Most Viewed Videos

“This deal legalizing marijuana is the result of closed-door discussions between leaders of one political party and a governor who is engulfed in scandal,” said Rob Ortt, the Republican leader in the Senate. “The outcome of these partisan negotiations is a deeply flawed piece of legislation that will hurt the health and safety of New Yorkers.”

The state’s recreational cannabis program will be run by two new government entities: the Cannabis Control Board, which will craft new regulations, and the Office of Cannabis Management, which will implement the regulations.

They will be in charge of creating and allocating licenses for businesses seeking to enter any facet of the supply chain, from the farming of cannabis to the processing of the plant into edibles, concentrates and smokable products.

There will be licenses for distributors who would sell cannabis wholesale to retailers, including dispensaries where individuals will be able to buy cannabis products and “consumption sites” where people will be allowed to smoke or ingest the products.

The tiered system of licenses is meant to create a division among those who produce, wholesale and retail the products, like in the alcohol market. Most businesses would only be allowed to have one type of license to avoid a few players from consolidating the entire market. Most dispensaries, for example, will not be able to also grow and distribute cannabis.

But that will not apply to the state’s few, but influential medical cannabis corporations, which currently operate about 40 dispensaries statewide. Those companies will be allowed to keep their operations vertically integrated, meaning they could cultivate, process and sell cannabis.

Supporters said the new law has guardrails to prevent a few companies from dominating the market and to stem suspicions that wealthy, white investors would reap most of the benefits, which critics say is what has happened in other states.

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2021/03/31/nyregion/cuomo-ny-legal-weed.html

Pese a la contundente respuesta del presidente ruso, Vladimir Putin, por el derribo de uno de sus aviones de combate por parte de Turquía, una ruptura de relaciones con Ankara es algo que parece poco probable.

“Si bien lo sucedido es un tremendo dolor de cabeza para Rusia, al punto de que se puede transformar en una verdadera pesadilla, ambos países tienen mucho que perder si se llegasen a plantear una ruptura de relaciones”, indicó Famil Ismailov, editor del servicio ruso de la BBC.

Y es que de acuerdo con el periodista, no solo se trata de dos países con un dinámico intercambio comercial, que en 2014 ascendió a US$30.000 millones, sino de dos naciones líderes en sus regiones.

Los números hablan de una relación sólida: 60% de las exportaciones turcas van a Rusia, mientras que Ankara es un gran cliente para el gas ruso.

Pero la amistad se ha visto sometida a una prueba de fuego, especialmente después de que Putin calificara lo sucedido como “una puñalada en la espalda” y de que advirtiera sobre “graves consecuencias” en su relación con Turquía.

El ministro de Relaciones Exteriores, Sergei Lavrov, informó que había cancelado su visita del miércoles a Turquía.

La guerra en Siria

El hecho de que Turquía haya derribado el avión ruso, que según las autoridades de ese país había penetrado en su espacio aéreo, complica las operaciones militares rusas en Siria.

Se produce en un momento en el que Rusia se estaba engranando positivamente con Estados Unidos, Francia y Reino Unido, en su lucha contra el autodenominado grupo Estado Islámico (EI), un enemigo común.

Image copyright
Reuters

Image caption

El presidente Putin expresó que lo ocurrido era una “puñalada en la espalda” por parte de “cómplices de los terroristas”.

Ahora, que Rusia no quiera echar por tierra ese acercamiento con Occidente es todo un desafío.

Uno de los dos soldados que murió en el derribamiento del avión es considerado como “la primera baja” de Rusia en su intervención en el conflicto sirio, indicó Ismailov.

La opinión pública rusa se pregunta por qué su país ha perdido un soldado si Rusia solo se comprometió a ofrecer apoyo aéreo en la lucha contra grupos terroristas en Siria.

La pelota está en los dos lados“, dijo el periodista de la BBC. “Es todavía muy prematuro tratar de determinar las implicaciones de la decisión de Turquía (de derribar el avión), pero lo que parece estar claro es que habrá consecuencias regionales”, señaló Ismailov.

Y es que ya se escuchan los ecos del incidente en la Organización del Tratado de Atlántico Norte (OTAN), a la cual pertenece Turquía.

El bloque de países señaló que estaba observando muy de cerca la situación y que se encontraba en contacto con las autoridades de Ankara.

Ecos del pasado

A inicios de octubre, el presidente de Turquía, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, había recordado que atacar a su país equivalía a atacar la alianza.

Image copyright
Reuters

Image caption

Moscú aceptó que uno de sus aviones había sido derribado pero negó que algún momento hubiese entrado en el espacio aéreo de Turquía.

Las declaraciones las hizo después de que un avión militar ruso incursionara por error en el espacio aéreo turco, según dijeron fuentes militares rusas.

Si Rusia pierde un amigo como Turquía con quien tiene mucha cooperación, va a perder muchas cosas. Debe saber eso“, dijo el presidente turco.

Erdogan no estaba haciendo otra cosa que citar el artículo 5 de Tratado del Atlántico Norte, que establece que un ataque armado contra uno miembro del bloque se considerará dirigido contra todos.

“Si tal ataque se produce, cada una de ellas, en ejercicio del derecho de legítima defensa individual o colectiva reconocido por el artículo 51 de la Carta de las Naciones Unidas, ayudará a la Parte o Partes atacadas”, agrega.

10 advertencias

De acuerdo con Rusia, la aeronave no generó ninguna amenaza para Turquía. Sin embargo, para Ankara fue un incidente extremadamente grave, especialmente después de que, según aseguró, lanzó al menos 10 advertencias antes de que dos aviones caza le dispararan.

Image copyright
Reuters

Image caption

Lavrov canceló un viaje que tenía previsto para el miércoles a Turquía.

Para el periodista de la BBC, también se trata de un asunto de personalidades, pues tanto como Putin como Erdogan son dos líderes con características similares: fuertes y conservadores. Por eso las implicaciones del incidente también pasan por un asunto de prestigio e imagen internacional.

En la región del norte de Siria, donde cayó la aeronave, había un campamento de refugiados turcomanos, una etnia cercana a la turca dentro de Siria y que es apoyada por Turquía.

Los turcomanos han estado huyendo de los ataques aéreos rusos y de la guerra contra las fuerzas del presidente sirio Bashar al Asad.

Según Jonathan Marcus, corresponsal de asuntos internacionales de la BBC, este incidente es precisamente el tipo de riesgo que se temía cuando Rusia lanzó sus operativos aéreos en Siria.

Los peligros de volar cerca de la frontera turca han quedado en evidencia, señala Marcus.

Turquía se opone vehementemente al presidente sirio Asad y ha advertido contra las violaciones de su espacio aéreo por aviones rusos y sirios, mientras que Asad tiene en Rusia a un muy fiel amigo.

Muchos se preguntan si los turcos reaccionaron con exageración a la incursión rusa o si Ankara le está mandando un mensaje contundente a Moscú.

Sea lo que sea, reflexiona Marcus, Rusia y Turquía no están en guerra y pese a la dura retórica, especialmente de Putin, este episodio podría en última instancia ser una experiencia más en el complejo conflicto sirio.

Source Article from http://www.bbc.com/mundo/noticias/2015/11/151124_turquia_rusia_avion_derribado_putin_erdogan_mr

Una de las banderas de Facebook y Google en el último año ha sido frenar las noticias falsas en Internet. Se propusieron desarrollar un algoritmo que le pusiera fin a las mentiras que son publicadas en sus redes sociales, o por lo menos, reducirlas ampliamente. Sin embargo, sus esfuerzos no se notaron tras el reciente atentado durante un concierto de música country en Las Vegas. En la mañana del lunes, los primeros lugares de las búsquedas de Google sobre el tiroteo le daban espacio a blogs que aseguraban que el asesino era un demócrata, contrario al presidente Donald Trump.

(Le puede interesar: Estados Unidos, el país donde suben las acciones de empresas de armas después d eun tiroteo)

De acuerdo con el diario The Guardian, la información surgió de algunos de los lugares más oscuros de Internet, pero rápidamente escaló hacia los espacios consultados legalmente por la gran mayoría de usuarios.  Y el Business Insider confirmó que la desinformación nació en el portal japonés 4chan, una alternativa a “Google News”. En efecto, lo publicado allí saltó a Google y a la Facebook.  

De hecho, antes de que la policía identificara al responsable de acabar con la vida de 58 personas y de herir a más de 500 y revelara que se trata de un hombre de 64 años que vive en Nevada, descrito por su familia como un tipo apolítico y poco religioso, portales de la extrema derecha en Estados Unidos lanzaron un nombre que aun nadie sabe de dónde salió: Geary Danley, decían, afirmando con vehemencia que se trataba de un liberal.

The Guardian agrega que no mucho tiempo después, Gateway Pundit, un blog dedicado a elaborar teorías conspiracioncitas, que de hecho obtuvo credenciales para entrar a la Casa Blanca, publicó una historia titulada; “El asesino de Las Vegas, según se dice, es un demócrata que al que le gusta Rachel Maddow, MoveOn.org y la asociación Anti-Trump “. El portal hizo estas aseveraciones sin presentar ninguna evidencia.

El portal de tecnología Fast Company le pidió una explicación a Facebook y la entidad respondió lo siguiente: “Nuestro Centro Global de Operaciones y Seguridad descubrió la publicación esta mañana y la eliminó. Sin embargo, su eliminación se retrasó unos minutos, lo que permitió ser tomar capturas de pantalla y circularlas en línea. Estamos trabajando para solucionar el problema que permitió que esto ocurriera en primer lugar y lamentamos profundamente la confusión que esto causó “. No obstante, varios usuarios denuncian que las noticias duraron publicadas casi una hora.

(Le puede interesar: “Fue un acto de pura maldad: Trump sobre atentado en Las Vegas)

La desinformación, ahora, es el nuevo ingrediente de las tragedias. No es la primera vez que esto sucede. Después del atentado a la maratón de Boston, los usuarios de Twitter y Reddit se equivocaron identificando al responsable, y tal equivocación también se volvió viral. De acuerdo con The Guardian “la manipulación exitosa que algunas personas de derecha hacen de los algoritmos de las redes social para politizar las tragedias habla de un patrón relativamente nuevo de abuso en línea”.

Source Article from https://www.elespectador.com/noticias/el-mundo/ojo-noticias-falsas-de-facebook-y-google-sobre-el-asesino-de-las-vegas-articulo-716109

Sen. Joe Manchin, D-W.Va., said Friday that he intends to vote for Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson, likely securing her spot on the Supreme Court.

Stefani Reynolds/AFP via Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Stefani Reynolds/AFP via Getty Images

Sen. Joe Manchin, D-W.Va., said Friday that he intends to vote for Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson, likely securing her spot on the Supreme Court.

Stefani Reynolds/AFP via Getty Images

Democratic Sen. Joe Manchin announced Friday that he will vote for Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson to be confirmed to the Supreme Court, clearing the way to an all-but-certain confirmation.

The West Virginia Democrat has become a pivotal vote in the evenly divided Senate, as he often sides with Republicans, and his opposition could have blocked Jackson from becoming the first Black woman to sit on the bench.

“After meeting with her, considering her record, and closely monitoring her testimony and questioning before the Senate Judiciary Committee this week, I have determined I intend to vote for her nomination to serve on the Supreme Court,” Manchin said in a statement.

Manchin added that Jackson’s “wide array of experiences” in the judicial system provides her with a unique perspective that she will bring to the court.

“I am confident Judge Jackson is supremely qualified and has the disposition necessary to serve as our nation’s next Supreme Court Justice,” he wrote.

Senate Judiciary Committee hearings for Jackson wrapped up Thursday after several days of intense questioning from Republican members who argued she was soft on sentencing child pornography defendants.

Manchin’s announcement of support comes after the head of the Republican Party in the Senate, Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, said on Thursday that he opposes Jackson’s confirmation.

The Senate Judiciary Committee will meet in an executive session on Monday. Its vote to confirm Jackson could come as early as then or could get pushed to the following Monday, April 4. Democrats hope to confirm Jackson by the full Senate by Easter, April 17.

Source Article from https://www.npr.org/2022/03/25/1088759442/manchin-says-he-will-support-supreme-court-nominee-judge-ketanji-brown-jackson

Wilbur Scoville ganhou um Doodle do Google com direito a um jogo que simula o ‘teste da escala quente’ de pimentas. Hoje, o Google celebra o nascimento do químico há 151 anos (1865-1942). Scoville, além de receber a homenagem desta sexta-feira (22), é conhecido por ter inventado um método de avaliação do nível de ardência de vários tipos de pimenta, a famosa Escala de Scoville, disponível abaixo em app. 

Escala Scoville; app salva de pimenta ‘muito quente’

O Doodle do Google, além de animado, é interativo. No jogo, os usuários devem fazer com que um sorvete acerte a pimenta para acabar com a ardência na boca de Scoville, após o químico prová-la. O leite, muito presente no sorvete, é um dos principais componentes neutralizadores do ardor da pimenta.

Doodle de Wilbur Scoville brinca com jogo que usa ‘teste da pimenta’ (Foto: (Foto: Reprodução/Google))

A cada degustação que Wilbur Scoville prova, uma pimenta diferente e as suas propriedades e curiosidades também são reveladas. Após terminar as “lutas”, que você pode ganhar (e aí desbloquear “novas pimentas” para enfrentar) ou perder (e fazer com que Scoville caia no chão com a boca “pelando”), um sistema de compartilhamento dos resultados do jogo nas redes sociais é exibido.

Ralador de pimenta bloqueia Wi-Fi e deixa todo mundo ’em família

O Doodle foi produzido pela artista e doodler do Google Olivia Huynh. Para a designer, a melhor parte do trabalho foi desenhar as pimentas e as reações de Scoville. “O conceito de picante é universal, cômico, e foi o que tentei usar para criar esse jogo de luta”, explica Huynh, em post do Google.

“Fiz storyboards de como poderia ser, rascunhos e testamos um protótipo. Depois vieram os cenários e animações. Desenhar as pimentas e as reações de Scoville foram minhas partes favoritas”, conta. 

Doodle também é informativo, detalhando tipos de pimentas  (Foto: Reprodução/Google)

Escala de Scoville

Wilbur Lincoln Scoville nasceu em Bridgeport, nos Estados Unidos, em 22 de janeiro de 1865 e morreu em 10 de março de 1942. O trabalho do americano como farmacêutico é reconhecido mundialmente: criou o Teste Organoléptico de Scoville, que gerou a já conhecida Escala de Scoville.

Com este método, Wilbur Lincoln Scoville definiu o grau de pungência de vários tipos de pimenta, através da detecção da concentração de capsaicina, substância responsável pela ardência da pimenta.

Qual é o melhor Doodle do Google? Comente no Fórum do TechTudo. 

O teste é um Procedimento de Diluição e Prova. Scoville misturava as pimentas puras com uma solução de água com açúcar, e quanto mais solução fosse necessária para diluir a pimenta, mais alta seria sua picância. Depois disso, o método foi melhorado e foram criadas as unidades de calor Scoville (Scoville Heat Units, ou SHU).

Doodle Wilbur Scoville (Foto: Reprodução/Google)

Uma xícara de pimenta que equivale a 1.000 xícaras de água é uma unidade na escala de Scoville. A substância Capsaicina, que gera a ardência nas pimentas, equivale a 15 milhões de unidades Scoville.

A pimenta mexicana Habanero chega a 300 mil, uma “Red Savina Habanero”, modificada, tem 577 mil, e a Tezpur indiana, 877 mil.

Entretanto, este não foi o único trabalho de Scoville. “The Art of Compounding” (A Arte dos Compostos), de 1895, é um de seus livros, que foi usado como referência na farmacologia até os anos 60.

Scoville também publicou um livro com centenas de fórmulas de perfumes e outras essências, que foi chamado de “Extract and Perfumes” (Extratos e perfumes).

Em 1922, Scoville recebeu o Prêmio Ebert, e em 1929 ganhou a sua Medalha de Honra Remington e o título de Doutor honoris causa em Ciências pela Universidade de Columbia. O pesquisador morreu no dia 10 de março de 1942, deixando mulher e dois filhos.

Download grátis do app do TechTudo: receba dicas e notícias de tecnologia no Android ou iPhone

Curtiu o Doodle? Veja a história dos Doodles do Google; vídeo

Via Google Doodles

*Colaborou Roberto Caligari

Source Article from http://www.techtudo.com.br/noticias/noticia/2016/01/wilbur-scoville-ganha-homenagem-do-doodle-em-seu-151-aniversario.html

“He coughed on me last night when I hugged him,” she said. “I don’t feel scared. I never was scared.”

Dr. Luciana Borio, a former chief scientist at the Food and Drug Administration who advised Mr. Biden during the transition, said reaching the unvaccinated was now arguably “the hardest aspect” of the U.S. response — one that would require a change of course in federal and state priorities, such as reopening community vaccine sites or urging providers to put more focus back on first doses.

A spokeswoman for the Department of Health and Human Services pointed to a wide-ranging vaccine public education campaign still underway at the agency, with special attention now to reaching young children and those in need of a booster. New ads this week targeting rural, younger Americans featured the language: “When you’re done with Covid, it doesn’t mean it’s done with you.” Other ads targeting rural adults warned of the financial costs of contracting the virus.

In Cleveland, the Covid picture is one of the bleakest in the country. Intensive care units are crammed with patients with the Delta variant, with a surge of new Omicron infections looming. New infections in Cuyahoga County, which includes Cleveland, have grown by 234 percent in the past two weeks.

Ohio, where 60 percent of people have gotten at least one shot, now has the country’s highest rate of Covid-19 hospitalization, and doctors say emergency rooms and I.C.U.s are running out of beds. They are being forced to call people in from holiday vacations as growing breakthrough infections whittle away at their staff levels.

There was just a single open bed in a sixth-floor intensive care unit at the main campus of the Cleveland Clinic on Thursday morning, where about 90 percent of I.C.U. patients were unvaccinated. The demand for intensive care has gotten so great that when a bed opens up, nurses are cleaning rooms and moving patients themselves to make space for the next patient.

“It feels like it will never end,” said Claire Strauser, a nurse manager in the intensive care unit whose adult son still has refused her entreaties to get vaccinated. Ms. Strauser said she will probably not see him over Christmas to reduce her own chances of getting infected and sidelined from a job she is devoted to.

“I don’t know what can change,” she said. “They’re just dug in.”

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2021/12/25/us/omicron-unvaccinated.html

Rep. Jim Banks is vowing not to back down from investigating the security shortcomings that led to the attack on the Capitol on Jan. 6 despite Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) booting him on Wednesday.

Pelosi announced on Wednesday she was rejecting two of House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy’s (R-Calif.) five selections to serve on the committee, with the California Democrat also vetoing Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio), another vocal ally of former President Trump.

McCarthy ultimately opted to reject placing any Republicans on the panel — which is tasked with investigating the deadly riot, when a pro-Trump mob attempted to disrupt the certification of the election results — asserting they would move forward with their own investigation. 

Banks (R-Ind.), who was tapped by McCarthy to serve as the ranking member on the Jan. 6 select committee, said Pelosi’s decision proves that the Democrats’ intentions were politically motivated.  

“It really made me angry. I served my country in Afghanistan and she is saying that I’m not up to playing a serious role on this Jan. 6 committee,” he told The Post Wednesday. 

“But it just goes to show all along this was never a serious effort on their part, it’s all a political witch hunt. They want to make this all about Donald Trump, dragging Republican members of Congress through the mud and attacking 75 million people that voted for Donald Trump.” 

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi announced that she is rejecting two of House Minority Leaders Kevin McCarthy’s picks for the committee.
AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite

McCarthy confirmed to The Post that he plans to select Banks to head the separate GOP panel. 

Banks alleged that Pelosi and Democrats on the committee are hesitant to look into potential shortcomings that could reflect poorly on the Speaker, with Republicans questioning whether she played a role in delaying the deployment of the National Guard that day. 

“When I came out of the gate, the minute that Kevin McCarthy asked me to do this job and I rolled up my sleeves and started digging into the real questions that nobody’s asked, that Democrats don’t want to answer to on why the Capitol was vulnerable on Jan. 6 when we had real intelligence three weeks before and we didn’t do anything to prepare for it,” he said.   

“Democrats don’t want to talk about it because at the end of the day, the higher up the food chain you get, the closer to Nancy Pelosi you get, and that spooked Nancy Pelosi and that’s why she rejected Jim Jordan and me.” 

House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy, Rep. Jordan and Rep. Banks at a press conference after Speaker Pelosi’s decision.
Photo by Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images

Democrats have vehemently denied that Pelosi had any role in the delay in response for additional law enforcement to provide backup for Capitol Police on the day of the attack, arguing Republicans taking aim at the Speaker are attempting to whitewash the severity of the riot. 

“On January 6th, the Speaker, a target of an assassination attempt that day, was no more in charge of Capitol security than Mitch McConnell was. This is a clear attempt to whitewash what happened on January 6th and divert blame,” Pelosi spokesman Drew Hammill said in a statement. 

“The Speaker believes security officials should make security decisions. The Speaker immediately signaled her support for the deployment of the National Guard when she was presented with that recommendation on the afternoon of January 6th. Public testimony confirms the fact that the Speaker was not made aware of any request for such a deployment prior to then.” 

Banks accused Democrats of avoiding to call certain witnesses that could provide critical information, taking aim at Rep. Bennie Thompson (D-Miss.), the Pelosi-appointed chairman of the select committee, for allegedly not being open to GOP  suggestions. “I met earlier today with the head of the Capitol police union, who represents the rank and file members of the Capitol Police. They [the select committee] don’t want him to appear on Tuesday,” he said. 

“I wrote a letter this morning, I waited to fire it off to him — but I did call Bennie Thompson yesterday and asked if Republicans would be given a chance to provide a witness and he hemmed and hawed. He was very shaky on the phone, and that now in hindsight I realized that’s because we were immediately going down a path that they were very uncomfortable with.” 

The Indiana Republican said in addition to asking about witnesses, Thompson did not answer his multiple requests for information on resources the minority party would be allotted during the course of the probe.

He said he believes Pelosi’s picks to serve on the panel — which include Reps. Zoe Lofgren (D-Calif.), Pete Aguilar (D-Calif.), Stephanie Murphy (D-Fla.) and Elaine Luria (D-Va.) and GOP Rep. Liz Cheney (R-Wyo.) — were strategically chosen to fit a narrative. Banks took a swing at Cheney for her decision to buck party lines and accept Pelosi’s offer, a move that has sparked strong backlash from her GOP colleagues. 

Rep. Liz Cheney was one of Speaker Pelosi’s picks for the committee.
AP Photo/Amanda Andrade-Rhoades, File

“I asked him [Thompson], will Republicans have resources for staffing, he hemmed and hawed about that. I asked him if we could delay the hearing next week so we’d have more time to prepare since they hadn’t named our names yet and he hemmed and hawed about that,” he said. 

“He doesn’t seem to be that serious of a leader, to be serious, you would have to share an effort like this and come up with something substantive or meaningful at the end of the day. And I think it’s because Pelosi picked people to be on this panel that are going to do what she tells them to do and that’s why she picked Liz Cheney.” 

Cheney, a GOP Trump foe, has stood by her decision to sit on the panel, stating “she objected to two, one of whom may well be a material witness to events that led to that day – that led to January 6th. The other, who disqualified himself by his comments in particular over the last 24 hours demonstrating that he is not taking this seriously.”

Thompson’s office declined to provide comment.

Top Republicans initially pushed for the scope of the investigation to stem beyond the Jan. 6 attack, with a sizable number of GOP lawmakers citing it as their reason for voting against a bipartisan 9/11-style commission in June.

Banks said he is hoping for the GOP investigation — which is expected to include Jordan, Reps. Rodney Davis (Ill.), Kelly Armstrong (S.D.) and Troy Nehls (Texas) — to probe an array of instances of political violence. It’s unclear if the panel will expand beyond the initial five lawmakers tapped to serve on the select committee.

Rep. Banks will serve on a GOP panel to investigate the Capitol riot on January 6, 2021.
NurPhoto via Getty Images

“We’re not giving up. These are questions that deserve answers and we’re still members of Congress who can demand answers to serious questions that the Democrats, so far. have not given any attention to. 

“If you want to study what happened at the Capitol, you’ve got to study the political violence that happened in big cities around the country. And I think you’ve got what happened on Good Friday with the Capitol police officer that was killed by a left-wing extremist,” he said. 

“I think all of it deserves attention, because again it gets back to leadership and it gets back to protocols. And I’ll tell you what the leader of the Capitol police union told us today said, on Jan. 6, the leadership the Capitol Police didn’t prepare them for what was going to happen even though they had three weeks to prepare with legitimate intelligence,” Banks said.

“They didn’t train them for what was going to happen on Jan. 6. They didn’t equip them for what was going to happen on Jan. 6, so why aren’t we talking about that? It’s serious.” 

Source Article from https://nypost.com/2021/07/21/banks-unloads-on-pelosi-vows-to-get-jan-6-answers-via-gop-panel/

Derechos de autor de la imagen
Reuters

Image caption

El presidente habló de la “opresión comunista” que prevalece en la isla y anunció una política más dura hacia Cuba.

Donald Trump regresó este viernes a Miami, bastión del exilio cubano en Estados Unidos, para dar un discurso que en Cuba algunos vieron como “un regreso a la retórica de la Guerra Fría”.

Y es que con esas palabras se refirió el diario oficialista Granma al tono cargado de hostilidad hacia el régimen de Raúl Castro del presidente de Estados Unidos en Miami.

Lograremos una Cuba libre“, dijo Trump en medio de aplausos en un auditorio entregado momentos antes de firmar la orden ejecutiva.

En un esperado discurso, el presidente llegó para presentar la nueva postura de EE.UU. con la isla. Y aunque dijo que iba a “cancelar el acuerdo completamente desequilibrado del gobierno anterior con Cuba”, lo cierto es que en concreto sólo presentó dos cambios.

Por una parte, habló de restricciones para hacer negocios con las empresas administradas por los militares cubanos e imponer de manera más estricta las limitaciones de viaje a la isla que ya rigen sobre los estadounidenses.

Las medidas anunciadas norevierten los pilares de la política de acercamiento impulsada por Obama, incluido el restablecimiento de relaciones diplomáticas entre ambos países.

El presidente justificó su decisión porque las medidas aprobadas por su antecesor en la Casa Blanca “no favorecen al pueblo cubano, sino que enriquecen al régimen”.

Derechos de autor de la imagen
Getty Images

Image caption

El presidente Trump reúne simpatizantes dentro de la comunidad cubana que reside en Miami, Florida.

Según Trump, su nueva política sigue procurando la apertura hacia los ciudadanos cubanos, pero bajo una estrategia de restringir los negocios con el gobierno de la isla.

En su discurso, el mandatario habló de la “opresión comunista” que prevalece en la isla y mencionó nombres de disidentes, como las Damas de Blanco, para denunciar las violaciones a los derechos humanos que dijo han aumentado desde el deshielo anunciado en 2014.

Además, pidió al gobierno cubano que “ponga fin al abuso hacia la disidencia” y dijo que estará dispuesto a sentarse a negociar un mejor acuerdo con el gobierno de la isla si libera a los presos políticos, se legalizan todos los partidos políticos y se celebran elecciones supervisadas y libres.

Las medidas propuestas por Trump son:

  • Reducir las actividades económicas de Estados Unidos, incluidas las relacionadas con el turismo, con el conglomerado militar cubano Grupo de Administración Empresarial (Gaesa)
  • Permitir a los ciudadanos y entidades estadounidenses que desarrollen lazos económicos con el sector privado y emergente de Cuba
  • Reforzar las restricciones de viaje para los estadounidenses que quieran visitar la isla
  • Prohibir los viajes individuales de estadounidenses bajo la categoría “persona a persona” que había permitido el gobierno de Barack Obama
  • Los cubanos radicados en EE.UU. podrán seguir enviando remesas y visitar a sus familiares en la isla
  • Continuar el embargo económico impuesto a la isla hace más de 50 años
  • Mantiene los vuelos regulares y los cruceros a la isla

Endurecimiento

Aunque deja en pie varios aspectos de la política de Obama hacia Cuba, la orden ejecutiva de Trump sí implica un endurecimiento que se apega más a las propuestas de legisladores republicanos de origen cubano, como el senador de Florida Marco Rubio, quien califica al gobierno de la isla como una dictadura que viola los derechos humanos.

Derechos de autor de la imagen
Getty Images

Image caption

El turismo de estadounidenses a Cuba aumentó desde la reapertura de relaciones diplomáticas entre ambos países.

La medida central de lo anunciado por Trump pasa por impedir los negocios con los militares de la isla, que, aunque sea de manera más o menos indirecta controlan sectores clave de la economía del país caribeño, como es el turismo.

En cualquier caso, esta prohibición de hacer negocios con las empresas vinculadas al ejército cubano tendrá sus excepciones.

Según anunció la Casa Blanca, se mantendrán los vuelos regulares de aerolíneas estadounidenses y los cruceros a Cuba, a pesar de que la autoridad aeroportuaria está controlada por una empresa que pertenece a los militares.

Además, los negocios hechos hasta ahora por empresas estadounidenses con entidades del gobierno cubano no se cancelarán.

Un ejemplo de esto es el hotel Four Points de La Habana, gestionado por la cadena Starwood del grupo estadounidense Marriott. El copropietario cubano es la cadena Gaviota, que pertenece al ejército.

Derechos de autor de la imagen
Getty Images

Image caption

Los vuelos regulares de aerolíneas estadounidenses y los cruceros a Cuban se mantendrán.

El otro elemento fundamental de lo anunciado este viernes por el presidente estadounidense pasa por aplicar de manera más rigurosa las limitaciones de viaje a la isla que rigen sobre los estadounidenses.

Aunque viajar por turismo a Cuba está prohibido para los estadounidenses y sólo existen 12 categorías que les permite visitar la isla, con Obama se habían relajado de alguna manera estas limitaciones, con lo que aumentó sustancialmente el número de visitantes de EE.UU. a ese país.

Con las nuevas medidas, el gobierno de EE.UU. pasará a auditar a todos los ciudadanos de su país que vayan a Cuba para comprobar que su viaje se ajusta de manera rigurosa a esas 12 categorías y no fueran de vacaciones.

“Retórica de la Guerra Fría”

Mientras el presidente Trump daba el discurso en Miami, el medio oficialista Granma iba comentando sobre el evento en una cobertura en directo desde su página web.

Allí, calificaron las palabras del republicano como “un regreso a la retórica de la Guerra Fría que parecía que se había superado”.

El medio citó a Trump cuando dijo que va a “reforzar el bloqueo para que las inversiones lleguen a las personas de Cuba” y habló de su discurso como una “contradictoria lógica, pues precisamente el boqueo (es) la principal causa de las limitaciones de los ciudadanos comunes en la isla”.

Otro medio oficialista, Cuba Debate, rechazó la nueva política de Trump y escribió en Twitter: “Bloqueo, imposiciones, bravuconería de imperio es la ‘creativa’ política de Trump para Cuba. ¿Ya no hemos vivido bastante eso? #CubaesNuestra”.

Derechos de autor de la imagen
Twitter Cubadebate

Hubo quienes respaldaron la decisión del presidente estadounidense. El disidente cubano Guillermo Fariñas pidió a Trump en su Twitter que “continúe” con sus políticas a pesar de que “tras su discurso (el de Trump) se recrudezca la represión”.

Varios opositores cubanos residenciados en Miami también respondieron positivamente a los anuncios del gobierno.

“Esperábamos que el presidente Trump se pronunciara en los términos en que lo hizo (…) el tema de los derechos humanos había pasado a un segundo plano con Obama”, dijo el activista Ángel Moya.

Análisis: ¿qué gana Trump?

William LeoGrande, profesor de Ciencia Política en la American University de Washington y experto en la política hacia Cuba y el Congreso de EE.UU., le dijo a BBC Mundo que hay dos formas de ver las relaciones de Trump con Cuba: desde la política exterior y la interior.

“Si se mira como un tema de política exterior, tiene mucho sentido para Estados Unidos involucrarse con Cuba: logramos firmar 23 acuerdos bilaterales en temas de interés mutuo solo en los últimos dos años”, dijo.

“Pero si se mira como un tema de política doméstica y eres un republicano que quiere apelar a un segmento de la comunidad cubano-estadounidense que es el más conservador, ignoras esas cosas”, añadió.

El experto mencionó que el congresista republicano cubano-estadounidense Mario Díaz-Balart y el senador Marco Rubio, del mismo partido, fueron las voces políticas principales en promover una política más restrictiva con la isla.

“Un cálculo es que parece que Díaz-Balart negoció con Trump por su voto para revocar (la reforma de salud del anterior gobierno conocida como) el Obamacare y una de las demandas que hizo fue que Trump tuviera una política dura con Cuba”.

“Y hay que recordar que (el senador republicano) Marco Rubio tiene una silla en el comité de inteligencia del Senado que investiga el involucramiento de la campaña electoral de Trump con Rusia”.

Source Article from http://www.bbc.com/mundo/noticias-internacional-40308105

Sen. Amy Klobuchar is highlighting her work bridging the political divide as she embarks on a 2020 presidential campaign – just don’t call her a “moderate.”

The day after the Minnesota Democrat declared her candidacy, she pushed back against the label, telling Rachel Maddow, “I think [voters] should see me as a progressive because I believe in progress and I have worked towards progress my whole life.”

KLOBUCHAR DISMISSES LIBERAL LABEL

The senator then touted a litany of “progressive” accomplishments during her years in Washington and at the state level.

The response underscored how even those candidates considered within the party’s center-left are reluctant to be seen as somehow ignoring the wishes of the – vocal and influential – liberal base. The label “moderate” is scorned, avoided as a potentially fatal term in a primary campaign stacked with left-wing heavyweights like Sens. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts, Kamala Harris of California and Cory Booker of New Jersey, who speak glowingly of big-government policies like the Green New Deal. Most recently, populist firebrand Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont on Tuesday launched his second straight bid for the Democratic nomination. And progressive champions Sens. Sherrod Brown of Ohio and Jeff Merkley of Oregon may soon join the 2020 melee.

Self-described centrists are few and far between. What is emerging is a field where candidates who might otherwise brand themselves moderates are pushing a message of unity while still highlighting their “progressive” bona fides — or, in the case of once-moderate-leaning figures like Beto O’Rourke or Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, openly aligning themselves with the party’s left flank.

Former Colorado Gov. John Hickenlooper, a possible 2020 candidate, pushed back on the “moderate” label during a visit to New Hampshire last week. “I think in many ways I’m more progressive than a lot of these other folks. We’re actually getting it done,” he said.

Last week, former Rep. O’Rourke of Texas, who appears to be leaning toward a presidential bid, called for tearing down existing wall along the U.S.-Mexico border in his home town of El Paso. His push may have been a move to highlight his progressive credentials, following coverage of his voting record in Congress which was more conservative than the average Democrat’s.

Asked about O’Rourke’s comments, Gillibrand signaled a willingness to consider the idea. The New York senator years ago was known for pro-Second Amendment views and strong opposition to illegal immigration. She has since backed calls to eliminate Immigration and Customs Enforcement, telling “60 Minutes” last year she’s “ashamed” of her past immigration stance.

“It’s clear at this early stage that the most energy is around progressive candidates,” said Wayne Lesperance, New England College vice president of academic affairs and a political science professor.

DEM HOPEFULS SHIFT TO THE LEFT

Lesperance has seen many of the candidates in action as they’ve made their way in recent weeks through the first-in-the-nation primary state of New Hampshire. He argued that “self-proclaimed moderates have a tougher path to navigate. And those who have taken moderate positions in the past find themselves having to explain those positions — never a good place to be while running.”

Defending such accomplishments that may not sit well with the increasingly liberal progressive base may be an issue for former Vice President Joe Biden, who’s seriously mulling a White House run. While he’s credited with pushing progressive policies during his years as vice president, his more conservative record in the Senate may not play well on the 2020 campaign trail.

The percentage of Democrats identifying as liberal averaged 51 percent in 2018, according to Gallup polling. That’s up from 50 percent in 2017, marking the first time a majority of Democrats have adopted this term, following gradual increases since the 1990s.

But there may still be an opening for a moderate. The Gallup survey found that 47 percent of Democrats still identify as moderate or conservative. And the survey indicated that a majority of Democrats and independents who lean toward the party would like to see the party move more to the center.

Former New York City Mayor Mike Bloomberg appears to have no issues being labeled a moderate or centrist. The billionaire media mogul who’s contributed millions to fight for gun safety and battling climate change recently took aim at the Green New Deal, “Medicare-for-all” and other progressive proposals during a recent stop in New Hampshire, as he weighs launching a presidential campaign.

The Democrat turned Republican turned independent, who returned to the Democratic Party last year, called for “realistic” proposals that could win support from both Democrats and Republicans.

DELANEY TAKES AIM AT GREEN NEW DEAL

Count former three-term Rep. John Delaney of Maryland in that camp.

With many of his rivals for the nomination running to the left, Delaney highlights how he’s carving a more moderate path. And he’s taking aim at both the Green New Deal and “Medicare-for-all.”

At a speech last week at “Politics and Eggs,” a must stop for White House hopefuls campaigning in New Hampshire, Delaney called for a “sense of common purpose and unity” and described himself as a centrist, “which I don’t think is a dirty word.”

Asked by Fox News if many of the other Democratic White House hopefuls are too far to the left, Delaney said: “I think I’m the only one running as a problem solver. And I think there are two ways to seek the presidency. You can try to divide and create some goals that are unrealistic. I think that’s wrong … or you can actually try to unify the country.”

But Democratic strategist Jesse Ferguson pushed back against labeling the contenders as progressive or moderate.

Ferguson, who was a senior spokesman for Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign, told Fox News that “voters are far more concerned with who you’re going to stand up for and why you’re going to do it than they are with any label you’re given. They want to connect with a candidate, believe what they are saying and see them as the antidote to Trump.”

“Voters don’t care what labels get pushed onto candidates because those labels don’t reflect the ideologies at play anymore,” he emphasized.

Source Article from https://www.foxnews.com/politics/2020-dems-cringe-at-being-labeled-less-than-liberal

Outspoken conservative political commentator Candace Owens has slammed Joe Biden‘s handling of the crisis in Afghanistan, accusing the president of hiding “like a little b****”.

Biden’s decision to draw down U.S. military operations in Afghanistan has come under fire since the Taliban entered the nation’s capital of Kabul on Sunday.

The decision to withdraw from Afghanistan was first made under the administration of former President Donald Trump. However, the withdrawal was initiated under Biden.

“Donald Trump is acting like the President Of The United States right now while Joe Biden hides like a little b*** and waits for his Beijing handlers to tell him what to do,” Owens tweeted Sunday night.

The 32-year-old has been a vocal critic of the Biden administration and is an ardent Donald Trump supporter.

Biden doubled down on his decision to withdraw U.S. troops from Afghanistan, instead blaming the Trump administration for signing a deal with the Taliban that left them “in the strongest position militarily since 2001,” while pulling 2,500 troops before he left office.

“One more year, or five more years, of U.S. military presence would not have made a difference if the Afghan military cannot or will not hold its own country,” Biden said in a White House statement issued on Saturday. “An endless American presence in the middle of another country’s civil conflict was not acceptable to me.”

“When I became President, I faced a choice—follow through on the deal, with a brief extension to get our forces and our allies’ forces out safely, or ramp up our presence and send more American troops to fight once again in another country’s civil conflict.”

Trump promptly responded, criticizing Biden for not following his plan that the former president said “protected our people and our property” and “ensured the Taliban would never dream of taking our Embassy or providing a base for new attacks against American,” without specifying any details of this plan.

“What a disgrace it will be when the Taliban raises their flag over America’s Embassy in Kabul,” he said. “This is complete failure through weakness, incompetence, and total strategic incoherence.”

In April, Trump praised Biden’s decision to withdraw U.S. forces from Afghanistan as “a wonderful positive thing to do,” adding that the U.S. should “get out earlier.” Before he left office, Trump pulled 2,500 troops and imposed a May 1 deadline for withdrawing forces. Biden announced that the withdrawal would commence on May 1, with an aim to complete the process by September 11, 2021.

Over the past week, the Taliban made swift gains across the country, securing the capital city Kabul on Sunday and forcing U.S. Embassy staff to evacuate in a takeover that has left U.S. officials stunned.

Candace Owens hosts “Candace” show on August 9, 2021 in Nashville, Tennessee. The outspoken conservative political commentator has slammed Joe Biden’s handling of the crisis in Afghanistan.
Jason Kempin/Getty Images

Source Article from https://www.newsweek.com/candace-owens-says-joe-biden-hiding-like-little-b-afghanistan-falls-1619586

Parrilli recordó a Servini de Cubría que Nisman había solicitado a la Secretaría de Inteligencia a través de un oficio “la desclasificación de la identidad, las acciones, los hechos y circunstancias correspondientes al personal de inteligencia que surge del producido de las intervenciones telefónicas de los abonados nro. 11-3238-4699, 11-3315-6908, 11-3964-0799 y 11-6224-0263”. Por ello, el titular de la SI dispuso autorizar “la desclasificación del producido de las intervenciones de los abonados números 11-3238-4699, 11-33158-6908, 11-3964-0799 y 11-6224-0263, y de todo otro material, archivo e información de inteligencia vinculada a la investigación del atentado contra la sede de la AMIA”. Dijo que la decisión se toma ” a los fines de brindar la colaboración que sea necesaria” y “por expresa instrucción de la Señora Presidenta de la Nación”.

El titular de la SI, además, solicitó a la jueza que “tenga a bien proceder a identificar los nombres del personal de este Organismo que se encontraría referidos en la mentada denuncia, a efectos de proceder al levantamiento del secretos de los mismos”.

Source Article from http://www.pagina12.com.ar/diario/ultimas/20-264286-2015-01-19.html

Rep. Bennie Thompson, D-Miss., pictured during a hearing in July 2020, is suing former President Donald Trump over the Capitol riot after Trump was acquitted by the Senate over an incitement charge.

Anna Moneymaker/Pool/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Anna Moneymaker/Pool/Getty Images

Rep. Bennie Thompson, D-Miss., pictured during a hearing in July 2020, is suing former President Donald Trump over the Capitol riot after Trump was acquitted by the Senate over an incitement charge.

Anna Moneymaker/Pool/Getty Images

Updated at 2 p.m. ET

Democratic Rep. Bennie Thompson is suing former President Donald Trump, Rudy Giuliani and two far-right groups — the Proud Boys and the Oath Keepers — for allegedly conspiring to incite the deadly violence on Jan. 6 at the U.S. Capitol.

The lawsuit, filed on Thompson’s behalf by the NAACP and the civil rights law firm Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll, accuses Trump and the other defendants of violating the 1871 Ku Klux Klan Act by trying to interfere in Congress’ certification of the Electoral College count. The legislation was part of a series of Enforcement Acts at the time intended to protect the enfranchisement of Black citizens from violence and intimidation.

The suit is the first against Trump since the Senate acquitted him Saturday in his second impeachment trial. Seven Republicans broke with Trump and voted for his conviction on the charge of inciting an insurrection, but the tally still fell short of the 67 needed to convict him.

After the vote, the Senate’s top Republican, Mitch McConnell, delivered a scathing speech in which he blamed Trump for the violence on Jan. 6 but said he voted to acquit because he believes a former president can’t be tried by the Senate. McConnell also said Trump can be held liable in the court system.

Thompson’s lawsuit, which was filed in U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C., and seeks compensatory and punitive damages, aims to do just that.

“I am privileged to partner with the NAACP to have my day in court so that the perpetrators of putting members of Congress at risk can be held accountable,” Thompson told reporters Tuesday.

The main sweep of allegations, as well as many of the details, presented in the lawsuit mirrors those made by House managers in Trump’s impeachment trial. The lawsuit alleges that Trump spent months pushing baseless claims about election fraud, primed his supporters with lies and ultimately directed them Jan. 6 at the Capitol.

It claims that Trump, Giuliani, the Proud Boys and the Oath Keepers conspired to incite a mob, march on the Capitol and, through force, intimidation and threat, prevent Congress’ counting of the Electoral College votes.

“The insurrection at the Capitol was a direct, intended, and foreseeable result of the Defendants’ unlawful conspiracy,” the lawsuit alleges. “It was instigated according to a common plan that the Defendants pursued since the election held in November 2020.”

The lawsuit accuses the Proud Boys and the Oath Keepers of spearheading the assault on the Capitol while Trump and Giuliani, his lawyer, incited the mob. Several members of both of the far-right groups are facing federal charges — including conspiracy — in connection with their actions on Jan. 6.

The lawsuit lists Proud Boys International, a Texas limited liability company with chapters around the U.S., as a defendant. The Oath Keepers, meanwhile, is a militia organization that is incorporated as a nonprofit in Nevada.

Thompson, who represents Mississippi’s 2nd Congressional District, was at the Capitol when the mob overran the building. The lawsuit says he was in Gallery C of the House chamber to certify the Electoral College ballots when the attack began.

Thompson heard rioters pounding on the doors of the House chamber, it says, and saw security guards blocking the door with furniture.

“Plaintiff Thompson heard a gunshot, the source of which, at the time, was unknown to him, although he later learned that it had killed one of the rioters who had forced her way into the Capitol lobby,” the suit says.

Thompson and other lawmakers were told to lie on the floor and put on gas masks. Eventually, he and his colleagues were able to leave the gallery. They sought shelter in a room with some 200 to 300 others, including lawmakers, staff and family.

“During this entire time, Plaintiff Thompson reasonably feared for his physical safety,” the lawsuit says. “While trapped in the building, during the siege by the rioters that Defendants unleashed on the Capitol, Plaintiff Thompson feared for his life and worried that he might never see his family again.”

The lawsuit notes that this all took place during the coronavirus pandemic and that Thompson, who is in his 70s, is at high risk for severe COVID-19. After the siege ended, it says, two lawmakers who sheltered in place with Thompson tested positive for the coronavirus.

Source Article from https://www.npr.org/2021/02/16/968374210/house-democrat-sues-trump-giuliani-and-2-far-right-groups-over-capitol-riot

Image copyright
Getty

Image caption

Bernie Sanders y Donald Trump fueron los triunfadores de la noche de primarias.

El millonario Donald Trump ganó este martes las primarias celebradas en los estados de Mississippi, Michigan y Hawái, consolidando su condición de favorito para lograr la nominación republicana de cara a las presidenciales de noviembre en Estados Unidos.

En el bando demócrata, Hillary Clinton se impuso en Mississippi, mientras que Bernie Sanders obtuvo una sorpresiva victoria en Michigan, el estado en el que más delegados había en juego.

Pese al buen resultado del senador de Vermont, la exsecretaria de Estado sigue en cabeza para ser la nominada del Partido Demócrata.

Image copyright
Getty

Image caption

Donald Trump consolida su ventaja en las primarias republicanas.

Aunque Trump fue el gran vencedor entre los republicanos, Ted Cruz, su principal rival por el momento, se impuso en Idaho, según las proyecciones de los medios de Estados Unidos.

“Nunca me gana”

“La única persona que lo hizo bien esta noche fui yo”, dijo Trump este martes tras su victoria en Mississippi, con el 47% de los sufragios, Michigan con casi el 37% y el caucus de Hawái con el 45%.

“Ted (Cruz) siempre dice que es el único que me puede ganar. Pero nunca me gana”, afirmó el magnate desde Florida, donde aprovechó para publicitar los negocios que llevan su nombre, como uno de carne, otro de vino y una revista.

Trump, en un tono más conciliador con su partido, pidió el voto para los republicanos para el Congreso y dijo que éste es el “momento de unificar”.

Image copyright
Reuters

Image caption

Además de hablar de las elecciones y de sus victorias, Trump promocionó los productos que llevan su nombre.

También volvió a hablar de su postura contra la inmigración irregular: “No quiero ser duro, quiero ser justo”.

Sorpresa de Sanders

La sorpresa de la noche en las primarias demócratas fue el ajustado triunfo del senador de Vermont Bernie Sanders en Michigan.

“La revolución del pueblo de la que hemos estado hablando resuena en todas las partes del país y lo mejor está por venir”, dijo Sanders en Florida, donde está en campaña.

Image copyright
AP

Image caption

Bernie Sanders reforzó con la victoria en Michigan su esperanza de poder ser el candidato demócrata.

Sanders logró la victoria con un 50% de los votos, frente al 48% de Clinton, quien obtuvo la victoria en Mississippi con casi un 83% de apoyo.

La exsecretaria de Estado se confirma así como la vencedora en los estados del sur de EE.UU., donde está recibiendo el respaldo casi unánime de la población negra.

Clinton habló en Ohio antes de conocer los resultados de Michigan.

“Presentarse a presidente no debería tratarse de lanzar insultos, sino de conseguir resultados”, dijo en referencia a Trump.

“Conforme la retórica se rebaja, aumentan las cosas que hay en juego”, dijo la exprimera dama.

Clinton y Trump, en cabeza

Por el momento, tanto Clinton como Trump superan a sus rivales en el número de delegados obtenidos en el proceso de primarias que se inició el pasado 1 de febrero.

Estos delegados serán los encargados de votar a favor de los precandidatos presidenciales que ganaron las primarias o caucus de sus respectivos estados en las convenciones demócrata y republicana que se celebrarán el próximo mes de julio.

Image copyright
AFPGetty

Image caption

Hillary Clinton sufrió una derrota imprevista en Michigan.

Los candidatos que salgan elegidos en esas dos convenciones se enfrentarán en la elección presidencial el 8 de noviembre.

Para ser nominado candidato republicano, el ganador necesita obtener el apoyo de 1.237 delegados. A falta de adjudicar el reparto de los delegados de este martes, Trump sumaba 446 por los 347 de Ted Cruz. Marco Rubio es tercero con 151 apoyos.

En el bando demócrata, el vencedor necesita 2.383 delegados. Al finalizar la jornada de este martes, Clinton sumaba 1.221 por 571 de Sanders.

El 15 de marzo

Image copyright
AP

Image caption

Ted Cruz ve alejarse a Trump en la carrera republicana.

La siguiente gran jornada de primarias será el 15 de marzo con las elecciones en Florida y Ohio, estados que reparten un gran número de delegados.

Rubio necesita una victoria en Florida, de donde es senador, para seguir aspirando a ser el candidato.

El cubanoestadounidense, que este martes volvió a vivir una mala jornada, ya inició una campaña para desalentar el voto por Ted Cruz y John Kasich, y presentarse como el único que puede derrotar a Trump en Florida.

Las encuestas, sin embargo, dan de momento el triunfo allí al magnate.

Florida reparte 99 delegados, una cifra muy elevada. Y a diferencia de los estados que votaron hasta ahora, no habrá reparto proporcional: los 99 irán para el vencedor.

Lo mismo sucederá con los 66 de Ohio, donde Kasich es gobernador.

Source Article from http://www.bbc.com/mundo/noticias/2016/03/160308_hillary_clinton_donald_trump_elecciones_primarias_eeuu_dgm

GUADALAJARA, JALISCO (16/MAR/2015).- Revisa lo más importante del 16 de marzo en México a través de este resumen de noticias publicadas a través de los sitios web de los medios que conforman los Periódicos Asociados en Red.

BAJA CALIFORNIA SUR

Rescatan a 200 tarahumaras que eran explotados en BCS

La Secretaría del Trabajo y Previsión Social (STPS) informó que como parte del Operativo ‘México con Trabajo Digno’ se liberararon 200 jornaleros indígenas tarahumaras que eran explotados laboralmente por la empresa Corporativo El Cerezo en Baja California Sur, por lo que ese centro de trabajo fue restringido en sus operaciones de manera indefinida.

CIUDAD DE MÉXICO

Aristegui califica de ‘atropello’ la decisión de MVS

La periodista Carmen Aristegui calificó como un atropello la decisión de la empresa MVS de ‘terminar su relación’ laboral.

En una breve conferencia de prensa a las afueras de MVS, la comunicadora refirió que ”los abogados nos dicen que se trata de un atropello a la libertad de expresión y que hay un conjunto de irregularidades y de situaciones absolutamente denunciables”.

Mancera pide denunciar corrupción, para ‘poner orden en la casa’

Al inaugurar el portal Trámites CDMX, que busca agilizar y transparentar este tipo de procedimientos en el gobierno del Distrito Federal y sus dependencias, Miguel Ángel Mancera llamó a los capitalinos a denunciar cualquier acto de corrupción por parte de las autoridades para ”poner en orden la casa”.

DURANGO

Reabren supercarretera Durango-Mazatlán

Después de que esta mañana se anunciara el cierre de la supercarrtera Durango-Mazatlán a causa de la intensa nevada que azota la sierra de Durango, la Policía Federal así como Caminos y Puentes confirmaron la reapertura de esta vialidad.

GUERRERO

Pese a lluvias, Acapulco recibe 241 MDP por turismo

A pesar del mal tiempo que prevaleció durante parte del segundo fin de semana largo de este 2015, Acapulco logró captar unos 214 millones de pesos como derrama económica que dejaron poco más de 90 mil turistas que visitaron este destino de playa.

JALISCO

Homicidio múltiple en Puente Grande, con arma blanca

Aunque la suposición inicial fue que el homicidio múltiple cometido ayer domingo por la tarde en pleno dormitorio para visita conyugal del penal de Puente Grande fue por asfixia, los exámenes forenses confirmaron que en el hecho se usó un arma blanca.

MICHOACÁN

Jara visita zonas afectadas por lluvias en Michoacán

Tras acudir a las colonias de la capital michoacana más afectada por las intensas lluvias de las últimas 72 horas, el gobernador Salvador Jara Guerrero, estimó que hay mil 500 personas afectadas tanto en Zamora como Morelia.

NUEVO LEÓN

Caen líderes regionales de ‘Los Zetas’ en Nuevo León

El comisionado Nacional de Seguridad, Monte Alejandro Rubido García informó que fueron detenidos en dos municipios de Nuevo León, dos líderes regionales de ‘Los Zetas’ por elementos de fuerzas federales.

SAN LUIS POTOSÍ

Inundaciones afectaron a 500 personas en SLP

La Unidad Municipal de Protección Civil de Soledad, entró en fase de alerta tras las continuas precipitaciones pluviales, estableciendo una estrecha coordinación con el organismo operador del agua (Interapas) a fin de evitar principalmente drenajes colapsados e inundaciones en algunas zonas que presentan focos rojos por este motivo.

SONORA

Pobladores cortan suministro de agua a Buenavista del Cobre

Un grupo de habitantes del Río Sonora y mineros del sindicato Sección 65 exigen la concesión de la empresa minera Buenavista del Cobre.

El contingente bloqueó el sistema de rebombeo derivado de la falta de agua que sufren los habitantes de comunidades del Río Sonora.

Source Article from http://www.informador.com.mx/mexico/2015/581693/6/mexico-en-resumen-las-noticias-del-16-de-marzo.htm

Hong Kong entered a recession in the second half of last year, with the economy contracting 1.2 percent, the first annual decline since 2009.

Several regional economies have also faced difficulties, with Singapore and South Korea recording weak growth in the last quarter of 2019 and Japan’s output shrinking by an annualized 6.3 percent for October through December.

Paul Chan, Hong Kong’s financial secretary, said the city would implement $15 billion in new spending and tax breaks as part of a new budget put forward Wednesday. The cash disbursement will go to about seven million people and cost around $9 billion, Mr. Chan said.

Mr. Chan said the handout involved “a huge sum of public money,” adding that it was an exceptional measure that he did not believe would impose a long-term burden on the city’s finances, with about $140 billion in fiscal reserves.

Under the proposed budget, Hong Kong will also cut salaries taxes for about two million workers by up to $2,500 per person, a measure that would cut revenues by about $2.4 billion, he said.

The government had previously announced a $3.8 billion fund to help fight the new coronavirus and aid small businesses harmed by the outbreak. Hong Kong has 85 confirmed cases of coronavirus infections, and two deaths from Covid-19, the disease caused by the virus.

Source Article from https://www.nytimes.com/2020/02/26/world/asia/coronavirus-news.html