shooting: At least four hurt after gunman opens fire in Michigan

Posted!

Sacramento police officers won’t be charged in shooting death of Stephon Clark

Sacramento protests continue after funeral for Stephon Clark

Las últimas

Más destacadas

Más en EEUU

Notas relacionadas

Te puede interesar

Hoy en portada

Por qué lo condenan

López y la oposición

Los retos de la oposición