Most Viewed Videos

Since becoming president, Mr. Trump has spent 99 days at Mar-a-Lago compared with 20 days at Trump Tower, according to NBC News. Although Mr. Trump ran his presidential transition from Trump Tower and some aides had expected him to spend many weekends there in his Louis XIV-style triplex on the 58th floor, his presence created traffic headaches for New Yorkers and logistical and security challenges for the Secret Service.

White House officials declined to say why Mr. Trump changed his primary residence, but a person close to the president said the reasons were primarily for tax purposes.

In his Twitter posts on Thursday night, the president claimed that he paid “millions of dollars in city, state and local taxes each year.” There is no way to fact-check his assertion; he has never released his tax returns.

Mr. Trump, who is deeply unpopular in New York, was infuriated by a subpoena filed by Cyrus R. Vance Jr., the Manhattan district attorney, seeking the tax returns, the person close to the president said. Changing his residence to Florida is not expected to have any effect on Mr. Vance’s case, which Mr. Trump has sought to thwart with a federal lawsuit.

It was unclear how much time he would spend in New York in the future or if he would keep his triplex at the top of Trump Tower. Under New York law, if he spends more than 184 days a year there, he will have to pay state income taxes.

Florida, which does not have a state income tax or inheritance tax, has long been a place for the wealthy to escape the higher taxes of the Northeast.

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/31/us/politics/trump-new-york-florida-primary-residence.html

Un mullah dispuesto a lanzar una operación militar contra las mujeres en vaqueros, yihadistas del ISIS “no circuncidados” y un ataque de gambas indias contra un restaurante en Karachi. En Pakistán, la exitosa página web “Khabaristan Times” utiliza la sátira para exponer las obsesiones de una nación.

Hace un año, el 14 de agosto de 2014, Pakistán estaba en plena ebullición política. Los opositores Imran Khan y Tahir ul Qadri movilizaban a sus partidarios en una acampada gigante en Islamabad para reclamar, en vano, la renuncia del primer ministro Nawaz Sharif. En ese momento, un ovni mediático nacía en el más completo anonimato. Khabaristan Times, página web similar a la española El Mundo Today, y cuyos autores se inspiran en el presentador Jon Stewart, quien puso fin a la semana pasada a su irreverente “Daily Show” tras 15 años de emisión en Estados Unidos.

“¡Jon Stewart! Lloré en su último programa. Dije: ‘Nooooooooooo’ Tiene tanto talento, cómo no dejarse influenciar por este tipo”, subraya la sonriente Luavut Zahid, de 28 años y cofundadora de Khabaristan Times.

El nombre del sitio web es un juego de palabras con “Khabar” (‘informaciones”, en urdu) y “Stan” de Pakistán.

Para leer el Khabaristan Times hay que estar informados. “Si no siguen la actualidad diaria, no pueden comprender ni la mitad de lo que Jon Stewart dice y tampoco la mitad de lo que nosotros publicamos“, señala el también cofundador Kunwar Khuldune Shahid.

A pesar de tratarse de noticias claramente satíricas para un paquistaní con cierto sentido del humor, medios indios y británicos reprodujeron la primavera pasada una información de Khabaristan Times como si fuera “real”.

El artículo tomaba una presunta declaración del jefe de uno de los principales partidos islamistas del país, el mullah Fazlur Rehman, instando a una intervención militar contra “las mujeres con vaqueros”, calificadas como el “peor enemigo” de Pakistán, al ser las responsables de “sismos”, de la “inflación” y de atentados.

La “noticia” se volvió viral, ante la gran estupefacción del pequeño equipo de Khabaristan Times. “Varios occidentales escribieron en nuestra página: ‘No sabíamos que era sátira, porque no estaba escrito’ (…) ¡Pensaban que todo era verdad!”, recuerda Luavut.

Con estas informaciones jugosas, pero inventadas, el Khabaristan utiliza el humor absurdo para exponer las conspiraciones y las obsesiones del país.

Por ejemplo, el titular “Pakistán no tolerará ningún drone no estadounidense” se mofaba de las ambigüedades de Islamabad sobre los ataques estadounidenses contra los talibán y otros grupos, que denuncia en público pero que favorece en privado.

Pero, ¿de qué y de quién se puede uno burlar en el país de la ley contra la blasfemia y del poderoso ejército? ¿Y por qué? Si Pakistán cuenta con una larga y rica tradición de caricaturistas, la sátira escrita es más reciente, pero muy viva pese a las conservadoras leyes.

En Pakistán, país con un 20% de sus casi 200 millones de habitantes con acceso a internet, la controvertida ley contra la blasfemia prevé hasta la pena de muerte para cualquiera que profane al profeta Mahoma.

Y, aunque la Constitución garantiza la libertad de expresión, también impone restricciones cuando se trata de “la gloria del islam” y de la “defensa” del país.

“El aparato militar sabe lo que hacemos (…) Quizás no le gusta, pero también sabe que no es serio“, subraya Kunwar.

Con todo, el Khabaristan critica con ironía a políticos, mullahs, a la religión, ateos de pacotilla e incluso al ejército. “Para cambiar algo, deben poder criticarse ustedes mismos, su país, sus líderes”, apunta Kunwar.

En el apartado “blasfemia”, el Khabaristan anunció, por ejemplo, que un líder del partido islamista local había elogiado al papa Francisco por sus declaraciones contra la blasfemia, tras el atentado en enero contra el semanario satírico francés Charlie Hebdo, al calificarlo del “mejor de los ‘kafirs'” (infieles).

“Nos imponemos límites, especialmente en los temas religiosos”, admite Kunwar. “Pero algunos piensan que ya vamos muy lejos”.

Las amenazas son por el momento virtuales. “Hemos leído que debían colgarnos (…) Pero sabemos que no van a pasar a la acción”, confía Luavut.

Por el momento, el éxito parece prometedor. En un año, el sitio ha pasado de 400 lectores mensuales a más de 100.000 actualmente.

Para Luavut, este humor es hoy día más necesario que nunca para animar el asfixiante día a día paquistaní. “En un país como el nuestro, todos necesitamos darnos un respiro de las verdaderas noticias”.

(Fuente: AFP)

Source Article from http://www.clarin.com/mundo/Pakistan-Khabaristan-Times-sitio-noticias-satira_0_1414058810.html

CLOSE

More than 200 former Boy Scouts are coming forward with sexual abuse allegations against the century-old organization.
USA TODAY

More than 200 individuals have come forward with new allegations of sexual abuse by members of the Boy Scouts of America in recent weeks as a trio of law firms seek to uncover unidentified child abusers.  

A few of the victims are young, still underage or in their 20s, but many have held their secrets close for decades.

“Nobody would have listened to me,” said James Kretschmer, 56, who says a leader groped him at a Boy Scouts camp when he was in middle school. “The problem is, then you think, ‘Is it something I did? What was I doing, was it my fault? If I hadn’t done whatever, he wouldn’t have done that.’ It took me years and years to realize it wasn’t that little child’s fault. It was the adult who had control.”

Samuel, 17, said he was fondled by a leader a decade ago, who told him, “Don’t say anything. 

“For awhile, I lived with those three words,” Samuel said. “That’s why I didn’t say anything.” 

Advised by Tim Kosnoff, an attorney who has litigated more than a thousand cases of sexual misconduct against organizations such as the Scouts and the Mormon church, the group of attorneys said it has identified 150 alleged pedophiles never before publicly accused.  

The law firms began running TV and Google ads encouraging victims to sign on as clients for a potential lawsuit after a report in December that Boy Scouts of America prepared for a possible Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing. The volume already gathered could double the number of legal cases the organization already is facing, although a bankruptcy would halt existing and future litigation, the attorneys told USA TODAY.

In a statement about the new allegations, Boy Scouts of America said, “Any incident of child abuse is one too many, and nothing is more important than the safety and protection of children in our Scouting programs.” 

Kosnoff and his colleagues said a bankruptcy filing would have a chilling effect on victims’ ability to expose predators who are a threat to their communities. The number of victims who have signed on since last month is evidence for the Seattle-based attorney that many more have yet to step forward.

“That’s proof that we’ve barely scratched the surface,” Kosnoff said. He added that FBI research has shown that each “perpetrator has over 100 victims over a lifetime of offending.” 

Kenneth Rothweiler, a partner at one of the three firms, Eisenberg Rothweiler,said that only a handful of the new allegations are related to previously identified perpetrators. About 90%, he said, are new.  

Kretschmer and Kendall Kimber, 60, are among those making their allegations public for the first time. They described a culture of shame and secrecy that kept them silent. That worry has not been erased over the years.

Kimber said he was abused by a leader who offered to help him prepare for the Order of the Arrow, an honor society within the Boy Scouts that he was invited to join. At the leader’s house, Kimber said, the man forced him to perform oral sex. 

“He did that while he was talking to his mother on the phone,” Kimber said. “He had nothing about the Boy Scouts or about what I was doing on his mind.” 

Kimber said he never went back to the man’s house and eventually quit the Scouts. He said he didn’t tell anyone about his experience until much later, when he learned his brothers were abused by the same man. One committed suicide, which Kimber said was tied in part to the abuse.   

“I probably would have gotten kicked out” for coming forward at the time, Kimber said.

Kretschmer said his abuser was his psychologist through the Air Force base where his dad was stationed. He was a kid with attention issues, he said, which were less understood at the time.

Both men said they are speaking out now to help prevent future abuse. 

“There are thousands of kids who may not have ever had this happen to them if people would have stood up and said, ‘No, no, no, we’re not tolerating this, we’re not allowing this to happen,’ ” Kretschmer said. ” ‘There may be a little bit of mud on our face right now, but it’s the children that are important.’ “

The Boy Scouts have been dogged by abuse allegations since a landmark case in 2010 that ended with an $18.5 million damage award and the release of more than 20,000 confidential documents, dubbed the “perversion files.”

Those records revealed that the 100-year-old organization had long kept track of suspected and known abusers – banning more than 1,000 leaders and volunteers between 1965 to 1985. But the records also showed the Scouts had rarely, if ever, reported those individuals to police. In a news conference Tuesday, attorney Jeff Anderson revealed court documents indicating that reviews of the “perversion files” found nearly 8,000 volunteers previously banned from the organization due to accusations of child sexual abuse.

Much like USA Gymnastics and the Catholic Church, the Scouts have been accused of covering up the abuse. The Scouting organization faces 200 lawsuits that its insurance companies threatened to stop covering. USA Gymnastics filed for bankruptcy protection in December, following the lead of more than a dozen church dioceses.

More: Boy Scouts deflects report of bankruptcy prep in face of sexual misconduct litigation

More: #MeToo was a culture shock. But changing laws will take more than a year.

More: How common is sexual misconduct in Hollywood?

The Boy Scouts joined institutions such as Michigan State University in lobbying against efforts to extend statutes of limitations, proposed in the wake of the Larry Nassar case and #MeToo movement, that would allow victims of sexual abuse more time to come forward and seek damages.  

In response to those proposals,“organizations like BSA and the Catholic Church are now taking legal maneuvers to try to prevent victims from bringing these cases,” Rothweiler said.

Bankruptcy would create a limited window for victims to file claims. Those filings would be confidential, meaning names of perpetrators would not be made public.Afterward, Scouts BSA would emerge as a reorganized debtor and would not have to face civil litigation for – or negative publicity about – claims of wrongdoing.

“That’s why they’re going into bankruptcy, not because they don’t have the money,” Kosnoff said. “They’re going into bankruptcy to hide, to hide these dirty secrets.” 

Rothweiler said that among the responses the law firms received through their hotline and website, abusedinscouting.com, were two minors, one alleging an incident in 2018. Their experiences call into question whether the Scouts have made good on promises to take proactive steps to prevent abuse. 

Samuel – whose name was changed to protect his identity, because he is a minor and an alleged victim – said he was assaulted by an assistant Scout leader around 2008, when he was 7 or 8. His parents had separated, and after a move across the state, he joined the Scouts to meet new people, at his mother’s urging. One of the assistant leaders positioned himself as a mentor, he said, frequently driving him to and from meetings.

On one such occasion, Samuel said, the man followed him to his door. He asked Samuel’s mother if he could invite Samuel to his home, to introduce him to his extensive technologycollection. She said yes.   

“She trusted the guy because he was always there,” said Samuel, now 17. 

Once they got to the house, Samuel said, the leader called him into his bedroom and began touching him inappropriately.  

“I remember it graphically; the one thing I don’t want to remember,” he said. 

Samuel never went back to the man’s house and dropped out of Scouts. He eventually confided in his grandmother, his legal guardian, but didn’t go any further until he saw the law firms’ TV ads.  

The attorneys probably will share their list with child protective service agencies, Kosnoff said, and may file a large suit. They’ve considered sharing the list directly with Scouts BSA but remain skeptical the organization would take action. 

“It’s striking to me that we’ve had this kind of response in such a short period of time with such limited outreach,” Kosnoff said. “If we could do this with our limited resources, why couldn’t the Boy Scouts of America have done this?” 

In a statement, Boy Scouts of America asked anyone who has been harmed to call the Scouts First Helpline (1-844-726-8871) or email scouts1st@scouting.org. 

CLOSE

Despite a national policy banning the hire of openly-gay scout leaders, the greater New York City council of Boy Scouts has hired a gay Eagle Scout to work as a summer camp leader. (April 2)
AP

 

 

Source Article from https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/investigations/2019/04/24/boy-scouts-face-hundreds-new-sexual-abuse-claims/3547991002/


Democrats were livid Wednesday about Hope Hicks’ stonewalling but hoped to glean information about her time on the Trump campaign in 2016. | J. Scott Applewhite/AP Photo

congress

Hope Hicks refused to answer 155 questions from House Democrats on Wednesday about her tenure as communications director in the Trump White House, according to a transcript of her closed-door testimony released Thursday.

The longtime confidante of President Donald Trump spent nearly eight hours clinging closely to White House attorneys’ demands that she refuse to answer every question about her time in the White House, as Democrats ticked through a lengthy, detailed and at times monotonous recitation of questions they knew the answer to: “Objection.”

Story Continued Below

The House Judiciary Committee’s interview yielded virtually no new information about Hicks’ role in the Trump campaign, and none at all about her testimony to former special counsel Robert Mueller centering on Trump’s repeated attempts to constrain or thwart Mueller’s investigation of Russian interference in the 2016 election.

The transcript — and the dozens of objections from White House lawyers — further documents the White House’s efforts to prevent witnesses from complying with House Democrats’ investigations, as part of its assertions that Hicks and other former aides have “absolute immunity” from testifying.

During Wednesday’s testimony, Hicks refused to answer several questions about the president’s actions, her conversations with him and her discussions even with officials outside the White House, according to the transcript. She did not answer questions about her testimony to Mueller, either — a fact that enraged Democrats who argued that she had no legal basis to refuse to discuss events that she already described in detail to the special counsel.

Most notably, the White House objected to lawmakers’ questions about Trump’s attempts to constrain the special counsel’s investigation, including his directives to then-White House Counsel Don McGahn to fire Mueller.

Hicks also refused to answer basic questions such as where her desk was located in the White House, and whether there was a war between Israel and Egypt during her tenure.

Two White House lawyers, Michael Purpura and Patrick Philbin, objected to lawmakers’ and committee staffers’ questions every time the inquiry touched on Hicks’ service in the White House and during the presidential transition period, which pre-dates Trump’s presidency.

Purpura told Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerry Nadler (D-N.Y.) that the White House was not formally asserting executive privilege to block Hicks’ testimony; he only stated the White House’s view that Hicks “may not be compelled to speak about events that occurred during her service as a senior adviser to the president.”

Hicks abided by Purpura’s demands, telling Nadler: “As a former senior adviser to the president, I’m following the instructions from the White House.” Hicks’ attorney, Robert Trout, said his client was “simply following the guidance of the White House.”

At one point, Nadler challenged those claims of “absolute immunity,” telling Purpura: “With all due respect, that is absolute nonsense as a matter of law.”

At times, Hicks grew snarky with Democratic staff as they grilled her, joking that “contrary to popular belief,” she doesn’t speak Russian, and dismissing a question about the value of a leaked Democratic opposition research file by noting, “We have a thing called Google now.”

Hicks also volunteered that she believed there was “no collusion” between the Trump campaign and Russia. But when asked what she makes of the president saying “no obstruction occurred,” she said: “I’m here to talk about the campaign.”

Hicks was permitted by White House lawyers to answer innocuous questions such as where she usually ate her lunch and whether it was sunny or cloudy on her first day on the job. She was also permitted to discuss her April dinner with Trump, during which she said they were “reminiscing about events from the campaign, rallies, things like that.” She said she did not discuss her congressional testimony with the president, but Philbin objected when Rep. Ted Deutch (D-Fla.) asked her if they discussed Trump’s comments about the congressional investigations, which Trump has railed against.

Nadler has not specified whether he will seek a court order that would force Hicks to answer questions that involve her White House tenure and her testimony to the special counsel.

Democrats were livid Wednesday about the stonewalling, but hoped to glean information about her time on the Trump campaign in 2016, when the claims of immunity did not apply. But the transcript revealed little information that was not previously known.

Hicks said she had no knowledge of Trump’s arrangement with his former attorney and fixer, Michael Cohen, to buy the silence of various women who alleged that they had affairs with Trump. Cohen is currently serving a three-year sentence for the scheme — which prosecutors said violated campaign-finance laws — and for lying to Congress about the timing of the failed negotiations surrounding the construction of a Trump Tower in Moscow.

Hicks appeared to show that she remains loyal to Trump, often refusing to break with the president’s views on how he conducted his campaign. For example, she defended the Trump campaign’s use of hacked Democratic National Committee emails and other materials at rallies and on social media, saying it was simply done to “show a differentiation” between Trump and Hillary Clinton.

Hicks said she felt “relief” when WikiLeaks released those hacked materials, telling the committee she was relieved to know “that other campaigns had obstacles to face as well.”

But Hicks appeared to break with Trump’s willingness to accept foreign dirt on his political rivals, saying that she would call the FBI “if I felt it was legitimate enough to have our law enforcement dedicate their time to it.” She also said she “would not” advise anyone to accept information offered from a foreign government during a U.S. election campaign.

The transcript shows that Rep. Doug Collins of Georgia, the top Republican on the Judiciary Committee, slammed Democrats for discussing Hicks’ interview while it was ongoing. In particular, he called out Rep. Ted Lieu (D-Calif.), who spoke with reporters and was using his Twitter account to decry the White House’s objections.

After the transcript was released, Collins said “we’ve learned nothing new from a witness who has been cooperating with this committee for months.”

Source Article from https://www.politico.com/story/2019/06/20/hope-hicks-refused-questions-house-testimony-1374240

Poland’s Solidarity labor union has joined forces with climate skeptics from America to call for “a restoration of the Scientific Method and the dismissal of ideological dogma” in the study of climate change as part of a joint declaration the union has submitted to the United Nations in partnership with a U.S.-based free-market think tank.

This is the same labor union founded under the leadership of Lech Walesa, the Nobel Prize winner who organized anti-Soviet movements in the 1980s.

The U.N.’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has repeatedly made the case that catastrophic climate change is imminent and that human emissions are largely to blame. The latest in a series of reports from the IPCC was released in October to measure “the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty.”

The IPCC has maintained a significant presence throughout the U.N.’s 24th Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, which is widely known as COP24. U.N. officials view the recently released IPCC report as a “wake up call” for conference participants to finalize negotiations for implementing the Paris climate agreement, which calls on participating countries to curb their greenhouse gas emissions. Although 195 countries adopted the language of the climate agreement during a December 2015 COP meeting in Paris, the agreement cannot be fully implemented until after 55 of the countries responsible for producing a combined total of 55 percent of the world’s emissions accept the treaty’s terms, according to the U.N.

Media coverage of the intergovernmental panel’s climate change report has made the case for “urgent and unprecedented changes” built around emissions restrictions to curtail global warming that could lead to catastrophic conditions.

But the joint declaration — which was signed by Jaroslaw Grzesik, chairman of Solidarity’s energy and mining secretariat; Dominik Kolorz, president of Solidarity in Poland’s Silesian region; and James Taylor, a senior follow for environment and energy policy with the Heartland Institute — makes the point that “there is no scientific consensus on the main causes and consequences of climate change.”

The Heartland Institute, which is headquartered in Illinois, has gained international recognition for challenging the premise of theories that link human activity with catastrophic levels of global warming. The free-market think tank released the latest version of the Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate Change at a media event last week in Katowice just as the COP24 meeting was getting underway. More than 100 scientists, economists, engineers, and other experts from across globe who have insight into the dynamics of earth’s climate have come together to take part in the nongovernmental panel, which began releasing the studies in 2009.

They conclude that “[t]he global war on energy freedom, which commenced in earnest in the 1980s and reached a fever pitch in the second decade of the twenty-first century, was never founded on sound science or economics. The world’s policymakers ought to acknowledge this truth and end that war.”

Unlike its U.N. counterpart, the nongovernmental panel performs a cost-benefit analysis into the use of fossil fuels that highlights the benefits to humanity.

“Despite calling for the end of reliance on fossil fuels by 2100, the IPCC never produced an accounting of the opportunity cost of restricting or banning their use,” the report says. “That cost, a literature review shows, would be enormous. Estimates of the cost of reducing anthropogenic greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by the amounts said by the IPCC to be necessary to avoid causing ~2°C warming in the year 2050 range from the IPCC’s own estimate of 3.4% to as high as 81% of projected global gross domestic product (GDP) in 2050, the latter estimate nullifying all the gains in human well-being made in the past century.”

Solidarity’s willingness to defy climate alarmism while making a principled stand on behalf of sound science will reverberate across Europe long after COP24 comes to an end, James Lakely, the director of communications for the Heartland Institute, said in an email.

“Propaganda fades, truth endures,” he said. “Solidarity proved with its joint statement with Heartland that it will not be pushed around by the jet-set bureaucrats of the United Nations. I think that is the case with Poland as a whole. The people of Poland get 80 percent of their power from coal. Going ‘carbon free’ in the next decade or so will destroy their economy and society. The Polish people know this, so they will not be pushed around by the UN — nor should it, as Solidarity made clear in their meeting with Heartland.”

He added:

Still, the money and organization standing behind climate change policies is considerable. That much was made clear in remarks made by Michal Kurtyka, a Polish energy official who is serving as the COP24 president.

Kevin Mooney (@KevinMooneyDC) is a contributor to the Washington Examiner’s Beltway Confidential blog. He is an investigative reporter in Washington, D.C., who writes for several national publications.

Source Article from https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/polands-solidarity-union-joins-forces-with-us-climate-change-skeptics

El FBI dijo que no hay crimen en los correos electrónicos de Clinton

El FBI no ha encontrado evidencia criminal en el nuevo lote de correos electrónicos de Hillary Clinton. En una carta enviada a los miembros del Congreso, el director del FBI James Comey, expresó que la agencia había terminado su revisión y no encontró nada que cambiara su posición.

En el mes de julio, Comey dijo que la ex secretaria Clinton había sido descuidada, pero no criminal en el manejo de material sensible en su servidor de correo electrónico privado, mientras que ejercía como secretaria de Estado.

La investigación se volvió a abrir con el descubrimiento de nuevos correos electrónicos “pertinentes” y relacionados al primer lote enviado al FBI. Según los informes, los correos se encontraron en la computadora portátil de Anthony Weiner, ex esposo de una de las asesoras más cercanas de la candidata demócrata.

La noche del domingo, dos días antes de las elecciones, WikiLeaks liberó 8.000 nuevos correos hackeados del Partido demócrata, que amenazan con desestabilizar nuevamente la campaña.

Alerta en Oklahoma  tras sismo junto a núcleo petrolífero

La noche del domingo se registró un sismo de una magnitud de 5,0 en las cercanías de uno de los núcleos petrolíferos más importantes del país, ocasionando varios destrozos como ventanas rotas, volteando fachadas de edificios lo que puede haber provocado daños estructurales, según reportaron los medios locales.

En una conferencia de prensa, Jeremy Frazier, un gestor asistente indicó que hubo varios heridos leves y que algunos edificios comerciales quedaron en escombros.

Como prevención de posibles réplicas, la policía acordonó la zona y pidió a las personas que se mantengan alejados del lugar. Un centro residencial para ancianos sufrió daños y fue evacuada, dijo Frazier. Además el distrito escolar canceló las clases del lunes.

Posible escenario en México: ¿qué pasa si gana Trump el martes?

Las autoridades mexicanas están creando un plan de contingencia si Donald Trump llegara a la presidencia, que en principio haría frente a lo que llamaron un “huracán” para la economía mexicana.

“Si el escenario adverso se manifiesta, es posible que las autoridades mexicanas respondan de alguna manera”, dijo el gobernador del Banco de México, Agustín Carstens, a la emisora mexicana Milenio TV. “Es un plan de contingencia sobre el cual estamos hablando con el secretario de Hacienda”, agregó el responsable del banco central.

Esto se debe a que el aspirante republicano en varias ocasiones ha hablado de imponer un arancel del 35% sobre los bienes fabricados por empresas estadounidenses en México, que luego son vendidos en Estados Unidos. Las exportaciones representan un tercio de la economía de México y casi todas ellas van hacia Estados Unidos.

(Foto: Alex Wong/Getty Images)

Venezuela sobre Argentina y Chile: “son unos vulgares”

Delcy Rodríguez, la ministra venezolana de Relaciones Exteriores, exigió respeto de Argentina y Chile, cuyas cancillerías pidieron resultados en el diálogo entre el gobierno y la oposición de Venezuela.

Rodríguez señaló, en conferencia de prensa en Caracas, que el gobierno venezolano repudia cualquier tutoría o injerencia extranjera en sus asuntos internos.

Por ello, la canciller venezolana exigió respeto a sus pares de Argentina, Susana Malcorra, y de Chile, Heraldo Muñoz, al referirse a Venezuela, especialmente en materia de derechos humanos.

Son unos vulgares que pretenden pronunciarse sobre nuestro país cuando ni siquiera son capaces de aceptar un reto en materia de derechos humanos”, dijo la ministra venezolana.

“Con qué cara vienen a hablar de Venezuela, yo les he dicho, y me disculpan que lo diga en estos términos, pero antes de hablar de Venezuela tienen que lavarse su boca, antes de pronunciar nuestro nombre”, apuntó Rodríguez y agregó que desde el Consejo de Derechos Humanos de la ONU, el gobierno venezolano hizo un llamado al cese del “hostigamiento” contra el país.

(Foto: FEDERICO PARRA/AFP/Getty Images)

España no cumplió con su compromiso con el cambio climático

España desembolsó menos del 1 por ciento de lo que ha comprometido entre 2015 y 2018 para el Fondo Verde del Clima, destinado a ayudar a los países menos desarrollados en su adaptación y mitigación contra el cambio climático, ya que estos son los más afectados por sus consecuencias, según informó ABC.

De acuerdo al informe de Oxfam Intermón “Contra viento y marea: España ya no puede poner más excusas en la lucha contra el cambio climático”, España aportó hasta ahora apenas un millón de euros de los 120 millones que anunció que desembolsaría y la ONG ha calculado que en función de su Producto Interior Bruto, la contribución justa del país debería ser de 540 millones de dólares (unos 500 millones de euros).

El Fondo Verde había solicitado 15.000 millones de dólares en todo el mundo para hacer frente a la emergencia global del cambio climático.

El cambio climático avanza más rápido de lo previsto. Foto: Pixabay

La Gran Época le recomienda el siguiente artículo: Seis maneras de detener la sustracción forzada de órganos en China

Source Article from http://www.lagranepoca.com/ultimas-noticias/97360-noticias-ultima-hora-7-noviembre.html

(CNN) – El presidente de Estados Unidos, Donald Trump, está alentando a sus 24 millones de seguidores en Twitter a ignorar encuestas precisas.

Este lunes publicó, erróneamente, que “cualquier encuesta negativa es noticia falsa, como las de CNN, ABC, NBC en la elección”.

Por su naturaleza, los sondeos profesionales son científicos, no políticos. Las encuestas realizadas por cadenas de televisión durante la elección no fueron “noticias falsas”. De hecho, la mayoría de sondeos no estuvieron muy lejos de la realidad. Las encuestas, correctamente, mostraron que Hillary Clinton ganaría la votación popular por un margen relativamente pequeño.

Pero eso es pasado. El mensaje de Trump en Twitter dijo más sobre el futuro: llevó su negación de larga data a una conclusión ilógica e invitó a sus partidarios a descartar datos desagradables.

Específicamente, Trump se opuso a las encuestas que se mostraron contrarias a la prohibición inmigratoria temporal de su gobierno para viajeros originarios de siete países de mayoría musulmana.

“Lo siento”, escribió, “la gente quiere seguridad fronteriza y escrutinios extremos”.

Si por “la gente” el presidente se refiere únicamente a los estadounidenses que votaron por él, entonces eso es cierto. Sin embargo, los habitantes de ese país en general están divididos sobre la medida de prohibición y algunas otras decisiones de seguridad.

El mensaje de Trump en Twitter parece estar motivado por un segmento que transmitió este lunes en la mañana el programa “New Day”, de CNN. (Frecuentemente, el presidente mira las noticias de cable en la mañana).

A las 6:31 de la mañana, tiempo del Este, el director político de CNN David Chalian mostró los resultados de la última encuesta realizada por CNN y ORC. Empezó con el dato de un 44% de aprobación frente a un 53% de desaprobación sobre el desempeño de Trump en el cargo.

Después Chalian anunció: “¿Qué hay de la política de prohibición inmigratoria? ¿Cómo está reaccionando el país a esa medida? Un mayoría se opone, una mayoría delgada. El 53% de los estadounidenses están en contra de la medida y un 47% a favor”.

La encuesta es una muestra científica de la población estadounidense en general.

La publicación de Trump en Twitter provocó críticas extendidas en la mañana del lunes. “Este es un comportamiento estrafalario. Algo no está bien”, respondió Joaquin Castro, congresista demócrata por Texas.

Otro fuerte crítico del presidente, el activista Deray McKesson, tuiteó: “Noticias negativas = noticias falsas: es el principio de la tiranía”.

Este lunes también se conoció que uno de los amigos del presidente, Chris Ruddy – director ejecutivo de Newsmax–, fue citado por el diario The New York Times con la siguiente declaración: “Creo que, en su mente, el éxito de esto estará en las cifras de las encuestas”.

A lo largo de su vida adulta, Trump se ha preocupado profundamente por las diferentes medidas de su popularidad, incluyendo apariciones en portadas de revista, índices de audiencia y multitudinarias reuniones.

Aún así, está empezando una presidencia que tiene niveles de desaprobación históricos y una generalizada oposición a algunas de sus políticas administrativas.

Es por eso que algunos observadores esperaban que Trump intentara desacreditar los índices de desaprobación en las encuestas.

Durante la carrera electoral, Trump se jactó de las encuestas que eran favorables para él, a veces incluso leyendo los datos en voz alta durante las concentraciones. Pero cuando las encuestas se volvieron desfavorables, sin fundamentos afirmó que se trataba de “encuestas torcidas”.

A mediados de enero, poco antes de asumir el cargo, el presidente reanudó su rechazo a las encuestas.

“Las mismas personas que hicieron las encuestas falsas durante la elección, y estaban tan equivocadas, son las que ahora producen los sondeos de aprobación. Y están tan amañadas como antes”, escribió Trump.

Pero las encuestas no están amañadas. Aunque ciertamente pueden ser imprecisas, hacer sondeos es una ciencia y los expertos trabajan muy duro para reflejar las visiones del país con la mayor precisión posible.

Algunas encuestas previas a las elecciones se alejaron de los resultados finales, especialmente en los estados indecisos, por razones que están siendo estudiadas por los expertos. Estos sondeos estatales llevaron a que muchos analistas anticiparan la victoria de Clinton en la noche de los comicios. Sin embargo, las encuestas nacionales fueron en general acertadas.

“Las encuestas en las que Clinton ganó el voto popular fueron precisas”, escribió el periodista de CNN Jake Tapper este lunes en respuesta a Trump.

Durante la sesión informativa del pasado viernes en la Casa Blanca, al secretario de Prensa Sean Spicer se le preguntó sobre los bajos niveles de aprobación del presidente. El funcionario respondió con una encuesta de Ramussen que muestra un mejor panorama.

“Creo que también está una encuesta de Ramussen que registró un 51% de aprobación”, señaló Spicer.

De hecho, ese sondeo mostró que Trump tiene un 54% de aprobación, pero los números no pueden ser comparados de manera exacta con las cifras de otras encuestas. ¿Por qué? Porque Ramussen encuestó a un subconjunto de personas definidas como “probables votantes” en las elecciones. Mientras que la mayoría de los sondeos de aprobación buscan una muestra de todos los adultos, no sólo de los “votantes probables”, con el fin de conocer las opiniones de la población entera.

El viernes, Spicer no criticó los datos de las encuestas ni se refirió a ellos como “noticias falsas”, sino que predijo una mejoría en los números.

“El presidente entiende que esto es una maratón y no una carrera de velocidad”, aseguró el funcionario. “Y mientras él continúa devolviéndoles el trabajo a las personas y protegiendo a este país, creo que los números de las encuestas se comportarán de acuerdo a eso”.

Y al tildar de “noticias falsas” a las encuestas, Trump parece estar contradiciendo a su secretario de Prensa, de nuevo.

Source Article from http://cnnespanol.cnn.com/2017/02/06/no-presidente-trump-las-encuestas-negativas-no-son-noticias-falsas/

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court ruled Thursday that the Trump administration cannot carry out its plan to shut down the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, which has allowed nearly 800,000 young people, known as Dreamers, to avoid deportation and remain in the U.S.

Chief Justice John Roberts was the swing vote in the 5-4 decision, which deals a big legal defeat to President Donald Trump on the issue of immigration, a major focus of his domestic agenda.

Roberts wrote in the decision that the government failed to give an adequate justification for ending the federal program. The administration could again try to shut it down by offering a more detailed explanation for its action, but the White House might not want to end such a popular program in the heat of a presidential campaign.

Roberts was joined in the majority by the liberal Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer, Elena Kagan and Sonia Sotomayor.

“We conclude that the acting secretary did violate” the Administrative Procedure Act, and that the decision to rescind DACA “must be vacated,” Roberts wrote. In his decision, Roberts called the Trump administration’s “total rescission” of DACA “arbitrary and capricious.”

The heart of Robert’s majority opinion held that Trump had broken the laws governing federal agencies when he ended DACA in 2017because the memorandum that recommended its termination did not address crucial parts of the policy.

In addition, every justice in the majority except Sotomayor dismissed the argument made by the parties that brought the case to the Supreme Court that the administration’s decision to terminate DACA was motivated by discrimination against Latinos.

Critically, however, Roberts pointed out in his decision that it wasn’t necessarily unconstitutional for the Trump administration to terminate DACA, but the way it did so was.

The chief justice pointed out toward the end of his opinion that the administration’s Department of Homeland Security could simply revisit its legal strategy on how to unwind DACA in the future.

“The appropriate recourse is therefore to remand to DHS so that it may reconsider the problem anew,” Roberts wrote.

The conservative Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh filed opinions that concurred with parts of the majority as well as with parts of the dissent — with several emphasizing that the majority ruling simple punted the issue back to the administration.

“The Court still does not resolve the question of DACA’s rescission,” Alito wrote in his dissent. “Instead, it tells the Department of Homeland Security to go back and try again.”

Thomas, in his dissent, wrote, “Today’s decision must be recognized for what it is: an effort to avoid a politically controversial but legally correct decision.” He added that the court “could have made clear” that a solution to the question over the status of the program must come from Congress through immigration legislation.

“Instead, the majority has decided to prolong DHS’ initial overreach by providing a stopgap measure of its own,” he wrote. “In doing so, it has given the greenlight for future political battles to be fought in this Court rather than where they rightfully belong — the political branches.”

Reaction pours in

Moments after the decision came down, Trump lashed out it the court, retweeting a screenshot of that part of Thomas’ dissent. The president later tweeted, “These horrible & politically charged decisions coming out of the Supreme Court are shotgun blasts into the face of people that are proud to call themselves Republicans or Conservatives,” and asked, “Do you get the impression that the Supreme Court doesn’t like me?”

Trump also said recent court decisions showed the need for new justices, adding that he would release a list of potential nominees by Sept. 1.

Later Thursday, acting Homeland Security Secretary Chad Wolf said “the DACA program was created out of thin air and implemented illegally.”

“The American people deserve to have the Nation’s laws faithfully executed as written by their representatives in Congress — not based on the arbitrary decisions of a past administration,” Wolf said in a statement. “This ruling usurps the clear authority of the executive branch to end unlawful programs.”

The Supreme Court’s decision was widely met with praise from various Democratic lawmakers, business leaders, immigrants and advocacy groups.

Joe Biden called the ruling a victory that was “made possible by the courage and resilience of hundreds of thousands of DACA recipients who bravely stood up and refused to be ignored.”

Biden, the presumptive Democratic nominee, vowed, if elected, to “immediately work to make it permanent by sending a bill to Congress on Day One of my administration.”

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., choked up on the Senate floor moments after the Supreme Court announced its decision.

Schumer said he “cried tears of joy” and called the decision, as well as the court’s ruling Monday that existing federal law forbids job discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation or transgender status, “a bright ray of sunshine.”

“Who would’ve thought,” he said repeatedly, remarking “wow” several times.

Apple CEO Tim Cook lauded the decision, tweeting, “We’re glad for today’s decision and will keep fighting until DACA’s protections are permanent.”

U.S. Chamber of Commerce CEO Thomas Donohue called the ruling “the right decision for Dreamers, our economy, and our country,” adding that removing DACA recipients “would deny our country talent, future leaders, and an essential piece of the American workforce including teachers, nurses, doctors, farmers, and entrepreneurs.”

And the National Immigration Law Center tweeted, “VICTORY.”

Former President Barack Obama, who put DACA into place by executive order in 2012, also applauded the decision and urged Americans to vote for his former vice president, Biden, in November because he would create a “system that’s truly worthy of this nation of immigrants once and for all.”

After the Department of Homeland Security ordered the program ended, lower court rulings allowed DACA to keep going, letting young people in the program to reapply every two years and remain under its protection. Children of illegal immigrants were allowed to remain here if they were under 16 when their parents brought them to the U.S. and if they arrived by 2007.

DACA’s defenders had argued that federal law required the Trump administration to give a detailed explanation before trying to shut the program down — an action that would affect hundreds of thousands of people and the businesses that employ them. Instead, they said, the government simply declared the program illegal. More than 100 business groups, including Apple and Microsoft, sought to preserve DACA, arguing many of their employees are part of the program.

Immigration lawyers told the Supreme Court after the case was argued last fall that front-line health care workers involved in responding to the coronavirus epidemic rely on about 27,000 DACA recipients, “including dentists, pharmacists, physician assistants, home health aides, technicians” and nearly 200 medical students.

“Termination of DACA during this national health emergency would be catastrophic,” they said in an April 2 court filing. The Association of American Medical Colleges told the court last fall — well before the pandemic crisis — that the U.S. is unprepared “to fill the loss that would result if DACA recipients were excluded from the health care workforce.”

Figures show that over 90 percent of DACA participants have a job. Nearly half are in school. Many don’t speak the language or know the culture of their home countries.

Among them is Claudia Quinonez of Maryland, brought to the U.S. at age 11 by her mother, who overstayed a tourist visa.

“DACA truly changed my life. I have a Social Security number. I have the ability to work, to contribute, and pay taxes,” she said.

Source Article from https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/supreme-court/supreme-court-rules-trump-cannot-end-daca-big-win-dreamer-n1115116

Noticias Telemundo’s “Inmigración, Trump y los Hispanos” (Immigration, Trump and the Hispanic Community) Town Hall broadcast on Sunday, February 12 at 7PM/6 C, ranked # 1 in Spanish-language TV in primetime across all key demographics, averaging 1.57 million total viewers, 708,000 adults 18 to 49 and 325,000 adults 18 to 34, according to Nielsen. The news special moderated by Noticias Telemundo News Anchor José Díaz-Balart also positioned Telemundo as the #1 Spanish-language network during the entire primetime on Sunday, across all key demos.

“Noticias Telemundo is empowering millions of Latinos with reliable and TRANSPARENT information at a time of change,” said José Díaz-Balart. “Viewers trust us because they know our only commitment is to present the facts the way they are, with professionalism and a total commitment to our community.”

“Immigration, Trump and the Hispanic Community” also reached 1.6 million viewers on Facebook, generating 23,000 global actions on the social network.

The Town Hall answered viewers’ questions about the impact of President Trump’s immigration policy on the Hispanic community. The news special featured a panel of experts, including immigration lawyer and Telemundo contributor Alma Rosa Nieto; Telemundo conservative political analyst Ana Navarro; the Deputy Vice President of the National Council of La Raza (NCLR), Clarissa Martínez, and CHIRLA’s Executive Director, Angélica Salas. In addition, “El Poder en Ti”, Telemundo’s robust community initiative, launched an Internet site for Hispanics looking for information, tools and resources on immigration in parallel to the Town Hall.

“Inmigración, Trump y los Hispanos” is part of a series of Noticias Telemundo specials, including “Trump en la Casa Blanca,” produced the day after the elections, and “Trump y los Latinos,” which aired on Inauguration Day. All of these programs share an emphasis on allowing audiences to express their views and empower them by giving them access to trustworthy, rigorous and relevant information presented under Noticias Telemundo’s banner “Telling It Like It Is” (“Las Cosas Como Son” in Spanish).

Noticias Telemundo is the information unit of Telemundo Network and a leader provider in news serving the US Hispanics across all broadcast and digital platforms. Its award-winning television news broadcasts include the daily newscast “Noticias Telemundo,” the Sunday current affairs show “Enfoque con José Díaz-Balart” and the daily news and entertainment magazine “Al Rojo Vivo con María Celeste.” The rapidly-growing “Noticias Telemundo Digital Team” provides continuous content to US Hispanics wherever they are, whenever they want it. Noticias Telemundo also produces award winning news specials, documentaries and news event such as political debates, forums and town halls.

Source: Nielsen L+SD IMP, 2/12/17. TEL #1 SLTV (vs UNI, UMA, AZA, ETV). Shareablee, 2/6/17-2/12/17.

Image courtesy of Telemundo.

Source Article from http://www.broadwayworld.com/bwwtv/article/Noticias-Telemundos-IMMIGRATION-TRUMP-AND-THE-HISPANIC-COMMUNITY-Ranks-1-IN-Spanish-Language-TV-Sunday-212-20170214

The White House’s policy would cancel up to $10,000 in federal student loan debt for borrowers who earn less than $125,000 per year, or less than $250,000 for married couples, or up to $20,000 for those who received federal Pell Grants. The Biden administration has been adamant that it has the legal authority to cancel student debt, citing a 2003 law giving the executive branch broad authority to overhaul student loan programs.

Source Article from https://www.washingtonpost.com/us-policy/2022/09/29/republicans-student-loan-forgiveness-lawsuit/

Múltiples incidentes se reportan este domingo durante las elecciones en el Estado de México, Coahuila, Nayarit y Veracruz: 

Edomex

La policía municipal de Ecatepec presentó ante el Ministerio Público a Alejandro Bernal, funcionario de la delegación Cuauhtémoc, encabezada por Ricardo Monreal, ya que en el auto que conducía había un arma (una escuadra calibre 32), cartuchos y dinero en efectivo (dos fajos de billetes de 10 mil pesos cada uno).

La camioneta con placas de Zacatecas fue retenida por la autoridad.

*****

La Fiscalía Especializada para la Atención de Delitos Electorales (Fepade) interceptó dos autobuses en las inmediaciones del Metro Oceanía; pretendían recoger a votantes y trasladarlos a Ecatepec y Nezahualcóyotl.

Los conductores fueron detenidos y dijeron que forman parte de un operativo mayor de 70 autobuses de la línea Pullman de Morelos para “acarrear” a más de 3 mil 500 electores. Se desconoce el partido o fuerza política detrás de esto.

*****

Así reaccionó el Secretario de Desarrollo Social, Luis Miranda, al no poder votar en el Estado de México, pues su credencial de elector estaba vencida.

“No aparezco en la Lista Nominal y ésta siempre ha sido mi casilla, no sé qué habrá pasado… sí tengo otra credencial también, pero sí yo tendría que estar en la lista nominal. No sé qué haya pasado, ahorita voy a buscar mi otra credencial y ver dónde estoy”, declaró.

*****

Se presentó una denuncia ante la Fiscalía General de Justicia del Estado de México y la Comisión Estatal de Seguridad Ciudadana por el presunto plagio de dos militantes de Morena en la entidad, lo cual está siendo investigado, informó José Manzur, Secretario General de Gobierno.

*****
Conferencia de prensa “Ni un fraude más”:

Coahuila

El Partido Revolucionario Institucional (PRI) en Coahuila alista las denuncias correspondientes por la caída de telefonía celular de militantes.

Verónica Martínez, presidenta de ese instituto político en la entidad, expuso que desde las 6:00 horas de este domingo se suspendieron líneas de servicio de personas adheridas a ese partido y uno de los casos correspondió al candidato a la gubernatura Miguel Ángel Riquelme.

****

El Partido Revolucionario Institucional (PRI) en Coahuila condenó la agresión en contra de su candidata a regidora y expresidenta del Comité Municipal de Múzquiz, Ernestina Hernández, quien sufrió daños a su patrimonio, luego de que su vehículo fue incendiado afuera de su domicilio durante la madrugada de este domingo.

“Reprobamos este tipo de acciones y exigimos un juego limpio en esta jornada electoral, no queremos ningún acto en contra de nuestros candidatos y pedimos a las autoridades realizar las indagatorias correspondientes”, afirmó la presidenta priista en esta entidad, Verónica Martínez.

*****

Por otra parte, ya se registró la votación de Los Moreira.

Nayarit

En Nayarit, balaceras y un detenido previo a la elección.

Veracruz

Desconocidos balearon un automóvil estacionado afuera de la casa de la candidata de la coalición PRI-PVEM en el Municipio de San Rafael, Lorena Piñón.

En el municipio de Álamo, ocho policías municipales que distribuían propaganda del candidato del Partido del Trabajo fueron detenidos.

En Santiago Tuxtla, 11 policías municipales fueron consignados debido a que estaban realizando actividades de apoyo a favor del candidato de la alianza PAN-PRD, Donaldo Errasquin.

En Xalapa, el partido Morena denunció la presencia de taxistas en el Velódromo y Plaza Cristal, a quienes acusó de ser parte de la estrategia de acarreo de la alianza PAN-PRD.

En Soconusco, una camioneta vinculada al PAN fue atacada a balazos por sujetos que viajaban en otro vehículo.

En Acayucan fueron dejadas ayer cuatro mantas ligadas al Cártel de Jalisco Nueva Generación (CJNG). Asimismo, habitantes reportaron una balacera, y, durante un operativo de la Fuerza Civil y la Policía Naval, fueron detenidos tres sujetos que portaban cuatro armas de fuego, entre ellas un “cuerno de chivo” en la Colonia José Maria Morelos.

Source Article from http://aristeguinoticias.com/0406/mexico/elecciones-2017-reportes-desde-edomex-coahuila-nayarit-y-veracruz/

Comienza la semana con muchas noticias que captaron la atención de nuestros lectores. Sucesos políticos y una lamentable partida constan entre los hechos que más reacciones generaron. Te los detallamos a continuación:

1. El ex ministro de Educación de la Nación, y actual precandidato a senador de Cambiemos por la provincia de Buenos Aires, Esteban Bullrich, realizó una polémica comparación entre el aborto legal y el colectivo Ni Una Menos. Desde la oposición lo criticaron con dureza en redes sociales.

2. Mauricio Macri apunta al “peronismo de caudillos” y tiene cuatro provincias en la mira. Tucumán, Formosa, La Rioja y San Luis, son distritos que Presidente busca arrebatarle al PJ. La jugada electoral y una fuerte frase contra Juan Manzur.

3. Donald Trump despidió a su director de Comunicación: duró solo 10 días en el cargo. El empresario Anthony Scaramucci estuvo en funciones menos de dos semanas, pero se le atribuye la salida del anterior jefe de gabinete, Reince Priebus.

4. El intendente de General Ramírez, departamento Diamante, Ente Ríos, denunció a una vecina de esa localidad que lo agredió y lo lesionó con agua hirviendo cuando fue a realizar el clásico timbreo en medio de la campaña para estas elecciones.

5. Una triste noticia sacude al mundo del vóley tras la confirmación de la muerte del hijo mayor de Marcos Milinkovic, una gloria de la selección argentina de los últimos 25 años, mientras disfrutaba de sus vacaciones en familia en un playa de Croacia.

Source Article from http://www.perfil.com/trends/las-5-noticias-mas-destacadas-de-este-lunes-31-de-julio.phtml

Ohio Republican Rep. Jim Jordan and North Carolina Republican Rep. Mark Meadows weigh in on Trump’s decision to release the Ukraine call transcript and Democrats’ push for impeachment. #FoxNews

FOX News operates the FOX News Channel (FNC), FOX Business Network (FBN), FOX News Radio, FOX News Headlines 24/7, FOXNews.com and the direct-to-consumer streaming service, FOX Nation. FOX News also produces FOX News Sunday on FOX Broadcasting Company and FOX News Edge. A top five-cable network, FNC has been the most-watched news channel in the country for 17 consecutive years. According to a 2018 Research Intelligencer study by Brand Keys, FOX News ranks as the second most trusted television brand in the country. Additionally, a Suffolk University/USA Today survey states Fox News is the most trusted source for television news or commentary in the country, while a 2017 Gallup/Knight Foundation survey found that among Americans who could name an objective news source, FOX News is the top-cited outlet. FNC is available in nearly 90 million homes and dominates the cable news landscape while routinely notching the top ten programs in the genre.

Subscribe to Fox News! https://bit.ly/2vBUvAS
Watch more Fox News Video: http://video.foxnews.com
Watch Fox News Channel Live: http://www.foxnewsgo.com/

Watch full episodes of your favorite shows
The Five: http://video.foxnews.com/playlist/lon…
Special Report with Bret Baier: http://video.foxnews.com/playlist/lon…
The Story with Martha MacCallum: http://video.foxnews.com/playlist/lon…
Tucker Carlson Tonight: http://video.foxnews.com/playlist/lon…
Hannity: http://video.foxnews.com/playlist/lon…
The Ingraham Angle: http://video.foxnews.com/playlist/lon…
Fox News @ Night: http://video.foxnews.com/playlist/lon…

Follow Fox News on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/FoxNews/
Follow Fox News on Twitter: https://twitter.com/FoxNews/
Follow Fox News on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/foxnews/

Source Article from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-67v4BaJhWc

Hurricane Barry touched down on the Louisiana coast on Saturday, weakening to a tropical storm with the potential to linger over this low-lying state and soak it with as much as 20 inches of rain.

“We are not, in any way, out of the woods,” New Orleans Mayor LaToya Cantrell (D) said at a news conference Saturday afternoon.

By the time the storm hit, many along the coast had either evacuated or sheltered in place. Now, thousands are bracing for days of flooding.

“The Mississippi is [the river] that’s levee’d and doesn’t pose a threat,” Louisiana Gov. John Bel Edwards (D) said at a news conference. “Every other river poses a threat to flooding.”

Barry became the first hurricane of the 2019 Atlantic season. Seven hurricanes have made landfall in the Lower 48 and Puerto Rico since 2017, causing billions of dollars in damage.

By the time Barry leaves, the Comite River is expected to crest higher than it did during the destructive floods of 2016; the Amite could also be well above flood stage.

Closer to the coast, in Morgan City on the Atchafalaya River, the rain and wind were already downing trees and power lines Saturday, leaving more than 6,000 in the dark, according to David Naquin of the St. Mary Parish Office of Homeland Security and Emergency Preparedness. One couple had to be rescued from their trailer, he said, after live wires fell onto it so they dared not touch the metal door handles.

In Baton Rouge, 60 miles inland, the “Cajun Navy” gathered, poised to perform flood rescues. So far, their services have not been needed. They are waiting — a painful process for a group of civilian volunteers with an instinct for action.

Some tongued plugs of tobacco and munched on day-old Domino’s Pizza. Others had charged debates over the U.S. border policy and strategy in Afghanistan.

“Emotions are heightened and the adrenaline is rushing,” said Sky Barkley, 33, as sideways rain blew outside the L’Auberge Casino, where they are staged. “If you do this work, there are times you are just sitting around.”

Some are native Louisianans, and others are from Texas, North Carolina and elsewhere. Barkley, the director of operations for Stronghold, a relief organization for victims of genocide and human trafficking, came from Toccoa, Ga.

A group gathered at an overlook of the Mississippi River watching white caps roll over its surface — a telltale sign of a storm surge and the flooding to come, Barkley said.

While the Mississippi showed no sign of overtopping levees in New Orleans, cresting two feet lower than anticipated, another crest is expected Monday — and heavy rains will continue to threaten the entire delta and inland areas for days to come.

All flights into and out of Louis Armstrong New Orleans International Airport were canceled Saturday.

With Uber and Lyft halting service on Saturday, taxi driver Harold Nolan was able to cash in, pocketing hundreds of dollars in just a few hours. Nolan, who has been driving a taxi for 30 years, said many tourists saw the calm weather and dashed to the airport to try to catch flights, without realizing they had been canceled.

“People had reservations to leave, and the airlines didn’t inform them well enough to know that their flights had been canceled until they got to the airport,” said Nolan, 70. “And then they got there, and it was chaos because there wasn’t enough taxis to service the people trying to get out here.”

Nolan said he’s relieved the city seems to have escaped the worst effects of the storm. He said he and other longtime New Orleans residents could sense days ago that weather forecasters were needlessly “hyping” the storm.

“I think a lot of the media overplayed this,” Nolan said. “I just can’t see that they didn’t see that this storm was going to bypass most of New Orleans, even if it is wreaking havoc on other parts of Louisiana right now.”

Cantrell, the New Orleans mayor, warned residents that Mobile, Ala., had rainfall rates as high as four inches per hour on Saturday morning and that downpours could pivot to New Orleans.

Authorities have pre-positioned boats and high-water vehicles across the city, Cantrell said. The Louisiana National Guard also has about 3,800 guardsmen and airmen stationed across the state to handle emergencies.

Cantrell asked residents to remain sheltered in their homes throughout the weekend, declining to put in place a curfew, which she said would require additional resources.

Crews are closely monitoring 72,000 storm drains across the city, and officials with the Sewerage and Water Board, which maintains the pumps that help push water out of New Orleans, said the machinery has been working well.

“There are no threats to the levee system,” said Lt. Col. Thomas Sears, deputy commander of the Army Corps of Engineers New Orleans District.

New Orleans officials continue to express confidence in the $14 billion flood-mitigation system built to protect the city after Hurricane Katrina, which killed more than 1,800 people in 2005. For the first time in the history of the new system, every floodgate has been closed.

In areas downriver from New Orleans, closer to the Louisiana coast, rescue operations were underway. The U.S. Coast Guard on Saturday deployed a helicopter and a safety boat to help 11 people who reported being caught in their flooded homes on the Isle de Jean Charles, about 45 miles south of New Orleans, according to Petty Officer Lexie Preston. The flooding reached “roof level” in parts of the area, Preston said.

In Terrebonne Parish on Saturday, officials implemented a mandatory evacuation order for people south of Falgout Canal, where water was overtopping a levee. Louisiana officials said 315 people had slept at 28 shelters across the state on Friday night.

In Plaquemines Parish, officials on Saturday were urgently evaluating a breach in a secondary levee.

Council member Richie Blink said persistent southerly wind caused water from the Gulf of Mexico to “overtop the levee in several areas as long as 1,000 yards.”

Local firefighters said 80 houses have been affected by the flooding, but they are elevated. Floodwater is threatening to submerge Highway 23, the only north-south highway through the parish, and officials are worried some residents who didn’t evacuate could become stranded.

“The water is just going over top of the levee and going into fields that already have two feet of water in them,” Blink said

Plaquemines Sheriff Gerald A. Turlich Jr. said officials were surprised by the extent of the flooding, which he said was caused by the storm’s slow movement.

“It hasn’t moved very fast and we are really getting the brunt of the wind,” Turlich said. “They say this wind should last all the way into Monday.”

Blink hopped onto an fanboat to survey the problem.

He said low-lying Plaquemines has been trying to upgrade its levee systems for years, and $700 million in federal funds have been allocated for the projects. But, Link said, much of the funding hasn’t been released yet.

“It’s a slow going process, and we need to be able to adapt as fast as the climate,” Link said.

What’s happening to Plaquemines, Link predicted, is a harbinger of what coastal communities throughout the nation will be facing as sea levels rise.

“Places all around the country are going to be dealing with this,” Link said, as the fanboat, which was named Katrina, sped off. “And the day before a storm is not the day to plan.”

Sellers and Iati reported from Washington. Ashley Cusick and Jacqueline Kantor in New Orleans, Nick Miroff in McAllen, Tex., and Morgan Krakow and Jason Samenow in Washington contributed to this report.

Source Article from https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2019/07/13/hurricane-barry-weakens-after-making-landfall-flooding-risk-remains-high-many-areas/

Sen. Joe Manchin, D-W.Va., said Friday that he intends to vote for Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson, likely securing her spot on the Supreme Court.

Stefani Reynolds/AFP via Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Stefani Reynolds/AFP via Getty Images

Sen. Joe Manchin, D-W.Va., said Friday that he intends to vote for Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson, likely securing her spot on the Supreme Court.

Stefani Reynolds/AFP via Getty Images

Democratic Sen. Joe Manchin announced Friday that he will vote for Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson to be confirmed to the Supreme Court, clearing the way to an all-but-certain confirmation.

The West Virginia Democrat has become a pivotal vote in the evenly divided Senate, as he often sides with Republicans, and his opposition could have blocked Jackson from becoming the first Black woman to sit on the bench.

“After meeting with her, considering her record, and closely monitoring her testimony and questioning before the Senate Judiciary Committee this week, I have determined I intend to vote for her nomination to serve on the Supreme Court,” Manchin said in a statement.

Manchin added that Jackson’s “wide array of experiences” in the judicial system provides her with a unique perspective that she will bring to the court.

“I am confident Judge Jackson is supremely qualified and has the disposition necessary to serve as our nation’s next Supreme Court Justice,” he wrote.

Senate Judiciary Committee hearings for Jackson wrapped up Thursday after several days of intense questioning from Republican members who argued she was soft on sentencing child pornography defendants.

Manchin’s announcement of support comes after the head of the Republican Party in the Senate, Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, said on Thursday that he opposes Jackson’s confirmation.

The Senate Judiciary Committee will meet in an executive session on Monday. Its vote to confirm Jackson could come as early as then or could get pushed to the following Monday, April 4. Democrats hope to confirm Jackson by the full Senate by Easter, April 17.

Source Article from https://www.npr.org/2022/03/25/1088759442/manchin-says-he-will-support-supreme-court-nominee-judge-ketanji-brown-jackson

“This deal legalizing marijuana is the result of closed-door discussions between leaders of one political party and a governor who is engulfed in scandal,” said Rob Ortt, the Republican leader in the Senate. “The outcome of these partisan negotiations is a deeply flawed piece of legislation that will hurt the health and safety of New Yorkers.”

The state’s recreational cannabis program will be run by two new government entities: the Cannabis Control Board, which will craft new regulations, and the Office of Cannabis Management, which will implement the regulations.

They will be in charge of creating and allocating licenses for businesses seeking to enter any facet of the supply chain, from the farming of cannabis to the processing of the plant into edibles, concentrates and smokable products.

There will be licenses for distributors who would sell cannabis wholesale to retailers, including dispensaries where individuals will be able to buy cannabis products and “consumption sites” where people will be allowed to smoke or ingest the products.

The tiered system of licenses is meant to create a division among those who produce, wholesale and retail the products, like in the alcohol market. Most businesses would only be allowed to have one type of license to avoid a few players from consolidating the entire market. Most dispensaries, for example, will not be able to also grow and distribute cannabis.

But that will not apply to the state’s few, but influential medical cannabis corporations, which currently operate about 40 dispensaries statewide. Those companies will be allowed to keep their operations vertically integrated, meaning they could cultivate, process and sell cannabis.

Supporters said the new law has guardrails to prevent a few companies from dominating the market and to stem suspicions that wealthy, white investors would reap most of the benefits, which critics say is what has happened in other states.

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2021/03/31/nyregion/cuomo-ny-legal-weed.html

“He coughed on me last night when I hugged him,” she said. “I don’t feel scared. I never was scared.”

Dr. Luciana Borio, a former chief scientist at the Food and Drug Administration who advised Mr. Biden during the transition, said reaching the unvaccinated was now arguably “the hardest aspect” of the U.S. response — one that would require a change of course in federal and state priorities, such as reopening community vaccine sites or urging providers to put more focus back on first doses.

A spokeswoman for the Department of Health and Human Services pointed to a wide-ranging vaccine public education campaign still underway at the agency, with special attention now to reaching young children and those in need of a booster. New ads this week targeting rural, younger Americans featured the language: “When you’re done with Covid, it doesn’t mean it’s done with you.” Other ads targeting rural adults warned of the financial costs of contracting the virus.

In Cleveland, the Covid picture is one of the bleakest in the country. Intensive care units are crammed with patients with the Delta variant, with a surge of new Omicron infections looming. New infections in Cuyahoga County, which includes Cleveland, have grown by 234 percent in the past two weeks.

Ohio, where 60 percent of people have gotten at least one shot, now has the country’s highest rate of Covid-19 hospitalization, and doctors say emergency rooms and I.C.U.s are running out of beds. They are being forced to call people in from holiday vacations as growing breakthrough infections whittle away at their staff levels.

There was just a single open bed in a sixth-floor intensive care unit at the main campus of the Cleveland Clinic on Thursday morning, where about 90 percent of I.C.U. patients were unvaccinated. The demand for intensive care has gotten so great that when a bed opens up, nurses are cleaning rooms and moving patients themselves to make space for the next patient.

“It feels like it will never end,” said Claire Strauser, a nurse manager in the intensive care unit whose adult son still has refused her entreaties to get vaccinated. Ms. Strauser said she will probably not see him over Christmas to reduce her own chances of getting infected and sidelined from a job she is devoted to.

“I don’t know what can change,” she said. “They’re just dug in.”

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2021/12/25/us/omicron-unvaccinated.html

A military training aircraft crashed into a residential area near Fort Worth on Sunday, injuring two pilots and damaging homes, local authorities said.

Source Article from https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2021/09/19/military-plane-crash-lake-worth/